Greece Today Is This Just The Tipping Point

Greek Protests are just the start

Created: Wednesday, 05 May 2010 14:43 Author: rugfish |  

Pop Up Embed " readonly="readonly" type="text"> RATE

Three killed in Greece as the people storm parliament.
People aren't terribly happy with the way their politicians have managed their country's economy to lead Greece to seeking money from the IMF and EU in the first of what many might think will be a round of handouts to prop up the masquerading Peacock States of Zanu-Europe.
I read an article from a Greek friend of mine this morning which in a nutshell, very eloquently and intelligently made the simple point that Greek's geographical position is 'different' to ours. My mate is of course fundamentally at odds with the EU but that's beside the point.
He shone a light on a simple fact that Greek culture, despite we in Europe have inherited some of it, is mainly between what we call Balkan, European and North African, and thus in many ways Greek in comparison to France, Britain and Germany for instance doesn't have the same capacity to trade within the European Union.
Resources are a problem, Greek social construct is a problem, transportation is a problem, their politics is a problem, and now their economy is a problem.
Of course Greek is a beautiful place to visit but is it able to provide employment?
Answer, hardly likely because close to 50% of Greek workers are employed as government employees, and they need a 'real economy' to pay them. Hence, they have a 'student' problem and an immigration problem, in a country without industry and now without much if any tourist trade.
Heck I wrote about this two or more years ago and said this would happen but since I was talking to idiots who want to live in an undemocratic super-state without asking anyone, then I guess I may just as well have been talking to myself.
Meanwhile, I feel sad for the three poor souls who died today in the legitimate protests of the people.
I hope Greece does the right thing, cancels its attachment to the Euro and gets its own national money printer out of storage. Because a country with its own money, with its own value, and with its self-imposing ability to make decisions for their country and their people first, is clearly the only way that Greece has of solving its 'economic problems', which seemingly did not exist until tourism came to a sudden halt as a result that our remortgage business came to a sudden halt, which led to Brits canceling holidays and cutting back on spending, which led to our very own recession here which is not likely to end up that much different to Greece if we remain a full member of the European Nightmare we call a 'union', where only two countries are really making anything out of it. i.e. France and Germany.

THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE GREAT CALIPHATE By Larry Abraham

THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS
AND THE GREAT CALIPHATE

By Larry Abraham

http://www.insiderreport.net

For an E-Mail in Response to this Article Click Here

I urge all of my readers to make copies of this report and send them to your friends and relatives. The information is too critical to be overlooked in the madness of this election year.

Part I of this essay was written in January before the Democrat Party primaries settled anything and before the occupation of Iraq took a turn for the worse. However, it is now more obvious that what I wrote about the nature of the Third Great Jihad is all too true. The political picture has deteriorated in Europe and the U.S .to a great degree since then so Part II takes these developments into consideration. Again, I urge all of you to distribute this essay as far and wide as possible without any concern for copyright violation. Our fellow citizens need to know the true nature of what we all face. LHA
As we watch and listen to all the Democrat Party candidates running for the nomination of their party, it is tantamount to enduring the Chinese water torture. The blah, blah, blah goes on and nothing of value comes out except the pain of listening to the same nothingness over and over again. I won't take the time or space to repeat what you have heard so many, mind numbing times over the past months but what you have not heard is crucial.
I must also fault President Bush and the administration spokesmen for not telling the American people what they really need to know about this "war". If they don't do that sometime between now and November it may cost them the election.
It Did Not Start on 9/11
The war we are now facing did not begin on September 11, 2001, nor will it end with the peaceful transition to civilian authorities in Iraq, whenever that may be. In fact, Iraq is but a footnote in the bigger context of this encounter, but an important one none the less.
This war is what the Jihadists themselves are calling the " Third Great Jihad" and are doing so within the framework of a time line which reaches back to the very creation of Islam in the Seventh century and their attempts to recreate the dynamics which gave rise to the religion in the first two hundred years of its existence.
No religion in history grew as fast, in its infancy, than did Islam and the reasons for this growth are not hard to explain when you understand what the world was like at the time of Muhammad's death in 632 AD. The Western Roman Empire was in ruins and the Eastern Empire was based in Constantinople and trying desperately to keep the power of its early grandeur while transitioning to Christianity as a de facto state religion. The costs to the average person were unbearable as he was being required to meet the constantly rising taxes levied from the state along with the tithes coerced by the Church. What Islam offered was the "carrot or the sword".
If you became a convert, your taxes were immediately eliminated, as was your tithe. If you didn't, you faced death. The choice was not hard for most to make, unless you were a very devoted martyr in the making. At the beginning, even the theology was not too hard for most to swallow, considering that both Jewry and Christianity were given their due by the Prophet. There is but one God-Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophet, as was Jesus, and the pre-Christian Jewish prophets of the Torah (old testament). Both were called "children of the book", the book being the Koran, which replaced both the Old and New testaments for Christians and Jews.
With this practical approach to spreading the "word" Islam grew like wild fire, reaching out from the Saudi Arabian Peninsula in all directions. This early growth is what the Muslims call the "first" great Jihad and it met with little resistance until Charles Martel of France, the father of Charlemagne, stopped them in the battle of Tours in France, after they had firmly established the religion on the Iberian peninsula. This first onslaught against the West continued in various forms and at various times until Islam was finally driven out of Spain in 1492 at the battle of Granada.
The "second great jihad" came with the Ottoman Turks. This empire succeeded in bringing about the downfall of Constantinople as a Christian stronghold and an end to Roman hegemony in all of its forms. The Ottoman Empire was Islam's most successful expansion of territory even though the religion itself had fractured into warring sects and bitter rivalries with each claiming the ultimate truths in "the ways of the Prophet". By 1683 the Ottomans had suffered a series of defeats on both land and sea and the final and failed attempt to capture Vienna set the stage for the collapse of any further territorial ambitions and Islam shrunk into various sheikhdoms, emir dominated principalities, and roving tribes of nomads. However, by this time a growing anti-western sentiment, blaming its internal failures on anyone but themselves, was taking hold and setting the stage for a new revival know has Wahhabism which came into full bloom under the House of Saud on the Arabian peninsula shortly before the onset of WWI. It is this Wahhabi version of Islam which has infected the religion itself, now finding adherents in almost all branches and sects, especially the Shiites. What this sect calls for is the complete and total rejection of anything and everything which is not based in the original teachings of The Prophet and it finds its most glaring practice in the policies of the Afgani Taliban or the Shiite practices of the late Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. Its Ali Pasha (Field Marshall) is now known as Osama bin Laden, the leader of the "third Jihad".
Jimmy Carter sets the stage
The strategy for this "holy war" did not begin with the planning of the destruction of the World Trade Center. It began with the plans for toppling the Shah of Iran back in the early 1970's and culminated with his exile in 1979. With his plans and programs to "westernize" his country, along with his close ties to the U.S. and subdued acceptance of the State of Israel, the Shah was the soft target.
Thanks, in large part to the hypocritical and disastrous policies of the Jimmy Carter State Department the revolution was set into motion, the Shah was deposed, his arm forces scattered or murdered and stage one was complete. The Third Jihad now had a base of operations and the oil wealth to support its grand design or what they call the "Great Caliphate".
The Great Caliphate
What this design calls for is the replacement of all secular leadership in any country with Muslim majorities. This would include, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, all the Emirates, Sudan, Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and finally what they call the "occupied territory" Israel.
As a part of this strategy, forces of the jihad will infiltrate governments and the military as a prelude to taking control, once the secular leadership is ousted or assassinated. Such was the case in Lebanon leading to the Syrian occupation and what was attempted in Egypt with the murder of Anwar Sadat, along with the multiple attempts on the lives of Hussein in Jordan, Mubarak of Egypt and Musharraf in Pakistan. Pakistan is a particular prize because of its nuclear weapons.
The long-range strategy of the Third Jihad counts on three strategic goals. 1. The U.S. withdrawing from the region just as it did in Southeast Asia, following Vietnam. 2. Taking control of the oil wealth in the Muslim countries, which would be upwards to 75% of known reserves, and 3. Using nuclear weapons or other WMDs to annihilate Israel. A further outcome of successfully achieving these objectives would be to place the United Nations as the sole arbiter in East/West negotiations.

Evidence of the Bush Administration awareness of this plan is found in the facts that immediately following the 9/11 attack, their first move was to shore up Pakistan and Egypt, believing that these two would be the next targets for al Qaeda while Americans focused on the disaster in New York. The administration also knew that the most important objective was to send a loud and clear message that the U.S. was in the region to stay, not only to shore up our allies but to send a message to the Jihadists. The attack on Afghanistan was necessary to break-up a secure al Qaeda base of operations and put their leadership on the run or in prison. Why Iraq?
The war on Iraq also met a very strategic necessity in that no one knew how much collaboration existed between Saddam Hussein and the master planners of the Third Jihad or his willingness to hand off WMDs to terrorist groups including the PLO in Israel. What was known, were serious indications of on-going collaboration, as Saddam funneled money to families of suicide bombers attacking the Israelis and others in Kuwait.
What the U.S. needed to establish was a significant base of operations smack dab in the middle of the Islamic world, in a location which effectively cut it in half. Iraq was the ideal target for this and a host of other strategic reasons.
Leadership of various anti-American groups both here and abroad understood the vital nature of the Bush initiative and thus launched their demonstrations, world-wide, to "Stop The War". Failing this, they also laid plans to build a political campaign inside the country, with the War in Iraq as a plebiscite, using a little know politician as the thrust point; Howard Dean. This helps to explain how quickly the Radical Left moved into the Dean campaign with both people and money, creating what the clueless media called the "Dean Phenomenon".
By building on the left-wing base in the Democrat party and the "Hate Bush" liberals, the campaign has already resulted in a consensus among the aspirants, minus Joe Lieberman, to withdraw the U.S. from Iraq and turn the operation over to the U.N. And, if past is prologue, i.e. Vietnam, once the U.S. leaves it will not go back under any circumstances, possibly even the destruction of Israel.
Should George W. Bush be defeated in November and a new administration come to power we could expect to see the dominoes start to fall in the secular Islamic countries and The Clash of Civilizations would then become a life changing event in all of our lives.
What surprised the Jihadists following the 9/11 attack was how American sentiment mobilized around the president and a profound sense of patriotism spread across the country They were not expecting this reaction, based on what had happened in the past, nor were they expecting the determined resolve of the President himself. I believe that this is one of the reasons we have not had any further attacks within our borders. They are content to wait, just as one of their tactical mentors, V.I. Lenin admonished "two steps forward, one step back".
A couple of additional events serve as valuable footnotes to the current circumstances we face: the destruction of the human assets factor of the CIA during the Carter presidency, presided over by the late Senator Frank Church and Carter's CIA Director, Admiral Stansfield Turner. This fact has plagued our intelligence agencies right up to this very day with consequences which are now obvious. Jimmy Carter is the one man who must bear the bulk of the responsibility for setting the stage of the Third Jihad. Americans should find little comfort in how the Democrat contenders constantly seek the "advice and counsel" of this despicable little hypocrite who now prances around with his Nobel Prize, while attacking President Bush with almost as much venom as his fellow Nobel Laureate, Yassir Arafat.
Lastly, we should not expect to see any meaningful cooperation from Western Europe, especially the French.

Since failing to protect their own interests in Algeria by turning the country over to the first of the Arab terrorists, Amid Ben Bella, the country itself is now occupied by Islamic immigrants totally twenty percent of the population. We are in the battle of our lives which will go on for many years possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we are facing or falter in the challenge of "knowing our enemy" the results will be catastrophic.
PART II (May 1, 2004)
Since writing the above, we have witnessed some frightening evidence in support of our hypothesis both internally and in other parts of the world.
The al Qaeda bombing in Madrid has emboldened our enemy into believing it can use terror as an instrument for democratic regime change. Based on what happened there, they may be right.
Kerry and bin Laden on the same page
John Kerry and other leaders of his party constantly refer to the United States as "acting unilaterally." They give no credit whatsoever to countries like Great Britain, Poland, Italy, Australia or even tiny Honduras for putting their limited armed forces in harm's way to support the U.S. led coalition in Iraq. It is little wonder that some are considering doing what Spain has done" pulling out. The leaders in these countries have spent considerable political capital in this effort, and have little to show for it as it relates to fostering good will with the American public. Couple that fact with Osama bin Ladin's latest offer of withholding attacks on those who "quit" the coalition and you have all the elements for a Democrat party fostered "self-fulfilling prophecy" where the U.S. will be totally alone in the pacification of Iraq. John Kerry and the Bush critics persist in the "lie" of the U.S. going it "alone" in Iraq but Osama bin Laden knows differently and will use the Kerry rhetoric to help isolate the U.S. The terrorists now see themselves as political "king-makers". They may be right.
Another aspect of the "anti-Bush" political axis is how both his political enemies and the main stream media take ghoulish delight in "the body count," just as they did in the later days of Vietnam. Oh sure, they pay incidental homage to the memory of the young Americans who gave their lives in the greatest threat this country has ever faced, but they do so with all the sincerity of Madonna making a vow of chastity. As the body bags grow in number, they believe, so grows their political prospects. They may be right.
If the Bush administration is further weakened in the months leading up to the November elections, we will witness a heightened al Qaeda offensive in all parts of the world, including our own country, and especially in Iraq and nations surrounding it ,i.e., Pakistan, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Events within the past few days in Jordan not only make this argument but also point to the possibility of "what happened to the WMDs."
Iran and Syria are daily growing more overt and bold in their support of insurgents within Iraq, believing that Bush has been so hurt by internal politics that he is powerless to act against them in any meaningful way. They may be right.
The Leftwing initiative, Political Correctness and Our Will to Win
Within our own country we are witnessing and almost insane application of "political correctness. " As the barbarism of radical Islam grows more apparent in the streets of the Middle East from Gaza to Basra, we see a cultural suicide taking place within our own schools and communities.
Our children are being taught from the Koran, our professors are preaching intifadah in their class rooms, and Muslim "call to prayer" loud speakers are blaring out from city halls. The more precarious our very existence becomes, the more our liberal brethren embrace their enemies. It is a Stockholm Syndrome which can only lead to the recruitment of young Muslims who will be willing to duplicate in the West what their co-religionists are doing in the streets of Israel and the market places of Baghdad. The liberal P.C. crowd say nothing about the silence of the Muslim religious leadership as it relates to the carnage of innocents but couldn't speak out fast enough against the inspiration supplied to tens of millions of Christians by Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. They were put off by the movie's "violence" and its alleged "fostering of anti-Semitism". Movies must represent their "reality" as the real thing moves them not at all. Among liberal Jews in America, hatred of George W. Bush is only surpassed by their contempt for Ariel Sharon; Let them explain it, I am at a total loss to do so. Maybe they just miss seeing Bill Clinton smooching Yassir Arafat in the White House Rose Garden.
The "Reverend" Jesse Jackson is now calling the U.S. "guilty of crimes against humanity" as he sets out to mobilize the non-Islamic Left. None of the Democrat leadership says a word in opposition to Jackson's treason or Hillary's attacks on the President and U.S. policy in an Arabic newspaper, while in London. You can bet that al Jezeera didn't miss a beat in their reporting of both events.
The campaign takes its toll
The campaign is seriously hurting Mr. Bush's leadership role in the War on Terror. While ducking every new book critical of his initiative or trying to counter the partisan nitpicking of the 9/11 Commission, he has persisted in the misbegotten insistence of "installing democracy" in Iraq. Our purpose for being in that beleaguered country should be restricted to one purpose and one purpose only, to stop the expansion of The Third Jihad and provide a base for doing same in the neighboring areas. This can be done by sealing the borders, attacking anything that moves in violation of same and by making it clear to Syria and Iran that any participation on their part will be considered an "act of war". Let the country be governed by the local tribes, Shiite in the south, Sunni in the central and Kurds in the north with a U.S. pro consul overseeing the military. Oil revenues could be spilt by population allocation. How about installing a Republic; it worked pretty well here with diverse populations.
The very idea that we should spend our sons and daughters blood or our tax dollars on trying to building a "democracy" in the region which has neither a history nor a desire for such, is sheer nonsense. The very essence of Islamic teaching speaks directly against this principle. Continuing on the current path can only result in fostering greater hatred for the "Great Satan". Force is the only thing which is respected in that part of the world and this force need not be tied to "reform". I suggest Mr. Rumsfled acquaint himself with a copy of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars and Sun Tsu's Art of War. All the tactics and strategies necessary to subdue the Iraqi insurgents can be found in those two military gems.
Please not the UN
Bringing the U.N. to the party will only compound the problem without adding any accountability. The U.N. has been accused of many things over the years, but being a "democratic" institution has never been one of them. Just the latest scandal of the "Oil for Food" program should provide any thinking person with all the evidence they need to keep the U.N. at bay. But this doesn't seem to bother the likes of the John Kerry's of the world who prattle on as if the scam doesn't even exist.
Just one example will make my case; the UN mandate in Israel, which has been in place since 1948. One more salient point needs to be made on this subject. There is no such thing as "The International Community." There are only individual countries, each with its own agenda which is always self serving. The myth of a higher level of "moral authority" coming out of the UN as been one of the greater lies of the past half century, but it is a lie which persists in spite of a bloody record of hypocrisy, graft, genocide and "perpetual war for perpetual peace." I have a suggestion for the 9/11 Commission:.Why don't they look into what the UN was doing before the attack on the World Trade Center? If they do, they will find that exactly one week before, the UN was holding a Conference on Racism in Durbin, South Africa where the delegates voted overwhelmingly to condemn Israel, as "racist and terrorist." The U.S., Canadian and Israeli delegates walked out in disgust. Nary a word was uttered about Saddam Hussein, al Qaeda, or the Taliban, to say nothing of what was happening in Rwanda while they crunched caviar on toast and washed it down with vintage Champaign. Genocide does not qualify as "racism" according to the UN "morality." Neither we nor the world needs the UN to muck up what is already a very delicate situation. If given proper leadership every Middle Eastern country named above will throw in with the Coalition, for if they don't they will be the next targets of the Third Great Jihad and the Great Caliphate. Pakistan is already showing the leadership which others will follow. What do you think moved Kadahaffi to cozy up to the U.S. and Great Britain? He fears the Jihadist more than he hates us.
Evil Does Exist
Our current crises, in meeting the threat of the Third Jihad, is one more example of how most Americans simply refuse to believe there is evil in this world and are willing to grant moral equivalence on any human action. Unless the crime is personalized such as in the case of Lacy Peterson, we lose interest quickly and become bored or at least not involved.
To try and understand what we are facing, look into the eyes of your son or grandson and try to fathom a mind which would take pride in strapping a bomb to his body and sending him out to kill himself and countless innocent people. Or in the case of your daughter or grand daughter, try to imagine a religion which commands you to mutilate her vagina to destroy her sex drive or demands you to stone her to death if she has sexual relations with a man other than of your choosing.
If you can comprehend these facts both intellectually and emotionally, then you will start to understand what we are facing in the months and years ahead, both at home and abroad.
The radicals of Islam will stop at nothing to destroy us and all we stand for. They see this war as their "entry to paradise" and a release from the miserable existence they have built for themselves within the confines of an evil and perverse religion. The Jihadist are NOT like us, nor most of their fellow Muslims. But, like terrorists everywhere they have silenced any criticisms from fellow Muslims through threat and intimidation and have, with the help of the "useful idiots" in the West, "created the appearance of popular support".
If we are incapable of understanding these realities and acting accordingly, within the life time of everyone who reads these words, we will see our cherished way of life cease to exist and chaos become our lot. The Clash of Civilizations is now reaching out and touching all of us. May God grant us the wisdom and the courage to meet the challenge.
I respectfully dedicate the above to the memory of Pat Tillman and his 872 comrades who by their courage and willing sacrifice set an example for every American. May we be worthy of their "greatest love"



Back to Top                Master Index

Tell Them "You saw 'Their Web Page' on the Web at JoshuaTreeVillage.com." Please direct web site issues to NJC@JoshuaTreeVillage.com . Web site designed and maintained by NJC Web Creations Site Disclaimer ©Copyright 2004. All rights reserved.

Global Elections Civil War Afghans to vote in our Elections

Global Elections Civil War

Created: Wednesday, 05 May 2010 15:56 Author: rugfish |  

Perhaps someone can tell me if I am actually living in my own nightmare, when I learn that 'our' government is allowing foreigners in Afghanistan to vote in our elections to appoint a government which will rule our country?
Perhaps someone can look into the legality of this?
Perhaps someone can tell me I AM really living in a nightmare, but that I will wake up, and I won't have to dream that I have a foreign government running my country.
Surely, there is a person out there who is able to answer the question as to what the effin hell are the political parties doing in this and others countries, when our own troops have had their votes removed.
Globally the nutcases who support these clowns have only one aim in life and you'd best wake up to it.
It is to KILL BRITAIN, and the British people's ability to regain control of their country by any means other than armed uprising.

BOLTON ASIAN RACE ATTACK ON YOUNG BRITISH MAN

ANOTHER ASIAN RACIST PACK ATTACK ON A YOUNG BRITISH MAN AND HIS SON, WHY  IS THE POLICE AND GOVERNMENT  NOT PROTECTING US FROM THESE MONSTERS IF IT WAS THE OTHER WAY ROUND IT WOULD BE ANOTHER LAWRENCE CIRCUS!


Fro m BEN 5/05/2010

A YOUNG dad has been scarred for life after racist thugs slashed his face as his five-year-old son watched in terror.
Doctors said Reece Johnson would have died if the wound been just a couple of millimetres longer.
He was walking past the entrance to Bobby Heywood Park, in Great Lever, with his son and a friend when he was targeted by a mob of 20 thugs.
The 23-year-old, who was returning home from Blackpool after a day out with pals, said the Asian gang claimed to be avenging the murder of a 19- year-old in the same park in November, 2007.
They were referring to the death of Seffar Khan who was killed by two teenagers who repeatedly stamped on his head.
Mr Johnson, of Rigby Court, Great Lever, said: “They were saying ‘you killed one of ours’ meaning white people killed an Asian lad.
“They attacked me because of the colour of my skin. They were very racist.”
The incident happened at around 10.45pm on Saturday.
Mr Johnson was with his son, Tyrel, and a friend when they walked towards the gang, who were outside the park’s Lever Street entrance.
One of the men stood in front of the trio and said “What’s up?”
Mr Johnson said the man was acting aggressively and the group was swearing and hurling racist abuse.
He added: “I did say something racist back.
But I have nothing against any religion and I have Asian friends. I only said something back in the heat of the moment.
The lads who attacked me have no respect. My little son was with me — he’s five years old.
“He was traumatised.
He was screaming, clinging on to one of my friend’s legs.
“I saw one of them in front of me with a small hand knife. I was watching him.
“But then another lad came at the side of me and punched me and that’s when I was slashed.
I was scared for my life.”
Medical staff told Mr Johnson that if the blade had continued another few millimetres then it would have hit his jugular vein.
He added: “The nurse said it must have been a very sharp blade, like a razor.
“She said another finger tip across my neck and that would have been it, I would have died.”
Mr Johnson was taken to a specialist facial unit at the Royal Blackburn Hospital on Saturday night. He was given 20 stitches inside his face and another 48 on the outside.

The father-of-three said he and his girlfriend will now move home because they are scared to return to the area. He said his son has been badly affected by the attack.
He added: “He was very upset, he was hysterical.
He woke up the other night crying. That is not normal for him.
“There are people in the community that know who has done it but it is whether they are brave enough to admit it.”
A police spokesman said: “An argument broke out and during this, the man was slashed across the left cheek, suffering a six-inch wound.”
A 16-year-old was arrested but later released without charge.
Anyone with information should call Bolton CID on 0161 856 5740 or Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111

ELECTION 2010 IN LESS THAN 24 Hrs YOU CAN SAVE OUR NATION & PEOPLE

IN LESS THAN 24 Hrs YOU CAN SAVE OUR NATION & PEOPLE


By Horwich nationalists
05/05/2010
With less than 24 hours to the start of polling in this most crucial of elections of the last 30 years, you have the fate of our nation and people in your hands. As it is a fact that they will be both gone from the face of the earth within 50 years forever. 50 years you say! Yes 50 years, the forces of Globalisation in the form of a alliance between the forces of big business and Marxism who view each other as usefull idiots in their goal of world domination, have been plotting the ultimate destruction of this nation and it,s people to further their aims, why? you ask.

In the case of the global multi national business interests the British Nation is seen only as a market and in their case they are willing to finance the old three political parties in order that they allow any legislation that will allow the free market to dissolve national borders so avoiding any duties or cross border taxes and free movement of cheap expendable labour no matter what the detrimental  social implications will be to the indigenous population.  IE enrichment means just that but for just the few billionares who bank roll the main parties Lord Ashcroft for the Tories what will he want for his funding of there election campaign, better social housing , I THINK NOT!

In the case of the Marxists globalists theirs is a far more dangerous agenda for their aim is to completely destroy western culture and traditions forever. For years they have been implementing the theories of a little known Italian Marxist called Antonio Gramsci  
 who stated that
“Socialism is precisely the religion that must overwhelm Christianity. … In the new order, Socialism will triumph by first capturing the culture via infiltration of schools, universities, churches and the media by transforming the consciousness of society.”    
His work was later expanded on by a Marxist philosopher called Herbert marcuse In effect to destroy Western Civilisation by promoting and creating a sense culture based on alleged tolerance that will create moral equivalence to any perversion by pre occupying peoples lives with sex, so much  that all other moral and cultural & political values are subjugated. As we we see in all the media today with promotion of homosexuality as the norm, even in our Churches! and TV programmes such as Sex in the City & Cougar Town , Sex education no more than condom distribution, The acceptance of the murder of millions of our unborn children, and now even more worrying for us baby boom generation now in our 50,s the promotion of euthanasia on the grounds of there in pain put them out of their misery! 

And the more dangerous aspect of this would be that the sense  culture that would and now is being set by these Marxist is flexible to the whim of the state, the permanent values of the west would be lost forever. we will end up with , To many old folk put them down, to many children abort a few, a terrifying scenario! 

And  by destroying National Identities by the promotion of unchecked immigration therefore fragmenting a society to such an extent that it cannot unite against a political elite, Diversity is just another word for Division! 


And also the use of the Environmental agenda for the control of people and resources, how often do you here the greens ranting against the car and airplane , how wonderfull for them would it be to have a static population unable to move from one are of a nation to the other unless you gain permission to use the resources to do so!

even these Marxist know that once there agenda is completed that there may be a need for a spiritual outlet for some of their controlled population, therefore what better religion than Islam who core pennant's are submission to higher authorities, unlike they Judea christian tradition were man is sovereign and has a choice in his actions. I must recommend to you all the works of larry Abrahams  
on all these matters a intellectual giant of a man! who has foreseen the dangers as far back of forty years ago. 

This is why for years they have attacked the forces of Nationalism in the form of the British National party , we are the defenders of western culture and values it heritage it,s peoples, they have made us out to be a bogeyman , but in fact they are the wolves in sheep's clothing!
please think about not just your own future, but what horrors await your children and grand children if we fail in our task to save our nation and it,s people, I personally am coming to the conclusion that we are involved in a titanic battle between good and evil ! And that the British National Party has a mandate from Heaven to save our Nation from these forces of Evil!
please vote 

The British National Party – Is A Centrist Christian Party

The BNP – A Centrist Party

Created: Wednesday, 05 May 2010 09:04 Author: Dave Yorkshire |

Imagine if you will that it is a hundred years ago today. It is a very different Britain from the one we know. There are virtually no buildings higher than a church steeple or a factory chimney to be seen. There is more space, more countryside, more public houses – which are all filled on an evening by men indulging in panel games. There is a sense of community – not in the sense that Gordon Brown talks about it: ‘the Bangladeshi community’ this, ‘the Muslim community’ that – but real social cohesion that in not artificially forced and monitored, but which comes from real deep-binding ancestral affiliations and a shared common culture.

The law is different too. One can be hanged for treason or murder or rape. Theft and violent disorder are punished by long sentences involving hard labour. Perhaps not so coincidentally, there is little crime, and children play out in the streets free from even knowing such vocabulary as ‘paedophile’ or ‘nonce’.

Imagine if you will that in 1910 a new political party is formed by a group of people concerned about the corruption in politics. They call the party the British National Party, as they wish to display their patriotism. The Conservatives of the time approve of their love of country and the indigenous British people, and are in favour of their support for British businesses, but do not like their policies about nationalising public services, nor are they in favour of national pensions and welfare for the elderly and disabled. These sound like Liberal policies, but at least they don’t go anywhere near as far as the recently-formed Labour Party’s Clause Four that proposes to put the means of industry into the hands of the workers. That has a whiff of Marxism to it.

The Liberals meanwhile see the BNP as quite a progressive party. They are a little more to the left economically and just as far to the right as the Conservatives in terms of preserving Britain’s traditions, heritage and culture. As for law and order, the BNP are happy as things stand. It is the policy of governmental investment for the future that is the real eye-opener for the other parties. The Conservatives have long had the idea of aristocratic patronage to further Britain’s technological and scientific development, whereas Labour and the Liberals do not seem to consider such development at all.

In all, then, circa 1910, the BNP would be considered a rather centrist party – unlike how they are portrayed today as ‘the extreme right’. This just goes to show how far left society has swung, or rather been dragged, and how near to the extreme left mainstream society now rests. Certainly, if one looks back to even fifty years ago, the practice of homosexuality was technically a crime (though tolerated); now even if a Baptist preacher dares suggest that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of the Lord, he will be carted off to a dark cell. Just like Dale McAlpine was the other day.

Treason is now the norm and rewarded with peerages, whereas patriotism is punishable by law. Again, ask 74 year-old Roy Newman, who was visited by police after putting up the political sign ‘Get the lot out’ in red, white and blue in his window. Evil is the new good and good is the new evil, as all the Bible’s teachings have been subverted in accordance with neo-Marxist doctrine and Christianity all-but criminalised. In a stream of illogic, the Frankfurt School’s Theodor Adorno in his Minima Moralia negated church and the very notion of spirituality thus:

The power of occultism [his term for Christian worship], as of fascism, to which it is connected by thought patterns of the ilk of anti-Semitism, is not only pathic… Only in the metaphor of the body can the concept of pure spirit be grasped at all, and is at the same time cancelled. In their reification, the spirits are already negated… No spirit exists.

Note the attempt at linking Christianity with fascism and anti-Semitism. This is again to make centrist social norms seem as though they come from the extreme right, when in fact this doctrine, the doctrine of the Labour Party is that of the extreme left.

The problem is that the other two parties, the Liberals and Tories have been dragged over to the left as Labour has moved ever towards the extreme left. The great tragedy of the two world wars, aside from the loss of life, was that extreme leftist ideas became ever more acceptable, as anything that was deemed diametrically opposite to Nazism was considered moral, instead of as another form of extremism.

The leftists gained ever higher positions in our institutions, especially in educational ones, where they could brainwash our young into becoming clones of themselves: the great unwashed. They promoted within their ranks; ideological sycophants were preferred to those of high ability. In any case, ability is anathema to the leftist – rather like soap! Incidentally, why do leftists insist on looking like tramps? I’ve begun to consider launching a counter-leftist lobby group called ‘Soap not Hate’!

And when one looks, it was not those of the extreme left in Britain or Germany who fought against Hitler. Michael Foot was excused after producing a sick note from his mother; the Frankfurt School relocated to America to spread their poison there. It was left to the centrist average Joe Bloggs in the street, who believed in the centrist ideas of patriotism, tradition and loyalty to one’s people and culture to fight the tyranny of fascism, while the leftists plotted their overthrow of the West.

Remember this when you go to the ballot box: the BNP is a centrist party.

Created: Wednesday, 05 May 2010 09:04 Author: Dave Yorkshire |  

Imagine if you will that it is a hundred years ago today. It is a very different Britain from the one we know. There are virtually no buildings higher than a church steeple or a factory chimney to be seen. There is more space, more countryside, more public houses – which are all filled on an evening by men indulging in panel games. There is a sense of community – not in the sense that Gordon Brown talks about it: ‘the Bangladeshi community’ this, ‘the Muslim community’ that – but real social cohesion that in not artificially forced and monitored, but which comes from real deep-binding ancestral affiliations and a shared common culture.

The law is different too. One can be hanged for treason or murder or rape. Theft and violent disorder are punished by long sentences involving hard labour. Perhaps not so coincidentally, there is little crime, and children play out in the streets free from even knowing such vocabulary as ‘paedophile’ or ‘nonce’.

Imagine if you will that in 1910 a new political party is formed by a group of people concerned about the corruption in politics. They call the party the British National Party, as they wish to display their patriotism. The Conservatives of the time approve of their love of country and the indigenous British people, and are in favour of their support for British businesses, but do not like their policies about nationalising public services, nor are they in favour of national pensions and welfare for the elderly and disabled. These sound like Liberal policies, but at least they don’t go anywhere near as far as the recently-formed Labour Party’s Clause Four that proposes to put the means of industry into the hands of the workers. That has a whiff of Marxism to it.

The Liberals meanwhile see the BNP as quite a progressive party. They are a little more to the left economically and just as far to the right as the Conservatives in terms of preserving Britain’s traditions, heritage and culture. As for law and order, the BNP are happy as things stand. It is the policy of governmental investment for the future that is the real eye-opener for the other parties. The Conservatives have long had the idea of aristocratic patronage to further Britain’s technological and scientific development, whereas Labour and the Liberals do not seem to consider such development at all.

In all, then, circa 1910, the BNP would be considered a rather centrist party – unlike how they are portrayed today as ‘the extreme right’. This just goes to show how far left society has swung, or rather been dragged, and how near to the extreme left mainstream society now rests. Certainly, if one looks back to even fifty years ago, the practice of homosexuality was technically a crime (though tolerated); now even if a Baptist preacher dares suggest that homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of the Lord, he will be carted off to a dark cell. Just like Dale McAlpine was the other day.

Treason is now the norm and rewarded with peerages, whereas patriotism is punishable by law. Again, ask 74 year-old Roy Newman, who was visited by police after putting up the political sign ‘Get the lot out’ in red, white and blue in his window. Evil is the new good and good is the new evil, as all the Bible’s teachings have been subverted in accordance with neo-Marxist doctrine and Christianity all-but criminalised. In a stream of illogic, the Frankfurt School’s Theodor Adorno in his Minima Moralia negated church and the very notion of spirituality thus:

The power of occultism [his term for Christian worship], as of fascism, to which it is connected by thought patterns of the ilk of anti-Semitism, is not only pathic… Only in the metaphor of the body can the concept of pure spirit be grasped at all, and is at the same time cancelled. In their reification, the spirits are already negated… No spirit exists.

Note the attempt at linking Christianity with fascism and anti-Semitism. This is again to make centrist social norms seem as though they come from the extreme right, when in fact this doctrine, the doctrine of the Labour Party is that of the extreme left.

The problem is that the other two parties, the Liberals and Tories have been dragged over to the left as Labour has moved ever towards the extreme left. The great tragedy of the two world wars, aside from the loss of life, was that extreme leftist ideas became ever more acceptable, as anything that was deemed diametrically opposite to Nazism was considered moral, instead of as another form of extremism.

The leftists gained ever higher positions in our institutions, especially in educational ones, where they could brainwash our young into becoming clones of themselves: the great unwashed. They promoted within their ranks; ideological sycophants were preferred to those of high ability. In any case, ability is anathema to the leftist – rather like soap! Incidentally, why do leftists insist on looking like tramps? I’ve begun to consider launching a counter-leftist lobby group called ‘Soap not Hate’!

And when one looks, it was not those of the extreme left in Britain or Germany who fought against Hitler. Michael Foot was excused after producing a sick note from his mother; the Frankfurt School relocated to America to spread their poison there. It was left to the centrist average Joe Bloggs in the street, who believed in the centrist ideas of patriotism, tradition and loyalty to one’s people and culture to fight the tyranny of fascism, while the leftists plotted their overthrow of the West.

Remember this when you go to the ballot box: the BNP is a centrist party.

Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year

Overpopulation: Labour Gave British Citizenship to 203,865 People Last Year 2009

BNP Newsroom

Looking at the latest figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS), immigration for last year alone has now reached half a million. So much for Labour’s electioneering-inspired claim that it is being reduced.

The point is that we must not let the people forget that former Labour adviser Andrew Leather has revealed what the BNP always suspected. The Labour Government in 2001 decided to purposely open up Britain’s borders as a “driving political purpose”.
That purpose, he admitted, was that mass immigration was the way the Government was going to make Britain “truly multicultural”. The grateful immigrants would also vote overwhelmingly for Labour, thus keeping them in power.
Neither must we forget that at this election the “multiracial Tory Party” is only committed to “bringing in more controls over immigration”, The Lib Dems seem happy with the status quo.
UKIP has supported a view put forward by some individual Tories that we should allow into the country the same number of people that depart these shores. With complete disregard for the higher birth rate among the immigrant population – and Muslims in particular – this still means that the indigenous Britons will become a minority within 30 years.
However, back to the latest immigration figures. The ONS figures show that in 2009 203,865 people were granted British citizenship, which was 58 per cent more than the previous year.
Additionally, more than 190,000 were given the right to settle.
Also, the non-EU “student” visa numbers again increased to a total of 250,000. It has been widely reported in the media, including by David Metcalf, chairman of the Migration Advisory Committee, that the student visa system is frequently abused, with up to 600 lower tier colleges either offering “Mickey Mouse” degrees or none at all. Apart from the one in eight “students” who were completely bogus, the Government has allowed those who have gained their degrees to stay on in employment.
Labour has repeatedly told us that many East European workers are now going home. An investigative report by Tom Whitehead in the Daily Telegraph (17/02/10) said, however, that officials in some towns and cities insist migrants are still arriving. This is certainly the case in Boston, Lincs, Peterborough and Slough, which have all seen a large recent influx of migrants.
Officials in Boston claim there are 75,000 people living in the town, compared with an official estimate of 62,000; Peterborough’s officials say they have 184,000 people, not 164,000; and officials in Slough claim it has up to 140,000 people, rather than the official 124,000.
Carol Clare, head of Boston’s Park Community primary school, said about half her pupils were from overseas and this would rise to 60 per cent.
Reprinted from the spring edition of the BNP’s Identity magazine – free to all Party members. 

Climate Change and Mental Health in Nottingham

Climate Change and Mental Health in Nottingham

May 4, 2010 - By mercia

A newspaper advertisement for a “climate change manager” for Nottingham City Council has once again illustrated just how dearly this fad costs the hard-pressed British taxpayer.

Exactly why Nottingham City Council regards the acquisition of a “climate change manager” as a must — and a very expensive must at that — when all the evidence shows that climate change has been occurring for as long as planet earth has been in existence, is not explained.

Furthermore, observers have asked is there something about the climate in the city of Nottingham and its environs that sets it aside from that embracing the remainder of the country.

If Nottingham Civic Centre’s water supply still utilises the city’s original system of Victorian lead pipes, then that could explain a lot.

Either way a recent advertisement placed in the Guardian for a “climate change manager”, at a salary of up to £39,855 per annum, does suggest that there are some at the Labour controlled town hall in dire need of a mental assessment, in a city increasingly blighted by poverty and unemployment.

A British National Party administration would no more be seeking to employ a “climate change manager” than an alchemist with a remit to turn base metal into gold.

Instead, a BNP administration would spend council taxpayers’ money on real services that benefit the whole community — with the funding of a mental health manager’s post being a distinct possibility.

British National Party Website read more 

The GreeningThe Greening the Environmentalists Drive for Global Power, 

Welcome to the United Kingdom of Pakistan

Welcome to the United Kingdom of Pakistan
Created: Tuesday, 04 May 2010 14:38 Author: rugfish

Pop Up Embed Embed this video on your site

Cameron appears to think all Muslims are like the cosy couple he spent 2 days with when he became the Tory scapegoat for the next parliament.

He apparently feels his ability to control Islam in the UK amounts to the easier task of controlling the British people with laws of 'hate crimes', and antagonising speeches like the last couple he's made where he's referred to British people who fundamentally disagree with his mental attitude that they are all despicable racists and fascists simply because they happen not to want their country to become another Islamic state like the shit holes he wants to take more voters from.

Apparently Cameron is so far up his own arse, he feels with a 2 seat majority gained from a fraudulent ballot in a fake general election, that this will give him the moral authority and power to dictate our way of thinking, along with blocking the rights to protest of millions of people who see the hostility toward us in our own country by his ethnic Tories, is outweighed only by the hostility shown by the likes of Cameron and his UAF hammer throwing UAF kooks, who together are behaving like Marxists rather than Conservatives with an aim for a 'Big Society' which excludes the British people but only if they happen to be white Christians.

He obviously thinks that HIS way of thinking is right, and that anyone who doesn't want to be raped or murdered with a machete, endure darts, hammers or bricks as they would in any other Islamic country if coming up against the mad ideological mass hysteria of Islam, or not wanting their kids to be brainwashed by Marxists that a paedophile prophet who wanted his followers to conquer the earth by sword, simply because he said so, is wrong.

Article
Thursday, April 15, 2010
By Murtaza Ali Shah LONDON:
Pakistan and Afghanistan will be the single-most important foreign policy commitment of an incoming Conservative government, says David Cameron, who is leading the 6th May election race in Britain with almost 8 points lead.
In an exclusive interview, the Tory leader said if he forms the government in a months time, Pakistan will find a strong partner committed to the beleaguered nations stability and prosperity.
David Cameron told The News that once in power, the Tories will continue to assist the Government of Pakistan in education, healthcare and employment, particularly in areas that have been affected by the recent campaign against insurgents.
After he became the Conservative Leader, Cameron spent two days with a British-Pakistani Muslim family, the Rehmans, in Birmingham. He says the experience strengthened his conviction about the right way to build a more cohesive Britain.
Cameron promises that he will take concrete measures to promote integration of various communities in the mainstream and it will not be one of those tactics already applied by the Labour. He will start by tackling the poison of racism and bigotry.
“The truth is that your skin colour still unjustly affects the patterns of your life ñ from whether you are born in poverty to how you do at school; from being a victim of crime to not getting a job. Itís wrong and it needs to change.”
Promoting community interaction and bringing people together is a must and he has proposed to create a National Citizen Service programme for 16-year olds to give them a chance to mix with people from different backgrounds.
He promises that if his party wins the election on 6th may, he will review all counter-terrorism legislation to make sure there is the right balance between security and our civil liberties.
“Under Tories, there will be more Muslim men and women at the top of Britainís businesses. It means more Muslim soldiers in the highest levels of command in our Army. It means getting many, many more Muslims into our Parliament.”
He held up Pakistani-origin boxer Amir Khan and business mogul Sir Anwar Pervez as the role models who inspire everyone. “If I become prime minister, I am determined to help and encourage and promote more role models so that together we can build a country open to the talents of everyone. ” Muslims in Britain have been under attack in many forms since the 9/11 and 7/7 tragedies.
Far-right groups, British National Party, National Front and a new group English Defence League (EDF) have made the Muslims target of their hate campaign.
Cameron says the standoffs between Muslim communities and the EDF are “extremely worrying”. He promises that he will sort out these problems by changing the way the communities are policed, with more community beat meetings, less paperwork, and much more time for police to spend on patrol and dealing with hate crimes.
David Cameron said that he will not support a ban on the Burqa, as suggested by some of his party leaders. When reminded that his party had opposed legislation intended to outlaw incitement to religious hatred, Cameron said he opposed the law just because he thought it will curtail free speech and went too far.
END
As I said yesterday, David Cameron has a big mouth but he's also proven to be an idiot.
What will Christians, Sikhs and Jews think of his policy toward making Britain into an Islamic state?
I guess if or when he becomes Britain's next dictator, then he might want to pass a law just for us who will want to keep our sovereign right to rule this land which is ours, and will undoubtedly still continue to call him a big mouthed idiot until he takes measures against us.
Whilst he's at it, he may like to ask them to build some gallows and we'll see who make it there first, unless of course he has plans to order armed police on to the streets or invoke the Civil Contingencies Act against the British people whilst he sits having tea with his new Muslim family from Pakistan who he'll undoubtedly be asking to vote for Dave the Dhimmi of the New United Kingdom of Pakistan if he gets half a chance.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
As I said yesterday, David Cameron has a big mouth but he's also proven to be an idiot.
What will Christians, Sikhs and Jews think of his policy toward making Britain into an Islamic state?
I guess if or when he becomes Britain's next dictator, then he might want to pass a law just for us who will want to keep our sovereign right to rule this land which is ours, and will undoubtedly still continue to call him a big mouthed idiot until he takes measures against us.
Whilst he's at it, he may like to ask them to build some gallows and we'll see who make it there first, unless of course he has plans to order armed police on to the streets or invoke the Civil Contingencies Act against the British people whilst he sits having tea with his new Muslim family from Pakistan who he'll undoubtedly be asking to vote for Dave the Dhimmi of the New United Kingdom of Pakistan if he gets half a chance.