Egyptian Coptic Christians Appeal to BNP MEP for Help After Fresh Attacks by Islamists

Egyptian Copts Appeal to BNP MEP for Help After Renewed Attacks by Islamists

The British National Party Newsroom

A representative of the Coptic Egyptian community in Britain has appealed to British National Party MEP Nick Griffin to highlight the violent anti-Christian attacks in Egypt by Islamist-supporting police in Egypt, instances of which are routinely covered up by the politically-correct controlled mass media.

In a statement released by Mr Griffin’s office, he announced that he would most certainly raise the latest attack at the earliest opportunity in Parliament, coming as it does hard on the heels of similar attacks by Muslims on Christian churches on the island of Cyprus.

The appeal for Mr Griffin’s assistance in publicising the latest attack in Egypt was sent by a well-known representative of the Coptic Christian community, who said that he was “writing on behalf of some of the Egyptian Copts who live in Great Britain. We are very concerned for the life and safety of our Christian brothers who live in fear under constant persecution from the State of Egypt.

“In the small hours of Wednesday morning 24th November 2010, the Egyptian Police opened fire on Christian worshippers who were staying overnight in a new building that they had built to use for services and prayers,” the letter continued.

“One person was killed instantly and two others died two days later in hospital. Over 64 people were injured, some seriously, and 165 people were detained by Police.

“The incident happened in Al-Omraneya near Cairo where there is a high concentration of Christian population. For the last 10 years the Christian residents there have been trying to obtain a license to build a church, but without success.

“To get around the obstacle of building a church, they obtained permission to build a four-storey building with the intention of using part of it to gather for prayers.

“The council’s Health and Safety department advised them to add to the original plan an escape stairwell, which they did.

“The building was almost complete when an inspection by another department from the council found the new stairwell added to the original plan which they said was in breach of the original license.

“A meeting was conducted with the Governor who, in an act of deception, advised the Christians that he was happy with the current building and would approve it,” the appeal said.

“It was the night of that same day in which the Christians found that the building was surrounded by thousands of policemen and saw demolition equipment on standby near the building.

“Seeing that months of their hard work was about to be demolished, they gathered inside the building to stop the demolition. The Police fired at them tear gas, plastic bullets and live ammunition.

“The Christians trapped inside the building and surrounded by thousands of policemen responded to the bullets by throwing bricks and stones at the Police. The Police closed in on the building shouting Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great), kill the infidels.

“They attacked the people with such savage brutality that many of them will live with disabilities for the rest of their lives. They ransacked the building, looting the donation box and altar vessels, threw the Holy Bible on the ground and stamped on it, and burned the icons.

“The police acted in exactly the same way that Muslim terrorists act,” the letter continued.

“The following morning the state-run media gave a completely different version of events. They accused the Christians of rioting and attacking the police. This wrong version of events spread to the international media.

“The Attorney General of Egypt announced that the Christians who defended themselves will face the full force of the Law. Nothing, however, was done to the police who were seen on video firing live ammunition, killing and injuring many people.

“A few days prior to these events, Muslim mobs had torched and burned to the ground over twenty Christian houses, also killing their farm animals, in the village of Nawahed at Qena province, in southern Egypt.

“The Christians gave the police the names of the perpetrators. However, the police decided that no one was responsible and that the fires, which affected only Christian houses, were merely an accident.

“These recent incidents and countless others, for which no one has been held responsible, prove the long held suspicion that many of the attacks on Christians are masterminded by the security forces in an attempt to drive the Christians to leave their homeland and live in foreign countries.

“In a way it is a slow, covert process of ethnic cleansing.

“Once again the incident of Al Omranya highlights the plight of the Coptic Christians in their own country. Despite the fact that the Copts are the indigenous people of Egypt, they are discriminated against, persecuted and killed by the Muslim majority, in collaboration with the police and with the blessing of the Egyptian government.

“Despite the fact that sectarian violence in Egypt is increasing with alarming severity, the British Government remains silent on the issue.

“We, the Christians of Egypt, are in need of help from every person and every country who cares for the values of freedom and human rights.

“The President and the government of Egypt will not act to protect Christians unless they realise that their acts to hide the truth from the eyes of the world are no longer working and that their devious acts are exposed.

“I hope you will be able to raise these issues in the European Parliament. I hope the European Parliament will be able to exert maximum pressure on the Egyptian Government to face up to its obligations to comply with the international conventions and laws on religious freedoms and human rights.

“Thank you for taking the time to listen to our concerns,” the letter concluded.

Mr Griffin said that this sort of treatment was fairly typical in majority Muslim countries.

“These events should serve as a wake-up call for Christians in Britain who think that they will be treated any differently if the establishment succeeds with its plan to colonise those country with Islamics,” Mr Griffin said.

* The Copts are native Egyptian Christians whose ancestors come from the original ancient Egyptians, who embraced Christianity in the first centuries after Christ.

The Copts became a minority in Egypt after Muslim armies from Saudi Arabia conquered that land by violence in the 7th century and today make up just over 5 percent of the population of Egypt.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of te British National Party  website.

The Uk Tory Party Break Up : You Read It Here

The Conservative Party Break Up : You Read It Here First

Written by

DATE_FORMAT_LC2 at The VBR Site

In his Mail On Sunday column of 4th December, Peter Hitchens wrote:- ‘The monstrous birth of a new Liberal Conservative Party is now certain’. Hitchens goes on, ‘A few weeks ago I drew attention to the amazing remarks of Francis Maude, a close ally of David Cameron, who said he would prefer a coalition to a Tory majority after the next Election. I am sure Mr Cameron agrees with this. Now, Sir John (Major) – another close Cameron ally – has called for a permanent alliance of two of our three parties against the people of Britain’. Major ‘explained the attraction of coalitions – to politicians: ‘Two parties are more likely to enjoy a tolerant electorate for policies that are painful.’ …Or, in other words, that a coalition can ram through unpopular policies (Mr Major is an expert on those) more easily than one-party governments.’ The realignment of British Politics suggested by Hitchens and quite probably the break-up of the Tory Party with its traditionalist wing hiving off, was foretold in the forerunner of this Website ‘The Home of the Green Arrow and Friends’ in an article posted on 5th July entitled ‘Sigmund Freud and the BNP.’   There, in a discussion of the way groups of varying sizes deal with internal dissensions, it was stated that:- ‘By way of contrast, the Tory Party is somewhere further down Freud’s spectrum of difference. It is obviously much larger than the BNP and for historical reasons has always been something of a coalition of interests. The differences between these interests have not been  perceived  so large, at least compared to the party’s main oppositions, as to occasion splits.  So the Party has survived.  All that might change.  One section of the Tory coalition may reposition itself elsewhere. The liberal David Cameron (‘Heir to Blair’) and his acolytes seem to have more in common with a good many Lib Dems than they do with the traditionalist Tories and the gulf between them may come to be seen as so wide as in Freud’s terms to be viewed with ‘Insuperable Repugnance.’ Many of these Tories  actually have in many respects a good deal more in common with the BNP than they do with Cameron’s politics, but would be loath to admit it for the present at least, for reasons mainly of social acceptability – of snobbery,’ The implications for the BNP are enormous should the ‘permanent coalition and /or  probable split in the Tory Party come about. There will immediately be available a large number of voters including many of the traditionalist working class with nowhere else to go but to this Party. The BNP should be prepared for this opportunity

EU Regulation Costs £110 Billion to European Business

http://www.bnp.org.uk/£110 Billion: What EU Regulation Costs European Business

The British National Party Newsroom

The European Commission (EC) has admitted that regulation and red tape created artificially by the European Union costs businesses in excess of £110 billion, or €130 billion, every year.

The shocking admission was made in an article in the EU-related news service, Euractive, dealing with the failure of the EC to live up to its own deadlines for cutting waste and red tape.

According to the article, the EC claimed that it was on track to cut red tape by a quarter by 2012. However, the Euractive article added, “businesses shouldn't get their hopes too high up [sic].”

According to Euractive, the EC has admitted that “unnecessary regulation” has created a burden, especially for small to medium enterprises (SME).

The EC realised as long ago as 2007 that it had created a bureaucratic monster, and that year appointed yet another taxpayer-funded body to make suggestions on how to cut down on the waste which they themselves had created.

The High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens (HLG) was duly created, and then actually proceeded to make suggestions as to where “unnecessary” regulations could be cut.

However, as Euractive pointed out, “only a few of the Commission’s major proposals have been fully approved.

“The other initiatives to simplify rules and reduce paperwork are still being debated by EU member states and the European Parliament.”

The article then quoted Andrea Renda, senior research fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies, who was a consultant to the Commission on the project, as saying that “while the Commission contends it could ultimately cut red tape by 31 percent, "I wouldn’t say we’ve gotten anywhere close so far.”

According to Euractive, other problems involved in cutting red tape include flaws in the method used to measure the paperwork burden and the fact that the target was based on the Commission’s proposals, not on the sometimes weaker versions that are passed by Parliament and EU member states.

Even worse, the goal of a 25 percent saving was based on a 2005/2006 level of bureaucracy, and many additional EU laws have been passed since then, which will have considerably added to the burden.

Increasingly, SMEs have complained that their time is being taken up just adhering to EU legislation.

The Euractive article then quoted Mary Boughton, co-director of a herbal veterinary medicines business in Dorset. That company now spends 20 percent of their time on administrative tasks.

“It’s certainly increased more since we joined the EU,” Ms Boughton was quoted as saying.

“It’s increased a lot in the last five years, especially the employment issue, which is a big issue and very time consuming.”

“We know all of our employees, and we have to jump through the same hoops as if we were British Airways.”

Although one of the original reasons for the creation of the EU and its predecessors was supposedly to simplify trade, Ms Boughton revealed that she now has “more problems exporting within Europe than outside because EU rules are interpreted differently by member states.”

 

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

Yes ! Enoch Powell Was Right After All

 Enoch Powell Was Right

The British National Party Newsroom

A review of political utterances made by establishment politicians since the early 1970s has shown that Enoch Powell was perfectly accurate in his prediction that unrestricted immigration would inevitably lead to the swamping of Britain, says Manchester superactivist Derek Adams.

Speaking to BNP News on the release of a new video, the latest in a series of highly popular multi-media releases dealing with political issues on YouTube, Mr Adams said that everything that Mr Powell had come true.

“We have nonwhite immigrants such as Trevor Phillips using the power of the state to persecute white people, exactly as Mr Powell warned,” Mr Adams said.

“We have an already present immigrant population fast out breeding the indigenous population, exactly as Mr Powell predicted.

“Finally, in this new video, we can see the pathetic excuses and lies being told by Tory and Labour politicians alike on immigration over the years.

“The time has come to acknowledge that both Enoch Powell and Nick Griffin have spoken the truth on immigration in Britain,” he said.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the British National Party Website

 

Reflections of a Statesman: The Writings and Speeches of Enoch Powell

  

Nick Griffin's MEP Constituency Office diligence gets results

Constituency Office diligence gets results

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

DECEMBER 2010: THERE has been a welcome Christmas present for one North West constituent after Nick Griffin's Constituency Office took on the Maltese Government and battled on his behalf.

 The constituent from Cumbria wrote to Nick Griffin concerning the Maltese Government's charge for vehicle importation and tax registration.
The gentleman spent some time in Malta with the intention of settling there permanently. He fell ill however within six months and returned to England following medical treatment. Whilst he was ill in hospital, he was pressurised into importing his British car and paying over 5000 Euros for tax registration.
He found out subsequently that he may have been wrongly advised and did not need to import the car, so he wrote to the Maltese Ministry of Finance, requesting a refund but had not received a reply.
"This was back in January and for the past 11 months Nick and I have been in correspondence with the Maltese Government trying to get the matter resolved," says Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield.
"Initially the Maltese Ministry of Finance stonewalled requests to open discussion on the matter, insisting that there was 'no exemption entitlement in the strict terms of the law'.
"Apparently it was a Transport Authority decision to reject the refund, so I requested an exception in writing, supplying all the documentary evidence in support of the case based on our constituent's particular and personal circumstances."
This was back in May, and over the the next three months there were more than 30 emails, letters and telephone calls from the Constituency Office to the Maltese Ministry of Finance trying to get the matter resolved
At the end of September there was some disappointing news which Tina reported to the constituent.
"I spoke to the Maltese Ministry of Finance this morning and was told that your case had been discussed at a meeting of the Transport Authority and it was decided that, as you had lived in Malta for more than seven months, you were liable to pay the vehicle tax. Your request for exemption from the payment was therefore refused on legal grounds. While it is stated that there is no legal basis for a refund, I have requested that an exception might be made in your case."
For the next six weeks the was no response from the office dealing with the matter and calls were not returned. In the end  Tina was left with no option but to contact the Ministry of Finance's Customer Care office.
She told them that her constituent had been denied the simple courtesy of a single response to his request for a refund, and that he was preparing a formal complaint.
Finally at the end of October there was a light at the end of this long tunnel.
The Customer Care office reported that the claim was being reconsidered by the Government of Malta but that proof of the vehicle's re-registration in the UK was required to be able to proceed.
This posed problems as Tina explained to the Customer Care Office:
"Unfortunately, the constituent sold the car that was registered in Malta, so no longer holds the logbook. As a pensioner, faced with ever-increasing petrol prices in the UK, he was forced to change his vehicle for a smaller, more economical car. He has however, provided you instead, with copies of the following documentation: the MOT Test Certificate which shows the registration transfer date; the Bill of Sale and the acknowledgement letter from the DVLA confirming the ‘change of owner’; and the logbook issued by Malta ADT (Certifikat ta’ Registrazzjoni) - which will enable you to cross-reference the vehicle details.
I hope this documentation suffices for the purposes of progressing the refund claim."
But there was further delay because more meetings in Malta failed to come up with a resolution.
Then finally on the 3rd of December, the Maltese Ministry of Finance agreed that there were "exceptional circumstances" in this case and that a refund on “humanitarian grounds” should be made.
This was a very satisfying outcome after nearly a year's polite persistence by Nick Griffin's Constituency office, and a very welcome Christmas bonus for the constituent concerned.

UK Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

The British National Party Newsroom

The Met Office has dramatically downgraded its apocalyptic sea level flood warnings of just a few years ago as the government-appointed Committee on Climate Change has estimated that fighting “global warming” will cost the UK taxpayer £150 billion.

The Met Office, which is an official government body, had earlier endorsed the prediction made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which, in a 2007 report, said that sea levels would rise six feet within the next century and flood out many cities.

However, a new report by the Met Office said this was no longer likely and instead halved its predicted "worst case scenario."

In addition, the IPCC’s prediction that the Arctic conveyor belt (which moves warm and cold water around the world’s oceans) is slowing has also been dismissed by the Met Office, with a spokesman being quoted as saying that this was “not likely to happen this century.”

Meanwhile, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), established under the Climate Change Act (2008), which advises the Government on “setting and meeting carbon budgets and on preparing for the impacts of climate change,” has presented a preliminary cost estimate of £150 billion which British taxpayers will have to pay to combat “climate change.”

To put this into perspective, the budget cuts announced by the ConDem regime this year amount to some £83 billion.

In addition to tax increases, the huge figure will send already expensive energy bills soaring even further.

The Climate Change Committee has said that the money will be needed to “deliver green transport, power and energy efficiency” over the next 20 years.

In addition, the CCC has said that Britain must cut its carbon emissions 60 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 as a stepping stone to an 80 percent cut by 2050.

In reality this means further de-industrialising Britain, and the removal of even more industry to China and the Far East.

The CCC’s budgetary plans also do not include British contributions towards “climate change funds” currently being set up to allegedly help the Third World.

The upcoming “climate change” talks in Cancun, Mexico, for example, aim to create a £60 billion fund to help “poor countries cope with climate change and deforestation.”

Of course, the major source of deforestation and aridification in the Third World is the fact that there is insufficient social responsibility in those societies to properly plan ahead and take care of their environments.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

PC Media Blame White Students Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

Whites Blamed Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

The British National party Newsroom

Another example of the anti-white mania which infests the establishment has come to light with the instant blame accorded to “white racism” because fewer black students are accepted into Oxbridge, even though the facts show that this has nothing at all to do with university policy.

The latest “blame whitey” media feeding frenzy came with the release of Freedom of Information Act (FOI) figures by Labour’s former universities minister, the black MP David Lammy.

Mr Lammy, who is well-known for the racial chip on his shoulder, said that his figures “proved” that there was “racial exclusion” at Oxford and Cambridge.

The controlled media lost no time in rebroadcasting the statistics, with lurid headlines such as “Whitewash at Oxford” and “Bleak Picture of Racial Exclusion,” all directly implying that the small number of black students at the two institutions was directly due to deliberate white racism hidden deep within the university administration.

In reality, both Oxford and Cambridge universities have formally established “Race Equality Schemes” which actively promote, encourage and give preferential treatment to nonwhites in order to meet government-sanctioned “race equality programmes.”

These programmes are designed to encourage applications from state school students and those from “black and working-class backgrounds.”

Despite all these programs, the number of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) students remains relatively low.

There are, however, simple and logical reasons for this state of affairs, and it is most certainly not due to “white racism.”

Firstly, the reality is that poor academic achievement by vast numbers of black students means that the number of applicants from that community is disproportionately smaller.

According to figures released by Diane Abbott MP, secretary of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs, 48 per cent of 16-year-old white boys get five GCSE grades A-E, while only 13 per cent of black boys achieve this level of education. In largely black boroughs like Hackney, this figure drops to as low as six percent.

Although liberals love to blame “white racist teachers” for this state of affairs, most sensible people know that this is not the root cause of black academic failure.

Secondly, admission statistics from the universities in question show that those black students who do apply to university, all attempt to get into already-oversubscribed faculties, which reduces their admission chances even further.

As an Oxford university spokesman said in response to Mr Lammy’s allegations: “Black students apply disproportionately for the most oversubscribed subjects, contributing to a lower than average success rate for the group as a whole: 44 percent of all black applicants apply for Oxford's three most oversubscribed subjects, compared with just 17 percent of all white applicants.

“That means nearly half of black applicants are applying for the same three subjects, the three toughest subjects to get places in. Those subjects are economics and management, medicine, and maths.

“This goes a very long way towards explaining the group's overall lower success rate,” the spokesman said.

* Mr Lammy’s statistics also show that of the more than 1,500 academic and lab staff at Cambridge, none are black, and only 34 are Asian.

This lack of academic prowess was, of course, also blamed on the ubiquitous “white racism.”

The British National Party utterly rejects the endless allegation that whites are to blame for every ill affecting any other community. Each year, tens of thousands of white British students are turned down for admission into the university of their choice, but do not endlessly blame this on mythical racial conspiracies.

The time has come to break the cycle of “whites are to blame” and firmly re-establish the rules of decency, fair play and common sense.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the BNP website

US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

Leaked US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

The British National Party World Newsroom

David Cameron knows about the huge terrorist threat posed to Britain by immigration from Pakistan, according to a leaked US diplomatic cable, but has refused to do anything about the problem.

According to a US cable released in the flurry of leaked documents by the Wikileaks website, Mr Cameron told a visiting delegation of US senators in 2008 that 60,000 individuals travel to Pakistan from the UK each year and that this has implications for the UK's own significant domestic "terror threat."

According to a Centre for Social Cohesion report, the “Security Service estimates that over 2,000 people in the UK pose a terrorist threat and in March 2005 it was estimated that there were up to 200 al-Qaeda trained operatives in the UK.”

According to the report, the “British-based threat does not only affect the UK: a number of British Muslims have been convicted in foreign courts or have fought for (or trained with) terrorist or extreme Islamist groups abroad.

“The most common country of heritage for Britain’s Muslim population, in recent years” was identified in the report as Pakistan.

Quoting Osama Nazir, a senior member of the Pakistani terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed and associate of 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer, the report said that between 2001 and 2005 over 300 Muslims from Britain “of Pakistani origin had visited Pakistan to attend training camps and enrol for suicide bomb missions.”

Furthermore, in November 2008 the Security Service revealed that over 4,000 “British Muslims” had attended terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

According to a Heritage Foundation report titled “The Pakistan–Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States”, published in November 2009, the “Pakistan–Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States.”

According to that report, Pakistan needs to be held “accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism.

“There is a terror connection between Pakistan and Great Britain. Many of the planned or successful Islamist attacks in Britain have been linked directly or indirectly to Pakistan ... This threat includes both terrorist attacks and the financial and ideological networks that support and inspire attacks,” the Heritage Foundation said.

Despite all of this and Mr Cameron’s own knowledge of the situation, the ConDem government has done nothing to halt the flood of Pakistanis entering Britain.

The Cameron government’s failure to address this issue is one which borders on the criminally negligent, and exposes ordinary Britons to the threat of terrorism in their own country.

The British National Party advocates a clampdown on immigration and a neutral foreign policy as the only way to bring the internal terrorist threat under control.

The ever present international Islamist threat needs to be contained in countries with large Muslim populations, and all steps necessary must be taken to avoid Britain becoming one of those nations.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

UK Govt ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

The British National Party Newsroom 

The ConDem regime has fully adopted the principle of anti-white male employment discrimination by endorsing the Equality Act promoted through Parliament by the last Labour government.

Making the announcement that the law will proceed as planned, ConDem “equalities minister” and Liberal Democrat MP Lynne Featherstone said that the law was about “making the workplace fairer.”

In reality, the law says that employers (which will include the state, where the guidelines will be rigorously enforced) will now be allowed to employ non-whites, homosexuals, lesbians, transgenders or another group over white males without being sued, even if those white males are equally qualified for the position.

In an attempt to make the vicious anti-white law more “acceptable,” the crazed social Marxists who dreamed up this latest scheme have included white women in the category of people to whom preference can be given, implying that businesses actively discriminate against them and all the aforementioned groups.

It is thus another form of the “blame whitey” syndrome, which is drawn from a worldview which intrinsically views whites (and white males in particular) as all-powerful, all-controlling wire-pullers who appear to do little else in society except continually try and put down everyone else.

The new law will come into effect from April next year and formal guidance will be published early in the new year.

Ms Featherstone was quoted as saying that the “positive action in recruitment and promotion processes” would be applied “when faced with candidates of equal merit, to address under-representation in the workforce.”

David Green, director of think-tank Civitas, said in his reaction that the law “imposed illiberal requirements on employers.

“For centuries liberals have fought for individuals to be judged on their own merits not according to their class or race,” Mr Green said.

“The Government is now to require employers to discriminate on grounds of “group identity”, not personal qualities.”

* It comes as no surprise that the Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties have endorsed the Labour Party bill. Observers have pointed out that both those parties unanimously voted in favour of the law when it was read just prior to the closing of the last parliamentary session before the election.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party Website website.

 

The Nuremberg Laws (Words That Changed History Series,) 

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Larger than in Pakistan

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Bigger than in Pakistan

  David Hannam The British National Party Newsroom

The colonisation of Britain by Islam is reflected in the dramatic growth in shariah law schools and courts, but nowhere better illustrated by the fact that the Islamic banking sector in this country is now bigger than in Pakistan.

The UK has five shariah-compliant banks which offer discriminatory no-interest transactions to Muslims — while British people face increasing interest burdens on banking transactions.

Recently, the International Financial Services London revealed that Britain’s Islamic banking sector is bigger than that of Pakistan.

There are also 55 colleges and professional institutions which offer education in Islamic finance, more than anywhere else in the world.

The growth of Islamic finance has been helped in recent years by the Government. The Government has extended discriminatory tax relief on shariah-compliant mortgages to companies.

These tax reliefs completely discriminate against the British non-Muslim population, who receive no such benefits.

As if these facts were not evidence enough of the spread of Islam in Britain, other statistics dealing with the growth of Islamic schools, Muslim birth rates and increasing numbers of shariah courts have accentuated the colonisation of our country.

For example, figures released by the Department of Education and Skills there around 126 Muslim schools in Britain. 

The think tank ‘Policy Exchange’ has recently warned that Muslim schools were allowing militant Jihadists to indoctrinate young Muslims, while the BBC programme Panorama came under fire recently for exposing anti-Semitic and shariah law teachings at Muslim Schools across Britain.

Many Islamic schools insist that girls wear the burka or a full headscarf and veil known as the niqab.

Earlier this year, statistics from the Office for National Statistics revealed that Mohammad was the most popular boy’s name in Britain, another sure sign of the huge racial demographic change occurring in Britain today.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the decades-old Sacred Heart School in Blackburn was to be handed over to Blackburn’s Tauheedul mosque and re-opened with a new name after the number of Muslim pupils rocketed from just 7 percent in 2000 to 97 percent last year.

Last year, think-tank Civitas revealed that there were at least 85 shariah courts operating in Britain, but added that the number could be significantly higher.

Shariah law allows the beating and enslavement of women, the punishment of rape victims and in some extreme cases, the killing of non-Muslims,

In contrast to all the other political parties, the British National Party is the only organisation dedicated to preventing the colonisation of Britain by Islam.

The BNP would address the core of the issue, which is massive Third World immigration, first. Once steps have been taken to ensure that the indigenous British population remains the majority population of this nation, then a BNP government would take steps to prevent all the outward manifestations of Islamic colonisation.

These steps will include a halt to the discriminatory Islamic banking industry, to which the Labour and Tory regimes have pandered by issuing tax reliefs on Islamic mortgages while the indigenous British people receive no help at all.

The BNP will also prevent the existence of Islamic schools within Britain. They are a breeding ground for militant Islam which educates young Muslims to recognise the second class ‘dhimmi’ status of non-Muslims.

The BNP will also prevent the establishment of shariah courts in Britain. British law should be the only law system recognised in our country.

In short, Britain has a choice: be overrun by Islam and the Third World, or vote in a British National Party government. The choice is as clear as it is simple.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running cost of the British National Party Website
Christianity in danger: As Islam threatens ; the five whys