Foreign Aid safe Whilst British People suffer Cuts

 Foreign Aid safe Whilst British People suffer Cuts

Dear Chancellor

Charity they say, begins at home. Not so?
I was over at my mate Old Holborn’s place today and there was a rather interesting link, something I hadn’t seen before, or in fact even bothered to look for. It was a link to the Department for International Development, and it gave a break down, country by country of just how much money Great Britain donates to other countries in order for them to “develop”. Frankly, and I’m sure you’ll agree some of those places are beyond help and should be completely cut off. If I had my way it’s be all of them but since I know that’ll never happen and there’s even less of a chance I’ll ever be in a position to decide, I’ll leave the deciding up to someone else.
So I thought I’d demonstrate a breakdown of every single country we as “Saviours of the Universe” donate to, and the grand total, to show any visitors to my site how much poo-poo we could save ourselves.
The figures are for 08/09. I may have missed one or two but I’m sure you’ll get the gist. Also do yourself a favour and go and visit the website, you pick up strange things like St Helena, population 4000, aid received £35.7 million.
Eastern & Southern Africa
eritrea 3.7 million
ethiopia 165.5 million
kenya 102.7 million
lesotho 6.2 million
madagascar 9.3 million
malawi 77.3 million
mozambique 65.5 million
somalia 35 million
south africa 40.6 million
tanzania 132.7 million
Uganda 71.1 million
zambia 46.9 million
zimbabwe 57.3 million
West and Central Africa
Angola 3.3 million
Burundi 10.4 million
Cameroon 6.8 million
Congo 93.9 million
Ghana 99.5 million
Liberia 16.7 million
Nigeria 110.5 million
Rwanda 70.1 million
Sierra Leone 47.8 million
Middle East and North Africa
Iraq 32.8 million
Occupied Territories of Palestine 41.3 million
Sudan 106.8 million
Yemen 12.1 million
Asia South
Afghanistan 147.5 million
Bangladesh 132.9 million
India 297 million
Nepal 58 million
Pakistan 120 million
Sri Lanka 19.4 million
Asia Central
Kyrgyzstan 9.4 million
Tajikistan 5 million
Asia East and Pacific
Burma 56.7 million
Cambodia 17.7 million
China 40.2 million
East Timor 2.1 million
Indonesia 36.6 million
Vietnam 55.1 million
Caribbean
Guyana 2.5 million
Jamaica 3.6 million
Europe
Bosnia 4.1 million
Georgia 8.2 million
Kosovo 17.7 million
Serbia 2.9 million
Ukraine 0.9 million
Latin America
Brazil 0.86 million
Nicaragua 3.9 million
Overseas Territories
Montserrat 16.3 million
St Helena 35.7 million
GRAND TOTAL: £2560 MILLION in Aid to other countries. That’s in 1, yes one year.
I dare you to tell us there’s not enough money for the lads in Afghanistan.
* My maths might not be too accurate, but I think I’m close enough.
Author You Have been Cromwelled

Galloway Incites Muslim Violence against White British

In the above video, you will see George Galloway, the former moslem sponsored Respect MP, clearly inciting violence against the British People at a demonstration in Tower Hamlets on Sunday by the moslems - many of whom were waving their Black Battle Flag.

The second speaker is a so far unknown moslem agitator, who also calls for violence when he says that the police will not tell the moslems when and where to march.  He was clearly listened to because afterwards, the moslems were worked up enough to go attack the police and chase them out of Tower Hamlets before turning their attention to passing white people.

Now there are a couple of interesting things about this video - the first being that the moslems have now clearly hijacked the Socialist Workers Party umbrella, the UAF and the second, that if these moslems and Galloway have the support of the British people, then where were the white people? 

By the way did you know that George Galloway's publishing empire, Asian Voice was funded by the Pakistani government in a covert operation to the tune of almost £600,000 pounds?

Whites Voting for Whites Is “Racism,” but Blacks Voting for Blacks Is “Democracy”

Whites Voting for Whites Is “Racism,” but Blacks Voting for Blacks Is “Democracy”

BNP Newsroom

 

Black people are joining the Labour Party in their droves to vote for Diane Abbott as leader of that party, state-funded Operation Black Vote (OBV) director Simon Woolley has revealed.

BAME LabourAccording to Mr Woolley’s post on the OBV blog, the “Labour Party has received an unexpected boost because of the inclusion of Diane Abbott to the Labour leadership race.”

“I went along to my home town Leicester as an observer to witness the BAME Labour leadership hustings meeting” at Soar Valley College, Mr Woolley informed his readers.

BAME Labour is a formal non-whites only section of the Labour Party. BAME is an acronym for Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic, sometimes shortened to Black Minority Ethnic or BME.

According to Mr Woolley, two things stood out. One of them was a demand from the 300-strong audience for compulsory BAME shortlists, and the other was the fact that blacks were joining the party only to vote for Ms Abbott.

“The question about BME representation was answered in a way that makes you wonder why ‘All BME’ shortlists aren’t already on the statute book,” he wrote.

“The second and fascinating occurrence of the day was talking to a number of individuals who told me that they had recently joined the party precisely because Diane Abbot was standing for the leader.

“A group of four women had joined including a mother and daughter. During another conversation an elderly gentleman told me he had abandoned the party after over [sic] the Iraq war but had rejoined to vote for Abbott.

“This is purely anecdotal but if this momentum gathers apace then who knows what might happen,” Mr Woolley said.

Now imagine if the opposite situation were to occur, namely that whites join any party just to vote for a white candidate against non-white competitors.

The media and Mr Woolley would be screaming racism from the rooftops, and the Equalities and Human Rights Commission would no doubt be intervening with legal action.

According to BAME Labour Chair, Ahmad Shahzad, that organisation’s aim is to “empower ethnic minority members within the Labour Party and campaigns for greater representation of ethnic minority communities in public life.

“Through encouraging increased participation in the political process BAME Labour empowers its members to campaign for a fairer, more equal and democratic society,” Mr Shahzad boasts on his website.

It seems therefore, that when white people vote in blocks for white candidates, it is “racism” but when black people vote in blocks for black candidates, it is “democracy.”

* The BAME website has been made up by the same people responsible for the non-whites only “Black Socialist Society” or BSS.

The amateurish Labour BAME webmaster forget to change the top line header of the website when converting the BSS website into the BAME “look.” As a result, the acronym BSS can still be seen at the top left-hand side of the screenshot of the BAME website below.

Horwich Bolton People pay for Foreign Aid whilst UK Services Cut And Vat Increases

ConDems Raise VAT to Pay EU and Foreign Aid

BNP Newsroom

 

By Andrew Moffatt, 

BNP Economics Department -- The chief beneficiaries and causes behind the 3 percent VAT increase announced yesterday are the foreign aid budget and the EU.

Andrew Moffatt“The inequitable tax rise, designed to raise £13 billion from hard-pressed consumers, was deliberately omitted in the Conservative Party’s s manifesto pledge two months ago and it was opposed by the Lib-Dems during the election. 

In other words, at a time of unparalleled austerity in the wake of Labour’s gross mismanagement of the economy, the Conservative Party has once again subordinated the British electorate to overseas interests.

VAT is inequitable because the poorest are hit the hardest. Thus, those who do not pay income tax are clobbered with VAT on their essential spending. In particular, the elderly are victims. 

The elderly have already suffered a second harsh winter of global cooling which inflicted a toll of some 40,000 fatalities in the past year alone.

Whereas the Government should have focused on assisting the most deserving and vulnerable in the UK, it has instead seen fit to increase its donations to developing countries such as India, which is sufficiently wealthy to finance its own space programme.

Meanwhile, the EU is absorbing £15 billion per annum in British taxpayers’ subsidies, with our net payments due to rise by some £2 billion this year.

A recent paper by the Taxpayers’ Alliance estimated that the total cost to the UK of the EU, which included its regulatory burden, at £2,000 per man, woman and child, per annum.

The extent of Britain’s subservience to the EU may be discovered on page 3 of the HM Budget forecast, which merits special mention:

The Economic and Fiscal Strategy Report and the Financial Statement and Budget Report contains the Government’s assessment of the medium-term economic and budgetary position. They set out the Government’s tax and spending plans, including those for public investment, in the context of its overall approach to social, economic and environmental objectives. After approval for the purposes of Section 5 the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1993, these reports will form the basis of submissions to the European Commission under Article 99 (ex Article 103)and Article 104(ex Article 104c) of the Treaty establishing the European Community.

In other words, undisclosed to the public, the British Government’s budgetary programme is subject to the requirements and approval of the unelected Commissioners of an alien potentate — the European Union.

Another casualty of the VAT hike will be the motorist, who will pay an additional 2.5% on fuel when the tax rise takes effect in January 2011.   This comes on top of recent rises, caused by the collapse in the value of Sterling against the US Dollar, in which oil is priced.

Finally, middle class families will be thumped by the withdrawal and restriction of benefits and credits to those on middle incomes.

We have long warned the middle classes that the Conservative Party is fundamentally disloyal to its core supporters.

Government Debt

The forecast for public borrowing for 2010/11 is £149 billion, or 10.1 percent of GDP. Despite the measures undertaken by the ConDem government in yesterday’s budget, the nation’s net debt is estimated to sit at 70 percent of GDP by 2013/14.

This compares with less than 40% some five years ago.

In our recent budget manifesto and during the 2010 election, the British National Party identified a number of key areas where taxpayers’ monies were unnecessarily employed and where significant savings could be made.

Our desire was to re-deploy these funds in more worthy areas and to reduce public borrowing, which crowds out private endeavour and investment.  Amongst them, we specified the following:

1. Climate Change:  £18 billion per annum, mainly via disguised levies in energy bills.

2 The multicultural society:  £13 billion per annum.

3 The EU:  £15 billion per annum.

4 Overseas Aid:  £9 billion per annum.

5 The unnecessary Afghan War:  £3-5 billion per annum.

6 £10 billion of spending cuts on wasteful bureaucracy.

The amount of unnecessary expenditure within these above categories amounts to some £70 billion per annum.

By contrast, the Emergency Budget, just unveiled, has identified £40 billion of cuts and tax rises over the life of the current Parliament.

In conjunction with the cuts already identified by the previous administration, this suggests a fiscal squeeze of some £96 billion by June 2015, assuming the Government lasts this long.

Let us therefore assume that the current Chancellor has already identified £10 billion per annum in wasteful expenditure in his calculations.

His total saving over the duration of office is a little under £20 billion per annum of the £96 billion earmarked throughout the term.

This contrasts with our savings of some £350 billion. With the exception of elements within point 6 above, however, none of these commitments we have identified will be touched. 

That is because the politically-correct ConDem administration is as committed to globalisation, international governance and the extirpation of the nation state as Labour was, before it.

Such undeclared ambitions do not come cheaply.

Credit Where It Is Due

We would not wish to be curmudgeonly in our justified condemnation of the politically-correct George Osborne and his Lib-Dem side-kicks.

We applaud the re-establishment of the link between the state pension and earnings, although this falls well below the level of £150 per week which we advocated reaching by the end of the current parliamentary term in 2015.

Similarly, we applaud the rise of the basic rate threshold to £7475 before income tax is paid. We would like to see this raised further: low tax thresholds penalise the low paid, undermine the incentive to work and create needless bureaucracy in the form of the complicated tax credits system.

In our manifesto, we argued for a basic threshold of £12000 for all, which would require some re-balancing of the rates at which tax is paid.

We concur with many of the areas currently targeted for spending cuts.

That includes the Regional Development Agencies (RDAs), which have absorbed over £20bn in taxpayers’ funds since 1999.  Unbelievably, these self-serving bodies have earmarked 62 percent of their funds towards the public sector, not including over £3m to the trades unions.

In their place, we would have used the savings to reduce by four pence the small business rate of tax, thus promoting creativity, employment and expansion amongst small companies.

Ominously, we note that the Government is merely to replace the RDAs with another body, which suggests any changes will be merely cosmetic.

The ConDem coalition will not abolish the regions and the attendant infrastructure, because these are decreed by the EU.

In consequence we suspect the new bodies in place of the RDAs, announced by the Government, will amount to no more than an exercise of smoke and mirrors; simply, the Conservatives cannot be trusted.

We agree with the Government’s plan to support the regions in terms of infrastructure spending and employment incentives for business. It is clear, however, that this manoeuvre is designed to buy votes in those areas where the Conservatives remain despised and hold minor representation.

Omissions

Departmental spending cuts will not be identified until 20th October.

The NHS has been excluded and yet, as we have previously reflected, the Strategic Health Authorities absorb £4bn in taxpayers’ funds when, instead of funding this overgrown bureaucracy, the monies could be better spent on front-line health care.

The Government has also failed to scrap entirely the plans to levy a higher rate of National Insurance Contributions on employees, a veritable tax on jobs, when it takes effect in 2011.

The Government has failed to increase the budget for science and technology. Despite our historical prowess in both, our country has long fallen markedly behind our competitors.

Science and technology fuel the inventions and industry of tomorrow and, therefore, the wealth and economic base of future generations.

The Banking Sector

The Government’s austerity package is due not merely to Labour’s gross mismanagement of the economy and the priority to fund the EU and the overseas aid budget.

It is also due to the distasteful excesses in parts of the banking industry. Such financial debauchery was caused by speculators and ‘wide boys’ who risked the monies of others’ to attract colossal bonuses.

This type of practice was described by the Chairman of the FSA as ‘economically useless.’

The cost of such reckless financial speculation, encouraged by the bonus culture, will be paid for with limited growth and economic stagnation.

It will also be paid for by unemployment.

We highlighted several areas in our recent manifesto to address these issues. We note with dismay that a reform of the banking sector has been kicked into the long grass by means of an ‘enquiry.’

In the meantime, in this budget, no measures were taken to curb the bonus culture, which employs the money of others in the interest of speculation designed to reap massive bonuses.

The gung-ho attitude of  bankers has been a cause for economic instability and it needs to be addressed.

Public Sector Pay Restraint v the Private Sector

The Government has earmarked the public sector for pay restraint, doubtless with a view to placing it more on a par with the reality which appertains within the private sector.

Certainly, the cold wind of austerity has been lapping around the private sector since the banking crisis developed more than two years ago.

One area, more or less untouched, however, has been the absence of pay restraint amongst the directors of many public companies. When shareholders experience reduced dividends; when earnings per share fall; when companies announce wage reductions; then clearly it is unreasonable that a significant number of company directors and chief executive officers should continue to reap bonuses at the expense of their employees and shareholders.

Good leaders set an example. Too many directors are now recipients of massive bonuses for doing what they are hired to do by their shareholders. A recent CEO of Shell cast serious misgivings on the bonus culture.

We do not question the worth of good managers. But we do draw attention to the current directors’ pay round, which has become a mirror image of the trades unions pay round in the late ‘70s.

We do not yet have an answer to this but we believe the solution lies in better corporate governance and the ability of ordinary shareholders to vote, specifically, on the remuneration of the directors hired to manage the company’s fortunes.

Presently, matters have moved out of hand at a number of companies, where directors are paid an eye-watering multiple of over a hundred times the rate of the average remuneration of the ordinary employee.

Spending Cuts, Tax Rises, Borrowing and the Economy

The Government has yet to identify exactly how cuts will be applied but the intention is for the relevant state departments to cut expenditure by 25 percent.

This will create a wave of redundancies and a severe decline to front line services.

By next Spring, we predict there will be severe hardship and a sharp fall in spending across the economy as VAT rises take effect.

In the wake of the global debt crisis, similar fiscal restraint amongst the G20 will create an additional diminution in money supply and a reduction in demand.

In these circumstances, we believe the Government’s forecasts of 2.3% growth for 2011 to be woefully unrealistic and unattainable. Indeed, there is a real chance of renewed slump.

Repairing the Economy

In essence, there are three means to address the global debt crisis, the leading cause of the current economic malaise:

1. Inflate the money supply and reduce the real value of debt.

2. Repay the debt.

3. Grow the economy and reduce the burden of debt.

Usually, these means are combined in some measure or other. We do not approve of inflation because it penalises savings and thrift.

In our manifesto, however, we set out our plans to reinvigorate the British economy.

Our intentions remain unaltered. Amongst them, our pledge to secede from the European Union will remove a constraint upon our economy which has raised the general tax burden and applied an unprecedented burden of regulation upon industry and commerce.

Our undertaking to introduce selective tariffs on the imports from developing countries will create an economic boom for years into the future as the economy adapts to produce what it presently imports.

Allied measures intended to reinvigorate British manufacturing, science and technology will ensure that Britain is returned to its historical lead in these fields.

By contrast, the ideals of globalisation advocated by the present administration and its predecessors will result in the continued pillaging of British manufacturing and, ultimately, an environment where we produce nothing.

Neil Hunter of Lancashire Constabulary

Det Supt Neil Hunter of Lancashire Constabulary

Author the Green Arrow

British National Party activist, Anthony Bamber has been cleared of intending to incite religious hatred by a jury of his peers after publishing and distributing a leaflet called "The Heroin Trade" which revealed how moslems were almost exclusively responsible for the growing, transportation and sale of this evil drug around the world.

Now doing a little research I find that Mr Bamber is indeed correct and that moslems are mainly responsible.  There is a lot more out there if you care to look.

But pleased as I am with the result, which shows why we must not let The Establishment do away with Trial By Jury, I am not to pleased with the gobshite senior police officer in charge of the case, Detective Superintendent Neil Hunter of Lancashire Constabulary who said after the trial:

''While we are disappointed with today's decision, we accept the decision of the court.
''We have worked very closely with the Crown Prosecution Service throughout this inquiry and careful consideration was given before any decision to charge was made.
''That decision was based upon both the nature of the leaflets and the persistent nature of their distribution."

Damned right you will accept the decision of the court you jumped up dipstick.  And as for opening your big mouth and saying you are "disappointed" with the result, your condescending acceptance of it implies that you think the Judge and Jury were wrong and would prefer to see yourself as Judge, Jury and Executioner.  You are entitled to no official public opinions on the results of any trial so keep your trap shut in future.

But I see where you are coming from.  You admit with working closely with the ethnically enriched Crown Prosecution Service that is swamped with moslems and were only doing your dhimmi duty bidding of your moslem masters.  You will be remembered for that act of treason.

I hope Mister Bamber sues the pants off DS Neil Hunter and Lancashire Constabulary for wrongful arrest, harassment and whatever else he can think of.

Muslim Riot in London not reported by BBC as Usual

The gutless BBC is reporting that "Gangs of youths" attacked police officers but you and I know that when the BBC says "Youths", they mean moslems and the moslems who went on the rampage in East London Sunday did not just attack the police but random members of the public who were unlucky enough to get in their way - you can bet your bottom dollar that those victims were probably white.

The "protest" that was originally organised by the Socialist Workers Party/UAF was completly taken over by the moslems who showed five white UAF supporters exactly what they thought of them daring to try and lead moslems by giving them a good beating.

"In order to prevent injuries to the public and officers, and serious disorder, police withdrew from the immediate area and a series of filter cordons were put in place."

Knowing that Islam is religion of peace one wonders who it was who continually attacked the police through the course of the day until eventually the police fled from the area, leaving the streets to their new owners from overseas.  That is when an undocumented number of attacks took place against innocent passer-bys.

The moslems, who were supposedly under the stewardship of the East London Mosque, flexed their muscles and showed the remaining white people of East London just whose land it is now.  Soon my friends the streets really will run with blood as they and their generals become more confident and realise that the police do not have the will or desire to resist them but would rather run away or be elsewhere impounding some innocent Brits car.   Police - don't make me laugh.

Adam Walker Appointed as BNP Staff Manager

Adam Walker Appointed as BNP Staff Manager

BNP Newsroom

 

Adam Walker has been appointed as Staff Manager for the British National Party's centrally paid staff and for the staff of MEPs Nick Griffin and Andrew Brons, it has been announced.

The popular County Durham activist hit the headlines recently when his three year battle for the right to freedom of conscience and political action led to the General Teaching Council accepting the right of teachers to be in the British National Party.

Mr. Walker has a wide range of life experience which should serve him well in this demanding and crucial role.

He served in the 15th/19th King's Royal Hussars (part of the Royal Armoured Corps), including service as a UN Peacekeeper, has extensive experience of training and motivating young sportsmen and -women through his Martial Arts Academy, and worked as a very successful teacher in both Japan and the UK for a total of  thirteen years. Since 2006 he has been the Organiser of the Co. Durham Branch of the BNP.

He is President of the independent nationalist trade union Solidarity. He has been involved to varying degrees in many of the more than one hundred and fifty cases that Solidarity has now fought on behalf of its growing membership.

This experience has given him a very good knowledge of the policies and procedures of a large number of public bodies and companies to draw on in his new role.

Mr. Walker is already working on creating an administrative back-up team, including experts in employment legislation. He will also be studying for formal management qualifications to top up his and his team's widespread practical experience in the field.

"I am very excited about the role, although I know it won't be easy,” Mr Walker told BNP News following his formal appointment by Nick Griffin after several weeks of discussions and initial planning.

"While my job is to get the most out of all our staff on behalf of our members and donors and indeed the taxpayer (in the case of EU staff), I don't anticipate any problems because we've got a great team and everyone's job fits into an overall big picture.

“Having looked at job descriptions and started getting to know key personnel better,  I do foresee some reallocation of duties so as to allow people to play to their strengths. Before any changes are made I will be listening to all views carefully,” he said.

"But I won't be rushing in like a bull in a china shop. My first priorities are to visit all our offices and depots so as to see our workers performing their normal routine jobs. I need to find out what we can do to help make them as efficient and happy in their work as possible.

"I'm here to get value for members' money as well as to ensure that in Europe staff have a focus on high levels of service to the constituents of Mr Brons and Mr Griffin.

“Having personally experienced all sorts of management styles, I believe that the best way to get that is to have happy, secure and productive staff who know what is expected of them, who can rely on regular and fair appraisals to help them identify and meet targets or establish where further resources and training are necessary.

“It's vital that all staff have clear policies and procedures and feel part of a highly motivated team where they are confident that everyone pulls their weight,” Mr Walker continued.

“We are already making progress on planning and getting created an interactive staff website. These are routine and familiar nowadays in huge numbers of occupations and industries, and I am looking forward to filling in this gap in the BNP's organisation.

“With everything from online calendars to forward planners, from archives to project management tools, it will be a hugely important tool for staff communication, support and management."

Sounds good, doesn't it? Obviously such a major and complicated project won't simply materialise fully built and debugged in the first few weeks, but we can be happy that we have a fresh new team who know what is needed and how to get there.

We wish Mr. Walker all the very best of luck in his new role, and look forward to bringing you updates in the near future.

Liverpool BNP Hits the Streets with Petition to Make St George’s Day a National Holiday

BNP Newsroom

Hardworking activists from the British National Party’s Liverpool branch hit the streets of Huyton village last weekend to canvas support for a petition to make Saint George’s Day a national bank holiday.

According to a report on the new Liverpool BNP regional blog, the sunny Saturday afternoon’s activity in the busy village provoked a “fantastic” response.

“There was a constant stream of well wishing supporters, the majority of which were only too happy to sign. There were so many that we ran out of petition sheets and had to use the backs of the ones we had already filled in,” the Liverpool blog announced.

“We also handed out hundreds of ‘England is for Life, Not Just for Football’ leaflets which were also accepted with great enthusiasm.

“We commended people for flying their flags in support of the England team and urged them to keep the flags up after the World Cup is over to celebrate our nation’s great history,” the blog said.

“All in all it was a great day of action with a very encouraging response indeed.”

You can find the Liverpool BNP blog here.

Opinion Poll Reveals That 43% of Voters Want Foreign Aid Cut , but Budget Ring fence it

Opinion Poll Reveals That 43% of Voters Want Foreign Aid Cut

BNP Newsroom

The British National Party’s campaign to highlight the injustice of domestic cuts while foreign aid is ring-fenced has broken through to the public consciousness with the news that a new opinion poll has revealed that 43 percent of voters now agree with the party’s position.

A Chinese astronaut in space, broadcast live in China.The opinion poll, conducted amongst 24,000 people by the well-known consumer website moneysavingexpert.com, revealed a huge gap between the political class and the voters, said that website’s founder Martin Lewis.

“It seems that a huge chunk of the UK public follow the 'charity begins at home' philosophy when it comes to public spending,” Mr Lewis was quoted as saying.

“This perhaps signifies a division between the political classes and the person at home.

“It's stunning that the area of spending the government has chosen to make watertight is the one most people would choose to cut.”

The BNP was the first party to raise the issue of foreign aid as an area of concern and a place to start spending cuts.

In response to the BNP’s anti-foreign aid campaign, the other political parties made commitments to increase the aid spend and to ring-fence it.

This, they correctly believed, would mark their policies out as radically different to the BNP, a move it seems they might yet regret.

The poll also showed that only a quarter of voters wanted benefits to be cut while 20 percent wanted cuts to the defence budget.

Matthew Elliott, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said the government was “wrong to be ring-fencing international aid spending whilst the budget crisis at home in Britain is so bad.

“It is well known that plenty of our aid money is actually squandered by big charities and British trade unions or worse stolen by corrupt regimes,” Mr Taylor was quoted as saying.

In a soundbite which sounded like it could have come off the BNP website, Mr Taylor said that the “politicians are out of touch with the people on this issue, and the public rightly question why we send aid to China when they have men in space, nuclear weapons and a booming economy.”

International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell has meanwhile called on EU nations to maintain their commitment to international aid, despite the financial crisis.

According to a press release issued on the Department for International Development’s website, Mr Mitchell, speaking in advance of his first visit to the EU Foreign Affairs Council, said:

“Five years ago EU nations made a promise to the world’s poor to work towards spending 0.7% of our income to help ensure people have access to the basics they need to survive such as water, health services and food.

“EU countries are important partners in the fight against poverty and need to show global leadership by meeting this pledge.

“We mustn’t balance the books on the backs of the world’s poorest and break this vital promise — doing so will mean more people will die from famine or lack of clean water. We have a moral duty to continue this work despite our own financial problems.”

Best Wishes to Nick and Jackie Griffin on Their 25th Wedding Anniversary

Best Wishes to Nick and Jackie Griffin on Their 25th Wedding Anniversary

Tue, 22/06/2010 - 13:26 |  BNP News

 

The entire team of the British National Party staff, members and supporters have joined together in wishing Nick and Jackie Griffin sincerest congratulations on the occasion of their 25th wedding anniversary celebrated over the past weekend.

“It was a truly wonderful weekend,” Mr Griffin wrote in an entry on his EU MEP blog.

“Even after 25 years of marriage, Jackie and I were both taken aback at just how emotional we (and I think many other people) were during the Rev West's splendid service,” Mr Griffin continued.

“After the service and lunch (complete with a longer speech from Jackie than from me, there's a first!) we and the immediate family and close old friends who had attended headed back home to the evening party, complete with other friends old and new, and neighbours,” he wrote.

Mr Griffin’s EU MEP website can be found by clicking here.

UK Slumdog Olympics

Slumdog Olympics

  Author: Sarah Maid of Albion

It is hard to contemplate quite how depressing, and certainly embarrassing, the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympic games is certain to be now that the director Danny Boyle has being appointed to direct the show.

Those who cringed at the pitiful spectacle presented by Britain at the closing of the 2008 games in Beijing might think it couldn’t possibly get much worse than the gangstas and sundry strumpets which tumbled out of a red double decker to represent some Liberal zealot’s lala land fantasy of London, but they are wrong, it will be infinitely worse.

Danny Boyle’s film career is dominated by movies expressing a particular attitude or world view, his 2000 adaptation of Alex Garland’s backpacker eulogy “The Beach” and “28 Days Later”, a post apocalyptic foray through a devastated world where few but the suitably diverse survived, are enough to fill one with foreboding on their own, however, Boyle is even better known for movies such as Trainspotting which followed a group of heroine addicts through the economically depressed streets of 1980’s Edinburgh, and of course every liberal’s must see, must rave over, must vote for heart warming tale of the street urchins of Mumbai, Slumdog Millionaire.

The opening ceremony of the Beijing games may have been over the top but it was a celebration of China, Chinese culture and native Chinese ethnicity. You can rest assured that we, the native British will not be allowed any such thing.

Mr Boyle's show will no doubt overflow with curry and calypso as the seventeen thousandth tribute to Bollywood since the Millennium merges into a sanitised version of the Notting Hill Carnival and then back to the gangsta rappers reprised so embarrassingly before the world in 2008. If any white person appears at all they will be bleach blond PVC clad sluts, gyrating like sexually aroused gibbons around the rappers, or beer bellied skinheads who briefly stumble across the arena before being chased away by dreadlocked Rastafarians either dressed as footballers, or maybe naked like on the twenty foot high billboard which was displayed outside London Bridge station for most of 2009.

There will be no sign of Christianity, but no doubt Islam will make an appearance, perhaps burka clad feminists will stride proudly across the stage or some kindly Mullahs will lead a group of suitably caramel coloured London Children through the audience and into a light at the end of the auditorium.

The sky will then light up with fireworks spelling out the EU's new oxymoronic slogan “United in Diversity” before Leona Lewis, Alexandra Burke and Danyl Johnson will appear beneath a multi-coloured spotlight and sing something about melting pots and rainbows, followed by the “Diversity” dance troop who unaccountably beat Susan Boyle in the Britain's Got Talent doing some Caribbean inspired dance whilst a specially flown in group from the ANC Youth League serenade them with vuvuzelas.

All that will before they get round to the 40 foot high effigies of Mandella, Obama, Shilpa Shetty and newly elected British Prime Minister Diane Abbot are wheeled out for the official worship section of the proceedings!!

Yes, I know I am only guessing, I have no way of knowing what that show will actually be, but do any of you, in all honesty imagine it will be that much different to what I have just described?

Green Arrow I know I should not laugh

I know I should not laugh

Author: Green Arrow

Moslems Calling the BNP Nazi's at todays demo

As reported in a previous article, the moslems have decided to push "whitey" out of the UAF in the areas of the inner cities they control and run it their way but even the moslems know they need a few token whites, if the British People are not to see the truth.

Who are the real Nazi's
Turkish moslems supporting Palistinian Terrorists

Take today's violent protest in Tower Hamlets, which the reds described as "exuberant", at which the professional black, Weyman Bennet who was recently arrested for conspiracy to commit violence said(and this gave me a laugh);

“We keep hearing edl worried about good v bad muslims

“But it's not up to the racists to decide who is good or bad. They are Nazis."

So let us have a look at this "protest" that was held to silence the voice of those people concerned about the Islamification of Our Country.  Who was there and who spoke out for the Cult of the Dead Paedophile.

• Trade Unions were represented by paid union officials from the NUT, CWU, Unison, PCS and Unite Unions.
• The Council of Mosques
• The Muslim Council of Britain
• The Islamic Forum of Europe
• National Union of Students
• Searchlight
• Black Students Campaign
• Socialist Workers Party
• UAF

The rally was also addressed by Motin Uz-Zaman, mayor of Tower Hamlets; Tower Hamlets councillor Abjol Miah; Steve Hart, regional organiser for the Unite union; Hugh Lanning, deputy general secretary, PCS union; Councillor Helal Abbas, leader of Tower Hamlets Council; John Biggs, London Assembly Member; Laura Maxwell, Jewish Council for Racial Equality; Rushanara Ali MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, and Tower Hamlets college lecturer Richard McEwan for the UCU union and last but not least George Galloway.

All the usual red rubbish, who really think they can control the moslems.  Boy they sure are stupid in mad marxist land.  Take the response to the fact that five white members of the UAF were attacked by the moslems and reported to have been stabbed.

Five Anti-Fascists on the way to the demo have been attacked by a large group of Asian youth reacting after the fear spread by the English Defence League.

Two have been taken to hospital with stab wounds, I'll post an update when I get it from my mate down in London.

This shows how much of a danger the EDL asre and why they must be opposed. They organise their demos and it gets the local Asians feeling angry. We need to reach out to Muslims communities and tell them that we show solidarity with them against the EDL.

Now personally I would not have cared if the five reds had been hacked to pieces.  It would serve them right for being brain dead reds but it is the way the reds blame the whites for the attacks on themselves by the moslems that gave me a laugh.
Anyhow they were not stabbed, as this later report, that had me, as well those attacked in stitches.  Fortunately my stitches were of laughter.

Update

20.06.2010 14:40
They weren't stabbed, one was hit by a bottle the others were just beat up a bit. All are ok, the two in hospital are there for minor cuts and bruising.
And EDL, fuck off back to where you came from. This is your fault for causing tension in the communities.

Roll on floor laughing and what a great way to end my blogging day.

Afghanistan, UN Confirms that British Involvement Has “Escalated Conflict”

As 299th Soldier Dies in Afghanistan, UN Confirms that British Involvement Has “Escalated Conflict”

BNP news

Britain’s involvement in the Afghan war has not brought peace to that nation but has escalated the conflict, the United Nation’s monitoring mission on the Taliban chief has announced.

The shocking revelation, which illustrates the extent of the gross treason committed by the Labour/Tory Lie Machine against the British people, came hot on the heels of the sad news of the death of the 299th British soldier to be killed in that war.

In an interview with a Sunday newspaper, the UN’s Richard Barrett, who is also Britain’s former counter-terrorism chief, said that attempts by British forces to expand their control over Afghan territory over the past 12 months have been counter-productive and led to a worsened security situation.

“Most people reckon there's a deterioration,” Mr Barrett was quoted as saying.

"Foreign troops push into areas where they haven't been before and if the Taliban are there they will start fighting. Then it's not calm. It's not calm because foreign forces have pushed in."

Mr Barrett's position is supported by a report submitted to the UN Security Council yesterday which showed a massive increase in violence in Afghanistan for the period January to April this year.

According to the report, roadside bomb attacks rose by 94 percent from the previous year.

The Afghanistan Conflict Monitor (ACM), which is a project of the School for International Studies at Simon Fraser University, has reported that the “southern region continued by far to record the highest number of security incidents in the country,” adding that there were “also increases in fighting in Faryab in the north, Badghis and Kunduz in the northeast, and Badghis in the west."

In addition, the ACM reported the number of security incidents during January 2010 was higher than in the same period in 2009.

The ACM said that the security situation appeared less affected by the onset of winter than in previous years, which was attributed to mild weather conditions and “ongoing military operations."

* David Cameron has announced his intention to help build up the Afghan army as a pre-requisite for British withdrawal.

In other words, British taxpayers can look forward to paying out even more in “developmental aid” to Afghanistan in a new project which is also guaranteed to fail.

In his newspaper interview, Mr Barrett confirmed that the Afghan army was a shambles.

“The Afghan army's organisation is still extremely weak,” he said. “It needs a more professional officer corps; I think the Afghan ministry of defence would be the first to admit this.

“Can you really get the Afghans to take on a significant role? There are still problems with retention [in the army], still problems with ethnic mix. Even if we withdraw from front-line activity, we still have this long-term training commitment,” Mr Barrett added.

His comments follow his earlier dismissal of the Labour/Tory claims that the war was helping to fight terrorism.

Mr Barrett described that argument as “rubbish” and confirmed that the war was inflaming terrorism, not subduing it.

UK Tax Rises of £10 Billion, but Foreign Aid “Ring Fenced” at £13 Billion

ConDem to Announce Tax Rises of £10 Billion, but Foreign Aid “Ring Fenced” at £13 Billion

BNP newsroom

The ConDem government’s plans to announce £10 billion of tax rises in Tuesday’s emergency budget stands in shocking contrast to their pledge to increase foreign aid to £13 billion per year.

The planned £10 billion across-the-board tax increase, leaked by the Sunday Times, will include rises in VAT and capital gains tax in addition to the increase in National Insurance already announced by the previous Labour regime.

According to the report, tax on alcohol, tobacco duty and air travel will also increase in the budget to be presented by Chancellor George Osborne.

He will also apparently outline £40 billion of spending cuts which will include a freeze on the wages of civil servants (except MPs, no doubt) and will cut benefits payments to middle class families.

It is mindboggling that Mr Osborne and his coalition gang have the nerve to demand of British people that they pay extra tax which could easily be made up by simply slashing the foreign aid budget.

Apart from the foreign aid budget, other places where billions could be shaved off the budget include the annual costs of £18 billion spent on “global warming,” the £13 billion spent on immigration, the £4 billion spent on asylum, the £15 billion spent on EU membership, the £5 billion per year spent fighting the illegal and immoral Afghanistan war and the billions spent on “politically correct” social engineering projects.

This would instantly generate savings well in excess of £80 billion per year.

In this way, front-line public services could be maintained without tax rises of any sort.

While welfare reform is also necessary to help break the cycle of dependency which 60 years or more of near all-out-socialism has generated, it is little short of scandalous to cut benefits while billions are paid out on projects which have no benefit at all to Britain.

Only the British National Party has a developed and concise policy of economic management which is the only path whereby economic stability can be returned to our nation.

Ironically, the upcoming budget will help to make the ConDem regime one of the most hated in British political history.

With the Labour Party thoroughly discredited and now relying on their imported ethnic vote, a new window of opportunity will soon open for the BNP, providing its activists stay the course.

Europe Is Being Ethnically Cleansed of Europeans MEP Warns

Europe Is Being Ethnically Cleansed of Europeans, Andrew Brons MEP Warns

Europe is being ethnically cleansed of Europeans, Andrew Brons MEP has told the European Parliament.

Andrew Brons addressing the European ParliamentMr Brons made the eye-opening speech recently during a sitting of that body in which he discussed globalisation, the role of the EU and immigration policies across the Continent.

“The idea that we can import large families from the Third World as a substitute for unborn European children is based on a particularly pernicious and wrongheaded assumption that we are the products of nurture,” Mr Brons said.

This assumption implies that “Third World cultures are like overcoats that can be taken off at the port of entry and replaced with a European cultural overcoat that can be issued with residence and citizenship papers,” he continued.

 “The children of such immigrants are allegedly as European as the indigenous population. They’re not.

“Distinctive cultures are made by distinctive peoples and not the other way round.

“We are not the products of our culture; our cultures are the products of our peoples.

“Replacing Europeans with people from the Third World will mean that Europe will be replaced by the Third World. Europe is slowly but steadily being ethnically cleansed of Europeans,” Mr Brons said.

Referring to the issue of globalisation and the EU’s response, Mr Brons was equally scathing.

“In the [European] Commission’s work program for 2010, it was said that the European Union must face up to long-term challenges such as globalisation and must regain competiveness,” Mr Brons said.

“The problem is that the EU hasn’t faced up to globalisation; it’s embraced it,” he said.

“It’s allowed a flood of imports from developing economies with wage rates a fraction of those in Europe. The only way in which we could possibly regain competitiveness would be to drive wage rates down to their levels.

“I, of course, am not even in favour of membership of the European Union. However, even if I were in favour of it, I would accuse its masters of betraying the economic interests of its peoples.

“I would say the EU is not so much a European union, as it is a global union trying to achieve global mobility of goods and services.

“I believe that sovereign nation states should rebuild their manufacturing bases and then protect the markets and jobs of their nations.

“However, my message is also for Europhiles: Europe, either as a whole, or separately, will fail to protect its manufacturing and it agriculture from Third World competition at its peril.

“Globalisation must be resisted individually or collectively or it will destroy us all,” Mr Brons said.

“The Commission’s document refers to the alleged need to develop further legal immigration policies to alleviate the perils of demographic ageing. There is no doubt that ageing populations are a concern in many countries.

“However, we must examine why the problem has occurred. Whilst many women pursue uninterrupted careers and refrain from having children out of choice, and that is their perfect right, many others pursue careers because it is economically necessary for them.

“They work in order to pay the bills, not because they have a disdain for motherhood.

“There’s no doubt that this development has had an impact on birth rates which have been depressed artificially at the behest of economic forces.

“However, we do not have to take a laissez-faire approach to economic forces. Economic intervention can change those economic forces and a change in those forces will bring about a corresponding change in family demographics,” Mr Brons said.

USA Faces Demographic Crisis as European-Americans Slide into Minority

USA Faces Demographic Crisis as European-Americans Slide into Minority Status

The demographic crisis which imperils Europe’s future also threatens the United States of America, a fact illustrated by this week’s news that European Americans will become a minority among newborn children in that nation next year.

The US Census Bureau’s (USCB) latest report announced that non-white births accounted for 48.6 percent of the children born in America between July 2008 and July 2009, gaining ground from 46.8 percent two years earlier.

This trajectory means that non-white births will pass European-American births within the next year.

In addition, the median age of the white population is older than that of non-whites. This means that a larger number of non-white immigrant women are of childbearing age, a situation aggravated by the fact that Third World populations tend to have much higher reproduction rates than Europeans.

Among the Hispanic population, there were roughly nine births for every one death, compared with a roughly one-to-one ratio for whites.

According to the census count, as of July 2009, whites constituted 65 percent of the American population. The rate of the white decline is astonishing: in 1960, they made up 85 percent of the population.

This figure is most certainly an underestimate as the US Census bureau counts all Middle Easterners (including people from North Africa and most of the Arab world) as “white.”

An August 2008 report from the USCB projected that by 2042, whites will be an absolute minority. This is a revision of earlier projections which projected this demographic change to take place in 2050.

By 2050, the USCB said, whites will have fallen to 46 percent of the population.

The Hispanic population will be more than 30 percent of the population by then, and the number of blacks will have risen to 15 percent. Asians are expected to rise to nine percent of the population by 2050.

Overall, the population of the United States is due to rise from 296 million in 2005 to 438 million, with 82 percent of the increase coming from Third World immigrants.

The total projected growth is equal to the combined populations of Great Britain, France and Spain. The 105 million extra people which will result from this immigration wave is equal to 13 additional New York Cities.

Hispanics accounted for 54.7 percent of the total population increase between July 2008 and July 2009, with 66 percent of that increase resulting from births in America.

As shocking as these figures are, they do not even include the impact of illegal immigration. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, an independent, non-partisan, non-profit research body widely regarded as an authority on the issue, in August 2007, the illegal population total stood at around 12.5 million. This means, in real terms, that there are probably more illegal aliens in America than there are blacks.

When this figure is added to the official totals, the demographic swing against European-origin America is even more marked. As all Third World immigrants have far higher birth rates than whites, then, when the legal and illegal immigration wave is factored in, it is likely that even the 2042 date for majority non-European America is optimistic.

The effects of this Third World immigration tsunami, which has reached into all parts of America, have been uniformly negative, quite apart from the long-term implications which will see that nation downgraded to Third World Status well before the end of the 21st Century
read more The BNP Newsroom

Nick Griffin elected Vice-President of the AENM Group in EU Parliament

Nick Griffin elected Vice-President of the AENM

Posted on19 June 2010 by Giuseppe De Santis. Tags: BNP, british national party, fiamma tricolore, front national france, general secretary, jobbik, margaret hodge, nick griffin, pan european, president bruno gollnisch

A few days ago we reported that the Alliance of European Nationalist Movements (AENM), a pan-European party made up of nationalist parties have chosen to work together at a European level.
On the 16th and 17th of June, the AENM held its first General Assembly in Strasbourg.
The Chairman Bruno Gollnisch set up the agenda and drew the position the AENM will take in the near future. The General Assembly then proceeded to renew the “Bureau”, the political leadership of the party namely, the President (Bruno Gollnisch), Vice-President (Nick Griffin), Treasurer (Bela Kovacs) and General Secretary (Valerio Cignetti).
The assembly then deliberated on the enlargement of the party by accepting applications from the “Partido Nacional Renovador” and “Nationaldemokraterna” to join the AENM increasing the total number of represented Nations to nine.
The full list of the members is now:
- Front National (France)
- Jobbik (Hungary)
- Fiamma Tricolore (Italy)
- British National Party (Great Britain)
- Svoboda (Ukraine)
- Movimiento Social Republicano (Spain)
- Front National du Belgique (Belgium)
- Partido Nacional Renovador (Portugal)
- Nationaldemokraterna (Sweden)
The appointment of Nick Griffin as Vice-President is an acknowledgment of his talent and his dedication to nationalism.
Mr Griffin is well known outside Britain and many party leaders in Europe respect him for turning the BNP into the most feared political party in Britain.
How effective the AENM will be is difficult to judge, but if Mr Griffin in his new position of Vice President can replicate, even in a small way what he has achieved for the BNP, you can expect shockwaves across the EU.
So should nationalists thank Margaret Hodge?
Her landslide victory gave our Chairman more time to concentrate on the new AENM project, and make an even bigger impact at the European level.
Mrs Hodge urged BNP members to pack their bags and leave, and this is what Mr Griffin did: he left Barking to go to Brussels and Strasbourg where he will stay until 2014.
How does the old saying go?
“Be careful what you wish for”?
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Oldham Madrassa Complaints Finally Addressed

Madrassa Complaints Finally Addressed

NICK GRIFFIN MEP has intervened to ensure that a non-registered Madrassa operating in the Oldham area conforms to standard legal requirements. He was responding to a plea for help by local residents who felt that the council wasn’t taking seriously their complaints about the Madrassa.

The Madrassa/Meeting room located on a back lane in Oldham, was established recently by a local resident in a former workshop/storage building to provide evening and weekend Islamic schooling for up to 40 children. Residents had raised concerns with the council regarding the noise and disruption associated with this new development, but little action had been taken to address the issue.

Nick wrote to the Planning Department, outlining the concerns of local residents and referring to the council’s pledge to “value the importance of customer complaints... and respond within 15 working days”.

Oldham Council certainly met its promise on this occasion and the MEP received a reply from the principal Planning Officer 10 days later, stating that he, along with a representative from the Environmental Health office, had gained access to the Madrassa and the developer had been informed that planning permission is required for a change of use.

He has also informed his colleagues in the Building Control office and School Improvement Team about the school, so that compliance with the necessary legislative requirements can be ensured.

It is understood that the developer intends to submit an application for retrospective planning permission shortly, and that this will be subject to consultation with nearby residents. If this application is refused, enforcement action could be taken under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

While Oldham Council has on this occasion - albeit with a little prompting - responded to residents’ concerns about this unregistered/unauthorised operation, complaints which may be politically sensitive are ignored all too often in the interests of “good community relations”. 

We have reported previously on this website, for instance, that some councils in the Northwest region are turning a blind eye to residents who claim that their properties are used as mosques in order to exploit a loophole in the council tax system. Mosques are exempt from full council tax charges, and perhaps not surprisingly, there has been a significant rise recently in the number of exemption claims submitted in certain areas. When the MEP’s constituency staff tried to confirm whether the expected comparative rise in the number of “change of use” (from residential to mosque/meeting place) certificates granted had occurred, they were informed that this information wasn’t available. In other words, there isn’t a cross-referencing system in place to ensure that council tax exemption claims relate to properties which are genuinely used as mosques, they are simply accepted in good faith - a most unusually tolerant and trusting approach that is not equally applied to benefit applicants from those “not-so-favoured” sections of the community. 

If you are experiencing similar problems to the Oldham residents with your local council, and feel your complaints are being brushed aside, please let your British National Party MEP, Nick Griffin, know. He will be pleased to act on your behalf, and is not restricted by the nonsensical “politically correct” straightjacket which other politicians and people in authority appear to wear with such exaggerated enthusiasm.

Don’t Accept a Brush-off: Take Action!

It is a very simple process to lodge a complaint against a development which you suspect doesn’t conform to legislative requirements. Write to your local council, expressing your views with reference to issues such as the planning history of the site, the visual impact of the development, the affect on the public in terms of noise/disruption, access, traffic and highway considerations, the impact on listed buildings/ conservation areas, etc. Councils are obliged to respond to complaints within set time limits and can be held to account if they fail to do so.
read more at Nick Griffin MEP for the North West