Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama,

Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama, by Ann Coulter

Nov 29th, 2012

by Brett Stevens.at Amerika

Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama
by Ann Coulter
336 pages, Sentinel, $16

For many years, the subject of race has been so carefully tinged with the trauma of the past that we did not even pretend we could discuss it. Most generation X+ citizens grew up under a regimen of teachers, politicians, media and entertainers telling us the one right way to think on this issue.
Recently this taboo has fragmented in light of the shocking polarization of American voters. 60% of white people vote Republican; everyone else votes Democratic. The white people who vote Democratic tend to be the lost: single mothers, scared post-collegiate children, the neurotic and the miserable. This tells us that among the healthy, representation is exclusively a racial question. Whites vote Republican, and everyone else votes against them.
Ann Coulter takes on this challenging topic in her latest book, Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama. As a writer and a product, Coulter has a foot in both worlds, embracing a witty mainstream conservatism but also exhibiting a challenging realism that might even be called Nietzschean, or Machiavellian. Coulter may write for the mainstream middle class audience, but she is aware of the dark underworld of realpolitik that manifests itself in all that we do. For most of her career, this duality has created ambiguity about what she actually believes. Her books often come on strong, make some really good points, and then spent the next 200 pages creating a fog of non-disclosure so she doesn’t get too close to the really dangerous parts of reality and politics.
With this current book, Coulter resolves the duality by keeping her points clinical. She doesn’t read into her own thesis beyond the provable and documented, but she lets us draw our own conclusions with ample amounts of accurate but hyperbolic liberal-bashing. In this book, her goal is to explore the use of race by liberal parties as a kind of “get out of jail free card” and a limitless credit card on which to charge their own wealth redistribution agenda. On top of that, she explores the history of racial denial in the American media and then seeks to prove how no one, black or white, is benefiting from this situation. As Coulter might say, the only people profiteering from this situation are liberals and their media lapdogs:

It produced a destructive welfare state that was untouchable for decades. It got us anxiety, anger, fear and a major political party incapable of making an argument more sophisticated than: “You racist!”
And then it got us the most left-wing president America has ever seen.
When there were so few cases of white-on-black hate crimes that liberals had to start making them up, wasn’t that a clue that the Klan wasn’t preventing black progress anymore? If white people could be shorn of all racism overnight, it’s not clear how that would improve the black condition. (261)

The way this book approaches race is reminiscent of Colin Flaherty’s White Girl Bleed a Lot: The Return of Race Riots to America, a book which similar takes a non-judgmental view of the failure of American racial policy as a policy and not as an indictment of any ethnic group. Coulter goes out of her way, as Flaherty did before her, to make it clear that her book is not about black people. It’s about white liberals and the racial policies they advocate and the consequent failure of those. Much of this book, like Flaherty’s, involves research into historical events and current news items in which there is a disconnect between reality and the way the liberal media and liberal politicians have chosen to explain the situation. Coulter’s greatest vitriol seems to be reserved for WASPy journalists, politicos and public figures who keep beating the tin drum of “racism” while ignoring the fact that liberal racial policies do not work for anyone, black, white or other.
The thrust of the book is on white-black relations, not the broader question of race as a whole and the Democratic intent to replace the white majority with a third-world majority and thus secure a permanent demographic majority for Democrats. As said above, Coulter stays within the immediate and clearly linked because this book is like all of her books an introduction both to a mainstream conservative position, and the underlying reason behind it which may be more complex than most people are willing to undertake.
Among the first hundred pages, Coulter repeats a disingenuous argument about how Republicans fostered racial equality through rule of law, while Democrats opposed it. This is a complex area involving the flip-flop of both parties from previous positions, moving Republicans from the left-ward position toward a right-wing one. She does better when she focuses on the difference between liberal views and rational views of the situation, instead of trying to rally the troops toward loyalty to a party name. It is this type of mainstream argument that loses Coulter readers among the quiet educated and thoughtful types who would like solid logical reasoning behind their positions. They are a minority with a huge trickle-down effect on those who recognize their wisdom, so they are important in the long-term but less important to product success.
Like Flaherty, Coulter approaches the African-American crime statistics with fairness. She points out numerous times that most victims of black crime are black, and that the permissive “rehabilitation” policies of liberals are to blame, in that they not only fail to discourage crime but effectively incentivize it.

Based on their having no understanding of human nature, the smart set turned American cities into petri dishes for crime and degenerate behavior without punishment. Thousands of Americans died, were raped and disfigured in criminal acts made possible by the Warren court, the ACLU, liberal professors and activists, whose single-minded policy objective was to return criminals to the street. (94)

For any faults she has, including the aforementioned prole drift of one of her arguments in the first part of this book, Coulter breaks new ground by opening up the issue that we’re afraid to look at here in the West. Both the USA and Europe are awash in internal division, complexity and cost from their policies of diversity. While Coulter does not argue against diversity itself, she shifts the argument away from racism toward criticism of liberal pluralism and its effects in the context of diversity. This is a huge first step toward having an issue we can discuss sensibly again, and leaving behind the Soviet lock-step with liberal ideas that has prevented that discussion until now.

Well BOOHOO to Pork and to Shopping with you BOO HOO!

 Well BOOHOO to Pork

Many people on Facebook and other social network sites may have seen the Alleged HR memo given to the employees of BOO HOO

in which non muslim employees are forbidden to enjoy any pork meat or in effect products of any kind. So concerned are we at this pandering to islamic intolerance! that we have contacted a Kathy Allison head of HR at BOO HOO, (email below) as to why this Nazi style policy has been enforced on non islamic staff.

Also we hope that all who read this seriously not consider shopping on the net with this outfit. As it says in effect in the email these islamics are only offended when it suits there purpose! And why should others have to suffer due to the intolerance of others!


 To Kathy Allison at Boo Hoo contact
As some one who was considering using your service to purchase clothes this Christmas, II was horrified when i learned and saw a HR notice from you company on the internet forbidding employees from enjoying pork products a  traditional British food Can you please offer me an explanation of why you have forbidden your non islamic employees from eating pork on your premises.
I find that to do such such a thing is against the Human rights of your employees, by pandering to the intolerant islamic employees. if they find that some one eating pork is offensive perhaps they should consider that eating other cultist and ritualistically slaughter meats is offensive to others who do not share their in my view  intolerant 7th centenary views.
It all the more shocking that you as a company who no doubt pride your selves on tolerance should be so intolerant by subjecting your employees to the intolerance of others!  These islamic employees who object to others eating pork.  I am sure do not object to the extra work and wages ,overtime,ect . that they get at Christmas, Another non islamic practice. Like all Political correct/cultural marxist practises this sound like Hypocrisy on behalf of your company and those who may object to pork !

American Slavery, Then and Now

An interesting article on the effects of socialism

 

Slavery, Then and Now

By Shoebat Foundation on November2012 in Blog, General

Keith Davies

Over the Thanks Giving Holiday weekend I took my family to see the film Lincoln. While I am somewhat familiar with the history, I am sure most Americans are probably very ignorant of those times. Hopefully, this film might shock some of the most die-hard Democrats into understanding the very sordid history of racism in the Democratic Party which continues to this day, but the propaganda of our media may have you thinking otherwise.
The fight against slavery was the most divisive time in American history. The Civil War had the highest casualties in any War that was fought by Americans with about 618,000 killed from a USA population of about 35 million. Nearly 2% of the population fell in battle or died from diseases as a result of the war – the equivalent of 6.4 million people based on todays USA population. In World War II, 416,000 soldiers were killed in action out of an approximate population of 90 million.
The passion with wich each side fought for their beliefs in the Civil War – whether one agreed with those beliefs or not – was stirring. Hundreds of thousands of men on the Union side were willing to die – and they did, by the tens of thousands to free black people from bondage.
Black people (not ‘African Americans’ – that is just PC nonsense, and I am tired of the left’s propaganda terms) were given the option of freedom for the first time. I ask my Black American brothers: what is freedom? In slavery, black people had housing, food and a job with no pay. Freedom meant that you had to find your own way, your own job and pay for your own home and food. Yet today, most black people have returned to slavery and indenture by choice. The Democratic party keeps them as victims, gives them free stuff in return for votes and most black people (about 90%), along with their leadership, fall into line.
Black women were raped or abused by their white masters during the time The USA was a slave-owning country. Yet today, most black women have babies outside of wedlock – a staggering 73% according to the New York Times. Many black women have multiple fathers of their children too. Black women now choose the same behavior but this time they volunteer their bodies to abuse.
The same ethnic group vote 96% for Democrats – the same Democrats who have a terrible history of supporting slavery and being counter to Black Civil rights. It certainly has a much worse record than Republicans on Black rights. Yet, you would never know that by listening to the old media.
Black people have chosen to re-enslave themselves by choosing free hand-outs in return for Democratic votes. They prefer to be provided with free stuff than struggling and working for a living like most of us. Then they cry ‘racist’ if anyone should object to this insanity.
Not all Black people have a chip on their shoulder but many do. They think that they are owed something because they were discriminated against in the past. There is no doubt that Black people have had a very rough past but when do we stop looking at the past and embrace the freedoms America offers. If America does not offer the best freedom in the world, please tell me which country does?
Now as a country we have voted to provide more free stuff which will end up enslaving us all with confiscatory taxes to provide 50% of the population free healthcare, free public sector pensions, social security from borrowed money because the government spent the money that was paid into it, and on-going multiple government programs to capture some interest group’s vote. White, black and brown are now denying our ability to be free. Our confidence in our ability to be entrepreneurs is being stifled with government largesse while at the same time bankrupting the country and destroying the capitalist system. The USA of the past has provided untold prosperity not only for itself but for the world too. If we continue on the path we are on we will all be enslaved.
What I would suggest to Black people who continue to think this way as well as white people who choose free stuff over work and risk-taking.
Before you call me a racist, I’d like to honor the 110,000 union soldiers who fell in battle, the 275,000 wounded and the 250,000 who died of disease during the civil war who won freedom not just for black people but they freed white people from the spiritual inequity of slavery. Their sacrifice granted all Americans the right to find our own way so that we can pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, just as the original founders decided to fight for in 1776; they also fought to ratify the greatest document of freedom in 1787 with the United States Constitution. Honor these fallen heroes by living Free as the founders wanted and the fallen have fought and died for.
Freedom is not a government hand-out or a “safety net”. Freedom is making your own way with limited interference from the government. We all need to free our minds from a self-inflicted slave mentality and embrace freedom the way we all need to do if America is to survive. We owe it to the fallen from the Union army from the Civil War and the sacrifice of Abraham Lincoln.

Wanted: a Winston Churchill for the culture war

1st posted here 

Wanted: a Winston Churchill for the culture war | Melanie Phillips

The story sounds just too idiotic and outrageous to be true. A Rotherham couple, by all accounts exemplary foster parents for nearly seven years, took on two children and a baby in an emergency placement.
Eight weeks later, social workers came and took the children away — despite the fact that they were thriving — on the grounds that because the couple belonged to the UK Independence Party this was not ‘the right cultural match’.
Astonishingly, the official in charge is still unrepentant. Joyce Thacker, the council’s director of children and young people’s services, has said that the children, who were from ‘EU migrant backgrounds’, had been removed to protect their ‘cultural and ethnic needs’ from UKIP’s ‘strong views’ and apparent ‘opposition to multiculturalism’.
This is as ludicrous and illogical as it is sinister.
This apparently splendid couple have been treated as criminals merely because social workers disapproved of their political views — which happen to be shared, incidentally, by millions of fellow citizens. This is the kind of behaviour we associate with a totalitarian state.
The clear implication is that they were racists. But there is nothing racist about opposing multiculturalism. Indeed, many immigrants themselves oppose it. To damn this couple in this way is an appalling smear.
In any event, this was merely a short-term emergency foster placement. These children clearly needed as a matter of urgency a safe and loving environment — which by all accounts this couple gave them.
Ms Thacker said: ‘I have to think about how sensitive I am being to those children.’ Is this woman for real? Clearly, she is actually doing them harm by putting ideological dogma above the children’s own needs.
The whole thing sounds beyond parody. But, alas, this goes far wider and deeper than this one incident. 
In the early Nineties, I unearthed what it is no exaggeration to say was a climate of totalitarianism in social-work training.
Anti-racist zealots had captured the social workers’ training body, and built into the social-work diploma the explicit assumption that society was fundamentally racist and oppressive.
What followed was an utterly chilling degree of intimidation and thought control. Blameless social work students were forced in tears to ‘confess’ to their own racism; some failed to qualify unless they identified racist attitudes even where none existed.
These and other politically correct dogma, and the requirement to enforce them, remain stamped into social-work culture like the name of Blackpool in a stick of rock.
As a result, the needs of vulnerable children and other social-work clients have been junked in favour of the overriding requirement to impose an ideological view of the world in which minorities can do no wrong while the majority can do no right.
Over the years, this has given rise to one horror story after another. Twelve years ago, an eight-year-old Ivorian child, Victoria Climbié, was tortured and murdered by her guardians under the noses of social workers who believed such behaviour had to be respected as part of African culture.
In the early Nineties, Islington council was revealed to have ignored the systematic sexual abuse and prostitution of children in its care because it was terrified of being called racist or homophobic if it disciplined black or gay staff perpetrating such crimes.
In Rotherham itself, the sickening sexual enslavement of under-age white girls by organised prostitution and pimping rings was largely ignored for more than two decades, in part because the abusers came overwhelmingly from Pakistani Muslim backgrounds.
And for years, would-be adoptive parents have been turned down by social workers because they are deemed to be too white, too middle class or in some other way fall foul of the politically correct inquisition. 
All this goes far wider and deeper even than the failings of public sector professionals.
The grip of the Left on our culture has meant not just that many perfectly reasonable things are now deemed to be unsayable in civilised society.
 Worse still, since political correctness stands truth and lies on their heads, people are vilified as extremists or bigots simply for telling the truth, connecting to reality or standing up for right over wrong.
Let us be clear: the claim that it is racist to oppose multiculturalism is the opposite of the truth. This is because multiculturalism does not, as is so often mistakenly believed, mean being tolerant of other cultures. It is a creed which holds instead that no one culture can trump any other.
That means you can’t uphold human rights, equality for women or freedom of religious belief over cultures that don’t uphold these values.
So multiculturalism inescapably involves abandoning certain ethnic minorities to violence, inequality and persecution. And that is truly racist.
Clearly, this row is an electoral gift to UKIP, coming as it does just days before the Rotherham by-election. And now it has spawned another similar accusation that a UKIP member was barred from volunteering for the charity Barnardo’s.
Whether this is all an amazing coincidence of timing, or whether UKIP sympathisers are deliberately leaking the stories at the moment they will gain most attention, the issue at the heart of this controversy is all too real.
For what it illuminates is nothing less than our ongoing culture war, in which political correctness — which should really be called cultural Marxism — is being used by the Left to revolutionise society by undermining and subverting its core beliefs.
So, fundamental values embodied in issues such as immigration, national identity, marriage and family and many others are under systematic assault, while all who seek to defend them are vilified as bigots, swivel-eyed extremists and lunatics.
This has not been achieved by any one organisation imbued with mythical and conspiratorial powers. It has occurred over decades as a result of two main factors.
The first was the steady rise into power, across the universities, media, professions, political parties and civil service, of those whose opinions were shaped in the Sixties and Seventies by the New Left, which believed in the cultural transformation  of society.
The second was the demoralisation of the institutions which should have defended our culture — in particular, the Church and the governing class, which had become convinced of their own and their country’s inevitable decline.
The result was what far-Leftists have called ‘the long march through the institutions’ — which all fell like dominoes.
Since this culture war has been fanatically prosecuted by the Labour Party — which consigns anyone who commits a politically incorrect heresy to the third circle of hell — Ed Miliband’s condemnation of Rotherham’s Labour council is the most arrant hypocrisy.
But the real problem is that David Cameron, in his obsession with rebranding the Tories, has not only failed to recognise that fighting the culture war is the great conservative cause of our time, but has even positioned himself on the wrong side.
Recent figures have shown that under Mr Cameron even more Labour ‘cronies’ are being appointed to quangos and charities than under the last Labour government.
And in 2006 he called UKIP ‘a bunch of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists’ — thus helping legitimise the kind of demonisation that has emerged in Rotherham.
In the wake of this row, Downing Street said the Prime Minister had not intended people to understand that all UKIP members were racist. ‘Not all’, eh? Well that’s nice of him! Talk about missing the point.
What’s needed is not just root and branch reform of social-work training. It’s a leader who will halt this onslaught on Britain’s core values and its terrifying descent into cultural tyranny. We need nothing less than a Winston Churchill for the culture war.

Manchester Labour CLLR who Demanded Removal Of BNP Wreath Email reply to us

We thought it only fitting that the Labour Party councilours reply to our concerns over his objections to the British National Party wreath of Poppies in Manchester. should be aired . rest assured we have all taken a good bath and wash our servers down thoroughly. After having to deal with such people. 

so here we go.

You have been misled. The wreath is as far as I know still where it was put, and despite the inaccurate story at BNP website I did not "demand" it be removed or encourage anyone to steal it. Far from it.

The BNP should remove it and certainly not lay one ever again.

Why? you're asking.

The fact is that in Manchester the Lord Mayor lays the first wreath on behalf of EVERYONE in Manchester including people, workers and councillors.

And NO political parties lay wreaths at all at our Cenotaph. Not one.

The suitability of the BNP for laying a wreath anywhere is another question. But fact is political parties do not lay wreaths at Manchester Cenotaph.

Thanks for your comments.

Chris Paul.

MMMmm  our view is there more than one clown , 

 

 

ps my right to comment, paid in full by my Grandfather , who died for my rights and fellow country men for there freedom and way of life and the right to pay respect to whom ever they wish and not for some free loading we will vote Labour for benefits don't offend my 3rd world ways foreigner.

 

 

Look out MUM here comes the labour Party

The Political decision by Rotherham Council to remove three children from a foster home (where they were happy) because the foster parents support UKIP shows that the “culture race war” here in Britain is being waged not by the Right, but by the Left and by the Labour party in pativular .
Joyce Thacker (above), the council’s commissars of the people assets (children), who said her decision was influenced by UKIP’s sceptical take on multiculturalism, and her false view that UKIP is the mirror image of those mad American right-wingers who want to outlaw abortion clinics and homosexuals. Unlike them, though, she is in a position of power. Hers is the latest in a series of many increasingly chilling actions of this nature taken by Labour and other closet Marxist traitor 5th columnists posing as council officials. Also last week, Adrian Smith, a Christian, won a High Court appeal against his demotion by Trafford Housing Trust for expressing opposition on his private Facebook page to gay marriage in church. most liberals do  believe that churches should be forced to conduct gay marriages on their premises in our opinion!
A white woman  was convicted of racially abusing her neighbour by calling her a “stupid fat Australian.” if though she was a fat white woman The week before, a British white bus driver won a court case against his sacking for being a member of the BNP – even though he had never acted in a racist way at work, no-one had ever complained and he was considered a “first-class employee.”
The special interest of the Rotherham case – and no doubt why the son of an illegal immigrant and marxist multi millionaire Ed Miliband was so quick to condemn it  is that in five days the town has a parliamentary by-election.And he wants to crawl to the electorate to spew forth his false opinions in order to gain votes.
 Labour is already in a bit of trouble here – about 80 of the 114 members present at the meeting to select its candidate walked out in protest  maybe part of  his his family circle? after the favourite, local man Mahroof Hussain, was excluded from the shortlist. Many of them said they wouldn’t campaign for the token woman Labour chose, Sarah Champion.
UKIP only got 6 per cent of the vote in Rotherham at the general election – but they came second in another byelection in next-door Barnsley last year. Like many working-class Labour areas, Rotherham showed an undercurrent of disaffection with the traitorous Labour  who have done more harm to the white working class than Adolph Hitler ever could have party, even before its MP was forced to resign for FRAUD.

Reply to Manchester Labour CLLR who Demanded Removal Of BNP Wreath

It sad state of affairs that such a sad event like this could happen , but the Labour party has now sunk to such a low level of Marxist inspired hatred of the white working class , that I thought it only fair to print a copy of the email , i sent to this oppressor of those whom he should be representing! Manchester Labour Councillor for Withington Chris Paul of Westfield Road, Chorlton

1. 

   What is up with you trying to have a wreath removed laid by an official and legal political party.
   
   Has all rational thought departed from you, can you not see that you and your fellow leftist ideologs are sending this country into a dark age nightmare from which it will never emerge. And that also they are putting yourself and your childrens future at risk by your own stupid ill founded ideolog...
   

   ical actions.
   
   Just look at history and see what has happened to all those who support a marxist elite . they are always the 1st to be eliminated, despite all there protestations of loyalty to the cause.
   
   please wake from your dillusions of a brave new world , look around you and see the white working class the people your party was so called founded to protect, living in poverty through low wages from a mass immigrant workforce. There daughters systamaticly groomed by muslim rape gangs. There rights to point out the alternative political view of and to mount a peaceful protest against what is happening to them denied on the grounds that it is offensive to those who are infringing their rights.
   
   Shame on you many members of the labour party fought in 2 world wars in order to secure a future for THEIR CHILDREN ! And not for the benifit of immigrants who were imposed on us with out our conset (Fact) . You have not only betrayed us, but them as well, as if you give it some rational thought you will see that you have helped to destroy all that they worked for for there children and childrens children.
   
   Chris Paul can be contacted on 07734137402 or 01612347009 cllr.c.paul@manchester.gov.uk his sugerys are held every 1st and 3rd Wednesday of the Month at Withington Library  410 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 3BN

BILDERBERG GROUP LIARS - CHEATS AND THIEVES

1. LIARS - CHEATS AND THIEVES
   
   THE FOUR BRANCHES OF THE BILDERBERG GROUP HAVE YET AGAIN SCAMMED THE BRITISH TAX PAYERS OUT OF 60 BILLION POUNDS IN BANK BAILOUTS WITH NO HOPE OF EVER RECOVERING A MONEY.
   
   Bilderberg Group scams consist of coordinated scamming interactions between the Political, Corporate, Financial and the Media Branches.
   
   Simply put the Political Branch comes up with the scam, sells i...
   

   t to the public through the Media Branch, gains finances through the Banking Branch and give the contracts to the Corporate Branch. In the case of the Banks bailout scam of the tax payer, they actually cut out the Corporate Branch. But you can bet your last penny that somewhere along the line the Corporate Branch got their cut of the profits to be made.
   
   IT IS NOW TIME TO SORT THIS HIDEOUS PROBLEM OUT ONCE AND FOR ALL
   
   Its time to take out all of the corrupt parties and their scamming politicians. Its time to investigate them and all of the other branches members and arrest them for corruption with a mind to recover the money that they have swindled the public out of.
   
   Its time to ban all politicians from every single party from standing for election for the rest of their lives.
   
   Its time to freeze their personal bank accounts in order to recover all of the public money that they have scammed.
   
   Its time to abolish all political parties and change the system to one of only independent politicians being elected.
   
   Its time for the sheeple to wake up and take to the streets in a concerted and prolonged effort to reestablish the common peoples rights and authority to run this country in our own best interest and not the greedy and corrupt interest of the super rich Bilderberg Group members.
   
   IT'S YOUR MONEY THEY HAVE STOLEN, IT'S YOU THAT WILL HAVE TO MAKE UP THE DEFICIT, IT'S YOU THAT WILL INEVITABLY HAVE TO SUFFER FROM AUSTERITY MEASURES.
   
   IF A THUG IN A HOODIE WANTS TO MUG YOU ON THE STREET WOULD YOU SIT IDLY BY AND LET HIM DO IT - OR WOULD YOU FIGHT TO PROTECT YOURSELF AND YOUR POSSESSIONS?
   
   WELL WHATS THE BLOODY DIFFERENCE,
   
   THESE MUGGERS ARE JUST WEARING SMART SUITS AND SPEAK WITH A POSH VOICE.
   
   DO YOU THE BRITISH COMMON PEOPLE REALLY WANT TO BECOME JUST LIKE THE PEOPLE OF GAZA?
   
   DOWN TRODDEN, PENNILESS PRISONERS IN YOUR OWN LAND.
   
   NO!!!
   
   THEN GET SOME COURAGE AND STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS

The Confederacy could rise Again 15 states file petitions to secede from United States

Citizens in 15 states file petitions to secede from United States
November 11, 2012 By: Joe Newby

As a result of Tuesday's election, Americans in 15 states have filed petitions to secede from the United States, Regina Conley reported at

Red Alert Politics on Saturday.

So far, she says, residents in Louisiana, Texas, Kentucky, Colorado, New Jersey and ten other states, have filed petitions at the White House petition site requesting secession. A petition for New York to secede was file by "C R" of Grand Forks, North Dakota on Saturday.

Examiner's Sheila Carroll says those other states include Montana, North Dakota, Indiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Georgia and Oregon.

On November 7, the day after the election, "Michael E" from Slidell, Louisiana, filed a petition at the White House "We the People" site, requesting that Louisiana be allowed to secede.

"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation," the petition reads, quoting the Declaration of Independence.

As of this writing, the petition has 8.162 signatures and needs 16,838 to reach a goal of 25,000.

On Friday, a Texas resident created a petition to secede in order to protect the standard of living Texans now enjoy.

"The US continues to suffer economic difficulties stemming from the federal government's neglect to reform domestic and foreign spending. The citizens of the US suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such as the NDAA, the TSA, etc. Given that the state of Texas maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas to withdraw from the union, and to do so would protect its citizens' standard of living and re-secure their rights and liberties in accordance with the original ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no longer being reflected by the federal government," the petition reads.

As of this writing, that petition had 5,289 signatures.

 The Oregon petition, started Saturday by "Kristopher W" of Tillamook, Oregon, wants the state to remain an ally of the United States and possibly vote to rejoin the Union once "the citizens of Oregon felt the Federal Government was no longer imposing" what it calls a tyrannical government that cares nothing about the future of Oregon's children."

Petitions on the White House site have 30 days to reach a threshold of 25,000 signatures.

"While these petitions serve more to make a point than to present a serious proposition, they are a physical symbol of the deep resentment for the direction in which the United States is moving under the Obama administration," Conley added.

1 Alabama https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-alabama-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/2TvhJSSC

2 Texas https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-texas-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/BmdWCP8B

3 North carolina
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-north-carolina-withdraw-united-states-and-create-its-own-new-government/rx1KDYTs

4 florida https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-florida-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/D87Rv7yJ

 5 Kentucky
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-kentucky-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/RskKYzB6

6 Georgia
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-georgia-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/zXYY751D

7 Mississippi
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-mississippi-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-governmen/9M9rdL8n

8 Indiana
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-indiana-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/51jYVZ5L

9 Montana
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-montana-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/l76dWhwN

10 Louisiana
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-louisiana-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/1wrvtngl

11 Colorado
https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-colorado-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/lWDshfl3

12 Missouri https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-missouri-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/Vd92R3YG

13 New Jersey https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-new-jersey-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/RYvjgdDT

14 New York https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-new-york-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/RSBkpCf9

15 Oregon https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/allow-oregon-vote-and-leave-union-peacefully-and-remain-ally-nation/X3kWX8kF

16 north dakota https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-north-dakota-withdraw-usa-and-create-its-own-new-government/lqPGbvVl

17 South Carolina https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-sc-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/KL6qrls8

18 Ohio https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-ohio-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/csqrXCxG?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl

19 Tennessee https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/peacefully-grant-state-tennessee-withdraw-united-states-america-and-create-its-own-new-government/7xsNwkJ8

http://www.examiner.com/article/citizens-15-states-file-petitions-to-secede-from-united-states

America goes into the darkness | Melanie Phillips

America goes into the darkness | Melanie Phillips

The greatest satisfaction today over the re-election of Obama is not being felt in the Democratic Party. It is not being felt among the media, who are no longer objective observers but have turned instead into corrupt partisans who ruthlessly censored the truth about Obama and helped peddle his demonising propaganda about his opponent. It is not being felt among the gloating, drooling decadents of the western left who now scent a great blood-letting of all who dare defy their secular inquisition. No, the greatest satisfaction is surely being felt in Iran.
With four more years of Obama in the White House, Iran can now be sure that it will be able to complete its infernal construction of a genocide bomb to use against the Jews and the west. World War Three has now come a lot closer.
It is said that, with likely gridlock in Congress over domestic issues, Obama will concentrate on foreign policy. We should all shudder. So far, Obama has empowered Iran to destabilise the region; supported Islamist takeovers in Egypt and Libya; is backing al Qaeda affiliates in Syria; refused to come to the aid of Americans being attacked by al Qaeda in Benghazi as a result of which four American officials were murdered; and hung Israel out to dry against its genocidal Palestinian attackers.
A report last month that Obama was secretly negotiating with the Iranian regime took on an even more incendiary aspect a few days ago with a claim that these negotiations were being led by his close friend and adviser, Valerie Jarrett.
If Jarrett was indeed involved, that should strike a deep chill into anyone who has not joined the lemming-like leap over the edge of the western cliff. For Iranian-born Jarrett – who Obama has admitted he consults before he takes any decision and who has been said to act as his ‘spine’ -- is a far-leftist with roots deep in the corrupt Chicago Democratic machine. Indeed, Jarrett has been credited with originally smoothing Obama’s entry into Chicago’s political elite, and is now said to be – despite her controversial background -- the most influential person in his circle.
 There have also been claims that she advised Obama against killing Osama bin Laden, which although unsubstantiated are all too credible. If this wholly ill-equipped and sinister individual really has been leading secret negotiations with Iran – raising the fear that far from preventing Iranian nuclear terrorism Obama intends to allow the regime a face saving compromise under cover of which it will finish building its nuclear weapon – then Obama’s perfidy against the west really is as bad as some of us feared from the start.
Four years ago, America put into the White House a sulky narcissist with close links to people with a history of thuggish, far-left, black power, Jew-bashing, west-hating politics. In his autobiography, Obama himself described his mentor, the communist agitator Frank Marshall Davis, as being a promoter of  black power; in 1995 Obama went on the Million Man March organised by the black power activist and radical antisemite Louis Farrakhan; for twenty years, Obama belonged to a church whose pastor, Jeremiah Wright, peddled antisemitic conspiracy theories, denounced black assimilation into white society and in June 2009 claimed that Jews were controlling Obama and were preventing Wright from talking to him.
Obama’s agenda has been crystal clear from the get-go: to increase the power of the state over the citizen at home, and to neutralise American power abroad. Four more years of this and he’ll almost certainly have succeeded.  The impact upon western security could be cataclysmic.
Britain and the Europeans love Obama because they think he will end American exceptionalism and turn the US into a pale shadow of themselves. What they don’t realise is that, all but lobotomised by consumerist rights, state dependency, victim culture, sentimentality, post-religion, post-nationalism and post-Holocaust and Empire guilt, Britain and Europe are themselves fast going down the civilisational tubes.
Romney lost because he refused to provide an alternative to any of this for fear of being labelled a warmonger, flint-heart or social reactionary. He refused to engage with any of the issues that made this Presidential election so truly momentous. Up against the bullying of the totalitarian left, he ran for cover. He played safe, and as a result only advertised his own weakness and dishonesty. Well, voters can smell inconsistency from a mile away; they call it untrustworthiness, and they are right.  
Romney lost because, like Britain’s Conservative Party, the Republicans just don’t understand that America and the west are being consumed by a culture war. In their cowardice and moral confusion, they all attempt to appease the enemies within. And from without, the Islamic enemies of civilisation stand poised to occupy the void.
With the re-election of Obama, America now threatens to lead the west into a terrifying darkness.

We are never defeated unless we give up on God.

 "We are never defeated unless we give up on God".
Ronald Regan quote 

The blame for the state of both morally and politically of the Nation is to be quite frank, our own fault especially the fault of the generations of the of British people of the 1960,s 70,s and 1980,s. we in our pride turned our back Our Lord and God. Ignoring the sound teachings of his Holy word, on how a society should be run. We turned our backs on our responsibilities and instead purposely pursed pleasure for ourselves instead of the the happiness of others. And also our personal responsibilities towards our nation and society .We were proud and full of vanity in thinking the subjective truths of man could  replace the objective truths of God! We turned our backs on him and so he has withdrawn his protection from us. 
You may think that this the power of the devil is now given free rein, not so! for that horror of that things free rein will always be held back from absolute free reign, till the appointed end time.
 But who has Our Wonderful Lord God removed his protection from, Guess? OURSELVES! 
The devil knows that he whispers  and man will fall through his own pride the same as he himself did, for remember the Apple in Eden was voluntary eaten by our own free will !

 Please read this  Ancient words of a centuries old poem carved in a gothic, medieval alphabet on a towering, ornate cathedral door right in the heart of Lubeck, Germany. Translated into modern English, the words take the form of a frightening poem. Here is what the poem says:" (Source - Twilight's Last Gleaming - By: Dr. Chuck Missler)


You call me eternal, then do not seek me
You call me fair, then do not love me
You call me gracious, then do not trust me
You call me just, then do not fear me
You call me life, then do not choose me
You call me light, then do not see me
You call me Lord, then do not respect me
You call me master, then do not obey me
You call me merciful, then do not thank me
You call me mighty, then do not honor me
You call me noble, then do not serve me
You call me rich, then do not ask me
You call me Savior, then do not praise me
You call me shepherd, then do not follow me
You call me the Way, then do not walk with me
You call me wise, then do not heed me
You call me Son of God, then do not worship me
When I condemn you, then do not blame me.

Then  Declare This to yourselves, in relation to our struggle against the evil that stalks our once safe Land, We turned our backs on God. And just remember in our struggle we do not hate another man or woman, but seek only restoration of what is correct!
For this itself was written by a BRAVE ! African pastor before he was murdered for his Christianity .

I'm part of the fellowship of the unashamed. I have Holy Spirit power. The die has been cast. I have stepped over the line. The decision has been made. I'm a disciple of His. I won't look back, let up, slow down, back away, or be still.

My past is redeemed, my present makes sense, my future is secure. I'm finished with low living, sight walking, small planning, smooth knees, colourless dreams tamed visions, mundane talking, cheap living, and dwarfed goals.,

I no longer need pre-eminence, prosperity, position, promotions, plaudits, or popularity. I don't have to be right, first, tops, recognized, praised, regarded, or rewarded. I now live by faith, lean on His presence, walk by patience, lift by prayer, and labour by power.

My face is set, my gait is fast, my goal is heaven, my road is narrow, my way rough, my companions few, my guide reliable, my mission clear. I cannot be bought, compromised, detoured, lured away, turned back, deluded or delayed. I will not flinch in the face of sacrifice, hesitate in the presence of the adversary, negotiate at the table of the enemy, ponder at the pool of popularity, or meander in the maze of mediocrity.

I won't give up, shut up, let up, until I have stayed up, stored up, prayed up, paid up, preached up for the cause of Christ. I am a disciple of Jesus. I must go till He comes, give till I drop, preach till all know, and work till He stops me. And when He comes for His own, He will have no problems recognizing me - my banner will be clear!

Anonymous African Pastor - Nailed to his wall

The English Defence League Supporting the Norwich Reformed Church demonstration

1. 

   
    The English Defence League are intending to hold a in demonstration Norwich to protest at Norwich City Council’s unfair treatment to the Norwich Reformed Church regarding ‘equality issues’
   
   The heinous crime that the Church committed was about a leaflet entitled ‘Why Not Islam’, written by the church’s pastor, Dr Alan Clifford some ten years ago. The Council claimed that the leaflet was “hate motivated”.
   

   
   Norwich City Council have now banned the Church from holding their weekly bookstall outreach at Hay Hill over this leaflet moreover they have also ordered Eaton park Community Centre to no longer take bookings from the Church which has held worship services there for 18 years.
   
   A complaint was made by one, yes you are reading this correct, one member of the Public to the Police who took no action against Dr Clifford but the Council decided that was not good enough for them and adopted their own politically correct appeasement to this one member of the Public. who was most likely in the opinion of the Horwich Nationalists a member of the said council , and most likely a Labour member to!
   
   Thus on the 10th November 2012 the English Defence League will be showing their support for the Church and protesting at Norwich City Council’s actions against the Church and everyone else’s Freedom of Speech

Anatomy of a self-fulfulling prophecy

Oct 2012

by Brett Stevens.

Once you have one revolution, everything after that must measure up by being revolutionary too.
This means you can no longer have incremental change or small victories. It’s not a new type of screw-top lid; it’s the screw-top lid that will revolutionize life on earth.
It may even bring world peace.
Over the past 2,400 years, we’ve seen a lot of revolutions. Most of history is made in un-doing them. They all tend to be about the same: the relatively insignificant change that in a social or emotional context “changes the world.”
Way back in the 1960s, there was a culture revolution staffed by hippies. They were here to tell us the insignificant: if we love each other, take lots of drugs, and accept just about any act as moral, we will live in a new world. It will be better, they said.
Theirs was a self-fulfilling prophecy, but they did not know it. To them, the world of peace and happiness could be had by acting as if that state had been achieved. Little did they know that an end result must have a cause other than itself, or the “end result” becomes a method toward an unknown end.
They didn’t think about that, or wonder what that end might be.
Always one for being iconoclastic, or deliberately and forcedly weird, The Beatles released Yellow Submarine in 1969. It accompanied a movie by the same name, in which psychedelic travelers tried to find a new paradise by escaping the Blue Meanies (analogue for police) into a groovy new state of mind. If it sounds like a child’s cartoon, it is. It just projects adult drama into that simplistic setting.
The original trigger for it was a song in which the vocalist describes an idyllic life in a yellow submarine, separated from humanity and hiding in the sea. Dream analysts may find the symbolism of hiding in the unconscious mind (water) interesting. Others will see the more likely explanation.
The Beatles, like all other revolutionaries, had impure hearts. They wanted revolutionary change, but were conflicted in themselves and harbored great doubts. The word “harbored” is appropriate: they nourished these doubts at the teats of their spirits.
Where the song and video are a self-fulfilling prophecy is that they predict a negative world, and create it by pulling back from reality as it is and forming an even less coherent worldview. The problem, as The Beatles saw it, was people projecting their needs onto the world selfishly. Thus, The Beatles did the same thing.
That the two fantasies were putatively different was really irrelevant. Both were the same method: project, then create the situation you envisioned, which doesn’t work out so well in actuality.
The difference is that the world before The Beatles, while imperfect, was attempting to find clarity in a balance between human mental urges and the complex web of interrelations that make reality interesting.
Now a half-century later The Beatles are ironic prophets. We all live in yellow submarines. Our communities are gated, our homes are air-tight and connected to the world through water and air filters. We live through bright colors and symbols in our text messages, Facebook and official documents.
Psychologically, we might as well be in air-tight submarines. We have identified the world as hostile, and withdrawn from it, resulting in its decay while we seal ourselves away.
Like most revolutions, this one knew what it hated, and was so busy hating it that it replicated it, but in a less competent form. Perhaps the source of human misery is human delusion, and no amount of revolutionary submergence can change that.

THE LIBERAL PANIC !

ONE OR TWO OF YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED ,THAT EVEN IN THE CONTROLLED LIBERAL MEDIA THERE IS A A AT THE MOMENT A QUIET RUMBLING SIMILAR TO THE DISTANT RUMBLING OF AN ONCOMING TRAIN THAT WILL UNDOUBTEDLY CONTINUE TO GROW AS IT GETS CLOSER. AND OF COURSE MOST OF US IN THE NATIONALIST/CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL SPECTRUM KNOW WHAT IT IS! IT IS THE SOUND OF THE LIBERAL ELITES PANICKING AT THE STATE OF THE SOCIETIES THEY HAVE HELP TO DESTROY. 

THEY IN THERE UNDOUBTED ARROGANCE THOUGHT THAT THEY  WERE CREATING A WORLD VIEW THAT WOULD CREATE HARMONY AND PEACE BY DESTROYING THE NATION STATES AND ESPECIALLY THOSE OF THE WESTERN WORLD.
BUT WHAT THEY FAILED TO REALISE THAT BY BREAKING DOWN THOSE SOCIETIES AND CULTURES BY THE USE OF CULTURAL MARXISM  AND MASS IMMIGRATION. THAT THEY WOULD DESTROY THE VERY LIFEBLOOD OF WHAT ALLOWS THE LIBERAL MINDED TO EXIST , WHICH IS. A ESTABLISHED POLITICAL DEMOCRATIC ORDER  BASED ON THE DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES OF THE JUDEO CHRISTIAN TRADITION AND THAT BY THE MASS INTRODUCTION OF THE 3RD WORLD POPULATIONS TO THE WEST A 3RD WORLD, WORLD VIEW AND IT,S SAID POLITICAL CULTURAL VALUES , OR AS I WOULD SAY NON VALUES, WOULD COME INTO BEING. 
AS WE HAVE SEEN BY THE ELECTION OF GEORGE GALLOWAY OF THE MUSLIM DOMINATED RESPECT PARTY .THE 3RD WORLD IMMIGRANT GHETTOS CREATED BY THE LIBERALS IN MOST OF THE WESTS CITIES ARE NOW CREATING THERE OWN POLITICAL IDENTITY BASED ON THE 3RD VALUES OF THE IMMIGRANTS 3RD WORLD HOMELANDS, WHICH ARE NOT ONLY AN ANATHEMA TO THE LIBERAL BUT ARE WHAT THEY FEAR MOST A PERSONAL PHYSICAL DANGER TO THEM. 
THEN AS A SECOND POINT THROUGH THERE USE OF CULTURAL MARXISM THEY HAVE IRREVOCABLY DESTROYED THE BASE OF ALL WESTERN SOCIETIES A EDUCATED AND CHRISTIAN VALUED CULTURALLY SOUND HOMOGENEOUS INDIGENOUS WORKING CLASS. THAT FORMED THE BEDROCK OF ALL THE POLITICAL AND MILITARY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS OF THE SAID NATIONS. AND THUS THE LIBERAL WILL HAVE NO ONE TO PROTECT THEM PHYSICALLY FROM THE OFTEN VIOLENT ORGANISED POLITICAL ACTIVITIES OF THE 3RD WORLD IMMIGRANTS THEY INTRODUCE PROTECTED AND ALLOWED TO FLOURISH. ALSO THEY MAY ALSO REALISE THAT THEY THEMSELVES WERE USED BY THE LARGE FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF THE ORIGINAL AND UNSEEN THREAT TO ALL OF THE WEST, AND THE SOLE POWER THAT IS EVEN BEHIND THEM. 
A REAL RECENT ITEM OF THE UPCOMING LIBERAL PANIC IS A SPEECH MADE BY ROWAN ATKINSON A ALLEGED COMEDIAN RECENTLY AGAINST THE LAWS HE AND IS ILK HELP TO CREATE. 

Gay Nazis strike again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Homosexual campaigners are once again targeting Christians in there campaign to promote their perversion,  two stories in the daily mail this week prove this. the 1st
Homosexual persecution 1 
Homosexual persecution 2  
the 2nd case is real case of real wickedness in which a lesbian deliberately tried to entrap a Christian co worker by posting entrapping comments on his face book page and then reporting it to his employers, in what can only be concluded as a deliberate attempt to cause mischief!   one can only ask the question , How come they never target moslem B&B or premises, is likely a good kicking or worse would ensue? 
just shows how peaceful Christians are an easy target for the exhibitionist homosexual. 
And as there poster we are forced to look at says, Some people are gay,get over it, then I would say to them a great many more people are Christian and are sick of you! Get over that!

Injustice acts like Bacterial illness

 

Injustice acts like bacteria

Oct , 2012

by Brett Stevens.

“Some men just want to see the world burn,” a popular movie tells us. What Hollywood thought was an impressive character insight can only be in Hollyworld acted out by dramatists.
In real life, it’s more common than we think. In fact, most people in this society are possessed with a desire to see the whole thing go up in flames.
Whether communist or capitalist, the nature of modern society as being egalitarian (not materialist, as many would allege, although that flows naturally from being egalitarian) shapes people to be competitive and, by the conditions of their victory, destructive.
Our previous models of bad behavior in society have focused on external causes (poverty) or social causes (marginalization) and have assumed that a relatively small and dedicated group commit the antisocial acts in our society.
While there’s truth to that, and in fact it’s probably a relatively small group that do, there’s also a huge population of opportunists who do things that are not illegal, but are most likely immoral. That is, they ruin good things, spread discontent, sabotage others and destroy the self-esteem of any they encounter.
The worst part is that they enjoy it. Are these people sociopaths or psychopaths? No, they’re normal and rational. They’ve understood a few things about modern society: first, since everyone is equal, we are all replaceable and must compete constantly to be relevant at all — or we get dragged beneath the wheel. Second, since society itself is essentially oppositional to us, we only win when it loses. Finally, since we are obligated to go through this demeaning process, the only true victory is for us not only to not care about the outcome, but to take our revenge on others for endorsing the system that forces us through this.
Just sit with that awhile, and compare it to the people you’ve known, and all the normal people you’ve witnessed doing spiteful, petty, mean, vengeful and vindictive things.
The hidden fact here is that our society is so maddeningly hell-bent on forcing us into its activities, and forcing us to compete not on our abilities but on our time and participation, that we hate it. We don’t have an outlet for that hatred. So we take it out on the things around us.
You can see this most clearly in politics. Many people want the world to burn. They want our society to fail, to be destroyed, and then as if by magic something better arises, and there’s a logical gap here where they assume it will turn out to be the type of society they desire. There is usually evidence to the contrary.
All liberals are motivated by this kind of hatred. Liberalism is another word for anti-majoritarianism, or the philosophy of opposing whatever already works for most people. It’s a way of making excuses for their own lack of performance, and it has some legitimacy in its genesis since our society is moribund and annoying. Where it lacks legitimacy is in its methods, which are inevitably calculated to sound good while wrecking everything the majority enjoys.
Liberals are usually debunked with a single realization: the people they see who are living “the good life” started down that path not because they enjoy it, but to avoid being dragged down by the dysfunction of the rest. Few people actually love money, but everyone loves independence from the herd, and the only way to get it is to get rich. Filthy rich.
It’s arguable that the first generation to really suffer the post-war corporate-regulatory employment which is now the norm, the Baby Boomers, were the most destructive generation ever. The policies they favor systematically destroy productive communities and replace them with “well-intentioned” liberal wastelands. The Baby Boomers, forever a “Me generation,” decided to take everything for themselves, and scorch and salt the earth so no one else could possibly have the same experience they did. It’s not that they worked harder; they worked meaner.
When you look at your political options, you will find a lot of people preaching to you that the world must burn. They have no positive ideas; they know what they hate, and they want to destroy everything they can so that they can make their ideal world. But even they don’t believe that. The core of their motivation is emotional, and it is vengefulness.
Injustice breeds like bacteria. You can’t un-do it by destroying everything, because you end up killing off the functional and then letting the bacteria take over. You can only systematically remove the bad, and uplift the good, and fix society from the inside out. This is not as emotionally satisfying as cheering on the destruction.
However, it’s worth remembering that injustice is not personal. Injustice to you hurts, it really does. Injustice is also created by destruction. When you smash a society, you smash the good people along with the bad. The creatures and plants who burn along with the police stations also suffer.
And then you create a new generation with an injury from injustice, and they’ll pass on the virus as well. They will know only their pain, and only their desire to destroy, and so every generation humanity will shave a little bit more off of its potential and replace it with a darkened hatred and pointless bitterness.

Nationalism, defender of the Faith and Nation

Nationalism, defender of the Faith and Nation

Written by Albion

Wikipedia tells us Nationalism is a political ideology that involves a strong identification of a group of individuals with a NATION.
There are two main perspectives on the origins and basis of Nationalism, one is the Primordialist perspective that describes Nationalism as a reflection of the ancient and perceived evolutionary tendency of humans to organise into distinct groupings based on an affinity of birth; the other is the modernist perspective that describes Nationalism as a recent phenomenon that “requires the structural conditions of modern society” which I can only assume is Gobblygook or BBC-Speak for Multiculturalism.
I maintain that one certainly cannot separate Nationalism from its first perspective Primordialist, or you could be mistaken or worse unknowingly embrace a bastardised form of Nationalism called Civic Nationalism.
Emotions aside, we must understand who we are politically.  What we do know without any doubt is who our political enemy is.  It is that form of government or group whose political ideology is opposed to the ideals of identification with their own people, or in other words is Anti-Nation or who wish to divest a nation of its identity or separate it from its distinct ethnic grouping, or the deliberate blurring of any Primordialist association with ancient loyalties.
When feelings of Nationalism are removed it leaves an empty shell, remove a nation’s identity and you remove the last vestiges of a nation. Multi-Culturalism is the perfect tool to destroy any sense of Nationalism so by definition Multi-Culturalism is Anti-Nation.
The Liberal champions of Multi-Culturalism never reveal that community cohesion was never a problem prior to Multi-Culturalism being forced on a tightly knit homogenous nation without their consent.
Nationalism as we understand it today is a recent phenomenon.  Prior to 1948 the strong identification with our ethnic group was tacit, whether it was from a Modernist or Primodialist aspect.  When both world wars commenced it was the people’s loyalist’s instincts, for Loyalist read Nationalist instincts that the government called on to encourage young men and women to defend and die for their country.
It was only when basic human rights, freedom of speech and the destruction and scattering of an ethnic group that Nationalism emerged in the way it is understood today.  If the threat to our ethnic solidarity was our only enemy we could fight the enemy but what we are seeing at present in the UK is very worrying indeed.
I should again stress at this point one must be careful of identifying with Civic Nationalism which defines the nation as an association of people who identify themselves as belonging to the nation, who have equal and shared political rights, and allegiance to similar political procedures.  I repudiate Civic Nationalism as according to the principles of Civic Nationalism the nation is not based on common ethnic ancestry, but is a political entity whose core identity is not.
In other words it is accepted that a British passport will suffice as identifying a person who can claim identification based on an affinity of birth, which is blatantly ridiculous.
To cement my argument on what is True Nationalism I quote Pierre van der Berghe in The Ethnic Phenomenon (1981) where he emphasizes the role of ethnicity and kinship involving family biological ties to members of an ethnic group as being an important element of national identity.  Van der Berghe states the sense of family attachments among related people as creating durable, intense, emotional, and cooperative attachments that he claims are utilised within ethnic groups.
Van der Berghe also identifies genetic-relatedness as being a basis for the durable attachments of family groups, as genetic ties cannot be removed and they are passed on from generation to generation.  Van der Berge identifies common descent as the basis for the establishment of boundaries of ethnic groups, as most people do not join ethnic groups but are born into them, so Civic Nationalism is a non-starter.
As an aside, the sense of strong family attachments also includes Negros, Arabs and Pygmies.  You will be relieved to know there is no exemption clause for Britons.
Mark Twain wrote “it is prohibition that makes anything precious”.  In contemporary Great Britain basic rights of freedom of speech are being stifled under the guise of race-hate crimes that might cause personal offence which in turn might cause alarm, distress or harass the recipient, Oh and thought crimes.  Name calling in school might also come under this umbrella.  Prohibition in the UK at present involves prohibition on what you can or cannot say and Government sanctioned restrictions on the right of free association.
I am going to mention George Orwell here because his writings are very pertinent to the England we see today.  His powerful dystopian novel 1984 warning of a future world where the state machine exerts complete control over social life might describe the direction Great Britain is taking today.  John Podhoretz an American neo-conservative columnist for the New York Post, the editor of Commentary magazine, the author of several books on politics, and a former presidential speechwriter claimed that if Orwell were alive today, he’d be standing with the neo-conservatives and AGAINST the Left.
Orwell described himself a Democratic Socialist which is a political philosophy and social movement that rejects centralised, elitist or authoritarian means of transitioning from capitalism to socialism.  Democratic socialism advocates for the immediate creation of decentralised economic democracy from the grassroots level, undertaken by and for the working class itself.
I repeat, Prohibition in the UK at present involves what you can or cannot say and as Orwell noted “freedom is the right to tell people what they do not want to hear” but ordinary people also have a right to this freedom.  Try telling the authorities you do not agree with nation wrecking using Multi-Culti as a tool.
Orwell would have readily recognised the Great Britain of today that is undergoing the painful birth of a totalitarian and authoritarian society, he wrote about it.
Orwell also wrote if you want a vision of the future imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.  We haven’t quite got to that stage in this country, we do have only a hand over our mouths at the moment and woe betides the person who innocently utters forbidden spoken words.
Orwell also wrote “every war when it comes, or before it comes, is represented not as a war but as an act of self-defence against a homicidal maniac”.
Nevertheless it is the victor who writes the rules and judges over its former enemies, that is how it has always been.