Search This Blog

Monday, 22 November 2010

The EU or EUSSR The Game Plan

The Game Plan
Written by Albion   
  November 2010
As the rampant spread of a bacterial infection is a direct result of an undressed wound, a simile would be the effect of social upheaval within the EU’s federated states sphere of influence caused by the huge movement of people from the very poor EU countries to richer countries this is further exacerbated by the interference in the internal affairs of European sovereign states by the United Nations.
The long term evil aspirations of the European Union of Socialist States and Regions (EUSSR) and the United Nations born of the League of Nations, are identical, in that it has less to do with democracy, human rights, close economic co-operation and financial ties but more to do with the eventual creation of a one Europe. The EU by default because of open European borders funnel the poor of Europe into the richer EU satellites countries and the UN funnel all the third world flotsam into the first world.

Their Marxist theory is that nation states create national tensions, destroy Nationalism and the wars that have plagued Europe for centuries will cease, that is the reason that any political party that is opposed to the wanton destruction of nation states will be confronted head on by the leaders of the Socialist States Presidium situated in Brussels, The Hague, Geneva and Amsterdam, the gloves are off and true democracy ceases to exist. It is in its full momentum, nothing will be allowed to stop it now, and it’s been too long in the planning.The Marxist game plan for Europe is that Nationalism will never again be allowed to flourish.
I have lifted a few passages from the CIB booklet. The CIB (Campaign for an Independent Britain) is a non political pressure group and calls for open democratic debate on Great Britain’s future within Europe and for a referendum as is our lawful right when there are changes to our constitution.
The seriousness of the situation is not so much the changes to our constitution that have taken place but rather the replacement of our constitution by the EU constitution or Lisbon Treaty as it is more commonly known, without a democratic referendum by the people. I want to show the skulduggery that has taken place to achieve this situation in this country and in Europe.
The CIB might appear to take a one issue stance but they must realise, without falling into the political trap of siding with anything that remotely smacks of Nationalism, that with self government all issues detrimental to this counties future will not be decided by 27 mostly poor countries in Europe.
With self government we call the tune, we decide who enters this country and who we can deport, and the CIB have no need to touch on rampant immigration that is slowly destroying the social cohesiveness in this country as once we have self government that enormous problem will self-heal once we remove ourselves from this dictatorship. The comments that follow have been mouthed by Marxist EU leaders in the past; they show the Marxist/Socialist true aims concerning the reformation of Europe by stealth that have been taking place since the war.
I particularly like this one mouthed by a Ruiz Jarabo Colomer, Advocate of the EU Court of Justice (who you might ask?) giving his opinion on the 19th October 2000.
“Criticism of the EU is akin to blasphemy and can be restricted without affecting freedom of speech”
Note he was not talking about religious blasphemy referring to the non-belief in God or Allah but the blasphemy of criticising the EU.
Marxism is to atheism as Nationalism is to loyalty to ones country. Marxists do not recognise any religions or religious beliefs, so blasphemy to a Marxist does not relate to any deity. If religion and Marxism are to be spoken in one breath it is the destruction of nation states that is the Holy Grail of Marxism. You may remember Salmon Rushdie was accused of blasphemy for the true criticism of Islam, not of Allah.
Read this gem by Peter Thornycroft later chancellor of the exchequer of the CONservative party:
“No government dependent on a democratic vote could possibly agree in advance to the sacrifice that any adequate plan must evolve. The British people must be led slowly and unconsciously into the abandonment of their traditional economic defences
This is just one British political leader giving judgment on the UK’s future.
This revelation came as a surprise from Dr Richard Aldridge BBC radio 4 Feb 2000 ‘Document.; a letter to the times,

"I was absolutely astonished to discover that the library of Georgetown University, Washington had the entire archive of a CIA front organization which documents from start to finish funnelling millions of dollars into Europe and Britain… The whole accounting structure of the European Movement was designed to hide the fact that CIA money was coming in’
I will finish with this admission of a subterfuge in an article in La Stampa in Feb 2000 in an interview with Barbara Speninelli headed,
Amato said "Europe does not need a Sovereign’ however daring a political project might be it must be hidden, camouflaged. One must act ‘as if’ in Europe, ‘as if’ nations wanted a very few things in order to obtain a great deal. ‘As if’ nations were to remain sovereign in order to convince them to surrender their sovereignty. The Commission in Brussels, for example must act ‘as if’ it were a technical organ in order to operate like a government, that sovereignty lost on a national level does not pass to any new individual. It is entrusted to a faceless entity….eventually the EU. The EU is the vanguard of this changing world …The new entity is faceless and those in command can neither be identified nor elected. All we need are a few corrections here and there along with a great deal of cunning”
This is the nation wrecking treachery that the British national Party and Nationalists throughout Europe must face.