Freedom News Freedom News writes and shares posts that are of Interest to a broad demographic . Articles are to be taken on a individual basis and not under the assumption that different Authors and content providers and Horwich Nationalist as well share the same opinions. Articles copied are fully attributed to Authors under international fair use acts. .
Search This Blog
FREEDOM NEWS HOME PAGE
Wednesday 31 December 2014
Sunday 14 December 2014
Saturday 13 December 2014
Wednesday 10 December 2014
Tuesday 9 December 2014
Friday 5 December 2014
So Bad it Should Be Illegal video LIB/LAB/CON Satire going Viral A Must See
A new video going viral A must watch and share! From This super site http://www.liblabcon.com/#cover
Tuesday 2 December 2014
Wednesday 26 November 2014
Sunday 23 November 2014
Wednesday 19 November 2014
Tuesday 11 November 2014
The Duke of Marlborough Churchill's Ancestor and the 1st Zionist Traitor of that Line
Author Unknown
The Duke of Marlborough
The Duke of Marlborough
Churchill's father, Lord Randolph, was second son of the seventh Duke of Marlborough. His ancestor, the first Duke, had risen to fame and fortune during the reign of Queen Anne. Described by one Victorian historian as notoriously fond of money, he played the decisive role in the overthrow of James II. When William of Orange landed at Torbay on 3rd November 1688, the future Duke of Marlborough, John Churchill, marched against the invader and then coolly turned his army over to him.
His conduct can easily be explained by reference to the Jewish
Encyclopaedia. This work declares that John Churchill, first Duke of
Marlborough, was paid the then enormous sum of £6,000 a year by Solomon
Medina in recognition of his many services. As the Jew's chosen
candidate to replace James II on the throne, the Dutchman William of
Orange was paid in the form of a 'loan' of two million Dutch guilders by
the Jewish merchant, Antonio Lopez Suasso, to take him across the
Channel. Although this has been kept out of the history books, it can be
seen that Jewish money-changers were the real power behind the scenes
controlling events. As pointed out, for valuable services rendered,
William allowed the Jews to establish their misnamed 'Bank of England',
which effectively gave them control over the country's affairs.
Thus was instituted the National Debt and the conversion of the English
into tax and debt slaves.
There is no doubt that John Churchill was a very capable general but he
was also extremely perfidious. For his great victories against the
French at Blenheim, Ramillies and Malplaquet he was voted an enormous
sum of money by Parliament, which enabled him to build the magnificent
Blenheim Palace at Woodstock. He was a mercenary who sold himself to the
highest bidder. After betraying James II he began to write letters to
him declaring that the time would soon come when he could return to
England. Arnold Foster, in his book A History of England, wrote:-
'For it is certain that on a later occasion he actually went so far as
to inform the French of an intended English expedition against Brest,
and the information which he gave helped to bring about the defeat of
the English and caused the loss of hundreds of English lives. When
Marlborough's treachery was discovered, he and his wife were disgraced
and dismissed from Court.'
So John Churchill betrayed his King and country on several occasions for
money when it suited him – even to the extent of causing the deaths of
hundreds of his soldiers, the very men who had brought him fame, fortune
and glory. The Jews did not pay him £6,000 a year for nothing.
On 21 June 1940 R. V. Jones briefed Churchill on Knickebein - a radio
beam guidance system used by the Luftwaffe for bombing through cloud
cover. In the resulting Battle of the Beams the British were able to
'bend the beams', influencing the drop point of German raids so that the
targets were missed completely.
During a raid on Thames Haven, on 24 August, some German aircraft (one
commanded by Rudolf Hallensleben who went on to win the Knights Cross
for other actions) strayed over London and dropped bombs in the east and
northeast parts of the city, Bethnal Green, Hackney, Islington,
Tottenham, and Finchley. It is not known with certainty whether this was
a navigational 'bungle' or a direct result of anti-Knickebein measures.
In any event, the incident prompted the British to mount a retaliatory
raid on Berlin the next night with bombs falling in Kreuzberg and
Wedding, causing 10 deaths.
here is a direct quote from Arthur "Bomber" Harris
"the aim of the Combined Bomber Offensive...should be unambiguously
stated [as] the destruction of German cities, the killing of German
workers, and the disruption of civilised life throughout Germany.It
should be emphasized that the destruction of houses, public utilities,
transport and lives, the creation of a refugee problem on an
unprecedented scale, and the breakdown of morale both at home and at the
battle fronts by fear of extended and intensified bombing, are accepted
and intended aims of our bombing policy. They are not by-products of
attempts to hit factories." Arthur Harris
Harris argued that the main objectives of night-time blanket bombing of
urban areas was to undermine the morale of the civilian population (NOT
TO DESTROY INDUSTRIAL TARGETS) and attacks were launched on Hamburg,
Berlin, Cologne, Dresden and other German cities. This air campaign
killed an estimated 600,000 civilians and destroyed or seriously damaged
some six million homes. It was a highly dangerous strategy and during
the war Bomber Command had 57,143 men killed.
Churchill, being an historian, became concerned about how these
firestorms would be seen during the post-war period. On 28th March,
1945, Churchill wrote to Bomber Harris: “It seems to me that the moment
has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the
sake of increasing the terror, should be reviewed. Otherwise we shall
come into control of an utterly ruined land. We shall not, for instance,
be able to get housing material out of Germany for our own needs because
some temporary provision would have to be made for the Germans
themselves. I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military
objectives, such as oil and communications behind the immediate
battle-zone, rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction.”
The following quote by Lieutenant Ernest Fisher, of the 101st Airborne
Division and former Senior Historian of the United States Army is from
the book "Other Losses":
"Starting in April 1945, the United States Army and the French Army
casually annihilated about one million men, most of them in American
camps." Ernst Fisher 101st airborn Div.
The term "Eisenhower's death camps" is obviously not an official title
but the term given by former US guards and german prisoners, it is
estimated that 1.7 million to germans died from mistreatment toward the
end of the war and immediately after it by the revenge seeking victors
of all of the allied nations. It is also estimated that upwards of 7 to
9 million total germans and eastern europeans died at the end of the war
and in the first year after the war due to mistreatment by the allies
and the russians.
On March 10, 1945 as World War II was coming to an end, General
Eisenhower signed an order creating the status of Disarmed Enemy Forces
for the German Prisoners of War who would soon be surrendering to the
Americans. This order was a violation of the Geneva Convention because
it allowed Eisenhower to disregard the rules for the treatment of
Prisoners of War. It allowed him to starve the German POWs, deny them
the right to send and receive letters, and to receive Red Cross packages
and packages from German civilians. All of these rights were enjoyed by
the prisoners in the Nazi POW camps and even in the notorious
concentration camps. Eisenhower signed this order before he had even
seen the horrors of the concentration camps, which so affected him.
On May 7, 1945, the German army surrendered to General Eisenhower, who
refused to shake hands with the German General, as is customary.
The neutral country of Switzerland was removed as the Protecting Power
for German prisoners, which was another violation of the Geneva
Convention. General George S. Patton quickly released the prisoners who
had surrendered to his Third Army, but General Eisenhower held his POWs
until the end of 1946, forcing them to live on starvation rations. Red
Cross packages sent to the German POW camps were returned. The POW camps
had no barracks or tents.The German prisoners were forced to dig holes
in the ground for shelter. Even though the American army had plenty of
tents, the prisoners lived for months in their holes. When it rained,
the holes collapsed and the prisoners died.
there is an article written by a US soldier and guard at one camp that
gives details on the treatment of Germans prisoners under the care of
the US and French Armies
In October, 1944, at age eighteen, I was drafted into the U.S. army.
Largely because of the "Battle of the Bulge," my training was cut short.
In late March or early April, 1945, I was sent to guard a POW camp near
Andernach along the Rhine. The men I guarded had no shelter and no
blankets; many had no coats. They slept in the mud, wet and cold, with
inadequate slit trenches for excrement. It was a cold, wet spring and
their misery from exposure alone was evident.
Even more shocking was to see the prisoners throwing grass and weeds
into a tin can containing a thin soup. They told me they did this to
help ease their hunger pains. Quickly, they grew emaciated. Dysentery
raged, and soon they were sleeping in their own excrement, too weak and
crowded to reach the slit trenches. Many were begging for food,
sickening and dying before our eyes. We had ample food and supplies, but
did nothing to help them, including no medical assistance.
These prisoners, I found out, were mostly farmers and workingmen, as
simple and ignorant as many of our own troops. As time went on, more of
them lapsed into a zombie-like state of listlessness, while others tried
to escape in a demented or suicidal fashion, running through open fields
in broad daylight towards the Rhine to quench their thirst. They were
mowed down.
Hunger made German women more "available," but despite this, rape was
prevalent and often accompanied by additional violence. In particular I
remember an eighteen-year old woman who had the side of her faced
smashed with a rifle butt and was then raped by two G.I.s. Even the
French complained that the rapes, looting and drunken destructiveness on
the part of our troops was excessive.
Sunday 9 November 2014
Churchill the Traitor
Churchill the Traitor
Origional Post at Digger for Truth
Recently declassified documents now prove beyond doubt that Winston Churchill was part of the Judeo-Masonic plot to replace Neville Chamberlain and drag us into war, selected documents from the National archives such as the 1939 MI5 file on MP Sir Archibald Maule-Ramsey and the 224 members of one important anti-war group, while the Nordic League, the Right club and the Anglo German fellowship, also held similar numbers of important people opposed to more bankers wars.
Sir Archibald Maule-Ramsay was the main critic in the House of Commons of having Jews in the government, and in 1938 he began a campaign to have War Minister Leslie Hore-Belisha sacked, in one speech on April 27th he warned that Hore-Belisha would lead us to war with our blood brothers of the Nordic race to make way for a Bolshevised Europe, as openly wanted by Sir Herbert Morison and the Jewish pressure groups.
Sir Archibald also petitioned in the House of Commons to get Winston Churchill deselected as MP for Epping for his constant warmongering,Sir Archibald also sought direct guarantees of peace from Hitler and Mussolini, much in these documents were stolen and passed through traitor John Cairncross to the Russians for £60.
MI8 was the wireless interception section of MI5 and much of this article contains portions of its secret transcripts, and it has been said it was Sir Joseph Ball who was instrumental in exposing the bankers grip on Churchill and informed British Intel chief Vernon Kell, who agreed no war was needed on Hitlers Germany.
Admiral Sir Barry Domvile went with others direct to Germany in 1935 and oversaw and shared with Heinrich Himmler German naval proposals and warships, with combined plans to stop the Russian communists from crossing Europe which was allowed and pre-planned by Churchill at the wars end, as predicted by Sir Oswald Mosely who had huge support from all sections of British society against Jewish control, the recent attack by the Murdoch press on his son Max Mosely was in revenge for his fathers beliefs, in Jewish law revenge down to the 7th generation is permissible.
Vernon Kell and Neville Chamberlain were among those opponents murdered by Churchill, while Sir Barry Domvile was one of a group sent to prison without charge throughout the war. A senior member of M I 5 through the war named Sorrell, kept copies of the documentation of Churchill’s murders and treachery, and was one of several intel officers secretly informing the magazine Truth. An agent runner for Lord Victor Rothschild’s pro Jewish banker group named Flora Solomons confessed in an interview that war with Germany was vital to restore bankers control.
“Agent 116″ was said to be a “Mr Shipman” a Jewish entrepreneur and distantly related to the Dr Harold Shipman, which claimed he spied for the Focus Group of Jewish bankers who were promising to fund the war, MI5 records from the restricted section confirm this and that the peace group was assisted by two women secretaries Anna Wolkoff and Joan Miller, Joan Miler was another traitor to Britain and was a paid informer to the pro-war group, later in life when alone she told me she would cry over this episode in her life, her book “One Woman’s War” which is heavily edited tells of her life in intel.
Winston Churchill had a small private cinema underneath his London Office, and while he would watch films while British and German people fought for their lives, the cinema projectionist would listen to Churchill’s drunken shouts, and he would talk to Churchill secretary Patrick Kinna about the murders instigated by Churchill mentioned here.
The saying runs thus,
“Those who do not learn the lessons of the past are condemned to repeat them”
Those in our parliament must be our citizens, not foreign nationals
and no dual passport fudges, and we will not allow our people to be
tricked into another World War.T Stokes London.
With thanks to all those patriotic intel informants past and present
Tuesday 4 November 2014
Sunday 2 November 2014
Wednesday 29 October 2014
Sunday 26 October 2014
Wednesday 22 October 2014
Saturday 18 October 2014
Friday 10 October 2014
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
IS AMERICAS MILITARY EXPANSIONIST POLICIES FOR ITSELF AND NATO STRATEGICALLY VIABLE.
By Stephen Toth
The American government have now tried to hide their aggressive expansionist policies concerning their constructing a new missile iron curtain around Russia by seemingly handing the issue over to NATO.
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
By Stephen Toth
The American government have now tried to hide their aggressive expansionist policies concerning their constructing a new missile iron curtain around Russia by seemingly handing the issue over to NATO.
Apart from America being a totally bankrupt nation and this program will boost its national debt to unprecedented levels which the American people cannot afford to pay. It is also strategically a stupid plan that is not only doomed to fail but is also to easy for President Putin to circumvent.
The objective of this American controlled European strategic missile defence system is to enable so called NATO forces (really the American government) to shoot down Russian missiles before they reach their ultimate operational peak. Sounds a really good idea to idiots that don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
Lets see why this military strategy simply cannot be effective or work in the long run.
OK, putting the program under the auspice of NATO from a non-financial perspective is to enable the American President to put his hands up and say this is not an American decision to go to war with Russia it is one taken by NATO.
The second mistake is that the American government thinks that by cloaking their misdeeds behind NATO will confuse the issue and remove them as the main target of reprisals.
Both of these assumptions are not only dangerous but also nonsensical because Putin already knows who pulls NATO's strings.
OK, looking at the objective above e.g shooting down Russian missiles over Russian territory.
Putin is not a stupid man. He has a multitude of options at his disposal to circumvent this problem.
1) All he needs to do politically is let it be know that the Americans will be the recipients of the TOTAL response to any military action taken against Russia. This straight away takes away any protective properties gained by hiding behind NATO.
2) All he needs to do is change his focus away from ground based nuclear bomb production and increase his global fleet with nuclear capability. Can you imagine how many high capacity nuclear bombs can be put on ocean going oil tankers. Those takers could be equipped with the latest radar tracking equipment and have orders to let lose their whole load if they come under attack from anyone at all.
This is a bummer for the American government, this means if any country in the world attacks one of these ships, they all let lose their payloads that are targeted on America.
OK, lets talk defence, the Russians already have a space station and I suspect missile silos in space. They could easily deny foreigners access to the space station and equip it as a nuclear base with massive defence capabilities. They could also convert it to carry a nuclear powered laser defence system. That system would take out any missiles approaching it from either space or the earth.
They could just as easily build more defence systems (well out into space) and other space stations around the world. First by putting in place the defence system then building the space stations under its protection.
Finally, and this is my favourite being a bastard by nature.
If I was Putin I would already have a zero sum doomsday device in place. That simply means that if the Americans started any serious shit on my country, and my country was in danger of being over run, I would just give them one warning to back of before obliterating the whole world.
That is my psychotic FUCK YOU TWAT -- YOU LOSE attitude towards bullying aggressors like the Americans.
Wednesday 8 October 2014
Tuesday 7 October 2014
Sunday 5 October 2014
Saturday 4 October 2014
Friday 3 October 2014
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Cameron Raps it up for the Poor British people
Mediocrity and complete ass hole David Cameron raps to his favourite tune!
Post by Chris Smith.
Wednesday 1 October 2014
Monday 29 September 2014
Sunday 28 September 2014
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
Why aren't the British middle-classes staging a revolution?
By Alex Proud
Why aren’t the middle classes revolting?
Words you probably never thought you’d read in the Telegraph. Words which, as
a Gladstonian Liberal, I never thought I’d write. But seriously, why aren’t
we seeing scenes reminiscent of Paris in 1968? Moscow in 1917? Boston in
1773?
My current fury is occasioned the Phones4U
scandal (and it really is a scandal).
Phones4U was bought by the private equity house, BC Partners, in 2011 for
£200m. BC then borrowed £205m and, having saddled the company with vast
amounts of debt, paid themselves a dividend of £223m. Crippled by debt, the
company has now collapsed into administration.
The people who crippled it have walked away with nearly £20m million, while
5,600 people face losing their jobs. The taxman may also be stiffed on £90m
in unpaid VAT and PAYE. It’s like a version of 1987’s Wall Street on
steroids, the difference being that Gordon Gecko wins at the end and
everyone shrugs and says, “Well, it’s not ideal, but really we need guys
like him.”
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
I’m not financially sophisticated enough to understand the labyrinthine ins and outs of private equity deals. But I don’t think I need to be. Here, my relative ignorance is actually a plus. You took a viable company, ran up ridiculous levels of debt, paid yourselves millions and then walked away, leaving unemployment and unpaid tax bills in your wake. What’s to understand? We should be calling for your heads on a plate.
This column is supposed to be a "lifestyle" column, not a "business" column. So, you might ask yourself, why am I writing about conscience-free private equity deals? Well, it’s because, assuming that you’re part of the broad middle class who make up the vast majority of the Telegraph’s readership, this is the most important lifestyle issue you’ll ever face.
Instead of shrugging and saying, “This is the world we live in” you should be on the streets, you should be calling for this sort of thing to be a jailable offence, and you should want to see these guys up in front of parliament (or, better yet, in stocks) explaining why they made around £3,500 for every person they put out of a job. Seriously, Stefano Quadrio Curzio, the managing partner at BC, should be ashamed to show his face in public.
Read rest of Article Here
There are two operant Crowns in England
There are two operant Crowns in England, one being Queen Elizabeth II.
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Although extremely wealthy, the Queen functions largely in a ceremonial capacity and serves to deflect attention away from the other Crown, who issues her marching orders through their control of the English Parliament.
This other Crown is comprised of a committee of 12 banks headed by the Bank of England (House of Rothschild). They rule the world from the 677-acre, independent sovereign state know as The City of London, or simply 'The City.'
The City is not a part of England, just as Washington D.C., is not a part of the USA.
The City is referred to as the wealthiest square mile on earth and is presided over by a Lord Mayor who is appointed annually.
When the Queen wishes to conduct business within the City, she is met by the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter this private, sovereign state. She then proceeds into the City walking several paces behind the Mayor.
Her entourage may not be clothed in anything other than service uniforms.
In the nineteenth century, 90% of the world's trade was carried by British ships controlled by the Crown. The other 10% of ships had to pay commissions to the Crown simply for the privilege of using the world's oceans.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth.
As of 1850, author Frederic Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion (today, the combined wealth of the banking dynasties is estimated at around $500 trillion).
READ REST OF ARTICLE HERE
Tuesday 23 September 2014
Common Law a Easy Explanation
Common Law a Easy Explanation
The easiest way to explain the English common law system and answer all questions in simple terms is as follows: Common law is the LAW and is the only law recognized in a lawfully capacity in England and all sovereign nations of HRH Elisabeth ll of England. Common law today is like a family tree. common law is made up of statute's, a statute is a specific part of common law i.e murder, theft, fraud. Acts are rules that Parliament links to statute's of common law however not all "Acts" are lawful and any Act passed by Parliament that dose not relate back to to common law is only enforceable by submission by verbal or written contract/assentto the authority of the party that holds you accountable or liable. Common law however does change to include new but specific offences but these must always relate to common law by LAW. Credit cards were not invented when common law was written as the law of the land in the 11th century, however Credit card fraud is a crime under an Act, this act relates to a specific statute of common law (theft) and is there for a criminal offence. On the other hand there is an Act which says you must pay for a t.v licence if you own a device capable of receiving live television. this act is not lawful unless you submit to a verbal or written consent or submission of will to the claimant as this Act only relates to common law if you have entered a contract or agreement it then become enforceable by Common law. Common law only adapts to include offences and rights that can be related and interpreted by common law its self. So yes the acting authority can take children into crown care if they have reason to believe that his or her life may be in any kind of danger under common law as every individual has the the right to life. Under common law you also have the right to have any dispute including this and all of the above settled and judged by a court of law.
The easiest way to explain the English common law system and answer all questions in simple terms is as follows: Common law is the LAW and is the only law recognized in a lawfully capacity in England and all sovereign nations of HRH Elisabeth ll of England. Common law today is like a family tree. common law is made up of statute's, a statute is a specific part of common law i.e murder, theft, fraud. Acts are rules that Parliament links to statute's of common law however not all "Acts" are lawful and any Act passed by Parliament that dose not relate back to to common law is only enforceable by submission by verbal or written contract/assentto the authority of the party that holds you accountable or liable. Common law however does change to include new but specific offences but these must always relate to common law by LAW. Credit cards were not invented when common law was written as the law of the land in the 11th century, however Credit card fraud is a crime under an Act, this act relates to a specific statute of common law (theft) and is there for a criminal offence. On the other hand there is an Act which says you must pay for a t.v licence if you own a device capable of receiving live television. this act is not lawful unless you submit to a verbal or written consent or submission of will to the claimant as this Act only relates to common law if you have entered a contract or agreement it then become enforceable by Common law. Common law only adapts to include offences and rights that can be related and interpreted by common law its self. So yes the acting authority can take children into crown care if they have reason to believe that his or her life may be in any kind of danger under common law as every individual has the the right to life. Under common law you also have the right to have any dispute including this and all of the above settled and judged by a court of law.
Sunday 21 September 2014
Americans Please stop Making arses of themselves on the Scottish Vote
Trouble is with you yanks you think that every one in Scotland go,s
around with blue faces saying Och Aye the Noo! The vote was attempted to
be rigged by both sides , The SNP (yes) lowered the voting age, use
violence against the leader of the UKIP (Libertarian Party of UK) . The
question should have been should we divorce our selves from Westminster
and the Edinburgh political elite. , one and the same creature. What the
Scots were voting on was the Break up of the Union of the Kingdoms.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
The same question placed in front of the US electorate would have been do you want the dissolution of the Union of States , NO! Do you want to divorce your selves from Sodom on the Potomac aka Washington DC , YES!
I have seen and heard to may Americans making complete arses of them selves on this question. Many of whom If i asked what about the Barnet formula or the West Lothian question would just blink mindless at the question. As I am sure the majority of Americans if you asked them to point to Scotland on a atlas would not have a clue to where it is.
Yes I hate the political elitist and the Private central banksters aka mass murders thieves and evil bastards. But all across Europe there are the Faux separatist causes that are in there Plans. Fragment the Nation States , By mass immigration , multiculturalism and faux nationalist movements in order to make bite sized morsels of central bank dependent non economic viable regions. for the ever growing evil of the EUSSR . And it's centralized power structure. WAKE SEE BEHIND THE CURTAIN!
As Cicero said so eloquently in his famous Quote,
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague."
Such are the faux nationalists such as Salmon and the SNP .
Such is a video like this from the USA.
Saturday 20 September 2014
Wednesday 17 September 2014
Tuesday 16 September 2014
Scottish independence requires full-hearted consent of the people - Roge...
That is exactly what Salmon and Camergoon want , the are in the same
camp. Salmon Like Camergoon is a collectivist and a TRAITOR of the
worst kind , both are in the pay of the bankers and there Zionist
controllers. If there is a yes vote Salmon will go to the EURO central
bank and accept any kind of loans of the Mickey mouse currency they
issue. Selling the Scots in to debt slavery for a millennium. He then
will accept terms to rejoin the EU accepting the EURO in the same manner
Greece did , with the same results. And then he will flood Scotland
with 3rd world immigrants in a manner that would make Blair look
amateurish. Leaving the Scots a Minority in there own land within 20
yrs. Mark my words !
The Scots and The Other Indigenous peoples of these isles have one
remaining chance and that is to remain united and to form a common
front against these New world order goons, Who are responsible through
the private central banks for the murders of billions of people over the
last 200 yrs
camp. Salmon Like Camergoon is a collectivist and a TRAITOR of the
worst kind , both are in the pay of the bankers and there Zionist
controllers. If there is a yes vote Salmon will go to the EURO central
bank and accept any kind of loans of the Mickey mouse currency they
issue. Selling the Scots in to debt slavery for a millennium. He then
will accept terms to rejoin the EU accepting the EURO in the same manner
Greece did , with the same results. And then he will flood Scotland
with 3rd world immigrants in a manner that would make Blair look
amateurish. Leaving the Scots a Minority in there own land within 20
yrs. Mark my words !
The Scots and The Other Indigenous peoples of these isles have one
remaining chance and that is to remain united and to form a common
front against these New world order goons, Who are responsible through
the private central banks for the murders of billions of people over the
last 200 yrs
Sunday 14 September 2014
Another Beheading ISIS Another Bnkers False Flag Deception
Another Beheading ISIS Another Bankers False Flag Deception
All this ISIS shite , is a false flag in order to invade Syria and Iraq AGAIN! in order to keep the banksters fiat currency going. The US and UK plc governments are funding them. It is the hegalian dialectic in action. Problem! Reaction ! Solution! They create the problem them wait for the reaction, then sell you the solution , to get there origional objectives. Dont fall for there shite. They did it in WW1 and WW2 in order to destroy the German industrial tiger and debt free banking systems. Then screwed us after those wars in order to loot our and the US nations by buying politicians and the people with the welfare state funded by there mickey mouse currencies that are rapidly racing towards Zero value. The previous so called beheading videos have been proven to be fakes, like 9/11 7/7 and all the west's messing around in Ukraine all these are proven false flags. Beware beware, it is you that will die , they will be safe in there bunkers
Saturday 13 September 2014
Tuesday 9 September 2014
Russia's Response To European Capital Sanctions In One Word
Russia's Response To European Capital Sanctions In One Word
by Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge
While the West continues to press the "Russia is increasingly isolated" meme, it appears - as we noted ironically previously, that Vladimir Putin is finding plenty of friends... most notably China. While threats of 'asymmetric' retaliation over European sanctions may have been enough to worry Europe's leaders, the slew of news overnight regarding increased cooperation between China and Russia is likely more damaging to Western strategy (and egos).
Not so isolated...
h/t @PersonOfAwesome
As overnight news shows... China and Russia are ramping up their cooperation...
First, as Reuters reports, Russia and China pledged on Tuesday to settle more bilateral trade in rouble and yuan and to enhance cooperation between banks, Russia's First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov said, as Moscow seeks to cushion the effects of Western economic sanctions...
* * *Russia's First Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov said told reporters in Beijing that he had agreed an economic cooperation pact with China's Vice Premier Zhang Gaoli that included boosting use of the rouble and yuan for trade transactions.
The pact also lets Russian banks set up accounts with Chinese banks, and makes provisions for Russian companies to seek loans from Chinese firms.
"We are not going to break old contracts, most of which were denominated in dollars," Shuvalov said through an interpreter.
"But, we're going to encourage companies from the two countries to settle more in local currencies, to avoid using a currency from a third country."
So that blows the oil/gas funding sanctions plan out of the water as Russian firms will merely fund via China.
* * *
Second, as RBTH reports, The Chinese company CNPC is to get up to 10 percent in Russia’s Vankor oilfields, Rosneft’s biggest production asset...
Finish reading article here , At ZerohedgeRussian President Vladimir Putin announced the plan at the construction launch of the Power of Siberia gas pipeline on 1 September, business newspaper Kommersant reported.
“The plan will secure state support, and we will encourage your participation,” said Putin to the members of the Chinese delegation.
“There are no restrictions for our Chinese friends,” he said. According to Kommersant, the Chinese state company CNPC could get up to 10 percent in Vankorneft for approximately $1 billion.
Saturday 6 September 2014
France’s Marine Le Pen states Crisis in Ukraine is ‘all EU’s fault
France’s Marine Le Pen states Crisis in Ukraine is ‘all EU’s fault
Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s far-right National Front party, says the EU is to blame for the crisis in Ukraine as it forced the situation where Kiev had to choose between East and West.
Now that France is joining sanctions against Russia over the alleged direct interference in the political crisis in Ukraine and Paris is considering suspending the €1.2 billion deal of two Mistral helicopter carrier ships ordered by Russia, the leader of the biggest parliamentary faction of the French parliament has her own opinion on Ukraine’s turmoil.
“The crisis in Ukraine is all the European Union’s fault. Its leaders negotiated a trade deal with Ukraine, which essentially blackmailed the country to choose between Europe and Russia,” Le Pen told Le Monde daily in an interview.
Le Pen has been a long-standing critic of Europe’s foreign policy and does not see how Ukraine could join the bloc.
“The European Union's diplomacy is a catastrophe,” Le Pen told RT's Sophie Shevardnadze in an exclusive interview in June.
“The EU speaks out on foreign affairs either to create problems, or to make them worse.”
“Ukraine’s entry into the European Union; no need to tell fairy tales: Ukraine absolutely does not have the economic level to join the EU,” Le Pen told RT.
In her fresh interview with Le Monde, the National Front leader had a positive attitude towards Russian President Vladimir Putin and the economic model he builds.
“I have a certain admiration for the man [Putin]. He proposes a patriotic economic model, radically different than what the Americans are imposing on us,” said Marine Le Pen.
As for France’s decision to suspend the delivery of the first of two Mistral helicopter carrier ships to Russia, it only shows Paris’ obedience of American diplomacy, Marine Le Pen said earlier.
"This decision (not to deliver Mistral ships) is very serious, firstly because it runs contrary to the interests of the country and shows our obedience of American diplomacy," Le Pen told France’s RTL radio.
France’s National Front and its leader Marine Le Pen, a party renowned for its anti-immigrant and anti-EU rhetoric, achieved unprecedented results at the latest EU elections, claiming nearly 25 percent of the votes and winning the election.
“Our people demand one type of politics: they want politics by the French, for the French, with the French. They don’t want to be led anymore from outside, to submit to laws.” These were the National Front’s slogans that garnered a quarter of French voters earlier this year.
President Francois Hollande’s popularity in France has hit a record low – just over 13 percent, according to estimates from the TNS-Sofres pollster, reported Reuters on Thursday.
Full of confidence, the National Front leader Marine Le Pen has no doubt she can head the national government today.
“I’m ready to be prime minister and implement the policies that the French are waiting for,” she said. “Hollande would be the president for representation and inauguration ceremonies, but that’s it. The government decides the policies and the political path to follow. He would have to submit to it, or he would have to go,” Le Pen told Le Monde.
Friday 5 September 2014
Rotherham, Common Purpose and routine evil in England
Rotherham, Common Purpose and routine evil in England
I generally baulk at publishing Pat Condell's work because he so steadfastly refuses to criticise Zion, no matter what it does.
But this is different. This is as brilliant and precisely accurate a deconstruction of commonplace PC evil as it you're likely to witness and all should check it out.
What occurred, and is still occurring in Rotherham, is happening everywhere in our country nowadays and it must be stopped. And not only must we stop the bestial immigrant from abusing our little girls, we must also punish their insane, far left sponsors to the max.
If you do not agree with this perfectly reasonable statement after viewing the video above, you are very much a part of the problem.
In 2012, Joyce Thacker, the Strategic Director of Children and Young People's Services at Rotherham Council, underwrote the decision to remove three children from their foster parents because they were members of the UK Independence Party.
The 25 November 2012 issue of The Daily Mail quoted her thus:
"When it became clear to us that the couple had political affiliations to UKIP we had to seriously think about the longer term needs of the children. We have to think about their clear statement on ending multiculturalism, for example. The children were from EU migrant backgrounds and UKIP has very clear statements on ending multiculturalism which might be sensitive to these children."Er, Joyce, you know the 1,400 little girls, almost all of them English natives, who were gang raped, tortured and prostituted by Pakistani-heritage paedophiles? Do you have any evidence of the sensitivity you showed to them when they were subject to said treatment?
The Mail added:
"She said there was no ‘quality of care’ issue with the couple, the husband is a former Navy reservist who works with disabled people and the wife is a qualified nursery nurse, only that they were UKIP members."'Quality of care?'
Ironic, huh?
Joyce Thacker is a 'Common Purpose graduate.'
Sarah Champion, who became Rotherham's MP in 2013, is also a 'Common Purpose graduate.'
I tweeted Ms Champion, queried the 95% statistic and asked her to provide a bona fide link.
She did not do so.
Common Purpose has been described as a hidden virus in our government and schools.'
Here's an American take on the Rotherham paedophiles and their LibLabCon sponsors.
Read More
Thursday 4 September 2014
Monday 1 September 2014
Russia and economic warfare: RIP the free market new world order
Russia and economic warfare: RIP the free market new world order
Source: The Guardian
It is a quarter of a century since the Berlin Wall came down. The cold war was eventually won by superior western economic power and a new era began once the communist regime collapsed in the Soviet Union and the two halves of Germany were reunited.
For the first time in 25 years, the west is seriously worried about Russia. Ukraine's president, Petro Poroshenko, said at the weekend his country was "close to a point of no return – full-scale war".
Russia faces the threat of tougher economic sanctions from the US and the European Union unless it withdraws its troops from eastern Ukraine.
Economic warfare has the potential to damage Russia just as it did in the 1980s. Indeed, sanctions are hurting the economy, making it more expensive to refinance loans and almost impossible to attract the foreign capital needed to modernise Russia's energy sector. Growth has slowed to a standstill and the country will soon be in what could be a deep and prolonged recession.
If this of concern to Vladimir Putin, he has yet to show it. With the eurozone itself teetering on the brink of a fresh downturn, the Russian leader believes that in a war of sanctions between a west that is barely out of recession and a Russia accustomed to belt-tightening, it will be the west that blinks first. Whether he is right or not, one thing is clear: the era that began with the opening of the iron curtain is over.
Consider what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed. Instead of two great powers, there was now just one: the US. Instead of two competing ideologies, there was just: capitalism. "We know what works", said the then US president, George Bush, "the free market works".
The next decade was the heyday for Bush's vision. Capitalism spread to parts of the world where it had previously been partially or totally off limits: China, India, and Russia. The dollar entrenched its position as the global currency. The Federal Reserve in Washington became the world's central bank.
The completion of the seven-year Uruguay Round of trade talks saw tariffs reduced and markets opened up. A supra-national body, the World Trade Organisation, was set up in Geneva to act as the global trade policeman and to facilitate further liberalisation.
Russia was subjected to shock treatment that saw economy shrink by 40% by the end of the 1990s. Male life expectancy plummeted. Privatisation delivered what had been seen as state-owned assets into the hands of oligarchs who got enormously rich. The poverty rate soared.
Read More...
Slavery By Consent ( Full Version)
Slavery By Consent ( Full Version)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)