Search This Blog

Wednesday 4 May 2016

About the E.U. Just a few of the negatives


By Peter Mullins
I was recently asked why I am so exercised about the E.U. Just a few of the negatives that spring to mind........
We joined the EU (EEC) in 1972. After 44 years inside we now know:
The European Union’s six constitutional treaties build a three-tier politburo dictatorship.
The EU has the laws of a police state – which are being increasingly enforced.
The EU’s 120,000 regulations will eventually bring us a soviet style command economy and abject poverty.
Unelected EU dictators will some time soon control the nuclear weapons of the former independent nations of Britain and France.
The EU’s illegal six treaties will compel us to hand over all our armed forces to the EU.
Our armed forces and police have been told they will swear a new oath to the EU, or be fired.
The EU’s 120,000 regulations will rigidly control our personal lives – more than any nation in history.
EU regulations now cost us £100 billion a year. (Better Regulation Commission annual report 2015)
When enforced, those illegal regulations will destroy most of our 4.5 million small businesses.
Up to 13.5 million will be unemployed after EU regulations finally close small businesses.
The 120,000 regulations will make us subject to continual arrest (SOCPA 2005).
There are now 3,095 “Crimes against the EU state” on the British statute book.
The EU’s Constitutional treaties replaced the British Constitution on 1st January 2009. (Not many people know that.)
The independent nation of Britain was finally abolished by the Lisbon Treaty on 1st Jan 2009.
EU Bilderbergers control our parties: Ken Clarke, Maude, Cameron, Millibands, Mandelson, et al
The EU’s Road Pricing and then ID chips will keep the state informed of our exact position.
Huge taxes/fines by the EU’s Road Pricing, Congestion Charging and global warming policies.
The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish England and our 48 counties in favour of 9 EU regions.
The 9 EU regions will report direct to Brussels, not to Westminster, which will be defunct.
The EU Regionalisation Plan will abolish our 19,579 councillors.
British common law was mainly replaced by EU corpus Juris by 1992. Government is now above the law.
Police have shot 30 innocent people dead since 1992 and have not been successfully prosecuted.
1,100 deaths in police custody since 1992 and no successful prosecutions.
Police Shoot to Kill policy now in force; illegal under British common law, OK under EU corpus juris.
EU conceived in Germany from 22nd June 1940 as the EEC – speech by Hermann Goering.
First EEC conference Berlin University 1942, 13 nation summit Berlin 1943 run by von Ribbentrop
After fall of Germany, the Germans switched the EU from a Nazi to a communist basis in 1946.
Hitler’s Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence Department (DVD) still controls EU development.
Edward Heath, Geoffrey Rippon, Roy Jenkins recruited by the DVD in 1958 as saboteurs.
DVD has arranged finance to put pro-EU ownerships into British newspaper groups.
EU has been sabotaging Britain with German Frankfurt School techniques since the 1950’s.
The EU’s main subversive organisations in Britain are senior Freemasonry and Common Purpose. Google Brian Gerish for a full exposition of Common Purpose.
The EU’s Common Purpose (CP) has trained 40,000 local leaders for “the post democratic era”
CP controls the NHS, and is wrecking it with Frankfurt subversion techniques (eg continual change).
Common Purpose has 400 staff inside the BBC censoring out anti-EU news and and current affairs.
Common Purpose has staff in hundreds of local newspapers censoring out anti-EU news
Common Purpose is transferring power from councillors to the unelected council executives.
Common Purpose has built the EU gravy trains inside local and national government.
CP snatch 4,500 children a year from good parents for forced adoption.
CP has built most of Britain’s 8,500 quangos costing us £167 billion pa (Cabinet Office 2007 figs)
These quangos bribe compliant, pro EU local officials and businessmen with £150,000+ salaries.
The EU is corrupt and cannot account for 95% of its expenditure (yes, ninety five % lost)
The EU has over 200,000 offshore bank accounts from which it pays bribes.
We now lose £65 billion a year trading with the EU. Outside, we had an even balance of payments.
EU Constitution is similar to the Soviet. And EU Commissioners similar to Soviet Politburo members.
The EU parliament is a sham with no power – just like the old Soviet parliament.
The leadership of the Conservative Party has been controlled by EU Bilderbergers since the 1960’s.
The Labour and Lib Dem leaderships have been EU controlled for 20 years – that’s why your vote doesn’t count.
The Amsterdam Treaty 1997 gave the EU control of our immigration, now running at 330,000 NET pa.
Our infrastructure can’t cope with the 10 million immigrants the EU has let in since 1997.
380,000 highly qualified British Subjects emigrate annually to escape from the EU and its over regulation..
The EU and their Bilderbergers have moved 50,000 pro-EU people, and CP up into all positions of power over 40 years. You don’t progress in British government unless you are pro-EU.
Is that enough to be going on with?

GOVERNMENTS WILL FALL AS THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM FAILS. By Gregory Mannarino

Monday 2 May 2016

The Road to World War 3

Concerning Nicola Sturgeon of The SNP....By Peter Mullins

Concerning Nicola Sturgeon....By Peter Mullins


I watched and listened to Scotland's First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon on the Andrew Marr Show and was confirmed more solidly in my opinion that she is a thoroughly nasty, self-seeking, perfidious, political weasel. Basically, her position and therefore her party's position is this. If the majority of the United (sic) Kingdom vote for Brexit she will arrange for another Independence Referendum if a majority of the Scots have voted with the Remainians. What would this mean in geo-political terms, though?
First point. If the majority of us, the British, vote for Brexit we will leave the E.U.. Fact. That means ALL of us, including the Scots. Our membership card of this club reads "The United Kingdom and Northern Island."
If Sturgeon and her bunch wish to pursue their independence cause they must first get this approved by both their own parliament in Edinburgh and then the U.K. parliament at Westminster. Two years or longer?
If the Scots vote for independence it will be another couple of years minimum to sort out the divorce settlement. During these years Scotland would have been a non-member of the E.U.as would England, Wales and Norther Ireland. Scotland, during this period, will be in a limboland, separate from the rest of us and certainly not part of any trade deals that we, the majority, will be conducting around the world.
At the end of this settlement, all military contracts with Scotland, i.e. ship building for the Royal Navy, would have been cancelled and re-allocated to English shipyards together with military installations and all other commercial and trade links. The 15 billion pounds deficit which Scotland's economy is running at the moment would be dumped, whatever the figure may be then, on Holyrood's doorstep.
With their shiny, new independence, the Scots would then have to start from scratch to negotiate with the E.U. on their acceptance to "The Club." This could take years.
If and when Scotland is allowed to join the E.U. that organisation, without the steadying hand of the U.K. on some of the levers of power, could be a VERY different organisation or, possibly, it may, as every other empire in history has done,have totally collapsed.
Do the "Canny Scots" really want to ditch an arrangement that has served them well for hundreds of years and join, some years in the future, some quasi-imperial dictatorship as a vassal of thirty or so completely alien states ruled over by Germany? My guess in they are far too sharp to even consider this.


Foot note by the Horwich Nationalist,
As some one who also has Scottish blood in the veins ,  I strongly urge our Scottish Brothers ans Sisters to wake up the the danger of the closet international marxist posing as faux nationalist. The are indeed as truely nationalist as Lipstick on a pig makes it attracctive. 
Also the Famous quote of the Repulican Roman Cicero from 2000 yrs ago sums the up exactly. 
PLEASE SCOTLAND AWAKE TO THE DANGER YOU ARE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Cicero's Traitor at the gate ,

"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."

Saturday 30 April 2016

Zionism, Anti Semitism and Israel

Red Ken Vindicated Jew where in Cahoots with Nazis

It turns out all those who clamoured for Ken Livingstone to be suspended from the Labour Party – on the basis that Nazi Germany and Zionist Jews never had an agreement – were completely wrong.
Perhaps John Mann needs to reconsider his actions of earlier today (April 28) – along with all those who accused Livingstone of “rewriting history” when he really was simply quoting it. It shows that in order to find out who controls your nation , learn whom one dare not critisise

From Wikeopeada
The Haavara Agreement was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933.
The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany.
The agreement was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine.
While it helped Jews emigrate, it forced them to temporarily give up possessions to Germany before departing. Those possessions could later be re-obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.
The agreement was controversial at the time, and was criticised by many Jewish leaders both within the Zionist movement and outside it.
Hitler’s own support of the Haavara Agreement was unclear and varied throughout the 1930s.
Initially, Hitler criticized the agreement, but reversed his opinion and supported it in the period 1937-1939.
Also from with more objective information 

Zionism and the Third Reich
by Mark Weber
Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity."/1 Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.
Common Aims
Over the years, people in many different countries have wrestled with the "Jewish question": that is, what is the proper role of Jews in non-Jewish society? During the 1930s, Jewish Zionists and German National Socialists shared similar views on how to deal with this perplexing issue. They agreed that Jews and Germans were distinctly different nationalities, and that Jews did not belong in Germany. Jews living in the Reich were therefore to be regarded not as "Germans of the Jewish faith," but rather as members of a separate national community. Zionism (Jewish nationalism) also implied an obligation by Zionist Jews to resettle in Palestine, the "Jewish homeland." They could hardly regard themselves as sincere Zionists and simultaneously claim equal rights in Germany or any other "foreign" country.
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, maintained that anti-Semitism is not an aberration, but a natural and completely understandable response by non-Jews to alien Jewish behavior and attitudes. The only solution, he argued, is for Jews to recognize reality and live in a separate state of their own. "The Jewish question exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers," he wrote in his most influential work, The Jewish State. "Where it does not exist, it is brought in by arriving Jews ... I believe I understand anti-Semitism, which is a very complex phenomenon. I consider this development as a Jew, without hate or fear." The Jewish question, he maintained, is not social or religious. "It is a national question. To solve it we must, above all, make it an international political issue ..." Regardless of their citizenship, Herzl insisted, Jews constitute not merely a religious community, but a nationality, a people, a Volk. /2 Zionism, wrote Herzl, offered the world a welcome "final solution of the Jewish question."/3
Six months after Hitler came to power, the Zionist Federation of Germany (by far the largest Zionist group in the country) submitted a detailed memorandum to the new government that reviewed German-Jewish relations and formally offered Zionist support in "solving" the vexing "Jewish question." The first step, it suggested, had to be a frank recognition of fundamental national differences: /4
Zionism has no illusions about the difficulty of the Jewish condition, which consists above all in an abnormal occupational pattern and in the fault of an intellectual and moral posture not rooted in one's own tradition. Zionism recognized decades ago that as a result of the assimilationist trend, symptoms of deterioration were bound to appear ...
Zionism believes that the rebirth of the national life of a people, which is now occurring in Germany through the emphasis on its Christian and national character, must also come about in the Jewish national group. For the Jewish people, too, national origin, religion, common destiny and a sense of its uniqueness must be of decisive importance in the shaping of its existence. This means that the egotistical individualism of the liberal era must be overcome and replaced with a sense of community and collective responsibility ...
We believe it is precisely the new [National Socialist] Germany that can, through bold resoluteness in the handling of the Jewish question, take a decisive step toward overcoming a problem which, in truth, will have to be dealt with by most European peoples ...
Our acknowledgment of Jewish nationality provides for a clear and sincere relationship to the German people and its national and racial realities. Precisely because we do not wish to falsify these fundamentals, because we, too, are against mixed marriage and are for maintaining the purity of the Jewish group and reject any trespasses in the cultural domain, we -- having been brought up in the German language and German culture -- can show an interest in the works and values of German culture with admiration and internal sympathy ...
For its practical aims, Zionism hopes to be able to win the collaboration of even a government fundamentally hostile to Jews, because in dealing with the Jewish question not sentimentalities are involved but a real problem whose solution interests all peoples and at the present moment especially the German people ...
Boycott propaganda -- such as is currently being carried on against Germany in many ways -- is in essence un-Zionist, because Zionism wants not to do battle but to convince and to build ...
We are not blind to the fact that a Jewish question exists and will continue to exist. From the abnormal situation of the Jews severe disadvantages result for them, but also scarcely tolerable conditions for other peoples.
The Federation's paper, the Jüdische Rundschau ("Jewish Review"), proclaimed the same message: "Zionism recognizes the existence of a Jewish problem and desires a far-reaching and constructive solution. For this purpose Zionism wishes to obtain the assistance of all peoples, whether pro- or anti-Jewish, because, in its view, we are dealing here with a concrete rather than a sentimental problem, the solution of which all peoples are interested."/5 A young Berlin rabbi, Joachim Prinz, who later settled in the United States and became head of the American Jewish Congress, wrote in his 1934 book, Wir Juden ("We Jews"), that the National Socialist revolution in Germany meant "Jewry for the Jews." He explained: "No subterfuge can save us now. In place of assimilation we desire a new concept: recognition of the Jewish nation and Jewish race." /6
Active Collaboration
On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.
Even as the Third Reich became more entrenched, many German Jews, probably a majority, continued to regard themselves, often with considerable pride, as Germans first. Few were enthusiastic about pulling up roots to begin a new life in far-away Palestine. Nevertheless, more and more German Jews turned to Zionism during this period. Until late 1938, the Zionist movement flourished in Germany under Hitler. The circulation of the Zionist Federation's bi-weekly Jüdische Rundschau grew enormously. Numerous Zionist books were published. "Zionist work was in full swing" in Germany during those years, the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes. A Zionist convention held in Berlin in 1936 reflected "in its composition the vigorous party life of German Zionists."/7
The SS was particularly enthusiastic in its support for Zionism. An internal June 1934 SS position paper urged active and wide-ranging support for Zionism by the government and the Party as the best way to encourage emigration of Germany's Jews to Palestine. This would require increased Jewish self-awareness. Jewish schools, Jewish sports leagues, Jewish cultural organizations -- in short, everything that would encourage this new consciousness and self-awareness - should be promoted, the paper recommended. /8
SS officer Leopold von Mildenstein and Zionist Federation official Kurt Tuchler toured Palestine together for six months to assess Zionist development there. Based on his firsthand observations, von Mildenstein wrote a series of twelve illustrated articles for the important Berlin daily Der Angriff that appeared in late 1934 under the heading "A Nazi Travels to Palestine." The series expressed great admiration for the pioneering spirit and achievements of the Jewish settlers. Zionist self-development, von Mildenstein wrote, had produced a new kind of Jew. He praised Zionism as a great benefit for both the Jewish people and the entire world. A Jewish homeland in Palestine, he wrote in his concluding article, "pointed the way to curing a centuries-long wound on the body of the world: the Jewish question." Der Angriff issued a special medal, with a Swastika on one side and a Star of David on the other, to commemorate the joint SS-Zionist visit. A few months after the articles appeared, von Mildenstein was promoted to head the Jewish affairs department of the SS security service in order to support Zionist migration and development more effectively. /9
The official SS newspaper, Das Schwarze Korps, proclaimed its support for Zionism in a May 1935 front-page editorial: "The time may not be too far off when Palestine will again be able to receive its sons who have been lost to it for more than a thousand years. Our good wishes, together with official goodwill, go with them."/10 Four months later, a similar article appeared in the SS paper: /11
The recognition of Jewry as a racial community based on blood and not on religion leads the German government to guarantee without reservation the racial separateness of this community. The government finds itself in complete agreement with the great spiritual movement within Jewry, the so-called Zionism, with its recognition of the solidarity of Jewry around the world and its rejection of all assimilationist notions. On this basis, Germany undertakes measures that will surely play a significant role in the future in the handling of the Jewish problem around the world.
A leading German shipping line began direct passenger liner service from Hamburg to Haifa, Palestine, in October 1933 providing "strictly kosher food on its ships, under the supervision of the Hamburg rabbinate." /12
With official backing, Zionists worked tirelessly to "reeducate" Germany's Jews. As American historian Francis Nicosia put it in his 1985 survey, The Third Reich and the Palestine Question: "Zionists were encouraged to take their message to the Jewish community, to collect money, to show films on Palestine and generally to educate German Jews about Palestine. There was considerable pressure to teach Jews in Germany to cease identifying themselves as Germans and to awaken a new Jewish national identity in them." /13
In an interview after the war, the former head of the Zionist Federation of Germany, Dr. Hans Friedenthal, summed up the situation: "The Gestapo did everything in those days to promote emigration, particularly to Palestine. We often received their help when we required anything from other authorities regarding preparations for emigration." /14
At the September 1935 National Socialist Party Congress, the Reichstag adopted the so-called "Nuremberg laws" that prohibited marriages and sexual relations between Jews and Germans and, in effect, proclaimed the Jews an alien minority nationality. A few days later the Zionist Jüdische Rundschau editorially welcomed the new measures: /15
Germany ... is meeting the demands of the World Zionist Congress when it declares the Jews now living in Germany to be a national minority. Once the Jews have been stamped a national minority it is again possible to establish normal relations between the German nation and Jewry. The new laws give the Jewish minority in Germany its own cultural life, its own national life. In future it will be able to shape its own schools, its own theatre, and its own sports associations. In short, it can create its own future in all aspects of national life ...
Germany has given the Jewish minority the opportunity to live for itself, and is offering state protection for this separate life of the Jewish minority: Jewry's process of growth into a nation will thereby be encouraged and a contribution will be made to the establishment of more tolerable relations between the two nations.
Georg Kareski, the head of both the "Revisionist" Zionist State Organization and the Jewish Cultural League, and former head of the Berlin Jewish Community, declared in an interview with the Berlin daily Der Angriff at the end of 1935: /16
For many years I have regarded a complete separation of the cultural affairs of the two peoples [Jews and Germans] as a pre-condition for living together without conflict... I have long supported such a separation, provided it is founded on respect for the alien nationality. The Nuremberg Laws ... seem to me, apart from their legal provisions, to conform entirely with this desire for a separate life based on mutual respect... This interruption of the process of dissolution in many Jewish communities, which had been promoted through mixed marriages, is therefore, from a Jewish point of view, entirely welcome.
Zionist leaders in other countries echoed these views. Stephen S. Wise, president of the American Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Congress, told a New York rally in June 1938: "I am not an American citizen of the Jewish faith, I am a Jew... Hitler was right in one thing. He calls the Jewish people a race and we are a race." /17
The Interior Ministry's Jewish affairs specialist, Dr. Bernhard Lösener, expressed support for Zionism in an article that appeared in a November 1935 issue of the official Reichsverwaltungsblatt: /18
If the Jews already had their own state in which the majority of them were settled, then the Jewish question could be regarded as completely resolved today, also for the Jews themselves. The least amount of opposition to the ideas underlying the Nuremberg Laws have been shown by the Zionists, because they realize at once that these laws represent the only correct solution for the Jewish people as well. For each nation must have its own state as the outward expression of its particular nationhood.
In cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a network of some forty camps and agricultural centers throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine. Although the Nuremberg Laws forbid Jews from displaying the German flag, Jews were specifically guaranteed the right to display the blue and white Jewish national banner. The flag that would one day be adopted by Israel was flown at the Zionist camps and centers in Hitler's Germany. /19
Himmler's security service cooperated with the Haganah, the Zionist underground military organization in Palestine. The SS agency paid Haganah official Feivel Polkes for information about the situation in Palestine and for help in directing Jewish emigration to that country. Meanwhile, the Haganah was kept well informed about German plans by a spy it managed to plant in the Berlin headquarters of the SS. /20 Haganah-SS collaboration even included secret deliveries of German weapons to Jewish settlers for use in clashes with Palestinian Arabs. /21
In the aftermath of the November 1938 "Kristallnacht" outburst of violence and destruction, the SS quickly helped the Zionist organization to get back on its feet and continue its work in Germany, although now under more restricted supervision. /22
Official Reservations
German support for Zionism was not unlimited. Government and Party officials were very mindful of the continuing campaign by powerful Jewish communities in the United States, Britain and other countries to mobilize "their" governments and fellow citizens against Germany. As long as world Jewry remained implacably hostile toward National Socialist Germany, and as long as the great majority of Jews around the world showed little eagerness to resettle in the Zionist "promised land," a sovereign Jewish state in Palestine would not really "solve" the international Jewish question. Instead, German officials reasoned, it would immeasurably strengthen this dangerous anti-German campaign. German backing for Zionism was therefore limited to support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine under British control, not a sovereign Jewish state. /23
A Jewish state in Palestine, the Foreign Minister informed diplomats in June 1937, would not be in Germany's interest because it would not be able to absorb all Jews around the world, but would only serve as an additional power base for international Jewry, in much the same way as Moscow served as a base for international Communism. /24 Reflecting something of a shift in official policy, the German press expressed much greater sympathy in 1937 for Palestinian Arab resistance to Zionist ambitions, at a time when tension and conflict between Jews and Arabs in Palestine was sharply increasing. /25
A Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937, cautioned that in spite of support for Jewish settlement in Palestine, "it would nevertheless be a mistake to assume that Germany supports the formation of a state structure in Palestine under some form of Jewish control. In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world."/26 "The proclamation of a Jewish state or a Jewish-administrated Palestine," warned an internal memorandum by the Jewish affairs section of the SS, "would create for Germany a new enemy, one that would have a deep influence on developments in the Near East." Another SS agency predicted that a Jewish state "would work to bring special minority protection to Jews in every country, therefore giving legal protection to the exploitation activity of world Jewry."/27 In January 1939, Hitler's new Foreign Minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, likewise warned in another circular bulletin that "Germany must regard the formation of a Jewish state as dangerous" because it "would bring an international increase in power to world Jewry." /28
Hitler himself personally reviewed this entire issue in early 1938 and, in spite of his long-standing skepticism of Zionist ambitions and misgivings that his policies might contribute to the formation of a Jewish state, decided to support Jewish migration to Palestine even more vigorously. The prospect of ridding Germany of its Jews, he concluded, outweighed the possible dangers. /29
Meanwhile, the British government imposed ever more drastic restrictions on Jewish immigration into Palestine in 1937, 1938 and 1939. In response, the SS security service concluded a secret alliance with the clandestine Zionist agency Mossad le-Aliya Bet to smuggle Jews illegally into Palestine. As a result of this intensive collaboration, several convoys of ships succeeded in reaching Palestine past British gunboats. Jewish migration, both legal and illegal, from Germany (including Austria) to Palestine increased dramatically in 1938 and 1939. Another 10,000 Jews were scheduled to depart in October 1939, but the outbreak of war in September brought the effort to an end. All the same, German authorities continued to promote indirect Jewish emigration to Palestine during 1940 and 1941. /30 Even as late as March 1942, at least one officially authorized Zionist "kibbutz" training camp for potential emigrants continued to operate in Hitler's Germany. /31
read More 

 

Peter Hitchens Interview - "Utopia is only approached across a sea of bl...

Monday 18 April 2016

Getting Prepared and UN Agenda 21



There is good news, certainly, but we have to be very prepared for the
unexpected. Let's also have a look at the EU referendum and Boris
Johnson and the real UN Agenda 21 root of all this migration.

Saturday 9 April 2016

Why the Jewish Elite Hates Donald Trump a Passionate appeal from Dr David Duke

Dr David Duke in this latest video makes a passionate appeal to Donald Trump . On how the Zionists who are destroying the western world will seek to destroy it. In this video he makes it quiet clear that they will stop at nothing to fuffil there goal , of destroying the Christian west ! A much watch for our American audience as well as the British public also.



Thursday 31 March 2016

Chaos in Refugee torn Europe

Chaos in Refugee torn Europe


This letter is from a retired RAF officer who served in the sixties and is now working and living in Germany.
Dear Friends,
Europe is now in total chaos and I think that you should know about it.
I have waited a week or so to see how things will develop and to glean more information before presenting the facts.
As you may know from the media, the flood of refugees cum economic immigrants into Europe has reached ridiculous proportions to the extent that Hungary and other Balkan states have closed their borders. Turkey is considering doing the same.
Angela Merkel, in an ill-advised speech to the Bundestag, welcomed all refugees to Germany and the floodgates opened and, in my view, this was all pre-planned beginning with the Pope’s appeal last year for Islam to move closer to Christianity. This was then followed up via the Italian Government instructing the Italian Navy to rescue all boat refugees and bring them to Italy.
As a result, it seems that some 8000 people per day are now entering Europe via various routes. Most of these are young males between 17 and 25. The result is chaos as you can imagine.
Here in Saarland we have been overwhelmed with refugees who are mainly young males but some are families. In Lebach, some 10 kilometres from here, a camp for 200 was set up and a further 100 added this last week. The politicians, local government and religious leaders have fallen over themselves to bring them in and cater for them.
And so what is the result? In Ventimiglia near Monte Carlo, the refugees banded together (organized by a smart phone) and over ran the market and stole or destroyed everything and ransacked the town.
Here in Lebach, a group entered a supermarket and took what they wanted and destroyed the rest. When the Manageress confronted them, they called up their friends and smashed the place to bits. The police arrived but were overwhelmed. The supermarket is now closed.
Yesterday, my friends rang from Weissenfels near Leipzig since two supermarkets and a Kaufland store in Halle suffered the same way. More news is coming in from all over Germany of the same situations.
The media report none of this.
Many people have demonstrated against being overrun by immigrants. In Weissenfels, families were thrown out of an eight unit apartment block and 70 refugees moved in. Small towns of some 2000 to 3000 people are over run by some 5000 to 6000 refugees.
Much civil unrest is apparent and is just boiling under the surface. Europe is in chaos and the do-gooders have totally lost control of the situation. Islam has overwhelmed us.
For the Syrian and Afghan refugees, I have every sympathy and they need help. They should get it. But for the rest, in my view, the state authorities must be firm and send them back. Perhaps it is too late.
Anyway, I thought that you should know that the situation here is pretty grim and I fail to see how it can be resolved. I can only foresee a police state.

Friday 25 March 2016

Happy Easter from Horwich Nationalists

Happy Easter from Horwich Nationalists ! And remember God is in control . Like when for Our Lords Disciples on the Friday all seemed to lost at 1st . Little did they realise that they ultimate victory over Death and the Devil was accomplished. 

And that by the Sunday They saw that victory with there own eyes. 

Never lose faith! And trust in our Lord Jesus Christ !

 

Thursday 24 March 2016

How To Get Out Of The EU WITHOUT Voting

Let's try to get away from the veil of debate and really have nothing whatsoever to do with the EU and live a Common Law life, which is our birthright. My website: http://davidcammegh.com/

The Truth About The Brussels Terrorist Attacks

Tuesday 22 March 2016

The Tree, The Trunk, The Branches ,The Leaves And The Common Law

A very interesting telling of the relationship of Almighty God and the common law. Although I do not agree on some of the Astrology parts of the talk . I find the talks by David to be very interesting and stimulating. One of the most important views I find is why the push for atheism has led to the devastating age of evil we find ourselves in. But please watch and visit Davids channel for many interesting and stimulating videos. Davids You Tube Channel link

CAUTION OVER LATEST TERROR ATTACKS

 

SIMPLY PUT! WHAT YOU SHOULD ASK IS . WHO'S AGENDA  BENEFITS FROM THESE ATTACKS!

IS IT A FALSE FLAG TO PROMOTE WARS IN THE MIDDLE EAST ? OR IS IT TO IMPOSE MORE SO CALLED SECURITY LEGISLATION , AKA DRACONIAN CURBS ON FREEDOM ! 

LETS SEEK THE TRUTH ON THIS ONE ! 


Sunday 20 March 2016

Orban's historic speech puts Hungary on war footing for the survival of European peoples

Orban's historic speech puts Hungary on war footing for the survival of European peoples.


 As we and many other Nationalist Have tried to warn for the last 30 yrs and more, the Plan by the zionist globalist bankers would back fire. Now I forecast that within 5 yrs Europe will be the scene of such horror,not seen since WW2. You have only your selves to blame , for being afraid of being called a wacist by the great unwashed,The paid Zio shills and useful idiots.

Saturday 12 March 2016

EU on brink: France declares ‘state of economic emergency

 EU on brink: France declares ‘state of economic emergency




EU on brink: France declares ‘state of economic emergency’ as Germany faces financial ruin FRANCE is in a state of economic emergency, President Francois Hollande announced today, amid fears the worsening financial situation in Germany could topple the entire eurozone. By LANA CLEMENTS at tundra tabloids

 
Francois hollande
GETTY Francois Hollande has declared a state of economic emergency
Investor sentiment plunged as the socialist leader announced unemployment in France has surged to an 18-year high of 10.6 per cent – plunging the country into a new economic crisis.
It comes as Germany faces the most difficult start to a year in recent memory. Its own industrial production growth has slipped to ZERO per cent and customer confidence has plummeted in a catalogue of disasters for Chancellor Angela Merkel.
An increasingly desperate Mr Hollande has now said he will PAY French employers to hire people in a bid to boost jobs as he sought to restore confidence and said that it was time to address the country’s “broken” economic model.
He said: “Our country has been faced with structural unemployment for two to three decades and this requires that creating jobs becomes our one and only fight.”
France was facing an “uncertain economic climate and persistent unemployment” and there was an “economic and social emergency”, he said.
Firms will get €2,000 (£1,500) when they employ young, unemployed people for at least six months.
More here.


Friday 4 March 2016

Hungarian Lady MEP spells it out on The EU

Hungarian Lady MEP spells it out!

Posted by Zibi Tokarski on Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Fear and Chaos: The Currency of Control - The David Icke Videocast

Tuesday 1 March 2016

Lawful Rebellion is Not An Anarchy in the UK

  Lawful Rebellion is Not      Anarchy in the UK

From a post from Pete Mitchel
There seems to be plenty of folk who think Lawful Rebellion to be some form of anarchy, that it breaks all bonds with the institution of governance. That couldn't be further from the truth. Lawful Rebellion is not Freeman on the Land anarchistic rhetoric!
The point of entering into a state of rebellion against the Crown by obeying the order of the Crown to rebel, distress and distrain, seizing its assets and buildings etc, is to compel the Crown to return to a state of protecting our liberties and administrating the affairs of the country for our benefit.
Like it or not, this realm has a set of laws for all of us regardless of status. The current ruling class has broken these laws with its attempts to enslave the population through its acts of treason. Our stance in obeying the law is not to cut ourselves off from governance but to reinstate it to its former position of a fair and just administration.
Once remedy against the offenses of the Crown are met, it will be our duty to return administrating power back into the hands of trusted individuals and the state of Lawful Rebellion will no longer be required. After this, rebellion will become unlawful unless a new circumstance makes invoking the security clause a necessary action.
Being in Lawful Rebellion is not a removal of oneself but a statement of your wish to have our country fixed and our treasonous ruling classes dealt with via the use of law.
If you follow the freeman thing and surrender your N.I. number, driving license, drive with no insurance, and generally surrender your entire citizenship of Britain and every other nuance they contrive from their ill conceived interpretation of legislation, then you will deserve all the trouble and hassle that action brings to your life.
If, however, you choose to obey the Royal command to piss off the state with all your might without fear, then you hold all the cards. You get to take from the state everything you can without fear of doing anything wrong. Committing legislated offences but not common law crimes is right up there in the terms of distressing them without fear of reprisal. You either swear your oath and do what you are commanded to do, or you do the freeman thing and at worse, find yourself incarcerated or perhaps even dead, who can say?. It's not pretty for those who remain within the system and the only way out is Lawful Rebellion.
Remember, Magna Carta was set up to protect us all with agreements from all three sides of our population, the rulers, the Lords of the lands and the people. An agreement that stands forever and is currently still very much active as the law of the land. Lose your fear and join the rebellion.

Tuesday 23 February 2016

The plight of Ann Richardson and the massive case of corruption

Good afternoon rebels,
Now some of you will already be aware of the plight of Ann Richardson and the massive case of corruption and theft committed against her and her family, by a cabal of solicitors, bailiffs and an extremely corrupt (alleged) Judge.
The lawful rebellion movement (Glastonbury) has taken this appalling matter to heart and it is now the FLAGSHIP case of the movement.
One of our honourable group members took on Anne's case and has been acting with power of attorney in this matter for sometime now. At least 40 Notices have been served on all parties involved in this matter so far and we have only just begun!!
All of the individuals are on Notice of article 61's invocation and ALL have acquiesced to the evidential truth in law. We are going after them ALL.
A post detailing the appalling circumstances of this corruption and what we are doing about it will be supplied by our honourable group member very soon.
THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR YOUR HELP to support our actions and to support poor Anne.
They are attempting to STEAL her last remaining shackles of her and her families estate, around £45,000 which is still being held by one of the solicitors (thieves) despite being put on Notice of the lawful truth. Treason Notices are now being served.
How can you help? Well initially we would be grateful for any donations if you can spare a quid? We are going to be descending on North Wales in the near future as the criminal activity that we can clearly evidence must now be reported to North Wales Police Constabulary and, we have put the Chief Constable of North Wales on Notice of the facts for good measure.
Any donations received will be used for expenses, road trips, paperwork etc with all remaining funds being forwarded on to Anne.
We are demanding a properly convened court de jure for the truth of this matter to be heard in a court of law, so that justice can be seen to be done. I am now going after Theresa May (imposter Home Secretary) to demand a hearing under constitutional law. It would be High Treason to deny Anne due process of law. I am also being granted power of attorney in the matter as I would very much like to conduct such a hearing.
Letters of support to Anne would also be much appreciated (address will follow...possibly a c/o address as we don't feel it wise to publish Anne's address on the internet, writing letters of support for Anne's plight to the North Wales police constabulary would also a great help, it can only help if they know that she and we are well supported, state that you demand justice to be done in this case and that you are acting as a common law witness in the matter perhaps...something like that, keep it short and to the point.
More will follow when Davy outlines the facts of this case and posts it in the group.
This case could be the one that brings the whole criminal regime crashing down. If we are unsuccessful then it will only be for the lack of your support, and if that is the case then we may as well pack up and go home...... YOUR COUNTRY NEED YOU NOW!! this is not much to ask. Peace.

Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS - and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS

Why Women DESTROY NATIONS * / CIVILIZATIONS - and other UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS 

 

 

Sunday 21 February 2016

EU Referendum - THINK Before Your Vote! Common Law Threat!

EU Referendum - THINK Before Your Vote!       Common Law Under Threat!

 A superb video by David Cammegh explaining the risk of what we will lose if we allow the TRAITORS! to sink us further into the slavery of the evil empire of the EU . A globalist corporation designed to make SLAVES off us all . In this video 
David explains what the common law is as Gods law based on the reason of mans common sense, 

And perhaps a massive explanation of why the promotion of atheism along with other destructive ideologies.  A must watch 

 

Adolf Hitler — ‘My spirit will rise from the grave and the world will see i was right.

Adolf HitlerMy spirit will rise from the grave and the world will see i was right.


By Neil  Whitelam
I have wondered this myself, why was all trace of National socialist Germany rubbed off the face of the planet.
Why were all the head guys executed, why were all their country houses, private accomodations levelled to the ground, why was Germany levelled to the ground, Why was WW2 started by Churchill ?, Why to this day is it still politically correct to slag off the Germans, Why has the alleged holocaust become a historical fact even though there is massive amounts of evidence that prove lies have been told. why! why ? there are lots of WHY'S.
One thing is for sure, during the passage of time more and more secret documents are been released or uncovered that paint quite a different picture on the one we have been spoon fed
IF TONY BLAIR could swindle, bamboozle, kid, deceive the majority of the UK to justify Gulf war 2 and A-stan with all the modern media weapons at his disposal HOW EASY WOULD IT HAVE been for Churchill and CO to hoodwink the British population with only state controlled radio, news papers and cinema at his disposal - fuck sake he could have told us the moon was made of cheese and we would have fell for it.
In fact Orson Wells proved the power of radio when he caused US nation wide panic when he broadcast war of the world in 1938 - mmmm one year before the war broke out in 1939, a test run perhaps?
The fact is the world bankers, the global swindlers, worldwide power brokers ,WANT TO STAY IN CONTROL via debt, oppression , suffering and hardship. The last thing they want is for people to work in harmony, world peace, debt less society, prosperity and good health for all AND THAT LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IS THE TRUE REASON WHY GERMAN NATIONAL SOCIALISM HAS BEEN DEMONISED AND RUBBED OUT.
They dont want this pure natural ideology ever to become popular again, for if it did it would signal the end of their reign of power over this planet. 

 READ ! RESEARCH ! FOR F.CK SAKE DON'T JUST TAKE MY WORD FOR IT.

Added note from Horwich Nationalists , Just watch the video below

Saturday 20 February 2016

Speed Camera Loophole Exposed Do Not Sign There Pirate Contracts

Speed Camera Loophole Exposed Do Not Sign There Contracts 


Extract from The Western Mail 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrates' courts could grind to a halt if thousands of motorists exploit a legal loophole unwittingly exposed by a Welsh driver. 
 
Magistrates had no choice but to find Phillip Dennis, of Whitford, Flintshire, not guilty of speeding when his case was heard on Thursday.
 
He had omitted to sign the standard form which is sent to the owner of each vehicle caught by a speed camera - and Mold magistrates said they couldn't accept the form as evidence.
 
Police have no power to compel car owners to sign the form and have been expecting someone to spot the loophole.
 
Yesterday the Association of British Drivers, representing about 2,500 motorists, predicted drivers would soon get wind of the court case.
 
"Motorists are always very quick to seek any way to avoid paying for their speeding ticket, particularly when they've been caught by cameras because they resent very much the way the cameras operate," said spokesman Tony Vickers.
 
"The cameras have very much reduced public respect for the police and local authorities.
 
"People are only too glad to find a way to beat the system."
 
He said motorists who receive a speeding ticket after being caught on camera could opt to have their case heard in court, rather than pay the fine without quibble.
 
"If a lot of people take up this option it will have another side-effect, which will be to clog up the magistrates' courts with hundreds or thousands of motorists all trying to avoid paying the fine.
 
"The implications for the legal system are interesting, to say the least."
 
Although the ABD did not condone breaking the highway laws, it said it would place details of the loophole on its own website for other drivers to read.
 
"I'm sure a lot of people will try it on and see whether it gets them anywhere."
 
The prospect of using the loophole could look especially appealing to people who already had endorsements on their licences, said Mr Vickers.
 
"They should bear in mind that if they fail, they will end up paying the full fine rather than the 50% they would pay if they put their hand up."
 
When a police camera takes a photograph of a speeding vehicle, the vehicle's registered owner is sent a form asking who the driver was at the time.
 
It is an offence not to complete the form and name the driver - but the owner does not have to sign it.
 
If the form has not been signed, the courts cannot take any notice of it.
 
Magistrates in Mold were asked to prove a case of speeding against Phillip Dennis, 34, of Gwibnant Farm, Downing Road, Whitford, near Holywell.
 
But clerk Paul Conlon pointed out that the form naming the defendant as the driver was unsigned.
 
The driver had provided the information required of him but there was no requirement under that section of the law for the form to be signed.
 
Magistrates said they were not happy but had to find the defendant not guilty in his absence.
 
Chairman John Beard suggested the police should go back to defendants and ask them to sign the form.
 
But he was advised that as the law now stood the only requirement was to stipulate the name of the driver, and that there was no legal requirement to sign it even if police did go back and request a signature.
 
Nobody was available from North Wales Police to comment yesterday.
 
But one police source said there had been concern that once the loophole was spotted "it could open the flood gates."
 
He said, "The police generally have been waiting for someone to appeal against a conviction on this point but no one has yet.
 
"We have basically been keeping our heads down.
 
"Some of my colleagues say we should just make sure people sign the forms but others are a bit concerned that to do that is tricking people into something they do not have to do.
 
"The trouble is when this is highlighted they will all be sending the forms back unsigned."
 
RoadPeace, the charity for road-accident victims, said the loophole showed that cameras and computers were no substitute for a police presence on the roads.
 
Chairman Zoë Stow said, "It illustrates that we can't just deal with these things as a bureaucratic issue and send forms through the post.
 
"It's disappointing that the law is poorly drafted and nobody seems to care enough to do it properly."
 
Speed cameras have proliferated in South and North Wales since the Home Office gave police permission to use fines to pay for enforcement, rather than sending the money to the Treasury.
 
Latest figures show that in 2001 the number of speeding tickets issued by South Wales Police was 38% higher than in 2000.
 
North Wales Police registered a 19% increase in 2001, although its Arrive Alive speed-camera campaign wasn't launched until late that year.
 
For More information on how the police are acting unlawfully here  At Lawful Rebellion

Tuesday 9 February 2016

HIGH TREASON In BRITAIN

HIGH TREASON
The Complete Text of Capt. K. R. McKilliam, M.A.



The British Nation is bedevilled today by alien organisations that have established themselves within our Christian Nation and aim to take us over, to destroy our Christian culture and force us to follow their preconceived designs. Unfortunately they have infiltrated themselves into our educational and religious systems and have educated many adepts among our people who unknowingly carry out their will. Many of them have been advanced to high places.



Gentile Home Secretary Roy Jenkins gets his latest set of instructions
“Gentile Home Secretary Roy Jenkins gets his latest set of instructions from Lord Fisher and Maurice Orbach.” Published with this caption in Let My People Go! c. 1976



LAWS AGAINST ESTABLISHING A FOREIGN POWER IN ENGLAND

In 1353 Edward III by his statute of Praemunire forbade appeals being made to foreign courts. Richard II who came to the throne in 1377 issued a Statute of Praemunire (16 Richard II II C5) which stated that anyone who procures from Rome or any other place any thing which touches the King, against him or his Crown or realm and all those aiding and abetting them shall be out of the King’s protection. Their goods and land would be forfeited and they would be made to answer to the King and his council and a process of Praemunire Facias made against them. The learned constitutional lawyer, Blackstone, in Book 4, C8, states that Praemunire is “introducing a foreign power into the land and creating an Imperium in Imperio [State within a State] by paying obedience to other processes which constitutionally belong to the King alone.” But although this is a general protection of the King, the constitutional lawyer Littleton states that Praemunire Facias also extends to the King’s loyal subjects and this particular protection is of two sorts, firstly it gives the subject immunity or freedom from action or suite and secondly to protect the safety of the subject and his goods, lands and possessions from violence, unlawful molestation and wrong. This the subject gains by right and by law. Subjects are protected by the King, by the law and by the King’s writ.
Praemunire doth fortify Jurisdictionem Jurium Coronae Suae of the Kingly laws of the Crown against foreign jurisdiction and against the usurpers upon them as by divers acts of parliament appears.... A man who by judgement given against him upon writ of Praemunire Facias etc. is out of the King’s protection. For such of these crimes for which any shall have this judgement, to be hanged by the neck until he be dead and shall forfeit all his lands and chattels.


HIGH TREASON

Treason is the act of betraying; betrayal of a trust undertaken by or reposed in anyone; a breach of faith, treachery. High Treason or Treason Proper is the violation of a subject of his allegiance to his sovereign or to the state, levying war on the King’s dominions, adhering to the King’s enemies in his dominions, or aiding them in or out of the realm. In 1795 the offence was extended to include the contemplated use of force to make the King change his counsels.


MISPRISION OF TREASON

Misprision of Treason is an offence or misdemeanor akin to treason or felony. It is the neglect of duty by a public official who conceals a knowledge of treasonable actions or designs. At an assize it may warrant the same penalty as High Treason. A subject of the Crown is also bound to inform the magistrates if he knows that High Treason is being contemplated.


ESTABLISHING AN IMPERIUM IN IMPERIO: THE JEWS

The Jews had been in England in Anglo-Saxon times dealing in slaves. Jews however came into England with the Norman Conquest. They made themselves a threat to the people of this country by (1) clipping the gold coinage and turning the clippings into bullion for sale overseas (2) dispossessing good Christian Englishmen of their lands and property by high interest rates in usury (3) by the ritual murder of young Christian boys by crucifixion and drawing off the blood for ritual purposes; particularly Hugh of Lincoln in 1255; a child sacrificed in Nottingham in 1279; and the ritual murder of a boy in Oxford by the Jew Isaac de Pulet in 1290 (Patent Roll. Edward I, mem. 21 21st June, 1290; Public Records Office).
On the 18th of July 1290, by a royal decree, King Edward I in his council expelled all Jews forever from England. Writs were sent out to the sheriffs of the English shires informing them that by royal edict all Jews were to leave the English realm before November 1st 1290, anyone who remained were to be executed. The population and parliament reacted with relief and great joy (Calendar of Close Rolls, 18 Edward I, Public Records Office). In his book Edward I (London, 1988) page 343, Michael Prestwick states that at a Parliament summoned to Westminster in that July a subsidy was granted and was collected. This subsidy was a thank offering for the Jews’ expulsion.


THE JEWS PRESENT BEGGING LETTERS TO CROMWELL

Various Jews made begging petitions to Oliver Cromwell to get him to revoke the Edict of Expulsion; but Cromwell, being only a commoner, could not revoke a royal edict and knew this. In February 1658 Cromwell is said to have made an oral commitment to Antonio Fernandes Cavajal, the leader of the Jews (buried under the name of Abraham in the Jews’ cemetery, London 1659), assuring his protection. This was in defiance of the recommendations of the council that the Jews should only be permitted the standing of ordinary aliens. This is the situation today (lecture by Lucien Wolf to the Jews College Literary Society in 1877).
Joan Comay, wife of the Israeli Ambassador to the Court of St. James and to the United Nations wrote in her book Who’s Who in Jewish History After the Period of the Old Testament, published in 1974:
Manasseh [ben Israel] returned to Holland in October 1657, deeply distressed at what he considered to be the failure of his mission. Cromwell remained on friendly terms with him and granted him a pension of £100 a year. Although Edward I’s edict of expulsion was not formally revoked as Manasseh had hoped, the resumption of Jewish worship achieved the same practical result. The edict has actually not been revoked to this day.
Because of the expulsion of the Jews from Europe, the Jews sent an appeal for advice to the Sanhedrin on the 13th of January 1489. The reply came back from the Prince of the Jews in Constantinople. It advised the Jews of Europe to adopt the tactics of the Trojan Horse: to make their sons Christian priests, lawyers, doctors etc. and to destroy the Christian structure from within. Thus, by 1990, we have had one known Bah-Mitzvahed bishop in the Church of England, Bishop Hugh Montefiore, numerous Jewish Queen’s Counsels in the legal profession and at least seven foreign Jews in the House of Lords.
It may be disputed that these old edicts have fallen into disuse and are no longer applicable. At a celebration to commemorate the conquering of England by William Duke of Normandy in 1066 held at Caen, the Mayor of Bordeaux assured all those present that the town of Bordeaux had faithfully paid the levy on wine placed on the town throughout the whole period of 900 years. An attempt had been made to have the levy annulled but this could not be done since the Queen of England is still Duke of Normandy, and Count of Aquitaine.
Israel Moses Sieff with his Political and Economic Planning (P.E.P.) tried to get rid of ancient territorial boundaries for the new county councils. Although the new county councils are in operation, all law officers functioning in Lancashire are appointed by the Duchy and County Palatine of Lancaster and not by the Lord Chancellor of Parliament. The courts are Duchy courts and all offences are against the Duke’s peace. The County Palatine of the Duchy of Lancaster is outwith the jurisdiction of parliament under the wills of Henry II, Henry III and Henry IV, and certain acts of parliament are inapplicable within the Duchy. A similar position is found in the Principality and County Palatine of Durham.
Being prohibited aliens by the Edict of Expulsion Jews have no right to sit in our houses of parliament, nor on our local government councils. They have no right to be in the judiciary nor to hold office in the executive of government nor in the police force. All purported laws and purported acts of parliament in which Jews have taken part in the voting are illegal, unconstitutional: null and void.
Contrary to the Statutes of Praemunire traitors we elect to parliament have allowed the Jews to establish an Imperium in Imperio, the ‘Board of Jewish Deputies,’ which have gained to themselves powers to influence the policies of British governments to their own universal advantage. The Daily Telegraph of 19th January 1972 stated: “The Zionist Congress is the head of the world’s political movement.” World’s Works – Inner Mountain Jewish News on 1st March 1976 stated:
This world organization has a highly centralized form of government, this consists of an international committee including representatives from all countries that have a local organization. But the real control is vested in what is known as the Inner Actions Council. This is a compact body of only seven men and it is dominated by the Jews of Europe.


MUSLIMS ATTEMPT TO SET UP ANOTHER IMPERIUM IN IMPERIO

It is the function of the Attorney General to advise governments and government departments (see Whitaker’s Almanac). Succeeding Attorneys General have failed to advise governments of the implications of the contents of Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Bill of Rights and Habeas Corpus. This is a dereliction of duty. Another attempt to establish an Imperium in Imperio by aliens, a felony of Praemunire, was reported in the Daily Telegraph of 15th July 1990. It was stated that the Muslim leader Kalim Siddiqui called for a special relationship between Muslims here and the government of Iran. He launched a manifesto to politicize Britain’s Muslim community which aimed to establish an Islamic parliament, to persuade Muslims to discriminate in favour of other Muslims, to place the names of all Muslims in Britain on a computer database and to raise five million pounds to establish a Muslim parliament in Britain. To do this is to commit the felony of Praemunire punishable with death by hanging. The culprits are those subjects of the Crown who have allowed this situation to arise. It is up to the government to give all Muslims their marching orders out of this country or incur the penalties laid down for Praemunire, allowing aliens to establish an Imperium in Imperio.
In bringing this matter to the attention of fellow subjects of the Crown I am under the Queen’s protection for as Fitzherbert wrote (Vide 7 Co. 8, 9, Calvin’s Case ANT 130a, Sect 199) “Every loyal subject is in the Queen’s Protection.”


THE PURPORTED RACE RELATIONS ACTS

The so-called Race Relations Acts are conspiracies to use acts of parliament to enforce the racial integration of subjects of the Crown with Negroes and Asiatics especially brought here for the purpose. They are acts of racial hatred against us by prohibited immigrants. The Race Relations Act of 1965 was introduced to parliament by the Russian Jew Frank Soskice, purported Labour Attorney General. Further Race Relations Acts were devised by the Board of Jewish Deputies. The Jewish Chronicle stated that amendments must be made to the Race Relations Act since the 1965 Race Relations Act was not working the way they wanted it to. The 1976 Race Relations Act was passed in the Commons by default, with only 132 of the 635 members present; 124 Labour and Liberal traitors voted for the bill with eight Tories against.
To terrorize the masses it was required to establish a network of so-called human rights agencies, the ‘Race Relations Industry.’ Ivor Benson writes that:
the task was to penalize the instinctive responses of the local resident population in the presence of unassimilable neighbours who have been forced upon them... Hereto there are rich pickings for decadent, deracinated elements who help to impose the tyranny, like human dregs who rule the roost and spend millions of the tax-payers’ money in Britain’s innumerable inner-city ghettoes. Nor should we omit to mention the zealous active connivance of politicians and bureaucrats whose greed for personal advancement is rationalized with a spurious humanistic ideology.
There are three phases in this Jewish imposition of race mixing:
  • Phase One: Unassimilable population elements are introduced into all-White communities of the West as legitimate immigrants, supposedly because their labour was needed.


  • Phase Two: Public opposition is circumvented by introducing them as refugees.


  • Phase Three: Which came into effect right from the start, is a massive and sustained campaign of mental terrorism aimed at suppressing every form of popular dissent and opposition. The campaign of terrorism has taken two forms, one aimed at the leadership and the other at the masses. Any political leader who dares to give voice to what his own people think and feel is at once made the target by the Jews by an orchestrated campaign of vilification with Jewish-devised swear words “Nazi,” “Fascist,” “racialist,” “racist” while support in money and publicity is diverted to political rivals and opponents. The masses are terrorized by Jewish-led Socialist Workers Party mobs who are quite prepared to use violence when necessary.


IMMIGRATION

The massive immigration of Islamics and other coloured peoples is illegal and the British people, subjects of the Crown, were never consulted about whether they wanted their country to become a multi-racial, multi-cultural society. Mrs Margaret Thatcher deceived the nation in 1979 when she declared that Britain was becoming swamped with immigrants, using the fears of the subjects of the Crown to gain votes and giving the impression that she would stem the flow. Having got her party into government she did nothing about it, only allowed vast numbers more into the country. Multi-racialism and multi-culturalism has been illegally and unconstitutionally imposed on this nation and the Jewish power controlling the government will ensure that the nation will never be consulted.


THE PURPORTED PUBLIC ORDER ACT OF 1986

The so-called Public Order Act of 1986 is a conspiracy to use an act of parliament to enable investigators to enter the homes of subjects of the Crown to gain evidence to initiate action in the law courts against those offending against the purported Race Relations Act. This Act was placed before parliament by the purported Conservative Home Secretary, the prohibited Jewish immigrant from Lithuania, Leon Brittanisky, also known as Leon Brittan, assisted by his cousin, another Lithuanian Jew, Malcolm Rivkind, also know as Malcolm Rifkind. This bill was primarily to prevent subjects of the Crown from discussing and revealing the Jewish take-over of our nation.


THE PURPORTED NATIONALITY ACT

The so-called Nationality Act is a conspiracy to use an act of parliament to take away our rights as subjects of the Crown. This act makes the place of birth rather than the genetic and racial identity of the individual the criteria for nationality. Britons from Australia and Canada visiting the continent from Britain were surprised on their return to be presented with documents to sign marked “Alien” while Pakistanis and other Asians passed through with British passports as British nationals.
This Act purports to replace ancestry, that for generations has been the practical definition of the British subject, by the definition of an accidental place of birth. Thus it seeks to encourage the development of a nation of half-breeds and to swamp and destroy the British people and their customs.
In The Common Law of England, 198. N2, Sir Edward Coke states:
Persons born beyond the seas, if their fathers or paternal grandfathers were natural born subjects, are likewise made so, though with an exception of some unfavourable persons.... Liegeus is ever taken for a natural born subject... Liegeance, a liegando, being the highest and greatest obligation of duty and obedience that can be. Liegance is the true and faithful obedience of a liegman or subject to his liege lord or sovereign. Alliegeance is born of faith: alliegeance is the essential law.
Until William Whitelaw’s Nationality Act we have been subjects of the Crown and under the protection of the Crown. This Act purports to deprive us of this and make us merely British citizens. This Act together with the European Communities Act and the Treaty of Rome aims at destroying the British Monarchy as soon as possible. It is High Treason.
By signing the United Nations Charter in 1946 and passing an act before parliament so-called British politicians were obliged to carry out the terms of the Charter. This entails the mixing of the races of the world to form a degraded population and the eradication of the British and other White races. These the planners regard, together with Christianity, as the main obstacles to the establishment of a totalitarian one-world government.
The United Nations Charter was drafted by Alger Hiss, a convicted communist and Soviet agent together with Andrei Gromyko, a senior Soviet official. Alger Hiss occupied the directional chair at the organizational conference of the United Nations. These people are aiming at genocide of the White race.
According to this Nationality Act the Queen is no longer our Queen and we are no longer her subjects. If we are no longer the subjects of the Crown this Act deprives us of the protection of the Crown, for according to the patent rolls of the Statute of Northampton 1328 it is the duty of the Queen to protect her subjects despite parliament; thus we are protected from a possible anti-White anti-British parliament. This Act purports to deprive the Queen of her titles, lands and prerogatives. We no longer go to war for the Crown but for parliament. This is High Treason.
A letter from the Home Secretary dated 31st May 1988, which appeared in the Independent newspaper on Monday 17th June 1988, made it plain that Her Majesty the Queen is prepared to place at the disposal of parliament all her remaining prerogatives: the power to make war or peace, to ratify treaties, to grant honours; the list is formidable embracing just about all those powers which remained to the monarch after the glorious revolution of 1688. The signature at the bottom of the letter is that of Douglas Hurd. The person who drew the Home Secretary into weighty correspondence is the cryptic left-winger, Tony Benn. Benn laid before parliament his Crown Prerogatives Bill to deprive the Crown of all the remainder of her prerogatives.


THE PURPORTED EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ACT

The European Communities Act of 1972 and the Treaty of Rome aims at destroying the British monarchy as soon as possible.
This is High Treason the penalty for which is death by hanging and this is still on the statute books. Likewise any subject of the Crown who knows that High Treason is being carried on and fails to report it is guilty of Misprision of High Treason, the penalty may be death: to deprive the Queen of her Crown or any of her dominions.
Article 189 of the Treaty of Rome is irreconcilable with the Oath of Allegiance. There is an absolute constitutional case that there is no statute authority for the executive acts that have bound the UK to the EEC, nor for the British Nationality Act. Both are contrary to the interests of the Crown and people.
The High Court of Great Britain disallowed an Act which was passed by our House of Commons and House of Lords and received the Royal Assent. This Act was the Shipping Act of 1988. The High Court referred the case to the European Court. This was the first case in the history of parliament that an Act passed by both houses of parliament with the Royal Assent and the regulations under it have been set aside. A British Court has interfered with an act of parliament in the interests of a foreign court. This is High Treason.
We can claim that the Queen carry out her coronation oath and protect us from alien and foreign-made laws.
We are legally not in the Common Market nor are we constitutionally a multi-racial multi-cultural society. Traitor Edward Heath carried out the plans of international Jewish financiers and multinational companies, the Imperial Institute for International Affairs and the Rothschilds to deceive the Queen in her grants. Many of us have taken the Oath of Allegiance to the Crown, her heirs and successors and demand protection from foreign-made laws made by aliens in Europe.
The Oath of Allegiance has been taken by members of parliament, Queen’s Councillors, members of the Judiciary, clergy of the Church of England and members of the executive yet many of them are working for our enemies, for a slave-state full of debt which our children will inherit. A charge of perjury of the Oath of Allegiance and High Treason must be laid against all those culprits who have allowed our government to be over-ruled by directives coming from beyond the seas – from foreigners in Brussels and Strasbourg.
Any attempt to take Scotland and England into the EEC is High Treason: “Depriving the Queen of her lands and titles.” All purported MEP’s are qualified for hanging. The basic statutes of the United Kingdom are still in force and are in conflict with growing foreign supremacy.
The full sovereignty of the United Kingdom is not now in the hands of the Queen; her powers have been handed over by a despicable traitor Edward Heath on the instructions of his Jewish mentors. Edicts and laws can be sent out from Brussels and Strasbourg which are enforced by traitors in the United Kingdom. European Law and Community Law is now destroying the respective laws and customs of the British realm and the very birthright of the British people.


High Treason: Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England is published by the Heretical Press, ISBN 1-901240-15-0, 14pp.

Friday 22 January 2016

The So Called British “Royal Family”: They are ALL Jews!

The So Called British “Royal Family”: They are ALL Jews!



For the last few years, I have been telling people that the British “Royal Family” are absolutely not as they seem.  I have already put up several articles in this blog that reveals how the “Queen” herself has been involved in both pedophilia rings and in murdering those who she sees as a threat to her reign.   I have said that these people are absolutely not British in any aspect, but are criminals, frauds, and have absolutely no rights to the British throne at all..
Now, I want to reveal through an article from my friend, Whitewraithe, who writes the blog: Pragmatic Witness, the facts that explain that not only are these people criminals, but they are also ALL Jewish!   I have that amazing article, entitled: “Britain’s Jewish Royal Family” right here for everyone to see for themselves, and I do, of course, have some additional thoughts and comments to follow:
Read the Full Article here 

Friday 15 January 2016

Sad But True, Europe's Zionist Politicians Betrayal of Women


Although I have my Doubts about Pat Condell via his support of Israel, On this point he is correct. I believe the Zionists are creating a situation in which The Christian west and Islam will destroy each other , leaving you know who in charge of a ruined world.

Wednesday 13 January 2016

OPERATION PASS IT ON TEN FOLD

Campaign to bring awareness to ONE MILLION British people of the MAGNA CARTA 1215 'Article 61' by the 4th of March 2016. Please share this video with TEN people that you know and ask them to do the same. We need ONE MILLION people to stand under ARTICLE 61 of the MAGNA CARTA by the 4th of March. Thank you for your support.

Tuesday 12 January 2016

Alarming The Prophecy of St. Nilus about Our Time

 I recently came across this Prophecy  of the 6th Centuary Monk St Nilus . I found it hair raising in it's detail and accracy. Just Read and make your own mind up. For after all you are your own Judge Jury and Executioner


The Prophecy of St. Nilus about

Our Times

After the year 1900, toward the middle of the 20th century, the people of that time will become unrecognizable. When the time for the Advent of the Antichrist approaches, people's minds will grow cloudy from carnal passions, and dishonor and lawlessness will grow stronger. Then the world will become unrecognizable.

People's appearances will change, and it will be impossible to distinguish men from women due to their shamelessness in dress and style of hair. These people will be cruel and will be like wild animals because of the temptations of the Antichrist. There will be no respect for parents and elders, love will disappear, and Christian pastors, Bishops and priests will become vain men, completely failing to distinguish the right-hand way from the left.

At that time, the morals and traditions of Christians and of the Church will change. People will abandon modesty, and dissipation will reign. Falsehood and greed will attain great proportions, and woe to those who pile up treasures. Lust, adultery, homosexuality, secret deeds and murder will rule in society.

Apostasy

At that future time, due to the power of such great crimes and licentiousness, people will be deprived of the grace of the Holy Spirit, which they received in Holy Baptism and equally of remorse.

The Churches of God will be deprived of God-fearing and pious pastors, and woe to the Christians remaining in the world at that time; they will completely lose their faith because they will lack the opportunity of seeing the light of knowledge from anyone at all. Then they will separate themselves out of the world in holy refuges in search of lightening their spiritual sufferings, but everywhere they will meet obstacles and constraints. And all this will result from the fact that the Antichrist wants to be Lord over everything and become the ruler of the whole universe, and he will produce miracles and fantastic signs.

Telephones, airplanes, submarines

He will also give depraved wisdom to an unhappy man so that he will discover a way by which one man can carry on a conversation with another from one end of the earth to the other. At that time men will also fly through the air like birds and descend to the bottom of the sea like fish. And when they have achieved all this, these unhappy people will spend their lives in comfort without knowing, poor souls, that it is deceit of the Antichrist. And, the impious one! - he will so complete science with vanity that it will go off the right path and lead people to lose faith in the existence of God in three hypostases.

The coming chastisement


Then the All-good God will see the downfall of the human race and will shorten the days for the sake of those few who are being saved, because the enemy wants to lead even the chosen into temptation, if that is possible... then the sword of chastisement will suddenly appear and kill the Perverter and his servants.

Friday 8 January 2016

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan - The Genocide Of The People Of Europe

The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan - The Genocide Of The People Of Europe





From: cigpapers.wordpress.com



Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still
cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is
trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend
to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon.
What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is
actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to
completely destroy the face of the continent.Read full article