Iran and Enriched Uranium: Controlled Media Continues War Hype Lies

Iran and Enriched Uranium: Controlled Media Continues War Hype Lies

  BNP News

The controlled media in Britain and elsewhere has continued with its war hype against Iran with the deliberate distortion of the contents of a new UN Atomic watchdog report on enriched uranium in that country.

According to a headline in the Daily Express, Iran has “two tons of uranium” which “would be enough for two nuclear warheads.”

That, and similar reports appearing in the controlled media in Britain and America, is deliberately designed to convey the impression that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has issued a report warning that Iran “is on the point of acquiring nuclear weapons.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, for example, ran a headline reading “Iran on the brink of a nuclear bomb.”

In reality, the IAEA report said nothing of the sort. Released on Monday, the report confirmed that Iran had a stockpile of low-grade uranium but said that it would require further enrichment to reach weapons grade.

The inspectors reported Monday that Iran has now produced over 5,300 pounds of low-enriched uranium, all of which would have to undergo further enrichment before it could be converted to bomb fuel.

Until recently, Iran’s uranium stockpile, as confirmed by the IEAE, had been enriched to around 4 percent, the level needed to run nuclear power reactors.

The IAEA report stated that Iran had expanded work at its Natanz site to raise the level of uranium enrichment up to 20 percent.

This is the level needed for the Tehran Research Reactor, which produces medical isotopes for cancer patients.

Weapons grade uranium requires an enrichment level of 90 percent.

This means that right now, Iran is nowhere near making “atom bombs” as the controlled media is hysterically claiming.

The main point of conflict between Iran and the IAEA is, according to the report, a question of trust.

This is not surprising, considering the outrageous lies circulated about Iraq's “atom bomb” and “weapons of mass destruction” which were circulated just prior to the illegal invasion of that nation.

The IAEA report went on to describe the lack of trust which resulted in cooperation with its inspectors inside Iran being thwarted by angry Iranian scientists.

For several months, Tehran has refused to accept a deal brokered by the IAEA in terms of which Iran would send 2,640 pounds of low-enriched uranium to Russia and France to be turned into fuel for Tehran's research reactor.

Iran initially rejected that offer but has now said it is prepared to accede and has enlisted the backing of Turkey and Brazil in pushing that process on.

Despite this, the IEAE report noted that the agency had succeeded in setting up a “good monitoring system” for the 20 percent enrichment work.

“A new safeguards approach is now being implemented,” the report said.

Doubtless these lies will now be seized upon by the London-Washington Lie Machine to try and incite the public in Britain and America into yet another conflict in the Middle East, this time against “atom bomb” Iran.

The British National Party stands resolutely opposed to this warmongering and demands that Britain stay out of all foreign conflicts in which our national interests are not affected.

Military Parade Cancelled because It Was Not Diverse Enough or It “Offended Muslims”

Liverpool Military Parade Cancelled because It Was Not Diverse Enough or It “Offended Muslims”

BNP News

In yet another example of the insanity which pervades ConDemLab Britain, the eighth annual Liverpool Military Show has been cancelled because it was not “diverse enough” and it had the potential to offend Muslims in Merseyside.
According to local media reports, the annual charity event was cancelled after the Labour Party-controlled town hall withdrew an £8,000 funding grant allegedly because it didn't meet their "diversity criteria.”
A local newspaper quoted a spokesman for the Liverpool Military Show as saying that the event organisers had tried to meet the “equality and diversity standards” by including a “transsexual soldier” in the parade.
The event was to have taken place last Saturday and would have included a memorial service to fallen war heroes. A large number of armed forces personnel and equipment, due to take part in the parade, had to stand down because of the last minute cancellation.
Last year's show raised £13,000 for the Army Benevolent Fund, Combat Stress, St John Ambulance and the Army Cadet Force.
This year, however, organisers said they were told that the show did not "score highly enough" on Liverpool City Council's "diversity scale" to justify funding from the arts and culture budget.
The decision to pull funding to the army charity event contrasts strongly with the decision a week earlier by Liverpool City Council to give £80,000 to fund the Liverpool "Homotopia" festival in August and the "IDAHO" Gay Pride festival which celebrates an "International Day against Homophobia.”
Liverpool war hero Peter Dunning, who lost both his legs while serving with the Royal Marines in Afghanistan, was quoted in a newspaper as saying the decision was "a disgrace.
"The council are just afraid of a Muslim backlash, similar to the protests in London last year,” Mr Dunning was quoted as saying.
So it goes: the colonisation of Britain by Islam will mean the replacement of British culture, heritage and traditions with that of the colonising force. Only the British National Party stands against this destruction of all that is Britain.

Victims of the silence of the PC Media

Victims of the silence

Created: May Author: Sarah: Maid of Albion

Johan Strydom (South Africa) and Shane McClellan (USA)

Johan Strydom (South Africa) and Shane McClellan (USA)

A few days ago hundreds of mourners gathered to grieve following the death of Johan Strydom, who was murdered at his farm near Parys in South Africa's Free State on the 15th of May. Strydom's popularity in life was clear from the numbers attending his funeral, many standing in the doorway of the overcrowded Dutch Hervormd Church in Parys as there were insufficient chairs to seat them all.

Johan Strydom's funeral

Now further details of the violent nature of the amiable Afrikaner farmer's death after he was hijacked at his farm gate have been revealed. Strydom suffered a burst liver, damage to his skull, and extensive “dragging injuries", following being chained face down behind his truck and dragged around his farm by one ankle. Medical reports reveal that he was alive whilst being dragged.

This is the second incident this year where a white South African has been carjacked, tied behind his own vehicle and then dragged. A young man was the victim of just such an attack only a few moths ago in that increasingly violent country. He survived, but with injuries which will take years to recover, if they ever do.

Unless you live in South Africa, this is most probably the first you have heard of either of these cases, indeed few in South Africa know of the first incident, as it has gone virtually unreported I only know of it because I was sent photographs of the young man's injuries, which I can not possibly publish here, and which I will probably never forget having seen.

However, as with so many of the horrors which have happened in South Africa in recent years, such as the ghastly, probably muti related, murders of 77 year old Alice Lotter and her 57 year old daughter Helen, who's horrific torture included their genitals being mutilated with shards of broken glass, before, whilst still alive their breasts were cut off and used to write anti-white hate slogans on the walls, news of anti-white hate crime continues to be suppressed.

Compare this with the case of James Byrd jnr. Who was tied to the back of a truck in Texas and dragged to his death in very similar circumstances to the two cases in South Africa this year, the only difference being that Byrd was black and his attackers were white. It was because of the colour combination Byrd's murder became a world wide news story, and “teachable event” in every school across America, and it is equally because of the colour combination that the South African hate crimes are being suppressed.

It is not just news from South Africa which is deliberately not reported, the press is also silent about anti-white hate crimes closer to home. Infamously within the Nationalist community, but almost unknown in the wider US population, the the savage 2007 rape and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian by five African Americans went almost unreported outside Knoxville where they took place, even while one by one their rapists and killers were tried and convicted, the most recent case ending this month. Similar limited reporting applied to the 2002 slaying of four young whites (a fifth escaped by playing dead) by African American brothers Jonathan and Reginald Carr, or more recently to the killings in Pearcy reported here by Vdare.com

However, these cases only scratch the surface of the epidemic of anti-white hate crimes across America, which the police are not permitted to prosecute as hate crimes, because the victims are from a group denied hate crime protection (white people), and which the media refuses to report outside the local news, if they report them at all.

Only this week Shane McClellan a 16 year old white youth was allegedly kidnapped and beaten for hours by a group of black men, who Shane claims used repeated racial slurs and told him they were doing it because he was white. Maybe that is why the case has hardly been reported outside the local Seattle news.

Shane's father, Tim McClellan said he barely recognized his son after the brutal assault, adding "I didn't know if he was alive or dead,"

Of course, at this stage, allegations remain allegations, however, can you just imagine how those two propaganda organs of which Joseph Goebbels would be proud, CNN and MSNBC, would be screaming had such allegations been made by a black person against a group of whites. (Remember Duke Lacrosse?)

Even when cases do make the national news, such as the carjacking and murder of North Carolina student Eve Carson by two black youths the race of her attackers is treated as incidental. (I wonder how many black women were carjacked let alone murdered by white gangs in recent years? None, I'd guess, otherwise we would certainly have heard of it.)

Likewise, when committed white Obama supporter Kirsten Brydum was shot dead whilst spreading the word of “Change” in a black neighbourhood of New Orleans, in 2008 she was reported as being "in the wrong place at the wrong time". No mainstream news organisation in America would dare to add that any time is the wrong time for a white person, let alone a white woman, to be in a black area – alone or otherwise.

If you lived on a remote Island in the South Atlantic and you read the crime news on the main US news websites, you could be forgiven for believing that violent crime in America was a multi-racial activity, with, if anything, whites being marginally more prone to criminal activity than other races. Indeed, if you ignored the news and formed your opinion of criminal perpetration on the basis of what you see in US Cop shows, you would be led to believe that crime in general is an overwhelmingly a white perpetrator activity.

However, the truth is very different from the carefully nurtured fiction. here are some figures:

In 2006, the incarceration rate in state or federal prison or jail for men was 1,384 per 100,000 residents, for women 134 per 100,000 residents. The rate for white men was 736 per 100,000, for black men 4,789 per 100,000, for Hispanic men 1,862 per 100,000. The rate for white women was 94 per 100,000, for black women 358 per 100,000, and for Hispanic women 152 per 100,000. (i)

Of the 249,400 state prison inmates serving time for drug offenses at year end 2004, 112,500 (45.1%) were black, 51,800 (20.8%) were Hispanic, and 65,900 (26.4%) were white. (ii)

At midyear 2006 more black men (836,800) were in custody in State or Federal prison or local jail than white men (718,100) or Hispanic men (426,900). Black men comprised 41% of the more than 2 million men in custody, and black men age 20 to 29 comprised 15.5% of all men in custody on June 30, 2006. my source, which I have quoted below, and which I am quoting verbatim states "Relative to their numbers in the general population, about 4.8% of all black men were in custody at midyear 2006, compared to about 0.7% of white men and 1.9% of Hispanic men. Overall, black men were incarcerated at 6.5 times the rate of white men. The incarceration rate for black men was highest among black men age 25 to 29. About 11.7% of black males in this age group were incarcerated on June 30, 2006. Across age groups black men were between 5.7 and 8.5 times more likely than white men to be incarcerated." (iii)

As you read that, you can almost hear the cry, “That is because of racism within the legal system and the fact that more blacks live in poverty and social deprivation!”

Wrong on both counts.

The reality is that politically correct law enforcement bends over backwards to avoid racial profiling, as shown by the shrieks of horror by various senior policemen following the new Arizona law requirements to merely check the legal status of suspects. Meanwhile courts in America go to great lengths not to disadvantage black or Hispanic defendants, whereas statistically, black and mixed race juries are significantly less likely to convict black defendants, especially if the victim was white, than white jurors are in the case of white defendants (iv)

The claim that poverty is the reason why more blacks offend also does not stand up to scrutiny. According to the most recent reliable figures (okay Wikipedia) the population of America stands at around 308,672,000 66% of whom (roughly 203,723,520) are white, 14% (about 43,214,080) are African American and 15% (46,300,800) are Hispanic, the remaining 5% being made up of groups such as Asians, Native Americans and Pacific Islanders.

When it comes to poverty the figures state that “only” 8.2% of the US white population live in poverty, compared to 24.7% of blacks. (v) This statistical imbalance is frequently used by liberals to excuse the higher numerical rates of offending amongst blacks and Hispanics. However, this is entirely misleading, and does not make any sense when you actually look at the ethnic make up of those living in poverty.

8.2% of 203,723,520 means that 16,705,328 white Americans are living in poverty, whereas despite the much quoted higher percentage rate 24.7% of 43,214,080 means that 10,673,877 are living in poverty, a significantly smaller number of people.

If poverty was the key to offending you would expect to see whites committing 16 crimes for every 10 committed by black people, however, outside the whacky parallel universe, as portrayed by CBS, that is not what we see.

Likewise, hate crimes are, to a massively disproportionate degree, something which happens to white people, that truth is merely hidden by legal system which refuses to call such crimes by their true name and by a media which fails to report them.

What we see in America we are seeing here in Europe, yet we are not allowed to say so.

We have reached a point in our society where the truth can not be acknowledged if it does not comply with an ideological narrative, despite the fact that the narrative is a lie. It is the silence of the reporters which gives succour to the lie and imperils its victims, for how many lives could have been saved had they had, at least been warned of the danger?

____________________

(i)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9, Table 14.
(ii)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Couture, Heather, and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, December 2007), NCJ219416, p. 24, Appendix Table 9.
(iii) Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9.
(iv)http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980807031456data_trunc_sys.shtml
(v) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

ConDem Coalition to Make Consumers Pay for Spanish-style Failed “Green Energy” Projects

ConDem Coalition to Make Consumers Pay for Spanish-style Failed “Green Energy” Projects

From the |BNP News Room
By Mercia — 

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition seeks to place a levy on power suppliers in order to finance “green energy” projects like those which have already failed in Spain, it has been announced.
The special levy will, according to reports, add approximately £20 to the annual bill of the already struggling individual consumer and will make British industry even more uncompetitive.
According to reports, the special levy “could generate capital” for the proposed “green investment bank” and has been suggested to the Government by investment bank NM Rothschild (who the Times described as having “a close relationship with the Treasury”).
Apparently the concept consists of putting a levy of about £2 per megawatt hour on the wholesale price of electricity to raise some £30 billion annually. When the Spanish government introduced similar "green" measures in that country, the move resulted in an increase in unemployment as hard-hit companies laid off staff to reduce cost overheads.
The Spanish example also resulted in an exodus of energy-intensive manufacturing industries such as steel-making, chemical production and food processing, to countries where cheaper energy was readily available.
The new levy is needed, it is claimed, to compensate for the reluctance of power companies to provide the funding because they are not convinced that the “green proposals” are economically viable and show little ecological benefit compared to the huge social hardship and economic damage they inflict.

The Government claims that the “green energy” measures are necessary to control greenhouse gas emissions but continue to ignore the reality that uncontrollable natural phenomena, such as volcanic activity, produce far more CO₂ than human activity. Most interestingly, it is not the ecologists who are behind the latest levy proposals, but the bankers.
Global investment banks, in particular, are supportive of “cap and trade” measures which will earn billions of pounds for the big institutional players on the world's stock markets.
No one should be surprised by the Tory’s close relationship with globalist bankers or by their reluctance to disclose their plans for the introduction of this wholly unnecessary and burdensome stealth tax.
Ultimately, it will benefit the ConDem’s friends in The City and on Wall Street, rather than the consumer or the environment.

County Durham BNP Is on the Right Path

County Durham BNP Is on the Right Path

Tue, 01/06/2010 - 14:41 |  BNP News

County Durham British National Party sent some of its members to the woods near the Cow Plantation in Spennymoor, County Durham, to construct a path as a community project, reports our North East correspondent Pete Molloy.
“The path was drastically needed to aid the public who use the woods for recreational purposes like walking their dogs or cycling, as the existing access was a bit treacherous,” Mr Molloy said.
Leading the project was County Durham’s Organiser, Adam Walker, who was impressed with the work by his team.
“I’ve been planning this project for a while, but it had to be put on hold until after the general election,” Mr Walker said.
“It took the team two hours to complete the project and we have used all natural materials from the woods itself, so it is very eco friendly,” he added.
The members of County Durham BNP who took part in the project were Adam Walker, Amanda Foster, Pete Molloy, Michael Stewart and Mark Walker.

ConDem Foreign Aid Policy Kicks in: 45 Million Condoms to Uganda while Egyptian Appointed to Oversee “Priority” Aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan

ConDem Foreign Aid Policy Kicks in: 45 Million Condoms to Uganda while Egyptian Appointed to Oversee “Priority” Aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan

The BNP News Room

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government’s foreign aid policy has kicked off with the donation of 45 million condoms to Uganda and the appointment of an Egyptian to oversee the “prioritisation of aid” to Afghanistan and Pakistan — while at home, the ConDem tricksters prepare their first wave of domestic budget cuts.

According to Tory Secretary of State Andrew Mitchell, British taxpayers will provide “urgently needed” contraceptive supplies to Uganda at a cost of nearly £3 million to the British taxpayer.

At the same time, Mr Mitchell announced in an official statement on the Department for International Development (DFID) website that “aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan needs to to [sic] get higher priority.”

British taxpayers will be glad to hear that this “higher priority” has included the appointment of an Egyptian, Ms Nemat Minouche Shafik, as the DFID’s “Western Asia and Stabilisation Director with responsibility for Afghanistan, Pakistan and Stabilisation.”

According to Mr Mitchell, this appointment reflects the “need to see the UK’s aid work harder in countries such as Afghanistan and Pakistan in order to bring about stability.”

Bizarrely, Mr Mitchell justifies aid to Afghanistan because of the war in that country.

His official statement said: “Following 30 years of conflict, Afghanistan is one of the poorest countries in the world.” Mr Mitchell has conveniently ignored the fact that Afghanistan has been at war for the last nine years because of an illegal invasion launched by the Labour Party regime and which was completely supported by his own Conservative Party.

Mr Mitchell and his fellow conmen also choose to ignore the reality of Pakistan, which had a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2009 of some $449.30 billion.

This makes Pakistan the 27th largest economy in the world in terms of purchasing power, and the 45th largest in absolute dollar terms — yet still somehow deserving of British taxpayers’ “foreign aid.”

Furthermore, the Pakistani armed forces have a budget of $7.8 billion per year, or the 23rd largest in the world. Approximately 650,000 personnel are on active duty in the Pakistani military, which is the world's 6th largest armed force.

Combined with the 302,000 strong paramilitary forces and 528,000 in reserve, the military of Pakistan has a total size of over 1,000,000 personnel.

The Pakistan military possesses nuclear weapons and a range of missiles and aircraft which can deliver these weapons of mass destruction over vast distances.

Why exactly British taxpayers should be giving foreign aid to a country that can finance such an army has never been explained.

Meanwhile, the ConDem government has announced the first wave of budget cuts in Britain which will see hundreds of thousands of British people lose their jobs.

Only the British National Party has called for an immediate halt to all foreign aid programmes and the reallocation of that budget to pressing internal problems inside Britain.

The United Nationalist Nations (UNN) And The Eight Percent Minority

The United Nationalist Nations (UNN) And The Eight Percent Minority

Created: Friday, 28 May 2010 11:58 Author: The Founders

This introduction to the UNN, is a concise, and uncomplicated offer to all people of European origin. In particular, to ordinary people from across the cultural, political, and religious spectrum that has resulted in centuries of division and pointless wars and conflicts.

The United Nationalist Nations is strictly Non-Political, and requires nothing more than five people to administer it, which it has now employed. It will never take sides in party political life, and requires only financial support from individuals, or blocks of individuals.  Whether the reader is a political leader, or activist, a working man or woman, or one of the millions of disparate and concerned diaspora of Europeans, whose ancestors built the region you currently live in, this organisation will speak for you.

There will be no requirement for left or right rhetoric and dogma, or advice from people whose egos are bigger than our need for survival. There is a simplicity, and an uncomplicated structure of five Founders and they will administer the whole project, and it's financial requirements. To this end, support is achieved through the equivalent of just 25 pence per week. Supporting the UNN is based on a non-partisan, non-political basis, whereby ALL those seriously wishing that the peoples of the Western World are sustained, supported, and have legal redress to corroborated problems that may result in their losing homes, jobs, or being coerced into accepting a way of life oppressive to them, can find a legally accepted voice through the first ever, Ambassador For The People Of European Origin.

Immediately upon initially promoting the UNN in basic format, the Founders unsurprisingly came across road blocks and potential infiltrators. Hence the trap was quickly entered by those wishing to ensure we, the original peoples of this region upon earth, and other areas we have settled in for centuries, have no voice in the New World Order.

The Founders are glad to say, it was obvious, and we will continue this project regardless of those opposed to our survival and eventual renaissance.

Within one year, we intend to reach one million people, and thus, as we insist on a low membership and support fee of 25 pence per individual per week, or £13 per annum, our aim is to supply our people with an organisation and infrastructure able to fund £13,000,000 worth of legal aid, educational support, food where necessary, and legal redress to those mentioned above. Funds will also be used to feed those who are struggling on a daily basis, such as the elderly and very young, whose families cannot find the income to do so.

The uncomplicated structure of the United Nationalist Nations, with just five salaries to be paid when funds allow, and very little Red-Tape needed as such, will not become a burden upon those who have contributed.

Millions of people around the world of European origin, are as we speak, suffering disgraceful, desperate and lonely lives. Over 30,000 elderly people in Britain alone, let alone our people elsewhere, are dying from cold each year. Britain is the world's fourth largest economy (apparently), and these figures are almost of Third World proportions in the 21st Century.

By mobilising under the UNN banner, this could be tackled through the already alert, and politically aware Nationalists. Other problems that could be tackled are threats to our freedoms. We do not particularly need political parties to tackle this, as seemingly, it is the very presence of Nationalist political parties on the election scene in many of our nations that, has resulted in jail, threats of jail, intimidation and wholesale electoral fraud. If a cultural or political leader, activist or other, is under threat of jail or legal action, then the UNN in it's role as a Human Rights organisation, would be there to support and lobby for the rights of both the activist, leader, and/or the family if and when required. As a world minority of just eight per cent, we have rights, and will fight for them.

A giant lobbying system would also become available for our people. Imagine if you will, a lady or gentleman, allegedly jailed, or threatened with jail, because they simply could not pay their bills, or were being hounded out of their home for whatever reason. The United Nationalist Nations would draw upon millions of people, supporters, and members, and LOBBY just as other ethnic and socio-cultural groups do almost daily somewhere on earth.

A system such as this, could then gather even more support, especially when countless millions realise that this really does happen, and the people of European and British origin, have never had support or help from anywhere... until now. Within a few short, and turbulent years, even those Journalists and weak minded politicians or community leaders, who wrote ugly and smear filled rubbish about Nationalists, and generally treated Europeans and Britons with contempt, will have had their salaries smashed, and their pensions turned to dust.

Then we will see support from as now, unlikely sources. They too have families, and as life gets harder, and international criminal enterprises get stronger in the guise of Global Warming and Aid organisations, the whole world will be looking beyond national politics for an answer. The international cabal of financiers and war-mongers, will not expect such a combined intellectual attack, and it will become harder for them to standardise our lives, and usurp our ancient rights and many cultures. We as a people, are being de-democratised, de-humanised, and our traditions and political power is being crushed. Thus, we now require an addition to the political process, and one that cannot, and will not be hi-jacked, or shoved onto a road that leads nowhere. The UNN will provide a complete and complimentary infrastructure that includes all of the above and more.

There will be a gathering of the masses of ancient European peoples, under the United Nationalist Nations banner. Those masses remember, all have similar socio-cultural traditions, commercial, and educative requirements, not to mention financial security and worthwhile careers they and we have fought long and hard to keep.

Below is the potential order with which we will construct the UNN:

1 - Establish an Embassy with it's own Ambassador, diplomatic procedures and infrastructure. Inform world leaders and institutions including the world media, as to our intentions in this as yet basic, and fledgling guise.

2 - Communicate with our Nationalist cultural and political leaders, their organisations and members, already concerned enough to have been active. Promote on websites everywhere, the intention of the UNN to leglly support international treaties that lobby for Human Rights, and to include pro-Caucasian sustenance and traditional values and rights to resources and land.

3 - Respectfully request that ALL nationalist leaders ratify the UNN treaty, and immediately contact members and supporters via their organisational literature and websites. No political or cultural leader, or any large financial donor(s) will expect to take control, or divert the UNN for financial gain. The five founders will protect it at every level.

4 - Ensure a solid financial and intellectual base is installed, and clearly understood by everyone. Transparency will be clear and easy to process. All members whether individual, or as a block membership or families, will be able to view accounts professionally documented under national and international law. Membership is private, and as the UNN is non-profit, and non-political, and could ultimately become a registered charity, privacy is guaranteed and legally acceptable with or without membership status. Card carrying members and financial supporters are considered equal, therefore no list is required for public domain.

5 - Create a date and time for the first inaugural UNN conference. This will only be relevant with sufficient numbers joining, and or enough funds offered by way of donations. There will be no ''Committees'' required when the UNN is up and running, as these can lead to take-overs, and distraction from our core principles and constitution. Committees also offer untold options for in-fighting, or to destroy the organisation by block-voting, or infiltration by those opposed to our survival. 

6 - Through the basic structure of each interested individual or organisational website, create links to the UNN basic site, or by then, professional website. Personal choice is important, no political agendas are expressed, and when the UNN site is viewed, people can make their own minds up about membership and/or support. 

7 - Implement an international strategy for action, and a more sophisticated constitution in all European languages. This strategy will include a ''Socio-Political Rescue Plan''. This will mean using funds as a lobby and human rights group, to oppose political exclusion of any individual whose party of choice is no longer available to them through state oppression and ''third party'' attacks, either physically or via wealthy ''Horse Whipserers'' behind the scenes.

8 - Establish the University Of Ancient European Peoples online initially. This will help redress the propaganda and levelling off of standards in British and European facilities. The UNN University will utilise its broad based collective and once again, educate Western youth to the degree our parents and grand-parents once knew.

9 - The UNN will eventually create a private, legally administered bank. Something along the lines of the Bank Of Ancient European Peoples for instance, will enable the UNN to employ professionals. Some of whom may have been sidelined by positive discrimination and lack of opportunities. A financial operation that is mutually beneficial, could provide emergency loans, and very low interest loans, would ensure that millions could enjoy the benefits of actually doing what others can only do chained up in perpetual internationalist debt.

10 - legal teams will be employed to activate, or re-activate the rights of individuals or lobbying groups officially supporting the UNN. The legal department will lobby and tackle the UN, and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on their lack of integrity when it comes to protecting the rights of Caucasian peoples. We will lobby and legally redress the state of our rights to keep our communities indigenous, and retain land, work, and homes that have been held by our families for generations. The UNN will work on behalf of ALL peoples of European origin wherever they are. The papering over of our rights by disregarding for instance, the English Bill Of Rights, The Magna Carta, and The Act Of Settlement in the UK, will be fought, highlighted, and taken to the highest courts, including our own. Our own legal institution will be funded via the initial UNN donations and membership income when funding allows this to happen.

11 - The UNN will lobby for the rights of ''Heads of Families'', provisionally one out of every 100 families in any region, to bare arms for protection of said community. The alien laws of recent years, have meant many cannot now protect their own families, homes, or businesses, when dangerous and violent criminals attack them.

12 - The UNN will respectfully request that the UN, all world leaders, the EU and NATO, officially recognise the UNN as a fully legal entity through its embassy and Ambassador. If this request is ignored, the UNN will lobby exactly as described herein. No internationally engineered ''condemnation'' of our own Human Rights and lobby group by the elites and their hired mouthpieces, will be allowed to have any impact on our project. Many countries have continued to control their own socio-cultural, and socio-political agendas.

Other peoples can take control of their immigration policy, their business and trading partners, and have suitably and rightly rendered useless, any opposition regarding these important rights. China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and many countries in Africa, have protected their cultures, religions, and ethnic ancestry. National policies are rightly protective, and create healthy self-governance for untold future generations to come. Their right is our right also. At merely 8 percent of this planet's inhabitants, we will take that right as an official world minority.

Australia could ship migrants to desert mining camp

Australia could ship migrants to desert mining camp

They have been sent to remote Pacific islands and to the Indian Ocean – now asylum-seekers intercepted in Australian waters may end up in the middle of the desert, in a near-empty former gold-mining town.

A flurry of boats arriving this year – mainly from Sri Lanka and Afghanistan – has led to chronic overflowing at Australia's main detention centre, on Christmas Island, as well as at mainland facilities. As a result, the government is urgently seeking alternative accommodation for asylum-seekers while their claims are processed.

 

More than 200 are living in hotels and motels. The latest site under consideration is a disused mining camp near Leonora, a historic gold rush town in Western Australia. More than 500 miles from Perth, Leonora was a booming place in the late 19th century. Nowadays it has a distinctly abandoned air, with its broad, empty streets and dwindling population.

The Immigration Department has confirmed that it recently examined the camp, as well as other potential sites in Western Australia, including a former agricultural college run by the Christian Brothers, a Catholic lay order implicated in sexual abuse scandals around the world. Around Australia, churches and other groups have been approached to see whether they can offer suitable facilities.

The refugee issue became highly controversial in Australia when John Howard, the former conservative prime minister, turned away the Tampa, a Norwegian tanker carrying shipwrecked asylum-seekers, in 2001.

Mr Howard then adopted the "Pacific solution", which involved intercepting "boat people" at sea and paying impoverished Pacific nations – namely, Nauru and Papua New Guinea – to house them while they were processed.

After Kevin Rudd's Labor government came to power in 2007, he scrapped the Pacific solution, along with other policies, such as mandatory detention for all asylum-seekers. Mr Howard's hardline measures proved such an effective deterrent that, for many years, few would-be refugees even bothered making the journey.

That has changed over the past 18 months, partly as a result of global events such as the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka. Last year about 2,700 people arrived by boat, and many more by air. Already this year 60 boats have been intercepted, the same number as during the whole of 2009.

The Australian external territory of Christmas Island, in the Indian Ocean, was supposed to be the Rudd government's solution. After refugee numbers escalated, a mothballed detention centre, originally designed to hold a maximum of 800 people, was opened on the island, about 1,600 miles north-west of Perth. Prefabricated huts and air-conditioned tents have boosted its capacity to 2,500, but the centre is now once again bursting at the seams. Officials hoped to transfer up to 90 people, mainly women and children, to Leonora.

However, the plan was criticised by the Western Australian premier, Colin Barnett, who told ABC radio: "I think it's quite silly of them, charging around country areas of Western Australia, looking for buildings or deserted mining camps. That's not a very professional way of dealing with... an important humanitarian issue."

Gold is still mined in the Leonora area, as is nickel, mainly by "fly in, fly out" workers accommodated in temporary camps. One-third of the town's population is indigenous.

David Laws: The Tip of the Lib Dem Expenses Scandal

David Laws: The Tip of the Lib Dem Expenses Scandal

From BNP News

The resignation of Lib Dem Treasury Chief Secretary David Laws for claiming £40,000 of taxpayers’ money to pay rent to his boyfriend is just the tip of his party’s expenses scandals.

Mr Laws, who has tried to use his homosexuality as an excuse for the blatant swindle, claimed between £700 and £950 every month to rent rooms in London.

These properties were actually owned by his long-term partner, James Lundie, who apparently works as a political lobbyist.

Mr Laws can have no excuse for his expenses claims, as MPs were banned four years ago from leasing accommodation from a partner.

Mr Laws is not alone in this grand rip-off conspiracy. Here is a selection of Lib Dem expenses claims:

* Lib Dem MP for St Ives, Andrew George, claimed £847 a month from taxpayers on mortgage interest payments for a riverside flat — even though the home insurance policy included on his expenses file is in the name of his 21-year-old daughter, Morvah George.

* Lib Dem leader — and now deputy prime minister — Nick Clegg charged monthly interest repayments of £1,018 on a £279,000 mortgage to the taxpayers, including stamp duty, land registry and legal costs, totalling £9,244.50.

Mr Clegg also charged the taxpayers for a £2,600 kitchen, and had £5,857.63 worth of decorating done, including carpets, a laminate floor, tiling and sanding, curtains, blinds, curtain rails and repairs to a garage door. Mr Clegg also claimed for cushions costing £4.99, a £2.49 cake pan and £1.50 paper napkins.

Mr Clegg also claimed £680 worth of gardening carried out, including work to “build small wall in rose garden”, followed by £760 for the repair of his garden path.

Taxpayers will also be glad to hear that apart from his parliamentary salary, they also paid to feed Mr Clegg. In the period from 2 August to 13 December 2005, Mr Clegg submitted a £1,657.32 invoice for food.

Finally, Mr Clegg made the taxpayer pay for his private telephone calls to Colombia, Vietnam and Belgium. The last set of claims was so outrageous that Mr Clegg was forced to pay the money claimed back.

* Multi-millionaire Lib Dem MP Chris Huhne, owns his second home in his Eastleigh constituency but makes sure that the taxpayers pick up the bills for its upkeep.

In August 2006 he claimed — and was paid — for a £5,066 builder’s invoice that included having two coats of “red rustic timber care” applied to garden items, and two coats of green preservative for fences.

Mr Huhne also submitted a handyman’s bill for £77.31, including a claim for “replacing rope on swinging chair.”

His incidental expenses provision claims include a single receipt for semi-skimmed milk (62p), chocolate HobNobs (79p), tea bags (89p), a bus ticket (£3.20), a cheese muffin (99p), bacon flavour Wheat Crunchies (28p),  Ready Brek (£1.81), and an £85.35 bill for the “mounting, framing and inscription of photo of Chris Huhne.”

* Lib Dem MP for Montgomeryshire, Lembit Opik, was forced to pay back £2,499 for a 42” plasma TV which he bought for himself.

In May 2006, Mr Opik billed a £40 summons for non-payment of council tax on the flat to his second home expenses.

He successfully claimed £890 for a smaller television and new video recorder. In July 2008, Mr Opik claimed £135 for a triple mirror and coffee table from Argos.

* Nick Harvey, Lib Dem MP for North Devon, claimed £30 per month for his subscription to Sky Sports and £3,515 for food between 2004 and 2008.

* Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, tried to claim for a bicycle and a computer so that he could “listen to music.” Both these requests were denied, but his expenses records revealed that he had claimed hundreds of pounds for food at his second home at a time when Parliament was not sitting.

* Lib Dem MP for Teignbridge, Richard Younger-Ross, charged taxpayers more than £1,200 for mirrors to furnish his London flat, one of which alone cost £725.

He also claimed on his parliamentary expenses for a top-of-the-range stereo system that cost more than £1,100, and a bookcase called the “Don Juan.”

* Former Tory party leader and current Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith told the BBC that Mr Laws “has the talent to return” to the cabinet.

Mr Duncan Smith, most famous for leading the Conservative party in backing the illegal war against Iraq by supporting the Labour Party in parliament, said Mr Laws was a "thoroughly decent person."

Abortion Killing for Convenience

May 2010
Sarah Maid of Albion 

Killing for Convenience

A report issued this week reveals that there has been a slight decrease in the number of abortions performed in Britain. The total number which took place in 2009 was 189,100 down from 195,296 in 2008. The fall is obviously good news, as far as it goes, and has been welcomed by the Department of Health, however, it has to be acknowledged that even the reduced figure is the equivalent of the population of Portsmouth, or three times the number killed in the bombing of Hiroshima. Irrespective of the tiny drop, in the two year period between January 2008 and December 2009 the number of lives eradicated amounted to just a few thousand short of the total population of Bristol.

Just over 3,800 of the procedures performed last year were on girls under the age of 16, however, the huge majority, over 185,00 were performed on adult woman. Some will have been the victims of rape, others will have been emergencies, where the woman's life was at risk, and in just over 2,000 of the cases, the child, had it lived, would have been disabled. However, as is always the case, these types of abortions, which are always held up as examples to justify why legalised abortion is so essential, will have accounted for a small minority of the total.

By a significant majority most abortions carried out last year, as in every year, will have fallen into the category which can reasonably be described as killing for convenience where the child is unplanned, unwanted or likely to cause a complication in the mother's life.

It is odd that this is allowed to happen in a society as child-centric as ours where so many people's lives are ruled by the well being of their children, and live in daily terror of a significantly exaggerated fear of paedophiles. However, we have somehow managed to separate children from foetuses in our mind, as if they are different creatures, rather than the same being who has merely moved from one environment to another. The pro-choice lobby, it seems have successfully managed to convince people that if you can't yet see a human being, it is a disposable commodity, and that a foetus, no matter how fully formed is not really a child.

We live in a society where a woman's right to choose, or in some instances, to change her mind, is considered of greater importance than the lives of hundreds of thousands of children.

Worse than that, in a troubling number of cases it does not appear to matter how many times a woman may wish to exercise her right of choice. As I have stated here before, for most of these women the abortion is the second choice, given that she had already had the choice not to have unprotected sex. However, beyond that the report reveals a quite disturbing statistic. Almost 3,700 of the women who had abortions in Britain last year have had at least four terminations. In fact 48 of them have had seven or more abortions.

Surely it defies credibility that all these women been raped four or more times (even if you believe that rape justifies terminating a healthy child for the sins of its father) or that they have been unlucky enough to face so many life threatening medical emergencies when they happen to be pregnant.

Certainly some will have had reoccurring complications and others will for genetic reasons will have produced disabled foetuses, but surely these will have been a minority

For whatever their reasons, thousands of women in this country appear to have chosen to repeatedly terminate the lives of their unborn children.

How can that be justified?

It is hard to escape the suspicion that a minimum of 15,000 children fell victim to serial killers in 2009, and, as this happened in the health service, we as tax payers aided and abetted in those killings.
An unnecessary evil. (Opinion).(abortion): An article from: First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life
Agenda of the Sexual Revolution: Abortion Contraception Sex Education and Related Evils
Will you vote for this evil called 'choice'.: An article from: Catholic Insight

FILTH WHO CALL THEMSELVES HONOURABLE MEN

FILTH WHO CALL THEMSELVES HONOURABLE MEN

Created: May 2010 Author: rugfish @ The Green Arrow

"I cannot now escape the conclusion that what I have done was in some way wrong, even though I did not gain any financial benefit from keeping my relationship secret in this way."
I did not gain any financial benefit he said, as he resigned as treasury minister and gave an 'emotional' speech.
But the Telegraph reported that David Laws MP had not only claimed expenses fraudulently, which met what he called rental of rooms at his 'partners' house, but they uncovered that he had in fact abused his expenses by claiming the maximum allowances he could without receipts until receipts were made a requirement. It was then when he had to prove his expense claims with receipts, Telegraph claims, that Laws expenses were drastically reduced.
Laws is clearly not only a thief but he is also a liar, and the two usually go together.
The FACT is, he DID have a financial benefit because he claimed for things he had no right to claim, and those claims spanned several years and amounted to over £40,000.
He says he will pay it back, but surely he's already given that money to his partner in this crime.
So his partner has benefited too as a result of Laws sneak thief approach to politics.
When will the proceeds of that crime be taken from his partner?
When a crime is committed, does the public have a whip round to compensate the loss or does the criminal get his comeuppance?
Clearly, Laws has not the first clue about truth and honesty, or fair play or justice, and nor does David Cameron who says that he hopes Laws "can return in time".
Cameron is mouthing hopes of a return to politics by a self declared thief and before judgement has been passed on him by the parliamentary standards commission.
Cameron not only spits in the face of the public but he spits in the face of the PSC too, as he tries to limit the damage to his pathetic unelected government of cobbled together lunatics, who HE put together in defiance of the democratic will of the people who declared NONE of them were suitable to make a government.
Cameron thinks he's the prime minister and maybe he is, but to me he is no different to Oliver Cromwell who marched into parliament with his troops to declare himself leader.
i.e. HE HAS NO MORAL RIGHT TO BE THERE AND NOR DOES LAWS.
Yet! He has declared his own office term will be 5 years despite not asking the people, and he has declared a referendum on a new electoral system which defies the public's expressed will, that government should be 'shared'.
The public voted and its vote is nearer to a request for proportional representation than it is to any other form of system.
Cameron has no inkling of the disturbance he is causing in society by declaring that millions of people who voted AGAINST him, will continue to not have a voice.
He sits in our government with a minority vote whilst declaring that all who oppose him have to wait 5 years. Further, when he took the seat of power in Britain without authority, he declared that he thought a large part of the people who did not vote for him, were 'ghastly filth'.
He speaks for the government and he has elected to brand the indigenous people of this country 'ghastly filth'. What prime minister does that?
He spouts hatred toward his own people, and he spouts lies about his authority and he spouts utter crap about his intentions to clean up politics, when in defiance of all moral conviction, he wishes that one day a thief and a liar can return to politics. Ergo, that proves Cameron is AGAINST the people not FOR them, and shows he is AGAINST DEMOCRACY.
David Laws has no moral right to be in politics and nor does Cameron, and both of them should resign.
Whilst Cameron and Clegg pander up to their 'Operation Black Voters', their 'Islamic Council of Britain', their 'Gay Lobby' friends (of which Laws home-partner is one), and to their Marxist UAF, Searchlight, HopenotHate, Nothing British subversives, Cameron and Clegg are UNDERMINING OUR DEMOCRACY FROM WITHIN.
They are clearly earmarked for a future tumbrel if ever we regain a government in Britain which actually takes the wishes of its sovereign people - those ghastly filthy people - into consideration, and I for one will be happy to prepare the scaffold for all of them if ever I am called.
These thieves, liars, traitors and CON Artists, cannot be permitted to rule this hallowed land much longer whilst our people are becoming extinct as a result of their damned hateful Marxist policies.
1 million or more people who support openly the British National Party, SHOULD have a voice in politics, and are prevented from doing so by FILTH who call themselves honourable men.

Global Argument on issues that matter whilst Brits are dumbed down

Global Argument on issues that matter whilst Brits are dumbed down

Created: May 2010  Author: rugfish 

Whilst our media pumps out pages full of crap for the next few days on a gay MP who stole money from taxpayers, who doesn't see anything wrong with it, and Cameron won't sack him because he is scared, a chicken, and a lily livered yellow bellied half-wit.
I thought I might bring you some news which actually matters to you in between watching the ConDem Party here as it dies a slow death.
This WILL matter to you because it matters to everyone. Also, watch this LINK
I'll say no more, just watch and listen to this man as he makes it very plain precisely what the matter actually is. It is why the British National Party will never die, and it why Nick Griffin needs to spread the feelings of British people to a pan-European and Global audience.

McClintockCA04 — Response to President Calderon House Chamber, Washington, D.C. May 20, 2010
M. Speaker: I rise to take strong exception to the speech of the President of Mexico while in this chamber today.
The Mexican government has made it very clear for many years that it holds American sovereignty in contempt and President Calderons behavior as a guest of the Congress confirms and underscores this attitude.
It is highly inappropriate for the President of Mexico to lecture Americans on American immigration policy, just as it would be for Americans to lecture Mexico on its laws.
It is obvious that President Calderon does not understand the nature of America or the purpose of our immigration law.
Unlike Mexicos immigration law -- which is brutally exclusionary -- the purpose of Americas law is not to keep people out. It is to assure that as people come to the United States, they do so with the intention of becoming Americans and of raising their children as Americans.
Unlike Mexico, our nation embraces immigration and what makes that possible is assimilation.
A century ago President Teddy Roosevelt put it this way. He said:
"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."
That is how we have built one great nation from the people of all the nations of the world.
The largest group of immigrants now comes from Mexico. A recent RAND discovered that during most of the 20th Century, while our immigration laws were actually enforced, assimilation worked and made possible the swift attainment of the American dream for millions of immigrants seeking to escape conditions in Mexico.
That is the broader meaning of our nations motto, e pluribus unum from many people, one people, the American people.
But there is now an element in our political structure that seeks to undermine that concept of E Pluribus Unum. It seeks to hyphenate Americans, to develop linguistic divisions, to assign rights and preferences based on race and ethnicity, and to elevate devotion to foreign ideologies and traditions, while at the same time denigrating American culture, American values and American founding principles.
In order to do so, they know that they have to stop the process of assimilation. In order to do that, they must undermine our immigration laws.
It is an outrage that a foreign head of state would appear in this chamber and actively seek to do so. And it is a disgrace that he would be cheered on from the left wing of the White House and by many Democrats in this Congress.
Arizona has not adopted a new immigration law. All it has done is to enforce existing law that President Obama refuses to enforce. It is hardly a radical policy to suggest that if an officer on a routine traffic stop encounters a driver with no drivers license, no passport, and who doesn't speak English, that maybe that individual might be here illegally.
And to those who say we must reform our immigration laws I reply that we don't need to reform them we need to enforce them. Just as every other government does. Just as Mexico does.
Above all, this is a debate of, by and for the American people. If President Calderon wishes to participate in that debate, I invite him to obey our immigration laws, apply for citizenship, do what 600,000 LEGAL immigrants to our nation are doing right now, learn our history and our customs, and become an American. And then he will have every right to participate in that debate.
Until then, I would politely invite him to have the courtesy while a guest of this Congress to abide by the fundamental rules of diplomacy between civilized nations not to meddle in each others domestic debates..

“Britons” Murdered in Pakistan Raises Issue of “Who is British”

“Britons” Murdered in Pakistan Raises Issue of “Who is British”

 BNP News

The recent shocking murders of three people described as “British” by the controlled media while they were attending an arranged marriage ceremony in Pakistan has once again highlighted the issue of indigenous versus civic national identities -- and proven the British National Party’s position correct.
According to media reports, a “British husband, wife and daughter were gunned down in Pakistan after a disastrous arranged marriage ended in murder” on 21 May.
According to the reports, father-of-six Mohammad Yousaf, 51, his wife Pervaze Yousaf, 49, and their 22-year-old daughter Tania lived in Nelson, Lancashire, and had gone to Pakistan to attend the arranged wedding of son Asad, 24.
Apparently they were shot dead just days after the wedding while paying respects at a family graveyard. The shooting was sparked by the breakdown of the arranged marriage of another of Mr Yousaf’s sons, Kamar, who wed his cousin.
Mr and Mrs Yousaf come from the Pakistan town of Jaurahm, where marriage between first and second cousins and arranged weddings are common.
According to Eileen Ansar, a Clover Hill ward in Nelson who is married to Mr Yousaf’s cousin Mohammed, about 70 members of the extended family flew out to Pakistan following news of the deaths.
The media has glibly described the Yousafs as “British” -- but are they really? Does possession of a UK passport make a person British?
The BNP has long argued that there are two sorts of British national identities -- a civic identity, which translates into a piece of paper such as a passport, and then true indigenous status.
The World Bank’s operational directive 4.20 of 1991 defines an indigenous people as those who “can be identified in particular geographical areas by the presence in varying degrees of the following characteristics: a) close attachment to ancestral territories and to the natural resources in these areas; b) self-identification and identification by others as members of a distinct cultural group; c) an indigenous language, often different from the national language; d) presence of customary social and political institutions; and e) primarily subsistence-oriented production.”
This definition is supported by the Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous peoples of the United Nations and the International Labour Organisation Convention No. 169, all of which assert the right of indigenous peoples to maintain their own identity in their own territories.
The Scots, Irish, English and Welsh have now been proven, through DNA, history and settlement, to have been in the British Isles since at least the end of the last Ice Age, some 12,000 years ago.
The “nation of immigrants” lie has been thoroughly refuted by the analysis of British DNA conducted over the past few years.
This research has shown that up to 80 percent of the original inhabitants of Britain have ancestors going back thousands and thousands of years, and that the “Anglo-Saxon” genetic contribution is less than five percent of the total DNA of Britain, a figure which is approximately similar for other groups such as the Danes.
Even the most “recent” large-scale migrants into ancient Britain, the relatively few in number Danes, have been in Britain longer than the Maori people of New Zealand, by way of comparison.
The BNP, alone amongst all parties in Britain, has argued that the Scots, Irish, Welsh and English are, by all definitions, the indigenous population of these lands.
This indigenous status confers on the British family of nations the right to protection from colonisation, usurpation of their territorial integrity and the right to remain the majority population of these lands.
Thus, the BNP argues, there is a difference between those who are civically British and those who are the indigenous population.
This difference in ethnic origin is completely valid, in exactly the same way that an Australian aborigine who might hold citizenship of Japan would never be classed as an ethnic Japanese person.
The assertion by the controlled media that the tragic Yousaf family are “British” is therefore little more than deliberate deception.
The Yousaf family are ethnic Pakistanis who possessed British passports. They were civically British, but not indigenous to these islands.
Indeed, the Yousafs were representative of a wave of colonisation, which, left unchecked, will see the indigenous population of Britain overwhelmed.
The BNP stands alone in opposing this coming demographic tragedy and has a reasonable, viable and realistic plan to solve this crisis.

New areas for ethnic cleansing announced

New areas for ethnic cleansing announced

Author: Green Arrow

I wonder if the people in the areas listed in the image above, knew that their little bits of England were about to be targeted for enrichment when they voted for the Tri-Axis of evil parties instead of the British National Party during the recent elections.  Oh well.  You get what you ask for and it seems they have voted for lower house prices, disease, increased crime, rapes  and eventually white flight.

More than half a million immigrants a year are coming into the country, figures showed, and immigration over the 12 months to September added 142,000 to the population.

A total of 503,000 new immigrants arrived, 270,000 of whom were from outside the EU.

The number of people awarded citizenship rose to 203,790 in 2009, up 50 per cent on the previous year.

I suppose all these people who are planned to displace and eventually replace the true British People will swell the voting block of the Labour Party but I personally do not know where  all these Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshi, Nigerians, Turks and Zimbabweans are going to work as we have already exported our jobs to their countries.
However, I can see problems for local services, etc but these colonisers are not even in the European Union so by what rights are they allowed to come in and replace us in our own land?

Of course The Establishment (liblabcon) are concerned about just how the indigenous population might react to being displaced and replaced and are already making sure that the army is full of people who will shoot them, should they protest.  Highly unlikely if Eastenders is on but you never know. 

And it will not be British Soldiers shooting "British" People it will be the soldiers they are importing in to create a new Army - they dropped the word British a long time ago - that will pull the triggers.

The MoD said it was "proud to recruit high-quality people from countries with close ties to Britain".

Anyone from outside the UK wishing to sign up must be a British dual national, a citizen of the Irish Republic or from a Commonwealth country.

The statistics show 1,420 people from overseas joined the Army in 2008/09, compared to 30 in 2001/02.

In case you were wondering, there are 54 nations in the commonwealth including of course India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.  Do you think soldiers from those countries who join the Army would have a problem with shooting down protesting indigenous people.  No?  Neither do I?

And of course someone is going to have to give orders to these brought in mercenaries and who better than the Armed Forces Muslim Association. 

We have been betrayed big time people.  Our only hope now is not just the ballot box in the disUnited Kingdom but also by joining with other Nationalist Parties across Western Europe to create a Pan European Nationalist Movement that sweeps away the forces of evil by using not just the ballot box(which they have rigged) but also civil disobedience.

Green Arrow take on the General Election

Created: May 2010 Author:Green Arrow

Right then, lots to do on a Sunday Morning and so will make everything brief.  I will not ramble off writing words just for the sake of them and making the article any longer than necessary? Did I just do that?  Why yes I did.

Good morning BNP.  First let us have a look at some facts and figures from the general election that proves to me that the British National Party is an avalanche about to happen.  An avalanche that will crush the traitors who would hand our country over to alien invaders whilst denying our own children a future.   These traitors are filth.  They are beneath contempt and the British People will bring them to justice and I for one hope the penalty is death.

The Establishment and their lickspittle thugs Searchlight and the SWP/UAF are crowing that the BNP was massively defeated during the general election.  Fiddlesticks - the general elections was not just about winning MPs(although that would have been nice), it was about winning the support of the British People for what is to come.  You do not know what is coming you say?  Come, come are you blind?  Any rate consider these facts.

• In 2001   47,000  people voted British National Party
• In 2005 192,000 people voted British National Party
• In 2010 563,000 people voted British National Party.

Work it out for yourself.  The BNP is now an unstoppable machine.  When it wakes up a True Brit to the truth, those people never go back to the lies of the lib/lab/con alliance.  They help to spread the truth via their friends and family.  And it is that exponential growth that terrifies The Establishment.  You would have thought that Lady Margaret Hodge (nee Oppenheimer) with all her connections to the Nation Rapist Rothchilds would know about that little equation.  It is one they have used to steal the wealth of the world.

As for Hodges vomit about the "Miracle of Barking".  Her victory was no miracle.  It was a done deal what with the increase of moslems in her area up from 5% to 40% in just four years.  And we know what those people brought with them.  Ballot Rigging on a truly industrial scale.  That was no miracle it was just plain old simple fraud and Gerrymandering.

And if you want to know the scale of the fraud then consider this. 91 Labour MPs lost their seats during the general election.  Labours share of the vote fell across the country by 6.2% and yet they still managed to gain over 400 councillors.
Looking again at Barking, where there was a huge influx of moslems we can see from the councillors names elected to replace the BNP councillors, there was not one indigenous British name among them,  There are currently 165 cases of ballot fraud being investigated with I  think about over 50 of these being in Barking alone.

So when you consider it, the chairman of the BNP, Nick Griffin MEP done exceptionally well to double the vote in barking to a more than respectable 6,620 votes which is the highest number ever cast for a BNP member or indeed any British Nationalist party candidate.

And yet despite the Postal Ballot Fraud, Ballot Rigging and importing of voters, allowing non British citizens to vote, the British National Party's change in vote across the country increased, beating UKIP, Lib Dems and all the other parties with the exception of the cabbage patch kids party - the conservatives.

So if the Establishment wish to whistle in the dark about beating and defeating the BNP, let them.  The British National Party continues to grow and continues to advance and soon it will not just be British Nationalists that the parasitic New World Order have to fear but it will be an alliance of all Nationalists across Western Europe to start and then hopefully the world. 

So that is my personal take on the elections.  With the recent state sponsored upset in the Party dealt with we can now continue our advance.  If this was a BNP defeat then imagine what a BNP victory would be like? 

One last thing whilst I am here.  The moslems.  What about them.

Now the moslem influence was staggering - apart from the ballot rigging their sheer numbers had an huge impact on over 40 seats that Labour won or held (this site listed them before the election) where Labour did actually increase their share of the vote - and we of course know how.

Other moslem news from the election, was that there were 89 moslem candidates (up 20 from 205) and the number of moslem MPs has now risen from 4 to 8 and they are also seeing their numbers grow exponentially in the maternity wards as well as in the Voting Booths.

There is only one choice for any True Brit to help save Our Country now before it is too late and that is not just to vote for the British National Party but to join them, support them, donate to them every spare penny you can, because we are in a war that if we lose, there will be none of our kind left to tell of our history.  It will be eradicated from the memory of a moslem world.

British People Put Last: Not Enough Money for Liver Cancer Drugs But MPS Demand Bigger Interest Free Loans

British People Put Last: Not Enough Money for Liver Cancer Drugs But MPS Demand Bigger Interest Free Loans

BNP News

By Mercia — The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which is the Government’s drugs allocation body, has refused to fund a drug for patients with advanced liver cancer on “cost” grounds — while at the same time, Westminster MPs have demanded even larger interest-free taxpayer provided loans.

According to a NICE spokesman, the drug Nexavar, is too expensive for the NHS.

Britain is the only country in Western Europe that does not provide this unique life extending drug to liver cancer patients, despite it being the only effective drug on the market.

Questions are also being asked as to why the Government is deliberately delaying the introduction of a £200 million budget to fund the provision of new drugs for patients afflicted with a range of cancers until well into next year.

It is speculated that the delay is part of the Government's plan to cut back on NHS spending by stealth, a covert policy that literally costs peoples' lives.

Meanwhile, whilst sick Britons are left “for nature to take its course,” the Government has no plans for reducing the £825 million currently being handed to India to help fund that country's health, education and space programmes.

The news from NICE may prove problematical for the Government in another respect.

Two years ago a failed Palestinian “asylum-seeker,” suffering from chronic liver disease, won a taxpayer funded appeal in the High Court for the right to receive free treatment for his condition from the NHS.

The decision had the additional “benefit” of confirming that other failed “asylum-seekers” — including thousands suffering from HIV — were also entitled to free treatment.

How NICE's recent decision to withhold funding will stand up in the face of the 2008 court ruling has yet to be tested.

In 2003, a daily newspaper reported that the “NHS is being overwhelmed by hundreds of AIDS sufferers from abroad”, but particularly from Sub-Saharan Africa.

At that time the claimed cost to the NHS was £15,000 per year per patient, meaning that the current cost per patient — which the NHS is legally required to meet — is likely to be in the region of £20,000 per annum.

Many find it absurd that there should be legal protection for foreigners in terms of free NHS health care provision where none exists for Britons.

Meanwhile, Britain's ever-grasping MPs have more important issues to wrestle with, not least of which is the vexed question of increased interest-free loans.

Following complaints from a number of greedy (but “Honourable”) Westminster hogs, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA) has agreed to allow MPs to claim a further £4000 in interest-free loans to fund “big-ticket” items on undefined “necessities” including, presumably, private health insurance.

The British National Party unashamedly advocates the view that the needs of Britons must come first, particularly in terms of health provision, and that until such time as the needs of our own people are met, taxpayers' money should not be expended on projects that neither serve the interests of this country nor its people.