Letter from America If you don't know GOD, don't make stupid remarks!!!!!!

A interesting Report from our Alabama Reporter 
The Alabama Rose,  
 
If you don't know God Don't make Stupid Remarks!
Or pride is the downfall of the Arrogant! 

A United States Marine was taking some college courses
between assignments. He had completed 20 missions in Iraq 
 and Afghanistan . One of the courses had a professor  who 
was an avowed atheist and a member of the ACLU.
One day the professor shocked the class when he came in. 
He looked to the ceiling and flatly stated, "GOD, if you are real, then I want you to knock me off this platform...
I'll give you exactly 15 min." 
The lecture room fell silent. You could hear a pin drop.
Ten minutes went by and the professor proclaimed, "Here I am GOD, I'm still waiting."

It got down to the last couple of minutes, when the Marine got 
out of his chair, went up to the professor and cold-cocked him; 
knocking him off the platform. The professor was out cold.

The Marine went back to his seat and sat there, silently.
The other students were shocked and stunned, and sat there 
looking on in silence. The professor eventually came to, 
noticeably shaken, looked at the Marine and asked, 
 "What in the world is the matter with you?  Why did you do that?"
 
 The Marine calmly replied, 
"GOD was too busy today protecting America's 
soldiers who are protecting your right to say stupid 
stuff and act like an idiot. So He sent me."

The classroom erupted in cheers!
THIS IS GOOD, KEEP IT GOING! 

Criticise the Global Warming and Climate Change and go to Jail and do not Pass Go Alert

                  Criticise Global Warming 
       and go to Jail and do not Pass go Alert!

In something reminiscent of the novel by George Orwell 1984, it is reported that people criticising the Climate Change Hoax ,could face imprisonment!

speaking on the internet station Radio Red White & Blues Europhile Report show , the Chairman of the British National Party Nick Griffin MEP, revealed how he could not get a satisfactory reply from the EU Sub Committee dealing with the Climate change scam, while it was in session. which has passed a ruling that 
in effect placed legal sanction against anyone who dared question the origin ,cause and effect of climate change!
Mr Griffin has claimed that after committee meeting it has been revealed to him that the intention of the ruling was to criminalise dissension on the topic of climate change.
listen to the full show here Radio Red White And Blue

We here at the Horwich Nationalists will resist this Orwellian ruling, and you must to, just do not sit there and let your freedom paid for by the blood of millions of your forebears,
join the British National Party here, and fight for your freedom before the Marxist criminals steal them forever!!!!!!!!
join by clicking this link https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

Britain’s Credit Rating on the Brink Figures Reveal £4.9 Trillion UK National Debt

Britain’s Credit Rating on the Brink as New Figures Reveal £4.9 Trillion National Debt

 BNP News

Decades of Tory-Labour-Liberal mismanagement have brought Britain to the point where we are about to lose our international credit rating as new figures reveal that the true national debt stands at £4.9 trillion, or nearly three-and-a-half times the country’s Gross Domestic Product.

New figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) have shown that once public sector net debt is added in, Britain’s debt stands at £4.953 trillion. In 2008, the International Monetary Fund put Britain’s Gross Domestic Product at £1.74 trillion.

Standard & Poor (S&P), the world's biggest credit ratings agency, said in a statement that it was keeping its rating of Britain as “negative.”

S&P rates borrowers on a scale from AAA to D and has now threatened to downgrade Britain’s rating.

To make matters worse, S&P also said it did not believe figures put out by the British government’s Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), which was set up by the ConDem regime to “improve the credibility of economic forecasts that feed into government policy.”

S&P said in its statement that the OBR has “over-estimated the strength of the recovery.”

In S&P's view, the OBR has underestimated economic growth as households and companies reduce record debt levels.

There was therefore, said the OBR, a “material risk” that the national debt would soon reach a level which was “incompatible” with an AAA rating.

The new debt figures, released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), were calculated by adding in Government liabilities such as public service pension obligations (£1.2 trillion) and “liabilities in unfunded state pension schemes” which account for another £1.35 trillion.

The bankster bailout makes up another £1.5 trillion.

What this means in real terms for the public is that every man, woman and child in Britain has been burdened with a £65,000 share of state debt.

According to reports, an average household “would have to work for five years to pay off its portion.”

The most recently available earnings figures show that average household income last year after taxes and benefits was £29,100.

read more at  http://bnp.org.uk/

BNP Fundraising Success Story that Terrified the Establishment a Message from Nick Griffin

BNP Fundraising: A Success Story that has Terrified the Establishment

From Nick Griffin at the BNP Newsroom 

The British National Party’s runaway success story with regards to fundraising has terrified the establishment to the point where all sorts of lies and rumours have been spread to halt the party’s progress, BNP leader Nick Griffin has said.

Writing in a special email news bulletin, Mr Griffin also dealt with many of the misconceptions and lies which have been circulated in connection with the Midas Consultancy and BNP fundraising.

“Ever since our party was founded in 1982, our fundraising income — i.e. the funds we survive on and can deploy for elections and use to build our organisation — has been negligible, some would say a bit of an embarrassment, nothing like the enormous funds available to the treacherous old gang parties and not even a fraction of the funds needed to save our country,” Mr Griffin wrote.

“The badly limited funds available in the past to mount election campaigns and to build a winning party machine has held back the cause of British Nationalism for decades. Raising money has always been approached in an amateurish way and often as an afterthought.

Fundraising, as any professional will tell you, is a delicate and skilled profession. Successful fundraising involves timing, psychology, administration, procurement of materials, layout and design, preparation, demographics, general mood, temperament of target audience, data analysis and many other crucially important factors.

It is not a game for well-meaning amateurs. It is not as simple as posting off a letter asking for donations — keeping the financial wheels on the fastest growing patriotic political party in Europe is a highly complex and skilled undertaking!

It is common practise for ALL major political parties to hire professional individuals or organisations to provide some kind of skilled service that is beyond the ability of essentially political people.

To presume that ordinary political folk will be naturally gifted with advanced professional skill sets such as marketing, fundraising, training and so on is ludicrous.

For example, Margaret Thatcher hired the advertising/marketing firm Satchi & Satchi in order to provide expert advertising techniques for her election campaigns — the result was the best Conservative Party propaganda campaign ever conceived.

Similarly our most successful campaign — The Battle For Britain 2009 — was the result of our relationship with the Midas Consultancy.

At the end of 2007, the BNP contracted the services of an accomplished fundraising consultancy: the Midas Consultancy. Throughout 2007 up until December, the BNP's income from donations was at the usual low levels.

When December came the Midas Consultancy took the reins and within one month flat raised nearly as much money as the party had done in the preceding 11 months.

Within four weeks the Midas Consultancy virtually doubled our fundraising income for the whole year.

In 2008, with the Midas Consultancy running our fundraising, our total income from donations exploded from a meagre £150,000 (that's minus the figure raised by Midas in December) in 2007 to an enormous £662,217.

This huge fundraising increase allowed us to roll out a large and unprecedented campaign in the Greater London Assembly elections of that year resulting in the most momentous breakthrough to date with the election of Richard Barnbrook to the GLA.

In 2009, under the stewardship of the Midas Consultancy, the party's donations income again exploded to unparalleled heights, rising from £662,217 in 2008 to a gargantuan £1.6 million!

During 2009 this huge acceleration of our fundraising income allowed the BNP to open several new offices, employ new staff to cope with the strain of organisation resulting from our rapid growth, and also mount the BNP's first properly funded election campaign that resulted in the most staggering breakthrough yet for British Nationalism: the election of Chairman Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons to the European Parliament.

First in the GLA elections, and then in the European elections, the BNP's new fundraising power enabled the party to frighten the life out of the establishment, break new records such as the ability to flood Britain with nearly 30 million leaflets, and made possible the most amazing breakthroughs ever achieved by patriotism in Britain.

They say 'money makes the world go round', and that is true in Britain: the parties with the largest budgets normally outgun everyone else.

This upward rocketing of the BNP's electoral success and the rapid increase in the BNP's fundraising has not gone unnoticed.

The media, the establishment and our twisted opponents on the far-left have all noticed the rapid upturn in our success, and they fully understand the root cause: that for the first time professional fundraising, combined with the selfless dedication of our activists and supporters, has made possible real and tangible successes, the kind of successes that increase our credibility and propel us into centre stage and the mainstream.

Our opponents' response to our new fundraising prowess has been hysterical and vicious: starting in the pages of Searchlight magazine, a vast anti-fundraising rumour and smear campaign was launched and has not let up in its intensity. The head of our contracted fundraising consultancy and his young family has been subjected to a disgusting campaign of media intimidation which includes attacks on his children.

Several other business interests and innocent individuals connected to the Midas Consultancy have also been systematically attacked by the far-left as well as the usual Searchlight plants, extremist cranks and malcontent liberals from our own side of the political fence.

Even our hardworking staff in our highly efficient Belfast administration centre have been targeted for exposure by the media, with an endless conveyor belt of smear attacks.

All of these disgusting and underhand activities have one simple objective: to scare off any professional firms from ever working for the party.

Remember, to drop professional fundraising would drag the party back to where we were, small and incapable of mounting fully funded national campaigns or capable of expanding our political administration structures. No funds available equals no prospects for the BNP.

The BNP's fundraising success has even drawn the paranoid attention of the Electoral Commission, who, flabbergasted by the seemingly unbelievable ability of the BNP to draw huge amounts of donations from its supporters, launched a brief investigation into our finances because they couldn't believe we raised such huge amounts without the backing of wealthy individuals!

The BNP now has a comprehensive fundraising machine that could rival any political party in Europe. We have a bulk-mail postal operation with around 55,000 supporters signed up and an electronic fundraising operation based around our website and email bulletins, again with 50,000 signed up.

Thanks to the professional advice provided by Midas, the BNP operates our own successful, fully staffed call centre which has provided £260,000 in profits (from which contrary to the lies of troublemakers Jim Dowson and Midas have not been paid a penny in commission or any other fees) to the party in just over one year. The modern and professional call centre signs up lapsed members, recruits enquiries, upgrades existing memberships and take subscriptions for our publications and so on.

Between these different arms of our fundraising machine, the hopes and aspirations of our members and supporters become a reality because we have the ability to fund campaigns that would otherwise exist only in our heads.

When the Equalities Commission attempted to financially cripple the BNP in the run-up to the general election, the Midas team instituted the 'fundraising workshops' which imparted how to use meetings to raise much larger amounts than we have done traditionally.

This caused a lot of suspicion and scepticism at the time, but doubts quickly evaporated when local branch meetings started to raise enormous sums using the Midas formulae, with collections increasing from a few hundred pounds into the thousands.

This Midas innovation salvaged the BNP's general election campaign from the financial strain imposed by the Equalities Commission attack and allowed us to stand in over 300 parliamentary seats for the first time.

Make no mistake: given the massive pressure we have been put under through the ongoing legal attacks on the party, it would have not been possible for us to survive this long without our fundraising machine.

However, while our fundraising apparatus is now well established and efficient, it is not a fountain of endless cash. We raise funds, but we cannot perform miracles, so we must be fully aware of the serious nature and damage groups like the Equalities Commission can and are inflicting on this party.

In short, they are attempting to bleed us dry. If it were not for our fundraisers the legal attacks would have sunk us a long time ago.

The present and ongoing anti-fundraising smear campaign — which was started by Gerry Gable and Searchlight and has been taken up by an unholy alliance of 'hardline' extremists and civic nationalist liberals — has reached a climax at present. With some of the 'knockers' there is little doubt that their stabbing us in the back is motivated by reckless personal ambition but for the leftist opponents at the heart of this black propaganda campaign the aim is simple: to bankrupt the party before next year's crucial PR elections in Wales and Scotland, where we could potentially gain a seat in both — but only if we can provide the fundraising to mount impressive campaigns like we did in the European elections.

And, of course, if we can fend off the horrendous legal bills the Equalities Commission and other legal assailants keep hitting us with.

The BNP's diverse fundraising operation has been the target for a sustained smear campaign, from Searchlight, malcontents, disgraced former employees, troublemakers and the media.

All these groups would love nothing better than the BNP returning to the 'good old days' where our tiny and meagre resources rendered our cause impotent and a laughing stock.

The campaign against the BNP's fundraising takes many forms, from internal malcontents preaching 'self-sufficiency', legal warfare (such as the Equalities Commission), malevolent pressure on our fundraising consultant, poisonous lies originating in Searchlight — all these are a coordinated and deliberate attempt to sabotage the BNP's newly found fundraising prowess, undo all the organisational advances of the last two years and literally to destroy the party.

Please refer to the FAQ below to answer some of the common questions and rumours that have arisen from the leftist inspired anti-fundraising smear campaign:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Why can't we do it ourselves?

A: Because professional fundraising is a complex and skilled profession that requires years of experience to master the various techniques and methods that accompany it.

To say that after two years of roaring and unparalleled success we should ditch our proven consultant and hand the financial safety of the BNP over to well-meaning but totally unskilled political amateurs is absurd in the extreme and perhaps a touch sinister as only our enemies would benefit from such a backward step.

Other political parties hire experts — we are no different.

Q: Has it been successful?

A: The figures speak for themselves. This is why so many people are questioning the motives of those who say we should never utilise the skills of friendly outside consultants and professionals for the benefit of our sacred cause.

Why not? Time is running out for our country and we do not have the luxury of being the 'odd one out' on the political landscape and not exploring the benefits professionals could bring to our cause.

Q: Are the fees justified?

A: There has been a lot of hype and downright lies about the fees paid to the Midas Consultancy (Richard Edmond's farcical statement being a recent example) and there is a need to put these fees in perspective.

Firstly, in reality the Midas involvement with the BNP doesn't cost us a penny because Midas only takes a fee from funds that we would never have seen anyway without the fundraising techniques and methods of the Midas Consultancy.

Secondly, in exchange for fees of £165,000 over two years, Midas has generated a fundraising income for the BNP of £2.3 million — and saved us over £156,000 through their procurement techniques and expertise. Not a bad deal by any yardstick!

Let us also remember that Midas came on board with a one off goodwill appeal for us that netted the party £136,000 in December 2007 and January 2008.

How many people have ever done that for us before?

The Midas fees, originally 7.5% of funds raised, were later capped at a flat fee which equated to less than the percentage, and this fee is significantly less than the industry average for such a service.

Q: Isn't a fundraising pack in the post every few weeks too much?

A: Possibly, but until we reach a membership level of 20,000 it is necessary and we must consider the enormous success that has been achieved via the funds raised by the fundraising packs.

Think of all the breakthroughs that have been achieved over the last two years and then ask yourself: aren't they worth it for the small sacrifice of receiving a fundraising pack every few weeks?

If you don't appreciate the fundraising appeals, then by all means read them and then bin them, or better still, pass them onto someone else.

But always remember, these appeals are the party's lifeline and many thousands of people do appreciate them and do donate to the party.

People may be not always be able to donate every time, but many, especially elderly members and those who are not in touch with an active group, say that the appeal letters keep them in touch with the party's plans and progress, so they are always happy to receive them.

This is a key reason for the party's record renewal rate last year. Every few weeks is the optimal time gap established by the fundraising industry that will generate a stable income for any organisation.

Remember: if they didn't work, we wouldn't use them. The advice from Midas is that when we reach a stable membership base of 20,000 we will be able to be self-sufficient and can then scale back significantly on the fundraising appeals.

This is why we recently launched an experiment where local branches and groups keep all the money that they raise by direct recruitment of new members.

The sooner were there the better, but until we do we should be grateful that we have the fundraising ability to keep us afloat and able to make real progress.

If you can help the British Resistance then please donate any amount to help us fend off the Equalities Commission legal attack on the party. Click here to send a small gift.

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP

Leader, British National Party”
or join https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

Collapse of the Eurozone Almost Certain !!!!

Collapse of the Eurozone Almost Inevitable

From the BNP Newsroom

The eurozone is doomed to failure and the British National Party has been the only party to continuously warn of its dangers and the high taxes necessary to pay for our membership of the EU, BNP economics spokesman Andrew Moffat.

“The recent Greek financial crisis demonstrated that investors were not prepared to purchase Greek Government debt (i.e. Greek bonds) excepting at a vast premium to offset the risk of default,” Mr Moffat said.

“In conjunction with the need to roll over debt at short intervals, in uncertain markets, Greek Government bonds have recently yielded double digit figures, despite nearly zero inflation.

“That compares with yields of between 1%-2% on the equivalent short term Sterling maturities, where the guarantees of the British Government are not doubted.

“It has only been the intrusion of the European Central Bank that has enabled the Greek Government to fund itself and the country's liabilities,” Mr Moffat continued.

“In effect, Greece had been shut out of the capital markets:  no one was prepared to buy Greek Government bonds until the ECB provided funding and guarantees.

“Given the recession and the shortfall in governmental revenues, Greece will soon be paying nearly 20% of its GDP in interest charges, to service its growing debt mountain.

“Similar difficulties afflict the governments in Spain, Portugal and Ireland — the latter of which is suffering the effects of a property crash, financed by the banking sector.

“Clearly, the ECB cannot continue to finance the debts of the 'PIGS', the acronym employed to describe this group of countries.

“The EU has created a stability fund of Euro 750bn, raised from a levy on EU members, albeit the Slovakians have complained about their contribution, which

 — like everyone else  — they can ill-afford in straightened circumstances.

“The Euro currency cannot work. It cannot work because of the inappropriate nature of a 'one size fits all'.

“This means that individual nations lose the ability to devalue their currency (the UK thankfully devalued its currency when we left the ERM in 1992, which created economic expansion) to remain competitive and to reduce interest rates.

“The currency is the Euro and the Central Bank is the ECB, which determines interest rates throughout the Eurozone.

“In consequence, the only means for nations to regain competitiveness is to cut wages and government expenditure. That typically creates tension and riots in Mediterranean countries.

“All Western nations are reducing their budget deficits and implementing spending cuts.  Where will the money originate to stimulate new growth and increased governmental revenues?  In the absence of growth, governments must raise taxes, which further depresses incomes and spending ability.

“In the light of this backdrop, it is likely that the governmental deficits in the PIGS countries will deteriorate.  That will make it more difficult for these countries to service their debts.

“Worse, there may enter a period of deflation, when real debts rise.  That provided the backdrop in the 1930s and created political instability in nations such as Spain.

“The Eurozone will lack the financial resources to bail out Greece and the other debtor nations. Greece will be ejected from the Eurozone, followed by other countries.

“The result will be disastrous for those banks throughout the EU, which hold the unpayable debt of the ejected member nations.

“Meanwhile, the ejected nations will find they have to repay their Euro debts with their newly reintroduced and devalued currencies.  There will follow defaults on governmental bonds, leading to more crises within the banking sector.

“The political imperative to create a European union, with its own anthem, heads of state, legislative body, armed services, central bank and supreme court, has not been matched by any competence to control economic forces.

“The British National Party has long warned of these difficulties.  We repeat them here.

“Unemployment, homelessness, bankruptcies and default are the end result of inappropriate currency union. So, too, are the high taxes to pay for the increasingly expensive cement to bind together the cracks, necessitated by our membership of the EU and our obligations to this supranational club.

“The British electorate has been well and truly stitched up in this political ideal, which has never been identified or explained to them.

“There may be an alternative: Germany could be ejected from the eurozone, along with its French collaborator. That way, the Euro would fall and monetary restraint in the ECB could be relaxed. This solution, however, would be politically impossible,” Mr Moffat concluded.

Make a differance join the British National Party by clicking this Link below https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

Importing votes. Why not Import a Prime Minister?

Author: BC1959 | 

From the Green Arrow and Freinds

    

Future Prime Minister of Britain?

Regardless of the troubles and strife all parties have to go through, including ours, there is always room for humour. Indeed it is necessary for our sanity. And as some commentators on the Green Arrow have pointed out with other articles of mine, the humour does not necessarily go beyond a real future scenario. The picture accompanying this semi humorous article, has a similarity to that of one of the candidates put forward by New labour, after the international gold smuggler and pensions thief, Gordon Brown was unceremoniously helped out of office.

The women in the picture are from Africa, but with voters now being imported into Britain, as seen with the recent brilliant campaign by Richard Barnbrook, in which he still came second, and voting allowed to be imported by the bag load from foreign climes by the thousand, it is not beyond this insane (MOG) Marxist Occupied Government, to actually import a future leader because the position ''is unhealthily white''.

The recent report, boldly proffered by the BBC, said that GCHQ, our number one first line defence and security stop, was ''not diverse enough''. Also, there was a similar report that said: ''One in five people, are now an ethnic minority, and within a few years, the population will reach 78 million''. All true of course, but the one position still ''not diverse enough'' is that of Prime Minister. With America now safely in the hands of ''President'' Obama, and blacks who had never bothered with the political process bussed in to vote en masse to ensure this victory for equality, as we all know, Britain will surely follow.

So, if anyone knows the whereabouts of the lady in the picture, please contact Trevor Phillips, or whatever his real African name is. He's at HQ at least three times a week, and it would give him something else to do instead of attacking the BNP leader. After all, he must surely be very embarrassed indeed to take all that tax payers money of nearly £90,000 per year for just three days a week, him being a Leninist and all that. The post would include an armour plated car, bodyguards from the cream of the cream, a salary that in your own country, would enable you to buy a whole city, a multitude of servants, and all the wine and beer you could throw down your neck.

Whilst we are on the subject of diversity, and our institutions still too white, it might be worth mentioning that the latest crime figures are also far too one dimensional. How so? Well you see, apparently, it is now obvious that whites don't make up enough serious crimes, and that only blacks, Asians, and new arrival ''refugees'' seem to be ''filling'' those horrible, all too smelly and cramped prisons.

So I think a little advice is needed which would help ease our first black Prime Minister into his or her new role. Firstly, if you put more cameras into operation, you can catch more traffic violation, including driving at 32MPH in a 30MPH zone, and then ''offering the criminal a lower price for agreeing to the crime without going to court.'' Secondly, you could increase the prison sentence for white folk accused of racism, to say, 15 years. Thirdly, you could, with help from a £25 an hour interpreter, jail any political leader who says things like: Britain is Full Up, Close The Doors Now. And: The British National Party - Putting The British people First. Plus: Working To Secure A Future For British Children. I mean, with a black British leader, we couldn't have that kind of thing now could we?

Readers will note of course, the last paragraph contains all the things we have seen anyway up to this point, and the only humorous/worrying points are the increases in sentencing and fines. They will surely come, and believe me, if we do end up with an immigrant Prime Minister, the humour will fast fade away. America is now realising all too late that, having an immigrant in the ''White House'', is no joking matter, and having one at No10 Downing Street, will not make this country more equal, but more sick, more burdened with debt, and more like Robert Mugabe's Marxist paradise, Zimbabwe.

Anyway, if anyone knows the lady above, please tell her Trevor Phillips has a car waiting at Heathrow, with a full selection of drinks, a Che' Guevara tee Shirt, and list of nasty white racists, provided by former members of the horrid BNP, who have now seen the light.

EU Debates with the conclusions prescribed in advance

Debates with the conclusions prescribed (by the EU) in advance

Andrew Brons British National Party MEP Blog

12TH JULY 2010: I was able to attend both my AFCO and LIBE committee meetings this afternoon, even though they were held at the same time!

This was the contribution I made to a debate in AFCO on the Citizens' Initiative
"Citizens' initiatives can be seen as a medium of debate and the communication of ideas. They will not, strictly speaking, be decision-making processes.
"Debates involve an exchange of ideas based on a complete range of values. Debates might or might not result in a consensus, based on common values. However, debates, in which the conclusions and the values are prescribed in advance, are not free debates but stage-managed demonstrations of unity that we used to see just over twenty years ago.
"One of the grounds on which a  proposed citizens' initiative might be refused for registration is that it infringes European values. The European Economic and Social Committee has suggested that this ground should be explained more clearly. In my view, this requirement should be scrapped. A prescription, in advance, of the values that citizens of member states are allowed to hold is not direct democracy (as it was described by one of the rapporteurs) but a denial of democracy. It is, in fact a denial of freedom of speech and freedom of thought".
A British Liberal Democrat and member of the ALDE group said that he agreed substantially with this view, because rejection of an initiative on the ground that it infringed European values would be too subjective a judgement. Furthermore, whilst he found many views offended his sensibilities, that was not a ground for suppressing them.

Experts Claim End of Eurozone Will Benefit Europe’s National Economies,

Dissolution of Eurozone Will Benefit Europe’s National Economies, Say Experts

From the BNP Newsroom

One of the world’s foremost macroeconomic research bureaus has confirmed what the British National Party has said all along, namely that national European economies are best left alone and out of the EU’s punishing grasp.

According to Capital Economics, which provides consultancy work to financial institutions in America, Europe, Asia, Latin America and the UK, a break-up of the eurozone would be positive for growth “and not the disaster that many think.”

In a new report, Capital Economics said that a breakup of the eurozone would “be beneficial for both weaker and stronger members because it would bring about the necessary rebalancing of the region's economy.”

According to the report, states such as Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain “have been hit by higher cost and price rises than countries like Germany, undermining their ability to compete.”

A second problem was that although Germany runs a “vast” trade surplus it has refused to increase domestic demand to help boost growth among the weaker, indebted economies.

"As long as the eurozone continues to operate by these rules, there is no alternative to many years of economic pain," the report said.

"For the sake of the future economic health and success of the European Union, the eurozone needs to break up."

Capital Economics said that if the weaker nations left the euro, their currencies would depreciate, wiping out much of their lack of competitiveness and enabling growth of exports.

“Germany would also reap the benefits of restoring its own currency, which would strengthen, cutting the trade surplus.

"The huge external surplus, from which German consumers derive no benefit, would be translated across into increased public and consumer spending. The standard of living of German households would rise substantially," the report said.

This simple logic is obvious to all objective observers, but the Labour, Liberal and Conservative parties remain in denial and are all committed to ever closer cooperation with the EU.

The Liberal Democrats, who are now part of the British government, have gone one step further and have even demanded that Britain adopt the euro as its currency.

Make a difference  Join the British National Party

No help from the EU for British Business and Entrepreneurs

No help from the EU for British entrepreneurs

by  Martin Wingfield

JULY 2010: Nick Griffin's Constituency Office has carried out some research into business grants, loans and assistance schemes, in response to many British entrepreneurs seeking to access European Union funds for business ventures outside of the United Kingdom.
Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield reports on the findings and provides the standard response to the many queries received:
"While it appears at the outset that there are various assistance packages available, more detailed investigation reveals that the assistance available is geared towards particular ‘less developed’ regions and targeted specifically at designated areas of trade. Some European countries, moreover, have more advanced assistance structures in place and language difficulties, not surprisingly, continue to present a barrier to effective cross-border trading.
The EU Service Directive, for example, was implemented with the aim of stimulating cross-border trade and to facilitate the establishment of new business ventures, through a ‘Single Point of Contact’.
The European Union (EU) supports indirect (i.e. through financial intermediaries in the home country) financing for small/medium sized enterprises (SMEs), to help their business start up or develop. It does this through the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme 2007-2013 (CIP). CIP funds are used to guarantee loans to SMEs provided by a range of financial institutions involved in SME lending. Unfortunately, however, there is currently no source of EU-supported loan finance in the United Kingdom. The EU also supports small businesses through direct funding/grants but this finance is directed primarily towards the poorer regions within the European Union. Another facility that is, therefore, of little use to to British citizens.
In short, as with many other aspects of our European Union membership, there is little or no benefit for British people in terms of gaining financial assistance for new business ventures. In fact, the net effect of our membership is socially, culturally and economically detrimental. In terms of finance, We put £billions British taxpayers’ money into the EU and receive few worthwhile services in return. Culturally, our British identity and national sovereignty are becoming increasing subsumed within a European Super State and our value as indigenous Britons eroded. Socially, the free flow of Eastern European migrants has squeezed British workers out of the jobs market and placed an unsupportable burden upon our health, education and welfare services.  
This is why, as a British National Party MEP, Mr Griffin believes that Britain and the British people would be better off if we were free and independent of the European Union. He is anti-European Union - and calls, therefore, for Britain to withdraw from the EU - but he is not anti-European. A British National Party Government would replace rule from Brussels with a system of cooperation between free nations, establishing bilateral agreements on trade and travel with other countries that benefit Britain and the British people.
British sovereignty must be restored and the right to decide on issues of national importance - such as social and economic affairs - returned to the elected British Government. Only then will we be able to ensure that the interests of British workers and British business are put before all others.

visit Nick Griffins MEP  Blog at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news
Constituents Contact Nick Griffin MEP http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/content/contact

Anti-Christian and anti-English agenda within our British schools

Anti-Christian and anti-English agenda within our schools

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Blog

15TH JULY 2010: Nick Griffin has received a letter from a constituent in Preston about a specific agenda within the local schools.
The lady told her MEP:
"In March I rang the head teacher of my children's school to try and encourage a special St George's Day celebration. I was told that such an event might cause offence to those pupils not of the English culture.
"Two days later my son cam home with a letter for a school trip to the local mosque. I sent the slip back to the school NOT giving my consent as this offended my Christian beliefs, now the school want my son to do the home work on the mosque visit and Islam.
"Am I within my rights to notify the school that I do not wish my children to partake in classes where islam is being promoted, especially when they aren't allowed to celebrate their own Christian and English culture?" she asked.
Replying on behalf of Nick Griffin MEP, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield, said:
"Religious Education (RE) is a compulsory subject in the state education system in the United Kingdom. Schools are required to teach a programme of religious studies according to local and national guidelines, which includes the study of different religions, religious leaders, and other religious and moral themes. However, the 1996 Education Act confirmed the right of parents to withdraw their children from religious education, either wholly or in part. Guidance regarding the right of withdrawal is outlined in DFES Circular 1/94, sections 46- 49 [RE] and 83-88 [collective worship], and relates to the 1988 and 1993 Education Acts. Parents are not obliged to state their reasons for seeking withdrawal and it is not a legal requirement to put requests for withdrawal in writing (although the Headteacher may advise you to do so).
All schools should include a right of withdrawal statement in their prospectus and it is considered good practice to have a policy outlining their provision for the right of withdrawal from RE and/or collective worship, so please refer to your son’s School Prospectus for this.
Authority guidelines for Headteachers point out that the withdrawal of any child from religious education is a cause for regret, and advise them to talk through the issues concerned with parents. It may be worthwhile, therefore, for you to contact the Headteacher so you can explain your reasons for withdrawal and perhaps negotiate a school programme which is more inclusive of English culture. To this end, it would be helpful to also contact the School’s governing body, which includes parent representatives, as part of their remit is to help the school be responsive to the needs of parents and the community.
Unfortunately, the neglect of our English culture and traditional way of life is becoming standard throughout the public sector. It seems these days that every culture and religion is catered for and ‘diversity’ universally celebrated, except for the culture, beliefs and preferences of the indigenous British majority.
With the help of a supportive school governing body, you may however be able to challenge this approach within your children’s school.
Mr Griffin wishes you every success in your endeavour to ensure that your son receives an education which reflects his cultural identity."
Included with the letter were:
*Details of local Parent-Governor groups and how to put someone forward as a parent-governor.
*Petition sheets for the BNP's campaign - Make St George’s Day a National Holiday.

footnote from Horwich Nationalists
Please visit Nick Griffins Blog he is your North west MEP and will be glad to help with any issue of concern
 http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news    
Contact Nick using this Link

The BNP Voice of Freedom Addresses Lib/Lab/Con Illegal Wars

Latest Issue of Voice of Freedom Addresses Illegal War

From The BNP Newsroom

Yesterday, on a day when four more British soldiers died in Afghanistan, the July issue of Voice of Freedom, the British National Party's monthly newspaper, was published with a front page headline 'Stop this senseless slaughter.'

The lives of British servicemen and women are being sacrificed for nothing in a war that cannot be won, says a report on page two and the editorial calls for David Cameron to be forced to attend every single 'homecoming' at Wooton Bassett until he sees the futility of the war in Afghanistan and the heartbreaking waste of young British lives.

As well as being a newspaper that campaigns on the issues of the day, Freedom also reports on the activities of British National Party units up and down the country.

The latest issue keeps readers well briefed on this, and on the work of the party's two MEPs, Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons, who each have their own page in the newspaper.

The initial response to the latest edition has been very positive. John Ryde, the press officer for the East Midlands, the first region to receive its supplies of the newspaper, commented:

"I'm delighted with the July Freedom. It’s a great asset to the party and ideal for recruiting new members over the next four weeks.

"The front page sums up exactly what the British public are feeling at the moment,” Mr Ryde said.

Order your Copy Here  

EU Announces It Wants More Third World Immigrants, as a Flood of Romanians Hit Britain

As EU Announces It Wants More Third World Immigrants, Flood of Romanians Hit Britain

From the BNP Newsroom

The European Union has announced its intention to encourage even more Third World immigrants to enter Europe as the news emerged that at least 51,000 Romanians have sought work in Britain in the last six months alone.

The wave of non-EU nationals and Romanians comes as the “economically inactive” segment of the UK population continues to climb to in excess of 8.2 million.

According to EU home affairs commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom, rules will be simplified for non-EU nationals to enter Europe for workers looking to take up “jobs in farming, tourism and other industries.”

Despite rising unemployment across the EU, Ms Malmstrom claimed the additional Third World workers were needed to “fill labour shortages.”

Mrs Malmstrom was quoted as saying that “We know unemployment rates are still very high in Europe.” Official EU figures have revealed that in certain business sectors, EU-wide unemployment is as high as 10 percent.

Nonetheless, Ms Malmstrom plans to speed up procedures for hiring managers, specialists and seasonal workers from outside the 27 EU member states.

Meanwhile, separate figures released by a Romanian recruitment agency showed that more than 50,000 Romanians applied for jobs in Britain in the first six months of this year.

According to the report, Britain is the second most popular destination after Germany for Romanians seeking to work abroad.

Some 426,443 Romanians applied for jobs in the EU, of which 72,000 were accepted.

Tens of thousands of Romanians came to Britain after their country joined the EU in 2007 and there are now almost three million Romanians living in EU states other than their own.

The addition of Turkey to the EU will add at least another 40 million mainly Muslims to the “freedom of movement” policy within the EU. That nation’s relaxation of all border visa controls with the rest of the Middle East will also allow a further mass invasion of Europe from the Arab nations.

Join The British National Party Here 

A Quick Text Mobile Phone way to donate to the British National Party Now

A Quick Text Mobile Phone way to donate to the British National Party 

 What with the elections and the EHCR and the turncoat who brought down the main site for several weeks, thus denying the ability of members and supporter to donate did not help either.

Now some of you will have have received a text message on your mobile phones saying:

Please donate £3 to the BNP by texting  DONATE TO 60777

and quite rightly a few of you have been concerned that it may not be genuine and quite rightly so, if a bright boy like Bennett(lol) can be fooled by a Nigerian Scam then what chance do we ordinary people have.

So, I can confirm that the text message is 100% genuine and ask that you cascade that information where ever you can and I believe it is an excellent way to help the party in its hour of need.   I must confess though, it would have been nice if the British National Party site had published a small article giving notification of this new initiative.

So forget that cheap bottle of wine for today and go text a message texting  DONATE TO 60777  .  You will feel better for it and neither will you have an headache in the morning.
UPDATE
Thats neat.  After you donate (which I did) you get a nice text message back given details how you can donate any amount for 25p up. Like that.  so save the number to your mobile , if you are pay as you go and just have a bit of credit left before a top just donate that, EVERY PENNY HELPS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Russian spy Chapman stripped of British citizenship yet Suspected Islamic Terrorist Welcomed Hypocrisy

By Horwich Nationalists
The British government has stripped Russian spy Anna Chapman of her British citizenship and revoked her passport, citing her guilty plea in U.S federal court for conspiring to violate the Foreign Agent Registration statute.
Chapman's New York lawyer, Robert M. Baum, said he received notification earlier today from the British Home Secretary. The letter said the decision was taken based on information "that could not be made public based on interests of national security," Baum said.
He sent the notice to Chapman in Moscow with the advice that she contact a lawyer in London if she wants to appeal the British decision. Chapman gained British citizenship through her marriage in 2002 to Alex Chapman a British businessman she met four months earlier. They were divorced four years later.
Before leaving the U.S. in the spy swap last Friday, the 28-year-old had told Baum she might want to relocate to London.
And yet in the UK today strongly suspected Islamic detainees and other suspected Terrorists are welcomed with open arms such as 

Moazzam Begg, Feroz Abbasi, Martin Mubanga and Richard Belmar were returned to Britain.And their is even the case of one who was not even a British citizen but a resident being given a private flight and fawned over by the Marxist political Left, And make millions from Human rights Lawyers, funds we suspect will go straight to terrorism,

And yet at the same time a British Troops are laying down their lives in the Lib/Lab/Con  illegal wars often killed by the likes of the who are welcomed into our land by the Corrupt political elite, Such awful hypocrisy must be challenged by we the British people , and the criminals both political and terrorist must be called to account and face real justice.
The crimes against the British Nation will continue, if the British people just stand by and do nothing, make a difference join the British Resistance using this link! Join The British National Party Now! All it takes for Evil to triumph is for good people to stand by and do nothing.

South Wales BNP Lifts Lid on Radical Islamist Infiltration Colonisation of Wales

BNP South Wales Lifts Lid on Radical Islamist Infiltration of Wales

From the BNP Newsroom

Radical Islamists are steadily infiltrating all corners of Britain in their colonisation of our country, aided and abetted by the ruling Liberal-labour-Tory party’s immigration policies, a new video report by the British National Party in South Wales has revealed.

Last weekend, a South Wales BNP camera crew under the direction of BNP YouTube star Roger Phillips filmed a shocking display of the colonisation process at work in Cardiff.

This small demonstration is the tip of the iceberg, and is the first wave of Islamist colonists who have firmly set their sights on Wales as well.

Mr Phillips said that a complaint had been laid with the police for incitement based on what was said at this rally, but it had been ignored.

Join the British National Party Here

Ethnic Population Increase Covered up by New Leeds University Study

Ethnic Population Increase Covered up by New Leeds University Study

From the BNP Newsroom

The increase in the ethnic population is far higher than the projections issued by the University of Leeds which is being used by the controlled media to cover up the Third World colonisation of Britain.

According to the Leeds study, which is currently being widely quoted by the media, the ethnic proportion of the population is set to rise to 20 percent by the year 2051.

According to the study, by 2051, 79 percent of British people will be classed as white, compared with 92 percent now.

The Leeds study has based its projections on vastly out-of-date figures, as evidenced by the claim that the current ethnic population is around 8 percent. This is from the 2001 census, which is already ten years out of date.

The real figures indicate that the ethnic population is already near to 20 percent of the population.

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.(1)

According to the ONS, 10.9 percent (or 6.7 million) of the currently resident population of Britain was not born in this country.(2)

In 2005, the ONS issued a separate report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”(3)

This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers. Figures released by the ONS in January 2009 revealed that the Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years. Their population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society.(4)

An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.(5) When these figures are added in, the immigrant birth rate is estimated to be around 50 percent of all live births in England and Wales.

The majority of the “new immigrants” are not from Eastern Europe, as is often widely claimed. According to the ONS figures, immigrants from Eastern Europe had 25,000 children in Britain last year — an absolute minority of the just over 700,000 live births.(6)

According to the Birmingham City Council, 61 percent of all primary school children in greater Birmingham are of Third World origin. (7)

Over 300 languages are currently spoken in London schools. Some of the most established of these are Bengali, Gujarati, Punjabi, Cantonese, Mandarin and Hokkien. (8)

Some 150 languages are spoken in schools in Reading, an indication of the extent of the invasion in Berkshire. (9)

All these statistics taken together show that the non-British ethnic population is increasing in number exponentially, and given current immigration and birth rates, will utterly overwhelm the indigenous population of Britain within the next 30 years.

Sources:

(1) Population review of 2004 and 2005: England and Wales, Karen Gask, Office for National Statistics.

 (2) “One in 10 of population born abroad,” 09 Dec 2009, Telegraph.

(3) Birthweight and gestational age by ethnic group, England and Wales 2005: introducing new data on births, Kath Moser, Office for National Statistics.

(4) “Muslim population ‘rising 10 times faster than rest of society',” January 30, 2009, the Times.

(5) “Most children of British mothers born out of wedlock,” Telegraph, 11 July 2008.

(6) “Number of foreigners in UK hits record 6.7m,” BBC, 8 December 2009.

(7) “Asian pupils outnumber white children in Birmingham primary schools for the first time,” Birmingham Mail, 26 Jan 2010.

(8) “Languages across Europe,” BBC

(9) 150 different languages spoken in Reading schools, Reading Post, 8 February 2010.

OBAMA THE EVIDENCE OF HIS STEALING US ELECTION FROM CLINTON

As Americans, we expect certain liberties and rights that were granted us by our forefathers, who wrote documents like the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. "We the people" expect that these fundamental rights will always be protected. However, in the current Democratic Presidential Primary, this has not been the case. We believe The Democratic National Committee (DNC) made a grave error by depriving American voters of their choice of Hillary Clinton as Democratic nominee. Senator Clinton, by all accounts, except caucuses, won the Primary Election and, therefore, should be the 2008 Democratic Nominee. That didn't happen, due largely to illegitimate and illegal acts. We have interviews of many accounts from caucus states recounting threats, intimidation, lies, stolen documents, falsified documents, busing in voters in exchange for paying for "dinners," etc. There are at least 2000 complaints, in Texas alone, of irregularities directed towards the Obama Campaign, that have lead to a very fractured and broken Democratic Party.

This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign. We the People have made this film. Democrats have sent in their stories from all parts of America. We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign "Chicago Machine" dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of "change" from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote, which is, of course, all documented in "We Will Not Be Silenced."

"We Will Not Be Silenced" is about the people who fight back by simply telling their stories: Teachers, professors, civil rights activists, lawyers, janitors, physicists, ophthalmologists, accountants, mathematicians, retirees - all bound together by their love of America and Democracy. They will tell us their experiences and how they feel betrayed by their own party. They will discuss how their party has disenfranchised them and how, when they saw and reported multiple instances of fraud, everyone turned a blind eye. Rather than support and protect the voices and votes of its loyal members, the DNC chose to sweep this under the rug by looking the other way, or using ceremony and quasi-investigations to assuage angry voters. It is our opinion there never before has been such a "dirty" campaign; the campaign that has broken the hearts and spirits of American voters, who once believed in the Democractic voting system.

We are not angry liberals; we are disappointed Democrats, who love our country and feel the DNC needs to stand for truth, care about its voter base and stop committing actions worse than what we only thought possible of the worst Republicans. The DNC and the Obama Campaign need to be held accountable for the catastrophe of the 2008 Democratic Primary. We must right their wrongs...after all, this is America, the Land of the Free, where every American has the right to a fair, honest voting process, and to have his or her vote counted...

Civitas Report Claims “Climate Change” Policies Risk Major Damage to Economic Recovery

“Climate Change” Policies Risk Major Damage to Economic Recovery

BNP Newsroom

A preoccupation with “green energy policies at any cost” is undermining the competitiveness of manufacturing industry, according to a new report from independent think tank Civitas.

In a new publication called British Energy Policy And The Threat To Manufacturing Industry, sector experts Ruth Lea and Jeremy Nicholson reveal that the increased costs of energy arising from “green” energy policies are set to increase significantly.

Ms Lea is currently Economic Adviser and Director of Arbuthnot Banking Group plc and Mr Nicholson is Director of the Energy Intensive Users Group.

 “Increased costs will hurt manufacturing at a time when much depends on the sector to generate the economic growth the country needs, and to rebalance the economy,” a press release from Civitas said.

In their report, the authors examine the impact of the recent Labour Government's policy on energy prices.

“They argue that Labour's aim to reduce carbon emissions and increase the proportion of energy generated from renewable sources, significantly increased costs for energy consumers,” Civitas said.

The “analysis provides a timely warning because under the new Coalition Government, energy policy could be as damaging to manufacturing industry as it was under Labour.

“Lea and Nicholson cite evidence that the recent Labour Government's climate change strategy hiked up electricity bills. For example, the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform estimated in 2008 that the 'surcharge' on electricity prices, attributable to climate-change policies, amounted to an extra 14 percent for domestic users and 21 percent for business.

“Furthermore, the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s Renewable Energy Strategy (2009) suggested that these surcharges could be as high as 33 percent and 70 percent by 2020 respectively.

“Lea and Nicholson highlight the two major legislative commitments responsible:

“1. The Climate Change Act (2008) - including a legally binding target of at least an 80 percent cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

“2. The EU's Renewables Directive (2008) - under which the UK must meet 15 percent of its final energy consumption through renewable sources by 2020.

“Britain will bear a greater cost than other countries,” Civitas said.

“This country is particularly badly placed for such commitments. First, Britain is starting with a very modest renewables industry, so the burden of the EU's Renewables Directive will be substantial,” the statement continued.

Highlights from the report include:

- The proportion of renewables to total energy consumption in 2005 was just 1.3%, compared with an EU27 average of 8.5%.' (p.6)

- Even without the extra costs associated with climate change policies that are due to be imposed, Lea and Nicholson argue, Britain's industrial electricity prices already tend to be amongst the highest of any major economy.

This puts British business and, in particular, energy intensive users at a cost and international competitiveness disadvantage. Moreover, given the expected increases in the climate change surcharges, Britain's cost disadvantage will almost certainly increase, thus undermining competitiveness further.

- Such extra costs would inevitably tilt the balance for many businesses and render them unviable in Britain. (p.10)

- Energy intensive users, including steel, glass and ceramics, bulk chemicals, industrial gases and cement, are especially vulnerable. These are important contributors to GDP not only in their own right but also because of their inter-dependent relationship with 'downstream' industries.

- Britain is already losing energy intensive businesses because of the lack of competitiveness... There is no doubt that high energy prices have already been a factor behind industry closures. (pp.10-11)

The report outlines specific examples of the layers of 'fall out' from such closures, for example, the INEOS Chlor plant in Cheshire manufactures chlorine and caustic soda which are vital inputs to a wide-range of 'downstream' industries including disinfectants, plastics, pharmaceuticals, soaps and detergents.

“Rather than import the basic chemicals, many of the downstream businesses would migrate to countries where they were still domestically produced for reasons of reliability of supply and transport costs,” the report states.

“The economy desperately needs a competitive and thriving manufacturing sector if it is to prosper. Competitive energy prices are vital to the success of manufacturers, especially energy intensive users.

“Government energy policies are, however, remorselessly driving up energy costs thus risking the 'migration' of manufacturing plants to economies where the costs are lower,” Civitas said.