BLACK BISHOP, WHITE BISHOP, BAD BISHOPS. AND IT AIN'T CHESS EITHER

BLACK BISHOP, WHITE BISHOP, BAD BISHOPS.

Christian Council Of Britain Archbishop John Sentamu fled his own country, Uganda, for ours but has brought the spirit of political and religious persecution with him!  Ungrateful for the haven he has found, here, in Great Britain he has become instrumental - as a bad bishop, a very bad bishop some would say -  in bringing, a stage nearer, persecution for one’s peaceful, if “politically incorrect,” beliefs.  According to Christian Concern for Our Nation, Christianity is already one of the main targets of this, not just the British National Party.  The only article of faith some Bishops have is nearly always something to do with this party; a peaceful, legal and registered political party undergoing some success in the polls and challenging the complacency, not to say delinquency, of all three main, overly secularised, parties.

Many see John Sentamu’s theology as poor, like his grip on the Bible and the truths which it teaches.  Certainly a Bishop of his position - whatever you make of his moral and cultural stature - should be more circumspect in any lack of regard he may have for the fundamental human rights, and civil liberties, of freedom of association and affiliation.

But, it has to be said, that he is in bad company.  Black Bishop has White Bishop!

Rowan Williams almost makes John Sentamu’s catastrophic failings - such as spitting in the face of religious and political liberty - look like success!

This is acknowledged very widely at the grass roots of the Church of England, which remains a Church that will live, if it lives at all, at parish level.  I have been surprised by how ordinary parishioners and parish “priests” have little respect for their bishops who are seen as menacing, out of touch, wishy-washy, hangers-on for media prestige and elite status.  This is not very Christ like, and certainly not very pastoral.

Rowan Williams favours the Islamic sharia which persecutes Christians and Jews and which is designed to apply to both Muslims and non-Muslims; so any comparison with Jewish law is out of place.  And White Bishop has practically split the Anglican Communion worldwide by his dithering over the issue of homosexuality in the clergy and laity.  Why does he not come out and condemn it - the Holy Scriptures do.  By the Bible of the Church of England, homosexual practise is a  heaven-denying sin: “Do not be deceived” says the apostle Paul.  The Bishops seem to be taken in and seem to want to take everyone else in.  All the main political parties are pushing this ancient Greek and Roman sin as if it were somehow new and modern - the Bad Bishops have clearly not been reading, and inwardly digesting, their Bibles; nor their ancient histories.   Hello?

And yet they claim to be ordained.  But if you are ordained to the ministry by God, or the Church, there ought to be some evidence for it!  All we have here is evidence of the loss of a moral compass, and the loss of mountains of moral fibre; and they are generally without fire, ardour, or love to God and for the souls of men - something for which they will surely answer for in the great day of judgement.  Ordained of God?  You must be joking!  I am almost persuaded to think that they are not Christians at all, let alone ministers except in the sense that perhaps Judas or Caiaphas were.  The former betrayed Christ and the latter crucified Him… …though each was ordained in some merely ecclesiastical sense.

This may seem a little harsh but it may well be a little too accurate.  It is better to warn people now rather than allow them to continue on the broad road that leads to destruction.  It is their job to call people to faith in Christ and to repentance from their sins. That includes homosexual practise, buggery and sodomy.  But it does not include moderate nationalism.

Nationalism within proper bounds is not a sin: rather it is ordained and approved by God.

Nations are groups of people of a common descent and all such nations have been made by God - no racism in that, see Psalm 86:9AV/NKJV and most versions.   It was His idea to have nations, in Genesis 10 and 11;  and it went against the global elite’s idea who built the tower of Babel - a kind of ancient Old Testament globalist project.  This theologically challenged African Bishop, at least on the matter of nations, who does not seem to appreciate political freedom as he should, needs liberally and theologically educating in more ways than one.  And yet he is leading the Church of England.   Jesus spoke about the blind leading others into a ditch.  We all know that the Church of England as a whole is in some mighty big ditch.  And at the bottom of it are these two Primates.

If Sentamu thinks that “nations” are wrong he is siding not with Christ or His Father in Heaven but with Nimrod and all the other polyglot dictators who have befouled the course of history.  Yes, nationalism can go beyond its proper bounds and then it does become sin.  But so can Bishops and Synods.  Did not Jesus say something about taking the beam out of our own eyes first?   It would be nice if the Bishops provided leadership in that role, first, by setting a good example in it themselves.

Let us invite the accused British National Party parishioners and “priests” to general synod and see what they really do stand for, unfiltered by a biased media, which promotes the things - including the mass killing of human life in abortion - which will surely destroy us, either in this life or in the next.  Let us not drive them underground or out of the Church of England for the Church of England needs as much help as it can get.  If you cannot love your own kin how can you possibly love others?  See what Paul says about his love for his own kinsmen in Romans 10: 1-3.  And yet he was the apostle to the Gentiles, not his own stock of Israel, seePhilippians 3:5.

And let us all start to value, for clergy and laity alike, freedom of political opinion and association being peaceful.  The exercising of such freedoms, peacefully, are not sin; but are an essential part of the political process in a liberal and democratic society.  They are also the mark of a Christian society.  After all that is why Archbishop John Sentamu came here to Britain in the first place.

Didn’t Jesus, also, say something about hypocrisy?

© The Revd RMB West, Dip. Th.
Minister of the Gospel.

The Rev Robert West uses the Book of Common Prayer (1662) of the Church of England and ministers to all churches or congregations.  He was trained in South Wales and was ordained presbyter in 1979.  He stood for the Lincolnshire Racial Equality Council in 2005 and joined the British National Party in 2006, having earlier founded the Christian Council of Britain as a Conservative District Councillor.
read more at the Christian Council Of Britain

heartless and lack compassion ?

Heartless and Lack of Compassion?

by Horwich Nationalists

What I have to say may seem heartless and lack compassion towards PC David Rathband was left blind after being shot by Raoul Moat.Of course I have sympathy as a human being towards this man as a fellow human being, BUT as policeman I have no sympathy what so ever with him!a contradiction you may ask?

Raoul Moat

But this man has taken the pay of the evil Liberal Marxist political elite, in order to enforce the laws that have been made by that same Liberal Marxist elite in order to subjugate and destroy the indigenous population of this country, and is therefore just as guilty of the charge of ethnic and national treason towards the indigenous peoples of this nation as they are!

The claim or in my opinion the excuse of a career serving the British public can no longer hold sway for the indigenous men and Women whom join the UK police . To me it now seems clear that those men and women now entering the Police service are fully aware as are the majority of the white and blue collar working classes, how the Laws of this land are now clearly established in order to subjugate themselves and their fellow native population of these Islands.

I believe that those who join the police are only concerned about their own financial prospects plus secure employment with retirement benefits. And that whom their serve or subjugate is of only minor if any consideration. As as been proved to some extent by the latest news that the officer PC David Rathband  shot by Raoul Moat is to sue for compensation for the sum of £1 million 

despite still being employed by the Police force and hoping for promotion that will lead to better financial rewards.

Now consider that against what our brave soldiers who serve for love of nation and people get after returning from Afghanistan, basically nothing but spit on by Muslim so called medical staff and their Respect Party brethren and an email saying F**k Off! you are surplus to requirements, and by the way here's £1500 and some sub standard paraplegic equipment, make do! see my point! but remember if it was in my power I would give PC David Rathband his eyesight back tomorrow for  do not hate the man but the institutions of evil he had chosen to support!

LOOK! Nick Griffin Bolton's MEP and Andrew Brons MEP on EU hypocrisy

Nick Griffin MEP and Andrew Brons MEP on EU hypocrisy

Written by Green Arrow

February 2011

Cracking video here of Nick Griffin MEP speaking to Andrew Brons MEP about the hypocrisy of the European Union and I must confess that whilst sometimes I have the attention span of a gold fish this clip had me riveted. I just wish the British National Party MEP's were given a chance like this to speak on British Television without being interrupted or ambushed and it is great to see Andrew restored to health and doing his bit.  Enjoy the video. I did.

Residents of Horwich and Bolton are you Passionate about Britain ? — A Message from Nick Griffin

Passionate about Britain — A Message from Nick Griffin

  The British National Party Newsroom

Monday was Valentine's Day. It got me thinking about love, in different forms, and how we express it. We love our family and our friends of course.

 The more religious amongst us love God. There are different types of love — all covered by just that one word.

You, like me, don't just love your friends and family. You love and care about your country.

Maybe this week you sent a card or a message of love.

The British National Party has a message for Britain. It's a message of hope. It's also a message of love.

   

We have produced a stunning new leaflet which is positive and professional and gets this message over.

This leaflet is the next step in the campaign to make sure that people understand that we do what we do because we care. Our new "Heart for Britain" logo was just the start.

Our leaflet goes beyond our complaints on key issues like immigration. It tackles other questions of vital concern to the public.

Everyone who cares about the future of our country needs to get hold of some of these leaflets.

Every person who believes our country can be a land we can be proud of again needs to donate so that we can print even more.

   

On the first day of release, our leaflet sold 200,000 copies. They will be going through doors up and down the land now.

It's not enough! Our message needs to get to everyone!

That's a big job, and we will need your help. Everyone can play a part.

You can help in two ways.

First, order some leaflets yourself.

Call 0844 809 4582 to place your order now. You can pay with credit card or make cheques or postal orders payable to ‘British Heritage’ and send them to PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP.

Prices:

*  100 = £5

*  250 = £9

*  500 = £17.50

*  1,000 = £30

*  4,000 = £100

We're passionate about our country – let's get others feeling the same way!

Second, donate online, or by ringing 0844 809 4581, so that we can get even more copies into the hands of our activists. Some are unemployed, some are pensioners, some are still at school – if you can't do the legwork with them, can you at least keep them supplied with leaflets?

Please accept my sincere thanks,

Nick Griffin

Member of the European Parliament

P.S. Help us get people to understand that supporters of the British National Party care about our country. Britain is our heartland, and we are passionate about it. Order our great new leaflet. You can also donate online, or by ringing 0844 8094582, to get even more printed. Remember, if our operators are busy, please call back!

   

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of this website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

David Cameron’s “Big Society” Nonsense Fails Big Time in Liverpool

“Big Society” Nonsense Fails Big Time in Liverpool

The British National Party Newsroom

One of David Cameron’s largest ‘Big Society’ projects — in Liverpool — has collapsed after the inherent contradiction between budget cuts and “increased support for community groups” dawned upon the scheme’s promoters.

According to reports, the ‘Big Society’ project in Liverpool was meant to support community groups and charities “central to the government’s vision” as mapped out in its nonsensical election manifesto.

The ‘Big Society’ scam in Liverpool hooked in local television producer Phil Redmond as its well-meaning frontman in order to try and sell the scheme to Liverpool Council and the public.

However, Mr Redmond has now washed his hands of the scheme, according to local media reports.

“The project has made little progress amid funding cuts,” Mr Redmond gave as his reason for quitting.

This opinion was confirmed by Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, who told the media that the ‘Big Society Network,’ set up by the government to support community organisers, is “imploding internally.

“Some of the apparatus they had set up to promote this idea is falling apart,” Sir Stephen said.

“Ministers should be protecting and using the existing voluntary sector, ensuring cuts didn’t fall disproportionately on charities.

“What this shows is you can’t drive development through diktats from Westminster. The vanguards were devised in London as showcase projects; they weren’t things that grew from within the sector,” he added.

Even if the ‘Big Society’ was actually real and not some half-baked fantasy drivel invented by David Cameron to divert attention away from this political bankruptcy, the savage spending cuts announced by the ConDem regime will make any further handouts impossible — just as Liverpool Council has discovered.

The council announced last week that it was to axe 1,500 jobs as part of a drive to save £141 million by 2013, and third sector umbrella body Liverpool Charity and Voluntary Services is losing two-thirds of its jobs to cope with an expected £800,000 cut in its £1.2 million budget for the coming financial year.

This news came after it was revealed that the Government’s ‘Big Society adviser', Chinese-origin Nat Wei, had found it impossible to continue in his role because he had not been paid.

Unemployment in Bolton and Nationally soars in the past month

Unemployment in Bolton has soared in the past month, new figures show.
Labour market statistics released today show the number of people claiming unemployment benefits in the borough jumped in January to 7,601, from 7,133 the previous month.
That means the rate of unemployment in Bolton has jumped from 4.2 per cent to 4.5 per cent.
However, the figure is still lower than this time last year when the number of people out of work in the town stood at more than 8,600.
In the North West, only Manchester, Liverpool , Wigan, Sefton and Wirral have a higher number of people out of work, whilst at the same time as reported by the British National Party news team in Horwich and Bolton

Unemployment rose by 44,000 to nearly 2.5 million in the last three months of 2010 nationally , according to the latest report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) — while other figures showed that there are now over one million illegal immigrants, and hundreds of thousands of “asylum seekers” in Britain.

To add insult to injury, the ConDem regime’s ‘immigration cap’ specifically excludes ‘tens of thousands’ of migrants, EU workers and a free trade deal with India will allow in thousands of Indian workers over and above any other immigration figures.

According to the ONS figures, one of the biggest increases was in youth unemployment, with one in five 16 to 24-year-olds now out of work. The overall unemployment rate has risen to 7.9 percent and the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance also rose by 2,400 to 1.46 million in January.

In April 2010, a MigrationWatch UK report said that there are more than one million illegal immigrants in Britain and that the number of visa overstayers is increasing by at least 60,000 per year. This is because the last Tory government abolished all exit controls at British airports and ports.

The number of asylum seekers runs at anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 per year, with more than 92 percent of them being allowed to stay even if their asylum applications are rejected.

Meanwhile, all foreigners earning more than £150,000 a year will be exempt from the ‘immigration cap’ hoax, it was announced this week.

The supposed cap, which is to come into force in April, will not affect any migrant worker already in the UK even if they change jobs or visas.

Companies will also still be able to bring in overseas staff who earn less than a planned salary cap so long as they rotate them each year.

Around 36,000 'skilled' workers arrived in the UK last year alone.

The total disregard for young British people in favour of outsiders has become a hallmark of the Westminster parties.

Other ONS figures released earlier this week showed that 20 percent of all new graduates in Britain have been unable to find work and have had to resort to dole money to live.

The figures also showed that 45 percent of 16 to 17-year-old school leavers ready for work, were also unable to find a job.

For new graduates, the unemployment rate has doubled since the start of the recession to 20 percent in the third quarter of last year. It is now at its highest for more than a decade.

The jobless rate among graduates has jumped by 6.3 percent compared with 5.3 percent for those without a degree.

Despite this, the Government has agreed to participate in a scheme to allow thousands of Indian IT and other workers free access to Britain’s job market in terms of an EU free trade deal with India.

This free trade agreement was piloted through all of its major stages by the previous Labour government in the form of Peter Mandelson, and has been endorsed by the Conservative/Lib-Dem coalition.

Once again, the establishment parties have all activley colluded to put the British people last.

Trafalgar Tourist Terror What Are Kosovan Street Gangs Doing in London?

What Are Kosovan Street Gangs Doing in London?

  The British National Party Newsroom

Thursday’s mass brawl between rival Kosovan street gangs in the middle of London’s Trafalgar Square has once again illustrated the insanity of the establishment parties’ asylum policy.

According to reports, “shocked tourists” were witness to the violent gang fight which saw at least three Kosovans hospitalised and another 19 arrested.

The Kosovans, armed with knives and hockey sticks, fought pitched battles with each other and police for around 90 minutes, apparently after going to the Square to “celebrate” Kosovo’s National Day.

The controlled media has tried to portray the mass fight as part of London’s “knife crime problem.”

While it is true that most of the capital city’s knife crime is of immigrant origin, the Kosovan street gangs are an end-product of a much more sinister aspect of government asylum policy.

Kosovo used to be part of Yugoslavia until the end of the Communist era when it broke up into would-be ethnic states.

Kosovo is currently under the administration of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX), despite its independence being recognised by 75 UN member states.

However, Kosovo is not formally part of the EU, and as such Kosovans do not have automatic right of residence in Britain.

Nonetheless, Kosovans were granted special privileges when applying for asylum in Britain as a result of the war in the former Yugoslavia.

As a result, at least 1,000 Kosovans applied every month to come to Britain under the asylum rules, which were only tightened up after widespread abuse of the system became apparent.

There are no publicly available figures on the number of Kosovan “asylum seekers” now living in Britain, but there are certainly enough to have imported their gang warfare onto the most famous square in all London.

* It is also no coincidence that 90 percent of Kosovans follow the Islamic faith. This could also explain the special privileges granted to them by the establishment parties.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

UK Unemployment Rockets but 1 Million Illegal Immigrants and ‘Tens of Thousands’ to Avoid Annual Cap

2.5 Million Unemployed, but 1 Million Illegal Immigrants and ‘Tens of Thousands’ to Avoid Annual Cap

The British National Party newsroom

Unemployment rose by 44,000 to nearly 2.5 million in the last three months of 2010, according to the latest report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) — while other figures showed that there are now over one million illegal immigrants, and hundreds of thousands of “asylum seekers” in Britain.

To add insult to injury, the ConDem regime’s ‘immigration cap’ specifically excludes ‘tens of thousands’ of migrants, EU workers and a free trade deal with India will allow in thousands of Indian workers over and above any other immigration figures.

According to the ONS figures, one of the biggest increases was in youth unemployment, with one in five 16 to 24-year-olds now out of work. The overall unemployment rate has risen to 7.9 percent and the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance also rose by 2,400 to 1.46 million in January.

In April 2010, a MigrationWatch UK report said that there are more than one million illegal immigrants in Britain and that the number of visa overstayers is increasing by at least 60,000 per year. This is because the last Tory government abolished all exit controls at British airports and ports.

The number of asylum seekers runs at anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 per year, with more than 92 percent of them being allowed to stay even if their asylum applications are rejected.

Meanwhile, all foreigners earning more than £150,000 a year will be exempt from the ‘immigration cap’ hoax, it was announced this week.

The supposed cap, which is to come into force in April, will not affect any migrant worker already in the UK even if they change jobs or visas.

Companies will also still be able to bring in overseas staff who earn less than a planned salary cap so long as they rotate them each year.

Around 36,000 'skilled' workers arrived in the UK last year alone.

The total disregard for young British people in favour of outsiders has become a hallmark of the Westminster parties.

Other ONS figures released earlier this week showed that 20 percent of all new graduates in Britain have been unable to find work and have had to resort to dole money to live.

The figures also showed that 45 percent of 16 to 17-year-old school leavers ready for work, were also unable to find a job.

For new graduates, the unemployment rate has doubled since the start of the recession to 20 percent in the third quarter of last year. It is now at its highest for more than a decade.

The jobless rate among graduates has jumped by 6.3 percent compared with 5.3 percent for those without a degree.

Despite this, the Government has agreed to participate in a scheme to allow thousands of Indian IT and other workers free access to Britain’s job market in terms of an EU free trade deal with India.

This free trade agreement was piloted through all of its major stages by the previous Labour government in the form of Peter Mandelson, and has been endorsed by the Conservative/Lib-Dem coalition.

Once again, the establishment parties have all activley colluded to put the British people last.

Cameron’s “Big Society”: The Greatest Piece of Garbage Ever to Appear in Bolton and British Politics

Cameron’s “Big Society”: The Single Greatest Piece of Rubbish Ever to Appear in British Politics

 The British National Party newsroom

David Cameron’s “big society” is the single greatest piece of rubbish ever to appear in British politics and consists of a collection of meaningless and unimplementable statements, costly and unimplemented undertakings and one outright lie.

A British National Party study group analysis of the Conservative Party’s 2010 election manifesto’s section on the ‘big society’ has revealed it to be a hotchpotch of utterly vague nonsense, deliberately designed to “sound” good but which completely lacks any substance.

The analysis showed that of the 16 major pledges contained in the Conservative Party’s manifesto ‘big society’ section, most are nonsensical sound bites which have no substance to them.

For example, the first claim in the Tory manifesto was that the 'big society' would “stimulate social action.”

No attempt was made to define this “social action” and it was deliberately left open-ended, most likely because the author (allegedly Mr Cameron himself) had no idea what was meant either.

The second claim in the Tory manifesto was a promise to help “social enterprises to deliver public services.”

This is equally meaningless, as “social enterprises” are also not defined. Even if they were, the very concept of outside non-government agencies delivering public services is an oxymoron in itself.

The third point in the Conservative manifesto was a promise to train “new community organisers to help achieve our ambition of every adult citizen being a member of an active neighbourhood group.”

Apart from the fact that absolutely nothing has been done in this regard, it is extremely far-fetched to claim that every adult citizen is going to be become a member of an “active neighbourhood group,” whatever that might mean.

The Tory manifesto did not stop there. It went on to claim as the big society’s fourth point that it would “direct funding to those groups that strengthen communities in deprived areas.”

What this statement says is that groups which “strengthen” communities in deprived areas are currently not being funded, which is, of course, pure nonsense.

There are already hardly any recognised ‘community organisations’ in ‘deprived areas’ which are not already funded. Indeed, in Third World immigrant-dominated ‘deprived’ areas, all the evidence indicates that they are overfunded to the detriment of the indigenous population.

Mr Cameron’s manifesto went on to say as its ninth point that the ‘big society’ would create “much higher levels of personal, professional, civic and corporate responsibility.”

Once again, that sounds good and well, but in reality this ‘point’ is meaningless, as a clear-minded reading of it reveals.

Other meaningless ‘promises’ made in the Tory’s ‘big society’ manifesto include the following examples of intellectual shallowness:

- The creation of a “society where people come together to solve problems and improve life for themselves and their communities.”

- The transformation of the “civil service into a ‘civic service’ by making sure that participation in social action is recognised in civil servants’ appraisals.”

- The launching of an “annual Big Society Day to celebrate the work of neighbourhood groups.”

- The development of “a measure of well-being that encapsulates the social value of state action.”

- A promise to “introduce new ways to increase philanthropy.”

As laughably transparent as this nonsense is, at least it is relatively harmless in comparison to the three ‘big society’ promises which have come remotely near to fruition.

The first of these, a pledge to introduce a “National Citizen Service to help bring our country together,” is scheduled for implementation this coming summer.

It is still not been revealed how this programme (which will see millions and millions of kids called up, housed and fed) will be financed, given the extent of the budget cuts currently being implemented across the board.

The second of the pledges nearing fulfilment is the promise to “redistribute power from the state to society.”

This is the purpose behind the Decentralisation and Localism Bill, one of whose most important elements (the simplification of planning applications appeals process) will have the exact opposite consequence for local people.

The third pledge which is on the point of fruition is the creation of a “Big Society Bank” funded from “unclaimed bank assets” to provide “new finance for neighbourhood groups, charities, social enterprises and other nongovernmental bodies.”

According to a statement released by the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) this month, loans from the “Big Society Bank” will be too expensive for many charities and social enterprises and therefore unusable.

The CAF said that if the bank operates on a commercial basis from the outset then there is “a risk that it will not let charities and social enterprises access affordable capital.”

Emilie Goodall, senior investment manager at CAF Venturesome, CAF’s social investment fund, said that the “emphasis of the Big Society Bank on helping charities and social enterprises to deliver public services may also exclude the bulk of the sector as most don’t do this but they still need access to capital. The result could be that the Bank doesn’t generate the wide-ranging positive impact that the government and the sector wants and needs.”

Another of the ‘big society’ claims which is unimplemented nine months later is the promise to “restore the National Lottery to its original purpose and, by cutting down on administration costs, make sure more money goes to good causes.”

There has been no indication anywhere that this has been done, or that it is even in the pipeline.

Finally, the most outrageous lie was kept for last. In the Tory ‘big society’ manifesto discussion on the promotion of sport, the Conservatives promised they would “deliver a successful Olympics that brings lasting benefits for the country as a whole.”

The winning London Olympic bid had nothing at all to do with any political party, and it is yet another indication of the gall and lies of the Conservative Party to claim this for themselves.

Mr Cameron’s ‘big society’ is a verbal hoax, vomited up again and again in the wasteland of meaningless noise which is the controlled media.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

The Joy of Teen Sex: Why we weep for our British young people

The Joy of Teen Sex: Why we weep for our young people

With Ofcom failing to act, the public must speak out against television programmes like C4's The Joy of Teen Sex which actively promote risky sexual behaviour

by Miranda Suitat http://www.christiantoday.com/

Miranda Suit

Full Size [+]

Channel 4’s series, The Joy of Teen Sex (JTS) has taken television to new depths of sexual explicitness by encouraging teenagers to be filmed attending their “frank and honest” Sex Advice Shop for help with their most intimate sexual worries.
C4 warned JTS would include “graphic sex and full frontal nudity”, but what follows is far worse: an arousing cocktail of graphic displays of sexual anatomy and sexual positions (heterosexual, homosexual and lesbian), followed by pornographic demonstrations by actors who look like teenagers themselves.
The three disarming young female presenters - a doctor, social worker (not yet qualified) and sex coach (actually a sex-toy saleswoman) - advise us, “While we think you should wait until at least 16 before losing your virginity, we can’t pretend teen sex is not happening, we should embrace it and face it head on.”
The teenagers are encouraged to ‘improve their sex lives’ with advice on oral and anal sex, genital plastic surgery and piercing (we saw one lad having a ring inserted in his penis), S&M, sex toys, ‘sex-enhancing’ drugs and working in the sex industry. No mention of avoiding promiscuous relationships, just instructions to use condoms for so-called ‘protection’ against STIs and pregnancy. Oral sex is portrayed in an exceptionally positive light despite recent research showing a link with mouth cancer. Advice on anal sex focuses on making it less painful as opposed to warning of the serious health risks.
This promotion of risky behaviour is absolutely unacceptable and potentially dangerous to young people’s health. It is the very opposite of ‘training a child in the way he should go.’ (Proverbs 22:6).
Having impressionable teenagers on screen exposing themselves physically and emotionally, exploits them for entertainment. How will they be affected in the future? How has C4 prepared them psychologically, and what follow up support will they receive?
In the UK, where we have some of the highest rates of teen pregnancy, abortion and STIs in Europe, our media’s obsession with values-free sex and nudity contributes to the problem. A report by the University of North Carolina found that “sexually charged music, magazines, TV and movies push youngsters into intercourse at an earlier age … the more kids are exposed to sex in the media, the earlier they have sex.” JTS takes this a step further by directly coaching young people in risky sexual behaviour.
Safermedia is especially concerned about the children who watched JTS unbeknown to their parents. The watershed offers scant protection to the majority of youngsters with televisions, computers, mobile phones, games consoles, etc. in their bedrooms. Many parents feel unable to use parental controls or monitor their children’s viewing; or they are too busy or indifferent. Many children circumvent controls with ease.
Amid growing public concern and the Government’s new independent Review on the Sexualisation of Childhood, C4’s behaviour is particularly irresponsible and needs to be challenged. Clearly the ‘light touch’ approach by UK regulator Ofcom is not working, as C4 have felt bold enough to broadcast such material, and Ofcom have taken no action against them so far. Public protest is therefore vital.
Twenty-three health and education professionals and bodies have already written to C4 about what they claim is the lack of qualified professionals on the show, poor advice and inaccurate and misleading information. We must all speak out ever more strongly and let Ofcom know that in no way does JTS meet with “acceptable community standards” (E: contact@ofcom.org.uk). C4 must be held to account even if retrospectively because this heralds the mainstreaming of pornography on television via the internet.
Several Safermedia supporters were reduced to tears by the programme, overcome by desperation and anger at such a betrayal of trust towards our younger generation. (Matthew 18:6). We hope and pray that our tears for the next generation will not be in vain.
Miranda Suit is Co Chairman of Safermedia, a charity seeking to reduce the harmful effects of the media on our children, families and society www.safermedia.org.uk

More Percived Benefits of Diversity

More Benefits of Diversity

Written by Sarah Albion

I see that China, a country which is famously a net exporter of immigrants, has become the second largest economy rapidly catching up on America, a nation now drowning in debt and immigration. Meanwhile, the immigrant friendly UK has plummeted from fourth place to sixth in the world ranking and is still falling. At the same time, India, a country which is probably the greatest net exporter of immigrants on the planet, whilst fiercely restricting inward migration, has risen to 11th place rivalling both Russia and Canada for a place in the top 10. Despite this we are forever told that that immigration benefits our economies and our national well being. Yet, those who make such claims tend to be less explicit when asked to substantiate or quantify their assertions. This is hardly surprising, for as Britain struggles to recover from the worst recession in our history, and one which hit us following a decade of inward immigration at levels unseen in any European country in history, is it not legitimate to ask where exactly is this much vaunted benefit. Inward migration to both China and India is all but non-existent, yet while our economies are in free fall their economies are soaring. By comparison, both Greece and Ireland the two earliest casualties (so far) of the so called global economic crisis, both experienced massive levels of inward immigration, before the whole thing fell apart.  This same story is being repeated throughout Europe and North America.  With the single exception of Germany, we are all in a state of rapid economic decline, despite enthusiastically importing the mass I which was supposed to be out salvation. “We all benefit from our vibrant m society” the great and the good keep telling us, “Divesity is our strength”  but the evidence supporting this claims becomes less credible by the day. It is not only countries which are suffering the consequences of this delusion, it is also not doing corporations much good either. Two of the largest casualties of the 2008 economic collapse were A, which required a bailout from the US government eventually totalling $150 billion and RBS which ended up 60% owned by the UK taxpayers,  Previously both companies appeared to be booming, however, I would  draw your attention to these two new stories which appeared in the three years leading up to the crisis: 14 February 2005 – RBS Appoints new Head of Diversity 12 January 2007 – AIG names first chief diversity officer Makes you think doesn’t it?  Diversity is our strength huh? I think not. ______________________ Sarah: Maild of Albion

British Government Cabinet Office Collaborates With French Brainwashing Guru To Change The Way We Think

British Cabinet Office Collaborates With French Brainwashing Guru To Change The Way We Think

Brian Gerrish
UK Column
Feb , 2011

On 3 January 2011, following the UK Column’s lead article exposing insider dealing between the Cabinet office and political behavioural training charity Common Purpose, the Independent newspaper revealed that David Cameron had also set up a Cabinet Office Behavioural Insight Team. Formed in July last year, the secretive cell is tasked to “dream up psychological tricks to alter our behaviour” – and on a massive scale.
The Independent article warned how the public is to be reframed or “nudged” into politically acceptable “Social Norms”; starting with healthy eating, voluntary work and tax gathering. While this may seem innocent to some people, these early ‘soft’ targets are already being greatly expanded to include wider central government ideological and political agendas, including Cameron’s socialist straitjacket of the Big Society. Elite multi-millionaire Socialist and Tory Chancellor George Osborne has already signed up to Behavioural Economics – another form of mental reframing of individuals and groups, specifically to achieve political economic objectives. Their theory and intent is, that once mentally retrained, we “willingly rush to pay excessive taxes”.
The danger is that we are to be trained to believe what our politicians and public sector – The State – says is right. And we will not even be aware that we have been ‘reframed’ to think so. Never mind the basics – politicians have been proved corrupt, deviant, liars – the Soviet Union would have paid in blood and gold for Cameron’s political mind-control initiative to lock people in a hive mind.
Research by the UK Column now exposes that Cameron’s Lib Con government is collaborating behind closed doors with similar sinister units in the French Government, to develop further plans and techniques to change our natural behaviour.
Our investigation of little known Rosie Donachie, who is part of the Behavioural Insight Team under Maude, Gus O’Donnell and David Halpern, reveals that Donachie is a key player and go-between in the mental attack on the British public.
Aside from her position as Senior Advisor with the Cabinet Office Behavoural Insights Team, she is also a Trustee of the Franco-British Council, and is involved with the Party of European Socialists based in Brussels. Not surprisingly for her murky role, she even has two names, being referred to as Rosalin in her Franco-British guise. Tracking Mrs Donachie’s path led UK Column investigative reporters to discover that on 17 November 2010, the Franco British Council had hosted a meeting inside 10 Downing Street attended by a mix of the Cabinet Behavioural Team and their French counterparts.
Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (AD)

Alongside Donachie and others, a key attendee at the secretive meeting was top French mind-bender Professor Olivier Oullier, who works directly within French President’s Sarkozy Private Office.
The meeting was instigated by Rohan Silva of the No10 Policy Unit following consultation with the Centre for Strategic Analysis of the Prime Minister of France with the aims of: “bringing together experts on behavioral Economics from France and the UK and to seek cross fertilization and generation of concrete proposals through open discussion”, and “to look at practical applications for the science of Behavioural Economics in France and the UK in light of the economic crisis.” Rohan Silva is Senior Policy Advisor to David Cameron and he also sits on the Advisory for progressive Conservatism at DEMOS (a marxist leaning think tank).
There is, no doubt, an inclination to laugh at the idea that we can be mentally ‘reframed’ or ‘reprogrammed’ into new belief systems and patterns of behaviour. But clearly these people have not been assembled behind closed doors to play games. A simple click on Google will reveal thousands of NLP training organisations, leadership trainers and consultancies. They all state that they can and do change people’s minds. They earn money from doing so. Moreover, whilst NLP and other mental reframing techniques can be used for theraputic purposes, any technique interfering with the human mind has risks. These may manifest as adverse personality changes, stress or depression.
Stating that: “behavioural economics can be a powerful tool for improving lives when used with care”, the No10 meeting was clearly aware of risks to individuals and the wider public, but according to the notes of the meeting released, seemingly failed to discuss or document those risks.
The truth of the meeting at No 10 is deeply sinister. Modern behavioural manipulation techniques, which includes NLP, can and do, achieve changes in people’s behaviour, particularly where the victim, individual or group, adult or child, is unaware that they are being targeted. It is perfectly feasible, as the attendees of No10 are fully aware, to implement political agendas and doctrine by reprogramming people. Consider Hitler Youth, or the Communist Chinese onslaught on the minds of children and young people. These latest insidious techniques, do not have that raw brutality, but unchecked, their stealth, effectiveness, and viral spread presents a far greater danger. Behavioural reframing for health, voluntary work and taxes today – and eugenics tomorrow. We have been warned.

read more articles by using this link
British Cabinet Office Collaborates With French Brainwashing Guru To Change The Way We Think: "

Con/Dem UK Government Report Ignores Immigrant Effect in Destruction of Britain’s Educational System

New Government Report Ignores Immigrant Effect in Destruction of Britain’s Educational System

 The British National Party Newsroom

A new Government report on declining educational levels in Britain has deliberately ignored the effect of immigrants in this process, a strategy which has been repeated by the controlled media.

According to the report, commissioned by the Secretary of State for Health, almost half of all boys in school aged five years are falling behind in educational standards.

The report said that only 44.5 percent of five-year-old children in Brent, North London are “progressing quickly enough at school” and that almost half of five-year-old boys are “failing in their development by their first year of school.”

Furthermore, the report, called the Marmot Review after its author, Sir Michael Marmot, said that in some parts of the country as many as six out of 10 boys are lagging behind the levels of behaviour and understanding they should have achieved.

Apparently the national figure of all five-year-olds who are not meeting standards is 44 percent.

The figures contain huge regional variations which are clearly linked to race and immigration, but which the report stoically ignores.

For example, in Solihull, West Midlands, almost seven in ten youngsters — 69.3 percent — have reached a “good” level of development, while in Richmond upon Thames, Surrey, the figure is 68.8 percent. These areas still have significantly large indigenous school age populations.

“In contrast, in deprived Haringey, North London, just 41.9 percent of five-year-olds have got to the same levels, while in Brent, North London, the figure is 44.5 percent,” the report continued.

Both those areas have very high young demographic immigrant trends, and in the school years under study, Third World origin immigrants are far and away the majority population.

Furthermore, the report says, in Tower Hamlets, 41 percent of homes are dependent on state handouts, but in Wokingham, Berkshire, it is just five percent.

Once again the racial demographics of the two areas are completely ignored. Tower Hamlets has been almost completely colonised by Third World immigrants, while Wokingham remains majority indigenous British.

The deceit about the real cause of the collapsing educational system is carried on by the controlled media.

In its coverage of the report, for example, the Daily Mail used a posed photograph of white five-year-olds to illustrate the article.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

UK Foreign Aid Scandal: The Financial Times Parrots the British National Party

Foreign Aid Scandal: The Financial Times Parrots the British National Party

  

The increasing acceptance of the legitimacy of the British National Party’s political message has been confirmed once again with an article in the London Financial Times (FT) complaining about foreign aid to nuclear-power India.

In an article headed “UK to give £1bn to India in spite of cuts,” the FT reported that a “review of UK aid policy is to maintain more than £1 billion of help for India, in spite of the nuclear-armed state’s rapid emergence as a world power with its own aid and space programme.”

Written as if it had been copied verbatim off the British National Party’s website (where the topic of the foreign aid scandal was first raised), the FT article confirmed that British “aid” to India would amount to £280 million every year to at least 2015.

Actually, the FT’s estimate of £1 billion is an understatement. Annual payments of £280 million will mean that between 2010 and 2015, the British taxpayer will hand over £1.4 billion to India.

According to the Office for National Statistics, in the financial year 2009/10 the UK recorded general government net borrowing of £159.8 billion, which was equivalent to 11.4 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP).

This means that the foreign aid grant to India alone is nearly 1 percent of Britain’s deficit. It also means that the total annual foreign aid budget makes up 7.58 percent of Britain deficit.

“India is growing at 8.5 per cent a year, gives aid to Africa, boasts more than 126,000 US dollar millionaires and is one of only six nations with satellite launch capability,” the FT article continued.

Moving on to quote International Development Minister Andrew Mitchell, the FT said that India was a “development paradox.”

Mr Mitchell was quoted in the article as saying that “Some people in both the UK and India have been asking whether the time has come to end British aid to India. In my view we are not there yet.”

Mr Mitchell also revealed to the FT that Ethiopia will shortly become the recipient of “Britain’s biggest bilateral aid programme.”

There is no justification whatsoever for British taxpayers to have to go into debt to give “aid” to India.

The Indian economy is already the eleventh largest in the world by nominal Gross Domestic Product and the fourth largest by purchasing power parity (PPP). Economists have predicted that by 2020, India will be among the leading economies of the world.

Furthermore, India possesses nuclear weapons and maintains short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles, nuclear-capable aircraft, surface ships, and will acquire the Arihant class of nuclear-powered submarines in 2012.

Unlike Iran, India is not a signatory to the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Intelligence estimates are that it has around 95 nuclear weapons and enough weapons-grade plutonium for a further 110.

The British National Party is the only political party to have consistently called for an end to all foreign aid while there is poverty and social deprivation in Britain.

It is time to put the British people first, and it is encouraging to see the FT at last waking up to this simple, reasonable and righteous demand.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National; Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

UK Coastguard Budget Cut as EU Membership leaps to £118 Billion Per Year

Coastguard Budget Cuts to “Save £7.5 Million” Per Year as EU Membership leaps to £118 Billion Per Year

The British National Party Newsroom

The government’s budget cuts for Britain’s coastguard service will “save” £7.5 million a year, while the cost of membership of the European Union has rocketed to in excess of £118 billion per year.

The 15 percent budget cut to the Department of Transport’s coastguard control centres will see the number of such units reduced from 19 to 8, with only 3 offering 24 hour cover.

Currently the Coastguard’s search and rescue helicopters consist of Royal Air Force Sea Kings and civilian helicopters arranged through the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA).

An earlier proposal to privatise that part of the service has been put on hold after serious “irregularities” in the tender process were identified.

Nonetheless, the government is still pushing ahead with the wholesale closure of coastguard control centres, claiming that the process will “modernise” the service.

The government’s cutbacks have imperilled much of the coastline and Britain’s borders. For example, the proposal will leave Scotland – which has nearly two-thirds of Britain’s coastline with only one full-time watch station.

In the South West of England, another important shipping hotspot, four emergency tugs, stationed around the coast to tackle maritime emergencies, will be cut in September this year.

According to maritime union Nautilus, prospect was "deeply worrying" for the "vulnerable" Devon and Cornwall coast. "Ships are bigger than ever before, operating with fewer crew than ever before and carrying more and more complex cargoes," Andrew Linington, a spokesman from Nautilus was quoted in the media as saying about the South West cuts.

"To be cutting back of maritime safety measures in those circumstances we believe is dicing with danger."

Many of the threatened resources had been introduced for "good reason" after specific incidents, including the rescue tugs, brought in after the Braer and Sea Empress tanker disasters, he added.

The same story has been repeated up and down the coastline, with local communities warning of the dangers of cutting this vital service.

Cutting the coastguard threatens lives and the environment, many experts have warned, adding that the supposed savings will easily be dwarfed by the first big emergency which strikes as a result of these services have been cut.

The £7.5 million “saving” is made even more bizarre when it is considered that Britain pays over £118 billion per year to the European Union (a figure supplied by the Taxpayers’ Alliance).

Even that figure is due to increase over the next few years as Britain’s contributions to the EU increase exponentially as that organisation expands even further.

It is little short of a mystery how the politicians in Westminster can justify spending these huge amounts of money on the EU and simultaneously make cuts to the safety and security of Britain’s coastline – unless, of course, it is presumed that they are just traitors.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British Natuional Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » Making a mockery of marriage

Making a mockery of marriage

Daily Mail, 14 February 2011

On countless occasions, David Cameron has declared that he is a tremendous fan of the institution of marriage. So big a fan, it now becomes clear, that he generously intends to bestow its status and privileges far beyond what most people consider marriage actually to be.

Time and again, the Tory leader has used his promise to strengthen marriage so as to reassure people that he was fully committed to defending this core value of conservatism.
Now, however, it is becoming all too plain that he is signing up instead to the wilder extremes of political correctness.
Indeed, he is planning to go further than even New Labour dared to tread. Eat your heart out Harriet Harman, patron saint of equality!
For it was revealed yesterday that ministers are planning to change the law to allow homosexual couples to ‘marry’ in religious ceremonies, including in church.
Gay partnership ceremonies in other venues will also be allowed for the first time to contain a religious element, such as hymns or readings from the Bible. These unions will then be called ‘marriage’.
For sure, this change doesn’t force religious institutions to introduce such ceremonies; whether they do so is up to them.
But the Government’s position is anything but neutral. For it implicitly endorses the idea that there is nothing wrong with overturning centuries of Biblical understanding of the sacrament of marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
As such, the Government will be cutting the ground from under the feet of religious traditionalists. And what if churches
refuse to conduct such a travesty of a marriage ceremony? Presumably, they would then risk being sued for ‘discrimination’.
Truly, we are fast reaching the stage where upholding Biblical sexual standards will become the morality that dare not speak its name.
Once again, we have to wonder at the way in which a politically motivated faction within a tiny minority of the population — for many gay people do not approve of this ideological gay rights agenda — is now running public policy.
When I argued here a few weeks ago that this agenda was all about destroying moral and sexual norms, I provoked a storm of protest. But once again, we can see that this is all too true. For Cameron’s latest idea proposes to make a mockery of marriage.
Gay rights supporters contend that there can be no justifiable objection to extending the status of marriage to those who are not heterosexual. Gay or straight — what does it matter, as long as two people are committed to each other?
But those who make this argument merely reveal they have no idea of the significance of marriage. They seem to think it’s just another contractual arrangement involving a binding (or not so binding) commitment — like buying a house or a car.
But the truth is that marriage is a unique institution because it involves the process by which humanity reproduces itself — which is only through the union of male and female.
The fact that some married couples are childless is irrelevant. The sole reason marriage has universal value is that it is vital for the healthy nurture of the next generation. This is because children need to be brought up by the two people who created them.
Activists argue that gay people should be able to get married because everyone is entitled to the same status. But why should this be the case if their sexual circumstances are different?
If the status of marriage is extended to other relationships — and that includes giving marriage rights to heterosexual cohabitants, as England’s most senior family judge, Sir Nicholas Wall, recently so unwisely recommended — the institution will be undermined.
If still in doubt, try this thought experiment. Imagine the Government was planning to recognise polygamy and polyandry (marriage with more than one woman or man), or marriage between ‘zoophiles’ (people who have ‘loving and committed relationships with mammals’, or bestiality to you and me) and their, er, partners.
If you think this is merely grotesque satire, you would be sadly out of date. There are now campaigns in North America to recognise the ‘equal rights’ of such people and end ‘discrimination’ against them.
If ‘marriage’ were extended to such groups, people would rightly conclude the institution was being turned into a meaningless joke. Yet the argument — that people with different sexual lifestyles must be treated identically — is exactly the same. (And no, before the hate mail starts, I’m not suggesting gays are on a moral par with zoophiles.)
But, of course, to question any of this is to run the gauntlet of bullying, threats and victimisation.
In a still-deepening scandal, a Christian GP, Hans-Christian Raabe, was sacked from the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. His crime? To have co-authored a document which claimed that 25 per cent of paedophiles were homosexual.
It was bad enough that Dr Raabe was bundled off the Advisory Council because he was demonised for views which bore no relation whatever to his ability as a drug policy-maker.
But now we learn the astounding fact that the very same Home Office that sacked him had itself published data saying precisely the same thing.
In a report it published in 1998, it had referred to research which ‘suggested reasonably that approximately 20 to 33 per cent of child sexual abuse is homosexual in nature’.
So this GP, whose views on combating drug abuse would have provided a much needed antidote to the destructive legalisation lobby on this most compromised of advisory bodies, was sacked by the Home Office for reporting facts which the Home Office itself had reported as reasonable.
Did Home Office Minister Jim Brokenshire know this when he terminated Dr Raabe’s appointment on the basis that his ‘controversial’ paper had caused ‘embarrassment’ to the department? Did he care what the facts actually were — or is Mr Brokenshire so petrified of the gay lobby that he blindly capitulates to its demands?
This is a truly terrifying totalitarian mindset from which the country cries out for deliverance. Yet, far from defending people against such bullying and seeing off the cultural subversives who are voiding morality of all meaning, Mr Cameron is going even further down this road.
Pinch yourself — a Conservative Prime Minister effectively endorsing the idea that upholding Biblical morality and the bedrock values of Western civilisation is bigotry.
He may be a Conservative, but he is no conservative. True conservatives seek to conserve what is most precious in a society and defend it against those who would destroy it.
Mr Cameron will apparently declare today that his programme is a moral one. Is this his idea of morality — to erode society’s core values?
The so-called ‘culture war’ now raging between those determined to destroy Western moral codes and those struggling to defend them is simply the most urgent domestic issue we face.
Despite the heroic efforts of Iain Duncan Smith to restore the importance of marriage to social policy, Mr Cameron has shown that in this war he himself is simply on the wrong side.
The most important thing is not whether we have a Big Society. It is rather that if we continue down this path there will be no society worth the name. Instead, those cultural ‘lifestyle choice’ bullies will stamp their boots ever more brutally on the faces of everyone else in a pitiless war of all against all.

read more articles at

Melanie Phillips’s Articles » Making a mockery of marriage: "- Sent using Google Toolbar"

Circumstances in Britain Will Play into British National Party’s Hands

Circumstances Will Play into British National Party’s Hands

The British National Party Newsroom

A convergence of circumstances about which the establishment can do nothing will legitimise the British National Party’s message and the party will be able to take advantage of that as long as it is properly organised and ready, Nick Griffin MEP has said.

Addressing around 90 delegates from around the country who attended the party’s organiser conference in Stoke-on-Trent, Mr Griffin said as spending cuts bite over the next few years, there will be a “momentous opportunity for the British National Party as the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties get the blame.

“The financial crisis is not over and the cuts will make it worse,” Mr Griffin said. “In fact, the second stage of financial crisis will be even worse than the first.”

He pointed out that the establishment politicians are just making things worse. “For example, there is a 35 percent youth unemployment rate in Barnsley, yet they are still bringing in masses of immigrants to do work which they claim no-one else will do,” Mr Griffin said.

The British National Party leader said that there were three other factors at work which made the future particularly uncomfortable for the establishment parties.

The first was the fact that certain parts of the media have gone out of their way not only to demonise the British National Party, but Muslims as well.

“If I was a young Muslim in Britain today, and saw how the media relentlessly portrays crazy things which other Muslims say or do, I would be pretty angry,” Mr Griffin said. This would, he said, lead to increasing radicalisation amongst Muslims living in Britain.

“Just recently we have seen the intelligence services admit that there are thousands of young radicalised Muslims about whom they know nothing, and that it is just a matter of time before they strike,” Mr Griffin continued.

The second factor is the strong possibility of a new war with Iran. “The establishment parties have now announced that Iran is going to have a nuclear weapon in 12 months, and the only way they can deal with this is to attack,” he said, adding that yet another war would have unforeseen consequences upon Muslims in Britain and amongst the general public.

“Finally, what is going on with the blatant media promotion of the English Defence League?” Mr Griffin asked.

“Is it their purpose to drive Muslims to do something crazy so that they can then persuade the public to support a war with Iran?

“Or is it aimed against us, the British National Party? They know from their study groups that there is enormous support for our policies amongst the general public, and they could be promoting the EDL to try and undermine us.

“Whatever the case, the EDL is certainly radicalising a large segment of British youth in a way which the British national Party, committed as it is to electioneering, could never do,” he said.

Mr Griffin also pointed out that the establishment was making a huge error — from their point of view — by legitimising the British National Party’s core message.

He gave two recent examples of this process at work. First, Labour’s Jack Straw had confirmed the accuracy of the British National Party’s warnings about Muslim rape gangs preying on young white girls.

Then Mr Cameron’s “incredulous” anti-multicultural speech had confirmed the party’s warnings on the effects of mass immigration.

“They are clearly trying to steal our rhetoric to trick people into thinking they are going to do something about the problems,” Mr Griffin said.

“In reality, of course they will do nothing. Nonetheless, the fact that they will fail to correct the problems after having legitimised our message, will present the British National Party with the opportunity it needs.

“When they fail to deliver, it tells people that our ideas are right and we will be able to take advantage of it if we are organised,” Mr Griffin said.

“We have the will and now we have the tools to put it all right,” Mr Griffin concluded to applause.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.