Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut Spending Review Nightmare Part III:

Spending Review Nightmare Part III: Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut

  The British National Party National Newsroom

Workers who commute by train on main routes with regulated fares face dramatic price increases because of the coalition government’s budget cuts, travel industry experts have warned.

The Tory/Lib Dem government has announced that it will be raising the ‘fee cap’ on routes with regulated fares to 3 percent above inflation in a bid to shift some of the cost of rail subsidies it provides onto the public — even though tax money is used to already subsidise the train companies.

The rise will hit conventional commuters the hardest, as the commuter runs are specifically those with regulated fares.

In addition, the budget cuts will “prove tough for workers in the public sector,” experts have warned.

Nigel Turner, director of programme management at travel company Carlson Wagonlit, was recently quoted in the Air and Business Travel News as warning that the budget cuts will prove a “major challenge” for the government.

He said that nobody in the public sector “has been quite sure what budget they have.

“There have been huge cutbacks already on travel, just through people not knowing what they are allowed to spend. In general, they have not been travelling.”

He said he was “hopeful” that the estimated one million job cuts, which are part of the cutbacks, would not affect the travel industry “too badly.”

It is not only the rail service which is going to cost the public more. Councils across the country have been told by Transport Minister Norman Baker that they should stop "bleating" for more funds to repair road networks.

Mr Baker, a Lib Dem MP for Lewes, admitted that the roads in his constituency were “not particularly brilliant” — an understatement considering that East Sussex County Council has an estimated backlog of 20,000 potholes to repair.

Nonetheless, Mr Baker and his colleagues have overseen a £1.5 reduction in the highways maintenance budget according to East Sussex County Council as part of the overall spending review budget cuts.

And so it goes on: While train fares rise, subsidies to train companies remain; and road maintenance budgets in Britain are cut, but the increased foreign aid budget contains millions allocated to road building in Africa.

Once again, British people are put last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite:Spending Review Nightmare Part II:British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part II: Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite

The British National National Newsroom

Coalition government Policing Minister Nick Herbert’s promise that the police’s front-line services would be protected after severe budgets cuts has been exposed as a lie with the news that yet another specialist unit that traces and recovers stolen cars is to be axed.

The Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (VCIS) has been highly successful in tracking down a significant number of the 150,000 cars stolen in Britain every year, but has been told its annual £300,000 grant has been cancelled.

This money is, of course, a mere fraction of what is spent on foreign aid each year, a large portion of which goes to helping establish ‘law and order’ in other countries.

In the past four years, the VCIS has recovered more than £48 million of stolen cars, arrested more than 200 thieves and reunited thousands of car owners with their property, according to a report in Police Review magazine.

The article went on to say that the 13 police officers and seven police staff who make up the unit, called its scrapping “short-sighted” and “unjust.”

According to the Automobile Association, the service was vital. “If you can take out a gang you can wipe out a crime wave for several months, so you need this specialist police activity,” an AA spokesman was quoted as saying.

In last October’s Spending Review, it was announced that the police funding would be cut incrementally until it totalled 20 percent by 2014-15.

At the time, Mr Herbert told parliament that “front-line services could be protected while achieving challenging savings.”

This was, of course, yet another lie. It is has since emerged that police forces up and down the country will have to cut at least 10,000 active officers and thousands more other staffers will also have to be fired.

Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, warned last year that police savings in back office costs and procurement would not be enough to absorb the cuts, as Mr Herbert has claimed.

“Police numbers will almost certainly have to fall once budget cuts start to bite,” Sir Hugh said.

Central funding to the police budget will fall to £9.3 billion in 2011-12, and to £8.8 billon the year after.

Compared to the billions spent on European Union membership, this figure is trifling, but, as always, the Westminster parties always put the interests of British people last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises, British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part I: NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises

The British National Party National Newsroom  

In yet another example of how Britain was conned by David Cameron’s promise not to cut back on the National Health Service, the East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has just announced that at least 1,000 hospital jobs, including those of doctors and nurses, are to end.

The cutbacks are a direct response to the coalition government’s Spending Review, which did not cut funding to the NHS but lowered its annual increase to 0.1 percent above inflation.

This is well under annual operating cost increases, many of which (such as the ‘carbon tax’ on emissions and the increased petrol price) are the direct result of government-imposed surcharges.

The East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has confirmed to a local newspaper that 200 posts a year will go between now and 2015, a figure which will total a fifth of their total workforce.

According to reports, positions “facing the axe will be 257 jobs from the administration and estates department, 226 from the nursing division, 126 from therapy and diagnostics, 47 doctors, 205 clinical support staff and 13 managers.”

The Trust’s director of human resources and organisational development, Mr Ian Brandwood, admitted to a local newspaper that “some” front-line doctors’ and nurses’ posts would go.

The announcement confirmed the accuracy of the earlier report this week by anti-cuts activist organisation, False Economy, which specifically said that the East Lancashire NHS Trust would soon get right of 1,013 full-time equivalent staff, 50 doctors and dental staff, and 270 nurses, midwives and health visitors.

The budget restrictions will impact more than 50,000 hospital posts nationwide as NHS Trusts struggle to meet the government’s demand of £20 billion of “efficiency savings” over the next five years.

The “savings” mean that the NHS has to trim £4 billion off its expenses each year — a figure which is less than the annual estimated £4.5 billion spent each year fighting the war in Afghanistan.

Once again, the Westminster parties clearly think that fighting an unwinnable war which causes terrorism, is more important that funding healthcare for British people.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Foreign Aid Costs £479 for every household in Britain. As Tories Admit that British National Party Was Right All Along

Foreign Aid: Tories to Admit that British National Party Was Right All Along

The British National Party Newsroom

A leaked draft copy of the government’s foreign aid spending review, has all but admitted that the British National Party has been correct on the topic — but still insists on increasing the amount of British money handed out to the Third World.

The document, leaked to the BBC ahead of this week’s spending review to be announced in parliament, apparently states that British foreign aid handouts are to be stopped to at least 16 countries, including Russia, China and Iraq.

In addition, aid to India will be “frozen,” whatever that might mean.

The dramatic turnaround comes after months of sustained pressure from the British National Party on the subject, which finally forced the issue to the forefront of politics after having been deliberately hidden for decades.

Although this move is a major concession to growing popular opinion on the topic — and an understanding that it is the British National Party which is responsible for it coming to the public’s attention — the manoeuvre does not in fact reduce the foreign aid spend.

Instead, the spending review merely redeploys the billions in the budget, and, to add insult to injury, will increase the total amount spent.

According to the document, the international development budget will rise by a third because “aid spending is good for Britain's economy and safety.”

This blatant Tory lie — that it is “good” for the economy — is exposed by the simple fact that the foreign aid budget is twice as much as the total cutbacks on university spending, which is set to cripple higher education in Britain.

In addition, the document apparently says, by 2014, some 30 percent of British foreign aid is to go to “war-torn and unstable countries.”

Afghanistan will continue to be a major aid recipient, being “war-torn.”

Of course, the only reason why it is in that condition was because the Labour/Tory elite waged war on that nation in the first place.

The Department for International Development’s budget for 2009/2010 was £7.8 billion,  but the total foreign spend in all sectors for that period was £8.4 billion.

This figure is set to rise to £12.6 billion per year by 2014, equal to £479 for every household in Britain.

Furthermore, at this rate, the total foreign aid spend over the next ten years will amount to £126 billion. This figure is a conservative estimate, as both Labour and Tories have promised to keep increasing the budget year-on-year.

The halting of aid to Russia, China, Iraq and India does not meet the demands of the British National Party on the subject, which is the complete halting of all foreign aid while there is need or want here at home.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

“Right Wing Support” Survey: Another Establishment Sleight of Hand, analyis By Nick Griffin MEP

“Right Wing Support” Survey: Another Establishment Sleight of Hand

  The British National Party National Newsroom

The newly-released “survey” which claims that 48 percent of British voters will support an anti-immigration party, is an Establishment sleight of hand which will backfire on its producers, Nick Griffin MEP has said.

Reacting to the release of the survey, which has been reproduced widely in the media, the British National Party leader said the report was a mixture of the obvious, the truth, a good deal of not-so-subtle propaganda and Establishment conniving.

“The reality is that no-one needs a new poll to become aware that there is deep dissatisfaction within society at the levels of immigration which, left unchecked, will plunge indigenous British people into minority status within a few decades,” Mr Griffin said.

“In that sense, the British National Party’s place in history, and destiny, is assured.

“We are the only party which has consistently warned about the dangers of unlimited mass immigration, and now the Establishment is slowly being forced to grudgingly concede that we were right, we are right and that all future trends are toward our political direction,” Mr Griffin said.

“There are however, contained in both the ‘report’ and the media coverage thereof, some important considerations.

“The first is that the media has tried to portray the report’s authors, the ‘Searchlight Educational Trust,’ as some sort of objective think thank devoted to ‘antiracism.’

 Searchlight founder Gerry Cable, guest of honour at Communist Party meeting in 2008.“In reality, as all informed journalists are already aware, Searchlight is nothing but an extremist Communist Party front organisation, whose founder actually stood as a formal Communist Party candidate and who as recently as 2008, was the guest speaker at a prominent Communist Party meeting in London.

“There is therefore, no question of ‘objectivity’ in anything Searchlight produces,” Mr Griffin said.

“Furthermore, Searchlight was closely involved with the setting up of the ‘UAF’ organisation, whose leaders are all senior members of the Socialist Workers’ Party.

“In fact, the only reason why Searchlight eventually left the UAF was because the latter organisation filled up with Islamist radicals and became anti-Zionist.

 “Searchlight, whose founder is also a radical Zionist whose son served in the Israeli army, objected to the anti-Israeli stance, and, complaining about anti-Semitism, left the UAF in a huff.

 “The Zionist nature of Searchlight offers another key in understanding the prominence given to the new ‘survey’ by the media.

 “Searchlight commissioned polling agency Populus to carry out the survey upon which the 48 percent figure is based.

 “It is no coincidence that the founder of Populus and that organisation’s Strategic Director, Andrew Cooper, has recently been appointed Director of Political Strategy at 10 Downing Street, working directly to David Cameron,” Mr Griffin continued.

 “All political observers have seen how influential Zionists, both Jewish and Christian alike, have identified radical Islam as a threat to Israel’s support base in western European nations, and have jumped on the anti-Islam bandwagon for their own purposes.

 “Thus it is in their interests to boost populist anti-Islamist organisations such as the English Defence League as a means of pressuring the rest of the political Establishment to do something about the problem.

“This development is becoming more and more blatant, with recent weeks having seen not only the Daily Star but also BBC’s Newsnight shamelessly promoting the EDL.

 “It can be seen in the ‘new’ survey that accent is given to what is described as ‘assertive English nationalism’ and the call for an English parliament as being key ingredients to the electoral possibility of a ‘new’ right wing political party.

“The British National Party does indeed believe that the creation of an English Parliament is necessary to stop the unfairness of the present devolved governmental system leading to a total break-up of the United Kingdom, but the fact that the EDP were beaten by the Monster Raving Looney Party in the Oldham by-election shows that this policy, in itself, is politically insignificant.

 “Obviously, however, the report’s authors hope that by stressing the ‘English’ angle in this way they can encourage organisations such as the EDL to resort to electoral politics, all with the obvious intention of sidelining the British National Party,” Mr Griffin said.

 “While the British National Party is obviously different from the EDL, and would not welcome a party emerging from that organisation, we are quite happy to let the Establishment proceed with its plans.

 “We are safe in the knowledge that all British people who have commonsense and political depth know, or will see very quickly, that the only avenue for real political power lies with the British National Party.

“Perhaps more significant still, the powerful people at present trying to boost and manipulate the EDL are playing with fire.

“In addition to politicising a whole generation of English working class youth (as the middle class would-be thugs of the UAF are already discovering to their discomfort), the whole operation has the potential to spark public disorder and communal violence on a scale never before seen on the British mainland.

“It is a massive and dangerous gamble for the media bosses now plugging the EDL to hope that this can be controlled and provide a safety valve to stop more people turning to us. It’s far more likely to blow up in their faces.

 “All-in-all, this new survey – and the bigger picture of manipulation behind it – only confirms what we know, namely that history is moving in our direction, and that no matter which way the Establishment tries to spin it, the end result will only be in favour of our party, and not against it.

 “This latest scheme will backfire against its producers and we will be the long-term winners,” Mr Griffin concluded.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Another Election Promise Smashed: Budget Constraints Mean NHS Job Losses Will Total 53,000

  The British National Party Newsroom

Budget constraints introduced by the Tory/Lib-Dem alliance will see the National Health Service will lose more than 50,000 jobs, activist group “False Economy” has announced.

 Original Conservative Party election poster, 2010.The organisation, which campaigns against budget cuts, said that its studies show that 53,000 NHS staff will lose their jobs in NHS Trusts across the country over the next five years. 

The figure is double previous estimates and reveals precisely how much the ruling regime’s budgetary contortions will cost the British public.

Although it was promised that spending on the NHS would not be cut, the real time increase is around 0.1 percent year, which is way below operating cost increases.

This disparity will inevitably lead to a lowering in NHS service levels as trusts will be forced to make major job cuts to reduce operating expenditure.

Contrary to ConDem denials, a number of doctors and nurses across all trusts will be among those affected.

The data was released after False Economy submitted a large number of Freedom of Information requests, which are available online here.

The figures from False Economy are double those forecast by the Royal College of Nursing forecast last November.

One of the biggest culls they uncover will be at Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, where 1,755 full-time posts will be cut, including 120 doctors and dentists, and 620 nurses.

Overall a minority of jobs are expected to be lost from ‘natural wastage’, but False Economy believes the majority of losses stem from the health service’s need to meet the so-called Nicholson Challenge which requires the NHS to make around £20 billion in efficiency savings by 2015.

During the 2010 election campaign, the Conservative Party promised in election posters and in its manifesto that it would not introduce any policy which would harm the NHS.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Welcome to fascist Britain, Salford BNP organizer is Unjustly sacked for his political affiliations

Gary Tumulty, Salford BNP organizer is sacked for his political affiliations

Today it has come to my attention that Gary Tumulty has been sacked by Spar (he worked in Spar city tower in Manchester city centre) because he is the Salford organizer for the British National Party.
This is a message that I received from one of Mr Tumulty’ friends and I want to bring it to the attention of nationalists.

Gary Tumulty is the Salford Organiser, he worked for a company called MITTIE as a security guard and did a great job, recently he was confronted by a few UAF from the local MAFA, then a few weeks later he was mobbed at his workplace by about 60 MAFA chanting and shouting the usual rubbish, he was then suspended until a investigation was held resulting in him being sacked today. This is unfair and unjust.

Here is the link to the antifascists’ demo.
Pyongyangcitysessions Judge for yourselves the significance of using Pyongyang as part of a blogsite name.
So far I’m unable to give more information, except that Pat Harrington has been informed and he will I am sure assist Mr Tumulty in his claim for unfair dismissal.
I will give an update as soon as I have more news.
Welcome to fascist Britain, a carbon copy of 1930′s Italy.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS at http://www.londonpatriot.org/

Immigration fears of our young Almost three-quarters say it's a problem British National Party Chairmans Update

Fellow Patriot,
Did you see the great poll news the other day? Young people are waking up! The number of 16-24 year-olds who say that immigration is a big problem has risen form 60% to 70% in just twelve months.
Despite years of brainwashing in schools and on TV, more youngsters than ever before are seeing through the lies and spin of the Political Class.
For the first time, people in the 16-24 age group are now more worried about immigrant numbers than those in their 30s, the MORI poll showed. Mind you, opinion in that age bracket is also very much on our side - 68% of 25-39 year olds now say immigration is a big problem.
I believe that the poll shows that young people are now more receptive to our message on immigration than ever before.

The economic crisis means that there will be increased competition for jobs and public services.
Last week it was revealed 965,000 young people are out of work and hundreds of thousands have never worked. One in five 16-24 year-olds is jobless and looking for work. As the banksters' bust and ConDem cuts hit home, even more people are going to realise that we've been right all along.
Am I the only one who thinks this?
Well, No I'm not. Our far-left opponents say:
"With unemployment likely to hit two million by the end of the year and house prices dropping 15% in the past 12 months, most people are feeling the pinch. The government’s response to the credit crunch might have boosted its poll ratings in the short term but it could be the far-right BNP that benefits when the recession really bites."
A leaked Home Office memo has said that “Increased public hostility to migrants” was predicted to result from heightened competition for employment.

It's really no surprise then that there has been a concerted campaign to disrupt and smear the British National Party.
Put simply they don't want us around because they believe we are entering a period of opportunity.
Sadly for them, we have weathered their storm and I have gathered round me a central team of dedicated, highly motivated and talented Nationalists.
We’re working flat out to revamp our Publicity Department and totally overhaul our Elections machine. I’m criss-crossing the country speaking at meetings and organising for the future. I’m determined that we’ll be ready when the stormclouds really break.
Yes, they’ve underestimated us. More importantly they underestimated you. Our enemy believed that you would not renew your membership, join or donate if they attacked and smeared us.
Having no loyalty themselves they don't understand loyalty in others. They don't understand how much you care about our country.
Through thick and thin ordinary, decent people like you have backed the British National Party. Renewals, donations and new memberships have floooded-in. Subscriptions to our new, improved Voice of Freedom newspaper are at an all-time high. As a result the British National Party is back in the fight - stronger than before.
As we enter this time of opportunity we must up our output of literature and our activism on the streets. To do this we need your help.
Please donate today and give us the tools to do the job.

Please accept my sincere thanks,
Nick Griffin
Member of the European Parliament

P.S. Our time of opportunity is coming. We need your help. You can donate online or by ringing 0844 8094582. Remember, if our operators are busy, please call back!

Subscribe to the Voice of Freedom for the truth in the British News

Subscribe to the Voice of Freedom

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The Voice of Freedom (VoF) is the monthly newspaper of the British National Party. It is packed with hidden and censored news that the mainstream media refuses to print.

By subscribing to Voice of Freedom you will gain information and knowledge that others don't have.

The Voice of Freedom is not censored by the Political Class and brings you all the facts.

Our next issue is about to go to press. It is full of news suppressed by the daily press.

Articles in our next issue include:

The Great Pretender, Cameron's phoney war against multi-culturalism comes unstuck He who pays the piper - an expose of Tory funding Reports from the European Parliament Make sure you get the next issue hot off the press by  subscribing today. The Voice of Freedom is not to be missed. A full year's subscription is only £13.15, postage and packaging included. Subscribing to Voice of Freedom will make you better informed about matters in the news as well as key developments within the British National Party. Stay informed and support our alternative  Nationalist press with the Voice of Freedom. Subscribe today: - Click Here to Subscribe to The  Voice of Freedom With sincere thanks, Nick Griffin, MEP Member of the European Parliament Leader, British National Party

War against being Normal Continues Unabated the Christians View

The war against being normal continues unabated as desperate and radical homosexuals and “sex educators” attempt, often aggressively, to stage-direct the opinion-forming media - and the thoughts of society thereby - often in a way to exclude Christian and absolute moral views, and values, from our society. “If we cannot corrupt you” they seem to say “we will corrupt your children”.

It is a delayed-fuse takeover of civil society by all means - usually more foul than fair; and always to an evil end. One of the ultimate objectives is, I believe,  the re-introduction of the ancient sin of child sex abuse, or pederasty, especially for the benefit of some of the male homosexual elite who have a taste for it; possibly of the Labour party but with a few Tories, Liberal Democrats and Greens thrown in. The ancient elites of the Greeks, Romans, and Persians were infamous for this form of child sex abuse and the whole aim of the “Homophobic Hate Screen,” that some radical homosexuals are frantically throwing-up, is to try to shield this movement from exposure to the public and the wrath that might bring, from mothers as well as fathers, if they suss out what is really going on. The BBC, it seems,  is not interested in child protection, or the human rights of children, where this is concerned, any more than it is over cases of Muslim paedophile gangs. The morally relativistic elite have a clear agenda of hate, themselves, against all things that are normal and moral; and it seems that they do not care what they do to get it, or how truculent they may, at times, appear.

The Coalition Government, following New Labour, is proposing to teach disgusting homosex to primary school children!  This really is a tell-tale sign of what is being planned for our children.  What is the point of teaching homosex to primary kids unless one has an ultimate, not necessarily immediate, pederastic intent with little boys? What possible other reason could there be, long term? Even the normal sex lessons that I have supervised for secondary schools are done in such a way as to sexualise and corrupt, not educate, the youth: the ill-effects, there, tending to be both immediate and long-term. A lot of “sex education”  is plain “promiscuity-propaganda” and “obscenity-promotion” under a fake “respectability guise” or a fake “need to cut teenage pregnancy guise”;  and its known intent and effect is to corrupt the children and the pupil-teacher, adult-child relationship. At 13, 14, and 15  the children and young people  are talking about things that they should not know about, and they can do so in the most disgusting and depraved way that would shock and offend any reasonable adult or parent. And they learn to experiment and practise what they have seen and been taught to think and talk about.  If the parents knew what was going in their name, in the schools, there might be violence as a result.

One of my pupils was pregnant at 13.  I asked her what happened to “..it..”, the baby.  She said, now aged 14, “They came and took it away”.  I could have broken down at that point.  The moral relativism that dominates officialdom is a pestilence, and not an enlightenment.  How dare they talk of  Hate Crime when they are perpetrating it against the helpless.  The aim seems to be to destroy our children and any sense of normalcy and morality they may still have.  And they try to pulverise any who oppose this with their Orwellian sounding programme to “promote equality and diversity” which is nothing more than the “promotion of iniquity and depravity”.   If we stand back from the canvass, so to speak, the Coalition government intend to promote homosexuality in primary schools to little boys as being normal (ugh…why?); they intend to promote civil partnerships of “two daddies” as normal, and such inverts having adoption rights for children as normal (ugh…why?); and if all sexual proclivities are equal (equality and diversity?) then why not, ultimately, with children - especially if some elite homosexuals have a penchant for it.  Disgusting, I know, but we have to examine the facts; and we need to be aware of them.

Patrick Strudwick, himself a radical homosexual activist and writer, is an example of the kind of aggressiveness that comes over, from the general homosexual quarter, that is, against people who stand in the way, however inoffensively, of the radical sodomising agenda.  He recently targeted Lesley Pilkington to seek advice on how to give up what he implied was his own sexual deviancy and disorientation; something that had apparently imprisoned him and that he did not really want to be captive to any longer. Fair dos, you may think, except that he was not being honest and straightforward about any of this. It seems that he was seeking to entrap a Christian professional simply because she was a Christian - a clear case of bigotry, belief discrimination and prejudice - from homosexuals, not against them. Mr Patrick Strudwick agreed to meet Lesley Pilkington but in the context, only, of a Christian moral framework, which, as we all know, condemns homosexual disorientation as being “…of the nature of sin…”, and the deeds of buggery and sodomy as being “unnatural” and an  “…abomination…”. He had two sessions of counselling with her - which he secretly recorded - in which he told her that he “wanted to change.” But later he lodged a complaint to the British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP) and alleged that Lesley Pilkington had tried to “…force…” her beliefs on him when he had actually approached her and agreed to the terms of the counselling sessions as being in a Christian context only. How helpless the instigator now postured himself to be; playing the “I’m a helpless homosexual card.” How persecuted he is - he deceptively wanted us to think - by a woman he had actually targeted and undoubtedly misled. When he published, through the Independent newspaper, an article having a go at Lesley Pilkington, he subsequently received a “Journalist of the Year Award” from the sexual deviancy group, Stonewall. This all suggests some kind of set-up. It seems that radical homosexuals are rather good at that, they think.

So are radical homosexuals doing themselves any honour? Are they doing anything other than being utterly dishonourable? Are they the ones with the pugnacious spirit, sizing everyone else up for a fight? Are they the ones with the irrational hatred and phobia, and obsessive dislike of anyone who cannot see things the bent or twisted way they do? Their personal mores seem, from this case, to be as distorted and unnatural as their sexual mores - but then I represent the normal and moral majority. “No Mr Strudwick, homosexuality is not normal. Get it? You have even admitted it to others, however dishonestly, yourself!” Shortly before Lesley Pilkington’s hearing, the BACP required all witness statements to be passed to them with contact details. Immediately after supplying the statements, an expert witness for Lesley Pilkington received several menacing phone calls, threats and intimidation, telling them not to attend. As a result the police were informed and the BACP had to adjourn the hearing. We await further news from the sodomite rights groups about how they feel they have the right to behave in this way, and how they feel that everyone else has got to fall in with their threats, intimidation, and sexual perversions.

I wonder what the mothers and fathers will do when they find out that all this is not unconnected to teaching little children, as young as 5, 6, or 7, about sodomy and buggery in their class lessons at primary school and how it is “normal” for someone to have “two dads”? Childhood is supposed to be a time of innocence. These monsters will not have it so, if they get their way. Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ said:  “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in Me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea”. (Matthew 18: 6, Authorised Version).  This is the judgement of God, not the intimidation of man.   Do you understand that, Mr Strudwick?  Where do you  and your prize-givers stand on the promotion of such perversion, especially  in primary schools?

May I ask David Cameron and Nick Clegg what they intend to do about the new pederasty-tending campaign in primary schools which is being shielded and defended under the pretence, cover and screen of “Sex Education“ and “Stopping Homophobic Hate”? It is the getting at our children in schools which will cause justified anger, concern and contempt! Is this homophobic hate, Mr Strudwick? Or is it child protection and the right to be normal, not bent? We all have life choices to make when we are adults. You have clearly made yours but we do not have to follow you or approve of you and what you do, and - as for the radical homosexual agenda for our children - it is time for the cohorts of radical homosexuals to leave primary children alone! Would you not agree with that Mr Strudwick? Adult obsessions and phobias should be left for adults and not be imposed through schools upon other peoples’ children or any children, at all, for that matter!

The belief that homosexual disorientation is normal does, logically, lead on to the view that other forms of sexual deviancy and inversion are normal - and that, ultimately, and sooner than many of us think - leads on to the issue of child protection and care.  It is vital to shield our children from all child abuse and perversion and to ensure that they do have a childhood.  Likewise it is important for homosexual activists, like Mr Strudwick, to recognise the need to respect Christian views and values, and those who hold them: they are the only life-line, any of us have, to repentance from sin and salvation through our only Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.  There may well come a day when Mr Strudwick, and others,  may wish to avail themselves of that life-line; and it is only right that they should ensure that they have the opportunity to do so by currently respecting those commands of the gospel, to saving faith and repentance, to be heard by all, even if, especially if, they expose our sin and condemnation.

Yours in Christ, 
The Revd Robert West 
Christian Council of Britain.http://christiancouncilofbritain.co.uk/

The Christian Council of Britain holds to the Holy Bible which teaches that buggery and sodomy are an unnatural lust and an abomination, a sign of God’s wrath upon the ungodly, as well as bringing God’s wrath upon them. However we also know, and acknowledge, that where Satan is at work to bind men to destruction, God-in-Christ is also at work to redeem them from sin, Satan, hell and the power of the grave. Though therapy may be useful, it is the gospel of Christ itself which is the alone power of God unto salvation (Romans 1: 16) and that all who put their trust in the Son of God will be saved from both the power and the penalty of their sins.