The British Foreign Aid Budget Will Total £50.8 Billion by 2014

Foreign Aid Budget Will Total £50.8 Billion by 2014

The British National Party Newsroom

British taxpayers will be forced to hand over £50.8 billion in foreign aid handouts to the Third World by 2014, which translates to 61 percent of the total “spending review” cuts announced by the Government this year.

The shocking figure, which comes at a time when British people face massive front line service cuts at home which will plunge millions into unemployment and poverty, was contained in a press release cunningly issued by the Department for International Development (DFID) on Saturday, so as to miss most of the media’s attention.

The press release announced that the total foreign aid budget would reach the targeted 0.7 percent of Gross National Income (GNI) by 2013.

This would mean a yearly spend of £12.6 billion, the DFID said. Earlier, the British National Party had predicted that the total spend would be of the order of £13 billion, based on GNI figures from 2007.

According to the DFID, the increased spending is “in line with the UK's international commitments to help those living in extreme poverty in our world.  Over the course of the Spending Review period, the Department for International Development will increase resource spending by 35 percent in real terms, and increase capital spending by 20 percent in real terms.”

This means that the foreign aid budget will be £8.4 billion in 2010, £8.7 billion in 2011, £9.1 billion in 2012, £12.0 billion in 2013, and £12.6 billion in 2014.

Added together, this means that the British taxpayer will hand over £50.8 billion by the year 2014.

Furthermore, the DFID said, aid to Afghanistan and Pakistan would be increased from 22 percent to 30 percent of the total aid spend by 2014, “in line with the Strategic Defence and Security Review” to subsidise “conflict-affected states.”

Both of those nations are “conflict-affected” because of the insane and criminal war which the previous Labour regime, supported by the Tories, launched in Pakistan.

The massive £50 billion represents over 61 percent of what has been cut off the UK’s internal front line services budget to “bring down the deficit” — as clear a case of the British people being put last as any.

* The Tory minister in charge of handing out British tax money, Andrew Mitchell, told a briefing in London last week that the British government (i.e. the taxpayer) would part fund two “new public-private partnership funds to promote generation of renewable energy in Africa and Asia.”

According to Mr Mitchell, the fund will “target low-carbon energy and related investments in Asia” which might, or might not, refer to giving even more money to China to try and bring its rampant pollution under control.

According to the DFID, “early modelling of the Asian fund suggests that it could bring 9 pounds of private sector investment for every pound committed by the government.”

The DFID has refused to say how much the new scheme is going to cost British people, but in its spending review in October, the ConDem regime said it would provide £2.9 billion pounds of international climate finance to 2015.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the British National Party Website

BNP Leader Nick Griffin Attacks Twinings Tea’s “Mad Insult” against British Workers

BNP Leader Attacks Twinings Tea’s “Mad Insult” against British Workers

BNP News

Twinings Tea have committed a “mad insult” against its British workers by telling them to train up their Polish replacements ahead of an EU-funded move of their factory to Poland, British National Party leader Nick Griffin has said.

Writing in a letter directed to existing BNP members asking them to renew their membership, Mr Griffin asked if he was the “only one who thinks this is madness, an insult?

“Tea is said to be our national drink. Twinings even supplies tea to the Queen. Founded in London in 1706 it has a long and proud British heritage,” Mr Griffin wrote.

“But Twinings are using taxpayers’ money to move British jobs to Poland. The tea company was given a £10 million European grant — partly funded by the British purse — for a new factory in Eastern Europe.

“The firm’s North Tyneside headquarters will close with the loss of 286 jobs. I have demanded that the £10 million grant be withdrawn from the firm,” he continued.

“Twinings has broken European Commission rules that ban any EU money being used to move jobs across the continent. I am frankly disgusted with firms like Twinings and Cadburys.

“They trade on their British roots but care little about our people. These greedy swine cannot wait to move our jobs to cheap labour countries to get more profit,” Mr Griffin said, adding that the move showed the urgent need for economic nationalism.

“We need to protect our industries and services so that our youngsters have a future with decent jobs. Only the British National Party says this.”

Mr Griffin said that workers at the Twinings plant, in North Shields, were even asked to train their Polish replacements before they leave their posts.

“Am I the only one who thinks this is madness, an insult?” he said.

The letter went on to point out that only the British National Party “speaks out for our workers and people. Labour has long ago betrayed the ordinary British worker and has become part of the Political Class they once despised,” Mr Griffin wrote.

“If we aren’t around to speak out and campaign against the export of our jobs, who else will — the Tories, the Lib Dems? Like Labour they are in the pockets of Big Business.”

The BNP leader pointed out that the party does not get huge handouts from big business as a reward for “towing their line.

“We rely simply on the generosity of ordinary people who like what we have to say and what we are trying to achieve. We are financed mainly by membership subscriptions and donations,” Mr Griffin said.

“Folk like you who join us so that we can speak out and fight for what they want. Please rejoin the British National Party today. We need you. Your country needs you,” the letter concluded.

Membership renewals can be made online by clicking here.

New membership applications can be made by clicking here.

Hard-leftist George Galloway attacks Tommy Robinson of the EDL

George Galloway attacks Tommy Robinsonof the EDL

Written by Finlandia

November 2010

The other evening (Friday 19th November) on Talksport radio, former MP George Galloway interviewed the leader of the English Defence League, the young man who goes by the name of Tommy Robinson. Mr Galloway, you may recall, is the self-promoting, Scottish hard-leftist and alleged supporter of Hamas, who first achieved notoriety following a 1994 visit to Baghdad, when he addressed murderous dictator Saddam Hussein: "Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability." Expelled from the Labour Party in 2003, "the member for Baghdad North" went on to set up the Respect Party, which has been roundly snubbed by voters, who know a charlatan when they see one. The Talksport interview was a masterclass in loud-mouthed arrogance, as Galloway repeatedly interrupted and shouted over Robinson, telling him to "shut up" at least half a dozen times. I (like many other listeners, I'm sure) was curious to hear what Mr Robinson might have to say, but he just wasn't given a chance. If Galloway showed little Respect to his guest, he did betray an ignorance – shared by many established politicians – of the significance of the phenomenal rise of the EDL since its formation in early 2009. Anyone who still doubts that significance need only look at the faces in the videos of the marches and rallies that have taken place around the country since the League was formed less than two years ago. What is utterly compelling about those faces is not that they are mostly white (they are), nor that they belong mainly to young, working class men (they do), but that they are glowing with pride and self-belief. When was the last time we saw such a thing in England? For longer than I can recall, the political establishment – whilst applying every trick of social engineering, every financial incentive and crooked educational preference to boost the success and self-esteem of "oppressed" minorities – has simultaneously cursed and kicked the "dole-scrounging", "racist", "knuckle-dragging" working class into a corner, like a mangy, unwanted dog. ("Knuckle-dragger" was just one of the charmless epithets that Galloway spat at Robinson.) What a delight it is to see that maligned British bulldog finally emerging from the shadows to piss on the feet of his disdainful and controlling masters, and to defiantly bare his teeth at those who would threaten his very survival! The English Defence League's overriding purpose was succinctly stated by Tommy Robinson in September last year, during the (now legendary) Nazi-flag-burning press conference: "We're doing it to stand up against Islamic extremists, who have been unchallenged in our country for ten to fifteen years. They're recruiting on our streets, in our universities and our colleges, and the government are doing nothing about it. And to be honest, we don't feel the Islamic community are doing anything about it.... We will stand up against Islamic extremists in the country – that's the message we're sending out.... We will peacefully protest, but we will not be scared into silence." The point about government inaction was a telling one, for the EDL probably owes its existence to the appeasement policies of successive British governments, which have allowed extremists to spread hate-filled anti-Western bigotry with impunity, and have allowed (by abandonment of immigration controls) the establishment here of intransigent ethnic enclaves and unknown numbers of jihadi terror cells. I believe that most EDL members have a better understanding of the true danger of militant Islam than most elected politicians. Even if we don't like their methods (and I don't, particularly), we must concede that the EDL is a genuine grass-roots movement (unlike Galloway's Respect Party). And it is bringing forth a new generation of working class leaders of the kind that Labour and the unions used to produce years ago, before they were hijacked by public school Trotskyites. These young men may be raw and inexperienced, but they are learning, and some of them, I have no doubt, will occupy centre stage in years to come. Tommy Robinson claims that, for his efforts, he and his family have been subjected to a Stasi-style campaign of police intimidation and harassment. Nevertheless the League continues to grow and to improve its organisation, and has recently begun to develop international connections, for example with the American Tea Party movement. But its weakness as a political organisation (if that's what it is, or wants to be) is its single-issue focus, its lack of broader political objectives, and its lack of a positive philosophy or ideology. Whilst the camaraderie of the crowd and the adrenaline rush of street confrontation with UAF activists may be potent attractions for some disaffected young people, they don't constitute a base for the establishment of an effective political force. (I'm not sure what to make of the League's vaunted commitment to multi-culturalism, as exemplified by its establishment of a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Division, reputed to be more than one hundred strong. This could be a genuine commitment to diversity and equality, or perhaps a fear of being called "bigots", or maybe just a desire to secure the broadest possible base of support.) If the rise of the organisation (and its counterparts, the Scottish Defence League and Cymru Defence League) is historically important, as I believe it is, and if the organisation taps into a huge well of righteous energy, as I think it does, then mainstream political parties ought to consider carefully their own relation to it. To dismiss the EDL as a collection of football hooligans would be a mistake, because they are more than that. Between the Defence Leagues and the British National Party there appears to be much common ground. Whilst the Leagues have been able to mobilise hitherto passive sectors of the population (and are showing encouraging signs of being able to contain violent or lawbreaking tendencies), the BNP has acquired political expertise and maturity over many years, and a level of mainstream appeal (including a more inclusive membership policy) that will be necessary precursors to a major electoral breakthrough. For these reasons, I hope that the organisations are talking to each other.

Nick Griffin's MEP Climate Change speech flagged up on award winning website

Climate Change speech flagged up on award winning website

  Martin Wingfield @ Nick griffin MEP North West of England Euro News

NOVEMBER 2010: ONE of America's foremost Climate Change sceptics regularly views Nick Griffin's MEP website to see what he is saying in the European Parliament on the subject.


 Anthony Watts (right), a former television meteorologist who spent 25 years on the air and who also operates a weather technology and content business, has a skeptical view of CO2-driven global warming.
His website Watts Up With That has been described as the "world's most viewed climate website" and in 2008 it won the internet voting-based "Best Science Blog" Wizbang Weblog Award.
Back in June, Anthony Watts flagged up on his website one of Nick's speeches in the European Parliament on Climate Change. It was when the MEP for the North West of England warned that Climate Change scepticism could soon be a criminal offence within the EU.
"I wonder if we will see some of our nemesis bloggers denounced this? I certainly do," he announced, carrying a link to Nick's speech.
This exchange of ideas upset fanatics in the Climate Change lobby who denounced Anthony Watts as promoting the British National Party.
"While I have a skeptical view of certain climate issues, I consider myself 'green' and promote the idea of energy savings and alternate energy generation," Mr Watts responded on his website.
"Unlike many who just talk about it, I’ve put a 10KW solar array on my home, retrofitted it with CFL’s and better insulation, as well as installing timer switches on many of our most commonly used lights. I also drive an electric car for my daily around town routine."

March of the Euro Police - The Mail Newspapers finally catches up with the BNP

March of the Euro Police - The Mail finally catches up with the BNP

Written by Green Arrow

November 2010

First I read the report on a Mail on Sunday investigation on what they term an "alarming array of new EU controls over justice" that none in Our Country has ever voted for.  I then thought, "wow these boys are really on the ball" and clicking to their next online headline, I fully expected them to be breaking the news about the Relief of Mafeking, so up to date are the lazy mail on reporting what is happening in the world. In the article, they finally report, as well as writing about the shameful European Arrest Warrants - which means that Britons  who have been been tried and convicted in their absence by a foreign court can be extradited for "offences" that are not even a crime in Our Country - they also report on the setting up the European Gendarmerie Force that is made up of non British Citizens, who will be allowed to operate in what was the UK with Diplomatic Protection, which means they can effectively break our laws and jaws with impunity. Europol’s officers have diplomatic immunity in UK and cannot be touched by our judges An 800-strong paramilitary force has been trained and armed for ‘expeditionary’ missions British citizens can be seized in UK and sent to foreign jails without appeal So how far behind is the Mail in reporting on this news and just how "exclusive" is it? Well this sites first home, warned about what would happen if the Queen committed treason by signing the European Constitution back in June 2007 when I wrote. Even now, the Eurabian Gestapo called the E.G.F. are training in Vicenza, Italy and when the new powers that are in the process of being passed are signed, detachments of this elite, armed force can and will be stationed in Our Country. An army of occupation. Of course the Queen ratified the treaty, which must have made the first Queen Elizabeth spin in her grave, that a Queen of England could betray her people. But back to the story. I again wrote about the mandate of the untouchable EGF in September 2007: performing security and public order missions; monitoring of and advice for local police in their day-to-day work, including criminal investigation work; conducting public surveillance, border policing and general intelligence; performing criminal investigation work, covering detection of offences, tracing of offenders and their transfer to the appropriate judicial authorities; protecting people and property and keeping order in the event of public disturbances; training of police officers as regards international standards; training of instructors, particularly through co-operation programmes. As you will see, if you follow the above link the EGF are desperate to "blood" themselves and their European Masters are looking for an opportunity to deploy them - probably the UK. In February 2008, I am again forced to return to the story when I learn that Bob Spink MP, in a Commons debate (Hansard, col 188) prior to the signing of the Treaty of Lisbon asked Miliband for an assurance that the Eurogendarmerie will never be allowed into the UK.  Read the link, especially the bit about Turkey, I then went on to write (boy do I write a lot). Indeed the Portuguese EU Presidency’s website, announcing the signing of this Treaty, stated that Turkey had already shown interest. So when the EGF does come over to Britain, we could find ourselves being policed by Turks in EU uniform. Even if they are excluded from being full members of the EU because their human rights record is not good enough, and torture in Turkish police stations is reported to be commonplace, the Turks are evidently considered good enough to be recruited as policemen to police us. Please note - these are not soldiers, they are European riot-control policemen. They are actually members of the Spanish Guardia Civil as you can see from the flashes on their left shoulders, and it is written on the flak jacket of the man standing on the left of the picture, but if you look at their right upper arms you will just glimpse the royal-blue armband of the European Gendarmerie Force - which has as its emblem a circle of little yellow stars, and in the middle a "sword and a flaming grenade, symbolising the common military root of European police" (this logo and the armband are fully explained on their website). And again, in June 2008, the Green Arrow is publishing another article in after copying a really informative and frightening comment discovered in the Sunday Express entitled This is only The Beginning - which I urge you to read. So it is a pity that the Mail had not published their "news exclusive" back in 2007 when the BNP and this site were trying to wake up the people before the European Treason Treaty was ratified.  But I suppose better late than never.  Remember if you want to learn the truth as it happens, then check out the patriotic sites that support the British National Party. Whilst here I might as well plug our donations link.  You want the truth to keep coming, then help keep this site going and expand.  Please donate what you can. And if you are really flush, then make a Donation to the British National Party by going here. Better still, join the British National Party by going to this link here and help the BNP spread the truth.

The EU or EUSSR The Game Plan

The Game Plan

Written by Albion

November 2010

As the rampant spread of a bacterial infection is a direct result of an undressed wound, a simile would be the effect of social upheaval within the EU’s federated states sphere of influence caused by the huge movement of people from the very poor EU countries to richer countries this is further exacerbated by the interference in the internal affairs of European sovereign states by the United Nations. The long term evil aspirations of the European Union of Socialist States and Regions (EUSSR) and the United Nations born of the League of Nations, are identical, in that it has less to do with democracy, human rights, close economic co-operation and financial ties but more to do with the eventual creation of a one Europe. The EU by default because of open European borders funnel the poor of Europe into the richer EU satellites countries and the UN funnel all the third world flotsam into the first world. Their Marxist theory is that nation states create national tensions, destroy Nationalism and the wars that have plagued Europe for centuries will cease, that is the reason that any political party that is opposed to the wanton destruction of nation states will be confronted head on by the leaders of the Socialist States Presidium situated in Brussels, The Hague, Geneva and Amsterdam, the gloves are off and true democracy ceases to exist. It is in its full momentum, nothing will be allowed to stop it now, and it’s been too long in the planning.The Marxist game plan for Europe is that Nationalism will never again be allowed to flourish. I have lifted a few passages from the CIB booklet. The CIB (Campaign for an Independent Britain) is a non political pressure group and calls for open democratic debate on Great Britain’s future within Europe and for a referendum as is our lawful right when there are changes to our constitution. The seriousness of the situation is not so much the changes to our constitution that have taken place but rather the replacement of our constitution by the EU constitution or Lisbon Treaty as it is more commonly known, without a democratic referendum by the people. I want to show the skulduggery that has taken place to achieve this situation in this country and in Europe. The CIB might appear to take a one issue stance but they must realise, without falling into the political trap of siding with anything that remotely smacks of Nationalism, that with self government all issues detrimental to this counties future will not be decided by 27 mostly poor countries in Europe. With self government we call the tune, we decide who enters this country and who we can deport, and the CIB have no need to touch on rampant immigration that is slowly destroying the social cohesiveness in this country as once we have self government that enormous problem will self-heal once we remove ourselves from this dictatorship. The comments that follow have been mouthed by Marxist EU leaders in the past; they show the Marxist/Socialist true aims concerning the reformation of Europe by stealth that have been taking place since the war. I particularly like this one mouthed by a Ruiz Jarabo Colomer, Advocate of the EU Court of Justice (who you might ask?) giving his opinion on the 19th October 2000. “Criticism of the EU is akin to blasphemy and can be restricted without affecting freedom of speech” Note he was not talking about religious blasphemy referring to the non-belief in God or Allah but the blasphemy of criticising the EU. Marxism is to atheism as Nationalism is to loyalty to ones country. Marxists do not recognise any religions or religious beliefs, so blasphemy to a Marxist does not relate to any deity. If religion and Marxism are to be spoken in one breath it is the destruction of nation states that is the Holy Grail of Marxism. You may remember Salmon Rushdie was accused of blasphemy for the true criticism of Islam, not of Allah. Read this gem by Peter Thornycroft later chancellor of the exchequer of the CONservative party: “No government dependent on a democratic vote could possibly agree in advance to the sacrifice that any adequate plan must evolve. The British people must be led slowly and unconsciously into the abandonment of their traditional economic defences” This is just one British political leader giving judgment on the UK’s future. This revelation came as a surprise from Dr Richard Aldridge BBC radio 4 Feb 2000 ‘Document.; a letter to the times, "I was absolutely astonished to discover that the library of Georgetown University, Washington had the entire archive of a CIA front organization which documents from start to finish funnelling millions of dollars into Europe and Britain… The whole accounting structure of the European Movement was designed to hide the fact that CIA money was coming in’ I will finish with this admission of a subterfuge in an article in La Stampa in Feb 2000 in an interview with Barbara Speninelli headed, Amato said "Europe does not need a Sovereign’ however daring a political project might be it must be hidden, camouflaged. One must act ‘as if’ in Europe, ‘as if’ nations wanted a very few things in order to obtain a great deal. ‘As if’ nations were to remain sovereign in order to convince them to surrender their sovereignty. The Commission in Brussels, for example must act ‘as if’ it were a technical organ in order to operate like a government, that sovereignty lost on a national level does not pass to any new individual. It is entrusted to a faceless entity….eventually the EU. The EU is the vanguard of this changing world …The new entity is faceless and those in command can neither be identified nor elected. All we need are a few corrections here and there along with a great deal of cunning” This is the nation wrecking treachery that the British national Party and Nationalists throughout Europe must face.

Nick Griffin in the Houses of Parliament Climate Change Group Meeting

Nick Griffin in the Houses of Parliament

  By Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP for Horwich & Bolton Euro News

NOVEMBER 2010: NICK Griffin MEP attended an All Party Parliamentary Climate Change Group meeting in a Committee Room of the Houses of Parliament yesterday evening to discuss a new approach to Climate Change & Resource Depletion.


 On the agenda was the cyclic conversion of carbon emissions into threatened carbon-based resources in order to ensure our food, water and energy security. Proponents hope this could be the basis of a new global industry which restores, rather than depletes or pollutes, our environment and resource base.
Amongst the speakers at the meeting were John Harmer, the Met Office's Chief Adviser to the Government and Dr David Bellamy OBE.
The invitation to MEP said that its was an opportunity to meet and network with a diverse group of politicians, academics, industry leaders, oil companies, foreign agencies, environmental groups, grant-making trusts, charities, youth representatives, general public and the media.
Nick said that the proposals were interesting - and heartening. The told the organisers of the meeting:
"So far I've spent a year on the European Parliament's Environmental Committee, listening in near despair as people have waffled on with unscientfiic hysteria about how the world's greatest fertiliser, carbon dioxide, is drowning polar bears and killing forests, and how the problem will be cured by high-tech industrial fixes such as electric cars, wind farms and solar power generation systems which are all dependent on Rare Earth Minerals that are already running out.
"It's a breath of fresh air to read of solutions that involve resources that actually exist, being used in a sustainable way that would benefit local communities instead of multi-national corporations. Most of all, while carbon cycling would help with AGW (if it exists) the proposals would also help address other absolutely real problems, particularly desertification, hunger-driven migration and Peak Oil (an issue which my party and I have championed for some eight years now).
"So congratulations, and I look forward to learning more, and perhaps trying to get your ideas pushed in the European Parliament."

Ethnically Cleansed Britain: 40,000 BC — 2066 AD RIP the British People

Ethnically Cleansed Britain: 40,000 BC — 2066 AD RIP

BNP News

Official population figures have confirmed that the British National Party is right: given current demographic trends, the British people are going to become a minority in their own country within the next 50 years.

The prediction, contained in an article in the latest issue of Prospect magazine, was made by Oxford demography Professor David Coleman.

He analysed figures from the Office of National Statistics (ONS) to show that at current immigration levels, the proportion of the white British-born population will fall from 80 per cent to 59 per cent by 2051.

"On those assumptions the 'white British' population would decline to 45 million by 2051,” Professor Coleman wrote.

“Were the assumptions to hold, the 'white British' population of Britain would become the minority after about 2066.”

Importantly, he added that this was a “milestone that would be passed much earlier in younger age groups."

Professor Coleman also said that even if net immigration was reduced to 80,000 a year, white Britons would still be outnumbered by 2080.

This mirrors precisely what the British National Party has been saying all along: that mass Third World immigration, combined with dramatically higher immigrant birth rates, will see British people ethnically cleansed from the land that their forefathers have inhabited for the last 40,000 years.

The BNP warned earlier that white British school pupils are set to become a minority by the year 2021, only 11 years away.

That analysis, conducted on government statistics, showed that ethnic “minorities” accounted for 22 percent of pupils at primary school, an increase of 2 percent from the previous year.

The 2 percent per year increase in ethnic “minority” pupils was replicated at secondary level schools, which in 2006 rose to 17.7 percent. Discounting increased immigration and using a straight 2 percent growth rate per year, the 2006 figures mean that this year (2010) some 32 percent of all primary school pupils are of ethnic “minority” origin.

Using the same calculation of a 2 percent growth rate, the 2006 figures mean that the 2010 secondary school ethnic “minority” pupil rate is now 27 percent. Given this growth rate, white British children will become an absolute minority in British schools by the year 2021, when the “ethnic “minority” levels will reach over 50 percent.

The BNP has also consistently warned that by the year 2030, the majority of live births in England and Wales will be to non-British immigrant stock.

The conclusions by Professor Coleman now give official establishment confirmation to the BNP predictions — and they also make a mockery of the “immigration cap” announcement by the government’s Migration Advisory Committee (MAC).

In a report issued today, the MAC said that immigration levels needed to be cut by up to 25 percent if the government was to achieve its goal of “bringing immigration down to “tens of thousands” per year by 2015.

The immigration cap nonsense has been proven to be a hoax over and over again, with a House of Commons report showing that even if fully implemented, it would affect only 20 percent of overall gross immigration.

According to the MAC proposal, which is likely to become government policy, the number of visas for skilled workers with job offers and highly skilled workers should drop to between 37,400 and 43,700 for 2011/12.

This figure does not include the 40,000 Indian IT workers which the government has already agreed to take each year in terms of the secretly negotiated EU/India free trade deal.

These figures show that even if the MAC policy is implemented, it will make little difference to the end result: British people are still on track to be marginalised, out bred and finally ethnically cleansed in their own country.

The only way that this disaster can be avoided is for the British people to stand up before it is too late, and demand the right to be British in Britain.

This will entail halting and reversing the immigration invasion which stands poised to utterly and irrevocably wipe our nation from the map of history. The British National Party truly represents our nation’s last hope.

Will you play your part?

Proven correct recommended reading:

The Immigration Invasion: How Third World Immigration is Destroying the First World and What Must be Done to Stop It

By Arthur Kemp. A shocking book detailing the full extent of the Third World immigration wave which is swamping the Western World.

Using the latest numbers and projections, it explains why Third World immigration will destroy the First World, with individual chapters on Britain, Europe, Russia, Canada, the USA, Australia and New Zealand.

It shows that, if left unchecked, the First World will be overrun within the next 50 years.

Click here to order online or call 0871 0500 242 office hours.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the British National Party Website

France – Token Ethnic minority women sacked from cabinet as Sarkozy moves to right

France – Ethnic minority women sacked from cabinet as Sarkozy moves to right

 November 2010 by Giuseppe De Santis.  

It seems to me that the useless marxists who write for The Guardian have spent so much time with Trevor Phillips and the EHRC that they have lost the plot.
They are quite happy to see the British National Party sued by the EHRC on the grounds that our constitution discriminates against non-whites, even though they know that there is not a long queue of ethnics wanting to join.
However their racist nonsense is now directed against France, they are complaining that the French government has become more white and more rightwing in a reshuffle that included the sacking of two ministers handpicked by Nicolas Sarkozy to bring ethnic diversity to the cabinet.

Senegalese-born Rama Yade, the sports minister, and Fadéla Amara, the minister for urban policies, lost their jobs in the shake-up which also signalled an end to the French president’s policy of “openness” to his political opponents and to racial minorities.
Less than two years ago, Sarkozy declared: “The diversity at the bottom of the country must be illustrated by diversity at the head of the country. This is not a choice, this is an obligation.”
That obligation went by the board in Sunday’s long expected reshuffle – it was announced almost five months ago. The prime minister, François Fillon, was reappointed, and the French administration moved further to the right.
Yade, 33, was one of the so-called Sarkozettes, seven women given ministerial posts after Sarkozy’s presidential victory in 2007. Their appointment was to fulfil his election vow to introduce “positive discrimination French-style” and to reflect the diversity of modern France.
Yade, while hugely popular with the public, fell out of favour with the president for not toeing the official line on several occasions, including the time she criticised Sarkozy’s decision to invite the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, to Paris on a state visit. She also refused his offer of a European parliament job.
Amara, 46, a once outspoken French feminist and former president of the organisation Ni Putes Ni Soumis (Neither Whores Nor Doormats), is a Muslim born to Algerian parents. She was appointed junior minister for urban policies in 2007. Her main job was to devise a “Marshall plan” for France’s troubled city suburbs, but she found herself rapidly sidelined.
The third symbolic appointment, Rachida Dati, who was made justice minister, the first Frenchwoman of Algerian and Moroccan roots to hold a top post in government, also fell out of favour with Sarkozy and was packed off to the European parliament in June last year.
In Sunday’s reshuffle French diversity was represented far down the political pecking order by Jeannette Bougrab, of Algerian parentage and a former president of the country’s anti-discrimination and equality authority, who is the newly appointed junior minister for youth, and by Nora Berra, 47, who has north African roots, and was appointed junior minister for sport.
Patrick Lozés, president of the Representative Council for Black Associations, wrote in his blog on the Nouvel Observateur site: “This is a sad day for diversity. I particularly regret the departure of Rama Yade from the government. Her leaving is a heavy symbol for all French from visible minorities.”
He said the appointment of Bougrab was a blow to his organisation. “It’s not a matter for celebration,” he wrote.
Female politicians fared slightly better: six of the 15 cabinet posts are now held by women, one fewer than in Sarkozy’s first government in 2007. The recruits include Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, 37, who is made minister for ecology, development, transport and housing.

So now the French government is institutionally racist?
Never mind that those ethnic minority women were not up to their job and attracted much criticism, clearly if they have been removed it’s because Mr Sarkozy is racist.
The Guardian’ problem is that they cannot accuse him of being nazi scum as he is Jewish, of Hungarian descent and they are worried that if Mr Sarkozy rejects diversity then the MSM would be caught between a rock and a hard place, it would be far more difficult to criticise us for trying to do the same thing.
Any day that is bad for those unwashed marxists is a very good day for nationalists and those who care about the future of this country.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Midwives: Yet Another Tory Election Pledge Ditched as Maternity Wards Overwhelmed by Immigrant Birth Rate

Midwives: Yet Another Tory Election Pledge Ditched as Immigration Invasion Overwhelms Maternity Wards

The BNP Newsroom

Yet another broken promise has been added to the growing list of abandoned Tory election pledges in the form of increased subsidies to the midwife profession, which has come under intense pressure due to the sustained immigrant invasion-driven rise in births.

In a speech to the annual conference of the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) in Manchester, that organisation’s general secretary Cathy Warwick said that both the Conservative Party and the Lib Dems had “gone back on pre-election pledges to increase the number of midwives.”

According to Ms Warwick, Prime Minister David Cameron and his deputy Nick Clegg had both promised to create more midwifery posts.

However, it has transpired, Ms Warwick said, that discussions with Health Secretary Andrew Lansley have shown that the Government is "clearly not prepared" to fulfil that commitment, despite the service being close to "cracking point.

“I fear for the future of maternity services, that the quality of care will fall and that safety could be compromised. I fear that midwives who are toiling away doing their best will become even more disillusioned,” Ms Warwick said.

“Most of all I fear that women and their babies will be ill-served by maternity services. The government's lack of response about this seems at best bewildering, and at worst a clear refusal to do something about it.”

She said David Cameron and health secretary Andrew Lansley had gone back on a pledge made before the election to increase midwife numbers by 3,000.

Ms Warwick pointed out that in January this year, Mr Cameron said in public that ‘We are going to make our midwives' lives a lot easier. They are crucial to making a mum's experience of birth as good as it can possibly be, but today they are overworked and demoralised. So we will increase the number of midwives by 3,000.’

Since the coalition government came to power it has consistently refused to honour that pledge, Ms Warwick continued. “When the NHS business plan was published last week, it contained no mention of midwife numbers.

“I am very concerned that the needs of pregnant women are greater than ever before, the birthrate remains high yet we are still acutely short of midwives. The RCM is well aware of the pressures on public spending, but midwives are already doing more for less. It now looks like they will be asked to do even more with fewer resources and fewer staff.”

The intense pressure on the maternity wards is a direct result of the immigration invasion of Britain by the Third World, a policy which has, ironically, been actively encouraged and supported by all the Westminster parties.

An analysis of official figures conducted by BNP news revealed that at least 60 percent of all new babies in Britain in 2009 were born to non-indigenous recent arrival immigrant mothers or to second or third generation immigrant parents.

The shocking figures are based on a comparison between new Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures and existing data.

According to the latest ONS figures, released in July this year, 24.7 percent of children born in Britain last year have mothers who were born abroad. These figures have doubled since the late 1990s.

According to the ONS figures, around 10 percent of babies are “born to mothers from New Commonwealth countries,” in other words, the Third World, with Pakistan topping the list.

An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

In London around half of babies have foreign-born mothers while in Newham and Brent, around three quarters of children have mothers who were born abroad.

As shocking as these figures are, they do not tell the whole story.

According to the ONS Population Review of 2004 and 2005: England and Wales, legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.

A 2005 ONS report said that in the previous year, 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”

This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers. Once it is added in, the non-indigenous birth rate climbs to just over 50 percent of all births in Britain — and this in 2005, data which is already five years old.

This figure, combined with July’s ONS figures, means that at least 60 percent and possibly more of all live births in Britain last year were of immigrant origin

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the BNP Main Website

Children in Need funded 7/7 terrorist propaganda, says the BBC NewsnightTV Programme

BBC's Children in Need funded 7/7 terrorist propaganda, says the BBC NewsnightTV Programme 

BY Horwich Nationalists

Thousands of pounds raised by Britons for the BBC’s Children in Need charity may have been used to recruit and train the homegrown Islamic terrorists involved in the 7/7  Islamic terror attacks on London.

Pudsey and other Islamic Friends

Some of the cash may also have been used to fund the propaganda activities of the Islamic suicide bombers who killed 52 people in July 2005, according to an investigation by BBC ,s Newsnight programme.

The programme has reported that £20,000 from Children in Need was handed over to the Leeds Community School, in Beeston, Yorkshire between 1999 and 2002.

The Islamic school, which also received large sums from other Tax funded public bodies, was run from premises behind the Iqra Islamic bookshop which the 7/7 Terrorist Bombing gang used as a meeting place and an opportunity to increase the radicalization of other Muslims in the UK.

Children in Need's chief Executive David Ramsden told the BBC Newsnight programme : I'm incredibly concerned that we did make an award to Leeds Community School over nine years ago .

well tough we at The Horwich Nationalists have always suspected the motives behind this annual Bourgeoisie fund raising event. And often how in our view the millions raised never seemed to be spent on the British People themselves but always seemed to be spent on ethnic projects in both the UK and in the never ending money pit of Africa.If you have made a pledge to this now apparent Islamic fund raising event we suggest you break it and donate any money raised to reputable charities such as the Poppy appeal and the Salvation Army or the RNLA.

Political Police in Wales Pay Compensation after Gestapo-like Harassment of BNP Leaflet Team

Political Police in South Wales Pay Up after Gestapo-like Harassment of BNP Leaflet Team

The British National Party Newsroom

South Wales Police have settled out of court in four figure sums with five British National Party activists who were detained in 2006 after legally leafleting the Bonymaen area of Swansea, reports South Wales correspondent Clive Bennett.

“After four and a half years of wrangling and just a few weeks from going to court, South Wales police have decided to settle out of court,” Mr Bennett said.

“All of the ‘Swansea Five,’ as the BNP team became known, have received an out of court settlement, without prejudice of course, which includes a four figure lump sum and all costs.”

The drama started in May 2006, when, in the run-up to the last Wales Assembly elections, a team of activists were delivering BNP leaflets.

“Shortly after they had started leafleting, the Plaid candidate phoned the police and complained about the leaflets,” Mr Bennett explained.

“Subsequently the group became aware that they were being kept under surveillance and they were followed for more than half an hour by a police constable in a panda car.

“At 12 o’clock, just before the group had finished leafleting the area, several police vehicles arrived and arrested the whole team, confiscated their phones and leaflets and proceeded to load the whole group into a police van.

“They were taken to the police station where they individually locked up in police cells and interviewed one by one. They were asked about where their meetings are held and who is in the group,” he said.

“Then their photographs, fingerprints and DNA were taken. Once all that was done, they were sent back to the cells and only released at 1 am the next morning, some thirteen hours after the arrest.

“In addition, during the afternoon, the police took it upon themselves to go around the area which had been leafleted to ask residents to hand over the leaflets.

“Now if that was not a political move designed to put those residents off supporting the BNP, I cannot think what is,” Mr Bennett said.

Of course, no charges were ever made against any of the activists. Rightfully angry at this blatant Gestapo-like interference in the political process, the activists laid a formal complaint of false arrest and imprisonment.

To no-one’s surprise, the internal police investigation found “no fault” with their actions.

Not satisfied with this obvious cover-up, the activists then took out a private case against South Wales Police and sued them for damages. It is this action which has now been settled by the police with the out-of-court payments.

“But most important of all, I think it is safe to say that because of this action, the South Wales police will be less inclined to act quite so politically in the future,” Mr Bennett said.

“It may be a small win, but nevertheless an important one. Well done to the Swansea Five for their tenacity.”

Multicultural Political Police Pass the Buck onto the EDL for Muslim Militancy

By Horwich Nationalists

A spokesman for the Politicised Police of the West Midlands of England, has stated that Muslim Militancy is caused by the EDL marching for the rights of the Indigenous British Peoples, in the face of the Islamic and Politically Correct repression the said British people now face.

Whilst completely ignoring the failure of the Multi cultural socialist experiments of the Main Lib/Lab/Con Political parties. Detective Superintendent of the West Midlands Police John larkin simply in our view has attempted to pass the buck ( reuters) onto the ordinary people of this nation who wish for nothing more than to preserve the hard won freedoms and traditions of our people in the face of an Islamic onslaught.

Has Detective Larkin forgot that the 7/7 bombings happened long before the EDL ever existed, or the fact that in order to show their willingness to get along with the British way of life it was Muslims who burnt a poppy at the Cenotaph insulting all members of the British Nation, And along with the suspected Islamic bomb test on the shores of a Scottish Loch this week.  As well as the majority of the heroin trade being owned and controlled by the so called Muslim Community , and the grooming of under age English Girls by Islamic sex gangs!
So come on Larkin stop Larking about and smell the roses it is not the EDL that is the Problem it is the failure of the Multi cultural experiment, and that is what you must be addressing as well as hunting down these Islamic criminals, and protecting our freedoms for a CHANGE! 

So I call on all EDL members to register to vote and to cast their votes for or join the only Political Party with a track record of standing up for the British and English way of life and who is sworn to put an end to the politically correct madness of the last 40 years, And I do not think it will be one of the main parties to!

Equalities Commission vS bnp Court Case Update

Equalities Commission Court Case Update

The British National Party National Newsroom

The British National Party’s legal team has advised the party leadership that there will still be another two day’s legal arguments early in December before the case brought by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission comes to an end.

“The news means that judgement in the case will not be given within the next week or two, as was previously thought,” Nick Griffin MEP said.

“Because Equalities Commission was forced to admit in court that their original order was unclear and ambiguous, the consensus of legal opinion is that there is no prospect of their contempt action succeeding,” Mr Griffin continued.

“During the upcoming two days, our excellent legal team will be arguing strongly that that the entire ECHR case was flawed from the very beginning, and that in addition to it being totally struck off, the Equalities Commission should bear all the costs,” he said.

“The ultimate decision, of course, lies with the court. However, the bottom line is that party supporters can only expect a decision in the case in December.

“Once we have an exact date, we will advertise that widely so that people can once again show their support at the Royal Court of Justice, and, hopefully, at the end of it, celebrate a famous victory,” Mr Griffin said.

“But no matter what the outcome, we need to show these fascist terrorists that the British people are not going to bow to their blackmail, and will carry on the fight to save our great nation no matter what.”

Legal Aid to British People Cut, Asylum Seekers” Continue with Subsidies

Legal Aid Cuts: “Asylum Seekers” Continue with Subsidies as Aid to British People Cut

The British National Party Newsroom

“Asylum seekers” in Britain will continue to have all their endless legal appeals financed by the taxpayer while legal aid to impoverished British people will be cut by more than £350 million, according to the ConDem regime’s new plans.

According to Tory “justice” secretary Ken Clarke, the taxpayer-funded legal aid bill will be cut by £350 million as part of “cost-saving” measures.

This means that all legal aid normally given to impoverished British citizens to aid them in civil cases such as divorce, medical negligence, private family cases, education, employment, welfare benefits and school admissions will end. Legal aid for criminal cases will not be affected.

The justification for the cuts — that the taxpayer is footing the bill for unnecessary court cases that could probably be settled out of court if the parties themselves were paying — is almost certainly valid. The publicly-funded legal bill in England alone was almost £2 billion last year, which is one of the highest in Europe.

At present, anyone with assets worth less than £8,000 qualifies for legal aid, with those worth £3,000 or less paying nothing and others expected to contribute.

Under the new proposals, all those with assets of £1,000 or more will have to pay a minimum of £100 towards their legal costs should their cases be successful.

This sounds all good and well — until the fine print of the new deal is read. It turns out that “asylum seekers” are one of the handful of groups (along with mental health, debt and housing matters) to be specifically excluded from the cuts.

Legal aid for asylum seekers cost taxpayers more than £90 million in 2009, according to figures released by the Ministry of Justice.

The bill, more than £550,000 a week, paid for "initial advice" in 46,000 cases. Each case costs the taxpayer an average of £610. Cases that go on to a full tribunal cost an average of £1,670, while those that go to judicial review cost £2,500 each.

The decision to exclude “asylum seekers” from the cuts goes directly against Mr Clarke’s own promises on the subject which he made as recently as August this year.

At the time, Mr Clarke said he would “target payments made to lawyers who make repeated challenges to decisions to turn down claims for asylum” and would “crack down on payouts to solicitors who make last-minute objections to deportation orders.”

While there is obviously a need for a crackdown on the exploitation of the legal system which results from free legal aid, the first point of savings should have been the utterly bogus asylum racket.

There are, in fact, no legal “asylum seekers” in Britain at all. All such persons have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach Britain, and are as such illegal immigrants, not genuine asylum seekers who only have right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they fled.

However, just like its Labour Party predecessor, the current government is always happy to put the interests of British people last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

The Misnamed Equalities and Human Rights Commission Their Evil Aim: Destroy the BNP

Their Evil Aim: Destroy the BNP

The British National Party Newsroom

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission is no neutral regulator, but an organisation out to destroy our human rights and democracy, British National Party leader Nick Griffin has said.

Writing in the latest fundraising appeal, Mr Griffin said that the “Commission's aim is to destroy OUR human rights and the democracy and freedom for which generations of our war heroes have died.

“The misnamed Equalities and Human Rights Commission brought a contempt case against me, Simon Darby and Tanya Lumby. Their aim was to use public funds to bully and oppress us and the entire party.

“Make no mistake, this is no neutral regulator out to secure the 'human rights' of others - the Commission's aim is to destroy OUR human rights and the democracy and freedom for which generations of our war heroes have died.

“Their aim was to bankrupt and humiliate us and to jail me. The Guardian newspaper made this clear: ‘Griffin faces a large financial penalty or even jail if the court rules in favour of the equality watchdog, which is bringing the case.’

“Both ECHR head Trevor Phillips and his racist ‘Operation Black Vote’ sidekick Simon Woolley have claimed that the BNP is deliberately flouting the original court order. The truth is quite different.

“The BNP has complied with the order and it is the ECHR that is misusing the courts and public money for political ends.

“Woolley has made his hatred of the BNP and his desire to close us down very plain. He does not even want to address your legitimate concerns: ‘Pandering to views peddled by the BNP and bought by BNP voters is grotesque,’ he has said in public.

“For his part, Phillips is on record saying that he views BNP members as ‘less than human.’

“These are the people who run the tax-guzzling ECHR. They want to destroy the BNP, dismiss your concerns and exclude you from any democratic debate No wonder Phillips used to have a bust of Lenin on his desk!

“Phillips and Woolley don't understand the British spirit - when our backs are against the wall we come out fighting! Supporters of the BNP embody that spirit. “Our boys and girls were on the streets outside the Royal Courts of Justice standing up for freedom, despite the pouring rain and freezing cold. Our supporters paid for a high-powered, confident and well-briefed legal team to present the best possible case to the court to throw out this crackpot charge.

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

or ring 0207 078 3269

“They were there because of you and your generosity. And they gave the Commission's lawyers bloody noses all round. The equality bullies got their come-uppance this week!

“I believe that the judges understand that we have sought to abide by the law and that the ECHR kept moving the goalposts to try to find new ways to attack us. We are nearing the end of this now and only have to get through a further two-day hearing on technical legal points before judgment will be delivered.

“So we will still have to send a legal team back into court. “It is vital to see that the party is represented by a professional team so that our best interests can be served.

“Give me the weapons I need in this fight. Please send a donation today to ensure that we once again - and for the last time - field the best legal minds to defend our rights.

“Let's wipe the smiles off the faces of Phillips and Woolley and show them that we will defend our rights and will not be bullied, sidelined or oppressed!

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

or ring 0207 078 3269

Yours sincerely

Nick Griffin MEP

Chairman, BNP

P.S. I know that the same spirit that got our Country through two World Wars is still alive in us today. With that spirit we can never be beaten. Whether you fight by attending protests or giving money you are expressing that 'never say die' attitude. It's what once made our country great and, God willing, will again.

Five UAF arrested for throwing fireworks at BNP stall Merseyside Police Reply

Five UAF arrested for throwing fireworks at BNP stall

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 NOVEMBER 2010: Nick Griffin has now received a reply to his letter to Merseyside Police concerning intimidation of British National Party campaigners in Liverpool.


 Chief Constable Jon Murphy wrote:
Dear Mr. Griffin,
Further to your letter dated the 11th October 2010 and our acknowledgement dated the 21st October 2010, I would like to provide you with the following response in relation to the questions you raised.
Firstly, I am able to confirm that on Saturday 2nd October 2010, representatives of both the British National Party and United Against Fascism were campaigning in Liverpool City Centre.
A period of approximately six hours passed without incident and the police facilitated the lawful political campaigning by both groups. Unfortunately at about 6pm the same day, a flash point occurred when missiles and fireworks were thrown at representatives of the British National Party. As a result the police were requested to escort British National Party campaigners from the location for their own safety.
I am able to confirm that five arrests were made for a variety of public order related offences.
This was a disappointing outcome to the day and we immediately reviewed our response to the situation. For trie weeks that foiiowed, we increased our resources in relevant locations to prevent any further incidents of this nature. We have also engaged in active dialogue with both parties to ensure that we can, when possible, facilitate both lawful protest and political campaigning.
In addition we have worked closely with all local authorities and partner agencies to ensure the British National Party, as a legal political party can continue to campaign without fear of transgressing any local by laws or environmental legislation.
However it must said that our efforts to police incidents such as this are hindered by receiving very short notice of British National Party intentions to campaign in this area, if in fact we receive any notice at all.
I would very much appreciate it if you would encourage your members to provide us with at least 24 hours notice of any specific locations where they intend to campaign, which will allow us the opportunity to plan accordingly.
This reply was in response to Nick's letter below:
Dear Chief Constable Murphy
Re: Intimidation of British National Party Campaigners: Liverpool
I have been contacted by a number of my constituents, some of whom are campaigners for the British National Party, with regard to the unacceptable intimidation they have been subjected to during the course of their campaigning activities in Liverpool city centre.
On Saturday 2nd October, a small team of British National Party campaigners, who were gathering signatures for a petition calling for the withdrawal of British troops from the war in Afghanistan, were surrounded by an organised and co-ordinated group of political opponents (who term themselves as “antifascists”) and subjected to a relentless, vicious verbal and physical attack. In addition to the campaign team suffering sustained verbal abuse from this group, they were also physically assaulted with objects thrown as missiles, which included eggs, water, bottles, cans and small incendiaries.
The British National Party campaign members report that they, and members of the public who tried to approach them with the intention of signing the petition, felt afraid for their physical safety and were not reassured by the actions of the Merseyside police officers who were present on the day. There was a general consensus, on the part of both the campaign team and the public, that the officers in attendance were unsympathetic toward their safety concerns and generally reluctant to take control of the situation: i.e. by dispersing the aggressive and unruly opponent group and taking direct action against the individuals responsible for the missile throwing and targeted verbal abuse.  
I understand that Mr Mike Whitby, the Liverpool British National Party organiser, has already written to Superintendent Bill McWilliam, raising his concerns about the apparent unwillingness of local police officers to intervene effectively to allow the British National Party campaign team to conduct their legitimate political campaigning without harassment, and also to protect the public from intimidation.
Given the seriousness of this attack and the climate of fear and victimisation that such incidents engender amongst individuals exercising their democratic right to freedom of political expression, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a full report on Merseyside Police’s response to the events of Saturday 2nd October, including whether any arrests were made on the day, and your assessment as to whether sufficient action was taken by officers to deal with the attack.
In order for me to reassure my constituents that Merseyside Police is committed to ensuring the physical safety of all individuals involved in legitimate democratic political activity, and to protecting their democratic right to function free from harassment, I would be grateful if you could also identify what risk management plans will be set in place to avoid a repeat of the events of Saturday 2nd October.
I would be grateful if you could direct your reply to my Wigton Constituency office address.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin, MEP
North West Parliamentary Constituency

The Continuing Persecution of Christians in Egypt

Persecution of Christians in Egypt

  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

NOVEMBER 2010: AS an MEP, Nick Griffin gets sent numerous texts of speeches that are being made in Britain. The speeches cover a multitude of topics and while some are of interest to nationalists, such as protecting the environment and defending a country's culture and traditions, the majority promote an internationalist agenda, seeking to expand the influence of the European Union and the global economy.

 Yesterday, Nick received notification of a lecture being given by Dr Ahsraf Ramelah at the Community College in Northampton on the Persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.
In his introduction Dr Ramelah provides a brief history of the Coptic Christians in Egypt and the persecution they have faced from Muslims. There then follows an interesting analysis of the Western Mindset with regard to Islamic aggression, Sharia Law and Jihad.
This is what he had to say:
"Many Westerners, including Americans, for some reason hesitate to hear the truths related to Islam and its history or see the sad reality of current events around the world, especially  the oppression and discrimination within Egyptian society today.
While in the Western civil societies there is a clear separation of religion and state, in Arab-Muslim countries the two are inseparable. Islam is a juridic religion which governs every single part of an individual's life and by definition must extend to state government. Therefore, the policy in Egypt which forces the dhimmi (submissive second citizens) status upon those of minority religions is linked to the religion of Islam. In fact, the Sharia, laws based upon Muslim religious texts, is written into Egypt's state constitution as an amendment and is the official guide to all rulings.
The United States constitution is the basis for our laws and regulations but does not interfere with individual citizens and their beliefs, while in Arab Muslim countries the Sharia is the source and basis of law and dictates an individual citizen's behavior and attitude.  
What is Sharia? And what does it mean to us as Westerners?
Sharia is an Arabic word which indicates the source of law in general. According to Islamic doctrine this law was delivered directly by Allah as a Divine revelation set fourth in the Qur'an and the Sunnah text which contains examples of behavior set forth by the Islamic prophet during his lifetime.
In analyzing the above, one can easily see how non-Muslims in Islamic majority countries are subject to the Sharia.
Muslims claim that Sharia is applied only to the Muslim people as part of their religion, however history and current practice indicates the opposite. The Sharia was introduced in Egypt by President Anwar Sadat in 1981, indicating Egypt to be a Muslim country with Sharia as its law. Sadat did not abrogate or nullify the Egyptian constitution, but instead he wrote a simple amendment and placed it as the second article within the Egyptian constitution.
Here are a few examples of Sharia compliance happening in Egypt today:
* Today as the past, the legal courts of Egypt do not ever rule against a Muslim when he has committed a crime against a non-Muslim and this practice follows Islamic Sharia doctrine.
* Today as in the past, Egypt Copts are struggling to build new churches and repair existing ones based upon two decrees, Omrani and Hamayoni, which regulate the relationship between believers (Muslims) and unbelievers (Jews, Christians, etc.). The submission of non-Muslim to Muslim is based on Sharia. This is likewise happening in other Islamic countries; for example, in Afghanistan a few years ago the Taliban destroyed a huge, ancient statue of Buddha!
* Today as in the past, Christian women and girls are kidnapped, raped and converted to Islam. Rape is part of Sharia. This is also in accordance to Mohammad's message to the countries his armies were to invade that all should embrace Islam to keep from being killed (Islam, Teslam).
* Today as in the past, in the public schools, Islam is taught to all students as part of Sharia.
Jihad is part of sharia and means holy war. Muslims teach that jihad is a fight in self-defense to protect their faith. The reality is the opposite; in fact, jihad is one of the pillars of Islam and is offensive and aggressive. Let me borrow a few verses of the Qur'an to prove this important matter.
The following are two verses. The first is from Surah Al Anfal (8) verse 60 below: Arabic Qu'ran, English Qu'ran.
60. And prepare for them, you Muslims, all the strength that you can recruit? armed forces and mounted troops? to strike terror into the hearts of Allâh's enemy, who is your enemy, and into the hearts of others whom you do not know but who Allâh knows. And remember that whatever you spend in the way of Allâh, you will be reimbursed for it and you will never be unjustly wronged.
Islam promoted Jihad in the past, promotes it now, and will promote it forever for the sole reason that Islam intends to conquer the whole world.
Here are the verses that state it, Al Bakara (Cow) 2:154 below: Arabic Qu'ran, English Qu'ran.
154. Do not consider the martyrs in Allâh's cause to be dead. They have acquired the glorious privilege of martyrdom. Do not say they are dead, for they are alive in the Lord's providence, but you do not perceive this fact.
Al Twaba 9:20:
20. Indeed, those who believed in Allâh's oneness and migrated to where they could best serve Him and strove for His cause with their wealth and their lives, are privileged by Allâh with distinction in the scale and rank, and these are the triumphant who are bound to His care.
Al Twaba 9:41:
41. O you who believe, march out, each in his capacity, lightly armed and heavily armed. Every hand must be open to contribute something to the common purpose, and strive in the cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives. Such a campaign is charitable for you if only you knew (it helps you prevail and confirm Allâh's faith and worship)."