Judges Warned in Official Guideline: Don’t Use “British” to Mean White Use Newspeak

Judges Warned in Official Guideline: Don’t Use “British” to Mean White

The British National Party Newsroom

A new official training manual published by the Judicial Studies Board which tells judges that the word “British” as a “synonym for White, English or Christian is incorrect and unacceptable” is one example of how George Orwell’s 1984-styel Newspeak is taking over Britain, says Doug Ward, Yorkshire BNP Press Officer in a new article.

The rise of Newspeak is more than the death of the English language—By Doug Ward.

The theory and practice of oligarchical collectivism steers our nation ever closer to the web of complete destruction, like moth transfixed on the brightness of the light that dooms it to the dangers of the spider’s guarantee.

But what is Newspeak? You would think its chief architect’s dream is the creation of new words, not a bit of it. It is the destruction of words, hundreds of verbs and adjectives as well as nouns can be got rid of, not only synonyms but antonyms as well.

After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word, when a word contains its opposite within itself?

Take ‘good’ for instance, what need is there for a word like ‘bad’, when ‘ungood’ will do just as well.

Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good’, why use excellent or splendid when ‘plusgood’ covers the meaning, or ‘double plusgood’ if you want something stronger still.

I sense in your heart you would prefer to stick to Oldspeak with its vagueness, you just don’t grasp the beauty of the destruction of words.

Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end ‘thought crime’ will literally be impossible, because there will be no word in which to express it.

By 2050 at the latest, not a single human being will be alive to understand such a conversation as you have daily, not even the proletariat will know Oldspeak.

Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron, they’ll all exist only in Newspeak. The whole climate of thought will be different, in fact there will be no thought as we understand it today.

The Equal Treatment Bench Book, published by the Judicial Studies Board, guides the judges and magistrates to their conformance of the Equalities Act which came into force on Friday 1st October 2010.

The manual warns about the use of the word ‘British.’ It states: ‘Use of the word ‘British’ as a synonym for White, English or Christian is incorrect and unacceptable’. 

The erosion of Oldspeak continues with the erosion of the meaning of ‘British’, or its connotation of who is actually British.

Once the meaning of the word is acceptable in its change we can then remove that word from the dictionary so its need has no worth and therefore will not then exist.

Do you not see the beauty of destruction?

Has Migrationwatch’s Sir Andrew Green Realised That the Tories Really Are Con as Their Name Suggests

Has Migrationwatch’s Sir Andrew Green Realised That the Tories Are a Hoax?

The British National party Newsroom

Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green’s latest press release, which contains a strongly worded attack on UK “governments” having “ducked” the immigration issue and “making the country suffer” could be the first sign that he has at last realised that the Tory Party leadership lie as much to their supporters as does the Labour Party.

In the statement, which revealed that the recent flood of immigrations has meant that one million new school places have to be created over the next decade, and half a million within the next five years, Sir Andrew warned that “no-one” wants to talk about it.

 “Almost every family in England is being affected by the growing crisis over school places but no-one will talk about its causes,” he said in a the press release, obviously including the Tories in that statement.

Previously, Sir Andrew has come out in tentative support of Tory promises to “cap” immigration, obviously refusing to believe that David Cameron would actually lie over such an important topic.

Now, however, the penny may have dropped.

“Our paper graphically demonstrates how families throughout the country suffer when governments duck the issue and fail to plan for the consequences,” Sir Andrew said, deliberately using the plural form of government in his statement.

According to the latest Migrationwatch paper, children of recent immigrants to the UK who arrived after 1998 are the primary cause of the schooling crisis which will cost an additional £40 billion over the period.

“By 2020 the need for extra places increases to one million at a total cost over the ten year period of almost £100 billion if immigration continues at current rates,” Sir Andrew continued.

“So far, educating the children of immigrants who have arrived over the past twelve years has cost the taxpayer more than £15 billion. In 2009 alone it was almost £4.5 billion or more than £12 million a day.

“The public are waking up to the speed and scale at which fundamental changes are being forced upon them, thanks to the policies of the previous administration, and our schools are but just one example.

“It will be replicated in many areas of our national life such as health, housing, natural resources and infrastructure and the costs will continue to increase for many years to come — all against a background of severe financial stringency,” he continued.

“What is also becoming clearer all the time is that there has been little if any planning or preparation for this surge in the need for education and other public services,” he said.

“Some schools might have spare capacity from earlier periods of higher birth rates but they will not necessarily be in the same places as the new demand,” he added.

The Migrationwatch statement also pointed out that the employment rate among some immigrant communities was considerably lower than the UK average, adding that “only about 40 percent of immigrants come for the purpose of work.”

Furthermore, the  Migrationwatch paper said, “between 2008 and 2033, official population projections suggest that an additional 2.3 million births will result from migration.

“Assuming that all of the additional children are educated in state schools, the total costs of their schooling would be around £ 190 billion over a 25 year period. This calculation is made using very conservative assumptions about school leaving age etc. It does not make any allowance for additional education requirements of migrants (eg: help with languages etc.) so the eventual cost could be much higher than this.

“If the official population projections are broadly right, an additional 1.3 million school places would be needed by 2033. This would be equivalent to almost 4,000 new schools staffed by around 55,000 additional teachers,” the statement said.

Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Geert Wilders proclaimed himself 'very happy' with the public prosecution department's announcement on Friday afternoon that he should be found not guilty on all charges of inciting hatred and discrimination.
The anti-Islam MP told reporters: 'I don't insult, I don't incite to hate and I don't discriminate. The only thing I do and will continue doing is speak the truth.'
Marxist Campaigners who took the case to the high court to force the public prosecutors to bring the case against Wilders said they were 'disappointed'.
'We hope the court will come to a judgement on a number of the charges,' a Marxist spokesman told reporters.


But the public prosecution department on Friday afternoon stated that Geert Wilders is not guilty of discriminating against Muslims. Earlier on Friday it announced he should also be found not guilty of inciting hatred.
Prosecutors Birgit van Roessel and Paul Velleman reached their conclusions after a careful reading of interviews with and articles by the anti-Islam politician and a viewing of his anti-Koran film Fitna.
They said comments about banning the Koran can be discriminatory, but because Wilders wants to pursue a ban on democratic lines, there is no question of incitement to discrimination 'as laid down in law'.
On the comparison of the Koran with Mein Kampf, the prosecutors said the comparison was 'crude but that did not make it punishable'.
Dealing earlier on Friday with incitement to hatred, Van Roessel and Velleman said some comments could incite hatred against Muslims if taken out of context, but if the complete text is considered, it can be seen that Wilders is against the growing influence of Islam and not against Muslims per sé.
On Tuesday, the prosecutors said the MP should not be found guilty of group insult.
The public prosecution department was forced to take the case by the high court after Marxist anti-racism campaigners protested at its refusal to prosecute Wilders.

As UK Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show White British Losing out to Immigrants

As Britain Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show Whites Losing out to Immigrants, Chinese and Indians

The British National Party Newsroom

The growing anti-white nature of the British state has been revealed with a series of statistics which show that despite increasing unemployment in Britain, immigrants, Chinese and Indians are still being given preference in employment opportunities.

According to a report issued by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), nearly one in eight British households has no-one in work.

This rate is the highest of the six largest EU economies, the CPS said.

According to its figures, the UK has a total of 11.5 percent of households where no adults are working, compared to 10.5 percent in France, 9.2 percent in Germany and 6 percent in the Netherlands.

A 10 percent drop in the number of workless households would add around 1 percent to Gross Domestic Product, the CPS said.

Remarkably, the CPS report also called for the “reduction of low skilled immigration” to prevent an increase in unemployment.

The news coincided with a report in the Financial Times which said that at least 139,000 immigrants had beaten the “jobs crunch” while the number of “Britons in work had dropped by 654,000.”

According to the FT report, “migrant workers have continued to flow into the country during the recession while Britons lose their jobs.”

The FT continued: “The findings echo official figures two months ago that the number of foreign-born workers had risen by 114,000 in a year, bringing the full number in the economy to 3.85 million.

“Some 100,000 of the migrants who have arrived in the past two years come from outside the EU.

It is not only in the unskilled job market where white people are being replaced.

According to the recently released “How fair is Britain?” report from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to find professional, middle-class jobs.

The EHRC report says that “People from some ethnic groups are more likely to be in higher skilled, professional occupations than others.

“For example, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to be in professional jobs.”

According to the report, just 14 percent of white men are in professional jobs, compared with 27 percent of Chinese and 25 percent of Indian men.

All in all, the picture which emerges is clear: white native British people are falling behind under the Labour-Tory-Lib Dem plan to ensure that our nation is colonised and taken over by the Third World.

Only the British National Party stands between you and this tragic disaster. Isn’t it about time you did something about it and helped the BNP?

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in UK Every Month

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in Britain Every Month

The British National Party Newsroom

Conservative Party claims to be “tough on immigration” have been exposed as a hoax once again with the news that in excess of 8,000 failed 'asylum seekers' are being granted permission to stay in Britain every month.

The shocking statistic was contained in a Home Office release of 'asylum' figures issued last week which has been largely ignored by the controlled media.

In the report, the Home Office said that special rules had so far allowed more than 135,000 failed 'asylum seekers' to legally take up residence in Britain.

When their dependents are added in, the total figure of 'asylum seekers' whose claims have been rejected, but who now can live in Britain and parasite off the taxpayer, will be as high as 240,000.

The special rules which have allowed the invasion to take place are part of the measures put in place in an attempt to deal with the massive backlog in applications which have built up over the years.

The backlog has, of course, been caused by the lax 'asylum' policies endorsed by the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties which have encouraged the parasites of the earth to descend on soft-touch Britain’s benefits bonanza.

Now, so many legal precedents have been set that even if the current influx was halted, the Government would face an avalanche of lawsuits based on the currently existing “Human Rights Act” and other legal devices.

The special measures included rushing through thousands of cases without proper checks on applicants’ stories, with a decision being made purely on the basis of written statements without any corroborating facts.

According to a media report, guidelines for officials state that they should “expedite” cases if, for example, the UK Border Agency had been at fault for delays. Claimants are also rushed through if they threaten suicide.

In July 2009, it was announced that 144,000 'asylum seekers' had been allowed to stay in Britain after the claims backlog was first announced.

The impossible demands on the asylum process are obvious from a bit of simple maths: there are in excess of 450,000 outstanding 'asylum seeker' claims, according to official figures.

If they are “resolved” at the rate of ten every day, it will take 4,500 days, or 12 years, just to bring the backlog to a conclusion — never mind the thousands who are pouring in all the time.

It is obvious that the 'asylum' issue is just an invasion scam designed to allow as many Third World immigrants as possible into Britain.

Only the British National Party will bring an end to this invasion. The BNP argues that asylum seekers have the right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they flee, and do not have the right to cross 20 safe countries to reach Britain.

How the UK Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Enquiry in Britain

How the Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Endeavour in Britain

The British National Party Newsroom

Great Britain, which was the home of the Industrial Revolution and whose collective genius shaped the modern world, is on the brink of total scientific academic collapse thanks to the treasonous ineptitude of the three-party-one-policy Tory-Labour-Lib Dem gang.

The crisis has been sparked by the massive deficit crisis which the ConDem coalition are just as complicit in causing as the previous Labour regime, although they pretend otherwise.

The deficit has five primary causes:

- The bank bailout (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (supported by the Tories and now endorsed by the Lib Dems);

- Mass immigration which costs upwards of £13 billion per year (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- Continued EU membership (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems); and

- The £9 billion a year foreign aid budget (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems who want to see it raised to £13 billion per year).

As a result of this reckless spending, Britain now faces one of its greatest deficits ever and all Government departments have been told to prepare for an average of 25 percent cuts in their budget (except, of course, the foreign aid budget).

Currently, Britain’s research budget is around £6 billion and a new report drawn up by Research Councils UK, which is responsible for distributing government funding for research, has warned that a £1 billion cut in this funding will mean “game over” for British science.

The report says that impending cuts “to scientific research funding could cost the UK economy up to £10 billion” as well.

“Public investment in scientific research is essential to ensure that long-term productivity and breakthroughs continue,” the report said.

“Without publicly funded research, private research and development could also dry up as companies will simply move to countries where they can still work with academics.

"Science is important for innovation and productivity not just for pushing forward the technological frontier.

"Universities at the research frontier have a second core 'product', namely highly trained people, an essential resource for UK companies and foreign companies investing in the UK,” the report continued.

“Continued public investment in scientific endeavour is essential for the success of UK business and industry and, more broadly, for a productive economy, a healthy society and a sustainable world."

It would seem that the amateurish clowns in Westminster have not only destroyed Britain’s recent past, but seem fully intent on destroying its future as well.

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Protest Rally after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Demonstration after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

The BNP Newsroom

A British National Party Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Councillor, Martyn Findley, is considering holding a demonstration outside the local Citizens Advice Bureau after that taxpayer-funded body engaged in blatant politically-motivated discrimination against him.

Cllr Martyn Findley said he would hold the demonstration if the district manager of the Bedworth, Rugby and Nuneaton Citizens Advice Bureau (branCAB) refused to let him offer his services as a volunteer at the bureau.

“The reason the director, David Gooding, gave was simply that I was a BNP councillor,” Cllr Findley said.

“This was outrageous as I have a long history of community involvement. I enjoyed my time as a school governor, for example, as much as I did my voluntary activities on occasion with the church.

“As an activist with the local residents association, I assisted in organising a family festival and was prepared to spend evenings burning the midnight oil filling in applications for funding,” he said.

The drama started when earlier this year, Cllr Findley responded to an advertisement in the local newspaper placed by branCAB which asked for volunteers.

“Encouraged by the knowledge that the CAB has previously never discriminated against anyone, I called and spoke to a lady about volunteering,” he continued.

“After I shared with her my volunteering experience she assured me that with my availability and experience, I sounded ideal and would be contacted as soon as possible. This happened and I passed the telephone stage successfully. 

“I waited and when my written invitation to the induction day came through the post I was delighted,” Cllr Findley said.

Instead of welcoming his services, the letter from Mr Gooding informed Cllr Findley that the branCAB would not accept his offer because of his membership of the BNP.

Bizarrely, the letter went on to confirm that branCAB staff, trustees and volunteers may be active members of political parties, providing that they keep their political work completely separate from their CAB work. 

“I cannot for the life of me see any conflict between being an elected member, under any party banner, and volunteering with the CAB, and there is certainly no prospect for political work,” Cllr Findley said.

However, the next paragraph contained the clause to which he took exception: ‘Active membership includes promoting being publicly associated with, or expressing the views of organisations such as the BNP,’ the letter said.

“Is there a list of organisations which the CAB discriminates against? Who wrote it and which organisations are on it?  Exactly which law do they think gives branCAB the authority to discriminate against a member of a lawfully constituted political party?” Cllr Findley said.

“It is even more shocking when compared back to an earlier section of the same letter where the branCAB specifically forbids discriminatory policies or practices.

“As I am prepared to state publicly that my heart is open to all and that as an extension to my duties as a democratically elected councillor I am prepared to work for nothing for the benefit of the whole community, I believe that I am suitable to volunteer with the CAB.

“If there are any volunteers, staff members or funders out there who wish to discriminate against me on the grounds of political belief I think it is they, not I, who should have their motives questioned,” Cllr Findley said.

“I feel that I must fight this discrimination and I am calling upon members and supporters of the British National Party for their assistance. I would be grateful if you could take a few minutes and politely outline your objection to this discrimination to Mr Gooding as I feel that public pressure is the best way of getting this disgraceful decision overturned.”

Mr Gooding’s email address is david.gooding @ brancab.org.uk. Why don’t readers send him a polite email asking why he does not want Cllr Findley’s kind offer of help.

“The branCAB is funded by the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council and Rugby Borough Council,” Cllr Findley continued.

“At the next full council meetings of the two councils I shall ask publicly, locally as an elected member and in Rugby as a member of the public, for the leaders of the councils to assist me with my struggle against discrimination in an organisation over which they share a great deal of influence.

“This will place on public record their position for/against institutional discrimination. As far as I am aware at the moment this is the limit of my redress to this voluntary organisation.

“If our appeals fall on deaf ears I consider that I shall have no alternative other than to organise a demonstration against discrimination on the footpath outside of the main CAB offices in Bedworth. I should imagine that having the British National Party holding a demonstration against discrimination outside the offices of the CAB would be the last thing that they would want, but the choice is theirs,” Cllr Findley concluded.

White Brits discrimanated Against as Labour Controlled Council Gives £273,000 Grant to Nonwhites Only Project

White Brits Put Last: Hartlepool’s Labour Controlled Council Gives £273,000 Grant to Nonwhites Only Project

 The BNP Newsroom

White British people have once again been blatantly discriminated against by the Labour-controlled Hartlepool Borough Council with the news that £273,000 of taxpayers’ money has been given to a local nonwhite-only “ethnic project.”

The project, known as the “Salaam Centre” provides a range of services to black and ethnic (BME) communities across Hartlepool.

According to the Hartlepool Borough Council’s website, the “group is only open to young women from the BME community” and engages in “fun and participative activities.”

Would the Hartlepool Council give taxpayers’ money to a group which was only open to the white community and which engaged in “fun and participative activities?”

Regeneration chiefs at Hartlepool “New Deal for Communities” (NDC) initiative, which is one of 39 similar regeneration initiatives across the country to which each have been awarded up to £54 million of extra Government funding over a 10 year period, have reportedly “welcomed the news as the Salaam Centre is one of its key projects.”

In addition to the tax handout, the “Salaam Centre” has also received £96,000 of funding from the independent private charity the Tudor Trust, and £177,000 from the Big Lottery Fund.

All the money has allowed the nonwhite-only organisation to move into newly refurbished community premises at the former St Paul's Church Hall, in Murray Street in Hartlepool.

A gushing local media report boasted that the “project will use the funding to secure and maintain its services for at least the next three years” and that it would “also help offer a wide range of activities at the new centre for its visitors.”

According to the report, a merry time was had by all when the money was handed over.

“Regeneration director Malcolm Walker, from Hartlepool NDC, joined members from the Salaam Community Centre Community Interest Company (CIC) to celebrate the news,” the local media report said.

Mr Walker continued: "It is fantastic news for those involved with the centre as well as BME communities in Hartlepool that the Salaam Centre has received this funding to continue to support and meet the needs of ethnic minorities settled across the town.”

The report went on to quote the chairman of the community centre CIC, a man with the non-Anglo-Saxon name of Rajab Malik, as saying “The Salaam Centre project has worked with people from different nationalities for more than eight years and we have outgrown the current premises.

"The funding will help support our move to much needed larger new premises and the facilities offered in the new centre look to enhance and enrich the lives of the increasingly diverse ethnic population of Hartlepool, providing opportunities for education, training, healthcare, fitness, cookery and much more."

Hard-pressed British taxpayers will doubtless be ecstatic to read that their money will also be used to build a “new cafe area” which will “provide opportunities for older people from BME communities to meet and socialise.”

In addition, the money will be used to provide “cultural and social events” and will offer a “reading room, a fitness and training centre and accredited training in healthy eating and food preparation.”

The Salaam Centre has been supporting black and ethnic minority groups across the town for eight years, all funded by the NDC.

Does anyone know of a centre like this set up for white British people?

I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation," that is what Nick Griffin said in a letter to Italian MEP Vittorio Prodi.

Ritengo che il picco del petrolio, sia la minaccia più critica affrontata dalla nostra civiltà

  Martin Wingfield

OCTOBER 2010: "I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation," that is what Nick Griffin said in a letter to Italian MEP Vittorio Prodi.


 Prodi (right) is also on Nick's Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) Committee and despite being a member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) Group, he shares Nick's concerns over Peak Oil.
The British National Party MEP for the North West region of England wrote:
"Dear Mr Prodi
Re. Amendment 170. Cancun. Peak Oil.
I was delighted to see your Amendment 170 on the Cancun resolution. Having raised the issue of Peak Oil in committee several times in the last year (I planned to yesterday during the exchange of views with Mrs Heddegarde, but was not called to speak) I was beginning to think that everyone else was blind to this issue. It is a shame that the Amendment was rejected, but at least it received significant support.
I believe that Peak Oil is the most critical threat faced by our civilisation. I have been studying this issue intensively for more than 5 years and have good contacts to experts in this field who would be very pleased to provide information to anyone who wants and needs to know more. Please be assured of my wholehearted support for any further attempts to put this crucial issue on the agenda.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin MEP"
The letter was then translated into Italian by Nick's Parliamentary Assistant Alberto Paoletti.
"Gentile Onorevole,
Mi ha fatto davvero piacere vedere il Suo emendamento 170 sulla risoluzione Cancun.
L'anno scorso, dopo aver sollevato la questione del picco del petrolio in svariate occasioni in commissione, stavo cominciando a pensare che tutti gli altri fossero ciechi rispetto a questo problema.
A tal proposito, mi ero riproposto di intervenire ieri durante lo scambio di opinioni con la sig.ra Heddegarde ma, purtroppo, non sono stato chiamato a parlare.
E' un peccato che l'emendamento sia stato respinto, ma quantomeno ha ricevuto un importante sostegno.
Ritengo che il picco del petrolio, sia la minaccia più critica affrontata dalla nostra civiltà.
Ho studiato a fondo questo problema per più di 5 anni, sviluppando rilevanti contatti con gli esperti in questo campo, i quali sarebbe piu' che lieti di fornire approfondimenti, a Lei o a chiunque ne avesse bisogno.
La prego infine di contare sul mio pieno appoggio, per qualsiasi ulteriore tentativo di mettere questo tema cruciale all'ordine del giorno.
Cordiali saluti
Nick Griffin"
READ MORE AT NICK GRIFFINS BLOG AT EU NEWS BLOG

Banking Crisis it is Just Money Money Created from Nothing Thats the Problem

Author Carl Hemmings
It is said by many people that they want to “hit the money men where it hurts”.
then they offer up measures to offset the effects of Government funding cuts which may temporarily be of benefit to some people. However, they have missed the crux of the matter by a mile, which is our debt-based economy.
So why did he not do what the bankers fear most and expose the corrupt Fractional Reserve System which causes all the nations’ debts?
The new Basel 111 regulations governing how much capital banks should have in reserve have been agreed to prevent another financial crisis. These measures, regardless of the new ratios agreed, will in the end fail to prevent another economic collapse.
This is because the banks are still allowed to create money out of thin air under the Fractional Reserve System, which is still the dominant and widely-accepted method of monetary creation.
Under this system, banks insert credit into the economy and charge the rest of us, including the Government, interest for the privilege of its use. The fact banks pay us interest on the tiny molehill of money that is in our bank accounts hides the reality that they collect a far greater bounty of interest from the mountain of bank credit that they create.
Here is another crucial point. All this credit pumped into the economy consists of principal (loan money) only but, like all debt, it has to be repaid with more money than was borrowed — as principal PLUS interest.
Clearly it is impossible to repay this debt from a pool of money that consists only of principal.
The only way in which the debt can be repaid without starving the economy of purchasing power is to borrow more bank credit to service previous debts, which results in an increasing spiral of un-repayable debt until the entire system comes crashing down under the weight of these debts and ends up in the type of recession which we are experiencing now.
It is this system which is the real cause of our problems. Under Fractional Reserve, if there is no debt then there is no money.
Money is debt. It’s no good tinkering around with it.
The only solution is a complete reform of the system to deliver us from this recession and to avoid future economic crashes. This will only happen when the Government claims back from the private banks the sole prerogative of monetary creation.

Carl Hemmings

Police officer 'indifference' at Left Wing disorder in Liverpool city centre

Police officer 'indifference' at disorder in Liverpool city centre

  Martin Wingfield

OCTOBER 2010: at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news
NICK Griffin has written to the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police Jon Murphy, to complain about a lack of effective policing in Liverpool city centre where a British National Party 'Troops Home' petition stall was surrounded by a hostile mob and members of the public intimidated.


 The MEP wrote:
"I have been contacted by a number of my constituents, some of whom are campaigners for the British National Party, with regard to the unacceptable intimidation they have been subjected to during the course of their campaigning activities in Liverpool city centre.
"On Saturday 2nd October, a small team of British National Party campaigners, who were gathering signatures for a petition calling for the withdrawal of British troops from the war in Afghanistan, were surrounded by an organised and co-ordinated group of political opponents (who term themselves as “antifascists”) and subjected to a relentless, vicious verbal and physical attack. In addition to the campaign team suffering sustained verbal abuse from this group, they were also physically assaulted with objects thrown as missiles, which included eggs, water, bottles, cans and small incendiaries.
"The British National Party campaign members report that they, and members of the public who tried to approach them with the intention of signing the petition, felt afraid for their physical safety and were not reassured by the actions of the Merseyside police officers who were present on the day. There was a general consensus, on the part of both the campaign team and the public, that the officers in attendance were unsympathetic toward their safety concerns and generally reluctant to take control of the situation: i.e. by dispersing the aggressive and unruly opponent group and taking direct action against the individuals responsible for the missile throwing and targeted verbal abuse.  
"I understand that Mr Mike Whitby, the Liverpool British National Party organiser, has already written to Superintendent Bill McWilliam, raising his concerns about the apparent unwillingness of local police officers to intervene effectively to allow the British National Party campaign team to conduct their legitimate political campaigning without harassment, and also to protect the public from intimidation.
"Given the seriousness of this attack and the climate of fear and victimisation that such incidents engender amongst individuals exercising their democratic right to freedom of political expression, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a full report on Merseyside Police’s response to the events of Saturday 2nd October, including whether any arrests were made on the day, and your assessment as to whether sufficient action was taken by officers to deal with the attack.
"In order for me to reassure my constituents that Merseyside Police is committed to ensuring the physical safety of all individuals involved in legitimate democratic political activity, and to protecting their democratic right to function free from harassment, I would be grateful if you could also identify what risk management plants will be set in place to avoid a repeat of the events of Saturday 2nd October."
ABOVE: Nick Griffin MEP visits the BNP Troops Home petition stall in Liverpool where a mob intimidated members of the public while police officers just stood by and watched.

Europe When easy answers die

 

When easy answers die

2010 

by Steve Harris. http://www.amerika.org/

Europe is awakening to the fallacy of globalism, which comes to us in the form of immigration and superstates like the EU. This is part of Europe’s general awakening to its own decline, which it has been able to hide for years under “easy answers”: super-simplified partial renditions of the truth that are more justification than reason.
For example, WWI was explained away as a momentary madness, not an attempted resolution to the events set into motion by the revolution of 1789. That didn’t work, so we got WWII, and with it, more easy answers. “He was a madman!” they said, forgetting that Hitler got elected because problems existed that still remain, and had remained since WWI.
Europe could not find a direction, and democracy was leading it away from tackling the important but difficult issues. Hitler did not create himself; the time created Hitler because a problem lingered and after Germany lost the war, continued to linger. It was the same problem that occurred after WWI, which was itself a struggle for direction to leadership after democratic revolutions replaced monarchs with demagogues. The old order rebelled.
The easy answer was, of course, to destroy the old order. “Then we’ll have peace!” they said, and nodded their heads vigorously, as if they’d said something wise. For a long time, people believed them. Get rid of the kings and princes, get rid of the idea of a right way of doing things, and liberalize our entire society so that people can do whatever they want.
That in turn produced a society that lived for the lowest common denominator, and became decadent and crass, blind to beauty and whorelike in its manic pursuit of pleasures to sidestep its lack of direction and insensitivity to the idea that life could be meaningful.
That society in turn produced a generation of people in the 1960s who demonstrated the greatest degree of selfishness yet recorded. They wanted easy sex; they invented “free love.” They wanted their venal acts to not be observed; they demanded freedom. Finally, they wanted to stay children forever, so they threw away the notion of family and lived for their own pleasures and when those deconstructed themselves, their personal wealth, at the expense of their community.
In the 1990s, society responded to the social disaster that these people presented by importing new people. After all, the indigenous ones — who had wrecked their families with free love and selfishness — were not breeding and no replacement workers would mean the economy would collapse. It was 1984 in reverse — instead of Big Brother controlling the people, the people created Big Brother through what they forgot to do.
Since the 1990s produced a maturing generation so cynical that they adopted no ideology whatsoever, the dogma of the 1960s — updated into political correctness, a slick advertising-style take on Marxism — kept rolling right into the 2000s. “The problem is that we are oppressed,” the people said with gaping expressions, and it almost sounded like they were right.
Fast forward a few years, and as the 2000s close, the silent plurality who have their act together — chaste families, sane careers, actually possessing souls, not buying into the easy answers of liberal politics — are demanding change. These 1960s ideas had fifty years to work, and they’re not, so let’s throw them out, they’re saying.

It is unclear when and why Dr. Thilo Sarrazin, 65, the child of a doctor and a Prussian landowner’s daughter, who supposedly did a decent job during his time as finance minister for the city-state of Berlin and who had unusual ideas, became a seducer. Did he see himself as a future chancellor, and was he bitterly waiting in the wings to be nominated by his Social Democratic Party (SPD)? Would he have preferred to become the CEO of Deutsche Bank instead of “merely” a member of the executive board of Germany’s central bank, the Bundesbank? Does he relish the role of agent provocateur and popular guest on German talk shows? And is he truly worried about the absurd concern that Germany is “doing away with itself” — as the title of his new book claims — by tolerating too many foreign influences in its society?
Opinions may differ among those who seek to interpret Sarrazin’s behavior. The important thing is that he is someone who has gone from being a tough-talking, audacious politician and anarchic prankster (see quote gallery) to a racist anti-Muslim who makes up nonsense about the genetic basis of intelligence and the “German-Jewish origins of intelligence research.” Those ideas have prompted him to voice his concerns over Germany’s “cultural identity” and “national character,” and to blame Muslim immigrants and their supposed non-culture for all the problems of integration — ignoring the fact that both the immigrants and the host country have a responsibility. – Der Spiegel

Ah, blame. Who cares about who has a responsibility? The only responsibility that matters is fixing the problem. Sarrazin is voicing in public what many have said in private, which is that globalization, or the process by which a nation becomes a suburb of the One Global People and its superstates like the EU, destroys national identity and with it, the ability to have any meaning in life whatsoever. Without culture, there are no rules, no norms, and no goals. There is only your job, what you buy, and the bar you visit nightly to try to drink away the existential emptiness.
But for now, people of the old order — the 1960s order — will continue to sharpen their claws and vent their spleens, confident that the popularity of their statements will make them rich and powerful at the expense of poor clueless wretches like Sarrazin. Or will it? As said above, time has passed since 1968 and 1789, and neither has brought the great deliverance and Utopia that we hoped for. Yes, we’re all “free” now, but with that comes a lack of any direction other than following the crowd in its pleasures. Where we used to tell ourselves that the old empires were bad and we don’t do evil things like they did now, we’re starting to realize that there’s a greater evil in false promises: wasted time and energy, and empty soulless lives.

Sociologist Dr David Bartram carried out the study: “Economic Migration and Happiness: Comparing Immigrants’ and Natives’ Happiness Gains from Income.” It was published by Social Indicators Research online on 27th August and will be printed next year.
He sought to establish whether those people who were motivated by higher incomes in a wealthy country actually gain greater happiness via migration.
…
“The results suggest that economic migrants might well experience disappointment. Migrants do gain happiness from higher incomes, to a greater extent than natives — but the relationship is weak even for migrants. In fact, it also works out that migrants are less happy than natives. The probable reason is that they expect to be happier by virtue of earning the greater incomes available in a wealthy country — but they end up wanting even more after they get there: aspirations probably increase at least as much as incomes. – Science Daily

Globalization promises wealth to the poor, but then they find a lack of anything but wealth does not solve their problems. It simply transfers them, and as they surge into new hosts nations, it dissolves those nations, in effect killing the goose that laid the golden egg. Similarly, European nations are finding out that joining superstates like the EU allows a group to make decisions — and that, as in all mobs, those decisions inevitably become a wealth transfer from the powerful to the weaker, because the weaker always outnumber those who have risen above.
Makes you wonder what other easy answers are out there. Diversity, a fallacy? Technology, not our savior? Overpopulation, more real than global warming? Legal drugs, a gateway to failure? The crowd loves easy answers and so they pick illusions, but as the silent plurality discovers its own mental clarity on this issue, they are mobilizing against the clueless mob with a more powerful weapon than any dogma or clever wording: the historical record that shows our 1789/1968 social inclinations have not brought glory, but misery and deconstruction.

Nick Griffin MEP warns over wind turbine fires

Nick Griffin MEP warns over wind turbine fires

  Martin Wingfield http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/newsat

OCTOBER 2010: NICK Griffin has pledged to raise the issue of 'self-combusting' wind turbines at his Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) Committee, after being contacted by environmentalists concerned at  the increasing number of incidents.

 The MEP was canvassed after a campaigning website published numerous graphic illustrations of burning wind turbines.
"These burning wind factory photos certainly bring home the dangerous and unpredictable nature of these huge turbines," Nick told his website this morning.
"I shall certainly be highlighting the issue in my campaign material as these monstrosities are spreading across my North West of England constituency at a rate of knots.
"I shall be raising the issue at Environmental Committee, which is sadly dominated by windpower enthusiasts, in the hope that some question marks at least may be raised as to the suitability of wind turbines as a reliable source of energy.
"There have been over 150 of such wind turbine fires which are caused by a failure in transmission. To date no gear oil has been invented to withstand the pressures produced within these units," he said.
One spectacular wind turbine fire occurred in a 200ft structure at the Wind Factory by the Nissan car plant on Wearside (right).
The fire was so fierce that all three 75-ft long fibreglass blades dropped off and thick black smoke could be seen for miles around.
Almost 200 people dialled 999 to alert emergency crews as flames engulfed the turbine.
Police closed both the A1231 and the A19 for an hour-and-a-quarter amid worries that parts of the metal tower could fall on to the busy roads.

BNP Yorkshire and the Humber region MEP and his team out in the constituency

MEP and his team out in the constituency

  by Martin Wingfield

11TH OCTOBER 2010: Andrew Brons was joined by members of his Euro staff this weekend during a series of stalls across the Yorkshire and the Humber region.
Andrew was in Richmond with Euro worker Adam Walker and a group of volunteers from Yorkshire and the North East, whilst PA and constituency officer Chris Beverley attended a stall held in Middleton in Leeds.
A large number of signatures were collected against the war in Afghanistan and both stalls were very well received.

 Richmond (top right)
Middleton (bottom right)

Manchesters BNP’s Derek Adams Releases Bombshell Halal Slaughter Video

BNP’s Derek Adams Releases Bombshell Halal Slaughter Video

BNP News at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The British National Party’s Manchester super activist Derek Adams has released a video which shows in graphic detail the process behind halal ritual slaughter and shows why this barbaric method of killing animals needs to be outlawed.

The video, which contains a strong age warning for the graphic scenes it contains, can be seen below. However, if you have weak stomach or feel disinclined to view such material, you are urged not to watch it.

In the video, Mr Adams describes exactly how the ritual slaughter process is carried out, comparing it to the humane stunning method which is the civilised way of the West.

All along, the video illustrates each step with a clear video record. Mr Adams ends the video with an appeal for consumers to boycott the major stores which are using halal meat without the public’s knowledge or consent.

“Imagine if Muslim people were sold meat in the belief that it was halal, when it was not,” Mr Adams said.

“Imagine the uproar that would follow. However, we have been sold halal meat while being assured that it was not.

“The BNP is the only party which will outlaw halal ritual slaughter, because we seek to preserve British values, he said.

“And one of these British values is compassion towards animals.”

The full video may be seen below. Viewer discretion is advised.

Taxpayers’ Alliance Calls for EHCR Race Gestapo to be Scrapped

Taxpayers’ Alliance Calls for Race Gestapo to be Scrapped

  BNP News at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The Taxpayers’ Alliance has joined the growing list of socially responsible organisations which have called for the disbandment of the £70 million per year Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

In a demining letter sent to Tory Equalities Minister Theresa May, the Taxpayers’ Alliance said that the “EHRC’s targets are arbitrary and unreasonable, driven by a peculiarly activist equality agenda that itself threatens to undermine the important gains made by women and minority groups over recent decades.

“The insistence that the organisation knows what is appropriate for every employer in the country is misguided and obstructive to businesses still struggling following the recession,” the letter continued.

“The [EHRC] has proved unable to manage its finances responsibly. The Comptroller and Auditor General at the National Audit Office (NAO) reported this year that there were a number of irregularities in their accounts.

“The Commission paid well over £300,000 to re-engage staff from the former Commission for Racial Equality as consultants without the authority of the Government Equalities Office or the Treasury,” the letter said.

“They also breached agreed remits for pay increases, of 4.65 per cent for the last six months of 2007-08 and 4.45 per cent for 2008-09, with average increases of 6.81 per cent for the last six months of 2007-08 and 4.8 per cent for the twelve month period of 2008-09.

“That breach was equivalent to £508,000. This fits with a general pattern of generous rewards for staff. Trevor Phillips, Chair, received a salary of £112,000 in 2008-09 and perks like an official car and driver.

“Dr. Nicola Brewer, former Chief Executive, received a salary of £185,000 in 2008-09.

“The NAO concluded that ‘the Commission was not able to obtain any assurances over how [the] recipients had used some £62,800 of grants.’ In addition to that, the EHRC found they had spent £739,421 on seven contracts for more than £50,000 without the authorisation it is required to obtain from your office,” the Taxpayer Alliance letter told Ms May.

“That was just from a sample – the NAO note that the EHRC ‘cannot be certain’ that ‘represents all the breaches.’ The NAO also found further weaknesses in how the EHRC managed procurement expenditure,” the letter continued.

“They said that ‘the scale of these systemic weaknesses reflects a culture of inadequate forward planning in the Commission, a lack of focus on compliance with procedures and insufficient review and oversight of expenditure by the senior management of the organisation.’ They think that a ‘number of the weaknesses outlined above are deep seated and longstanding.”

The Taxpayers’ Alliance letter also stated what every British National Party supporter knows well, namely that the EHRC is not an equalities organisation but actually just a political front.

“The EHRC also engages in political campaigns at taxpayers’ expense. For example, their ‘human rights strategy and programme of action’ for 2009-12 set out ‘no regression in law from the levels of human rights protection and mechanisms for enforcement under the Human Rights Act and other ratified human rights treaties’ as something they aim to achieve,” the letter said.

“That is a political objective, and while the public may want some law to deal with human rights, research suggests a majority think that ‘too many people take advantage of the Human Rights Act.’ It is clearly inappropriate for those people to see their money spent supporting a cause they do not believe in.

“With so much inappropriate spending the EHRC is ripe for abolition. Genuine discrimination should be tackled by the courts. The saving would be a valuable contribution to the reductions in spending the Government need to make to deliver on their pledge of greater fiscal responsibility,” the Taxpayers’ Alliance letter, signed by Directors Matthew Sinclair and Douglas Murray concluded.

Indian Immigration and the EU: UK Conservatives Hoisted on Own Petard

Indian Immigration and the EU: Tories Hoisted on Own Petard

BNP News http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The Conservative Party’s pretence of “capping” non-EU immigration has been exposed as yet another hoax by the news that the EU has negotiated a trade deal in terms of which thousands of Indians will gain access to work opportunities here, no matter what UK immigration rules say.

The European Union’s "free trade agreement" with India, which is due to be signed in less than two month’s time, will give Indian IT workers, engineers and managers instant immigration passage into Europe.

Tory Foreign Secretary William Hague is already on record as supporting the agreement, as is his Liberal Democrat colleague Vince Cable.

The dilemma facing the Tories is now to persuade their supporters, who are increasingly demoralised as election promise after election promise has been thrown out the window, of how continued membership of the EU can be reconciled with the promise to lower the number of non-EU immigrants.

The European Commission has set a 20-day deadline for comments from EU member states on the agreement which has already been finalised with the Indian government.

In terms of the deal, India has insisted on what it has called “increased mobility” (but actually means unfettered immigration access) for Indians into Europe in return for “reduced tariffs on European products” and the lifting of some restrictions on businesses bidding for public contracts.

The latter move is designed, for example, to keep confidential government files (such as medical records, personal files and so on) in EU member states, rather than letting it be removed to call centres in India.

Britain will, by virtue of its EU membership, be obligated to adhere to this free trade agreement which will utterly destroy the last pretence David Cameron has been able to maintain on the issue of “capped” immigration levels.

The choice is as obvious as it was with the Lisbon Treaty: either accept it, or leave the EU.

Will Mr Cameron choose to lie once again to the voters on the topic? Given his past record, it seems likely.

A moral from Aesop fables to you Electors

A moral from Aesop fables,

 The Dog and the Hare Hound having started a Hare on the hillside pursued her for some distance, at one time biting her with his teeth as if he would take her life, and at another fawning upon her, as if in play with another dog. The Hare said to him, "I wish you would act sincerely by me, and show yourself in your true colors. If you are a friend, why do you bite me so hard? If an enemy, why do you fawn on me?' -"No one can be a friend if you know not whether to trust or distrust him."- 

so it is with the 3 main parties, they fawn on you at election times and then bite hard once elected!