Search This Blog

Thursday, 17 June 2010

M.O.G. Marxist Occupied UK Government

M.O.G. Marxist Occupied Government

With many opportunities to be inventive, Nationalists can draw upon and spread widely, new terms and catchphrases such as MOG, and Soft Focus Communism, or Genetically Modified Leaders, as this Author has done previously when speaking and writing about our Socio-Political enemies.
These terms are not only light and humorous, but are necessary so as to broaden our appeal. If we use terminology that will be eventually widely read, then millions around the world will ''get it'' so to speak.
The seriousness of of our predicament, and the west's ''Marxist Occupied Governments'', or MOG, is meant in equal terms to be both informative, and give many apolitical, uninterested voters and readers of this and other sites, an opportunity to engage in something they would otherwise have ignored.
Our Marxist governments around the west, have relied heavily on smears, name calling, and outright lies when pretending to discuss the problems they themselves have engineered, and used indigenous people as tools, and fodder in their industrial power grab, foreign wars, and mass immigration plan to further Balkanise this, and other countries of the west. The crux of this article is to bring to attention, the flaws and origins of Marxism. So let us discuss this now.

Firstly, M.O.G. Now this may seem of little importance, but the term Government alone is now so clouded from its original purpose that, many only understand it as a far off rump of political greed-mongers, who tax us all stupid, and send our people off to foreign wars whilst conducting mass immigration on a grand scale.
But Government was supposedly to administer protection, to govern us only in that manner, and not take the office of government and ideologise it to suit their collective agenda. Both Capitalism, and Socialism/Marxism, took the office of government, and distorted it to such an extent that it no longer represented the masses of those who supposedly voted for a particular government.
Genetically Modified Leaders is a more humorous term, but is meant to express the unnatural, and perverted actions of many of our so-called leaders. They have been modified just like vegetables and fauna and flora, to be seeded for the Horse Whisperers behind all western nations, to create an eventual world government. GML's are not new either, many of our leaders of the past have been caught out doing the bidding of foreign business men, and doing very little to create wealth, health, and a happy safe environment for us in our own countries.
Soft Fucus Communism is exactly what is says... old style repressive and oppressive tecniques, proffered to us as new ideas, more enlightened ways of life, and less a Zenophobic attitude, are all used to soften us up, ready for what is even now being brazenly proposed as the Post Democratic Era.
Communism was an invention of foreign, well off, and well connected people. It was never thought up by genuine Working Class people in some dimly lit mine, or some hot and dangerous steel plant, and was not thought up by a group of lorry drivers, all working themselves into an early grave for a few shillings a week whilst they drive long hours, and pay through the nose for criminally priced fuel.

So where and how did it all begin? Without going into a far too complex and historical argument about it, and for the sake of the reader, suffice to say this: Karl Marx was born into a well off, comforatable middle-class family in Trier, Germany in 1818.
Marx became a member of the Young Hegelian movement. This included theologians such as Bruno Bauer, and David Friedrich Strauss. They engaged in a radical critique of Christianity, and thus by implication, profered liberal opposition to the Prussian autocracy. Marx, as many others on the extreme left have done since, wormed his way into journalism. He became editor of the very influential liberal newspaper, Rheinische Zeitung.
As many Nationaists will have already known, this liberal paper was odly supported by industrialists. Marx's many articles, especially those on economic questions, had the Prussian government close this trouble-making news paper. Marx then emigrated to France, where he continued his hate campaign against what we all now now was White European self governance and independence. Marx was himself funded by hugely wealthy Capitalists, which makes his critique of Capitalism unbelievably duplicitous. Also, it makes the pathetic, gullible Student types, political gravy train guzzlers, and the media, look like brain dead tortoises slowly helping both them, and us, crawl towards a large, hungry crocodile with his massive mouth wide open, in eager anticipation of the easiest meal of his entire life. Jacob Schiff, head of Kuhn-Loeb and Co, bankrolled the Communist revolution. This was reported by a White Russian General, named Arsine de Goulevitch in his book Czarism and the Revolution. Jacob Schiff, a long-time associate of the Rothschilds, financed the Communist Revolution in Russia to the tune of $20 million. According to a security report held with the  United States State Department, his company, Kuhn Loeb and Co. bankrolled the first five year plan for Stalin. Schiff's descendents are active in The Council on Foreign Relations to this very day. http://www.cfr.org/

Thus far, any reader, regardless of his or her own political views, can already see the absolutism of this link between so-called Socialists/Communism, and Capitalism. Sadly, it was never about the Working Classes, or oppressed peoples. Nor was it about equality of the sexes or races etc etc. It was, and still is, about eventual world governance string pulled by a small group of bankers and industrialists. Already there is a massive drive to control the world's resources by them. How could they acheive it without being found out? Why would someone so caring about the state of workers, require such a vast sum of money to fund an ideal, when he could have engaged the workers themselves in uniting to confront their employers? Why was the following 1930's report never made widely more public?

June 15 1933... Congressman Louis McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee reported in a speech to fellow Congressmen:

"The Soviet government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Company, and other banks in New York City. Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg, the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and of the State Bank of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States Treasury, for the benefit of Russia.''

The term Absolutism, was refered to by Marx and his Socialist comrades to specify the horror, and immoral way that nations had until then, been independently run. The word to these democracy loving leftists means: Absolute control by a government, autarchy, autocracy, despotism, dictatorship etc etc. Additional info linked to Nationaism and free speech, also includes now familiar terms used by Marxists, such as racism, Fascism, Nazism, Czarism, despotism, dictatorship, Monarchy, oppression, totalitarian government, and tyranny. Wow, and we all thought that's what we were living under now.
According to many of Marx's followers, such as Jack Straw, Mandleson, Blair, and the new Genetially Modified Leadership in Britain, engineered to form the Con-Dem coalition, these are all things that Nationalism and the British National Party would bring to fruition if it got to power.
The very fact that all Nationalist governments engaged with its people historically, and explored intellectual ideas such as Collectivism and Referendum regularly throughout a term of office, has been ignored. Old arguments about oppressive businesses, and past conflicts need not be brought up here, as many were in fact engineered by those discussed above.
In the early Industrial Revolution of Britain, Europe, and America, workers were by and large, happy to leave peasantry behind, for what was then the new idea of working all week for a wage, and living amongst fellow workers and families in modern brick built homes. No one, including the mill owners, mine operators, and factory bosses, actually intended to end up oppressing these people. It was only by the passing of each different era and in retrospect that, common sense prevailed.
In the same sense, the damage done to the environment was also unintended, and again, by the 1950's, laws were past to limit the black clouds and emmissions produced by factories and forges etc etc with the Clean Air Act.

If Monarchy, aristocracy, working your way up through the ranks, working hard for your own family and community, and enjoying the benefits of nationhood are so wrong, how did each nation actually give birth to itself?
Yes, that's right, you are obviously thinking correctly if you immediately had spring to mind Monarchy, Aristocracy, working your way up the ranks, and enjoying the benefits of nationhood whilst working hard for community and family.
The very foundations of every nation on earth, is that of a King, Queen or equivelant. Nature bestows upon all peoples, leaders, inventors, builders, shysters, trouble-makers, hard workers, criminals, and those who simply fight for each other and the right to free speech and living healthy and safe lives.
Nature on the other hand, did not bestow upon us Marxist philosophy, unnatural laws, and keeping down everyone until we act, look, and live like everyone else, whilst our leaders gain ever greater wealth and resources.
England has a fine tradition, along with every other nation on these isles, of the founding of its nationhood by a leader, a King. Frederick the 1st was known as the first King of Prussia, thus, that region was self-governed. The first King of England who actually helped unify it, was King Egbert.
Thus, England was a soveriegn state. Let's move outward to the far east. The first King or Emporer of a unified China, was Qin Shi Huang, thus, it was protected in many ways that never existed before. The examples above are not necessarily to offer perfect examples, but simply to show proof that, with leaders who have the best intentions of their people at heart, a nation is safer, more prosperous, and more likely to survive natural, military, and Socio-Political turmoil.
Sadly for Britain, and it's closely related ethnic brothers and sisters, this has all become unwoven. The fabric has been cut, unravelled, and purposely ripped apart, and replaced with a foreign fabric. This fabric is loose, prickly, and provides no warmth for any of us. We do not deserve good material according to the Marxists in power, and certaily do not receive protection from the Horse whisperers who have placed them inside the mill. We are but a mongrel race, a race of biggoted fools. We are to be mongrelised, and have out tools of the trade taken from us like naughty children, for after all, we repressed and oppressed millions of people didn't we?

For years, many happy, and until recently prosperous countries, like Australia, Iceland, New Zealand etc etc, have been seemingly allowed to carry on freely. But a quick look behind the scenes will frighten anyone who has ignored their latter day state. Australia has been fingered for change by Republicans, in other words Marxists, who see it as old fashioned, linked to the British Monarchy, and far too white.
Iceland was well known as very industrious, homogenous, and wealthy, but has now been tripped up and kindly picked up given a credit/debt package resulting in the Icelandic government raising interest rates to 18%. Although now lower at 8%, this move was forced upon it under the terms of the loan from the International Monetary Fund, (IMF).
Iceland appealed to it's Nordic neighbours for an additional Four Billion (Euros) to avert the continuing crisis which will eventually engulf the whole world.
New Zealand, to many a happy, propserous and safe society of mainly white settlers, has undergone change that will shock some readers. last year, a former Victoria University of Wellington Students’ Association President, burnt the national flag after making a speech against New Zealand imperialism.
Once again, this country, for so many a quiet reserve of old Europe and Britain, has seen disgraceful Marxist activity at ground level, fully endorsed through political support by way of de-Europeanising, or ethnically cleansing it's white population. The students then also voted on whether to lay a wreath in memory of the Anzacs.
The High Court at Wellington, also overturned the conviction of another activist for dishonouring the flag during a 2003 protest at Parliament. One former New Zealand labour politician, oversaw 100,000 immigrants from Asian countries converge upon the shores, and all this when the Marxists in power, were rambling on about the gap between rich and poor.
Yet again, we see the same old script being used to smash the peace and prosperity of a former independent nation. MOG has gone global, and we all now suffer the consequences where ever we live. Welcome the the Marxist Occupied Government of the world.
more at the Green Arrow & Freinds

 MysteryPILosAngeles300x125Nook- the award winning Barnes and Noble eReader with 3G and WIFI and Free Shipping

Looking for Budget Cuts? How about the £10.3 Billion a Year EU Membership?

Looking for Budget Cuts? How about the £10.3 Billion a Year EU Membership?


The cost of Britain’s membership of the European Union is set to reach £10 billion per year within three years, new research by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has revealed.
The dramatic spike in EU membership costs is the result of a “natural” increase in fees and the surrender of Britain’s rebate made by Tony Blair in 2005.
According to the OBR, British taxpayers will be paying half a billion more pounds this year to the EU, which will bring total membership fees for 2010 to just over £8.3 billion.
This figure is set to rise to £10.3 billion by 2014, the OBR said.
The scale of the increase is apparent when it is considered that in 2008, Britain’s direct membership fees were “only” £3.1 billion.
This figure does not, of course, include the indirect costs, which considerably increase the cost of the EU to British taxpayers.
Mr Blair unilaterally cut Britain's £3 billion-a-year budget rebate to reach a compromise deal with his EU partners at a summit in Brussels five years ago.
According to think tank Open Europe, EU regulation (which is separate from EU membership fees) has cost the UK £124 billion since 1998.
Based on over 2,300 of the Government's own impact assessments, Open Europe found that regulation has cost the UK economy £176 billion since 1998, “roughly equivalent to the country's entire budget deficit.
“Of this amount, £124 billion, or 71 percent, had its origin in EU legislation,” the think tank said.
“We estimate the benefit/cost ratio of EU regulations at 1.02, while the ratio of UK regulations is 2.35.
“In other words, for every £1 of cost, EU regulations introduced since 1998 have only delivered £1.02 of benefits, meaning that it is 2.5 times more cost effective to regulate nationally than it is to regulate via the EU,” an Open Europe statement said.
* Britain’s deficit costs the taxpayers £1 billion a week in interest, it was announced last week.
When combined with the crippling cost of immigration (£13 billion per year), the war in Afghanistan (£5 billion per year), foreign aid (£9.1 billion per year), and the asylum swindle (£4 billion per year), it becomes clear that EU membership is the very last thing for which British taxpayers should be forced to pay.

Wednesday, 16 June 2010

The “British Mongrel Race” Nonsense Refuted

The “Mongrel Race” Nonsense Refuted

By Alan Robertson — Two weeks before the election this year, Sandy Walkington, a Liberal Democrat candidate for St Albans said, "We're all mongrels. I mean, this country is the most mongrel country in the world. In 200 years we'll all be coffee-coloured — and I've got no problem with that.”
It is outrageous and deeply offensive that politicians, the media and left-wing celebrities have promoted the lie that we are somehow all basically from mixed breeding stock in order to legitimise the invasion by hordes of foreigners.
Eddie Izzard said in his TV series Mongrel Britain, “our country has been massively diverse for most of its history — a blend of Angles, Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Celts.”
But the history of the British people shows that we have been here for thousands of years and that past invasions have contributed no more than five percent to our population.
Izzard speaks with excitement about “rich diversity” and “a dynamic and vibrant mix of foreign genes.” 
Yet there is nothing vibrant or dynamic about losing your job to cheap Eastern European workers or finding that you can’t spot a white face in your high street.
The diversity he speaks of isn’t rich. The UK is poorer as a result of free handouts for immigrants and gifts to third world countries.    
Our cultural heritage has been savaged as we are forced to accept barbaric religions and the criminal scamming culture that we always knew was present in poor countries.
How dare they smile condescendingly while they attempt to change history and teach us that we owe everything, as Izzard claims, to “waves of invasion, centuries of immigration and floods of foreign ideas.”
The numbers of invaders were in fact few — mostly only in the tens of thousands and, crucially, all of the invaders' origins were limited to northern Europe.
This is supported fully by up-to-date genetic evidence in the book Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Great Britain by Arthur Kemp. (Available here).
Kemp presents genetic evidence proving that the vast majority of British people have ancestors going back 12,000 years when haplogroups R1b, I and R1a spread northwards. British people with the R1b1 DNA haplotypes have on average a 74 percent homogeneity, with the remainder coming from countries just across the sea.
Historical records offer proof as well:
The Romans invaded in AD 43 with an army of 40–45,000 men but only 16,000 legionaries were stationed here afterwards.
Estimates for the population at that time are around 1.5 million; therefore, the effect of this invasion was one to two percent (Eagles Over Britannia: The Roman Army in Britain by Guy de la Bedoyere).
“In the sixth century the Anglo-Saxon element in the population of Britain amounted to no more than fifty to a hundred thousand” (Arthur's Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367–634 by Leslie Alcock).
Therefore, the Anglo-Saxon contribution would be somewhere between three and six percent.
DNA evidence shows that the R1a Haplogroup for Anglo-Saxons in England is 4.5 percent, a remarkable correlation (Kemp, ibid).
Between 789–1104 AD, the Vikings were known for their ferocious attacks on villages but only small numbers actually settled. War bands were tiny: “from seven to thirty-five a band and above three dozen an army” (Anglo-Saxon England by Lloyd and Jennifer Laing).
After the Norman Conquest, William, Duke of Normandy, dismissed his mercenaries and nearly all returned to France.
“The probability is that the Continental settlement did not involve more than 10,000 people — and perhaps as few as 5,000” (Offshore Islanders: From Roman Occupation to European Entry by Paul Johnson). “England simply acquired a new ruling class,” writes Johnson. 
The Flemish and Walloons came from what is now Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and parts of northern France and Germany. About 16,000 were recorded in 1440, which was less than one percent.
The population at the time was estimated between two and 2.5 million, and had diminished as a result of the Black Death (Roots of the Future: An Education Pack for Exploring Ethnic Diversity in Britain by Peter White).
The Jews also settled at various periods in history but did not approve of marriage to Gentiles. In 1290, the community of around 5,000 was expelled by Edward I.
They returned slowly and by 1815, there were around 20–30,000. Around 55,000 Jews arrived between 1933 and 1939. Britain’s population was at 40 million in 1940, and therefore the Jewish contribution was at best 0.3 percent.
Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a small trickle of people from all over Europe. In England and Wales, the 1871 census recorded 32,823 Germans, an Italian population of 5,063, again not significant amounts compared to the population of 20 million.
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) estimates 50,000 Huguenot and 80,000 French Protestants arrived between 1680 and 1720. About 40,000 of these left for America.
However, around 1685, the population of Britain was four to 4.5 million, meaning that the contribution was still only about two percent (White, ibid; and Alien Immigrants to England by W Cunningham).
Between 1600 and 1800, people didn’t welcome foreigners with open arms and intermarriage of any sort was infrequent. Even when William of Orange came to England to unseat the unpopular James II, he was accompanied only by approximately 11,000 foot and 4,000 horse soldiers. The effect of his invasion was once again small.
The marriages between kings and queens of Europe and their relative squabbles did not have much of a bearing on the poor, often starving, ordinary people who mostly stayed where they were for thousands of years.
Cheddar Gorge ManCheddar Gorge ManPossibly one of the best examples is Cheddar Gorge Man who is an example of how people have stayed where they were for thousands of years.
The remains of Cheddar Man were excavated in 1903 and have been dated at around 7,150 BC. 
In 1996, his DNA was profiled and a sample from 20 residents of a nearby village was taken. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett.
What this means is incredible — these people are direct descendants of Cheddar Man and still live in the same area, nearly 10,000 years later.
The historical and genetic evidence support the fact that there is indeed a native people of Britain who have a right to this land. We have as much right as the American Indians, Aborigines or Maoris.  
There were invasions and a small amount of migration but, as has been already stated, these were from people just across the channel.
So why do they wish to convince us that we are all mixed race?
The agenda of previous Labour and Conservative governments have only ever been concerned about re-election at any cost.
They know that importing cheap workers will provide short-term prosperity and thus they will secure re-election.
By offering free handouts to immigrants they know that when the time comes they can count on the ethnic vote. 
The proof is here. They have betrayed their own people.
The erasure of the native British people today has already begun and it is legitimised by whitewashing over our truthful British history with lies. Don’t stand for it.

Queen’s Invitation: BNP’s Opponents Must Learn about Democracy, Says Nick Griffin

Queen’s Invitation: BNP’s Opponents Must Learn about Democracy, Says Nick Griffin

The crazed opponents of the British National Party should take a step backwards and enjoy a lesson in how democracy works, Nick Griffin MEP has said in response to hysteria from the far left over his invitation to Buckingham Palace.
“This is how democracy operates,” Mr Griffin said. “It is a fine old tradition in this country and I have every intention of taking part in a non-political event which in many ways symbolises the greatness, heritage and tradition of our country.
“It is my democratically elected right to attend. I will be there with my wife and two of my children and am not going to grandstand or make political points,” Mr Griffin said.
“As many will recall, I was last year prevented from attending a similar function as the guest of London Assembly Member Richard Barnbrook.
“This year, however, thanks to the voters of the North West of England, I am able to attend in my own right.
“It is not a political event and it is nothing less than disgraceful that the BNP’s opponents are seeking to turn it into one.
“It is about time these crazed opponents of the BNP take a lesson in democracy. The BNP has elected representatives, gained nearly a million votes in the 2009 Euro elections and well over half a million in the 2010 general election, despite only fighting half the total number of seats.
“By any measure, this is a significant vote and the BNP is a now a permanent fixture on Britain’s political map. The party’s opponents better get used to it, because we are not going away,” Mr Griffin said.

Simon Darby - Deputy Leader of the BNP live on Five

Simon Darby - Deputy Leader of the BNP live on Five

 

 Simon Darby live on Radio 5 on 16th of June.

 

New Foreign Aid Scandal: Free Books for Schools in Pakistan, but Education Cuts in Bolton & Britain

New Foreign Aid Scandal: Free Books for Schools in Pakistan, but Education Cuts in Britain

In a new foreign aid scandal which has shocked even hardened observers, British taxpayers will pay for textbooks for three million Pakistani pupils and a third of a million female pupils will receive cash handouts — while the education budget in Britain is targeted by the ConDem government for millions of pounds in “savings.”
The announcement of the £89.3 million free school textbook programme for schools in Pakistan’s north west Khyber Pukhtunkhwa province was made in an official statement released by Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell.
“More than three million children will benefit from free textbooks in the conflict-affected province and more than 300,000 girls will receive a monthly allowance to encourage them to attend school,” Mr Mitchell announced.
According to the statement, issued while the Tory cabinet minister was on a visit to Peshawar, Mr Mitchell said he was “determined to make the country a higher priority for DFID,” and that education would be one of his key areas of focus.
This is Mr Mitchell’s second trip overseas since becoming International Development Secretary, after visiting Afghanistan last month. In Islamabad, he met President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, as well as the ministers for finance, education and health, to reiterate the UK’s commitment to Pakistan.
The DFID statement added that the foreign aid commitment intended to “help 5 million more children attend primary school” by 2013.
Meanwhile back in Britain, the Department for Education has been told to make £670 million in savings.
At a time of record demand, with applications up 16.5 percent on last year, there will be 10,000 fewer university places for this autumn than Labour had promised.
* British taxpayers have also been called upon to provide £200 million support to Afghanistan in a “drive to create more jobs, improve policing and strengthen the effectiveness of Afghan government,” David Cameron has announced.
Mr Mitchell will announce further details of this £200 million package at the Kabul Conference on 20 July

Lib-Lab-Con Justification for Afghanistan War is “Rubbish” Says Former UK Counterterrorism Chief

Lib-Lab-Con Justification for Afghanistan War is “Rubbish” Says Former UK Counterterrorism Chief

The former head of Britain’s counterterrorism unit and current United Nations Coordinator of the Al-Qaeda and Taliban Monitoring Team, echoed BNP policy when he dismissed as “rubbish” the Lib-Lab-Con argument that British military intervention in Afghanistan prevents terrorism.
New York-based Richard Barrett, who also worked for the British Security Service, the Foreign Office and was head of counterterrorism for the Secret Intelligence Service, made the startling comment in an interview with the Financial Times.
According to that paper, Mr Barrett said the argument used by Labour, Tory and Lib Dems that British involvement in Afghanistan would reduce terrorism in Britain was wrong and that it would actually increase it.
“That’s complete rubbish. I’ve never heard such nonsense,” Mr Barrett was quoted as saying.
He warned that the presence of foreign troops would actually inflame anti-western sentiment among Muslims in Britain.
“I’m quite sure if there were no foreign troops in Afghanistan there’d be less agitation in Leeds, or wherever, about Pakistanis extremely upset, or suspicious about what western intentions are in Afghanistan and Pakistan,” Mr Barrett said.
The British National Party is the only political party which opposed continued British involvement in that conflict and pointed out the link between it and the spread of Islamism in this country.
The obvious link between increased Islamist agitation in Britain and military intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan has been totally ignored by all of the Westminster parties.
The BNP has long maintained that the cause of terrorism in Britain is twofold: mass Third World immigration and Britain’s biased foreign policy.
Mass immigration has created a large pool of Muslims in Britain from which the Islamists — who have been waging war against the infidel khufars of Europe for over 1,300 years — can actively recruit.
Britain’s biased foreign policy has given these Islamists, who are already not short of hatred for all things Western, a gift horse with which they can justify attacks inside Britain.
Mr Barrett’s comments completely underpin the BNP’s policies for ending the terrorism threat: the end of mass immigration, the return to policies which ensure that hostile immigrants are returned to their country of origin and the end of military adventures in foreign countries which serve to further incite the world against us.
Recommended reading: Jihad: Islam’s 1,300 Year War on Western Civilisation. By Arthur Kemp. For centuries, violent Muslims have been trying to capture Europe for Islam. Sweeping out from its origin in Saudi Arabia, Islam has expanded through violent conquest into North Africa, the Middle and Near East, and very nearly into Europe itself, attacking through Spain, Italy, and the Balkans. Each time, the Islamic hordes were turned back by a united European military effort.
Today, the Islamic invasion is not being carried out with sieges, scimitars, or cannon, but rather by immigration, birth rates, and demographics. Given current trends, Europe is set to be overrun before the end of this century.
This book puts the current crisis into historical perspective, showing that instead of being a "religion of peace," violent Islam has, in fact, been waging war on all its self-appointed opponents since its inception.
Finally, this book dares to say what must be done if Europe is to avoid succumbing to the new invasion. The choice is hard, but is one which will determine whether Western civilisation lives or dies.

Tuesday, 15 June 2010

British National Party Correct on Foreign Aid Swindles

British Chambers of Commerce Confirms BNP Is Right on Foreign Aid Swindle

The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) has confirmed that the British National Party’s stance on foreign aid is correct with a press release that calls on the Chancellor “to drop unsustainable ring-fences” such as the  Department for International Development’s budget.
“The BCC argues that by protecting certain budgets and programmes without clear justification, it will force more drastic cuts to capital investment, which is essential to underpin Britain’s long-term economic recovery,” said the press release.
“By contrast, health and aid budgets were cut in Canada’s successful 1990s consolidation -- preventing ‘slash and burn’ elsewhere,” it continued, adding that the health services also needed to be cut.
The BNP has argued that the foreign aid budget, the war in Afghanistan, the immigration and asylum swindle and the billions paid to the European Union should all be cut. This would leave more than enough for the NHS.
The BBC proposals form part of their 11-page Budget submission, which has been sent to the Treasury ahead of the ConDem coalition’s emergency Budget. Some of the submission’s key points include:
• Introduce an immediate two-year freeze on the total public sector wage bill;
• Avoid deep cuts to capital investment, which supports growth of the productive economy;
• Fully abolish the April 2011 employer NICs rise, paid for by using a portion of any increases in VAT;
• Proceed with the simplification of Corporation Tax, but only after a careful study of how the elimination of allowances could affect business investment;
• Do not raise CGT to near-income-tax levels. If a rise is unavoidable, clear and concrete exemptions and reliefs for business activity must be detailed, along with taper relief and indexation;
“As politically unpalatable as it may be, the decision to ring-fence spending on health and overseas aid is unrealistic and unsustainable in the current circumstances. Ring-fencing health will mean deeper and more drastic cuts to important investment elsewhere, without the benefit of clear justification,” said David Frost, Director General of the BCC in the statement.
* BNP News wished to make it clear that Mr Frost’s remarks did not mention the BNP and this article in no way implies or suggests that the BCC is in any way supportive of the party.

British Youth Unemployment to Rise Sharply as Migrants Continue to Flood In

Youth Unemployment to Rise Sharply as Migrants Continue to Flood In

By Mercia — Despite unemployment amongst our under-24s likely to exceed a million this summer and joblessness generally predicted to hit three million next year, the Cabinet Millionaires Club has no real intention of substantially reducing record-levels of immigration.
Currently, some 925,000 under-24s are recorded as being jobless, a figure expected to sharply rise next month as the school year ends with another wave of teenagers starting out on their "working" lives by joining the dole queues.
For huge numbers of schoolkids, years spent studying hard for qualifications, in expectation of good jobs, will count for nothing as both the public and private sectors either “downsize” or adopt “recruitment freezes.”
Not even fast food outlets, notorious for their soul destroying low pay employment of the “McJob” variety, are a realistic option in many urban areas.
In these institutions, students are forced to compete with "highly qualified" immigrants, legal or otherwise, for what work may be available.
Under the circumstances it is not surprising that the gradually rising support from the under-24s for the British National Party is likely to increase dramatically as young people learn the hard way the real meaning of immigration, establishment party/union apathy and commercial exploitation.
Experts are also predicting that proposed government spending cuts will push unemployment to around three million next year as hundreds of thousands of public sector workers are laid off to achieve the cost savings demanded.
Indeed, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) has recently claimed that the public sector will shed one job in eight, adding 725,000 to the unemployment total.
The Government's chief economic adviser, Dr John Philpott, confirms that many state employees, who presently constitute a staggering 20 percent of the entire workforce, face little prospect of finding another job.
He is also on record as expressing the view that unemployment will remain high for the next five years, reducing the career dreams and aspirations of so many of those studying hard in our schools and universities.
An indication of just how rapidly the situation is deteriorating is exemplified by the CIPD recently revising its 2010 unemployment forecast from 2.51 million to 2.65 million, and even that may prove an underestimate.
Despite rapidly worsening unemployment, particularly amongst our young people, the Cabinet Millionaires Club have not indicated their intention to either significantly reduce immigration or remove from this country the hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants who are currently taking jobs from British people.

The BNP Excalibur Re-launched with Two New Books

Excalibur Re-launched with Two New Books

Two extremely rare but highly important books, Decline or Dawn? Preserving Western Values in an Age of Change and The Making and Meaning of Britishness: National Identity in the 21st Century, form part of the more than 50 titles on offer in the newly re-launched British National Party’s online merchandising arm, Excalibur.
Decline or Dawn? Preserving Western Values in an Age of Change is a collection of speeches given at the first “Right Now!” 2005 conference.
The conference attracted a wide range of prominent speakers and attendees from several countries to discuss and debate some of the challenges facing the West in an era of rapid and disconcerting change.
The speeches include “The Not-So-Strange Decline of Conservative Britain,” by Angela Ellis-Jones, Right Now!;  “How and Why Britain’s Politicians Have let the Side Down over Europe,” Christopher Gill, Freedom Association; “The Creeping Menace of Political Correctness,” by Roger Ison and Laura Midgley, Campaign against Political Correctness; “ Preserving Western Values,” by John Papworth, Fourth World Review; “The EU  Why We’d Be Much Better off Out,” by Ashley More, Independent MEP; “Belgium, Turkey and the European Union  A Strange Alliance against Western values,” by Phillip Claeys, MEP (Vlaams Belang); “How Good Urban Planning Can Help Rescue Civil Society,” by Professor Alice Coleman, Land Use Research Unit; “Demography is Destiny,” by Jared Taylor, American Renaissance; and “The Post-Communist World,” Brain Crozier, Sovietologist and author.
The Making and Meaning of Britishness: National Identity in the 21st Century is a collection of speeches given at the “Right Now!” 2006 conference.
The second gathering of that body once again drew a highly respected panel together to debate critical issues of the day ranging from the EU through to immigration, birth rates and Eastern Europe.
The speeches included “Introductory Remarks” by Derek Turner, Right Now!; “We Want Our Country Back,” by Ashley Mote MEP;  “Ulster in the United Kingdom — The Ties That Bind,” by Sammy Wilson MP; “Britistan: The Looming Cultural and Demographic Disaster” by Jillian Becker; “The Psychology of Race Differences,” by Prof Richard Lynn; “The Biological Basis of Patriotism,” Professor JP Rushton; “Dysfunctional Government, Suicidal Policies,” by Steve Moxon; and “The United Kingdom and Multiculturalism  Lessons From Eastern Europe,” by Dr Frank Ellis.
Both these books are extremely sought after and Excalibur has managed to acquire the very last stock of both titles. Once they are gone, there are no more to be had.
The books form part of the “Ideology” book section of the new Excalibur web store, which was recreated after a period of severe disruption following the destruction of the BNP’s entire web operations in an act of sabotage by the party’s disgraced former webmaster.
Other book sections include British History, Climate Change and Environment, Current Affairs, Education, Ideology, Immigration and Asylum, Islam, Race and Science and Social Cohesion and Policing.
In addition, Excalibur also offers a huge range of T-shirts and other items of interest to nationalists in Britain.
Another new item of interest is the BNP’s groundbreaking 2010 election manifesto which is available in the ideology section of the bookshop.
As the shop expands, it will also be a conduit for leaflets and other party material.
The new Excalibur site can be found by clicking here,  

New BNP Summer Campaign: 'England Is for Life, Not Just for football'

New BNP Summer Campaign: 'England Is for Life, Not Just for football'

"England is for life, not just for football." That is the strong, patriotic message that the British National Party will be pushing hard this summer.
“While everyone will be engrossed by the impending World Cup tournament, BNP activists the length and breadth of the country will be working round the clock to highlight the terrible state of modern day England,” said national elections officer Clive Jefferson.
“A special new leaflet has been produced by the Communications and Publicity department that is available for download by all supporters,” said Mr Jefferson.
“It is imperative we get as many of these leaflets distributed as possible: to family, friends, through letter boxes, in high streets and shopping centres, from BNP town centre stalls, and so on.
“The enemies of our country never rest, and neither must we. That is why everyone reading this must print off some of these leaflets and spread the word,” he said.
The leaflet reads: "As well as cheering on our team during the World Cup, we are also celebrating our English identity. We English have a great history which we should be proud of. When this football tournament finishes keep the flags flying, because England is for life -- not just for football."
As part of this campaign, The BNP is also launching a petition to collect as many signatures as possible to make St George's Day a public holiday.
Download and print off as many copies of the petition as you can manage and ask your friends and family to add their voice to the growing campaign for a St George's Day public holiday. Remember to post the petition to the address listed at the bottom of the form.
You can order 1000 leaflets for £10 + P & P (Free delivery on orders over 4000) by emailing dispatch@bnp.org.uk.
Download the files and print your own:

Birmingham Imports Iraq War Technology to Fight Non-White Gun Crime

Birmingham Imports Iraq War Technology to Fight Non-White Gun Crime

Non-white gun crime in the north west of Birmingham has reached such outrageous levels that the police have had to import sniper fighting technology currently being used in Iraq to try and suppress the violence.
shotshotThe technology, known as ShotSpotter, uses audio sensors to pinpoint the location of gunfire to within three feet and can detect firearm discharge up to two miles away.
The devices are used in Baghdad to spot Iraq insurgent snipers and will now be deployed in the Aston, Lozells and Soho wards of Manchester to track down shooters in these immigrant-heavy areas.
Aston has a population of around 29,000. Around 51 percent are of Asian origin, with 23 percent from Pakistan, 16 percent from Bangladesh and 12 percent from India.
A further 21 percent of the population are black, while 4 percent are of mixed race and 3 percent are Chinese or some other ethnic group.
Lozells has a population of approximately 26,000. Around 57 percent of the population are of Asian origin, with 25 percent from Pakistan, 18 percent from India and 12 percent from Bangladesh.
A further 19.5 percent are black, 4 percent are of mixed race, and 3.5 percent are of Chinese origin or belong to some other ethnic group.
Soho has a population of around 26,000. Around 46 percent of the population are of Asian origin with 25 percent from India, 16 percent from Pakistan and 3 percent from Bangladesh.
A further 22.5 percent are black, 5 percent are of mixed background and 2.5 percent are of Chinese origin or belong to some other ethnic group.
Against that backdrop, the reason for the introduction of the ShotSpotter technology takes on new meaning.
The system can detect the sound waves of gun shots from sensors placed on buildings at various locations around the city.
By triangulating the data, the ShotSpotter can identify the location of the shooter, even if moving. It can also tell its direction and how many firearms have been used.
The system will cost the taxpayers £135,000 to purchase and £20,850 a year to maintain and manage.
This is what immigration has brought to Britain: war on our streets.

National Lottery Exposed as Vicious Anti-Black Racists

National Lottery Exposed as Vicious Anti-Black Racists

The National Lottery spends millions of pounds on whites-only causes which include specialist groups devoted to white history, white mental health, white arts, white culture, white sports clubs, white professionals and white schools — and does not give a penny to any similar black, Asian or Muslim cause.
The shocking bias has been uncovered in a BNP News analysis of grants made by the National Lottery via its publicly accessible website in which all allocations can be searched by using keywords such as black, white, Asian, Muslim, Nigerian, African, Chinese, and so on.
The National Lottery’s website can be found by clicking here.
A search for “white” under the list of grants made by the National Lottery revealed that millions of pounds have been given to organisations such as:
- 100 White Men of London;
- Abacus White Families Support Group;
- Action for White Community Development;
- Archives and Museum of White Heritage;
- Association for White Engineers Limited;
- Association of White Photographers;
- WCAT: The White Sexual Health Organisation;
- White & European Arts;
- White & European Sports Association;
- White & European Financial Services;
- White & European Homeless Support Group;
- White Arts Alliance;
- White British Heritage Group;
- White Business Association Ltd;
- White Carers Project;
- White Community Agency for Regeneration and Development;
- White Employment Initiative;
- White Family Health Project;
- White Fashion Designers Network;
- White Graduates and Professionals Network;
- White History Foundation;
- White Justice Project;
- White Media Training Trust;
- White Mental Health Group Resource Centre;
- White Women In The Arts;
- White Writers Production;
- White Youth Network;
- Camden White Sisters;
- Coventry White Boys Can;
- Mr and Miss White and Beautiful.
All of the above projects — and many more — can be found listed as recipients of lottery funds on that organisation’s website.
* Astute readers might by now have seen the truth. In reality, all of the above organisations do exist and have been given millions of pounds in subsidies — but all of them have had the word “black” swopped out with “white” for the purposes of this article.
In other words, all of the above organisations — and hundreds more not listed here — exist but are actually named “Mr and Miss Black Beautiful” and so on. This can be confirmed by searching for them on the National Lottery website.
The National Lottery has made millions of pounds of grants to every non-white ethnic group possible — but has never provided a penny to any white British organisation or cultural group.
According to the National Lottery website’s recipient search facility, 746 grants have been made to organisations which have the keyword “Asian.” Total funds disbursed to Asian-only organisations amount to £23,618,910.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Muslim” produces 163 grants with a total value of £6,345,128.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Somali” produces 431 grants with a total value of £9,414,750.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “African” produces 956 grants with a total value of £25,492,379.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Pakistan” produces 158 grants with a total value of £3,151,424.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “India” produces 336 grants with a total value of £10,657,742.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Chinese” produces 480 grants with a total value of £18,566,988.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Philippine” produces 2 grants with a total value of £74,300.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Nigeria” produces 21 grants with a total value of £462,734.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Mexican” produces 2 grants with a total value of £12,490.
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “Black” produces hundreds of results directly linked to black racial causes (although the total number of returns for that search is mixed up with “Black Country” and other unrelated results).
A search on the National Lottery recipient list under “White” produces 0 results.
Possibly the time has come for groups of enterprising indigenous British people to form “White and British Cultural Heritage Groups” or other white charitable organisations and apply to the National Lottery for funds.

Monday, 14 June 2010

Lee Kuan Yew: Race Realist of Singapore

Lee Kuan Yew: Race Realist of Singapore

No 4 in the series ‘Liberal Optimism and the Reality of  Multicultural, Multiracial ‘Societies’ World- Wide.
‘Three women were brought into the Singapore General Hospital, each in the same condition and each needing a blood transfusion. The first, a southeast asian was given the transfusion but died a hours later. The second, a south asian was also given a transfusion but died a few days later. The third, an east asian, was given a transfusion and survived. That is the X factor in development.’ - Lee Kuan Yew, ‘Minister Mentor’ of Singapore.
 Singapore is the meeting place of many races. The Malays, though natives of the soil, dwell uneasily in towns, and are few; and it is the Chinese, supple alert and industrious, who throng the streets; the dark-skinned Tamils walk on their silent, naked feet, as though they were brief sojourners in a strange land, but the Bengalis, sleek and prosperous, are easy in their surroundings, and self-assured; the sly and obsequious Japanese seem busy with pressing and secret affairs; and the English in their topees and white ducks, speeding past in motor –cars or at leisure in their rickshaws, wear a nonchalant and careless air. The rulers of these teeming peoples take their authority with a smiling unconcern.
 - Somerset Maugham (‘P & O’ - 1926)
 The Success of Singapore
singapore
It might seem strange that Singapore should feature as No 4 in this series. It is after all law abiding, seemingly politically stable and economically an astounding success.  In the space of a single generation since its independence from Britain it has on the basis of its now legendary efficiency and social control achieved an annual economic growth rate of some 9%. It now has the highest gross per capita income of any Asian country outside Japan and a standard of living higher than many European countries.
‘Authoritarianism’ is Necessary for the Survival of Multicultural, Multiracial ‘Societies’

But it is a theme of the series that multicultural, multiracial states, politically correct Britain not excluded, almost invariably survive as functioning entities, or come about in the first place only by means of the exercise of overriding power. This includes domination of a country as a policy by a political class &/or ethnic &/or religious group, either enforced as an minority as in an Empire, limited and managed politically correct ‘Democracy’ like Britain or other form of Dictatorship of some description, or by a robustly  confident and decisive majoritarian Democracy.
 Singapore has been ruled by both Empire and by a majority ethnic group which allows minorities to coexist with itself provided they abide by the norms of the dominant group.  It is only because of the authoritarian exercise of power by its rulers both as Empire and as (formally) a Democracy, and (let us be frank) the particular racial and cultural characteristics of its rulers and majority population that it has enjoyed peace, dynamism and prosperity.
 The Force for Disintegration of Ethnicity
 Without the exercise of power which overrides the wishes of the majority and /or minority ethnic groups, all other things being equal such ‘societies’ tend to fragment along ethnic lines since it is natural and normal to wish to live among those with whom one identifies racially culturally and religiously in a group which can run its own affairs to suit itself. These natural affinities and desires will continue to be present even though other factors such as economic considerations weigh more powerfully, at least temporarily.
Authoritarian Rule by the British
The fortunes of Singapore, an island at the tip of the Malay Peninsula, has been shaped and continues to be shaped by its ruling race. The city was founded in the early 1800’s in what was pretty much a swamp by the British, a people who were confident in their superiority of their own characteristics including their religion and its civilisation and moral norms, and rightly so in the opinion of the writer. They directed its early growth, turning it into the bustling, successful port and entrepot described by Somerset Maugham. They were succeeded in control by another race at least as confident in the superiority of their characteristics and of the qualities of their ancient civilisation.
Authoritarian Rule by the Chinese
The majority Chinese of Singapore took control on independence from the British. They thought, though, that economic survival on its own would be difficult for the island, so they merged it with the Federation of Malaya to form Malaysia. But because of racial tensions, it was expelled from Malaysia in 1965. The Chinese of Singapore objected to being discriminated against by the Malaysian policies of affirmative action, including financial and economic benefits reserved for the Malays. The Malays, who are moslem, feared the racial, religious and economic dominance of  mostly Chinese, mostly non-moslem Singapore, thinking that it would shift power away from themeselves. There were many race riots in this period  in Singapore including one on the Prophet Mohammed’s birthday in 1964 which killed 23 people and injured hundreds more.
Independent Singapore’s Drive to become an Economic Powerhouse
Facing mass unemployment Singapore began energetically to modernise and to build up its manufacturing industry. It tackled its housing problems by developing large public housing estates and invested heavily in public education. Over the years it developed into the modern economic powerhouse we see today, and with none of the huge debts which now saddle the West, continues to expand economically. Its education and health systems rival anything in the West.
Singapore’s Leader: Lee Kuan Yew
The success of Singapore may be ascribed not just to the particular qualities of the ethnic Chinese, but to the views on these qualities by the Cambridge – educated  Lee Kuan Yew, who has been at the top of Singapore politics since the country’s inception. He was its Prime Minister for 26 years and senior minister for another 15. His current title, which he assumed when his son became Prime Minister in 2004,  is ‘Minister Mentor.’ There are few in Singapore who do not believe that the 86- year old, still as sharp as a tack, is not the power behind the throne. The self-perpetuating ruling party which he has dominated for so long micromanages the behaviour of the citizens right down to forcing them to save a proportion of their income and imposes the  death penalty for drug trafficking.
Lee Kuan Yew's Ethnic Preference
So how have Lee Kuan Yew’s racial views been made manifest? He strongly associates Race  with genes, culture and economic success. The government under his control has shaped Singapore accordingly. For example, he has refused to spend large sums on ‘affirmative action’ to raise up Malays and other ethnic group, thinking that these are largely a waste of money when the problem of their underperformance is fundametally genetic. (Such programmes in the USA with respect to negro underperformance have proved useless in their aim:  a huge waste of taxpayers’ money).
Maintaining Singapore's Racial Balance 
He has been instrumental in encouraging the immigration of Chinese from Hong Kong. He defended this policy on the grounds that the birth rate of Singapore’s Chinese is lower than that of its Indians and Malays. ‘The numerical superiority of the Chinese must be maintained’, he said,, ‘or there will be a shift in the economy, both the economic performance and the political backdrop which makes that performance possible.’ Lee assured the Malays that they need not fear Hong Kong immigrants  taking their jobs because the immigrants will all be high income earners.
 Lee Kuan Yew's Racial Hierarchy
These remarks and Lee’s  parable, noted at the head of this article, reflects his view that there is a racial hierarchy among Asians in which the Chinese and other East Asians (such as the Koreans and Japanese) are at the top, Malays and other South East Asians are at the bottom and Indians and other South Asians are in the middle.  It is a view largely shared by a Prime Minister of Malaysia, Mahathir Mohamad (a medical doctor and also incidentally an outspoken critic of Western style Globalisation) whose ‘The Malay Dilemma’ Lee read in 1971 or 1972. Lee said that he agreed with 75% of Mahathir’s analysis. According to Mahathir, the problem of Malay underperformance was both genetic and cultural.
 Lee  Kuan Yew and 'The Bell Curve'
Lee told his authorised biographers concerning Herrnstein and Murray’s ‘Bell Curve’ that ‘The Bell Curve is a fact of life. The blacks on average score 85% per cent on IQ and it is accurate, nothing to do with culture. The whites score an average 100. Asians score more…the ‘Bell Curve’ authors put it at least 10 points higher. These are realities that, if you do not accept, will lead to frustration because you will be spending money on wrong assumptions and the results cannot follow.’ (He is referring here to the kind of waste on affirmative actions indulged in by politically correct governments in the USA, Britain and elsewhere. His views totally contradict  the assumptions behind much of Britain’s equality legislation).
'Equality is the Most Unlikely Thing'
Lee says that ‘I started off believing all men were equal. I know now that that’s the most unlikely thing that’s ever been, because millions of years have passed over evolution, people have scattered across the face of this earth, been isolated from each other, devloped indpendently, had different intermixtures between races, peoples, climates, soils…. I didn’t start  off with that knowledge. But by observation, reading, watching, arguing, asking, that is the conclusion I’ve come to.’
Lee Kuan Yew and Toynbee
Lees racial views have been strongly influenced by the historian Arnold Toynbee (ironically a relation of Polly Toynbee of the ‘Guardian’) having come across his ideas whilst at Cambridge. In ‘A Study of History’, Toynbee argued that ‘civilisations come to birth in environments which are unusually difficult and not unusually easy. The Sinic (Chinese) Civilisation, wroteToynbee, was nurtured in north China, where the climate was severe and swamps and regular floods made agriculture  difficult, and it became a’hard’ society. Conversely, societies that were nurtured in easy environments without challenges from people or nature are inherently weak.  Such peoples are left far behind by those in ‘hard ‘ societies. With  a harsh climate go many challenges  which develop a plethora of cultural and racial  characteristics in people. This is the thinking behind Lee’s parable of the three women in hospital. In it we can trace one of the threads of thought brought into J Philippe Rushton's racial theory synthesis.
Lee Kuan Yew is forgiven his ‘Racism’ because he is not White
According to the mad, prejudiced drivel that passes for leftist thought, Racism is ‘prejudice plus power.’ This marxoid  definition  is purpose-designed to criminalise the white race and only the white race, which it assumes in typical leftist anti-white, Euro-Centric fashion has a monopoly of power.  It conveniently excludes those members of ethnic minorities in white societies who, everyday observation shows, themselves exhibit the kind of straightforward racial or ethnic preferences which are normal in humanity.
The True Intent of Western Leftist Anti-Racism 
YewandMillipede
                                                                   Shaking Hands with 'a Piece of Filth'
And it ignores those ‘societies’ such as Singapore where non-white races are in the majority. Strictly speaking, according to the Marxoid definition of ‘Racism,’ in his position of power Lee Kuan Yew would  be guilty of this ‘crime’ if one is so foolish as to accept the leftist notion that race realism is strictly prejudice.  If he were a British politician, he might very well  find himself described as a 'Fascist,' 'Racist,' or even a 'Nazi' and be called a 'piece of filth' by David Cameron.  However, and this shows clearly the true intent of the leftist stigmatisation of ‘racism,’ as an oriental, he is mostly absolved from or forgiven this ‘offence’ in the eyes of western liberals, since he is innocent of the true crime, which is of being white. Therefore, while he has indeed been criticised by western liberals for his views on racial matters and the policies he put into place as a result of these, such criticisms have been sporadic and muted.
 Nota Bene.

Cameron to host No 10 party for homosexual celebrities

Cameron to host No 10 party for homosexual celebrities

We all know that the Cabbage Patch Kid, known as Cameron has the political morals of a prostitute and will sell himself to anyone who promises to vote for him and none licks moslem butt better than Cameron, except perhaps for the homosexual Simon Hughes of the Liberal Democrats.

Well now the election is over, Cameron is looking to get the homosexual community behind him by hosting a party at No 10 Downing Street for homosexual celebrities as part of a "concerted drive to woo the 'pink vote'".

Now you would think that with all the cut backs in services, the cancellation of live saving operations, the redundancies of workers, the inability to fund our troops fighting his illegal wars and the need to keep paying millions in foreign aid to fund India's space programme, that Cameron would have had a bit more respect for the public money that will be used to fill his "celebrity friends" with pink gin and jumbo sausages.

Now I know some of you like to laugh at "The Only Gay in the Village", Daffyd of Llanddewi Brefi portrayed by Matt Lucas,  especially when words like "rimming", "fisting" and "glory holes" are used but just to remind you what those terms mean below is a quick intro to homosexual terminologoy.  Be advised, as the homosexual Julian Clary once said, people find it difficult to handle the "nitty gritty of gay sex".

Rimming: Anal–oral sex, also referred to or described as anal–oral contact or anilingus (from anus + lingus (Latin Lingere: to lick, less commonly spelled analingus), is a form of oral sex involving contact between the anus or perineum of one person and the mouth (lips) or tongue of another. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rimming

Fisting
is a sexual activity that involves inserting a hand into the vagina or rectum. Once insertion is complete, the fingers either naturally clench into a fist or remain straight. In more vigorous forms of fisting, such as "punching," a fully clenched fist may be inserted and withdrawn slowly. Fisting may be performed with or without a partner.

A glory hole (also spelled gloryhole and glory-hole) is a hole in a wall, or other partition, often between public lavatory stalls or adult video arcade booths for people to engage in sexual activity or observe the person in the next cubicle while one or both parties masturbate. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glory_hole_(sexual_slang)

None of the above is my cup of tea but then again what people do in the privacy of their own homes is their business but I do not believe that Number 10 Downing Street is the place for those kinds of things and neither do I think the British Public should have to pay for this party.  Can't they hold the party on Clapham Common and then Ron Davies can go as well?

Sunday, 13 June 2010

British National Party Activist confronts the Fascist State

British National Party Activist confronts the Fascist State


Good morning British National Party.  All I can say is, thank God for the actions of the British National Party's activists.  They are true patriots and if everyone were to display the courage in confronting the Fascist Establishment the way that Corsham Crusader, who filmed the above video does, then we would soon have Our Country back.

The video that was shot by BNP super activist Corsham Crusader, who I am also proud to call a personal friend speaks for itself but I will give you the background of the story anyway.

The gentleman whose car is being towed away had recently lost his job and whilst parking in Trowbridge in Wiltshire, one of the wheels was over the white line of the parking pay.  For this he received one of the illegal fixed penalty parking tickets issued by Wiltshire Council to raise revenue. 

When due to personal circumstances, he was unable to pay this fine his vehicle was clamped and £370 demanded in extortion fees.  If the guy could not pay £70 then how could he find £370(and rising)? But the "local authorities" that care so much for the rights of colonisers care nothing for the indigenous people - all they want from us is our blood.  I am also sure that some of us would be unable to put our hands on £370 within a few hours or even a few weeks and so The Establishment steals a £2,000 vehicle and makes a nice profit for itself.

Now I am wondering how much this shameful display of abuse of power cost us?  The bailiff, the police, the tow truck that had to drive over 60 miles to pick up and take the car away.  The administration costs and God only knows what other parasites are feeding off the former car owners misery.  No car - no job.  No job - No Car. 

Now I intend to get a little bit personal here.  Because without the support of the androgenous creature wearing the white shirt - who is in fact a woman and its bodyguard - the oh so diplomatic police officer, then the state could not function.

I have long known that there are creatures in our society that would work as concentration camp guards and this little turd in white would be quite happy to strut around with a club beating inmates of the camp just like Irma Grese, who swaggered around the Bergen-Belson concentration camp during the 2nd World War.

And what about Plod, who slovenly slouches with his hands in his pockets? What of him?  Well at least he recognises the right for our cameraman to film in a public place  but that is it.  By being present he is acting as nothing more than a criminal extortion heavy.  And isn't it amazing that the police can never turn up when a criminal act is being committed but once there is the chance for the state to extort some more money they can "send one of the boys around".

No Plod, you are as guilty as the Bergen Bitch in white who you call colleague in the video and you were not there to preserve the peace, you were there to assist in the theft of an unemployed mans property.  Shame on the pair of you and shame on the Fascist Bastards called Wiltshire Council. 

Corsham Crusader - we are proud of you.

And when you said "I am a member of the British National Party fighting for the right of the British People" my heart soared.  Thank you.

Electoral Commission “Will only Have Vote Fraud Statistics in 2011

Electoral Commission “Will only Have Vote Fraud Statistics in 2011”

The Electoral Commission has shocked observers by admitting that it will only have statistics on the amount of vote fraud committed in the previous election “sometime in 2011,” a Freedom of Information (FOI) request submitted by British National Party South Wales super activist Roger Phillips has revealed.
Mr Phillips, already well-known as a thorn in the establishment’s side for his devastating “Wembley immigration invasion” video and other activities, submitted an FOI to the Electoral Commission (EC) on 10 May 2010.
Mr Phillips wrote that in “the recent general election the national media exposed a possibility of postal voting frauds in several wards.
“In light of the election being so close, why was this not investigated before voting was allowed? And how many investigations are being carried out regarding this issue and what is the progress of these investigations?”
By 7 June 2010, the EC had not bothered to respond — as they are legally obliged to — and Mr Phillips wrote to them once again asking why they had not fulfilled their legal duty.
The answer which Mr Phillips received from the EC the very next day contained the admission that the EC seems to be less than enthusiastic in tracking down the large-scale electoral fraud committed in this year’s election.
“We are awaiting comprehensive figures from the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), who are collating figures on a rolling basis from the force SPOC officers across the UK of all police investigations currently being carried out relating to cases of electoral malpractice,” wrote Tom Hawthorn, Head of Electoral Policy for the EC.
“Most election related police investigations are on-going and at various stages of completion. It will be some time before an accurate picture emerges of allegations where an offence is proven to have taken place and the offender has been tried in court and those allegations that are unfounded or unsubstantiated,” Mr Hawthorn wrote.
“Jointly with ACPO, we will be publishing our analysis of cases of alleged electoral malpractice reported to the police early in 2011, and we will also be releasing interim figures in our statutory report on the elections in July when the picture will be clearer.”
The EC’s relaxed attitude contrasts strongly with the previously reported comments by international observer and Oxford historian Mark Almond who described the 2010 election was one of the “most shambolic, incompetent and fraudulent elections Britain has ever witnessed.”
Mr Almond, who is also Visiting Professor of International Relations at Bilkent University, Ankara, has said in a newspaper article that “ingenious fraudsters” from the “minority communities” have committed massive registration fraud.
According to Mr Almond, “New Labour turned voter registration into a free-for-all. Coupled with unfettered immigration, keeping accurate electoral records was thus reduced to little more than guesswork.
“Ingenious fraudsters — usually in minority communities — were soon competing to see who could squeeze the most imaginary voters into one property.”