How a Changed Population Leads to a Changed Culture , How Will this Effect Bolton

How a Changed Population Leads to a Changed Culture

The BNP Newsroom

The news that Muslim children are being withdrawn from state school music classes on religious grounds has once again illustrated how a changing population changes the cultural norms of a society.

According to a BBC TV documentary, Muslim families are unilaterally — and illegally — withdrawing their children from parts of the state school curriculum while Ofsted inspectors “turn a blind eye.”

Muslims object to music in the same way they object to images, namely by quoting a section of the Koran.

The passage in the Muslim holy book categorises music along with fornication and the “wearing of silk” by men (presumably an indication of homosexuality).

A passage in the Ahadith reads as follows: "There will be people from my Ummah [nation] who will seek to make lawful fornication, the wearing of silk [for men], wine drinking and the use of musical instruments."

According to the BBC documentary, many schools in immigrant-colonised areas are already seeing large numbers of pupils refusing to take part in music lessons of any sort.

Eileen Ross, head teacher of the Herbert Morrison Primary School in Lambeth, south London, told the BBC that “Some of the parents don't want children to play musical instruments and they don't have music in their homes.”

About 29 percent of children at the school come from Somali Muslim families.

Another academic quoted by the BBC, Dr Diana Harris, from the Open University, claimed that Ofsted inspectors have sometimes turned "a blind eye" to the issue.

Parents have no automatic right to withdraw their children from compulsory subjects such as music.

The changing cultural expression is the natural consequence of the changing population.

A culture is an expression of a people, not the other way round. A First World people will produce a First World culture, and a Third World people will produce a Third World culture.

This is why immigration matters.

Tory Equalities Act Reversal Reveals Identical Ideologies of Conservatives and Labour

Tory Equalities Act Flip Flop Reveals Identical Ideologies of Conservatives and Labour

BNP Newsroom

Tory Home Secretary Theresa May has dropped her party’s opposition to Labour’s Equality Act and has announced that it will “better protect people from discrimination” even though in April last year she condemned the same law as “ill thought out” and a “waste of time and money.”

The latest shocking example of Tory duplicity came with the announcement by Mrs May that the Equality Act, passed last year, will be fully implemented by October this year.

According to new reports, Mrs May — who is also Minister for Women and Equality — said that the law “would make it easier for firms to comply with anti-discrimination rules.

"By making the law easier to understand, the Equality Act will help businesses treat staff fairly and meet the needs of a diverse customer base," Mrs May said.

“"The law will be easier to understand and better able to protect people from discrimination. A successful economy needs the full participation of all its citizens and we are committed to implementing the Act in the best way for business."

However, in the parliamentary debate of 11 May 2009, Mrs May, then Shadow Home Secretary, called the bill “ill-thought out, and last minute.

“It doesn’t tackle root causes of inequality, like ‘family breakdown’,” Mrs May said during that debate, adding that she “opposed widespread positive discrimination” and that “all-women shortlists are unacceptable.”

The Equalities Act gives employers the ability to legally discriminate in favour of women and black job candidates against white males.

The law also forces public bodies to award contracts according to a firm's “diversity” (or how non-white a company may be) and allows “positive action” to ensure more women and non-white employees in all companies.

It was this clause in particular that Mrs May opposed when she was in opposition. At the time, Mrs May said that too “many of the proposals in this Bill will be bureaucratic and expensive without providing real results.

“Labour's proposal for compulsory pay audits without any sanctions for failure will simply waste time and money without making any difference to pay discrimination,” Mrs May went on.

However, now that she does not have to pretend to be in opposition anymore, Mrs May has, like all the Tory leadership, reverted to type and clearly shown that there is no real difference between the three Westminster parties after all.

Thirteenth Stabbing Death in London Highlights Ongoing Black Violent Crime

Thirteenth Stabbing Death in London Highlights Ongoing Black Violent Crime Wave

BNP Newsroom

The thirteenth stabbing death of a black youth this year in London yesterday has highlighted the black crime wave crisis which is sweeping London and other major cities in Britain.

In the latest incident, 15-year-old Zac Olumegbon was murdered near Park Campus School in West Norwood, south London in a frenzied attack by members of a rival black gang.

Olumegbon was a pupil at the school, which was set up for what the controlled media have politely called “some of London’s most troubled teenagers, who have been excluded from mainstream education.”

According to the media, the school has “bright, open classrooms arranged around a central garden” and is “deliberately designed to reduce aggression and behavioural problems.”

Apparently its 90 pupils “enjoy state-of-the-art sports facilities, have access to wireless internet and are encouraged to grow vegetables in the school grounds.”

All of this seems to have been to no avail, as “staff and neighbours told of a catalogue of fights and attacks in the school with youths from different gangs from across London brought together under one roof,” a report continued.

The latest killed is the product of an ongoing fight between two black gangs rejoicing in the names “Get Money Gangsters” from Norwood and the “Gas Gang Crew” from Brixton and Streatham.

The violent nature of these gangs is on public display on YouTube where gang members, possibly using the free internet services provided at their special school courtesy of the taxpayer, have uploaded several clips of their activities.

The videos usually show gang members talking in rap “language” with violent lyrics exalting criminal activity. They appear with subtitled names such as “shotz” and “stabber.”

Figures released in 2008 and published in the Daily Mail shows that of the 225 people aged under 18 proceeded against for knife crime in London between 1 April and 30 June that year, 124 were black, 18 were of mixed race, 14 were Asian, 6 were of some other group, 60 were white and 3 were not identified by race.

The problem of immigrant-origin crime in Britain will not be solved until the immigration question is honestly and openly addressed.

There is a clear incompatibility issue with large Third World immigrant populations and First World countries which must be addressed if Britain is to survive as a First World nation.

This reality is visually addressed in a YouTube video which compares ethnically homogenous British London of a few decades ago with the nightmare that immigration has turned it into today.

Anti-Terrorism Funding Cut as Muslim Population Rises Tens Times Faster

Anti-Terrorism Funding Cut as Muslim Population Rises Tens Times Faster than Everyone Else

BNP Newsroom

Millions of pounds are to be cut off the police’s anti-terrorism budget as the Muslim population in Britain rises ten times faster than anyone else, exposing the rest of the country to even more danger.

CCTV image at King's Cross train station, showing Hasib Hussain, one of the July 7, 2005 suicide bombers.The stark warning about budget cuts was made by Assistant Metropolitan Police Commissioner John Yates at last week’s Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) annual conference in Manchester.

According to Mr Yates, Britain will be “left vulnerable” to terrorist attacks after it transpired that the ConDem government plans to cut funding for counter-terrorism police by £150 million.

He said that proposed spending cuts of 25 percent “could not be achieved without weakening defences against al-Qaeda.”

According to reports, it is claimed that “entire counter-terrorism units” will have to close.

Earlier studies revealed that 92 percent of all terrorists arrested in Britain over the past few years have been Muslim, and that the Muslim population in this country is rising ten times faster than the rest of society.

Mr Yates’s warnings were dismissed by Tory Minister for the Cabinet Office Francis Maude as "shroud-waving" and "alarmism."

The ConDem regime has announced that all government departments (with the notable exception of the foreign aid handouts) will be forced to cut back on their expenditure to help bring the nightmarish budget deficit under control.

Bizarrely, the ConDem regime seeks to prolong and even escalate the war in Afghanistan and is an active participant in efforts to provoke a war with Iran.

These two insane foreign policy initiatives serve as a further reason to incitement of the Muslim population in Britain.

At the same time, the immigration policies pursued by decades of Tory and labour regimes has actively encouraged immigration from Muslim nations.

In addition, the slavish adherence to the European Union’s directives has created that outrageous “asylum” racket which imports even more Muslims who have fled the Middle Eastern wars which the Tory-Labour axis generated in the first place.

In other words, the Tory-Labour-Lib Dem policies of mass immigration and anti-British interest foreign policies are the direct cause of terrorism in Britain.

And now, in a final act of treachery and betrayal to the British people, the same gaggle of political traitors is going to cut spending on anti-terrorism measures at home.

The blood of our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan is already on the hands of the members of the House of Treason in Westminster.

Soon, it seems, the blood of British people, victims of Islamist terrorism at home, will be added to the long list of crimes for which those politicians must one day be called to account.

MUSLIM MP CAMPAIGNS ON BEHALF OF MARXIST UAF VIOLENT THUGS IN BOLTON

Sunday, 4 July 2010

You can see the unbelievable violent tactics the UAF supporters used in March against members of the public and patriotic English men and women supporters as independently reported by the The Independent newspaper as the assistant police commissar of Greater Manchester placed the blame for the violence on the  UAF group, and yet.

"YASMINE QURESHI AND HER BRAND NEW ISLAMIST ENTOURAGE ‘JUSTICE 4 BOLTON’ PLAN TO STEP UP THEIR CAMPAIGN AGAINST FREE SPEECH THIS WEEK WITH THE NEWS ,THAT THEY INTEND TO HOLD A MEETING SUPPORTING THOSE VIOLENT ANTI PATRIOTIC THUGS AND UNBELIEVABLY HAVE OF COURSE A MUSLIM MP IN ATTENDANCE! AND AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THE NOTICE THEY ISSUED BELOW! THEY ALSO THE SUPPORT OF OTHER TRAITOROUS MP,S FROM THE OUT OF TOUCH POLITICAL ELITE







Public Meeting
Friday 9th July 2010, 7.30pm
QUEBEC HALL, QUEBEC STREET, BOLTON BL3 5JN


( Quebec Hall entrance is from grassy side of the industrial complex )

On 20th March in Bolton’s Victoria Square, thousands of people responded to a Unite
Against Fascism call to demonstrate against the English Defence League (EDL). The EDL
is a racist and fascist organisation linked to the fascist British National Party.
(http://barthsnotes.wordpress.com/2010/06/26/searchlight-names-edl-leader-tommy-robinson-as-stephen-yaxley-lennon/)

Following the demonstration, justice4bolton was launched on 8th June in the House of
Commons with MP’s Jeremy Corbyn and Peter Hain.

This Bolton launch is for you -whether you are anti-fascists, members of Trade Unions,
members of our Faith communities or simply Bolton people who are concerned about what
happened on Saturday 20th March 2010. Anti-EDL protesters were arrested (Muslims
included), some have been charged. The police investigation is ongoing. There could be
other arrests and charges in the coming months. justice4bolton offers support and
solidarity to those arrested and charged and to those under threat of arrest.

You can see the unbelievable violent tactics the UAF supporters went as independently reported by the The Independent 
newspaer as the assistant police commissar of Greater Manchester placed the blame for the violence on the  UAF group

Speakers include:
Martin Challender Secretary, Bolton Trades Council
Yasmin Qureshi MP, Bolton South East
Dr Rhetta Moran j4b National Committee
Independent Muslim Forum Representatives
Everyone is welcome to come, to listen, and to speak

Yeah I bet any one opposing this will be allowed to speak and you can bet that if you do your teeth will soon go missing to knowing the record of the Anti White Marxist UAF Millitia!

Bolton BNP June 2010 Meeting

Bolton BNP  June 2010 Meeting

Wed the 30th of June, our Bolton group held it's monthly meeting, and what a very good meeting it was. Tony Backhurst  spoke about the solidarity union, and the benefit's of joining. Dorothy Sayers spoke about the the need for more people to pull together for leafleting, and bringing more on board, and there was our guest speaker Patrick Newman, who talked about the rise of the Muslims all over the world, and how England was the most effected, and how long we have left as a nation before we are totally colonized. I recommend Patrick as a speaker for other BNP meetings, you will not be disappointed. Bolton BNP, getting stronger by the month.
Please do not forget our national parties latest campaign England is for life not just for football to,

Help us to help Bolton join the  British national Party  by clicking the link

Under Proportional Representation, the BNP Would Have 12 Seats in Parliament

Under True Proportional Representation, the BNP Would Have 12 Seats

BNP Newsroom

Under a true proportional representation system, the British National Party would already have twelve seats in parliament, a leading anti-BNP academic has warned.

In a near-hysterical article published on the Public Finance magazine’s blog, Professor Ted Cantle, executive chair of the Institute of Community Cohesion (iCoCo) at Coventry University, said that other political parties dismissed “concerns about migration and the impact on local services as ‘ignorant’ or ‘racist’ at our peril.”

According to Professor Cantle, the ConDem “plan to cap annual immigration is just a scratch on the surface of a much larger and more fundamental issue for the UK and its local communities.

“In 2001 the British National Party picked up just 47,000 votes, and by 2005 it had grown to 192,000,” he wrote.

“This year it was 563,000 — far from the collapse in support suggested by reporting on the general election result and the focus on the defeat for BNP leader Nick Griffin.

“Under a proportional representation system, for example, the BNP would now have 12 seats in parliament,” he continued.

“Based on a new analysis by iCoCo . . . this appears to be part of a genuine trend of gathering support that threatens the stability of the UK.

“Increased population numbers and changes in the composition of local populations have increased pressure on local services, and these have to be understood and addressed,” Professor Cantle wrote, going on ot make the usual string of allegations against the BNP.

“There is a danger in regarding the BNP as a spent force. They lost ground because of campaigns to oppose them on the ground in places like Barking and Dagenham, but also all the minority parties were squeezed by the media focus on the three main parties, especially around the televised debates.

“That may not be the case next time. We have to recognise they do tap into real concerns, as the ‘bigoted woman’ incident showed and we need more debate, not less, to answer these concerns.”

* The “Alternative Voting” system upon which Britain will be asked to vote next May is not true proportional representation and has been identified by the Electoral Reform Society as producing even greater distortions than the current first-past-the-post system.

Third World Culture Accompanies Third World Immigrants to UK

Third World Culture Accompanies Third World Immigrants

BNP Newsroom

The rise in forced marriages — estimated to be in the region of 10,000 every year, of which 20 percent involve male victims — is yet more evidence that Third World culture has been imported into Britain along with Third World immigrants.

In a disturbing display of the simple truth that a culture is merely the reflection of a people, and that cultures change when the population changes, the incidence of forced marriages in Britain has risen sharply along with the rise in the number of immigrants.

The numbers are so high that the Government has set up a special unit, Forced Marriage Unit (FMU), whose sole job is to “combat” forced marriages.

The FMU’s work is of course hampered by the ever increasing numbers of Third World immigrants pouring into the country.

According to figures released by the FMU, the “majority of cases involve families from South Asia, particularly Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.”

The unit says it estimates that there are 10,000 incidents of forced marriage involving “British nationals” each year and that up to 20 percent of the victims are males.

According to the FMU, it received more than 220 messages from male victims in 2009, an increase from the 134 reported the previous year.

Male immigrants are forced into marriages for “family commitments and expectations, securing visas or the desire to control behaviour and protect a family's reputation.”

Apparently the latter reason means that the immigrant families suspect that the males in question are homosexual.

The FMU went on to warn social workers to be on the lookout during summer when incidents of forced marriage increase as the immigrants visit their countries of origin for holidays. There, the forced marriages are either sought or concluded. 

Professionals working with young people were urged to be vigilant during summer, a time when incidents increase.

According to the RMA, victims of forced marriages are compelled or tricked into going back to their countries of origin.

Those who refuse, the FMU said, are “often locked up, subjected to physical and sexual violence and forcibly removed to other countries if they refuse to comply with their families' wishes.”

The existence of this problem in Britain today is proof that culture and identity is not something which can be taken off like a coat and left at an airport gate, as British National Party MEP Andrew Brons said recently in the European Parliament.

“Third World cultures are like overcoats that can be taken off at the port of entry and replaced with a European cultural overcoat that can be issued with residence and citizenship papers,” Mr Brons said.

 “The children of such immigrants are allegedly as European as the indigenous population. They’re not. Distinctive cultures are made by distinctive peoples and not the other way round.

“We are not the products of our culture; our cultures are the products of our peoples.

“Replacing Europeans with people from the Third World will mean that Europe will be replaced by the Third World. Europe is slowly but steadily being ethnically cleansed of Europeans,” Mr Brons said.

Being English ?

Being English

England players Ashley Cole and Ledley King leaving South Africa following England's humiliating 4-1 defeat by Germany, their expressions revealing what their country means to them.

Meanwhile English fans make their way home

On a related subject, readers may remember the outcry last year when ex-BNP publicity Officer Mark Collett and Joseph Barber from Great White Records stated in an interview that the same Ashley Cole was "not ethnically English". So, it is interesting to note Ashley Cole's own views on the English reported here and here.
Author   http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/

Londons Cockneys become First Victims of the Immigration Invasion Genocide

Cockneys become First Victims of the Immigration Invasion Genocide

  BNP News

Cockneys have become the first victim of the immigration invasion genocide perpetrated against the British people and are set to vanish completely from the streets of London, a new study has revealed.

According to a study entitled Multicultural London English: the emergence, acquisition and diffusion of a new variety, due to be published in early 2011, the 500-year-old Cockney accent “will be replaced by Multicultural London English - a mixture of Cockney, Bangladeshi and West Indian accents.”

The study’s author, Paul Kerswill, Professor of Sociolinguistics at Lancaster University, said that the distinctive and uniquely British accent “will be gone within 30 years.”

The study, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, said the Cockney accent is being replaced in London by a new hybrid language called Jafaican.

"Cockney in the East End is now transforming itself into Multicultural London English, a new, melting-pot mixture of all those people living here who learnt English as a second language," Prof Kerswill was quoted as saying.

As a measure which underlines the approaching extinction of the dialect and culture, an arts centre in King’s Cross has asked Londoners to talk to elderly relatives and contribute Cockney poetry and phrases to an archive.

The 30 years scenario spelled out by Professor Kerswill is the time period that it will take for the last of the existing genuine Cockneys to die out.

Traditionally, a cockney was someone born within earshot of the Bow Bells, but in reality, almost the entire East End of London was regarded as cockney. The traditional core districts of the East End are Bethnal Green, Whitechapel, Spitalfields, Stepney, Wapping, Limehouse, Poplar, Millwall, Hackney, Hoxton, Shoreditch, Bow and Mile End — all of which have been heavily colonised by Third World immigrants.

London had a relatively young population, the highest proportion of non-white British ethnic origin, with a constant inflow of new migrants from abroad.

The city received 160,000 international migrants in 2007, equivalent to 2 percent of its population and is the second largest region in terms of total population, accounting for 12 percent of the UK total.

London’s age structure also differs from the UK’s, the population tending to be younger than in the country as a whole.

In 2007, 7.0 per cent of the population were children aged under 5, compared with 5.9 per cent in the UK, and 44 per cent were in the age band 20 to 44 compared with only 35 per cent of the UK population.

A third of all Londoners were born outside the UK, compared with 12 per cent of the population of the UK, and it has 40 per cent of all foreign-born residents in the UK.

A 2007 report showed that whites were already a minority in many of London’s schools. According to figures released by the Department for Children, Schools and Families, 15 percent of primary school pupils were classed as white British, while 63 per cent of their classmates come from Bangladeshi families. The number of whites is likely to have decreased in the intervening three years.

In Newham, just under 12 percent of primary pupils were white British, while the figure in Brent's secondaries is seven percent, compared with 36 per cent who are classed as Asian, and 24 per cent black.

The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948 states that genocide “means any of the acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group, as such:

“2c: Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

The systematic destruction through immigration of the British people is nothing less than genocide.

read mores news stories http://www.bnp.org.uk/ 

Election and Referendum Chaos Coming To A Ballot Box near You

Election and Referendum Chaos Coming To A Ballot Box near You!

Author John Of Gwent

 

Remember when "electoral reform" was the
way Labour would save itself from extinction?

GA's article below citing the report by Ted Castle in the "Public Finance" site set me thinking.
Is it any coincidence the people of Wales face not one but three sets of ballot papers next year ?
Of course it isn't. The hope is that the people will be so weary of turning out three times they won't bother,and the arguments over three separate trips to the ballot box, and three separate set of school closures, are already being rehearsed. Look at this page on the BBC site whingeing that schools are being forced to close too often already.
So why three trips to make your mark ?
Well, the first is the ultimate waste of time that is Cameron And Clegg's presentation Of Gordon Brown's Survival Plan. Gordon, as you know, based his master plan to stay in Number Ten on the parable of the talents - that strange biblical tale whereby to he who has everything shall more be given, while from he who has nothing shall even that nothing be taken away and given to him who has. 
A bit like that verse in All Things Bright and beautiful :-

The Rich Man In His Castle, The Poor Man At His Gate,
God made them high and lowly, and ordered their estate

We used to sing that in Assembly when I was in Infant school under a Tory Government - but for some reason under Harold Wilson that verse vanished from the school assembly - I wonder why ? Surely Labour could see God had ordained that there would be rich, and poor, and that was how it was, for ever and ever amen ? (!!!)
But I digress.
Back to Brown's AV Westminster voting system. A scam well suited to a man who called himself a "son of the manse". Brown proposed to throw the existing system away and replace it with one in which the last candidate in any election had their votes stolen and handed to the others, whom the voter had not wanted, until one of them in the list could say, with utter falseness of course, that they were elected by more than 50% of the electorate.
The truth is that the Alternative Vote system is actually LESS representative than what we have now.
But how typical for a control freak of a failed ex leader of a failed ex government that such a travesty of a system should be presented as a fairer way of doing things. By the way here is an analysis of what it would have meant at the last election.
Now the funny thing is, The Con Dem Tricksters have picked up this failed plot and propose to run with it.
GOD KNOWS WHY
Cameron is on record as saying he will vote AGAINST the measure when his own government introduce it to the Commons. And the party that elected Clegg as their leader reject it out of hand, demanding truly proportional representation instead as the only acceptable voting reform. Which has forced Lib-Dem diehards into some of the most spectacular back-pedalling I have seen since the days when their party only made it to the headlines when they referred to labradors and shotguns.
So that is the first disaster wales face nest year, and it may be the iceberg that may sink Cameron and Clegg's Titanic. Which of them will take the part of DiCaprio, and which of them puts on the dress to play Kate Winslett remains to be seen, but I can hear the sound of deckchairs being rearranged so as to better hear the band already.
So what will be the second trip to the ballot box then ?
Why, it's the Plaid Curry Independence Roadshow. The demand that the eleventh EU region of what used to be called the United Kingdom get full powers of legislature and no longer have to get them in drips from a man who looks like he's got a strange suntan, or a woman who looks every inch the dithering fuddy duddy grandmother.
And the third is of course the Welsh Assembly Elections themselves, whose PR system will see at least three of our people take their rightful place at the table this time, and see the turncoat shia islamist Mohammed Asghar, who discards political allegiances like you and I discard yesterday's shirt into the laundry basket in favour of a freshly ironed one to face the new day, thrown into Cardiff Bay where he belongs.
But already the siren voices are clamouring. The politicians, realising the vote on whether you want more powers all at once or drip by drip as they are at the moment, clashes with the Assembly Election itself, call for a delay to the Election. Denying the people their rightful say in disposing of the has-been government in Cardiff the same way they chicked Brown out of Downing Street
And now it seems those two also clash with the Cameron/Clegg showdown.
Oh de

Moslem call to Rise Up in Walesl 10th July

Moslem call to Rise Up in Cardiff 10th July

  Author: Green Arrow |  

You can bet the Black Flags of the Cult Dead Paedophile will be flying in Cardiff, South Wales on the 10th of July, because moslem sites are calling for a demonstration to "protest" and to "defend" the symbols of their sick cult on that date.

Demonstration to defend the symbols of Islam
Date: Saturday, July 10, 2010
Time: 2:00pm – 4:00pm
Location: Gathering point @ city hall, cathays park, cardiff, cf10 3nd

If you listen to the following video that Berte Bert has kindly copied from their web site you will see that their intentions are somewhat different to their claims that this demonstration is to be a peaceful protest and that they will not allow any symbols of Britain, only symbols praising Allah and promising tickets to paradise to all who rise up against the "dirty Kuffar".

Alhumdulillah Allah has blessed us with the ability to speak, so join us Inshallah at a demonstration to defend the symbols of Islam and the honor of the prophet (saw). Speak out and let your voice be heard let be known that no longer will you tolerate the attack on Islam, that no longer will you tolerate the banning of the symbols of Islam.


Soon the British People will awaken to the fact that it is more than just the loss of their country that they are facing.  Please God, let them awake in time.

Beta Testers Wanted iPhone ® or iPod Touch ® ?

Beta Testers Wanted

  Author: Anjin-sama |  

I have a request I'd like to put to you.
Do you own an iPhone® or iPod Touch®?
I need beta testers for a forthcoming iPhone Application from the BNP. I really need iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 and iPod touch owners to help test the App before we launch. There is nothing special to do only use the App and tell me if it crashes or fails in some other way. You can also comment on the design, and functions and although they will be more than likely put off until later, you can request new features.
If you would like to join in as a tester please email info@bnpnews.org.uk This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it you can also visit bnpnews.org.uk for a seek peek at the App.

The Scorpion and the Frog or Islam and Labour

The Scorpion and the Frog or Islam and Labour

Author Horwich Nationalists 

For all you Labour supporters who think 

that you have the Islamic vote in the bag 

and that it can be utilised at will,

 word of warning! you think that you have a ally

in the Islamist community that can gain you victory in elections.

 But I would remind you 

of how it was put in Aesop's Fables about choosing your friends

 and putting your lives 

and the future of your children in

their hands!  

The Scorpion and the Frog

  A scorpion and a frog meet 

on the bank of a stream 

and the 
scorpion asks the frog to carry him across

 on its back.

 The frog asks,

 "How do I know you won't sting me?" 

The scorpion 
says, "Because if I do, I will die too."

  The frog is satisfied, and they set out, 

but in midstream,
the scorpion stings the frog. 

The frog feels the onset of 
paralysis and starts to sink,

 knowing they both will drown,
but has just enough time to gasp "Why?" 

  Replies the scorpion: "Its my nature..."

So in effect you foolish marxist fools

 will perish at the handsof your 

allies inbuilt nature!

Unemployment to Soar But British People Put Last: 25% of All Jobs in Britain Filled by Non-Indigenous Workers

British People Put Last: 25% of All Jobs in Britain Filled by Non-Indigenous Workers

|  BNP News

The British National Party’s claim that immigration hurts job prospects for British people has been confirmed with new figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) which show that an astonishing 25 percent of all jobs are now filled by non-indigenous workers.

The shocking figures also showed that in London, non-indigenous workers accounted for up to 70 percent of all jobs in many areas.

In the borough of Newham, where work has been most plentiful due to the location of the Olympic site, seven out of every 10 jobs are filled by workers not born in Britain.

Some 65,100 out of the 93,700 posts there are filled by foreigners, despite government promises that the Olympics would provide employment for local people.

There are nine council areas with 40 percent and above workers from outside Britain and 13 areas with 30 percent and above non-British workers.

In addition, the ONS figures showed that non-indigenous workers hold 20 percent of the jobs in 22 other council areas of London.

Outside London, the areas where the largest numbers of jobs are taken by immigrants are Slough, Leicester, Luton, Reading, Cambridge, Manchester and Oxford.

According to official Government figures issued on 15 June 2010, the unemployment rate stands at 7.9 percent, up 0.1 percent over the quarter and 0.6 percent over the year.

In real terms, this means that unemployment in February to April was 2.47 million,   up by 23,000 on the quarter and 192,000 from a year previously. The claimant count for key out-of-work benefits was 1,481,100 in May.

This figure does not include the officially defined “economically inactive” segment of the UK population, which is estimated to be in excess of 8 million.

* According to the ONS, legal migration into Britain in 2008 was as follows:

Total: 590,000

UK citizens: 85,000

EU nationals: 198,000

Rest of the world: 307,000.

These figures do not include illegal immigration or “asylum seekers,” and as such are a underrepresentation of the facts.

iBooks & Kindle New eBooks to spread the word

iBooks & Kindle New eBooks to spread the word

  Author: Anjin-sama |  

As some of you will no doubt have noticed Apple have released a new iPhone and recently the iPad. Sometime ago Amazon released the Kindle and even before that Sony released their Reader.
What are they, well they are all digital book readers, on the iPhone and iPad you use the iBooks Application. You can also get digital book readers for your PC or Mac, with Adobe Digital Editions.
Great but what can I read, well just as we launched the pdf versions of the collected writings of Reconquista we now have the ePub versions for the above digital book readers (they do work much better than pdfs).
So download for yourself but also download and share, email them to friends, put a link at the bottom of every email you send, put them on your facebook page, anywhere and erverywhere you can.
This is the first we have done of a book we have already released but very soon
http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/

Kenneth Clarke Worst Home Secretary Ever Says CIVITAS

Kenneth Clarke Is “Worst Home Secretary Ever” Says CIVITAS

If Home Secretaries are judged by the amount of crime during their time in office then Kenneth Clarke must rank as the worst Home Secretary ever, CIVITAS think tank director Dr David Green has said.

Writing in a briefing note called “The Potential Consequences of Kenneth Clarke's Crime Policy,” Dr Green drove home the savage attack on the Tory Home Secretary by pointing out that Mr Clarke “held the office from April 1992 to May 1993 when crime was higher than it had ever been before and has ever been since.”

Dr Green, formerly of the Institute of Economic Affairs, went on to say that from Mr Clarke’s “comments this week, he has learnt little from his time at the Home Office in the 1990s.

“He now argues for reducing the prison population by lowering the number of offenders sentenced to prison and reducing long sentences. Why, he asks, is the prison population twice what it was when he was last at the Home Office in 1993?

“His time at the Home Office coincided with the highest police-recorded crime figures ever, and the increase was in large measure the result of the policies he and his predecessors pursued,” Dr Green said.

“Repeat cautions were preferred to custody, the 1991 Criminal Justice Act required judges to give less weight to previous convictions when sentencing criminals, car theft had been downgraded in importance and early release at the half-way stage of sentences under four years was made automatic.

“Despite huge increases in crime the average prison population was reduced from nearly 50,000 in 1988 to 44,500 in 1993. Recorded crime surged by over 20 percent during the early 1990s, from 4.544 million crimes in 1990 to 5.592 million in 1992. It took until 1997 to get it back down to 4.598 million by putting an additional 15,000 career criminals behind bars,” he said.

The briefing paper pointed out Mr Clarke’s core strategy of releasing criminals and cutting the prisons budget would be a false economy.

“If Mr Osborne is tempted by Mr Clarke's offer to cut the prison budget, he should realise that cutting the £2.2 billion cost of the prison service would be a false economy,” Dr Green continued.

“From time to time the Home Office has made estimates of the total social and economic costs of crime, including the insurance and security measures we have to pay for, the cost of personal injuries and lost property, and the additional costs to the criminal justice system of allowing repeat criminals the freedom to carry on offending.

“What would be the cost of releasing a criminal from jail who would otherwise be committing offences. The total social and economic cost of crimes against individuals and households in 2003-04 was £36.2 billion and there were 12.168 million crimes against individuals and households, an average cost of £2,972 per crime.

“A Home Office survey of offenders being admitted to prison in 2000 found that they committed on average 140 crimes per year. If the average cost of each crime was £2,900 then the total annual cost would be £406,000. Compared with the cost of prison the saving is vast.

“The annual cost of a prison place in 2008-09 according to the prison service annual report was £29,561. But £406,000 is the cost to society as a whole. What about the cost to the Government?

“Twenty percent of the total social and economic cost was incurred by the criminal justice system, £7.1 billion, including the cost of policing and processing and re-processing offenders through the courts. The average cost per crime just counting those costs would be £594, which means that the annual cost to the criminal justice system of an offender carrying out 140 crimes per year would be £83,200.

“Much of the health care cost in patching up people who have been harmed by criminals would also fall on the NHS, estimated at another 7 percent by the Home Office, a total annual cost of £2.4 billion — on its own more than the total cost of the prison service (£2.2 billion).

“Another 12 percent was the result of lost output, £4.3 billion. If criminals are released and crime increases the lost output would reduce tax revenues,” Dr Green said.

ConDem Government Abandons Yet another Tory Election Promise

ConDem Government Abandons Yet another Tory Election Promise

The ConDem coalition government has abandoned yet another Tory election promise, this time the one which undertook to bar immigrants unless they had a command of English.

The promise was a major part of the Conservative Party’s election campaign in the completely false assumption that speaking English would turn a Congo pygmy into an Englishman.

However, even this absurd presumption has been thrown away, like almost all other Tory election promises, with the ruling by Home Secretary Theresa May that the families of asylum seekers will be exempt from the rule.

The announcement was made on the quiet in a written Commons reply last week which said: “The new language requirement will not apply to dependants of refugees and people granted humanitarian pro­tection in the UK.”

The reason for the ruling is directly attributable to Britain’s membership of the European Union.

The demand that asylum seekers speak English breaches Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives everyone “the right to a family life.”

It was to fit in with this EU rule that the previous Labour regime introduced the Human Rights Act (which the Conservatives also promised to repeal, another promise which they threw out the window).

It is therefore possible for an asylum seeker to argue that their right to a “family life” is greater than the demand that they speak English.

As such, the EU court can override any rule made by a British court.

Although the Tories will now claim that they have no choice but to accept this “exception” to their rule, the reality is that all objective observers knew all along that this was an impossible promise to fulfil.

Membership of the EU compels Britain to abide by that organisation’s rules and laws.

The Conservatives’ promises to repeal the Human Rights Act, “roll back EU power” and force immigrants to speak English are all impossible to achieve while Britain remains a member of the EU.

All of this is obvious from the briefest reading of the Lisbon Treaty, which forces observers to one of only two conclusions:

1. The Tories really did not know, and they are incompetent fools; or

2. The Tories do know what the situation is, and they deliberately lied to the public.

Either way, the verdict on the Tories is equally ghastly.

BNP Newsroom