Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Geert Wilders proclaimed himself 'very happy' with the public prosecution department's announcement on Friday afternoon that he should be found not guilty on all charges of inciting hatred and discrimination.
The anti-Islam MP told reporters: 'I don't insult, I don't incite to hate and I don't discriminate. The only thing I do and will continue doing is speak the truth.'
Marxist Campaigners who took the case to the high court to force the public prosecutors to bring the case against Wilders said they were 'disappointed'.
'We hope the court will come to a judgement on a number of the charges,' a Marxist spokesman told reporters.


But the public prosecution department on Friday afternoon stated that Geert Wilders is not guilty of discriminating against Muslims. Earlier on Friday it announced he should also be found not guilty of inciting hatred.
Prosecutors Birgit van Roessel and Paul Velleman reached their conclusions after a careful reading of interviews with and articles by the anti-Islam politician and a viewing of his anti-Koran film Fitna.
They said comments about banning the Koran can be discriminatory, but because Wilders wants to pursue a ban on democratic lines, there is no question of incitement to discrimination 'as laid down in law'.
On the comparison of the Koran with Mein Kampf, the prosecutors said the comparison was 'crude but that did not make it punishable'.
Dealing earlier on Friday with incitement to hatred, Van Roessel and Velleman said some comments could incite hatred against Muslims if taken out of context, but if the complete text is considered, it can be seen that Wilders is against the growing influence of Islam and not against Muslims per sé.
On Tuesday, the prosecutors said the MP should not be found guilty of group insult.
The public prosecution department was forced to take the case by the high court after Marxist anti-racism campaigners protested at its refusal to prosecute Wilders.

As UK Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show White British Losing out to Immigrants

As Britain Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show Whites Losing out to Immigrants, Chinese and Indians

The British National Party Newsroom

The growing anti-white nature of the British state has been revealed with a series of statistics which show that despite increasing unemployment in Britain, immigrants, Chinese and Indians are still being given preference in employment opportunities.

According to a report issued by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), nearly one in eight British households has no-one in work.

This rate is the highest of the six largest EU economies, the CPS said.

According to its figures, the UK has a total of 11.5 percent of households where no adults are working, compared to 10.5 percent in France, 9.2 percent in Germany and 6 percent in the Netherlands.

A 10 percent drop in the number of workless households would add around 1 percent to Gross Domestic Product, the CPS said.

Remarkably, the CPS report also called for the “reduction of low skilled immigration” to prevent an increase in unemployment.

The news coincided with a report in the Financial Times which said that at least 139,000 immigrants had beaten the “jobs crunch” while the number of “Britons in work had dropped by 654,000.”

According to the FT report, “migrant workers have continued to flow into the country during the recession while Britons lose their jobs.”

The FT continued: “The findings echo official figures two months ago that the number of foreign-born workers had risen by 114,000 in a year, bringing the full number in the economy to 3.85 million.

“Some 100,000 of the migrants who have arrived in the past two years come from outside the EU.

It is not only in the unskilled job market where white people are being replaced.

According to the recently released “How fair is Britain?” report from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to find professional, middle-class jobs.

The EHRC report says that “People from some ethnic groups are more likely to be in higher skilled, professional occupations than others.

“For example, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to be in professional jobs.”

According to the report, just 14 percent of white men are in professional jobs, compared with 27 percent of Chinese and 25 percent of Indian men.

All in all, the picture which emerges is clear: white native British people are falling behind under the Labour-Tory-Lib Dem plan to ensure that our nation is colonised and taken over by the Third World.

Only the British National Party stands between you and this tragic disaster. Isn’t it about time you did something about it and helped the BNP?

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in UK Every Month

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in Britain Every Month

The British National Party Newsroom

Conservative Party claims to be “tough on immigration” have been exposed as a hoax once again with the news that in excess of 8,000 failed 'asylum seekers' are being granted permission to stay in Britain every month.

The shocking statistic was contained in a Home Office release of 'asylum' figures issued last week which has been largely ignored by the controlled media.

In the report, the Home Office said that special rules had so far allowed more than 135,000 failed 'asylum seekers' to legally take up residence in Britain.

When their dependents are added in, the total figure of 'asylum seekers' whose claims have been rejected, but who now can live in Britain and parasite off the taxpayer, will be as high as 240,000.

The special rules which have allowed the invasion to take place are part of the measures put in place in an attempt to deal with the massive backlog in applications which have built up over the years.

The backlog has, of course, been caused by the lax 'asylum' policies endorsed by the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties which have encouraged the parasites of the earth to descend on soft-touch Britain’s benefits bonanza.

Now, so many legal precedents have been set that even if the current influx was halted, the Government would face an avalanche of lawsuits based on the currently existing “Human Rights Act” and other legal devices.

The special measures included rushing through thousands of cases without proper checks on applicants’ stories, with a decision being made purely on the basis of written statements without any corroborating facts.

According to a media report, guidelines for officials state that they should “expedite” cases if, for example, the UK Border Agency had been at fault for delays. Claimants are also rushed through if they threaten suicide.

In July 2009, it was announced that 144,000 'asylum seekers' had been allowed to stay in Britain after the claims backlog was first announced.

The impossible demands on the asylum process are obvious from a bit of simple maths: there are in excess of 450,000 outstanding 'asylum seeker' claims, according to official figures.

If they are “resolved” at the rate of ten every day, it will take 4,500 days, or 12 years, just to bring the backlog to a conclusion — never mind the thousands who are pouring in all the time.

It is obvious that the 'asylum' issue is just an invasion scam designed to allow as many Third World immigrants as possible into Britain.

Only the British National Party will bring an end to this invasion. The BNP argues that asylum seekers have the right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they flee, and do not have the right to cross 20 safe countries to reach Britain.

How the UK Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Enquiry in Britain

How the Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Endeavour in Britain

The British National Party Newsroom

Great Britain, which was the home of the Industrial Revolution and whose collective genius shaped the modern world, is on the brink of total scientific academic collapse thanks to the treasonous ineptitude of the three-party-one-policy Tory-Labour-Lib Dem gang.

The crisis has been sparked by the massive deficit crisis which the ConDem coalition are just as complicit in causing as the previous Labour regime, although they pretend otherwise.

The deficit has five primary causes:

- The bank bailout (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (supported by the Tories and now endorsed by the Lib Dems);

- Mass immigration which costs upwards of £13 billion per year (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- Continued EU membership (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems); and

- The £9 billion a year foreign aid budget (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems who want to see it raised to £13 billion per year).

As a result of this reckless spending, Britain now faces one of its greatest deficits ever and all Government departments have been told to prepare for an average of 25 percent cuts in their budget (except, of course, the foreign aid budget).

Currently, Britain’s research budget is around £6 billion and a new report drawn up by Research Councils UK, which is responsible for distributing government funding for research, has warned that a £1 billion cut in this funding will mean “game over” for British science.

The report says that impending cuts “to scientific research funding could cost the UK economy up to £10 billion” as well.

“Public investment in scientific research is essential to ensure that long-term productivity and breakthroughs continue,” the report said.

“Without publicly funded research, private research and development could also dry up as companies will simply move to countries where they can still work with academics.

"Science is important for innovation and productivity not just for pushing forward the technological frontier.

"Universities at the research frontier have a second core 'product', namely highly trained people, an essential resource for UK companies and foreign companies investing in the UK,” the report continued.

“Continued public investment in scientific endeavour is essential for the success of UK business and industry and, more broadly, for a productive economy, a healthy society and a sustainable world."

It would seem that the amateurish clowns in Westminster have not only destroyed Britain’s recent past, but seem fully intent on destroying its future as well.

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Protest Rally after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Demonstration after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

The BNP Newsroom

A British National Party Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Councillor, Martyn Findley, is considering holding a demonstration outside the local Citizens Advice Bureau after that taxpayer-funded body engaged in blatant politically-motivated discrimination against him.

Cllr Martyn Findley said he would hold the demonstration if the district manager of the Bedworth, Rugby and Nuneaton Citizens Advice Bureau (branCAB) refused to let him offer his services as a volunteer at the bureau.

“The reason the director, David Gooding, gave was simply that I was a BNP councillor,” Cllr Findley said.

“This was outrageous as I have a long history of community involvement. I enjoyed my time as a school governor, for example, as much as I did my voluntary activities on occasion with the church.

“As an activist with the local residents association, I assisted in organising a family festival and was prepared to spend evenings burning the midnight oil filling in applications for funding,” he said.

The drama started when earlier this year, Cllr Findley responded to an advertisement in the local newspaper placed by branCAB which asked for volunteers.

“Encouraged by the knowledge that the CAB has previously never discriminated against anyone, I called and spoke to a lady about volunteering,” he continued.

“After I shared with her my volunteering experience she assured me that with my availability and experience, I sounded ideal and would be contacted as soon as possible. This happened and I passed the telephone stage successfully. 

“I waited and when my written invitation to the induction day came through the post I was delighted,” Cllr Findley said.

Instead of welcoming his services, the letter from Mr Gooding informed Cllr Findley that the branCAB would not accept his offer because of his membership of the BNP.

Bizarrely, the letter went on to confirm that branCAB staff, trustees and volunteers may be active members of political parties, providing that they keep their political work completely separate from their CAB work. 

“I cannot for the life of me see any conflict between being an elected member, under any party banner, and volunteering with the CAB, and there is certainly no prospect for political work,” Cllr Findley said.

However, the next paragraph contained the clause to which he took exception: ‘Active membership includes promoting being publicly associated with, or expressing the views of organisations such as the BNP,’ the letter said.

“Is there a list of organisations which the CAB discriminates against? Who wrote it and which organisations are on it?  Exactly which law do they think gives branCAB the authority to discriminate against a member of a lawfully constituted political party?” Cllr Findley said.

“It is even more shocking when compared back to an earlier section of the same letter where the branCAB specifically forbids discriminatory policies or practices.

“As I am prepared to state publicly that my heart is open to all and that as an extension to my duties as a democratically elected councillor I am prepared to work for nothing for the benefit of the whole community, I believe that I am suitable to volunteer with the CAB.

“If there are any volunteers, staff members or funders out there who wish to discriminate against me on the grounds of political belief I think it is they, not I, who should have their motives questioned,” Cllr Findley said.

“I feel that I must fight this discrimination and I am calling upon members and supporters of the British National Party for their assistance. I would be grateful if you could take a few minutes and politely outline your objection to this discrimination to Mr Gooding as I feel that public pressure is the best way of getting this disgraceful decision overturned.”

Mr Gooding’s email address is david.gooding @ brancab.org.uk. Why don’t readers send him a polite email asking why he does not want Cllr Findley’s kind offer of help.

“The branCAB is funded by the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council and Rugby Borough Council,” Cllr Findley continued.

“At the next full council meetings of the two councils I shall ask publicly, locally as an elected member and in Rugby as a member of the public, for the leaders of the councils to assist me with my struggle against discrimination in an organisation over which they share a great deal of influence.

“This will place on public record their position for/against institutional discrimination. As far as I am aware at the moment this is the limit of my redress to this voluntary organisation.

“If our appeals fall on deaf ears I consider that I shall have no alternative other than to organise a demonstration against discrimination on the footpath outside of the main CAB offices in Bedworth. I should imagine that having the British National Party holding a demonstration against discrimination outside the offices of the CAB would be the last thing that they would want, but the choice is theirs,” Cllr Findley concluded.

White Brits discrimanated Against as Labour Controlled Council Gives £273,000 Grant to Nonwhites Only Project

White Brits Put Last: Hartlepool’s Labour Controlled Council Gives £273,000 Grant to Nonwhites Only Project

 The BNP Newsroom

White British people have once again been blatantly discriminated against by the Labour-controlled Hartlepool Borough Council with the news that £273,000 of taxpayers’ money has been given to a local nonwhite-only “ethnic project.”

The project, known as the “Salaam Centre” provides a range of services to black and ethnic (BME) communities across Hartlepool.

According to the Hartlepool Borough Council’s website, the “group is only open to young women from the BME community” and engages in “fun and participative activities.”

Would the Hartlepool Council give taxpayers’ money to a group which was only open to the white community and which engaged in “fun and participative activities?”

Regeneration chiefs at Hartlepool “New Deal for Communities” (NDC) initiative, which is one of 39 similar regeneration initiatives across the country to which each have been awarded up to £54 million of extra Government funding over a 10 year period, have reportedly “welcomed the news as the Salaam Centre is one of its key projects.”

In addition to the tax handout, the “Salaam Centre” has also received £96,000 of funding from the independent private charity the Tudor Trust, and £177,000 from the Big Lottery Fund.

All the money has allowed the nonwhite-only organisation to move into newly refurbished community premises at the former St Paul's Church Hall, in Murray Street in Hartlepool.

A gushing local media report boasted that the “project will use the funding to secure and maintain its services for at least the next three years” and that it would “also help offer a wide range of activities at the new centre for its visitors.”

According to the report, a merry time was had by all when the money was handed over.

“Regeneration director Malcolm Walker, from Hartlepool NDC, joined members from the Salaam Community Centre Community Interest Company (CIC) to celebrate the news,” the local media report said.

Mr Walker continued: "It is fantastic news for those involved with the centre as well as BME communities in Hartlepool that the Salaam Centre has received this funding to continue to support and meet the needs of ethnic minorities settled across the town.”

The report went on to quote the chairman of the community centre CIC, a man with the non-Anglo-Saxon name of Rajab Malik, as saying “The Salaam Centre project has worked with people from different nationalities for more than eight years and we have outgrown the current premises.

"The funding will help support our move to much needed larger new premises and the facilities offered in the new centre look to enhance and enrich the lives of the increasingly diverse ethnic population of Hartlepool, providing opportunities for education, training, healthcare, fitness, cookery and much more."

Hard-pressed British taxpayers will doubtless be ecstatic to read that their money will also be used to build a “new cafe area” which will “provide opportunities for older people from BME communities to meet and socialise.”

In addition, the money will be used to provide “cultural and social events” and will offer a “reading room, a fitness and training centre and accredited training in healthy eating and food preparation.”

The Salaam Centre has been supporting black and ethnic minority groups across the town for eight years, all funded by the NDC.

Does anyone know of a centre like this set up for white British people?

I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation," that is what Nick Griffin said in a letter to Italian MEP Vittorio Prodi.

Ritengo che il picco del petrolio, sia la minaccia più critica affrontata dalla nostra civiltà

  Martin Wingfield

OCTOBER 2010: "I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation," that is what Nick Griffin said in a letter to Italian MEP Vittorio Prodi.


 Prodi (right) is also on Nick's Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) Committee and despite being a member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) Group, he shares Nick's concerns over Peak Oil.
The British National Party MEP for the North West region of England wrote:
"Dear Mr Prodi
Re. Amendment 170. Cancun. Peak Oil.
I was delighted to see your Amendment 170 on the Cancun resolution. Having raised the issue of Peak Oil in committee several times in the last year (I planned to yesterday during the exchange of views with Mrs Heddegarde, but was not called to speak) I was beginning to think that everyone else was blind to this issue. It is a shame that the Amendment was rejected, but at least it received significant support.
I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation. I have been studying this issue intensively for more than 5 years and have good contacts to experts in this field who would be very pleased to provide information to anyone who wants and needs to know more. Please be assured of my wholehearted support for any further attempts to put this crucial issue on the agenda.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin MEP"
The letter was then translated into Italian by Nick's Parliamentary Assistant Alberto Paoletti.
"Gentile Onorevole,
Mi ha fatto davvero piacere vedere il Suo emendamento 170 sulla risoluzione Cancun.
L'anno scorso, dopo aver sollevato la questione del picco del petrolio in svariate occasioni in commissione, stavo cominciando a pensare che tutti gli altri fossero ciechi rispetto a questo problema.
A tal proposito, mi ero riproposto di intervenire ieri durante lo scambio di opinioni con la sig.ra Heddegarde ma, purtroppo, non sono stato chiamato a parlare.
E' un peccato che l'emendamento sia stato respinto, ma quantomeno ha ricevuto un importante sostegno.
Ritengo che il picco del petrolio, sia la minaccia più critica affrontata dalla nostra civiltà.
Ho studiato a fondo questo problema per più di 5 anni, sviluppando rilevanti contatti con gli esperti in questo campo, i quali sarebbe piu' che lieti di fornire approfondimenti, a Lei o a chiunque ne avesse bisogno.
La prego infine di contare sul mio pieno appoggio, per qualsiasi ulteriore tentativo di mettere questo tema cruciale all'ordine del giorno.
Cordiali saluti
Nick Griffin"
READ MORE AT NICK GRIFFINS BLOG AT EU NEWS BLOG

Banking Crisis it is Just Money Money Created from Nothing Thats the Problem

Author Carl Hemmings
It is said by many people that they want to “hit the money men where it hurts”.
then they offer up measures to offset the effects of Government funding cuts which may temporarily be of benefit to some people. However, they have missed the crux of the matter by a mile, which is our debt-based economy.
So why did he not do what the bankers fear most and expose the corrupt Fractional Reserve System which causes all the nations’ debts?
The new Basel 111 regulations governing how much capital banks should have in reserve have been agreed to prevent another financial crisis. These measures, regardless of the new ratios agreed, will in the end fail to prevent another economic collapse.
This is because the banks are still allowed to create money out of thin air under the Fractional Reserve System, which is still the dominant and widely-accepted method of monetary creation.
Under this system, banks insert credit into the economy and charge the rest of us, including the Government, interest for the privilege of its use. The fact banks pay us interest on the tiny molehill of money that is in our bank accounts hides the reality that they collect a far greater bounty of interest from the mountain of bank credit that they create.
Here is another crucial point. All this credit pumped into the economy consists of principal (loan money) only but, like all debt, it has to be repaid with more money than was borrowed — as principal PLUS interest.
Clearly it is impossible to repay this debt from a pool of money that consists only of principal.
The only way in which the debt can be repaid without starving the economy of purchasing power is to borrow more bank credit to service previous debts, which results in an increasing spiral of un-repayable debt until the entire system comes crashing down under the weight of these debts and ends up in the type of recession which we are experiencing now.
It is this system which is the real cause of our problems. Under Fractional Reserve, if there is no debt then there is no money.
Money is debt. It’s no good tinkering around with it.
The only solution is a complete reform of the system to deliver us from this recession and to avoid future economic crashes. This will only happen when the Government claims back from the private banks the sole prerogative of monetary creation.

Carl Hemmings

Police officer 'indifference' at Left Wing disorder in Liverpool city centre

Police officer 'indifference' at disorder in Liverpool city centre

  Martin Wingfield

OCTOBER 2010: at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news
NICK Griffin has written to the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police Jon Murphy, to complain about a lack of effective policing in Liverpool city centre where a British National Party 'Troops Home' petition stall was surrounded by a hostile mob and members of the public intimidated.


 The MEP wrote:
"I have been contacted by a number of my constituents, some of whom are campaigners for the British National Party, with regard to the unacceptable intimidation they have been subjected to during the course of their campaigning activities in Liverpool city centre.
"On Saturday 2nd October, a small team of British National Party campaigners, who were gathering signatures for a petition calling for the withdrawal of British troops from the war in Afghanistan, were surrounded by an organised and co-ordinated group of political opponents (who term themselves as “antifascists”) and subjected to a relentless, vicious verbal and physical attack. In addition to the campaign team suffering sustained verbal abuse from this group, they were also physically assaulted with objects thrown as missiles, which included eggs, water, bottles, cans and small incendiaries.
"The British National Party campaign members report that they, and members of the public who tried to approach them with the intention of signing the petition, felt afraid for their physical safety and were not reassured by the actions of the Merseyside police officers who were present on the day. There was a general consensus, on the part of both the campaign team and the public, that the officers in attendance were unsympathetic toward their safety concerns and generally reluctant to take control of the situation: i.e. by dispersing the aggressive and unruly opponent group and taking direct action against the individuals responsible for the missile throwing and targeted verbal abuse.  
"I understand that Mr Mike Whitby, the Liverpool British National Party organiser, has already written to Superintendent Bill McWilliam, raising his concerns about the apparent unwillingness of local police officers to intervene effectively to allow the British National Party campaign team to conduct their legitimate political campaigning without harassment, and also to protect the public from intimidation.
"Given the seriousness of this attack and the climate of fear and victimisation that such incidents engender amongst individuals exercising their democratic right to freedom of political expression, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a full report on Merseyside Police’s response to the events of Saturday 2nd October, including whether any arrests were made on the day, and your assessment as to whether sufficient action was taken by officers to deal with the attack.
"In order for me to reassure my constituents that Merseyside Police is committed to ensuring the physical safety of all individuals involved in legitimate democratic political activity, and to protecting their democratic right to function free from harassment, I would be grateful if you could also identify what risk management plants will be set in place to avoid a repeat of the events of Saturday 2nd October."
ABOVE: Nick Griffin MEP visits the BNP Troops Home petition stall in Liverpool where a mob intimidated members of the public while police officers just stood by and watched.

Europe When easy answers die

 

When easy answers die

2010 

by Steve Harris. http://www.amerika.org/

Europe is awakening to the fallacy of globalism, which comes to us in the form of immigration and superstates like the EU. This is part of Europe’s general awakening to its own decline, which it has been able to hide for years under “easy answers”: super-simplified partial renditions of the truth that are more justification than reason.
For example, WWI was explained away as a momentary madness, not an attempted resolution to the events set into motion by the revolution of 1789. That didn’t work, so we got WWII, and with it, more easy answers. “He was a madman!” they said, forgetting that Hitler got elected because problems existed that still remain, and had remained since WWI.
Europe could not find a direction, and democracy was leading it away from tackling the important but difficult issues. Hitler did not create himself; the time created Hitler because a problem lingered and after Germany lost the war, continued to linger. It was the same problem that occurred after WWI, which was itself a struggle for direction to leadership after democratic revolutions replaced monarchs with demagogues. The old order rebelled.
The easy answer was, of course, to destroy the old order. “Then we’ll have peace!” they said, and nodded their heads vigorously, as if they’d said something wise. For a long time, people believed them. Get rid of the kings and princes, get rid of the idea of a right way of doing things, and liberalize our entire society so that people can do whatever they want.
That in turn produced a society that lived for the lowest common denominator, and became decadent and crass, blind to beauty and whorelike in its manic pursuit of pleasures to sidestep its lack of direction and insensitivity to the idea that life could be meaningful.
That society in turn produced a generation of people in the 1960s who demonstrated the greatest degree of selfishness yet recorded. They wanted easy sex; they invented “free love.” They wanted their venal acts to not be observed; they demanded freedom. Finally, they wanted to stay children forever, so they threw away the notion of family and lived for their own pleasures and when those deconstructed themselves, their personal wealth, at the expense of their community.
In the 1990s, society responded to the social disaster that these people presented by importing new people. After all, the indigenous ones — who had wrecked their families with free love and selfishness — were not breeding and no replacement workers would mean the economy would collapse. It was 1984 in reverse — instead of Big Brother controlling the people, the people created Big Brother through what they forgot to do.
Since the 1990s produced a maturing generation so cynical that they adopted no ideology whatsoever, the dogma of the 1960s — updated into political correctness, a slick advertising-style take on Marxism — kept rolling right into the 2000s. “The problem is that we are oppressed,” the people said with gaping expressions, and it almost sounded like they were right.
Fast forward a few years, and as the 2000s close, the silent plurality who have their act together — chaste families, sane careers, actually possessing souls, not buying into the easy answers of liberal politics — are demanding change. These 1960s ideas had fifty years to work, and they’re not, so let’s throw them out, they’re saying.

It is unclear when and why Dr. Thilo Sarrazin, 65, the child of a doctor and a Prussian landowner’s daughter, who supposedly did a decent job during his time as finance minister for the city-state of Berlin and who had unusual ideas, became a seducer. Did he see himself as a future chancellor, and was he bitterly waiting in the wings to be nominated by his Social Democratic Party (SPD)? Would he have preferred to become the CEO of Deutsche Bank instead of “merely” a member of the executive board of Germany’s central bank, the Bundesbank? Does he relish the role of agent provocateur and popular guest on German talk shows? And is he truly worried about the absurd concern that Germany is “doing away with itself” — as the title of his new book claims — by tolerating too many foreign influences in its society?
Opinions may differ among those who seek to interpret Sarrazin’s behavior. The important thing is that he is someone who has gone from being a tough-talking, audacious politician and anarchic prankster (see quote gallery) to a racist anti-Muslim who makes up nonsense about the genetic basis of intelligence and the “German-Jewish origins of intelligence research.” Those ideas have prompted him to voice his concerns over Germany’s “cultural identity” and “national character,” and to blame Muslim immigrants and their supposed non-culture for all the problems of integration — ignoring the fact that both the immigrants and the host country have a responsibility. – Der Spiegel

Ah, blame. Who cares about who has a responsibility? The only responsibility that matters is fixing the problem. Sarrazin is voicing in public what many have said in private, which is that globalization, or the process by which a nation becomes a suburb of the One Global People and its superstates like the EU, destroys national identity and with it, the ability to have any meaning in life whatsoever. Without culture, there are no rules, no norms, and no goals. There is only your job, what you buy, and the bar you visit nightly to try to drink away the existential emptiness.
But for now, people of the old order — the 1960s order — will continue to sharpen their claws and vent their spleens, confident that the popularity of their statements will make them rich and powerful at the expense of poor clueless wretches like Sarrazin. Or will it? As said above, time has passed since 1968 and 1789, and neither has brought the great deliverance and Utopia that we hoped for. Yes, we’re all “free” now, but with that comes a lack of any direction other than following the crowd in its pleasures. Where we used to tell ourselves that the old empires were bad and we don’t do evil things like they did now, we’re starting to realize that there’s a greater evil in false promises: wasted time and energy, and empty soulless lives.

Sociologist Dr David Bartram carried out the study: “Economic Migration and Happiness: Comparing Immigrants’ and Natives’ Happiness Gains from Income.” It was published by Social Indicators Research online on 27th August and will be printed next year.
He sought to establish whether those people who were motivated by higher incomes in a wealthy country actually gain greater happiness via migration.
…
“The results suggest that economic migrants might well experience disappointment. Migrants do gain happiness from higher incomes, to a greater extent than natives — but the relationship is weak even for migrants. In fact, it also works out that migrants are less happy than natives. The probable reason is that they expect to be happier by virtue of earning the greater incomes available in a wealthy country — but they end up wanting even more after they get there: aspirations probably increase at least as much as incomes. – Science Daily

Globalization promises wealth to the poor, but then they find a lack of anything but wealth does not solve their problems. It simply transfers them, and as they surge into new hosts nations, it dissolves those nations, in effect killing the goose that laid the golden egg. Similarly, European nations are finding out that joining superstates like the EU allows a group to make decisions — and that, as in all mobs, those decisions inevitably become a wealth transfer from the powerful to the weaker, because the weaker always outnumber those who have risen above.
Makes you wonder what other easy answers are out there. Diversity, a fallacy? Technology, not our savior? Overpopulation, more real than global warming? Legal drugs, a gateway to failure? The crowd loves easy answers and so they pick illusions, but as the silent plurality discovers its own mental clarity on this issue, they are mobilizing against the clueless mob with a more powerful weapon than any dogma or clever wording: the historical record that shows our 1789/1968 social inclinations have not brought glory, but misery and deconstruction.