Search This Blog

Tuesday 14 June 2011

Police arrest more alleged Paedophiles in Manchester

GMP arrest more alleged Paedophiles

An interesting story appeared on Sky news this morning, 14th June 2011.




It was reported that, Greater Manchester Police have carried out a series of raids against men allegedly involved in the sexual exploitation of teenage girls.

The victims are young girls living in the Stockport area.






Eight men have so far been arrested at addresses in Cheetham Hill, Fallowfield, Levenshulme, Woodhouse Park, Moss Side and Chorlton-on-Medlock, all Manchester or Salford and all 'ethnically enriched' areas.

The suspects are being held in custody on suspicion of trafficking within the UK for the purposes of sexual exploitation.

Assistant Chief Constable Terry Sweeney, of GMP, said: “It is believed there could ultimately be more victims in this case and officers now want to hear from anyone else who thinks they may have been sexually exploited.

I cannot go into details as that could jeopardise the operations, but people need to know this issue is at the top of GMP's priorities.”

Mr Sweeney said he could not go into details and that included the ethnicity and religion of those arrested, however if Ladbrokes would take a bet on it, I would put a large stake on the words Islam and Asian being closely linked to the investigation.

The story was mentioned just once on Sky news and seems to have disappeared altogether now, it is even absent on their website.

These arrests come just a short time after eight Muslims from Rochdale were arrested for allegedly raping young girls in that town.

The British National Party has been campaigning for many years about the scandal of authorities turning a blind eye to these offences in the name of ‘diversity and cohesion’, maybe their efforts are beginning to pay off.



If the police won’t stop our children being exploited then it is about time we did, support the only political party that cares, join the British National Party now.






Monday 13 June 2011

Islamic Grooming :Declare Yourselves Are You With Us Or Not

By the Horwich Nationalists  

 Although on different sides of the political spectrum, I am sure that their must be some aspect of decency no matter how minuscule left within the Socialist movement somewhere in this country. 
So In order to try to find out I have emailed the Bolton Socialist Club   , which also the headquarters of the Bolton Hope not Hate Group   in order to find out if the would like to offer an assurance that they would campaign on the issue of Islamic Grooming of young female British Children, and also the hatred of Islam towards homosexuals. We feel that it is of great interest to not only all Bolton but the British in general were this Groups stand on the issue!  and I recommend that you contact said groups in your area to ask the same questions. 
Email to the Bolton Socialist Club
 Dear Sir or Madam,
I would like very much to know if you are planning any Hope not Hate campaigns, that support a campaign against radical Islamist sex groomers and Homophobes, in the Bolton area. Who now seem to be targeting the children mainly daughters of the British working class residents of Bolton! And also the seemingly message of hatred that seems to be spread concerning people who suffer from Homo sexual desires.
The reason I ask is that your address is given as the headquarters of Hope not Hate Bolton, 16 Wood St Bolton.
And I would be very much interested in your views on such a campaign, as I am sure that this problem that now seems to be highlighted in the media deserves some response from the Bolton Socialists Society and the Hope not Hate Campaign group, a society that I assume was set up to protect and promote the interests of the working classes of Bolton.
I look forward to your responce with anticipation.

Sunday 12 June 2011

Asians sought over Bolton rape

Asians sought over Bolton rape

Three Asian men are being urged to come forward after a teenager was raped in a Bolton Street, the three men aged between 20 and 27 were seen talking to the girl shortly before the attack.

The brutal assault took place in the early hours of Friday morning in an alleyway in Astley Bridge.

Police say the attacker was Asian, medium build and had black spiky hair, he was wearing a distinctive black top emblazoned with a diamante or 'bling' motif across the chest, and he was also wearing blue jeans.


The girl, in her late teens, was treated at St Mary's Centre in Manchester.

Detective Sergeant Rob Parker, of Bolton CID, said: “We are carrying out a thorough investigation to try and find out who is responsible for this attack and I believe someone living locally will know the culprit.”

He went on to say "There is no cause for alarm but it is only right we make people in the community aware of what has happened.”

Anyone with information is asked to call police on 0161 856 5740, or the independent charity Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.

Saturday 11 June 2011

Exciting New Media Developments at Radio Red, White and Blue

Exciting New Developments at Radio Red, White and Blue

By James North –
 MOn Radio Red, White and Blue's Euro File, Simon Darby speaks to Nick Griffin MEP and John Walker about the future of Radio Red, White and Blue and the exciting media opportunities it presents, including some exclusive media interviews that we have lined up.

John talks about how the listener figures of the station have increased and that the new player coming soon to the website is fully compatible with mobile phones and the ability to embed the player onto any website or blog.
Looking to the future, we hear about the opportunities for growth within Radio Red, White and Blue, including live reports, worldwide reporters, and the possibility of a DAB radio station. John explains how people can get involved in building Radio Red, White and Blue.
Finally, Nick outlines the possibilities for young musicians to have their music played and offers them a platform to help them get started in the music industry.
Then at 8.00 p.m. we present 'The World at 8’. On tonight's show:
The Rev Dominic Smart and his 380-strong congregation at Gilcomston South Church in Aberdeen are quitting the Church of Scotland in protest of plans for allowing homosexuals in the pulpit.
A Conservative MP who is facing allegations of sexual assault has ''vigorously'' denied any wrongdoing. Andrew Bridgen, the MP for North West Leicestershire, was arrested in the early hours of yesterday morning after police received a complaint of sexual assault from a 29-year-old woman.
British taxpayers are paying for a French Muslim couple to challenge their country's controversial burkha ban. They are using the freely accessible British Immigration Advisory Service, which receives £15 million a year in taxpayers’ money, to try and overturn the law at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.
In European news, Marine Le Pen, leader of the Front National, held a joint press conference with Heinz-Christian Strache, chairman of the Austrian Freedom Party and a member of the Austrian National Assembly, in which they talked about maintaining links between Nationalist parties across Europe.
In world news, America's covert war in Yemen is up and running again, with armed drones and fighter jets hitting a number of suspected militant targets.
Radio Red, White and Blue is the only news outlet that covers all aspects of the news, including those stories that organisations like the BBC consider too politically incorrect to report on.
Tune in every weeknight from 8 p.m. to hear a complete news round-up of all the day’s events only on The World at 8, exclusively on Radio Red, White and Blue.
To listen, simply click our 'Listen Now' Button on the top right-hand side of the page at www.radiorwb.co.uk.
See the video interview with Nick Griffin MEP and Radio RWB host John Walker on British National Party TV here.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of thE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again

Friday 10 June 2011

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH : THE SCOURGE OF MUSLIM GROOMING SIGN THE PETITION

Please read and use the Link below to take you to the Britain First Website and please sign the petition, enough is enough ! how much longer do we have to openly have our children and daughters preyed upon by these Monsters! whilst our PC riddled MP's do nothing to protect those, they should be protecting!

THE SCOURGE OF MUSLIM GROOMING

In towns and cities all over Britain, there is a hidden, censored problem of paedophile gangs targeting the underage girls of non-Muslim communities for sexual exploitation.
The Sikh, black and local English communities have all spoken out about this pernicious but largely ignored problem.
Muslim grooming is a growing problem across the country.
As of yet, the police and media have been extremely reluctant to publicise the problem or take action to stamp it out for fear of being labelled ‘racist’. The innocence of children is being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. The grooming of children for sexual exploitation is always wrong no matter what community the abusers belong to and justice must be blind to colour or creed.
Whilst our leaders are reluctant to take action, hundreds of young underage girls face the predatory attention of well-organised grooming gangs.
Our plan is to collect the signatures of 10,000 people on a “Take Action Against Muslim Grooming – NOW!” petition and deliver it to the Muslim Council of Britain and to Justice Minister Ken Clarke.
A call for action on this scale will be hard to conceal. Sign the petition above to make sure that the establishment knows how much we care about our young girls who are being targeted by these Islamic paedophile gangs.
Britain First activists will be organising a series of direct action and online campaigning operations against politicians, media outlets and grooming hotspots to help raise awareness of this important issue.
please use this Link  muslim-grooming-scandal-petition/

Thursday 9 June 2011

Freedom is Slavery :The reversal of Left and Right in Politics

Freedom is Slavery

Gates of Vienna
By Nicolai Sennels

Below is a brief essay by Nicolai Sennels on the strange metamorphosis of the Left over the past fifty years from the champions of the oppressed into the oppressors themselves.
The reversal of Left and Right
by Nicolai Sennels
In the good old hippie days, the socialists on the Left were the good guys. They risked their jobs and reputations demonstrating for the equality of women, sexual freedom, and freedom of speech to criticise the system and the authorities.
It was the time when the Left said that "Religion is the opium of the people” and freedom-loving youth made fun of the religious authorities and their dogmas.
But something happened. The Left — which defines itself as the protector of the weak — decided that a repressive religion and its often fanatic and incompetent followers were a threatened minority, whose destructive actions were a result of poverty and a reaction to others’ criticism, all caused by capitalism and racism.
Most people were cowards and feared being called racists, and this made it easy for the Left’s agenda to find its way into politics and the media.
The Left’s struggle for "Liberty, Equality and Fraternity” has faded. Today, such archetypal human values of liberty (free speech), equality (of women) and fraternity (social cohesion) are defended by the Right.
Many people grew up as Leftists or hippies, but are now categorized as Rightists — or even extreme or radical Rightists — because they criticise the oppression of females and religious fanaticism, and support Western culture. But those people did not change. Politics changed. On protecting and promoting basic humanitarian values and human rights, the Right is now the cutting edge.
Nicolai Sennels is a psychologist and the author of "Among Criminal Muslims: A Psychologist’s experiences with the Copenhagen Municipality”.

Wednesday 8 June 2011

Great Wigan Blog :Ed Miliband MP - Red Ed’s Next Election Campaign

I had got to bring this great blog from Wigan just down the road to your attention superb , here is a sample , find them at Town of Shame

Ed Miliband MP - Red Ed’s  Next Election Campaign

We have recieved secret plans  from a inner circle mole outlining the proposed next election campaign for the Labour Party written on the back of a large brown envelope along with  ”WLP (We work for you)” in black felt tip confirming it’s authenticity.
Wallace Ed Miliband - Red Ed Labour Party Leader - Multiculture The Way Forward
Wallace Ed Miliband - Red Ed Labour Party Leader - Multiculture The Way Forward
It is being proposed by the influential activists in the party with the full support of Red Ed Miliband that the thrust of the next Election campaign should be centered around Multiculturalism and how it is the way forward for these islands of Britain. celebrating our diversity as now instead of being  four protestant countries with the same culture we are now into double figures each with its individual culture and religion.
It will start with a poster campaign outlining exactly what multiculturalism has done and will continue to do for this country. It will attempt to explain to the majority of people in this country who are against multiculturalism that the reason they are against it is because they don’t understand it and not because it has destroyed over a 1000 yrs of christian civilisation. If that fails they will just have to put up and shut up.
I tried to explain to a 5yr year old how multiculturalism unites us but by definition divides a nation/country/society. He looked at me really puzzled and said “that’s rubbish”
…………………………………..  even a 5yr old knows that for a fact

Britain's First – Practical Campaigning : for Change against anti-White Discrimination

Britain's First – Practical Campaigning PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mister Fox   at http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/
Misty British countryside
How do we defend ourselves against discrimination by the local authorities?
The Sky News website told of the effective amnesty which has been granted to a quarter of a million bogus asylum seekers and there were hundreds of comments that criticise this action by a clique of elites against the interests of our communities. Most commenters agree with our political and moral outlook but have been turned against us not only by media propaganda but inept nationalist leadership and apparently dishonest financial practices.
These comments tell us that there is a generally favourable political climate building up in a natural reaction to the destruction of our people, our culture and our communities by the dominant elites – political, financial, academic and cultural. But our people lack representation, a voice. There is a vacuum and a need for practical activism for the one unrepresented group who suffer constant discrimination from the authorities - White people!
An issue that shows how little our rulers care about us is foreign aid and this demands a campaign group to fight for Whites. Several issues have the potential to split the Establishment coalition. However, Dave and his anti-White colleagues in the coalition want to continue transferring taxpayers money to the third-world while making people in this country unemployed and cutting back on welfare and services. All across the country community centers are being closed, but those in inner cities are privileged.
Melanie Phillips of the Daily Mail wrote that after she appeared on QT making this point about overseas aid that she was flooded with letters of support from the public. We must state boldly that multi-racialism is inverted Nazism and promotes the interests of every identity group apart from heterosexual Whites who are scapegoats for everything that goes wrong.
Cameron recently made a speech trying to justify excessive overseas aid, apparently in response to large numbers contacting MP's. There is clear public anger. Another campaign could be on car insurance. Premiums have gone up by about 40-50% in many cases this year. Foreign gangs committing motor vehicle related fraud is costing millions and about £50 of what motorists now pay in insurance is to cover this. People need to know that mass immigration is costing them dear, something which voters care most about.
At this rate of immigration, we, the native Britons, will be outnumbered in half a century. The Conservatives promised to reduce the numbers but they have no intention of doing so, they actually want this situation. Immigration is higher now than under Labour. All the ruling parties are variations on the same theme.
Progressives see no danger in this because they have convinced themselves that immigrants are nice, harmless people who want to be like us. This patronising view, denies newcommers their humanity and pretends their human nature is different from ours. We are potentially evil; within every White, progressives think, is a Hitler waiting to get out. Why do they treat at us differently? - prejudice!” They are prejudiced against us and prejudiced in favour of ethnics. Underlying this prejudice is fear.
They are frightened of seeking to curb ethnic behaviour so firstly, they pretend it isn't happening and, secondly, then they use Whites as scapegoats. They can do so because they take our compliance for granted. They may be right, it is happening throughout Europe.
The white community is the only racial group in Britain without any political representation as a community. We have to organise to defend our communities because nothing is being distributed to us apart from just enough to bribe us to support a political party and to keep us quiet while we are dispossessed.
In order for Whites to have representation in our multi-cultural and multi-racial society then recognition of a common ethnic bond is required. It is by race that our dispossession is being carried out.
The multi-racial society has been imposed from the top; unless whites start to organise to protect white racial interests then we will suffer as ethnic communities take more and more. They can do so because they are organised and have official support. Meanwhile, they are growing in numbers and gaining more and more strength and power over us.
What can we do now to help our people and redress the imbalance of local power?
First of all, remember that the successful campaign groups like Green Peace, Gay Rights pushed certain orthodox issues forward albeit against other interest groups but they are not rebelling against the whole system of the elites and this demands certain key preliminaries.
We must have high standards of morality and conduct and act decisively against members who’s actions damage our cause, such as those who promote Nazi race hate, which enables state assets, such as the hostile media and Searchlight agents to discredit opposition to Globalism. These are issues which the establishment media have constantly used to beat previous movements: Nazism and thuggery. This behaviour is rightly unacceptable to the public which is why by using these antics infiltrators who pose as Nazis, commit or urge acts of violence which give the media “evidence” that we are like that. Another type to be watched for are those who foment internal discord and dissatisfaction which can destroy groups and damage the organisation through whole regions.
These  people must be brought before an appropriate committee and democratically examined and if found guilty, then they should be expelled. A proper disciplined organisation is imperative. But it must be democratic, open and above board.
Groups of campaigners or leafletters must always be of say five in number and always carry camera phones to record physical attacks because the politicians will use the UAF to carry out physical intimidation. Assailants must be photographed and prosecuted.
We must avoid the BNP's cry baby approach:” Boo Hoo, they won't give us democracy.” If they deny us a platform, tell them straight: “You are frightened of us. You know how much latent support we have and you are terrified!”
Multi-Racialism is itself based on race, but racism that centres round attacking and even persecuting Whites. Race is real not just as a genetic reality also as a Social Reality. The neo-Marxist elites have created a multi-racial society that denies the existence of race as a genetic reality, whilst simultaneously asserting the existence of race as a social construct and then impose laws that discriminate against all Whites on the basis of their race. A classic example was the prejudiced attacks against Dr. James Watson by semi-educated bigots like David Lammy and Ken Livingstone.
The politicians and media will still try to smear us as “haters” and “Nazis” but wait! Multi-Racialism is justified by reference to the holocaust but is now itself bringing about a new European persecution of Jews by Muslims. In Europe, especially France and Sweden, Jewish people are being persecuted by Muslims yet the media and politicians who decry us as “haters” and “racists” cover it up. Explain that to the population on a few leaflets and the faux saintliness of the elites will crumble before their eyes.
We need to be active in communities like Southall, Tower Hamlets, Bradford and Handsworth, anywhere where Whites are a minority, or soon to be racial minority. We must help them organise community and political structures that allow them to fight for their share of social resources where they are being treated less favourably than the privileged ethnic groups. If we can attract people with legal knowledge we could open community advice centres.
There is not one community centre in any London inner city borough for the white families who live in those areas – yet there are many for Black, Chinese, Muslim, Sikh, Hindu or Jewish community centres and charities. We are entitled to equal representation. The disparity is obvious.
There is a proven need to start using resources on community outreach programmes in inner city areas to assist the white community to come together so as to enable them to obtain the same rights as ethnic communities do.
That means parity of social facilities - youth clubs, sports centres, community centres etc and if
requests for equal white rights and facilities are refused and our bids for those facilties turned down then not only does this expose the anti-White racist double standards of the authorities, it creates grounds for legal challenge as it demonstrates the discrimination against White people of the local authorities. It also galvanises the oppressed local White populations in developing actions for equal racial treatment.
This is an opportunity after years of inept political leaders to become, in contemporary political language:
1) The voice of white rights
2) a civil justice campaign for white rights
3) a social justice campaign for white social justice
Election campaigns waste millions in fighting loaded elections when we it could be spent them on developing community networks that allow us to have power at the level of the community. That is apart from developing a network of parish councillors until we have a significant number which will generate success from success because we will have something to show to the voters – its like an impressive port folio.
We have to face the reality that even in the most appalling situations the police will take the side of ethnics against us so we need to build local representation networks with proper legal advice. The issue of White rights has become of paramount political importance to defend our oppressed people from :
a) the systematic racist gang-raping of young White girls by Muslim rape gangs,
b) The state anti-white racism in the guise of affirmative action and political discrimination programmes,
c) the one-sided allocation of funds from councils and community groups to immigrant, asylum seeker, race based groups that discriminate directly and indirectly
d) The growth of failure by Whites in education
e) White working class unemployment in order to import cheap labour
f) integrating white Eastern European communities into a white nationalist political movement
g) social justice and equal rights for whites in the context of social housing, education, the NHS, council housing and community centres for kids etc etc
These have never been taken up but our people who are discriminated against and given second-class treatment deserve better. They need a campaign organisation to fight for them and reinvigorate a dispossessed and abandoned White electorate.
Refuse to change our beliefs to those of the self-seeking and corrupt neo-Marxist elites. Why give up our beliefs in the vain hope that the media will go easy on us - they will not. They can not because they need us as a bogey group to convince themselves that they are morally right when they are obviously immoral and prejudiced against White people.
We need to fill the vacuum at the local community level.
Our unifying belief should be in a racial civil defence group for the forgotten people: our people. We must not sink to race hate like the Establishment who have tried to eradicate us; nor should we try to compromise with the evil ideology of the neo-Marxists which is race replacement of white British people by immigrants from the Third-World. We take up the cause of fighting for white people to exist as a people, as an ethnic group, and to stop them from being discriminated against in their own country by politicians who pretended to be their representatives to gain power and personal wealth.
We as the British part of the White race are being racially discriminated against and this provides us with the moral justification to act in defence of our people. We occupy the moral high ground. In Blackpool the police suppressed a report that showed 11 Muslim fast food outlets were being used as “honey traps” to lure young White girls as young as 11 and 12 into sex and then prostitution. That is an act of war on our people by a rival community.
The Director of Media Prosecutions Jeremy Paxman, who aggressively cross examines dissidents, uses foreign au pair girls as cheap labour. No wonder he likes immigration! These morally corrupt, hypocrites are actively harming the white community.
Every rape in Oslo over the past year was committed by a non-White man. Of 86 rapes in Oslo over the last five years, all 83 in which the perpetrator was identified were committed we can assume that almost all of these non-Western men were Muslims. We're also told that "almost all" the victims of these rapes have been ethnically Norwegian women..."
Sweden has been described as the rape capital of Europe or, more properly, for White women being raped by Muslims. We have similar problems here. A campaign to protect young White girls from foreign child-rapists appeals to the male protective instinct and the female instinct to care and nurture. It shows local authorities to be cruel, callous and biased against our people even in suffering.
The only community without representation is the white community - Blacks, Asians etc have organisations to represent their interests. They are encouraged to practice and develop their religions. They have lobby groups, legal groups, community centres special charities etc to represent and support them as ethnic, racial and religious communities in Britain – Whites have none. We must redress that and actively defend our people.
I have written on tactics before but the above is for present action not later when Race War has broken out.
I wish to acknowledge that this essay was inspired by a recent essay from Lee Barnes.
___________________
Click here for the reference notes relating to this article


  nn

Tuesday 7 June 2011

NEVER HAVE SO MANY BEEN BETRAYED BY SO FEW !

by The Horwich Nationalist

Another shocking statement by one our parliamentary Minsters, International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell MP, State,
‘My ambition is that over the next four years people will come to think across our country – in all parts of it – of Britain’s fantastic development work around the poorest parts of the world with the same pride and satisfaction that they see in some of our great institutions like the Armed Forces and the monarchy.
‘This is brilliant work that Britain is doing.’
Now to the Horwich and Bolton Nationalists this shows how much the political elites have become detached from the reality of the life of the ordinary white working class of this country and with the following statement by Harriet Harman of the Labour Party 
That " Immigrants should get more tax breaks so they can send more money home". I just staggers belief that either of those two retched creatures could even utter such statements. 
When they indigenous population has had it,s basic rights of a decent wage and working conditions systematically stripped from it by an overwhelming influx of cheap wage third world immigrants and an eye watering punishing Tax system. And to make matters worse the now Marxist riddled so called Trade unions originally set up by the White working class in the late 19th cent, to defend such rights   have openly supported all of the above.
You only have to look at our poor brave soldiers due to MOD cutbacks to realise that all they will have in equipment to go into to battle shortly will be the ability to use harsh language, (as long as it not racist other wise their opponents will get the ability of compensation from the EHCR). as many front line troops now have to purchase their own adequate body Armour from army surplus, as either none is available or what is is as effective as tissue paper on a rainy day. 
And on the Home front of Horwich and Bolton just look at our streets and services , overstretched by the mass of bogus asylum seekers and immigrants , BILLIONS of pounds wasted on the equalities and immigration industry. It beggars belief in my 50 years I have seen this once peaceful proud Nation  become more and more degraded by the evil traitors whom have wormed their way into our public offices, leaving me more and more with a sense of fear for my nation my people , my family, and myself ,
NEVER HAVE SO MANY BEEN BETRAYED BY SO FEW!

Monday 6 June 2011

An Open letter to the Times Higher Education by Dr Frank Ellis : ref Dr Satoshi Kanazawa research

A interesting and informative letter written to Times Higher Education in order question the so called intelligentsia over their faux  outrage at the factual and scientific findings of his research that proved that of all the women of the earth those of the negroid race are the least attractive to men including negroid men themselves! Look folks I don't make this up I just report it ! Horwich Nationalist

Print
Written by Frank Ellis   
From: Dr Frank Ellis
To: Times Higher Education
Date: 4th June 2011, A.D.
Re: My Response to the Open Letter Published in the Times Higher Education 2ndJune 2011 signed by Alvergne et al in which Dr Satoshi Kanazawa is attacked for allegedly Sub-standard Research.
The signatories to this circular-letter to the Times Higher Education make much of the fact that Dr Kanazawa refuses to address criticism of his work and that he will not engage with his critics. There are two problems here. First, why is Dr Kanazawa expected to become involved in lengthy and time-consuming correspondence with people who object to his published work? If he wishes to do so that is a matter for him. If, however, he decides that his time can be more profitably spent by doing his research, rather than talking about it that is also a matter for him. I should also point out that when I challenged Bhikhu Parekh to provide sources for his claim, made in The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain: Report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain (2000) that ‘Race, as is now widely acknowledged, is a social and political construct, not a biological or genetic fact. It cannot be used scientifically to account for the wide range of differences among peoples’ (Parekh, para 5.10, p.63), he just ignored me.
Second, the signatories begin their letter by referring to hostile comments made about Dr Kanazawa’s article (‘Why are Black Women Less Physically Attractive than other Women?’) in various fora. At no stage do they address the assertions and arguments of the article. Even if Dr Kanazawa’s question reflects some racial bias against blacks that itself does not automatically disqualify the search for an answer to a question that arises from bias against blacks. All research begins with a bias: the bias of interest. In any case, I thought that the pursuit of knowledge and ideas for its own sake was one of the founding principles of a university and other institutions of higher learning. Or am I to understand that this principle must be jettisoned when dealing with race?
Moreover, how can it be the case that Dr Kanazawa ‘rarely engages with his scientific critics’ if he submits articles for publication in journals? In the politically correct world of what purports to be higher education any researcher who submits an article in which he uses low mean black IQ to explain black failure is most emphatically engaging with his scientific critics: he serves notice that he rejects the current explanations for black failure (white racism, the legacy of colonialism and so on). Nor does Dr Kanazawa sin against academic convention, as asserted, when he has not published ‘corrections to the papers for which doubt has been cast on his conclusions’. In the academic world today, one which is dominated by various multiracial/multicultural orthodoxies, any researcher who concludes that low mean IQ can explain a great of black failure will have his conclusions subjected to ‘doubt’. Doubt does not constitute evidence of hard error. In fact ‘doubt’ is too polite a word. Any academic who rejects the cosy, sentimental assumptions of the left regarding race and racism can expect to be subjected to vicious ad hominem attacks. I experienced such attacks at Leeds University in 2006. Members of the faculty who agreed with me in private nevertheless maintained a cowardly public silence.
An answer to the question posed by Dr Kanazawa on the lack of black female attractiveness may have implications for understanding the weak family structures of blacks, their greater sexual promiscuity (the implications for the spread of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are obvious) and the high levels of black on white rape. Far more threateningly, the premise of Dr Kanazawa’s question implicitly posits the view that skin colour or any other visible racial characteristic is or may be a primary criterion in any hierarchy of racial beauty. In other words, Dr Kanazawa’s article is a direct challenge to the fallacious view that race is a social and political construct and that desirable qualities, such as sexual attractiveness and high IQ are uniformly and equally distributed among and between populations or that these evolutionary valuable assets should be so distributed. Is it this that provokes the hatred of what the signatories call ‘the evolutionary behavioural science community’ instead of a reasoned response? By ignoring the challenge thrown down by Dr Kanazawa the signatories to this letter are guilty of the very thing of which they accuse Dr Kanazawa: silence in the face of his trenchant criticism. They remain silent because they are frightened of race (as a genetic and biological reality) and they know that if they argue for or against Dr Kanazawa’s assertions they enter into the forbidden realm that race is in fact a genetic and biological reality.
The signatories then warn: ‘we feel compelled to state publicly that Kanazawa’s research should not be taken as representative of the evolutionary behavioural science community’. Well, I am compelled to state publicly that many scientific discoveries, inventions, technological advances and intellectual shifts in the status quo were not representative of any established community or group when they were first made. Innovation, discovery and invention are by their very nature outside the known and the expected and typically the work of individuals who are, happily for them, not part of any collective or ‘community’. Discoveries great and small, shock, offend or inspire awe, precisely because they are unknown, unexpected and often challenge reputations and powerful vested interests: they dislocate our expectations of the world about us. Socrates, Plato, Pythagoras, Heraclitus Kepler, Galileo, Darwin, Mendel, Leibnitz, Heisenberg, Einstein, Nietzsche, Rand, Solzhenitsyn, and the greatest mind of them all - Sir Isaac Newton – exemplify the historical trend, the path away from obscurantism towards knowledge and this elusive thing called Truth.
The signatories make much of the fact that the London School of Economics (LSE) will host a debate under the heading of ‘Is Evolutionary Psychology Racist?’ In the West, anything that challenges or undermines multiculturalism is deemed to be racist. For example, the following assertions are deemed to be racist in British universities: (i). race is a genetic and biological reality; (ii). all races and cultures are not equal; and (iii). mean black IQ is lower that mean white IQ (in the case of Sub-Saharan blacks, significantly lower), and this discrepancy has major consequences for real-existing multiculturalism in First-World states with large non-white populations.
The signatories to this letter betray their politically-correct credentials and their agenda when they write that a great deal of the research in the field of evolutionary psychology is ‘nuanced’ and ‘culturally-sensitive’. In plain English, if one regards low mean black IQ as a powerful and consistent explanation of black failure worldwide one is not demonstrating a ‘nuanced’ or ‘culturally-sensitive’ interpretation of the data if one makes those points. Ad hoc, ‘culturally- sensitive’ explanations have to be provided – colonialism, white racism, capitalism, multinationals, or in the case of Macpherson, institutional racism – anything will suffice, provided that it is not directly attributable to blacks and the way they behave.
When it comes to peer-reviewed articles in journals the critics of Dr Kanazawa want it both ways. Articles by Dr Kanazawa in peer-reviewed journals are deemed to be suspect yet articles in peer-reviewed journals which attack Dr Kanazawa are somehow above reproach. In fact the signatories admit as much when they write: ‘The peer review process is not perfect and appears to have failed when dealing with Kanazawa’s poor quality work’. Did anyone review the letter to the Times Higher Education attacking Dr Kanazawa?
The attacks on Dr Kanazawa reveal something of a war between journals. So: ‘Those of us who have reviewed his papers have had experiences where we have rejected papers of his for certain journals on scientific grounds, only to see the papers appear virtually unaltered in print in other journals, despite the detailed critiques of the papers given to Kanazawa by the reviewers and editors of the journals that rejected his papers’. Could it be that the scientific grounds alone, on which the signatories claim the reviewers rejected Dr Kanazawa’s articles, were not accepted by the editors of the journals in which the original unaltered articles were eventually published? One editor of a journal rejects an article for publication; another accepts the article. That an article is rejected by one journal (with reasons for rejection) does not mean that the author of the rejected article has to make changes before he submits the article to another journal. I thought diversity of scientific opinion was supposed to be a good thing. I hope that the editors of the journals in which Dr Kanazawa’s work has been published, editors who are now being criticised, will respond robustly to these accusations of academic incompetence.
It is a rule that the author of an article should not know the names of those who review his article; yet here we have signatories to an open letter to the Times Higher Education who claim to have reviewed Dr Kanazawa’s articles and found them to be inadequate on scientific grounds alone (of course) and are now openly violating the ethical code which requires that their assessment of an academic’s work be kept private. They publicly violate the ethical code required in the peer-review process by informing the world that they had earlier found Dr Kanazawa’s articles to be inadequate on scientific grounds (of course), and now, having violated that ethical code to attack Dr Kanazawa, they exploit the anonymity of the code so as to hide among a list of names. Who are these people that claimed to have reviewed Dr Kanazawa’s work? Why do they hide among others, protected by ‘we’? This blatant violation of the ethical code that governs peer review and which now serves as the basis for mounting these scurrilous attacks on Dr Kanazawa may well be actionable.
Highlighted here is that the whole process of peer review is wide open to abuse, and will be abused in areas such as global warming, race and IQ and sex differences. Another massive potential for abuse arises from the fact that nepotism and cliques are rife. If there is money, status and media adulation to be derived from telling the world that black failure is not due to low mean IQ but is caused by white racism then those who dissent from these evasions can expect to be ostracised and denied publication in the relevant journals. They also run the risk of losing their posts. The signatories to this letter know these outcomes full well. In the USA and in the UK there are countless examples of academics’ being harassed and threatened with loss of employment for attacking the cult of multiculturalism.
That the signatories to the letter attacking Kanazawa signal their support for academic freedom is, in this instance, cynical and tactically opportunistic on two counts. First, they write: ‘Academics who publish work that may be unpopular with some sections of the media or general public should not be condemned on those grounds’. The trouble with this is that it rather conveniently arrogates a special status to academic opinion, the much-vaunted peer-review process, as being decisive in rejecting Dr Kanazawa’s work. This process is massively flawed and wide open to abuse. Second, in writing this letter to the Times Higher Education the authors are manifestly reacting to the attention of the electronic and broadcast media, ignorant student activists, black special-interest groups and some members of the general public. The masses, as it were, having created an atmosphere of outrage against Dr Kanazawa, have prepared the way for the authors who now judge that the time is right for them to inflict the coup de grâce on the hapless and isolated Dr Kanazawa.
The timing of the letter to the Times Higher Education in which Dr Kanazawa is attacked in this way is also rather convenient. Dr Kanazawa is, we are informed, currently the subject of an internal LSE investigation. The letter to the Times Higher Education, alongside the provisional findings of the investigation, could be used by some in the LSE as justification for suspending Dr Kanazawa pending an internal inquiry. Suspension at this stage would create the impression among the gullible that Dr Kanazawa is not being suspended for challenging the anti-intellectual orthodoxies mandated by political correctness in British universities - and so there can be no question that academic freedom and the institution of free speech are being violated – but because he has transgressed the conventions and codes of rigorous scientific method, as defined by the signatories to the letter to the Times Higher Education. According to this view he would be an impostor who should be expelled from ‘the evolutionary behavioural science community’ and lose his post at LSE. The LSE must not permit itself to be influenced by external rivalries and feuds.
I have no doubt that should Dr Kanazawa be suspended the delay between his suspension and any internal hearing will be used to examine all his published work with a view to citing any errors against him in the hearing. His work will be subjected to a level of scrutiny and criticism beyond that used in peer-review and will also be expected to meet higher standards of evidence than that used in the original peer-review process. Were this to happen it would amount to an academic version of double jeopardy and would represent a clear violation of due process. The signatories to this letter and other critics should ask themselves whether their own published work would survive full, open, heightened and post-publication scrutiny.
None of these attacks would have been made on Dr Kanazawa were he black or brown. Black or brown academics are able to make nonsensical, bizarre and often virulently anti-white racist statements without any sanction at all yet whites (and now Japanese) can expect to be chastised for anything that violates multicultural orthodoxy and especially for dissenting from the view that all races and cultures are the same. The evidence for a double standard here, a clear and obvious violation of scientific method, never mind the hypocrisy, is overwhelming and well documented.
As I have indicated in an earlier email to Professor Rees, the director of LSE, if Dr Kanazawa is suspended pending an internal hearing, others and I will offer our services and expertise as witnesses for the defence.