Search This Blog

Wednesday, 28 July 2010

What Is Going to be Done Nick Griffin sets out his Agenda for the Months Ahead

What Is Going to be Done

Nick Griffin sets out his agenda for the months ahead. This 'must-read' article builds on his incisive and insightful article Deadline 2014: The Convergence of Catastrophes and What the BNP Needs to Do published here on 6 July 2010.
The first article set the scene, describing the exciting and highly promising external circumstances now influencing our future as a party. This new article takes an in-depth look at the things we need to do together in order to fulfil our potential.
By Nick Griffin — Brutal cuts, tax rises, growing anger over the no-win Afghan War, the second financial crash into double-dip depression, the looming threat of a US/Israeli attack on Iran, and the ever-present threat of an explosion of the growing tensions between 'British' Muslims and their long-suffering neighbours.
Did you ever imagine such a witches' cauldron of trouble for the Establishment, or such a time of opportunity for Nationalism?
I recently examined the terminal instability of liberal globalism in an in-depth article on this website. So now it's time to follow on from that with a detailed assessment of where are we now, and what is to be done next?
In brief, at the beginning of 2008 I agreed on behalf of the BNP a contract with a professional fund-raising and management firm, the Midas Consultancy. Run by Jim Dowson, a fiery Ulster Scot with extensive campaigning experience in the pro-life movement, this has revolutionised the party's central structure over the last two years.
Our fund-raising has soared from a couple of hundred thousand pounds a year to a staggering £1.6 million last year. Various measures to show our members they are truly valued has cut our annual drop-out rate for a shocking 70% per year at the start of that period to a mere 17% per annum last year.
The money that Jim Dowson has saved us through his cost-cutting advice has more than covered the total cost of his professional fees.
Innovations such as a hugely sophisticated database of members and supporters, our Call and Dispatch Centre in Belfast, effective staff monitoring to ensure that we get value for members' money, and accountancy procedures which give us the same level of financial oversight and transparency as a multi-national corporation, have transformed the effectiveness of the party centre.
None of this has escaped our opponents, who over the last year especially have used every black propaganda trick in their book to frighten Mr. Dowson off (and the threat to his safety from Republican dissidents, who are heavily linked to Islamic extremists, has indeed forced him into virtual exile from his Ulster home) and failing that to demonise him almost as much as me (which, you will appreciate, takes some doing.)
But despite the threats, pressure, lies and character assassinations, we and the rest of the team have persevered, and the amazing progress of the last two years has continued, and continues to this day.
The last key pieces of the jigsaw are now being put into place. Perhaps the most important is that, we have just had our first full year of not just having our financial affairs in order in accountancy terms but also of having absolutely every single transaction entered electronically as it has happened.
This means that, for the first time ever in the history of British nationalism, we not only can show that our financial affairs are conducted with complete probity, we are also now in the position to use that full year's figures to work out cash flow forecasts and budgets for the future and to plan ahead, rather than constantly working by guesswork and living from hand-to-mouth.
To anyone with serious business experience this may all sound fairly basic, but for a political organisation, staffed and run by people used to working with politics and ideals, this will be a huge step forward.
It should, of course, have been done years ago, but I am a political organiser rather than a financial whizzkid, and all our key people naturally also tend to think in terms of politics rather than business.
So until Mr. Dowson came on the scene this gap was left unfilled. Hence, while we have made good progress introducing internal controls to guard against possible misappropriation of funds, we have up until now still lacked budgetary control systems —  hence a recurring problem with well-intended overspend at each big election. We did it again back in May, and it has to be the last time. 
The second huge advance which is also only just beginning to kick in is that we have finally created a team, headed by popular persecuted BNP teacher Adam Walker, backed by Solidarity trade union's employment law specialist Patrick Harrington (who himself is a nationalist old hand who achieved national prominence over his brave and successful fight as a young student against the bigots of the far-left for the right to an education at the University of North London), to put the management and motivation of our staff on a professional footing.
This is something I have tried to do several times since being elected to run the BNP ten years ago. The most promising early effort came to a sad halt owing to the untimely death of Chris Green.
Subsequently I called together a group of long-standing members with business and management experience to brainstorm this issue.
We called them the Central Management Team but, for all their willingness and experience, the job turned out to be beyond the capability of volunteers.
There was also a problem with 'office politics', hence the decision now to use not only full-timers but also one who, while a committed nationalist, is not inside the BNP 'loop' and thus can bring much-needed objectivity to the vital job of staff management.
This in turn is only part of a wider reaching drive to modernise the party. Right at the start of the Midas contract, Jim Dowson and I decided that we had to get the party's administrative centre straight before working on ways to raise the efficiency of the BNP's regional and local operations. The process of dragging the party centre into the 21st century has not been easy.
The process of imposing even fairly basic commercial employment disciplines (such as time sheets and forward planners) on people who are at heart still political volunteers rather than paid administrative bureaucrats has not always been without friction. But it had to be done.
I do not believe that I, or any other party leader, has the right to waste members' money employing individuals who are lazy, incompetent or insubordinate.
But while there are still some minor failings to address and gaps to fill, the work of professionalising the central administration is now more or less done. Which means that it is now time to move on to the even bigger job of professionalising our regional and local structure.
This too has to be done. I dread to think, for example, how many members we have failed to sign up in the past because we spend so much of our time in heavy politics to grasp that most people don't get involved in a cause on account of careful consideration of political literature, but because they pick up the enthusiasm and follow the example of a friend who is already involved and who invites them to a social occasion where they suddenly find that they belong and feel at home.
I shudder at the thought of how many new recruits have dropped out after a year because their local organiser didn't bother to contact them or failed to involve them in suitable meetings or activities.
Did you know that, for all our years of canvassing, we have never instituted a programme to train canvassers in elementary sales techniques such as how to overcome objections and to 'close the deal'?
What little training was done under our old Elections Department was confined to showing people a hugely laborious way of turning the electronic electoral register into canvass sheets, and explaining how to fill them in; but as to persuading people to vote for us, nothing was ever done.
Incredible, isn't it? But don't these facts also show how much so far unfilled potential there is just waiting to be tapped?
Once again, however, it won't be easy. There will be resistance from those individuals who resent the monitoring and the targets that will follow the explanations and the training we will provide.
But we have to break through such personally motivated negativity if our party is truly to become the super efficient machine we need to overcome the thoroughly underhand treatment we all have to endure at the hands of the Establishment.
This is the key reason for my decision to step down as party leader at the start of 2014. It gives me a tight three year schedule in which to oversee and take the inevitable flak that will arise from this essential modernisation programme.
It is going to make me very unpopular among those officials who cannot or will not raise their game. But it has to be done, and we cannot afford to wait any longer.
My remaining job as the leader who has made this party a winner is to clear the decks and build the organisational superstructure for my successor (who, incidentally, contrary to black propaganda put out by our far-left opponents and those with personal axes to grind, will neither be a member of my family or a recently promoted youngster. This is not a job for someone who lacks extensive life experience, and my family have all seen enough of the burdens and heartaches to have the sense to wish to shun it like the plague).
With that done it is then my intention to concentrate completely on my North West constituency in the run-up to the European Elections in June 2014, and hopefully to provide experienced advice and assistance to my successor (realistically, it is impossible to hand over a machine as complex as the BNP has now become in one go. If there is not to be a dangerous disjoint, the outgoing and incoming leader must have a good working relationship and trust each other).
Then I intend to go on to lead the larger BNP group that is going to be at the centre of a more powerful nationalist resistance block within the European Parliament.
But we're getting a bit ahead of ourselves, so let's return to the present and get down to the nitty-gritty of my practical plans for our further and broader progress over the next three years.
While many of these overlap and mutually support each other, they can in general be put into seven broad categories:
1) Elections - getting back to winning.
i) I wrote in detail on our website about this within days of the election. In short, we have — and are already working — to emulate Labour's hugely successful combination of voter identification and engagement. We are going to do this through grassroots and telecanvassing campaigns, highly sophisticated data-basing of the resulting information flows, and targeted mailshots, call backs and personal visits at subsequent elections.
ii) Closely related to that, our new Elections Department, Communications team and internet technocrats are already well on the way to creating an interactive website which will give our front line workers all over the country instant access to full campaign templates, including all the leaflets, petition forms, posters, social networking tools and everything else they need to agitate and recruit on every possible subject.
We are well placed to create and use such systems of our own because the skills and technology we have acquired and bought for and through our own fundraising and call centre operations are absolutely transferable from internal organisation to external campaigning.
iii) This revolution in our electioneering backroom work will be complimented by planned advances in our front line capacity too. The Elections Department is already working on creating a highly trained elections taskforce, including insisting that all our BNP staff make themselves available at key moments in important by-election campaigns.
Not only will this provide extra manpower where it is most needed, but also that by leading by example and showing how to do it properly, the taskforce will help to train our local campaigners in our best practice techniques.
iv) Finally (for now) we need within a year to have bought, converted and equipped a mobile home or similar vehicle to create a mobile publicity production and data-crunching centre.
This would mean that instead of trying to find a spare room in which to cobble together a temporary campaign office, we would instead drive into crucial campaigns a mobile office, printshop and activist support facility (hot tea and bacon butties in the winter, iced water and suncream for follicly-challenged activists in summer).
2) Education and Training - the key to expansion.
This summer will see the start of a massive expansion of our E&T operation. This will be done in three main ways: An online distance learning site; regionally based evening classes and, as soon as we can afford it, weekend courses done at our communications and training base in Stroud. The courses will cover:
i) Practical organisational matters at various levels of the party, but with particular emphasis on raising the capabilities of teams supporting our Regional Organisers, councillors and candidates in winnable wards, and specialist groups involved in different aspects of more advanced electioneering;
ii) Nationalist ideology. It is essential to turn future waves of new recruits into proper, committed real nationalists - fully educated as to the bigger issues behind the immigration issue, the banking swindle and the other matters of principle that truly distinguish us from the Establishment and their safety valve parties.
Every few years some ambitious charlatan comes along and tries to turn the BNP into a civic nationalist sell-out party.
Frankly, if that was what we wanted, and if that was what was needed, we could all have left it to UKIP in the first place. But it is not. Just because a featherless biped can speak English and knows how to sign on for benefits, that does not make it one of us.
Nationality and identity are based on ancient roots and belonging, not on possession of a passport. And every new wave of new recruits must be taught this, or our struggle would be pointless.
iii) Our culture and heritage. This is especially important for younger people who have been so badly let down by the education system and so denied real informed pride in their ethnic roots.
iv) Personal character, proper behaviour and individual and community improvement. Our movement has to be so much more than a political party, it must also become the vehicle for a true national revival, and that has to grow first through our own ranks before we can even begin to change the wider community around us.
3) Alternative Media - further steps on a long road
Our left-liberal and internationalist enemies have a vice-like grip on the minds of the population through ruthless control of the mass media. For us to expect to beat them without breaking that grip through the development of an alternative nationalist media network is ridiculous.
That, of course, presents us with a huge task, but the way to walk a thousand miles is to stand up and start taking the first steps, so here is what we are going to do to build further on the remarkable and continued success of our website:
i) Radio RWB, our embryonic online radio station, is already getting many thousands of listeners. While it's early days yet, there is clearly huge potential for this to become further 'social glue' to attract and keep newcomers to the movement, and to motivate the new activists we need to strengthen our electoral challenge.
It should also become a way to attract a fresh generation of future nationalists, by playing demo tapes of whatever genre of music youngsters are making in garages and bedrooms.
The left have made the capture and distortion of young minds through music a speciality. We cannot just back and make no response, and while personally I love folk music I am very much aware that to appeal to young people it is essential to use the music with which they already identify.
Radio RWB gives us, and Great White Records, a way to break into those genres.
ii) Internet TV is already breaking the monopoly domination of the broadcast media by anti-nationalist forces. It is without a shadow of a doubt the way ahead, and is already the subject of discussions with a view to co-operation between the BNP and our partners in the Alliance of European Nationalist Movements.
What has been eye-catchingly and provocatively dubbed "the nationalist Al-Jazera" is not a pipedream, it is a seriously achievable aim within the next three years, as advances on the Internet remove the need for access to impossibly expensive satellite technology.
4) Breaking out of the Nationalist Ghetto — reaching out to the wider community
Over the last few years the BNP has won enormous 'soft' support and respect among millions of ordinary Brits. But to translate this into firm support, we have to show them that not only do we say what they think on the really big issues, but also that we can make a practical difference in real life. Hence the need to build on the experience and successes of the experiments in which we have already been involved.
i) Community Groups, especially on issues that the usual PC crowd won't touch, such as the scandal of the racist sexual grooming of young white girls by Muslim men. There is enormous scope for a combination of playing victim cards on behalf of our community (as done, to the horror of the left, with our mass mail-shot Racism Cuts Both Ways campaign) and encouraging self-help initiatives.
These played an important role in setting the scene for the rise of the early Labour Party, and their time will come again as the deepening economic crisis and corporate looting tear up the welfare safety nets of the old nation state. This too is ground that must not be left to our opponents.
ii) Solidarity. A couple of years ago, the independent nationalist trade union faced an intense campaign of black propaganda and subversion by in hindsight obvious far-left plants. With enormous effort it overcame those early assaults and has now grown from having fewer than two dozen members to around 500. That makes it a fully viable union that does very effective work on behalf of its membership.
It also means it is perfectly poised for major expansion, which will help to protect even more nationalist activists from persecution, but also begin to give us scope to turn to our advantage anti-BNP laws like those allowing 'third party disparagers' during elections. That's why, as soon as possible, we will be doing all we can to assist Solidarity in its drive to double its membership to over 1,000.
iii) Single issue campaigns. These have huge potential not only in terms of helping the public learn that we are on their side on more than the subject of immigration. They will also be invaluable as a way of bringing in names and contact details, as well as invaluable information about those people's 'hot buttons', which we can then press during recruitment and election campaigns. Opposition to the Afghan War is going to be a very good place to start.
iv) Local "propaganda of the deed". Again, we've already done the experimental work. From community clean-ups to Adam Walker's recent footpath building project, from Burnley BNP Councillor Sharon Wilkinson's pensioners' dining club to the Community Observation Patrols run by Mike Howson and our people in Corsham until Wiltshire police reintroduced evening police patrols —  we already know these things work.
Again, the scope for this vital deep community roots work is set to grow exponentially as ConDem cuts take the police off streets, increase crime and leave neglected indigenous communities to sink or swim by themselves. It is our duty and great opportunity to make sure they swim.
5) Intelligent Militancy —  time to make our presence felt
In the strange, hard times into which Britain has been plunged by the failure of globalism, there will be a growing collective desire for a movement which doesn't only stand up for traditional values, identity and its own people in theory, but which also does so —  intelligently and legally, but forcefully —  in practice. There are several ways in which, by the time I hand over the further improved BNP, it will be justly known for intelligent militancy such as:
 i) "Legal Rioting". More properly known as Judicial Review Applications, which are tailor-made to allow our people to throw very chunky and rusty spanners into the works of any and every part of the machinery of central and local government.
While the cost to us is minimal, the cost to, for example, a Local Education Authority which refuses to keep records of the racist bullying of white schoolchildren, is shocking publicity and a legal bill of at least £20,000. This is why the majority of pre-action letters for Judicial Review lead to the institution in question agreeing to negotiate and to sort out the problem concerned. Now that's power, and the Equality Commission will shortly see us wielding it.
ii) Lightning demonstrations. While we will continue with the self-discipline of generally avoiding futile confrontations with large bodies of leftists, the new external circumstances do demand a higher profile as a party willing to make a stand on key popular issues.
A budget is therefore going to be set aside for an Instant Response Activities Organiser in each region. This will pay for the equipment and materials we need stockpiled ready to go, and to hire transport. The aim is for us to be able to mobilise, at very short notice (as we have already shown we can do, for instance, when I or others have been arrested for political offences) several hundred people for whatever demonstration is needed.
Opposition to the Muslim thugs who are making a habit of abusing army home-coming parades is an obvious starting point as far as I am concerned.
iii) Pressure on bullies, hacks and collaborators. How often have you like me seethed with anger when you've seen news reports of some PC council bullying a market trader for selling apples by the pound, or a guest house owner for politely turning away a 'gay' couple or a burqua-clad Muslim, or of some newspaper editor who openly lies about the BNP and thinks he's untouchable? Well, it's time to hit back.
So we're going to produce several sets of Truth Truck skins specially designed so it can turn up in the posh, polite, leafy suburbs where the bullies and the media liars live, and ruin their Sunday mornings off.
We'll have template leaflets ready to go to, so that their neighbours can be told what sort of people they really are, and understand why they are attracting such unwelcome attention.
6) Organisational Professionalisation
Increasingly favourable external circumstances are combining with our massive internal organisational advances, and with already extensive public sympathy for the BNP, to provide the potential for explosive growth.
This, of course, is the reason for the hysterically dishonest campaign to blacken my reputation, undo the advances of the last two years and to destroy the party. It is also the reason why, even while dealing with the smear mongers, we have to work flat out to put in place the systems that will allow us to manage and channel that growth.
This can only happen if we push through major reforms and improvements in our internal structure, including:
i) The creation of a sophisticated but user-friendly Intranet operation to provide an online tool for staff co-ordination and management, and for the support of officials and our hard-working local councillors.
ii) Training. Already covered in Section 2, but I cannot overstress the importance I attribute to this field over the next three years. We can grow massively, but only it will only be sustainable and lead anywhere if we train our existing people to raise their game, and teach the newcomers what we're about and how they can help.
iii) Target Setting, Performance Monitoring and Reviews. Our past and current standards of planning meetings and human resource and project management are frankly pitiful. To introduce proper business-quality practice in these fields is not 'alien corporatism' as the knockers claim, but basic organisational commonsense.
Imposing this from the top to bottom of the party is not going to make me popular, but doing it is going to provide my successor with one of my most valuable legacies.
iv) Recruitment and retention of members through social events and entertainment. In the hard times into which Britain is now plunging, there is going to be enormous power in cheap social events that give participants a sense of belonging and a few hours away from worry and being part of something bigger and worthwhile. Again, this is a pool into which we have already dipped our toes, most effectively with the Battle of Britain Roadshows that raised so much money and morale in the run-up to the European Election.
7) Finally, by the time I step down as leader, I aim to have well underway a serious programme to buy and equip a full, permanent, central England training/communications/administration/distribution centre. This would bring all our essential central functions into one complex, with all the proper permissions, security and facilities.
This has been the medium- to long-term plan for the last two years. The decision to set up our main administrative, call centre and dispatch centre in Ulster was taken reluctantly on the grounds that it was the only place we could find and employ the experts we needed to teach us how to do these things, and control them hands-on while our own people were learning. 
But, for all sorts of reasons, now our young team knows how to use the sophisticated systems and delicate equipment involved and — just as important —  understands the crucial importance of tight-deadlines and a proper work ethic, it would be more efficient to have everything based in the middle of England.
This is not something that can be done overnight, and for financial reasons it will have to be done in two stages in any case. First, we plan to bring the whole set-up to a rented unit in the West Midlands. This is all we can afford at present and, once again, we need to de-bug the new operation and establish exactly what and who we need there in order to maximise both efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
Having done that, we will be in a position to move to Phase Two, which is going to be the most ambitious and important project in British nationalist history —  the purchase and edevelopment of our own fully integrated operational headquarters and training centre.
Of course, this will not come cheap, for a start it needs to be in at least 30 acres of our beautiful countryside to provide a permanent landscaped RWB site. But another property crash is just around the corner, and properties in need of development will, at the right time, be an affordable bargain for a united and confident movement that has been saving for several years and which has several hundred local units all doing their bit to reach our goal.
At which point, despite having much more to tell you, I am out of time. So I can only conclude like this: These are only the next rungs up on a long ladder. The only reason we are in a position to climb them is because what has already been done with so many people's dedicated, loyal and generous support.
What we have achieved, especially with what we have done at the party centre in the last two years, positions us for the next steps up, and for further advances after that. Sometimes this progress involves us taking two steps forwards and then one step back, but overall, our progress has been, is and will remain, relentless. Whatever our enemies do, we keep moving forward. Whenever they beat us, we learn and turn the lesson to our advantage.
This movement of ours is like a brave, loyal terrier with its teeth deep in the leg of a  homicidal burglar, which is a good way to visualise those who have sold and raped our country and her people. We won't let go. And, sometime soon, we will get one, just one, chance to go for the burglar's throat and save all we hold dear.
We are here to save and to build a better future for the people of this our island home. I implore you not to sit and watch the chance pass us by, don't sit and watch as others make it happen. Be part of it. Don't make excuses, help us make history!
read more articles at http://bnp.org.uk/

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

BNP Support Stronger Than Ever, Says Salford BNP

Support Stronger Than Ever, Says Salford BNP

The public is increasingly angry over the illegal war in Afghanistan and are showing it on the streets of Salford by expressing support for the British National Party, reports organiser Gary Tumulty.
“The loyal and hardworking activists of Salford BNP distributed more than 200 copies of the latest Voice of Freedom newspaper this past weekend and topped it off with a 2000-strong leafleting session in one of our key wards,” Mr Tumulty said.
“The main issue over which the public has expressed an opinion is the LIB-Lab-Con’s decision to keep our troops in Afghanistan,” he continued.
“Salfordians are outraged that our boys and girls being brought home in coffins for a war in favour of which Salford MP Hazel Blears voted.
“Salford people are now getting the message that the BNP is the only party which demands an immediate withdrawal of our troops from that pointless war,” Mr Tumulty said.
“If the level of support we experienced over the weekend is anything to go by, then we stand a very good chance of making a breakthrough into the council here in the 2011 local elections.
“We are already busy selecting our candidates for these elections and will start making them visible in their target wards over the next few months,” he concluded.
join the  BRitish National Party By Clicking this link https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

UK Conservatives Abandon Their Principles Once Again over EU

Tories Abandon Their Principles Once Again over EU

The Conservative Party has once again betrayed its supporters, principles and election promises to “roll back” EU powers by agreeing to even more intrusive powers from the superstate.
The latest flip-flop policy decision will allow police officers from other EU member states to spy on an arrest British citizens in Britain for crimes in those other countries, even if they are not crimes here.
According to reports, foreign police will be able to travel to Britain and take part in the arrest of British nationals, place them under surveillance, bug telephone conversations, monitor bank accounts and demand fingerprints, DNA or blood samples.
Even more shockingly, anyone British person who refuses to comply with such a demand can be arrested by British police.
The Tory turnaround is a natural consequence of their coalition with the pro-EU Lid-Dem party, although it was obvious to all sensible observers that David Cameron had no intention of “rolling back” EU powers.
Such a “roll back” policy is impossible under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty, as the British National Party alone pointed out.
The choice was always quite clear: accept the terms of the Lisbon Treaty or leave the UE. The Tory leadership simply lied to their voters by promising some half measure.
A statement issued by campaign group Fair Trials International said that the new rules would allow, for example, Spanish police investigating a murder in a nightclub to demand the details of every British citizen who flew to the country in the month the offence took place.
The new powers are known as the European Investigation Order (EIO). Fair Trials International has demanded that Britain stay out of the EIO, saying that it will bring “miscarriages of justice and civil liberties abuses.”
It has also expressed concern over the fact that British police will now be forced to investigate activities which are not even criminal offences in Britain.
The EU has therefore made yet another power grab in its march to utterly destroy the national sovereignty of all European nations and needs to be resisted more strongly than ever before.

Monday, 26 July 2010

UK Black Gang Violence Is Destroying Britain

Black Gang Violence Is Destroying Britain’s Cities: Time for Straight Talking

Black criminal gang violence is destroying many of Britain’s inner cities and the time has come for the establishment to stop pretending it is not happening and admit that their disastrous mass immigration policies are the primary cause of this disaster.
Police mug shots of London Field Boys convicted of murder.Police mug shots of London Field Boys convicted of murder.The latest example of the cost of black gun crime has come with the report that Hackney Council now spends £400,000 in taxi bills to move teenagers around the borough because of the high level of gang violence.
The news report, which of course fails to mention race as a factor, blames the violence on gangs such as the “London Field Boys” and the “Hoxton Boys” – both notorious black gangs in the area.
Hackney has one of the highest rates of shootings and stabbings in the country, and one of the largest concentration of black “youths” in London.
According to the book Guns and Gangs — Inside Black Gun Crime, by former BBC home affairs correspondent Graeme McLagan, black gun crime is a “hugely unreported but important modern-day problem - an expensive problem both in terms of money and young lives.
“After terrorism, the single greatest worry for law enforcement agencies is gun crime, and in particular the so-called `black on black` shootings,” reviews of his book said.
According to his figures, black people are the victims of three quarters of the capital`s gun murders and non-fatal shootings. The shooters in 80 per cent of cases are also black.
“The real-life stories are even more shocking. Parents gagged and shot while their children cower under the bed, an innocent women shot for her flashy car, men gunned down simply for showing 'disrespect',” reviews of Mr McLagan’s book read.
“The police have since launched numerous operations to tackle the problem (the big turning point for which came after the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence) but most of these operations have been kept secret over the years - until now.
“The book also describes in detail the difficult and complex operations to catch key players, the community's fear of cooperation and the problem of witness protection.
“Birmingham, Bristol, Manchester and Nottingham are other cities where life is terrifyingly cheap.
“Murders of children, like Toni-Ann Byfield, the seven-year-old killed with her guardian, crack dealer Bertram Byfield, in October 2003, or 14-year-old Danielle Beccan, shot from a car on her way home from a Nottingham fair a year later, make headlines. But the regularity and similarity of the vast majority of shootings involving those caught up in drug and gang wars mean they attract far less media attention, despite the devastation of dozens of families and the catastrophic effect on neighbourhoods and communities.
“McLagan traces the trends, from the rise of the Jamaican Yardies and the emergence of large scale crack-cocaine dealing in the late 1980s, to the macho posturing of a new generation of British-born black gangs, whose twisted ideals of "respect" and "revenge" have led to people being shot over the most trivial incidents.
“He explores some theories for the prevalence of gun crime among black British youths. He touches on lack of job prospects, the well-documented but largely unexplained educational failure of many black boys, and the dearth of positive male role models in early childhood.
“More than half of the black families in the UK are brought up by one parent, overwhelmingly the mother, compared to one in four white families and one in 10 Indians, according to a 2002 Office of National Statistics report.”
McLagan reports that white police officers “are greeted with sneers and laughter” if they try to tell a young black audience why they should turn away from gun crime.
* The British National Party is adamant that this problem can only be addressed by halting and reversing the tidal wave of Third World immigration into Britain.
It is not acceptable to continually blame white British people for the behaviour of ethnic populations, and if the current situation is left to develop without intervention, this Third World chaos will simply engulf and destroy all of Britain.

Britain: A Nation of Immigrants? No in Fact it is a Left Wing Myth

Britain: A Nation of Immigrants?

By Alan Robertson at the BNP NewsRoom
— Two weeks before the election this year, Sandy Walkington, a Liberal Democrat candidate for St Albans said, “We’re all mongrels. I mean, this country is the most mongrel country in the world. In 200 years we’ll all be coffee-coloured — and I’ve got no problem with that.” It is outrageous and deeply offensive that politicians, the media and left-wing celebrities have promoted the lie that we are somehow all basically from mixed breeding stock in order to legitimise the invasion by hordes of foreigners.
Eddie Izzard said in his TV series Mongrel Britain, “our country has been massively diverse for most of its history — a blend of Angles, Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Celts.” But the history of the British people shows that we have been here for thousands of years and that past invasions have contributed no more than five percent to our population.
Izzard speaks with excitement about “rich diversity” and “a dynamic and vibrant mix of foreign genes.” Yet there is nothing vibrant or dynamic about losing your job to cheap Eastern European workers or finding that you can’t spot a white face in your high street.
The diversity he speaks of isn’t rich. The UK is poorer as a result of free handouts for immigrants and gifts to third world countries. Our cultural heritage has been savaged as we are forced to accept barbaric religions and the criminal scamming culture that we always knew was present in poor countries.
How dare they smile condescendingly while they attempt to change history and teach us that we owe everything, as Izzard claims, to “waves of invasion, centuries of immigration and floods of foreign ideas.”
The numbers of invaders were in fact few — mostly only in the tens of thousands and, crucially, all of the invaders’ origins were limited to northern Europe. This is supported fully by up-to-date genetic evidence in the book Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Great Britain by Arthur Kemp.
Kemp presents genetic evidence proving that the vast majority of British people have ancestors going back 12,000 years when haplogroups R1b, I and R1a spread northwards. British people with the R1b1 DNA haplotypes have on average a 74 percent homogeneity, with the remainder coming from countries just across the sea.
Historical records offer proof as well: The Romans invaded in AD 43 with an army of 40–45,000 men but only 16,000 legionaries were stationed here afterwards.
Estimates for the population at that time are around 1.5 million; therefore, the effect of this invasion was one to two percent (Eagles Over Britannia: The Roman Army in Britain by Guy de la Bedoyere).
“In the sixth century the Anglo-Saxon element in the population of Britain amounted to no more than fifty to a hundred thousand” (Arthur’s Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367–634 by Leslie Alcock). Therefore, the Anglo-Saxon contribution would be somewhere between three and six percent. DNA evidence shows that the R1a Haplogroup for Anglo-Saxons in England is 4.5 percent, a remarkable correlation (Kemp, ibid).
Between 789–1104 AD, the Vikings were known for their ferocious attacks on villages but only small numbers actually settled. War bands were tiny: “from seven to thirty-five a band and above three dozen an army” (Anglo-Saxon England by Lloyd and Jennifer Laing).
After the Norman Conquest, William, Duke of Normandy, dismissed his mercenaries and nearly all returned to France. “The probability is that the Continental settlement did not involve more than 10,000 people — and perhaps as few as 5,000” (Offshore Islanders: From Roman Occupation to European Entry by Paul Johnson). “England simply acquired a new ruling class,” writes Johnson. 
The Flemish and Walloons came from what is now Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and parts of northern France and Germany. About 16,000 were recorded in 1440, which was less than one percent. The population at the time was estimated between two and 2.5 million, and had diminished as a result of the Black Death (Roots of the Future: An Education Pack for Exploring Ethnic Diversity in Britain by Peter White).
The Jews also settled at various periods in history but did not approve of marriage to Gentiles. In 1290, the community of around 5,000 was expelled by Edward I.
They returned slowly and by 1815, there were around 20–30,000. Around 55,000 Jews arrived between 1933 and 1939. Britain’s population was at 40 million in 1940, and therefore the Jewish contribution was at most 0.3 percent.
Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a small trickle of people from all over Europe. In England and Wales, the 1871 census recorded 32,823 Germans, an Italian population of 5,063, again not significant amounts compared to the population of 20 million.
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) estimates 50,000 Huguenot and 80,000 French Protestants arrived between 1680 and 1720. About 40,000 of these left for America. However, around 1685, the population of Britain was four to 4.5 million, meaning that the contribution was still only about two percent (White, ibid; and Alien Immigrants to England by W Cunningham).
Between 1600 and 1800, people didn’t welcome foreigners with open arms and intermarriage of any sort was infrequent. Even when William of Orange came to England to unseat the unpopular James II, he was accompanied only by approximately 11,000 foot and 4,000 horse soldiers. The effect of his invasion was once again small.
The marriages between kings and queens of Europe and their relative squabbles did not have much of a bearing on the poor, often starving, ordinary people who mostly stayed where they were for thousands of years.
Possibly one of the best examples is Cheddar Gorge Man who is an example of how people have stayed where they were for thousands of years.
The remains of Cheddar Man were excavated in 1903 and have been dated at around 7,150 BC. In 1996, his DNA was profiled and a sample from 20 residents of a nearby village was taken. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett. What this means is incredible — these people are direct descendants of Cheddar Man and still live in the same area, nearly 10,000 years later.
The historical and genetic evidence support the fact that there is indeed a native people of Britain who have a right to this land. We have as much right as the American Indians, Aborigines or Maoris. There were invasions and a small amount of migration but, as has been already stated, these were from people just across the channel.
So why do they wish to convince us that we are all mixed race? The agenda of previous Labour and Conservative governments have only ever been concerned about re-election at any cost.
They know that importing cheap workers will provide short-term prosperity and thus they will secure re-election. By offering free handouts to immigrants they know that when the time comes they can count on the ethnic vote.
The proof is here. They have betrayed their own people.
The erasure of the native British people today has already begun and it is legitimised by whitewashing over our truthful British history with lies. Don’t stand for it.
Recommended reading: Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Britain (DNA, History and the Right to Existence of the Native Inhabitants of the British Isles.)
By Arthur Kemp. Contrary to what the liberal left Tory/Labour/Lib-Dem/UKIP-ECHR allege, the native people of the British Isles are a distinct, identifiable and homogenous indigenous people who have every right to exist and be free from invasion and domination -- like any other indigenous people on earth.
This booklet proves that the vast majority of the British people have ancestors going back to the last mini ice age more than 12,000 years ago.
Table of contents:
1. Introduction (Deals with the denial of indigenous status to the British people)
2. Indigenous People - A Definition (uses UN and other definitions)
3. Haplogroups and the Genetic Identification of Peoples (explains Y-Chromosomes, mtDNA and Autosomal DNA in detail, and how they are used in forensics and history to identify and track peoples to specific areas)
4. The Haplogroups Which Mark the Indigenous People of Britain (explains which haplogroups are indigenous to Britain)
5. A History of the Peopling of Britain (a potted history of the people who have made up Britain through settlement, i.e. Euro base population, Celts, Romans, Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Danes, Normans -- including figures on actual numbers of settlers and their genetic impact as measured by haplogroup)
6. Four Flags, One Nation: The right of the people of the British Isles to existence and freedom from colonisation, domination and dispossession of their lands and culture.
This booklet shows:
* Genetic evidence shows that the vast majority -- nearly 80% -- of all British people have ancestors going back to the end of the last mini ice age 12,000 years ago;
* Genetic evidence showing that the Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Viking/Danish and Norman conquests had negligible impacts upon the British people (less than 5 percent each);
* Genetic evidence showing that the Irish people have far more in common with the British than both sides of that traditional divide realise.
* The people of the British Isles have been indigenous peoples for far longer than many other nations who are already classified as "indigenous" by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.
This booklet also shows how the indigenous people of Britain are fully protected by the United Nations Charter on Indigenous Peoples from "dispossession of their territory" through "mass population transfers" and from "forced integration and assimilation" and "destruction of their identity and culture" (all according to the United Nations.)
Even more importantly, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states that all indigenous peoples have the right to define who is part of their nation and who is not. This is the killer booklet to destroy the final left-liberal argument against the right of Britain to be British.
£7.20 Includes postage and packaging. Click here to order online.


I'm Indigenous, Are You? T-Shirt
Full colour map of the British Isles, with each nation's flag prominent and a DNA swirl.
Perfect to wear anywhere where you want to start a conversation about who are the indigenous people of Britain and their right to survival.
Each T-shirt individually printed: please allow 14 to 20 days for delivery.
£12.50 Includes postage and packaging.
Size scales (in inches): S: 34-36 M: 38-40 L: 42-44 XL: 46-48 XXL: 50-52

Sunday, 25 July 2010

Why has the African Nations gone to Hell

Why Africa has gone to Hell

by James Jackson
White Zimbabweans used to tell a joke—what is the difference between a tourist and a racist? The answer—about a week.

Few seem to joke any more. Indeed, the last time anyone laughed out there was over the memorable headline “BANANA CHARGED WITH SODOMY” (relating to the Reverend Canaan Banana and his alleged proclivities). Zimbabwe was just the latest African state to squander its potential, to swap civil society for civil strife and pile high its corpses. Then the wrecking virus moves on and a fresh spasm of violence erupts elsewhere. Congo, Ivory Coast, Sudan, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, even Kenya. Take your pick, for it is the essence of Africa, the recurring A-Z of horror. And as surely as Nelson Mandela took those steps from captivity to freedom, his own country will doubtless shuffle into chaos and ruin.

Mark my words. One day it will be the turn of South Africa to revert to type, its farms that lie wasted and its towns that are battle zones, its dreams and expectations that lie rotting on the veldt. That is the way of things. Africa rarely surprises, it simply continues to appall.

This article continues at South of the Zambezi - Click here to continue reading

Conservative MP faces legal action over burkas or niqabs , Dunkirk Danger

Author Horwich nationalists

A Conservative MP has been warned he could face legal action if he refuses to meet constituents who wear burkas or niqabs, which hide their faces.
Lawyers for pressure group Liberty have written to Philip Hollobone stating the Equality Act obliges him to avoid discrimination.

This is just showing once again how Enoch Powell's famous speech has come to fruition, in were is stated quite clearly, " that soon the Black man would hold the whip hand over the white man" of this nation.

Their are a couple of thing I would like to ask, one is who funds these groups such as liberty and also why these groups have such open double standards of allowing women in the 21st century to be oppressed in such a Medieval oppressive dress code.
In my mind the first point the is that the Marxist political elite now running Parliament fund such groups as Liberty & the EHCR to subvert the natural law of free speech paid for the blood of millions in this nation, while appearing not directly involved.
On the second point it is quite obvious that the type of mindless morons involved in groups such as Liberty are nothing but open Marxists who do not give a damm about the freedom of a woman's choice of clothing , but have their own agenda . mainly of f closing down the peoples free speech or debate by the use of the laws their closet Marxists pals in Parliament Pass under the guise of a tolerance agenda.
Or even worse they are  deluded do gooders who lacking imagination or fore sight cannot see that they are sowing the seeds of their own destruction, by their misguided actions.
 It is now time for the British People to take action against these Political Monsters that now are hell bent on the destruction of this Nation it,s People and Culture. 
For now our Nation is in a even GREATER PERIL than what it was at the time of the Dunkirk evacuations. their our enemy was from without and open in his intentions of the destruction of our nation. But now we have an enemy that is from within and is not open with his intentions of our annihilation! And all that is required for this EVIL to truimph, and I mean it EVIL for it is based on the works of the Satanist Karl Marx, is for good men and women to stand by and do NOTHING!
So you must decide that now is the time for you take take responsibility for not only your future but for that of your childrens and your childrens children futures!

For goodness sake join the men and women in the movement that is growing every day in size, and that is the only one willing to battle this EVIL openly and with the truth! please join the British National Party and help save your tommorows. by clicking on this link http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The end of racial appeasement Article from the USA

I have come across this article I recommend a view of this interesting USA website/Blog.

The end of racial appeasement

Since the end of the Civil War, America has embarked on a policy of “racial appeasement,” or gifting minority populations with money and power to stave off the inevitable conflict brought on by diversity. As America wakes up to how easily an accusation of racism can crush a career, people are re-thinking racial appeasement and thinking instead of options to diversity.
Picture this for a movie:
On planet Raeth, injustice reigns. The ruling group, Aucascians, have oppressed the Friacans, who don’t have technology and have been in the past cruelly enslaved and used as cheap labor. When a few people of good moral character figure this out, they band together to help the Friacans gain political power. Eventually, a Friacan is elected with the promise that racial antagonism will end, Friacans and Aucascians will breed together into a new race, and peace will reign forever.
Except that it doesn’t happen. The movie doesn’t end there; instead we see the Friacan president struggling, realizing that he has to both make Friacans like him, and avoid having the Aucascians feel attacked. He starts trying to transfer wealth and power to the Friacans, which makes the Aucascians realize: now we’re the target, and soon we’ll be oppressed like the Friacans were, if we don’t do something about it.
Sound familiar?
When we elected Barack Obama, his constituents hoped for many things. The white people who voted for him were primarily young and inexperienced; 95% of black people voted for him, as did many members of other ethnic groups. They elected him for the same reason they elected Bill Clinton, which was a hope for racial reconciliation and a happy ever after story.
Instead they got an intensification of racial resentment. Race relations are probably more tense now that at any previous time except the morning after the Watts riots wound down. Both groups are slowly starting to realize: in a diverse society, one group has to be on top. Both can’t be. Even more, if you try to “raise up” one group, you’re going to do it at the expense of the other, and then they’ll hate each other.
Brushing past the insane racists (people who hate black people and consider them inferior) and insane anti-racists (who consider wanting to be of your own race to be racist) we can see that this problem has no end. The problem isn’t white people. It isn’t black people. It’s diversity.
Never in recorded history has diversity been anything but a problem. Look at Ireland with its Protestant and Catholic populations, Canada with its French and English populations, Israel with its Jewish and Palestinian populations.
Or consider the warring factions in India, Sri Lanka, China, Iraq, Czechoslovakia (until it happily split up), the Balkans and Chechnya. Also look at the festering hotbeds of tribal warfare — I mean the beautiful mosaics — in Third World hellholes like Afghanistan, Rwanda and South Central, L.A.
“Diversity” is a difficulty to be overcome, not an advantage to be sought. True, America does a better job than most at accommodating a diverse population. We also do a better job at curing cancer and containing pollution. But no one goes around mindlessly exclaiming: “Cancer is a strength!” “Pollution is our greatest asset!” – Ann Coulter
Very few people would voice this sentiment because the populist political parties — those most popular with those who are least invested in understanding the mechanism of governance and economics — tend to group together “critics of any attribute of diversity” with “racists: those who hate black people.”
But the facade has been cracking. After Andrew Briedbart trolled the left by showing them how damaging an unsourced whisper of “racism” could be, people are starting to realize that the situation is unstable. Blacks aren’t happy; whites aren’t happy. Other ethnic groups are caught in the middle, but all ethnic groups are starting to realize that one ethnic group must rule us — trying to split the power isn’t working and cannot work.
Interestingly, the same thing is happening in Europe, where immigrants from backgrounds as varied as Turks, Arabs, Africans and Asians are finding it hard to integrate. They find themselves in ghettoes, despising the local population and in turn being despised, while governments make more laws to prevent discrimination and write more checks to subsidize them.
We’re even seeing people on the left trying to compete with the Tea Party for the white middle class vote, since not only are those people numerous, but they’re economically, socially and politically important as a creative force in America.
The Tea Party was a classic Libertarian backlash: we don’t want the entitlement state, and we don’t want a moral government telling us how to think, especially if that thinking includes a morality of self-destruction. Tea Party logic is that if other ethnic groups can demand self-serving change, so can white people, starting with the elimination of politically privileged ethnic groups.
In other words, if we’re going to be fair, we should apply the same standards to everyone. If a black person isn’t racist for wanting to marry a black person, then a white person should not be racist for wanting to marry a white person. If “black power” is socially acceptable, “white power” should be too. That’s real diversity. But it’s not what the left has been supporting; instead, in their view, only white people can be racist. That got old real fast.


The injustices endured by black Americans at the hands of their own government have no parallel in our history, not only during the period of slavery but also in the Jim Crow era that followed. But the extrapolation of this logic to all “people of color”—especially since 1965, when new immigration laws dramatically altered the demographic makeup of the U.S.—moved affirmative action away from remediation and toward discrimination, this time against whites.

Policy makers ignored such disparities within America’s white cultures when, in advancing minority diversity programs, they treated whites as a fungible monolith. Also lost on these policy makers were the differences in economic and educational attainment among nonwhite cultures. Thus nonwhite groups received special consideration in a wide variety of areas including business startups, academic admissions, job promotions and lucrative government contracts. – “Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege,” James Webb, Wall Street Journal
In other words, we can’t expect to force people to be equal and we can’t fix the past by discriminating against Caucasians. This makes sense, but Webb is serving democratic interests here by trying to apply a band-aid to a situation that’s ready to explode.
Think about two salient facts:
  • Everywhere diversity has been tried, it has brought conflict and instability. This applies to diversity of ethnic/racial groups as well as religion, radical political differences, or radical leaps in ability or economic power (class/caste). People like to point to the West and say, “See, it’s working out OK, especially in Canada” forgetting that diversity on any measurable scale has only been in effect for thirty to forty years, which from a historical viewpoint is less than the blink of an eye. What does other modern and ancient history show us? That diversity causes conflict and ultimately destabilizes a nation, leaving behind a society of the third world type.
  • Different ethnic groups evolved differently. We shouldn’t worry about whether this extends to the potential or abilities of individuals, but should point out that no continent was ever completely dominated by a foreign authority. Had these continents wanted to invented technology, they could have but did not. Evidence suggests that limited efforts were made along those lines. So there’s a reason why some groups, notably Jews, Western Europeans, and North Asians succeed and still stay on top of the game: they developed along these directions and maintain the ability to do so. It’s not racist to admit this, since these are subsets of races rather than racial groups in themselves.
We can at this point either face history, and see that the diversity experiment in America is doomed to failure because someone must always rule and everyone else will rebel, or continue our “out of sight, out of mind” policy of racial appeasement. Policies of racial appeasement:
  • The welfare state. We’ll transfer money from others to you if you’re having trouble.
  • Affirmative action. We’ll put you first in line, maybe that’ll help.
  • Political correctness. We’ll insist you are magical, innocent and vital so that you become symbolically important.
  • Conflict avoidance. If a white cop shoots a black guy in Oakland, we’ll lock down the city and excuse you if you riot. It’s not your fault; you were wronged.
  • Anti-discrimination legislation. As much a handout as legal redress, this enables you to sue someone if you don’t get hired or rented to, even if you’re incompetent or dangerous, as some individuals of all ethnies and races are.
  • We’ll elect one of you. Barack Obama has less experience, a past with less documentation or evidence of competence, and less experience with decision-making than any president in history. He was elected because he was black and we hoped that would end the race debacle.
Racial appeasement ran its course because it appeared to be the path of least resistance. After a disastrous civil war, no one wanted to bother with partitioning the United States, or even repatriating its former slaves with compensation. Through the next generations, race riots were commonplace about every decade, and appeasement was the policy there, too.
Horrible racist injustices did happen, as did cruelty, but the perpetrators have been punished where caught, and now are thoroughly marginalized especially after WWII, when we defeated that big evil racist, Hitler. For every incident, an appeasement was tabled, until we get to the point where government looks first to hire minorities, businesses are scrambling to hire minorities, all of our movies feature positive stereotypes of minorities, and we’ve elected a black man as president. When does one appease enough?
As the dust settled after Obama’s election, a sinking feeling set in among Americans. What if this didn’t do the trick? What if this is an ongoing problem instead of something we can solve with one gesture of appeasement? As Neville Chamberlain found out when appeasing Hitler just delayed the inevitable war, appeasement doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for blacks, or whites, or anyone else. And so the myth of racial appeasement starts to crumble.

Saturday, 24 July 2010

White British School Pupils Set to be Minority by 2021 Colonisation of Britain Shock

The Colonisation of Britain: White British School Pupils Set to be Minority by 2021

A BNP News analysis of official Government figures have shown that the ethnic “minority” school-going population will be an absolute majority in British schools by 2021, less than ten years away.
The shocking figures are based on statistics released by the Department for Children, Schools and Families in 2006, which do not take into account the massive flood of immigrants over the past five years which will skew the time scale further against the indigenous population.
According to the figures, in 2007 at least at least 20 percent of all children in Britain were from the ethnic “minorities.” (Source). 
The official figures for 2006 showed that ethnic “minorities” accounted for 22 percent of pupils at primary school. This was an increase of 2 percent from the previous year.  (Source).   
The 2 percent per year increase in ethnic “minority” pupils was replicated at secondary level schools, which in 2006 rose to 17.7 percent. (Source).   
Discounting increased immigration and using a straight 2 percent growth rate per year, the 2006 figures mean that this year (2010) some 32 percent of all primary school pupils are of ethnic “minority” origin.
Using the same calculation of a 2 percent growth rate, the 2006 figures mean that the 2010 secondary school ethnic “minority” pupil rate is now 27 percent.
Given this growth rate, white British children will become an absolute minority in British schools by the year 2021, when the “ethnic “minority” levels will reach over 50 percent.
It is important to bear in mind that the 2006 figures are already half a decade old, and do not account for the dramatic increase in immigration over the past five years.
In many areas, white children are already a minority. According to the Birmingham City Council, 61 percent of all primary school children in greater Birmingham this year are already of Third World origin. (Source). 
In 2007 it was reported that whites were already a minority in London classrooms. (Source).  http://tinyurl.com/2dqslcc and in 2008, more than 30 state schools in England were made up solely of ethnic minority pupils with no white children on the roll. (Source). 
According to Data collected by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) between 1992-1994 and 1997-1999, the number of people from “minority” ethnic groups grew by 15 percent compared to 1 percent for white people. (Source). 
Figures released by the ONS in January 2009 revealed that the Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years. Their population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society. (Source). 
The massive increase in immigration between the years 2006 and 2010 will only have increased the ethnic “minority” population even further, so even the projection of 2021 is possibly “optimistic” and whites will become a minority even before that year.
The British people stand before a historic choice over the next few years. They can continue to vote for the Lib-Lab-Con party and endorse the utter destruction by ethnic cleansing of Britain, or they can vote for the British National Party.

Arizona illegal Immigrants Protest A Picture tells a Thousand words

THEY SAY A PICTURE SAYS A THOUSAND WORDS , SO I WON'T WRITE THEM JUST LOOK AT THIS IMAGE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS PROTESTING ABOUT ARIZONA'S NEW AND CORRECT IMMIGRATION LAWS!

Andrew Brons MEP, BNP Educated Politician Vs Weyman Bennet UAF Thug and Retard, Radio Interviews

Andrew Brons MEP, BNP Educated Politician Vs Weyman Bennet UAF Thug and Retard, Radio Interviews,

Author the Horwich Nationalists

Andrew Bron

 

 

This Radio interview of Andrew Brons shows how much of a educated and articulate BNP representative the British People have in the European Parliament, Mr Brons easily answers all the hostile questions in a polite and informed manner showing how much of a gentleman and informed politician he is.

weyman Bennett Of the UAF

And yet on the other hand you will hear the spokesman of the violent Marxist UAF weyman Bennett, ( who was arrested for organising violence against the English in Bolton this early this year, pictured). go into a, what can only be described a retard diatribe of lies and false accusations , so bad that even the biased media types had to call a end abruptly to he's section of the interview. 

But the most alarming aspect of this collection of violent Marxist thugs called the UAF, is that the are being supported by our present Prime Minister Cameron, who is signed up to their charter. 

This shows quite clearly that the Old Party political elite are using not only repressive anti free speech laws and race hate quangos such as the EHCR , to quash our ancient liberties, but are also the sponsors of a violent political militia , similar to those run by Robert Mugabees Zanu PF party in Zimbabwe.

please listen to this interview , and then decide if you should just idly sit by and watch your children's hard won freedom be taken away from them.  use this link to join or donate the British National Party and resist the True LIB/LAB/CON Fascist parties in Britain today https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html