State Betrayal of Young White Girls in Blackpool,

Following his earlier article on the betrayal of young white girls in Blackpool, Mister Fox continues to focus on the threat posed by Muslim paedophiles. 

There is a yawning gap between the elites and the people; between what the elites say is happening and the truth, the reality. They will do anything in their power, no matter how dishonest and deceitful to hide or distort the truth.  A recent video of an EDL supporter being mocked by opponents through youtube is a example of how functionaries of the elites try to discredit those who see what is really going on and want to rescue young White girls from widespread organised rapes.  The victim had had a few bevvies and did not express himself clearly.  The truth is that large numbers of our women are being abused, lured into prostitution, gang-raped and worse by outsiders, Our elites know it is happening but try to cover it up or ridicule those few honourable people who try to stop it, such as the unfortunate victim of Youtube  sting.
He was objecting to something deeply evil which is being covered up by the police and obfuscated by elites.  He did not pronounce the “p” very clearly in rape so  it sounds like ray. The autotune changed his words to “They’ve got Muslamic ray guns” when what he meant was “ They’ve got Muslamic rape gangs”.  He was there to defend our young girls – an honourable and  noble cause.
His mockers are trying to keep it covered up.  They are the real haters, imaging how much one must hate a people to cover up the rape of its women
He said Iraqi law but obviously meant sharia law.  The original interview was with Iranian broadcaster Press TV which is an Iranian state broadcaster funded by government and acting against us within our own country.  The voice over mocked the EDL.  (1)
You only need to look at their present and previous presenters, Trotskyists, corrupt British politicians and fanatical Jew haters. They once tried to interview Green Arrow and other patriots to stitch them up. Andrew Gilligan, media elite, of the Evening Standard who made his name by exposing the WMDs and the “sexed up” document was involved.
Several Establishment functionaries like comedian Russell Howard have also bullied this lad obediently mocking what the elites don’t like.  He would not dare mock what elites promote like, he would not mock Islam, or his career would be terminated as was that of massively popular Benny Hill.
Benny’s ITV series was cancelled by cultural elite Michael Grade because it wasn’t “politically correct.” Twenty years later  Royal Mail rejected a stamp in his honour to commemorate the 50th anniversary of ITV.
The interview was a clear case of media misrepresentation. In the original Press TV interview, when the lad says “rape gangs” the rape part is distorted but he immediately follows up with the sentence that 15 year old girls are being raped.   What he says in his inebriated fashion is correct, Islam is spreading throughout Europe, they do want sharia law and very young white infidel girls are being raped all around us some as young as 11 and we do want to keep Britain British.  He is a British hero! (1)
The most serious social problems problems we are facing have been imported into our country by our political masters. For years, they have covered up crime against us while they themselves live in safe and exclusive areas.  Meanwhile they have introduced Race laws which they have fostered upon us, enabling “aliens” to prosecute Whites who remonstrate with them, for racism.  The elites have systematically set up about oppressing and persecuting White British people till they need real courage and will to throw off their shackles and protect children from what is going on
Totalitarian edicts are imposed upon us by the likes of Judge Macpherson with his Stalinist anti-police report and Sir David Calvert-Smith, who in 2005, led an inquiry for the Commission of Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales  deal with “racism”. Calvert-Smith did not investigate whether the police were racist or not:  “racism is a given”, the deeply prejudiced man zealot insisted.  Such men turned the police into an anti-White force biased in favour of ethnics.   Those who defended the young girls from rape are  the ones who are prosecuted.  The rapists know it, and it t gives them confidence to do whatever they want.  In a natural society where immigrants were not given favourable treatment over natives by the legal system they would not dare do what they do.(2)
The anti-White racism in the police was introduced by Judge Macpherson, Sir David Calvert-Smith and fast-tracked, careerist chief police officers.
By exposing what is happening as I reported in my last article, the  Times must have re-found their old zeal to crusade for social justice. That is what they once did so well, in 1855 W.T.Stead broke a major story when he exposed the trade in child prostitution. As now the government knew of the problem but turned a blind eye, then to protect the trade’s upper class clientèle  now to stop a civil war.  Stead’s article: “The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon” opened respectable society’s eyes to London vice — dirty brothels, women procuring children, drugs, and padded rooms, where upper-class rakes could enjoy “the exclusive luxury of revelling in the cries of an immature child.”
But after 60 years of  ‘anti-racist’ propaganda and brainwashing is anyone listening?  From the time they were schoolchildren our people have been taught to think brown people are wonderful and to trust them.  They are educated by the state so young White girls think its racist to shun the advances of older Muslims. But it’s their assailants who are racist; it is they who see white girls as slags and “easy meat” who because they are not Muslim but from a rival community can be used for sex and prostitution, even as young as 11, while the predators protect their own children.
People are told we, Nationalists, make lies up because of our “hate” and racism: They lump us all together, Traditional Conservatives, EDL and BNP under the same labels. However, its the other way round and finally evidence is now coming to light which vindicates us.
However, a few years ago we were mocked for saying what what has now been revealed:
On 21st December 2005 the UAF alleged “… false BNP claims of so called racist targeting by members of the Muslim population of young white girls for sex and prostitution in Yorkshire, West Yorkshire police have said that after thorough investigation they have found “no evidence of systematic abuse of young women.”
“In Bradford the BNP have sought to wage a racist and anti-muslim campaign – particularly with the suggestion that there was a large-scale phenomenon of exclusively Asian men grooming white school girls for sex.” they went on to claim  “The reality is, however, that the so-called phenomenon is a myth.” they most likely knew that statement was a lie when they made it, but what is the well-being, or indeed the lives of a few white girls, when the future of the multiracial dream is at stake
Furthermore, West Yorkshire police claimed they “do not accept that there is a major problem of this nature in this county and have not seen any evidence to sway” them from this view. The behaviour of Yorkshire police should be investigated because in 2003 they claimed to be looking into grooming of young girls. (3)
The TUC and Searchlight published a guide to fighting “racism”: stating “The impression that the far right make up lie after lie is an important task. We want to be in the position that voters simply don’t trust anything the far right say.”
So whilst those who should have been protecting society were engaged in discrediting the BNP, the crimes against the white community continued:
Apart from grooming children, there are many of rapes of older women.  We even  have sex traffickers.  Their poor young victims are conned into thinking they are going to find a better life, instead they are sold into slavery, exploited and abused, just like our girls, the difference is, no-one cares about our girls, the government hasn’t put together a huge operation to stop the offences taking place in our own country as they don’t want to start a race war.
Some newspaper reports about delaying the famous Channel Four Edge of the City documentary:
The Mail 28 May 2004 reported:

“Channel Four has announced today it is not going to show a British National Party (BNP) European election broadcast amid fears it would stir up racial hatred.

The five-minute television broadcast features the mother of a teenage girl who claimed her daughter was drugged and gang-raped by Asian men in Keighley, West Yorkshire.
It was based on claims made by a Channel 4 documentary that Asian men in Bradford are grooming and targeting white girls as young as 11 for sex and drug abuse.
This programme was also pulled after West Yorkshire Police said it would risk inciting community disorder in the area.  A Five spokesman said today: “Having viewed the European Parliamentary Election Broadcast submitted by the BNP, Five has taken the decision not to transmit it as we feel it is likely to stir up racial hatred, as prohibited by the existing Programme Code.” (3)
On 9 August 2004, The Guardian’s Anthea Milnes interviewed programme maker Anna Hall who was  “was devastated when her Channel 4 film, which investigated allegations that young white girls in Bradford were being groomed for sex, was used as right wing propaganda.”
Propaganda … “and the chief constable of West Yorkshire warned that its screening could provoke community disorder in the run-up to the local and European elections.”
The controversy centred on the film’s claims that men – most of them British Asians – in Bradford and neighbouring Keighley were grooming under-age white schoolgirls for sex.
The explosive grooming story nearly didn’t make the short list. Hall had already filmed several other stories through the children’s department which she was unable to screen for legal reasons. “We weren’t looking for this issue,” she says. “It just kept surfacing. Social workers said, ‘You can’t do that story because it’s too difficult.’ What did they mean by ‘too difficult’? Too racially sensitive?
The social workers she spoke to were appalled and frustrated, but also frightened of becoming targets of violence if they spoke out publicly, as were the mothers she spoke to.
What emerges from these women’s accounts, and from the testimony of two girls, one of them currently being groomed, is disturbing. Men from Bradford’s Asian community, they claim, are targeting girls from 11 or 12 years up, taking them out in their cars, and giving them alcohol and gifts. The girls are flattered into believing that the men love them. Subsequently, they might be given heroin and crack cocaine and date-rape drugs, raped vaginally and anally, and in some cases, abducted and gang-raped… Many of the girls either do not think they are being abused, or have been so heavily drugged that they cannot recall clearly what has happened, or are intimidated by what will happen to them and their families if they do speak out.
Groups such as Unite Against Fascism, the 1990 Trust, and the National Assembly Against Racism began to flood Channel 4 with requests to delay transmission. The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire, Colin Cramphorn, joined the call, and Channel 4 complied. Both the police and Channel 4 stressed that the issue was the timing, so close to local and European elections. The mainstream press were quick to respond, accusing Channel 4 variously of naive scheduling, of handing a political coup to the BNP, of being politically motivated in withdrawing the film, of cravenness, and of self-censorship.”
The police blurred the truth since 2004 by claiming the grooming was being done by both whites and Asians in the area, whereas in fact the overwhelming majority involved were Asian. They tried to prevent civil war breaking out but all they have done is inflame the Whites they tried to deceive.
In 2007 The Times reported:

“It was a very uncomfortable scenario, not least because many of these crimes had an identifiable racial element: the gangs were Asian and the girls were white. The authorities, in the shape of politicians and the police, seemed reluctant to acknowledge this aspect of the crimes; it has been left to the mothers of the victims to speak out.
I was told by one police officer that he did not ‘want to start a race riot’ by arresting Pakistani men for sexual offences,” Maureen said. During the six months that Jo was in the clutches of these men, they raped, beat and abused her to the point where, says her mother, she did not even know who she was any more. Eventually, after she was attacked by Hussain and Naveed with an iron bar, Jo somehow found the courage to report them to police, and they were arrested. The case took 16 months to come to court. In the meantime, other pimps, undeterred by the impending trial, continued to go about their business.”

The police have a duty of care to the public so what tough measures did they take? Lancashire police sent letters to 70 men who were believed to be spending an unusual amount of time with young girls. The letters warned the men that the girls are underage as if they didn’t know! The men are required to sign the letter, confirming they have received and read it.” 

In 2009 Three men were been jailed for a total of 18 years for the “calculating and evil” sexual abuse of a young teenage girl.  A court heard they saw the 14-year-old, who was running wild, as easy prey and plied her with drugs, alcohol and cigarettes. Mohammed Zackriya, 21, of Springfield Road, Keighley, was jailed for eight years for oral rape and five offences of sexual activity with a child.

Zackryia’s barrister, Nikki Peers, said the girl was sexually experienced from an early age as if it were a justification for his behaviour.

Judge Benson lifted an order prohibiting the media from reporting how the jury were quizzed briefly over any connections they may have with the far-right British National Party before the trial started.  A concern had been expressed that BNP leader Nick Griffin’s explosive claims several years ago that gangs of Asian men were grooming white girls for sex might influence their judgement.” (4) When the police are not intimidated or stopped from above they can protect young girls as the Telford police did. “Eight men from the Pakistani community in Telford, Shropshire appeared in court on Friday charged with a wide range of serious sexual offences, including trafficking girls within the UK for sexual exploitation. It is the first time anyone has appeared in court in Britain charged under Article 58 of the 2003 Sexual Offences Act, which outlaws trafficking within the UK..
.
The campaign  My Dangerous Loverboy commenced last April, following the arrest of five of the Telford men, that the charges brought against them represented “a really significant breakthrough” in the recognition of internal trafficking as a real issue in Britain today.
 

“The girls are disoriented, cut off from family and friends and systematically raped by large groups of men,” Virginia Heath wrote on the campaign group’s website. “They often wake up with no idea of where they are in the UK, let alone how to escape this nightmare world.“

The men in court yesterday deny more than 50 charges against them. According to the Shropshire Star, the alleged offences took place between 2007 and 2009.

The “internal trafficking” charges relate to the alleged transport of girls to a variety of locations – including a college, a fish and chip shop and a churchyard – where men paid to have sex with them. Police claim the girls were not always paid cash in exchange for sex, but instead were given food, alcohol and mobile-phone credit.” (3)

If White men try to protect our women they are warned off by the police, and branded racist by the local papers. Unless men, women and children protest in groups to confront the Muslims and the police they will get no justice – the law is against them.  What the mother said at the end is a verdict on Judge Macpherson and David Calvert-Smith: “The police kept quiet in order not to feed a growing racism, or out of fear of being labelled racists themselves” at 2:05
Alison Shaw exposed the attitude of young Pakistanis to young White women in Britain. (5)
The threat is apparent now because the truth is starting to come out and people are realising how dire the situation is. Foreign Criminal gangs have a walk-over in Britain with only a small percentage brought to ‘justice’, housed in prisons at our expense, before being unleashed to start again. These infiltrators are working  in care homes, at airports (despite repeatedly threatening us with terrorism), they are doctors, teachers, taxi drivers (pushing their White competitors out of business), post office workers, public transport staff, drug gangs, child abusers and muggers. As more cases involving rape-gangs with similar names or suspects of Asian appearance, people realise that there is a race war against us nurtured by the elites with one-sided oppressive race laws, education and media falsification of the truth. Hence the need to prevent the public perceiving what is happening.
As evil has crept out of the shadows into the limelight, will those it aims to destroy rise up in defiance? The audacity wakes the spirit of our ancestors which has lain dormant, but is now rousing ready to burst forth. We have it in our power, if we have it in our hearts, to defend this Land our forefathers fought for, to combat the biggest internal threat in our history.
As it stands we are demographically doomed in 50 years, unless we change things now.
We have to tell the truth. Tell the truth and shame those who don’t want to hear it; shame those who prefer the comfortable lie to the uncomfortable truth; shame those who prefer the fashionable spin to the harsh reality. (6)
I urge you to research for yourselves and when convinced join the resistance against state oppression of our anger to save our people.  We still officially have the democratic right to protest and we are responsible for protecting our communities from attack by rival communities who do not belong here.

The anti-English racism of Manchester Cathedral

The anti-English racism of Manchester Cathedral

  Martin Wingfield

 May 2011: Traditional celebrations for St George's Day took place across the North West of England on April 23rd thanks, in part, to an initiative from Nick Griffin MEP who funded the stalls set up in many towns and cities which gave out English flag cakes and key rings, along with a special St George's Day leaflet.

Nick paid for the patriotic stalls from his English Fair Fund to which he gives 10% of his MEP's salary each month. The fund was set up to support good causes and help to keep British traditions alive and British heritage maintained.
In stark contrast to Nick's effort, the clerics at Manchester Cathedral are doing their best to change the tradition of St George, using an Afro-Caribbean puppet as the English Patron Saint which to lead a 'multi-cultural carnival procession' through the city.
This led to the expected outcry from patriotic Britons who inundated the British National Party's MEP with letters and emails accusing Manchester Cathedral of anti-English and anti-White racism.
He also received a letter from a member of the Cathedral community who expressed her dismay and anger at what had taken place.
She wrote:
"I attended the services over the St George's Day and Easter weekend and have to report that there was a deliberate programme of 'doing-down' the indigenous population.
The Dean, the Very Reverend Rogers Govender, and the Canon Theologian, Canon Andrew Shanks, were instrumental in promoting this agenda.
At the Easter Service, the baptism of a mixed race child took centre stage, and there was a specially orchestrated procession around the church with the mother of the child, a Nigerian and her imposing family, leading the way while the the White father and his relatives walked two paces behind.
The Resurrection of Christ is the most important celebration in the Christian Calendar, but apparently not in Manchester where it appears that it's more important to celebrate the huge change that has taken place in the demographics of the British population by 'celebrating' the growing influence of Black people in our society.
I was prepared to give the Cathedral Clergy the benefit of the doubt, but not anymore. The Dean, who is an ethnic Indian from South Africa, is pursuing his own divisive agenda. He is blatantly anti-British and anti-White.
Andrew Shanks is also promoting anti-White colour prejudice and Religious Pluralism. In the past I have protected him from criticism, but not anymore. He must now face the wrath of the public for his actions.
Please help make your constituents aware of this campaign to undermine our British identity and traditional Christian values."
Nick urges his constituents to write to the Cathedral and voice their concerns about the RedCrosse - A 'Celebration' of St George, and the 'blessing' in the Cathedral of the Afro-Caribbean effigy of St George.
Manchester Cathedral, Victoria Street, Manchester M3 1SX.
Tel: 0161 833 2220
www.manchestercathedral.org.

The Realistic Nationalist Economics Versus Capitalism And Socialism

Nationalist Economics: Realism Versus Capitalism And Socialism

Written by BC1959

If a mainstream lending institution had agreed to loan £100,000 to a farmer to purchase machinery, seed, or livestock, the result under Nationalism would be an immediate benefit to both the farmer, and his or her customers. This would be specific for the local community, and cut out unnecessary long distance transportation of produce. Under Capitalism, the farmer may be lucky to break even, and struggle to offer local customers any of his produce, mainly because Capitalism in its raw, internationalist state, would make it almost impossible for the farmer NOT to sell bulk, or wholesale, to a major supermarket. Under Socialism, the farmer would have no choice but to take the loan, and probably not buy seed, machinery or livestock, but feed previous loans required simply to survive, as Socialism is the most costly of all alien ideologies. His abilities would be hindered due to the interest rates that always go hand in hand with Socialist regimes... remember the 70's? Some might say we are actually in a Socialist/Marxist regime anyway. If the same loan was agreed under Nationalism, let's say for a young couple hoping to gain access to the property ladder, the young couple would be able to stay local, and not face an unwanted move. Also, such loans would not mean a couple need to rent property in a downwardly mobile area, far away from family and localised work. Under both Capitalism and Socialism, they are thrown to the dogs of internationalist opportunism. Both Capitalism and Socialism, have always ended up getting people into serious trouble in home buying or renting. With the leftists, they regard a world population as rightfully and equally able to expand family ties where ever, and when ever they want to, shrinking the opportunities for home grown youngsters and others, and thus competing for home, career, and resources, any such couple would find no solace or stability. Under a Capitalist ''liberal free market economy'' structure, they may well initially be alright, but if the market takes a ''high'' turn, then costs are always unimaginably out of reach, and loans to gain access to the (as now) high cost of down payments for example, prove that even this option is unsustainable, and destroys local economies and communities. So, we are left with Nationalism. (1) A British National Party government, would halt elitist second and third home ownership, and promote ''local homes for local people''. (2) A Nationalist government would also employ a policy of ''local economy over global economy,'' therefore taking the risk out of the equation of staying local. Economic policy under Nationalism, would also require the re introduction of guilds and apprenticeships, and rebuild independent and self-contained industries. (3) Imports would be curtailed, and self-employment would be promoted, aiding the SME sector (Small to Medium Business) who, in turn would gain from local knowledge and ''preferred supplier'' organised labour and its relative skills base. Anyone reading this, must also take into account of China. A recent report has given one particular reason for China's take-over from America as an industrial superpower, through its use of strict import duties and producing products that others and their own markets either want, or need. Indeed, through import tariffs, China ensured its growth was not impaired by our own standards. It did what we once did, and accepted certain businesses, but not mass product importation. Britain was once, and could be again, a force to be reckoned with, but it can never happen without the right mentality. And that mentality would probably mean, the world hidden powers operating very damaging sanctions and trade restrictions. We must remember that possibility if we are to take our nation and its institutions back from the brink of permanent compound debt. Simplicity is always the best policy. Nationhood is hated by the world leaders. Internationalist policies are forging ahead, so we must realise that it is RIGHT NOW that we need the skills, trade, and communications between our own, not when it is too late. Income on an individual basis could be sustained through cutting out altogether, the bureaucratic and troublesome ''contract of employment'' option. Everyone except those in the forces, and the emergency services, would be reclassified as ''Self-Employed.'' Thus, no benefits would be abused, and no foreigners would want to come here, because it would not benefit them to do so. Other options would be linked to how long a person's family has been here. Secondly, only fellow Europeans would be given opportunities to fill any reasonable skills shortages, and firstly, these would be relatives who may want to return to their home country or country of ancestral heritage. A system of ''engineering what we need first'' is another option. Sales, therefore taxes, would reflect each other. If exports or new ideas are impressively sustainable, then a Nationalist government would ensure a home grown workforce, and local would regions benefit. This would increase pride in achievements, and taxes would be lowered to accompany the ''new economic'' era. There is no need for high taxes, if a nation consists only of its mainly indigenous, hard working folk. Taxes are currently high, as is borrowing through sheer ''socio-political engineering''. We do not need, nor want, high costing labour or workers, who need housing, benefits, and other national resources that could be used by our own. We would then have the ability to pay debts off, then ''write down'' costs to suit. A 16 year old, working for a period of three years as an apprentice or Guild aided funding, for a new engineering company for example, is far less costlier than a 16 year old, who came here for no other reason but to be used as a shoe-in for other family members later. National debt would also be a thing of the past, even with the threat of ''international sanctions'' railed against us just like Austria a few years ago, we could, and should, operate a system whereby the banks would be nationalised. This would then give us the opportunity to produce our own money, and offer a thing I call a ''life of the loan interest'' contract. The interest would be about 5% on borrowings, both commercial and personal, over the whole loan's lifetime. A business, individual, or couple, requesting a loan for whatever reason, would then enjoy a providential and mutually beneficial lump sum, and not fall into serious debt. Let's use that £100,000 as an example. Ten years at 5%, would only require a total payback of £105,000. The banks, not being driven by greed or even profits, would of course be able to pay its staff, and any costs, based upon a non-bureaucratic, simplified system. The debtor would also enjoy freedom unknown up to this point in time. This not only improves economic independence, but ensures local communities stay sustainable and together. Our banking system would NEVER play the stock markets, or invest peoples money anywhere. A separate ''inventions bank'' would be set up, providing funds based upon a 1% charge from ''bank charges'', and this would be added to by patriotic businesses, wealthy ones with the interests of the nation at heart, whereby they themselves would invest in entrepreneurs and inventions, thus side stepping future problems, such as the ones we face now. We have our hands tied behind our backs, and global investors dictate policy based upon their greedy requirement for cheaper labour, products, and ever increasing inroads into our nation's green belt and industrial power base. People would be offered bonds, and would then play a role in ensuring the new, state owned Nationalist banks are people led, not profits led. Work, and home life are linked, so any surplus produce, manufactured items, and finance, would immediately be streamed into the local economy. Over and above that, we could provide other nations with both surplus, and knowledge of how to become independent themselves. As Nationalists, we need not be selfish, and all nations would be once again enthralled by British ideas, manufactured products, and a sound, political, cultural, and socio-economic ideology. To make all this work, even after hateful sanctions and threats, we would need to rid ourselves of the sham democracy we now endure. A series of 'referendums'' would overhaul the current system. Thus, not only would our economic policy be one that is based upon need, not greed, but the actual wishes of the masses, would ensure we all got as near as is possible, to getting what we want from our then government. Community gardens could replace the now, and often abused system of allotments. These gardens would give unskilled families an opportunity to sell their organic, or at least fresh, ''home grown'' surplus to locals. No tax would be taken, and traditional green grocers and other small professional traders, would mutually and beneficially benefit from a source close to them. Food imports would also be heavily curtailed, and seasonal fresh produce would replace the ridiculous system now in place, whereby food is taken around the world, some it from here, and imported right back into it's country of origin in some cases. Although this is meant to simply be a snapshot, already we see a picture that takes into account the evils of globalist opportunism, and outright hatred through sanctions. Whilst at the same time, there is light at the end of the tunnel. Closely knit communities, mutual co-operation, and bringing back a sense of belonging, will ultimately give the next generation the inheritance we had stolen from us. Money should stay local, and incomes should be taxed only in proportion to what is necessary regarding local services. Without mass immigration, and without bureaucratic top down institutions and government, we can ease the lives of millions of our people. Economics and global finance has made everyone and all regions on earth unstable. Pressure brings with it health risks, health risks bring economic pressure in the form of national debt and increase costs in health care. Without all of this, a nation like Britain could within a few short years, be completely free of the shackles of debt, serious crime, and foreign wars to bleed us dry. Nationalist economics is free from red tape, and will bring in money through a renewed sense of ''Made In Britain'', which not that long ago, brought wealth and jobs to all areas. Fishing will be protected, and once again, this industry will be protected EU law, and foreign trawlers. Obviously, Britain under the British National Party, would not endure the federal union now imposed upon us, and we would immediately withdraw from the EU. All produce caught here, will be used here firstly, then surplus fish stocks will be sold to others. Income from exports will be added to the ''Inventions Bank'', and will swell the jobs market via foreign nations once again, actually wanting British goods as they once did. There is nothing complex about economics, nor any other policy, it has been made purposely complex, because hard to understand issues and laws, lead to high taxes, fines, and a system whereby only the rich and foreign benefit. A single source of outgoings, and income is all that is required, and nothing more complex than looking after our own first is necessary. Simple, but look at the difference. Nationalist economics means wealth for the nation, and health to mind and body, all else is a smokescreen.

Revaluating the Voting Franchise

Revaluating the Franchise

By The Horwich Nationalist 

What with all the drivel spouted over the referendum on the question of the AV voting system between the traitorous Marxist elites of Britain, and whether it should have been a fully proportional system or not.

Perhaps the real question should be not the voting system but the franchise itself?

What! Eh! I hear you say, and why are their no pictures to explain what you mean from the Labour voters trying to understand this!

Well I will try, for me the system of just allowing any adult to vote in the so called democratic system is to me just a recipe for the disaster we now see inflicted upon our once great nation.

For in a universal franchise the envious mob can be more easily exploited by those who seek only power to suit their own perverse and selfish ways, by appealing to the baser politics of envy that they knew would appeal to the flawed Human character, as seen in the rise of the Socialist Labour Party in the early 20^th century after the universal franchise came into being.

As it allowed those either unwilling in many ways to educate or better themselves to vote and have a say in the National interests, an interest that they had no real understanding of or interest in only the interest of self and personal  gratification. This in it’s self allowed those intent on destroying this nation both financially and culturally to appeal and manipulate the new universal franchisees. Into allowing the gradual erosion of influence and power in the political sphere of those persons whose cultural and economic interests were dependant welfare of the nation and who's power was broken through through the burden of taxation by the myth that is was for wealth distribution? I could site many other reasons of why the universal franchise will and can never work.

But I would rather suggest an alternative to it. And that would be that the case for a single vote per head of a contributing household to the national welfare.

For example only one vote would be allowed the nominated head of the household

1, it can be either male or female in the case of single parents, (so we can get the feminists accusations out of the way.)

2, which has at least one British born Citizen Adult in 12 months tax contributing full time work or on a practical valid educationional course, or is retired with at least 5 years British tax contributions or are registered disabled.

3 had been a tax non British born contributing Citizen for at least unbroken 10 years. (Gets the anti immigrant claims out of the way.)

With this system those who had a vested interest in the welfare of the Nation and their own circumstances together would only be allowed to vote. It also would make families more politically aware by making them consider whom they voted for and what the vote cast on behalf of them all in the household would really mean, in effect the electorate would become more responsible for their own actions in considering why and whom they elect,!

Stop looting the Third World of its skilled People

Stop looting the Third World of its skilled workers

This was Andrew’s sole contribution today, but it was his fifth of the week. He spoke to a hearing in his Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee (LIBE) on the subject of Legal Migration: Seasonal Workers and Intra-Corporate Transfers
He said:
“To allow immigration – even to encourage it – is seen as a liberal policy, a kind policy, an altruistic policy even a generous policy. It presupposes that there is an autonomous desire among the world’s peoples to transport themselves from familiar people and places to the unfamiliar.
The desire to move is often a function – a consequence – of: war; economic disruption; – both possibly caused by the West – and  exaggerated expectations of wealth fostered by the entertainment industry.
The motivation of those who encourage immigration are far from altruistic and far from generous. They want ‘flexibility’ of employment, which means the right to ditch workers when unwanted.  Seasonal workers fit the bill; seasonal workers are disposable workers.
Seasonal workers and intra-corporate workers are types of migrants that reveal the motivation of employers and the politicians who dance to their tune.  Both categories of workers are seen, not as human beings with autonomous desires and choices but as factors of production that can be bought and sold and moved around at whim. Indeed they are slaves without the fixed costs.
The conditions of work for seasonal workers are often below minimum acceptable standards. Rosarno was a particularly bad example but I suspect it was not unique. The other piece of information we brought back from Rosarno was that there were unemployed local workers, on scemes, who were being paid less than the minimum wage. If there is a need for seasonal workers, that work should be given to the local unemployed, who would work on proper contracts of employment on or above the minimum wage.
I know that Intra-Corporate workers are often contrasted with the less skilled seasonal workers but they too are bought and sold and moved at the whim of their employers. They are simply more expensive factors of production.
The developed world defends its recruitment of skilled third country – often Third World – workers because it needs their skills. I have news for the developed world: so do their own countries and they have paid for their education and training!
We are not content to rob the Third World of its health service employees. Their sick can be left to suffer and die. We are also looting their employees with valuable business skills that provide the only hope for their countries to develop economically.
The Third World is part of this world and is not a well of resources to be exploited by Big Business.

Islam Has Expired writes Amil Imani

Islam Has Expired

Islam Has Expired

Islam has expired, according to Muhammad himself, writes Amil Imani.
“How long your faith shall endure?” Muhammad was asked.
“En salahat ummati fa laha yom. Va en fasadat fa laha nesfe yom. Val yomo ende rabbeka alfe sanaton men ma taedoon” – if my Ummeh becomes righteous, it shall last one day; if corrupted, it shall last half a day. “And a day of your lord is equivalent of a thousand years of your accounting,” he replied.
This account is as recorded by a contemporary chronicler of Muhammad. So, even if his Ummeh had lived up to his standards of righteousness, one thousand years have come and gone. Yet, a greatly fractured system of belief called Islam is still around as judged by over a billion who call themselves Muslims.
Muhammad’s allusion to “righteousness” and “corruption” deserves a close look. All things on earth are subject to a limited life span, be they bacteria, trees, mountains, humans or ideas – including religions. Renewal seems to be a core principle of the planet earth and its inhabitants. And in order for renewal to take place, the old by necessity, must give way.
The moment a new entity is formed, an array of forces work to end it. Death, in effect, is pre-birth. Without death, everything freezes in place. Death often provides the raw material for the new birth. The death and decay of a tree, for instance, supplies the needed nutrients for the seed to grow: the Newtonian physics’ obsolescence provided the foundation for Einstein’s relativity theory.
Death and renewal are also fundamental to religion. It is for this reason that many religions promised renewal in the person of another savior or the return of the same person. The Jews, for instance, expect the Messiah; the Christians long for the second coming; and some Muslims pray for the appearance of the Mahdi, while other Muslims supplicate God for “Rejateh Hossain,” – the return of Hossain.
What Expires Religions?
The death of a biological entity is caused by trauma, viruses or bacteria. Viruses and bacteria are major killers of humans and present great challenges to medicine. They can be deadly and have the uncanny ability to mutate. Yet, they are there for their mission of ending life.
Poorly understood and little appreciated are psychosocial viruses – PSVs. As is the case with their biological kin, psychosocial viruses also work to corrupt any idea, mental functions or belief and help supplant them with new ones. Various forms of mental disorders are the result of interaction between the PSVs and the person’s pre-disposition for the condition. Not all mutations caused by PSVs are pathological. Many serve to advance the human enterprise. Without the contributions of the beneficial PSVs humanity would still be stunted in its development at the level of day one.
In the case of Islam, a special group of PSVs set out to work the minute Muhammad launched his faith, and mutation rapidly followed. First, there was the Islam of Mecca or the Islam of Meekness. For thirteen years, Muhammad’s teachings, as recorded in the early Suras of the Quran, were about many good things. Very few people became attracted to what he preached. In fact, the people scorned the man, harassed him and eventually made him flee his hometown of Mecca for Medina. Then a major mutation took place: the Islam of Medina or the Islam of Tyranny arrived on the scene. The Quran Suras of Medina are replete with exhortations of intolerance, exclusivity, and sanctioning of violence against non-Muslims. This mutation deeply appealed to the temperament of the Arab savages and they flocked to Muhammad’s faith.
The PSV of the time of Muhammad continued to mutate as it reached other peoples and other lands. Each peoples’ own ideas and beliefs – their cognitive immune system – responded differently to the invader. Some completely resisted the assault and defeated it. Others were overwhelmed and forced into submission. Yet some of the vanquished, over time, managed to repel the invader while others incorporated it to various extents into their own system of belief. In due course, the mutation among the vanquished people has become so divergent that some of the variants can hardly be recognized as the progeny of the original.
Islam of today is composed of a dozen major sects and hundreds of sub-sects and schools. Just two examples should demonstrate the fact that Muhammad’s Islam has expired and decomposed.
One branch of Sunni Islam, the Wahhabi for instance, has interbred with the Pashtune culture of Afghanistan and Pakistan and the result has been the Taliban version of Islam: a most reactionary, repressive and savage “religion.”
On the Shiite side, for example, there is a sect of the Ghulat Alavi that holds only to one of the five pillars of Islam: the Shehadah, an Islamic credo that says, “I testify that there is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.” This sect does not subscribe to the remaining four pillars of praying five times a day, fasting one month a year, pilgrimaging Mecca at least once in a lifetime, and paying the religious tax of zakat. The Alavi women are allowed participation in all religious events and are not required to don the hijab – a stark contrast to the Taliban who deny even rudimentary education to women and forbid them from leaving home without the accompaniment of a male relative.
The Ghulat Alavis deify the Imam Ali and the other Imams. They particularly revere the Imam Ali and worship him as a co-rank of God. They profess, “Ali khoda neest, valee as khoda joda neest” – Ali is not God, but he is not apart from God. This very same sect places Imam Ali above the Prophet Muhammad.
In conclusion, Muhammad’s dating of his faith notwithstanding, the facts conclusively show that Islam has expired. Over time, its component parts have undergone drastic mutations to the extent that the only thing that all Muslims have in common is the name of Islam and the Quran.
–§–
Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen, a pro-democracy activist, novelist, essayist and literary translator who writes and speaks out for the struggling people of his native land

Daily Telegraph, An attempt to smear by association

Mr & Mrs Andrew Brons MEP

An attempt to smear by association

April 2011:
Earlier this week, Andrew Brons wrote the following letter to the editor of the Daily Telegraph. As of this morning, the letter still hadn’t been published.
Andrew wrote:
“The use of the word extremist in two quite different contexts, by no less a figure than your deputy political editor, deserves comment, if nothing else.
“In an article on the AV campaign (25th April) reference was made to, “extremist parties, such as the BNP”. It would be curmudgeonly to point out that extremist is a noun and that it is the job of adjectives (extreme in this case) to describe the following noun, so I shall not do so. In this context the word extremist is used to mean, disapproved of greatly by the Political Class and its journals but without any suggestion that the party named is involved in violence, other than as a victim of it. It therefore tells us everything about the writer and nothing about the person or party described.
In an article on London, as a hub of Al Qaeda (26th April), the word extremist is used to denote those who plot acts of terrorism against civilians and attacks on British servicemen in Afghanistan.
The use of the same word to describe two quite different phenomena is, at best, a sign of slovenly thinking and, at worst, an attempt to engage in smear by association.
Yours faithfully
Andrew Brons”

Royal Mail Democratic Fraud or Organized Political Maffia?

Royal Mail Fraud or Organized Political Maffia?

 by Carlos Cortiglia. http://www.londonpatriot.org/

Once again, Royal Mail – that has become a Royal Disaster in the hands of the Trade Unions – is failing to comply with its democratic obligations of delivering party political leaflets. I think Trade Unions in this country have no reason to complain. The Trade Unions have led us into the mess we are in by putting Marxist ideology before country.
In 1997,  the Trade Unions, that have been the bankers of the Labour Party, saw their opportunity when they backed Tony Blair because they believed that Tony Blair would be their servant. New Labour used them to fill up its own coffers by transferring money that was supposed to be used to develop the Trade Union Movement.
The money was made to appear as state funding for education when in fact most of the money was redirected to the coffers of New Labour as ‘Trade Union Contributions’. This fraudulent activity that went on during thirteen years of a Labour administration continues today. Conveniently, the Labour government passed legislation to ‘control the monies donated to and spent by’ political parties in political campaigning.
Why is this happening? Because very conveniently the actions of the apparatchiks are not considered party political even when the Trade Unions, the UAF and Searchlight are obviously party political. Huge amounts of money are spent and don’t seem to be controlled by Electoral Regulations.
Funnily enough, when you look at organizations like the UAF (organized violent thugs that do the dirty work for the Labour Party) and Searchlight (an organization that should be put under close observation by the Metropolitan Police for their use of private data that surely should be regulated under the terms of the Data Protection Act) get away with murder because they are well funded and protected with taxpayers’ money.
At a time when the ruling Coalition is implementing cuts in the public sector, funding for the satellites of the Labour Party and its acolytes continues and has not been affected. Even at local authorities level, the apparatchiks salaries are paid without a working day because ‘they are Trade Union representatives’.
Never mind if the rest of the people are losing their jobs. The bosses – or shall I say the Padroni (a term used by the Maffia) – get richer and richer.
When you look at how things work, the apparatchiks are everywhere. They control the BBC, the so called National Union of Journalists, the State Administration and public services in general, including Royal Mail and even the Police Services. A telephone call is enough to send Police Officers into a frenzy harassing and arresting individuals for political ends.

A New Europe Arises from The Ashes of the EU

A New Europe Arises

Published on April , 2011   at http://freedomnewsnetwork.co.uk/

Rise of Populist Parties Pushes Europe to the Right
AFP

A True Finns’ supporter on election night. The success of the right-wing populist party has shocked many in the European Union.
The success of the True Finns in last week’s Finnish elections has shocked Brussels. They are just one of a number of right-wing populist parties currently flourishing in Europe. Their rise could threaten the euro bailout. By SPIEGEL Staff.
Timo Soini, 48, is standing in front of “Hesburger,” a fast food restaurant in the western part of Helsinki. It is shortly before 10 a.m., and he is waiting patiently for the restaurant to finally open its doors. Soini, the chairman of the right-wing populist Perussuomalaiset, or “True Finns” party, has been giving interviews for almost three hours. There are more than 250 new text messages on his mobile phone. Now he’s hungry.
It is the morning after an election that brought what the papers have called a “revolution” to Finland. Almost one in five voters voted for Soini’s party on Sunday, April 17, and now it looks like it is about to become part of the new government. A political earthquake is happening in Helsinki, one that could have reverberations throughout Europe.
Until now, the small country in the far northeastern corner of the continent was seen as a model member of the European Union. It was known for its successful export-oriented companies, liberal social policies and the best-performing school students in the Western industrialized world. It is ironic that it is here in Finland — a part of Europe that always seemed eminently European — that a movement is now coming to power that inveighs against immigrants and abortions, considers Brussels to be the “heart of darkness” and rejects all financial assistance for what it calls “wasteful countries,” like Greece, Ireland and Portugal. “We were too soft on Europe,” says Soini, adding that Finland should not be made to “pay for the mistakes of others.”
The election result from Europe’s far north has alarmed the political establishment in Brussels. If Soini’s party becomes part of the new government, there will be more at stake than Helsinki’s traditional pro-European stance. The entire program to rescue the euro could be in jeopardy, because it has to be approved unanimously by the entire European Union. That includes both the anticipated aid for Portugal, the additional billions for the euro bailout fund and the planned reform of the fund. Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt calls the Finnish election results a “reason for concern,” while Hans-Dietrich Genscher, the former head of Germany’s pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP) and former German foreign minister, warns: “The outcome of the elections is a warning sign.”
Gaining Ground Across the EU
As a wave of skepticism about Europe sweeps across the continent, the political elites in the continent’s capitals are reacting precipitously and inconsistently. To neutralize the populist movements and score political points at home, European leaders are seeking conflict with one another, arguing about such issues as accepting North African refugees or participation in the Libya mission. Markus Ferber, a member of the European Parliament for Germany’s conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), warns that solidarity among European countries is waning, a situation he calls “extremely dangerous.”
The successes of right-wing populists could indeed exacerbate the smoldering euro crisis. Tensions between the wealthy countries in the north, who are contributing most to the bailouts, and the ailing debtor nations in the periphery already threaten to destroy the monetary union. If a European version of the American Tea Party movement develops, it could very well become the kiss of death for the euro.
The risk is substantial, as euroskeptics gain ground across the EU. In Denmark, the xenophobic Danish People’s Party has supported a center-right minority government for almost 10 years. In the Netherlands, Prime Minister Mark Rutte is dependent on the goodwill of right-wing populist politician Geert Wilders, who, with his tirades against Islam and the EU, captured 15.5 percent of the vote in the country’s last parliamentary election. In Sweden, the nationalist, anti-European Sweden Democrats crossed the 4-percent threshold to gain seats in the parliament, the Riksdag, and in Italy Umberto Bossi’s xenophobic Lega Nord, or Northern League, is even part of the government. Although the party is primarily active in the north of Italy, it is the third-strongest party on the national level.
Only in the core European countries of Germany and France has opposition to the EU long been restricted to marginal groups. In both Berlin and Paris, a strong commitment to Europe has traditionally been considered part of the national interest and was something that transcended party lines.
Appeal for Ordinary People
But that too could change, especially now that the True Finns have demonstrated in Helsinki how to achieve double-digit election results with nationalistic posturing. In Germany, the euroskeptics are trying to take over the pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP), and in France the nationalist right is eyeing the country’s highest office.
Marine Le Pen, daughter of National Front founder Jean-Marie Le Pen, is in the process of putting the fear of God into the country’s traditional parties. She wants to shed the image of a racist, extreme party established by her father. As a politician, she appeals to middle-class and blue-collar workers, because she is young and wears jeans, and seems less aloof than the traditional elites that dominate politics in France.
Le Pen wants a strong social welfare state and fewer immigrants from Islamic countries, and she is adamantly against the European Union. She argues that France should withdraw from the euro and reintroduce the franc because the euro, as she says, is already on its way out. If Le Pen had her way, Europe would soon have trade barriers again and a “moderate protectionism” to secure jobs.
Her party’s showing in regional elections last March speaks for itself. The National Front achieved 15 percent in the first round of voting, even though it was not even on the ballot in the entire country. President Nicolas Sarkozy’s party, the UMP, only managed to capture two percentage points more than the National Front.
According to opinion polls, Le Pen could even beat Sarkozy in next year’s presidential election, which would result in a runoff between her and the expected Socialist candidate, Dominique Strauss-Kahn. In addition to being an embarrassment for the French political establishment, it would be a warning sign for the EU, which is becoming more and more unpopular among its citizens.
German Movement Against Euro Rescue
Enthusiasm for the EU has also declined in Germany. An anti-Brussels movement called “Liberal Awakening” has developed within the FDP, once a strong advocate of European unity. Its leader is Frank Schäffler, a boyish-looking former insurance agent who is a member of the German parliament. “We see ourselves as a grassroots movement,” he says. “We are infiltrating the FDP from below.”
There was already criticism of the euro in Germany, mainly from the political right, before the European single currency replaced the deutschmark in citizens’ pocketbooks. But Schäffler wants nothing to do with that line of argument. His criticism of the euro and the government’s crisis management stems from classic liberal convictions about the constitutional state and democracy. He wants the German parliament, the Bundestag, to be making decisions about government finances, and he cites the European treaties that forbid an EU member from taking on the debts of other countries.
But the first year of overcoming the euro crisis has produced precisely the opposite outcome, Schäffler complains. “We have pledged two-thirds of the federal government’s tax revenues to cover the national debts of other countries — without the Bundestag being required to approve the issuance of loan guarantees and without a firm basis in the European treaties.”
Schäffler was long viewed as a maverick that the party leadership could easily dismiss as a troublemaker. But now his support is growing. Traffic to his website has quadrupled recently, and gone are the days of his being marginalized in the Bundestag.
Part 2: FDP Rebels Could Cause Problems for Merkel
Like Schäffler, fellow FDP member Wolfgang Gerhardt, a former party chairman who supports a unified Europe, has also come to believe that it is “simply outrageous that the German government’s representatives in Brussels make commitments without so much as consulting the members of the German parliament.”
Schäffler plans to make his move at an upcoming FDP convention in the northern city of Rostock. He and 11 other Bundestag members have drafted a motion that contradicts government policy in almost every respect. Schäffler and his fellow combatants are demanding that banks and other private-sector lenders be involved in the euro rescue program, and that member states that do not satisfy the monetary union’s stability requirements be given the option to withdraw. Schäffler also wants the German government to pressure the European Central Bank to stop buying up the bonds of debt-stricken countries in the future.
Schäffler’s foray could create problems for Chancellor Angela Merkel. If members of her center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the CSU, join the FDP renegades, the CDU/CSU and the FDP (who together make up Merkel’s coalition government) will lack the necessary majority in the Bundestag to approve the new euro crisis fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). One CDU member of parliament, the budget policy expert Klaus-Peter Willsch, has already joined the ranks of the FDP rebels.
Schäffler already feels strong enough to demand changes from FDP leaders. “It isn’t enough just to replace the party leadership,” says Schäffler. “The FDP also has to score points in the cabinet with new appointments. If we want to implement liberal objectives in tax policy or in the euro rescue program, we have to appoint the finance minister.”
Helping to Shape Policy
Although it is not very likely that anti-euro politicians like Schäffler or Le Pen will soon be shaping government policy in their countries, they have already changed the political climate in Europe.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, for example, is reacting to his political competition on the right when he pursues certain populist policies, such as deporting Roma to Romania or having a train carrying Tunisian refugees stopped at the Italian border.
The German chancellor has also proved to be open to views critical of the euro. Partly because of resistance from the FDP, Merkel had the European bailout funds amended several times, and additional corrections are in the works. To curb discontent within the coalition partners’ respective parliamentary groups, the German government wants to demand more of a say for national parliaments at the upcoming negotiations over the ESM.
From Helsinki to Rome to The Hague, the anti-Brussels parties can make the dubious claim of already helping shape policy on the continent today. Out of fear of right-wing populists, European leaders are behaving like right-wing populists themselves — and driving Europe further and further apart as a result.
Split over Europe
This could also happen in Helsinki, where the three parties that are trying to form a government have different positions when it comes to Europe. While Euro rebel Soini wants to change the conditions of aid for Portugal and the euro rescue fund, the leader of the conservative National Coalition Party, Jyrki Katainen, supports the European agreements. “The changes cannot be very significant,” says the designated prime minister. The aid package for Portugal, says Katainen, is in Finland’s interest and is “essential” for economic stability. “The Finnish government’s position must be to solve problems and not create new ones.”
What remains unclear, however, is the extent to which Katainen can rely on the Social Democrats, which, as the second-largest party, will also be part of the new government. Former Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen, a Social Democrat, helped make Finland the model European country it is today.
His successor as party chairman, Jutta Urpilainen, has a different agenda, which could still become a serious threat to all of Europe. Urpilainen seems determined to take a leaf out of the right-wing populists’ book, especially following the recent election result.
When it comes to the conditions for the euro rescue, she says, the Social Democrats are “more closely aligned with the True Finns than with the conservatives.”
MANFRED ERTEL, PETER MÜLLER, MATHIEU VON ROHR, MICHAEL SAUGA
Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

Money for War but Not towards a Living Wage In Bolton Or Horwich

Money for War but Not towards a Living Wage

  News Team at   http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The ConDem Government has recently announced that they will be increasing the National Minimum Wage later this year. However, before anyone puts the flags out, it’s only going up by a few pence.
At the moment, the main rate for workers aged 21 and over is £5.93, the 18-20 rate is £4.92, the 16-17 rate for workers above school leaving age but under 18 is £3.64 and the apprentice rate (for apprentices under 19 or 19 or over and in the first year of their apprenticeship) is £2.50.
At the beginning of October, the main rate will increase to £6.08, the 18-20 rate will increase to £4.98, the 16-17 rate will increase to £3.68 and the apprentice rate will increase to £2.60.
Although it hardly represents a living wage, Solidarity Trade Union has welcomed these proposed increases as “a step in the right direction”.
Pat Harrington of the Nationalist Trade Union Solidarity said:
“When the minimum wage was first introduced in April 1999, the adult rate was £3.60 an hour. That was twelve years ago, yet we’re still paying grown adults at a miserly rate. However, at least the rate is going up. It’s not much, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.
“However, what’s baffling me is why the increase isn’t much, much, more.
“After all, Britain can afford military adventures in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya. And on a recent visit to Pakistan, David Cameron announced that Britain would be giving up to £650 million in foreign aid to help with education. We’re also prepared to bail out Portugal.
“Yet at the same time, we can’t afford to pay our own people a living wage. Something doesn’t add up here.”
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

The difference between the 1957 and the 2011 British society:

The difference between the 1957 and the 2011 British society:

A few examples to show the difference between the 1957 and the 2011 British society:


Scenario #1: Johnny and Mark get into a fight after school.

1957 - Crowd gathers. Mark wins. Johnny and Mark shake hands and end up buddies.

2011 - Police called, SWAT team arrives, arrests Johnny and Mark… Charge them with assault, both expelled even though Johnny started it.


Scenario #2: Jeffrey will not be still in class, disrupts other students.

1957 - Jeffrey sent to office and given a good caning by the Headmaster… Returns to class, sits still and does not disrupt class again.

2011 - Jeffrey given huge doses of Ritalin… Becomes a zombie. Tested for ADHD. School gets extra money from state because Jeffrey has a disability.


Scenario #3: Billy breaks a window in his neighbor’s car and his Dad gives him a bloody good hiding with his belt.

1957 - Billy is more careful next time, grows up normal, goes to college, and becomes a successful businessman.

2011 - Billy’s dad is arrested for child abuse… Billy removed to foster care and joins a gang… Govt psychologist then tells Billy’s sister that she remembers being abused herself and their dad goes to prison… Billy’s Mom has affair with psychologist.


Scenario #4: Mark the Teacher gets a headache and takes some aspirin to school.

1957 - Mark shares aspirin with Headmaster in the smoking room.

2011 - Police called, Mark expelled from school for drug violations… Car searched for drugs and weapons.


Scenario #5: Ahmed fails high school English course.

1957 - Ahmed studies harder, passes English, then goes to college, and returns to Middle east to become successful business man

2011 - Ahmed's cause is taken up by state. Newspaper articles appear nationally explaining that teaching English as a requirement for graduation is racist. unions and civil liberty files class action lawsuit against state school system and Ahmed's English teacher… English banned from core curriculum… Ahmed given diploma anyway… but ends up mowing lawns as an illegal immigrant and planning terrorist attacks for a living because he cannot speak English.


Scenario #6: Johnny takes apart leftover fireworks for Royal celebration, puts them in a model airplane paint bottle, blows up a red ant bed.
 
1957 - Ants die.

2011 - MI5 and police Security, called. Johnny charged with domestic terrorism, MI5 investigates parents, siblings removed from home… computers confiscated. Johnny’s Dad goes on a terror watch list and is never allowed to fly again.


Scenario #7: Johnny falls while running during playtime and scrapes his knee. He is found crying by his teacher, Mary… Mary hugs him to comfort him.

1957 - In a short time, Johnny feels better and goes on playing.

2011 - Mary is accused of being a sexual predator and loses her job. She faces 3 years in Prison… Johnny undergoes 5 years of therapy and later commits suicide .

Thorium as a Power Source has potential to overcome the energy crisis

Thorium has potential to overcome the energy crisis

  Nick Griffin at  http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

April 2011: 
This week at the European Parliament in Brussels, I certainly scored some points for common sense in a debate in my Environment, Public Health and Food Safety Committee (ENVI).

 Firstly I called the European Union's biofuel policy an utter disaster. Then man-made global warming as 'non-existent', and followed this up by branding wind factories as 'Mickey Mouse technology' which wouldn't solve the world's energy crisis.
This blast of reality left the committee’s chairman Jo Leinen, an MEP for the German Social Democratic Party, and other members of ENVI lost for words. That's because they seldom hear a dissenting voice in the chamber.
This is what I had to say on the EU’s biofuels policy, which has replaced food crops with an energy-negative ethanol industry.
“This has made a lot of money for big business, but it’s forced up world food prices and is starving hundreds of thousands of people in the Third World to death.”
I then went on to criticise the European Union’s folly of blowing $100 billion on fighting the discredited pseudo science of global warming that voters regard as jst another 'a rip-off tax'.
"Just a few years ago, the global warming alarmists were telling us that we’d never see snow again in Britain. No wonder the public, who have more sense than most MEPs, reject this childish big lie."
I also made this contribution to a discussion on the energy crisis :
"There might be a solution to the world’s energy crisis, because China is proposing the use of thorium molten salt nuclear reactors.
"These are extraordinarily safe. The technology is well established. Thorium is as cheap as it is plentiful, but Europe’s thorium programmes have been destroyed by shortsighted government cuts in the UK and lobbying from the uranium lobby in France."
I finished by condemning the European Commission's ignorance of peak oil and lack of interest in the potential of thorium to overcome the energy crisis.

European Union moving towards the Horrific ideology of the old Soviet Union

European Union moving towards the ideology of the old Soviet Union

  Martin Wingfield at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

: The conversion of the European Union into a unitary superstate took a further step forward with the adoption by the European Parliament at the last Plenary Session in Strasbourg of a report laying out a plan to set up Europe-wide EU-funded political parties.

 The rules for setting up such parties only allow ones which endorse a programme of Political Correctness, thus specifically excluding Nationalists.
The report, drafted by Greek neo-Tory MEP Marietta Giannokou, calls for the current alliances of national parties in the European Parliament to be recognised as parties able to fight elections in their own right. Thus Labour could fight Euro-elections as the Party of European Socialists and the Tories as the Alliance of European Conservatives and Reformists.
A group of Euro-federalist MEPs, led by British Liberal Democrat Andrew Duff, want to go further. They are proposing  a new "pan-European" Euro-constituency, represented by 25 MEPs. Citizens of EU member states would therefore have two votes - one for their domestic MEP, and one from the transnational list.
National authorities would report the results to a new EU electoral authority that would have to be created to oversee the EU-wide elections. The 25 MEPs elected from the transnational lists would join the 751 MEPs chosen from national ones, meaning a rise in the overall number of MEPs to 776.
These further  proposals have been backed by the European Parliament's Constitutional Affairs Committee, and now go on to be scrutinised by the Parliament as a whole, during the plenary session in June.
What is sinister about all this, apart from its generally Euro-federalist tone, is that to be officially recognised as Euro-wide parties, and therefore to benefit from the existing handout of 0.8 million Euro a year EU funding  and in the future to benefit from the Giannokou proposals and indeed to stand at all for the proposed new Europe-wide constituency, parties have to fulfil a number of requirements.
Some existing recognition requirements are not unreasonable, such as having representation, via their member parties, in at least a quarter of all EU member states, either by obtaining at least 3% of the vote in the most recent European Parliament elections, or simply by having national or regional representatives in these countries. Giannokou proposes that this be replaced by having an elected MEP in at least a quarter of all member states, which at a stroke excludes countries where parties have wide support up to and including national MPs but not currently an MEP.
More sinister is a requirement that all Euro-parties must observe the founding principles of the EU. This doesn’t – yet! – mean they have to be Euro-federalists to stand at all. It is unclear if nationalist parties opposed to the EU’s existence would be excluded by this alone. However the EU “founding principles” are defined in Article 1a of the Treaty of Maastricht (which turned the Common Market Britain voted to join into the European Union) as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon thus:
"The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy,
equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging
to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism,
non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men
prevail."
Whilst obviously nationalist MEPs would have no problem with values of respect for freedom, democracy and the rule of law – to all of which the EU itself is in fact a major threat – 'minority rights', 'tolerance' and 'equality' etc are PC-speak for supporting immigration and other socially undesirable phenomena to which we are in principle opposed.
It can and no doubt will be argued in the Euro-Courts that, if these new proposals pass into EU law – which now they are backed by the Euro-Parliament is likely – Nationalist parties such as ours, the French FN, Vlaams Belang, Jobbik and the rest voted for by tens of millions across Europe, by their very nature are excluded from taking part in Euro-elections or receiving EU funding.
So that, in the European Union as in the old Soviet Union, only those endorsing the Official Ideology can stand in the official elections. So much for the EU’s 'freedom and democracy'.

Chairmans Update Build the Nationalist Alternative Media Open your Eyes to Mass Media LIES!

Build the Nationalist alternative media Open your eyes to mass media lies Fellow Patriot, The Voice of Freedom (Number 122) is out now. This special edition is twenty pages long and features a four-page spread about our May election campaigns and many exclusive stories not available online. Inside you will find: An in-depth blow-by-blow breakdown of the epic victory against Trevor Phillips and his tax-payer funded PC army. News of the record number of British National Party councillors elected un-opposed this year An Editorial on the war in Libya Reports on the scourge of unemployment in our communities Our lively and sometimes controversial letters column where ordinary Nationalists just like you get to debate and express their views and more... Subscribe and get yours hot off the press! It is packed with hidden and censored news that the mainstream media refuses to print. The Voice of Freedom is not censored by the Political Class and brings you all the facts. It has a hard-hitting, no-nonsense style. It brings you the truth before you hear the establishment media lies. Make sure you subscribe today. The Voice of Freedom is not to be missed. A full year's UK subscription is only £13.15, postage and packaging included. Subscribing to Voice of Freedom will make you better informed about matters in the news as well as key developments within the British National Party. Stay informed and support our alternative Nationalist press with the Voice of Freedom. Subscribe now: Thank you in advance, Chairman Nick Griffin MEP Member of the European Parliament P.S. Make sure you keep in touch with the Nationalist struggle. Subscribe to Voice of Freedom online or by ringing 0844 809 4581. Remember if our operators are busy please call back.

THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN BRITAIN IN 2011

THE STATE OF EDUCATION IN BRITAIN TODAY

  | Written by Rev. Rob West at http://christiancouncilofbritain.co.uk/

According to Dr David Starkey, the TV historian and author, the state of education in Britain is dire, not because of bad teachers but because the lack of discipline in classes and schools mean that even the very best of teachers would not be able to get through to the pupils.  Despite massive salaries being paid to qualified teachers, to head teachers and super heads; and despite the immense amount of money spent on resources and computers, all is failing because of a lack of attention to the obvious - the children cannot, or will not listen, because the teachers, really, have no authority to make them.  And they have no authority, or little authority, because both the schools and the law will not give them any.  
This is not rocket-science of course: our Victorian great-grandmothers could have told us all of this: that teaching and learning and children do not flourish where freedom, over-equality and a total free-for-all prevails.  What does flourish is mayhem.  The children think it is great: that they can muck about, jump on desks, assault staff and not learn anything at all.  But then they would: they are children after all.  What amazes us all is not that the children are quite happy with this, at least quite a few of them some of the time; but that the governors, the full-time teachers and the heads and super-heads can put up with it and pretend that it is really not as bad as that.  But Dr David Starchy thinks otherwise.
At one point he refused to teach.  Correction: at one point he refused to attempt to teach.  He added that what struck him about teaching and learning in schools is that you spend hardly any time teaching the subject.
“You are like a lion tamer dealing with savage beasts.  The saddest thing is that you totally fail to get through.  The children are destroyed by this process. It is unkind to students and to teachers.  The idea was if you get a group of wonderful teachers and then the kids will respond and do wonderful things.  This is not possible without the right structure and ethos in the school.”  Amen to that!  But he is only stating the obvious.
Why is it that politicians, leaders and Church leaders cannot see, or do not want to see the obvious? Why is it that we are all involved to some extent in a conspiracy of silence not to state the obvious because, my goodness, it needs stating?  How long can the debacle of modern “education” go on before we realise that it is costing us plenty and we are getting nothing or little out of it; indeed we are storing-up trouble for the future.  My experience is in schools and to some extent in post-16 education. I can confirm all of Dr Starkey’s pertinent observations.  It has been going on since the ending of corporal punishment in 1986.  Hardly surprising, really, but so few seem to wish to couple the cause and effect together, despite all the emphasis on cause-and-effect in modern science.  It is just not politically expedient or rather politically correct.
So long as the teachers and the teaching super-heads draw their salaries it does not matter if no teaching goes on at all.  When will the tax-paying public begin to realise that schools are in danger of becoming one big tax-mulching scheme for the benefit not of education and the pupils but the staff who keep these zoos and adopt “survival techniques” for the animals which live in them!
for more articles on modern britan and the Christian Faith please visit http://christiancouncilofbritain.co.uk/

One Law for Them and Another for Us British

One Law for Them and Another for Us

  News Team

Muslims chanting ‘BNP burn in hell’ and waving placards stating ‘The Koran will destroy man-made law’ and ‘Islam will dominate the world’ demonstrated outside a mosque on St. Helen’s Road, Swansea, on Good Friday.
Muslims from an organisation called the ‘Ummah of Muhammad’ distributed leaflets intended to incite the 1,000 Muslims attending the Swansea mosque yesterday. Police boxed in the marchers outside the Rowlands Exchange & Mart store; however, it is understood that no Muslims were arrested by Swansea police for incitement.
This is, of course, in sharp contrast with the politically motivated arrests of two British National Party candidates by Swansea police in a night raid by ten plain-clothes police officers in unmarked cars who ransacked their home, seizing computers, mobile phones, satnav equipment, election material and personal belongings.
As reported earlier on this site, Sion Owens, a British National Party candidate in the current Welsh Assembly election, was one of thousands of people internationally who is alleged to have burned a book, in his garden, last 11th September, on the anniversary of the 9/11 Islamic terrorist atrocities which caused the deaths of nearly 3,000 innocent victims. Joanne Shannon, the British National Party candidate for Swansea East in the Welsh Assembly election, was also arrested once police realised she too was a British National Party candidate.
Although Swansea police were forced to withdraw charges against Sion Owens, their reckless and irresponsible action directly placed both Sion Owens’ and Joanne Shannon’s lives in danger, not least as a result of an Islamic ‘fatwa’ being issued against them.
Ironically, the ‘protective measures’ now needed to be put in place by Superintendent Phil Davies of Swansea police – in recognition of the real and serious threat the police have caused to be created with the issue of an Islamic fatwa in Swansea – completely failed even to warn Sion and Joanne of the demonstration by fanatical Muslims in St. Helen’s Road on Good Friday, in order for them to take steps to avoid the area.
Instead, they learned of the events from people in Swansea city centre who happened to witness them, rather than from the police protection patrols. It is Superintendent Phil Davies’ complicity with the media smear campaign against the British National Party election campaign, by journalist Mark Townsend of the left-wing Guardian newspaper, which directly led to this situation in the first place. So much for democracy.

BREAKING NEWS:
As we up our intensity and activity towards election day, the enemies of Nationalism are also upping their illegal activity in a vain hope of disrupting and intimidating the dedicated British National Party activists.
Today in Abergavenny our tabletop stall has been disrupted and our activists accosted by the deputy leader of the local council. Our people have refused to move and are carrying on their lawful political campaigning. The council officials have now brought the police in to try and have our people removed.
At the same time, at our tabletop stall in Bridgend, one of our Assembly candidates has been assaulted, and eggs have been thrown at our activists. The police have been called, and again our dedicated team is still on the street.
“We will not be intimidated on our own streets in our own towns,” said Brian Mahoney, the Wales Regional Organiser.
“We are, in fact, stepping up our campaign in the face of this concerted attack, and I appeal to every Nationalist in the country to come to Wales for the last week of action. This election will go right down to the wire, and much will depend on our mobilising our support in the last week.”
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again