Search This Blog

Tuesday 6 July 2010

Inquisitions, Heretics, Witches and Racists. and Alike


Inquisitions, Heretics, Witches and Racists.

A mischievous or malicious accusation of racism can find one incarcerated in jail much like the Spanish Inquisition in 1478 when many true and faithful Christians, because of the testimony of enemies, rivals, slaves and other low people—and still less appropriate—without tests of any kind, were accused of heresy and were locked up in secular prisons, tortured and condemned like relapsed heretics, deprived of their goods and properties, and given over to the secular arm to be executed, at great danger to their souls, giving a pernicious example and causing scandal to many.

The purging of society of Witches, history informs us, was stopped by King Coloman of Hungary who declared that witch-hunts should cease because witches did not exist; a very enlightened person for his time I might add. "Neighbourhood witches" were the product of neighbourhood tensions, and were found only in self-sufficient serf village communities where the inhabitants largely rely on each other.

Such accusations follow the breaking of some social norm, and any person part of the normal social exchange could potentially fall under suspicion.

Perhaps history does repeat itself. The modern phenomenon of purges is not as the result of superstition but the shame and fear of being a victim of the purge is the same. Times have changed; modern day connotations of charges of enemies of the people are brought by the enrichers who accuse the enriched, and the colonizers that accuse those being colonised of being racists because they object to unwanted ‘cultural enrichment’ by primitive people and to the colonization of their lands.

The political establishment who through self preservation continue to use a contemporary type of inquisition to those opposed to their plan of ethnic dilution and eventual destruction. The powerful, wealthy clergy who through the ages have sexually violated the bodies of young children still have strong political muscle and influence, and like their predecessors preach their bigoted diatribe from the pulpits to the frightened people; they will even throw baseless accusations at political parties and still have the temerity to call themselves God’s disciples.

It has reached a disturbing stage where teachers will accuse a child of racism; one child will even accuse another, purges like inquisitions whether religious or superstitious are designed to keep the peasants in a continual state of concern and controlled servitude. It is only in the private, comfortable sanctuary of one's home and amongst one’s closest friends and out of earshot of strangers that one can be free to speak of their concerns for their future.

We don’t have religious tribunals any more but we do have departments of inquisitors like the EHRC led by an ebony representative of the colonizers and enrichers whose position is the surveillance of the faithful and the punishment of the transgressors. To add insult to injury he even sexually mates with a female of those peasants being colonised. The EHRC’s sole reason for being is to use threats of incarceration and to purge society of the peasants who express resentment to the destruction of their identity and theft of their land.

It has almost reaches a stage of frenzy. But unlike accusations of witches and heretics the purpose of the use of the word racist is not of the result of superstition but of something much more sinister, the reshaping of Europe.

Never in our nations long and glorious history have treachery and sedition been so blatant by our traitorous leaders. Never has a whole ethnic society whose resentment to being overwhelmed and discriminated against been silenced by a comparatively few people.

The modern heretic is ‘THE RACIST’. That is title that is ascribed to anyone who openly opposes their loss of their identity, their culture and the deliberate overwhelming of their homeland by violent peoples of cultures so alien to theirs, and of the violation of their basic human rights of self determination by government decree.

Exposed: Conservative “Temporary Cap” on Immigration Is a Hoax

Exposed: Tory’s “Temporary Cap” on Immigration Is a Hoax

The Tory “temporary immigration cap” to Britain has been exposed as yet another hoax with the Home Office confession that it excludes Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) programmes, which in 2008 let 43,495 non-EU workers into Britain, nearly 20,000 more than the Conservative’s stated “cap” limit.
ICT transfers allow foreign companies with offices in Britain to transfer their own employees to here from anywhere in the world. ICT transfers are over and above what the ConDem regime seeks to keep as a “cap” limit of 24,400.
The depth of the Tory deception became apparent with a comparison between the figures quoted by Home Secretary Theresa and the number of Indian IT workers allowed into Britain under the ICT scheme.
Figures released last August by Ann Swain, chief executive of the Association of Professional Staffing Companies (APSCo), showed that ICT programmes resulted in the transfer of 29,240 foreign IT workers alone into Britain during the during the 2008/2009 year.
According to Ms Swain, IT workers in particular accounted for the importation of non-European workers into the UK at twice the rate of all other types of professional skills combined.
“Despite the downturn creating an ample supply of settled UK IT staff, almost 30,000 computer workers from outside of the European Union were brought to the country in 2008,” Ms Swain said.
This figure, Ms Swain said, was more than double the number (14,255) who entered the UK on ICTs that year to work in all the other professional service sectors, including telecoms, combined. 
This means that in one year, 43,495 non-EU workers entered Britain using the ICT programme.
Under current ICT rules, employers can effectively bypass UK job-seekers, who command higher pay than their overseas counterparts, as they have no obligation to advertise the roles. 
Unlike other non-EU workers who must be employed at the company for a year before they can be transferred, graduates would be eligible for an ICT from the third month of work. 
“The irony is that while graduate level IT jobs are being outsourced to India it is now being proposed that it should be easier for Indian IT graduates to work in the UK at a time when there are few if any skill shortages at that level,” Ms Swain said last year.
One Indian company, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), sponsored 4,600 of its employees to come to Britain in 2008 through ICTs, according to new Home Office data.
Another Indian company, Infosys Technologies Limited, sponsored 3,235 foreigners to come to the UK in the same year, while a third, Wipro Technologies, brought in 2,420.
Indians make up 70 percent of the migrants brought to Britain on ICTs, while others are from nations including the US, South Africa, Japan and China.

How a Changed Population Leads to a Changed Culture , How Will this Effect Bolton

How a Changed Population Leads to a Changed Culture

The news that Muslim children are being withdrawn from state school music classes on religious grounds has once again illustrated how a changing population changes the cultural norms of a society.
According to a BBC TV documentary, Muslim families are unilaterally — and illegally — withdrawing their children from parts of the state school curriculum while Ofsted inspectors “turn a blind eye.”
Muslims object to music in the same way they object to images, namely by quoting a section of the Koran.
The passage in the Muslim holy book categorises music along with fornication and the “wearing of silk” by men (presumably an indication of homosexuality).
A passage in the Ahadith reads as follows: "There will be people from my Ummah [nation] who will seek to make lawful fornication, the wearing of silk [for men], wine drinking and the use of musical instruments."
According to the BBC documentary, many schools in immigrant-colonised areas are already seeing large numbers of pupils refusing to take part in music lessons of any sort.
Eileen Ross, head teacher of the Herbert Morrison Primary School in Lambeth, south London, told the BBC that “Some of the parents don't want children to play musical instruments and they don't have music in their homes.”
About 29 percent of children at the school come from Somali Muslim families.
Another academic quoted by the BBC, Dr Diana Harris, from the Open University, claimed that Ofsted inspectors have sometimes turned "a blind eye" to the issue.
Parents have no automatic right to withdraw their children from compulsory subjects such as music.
The changing cultural expression is the natural consequence of the changing population.
A culture is an expression of a people, not the other way round. A First World people will produce a First World culture, and a Third World people will produce a Third World culture.
This is why immigration matters.

Monday 5 July 2010

Tory Equalities Act Reversal Reveals Identical Ideologies of Conservatives and Labour

Tory Equalities Act Flip Flop Reveals Identical Ideologies of Conservatives and Labour

Tory Home Secretary Theresa May has dropped her party’s opposition to Labour’s Equality Act and has announced that it will “better protect people from discrimination” even though in April last year she condemned the same law as “ill thought out” and a “waste of time and money.”
The latest shocking example of Tory duplicity came with the announcement by Mrs May that the Equality Act, passed last year, will be fully implemented by October this year.
According to new reports, Mrs May — who is also Minister for Women and Equality — said that the law “would make it easier for firms to comply with anti-discrimination rules.
"By making the law easier to understand, the Equality Act will help businesses treat staff fairly and meet the needs of a diverse customer base," Mrs May said.
“"The law will be easier to understand and better able to protect people from discrimination. A successful economy needs the full participation of all its citizens and we are committed to implementing the Act in the best way for business."
However, in the parliamentary debate of 11 May 2009, Mrs May, then Shadow Home Secretary, called the bill “ill-thought out, and last minute.
“It doesn’t tackle root causes of inequality, like ‘family breakdown’,” Mrs May said during that debate, adding that she “opposed widespread positive discrimination” and that “all-women shortlists are unacceptable.”
The Equalities Act gives employers the ability to legally discriminate in favour of women and black job candidates against white males.
The law also forces public bodies to award contracts according to a firm's “diversity” (or how non-white a company may be) and allows “positive action” to ensure more women and non-white employees in all companies.
It was this clause in particular that Mrs May opposed when she was in opposition. At the time, Mrs May said that too “many of the proposals in this Bill will be bureaucratic and expensive without providing real results.
“Labour's proposal for compulsory pay audits without any sanctions for failure will simply waste time and money without making any difference to pay discrimination,” Mrs May went on.
However, now that she does not have to pretend to be in opposition anymore, Mrs May has, like all the Tory leadership, reverted to type and clearly shown that there is no real difference between the three Westminster parties after all.

Sunday 4 July 2010

Thirteenth Stabbing Death in London Highlights Ongoing Black Violent Crime

Thirteenth Stabbing Death in London Highlights Ongoing Black Violent Crime Wave

The thirteenth stabbing death of a black youth this year in London yesterday has highlighted the black crime wave crisis which is sweeping London and other major cities in Britain.
In the latest incident, 15-year-old Zac Olumegbon was murdered near Park Campus School in West Norwood, south London in a frenzied attack by members of a rival black gang.
Olumegbon was a pupil at the school, which was set up for what the controlled media have politely called “some of London’s most troubled teenagers, who have been excluded from mainstream education.”
According to the media, the school has “bright, open classrooms arranged around a central garden” and is “deliberately designed to reduce aggression and behavioural problems.”
Apparently its 90 pupils “enjoy state-of-the-art sports facilities, have access to wireless internet and are encouraged to grow vegetables in the school grounds.”
All of this seems to have been to no avail, as “staff and neighbours told of a catalogue of fights and attacks in the school with youths from different gangs from across London brought together under one roof,” a report continued.
The latest killed is the product of an ongoing fight between two black gangs rejoicing in the names “Get Money Gangsters” from Norwood and the “Gas Gang Crew” from Brixton and Streatham.
The violent nature of these gangs is on public display on YouTube where gang members, possibly using the free internet services provided at their special school courtesy of the taxpayer, have uploaded several clips of their activities.
The videos usually show gang members talking in rap “language” with violent lyrics exalting criminal activity. They appear with subtitled names such as “shotz” and “stabber.”
Figures released in 2008 and published in the Daily Mail shows that of the 225 people aged under 18 proceeded against for knife crime in London between 1 April and 30 June that year, 124 were black, 18 were of mixed race, 14 were Asian, 6 were of some other group, 60 were white and 3 were not identified by race.
The problem of immigrant-origin crime in Britain will not be solved until the immigration question is honestly and openly addressed.
There is a clear incompatibility issue with large Third World immigrant populations and First World countries which must be addressed if Britain is to survive as a First World nation.
This reality is visually addressed in a YouTube video which compares ethnically homogenous British London of a few decades ago with the nightmare that immigration has turned it into today.

Anti-Terrorism Funding Cut as Muslim Population Rises Tens Times Faster

Anti-Terrorism Funding Cut as Muslim Population Rises Tens Times Faster than Everyone Else

Millions of pounds are to be cut off the police’s anti-terrorism budget as the Muslim population in Britain rises ten times faster than anyone else, exposing the rest of the country to even more danger.
CCTV image at King's Cross train station, showing Hasib Hussain, 
one of the July 7, 2005 suicide bombers.CCTV image at King's Cross train station, showing Hasib Hussain, one of the July 7, 2005 suicide bombers.The stark warning about budget cuts was made by Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates at last week’s Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) annual conference in Manchester.
According to Mr Yates, Britain will be “left vulnerable” to terrorist attacks after it transpired that the ConDem government plans to cut funding for counter-terrorism police by £150 million.
He said that proposed spending cuts of 25 percent “could not be achieved without weakening defences against al-Qaeda.”
According to reports, it is claimed that “entire counter-terrorism units” will have to close.
Earlier studies revealed that 92 percent of all terrorists arrested in Britain over the past few years have been Muslim, and that the Muslim population in this country is rising ten times faster than the rest of society.
Mr Yates’s warnings were dismissed by Tory Minister for the Cabinet Office Francis Maude as "shroud-waving" and "alarmism."
The ConDem regime has announced that all government departments (with the notable exception of the foreign aid handouts) will be forced to cut back on their expenditure to help bring the nightmarish budget deficit under control.
Bizarrely, the ConDem regime seeks to prolong and even escalate the war in Afghanistan and is an active participant in efforts to provoke a war with Iran.
These two insane foreign policy initiatives serve as a further reason to incitement of the Muslim population in Britain.
At the same time, the immigration policies pursued by decades of Tory and labour regimes has actively encouraged immigration from Muslim nations.
In addition, the slavish adherence to the European Union’s directives has created that outrageous “asylum” racket which imports even more Muslims who have fled the Middle Eastern wars which the Tory-Labour axis generated in the first place.
In other words, the Tory-Labour-Lib Dem policies of mass immigration and anti-British interest foreign policies are the direct cause of terrorism in Britain.
And now, in a final act of treachery and betrayal to the British people, the same gaggle of political traitors is going to cut spending on anti-terrorism measures at home.
The blood of our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan is already on the hands of the members of the House of Treason in Westminster.
Soon, it seems, the blood of British people, victims of Islamist terrorism at home, will be added to the long list of crimes for which those politicians must one day be called to account.

MUSLIM MP CAMPAIGNS ON BEHALF OF MARXIST UAF VIOLENT THUGS IN BOLTON

Sunday, 4 July 2010

You can see the unbelievable violent tactics the UAF supporters used in March against members of the public and patriotic English men and women supporters as independently reported by the The Independent newspaper as the assistant police commissar of Greater Manchester placed the blame for the violence on the  UAF group, and yet.


"YASMINE QURESHI AND HER BRAND NEW ISLAMIST ENTOURAGE ‘JUSTICE 4 BOLTON’ PLAN TO STEP UP THEIR CAMPAIGN AGAINST FREE SPEECH THIS WEEK WITH THE NEWS ,THAT THEY INTEND TO HOLD A MEETING SUPPORTING THOSE VIOLENT ANTI PATRIOTIC THUGS AND UNBELIEVABLY HAVE OF COURSE A MUSLIM MP IN ATTENDANCE! AND AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE NOTICE THEY ISSUED BELOW! THEY ALSO THE SUPPORT OF OTHER TRAITOROUS MP,S FROM THE OUT OF TOUCH POLITICAL ELITE







Public Meeting
Friday 9th July 2010, 7.30pm
QUEBEC HALL, QUEBEC STREET, BOLTON BL3 5JN


( Quebec Hall entrance is from grassy side of the industrial complex )

On 20th March in Bolton’s Victoria Square, thousands of people responded to a Unite
Against Fascism call to demonstrate against the English Defence League (EDL). The EDL
is a racist and fascist organisation linked to the fascist British National Party.
(http://barthsnotes.wordpress.com/2010/06/26/searchlight-names-edl-leader-tommy-robinson-as-stephen-yaxley-lennon/)

Following the demonstration, justice4bolton was launched on 8th June in the House of
Commons with MP’s Jeremy Corbyn and Peter Hain.

This Bolton launch is for you -whether you are anti-fascists, members of Trade Unions,
members of our Faith communities or simply Bolton people who are concerned about what
happened on Saturday 20th March 2010. Anti-EDL protesters were arrested (Muslims
included), some have been charged. The police investigation is ongoing. There could be
other arrests and charges in the coming months. justice4bolton offers support and
solidarity to those arrested and charged and to those under threat of arrest.

You can see the unbelievable violent tactics the UAF supporters went as independently reported by the The Independent 
newspaer as the assistant police commissar of Greater Manchester placed the blame for the violence on the  UAF group

Speakers include:
Martin Challender Secretary, Bolton Trades Council
Yasmin Qureshi MP, Bolton South East
Dr Rhetta Moran j4b National Committee
Independent Muslim Forum Representatives
Everyone is welcome to come, to listen, and to speak

Yeah I bet any one opposing this will be allowed to speak and you can bet that if you do your teeth will soon go missing to knowing the record of the Anti White Marxist UAF Millitia!

Bolton BNP June 2010 Meeting




Bolton BNP  June 2010 Meeting

Wed the 30th of June, our Bolton group held it's monthly meeting, and what a very good meeting it was. Tony Backhurst  spoke about the solidarity union, and the benefit's of joining. Dorothy Sayers spoke about the the need for more people to pull together for leafleting, and bringing more on board, and there was our guest speaker Patrick Newman, who talked about the rise of the Muslims all over the world, and how England was the most effected, and how long we have left as a nation before we are totally colonized. I recommend Patrick as a speaker for other BNP meetings, you will not be disappointed. Bolton BNP, getting stronger by the month.
Please do not forget our national parties latest campaign England is for life not just for football to,

Help us to help Bolton join the  British national Party  by clicking the link

Under Proportional Representation, the BNP Would Have 12 Seats in Parliament

Under True Proportional Representation, the BNP Would Have 12 Seats

Under a true proportional representation system, the British National Party would already have twelve seats in parliament, a leading anti-BNP academic has warned.
In a near-hysterical article published on the Public Finance magazine’s blog, Professor Ted Cantle, executive chair of the Institute of Community Cohesion (iCoCo) at Coventry University, said that other political parties dismissed “concerns about migration and the impact on local services as ‘ignorant’ or ‘racist’ at our peril.”
According to Professor Cantle, the ConDem “plan to cap annual immigration is just a scratch on the surface of a much larger and more fundamental issue for the UK and its local communities.
“In 2001 the British National Party picked up just 47,000 votes, and by 2005 it had grown to 192,000,” he wrote.
“This year it was 563,000 — far from the collapse in support suggested by reporting on the general election result and the focus on the defeat for BNP leader Nick Griffin.
“Under a proportional representation system, for example, the BNP would now have 12 seats in parliament,” he continued.
“Based on a new analysis by iCoCo . . . this appears to be part of a genuine trend of gathering support that threatens the stability of the UK.
“Increased population numbers and changes in the composition of local populations have increased pressure on local services, and these have to be understood and addressed,” Professor Cantle wrote, going on ot make the usual string of allegations against the BNP.
“There is a danger in regarding the BNP as a spent force. They lost ground because of campaigns to oppose them on the ground in places like Barking and Dagenham, but also all the minority parties were squeezed by the media focus on the three main parties, especially around the televised debates.
“That may not be the case next time. We have to recognise they do tap into real concerns, as the ‘bigoted woman’ incident showed and we need more debate, not less, to answer these concerns.”
* The “Alternative Voting” system upon which Britain will be asked to vote next May is not true proportional representation and has been identified by the Electoral Reform Society as producing even greater distortions than the current first-past-the-post system.

Third World Culture Accompanies Third World Immigrants to UK

Third World Culture Accompanies Third World Immigrants

The rise in forced marriages — estimated to be in the region of 10,000 every year, of which 20 percent involve male victims — is yet more evidence that Third World culture has been imported into Britain along with Third World immigrants.
In a disturbing display of the simple truth that a culture is merely the reflection of a people, and that cultures change when the population changes, the incidence of forced marriages in Britain has risen sharply along with the rise in the number of immigrants.
The numbers are so high that the Government has set up a special unit, Forced Marriage Unit (FMU), whose sole job is to “combat” forced marriages.
The FMU’s work is of course hampered by the ever increasing numbers of Third World immigrants pouring into the country.
According to figures released by the FMU, the “majority of cases involve families from South Asia, particularly Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.”
The unit says it estimates that there are 10,000 incidents of forced marriage involving “British nationals” each year and that up to 20 percent of the victims are males.
According to the FMU, it received more than 220 messages from male victims in 2009, an increase from the 134 reported the previous year.
Male immigrants are forced into marriages for “family commitments and expectations, securing visas or the desire to control behaviour and protect a family's reputation.”
Apparently the latter reason means that the immigrant families suspect that the males in question are homosexual.
The FMU went on to warn social workers to be on the lookout during summer when incidents of forced marriage increase as the immigrants visit their countries of origin for holidays. There, the forced marriages are either sought or concluded. 
Professionals working with young people were urged to be vigilant during summer, a time when incidents increase.
According to the RMA, victims of forced marriages are compelled or tricked into going back to their countries of origin.
Those who refuse, the FMU said, are “often locked up, subjected to physical and sexual violence and forcibly removed to other countries if they refuse to comply with their families' wishes.”
The existence of this problem in Britain today is proof that culture and identity is not something which can be taken off like a coat and left at an airport gate, as British National Party MEP Andrew Brons said recently in the European Parliament.
“Third World cultures are like overcoats that can be taken off at the port of entry and replaced with a European cultural overcoat that can be issued with residence and citizenship papers,” Mr Brons said.
 “The children of such immigrants are allegedly as European as the indigenous population. They’re not. Distinctive cultures are made by distinctive peoples and not the other way round.
“We are not the products of our culture; our cultures are the products of our peoples.
“Replacing Europeans with people from the Third World will mean that Europe will be replaced by the Third World. Europe is slowly but steadily being ethnically cleansed of Europeans,” Mr Brons said.