Search This Blog

Thursday, 13 May 2010

Tory and Lib Dems Betray Their Voters and Their Principles

Tory and Lib Dems Betray Their Voters and Their Principles


The Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties have betrayed many of their principles and their voters by simply throwing away many of their core policy points in a desperate rush to seize office.
A large number of important election promises upon which both parties strenuously campaigned have now been thrown onto the rubbish heap.
* The Liberal Democrats have abandoned their election promise to introduce a special tax on properties costing more than £2 million (Mr Cameron was personally worried about that one).
* The Liberal Democrats have abandoned their opposition to the Tory’s £6 billion in public spending cuts this year.
* The Liberal Democrats have agreed to support the scrapping of part of next year's one percent National Insurance tax rise.
* The Liberal Democrats have abandoned their opposition to renewal of the Trident nuclear deterrent.
* The Liberal Democrats have agreed that no further powers should be given the EU without a referendum.
* The Liberal Democrats have abandoned their demand that Britain join the euro currency.
* The Conservative Party has abandoned its election promise to raise the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million.
* The Conservative Party has agreed to Lib Dem plans to raise the point at which people start paying tax to £10,000, although this will be phased in.
* The Conservative Party has thrown away its opposition to a referendum on the voting system and the introduction of fixed-term parliaments, which they previously opposed.
On the important issue of immigration, the Liberal Democrats have abandoned their mad policy plan to grant illegal immigrants asylum and have agreed with the Tory’s pathetic “cap on immigration” policy which actually means that current levels of immigration will continue.
Nick Clegg and David Cameron have been exposed as unprincipled scoundrels with this ruthless betrayal of their core policies.
The British public can therefore expect to see further policies and programmes launched for which they did not vote.

Tories Appoint First Muslim Party Chairman

Tories Appoint First Muslim Party Chairman


The Conservative Party has taken a giant leap forward in its plans to complete the Islamification of Britain with the appointment of Pakistani-origin Sayeeda Hussain Warsi as their new chairman.
Ms Warsi has replaced ‘former’ Communist Party member Eric Pickles (who has been appointed to the cabinet post of Communities Secretary under Mr Cameron) to become the most senior figure within the Tory party structure.
The move is widely seen as yet another Conservative sop to the growing Muslim population of Britain and complements the creation of the Conservative Muslim Forum (CMF) which is the officially-endorsed Islamic section of that party.
According to the CMF website, that body believes that the “Conservative Party's values and policies reflect the values and beliefs of the Muslim community in the United Kingdom” and then goes on to add: “Unfortunately, there are many Muslims who live in deprived areas, the unemployment rate amongst Muslims is 15%, there is general underachievement of Muslim children in school, the health of Muslims in [sic] below average and there is a lack of interaction in certain areas.”
Ms Warsi has been unable to win a seat and Tory leader David Cameron was ‘forced’ to nominate her to the House of Lords to enable her to sit in Parliament.
She has also served as a special adviser to Michael Howard on Community Relations and was earlier appointed by Mr Cameron as Vice Chairman of the Conservative Party with specific responsibility for cities.
In its December 2006 edition, the New Statesman magazine revealed that Ms Warsi had received support from the Muslim Labour Peer ‘Lord’ Ahmed during her unsuccessful failed election bid in Dewsbury during the the 2005 general election. 
According to the New Statesman's report, Ms Warsi "welcomed Lord Ahmed's support."
Ms Warsi is also expected to take on a junior ministerial role in the new Tory/Lib Dem cabinet.
* The Muslim population in Britain has grown by more than 500,000 to 2.4 million in just four years, according to official research published in January 2009.
The Muslim population multiplied 10 times faster than the rest of society, the research by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed.
In September 2009, ONS figures also revealed that Mohammed is now the most common name for baby boys born in London and three other English regions.
When various spellings of the Islamic prophet are added together -- including Muhammad, Mohammad, Mohamed and Muhammed -- the name is now more than twice as popular in London as the capital's second-ranked boys’ name, Daniel. There were 1,828 baby boys given the name Mohammed, including variants, in 2008, compared with only 844 who were called Daniel.
London is not the first European capital to see Mohammed become the number one name for baby boys. In Brussels, Amsterdam, Copenhagen and Oslo the name has already gained the top slot.

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE ABOUT ISLAM

THE TRUTH IS OUT THERE ABOUT ISLAM


I've just spent the last 30 minutes checking online comments of Conservative party members to see what the general reaction is to this crooks deal cooked up between Cameron and Clegg, and I'm pleased to say I've found a lot of commonsense views in regard to the same basic question we would ask. i.e. WTF is all this about - working with LibDims - when they have no mandate and were voted for to prize us away from Europe.
One comment posted the content of a letter of resignation, and a few others said if they'd known this would happen then they would have stayed with UKIP.
On the face of it (early days granted since it's only been an hour or so), it looks like support is already waning for David Cameron's NuTories. Another commenter referred to Cameron as not being a Conservative but rather a Liberal and I assure you it wasn't me.
I didn't get chance to look at any Liberal sites but I'd appreciate anyone who has or is about to investigate, if they would come back here to tell the rest of us what they say.
But this is also interesting:
I'll copy the article here which I found on CentreRight, the 'right' wing of the Conservative Party.
Pay attention to the lady in the first video who says she's attending what she says is: "Our annual Hitler Youth week" - SHOCKER EH! But she then goes on to say she supports the terror organisation 'Hamas', and what they said about Israel. (The speaker is Jewish).
Okay the rest is lifted from the article, which you might be interested to read alongside viewing the video's, the second of which shows assaults within a university in Sweden.
For anyone looking for some non-election related news, I must point you towards two especially shocking short videos. The first comes from the University of California San Diego, and records a chilling exchange between David Horowitz, founder and the president of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and a young Muslim student. That this kind of mindset exists anywhere - let alone a university campus - is about as depressing and as frightening as it gets.

Pop Up Embed " readonly="readonly" type="text">

The next piece of footage is of an assault - and subsequent celebration of this assault - on the artist Lars Vilks, at a university in Sweden. Vilks has received death threats and a great deal of censorship for producing artwork which portrayed Mohammed (the picture of which can be viewed here).

Pop Up Embed " readonly="readonly" type="text">

As I have posted before, and as previous studies have shown, this type of attitude is not uncommon on British campuses. Labour stuck their head in the sand on this issue for years. Let's hope the new government will not.

Now read what UK students think: LINK
I sum this article up as an entire establishment KNOWING what is going on, yet deciding to purposely work against the aims of the British National Party in their endeavours to deal with the massive Islamic problems facing western civilisation.
Brothers and sisters, our cause is right and there's a lot of support, and as we've now shown, the truth is out there about Islam!
  Islam And Violent Separatism (Kegan Paul Studies in Anthropology, Economy and Society) 


Deradicalisation by Default: The Dialogue Approach to Rooting Out Violent Extremism

Another Election Lie as Nick Clegg Abandons Single Transferrable Vote System for “Alternative Vote” Policy

Another Election Lie as Nick Clegg Abandons Single Transferrable Vote System for “Alternative Vote” Policy


As part of his deal to become deputy Prime Minister, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has abandoned his party’s policy of introducing a proportional representation “single transferable vote” (STV) system for the “alternative vote” (AV) system which the Electoral Reform Society (ERS) has dismissed as “even more disproportional than the first-past-the-post” system.
The shocking reversal of core Lib Dem policy is bound to sit uneasily with its supporters. The Liberal Democrats, just like the British National Party, bears the brunt of disproportional elections which see vote tallies not reflected in seats in parliament.
According to the Liberal Democratic 2010 election manifesto, that party promised to “(C)hange politics and abolish safe seats by introducing a fair, more proportional voting system for MPs. Our preferred Single Transferable Vote system gives people the choice between candidates as well as parties.”
However, in terms of the deal Mr Clegg struck with the Tories, the Lib Dems have now agreed to hold a referendum on the introduction of an AV system rather than their promised STV system, despite the differences between the two systems being vast.
According to the ERS (which officially backs the STV system and thus was inclined to support the Lib Dems), STV is a preferential voting system in which votes are initially allocated to an elector's most preferred candidate.
After candidates have been either elected or eliminated, STV then transfers surplus or unused votes according to the voters' stated preferences. According to the ERS, this minimises "wasted" votes, provides proportional representation, and ensures that votes are explicitly cast for individual candidates rather than party lists.
It achieves this by using multi-seat constituencies (voting districts) and by transferring votes that would otherwise be wasted on sure losers or winners to other eligible candidates.
According to the ERS, STV ensures that each voter gets one vote, which can transfer from their first-preference to their second-preference and so on, as necessary. Candidates don't need a majority of votes to be elected, just a known 'quota', or share of the votes, determined by the size of the electorate and the number of positions to be filled.
If a preferred candidate has no chance of being elected or has enough votes already, the vote is transferred to another candidate in accordance with the elector’s instructions.
“STV thus ensures that very few votes are wasted, unlike other systems, especially the First-Past-the-Post, where only a small number of votes actually contribute to the result,” the ERS says.
The AV system, now endorsed by the Lib Dems, is “very much like First-Past-the-Post (FPTP),” continued the ERS explanation of the two systems.
“Like FPTP, it is used to elect representatives for single-member constituencies, except that rather than simply marking one solitary 'X' on the ballot paper, the voter has the chance to rank the candidates on offer.
“The voter thus puts a '1' by their first-preference candidate, and can continue, if they wish, to put a '2' by their second-preference, and so on, until they don't care anymore or they run out of names,” the ERS explains.
“In some AV elections, such as most Australian elections, electors are required to rank all candidates.
If a candidate receives a majority of first-preference votes (more people put them as number one than all the rest combined), then they are elected.
“If no candidate gains a majority on first preferences, then the second-preference votes of the candidate who finished last on the first count are redistributed. This process is repeated until someone gets over 50 percent.
“AV is thus not a proportional system, and can in fact be more disproportional than FPTP,” said the ERS, adding that the AV system does “not give proportionality to parties or other bodies of opinion, in Parliament.
“Research by Democratic Audit in 1997 showed that the results could actually be even more distorting than under first-past-the-post,” the ERS said.
“It also does very little to give a voice to those who have been traditionally under-represented in parliament” and as there is “no transfer of powers from party authority to the voters, it does not produce a proportional parliament,” the ERS concluded.
In other words, the AV system is no improvement upon the existing system and is merely designed to make it more difficult for a party such as the BNP to gain parliamentary representation.
The AV system is obviously a sleight of hand which is directed against the BNP and is not aimed at improving democracy in Britain. Rather, Mr Cameron and Mr Clegg’s sudden conversion to AV are an indication that they have now fully comprehended the meaning of the BNP’s surge in vote totals in last week’s election — and are desperate to undermine democracy even further.

Wednesday, 12 May 2010

British Democracy Is Dead – Now What?

British Democracy Is Dead – Now What?

Background
The general election of 2010 yielded little in the way of reward for the hard-working and expectantNationalists of the British National Party. Although it is encouraging to have increased the vote to just over of 563,000, a 1.2% vote share, the failure to return a single MP is hugely disappointing.
In reading the post-election reaction around the BNP supporting sites and forums, the focus has been on the highly-questionable integrity of the electoral system, with many frustrated and angry Nationalists citing the more than dubious postal voting; the unfairness of the first-past-the-post system; gerrymandering of constituencies and spoilt or uncounted BNP votes. But the reality is that none of these are actually at the root of the enormously difficult problems facing British Nationalists.

The issues presented here in this article represent the reality of what Great Britain and the British people have now become. If British Nationalists are to progress, I believe each of these issues needs to be fully understood and thoroughly considered if the cause of British Nationalism is to progress or all that is going to happen is further disappointments and frustrations as precious time, hard-work and valuable resources will be wasted and time is the one resource we simply cannot waste any further. Britain is dying each and every day. Actually, it isn’t dying, it is being deliberately destroyed and this article will explain how.
The question facing British Nationalists right now is: Why did the British National Party fail to return a single MP to Parliament in the 2010 general election?


Masters Of The Game

What is apparent to me is that there is a complete lack of understanding about the nature of the enemy we face. The criticisms of the electoral system are quite frankly misplaced and focusing on why the electoral system is so unfair is simply an act of folly. It is folly because the democratic process is completely abused from one year to the next on an enormous scale.
British Nationalists need to understand fully a very important fact about Great Britain: It is a Marxist state. Why is this so crucial?

Marxism, by definition, is a totalitarian ideology that seeks to dominate and control society. The only way ANY ideology becomes dominant in society is by establishing hegemony. Hegemony is NOT established via the ballot box and Marxists such as Gramsci and the Frankfurt School knew this all too well. Making an ideology dominant in society takes years, and it happens by infiltrating all areas of society.

In Great Britain today, the dominant ideology is Marxism, particularly cultural Marxism: Multiculturalism, political correctness, diversity, equality and tolerance. It has become the dominant ideology because at all levels of society: schools, colleges and universities, the print and broadcast media, the legal system and the political process itself is now all controlled by Marxists.

Look at the three political parties. They each prosecute Marxist ideologies. Labour has sold-out its working class roots and destroyed working class communities through mass-immigration, the Conservatives are all about conserving Multiculturalism and diversity and no longer care about conserving Great Britain and the Liberals are only Liberal when it comes to minorities and not the indigenous British people. The only choice for the British people in a general election is Marxism, in fact there is no “no” vote to Marxism, as the Marxist European Union has demonstrated on more than one occasion, witness France, Holland and Ireland.

So despite the fact that politicians from each of these parties:
1.    Started THREE illegal wars based on a pack of lies and murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children
2.    Drove the entire British economy into bankruptcy and bailed out greedy and failed banksters with taxpayer’s money
3.    Looted the public purse at will to pay for all manner of “expenses” including porn-films and playing the property market with public money for private gain
4.    Have flooded the UK with millions of immigrants from all over the world which is destroying the British way of life and creating mayhem in British cities
The British people still voted overwhelmingly in their millions for these disgusting hypocrites and parasites. This is why hegemony is so important to understand and to illustrate further precisely how important this issue is, consider the following:

You are a committed Christian living in Islamic Turkey. In Turkey, 99% of the population are Muslims, just 1% Christian. You decide to start the Turkish Christian Party because you’re convinced the Turkish people need a Christian government. Islam holds cultural hegemony in Turkey. What do you think will happen?

Making an ideology dominant throughout society is how people are controlled and brainwashed and Marxism has been brainwashing Britons and transforming British society for the last sixty years with the result that the majority of Britons are not open to rational and reasoned argument as any British Nationalist worth their salt will know all too well after engaging in debate with Liberal-Multiculturalists.

And as Marxism is a totalitarian anti-democratic ideology, democracy is not an option.  Marxists are enforcing their ideologies with organisations outside the democratic process, using taxpayer’s money to fund anti-British organisations such as Searchlight and the UAF and of course, the little-known Common Purpose.
In Great Britain, the democratic process isn’t just a corrupt charade, another circus designed to entertain the masses giving them the illusion of a free democracy, it is now a weapon deployed by Marxists to further destroy Great Britain and the British people. And as last Thursday showed beyond any doubt, the fact that Marxism holds hegemony means they are winning with ease, the victory secured long before any voting takes place. Marxists are masters of the game, they hold power and they will not concede it through the ballot box. That people think Britain is a democratic state shows how effective at weaving comforting illusions the Marxists truly are.

Out Of Tune

But it would be a big mistake to just blame the current state of Great Britain for the BNP’s failure to return an MP. The British electorate are in the main, so brainwashed by cultural Marxism they are almost in a zombie state, responding automatically to the dictates of their Marxist political masters. Waking them from this brainwashed state is an almighty task and it is absolutely vital to deploy the right tactic.

In my humble opinion, I believe the decision to make Afghanistan the core issue that the BNP campaigned on was a huge mistake. It just didn’t chime with the electorate – it didn’t chime with me and I speak as someone whose friend lost his 20 year old son in Sangin in 2007 – because they’re not thinking about it for most of their waking hours. I shared my concern at the time with the Green Arrow so please don’t think I’m being wise after the event here.

Adding in the nostalgia of the Second World War only exacerbates the mistake, it only serves to further alienate many Britons who have been exposed to the Marxist anti-war pacifist rhetoric of the last sixty years. And what the British people were sixty years ago they most certainly are not now.

The most powerful motivator for humans isn’t reward but fear. To reach brainwashed Britons, fear is the key. Rationality and reason will not work and if you doubt this, try to have a reasoned conversation with a devout Christian or a fanatical Muslim about the existence of a God.

But what issues will arouse fear in Britons you may ask? There are two issues right now that the BNP should’ve focused on with laser-beam accuracy – and indeed should from now on:

1. The catastrophic state of the European economy.
2. The rise and growing threat of Islam.

Let’s take a few lessons from Europe and first, the serious events occurring right now in Greece. Because nothing highlights the crass stupidity of the European Union and the single currency more than this crisis facing the Greeks.

The Greek government has continually spent more money than it has and to say that it engages in creative accounting would be an understatement. The result of repeated irresponsible and weak financial management has led to Greece going completely bankrupt and requiring loans totalling a staggering one hundred and twenty-two billion euros to keep it in the euro zone.
Note that the goal isn’t to provide a solution that is best for Greece and the Greek people, it is to ensure the European project is maintained with Greece still part of the euro zone.

Here’s the killer: These loans are to be provided by countries such as the UK, a country whose corrupt politicians have just used taxpayer’s money to bail-out the greedy banks, and Portugal and Spain, whose credit rating has just been downgraded to “junk status” largely because they too are in similar situations to Greece.

You’ve got it, those nations up to their necks in debt are bailing out a country that is wholly bankrupt. It also begs the question: What happens when – not if – other euro zone countries go the same way. Where the hell is the money coming from?
Germany! Cries the EU. Except the Germans are now wising up to the reality of socialism: the weak and irresponsible are rewarded at the expense of a competent and continually punished strong. Germany has resisted this bail-out only to eventually cave-in causing a tidal-wave of resentment amongst angry Germans who are demanding to know why German taxpayers should be bailing out the failed Greek government. They know it won’t end with Greece and the markets know it too and so the euro is weakening almost daily.
Yet during the election, the BNP chose not to exploit this issue and I have no idea why. The day of reckoning HAS TO COME and when it does it is going hit the people of Britain very hard indeed. The Marxist opposition should’ve been attacked every day on this issue by the BNP and I think an opportunity to reach the brainwashed Britons and awaken them to the serious consequences they and most definitely THEIR KIDS – not the pampered hypocritical Marxist elites – are going to face.

Inspirational Infidel
But Europe also provided British Nationalists with another opportunity to invoke the fear factor, and if there is one issue that merits being centre stage of British Nationalism, it is this.

Holland and Switzerland may seem unlikely countries for British Nationalists to take a cue from yet recently, events in these countries revealed an increasing awareness about the very serious threat posed by Islam and an ever-growing and perpetually agitated Muslim population.

The Swiss voted to ban the building of minarets, and unsurprisingly faced the wrath of annoyed Marxists in Europe and outraged – there’s a surprise – Muslims. But the rise of Geert Wilders and his freedom party provides an even bigger clue as to how more and more people are becoming very concerned about the growing presence of Islam in Holland. And the reason they are becoming concerned is because Wilders has made this THE CORE ISSUE of his party and brought it forcibly to centre stage so it cannot be ignored.

The brilliant film “Fitna” that Wilders made about the reality of the verses in the Qur’an that command Muslims to fight and kill the unbeliever not only won him strong support in Holland, it also gained the attention of the entire world with the result that Wilders now has a very real chance of becoming the next Dutch Prime Minister. The coming Dutch elections are in my opinion the most important elections in Europe for many years.

I believe the BNP should take a cue from Wilders and his PVV party and make Islam a core issue. I’d like to see the party expose Islam for the violent, totalitarian ideology it is at every turn, especially highlighting the religious and gender apartheids enshrined in Islamic Sharia law and of course, the legalised sexual abuse of children. The cruel and deplorable treatment of animals could also be a part of this, but make no mistake, I live and work in Barcelona and there isn’t a day passes without me talking about Islam with Spaniards, Dutch, Italians and just last week, two people from Switzerland.
What needs to be communicated without compromise is this plain and simple fact: Those who tolerate Islam tolerate religious and gender apartheid and the sexual abuse of children. They tolerate the intolerant and in doing so, they are themselves every bit as guilty as the terrorists, the rapists, the wife-beaters and the sexual abusers of children, the devout Muslims who follow the commands of their Qur’an and the real-life example of their Prophet Mohammed, a man who personally committed all the abuses listed here and many, many more.

Let’s make it centre stage because the violent and oppressive nature of Islam is something more and more people are justifiably feared of.

Mean Streak

Let me state right now that I firmly believe Nick Griffin and Simon Darby are the two very best men to lead the British National Party. I listened to their debates during the campaign and their behaviour and conduct was absolutely exemplary, they are a credit to the BNP and long may they lead us.

But I have one main criticism of them both and it is a criticism I know other Nationalists have made and I sincerely believe it is a valid criticism that I hope both of them will address.

The problem is that both men are gentlemen. They are too nice and I would like them to stop being nice and start being mean, even nasty to the hypocrites and parasites in the media and from political opponents by responding in kind. God knows they have enough ammunition. For example:
Nick Griffin on the circus of Question Time.  He was polite and convivial, a tad too much for my liking, but when Baroness Jihad Warsi referred to him as “a disgusting man”, he let it pass. This disgraceful smear from a woman who believes that grown men can legally marry and abuse little girls and as a Muslim HAS TO believe that all unbelievers – kuffars – are the equivalent of dogs, pigs and excrement. Pity the BNP Chairman didn’t remind her and the British people of her beliefs for all to hear. Google “Haram” if you doubt what I am saying.

Then I heard Simon Darby on a political debate on Stoke radio where there was another example of this. His opponent was one sneering, upper-middle-class toff called Tristram Hunt who referred to the “nasty, vile politics of the fascist BNP”, and the Deputy Leader made a passing reference to Labour’s illegal wars but nowhere near forcibly enough as it was drowned out by the Liberal candidate. Yet Hunt represents a party of war criminals who deliberately murdered hundreds of thousands of people – Serbs, Iraqis and Afghans – callously bombing civilians, the hands of these war criminals are dripping with the blood of innocent women and children.

Those who oppose us, who hate Britain, who are deliberately destroying Britain and who are deliberately ethnically cleansing Britons from their communities should have the reality of who and what they are pointed out to them in no uncertain terms every time they launch their disgraceful slurs, smears and lies. That takes a mean streak, but if they’re nasty, then it’s time we hit them back, hard and to hurt by showing them in their true light.  They are charlatans masquerading as sheep but behind the suits and the smiles lurk wolves with a rabid hatred for Britain and the British people.

Cry Freedom

Finally, I would like to see the British National Party expand from being a “Resistance” movement – which I find a bit negative – to being a British Civil Rights Movement. When you look back through the history of civil rights struggles, success was achieved not through the ballot box but by winning public support, i.e. their cause was accepted by the majority of people in their respective societies, that is their ideology gained hegemony in their lands.

I believe with all of my being that the British people have a right to their homeland and to their identity. I believe those rights should be afforded to ALL peoples of ALL nations and I believe Britons are now engaged in a Civil Rights struggle to protect these freedoms. In fact the entire white race is engaged in a fight for survival but I’ll leave that for another time.

Instead of seeing “The BNP, the British Resistance” I suggest an amendment: “The British National Party – Fighting For The Civil Rights And Freedoms Of The British People”
They are the Civil Rights and Freedoms our forefathers gave their blood, sweat and tears for and they are ours by birthright and I think this needs to be stated firmly and clearly, without apology and without conceding to Multicultural dogma in any way.

Call It Conspiracy   The GreeningThe Clinton Clique

British Patriots Never Give In

British Patriots Never Give In

It is with respect to former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, I say farewell and good luck to both him and his family and to say thank you for doing what you thought best for Britain despite that I and many others may have disagreed with you.
As for the rest of your party, it has proven itself to be despicable to the end.
Outside the gates of Downing Street tonight, on David Cameron's entrance as new Prime Minister, Labour supporters and so called anti-fascist UAF, were booing him and his wife on their arrival, and were shouting "Tory Scum".
As to David Cameron, I sincerely wish him well in his position which I and many others would want to be the start of a new beginning in Britain where the British people can be treated for who they are, for what they are and for what they have right to be by all moral and legal standards.
In particular the right to be called indigenous Britons in precisely the same way immigrants are recognised in their own identities.
This land belongs to the British people and if you mistreat them or isolate them, then you will fail in the post of Prime Minister just as others have before you.
You say you want the country to take responsibility.
Take responsibility now for our past and for our future, and make a start to end the discrimination against us the indigenous people of Britain.
This video presentation may help David Cameron and all politicians to see that those of us who are patriots are fighting for something higher than politics, and which is higher than any other thing on earth you could describe.
We fight for our right to our indigenous identity, our culture, our land, our ancestors and our people and for the future existence of all these things in no distinctly different way than former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and others.
Pop Up Embed " readonly="readonly" type="text"> RATE
Perhaps you could start by asking the 122 MP's to return their Early Day Motion to the House of Commons, which seeks the signature of our government to recognise the rights of the Indigenous People of the United Kingdom.
Lastly, replacing us is not a viable option it is an act of betrayal.

REDS IN CLASSROOM ORDER GIRL TO DRESS AS A MUSLIM, SCANDAL

In Liverpool a young Catholic girl was forced to be classed as a truant for refusing to dress as a Islamist on a field trip to a mosque. Also adding injury to injury the School, Ellesmere Port Catholic High School also demanded £ 3 from each parent to cover the costs of the trip! 
as reported in today's Daily Mail , it states,
"But when Amy refused to dress in Muslim attire for the visit to Al Rahma Mosque in Toxteth, Liverpool, staff warned her about rules and said refusal would mean non attendance which would then be marked down as an 'unauthorised absence.' 
In a stern letter to her family with words in block capitals and underlined, the school's headmaster Peter Lee said the visit was 'as compulsory as a geography field trip."

Now what strikes me is that this is so called a GEOGRAPHY field trip! Although due to the last 13 years of Nu Labour Misrule many of our inner cities look like another country, the fact is what as geography got to do with a trip to Islamist temple. NOTHING IN MY VIEW! as the headmaster of this school is quoted as saying in ,
 
"That the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement. None of us would relish that."

Well their you have it in a nutshell, "required to promote" IE: brainwashing and "unwelcome inspection judgement" Unwelcome from who? I am sure who from? the Reds who now permeate all levels of Govt both Local and National, who resort to all methods of intimidation to forward their policies of destroying The British Culture and Peoples.

We at Horwich Nationalist can only show admiration to this young Ladies mother who said,

"It's like they are saying she is playing truant for not wearing a head scarf. If the trip had been without the leggings and the headscarf, that would have been fine but I wasn't having my daughter dressed in the Muslim way". And also
'I also fail to see how a three-hour trip to a mosque is of any educational value to a Catholic when she can learn about the Muslim faith in the classroom.
'I can guarantee that if there were ten Muslim girls coming to our school it would adhere to what they wanted, because that's their faith, their religion, their dress code.' 


it is now time for us all to make a stand against these Communist Reds and the Dogma of political correctness and their push towards us all becoming slaves to them and the Islamist religion, which with it,s core belief of submission , would ideally suit their purposes of a non British Marxist hegemony. As I have said in the past we are adults and each have a responsibility to take a stand if we want our Democratic British way of life to survive! 



BNP Inquiries Top 10,000 Mark Since 1 April

BNP Inquiries Top 10,000 Mark Since 1 April


The number of inquiries into the British National Party’s call centre has now topped the 10,000 mark with a new wave of post which arrived yesterday, BNP national elections officer Clive Jefferson has announced.
“The bags of mail also contained another £23,000 in donations to the BNP,” Mr Jefferson said. “This means that the BNP was the only party to start the election in the black and end it the same way.
“This is a tremendous achievement and is a tribute to the professionalism of the back office staff and the BNP’s administration team,” he continued.
“The latest batch of inquiries has taken the total number received since 1 April to well over 10,000. All of the previous inquiries have now been processed and databased.”
Mr Jefferson said that although all of these people had made the effort to inquire and donate, it would still require further effort to get them to join or become regular donors.
“For this reason all 10,000 people must be visited, spoken to and encouraged to join,” he said.
“For this purpose, the BNP’s regional organisers will be tasked with organising teams of activists to visit every inquirer.
“Every single branch and group in the country will also start holding social events where these new people can mingle with long-established BNP members and supporters and find out for themselves what the true BNP is about,” Mr Jefferson said.
“This is a time of great growth for the BNP and we are privileged to serve the party at this moment in time. All we have to do is hold the line and not buckle under the wave of attacks, smears and sabotage by enemy agents who managed to infiltrate the party,” he said.
“We know that our cause is just, our policy correct and our ideal untouchable. We will win, because we must.”
Join The British National party by Contacting us  enquiries@bnp.org.uk


Fifth terror-related conviction for a Blackburn muslim in recent years

Fifth terror-related conviction for a Blackburn muslim in recent years

A BLACKBURN man who posed as the head of al Qaeda in Britain and called for the deaths of Gordon Brown and Tony Blair has pleaded guilty to a string of terrorist offences.
Ishaq Kanmi, 23, of Cromwell Street, posted messages on a jihadi website which declared the Prime Minister and his predecessor would be sought by 'martyrdom seekers' if his demands were not met.
Pretending to be Umar Rabie - the head of 'al Qaeda in Britain' - he issued a two-month deadline in January 2008 calling for the withdrawal of British troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, together with the release of all Muslim 'captives' from Belmarsh Prison.
Over a series of months he spent up to nine hours a day at Black-burn Central Library researching and plotting, Manchester Crown Court heard. But he was unaware that counter terrorism police spent five months conducting covert surveillance of his activities after being alerted by a website moderator.
Kanmi was arrested at Manchester Airport as he waited to board a flight to Finland in August 2008. He had three electronic storage devices in his suitcase and was carrying a mobile phone all of which contained terror-related inform-ation which he intended to distr-ibute.
Today he pleaded guilty to professing to belong to al Qaeda and inviting support for the terror group. He also admitted collecting or making a record of information likely to be useful to a terrorist and three counts of disseminating terrorist publications.
Kanmi denied two counts of soliciting to murder Mr Brown and Mr Blair, which the Crown Prosecution Service said it was content to lie on file. Andrew Edis QC, prosecuting, said inviting support for a 'murderous organi-sation' such as al Qaeda was a similar crime to soliciting to murder.The pleas brought a strong reaction from Muslim community leaders in Blackburn.
Coun Salim Mulla, the chairman of the Lancashire Council of Mosques, said Kanmi was a 'rotten apple' who had behaved in a 'completely unacceptable way'.
And Jack Straw, Blackburn MP, said the court action, the fifth terror-related conviction for a Blackburn man in recent years, had come as a shock.
Following the lifting of reporting restrictions yesterday it can now be revealed that Kanmi was travelling to Helsinki when he was arrested in January 2008.
He was with Abbas Iqbal, 24, one of two brothers who filmed al Qaeda-style propaganda and dubbed themselves 'The Black-burn Resistance'.
Iqbal, of Percival Street, Black-burn, was sentenced to three years in jail at Manchester Crown Court two months ago.
Another terrorist linked to Kanmi was Albanian Krenar Lusha, 30, who was convicted by a jury at Preston Crown Court in December last year of five counts of possessing terror-related articles, and jailed for seven years.
Kanmi, still posing as Umar Rabie, had been in phone and internet contact with Lusha who was caught downloading a video on how to blow people up when police burst into his home in Derby.
Officers also discovered 71.8 litres of petrol in the cellar of Lusha's terrace house and computer documents such as 'The Bomb Book' and videos including 'Mobile Detonators'.
The convictions were the culmination of an operation which saw undercover police stationed at Blackburn Library between March to July 2008. They watched and filmed Kanmi while he used the computers.
During last year’s aborted trial, Mr Edis said Kanmi admitted making the two postings regarding Mr Brown and Mr Blair but would counter that it was a joke and that he never thought anyone would take him seriously.
The first message posted on the al-Ekhlaas website on January 2, 2008 compiled a list of aims for al Qaeda in Britain which included 'the elimination of political leaders and top of the list Blair and Brown. As God said: ‘Kill the nonbelievers’.'
Another objective was 'huge attacks, God willing, on centres and places of benefit to the crusaders. As God said: ‘Kill the participants as you find them, take them, guard them and wait for them’.'
The message concluded: 'We invite all Muslims in Britain to join us and prepare themselves for martyrdom operations and not lose this golden chance.
'We also invite all Muslims in Europe to make us victorious in Europe, with men and money, until the British government withdraws its troops from Iraq and Afghanistan.'
It was signed 'Leadership of al Qaeda in Britain.'
A second posting followed on January 24, 2008, composed from a public computer at Blackburn Central Library, in which Kanmi wrote: 'In the name of Allah, we the organisation of al Qaeda in Briton (sic) offers a truce to the British government.
'Our demands are as follows - 1: A complete withdrawal of the British troops from Afghanistan and Iraq, 2: To free all Muslim captives from Belmarsh Prison.
'If the British government fails to respond to our demands within the last day of March 2008 then the Martyrdom seekers of the organisation of al Qaeda in Britain will target all the political leaders especially Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
'And we will target all embassies, crusaders’ centre and their interests throughout the country, with the help of Allah.'
Mr Edis said Kanmi began using the name Umar Rabie on a US chat forum called Infovlad in May 2007.
He went on to create two other online identities, Umar Rabie’s Bro and Lover of Islam.
On the planned visit to Finland, Kanmi was to formally introduce Iqbal to the mosque leaders who had offered the latter a teaching post, the court heard.
He had previously visited a newly-opened mosque in the Finnish capital in his purported role as an Islamic scholar.
When searched at the airport both men were carrying terror-related information on mobile storage devices contained in their luggage.
Kanmi possessed a film from the media wing of al Qaeda about the 7/7 bombings in London and other videos on martyrdom and military training.
In Iqbal’s suitcase was a memory card which contained a video of two men dressed in camouflage crawling through Corporation Park in Blackburn.
Joel Bennathan QC, defending Kanmi, said it would be argued that his client was 'reckless rather than intentional' in some of his actions.
He said: “We will say this is a very young, damaged man who is a million miles away from Abu Hamza.”
Sentencing will take place on a date yet to be fixed as psychiatric and psychological reports on the defendant are prepared.
Link

Even more Electoral UK Fraud?

Even more Electoral Fraud?

In the council elections of 2009 I was election agent for Epping Forest branch. We were standing in every county council ward and also a district by-election.

I attended the counting of the postal ballots a week before polling day and I was surprised to find I was the only election agent there. I was also told that I could not bring anyone with me which some have said should not have been the case. When I arrived at the count I was aware of a corridor passing through the centre of the room and council staff were passing through the room to get to the toilets.

I could immediately feel that my presence was not wanted so I sat in the corner out of the way. At 1 o'clock the counters were dismissed for a 1 hour lunch break and 4 of the 5 officials left the room. I was now in the room alone with one official and members of the council were still using the corridor to get to the toilets, within feet of opened ballot papers. I thought this was way out of order.

After the initial stampede of the council staff using the room for access to the toilets it went quiet. Then the leader of the council entered the room, a person who is very much against the BNP.  She greeted the official who you must realise works for her, she is his boss.  She gives the orders and if he wants to keep his job he must obey her. They started talking and then she noticed me in the corner of the room and appeared surprised to see me there.

It then stuck me that if I had not have attended the opening of the postal ballot votes, an ardent opponent of our party would have been alone in the room with 1000's of opened ballot papers laying on tables and just one official in attendance.

About 4 months after this time this leader of the council had the CEO of the council (who had worked there for 38 years) dismissed for no reason that anyone in the council could ascertain.So you can see how much power she would have had over this lone official.

The count went on until 4pm and when finished the counters were sent home. The council officials were now standing around looking very uncomfortable and I could sense something was about to happen.

A man entered the room with a trolley and the officials loaded it with ballot boxes. Then the man proceeded to wheel the trolley out. I jumped up and said
" Aren't you going to put the seals on? You said I could put my seals on "

The head of the electoral office then shouted at me "they will only come off in the morning!"

I replied "but surely you have got to put the seals on, that's the law isn't it?"

She again shouted at me angrily "no it's not the law"

I stood between the door and the trolley determined that it would not leave until the seals were put on. I now had 5 officials standing in front of me looking at me as though I had just killed someone. It was very intimidating.

The head of the electoral office left the room and a few minutes later returned with the head of democratic services who informed me that the seals will indeed be put on. The seals were literally snatched out of my hands and put on the boxes.  It took 10 minutes at most.  Now remember that these ballot boxes would have remained opened in the council offices for a week.

On polling day I received a phone call from our organiser who informed me that one of the polling  officials was saying that we would not be allowed to put a seal on his ballot boxes when the count closed.  On arriving at the polling station our organiser informed me that the official in charge of this polling station was one of the biggest anti-BNP campaigners in Epping Forest.  This man was in charge of the polling station, can you believe that?

You can draw your own conclusions from the above, why all the antagonism towards me for wanting to put seals on the ballot boxes which only took ten minutes to do?

How can it be that an anti-BNP campaigner was allowed to be in charge of a polling station, which in fact was the  most out of the way polling station that night.  Draw your own conclusions, but the counting of the postal ballots must be attended and you must be prepared to watch them like hawks.
Voter fraud?(BALLOT): An article from: National Voter

Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Britain Has Entered a New Political Era - Post Election Analysis by Chairman Nick Griffin

Britain Has Entered a New Political Era -
Post Election Analysis by Chairman Nick Griffin
Chairman Nick GriffinDear Fellow Patriot,
So the election dust has now settled, and from our point of view there are four key outcomes:
First, the resulting hung Parliament and political instability will rapidly add to Gordon Brown's economic disaster. The Bank of England prediction that whoever won this election will end up being "out of power for a generation" is now going to apply to two of the three old parties. That's bad news for Britain, but good news for us.
Second, although many people were initially disappointed that the enormously sympathetic response (yes, don't worry; it wasn't just you, it had me going too!) we received from the public during the campaign did not translate into huge votes, the fact remains that this was the best general election result in the history of British nationalism. The headline figures tell us what we need to know:
* Total votes cast 563,743. This compares with 192,746 votes secured by the BNP in 117 seats in 2005. The nearest comparison historically is with 1979, when the National Front fought the now easily broken record of 303 seats, from which it garnered a feeble 191,719 votes
* There were a record number of deposits saved. This would undoubtedly have been even higher were it not for us missing out on crossing this important threshold in a number of seats by the votes that were undoubtedly lost in each constituency thanks to the confusion and concern caused by the unforgiveable sabotage of our website.
* The 6,620 votes I secured in Barking is the highest number ever cast for a BNP (or in fact for any British nationalist party) candidate in a general election.
* BNP candidates beat UKIP in the majority of seats where we went head-to-head - despite their party having vastly more money and receiving relentless media puffs. And we positively slaughtered the Greens.
Third, our frankly shocking wipe-out from Barking & Dagenham council is, when we look at the facts, not some terrible indictment of our councillors or leadership, but simply the result of a paradigm shift in the quality of Labour's election-winning machine.
Four years ago, the British National Party, Respect and the Christian People's Alliance between us dealt a series of shattering blows to Labour, particularly in Barking & Dagenham, Stoke, Tower Hamlets and Newham.
Rather than losing heart and wasting time blaming each other, Labour took this as a wakeup call and set about improving their election machine.
Opposition plants, sacked and bitter incompetents and ambitious knaves may use such moments to try to advance their own personal agendas, but looking for better ways to do things next time is what mature parties with real ambitions do.
Last year I wrote that Labour's use against us of state-of-the-art US techniques imported by Obama's Blue State Digital team was only a trial run, and that the real target in the long term was the Tory party.
Some people may not have believed me then, but look at what Labour just achieved by rolling out BSD's potent mix of targeted voter contact, sophisticated data basing and the ruthless use of deceit and lies to sway vulnerable voters.
It didn't just knock us out in Barking & Dagenham and take 10 of Respect's 11 seats in Tower Hamlets, but it also eliminated all opposition on Newham council, wiping out Respect and turning a confident Christian People's Alliance challenge into the loss of all three of their existing seats.
Despite Blair, despite Brown, the strong local challenges of three radical alternative parties have been crushed, leaving the whole of East London, from the edge of the City right out to the horsey fields of Essex, a Labour one party state.
The same tactics were also rolled out against the Tories and Lib Dems in other key areas, with the result that Labour, despite losing heavily in the general election, walked back into control of no fewer than 14 major councils up and down the country.
I am not saying that our inability to stand up to the Labour steamroller is not in part our own fault - of course it is. Our elections department did rest on its four- or five- year-old laurels, despite our failure to win a by-election for more than two years.
Personally I should have acted quicker to reinvigorate that side of the party - putting Clive Jefferson in charge with the brief to bring his innovative approach to wooing and securing the postal vote (the advance he pioneered that undoubtedly won us our two northern Euro seats last year) was something I should have done earlier.
But there's no use crying over spilt milk or beating ourselves up over our failure to stand up to Labour's brilliantly effective new techniques.
Rather, we must learn from the scientifically applied beating we've just received, and equip ourselves to hand out the same to our opponents in future.
I'm looking forward to that, and I know that it can and will be done.
The fourth and final point is that we have just seen the last first-past-the-post major election contest in British history.
Apart from local council elections, which may continue to be held on the old basis for some time yet, first-past-the-post is finished; Britain has entered a new political era.
Next year we have the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliamentary elections - proportional representation (PR) contests in which we can win (we only missed out winning last time around in Wales by a few thousand votes, and our Welsh results last week all showed further clear improvements).
In two years' time we have another round of Greater London Assembly elections - a PR contest in which we have already shown we can win.
Just two years after that we'll be back contesting the European elections, defending our two seats and aiming to win more.
And probably even before then, we'll be facing another general election. That too will almost certainly be fought with a PR system.
If a pure one were to be adopted, last week's showing would give us twelve MPs, which would compare well with UKIP's twenty and the Greens' six.
In fact, the Powers-That-Be will probably plump for a less fair system, but even the worst one possible is likely to lower the threshold for victory from the present mountain of about 36 percent down to a relative molehill of 15 percent. I know which target I'd rather have to reach.
Even more worrying for Labour and their hate-filled far-left mercenaries, the voter targeting they have now mastered in local elections is many times harder to roll out in the much larger constituencies that have to be used to make PR work.
We can, and will, learn ways to use techniques such as mass telephone contacts to boost and then mobilise our core vote in those future contests, but they are far harder to apply in the negative way we've just seen rough us up so effectively at local level.
With all major elections from now on therefore inevitably scheduled to involve PR, our opponents have just one year in which to break the British National Party.
Make no mistake, the forces of political hell are about to be unleashed on us. 'Operation Total Destruction of the BNP' is being rolled out right now.
You can see it in the fake emails supposedly from me and our London organiser, the brave Bob Bailey, in which we attack each other. Disastrous news - if it were only true, but fortunately it's not. And it would take much more than bogus emails to break the trust that people like Bob and I have in each other.
You'll hear it in the disgusting accusations of fraud, theft and all sorts of horror stories that are already being hawked around by various Searchlight and direct state assets who have burrowed into the party over the years.
Their previous subtle negativity, 'misjudgements' and minor acts of 'accidental' disruption are now being replaced by outright lies and sabotage in a last desperate throw of the dice to break our party before it's too late.
Again, if their tales were true, it would be a disgrace, but fortunately they are not.
Old hands have seen it before, of course, back in 1979. And that's the real good news, because enough of us know what we will now have to face together to be able to guide our party through this treacherous passage of stormy and rocky waters.
The would-be wreckers, waving their fake lighthouse lanterns from various deadly cliffs, will get short shrift from us.
Those who offer easy routes to victory, or who whisper poison against colleagues but who publicly profess loyalty or 'concern for the party', should be called to account at every turn.
If you hear anything that sounds too bad to be true about the people who have transformed this party thus far, and who united will do even more good, then understand that it probably isn't true.
New readers might at this point be thinking, "what's going on here, surely this isn't what happens in normal political parties?"
Well, friends new and old alike, that's quite right. Because the BNP is NOT a "normal political party."
In fact, in reality, we are much more than a political party, and have no desire to be like the others. For this is not a "party", so much as a movement - nay, the movement - of national salvation.
Without a complete change of course our entire nation and civilisation are heading for the rocks and for irrevocable disaster.
The old parties, the internationalist masters of the media, and the super rich and the banksters they all ultimately serve, are all happy with that deadly course. After all, they charted it.
So why should anyone who understands that be surprised to learn that these people - with all their money, all their greed, all their ruthlessness and all their fear of justice and the anger of a people betrayed - will use a combination of apparently 'internal' squabbles, wicked and baseless accusations against the innocent, and no doubt a wave of legal attacks from without, to try to drive this party to destruction over the months ahead.
They can try; they are trying - but with your loyalty and true British team spirit and dogged determination, they will fail. Our day will come - because, together, we will make it come.
Yours sincerely,
Nick
Griffin
Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

DOUBLE STANDARDS OF BOLTON EVENING NEWS COUNT ABUSE STORY

ELECTION COUNT ABUSE BY LABOUR HORDES UPDATE!


In a staggering show of double standards the Bolton Evening News, has covered a incident of a Senior Labour Councillor allegedly slandering a defeated Tory candidate. in the article in the B.E.N it says 
"A SENIOR Labour councillor has been reported to Bolton Council over claims he shouted abuse at a losing Conservative candidate during last Thursday’s election count.
Tory supporter Ian Upton has reported Cllr Guy Harkin, who was re-elected to the council in last year’s Crompton by-election, to Bolton Council chief executive Sean Harriss after being “disgusted” at his behaviour at the Bolton Arena count.
Mr Upton alleges Cllr Harkin made a “slanderous”
reference"

And yet their has been no reporting by the BEN of how the Brave Bolton South East PPC Shelia Spinks suffered Anti British Racism and how other BNP candidates were also racially abused also. 

This article says to us at the Horwich Nationalists how the once widely read Bolton evening news, has degraded it,s self to the level of the Labour party, and is no longer like Labour interested in reporting the truth. 

And that it should remember what Malcolm Muggeridge is quoted as saying " Never forget the fact that only dead fish swim with the stream". If it ever wishes to avoid the fate of many other local newspapers!

BRAVE BOLTON BNP CANDIDATE COURAGEOUS ELECTION SPEECH IN FACE OF ISLAMIC LABOUR HORDE

See and listen how the authorities let the brave Bolton south east British National Party candidate Shelia Spinks, suffer anti British racism from the Islamic labour horde that turned the election count on May the 6th in a shameful event. Shelia Spinks was not the only BNP lady candidate to suffer at the hands of this labour rabble, the following day at the local election count the Delightful Dorathee Sayers was open racially abused, POLICE REACTION ZERO! 
for goodness sake join us in our battle for freedom, before you suffer the same abuse in your everyday life!!!!!!!!! please ignore the not graceful tag some Marxist traitor idiot on you tube put that on.

Immigration and Asylum Madness Continues as Lib/Lab/Con Coalition Talks Splutter On

Immigration and Asylum Madness Continues as Lib/Lab/Con Coalition Talks Splutter On


Muslim terrorist suspects  and their wives  continue to brazenly parasite off the British taxpayer while the Lib/Lab/Con artists concentrate on trying to gain power to perpetuate their policies for the destruction of Britain.
In the latest shambolic display of Britain’s smashed border and security policies, a Muslim terrorist suspect from Algeria has been granted the right to stay in Britain under the “Human Rights Act” (HRA) travesty.
The suspect, who is so protected that he cannot even be named and is only identified as “T,” entered Britain in 1997 on a false passport. He brought his wife to Britain in 2001 using false documents.
Since then, he has used taxpayers’ money to fight all deportation attempts and has now been granted leave to remain in Britain because he has now had children in this country.
The HRA was created by the Labour regime to make Britain’s legislation fall into line with European Union human rights laws.
This law is supported by the Lib Dems and although initially opposed by the Conservatives, they too have admitted that the law cannot be changed while Britain remains a member of the EU.
Remaining in the EU is of course a fundamental part of Conservative Party policy.
According to the latest ruling, immigration judges have ruled that attempts to remove “T” have taken so long that it would now be unfair on his four children to deport him.
The 39-year-old man has links with al-Qaeda suspect Abu Doha and attended the same training camp as the British shoe bombers Richard Reid and Saajid Badat.
According to reports, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) has ruled that deporting the suspect “would be unfair on his children.”
Astonishingly, it is said that the SIAC also “warned that further legal battles against his deportation could drag out for another two years, by which time his children 'will each have become even more settled in England.”
* Meanwhile, a ruling by the European Court of Justice last month forbid the British government from withholding benefits to the wives of terrorist suspects in this country.
According to reports, the decision will in all likelihood force the Government to change anti-terrorism rules.
The case was brought by three women whose husbands appear on a list of people said to have links with al Qaida, the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. This list, which was drawn up by a UN sanctions committee, contains names of people who have had their funds and other assets frozen, in a bid to cut off terrorist funding.
The EU enforces the measure via rules stating that no funds “shall be made available, directly or indirectly, to, or for the benefit of people named on the list, unless authorised to cover basic expenses.”
The wives of the suspects went to court to challenge the Treasury's decision to impose tough restrictions on access to social security payments worth several hundred pounds a week, including income support, child benefit and housing assistance.
Under the Treasury rules, such benefits must be paid into a bank account, and the spouse can draw only up to £10 in cash for each member of her household. All other payments from the account must be made by debit card.
The spouses, all living in the UK with their husbands and children, must also submit a monthly account to the Treasury detailing all spending, with receipts for any goods bought and copies of bank statements allowing Treasury officials to check that the purchases do not exceed “basic expenses.”
The EU court has ruled that “'The freezing of funds of persons with suspected links to bin Laden, al Qaida or the Taliban does not apply to certain social security benefits paid to their spouses.
“The regulation ordering funds to be frozen applies only to assets that can be used to support terrorist activities.”
In other words, thanks to the Lib/Lab/Con EU membership policy, British taxpayers are now obliged to financially support the families of Islamist terrorists as well.

British Election Was a “Fiasco That Would Shame the Third World” Says International Observer

British Election Was a “Fiasco That Would Shame the Third World” Says International Observer


The British election was one of the “most shambolic, incompetent and fraudulent elections Britain has ever witnessed,” according to international observer and Oxford historian Mark Almond.
Mr Almond, who is also Visiting Professor of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara, has said in a newspaper article that “ingenious fraudsters” from the “minority communities” have committed massive registration fraud.
Mr Almond’s comments have confirmed the British National Party’s allegations of massive ethnic gerrymandering in east London, where dozens of voters with ethnic names were found to be registered at addresses in key wards.
The huge ethnic “turnout” in the election played a critical role in the election result.
According to Mr Almond, “New Labour turned voter registration into a free-for-all. Coupled with unfettered immigration, keeping accurate electoral records was thus reduced to little more than guesswork.
“Ingenious fraudsters — usually in minority communities — were soon competing to see who could squeeze the most imaginary voters into one property.
“Worse still, Blair also opened up postal voting to anyone who requested it, making the scope for fraud even greater,” Mr Almond wrote.
He added that during the course of his work as an official observer in more than a hundred polls across the old Communist bloc, “I have witnessed more incompetence and corruption than I care to remember.
“Yet this week's British election has shocked even seasoned monitors like me. As one friend from Azerbaijan remarked archly to me yesterday, 'At least in my country, we have managed chaos’.
“What he meant was that while many corrupt governments around the world actively fiddle elections, in Britain we have witnessed fiasco rather than state-sponsored fraud.
“These are abuses of process one might expect in a banana republic, not in the land that gave us the Mother of all Parliaments,” he continued.
“In many other nations I have visited, an election as incompetently managed as Thursday's would result in riots in the street. In Britain, we just seem to shrug our shoulders.
“That is an insult to all those who have fought through the years to preserve a democracy we could once be proud of,” he concluded.