Search This Blog

Friday, 22 July 2016

Today's newsletter from UKIP:

Today's newsletter from UKIP:

Dear Sir,
Daily you fill your letters pages with calls for the referendum to be re-run because a minority did not like the result; the mere fact that well over a million more voted to leave the EU than remain apparently means nothing to them.
The fact that the referendum was not a minor matter or glorified opinion poll but an Act of Parliament backed by a 6 to 1 majority of MPs seems not to have registered with the 'Remainers'.
The fact that the Conservative manifesto makes clear that it is a 'one time only deal' and "we will honour the result" seems to mean nothing either to those who rebel against democracy both in, and out, of the Houses of Commons and Lords.
The fact that, whatever happens over the referendum, there will be a general election in 2020 at the latest and woe betide the MP, and indeed party, who decides to ignore the 17 million plus voters who want to leave the EU by voting to overturn the result. UKIP, the one party which will get us out of the EU, is ready to hoover up those votes, five million more than voted Tory in 2015.
The whole thing boils down to one simple question: is the UK a democracy run by the people (as UKIP believe) or a parliamentary dictatorship which ignores the will and opinions of the majority for their own selfish ends, as many MPs seem to think? In other words, have the Houses of Parliament become so tainted by the way Brussels does business that they no longer recall how it is done in the UK, via a simple majority rule verdict?
The referendum question, which I'm sure 17 million of us thought was resolved on June 23rd, will be an interesting test case but MPs must understand that the people are in no mood to be ignored over Brexit, especially as the country is already beginning on the road to recovery away from the EU and we don't want to see that progress overturned for no good reason.
I would respectfully suggest to Mrs May that she stop procrastinating over Article 50 and trigger it this year. What is she waiting for given that she has a legal mandate over the EU, arguably the first any European Union leader, certainly in the UK, has ever been given by their electorate.
Yours faithfully, (signed; Steve Crowther.)

Thursday, 14 July 2016

The War Criminal Winston Churchill

This article was found on the Calvin College website, they are a Christian academic community dedicated to rigorous intellectual inquiry. Calvin College was founded in 1876 by the Christian Reformed Church in North America and named for 16th-century reformer John Calvin.

Background: This 1944 essay by Alfred Rosenberg analyzes a collection of Churchill’s pre-war essays. Rosenberg concludes that Churchill was long plotting war against Germany, supported from behind the scenes by the Jews. I am using Churchill’s original words from Step by Step: 1936-1939 (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1939). With an occasional exception, the German translation is accurate, though the passages are, as one might expect, chosen selectively.
The source: Alfred Rosenberg, “Der Kriegsverbrecher Churchill,” Der Schulungsbrief, (March/April 1944), p. 20-22, 28.

The War Criminal Churchill

by Alfred Rosenberg
For many years, the main propagandist against the German people has been Winston Churchill, driven on by influential money from American and Jewish sources. It is therefore instructive to examine the career of this war criminal, using his own words.
Even before he became prime minister, Churchill consistently agitated against Germany in his articles, angrily attacking above all anyone in England who strove for an understanding with Germany. Later, Churchill affirmed this journalistic agitation when he published his essays, only lightly retouched he said, in a book. He titled it Step by Step. It contained his essays written between 1936 and 1939. Step by Step was intended to suggest that the German Reich had intentionally caused the new world war, and that it was really Churchill who warned the so-called civilized nations about it. In fact, Churchill’s hatred of Europe’s Renaissance, and its peaceful order, flows from every line. Let me examine several unintentional admissions more carefully.
One of the central points of Churchill’s thinking has to do with England’s billions of investments in the Far East. Everything centers around the opium trade and similar profitable businesses. Churchill clearly had interested big money in his closest circle, with whose favor and help he wanted to become prime minister of the kingdom of Great Britain. On 3 September 1937, he published an article titled “The Wounded Dragon,” by which he meant China. He wrote:
No single power, except after long preparation, could impose its will upon Japan in the Yellow Sea. If the United States and Great Britain acted together jointly for several years, and if they were supported by Soviet Russia, representations could no doubt be made to which Japan would have to defer. [Rosenberg cuts an intervening section without noting it.]
We have created great establishments and businesses in China which have done nothing but good [Rosenberg inserts a “?” here] to the Chinese….. European and American missionaries have carried their message fearlessly into the recesses of China.
These words clearly show Churchill’s longing for a grand alliance between England, the USA, and the Soviet Union two years before the war broke out. The Chinese, ruined by England, are mocked when he says that the English provision of opium and missionaries had brought “only good.” Everyone knew that China was the target of Jewish and other high finance, and Churchill’s sanctimonious tone hardly concealed the true reasons for his policies in the Far East. Churchill clearly directed his attentions in 1937 to protecting big business in China, adding in the same sentence: “If Europe wishes to talk to the East, she will have to clean up her home lines first.”
This single sentence reveals Mr. Churchill’s entire war policy. He wants to “clean up” Europe, which means making any kind of common effort impossible that would benefit the entire continent and bring about a new order. He wants to perpetuate the impotence and fragmentation of the civilized European states. After Europe has been “cleaned up,” and after India and the Middle East have been exploited, he wants to bring all of the Far East under the thieving capitalism of the City and Wall Street, as well as subjecting it to the Bolshevist threat.
After this beginning, Churchill reveals how he wants to prepare for the “cleaning up.” It involves the isolation and defeat of the German Reich. When the Führer and the Duce met in fall 1937, Churchill wrote the following on 1 October 1937:
The Western democracies, now armed and arming heavily, have much to give these harassed dictators, if they would only prove that they mean to be the friends and not the bane of our common humanity. If the true concert of Europe were re-established, our collective remonstrances would not go unheeded in the Far East.
Churchill thinks only of re-establishing the European concert, which means a situation in which England is the outside choir master. His comment that the Western democracies are armed, and arming heavily, shows that all the latter chatter about being “unprepared” was simply a lie. When Italy, under Mussolini, later took successful steps to secure Africa, Churchill angrily wrote on 4 March 1939:
But this is not the end. The underlying realities and verities of Europe will increasingly assert themselves. In a short time we shall know whether Mr. Chamberlain’s hope of detaching Mussolini from Hitler will be realized. If it is not realized, nothing else that Mussolini could give us is of the slightest value. [Rosenberg omits a section here without noting it.] If Mussolini is willing to separate from Hitler, to take his stand with France and Britain, and help sustain the independence of Austria, there will be an undoubted gain.
These words reveal not only Churchill’s policies, but also those of that fine man Prime Minister Chamberlain. We learn from Churchill’s own mouth that the good Mr. Chamberlain used all his strength to separate Mussolini from Adolf Hitler, which leads to the necessary conclusion that the goal was to encircle both of them, “cleaning up” one after the other.
The reference to Austria as the hoped-for launching pad next to Czechoslovakia is more than clear. That is why Churchill fell into such a rage as Ostmark German-Austria jubilantly joined the German Reich. In an article titled “The Austrian Catastrophe” [the actual title was “The Austrian Eye-Opener”] dated 18 March 1938, Churchill wrote of the “seizure and subjugation of Austria,” although this man naturally knew very well that only a small clique of Jews and reactionaries were listening to England and the Jews, whereas the whole decent population of Ostmark [Austria] could hardly contain its joy as the dream of the union of all Germans was fulfilled — as indeed was consistent with the right of self-determination that even the Entente had once proclaimed.
In the same article, he began provocative warmongering to bring about a war coalition against Germany.
The first step is to find out which of the Powers of the second rank in Europe would be willing to join with Great Britain and France for special action, not excluding armed resistance, under the Covenant of the League.
It is not without its attractions to establish that world power England immediately tried to discover which of the “smaller” European powers were ready to serve as canon fodder against the German Reich. The remark become even more interesting when he further says: “It must also be made clear that there is no desire to encircle Germany, but only to encircle an aggressor.”
Encirclement! It is well known that British policy always claimed to have no intention of encircling Germany. But now Winston Churchill himself has used the word “encirclement,” and that cannot be erased from the world. He himself affirmed with this word a plan to encircle Germany, which he insolently terms an aggressor. No subsequent attempts at concealment can rescue Churchill the warmonger, who has revealed himself.
Throughout the period, Churchill relied on France as a junior partner, and naturally feared that its various party groups could cause a weakening of its military power. In 1938 he wrote on the newly-formed Daladier government:
If France broke, everything would break, and the Nazi domination of Europe, and potentially of a large part of the world, would seem to be inevitable.
This is another bald-faced lie, suggesting that Germany wanted not only to unite all Germans, but bring the whole world under its “tyranny.” He turns next to nasty agitation against all those decent Englishmen who really want peace. Churchill writes:
I wonder whether the French people realize how bitter and persistent is the pro-German propaganda in this island? The strongest point, repeatedly made, is that France is on the verge of collapse. She is portrayed as about to go down the same bloody sewer as Spain has done. All the “Heil Hitler” brigade in London society exploit and gloat over what they are pleased to call “the Parliamentary impotence of the French democracy.”
Churchill’s Jewish brigade guided his attempt to make the so-called “Heil Hitler brigade” in London look ludicrous, even though it consisted of far-sighted Englishmen. They financed him, and were also the main agitators behind Roosevelt in the United States. The US-American ambassadors in France and Poland continually and intentionally fanned the world conflagration. After wishing Daladier “all the best,” Churchill mentions Jewish forces in France, writing:
But he has one important political force in reserve. M. Blum will not fail the cause of European freedom. His influence with the Socialist party is commanding. He will certainly give loyal aid.
The Jew Blum, of course, was the hope of all Jewish lackeys, and one of the main agitators against an understanding between the German Reich and the French Republic.
Following the essays in chronological order, I come to May 1938. Churchill returns to the presumed difficulties of the Japanese in China, noting in his article of 26 May 1938 that these difficulties are primarily the result of Russian threats:
Here we must recognize the services which Soviet Russia is rendering in the Far East to civilization and also to British and United States interests.
On 6 July 1938, Churchill moans once more about the so-called rape of Austria, but he is worried most about the Jews. He complains about the incarceration of the representative of Jewish high finance, Rothschild, about the terrible fact that “Jewish ladies” are forced to clean the streets, then continues:
But 300,000 Jews in Vienna present a problem of large dimensions and intractable quality to a policy of extirpation.”
After Churchill has lamented the presumed terrible economic situation of the Jews, he turns, as always, to making threats:
The tale of their tribulation spreads widely through the world, and it is astonishing that the German rulers are not more concerned at the tides of abhorrence and anger which are rising ceaselessly against them through the heavily-arming United States.
Churchill sees Jewish rage over the fact that it is not possible to bleed the German Reich dry, since Germany has freed its lands from parasites, as a decisive factor in politics, and therefore unintentionally reveals the extent to which Englanders and Americans have become unable to govern their nations themselves, making their fate and their activities — the “heavily-arming United States” — dependent on the rage and opinions of big Jewish financial parasites and Bolshevist agitators.
This careless statement by Mr. Churchill shows in which direction, and on whose orders, Great Britain’s current prime minister is directing his policies. It is occasionally healthy and good to look at what a war criminal once wrote, and later gathered together in a book. They reveal that his war crimes were systematically planned.
This places all those lying communiqués from whatever world conference he and his buddies have gathered at in their proper light. They show how Churchill strove “step by step” for power, motivated by hatred and pride, supported by Jewish agitation. The plainly stated goal was to turn the Far East into an enormous object of exploitation for the whole of Jewish world plutocracy, “cleaning up” Europe in the process so as to render it powerless, to atomize it into its various parts, splitting it into battling states so that it would keep from involvement in world politics, and ultimately impoverish itself. To this end, he worked together with Mr. Chamberlain to isolate Fascist Italy from Germany, to arrange an alliance of the smaller peoples against the German Reich (meaning, probably Czechoslovakia and Poland, later Belgium and Holland), and to use the “independence” of Austria as a launching pad for an attack of the entire anti-European world conspiracy to subject the German people to Jewish exploitive policies.
Mr. Churchill stands before us today as a war criminal, as a world-class criminal, revealed through his own words. It would be good for so-called neutrals to pay serious attention to his words, and to know the situation in which the German Reich found itself. Then they will understand that this German Reich today is the only force battling the conspiracy of Pan-Jewish Anglo-American biological plans for destruction, and is using its full strength to defend and protect the old Europe, even the lives of those who do not believe that they have to take the war seriously, since they still live in a safe place.

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Christian Pastor Stephen Anderson victimised by Sodomites NAZIS

World Famous King James Bible only Pastor Stephen Anderson of the Faithful Word Independent Baptist Church Arizona , has come under attack again from the international sodomite NAZI brigade again. For him once again exposing there wicked ways. After arranging a trip to South Africa to spread the Gospel. The sodomite Nazis put pressure on the Hotel he booked to cancel his booking. Of course the Hotel cowards that they are issued the following statement on Facebook.

The Premier Hotels & Resorts Group have taken the decision to decline a booking by Pastor Steven Anderson at Premier Hotel OR Tambo on the 18th of September 2016. This decision was taken when it was brought to our attention that some of the contents of his sermons contradict the Bill of Rights contained within the South African constitution. This particularly relates to clause 9.3 which states that “No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including…sexual orientation…”
As a South African company, we support the democratic values of human dignity, equality and freedom laid out in this cornerstone of our country’s democracy.
We reserve the right of admission to any of our properties and will be exercising this right in this instance.
 Statement At this Link Location that should in my opinion say  Sodomite loving Hotels

I for one would encourage all to visit this in my opinion sodomite loving hotel chains social media sites and voice your anger that a Man of God there to spread the Gospel should be victimised and discriminated against for spreading the truth and Light much needed in this darkened world. And instead that evil  Perversion should dictate who can stay where this wish.

On a final note if you are a family with small children considering using one of these resorts or Hotels . Would you like your children exposed to sodomite perversion or perhaps even be a victim of it! 

Remember !


The mistaken idea that tolerance is always a virtue and intolerance always a vice is corrupting the very heart of our society. In the name of tolerance every evil is exalted and proudly defended, while all those who resist and condemn evil are smeared and demonized as hate mongers and bigots. Yet what are such smear tactics other than intolerance and bigotry on the part of those who claim to be tolerant? Like all who are self-righteous, the dogmatic zealots of tolerance often reveal themselves to be extremely intolerant

Pastor Andersons Appeal for help

Brexit May and the Globalist Private Central bankers and the EU Civil War

Solutions for living as a rational person in a Politically correct mentally ill society

Solutions for living as a rational person in a mentally ill society


If you’re a rational, thinking person, then you already know you’re living in a society largely populated by mentally ill people who believe one or more of the popular delusions described here. So what’s the solution to all this?
Believe your own experience and refuse to give in to the delusional memes of the P.C. zombies. Remind yourself to stay rooted in reality. Do not be swayed against your own direct experience by the wishy washy narratives of the mentally ill. Spend more time in nature, where truth is evident with every foot step. The more contact you have with nature, the saner you will stay even as the world goes totally insane all around you.
In essence, all of us must now practice mental self-defense. We must defend our own minds from the twisted distortions, influence and psychological pollution of the P.C. zombies. This requires real dedication to clear thinking and the turning off of all mainstream media sources (which specialize in persuasively presenting false narratives as facts).
The more you read independent media, in other words, the saner you become as you cast off the false narratives and delusional lies of the P.C. culture. Rejecting political correctness is, in fact, an important first step in the art of mental self-defense. You must also reject the peer pressure from your lunatic friends and family members who often believe all ten of these P.C. falsehoods. Don’t try arguing with them, however: They’re probably too far gone to save with reason. It’s best to move on and make new friends who are already awakened and aware of what’s really going on.
Read full article Mentally ill America here 

Europe is imploding as we speak ,MASSIVE Chaos to Start…Tomorrow?

MASSIVE Chaos to Start…Tomorrow?

roadtoroota / by Bix Weir / Origional post at Silver for the people
Europe is imploding as we speak. From riots in Berlin to ATM runs in Italy to Deutsche Bank begging for a 150B Euro bailout – all the controls are breaking down and there is no way to stop it.
Many people are asking…WHY NOW?
I think it has to do with the BREXIT derivatives that start paying out this week.
Let’s face it – the BREXIT was unexpected by the elite even up to the evening of the vote. TRILLIONS in FX bets were gambled on the outcome and those who were supposed to be “in the know” got it wrong. Now they have to pay up according to the rules set out in the ISDA Master Derivative Agreements and individual derivative contracts on OTC Derivative Market.
There are various time frames for settlement of derivative contracts but most are either settled in 3-4 weeks after the event or 10 business days after the end of the quarter. The BREXIT vote was held on June 23rd and the results were finalized on June 24th.
That puts us at “Settlement Dates” roughly starting tomorrow (if you count the 4th of July as a holiday) and going through the next few weeks.
As I believe that many of these contracts will not be fulfilled we will run into immediate counter-party failures blowing apart the “derivative hedges” that were supposed to offset losses. Then, all of a sudden, the “notional value” in the Quadrillions that is claimed to be hedged against turns into the real deal.
So expect the rumblings in Europe to begin to turn into a REAL collapse nearing the end of this week and getting worse as we move through July.
In the USA expect more planned social breakdowns as we approach the Republican Convention on Monday July 18th. BUT keep a close eye on the Republican Rules Committee meetings scheduled to start tomorrow. There will be those calling for DRASTIC rule changes in order to oust Trump.
Read More on US situation 

Monday, 11 July 2016

Parliaments Puppet Show go's into Traitor at the Gate

Parliaments Puppet Show go's into Traitor at the Gate

news Just breaking , is that the Tory leadership has been settled by the withdrawal from the race of Andrea Leadsom.  leaving Sharia law and Pro EU Theresa May as the next conservative leader and of course Prime Minister. 

This is no suprise to the Horwich Nationalists, as all along we have warned NEVER! Put any faith in these traitors in Parliament. As we believe that Leadsom was always a stalking horse designed to shoe May and the Brexit betrayers back into the driving seat. Or if you want to give her the benefit of the doubt , they had the goods on her And Blackmailed her out . 

But in total this shows that it is UTTERLY pointless putting any faith in any of these politicians . They are all Traitorous puppets with only the very rarest of exceptions. All corrupted for the illusion of power or illusionary wealth , dancing the to the tune of there satanic globalist puppet masters. 

As for the next move we believe that the may try to have a RIGGED general election, as trying to have a second referendum may be to politically risky for the moment unless they can buy time with phoney talks with the EU. Then hide a second referendum under the guise of a vote on the deal they strike, which will leave us in the EU at a even worse disadvantage than we have in the present . 

  Politically only a open honest General election under total vigilance from the British people aware to the potential of vote fraud robbing them of there future as a sovereign people can save them now. But the problem is they will allow EU nationals to vote in that.  And all Nationalists need to influence the UKIP party and support them in the upcoming struggle for National survival. As they will try to divide us. Even BNP and Britain 1st and other Nationalist take heed . Do not be used for a division. Support and INFLUENCE the only Nationalist party with a chance. 

For as Cicero said

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”

Sunday, 10 July 2016

A massive CIA hatchet-job against Leadsom.

Today we see a massive CIA hatchet-job against Leadsom. Now why might that be? Why are they backing May? Why are they so desperate to stop Leadsom. Perhaps because they control Theresa May, who did as she was told at the Home Office and flooded the UK with third-world jihadi migrants, while they do not control Leadsom. So they are desperate to stop her.
Theresa May's refusal to have children or offer some explanation of why she did not, does indicate that she is FAR MORE LIKELY to be disloyal to this country. This is exactly the pattern that we saw with Angela Merkel, Nicola Sturgeon and Ted Heath. None of them had children either. In contrast pro-British Mrs Thatcher had two children. No one without children, whether male or female, should ever be allowed to be Prime Minister or President of any country without an acceptable explanation (such as a medical reason). If it was through choice they should be barred from holding office, as they have no interest in the future of the country, and therefore are unlikely to make decisions that will promote it. That is perhaps why May has been so disloyal and why the CIA is desperate to install her!



By Larry Abraham 
written years ago but still valid

I urge all of my readers to make copies of this report and send them to your friends and relatives. The information is too critical to be overlooked in the madness of this election year.
Part I of this essay was written in January before the Democrat Party primaries settled anything and before the occupation of Iraq took a turn for the worse. However, it is now more obvious that what I wrote about the nature of the Third Great Jihad is all too true. The political picture has deteriorated in Europe and the U.S .to a great degree since then so Part II takes these developments into consideration. Again, I urge all of you to distribute this essay as far and wide as possible without any concern for copyright violation. Our fellow citizens need to know the true nature of what we all face. LHA
As we watch and listen to all the Democrat Party candidates running for the nomination of their party, it is tantamount to enduring the Chinese water torture. The blah, blah, blah goes on and nothing of value comes out except the pain of listening to the same nothingness over and over again. I won't take the time or space to repeat what you have heard so many, mind numbing times over the past months but what you have not heard is crucial.
I must also fault President Bush and the administration spokesmen for not telling the American people what they really need to know about this "war". If they don't do that sometime between now and November it may cost them the election.
It Did Not Start on 9/11
The war we are now facing did not begin on September 11, 2001, nor will it end with the peaceful transition to civilian authorities in Iraq, whenever that may be. In fact, Iraq is but a footnote in the bigger context of this encounter, but an important one none the less.
This war is what the Jihadists themselves are calling the " Third Great Jihad" and are doing so within the framework of a time line which reaches back to the very creation of Islam in the Seventh century and their attempts to recreate the dynamics which gave rise to the religion in the first two hundred years of its existence.
No religion in history grew as fast, in its infancy, than did Islam and the reasons for this growth are not hard to explain when you understand what the world was like at the time of Muhammad's death in 632 AD. The Western Roman Empire was in ruins and the Eastern Empire was based in Constantinople and trying desperately to keep the power of its early grandeur while transitioning to Christianity as a de facto state religion. The costs to the average person were unbearable as he was being required to meet the constantly rising taxes levied from the state along with the tithes coerced by the Church. What Islam offered was the "carrot or the sword".
If you became a convert, your taxes were immediately eliminated, as was your tithe. If you didn't, you faced death. The choice was not hard for most to make, unless you were a very devoted martyr in the making. At the beginning, even the theology was not too hard for most to swallow, considering that both Jewry and Christianity were given their due by the Prophet. There is but one God-Allah, and Muhammad is His Prophet, as was Jesus, and the pre-Christian Jewish prophets of the Torah (old testament). Both were called "children of the book", the book being the Koran, which replaced both the Old and New testaments for Christians and Jews.
With this practical approach to spreading the "word" Islam grew like wild fire, reaching out from the Saudi Arabian Peninsula in all directions. This early growth is what the Muslims call the "first" great Jihad and it met with little resistance until Charles Martel of France, the father of Charlemagne, stopped them in the battle of Tours in France, after they had firmly established the religion on the Iberian peninsula. This first onslaught against the West continued in various forms and at various times until Islam was finally driven out of Spain in 1492 at the battle of Granada.
The "second great jihad" came with the Ottoman Turks. This empire succeeded in bringing about the downfall of Constantinople as a Christian stronghold and an end to Roman hegemony in all of its forms. The Ottoman Empire was Islam's most successful expansion of territory even though the religion itself had fractured into warring sects and bitter rivalries with each claiming the ultimate truths in "the ways of the Prophet". By 1683 the Ottomans had suffered a series of defeats on both land and sea and the final and failed attempt to capture Vienna set the stage for the collapse of any further territorial ambitions and Islam shrunk into various sheikhdoms, emir dominated principalities, and roving tribes of nomads. However, by this time a growing anti-western sentiment, blaming its internal failures on anyone but themselves, was taking hold and setting the stage for a new revival know has Wahhabism which came into full bloom under the House of Saud on the Arabian peninsula shortly before the onset of WWI. It is this Wahhabi version of Islam which has infected the religion itself, now finding adherents in almost all branches and sects, especially the Shiites. What this sect calls for is the complete and total rejection of anything and everything which is not based in the original teachings of The Prophet and it finds its most glaring practice in the policies of the Afgani Taliban or the Shiite practices of the late Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. Its Ali Pasha (Field Marshall) is now known as Osama bin Laden, the leader of the "third Jihad".
Jimmy Carter sets the stage
The strategy for this "holy war" did not begin with the planning of the destruction of the World Trade Center. It began with the plans for toppling the Shah of Iran back in the early 1970's and culminated with his exile in 1979. With his plans and programs to "westernize" his country, along with his close ties to the U.S. and subdued acceptance of the State of Israel, the Shah was the soft target.
Thanks, in large part to the hypocritical and disastrous policies of the Jimmy Carter State Department the revolution was set into motion, the Shah was deposed, his arm forces scattered or murdered and stage one was complete. The Third Jihad now had a base of operations and the oil wealth to support its grand design or what they call the "Great Caliphate".
The Great Caliphate
What this design calls for is the replacement of all secular leadership in any country with Muslim majorities. This would include, Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, all the Emirates, Sudan, Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and finally what they call the "occupied territory" Israel.
As a part of this strategy, forces of the jihad will infiltrate governments and the military as a prelude to taking control, once the secular leadership is ousted or assassinated. Such was the case in Lebanon leading to the Syrian occupation and what was attempted in Egypt with the murder of Anwar Sadat, along with the multiple attempts on the lives of Hussein in Jordan, Mubarak of Egypt and Musharraf in Pakistan. Pakistan is a particular prize because of its nuclear weapons.
The long-range strategy of the Third Jihad counts on three strategic goals. 1. The U.S. withdrawing from the region just as it did in Southeast Asia, following Vietnam. 2. Taking control of the oil wealth in the Muslim countries, which would be upwards to 75% of known reserves, and 3. Using nuclear weapons or other WMDs to annihilate Israel. A further outcome of successfully achieving these objectives would be to place the United Nations as the sole arbiter in East/West negotiations.

Evidence of the Bush Administration awareness of this plan is found in the facts that immediately following the 9/11 attack, their first move was to shore up Pakistan and Egypt, believing that these two would be the next targets for al Qaeda while Americans focused on the disaster in New York. The administration also knew that the most important objective was to send a loud and clear message that the U.S. was in the region to stay, not only to shore up our allies but to send a message to the Jihadists. The attack on Afghanistan was necessary to break-up a secure al Qaeda base of operations and put their leadership on the run or in prison. Why Iraq?
The war on Iraq also met a very strategic necessity in that no one knew how much collaboration existed between Saddam Hussein and the master planners of the Third Jihad or his willingness to hand off WMDs to terrorist groups including the PLO in Israel. What was known, were serious indications of on-going collaboration, as Saddam funneled money to families of suicide bombers attacking the Israelis and others in Kuwait.
What the U.S. needed to establish was a significant base of operations smack dab in the middle of the Islamic world, in a location which effectively cut it in half. Iraq was the ideal target for this and a host of other strategic reasons.
Leadership of various anti-American groups both here and abroad understood the vital nature of the Bush initiative and thus launched their demonstrations, world-wide, to "Stop The War". Failing this, they also laid plans to build a political campaign inside the country, with the War in Iraq as a plebiscite, using a little know politician as the thrust point; Howard Dean. This helps to explain how quickly the Radical Left moved into the Dean campaign with both people and money, creating what the clueless media called the "Dean Phenomenon".
By building on the left-wing base in the Democrat party and the "Hate Bush" liberals, the campaign has already resulted in a consensus among the aspirants, minus Joe Lieberman, to withdraw the U.S. from Iraq and turn the operation over to the U.N. And, if past is prologue, i.e. Vietnam, once the U.S. leaves it will not go back under any circumstances, possibly even the destruction of Israel.
Should George W. Bush be defeated in November and a new administration come to power we could expect to see the dominoes start to fall in the secular Islamic countries and The Clash of Civilizations would then become a life changing event in all of our lives.
What surprised the Jihadists following the 9/11 attack was how American sentiment mobilized around the president and a profound sense of patriotism spread across the country They were not expecting this reaction, based on what had happened in the past, nor were they expecting the determined resolve of the President himself. I believe that this is one of the reasons we have not had any further attacks within our borders. They are content to wait, just as one of their tactical mentors, V.I. Lenin admonished "two steps forward, one step back".
A couple of additional events serve as valuable footnotes to the current circumstances we face: the destruction of the human assets factor of the CIA during the Carter presidency, presided over by the late Senator Frank Church and Carter's CIA Director, Admiral Stansfield Turner. This fact has plagued our intelligence agencies right up to this very day with consequences which are now obvious. Jimmy Carter is the one man who must bear the bulk of the responsibility for setting the stage of the Third Jihad. Americans should find little comfort in how the Democrat contenders constantly seek the "advice and counsel" of this despicable little hypocrite who now prances around with his Nobel Prize, while attacking President Bush with almost as much venom as his fellow Nobel Laureate, Yassir Arafat.
Lastly, we should not expect to see any meaningful cooperation from Western Europe, especially the French.

Since failing to protect their own interests in Algeria by turning the country over to the first of the Arab terrorists, Amid Ben Bella, the country itself is now occupied by Islamic immigrants totally twenty percent of the population. We are in the battle of our lives which will go on for many years possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we are facing or falter in the challenge of "knowing our enemy" the results will be catastrophic.
PART II (May 1, 2004)
Since writing the above, we have witnessed some frightening evidence in support of our hypothesis both internally and in other parts of the world.
The al Qaeda bombing in Madrid has emboldened our enemy into believing it can use terror as an instrument for democratic regime change. Based on what happened there, they may be right.
Kerry and bin Laden on the same page
John Kerry and other leaders of his party constantly refer to the United States as "acting unilaterally." They give no credit whatsoever to countries like Great Britain, Poland, Italy, Australia or even tiny Honduras for putting their limited armed forces in harm's way to support the U.S. led coalition in Iraq. It is little wonder that some are considering doing what Spain has done" pulling out. The leaders in these countries have spent considerable political capital in this effort, and have little to show for it as it relates to fostering good will with the American public. Couple that fact with Osama bin Ladin's latest offer of withholding attacks on those who "quit" the coalition and you have all the elements for a Democrat party fostered "self-fulfilling prophecy" where the U.S. will be totally alone in the pacification of Iraq. John Kerry and the Bush critics persist in the "lie" of the U.S. going it "alone" in Iraq but Osama bin Laden knows differently and will use the Kerry rhetoric to help isolate the U.S. The terrorists now see themselves as political "king-makers". They may be right.
Another aspect of the "anti-Bush" political axis is how both his political enemies and the main stream media take ghoulish delight in "the body count," just as they did in the later days of Vietnam. Oh sure, they pay incidental homage to the memory of the young Americans who gave their lives in the greatest threat this country has ever faced, but they do so with all the sincerity of Madonna making a vow of chastity. As the body bags grow in number, they believe, so grows their political prospects. They may be right.
If the Bush administration is further weakened in the months leading up to the November elections, we will witness a heightened al Qaeda offensive in all parts of the world, including our own country, and especially in Iraq and nations surrounding it ,i.e., Pakistan, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Events within the past few days in Jordan not only make this argument but also point to the possibility of "what happened to the WMDs."
Iran and Syria are daily growing more overt and bold in their support of insurgents within Iraq, believing that Bush has been so hurt by internal politics that he is powerless to act against them in any meaningful way. They may be right.
The Leftwing initiative, Political Correctness and Our Will to Win
Within our own country we are witnessing and almost insane application of "political correctness. " As the barbarism of radical Islam grows more apparent in the streets of the Middle East from Gaza to Basra, we see a cultural suicide taking place within our own schools and communities.
Our children are being taught from the Koran, our professors are preaching intifadah in their class rooms, and Muslim "call to prayer" loud speakers are blaring out from city halls. The more precarious our very existence becomes, the more our liberal brethren embrace their enemies. It is a Stockholm Syndrome which can only lead to the recruitment of young Muslims who will be willing to duplicate in the West what their co-religionists are doing in the streets of Israel and the market places of Baghdad. The liberal P.C. crowd say nothing about the silence of the Muslim religious leadership as it relates to the carnage of innocents but couldn't speak out fast enough against the inspiration supplied to tens of millions of Christians by Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ. They were put off by the movie's "violence" and its alleged "fostering of anti-Semitism". Movies must represent their "reality" as the real thing moves them not at all. Among liberal Jews in America, hatred of George W. Bush is only surpassed by their contempt for Ariel Sharon; Let them explain it, I am at a total loss to do so. Maybe they just miss seeing Bill Clinton smooching Yassir Arafat in the White House Rose Garden.
The "Reverend" Jesse Jackson is now calling the U.S. "guilty of crimes against humanity" as he sets out to mobilize the non-Islamic Left. None of the Democrat leadership says a word in opposition to Jackson's treason or Hillary's attacks on the President and U.S. policy in an Arabic newspaper, while in London. You can bet that al Jezeera didn't miss a beat in their reporting of both events.
The campaign takes its toll
The campaign is seriously hurting Mr. Bush's leadership role in the War on Terror. While ducking every new book critical of his initiative or trying to counter the partisan nitpicking of the 9/11 Commission, he has persisted in the misbegotten insistence of "installing democracy" in Iraq. Our purpose for being in that beleaguered country should be restricted to one purpose and one purpose only, to stop the expansion of The Third Jihad and provide a base for doing same in the neighboring areas. This can be done by sealing the borders, attacking anything that moves in violation of same and by making it clear to Syria and Iran that any participation on their part will be considered an "act of war". Let the country be governed by the local tribes, Shiite in the south, Sunni in the central and Kurds in the north with a U.S. pro consul overseeing the military. Oil revenues could be spilt by population allocation. How about installing a Republic; it worked pretty well here with diverse populations.
The very idea that we should spend our sons and daughters blood or our tax dollars on trying to building a "democracy" in the region which has neither a history nor a desire for such, is sheer nonsense. The very essence of Islamic teaching speaks directly against this principle. Continuing on the current path can only result in fostering greater hatred for the "Great Satan". Force is the only thing which is respected in that part of the world and this force need not be tied to "reform". I suggest Mr. Rumsfled acquaint himself with a copy of Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars and Sun Tsu's Art of War. All the tactics and strategies necessary to subdue the Iraqi insurgents can be found in those two military gems.
Please not the UN
Bringing the U.N. to the party will only compound the problem without adding any accountability. The U.N. has been accused of many things over the years, but being a "democratic" institution has never been one of them. Just the latest scandal of the "Oil for Food" program should provide any thinking person with all the evidence they need to keep the U.N. at bay. But this doesn't seem to bother the likes of the John Kerry's of the world who prattle on as if the scam doesn't even exist.
Just one example will make my case; the UN mandate in Israel, which has been in place since 1948. One more salient point needs to be made on this subject. There is no such thing as "The International Community." There are only individual countries, each with its own agenda which is always self serving. The myth of a higher level of "moral authority" coming out of the UN as been one of the greater lies of the past half century, but it is a lie which persists in spite of a bloody record of hypocrisy, graft, genocide and "perpetual war for perpetual peace." I have a suggestion for the 9/11 Commission:.Why don't they look into what the UN was doing before the attack on the World Trade Center? If they do, they will find that exactly one week before, the UN was holding a Conference on Racism in Durbin, South Africa where the delegates voted overwhelmingly to condemn Israel, as "racist and terrorist." The U.S., Canadian and Israeli delegates walked out in disgust. Nary a word was uttered about Saddam Hussein, al Qaeda, or the Taliban, to say nothing of what was happening in Rwanda while they crunched caviar on toast and washed it down with vintage Champaign. Genocide does not qualify as "racism" according to the UN "morality." Neither we nor the world needs the UN to muck up what is already a very delicate situation. If given proper leadership every Middle Eastern country named above will throw in with the Coalition, for if they don't they will be the next targets of the Third Great Jihad and the Great Caliphate. Pakistan is already showing the leadership which others will follow. What do you think moved Kadahaffi to cozy up to the U.S. and Great Britain? He fears the Jihadist more than he hates us.
Evil Does Exist
Our current crises, in meeting the threat of the Third Jihad, is one more example of how most Americans simply refuse to believe there is evil in this world and are willing to grant moral equivalence on any human action. Unless the crime is personalized such as in the case of Lacy Peterson, we lose interest quickly and become bored or at least not involved.
To try and understand what we are facing, look into the eyes of your son or grandson and try to fathom a mind which would take pride in strapping a bomb to his body and sending him out to kill himself and countless innocent people. Or in the case of your daughter or grand daughter, try to imagine a religion which commands you to mutilate her vagina to destroy her sex drive or demands you to stone her to death if she has sexual relations with a man other than of your choosing.
If you can comprehend these facts both intellectually and emotionally, then you will start to understand what we are facing in the months and years ahead, both at home and abroad.
The radicals of Islam will stop at nothing to destroy us and all we stand for. They see this war as their "entry to paradise" and a release from the miserable existence they have built for themselves within the confines of an evil and perverse religion. The Jihadist are NOT like us, nor most of their fellow Muslims. But, like terrorists everywhere they have silenced any criticisms from fellow Muslims through threat and intimidation and have, with the help of the "useful idiots" in the West, "created the appearance of popular support".
If we are incapable of understanding these realities and acting accordingly, within the life time of everyone who reads these words, we will see our cherished way of life cease to exist and chaos become our lot. The Clash of Civilizations is now reaching out and touching all of us. May God grant us the wisdom and the courage to meet the challenge.
I respectfully dedicate the above to the memory of Pat Tillman and his 872 comrades who by their courage and willing sacrifice set an example for every American. May we be worthy of their "greatest love"

Saturday, 9 July 2016

What wonderful people the British are to have resisted all the threats,


Peer calls for Government to repeal the European Communities Act 1972 rather than go “cap in hand to Brussels for permission to leave”
The independent Labour Peer, Lord Stoddart of Swindon, has welcomed the result of the referendum but has some strong words of advice for the Government about how to take Britain out of the EU.
Lord Stoddart said: “What wonderful people the British are to have resisted all the threats, the denigration of their country by their own rulers, big business, big bureaucracy and intervention by arrogant foreign leaders. Despite all this intimidation they still voted to get their country back. We must now ensure that they are not betrayed again by their leaders.
“The first step in this should be for the Government to introduce a bill to repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and all its amendments. This would give it the authority to negotiate our exit from the EU. While this Act remains in force, we have to go on handing over vast sums of money to the EU and we are still subject to its demands.
“The preoccupation with Article 50 of the European Treaty is a red herring and requires the Government to go cap in hand to Brussels for permission to leave. We should seize the initiative and start the process of getting our country back now, not wait months for an interminable Conservative Party leadership contest, followed by several years while we await permission from Brussels to leave. The Government has the authority of the people to act and it should do so, not sit on its hands.”
Lord Stoddart said: “At the moment, Westminster seems to be playing second fiddle to the European Council. I understand that Mr Cameron is going to write to the President of the Council to set out his proposed negotiations before bringing them to Parliament. I call upon the Prime Minister to lay his proposals before Parliament in the right and proper manner and to do so before he presents them to the Council.
“I would remind Mr Cameron that he is the Prime Minister of a Government and sovereign Parliament at Westminster and he is subject to the traditional obligation of any Prime Minister, namely to consult Parliament first about this or, for that matter, any other major Governmental policy decision.
“Therefore, I have submitted a written question in the House of Lords, asking if the Prime Minister is going to consult Parliament, before going cap in hand to Brussels.”
Lord Stoddart of Swindon,

Wednesday, 6 July 2016

what we really think of Mrs May

Please copy paste edit and send to your Local MP in informing them what we really think of Mrs May
Date: 6 July 2016
Rt Hon. MP
House of Commons

Dear Mr
As one of your Constituents who voted to leave the EU in the recent referendum, and being of conservative instinct, I would like to express my hope that you will back Andrea Leadsome to be the next Conservative party leader and Prime Minister.
I feel that following the referendum result, only someone who supported Brexit can legitimately hold the office of Prime Minister and be trusted to carry out the will of the British people.
It worries me deeply that Theresa May is being touted as the front runner in this contest. Not only did she support remaining in the EU – and still does - but her performance as Home Secretary has been far from impressive. She has overseen unprecedented levels of uncontrolled mass immigration and has overseen cuts to the Police, Immigration Service and Border Force.
She also supports the European Arrest Warrant which allows the arrest of British citizens in their own country by a foreign police service and deportation to that country to stand trial for things which may be perfectly legal in Britain.
The only requirement of the EAW process is that the paperwork is completed correctly – there does not need to be any prima facie evidence against the person being arrested.
This is completely contrary to the British judicial tradition of Habeus Corpus, ie, the right of a person to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, enshrined in Magna Carta for over 800 years.
In her bid for power, May has also come out in support of Britain remaining bound by the judgment of the very inappropriately named European Court of Human Rights.
This is a complete about face on her previous stance on the issue. As you know, it is this court which has frequently over ruled British courts and prevented our elected government from deporting foreign criminals including murderers, rapists and terrorists.
What we need is a British Bill of Rights based on our own Common Law, not a criminal’s charter from Brussels.
May has also cynically and despicably continued the former Remain campaign’s ‘Project Fear’ by suggesting that the rights of EU nationals already legally resident in the UK cannot be guaranteed and may depend on the continued free movement of people as a condition for continued access to the single market post-Brexit.
Uncontrolled immigration from the EU was a major factor in many people voting to leave on June 23rd. We did not vote for it to continue as a condition for free trade, which any intelligent person knows will continue regardless since it is at least as much in the EU’s interest as Britain’s.
Many fellow Brexiters I have spoken with firmly believe that the rights of these EU citizens to remain here should be protected and that they should not be used bargaining chips. This is the honourable position that Andrea Leadsome has taken.
On a personal level, why should anyone who has found employment here, pay their taxes and who speak English by way of integrating themselves into our society. Why should they be forced to leave or be made to fear that they may have no choice?

By all means let’s be able to remove those who have come here simply to live off our generous welfare state with no intention of working or integrating or those who have abused our hospitality by committing crimes here, but that should apply to all such foreign residents, not just those from the EU.
I wonder what game Theresa May is playing here. I am of the opinion that she is exploiting the perceived increase in racism and xenophobia since the Brexit vote to create a sense of guilt in people like myself who have European friends living in this country in order to ‘soften us up’ for a second referendum or delay our exit until after March 2017 when new EU rules will mean we will need a majority EU vote to leave?
The contrast in Theresa May’s and Andrea Leadsome’s respective positions on this emotive issue is extremely ironic when one thinks about it – a Brexiter guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals and Remainer putting them in doubt.
May should be ashamed of herself. On this issue alone she has shown herself up to be the embodiment of all that is wrong with politics in Britain and which has created such a dis-connect from the general public.
Add to this list May’s support for Sharia Courts operating a parallel legal system in this Country and her comments that there is no evidence that sex with children does them any harm – all of which is on record – and she has shown herself utterly unfit to lead this Country, now or at any time.
Yours sincerely
Telephone and address provided

Brexit Victory: the war between Identity and Globalism the first globalist domino has fallen

Brexit Victory: In the war between Identity and Globalism the first globalist domino has just fallen

Freedom loving peoples everywhere hailed the Brexit referendum victory for it gave them hope, inspiration and courage.  It encouraged them to also rise up and throw off the shackles of the shekels.  The Enemy seeks a one world slave state, and uses brainwashing, blackmail, bullying and bribery to achieve this aim.  The Enemy is aided by dupes, cowards and well paid treacherous criminal puppets.

The Enemy has immense financial power, the Enemy has money, limitless supplies of it, but we have something stronger… we have Identity.  And Identity will triumph over Globalism.  Truth will triumph over lies.  Bravery over cowardice.  Loyalty over treachery.  Honesty over usury.  All people who value something higher than money can rejoice that the first domino has fallen - the first Globalist domino in the war between Identity and Globalism has fallen. In the realm of ideas we won long ago.  It is now time for our ideas to triumph in the realm of reality.  And triumph we will.  Indeed it is all over bar the fighting.  And there will be lots of fighting.  This is the start.  We won and we better get used to winning.  It is going to be fun.

Brexit Exposed the Hysterical Subjective Nature of Modern Young People

By Thomas Sheridan

Life has a certain delicious vitality associated with risk. Remaining as you were, is stagnation and entropy. A leap into the unknown is better than the security of comfortable, conditioning over the long run. Risk is the engine of possibilities. It unleashes creative ideas and solutions.

What did we see as the response by young people who were told about the democratic passing of the Brexit vote? Sheer, hysterical, conservative terror, and closed-minded bigotry against the working classes and older voters. A generation raised within Richard Dawkin's safe spaces of 'reason' and who have turned out to be more terrified of change and the unknown than the older generations they desire to exterminate for voting the 'wrong way'...bad, bad older people!!! You have made Tarquin the media studies, third year student from Hampshire cry and stamp his progressive designer boots in horror and vitriol. "Keep the world the same!!!" That's the young people of today, all waiting for Simon Cowell or Louis Walsh to allow them a chance to grow as individuals, or worse still, waiting for the unelected bureaucrats of the European Union, Trotskyite Professors, and the Fabian Society/London School of Economics spooks who infest the likes of the BBC and the Guardian newspaper to do something to take the votes away from people who voted for Brexit.

Brexit will be looked upon as one of the defining moments of Western civilisation. On par with the French Revolution and the Fall of the Berlin Wall. The last dice that academic Marxism - in tandem with their corporatist, globalisation,benefactors - had to play with, and, which crapped out. The reaction of the leftist intellectual elite holding hands with the likes of Peter Sutherland of Goldman Sach/World Bank in attempting to incite a Bernays-like coup upon the consciousness finally demonstrated - to all who can still think for themselves - what working class hating fascists they all are. The real agenda of globalism was there for all to see.

It also brought about a closure which began with the London School of Economics/BBC graduates in the late 1980s of reengineer the British working classes. Treating them like lab rats using the Pavlovian conditioning of Eastenders, Little Britain and Tellytubbies. Destroying the family structure, altering their thought processes, and with Little Britain, making them despise their own existence. Gaslighting them into oblivion, and then promising them their neo-liberal globalisation rewards which was to tolerate things no sane person should ever have to tolerate. It is indeed ironic looking back now to a time when the BBC used the otherwise wonderful Fred Dibnah to demolish the landscape of working class Britain, that the Marxist intellectual elite were demolishing the psychology of the communities around the falling smoke stacks. Proclaiming that something vague called 'diversity', and destroying your own identity, was proof of you being fit (in reality, 'worthy enough') to live in their New Statesman dreamworld of the globalist future.  READ FULL ARTICLE HERE

Tuesday, 5 July 2016


Published on 5 Jul 2016
Nigel Farage has now departed from his position as UKIP's leader.
The man has done far more good than people might imagine.
And BREXIT has had far more impact at far more levels than people might imagine.
My websites:

Under Common Law I believe we are out the EU.

By N Carter modified by the Horwich Nationalists 

I believe we are out  the EU. 
Under Common Law The People are supreme over Parliament so the for us the EU is over...only the paperwork and mopping up.
Article 50 is an EU treaty provision. By Our referendum by the People have trumped all treaties and even parliament which draws it legitimate  powers from the People. On the formulation of acts and statutes. That are only applicable by by contract under common law. 
Therefore, Parliament MUST prioritise the People's clear common law decision over any treaty or those that the EU has used to bind us.
The Prime Minister is therefore required, not just able, to use the Royal Prerogative power to nullify the EU treaties...except any provisions he/she chooses to continue for the time being for practical reasons beneficial to us. So, to me, it is absolutely clear that the EU no longer exists for us, the British people.
Therefore, Article 50 does not, and cannot, apply to the British People.
  The EU must ask us if it wants to negotiate with us to offer mutually beneficial new arrangements.
Essentially it's the same outcome...but it will be OUR negotiation, controlled by us, NOT theirs controlled by them, a hostile foreign bullying Fascist  power having a petulant spat! We cannot allow EU to have the whip hand over us...for they will use it...and prevent our free and prosperous future...and then do to us what they did to Greece...kill our future with criminal debt loads and long-winded legal cases.

The  EU is a Toxic entity. Only a fool would trust the EU! Ask the Greeks! as the fell for another Socialist Greek bearing gifts of free stuff for all with out realising , they meant just free for all the Bankers .And you  could ask many other nations who are being plundered by this Fascist internationalist corporate entity.

A free country does NOT need to ask permission! We can begin our free future NOW!
We can benefit from that Freedom now, and whilst we speak to EU about better terms than the standard WTO terms available to any country in the world.
And if EU try political machinations ...we will not care because we will be free to trade and set our own international treaties with the rest of world, that would be in the interest of the British People and not corporations ...And dismiss the EU.with 'countervailing measures' that are permitted, indeed almost required under WTO rules.
Onwards and upwards!

Sunday, 3 July 2016

EU-inspired fascists and Hypocrites just marched in London

Thirty thousand frothing, flag-waving, EU-inspired fascists just marched through downtown London under the flag of a foreign power. These people are openly instigating a Ukraine-type coup of the UK’s democratically-elected government. Yet nobody in power in the UK seems too bothered by it all. WTF!? The fascist horde presented itself as an “anti-Brexit” protest, but the mass flying of, and show of fealty to, a foreign flag — the blue and yellow EU Swastika — in a land in which the Union Jack reigns supreme tells its own story. Saturday’s terrifying display of fascistic EU nationalism in London is no different to Oswald Mosley’s malignant black-shirted rallies calling for the imposition of a brutal British nationalism on the people of the UK; its participants are cut from the same political cloth. Make no mistake, these marchers are extremist EU nationalists in every sense of the word, and they will seek to terrorize us and to burn our democratic house down to the ground, in order to replace it with their Technocratic “European Project”. These extremists advocate a politics that is anathema to the United Kingdom and its tradition of always fighting to increase — not diminish, as constantly equivocating Soros “progressives” seek to do — the individual rights of all who call ourselves British. Could it be that our government has been made so redundant, is so cowardly, so useless, so stupidly blind, and so negligent of its duty to protect those it governs — we, the people of the UK — that it doesn’t recognize the manifestation of the most urgent and malignant force seeking to destroy us since 1939? 
Read full article here  AT  

2nd of July 2016 a year on The Face of Modern Corporate Britain

This something all those Pro EU useful idiots need to look at , when corporations and corporate legislation run amok like in the EU . Ordinary people are wide open to Fraud and tyranny from these dead entities. Only under The Common Law and true National and personnel sovereignty can security of property and body be assured.Tom Crawford of Nottingham and his wife were evicted from there house with fraudulent documents ,DESPITE! having paid the morgate in full ! Welcome to the Modern Corporate Britain all the useful idiots who support remaining in the EU are arguing for.

Brexit Forget 'negotiation ! Is Article 50 is a trap

By Nigel Carter
A useful reminder...the EU is nasty, petulant and determined to stop matter how nicely they ask, plead, beg or grovel.
Forget 'negotiation'...we will not be in the room...Article 50 is a trap, a torture for the is to hold a country limbo, suspended animation...long enough until circumstances change and a re-run of a referendum, rigged this time, can force obedience.
eu cannot be talked with...negotiations are futile.
Immediate OUT...because all treaties fell when the supreme People voted...followed by immediate independent action on border control, points system (simply include EU citizens in the non EU system tomorrow...for now) and suspension of membership and VAT payments, diversion of cash to current recipients directly through UK Govt (same rates)...from Jan 1st, say, etc.
We voted OUT, now behave OUT.
For us the EU is over, alien.
Then negotiate, at our pace, under our rules...a better and free way forward...or 'no trade deal' status continues forever.
Any hostilities from EU becomes 'countervailing measures' allowed/required under World Trade Organisation rules.
Key points: Article 50 can only apply to members of the EU...countries governed by the EU....we, UK, are OUT...already Article 50, none of it, nothing applies.
UK People are supreme over UK Parliament and therefore EU has NO hold over us whatsoever.
Now we can chat to EU as equals, not supplicants...and if EU continues to be rude, insolent and high-handed...who cares? ...we can get on with our global future as friends to our friends in the world...and let the EU they will do to us if we succumb to the torture of Article 50...designed to punish and hold a country in...if it dares to defy the high and mighty, low-down EU.
Please! Get this point if no other...EU are not 'our partners'...EU is the overlord...EU countries are grabbing competitors for influence and/or cash...they're in it for what they can get...not to be British by 'doing the right thing'.
Be wise. Protect your back. Seal your pockets. Hide your wallet. Don't let them pick the battleground or they will win and rob us again.
Get out first just by taking our Freedom back that they should never have touched...and demand the best treatment for us if they want the best from us.
We put them on notice...nothing for nothing...meanwhile we are better off with no deal than any eu deal that's on offer or in prosperity today.
This way, no delay.
Wait, plead from within and EU will have us down its gullet, paying its bills of failure a gulp.
  EU is nasty, EU is toxic...for our children and grand children's wise...escape now!

  EU is a chasm you cannot jump in easy stages...bit by bit is not possible, you will fall in.
A chasm, in or out, must be jumped in one big leap...or fall down.
Don't dither mid-air...reach and fly to the other side...with confidence.
Remember, there going back now...nasty eu is spiteful and will never forgive us, or forget, unless we ignore it...and thereby humble it.
Beware. Be wise.

Saturday, 2 July 2016

Usefull Idiots Protest in London in Favour of Slavery to Central Bankers

by Horwich Nationalists
This Morning 2nd July 2016,

 London witness the most shocking example of useful idiocy so far manifested since
the Brexit victory that the vast overwhelming majority of the British People voted for and want.

The useful idiots began gathering in Park Lane in the early hours this morning as they prepared for the #F**k Brexit rally which started at 11am. 
The mob to marched down Piccadilly, Pall Mall and Whitehall before ending at Parliament Square, where Bob Geldof and Tim Farron gave their anti-Brexit speeches, as a no doubted they owed there masters something in return for vast riches for such mediocre talent in my view. 

The Mob of useful idiots were waving EU flags and home-made placards, as well as using smoke bombs, and chanting “EU, we love you” “Hope not hate”, “Breverse” and “Parliament use your sovereignty to save the UK from this crisis” . 
It is quite obvious to me that these so called protests are nothing more than a paid for and orchestrated by the Globalists.  It is quite obvious that the mob with the lack of mental capacity that can see that the EU is nothing more than a Fascist empire of the Merger of a undemocratic  technocratic bureaucracy ridden government with Corporate powers , and the  central banks that control them both , are incapable of organising this kind of thing so quickly. And that the establishment MUST ! Be behind it with a dark agenda.  
Addressing the  the March for Europe protestors, mediocre musician and tragedy exploiter Bob Geldof said leader’s of the Leave campaign had "robbed the young of their future".  
But What future Bob ? A future of enslavement via debt in a country even more enslaved to the European Central Bank with a National debt that needs a massive Tax burden to service just the interest on the Currency created out of thin air by the bankers. A future were they have no say in any thing that affects there lives . A future where they will be told they have to live in a certain district ,eat certain GMO food , a future where the dictates say that once they reach a certain age they must be subject euthanasia for the Good , sorry profitability of society. A future where any sense of personal identity whether it be gender ,race , religion, nationality, is deemed a hate crime. 
These over indulged youngsters want to sit down and try to think matters through. it is a pity that so many of them have been so dumbed down by the atrocious but deliberate standard of state education. That to even consider anything that will not stimulate there physical senses or emotional state, has no chance what so ever of ever occurring. 
They are like sheep following the Judas goats . And marching straight into the spiritual and physical death  of the darkness that that hates and despises them and is completely malevolent. And will destroy them 1st if it succeeds.  
In a way I feel sorry for them for I know what I fight for and what I know to be objective truth both spiritually and temporally . But these wretches as Our Lord Jesus Christ said. "

"And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.".

They through either there pride , ignorance or complete loving of darkness are after creating a Hell on Earth for all. And a certainty of Hell for ever for themselves. We Must oppose them !"

Friday, 1 July 2016

More Liberal Hypocrites



List of Conservative Party Elected MP’s
Nigel Adams
Selby and Ainsty
Adam Afriyie
Peter Aldous
Lucy Allan
Heidi Allen
South Cambridgeshire
David Amess
Southend West
Stuart Andrew
Caroline Ansell
Edward Argar
Victoria Atkins
Louth and Horncastle
Richard Bacon
South Norfolk
Steven Baker
Harriett Baldwin
West Worcestershire
Steve Barclay
North East Cambridgeshire
John Baron
Basildon and Billericay
Gavin Barwell
Croydon Central
Guto Bebb
Henry Bellingham
North West Norfolk
Richard Benyon
Sir Paul Beresford
Mole Valley
Jake Berry
Rossendale and Darwen
James Berry
Kingston and Surbiton
Andrew Bingham
High Peak
Bob Blackman
Harrow East
Nicola Blackwood
Oxford West and Abingdon
Crispin Blunt
Nick Boles
Grantham and Stamford
Peter Bone
Victoria Borwick
Peter Bottomley
Worthing West
Karen Bradley
Staffordshire Moorlands
Graham Brady
Altrincham and Sale West
Julian Brazier
Andrew Bridgen
North West Leicestershire
Steve Brine
James Brokenshire
Old Bexley and Sidcup
Fiona Bruce
Robert Buckland
South Swindon
Conor Burns
Bournemouth West
Simon Burns
David Burrowes
Enfield Southgate
Alistair Burt
North East Bedfordshire
Alun Cairns
Vale of Glamorgan
David Cameron
Neil Carmichael
James Cartlidge
South Suffolk
Bill Cash
Maria Caulfield
Alex Chalk
Rehman Chishti
Gillingham and Rainham
Christopher Chope
Jo Churchill
Bury St Edmunds
Greg Clark
Tunbridge Wells
Kenneth Clarke
James Cleverly
Geoffrey Clifton-Brown
The Cotswolds
Thérèse Coffey
Suffolk Coastal
Damian Collins
Folkestone and Hythe
Oliver Colvile
Plymouth Sutton and Devonport
Alberto Costa
South Leicestershire
Geoffrey Cox
Torridge and West Devon
Stephen Crabb
Preseli Pembrokeshire
Tracey Crouch
Chatham and Aylesford
Byron Davies
Chris Davies
Brecon and Radnorshire
David Davies
Glyn Davies
James Davies
Vale of Clwyd
Mims Davies
Philip Davies
David Davis
Haltemprice and Howden
Caroline Dinenage
Jonathan Djanogly
Michelle Donelan
Nadine Dorries
Mid Bedfordshire
Steve Double
St Austell and Newquay
Oliver Dowden
Jackie Doyle-Price
Richard Drax
South Dorset
Flick Drummond
Portsmouth South
James Duddridge
Rochford and Southend East
Alan Duncan
Rutland and Melton
Iain Duncan Smith
Chingford and Woodford Green
Philip Dunne
Michael Ellis
Northampton North
Jane Ellison
Tobias Ellwood
Bournemouth East
Charlie Elphicke
George Eustice
Camborne and Redruth
Graham Evans
Weaver Vale
Nigel Evans
Ribble Valley
David Evennett
Bexleyheath and Crayford
Michael Fabricant
Michael Fallon
Suella Fernandes
Mark Field
Cities of London and Westminster
Kevin Foster
Liam Fox
North Somerset
Mark Francois
Rayleigh and Wickford
Lucy Frazer
South East Cambridgeshire
George Freeman
Mid Norfolk
Mike Freer
Finchley and Golders Green
Richard Fuller
Marcus Fysh
Sir Roger Gale
North Thanet
Sir Edward Garnier
Mark Garnier
Wyre Forest
David Gauke
South West Hertfordshire
Nusrat Ghani
Nick Gibb
Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Cheryl Gillan
Chesham and Amersham
John Glen
Zac Goldsmith
Richmond Park
Robert Goodwill
Scarborough and Whitby
Michael Gove
Surrey Heath
Richard Graham
Helen Grant
Maidstone and The Weald
James Gray
North Wiltshire
Chris Grayling
Epsom and Ewell
Chris Green
Bolton West
Damian Green
Justine Greening
Dominic Grieve
Andrew Griffiths
Ben Gummer
Sam Gyimah
East Surrey
Robert Halfon
Luke Hall
Thornbury and Yate
Philip Hammond
Runnymede and Weybridge
Stephen Hammond
Matthew Hancock
West Suffolk
Greg Hands
Chelsea and Fulham
Mark Harper
Forest of Dean
Richard Harrington
Rebecca Harris
Castle Point
Simon Hart
Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire
Sir Alan Haselhurst
Saffron Walden
John Hayes
South Holland and The Deepings
Oliver Heald
North East Hertfordshire
James Heappey
Chris Heaton-Harris
Peter Heaton-Jones
North Devon
Gordon Henderson
Sittingbourne and Sheppey
Nick Herbert
Arundel and South Downs
Damian Hinds
East Hampshire
Simon Hoare
North Dorset
George Hollingbery
Meon Valley
Kevin Hollinrake
Thirsk and Malton
Philip Hollobone
Adam Holloway
Kris Hopkins
Sir Gerald Howarth
John Howell
Ben Howlett
Nigel Huddleston
Mid Worcestershire
Jeremy Hunt
South West Surrey
Nick Hurd
Ruislip Northwood and Pinner
Stewart Jackson
Margot James
Sajid Javid
Ranil Jayawardena
North East Hampshire
Bernard Jenkin
Harwich and North Essex
Andrea Jenkyns
Morley and Outwood
Robert Jenrick
Boris Johnson
Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Gareth Johnson
Jo Johnson
Andrew Jones
Harrogate and Knaresborough
David Jones
Clwyd West
Marcus Jones
Daniel Kawczynski
Shrewsbury and Atcham
Seema Kennedy
South Ribble
Simon Kirby
Brighton Kemptown
Sir Greg Knight
East Yorkshire
Julian Knight
Kwasi Kwarteng
Eleanor Laing
Epping Forest
Mark Lancaster
Milton Keynes North
Pauline Latham
Mid Derbyshire
Andrea Leadsom
South Northamptonshire
Phillip Lee
Jeremy Lefroy
Edward Leigh
Charlotte Leslie
Bristol North West
Oliver Letwin
West Dorset
Brandon Lewis
Great Yarmouth
Julian Lewis
New Forest East
Ian Liddell-Grainger
Bridgwater and West Somerset
David Lidington
Peter Lilley
Hitchin and Harpenden
Jack Lopresti
Filton and Bradley Stoke
Jonathan Lord
Tim Loughton
East Worthing and Shoreham
Karen Lumley
Craig Mackinlay
South Thanet
David Mackintosh
Northampton South
Anne Main
St Albans
Alan Mak
Kit Malthouse
North West Hampshire
Scott Mann
North Cornwall
Tania Mathias
Theresa May
Paul Maynard
Blackpool North and Cleveleys
Jason McCartney
Colne Valley
Karl McCartney
Patrick McLoughlin
Derbyshire Dales
Stephen McPartland
Mark Menzies
Johnny Mercer
Plymouth Moor View
Huw Merriman
Bexhill and Battle
Stephen Metcalfe
South Basildon and East Thurrock
Maria Miller
Amanda Milling
Cannock Chase
Nigel Mills
Amber Valley
Anne Milton
Andrew Mitchell
Sutton Coldfield
Penny Mordaunt
Portsmouth North
Nicky Morgan
Anne Marie Morris
Newton Abbot
David Morris
Morecambe and Lunesdale
James Morris
Halesowen and Rowley Regis
Wendy Morton
David Mowat
Warrington South
David Mundell
Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale
Sheryll Murray
South East Cornwall
Andrew Murrison
South West Wiltshire
Bob Neill
Bromley and Chislehurst
Sarah Newton
Truro and Falmouth
Caroline Nokes
Romsey and Southampton North
Jesse Norman
Hereford and South Herefordshire
David Nuttall
Bury North
Matthew Offord
Guy Opperman
George Osborne
Neil Parish
Tiverton and Honiton
Priti Patel
Owen Paterson
North Shropshire
Mark Pawsey
Mike Penning
Hemel Hempstead
John Penrose
Andrew Percy
Brigg and Goole
Claire Perry
Stephen Phillips
Sleaford and North Hykeham
Chris Philp
Croydon South
Eric Pickles
Brentwood and Ongar
Christopher Pincher
Daniel Poulter
Central Suffolk and North Ipswich
Rebecca Pow
Taunton Deane
Victoria Prentis
Mark Prisk
Hertford and Stortford
Mark Pritchard
The Wrekin
Tom Pursglove
Jeremy Quin
Will Quince
Dominic Raab
Esher and Walton
John Redwood
Jacob Rees-Mogg
North East Somerset
Laurence Robertson
Mary Robinson
Andrew Rosindell
Amber Rudd
Hastings and Rye
David Rutley
Antionette Sandbach
Paul Scully
Sutton and Cheam
Andrew Selous
South West Bedfordshire
Grant Shapps
Welwyn Hatfield
Alok Sharma
Reading West
Alec Shelbrooke
Elmet and Rothwell
Keith Simpson
Chris Skidmore
Chloe Smith
Norwich North
Henry Smith
Julian Smith
Skipton and Ripon
Royston Smith
Southampton Itchen
Sir Nicholas Soames
Mid Sussex
Amanda Solloway
Derby North
Anna Soubry
Caroline Spelman
Mark Spencer
Andrew Stephenson
John Stevenson
Bob Stewart
Iain Stewart
Milton Keynes South
Rory Stewart
Penrith and The Border
Gary Streeter
South West Devon
Mel Stride
Central Devon
Graham Stuart
Beverley and Holderness
Julian Sturdy
York Outer
Rishi Sunak
Desmond Swayne
New Forest West
Hugo Swire
East Devon
Robert Syms
Derek Thomas
St Ives
Maggie Throup
Edward Timpson
Crewe and Nantwich
Kelly Tolhurst
Rochester and Strood
Justin Tomlinson
North Swindon
Michael Tomlinson
Mid Dorset and North Poole
Craig Tracey
North Warwickshire
David Tredinnick
Anne-Marie Trevelyan
Elizabeth Truss
South West Norfolk
Thomas Tugendhat
Tonbridge and Malling
Andrew Turner
Isle of Wight
Andrew Tyrie
Ed Vaizey
Shailesh Vara
North West Cambridgeshire
Martin Vickers
Theresa Villiers
Chipping Barnet
Charles Walker
Robin Walker
Ben Wallace
Wyre and Preston North
David Warburton
Somerton and Frome
Matt Warman
Boston and Skegness
Dame Angela Watkinson
Hornchurch and Upminster
James Wharton
Stockton South
Helen Whately
Faversham and Mid Kent
Heather Wheeler
South Derbyshire
Chris White
Warwick and Leamington
Craig Whittaker
Calder Valley
John Whittingdale
Bill Wiggin
North Herefordshire
Craig Williams
Cardiff North
Gavin Williamson
South Staffordshire
Rob Wilson
Reading East
Sarah Wollaston
Mike Wood
Dudley South
William Wragg
Hazel Grove
Jeremy Wright
Kenilworth and Southam
Nadhim Zahawi