Another £1 Billion Set to be Added to the EU Membership Finacial BLackhole

Another £1 Billion Set to be Added to the EU Membership Bill

The British National party Newsroom

On the same day that the ConDem regime announced massive cuts to frontline services to British people, the European Parliament voted in a new budget which is set to increase the cost of British membership of the EU membership by nearly a billion pounds every year.

MEPs voted to increase the annual EU budget from nearly £108 billion this year to more than £114 billion in 2011, a rise of 5.9 percent. There were 546 votes in favour of the budget, with only 88 against (including, of course, the British National Party’s two MEPs, Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons).

The issue goes now goes into arbitration between MEPs, EU ministers and the European Commission, with this year's budget being rolled over into 2011 if no deal is done by January.

Nearly £400 million has been allocated to finance the new EU diplomatic service which will open offices in New York, Beijing and Moscow, despite all EU members already having embassies in those nations.

Another EU budget allocation which was doubled end was that of the “entertainment” department. This body puts on champagne receptions and courtesy limousines, amongst other things.

Most of the increased spend would however be directed toward agricultural subsidies and aid to the Continent’s poorer regions, particularly those southern European nations who are already struck by financial instability.

It was therefore not surprising to see almost all the Greek, Spanish and Portuguese MEPs vote in favour of the budget, with many rebelling against their political group policy on the matter.

The Lisbon Treaty has put more pressure on the budget by giving the EU new tasks and creating new senior posts, something which David Cameron claimed to have opposed but who now, infamously, accepts as a done deal.

* The EU’s Budget Commissioner has also proposed a new VAT tax which, if approved, will be applied in all member states.

Commissioner Janusz Lewandowski has announced that he wants to revivie stalled plans for a taxation system across all 27 member nations to help finance the EU’s operations.

Other taxes under consideration include levies on carbon emissions, air transport, financial transactions or bank profits.

EU chiefs have already indicated that they want to scrap the remains of

Britain’s multi-billion pound annual rebate.

Islamists terrorise Met Police so This is England Today

So this is England
In this shocking video you can see what has become of our nation through the traitorous actions of the 3 main political parties. 
 

Secret Green Climate Warming” Hoax Tax Emerges: £1 Billion in “Carbon Emission”

Now, the Secret Tax Emerges: £1 Billion in “Carbon Emission”

The BNP Newsroom

In what is the inevitable result of the “climate warming” hoax against which the British National Party alone warned, taxpayers are to be hit with a new £1 billion secret tax hike on “carbon emissions,” it has emerged.

The tax, which was not mentioned by Chancellor George Osborne in his Spending Review speech to the House of Commons, was contained in the small print of the accompanying documentation.

The nature of the new tax and its difference from previous “carbon emission” tax proposals makes it clear that the new tax is nothing but an additional way of raising revenue to help clear the deficit.

Previous “carbon emission” tax proposals which were due to be introduced in Spring next year would have seen companies buy “allowances” at £12 for every tonne of carbon dioxide they emit.

If companies reduced emissions, they would then receive rebates in relation to the amount they “saved.”

Now however, the scheme will simply charge companies per tonne of carbon dioxide no matter what.

The new tax will, it has been estimated, add 11 percent to the energy bills of British companies which will inevitably be passed on to the consumer.

Reports indicate that about 5,000 large and medium-sized companies with bills of more than £500,000 per year will bear the brunt of the new tax.

The business community was unanimous in its rejection of the tax plans which will cause a ripple increase in the consumer inflation index across the board.

Stephen Robertson, director-general of the British Retail Consortium, was quoted as saying that his organisation was “surprised and dismayed that the £1bn per year participating businesses will put in to the Carbon Reduction Commitment scheme is no longer to be recycled to participants but is instead to be pocketed by the Exchequer.

"A tax of this size surely merits a mention in the Chancellor's speech. It is appalling that the Government is sneaking this in, introducing a new burden on businesses that are trying to create new jobs to offset the public sector cutbacks and growing the economy to generate the tax base to pay down the debt."

Additional reports quoted analysts from PriceWaterhouseCooper as saying that the new tax will cost an extra £76,000 per year in the first year, rising to £114,000 per year by 2015, for a business with an average £1 million gas and electricity bill.

The shock effect of this tax and the retardation it will have on medium size enterprises is massive.

The BNP was the only party to warn from the beginning that “climate change” was little more than an attempt to extort taxpayers in Western countries by using the “threat” of temperature changes as a reason to raise taxes.

Now that warning has come home to roost as the ConDem regime has latched onto the ongoing “climate change” scam as yet another method through which they can raise taxes to pay off their madcap schemes which have caused the deficit in the first place.

The new tax clearly has nothing to do with paying for “climate change” and has everything to do with paying for the massive borrowing that the previous Labour regime and their ConDem twins have engaged in to keep their bankster friends bailed out, to keep the foreign aid budget going, to keep up Britain’s EU membership fees and to pay for the Afghanistan war, amongst other madcap schemes.

The UK Governments £83 Billion Cut with 500,000 Job Losses vs the BNP Financial Plan of £83 Billion in Cuts With No Job Losses

The ConDem Plan=£83 Billion Cut with 500,000 Job Losses vs the BNP Plan= £83 Billion Cut With No Job Losses

The British National party Newsroom

The British National Party’s plan to cut the budget deficit consists of slashing all expenditure not in Britain’s interests with no job losses — in marked contrast to the ConDem plan which will cause half a million people to lose their jobs and much further economic damage further down the road.

The £83 billion which the ConDem regime claims is necessary to bring down the budget deficit will bring unprecedented misery to the British public and the economy.

The 500,000 projected job losses will have a massive ripple impact upon welfare and ancillary business which are dependent on state contracts — but all of that could have been prevented by using simple logic and cutting those things not serving any useful purpose.

The British National Party has long argued that the best way to reduce the deficit is simply to cut expenditure which is not vital to Britain’s national interest.

Areas which could be cut immediately without impacting any frontline services to the British people would include:

- Halting British involvement in the Afghanistan war which would cut £5 billion a year off the deficit. The cost of that war has steadily escalated over the years, and will cost even more in the near future as the compensation payouts to the thousands wounded carry on being paid out for decades to come.

- Halting the ‘asylum’ racket which costs Britain around £4 billion per year. There are no legal asylum seekers in Britain, and all such claims are bogus. Asylum seekers who have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach soft-touch Britain are just illegal immigrants, and nothing else.

- Halting the immigration swindle which costs Britain around £13 billion per year. This figure was calculated by Migrationwatch and is a compilation of the direct costs of benefits, housing, incarceration costs, schooling and what the immigrants then send home by way of financial repatriations.

- Halting the £9.9 billion per year foreign aid budget. This figure is set to increase even more under ConDem plans to set foreign aid at 0.7 percent of Britain’s Gross National Income. There is no excuse for giving British tax money away while there are massive shortfalls at home.

- Halting British membership of the European Union which, according to estimates by the Bruges Group costs Britain at least £60.1 billion per year gross, or £50.6 billion net.

According to the Bruges Group figures, this amount is made up as follows:

- £28 billion for business to comply with EU regulations;

- £17 billion of additional food costs resulting from the Common Agricultural Policy;

- £3.3 billion - the value of the catch lost when the Common Fisheries Policy let other countries fish in our territorial waters;

- £14.6 billion gross paid into the EU budget and other EU funds.

In addition, the Bruges Group says, since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net. By 2013, this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.

Finally, Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.

If the ConDem regime had the interests of the British people at heart, they would first have cut all of the expenditures listed above before putting the boot into civil servants and the economy in general.

But then again, those who are familiar with the Tory and Lib Dem leadership know that patriotism and a desire to protect Britain are the very last things those people think about.

ConDems Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget Outrage

Scandal: Foreign Aid Budget is Twice as Much as British Higher Education Budget

British National party Newsroom

Evidence of the vicious anti-British nature of the Westminster parties has come with the “education budget cut” announced by the ConDem regime — which inadvertently revealed that the foreign aid budget is now twice as high as the higher education budget.

The shocking news was contained in the announcement by Chancellor George Osborne that the spending review cuts have meant that the higher education budget will be cut from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion by 2014.

As bad as that news is, a quick look at the “ring fenced” foreign aid budget reveals that even prior to the recession, more money was being put aside for foreign aid than for higher education.

A “revised spending budget” issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) in June 2009 showed that the foreign aid budget for 2009/10 was £6.8 billion and was set to rise to £7.7 billion in the 2010/11 financial year.

The DFID announcement has deliberately understated the figures, hiding the true cost with an administrative trick. The figures they announced are only the direct aid programme, and not the total cost, which is called the “Gross Public Expenditure on Development” (GPEX) – which adds nearly £2 billion each year to total DFID expenditure.

For example, the GPEX in 2007/08 amounted to £6.027 billion, of which £5.2 billion was direct aid. The GPEX for 2006/07 was £7.4 billion, of which £4.9 billion was direct aid, and the GPEX for 2005/06 was £6.6 billion, of which £4.4 billion was direct aid.

This means that in the financial year 2010/2011 the GPEX for the DFID amounted to some £9.9 billion.

Given the higher education budget cuts, this means that British taxpayers now spend more than twice as much handing out cash to countries like India and China than what is spent educating British kids.

The budget cut announced by Mr Osborne amount to a 40 percent cut in higher education teaching budgets.

In addition, universities will be allowed to charge higher tuition fees, which will mean that the debts with which those kids lucky enough to get into university leave those institutions, will be even higher than before.

According to a report which quoted Professor Steve Smith, president of the vice-chancellors' association, the stagnation of investment in the science budget has meant that Britain is “now one of the only countries in the industrialised world that is not increasing our investment in science and research.”

It seems that the ConDem regime, and its Labour twin, are perfectly happy to keep funding nuclear power India and buying schoolbooks in China than ensuring that British kids have a fair chance at obtaining a higher education.

How much more treason do they have to perpetrate before the public sees through the Westminster party scam?

* Mr Osborne also announced that the government will establish a new £150m national scholarship fund to support students from “disadvantaged backgrounds.”

While the principle behind such a scheme is praiseworthy, observers have pointed out that the ConDem’s own definition of “disadvantaged” has generally meant to be those of ethnic origin.

Time will tell if this scheme is just another affirmative action handout or no

Solidarity — A Nationalist Union Which Wins Cases

Solidarity — A Nationalist Union Which Wins Cases

The BNP Newsroom

Solidarity Trade Union National Executive member David Kerr has called on all patriots and Nationalists to join the Solidarity Trade Union and register with its website to receive regular updates.

The Solidarity site has recently featured articles looking at social inequality, the Liberal Democrat’s views on immigration, capitalism and cheap labour and the strikes on the London Underground. 

There’s also a thought-provoking article which asks how British workers can counter the power and influence of the establishment media — and especially the likes of the Sun. 

The most up-to-date articles include a look at the Labour leadership contest and the influence of the establishment Unions and an announcement that Solidarity will be looking into the whole banking system. Here they will also look at “practical alternatives to the banks like Credit Unions, the Islamic banking system, Zopas — 'zone of possible agreement' — and Local Exchange Trading Systems (LETS).”

The union is particularly interested in getting a wide range of views in their examination of the whole banking system and alternatives. Therefore BNP members/sympathisers who have experience in the financial sector or an interest in economics may wish to participate in this debate.

Mr Kerr reminded patriots that Solidarity does not go in for political vetting: “we just win cases and do our job.”

Many disciplinary cases have been won for members, but more serious cases have been taken to Tribunal. Often settlements can be brokered by the Union in the interests of our members.

Recently our Representatives won a settlement for a member who was not correctly paid the National Minimum Wage over many months and compensation for another worker who claimed he was a victim of 'religious discrimination' by a public employer.

As the latter case highlights, although most of our cases are related to everyday disputes at work, we are not afraid of taking on discrimination cases whether political, religious or other grounds.

Solidarity is the only union that favours economic Nationalism and resists all attempts to discriminate against or harm the interests of British workers.

Join the Union now!

Join for just £5 a month by clicking on this link.

If you prefer to pay by standing order you can request a form from: Solidarity, P O Box 93, Spennymoor, DL16 9AN, United Kingdom.

UK Leftists Union Leaders and Third World Sadists

Western Leftists and Third World Sadists

by Paul Bogdanor
Andy Newman is a member of Respect Renewal. He is on the National Steering Committee of the Stop the War Coalition. Recently he paid tribute to a pair of “great socialist heros” [sic].
One of them was a military dictator who banned trade unions and opposition parties. And here is the other:

Samora Machel was a former nurse and the son of a peasant, who became a guerilla leader in the Frelimo army to defeat the brutal Portuguese colonialist rule over Mozambique. He was then elected to became Mozambique’s first president.

Newman’s Machel comes across as a saintly figure:

He was determined to prevent a new elite forming… Machel used to say, there are no small or big people, all people are equal.

All this is nonsense. Machel left no doubt as to his political proclivities. He championed the “wise leadership” of Maoist China, celebrated the “glorious tradition” of Stalinist Vietnam and Pol Pot’s Cambodia, and promised to establish the “dictatorship of the proletariat” under his Frelimo “vanguard” in Mozambique. [1]
Machel was not “elected to became Mozambique’s first president.” He came to power by murdering his rivals:

The accused were given anything between 15 and 80 lashes… Executions were carried out by strangulation, blows with the butt of a rifle, stabbing, or even burning with firebrands. [2]

Machel was not interested in preventing a “new elite.” He was interested in forming a totalitarian elite. His secret police force quickly became notorious for its savagery:

Some 100,000 people are thought to be held in nearly 30 camps on suspicion of opposing Frelimo’s policies. The inmates, including many women and children, are made to work 12 hours a day. The effects of fever, exhaustion and disease are exacerbated by brutal treatment. Beatings and rape by the guards are commonplace in the camps, say the escapers. [3]

A foreign detainee met the victims of Machel’s concentration camps:

Some had owned small businesses or farms; two had owned taxis. The government had simply taken these from them and thrown the owners into prison.
Most had been transferred from Machava Prison, where they had been tortured. They held up swollen and scarred hands to show where knives had been inserted between tied fingers and twisted, so that the knuckles were cut and prized apart. Some had been thrown into chin-deep water in a squatting position and had weights piled on their heads. Others had their faces held over spikes while guards danced on their shoulders – all this to find if they owned more property, or if and where they might have some money hidden. [4]

Witnesses reported seeing inmates reduced to “walking skeletons.” Kept underground, “Many prisoners suffocated to death.” Beatings occurred “invariably twice a day, with whips and sticks.” Under interrogation, a condemned prisoner “was willing to confess anything. All he wanted was to avoid an agonizing death.” Forced labour was “unbearable as we had nothing to eat.” [5]
Any minority that incurred Machel’s displeasure was a target. After Machel personally ordered the imprisonment of Mozambique’s 7,000 Jehovah’s Witnesses – men, women and children – the state media disclosed that many would be “crippled for life” as a result of torture. [6] Even children who refused compulsory “training” in Castro’s Cuba were not spared. “We sent them to re-education camps, for forced labour,” boasted Machel. “Some of them have vanished from schools.” [7]
According to a high-ranking official, “Frelimo had in 12 months of governance proportionally tortured and executed more people than the Portugese in 500 years of colonial rule.” Such criticisms could not go unanswered, so the official was put to death as well. [8]
Needless to say, Machel’s state terrorism had nothing to do with helping the impoverished masses. Quite the contrary: within months of his takeover, Frelimo cadres were “active along the Tanzanian frontier trying to prevent thousands of Mozambiquans escaping from famine.” [9]
Why do Western far leftists admire Third World sadists such as Samora Machel? Why would they make a hero out of a dictator who inflicted systematic torture and murder, concentration camps, religious apartheid, slavery and famine on one of the world’s poorest societies? I can think of two possibilities:
1. They want to impose the same tyranny and commit the same atrocities here.
2. They can’t stomach that kind of regime in Britain but they consider it appropriate for the population of an African country.
If the first explanation is true, they are totalitarian psychopaths. If the second is true, they are obnoxious racists. Which one fits Socialist Unity?
 Perhaps Andy Newman will tell us?

British People Put Last 40,000 British Jobs to Go, Defence Budget Cuts but Foreign Aid Increase

British People Put Last Again: 40,000 British Jobs to Go, but Defence Budget Cuts Less Than Foreign Aid Increase

BNP Newsroom

Some 40,000 British people are to lose their jobs in terms of the defence budget cuts which are in real terms a billion pounds less than the increase in the foreign aid budget, a BNP News analysis has revealed.

The current UK defence budget is £43.8 billion, and the 8 percent cut will see around £3.5 billion shaved off this figure.

This reduction will result in the scrapping of the Royal Navy’s flagship, the mothballing of one of two aircraft carriers being built, the phasing out of UK-built aircraft to fly on the remaining carrier, the closing down of army bases, a reduction in the number of standing army personnel and a downsizing in the number of military vehicles and arms.

At the same time, the “ring fenced” foreign aid budget is to be increased from its current £9.1 billion to over £13.1 billion, an increase of over £4 billion as the ConDem regime is committed to spending 0.7 percent of Britain’s Gross National Income on foreign aid.

The disparity in expenditure has proven once again that the interests and jobs of British people have been made subordinate to those of foreigners.

David Cameron and the rest of the ConDem regime, enthusiastically supported by their Labour Party clones, would rather see 40,000 British people lose their livelihoods than have foreign aid to nuclear power- and spaceship-launching India cut.

The total budget cuts in the “public spending review” are set to amount to some £83 billion, according to a report in a Tory-supporting newspaper.

Observers have pointed out that if the defence budget cuts alone will cause 40,000 job losses, the number of job losses which will be caused by the budget cuts in other departments will be astronomical.

It is not, of course, only the direct civil service jobs which are negatively affected by these cuts. A large number of ancillary enterprises who employ private workers are also dependent on state contracts. As these are cut, the job loss effect will ripple out further and further.

Ironically, the £83 billion which the ConDem regime seeks to implement is precisely the amount which could be shaved off the budget by cutting foreign aid, immigration, asylum, EU membership and the illegal foreign wars.

* The defence budget cuts will see the Royal Navy reduced to its smallest size since Henry VIII’s time.

Marianne Top French Magazine courts the BNP's Nick Griffin MEP !

Marianne courts Nick!

   Author Martin Wingfield

 OCTOBER 2010: NICK Griffin is to be interviewed by the prestigious French weekly political magazine, Marianne.


 The interview will be to seek Nick's opinion on the growing evidence, identified by experts on European politics, that nationalist political parties are having a much greater influence today on mainstream politics.
"I also want to collect Mr Griffin's opinion on his influence on the European Parliament. Does he think he has one and what kind of influence is it?" explained journalist Snejana Jovanovic.
Paris-based Marianne has a circulation of 300,000 copies per week which topped at 580,000 with French news magazine record breaker "The True Sarkozy" (right) in April 2007.

Read more at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news
Listen to interviews from Nick griffin and Andrew Brons
at RWB Euro News 

Thinking of Supporting Socialism Warning Left-Wing Bloodbaths

Left-Wing Bloodbaths 
Radical leftists would have us believe that they stand for democracy, progress, human rights and social justice – but when they seize power, they impose slavery, terror, famine, concentration camps and mass murder. As the Marxists used to say, this is no accident. 

General John Kekes, Why Robespierre Chose Terror

The human costs of radical left-wing ideology during the French Revolution: “A remarkable feature of the ideological frame of mind is that those in its grip actually believe these justifications for disemboweling, lynching, mutilating, burying alive, drowning, and hacking to pieces their unfortunate victims.”

Paul Bogdanor, The Communists As They Really Are

Quotations not taught in the average history class.

Paul Hollander, The Distinctive Features of Repression in Communist States [PDF]

Comprehensive analysis of communist tyranny and mass murder all over the world.

David Marcus, Famine Crimes in International Law [PDF]

Superb paper on the role of the state in creating famines, with detailed case studies of communist famines in the Soviet Union, Ethiopia and North Korea.

Steven Bela Vardy and Agnes Huszar Vardy, Cannibalism in Stalin’s Russia and Mao’s China [PDF]

Cannibalism was one of the countless horrors awaiting the victims of communist famines and purges.

Soviet Union - Pre-Stalin Sergei Melgunov, The Record of the Red Terror [PDF]

Lenin mercilessly tortured and massacred hundreds of thousands after 1917.

Peter Boettke, The Soviet Experiment With Pure Communism [PDF]
Peter Boettke, The Political Economy of Utopia: Communism in Soviet Russia, 1918-1921 [PDF]
Peter Boettke, Soviet Admissions: Communism Doesn’t Work [PDF]

Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin and other Soviet planners admitted to inflicting catastrophe on tens of millions.

Nicolas Walter, The Legacy of Bolshevism [PDF]

A British anarchist on the Bolshevik concentration camps.

- Genocides Inquiry Reveals Lenin Unleashed Systematic Murder of 200,000 Clergy
Communist Reign of Terror Killed 200,000 Clergymen

Victims were “crucified on royal gates and shot in the basements of the Cheka, scalped, strangled, drowned and submitted to other bestial tortures.”

Soviet Order to Exterminate Cossacks is Unearthed
Peter Holquist, “Conduct Merciless Mass Terror”: Decossackization on the Don, 1919

Bolshevik genocide against the Don Cossacks.

Samuel D. Sinner, The Open Wound: The Genocide of German Ethnic Minorities in Russia and the Soviet Union
Samuel D. Sinner, The German-Russian Genocide: Remembrance in the 21st Century [PDF]

Atrocities included “mass rape of the elderly, women and children, mass drownings, prolonged torture sessions, mutilations, hacking up of bodies, mass shootings of hundreds, even thousands in a single action, the holocaust of entire villages – including the burning of all inhabitants and building structures.”

Edige Kirimal, Complete Destruction of National Groups as Groups: The Crimean Turks
Aurelie Campana, Surgun: The Crimean Tatars’ Deportation and Exile [PDF]

Massacres, famines and ethnic cleansing wiped out hundreds of thousands of Crimean Muslims.

Aleksandr M. Nekrich, The Punished Peoples [PDF, 4.9 MB]
Aurelie Campana, The Massive Deportation of the Chechen People [PDF]
Elza‐Bair Guchinova, Deportation of the Kalmyks (1943–1956) [PDF]
For Victims of Stalin’s Deportations, War Lives On

Genocidal deportations of national minorities created an apartheid system that lasted for decades.

- Famines Roman Serbyn, Famine in Ukraine

Summary of the 1921 and 1933 famines.

Kazuo Nakai, Soviet Agricultural Policies in the Ukraine and the 1921-1922 Famine [PDF]
Roman Serbyn, The First Man-Made Famine in Soviet Ukraine, 1921-1923

Forgotten Bolshevik famine, in which millions died.

Simon Ertz, The Kazakh Catastrophe and Stalin’s Order of Priorities 1929-1933 [PDF]

Soviet grain confiscations killed a third of the population of Kazakhstan.

James Mace, The Man-Made Famine of 1933 in Soviet Ukraine: What Happened and Why
James Mace, The Famine: Stalin Imposes a Final Solution
D’Ann Penner, Stalin and the Ital’ianka of 1932-1933 in the Don Region
Michael Ellman, The Role of Leadership Perceptions and of Intent in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1934 [PDF]
Michael Ellman, Stalin and the Soviet Famine of 1932-33 Revisited [PDF]
Stanislav Kulchytsky, Why Did Stalin Exterminate the Ukrainians?
Roman Serbyn, The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933 as Genocide in the Light of the UN Convention [PDF]
Roman Serbyn, Is There a “Smoking Gun” For the Holodomor?
Roman Serbyn, The Holodomor: Reflections on the Ukrainian Genocide [PDF]
Sergei Maksudov, Genocide Remembered
Nicolas Werth, The Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33 [PDF]
Yevhen Zakharov, Legal Classification of Holodomor 1932-1933 in Ukraine and in Kuban

This Soviet famine was the worst peacetime mass murder in the history of Europe.

Michael Ellman, The 1947 Soviet Famine and the Entitlement Approach to Famines [PDF]

Another forgotten famine, in which the Soviets withheld food from the victims.

- Purges Harvest of Bones: A Geologist Uncovers One of Stalin’s Killing Fields
A City Built on Bones
Forest Skulls May Tell Where 30,000 Stalin Victims Lie

Examples of the huge mass graves containing victims of the Soviet regime.

Poisons Tested on Stalin’s Prisoners

The Soviets, like the Nazis, perpetrated medical experiments on conscious victims.

Top Soviet Denounces Stalin’s Gulags [PDF]

The true scale of the Gulag.

- Death Tolls Robert Conquest, Coming to Terms With the Past

Glasnost revelations about the Soviet death toll.

Papers on Soviet Repression Statistics

Post-Cold War academic papers on Soviet mass murder.

Steven Rosefielde, Documented Homicides and Excess Deaths [PDF]

Demonstrates that the number of killings documented in the Soviet archives was only a fraction of the total, which reached 10 million during the 1927-38 period alone.

- Post-Stalin David Satter, The System of Forced Labor in Russia [PDF]
Juliana Geran Pilon, Slave Labor and the Soviet Pipeline [PDF]

Slavery in the post-Stalin Gulag.

Who Says No Soviet Concentration Camps? [PDF]
Peter Reddaway, Inside Russia’s Concentration Camps [PDF]
Alexander Shatravka, Man of Peace Finds None in Soviet Camp [PDF]
The Gulag: Lost Millions
Human Rights Survey Deplores Soviet Prison Camp Conditions [PDF]

The atrocities included forced starvation, medical neglect, systematic beatings and death by radiation.

Soviet Prisoners Exposed to Fatal Radiation in Uranium Mines
George Schopflin, Radiating a False Picture: Focus on the Difference Between Soviet PR and Reality

On the Nuclear Gulag, where victims were murdered by radiation poisoning.

Eastern Europe Red Army Troops Raped Even Russian Women As They Freed Them From Camps
Anthony Beevor, “They Raped Every German Female From Eight to 80”
German Rape Victims Find a Voice at Last

The Soviets mercilessly gang-raped millions of women and girls in Eastern Europe.

Jean C. Bingle, Labor For Bread: The Exploitation of Polish Labor in the Soviet Union [PDF]
Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, Interrogation Methods of the Communist Secret Police in Poland [PDF]

Hundreds of thousands were killed by deportation, massacre and torture in Poland.

Tamas Stark, Genocide or Genocidal Massacre? The Case of Hungarian Prisoners in Soviet Custody [PDF]
Agnes Huszar Vardy, Forgotten Victims of World War II [PDF]

The Soviets deported hundreds of thousands of Hungarians to their deaths.

Communist Atrocities to be Aired at Prison Camp Commander Trial

Mass killings in the Romanian Gulag.

Iron Curtain’s 100,000 Dead
Germans Find Mass Graves at an Ex-Soviet Camp

The Soviets used former Nazi concentration camps to wipe out political prisoners in East Germany.

Death Camps, Torture, Experiments on Children
Germany’s Guilty Secret: Beaten, Drugged, Skewered
“More Than 1,000 Died” Trying to Flee East Germany

Systematic torture, medical experiments and mass murder in East Germany.

Jeffrey Herf, An Age of Murder: Ideology and Terror in Germany [PDF]

The terrorism and antisemitism of the Stasi-sponsored Red Brigades in West Germany.

Michael Portmann, Communist Retaliation and Persecution on Yugoslav Territory [PDF]
Piles of Bones in Yugoslavia Point to Partisan Massacres
Italy Foots the Bill For Tito’s Ethnic Cleansing

Communist mass murder in Yugoslavia, now erased from the historical record.

Bulgaria Ran Brutal Camps For Prisoners [PDF]

The brutality of the Bulgarian Gulag.

Justice Delayed For Those Tortured Under Communism

Tens of thousands were tortured and murdered in Czechoslovakia.

Afghanistan Afghan Driver Says He Saw Soldiers Blind and Strangle Children [PDF]
Afghans Disclose Deaths of 11,000

Communist mass murder in the pre-invasion years.

Atrocities and Violations of Human Rights and International Law in Afghanistan [PDF]
Eyewitnesses to Afghanistan at War [PDF]

Accounts of terror bombing and other war crimes.

Rosanne Klass, Lifting the Curtain on Afghanistan’s Horror [PDF]

Freedom House describes the Nazi-style methods of the Soviet invaders, including massacre, torture, maiming and rape.

The Soviets’ Ugly Exit [PDF]

Retreating Soviet forces scattered millions of anti-personnel mines, planted explosive devices disguised as toys in order to blow off children’s limbs, poisoned food supplies and waged chemical warfare against the civilian population.

M. Hassan Kakar, The Story of Genocide in Afghanistan

Academic history of the Soviet genocide.

China - Mao Two Millions [PDF]
Human Rights in Mainland China [PDF]
Uncounted Millions: Mass Death in Mao’s China
Scholars Continue to Reveal Mao’s Monstrosities

The communists slaughtered many tens of millions in China through massacre, slavery and famine.

Basil Ashton et al., Famine in China, 1958-61 [PDF]
Jasper Becker, Ex-NPC Chief Admits Maoism Killed Millions
Vaclav Smil, China’s Great Famine: 40 Years Later [PDF]

How the communists caused the greatest man-made catastrophe in the history of the world.

Miriam and Ivan D. London, The Other China: The Three Red Flags of Death [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, The Other China: The Case of the Missing Beggars [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, Hunger in China: The “Norm of Truth” [PDF]
Miriam and Ivan D. London, Hunger in China: The Failure of a System? [PDF]

Forced starvation under communism.

Yongyi Song, The Cultural Revolution and the War Against Fascism [PDF]
Yongyi Song, The Dao County Massacre of 1967 [PDF]
Youqin Wang, Student Attacks Against Teachers: The Revolution of 1966
Youqin Wang, The Second Wave of Violent Persecution of Teachers: The Revolution of 1968

Mass murder during the Cultural Revolution.

Ex-Inmate Recalls Life in China’s Gulag [PDF]
“We Felt We Had Been Buried Alive”

“Class enemies” endured slavery and mass death in concentration camps.

- Post-Mao

Stephen W. Mosher, China’s One-Child Policy: Twenty-Five Years Later

Population control ideology and the resulting atrocities against tens of millions of women.

China: Human Rights Violations and Coercion in One-Child Policy Enforcement [PDF]
Chinese Region “Must Conduct 20,000 Abortions”

Forced abortions and infanticide under the totalitarian one-child policy.

China Reviews “Apartheid” For 900m Peasants

The cruel system of class discrimination imposed on hundreds of millions of peasants.

Tibet Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, Kuxing: Torture in Tibet [PDF]

Report on communist savagery against the population of Tibet.

Mongolia Mass Buddhist Grave Reported in Mongolia

The communist slaughter in Mongolia.

North Korea Jack Rendler, The Last Worst Place on Earth: Human Rights in North Korea [PDF]

From Henry D. Sokolski, ed., Planning For a Peaceful Korea [PDF]. An excellent overview of this totalitarian slave state, where millions have been starved to death or murdered in concentration camps.

Jack Rendler, Horrific Conditions and Suffering Make It the Last Worst Place on Earth

A shorter and more recent account.

Fiona Terry, The Deadly Secrets of North Korea

Forced starvation has claimed millions of victims, primarily the elderly, the young and the sick.

David Hawk, The Hidden Gulag: Exposing North Korea’s Prison Camps [PDF, 8 MB]
Death, Terror in N. Korea Gulag
North Korean Prison Guard Remembers Atrocities
7 Years of Torture in N. Korean Prison Camp
North Korean Imprisoned at Age 10 For Grandparents’ Dissent
Gulag Nation         

Extensive evidence of torture and mass murder in the North Korean Gulag.

Regime That Kills Babies of Foreign Blood
“I Saw an Entire Family Being Killed”
Young Howard, The Hidden Gulag

Torture, medical experiments and racist infanticide.

Vietnam - Pre-1975 Lam Thanh Liem, Ho Chi Minh’s Land Reform: Mistake or Crime? [Excerpt]
50 Years On, Vietnamese Remember Land Reform Terror

The bloodbath inflicted during the North Vietnamese land reform was effectively whitewashed by leftist pseudo-scholars in the West, but the victims were not so quick to forget.

The Blood-Red Hands of Ho Chi Minh

Stomach-churning accounts of communist mass murder during the Vietnam War.

The Massacre of Hue

In this communist massacre, thousands of men, women and children were mercilessly slaughtered.

Stephen T. Hosmer, Viet Cong Repression and its Implications For the Future [PDF, 4.9 MB]

Detailed analysis of Viet Cong mass murder campaigns.

The Human Cost of Communism in Vietnam: 1-31 32-65 66-99 101-23 [PDF]

Compilation of research and newspaper reports on communist terror in Vietnam.

- Post-1975 Le Thi Anh, Let the Vietnamese Speak For Themselves [PDF]
M. Stanton Evans, Westerners Ignore Vietnam Gulag [PDF]
Ginetta Sagan, Vietnam’s Postwar Hell [PDF]

Concentration camps and mass murder in post-1975 Vietnam.

Declaration of Disinherited Vietnamese on Human Rights [PDF]
Testament of Patriotic Prisoners in Vietnam [PDF]

Victims of state terror beg the outside world for help.

Nguyen Cong Hoan, Human Rights in Vietnam I [PDF, 2.8 MB] II [PDF, 2.7 MB]
Nguyen Cong Hoan, Why I Escaped From Vietnam

Defector’s account of totalitarian slavery in post-1975 Vietnam.

Doan Van Toai, In Vietnam’s Gulag, the Captives Die a Slow Death [PDF]

Survivor’s account of the hidden mass killings of political prisoners in the Vietnamese Gulag.

Theodore Jacqueney, They Are Us, We Were Vietnamese [PDF]
Ginetta Sagan and Stephen Denney, Re-education in Unliberated Vietnam: Loneliness, Suffering and Death
Stephen J. Morris, Glasnost and the Gulag: The Numbers Game [PDF]
Anh Do and Hieu Tran Phan, Camp Z30-D: The Survivors

Starvation, torture and murder in the Vietnamese Gulag.

Hanoi Regime Reported Resolved to Oust Nearly All Ethnic Chinese [PDF]
Vietnam Refugees Fleeced of Possessions, Expelled [PDF]
Escape From Vietnam: Nightmare at Sea Haunts Refugee Who Survived [PDF]
Vietnam Goes on Trial in Geneva Over Its Refugees [PDF]

Communist ethnic cleansing literally drove the Chinese population into the sea, where hundreds of thousands of boat people suffered and drowned.

Stephen Denney, Human Rights and Daily Life in Vietnam

Ongoing political persecution and class discrimination.

Laos 40,000 Reported Held in Harsh Laos Camps [PDF]
Thorns Appear in Lotus Land

Tens of thousands of political prisoners were sent to die in concentration camps.

The End of the Hmong
Lao Human Rights Council, White Paper on Genocide in Laos

The Vietnamese and Laotian communists waged a genocidal war against Hmong tribespeople.

Cambodia - Civil War The Agony of Phnom Penh [PDF]
Khmer Rouge’s Bloody War on Trapped Villagers [PDF]
“I Watched Them Saw Him 3 Days” [PDF]
Priest Won’t Leave Refugees Despite Khmer Rouge Threat [PDF]

The savagery of the Khmer Rouge was easily discoverable before 1975.

President Ford, News Conference on Cambodia [PDF]

President Ford warns of “an unbelievable horror story” if the communists capture Cambodia.

Fear of Cambodian Bloodbath Seen Key to Senate Vote on Aid [PDF]

More bloodbath predictions; anti-war leftists in Congress successfully cut off the aid shortly afterwards.

- Killing Fields The Khmer Rouge: Rampant Terror
Yin Savannary, Diary From Darkness [PDF]
Asian Blood Bath [PDF]
Cambodia – An Outlaw Nation [PDF]

Early reports from survivors and journalists.

Leo Cherne, The Terror in Cambodia [PDF]
Leo Cherne, Cambodia – Auschwitz of Asia [PDF]

The chairman of the International Rescue Committee describes the genocide.

Craig Etcheson, The Number: Quantifying Crimes Against Humanity in Cambodia
Bruce Sharp, Counting Hell

Studies demonstrating that the death toll was in the millions.

Henri Locard, State Violence in Democratic Kampuchea (1975-1979) and Retribution (1979-2004) [PDF]

This is the best summary of the Khmer Rouge bloodbath.

Cambodia Steps Slowly Toward a Genocide Trial

Feeble attempts to prosecute the butchers.

Africa Ethiopian Ex-Rulers Go on Trial
Peter Niggli, Ethiopian Resettlement: Vomit and Death [PDF]
Dawit Wolde Giorgis, Power and Famine in Ethiopia [PDF]

The communists caused a million deaths through terror and forced starvation in Ethiopia.

National Society for Human Rights, Ending the Angolan Conflict [PDF]
National Society for Human Rights, Criminal Liability in Angola [PDF]
Global Witness, A Crude Awakening [PDF]
As Guerrilla War Ends, Corruption Now Bleeds Angola to Death

The MPLA dictatorship’s responsibility for civil war and mass starvation in Angola.

Terror of Maputo Jail

Torture, rape, slavery and starvation in Mozambique’s Gulag.

John Sweeney, Inside the Terror-Camp

The genocidal massacre of tens of thousands in Zimbabwe.

Cuba Mary Anastasia O’Grady, Counting Castro’s Victims
Cuba’s Lost Population

Mass killings under communism in Cuba.

Deaths in Prison [PDF]
Victims of Che Guevara [PDF]
Executions by Raul Castro [PDF]

Shooting dissidents, murdering pregnant women, drowning children, etc.

The Cuban Rafter Phenomenon
Mary Anastasia O’Grady, The Lives of Cubans

The communists also murder boat people as they try to escape.

Alfred G. Cuzan, Castro’s “Revolutionary” Despotism [PDF]

The enslavement of the Cuban people.

Armando Valladares, Torture in Castro’s Cuba
Armando Valladares, Castro’s Gulag
From the Prisons of Cuba: A Cry For Help [PDF]
Chronicle of an Unforgettable Agony: Cuba’s Political Prisons
Cuba’s Abuses of Psychiatry

The realities of political imprisonment and torture in Cuba.

Nicaragua Nicaragua Executions Put at 500-1,000 [PDF]

Mass executions started within weeks of the Sandinista takeover.

Jose Esteban Gonzalez, Remember Nicaragua [PDF]

Nicaragua’s leading human rights activist on Sandinista persecution and terror.

New Regime, Old Methods
Inside Communist Nicaragua: The Miguel Bolanos Transcripts [PDF]

Defectors accuse the Sandinistas of atrocities in Nicaragua and aggression throughout Central America.

Inside the Sandinista Regime: A Special Investigator’s Perspective [PDF, 2.4 MB]
Defector Describes “Bloody,” “Corrupt” Regime [PDF]

A former high-ranking official explains how the Sandinistas murdered thousands.

Alfred G. Cuzan, Sandinista Goals Were Evident Long Ago [PDF]
Alfred G. Cuzan, The Nicaraguan Revolution: From Autocracy to Totalitarian Dictatorship? [PDF]
John Norton Moore, The Secret War in Central America and the Future of World Order [PDF, 5 MB]

Comprehensive record of the Sandinista role in provoking violence and war throughout the region.

J. Michael Waller, Will Sandinistas Face Justice?
J. Michael Waller, Tropical Chekists: The Sandinista Secret Police Legacy in Nicaragua

How the Sandinistas tried to build a police state through torture, rape, mutilation and murder.

Peru Peru Indians Take Up Arms Against Rebel Terror

Mass murder and enslavement of the poor by the Shining Path terrorists in Peru.

Other - Campaigns For Eugenics Jonathan Freedland, Master Race of the Left

“Nearly every one of the left’s most cherished, iconic figures espoused views which today’s progressives would find repulsive... Indeed, contempt for ordinary people and outright racism were two of the defining creeds of British socialism.”

- Collaboration With Fascists Oliver Kamm, The Far Left Meets the Far Right: A Historical Note

Japanese communist support for genocidal racist expansionism.

Nazi-Soviet Relations 1939-1941

Soviet-Nazi collaboration was the immediate cause of World War II.

E. Germany Ran Antisemitic Campaign in West in ’60s
Stasi Supported West German Neo-Nazi Groups

East Germany essentially created the neo-Nazi movement in West Germany.

- Collaboration With Jihadists Paul Bogdanor, Leftists For a Second Holocaust
Eugene Goodheart, The London Review of Hezbollah

How the radical left embraced jihadist mass murderers who plan to annihilate the Jewish people.

Steven Stalinsky, Islamist-Left Alliance A Growing Force
John Perazzo, Platforms of the Enemy

The radical left’s open collaboration with the most virulent hatemongers in the Middle East.

- The Post-9/11 Left Brink Lindsey, Terrorism’s Fellow Travelers [PDF]
Paul Hollander, The Resilience of the Adversary Culture

Radical leftists blamed the victims and excused the perpetrators of the 9/11 massacres.

Edward Alexander, Suicide Bombers and Professors
Edward Alexander, Ward Churchill and the Politics of Campus Extremism

The murderous fanaticism of the American campus left.

Railway Privatisation Horro as Chickens Come Home to Roost

Railway Privatisation Nightmare Chickens Come Home to Roost

  BNP Newsat the British National Party Newsroom

The announcement that rail fares are to rise by around 40 percent over the next four years is the inevitable result of the Tory-generated and Labour-supported railway privatisation project.

Despite the much-vaunted “privatisation” programme having stared in 1993 with legislation enacted by the John Major government, the railways network has remained chaotic, particularly with the splitting of track ownership from the train operator companies.

Furthermore, although the original idea was to “save the taxpayers money,” the reality is that the state has been forced to continue subsidising all the railway companies, and in some cases, even take them back under state control.

This happened as recently as last year with the National Express East Coast company, which took over the Scotland-London route running through Anglia. That company is still directly owned by the Department for Transport through a subsidiary, Directly Operated Railways Limited.

Exactly how much the “privatised” rail network costs the British taxpayer is still the subject of much speculation. According to an article published by the authoritative Daily Finance website, the total UK rail subsidy runs into the £5 billion a year figure.

According to that analysis, state “money changes hands between track owner Network Rail and train operating companies on a weekly basis, wasting millions of pounds of taxpayers' money” because of the complex system of multiple ownership of the network.

“Network Rail pays the train operating companies, such as Virgin Trains, when its equipment causes delays. But the companies pay Network Rail when it does better than expected,” the Daily Finance continued.

“Network Rail claims that in the six months to November 2009, the companies paid it a net contribution of £58m.

“Exactly how much each train operator is paid or the most paid for a single incident is, apparently, ‘commercially sensitive’ but Network Rail can pay out anything from £20/minute of delay to £400/minute. Delays to south-east commuter trains are the most expensive.

“There's a rail regulation department with a boss on not far short of £200,000, though, on top of National Rail, whose boss gets more than £600,000 in basic, plus a near 50 percent bonus for the great running of the service. The trains may not run on time, but there's a chuffing lot of money going round,” the article concluded.

Now, commuters have been told that rail fares are set to rise by as much as 30 or 40 percent as a result of “changes to subsidies” to be announced next week.

According to reports, Transport Secretary Philip Hammond is “known to want to continue investment in the railways and is not ruling out fare rises to help pay for it during a time of retrenchment in public spending.”

Apparently Mr Hammond has fold train operating companies that the formula by which regulated rail fares are set may have to be changed.

What he actually means is that their taxpayer-funded subsidy will be cut, which will leave them with no alternative but to increase their fare prices dramatically, if they still want to pay profits to their private investors first.

Currently, almost half of all train fares are regulated, including popular commuter routes, season tickets and long-distance off-peak journeys.

Once again, it is the taxpayer and consumer who will be forced to pay for the ongoing disaster inflicted upon us by the Westminster parties.

European Parliament must not interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state

Author Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin Euro News

 OCTOBER 2010: NICK Griffin has responded to a letter from the Ukrainian Ambassador to Britain and criticised the European Union's support for Ukraine's "plutocrat puppet Orange 'revolution' movement".

 Volodymyr Khandogiy wrote to the MEP:
"It has come to my attention that there has been some work undergoing in the European Parliament on drafting of the Resolution on situation in Ukraine.
With this regard let me share with you some thoughts on the matter. My understanding is that to adopt a resolution on internal situation in Ukraine on the eve of local elections in Ukraine seems to be counterproductive. This particular timing for the adoption of the document could be considered as a gesture to support certain political forces in Ukraine.
"Please, find enclosed a non-paper on the constitutional process in Ukraine, which, I think, could be useful in making assessments of the developments in my country.
"I would very much appreciate your comments and vision of the mentioned above and would be happy to discuss the matter with you over a telephone.
"I am open for further dialogue on this and other matters that are of interest to you. I am looking forward for an opportunity to meet you personally in the nearest future.  
Sincerely,
HE Volodymyr Khandogiy
Ambassador
Embassy of Ukraine to the UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
60, Holland Park,
London, W11 3SJ.

Nick replied: 
"Dear Mr Khandogiy
"Thank you for your letter concerning the EU Resolution on the situation in Ukraine.
"I do not believe that the EU has any right whatsover to interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state, or to give overt or tactic support to supporters of the plutocrat puppet Orange ´revolution´movement (above) in their bid to destroy the natural political balance of Eastern Europe.
"Accordingly, I agree entirely that the Parliament should refrain from commenting on the situation on the eve of important local elections in Ukraine.
"Indeed, I regard it as the height of hypocrisy for the ruling elites of Western Europe, who persecute, imprison and rig elections against nationalist opponents at every opportunity, to complain about alleged shortfalls in the democratic process elsewhere."

Sonia Alfano gets short shrift on 'Thought Crime' motion from Nick Griffin MEP

Sonia gets short shrift on 'Thought Crime' motion

Author  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

OCTOBER 2010: ON the face of it, Written Declaration No. 59 on a Clean Parliament seems quite reasonable. No self-respecting MEP would want to see terrorists, members of the Mafia, or those convicted of corruption, sitting in the European Parliament.

 But the motion is not exactly what it seems.
Written Declaration 59 demands "Candidates for European elections must not have been convicted of corruption, abuse of public office,  **** **** **** or crimes relating to involvement with mafia groups, organised crime or terrorism."
Now there's nothing wrong with that, but it's the three missing words that the motion is really all about . . . "incitement to racism".
This written declarations seeks not only to stifle discussion on immigration but effective to bar any candidates who campaign on an anti-immigration platform from being able to take their seat in the European Parliament.
So when Italian Liberal MEP Sonia Alfano (right) wrote to Nick Griffin asking him to sign the Written Declaration, it was not surprising that she received short shrift from the MEP for the North West of England.
Sonia wrote:
You have not yet signed Written Declaration No. 59 on a Clean Parliament.
"Candidates for European elections must not have been convicted of corruption, abuse of public office, incitement to racism or crimes relating to involvement with mafia groups, organised crime or terrorism."
I should be very grateful if you would sign the declaration in the register situated outside the Chamber during the part-session
Thank you in advance for your support."
Nick replied:
"I have no intention of signing a motion that would debar those convicted of 'thought crimes' from taking their seats. Substitute "class hatred" for "racism" if you need educating as to the full undemocratic monstrosity of the proposal.
Nick Griffin MEP (with a conviction under a law that states that "telling the truth is no defence").

Could the English Fair Fund help your Social Club or Group

English Fair Fund

  Martin Wingfield

2010:  
HELPING to maintain the traditions and heritage of the North West as well as improving the quality of life of the under privileged in the region is the key goal of Nick Griffin's English Fair Fund.

He donates 10% of his monthly MEP salary to the fund for this purpose and has provided help to dozens of good causes over the past 12 months.
The MEP for the North West Region of England was particularly pleased that a recent trip to Ullswater in the Lake District was hailed a huge success by those who attended.
"My political assistant, Adam Walker, arranged the day out for a group of youngsters to enable them to make full use of newly purchased kayaks paid for out of the English Fair Fund, Nick said.
"I bought five kayaks, wetsuits and buoyancy jackets to give some youngsters an alternative to maybe just hanging around the street corners.
"Kayaking is a great way of getting out and about, having new experiences and an enjoyable way of keeping fit. It is good for confidence and team building and can be enjoyed by all age groups.
"The day went well and Adam reported that the youngsters had a great day out and they were so pleased to be able to use this fantastic equipment in such a beautiful part of our country.
"It was the first time they have tried kayaking and was their first visit to the Lake District. They enjoyed the day enormously and were eager to know when they could try it again,” he concluded.
Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield said that dozens of good causes had been helped with small donations of between £100 and £250.
"Sports clubs struggling for funding and heritage projects needing resources have been helped. We have also made a loan to assist when there was a shortfall in funds," reports Tina.
"The largest donation the English Fair Fund has made was £1,000 to the Cumbria Flood Appeal, but we have also invested in equipment such as the boats and lifejackets."
If your sports clubs or heritage project would like to be considered for a small donation, then please contact the constituency office of Nick Griffin MEP at contact@nickgriffinmep.eu

Angela Merkel's Comment Multiculturalism Has Failed” Remarks Highlight Danger of Multiculturalism

German Chancellor’s “Multiculturalism Has Failed” Remarks Highlight Danger of “Adapt or Integrate” Mentality

The British National party Newsroom

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s comment that multiculturalism in Germany has “utterly failed” has once again highlighted the dangerous ignorance of the “adapt or integrate” mentality which pervades civic nationalist thinking.

Ms Merkel’s remarks, made to a meeting of her Christian Democrats Union (CDU) party, were widely misinterpreted by the controlled media as some type of “anti-immigration” outburst.

In reality, it is nothing of the sort. Ms Merkel’s comments are actually is a call for even greater integration of immigrants from the Third World, not less.

Ms Merkel has in essence endorsed the “become like us and do not form separate societies” philosophy, which is prevalent in Britain in UKIP and other civic nationalist circles.

This belief, that Third World immigrants can “become” German (or “British”) simply by learning the language and not forming separate cultural ghettoes inside European countries, is of course as much of a disaster as the “multi-cultural” approach, and just as deadly.

Both approaches fail to account for the reality that all ethnicities are linked to a specific people, and cannot be “transplanted” like clothes or language by checking through an airport terminal.

It is for example, the uniqueness of the British people, their originating population and their ancestry going back tens of thousands of years which make the people of these islands unique.

In the same way, it is the ancestry, heritage and history of the German people which make them unique. Any attempts to deny this uniqueness by pretending that Third World immigrants can “become” British or German just by learning a language and dressing in a bowler hat or lederhosen, is nonsense, born out of ignorance or maliciousness.

To explain this in a simple way:

- Would an African who learned Mandarin and dressed in Oriental clothes become Chinese?

- Would an Englishman who learned Ngaanyatjarra and who dressed in animal skins become an Australian Aborigine?

- Would a Chinese person who learned Yoruba and dressed in African garb become a Nigerian?

- Would an African who learned Iroquoian and dressed in deerskin and wore a feather hat become a North American Indian?

The answer to all these questions is a resounding no, and only an idiot would even contemplate otherwise.

Yet, the very same people who would deride any of the concepts outlined above, would have the rest of the world believe that Africans, Asians, Chinese and all manner of Third Worlders can suddenly “become” European simply by learning the language and dressing like Europeans.

It is this civic nationalist ideology, also known as “cultural nationalism,” which is far more insidious and dangerous to the existence of the native people of Europe than even the obviously failed “multiculturalism” to which Ms Merkel referred.

“Multiculturalism” implied the creation of a society in which each culture was allowed to flourish and exist, supposedly “side-by-side,” so that the benefits of diversity” would be enjoyed by all.

Multiculturalism, and its twin ideology of “cultural nationalism” ignores the demographic reality of a higher Third world immigrant birth rate. This will inevitably lead to the overwhelming and destruction of the native peoples of Europe, irrelevant of the language and dress of the conquerors.

The fake “multiculturalism” and “cultural nationalism” ideologies, both rooted in civic nationalism, are the collective death knell of our people.

Only the British National Party’s sound, logical and natural policy of ethno-nationalism is the only alternative which can guarantee the survival of the native, indigenous European people.

Recommended reading on the topic:

Folk and Nation: Underpinning the Ethno-State

By Arthur Kemp and Nick Griffin. This booklet explains in detail the concept of ethno-nationalism. It is divided into the following subheadings:

Ethnic Nationalism - A Definition;

Central Tenets of Ethno-Nationalism;

Underlying Concepts of Ethno-Nationalism;

The Implications of Ethno-Nationalism;

The Practical Application of Ethno-Nationalism;

Attacks on Ethno-Nationalism; and

How to Argue the Case for Ethno-Nationalism.

This booklet will provide all the answers underpinning the non-racist argument for Britain to remain a British country.

Invaluable for anyone wishing to understand a crucial part of BNP policy and modern democratic nationalist ideology. Click here to order online.

Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Britain (DNA, History and the Right to Existence of the Native Inhabitants of the British Isles.)

By Arthur Kemp. Contrary to what the liberal left Tory/Labour/Lib-Dem/UKIP-ECHR allege, the native people of the British Isles are a distinct, identifiable and homogenous indigenous people who have every right to exist and be free from invasion and domination -- like any other indigenous people on earth. This booklet proves that the vast majority of the British people have ancestors going back to the last mini ice age more than 12,000 years ago.

This booklet shows:

* Genetic evidence shows that the vast majority -- nearly 80% -- of all British people have ancestors going back to the end of the last mini ice age 12,000 years ago;

* Genetic evidence showing that the Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Viking/Danish and Norman conquests had negligible impacts upon the British people (less than 5 percent each);

* The people of the British Isles have been indigenous peoples for far longer than many other nations who are already classified as "indigenous" by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

This booklet also shows how the indigenous people of Britain are fully protected by the United Nations Charter on Indigenous Peoples from "dispossession of their territory" through "mass population transfers" and from "forced integration and assimilation" and "destruction of their identity and culture" (all according to the United Nations.)

Even more importantly, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states that all indigenous peoples have the right to define who is part of their nation and who is not.

This is the killer booklet to destroy the final left-liberal argument against the right of Britain to be British. Click here to order online.