Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
Saturday, 18 October 2014
Friday, 10 October 2014
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
By Stephen Toth
The American government have now tried to hide their aggressive
expansionist policies concerning their constructing a new missile iron
curtain around Russia by seemingly handing the issue over to NATO.
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
By Stephen Toth
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
Tuesday, 7 October 2014
Sunday, 5 October 2014
Saturday, 4 October 2014
Friday, 3 October 2014
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Mediocrity and complete ass hole David Cameron raps to his favourite tune!
Post by Chris Smith.
Wednesday, 1 October 2014
Monday, 29 September 2014
Sunday, 28 September 2014
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
.jpg)
By Alex Proud
Why aren’t the middle classes revolting?
Words you probably never thought you’d read in the Telegraph. Words which, as
a Gladstonian Liberal, I never thought I’d write. But seriously, why aren’t
we seeing scenes reminiscent of Paris in 1968? Moscow in 1917? Boston in
1773?
My current fury is occasioned the Phones4U
scandal (and it really is a scandal).
Phones4U was bought by the private equity house, BC Partners, in 2011 for
£200m. BC then borrowed £205m and, having saddled the company with vast
amounts of debt, paid themselves a dividend of £223m. Crippled by debt, the
company has now collapsed into administration.
The people who crippled it have walked away with nearly £20m million, while
5,600 people face losing their jobs. The taxman may also be stiffed on £90m
in unpaid VAT and PAYE. It’s like a version of 1987’s Wall Street on
steroids, the difference being that Gordon Gecko wins at the end and
everyone shrugs and says, “Well, it’s not ideal, but really we need guys
like him.”
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
There are two operant Crowns in England
There are two operant Crowns in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Tuesday, 23 September 2014
Common Law a Easy Explanation
Common Law a Easy Explanation
The easiest way to explain the English common law system and answer all
questions in simple terms is as follows: Common law is the LAW and is
the only law recognized in a lawfully capacity in England and all
sovereign nations of HRH Elisabeth ll of England. Common law today is
like a family tree. common law is made up of statute's, a statute is a
specific part of common law i.e murder, theft, fraud. Acts are rules
that Parliament links to statute's of common law however not all
"Acts" are lawful and any Act passed by Parliament that dose not relate
back to to common law is only enforceable by submission by verbal or
written contract/assentto the authority of the party that holds you
accountable or liable. Common law however does change to include new but
specific offences but these must always relate to common law by LAW.
Credit cards were not invented when common law was written as the law of
the land in the 11th century, however Credit card fraud is a crime
under an Act, this act relates to a specific statute of common law
(theft) and is there for a criminal offence. On the other hand there is
an Act which says you must pay for a t.v licence if you own a device
capable of receiving live television. this act is not lawful unless you
submit to a verbal or written consent or submission of will to the
claimant as this Act only relates to common law if you have entered a
contract or agreement it then become enforceable by Common law. Common
law only adapts to include offences and rights that can be related and
interpreted by common law its self. So yes the acting authority can take
children into crown care if they have reason to believe that his or her
life may be in any kind of danger under common law as every individual
has the the right to life. Under common law you also have the right to
have any dispute including this and all of the above settled and judged
by a court of law.
Sunday, 21 September 2014
Americans Please stop Making arses of themselves on the Scottish Vote
Trouble is with you yanks you think that every one in Scotland go,s
around with blue faces saying Och Aye the Noo! The vote was attempted to
be rigged by both sides , The SNP (yes) lowered the voting age, use
violence against the leader of the UKIP (Libertarian Party of UK) . The
question should have been should we divorce our selves from Westminster
and the Edinburgh political elite. , one and the same creature. What the
Scots were voting on was the Break up of the Union of the Kingdoms.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)