Search This Blog

Saturday 7 August 2010

How Third World Immigration Is Returning TB to Britain

Importing Disease: How Third World Immigration Is Bringing Back TB to Britain

The current tuberculosis screening system for immigrants into Britain does not work and is exposing the indigenous population to thousands of infected persons from Third World nations with 70 percent of all new cases attributable to immigrants.
This is the conclusion which can be drawn from an article in the latest edition of the British Medical Association’s respiratory health journal, Thorax.
Around 8,500 cases of active disease are diagnosed annually in the UK, [of which] more than 70 percent of which are in people born elsewhere,” the article,
Rethinking TB screening: politics, practicalities and the press, authored by specialists Dr John Moore-Gillon and Professors Peter Davies and Peter Ormero, said.
The authors also revealed that the state’s ‘Port of Arrival Scheme’ which has operated since 1971, has failed.
This scheme focuses on those wishing to stay in the UK for at least six months and arriving from countries with high rates of TB (classed as more than 40 cases per 100,000 of the population).
"Clearly, current methods of TB screening for new entrants...are not working," they continue, adding that the reason for the system’s failure is because there are no standard criteria for who is offered screening and there is often no way of checking whether the subjects actually turn up to a local clinic as instructed.
“Furthermore, a TB screen is triggered only by migration status, not by arrival from a high risk country,” the article continues.
“And the screen is geared towards picking up active infection, yet it is
estimated that a third of the global population has latent TB infection.
More incredibly, the screen is also designed to uncover respiratory TB, yet TB in other sites of the body, such as the spine, gut, kidneys and brain, accounts for almost half (44 percent) of cases in new arrivals.
The authors suggest that the “best option would be for recently arrived immigrants from high risk countries to be screened in community services,” though, they add, “such services are currently overstretched due to increased demand.”
The doctors finally pose the question if the “time has come for new arrivals to be granted a residency permit only on condition they register with a GP for a TB test, as is the case in the Netherlands and Norway.”
Figures for 2008 show that the largest number of new TB cases and deaths occurred in the south-east Asia region, while sub-Saharan Africa had a particularly high incidence rate. 

Friday 6 August 2010

Germany and the Euro: What Will Be the Ultimate Outcome?

Germany and the Euro: What Will Be the Ultimate Outcome?

A severe crisis often results in economic and political disaster, but it can also foster an opportunity for exercising much greater control, especially for an economically strong and dominant country like Germany. Does the Bible indicate where the current crisis (and others like it to follow) could eventually take Europe?

by John Ross Schroeder http://www.gnmagazine.org/

The euro, the shared currency of 16 nations in the European Union (EU), came into being some 11 years ago. But the economic and monetary union it represents has met with a dire situation, calling the currency's survival into question.
A former president of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, recently declared: "When the euro was born, everyone knew that sooner or later a crisis would occur. It was inevitable that, for such a bold and unprecedented project, in some countries mistakes would be made and unforeseeable events occur" (Financial Times, May 21, 2010).
As with any chain, that of the euro is only as strong as its weakest link—which in this case turned out to be Greece.
Heavily in debt, it was in danger of default and being forced off the euro—which would lead to many investors losing confidence in other overextended eurozone countries and abandoning euro holdings. The EU and the International Monetary Fund decided to bail out Greece to maintain the eurozone and buoy up faith in the currency. And political integration has been pushed forward in order to impose stricter financial discipline on member states.
Mr. Prodi went on to say: "I was warning years ago that . . . extraordinary events could occur that would force joint co-ordination of fiscal policies. Then the Greek crisis arrived—serious in terms of the sins that caused it, but easily solvable considering the modest size of the country's economy."
Most European observers would probably take issue with his statement about an easy solution, as the situation remains precarious for Europe and the global economy. But his overall assessment about closer integration seems to be pretty much on target.

European political integration or eventual meltdown?

Daily Express columnist Leo McKinstry analyzes the current situation more bluntly: "The moment of truth has arrived for the European Union. The debt crisis has brought the single currency to the brink of meltdown. Leaders of the EU now face a stark choice.
"They can either allow the eurozone to fall apart through the withdrawal of hopelessly indebted member states such as Greece and Portugal, or ruthlessly press ahead with full economic and political unification, creating a new European nation that will impose fiscal discipline throughout its territory" (May 21, 2010, emphasis added throughout).
Hamish McRae, chief economics commentator for The Independent, offers his own assessment—embedded in the title of his recent article: "The euro should survive this crisis; but it won't get through the next one" (May 21, 2010).
A Stratfor Global Intelligence report stated: "The euro and the European Union will probably survive this crisis—although their mutual failure is not nearly as unthinkable as the Europeans would have thought even a few months ago—but this is not the only crisis Europe will experience" (May 25, 2010).
Romano Prodi, in his piece quoted above, expressed his own assessment: "We are therefore at a crossroads. The only alternative to greater co-ordination of economic policies is dissolution of the euro."

The German and British roles—and their mutual relationship

Berlin took a calculated risk by banning short selling of euro-area government sovereign credit-default swaps and 10 German financial stocks until March 2011. Whether boldly or foolishly, it made this decision unilaterally, without consulting France or any other member country of the eurozone. Though the action has invited immediate backfire, being generally condemned as ill-judged, this German government rarely acts without careful calculation.
One observer speculated about the possibility of "a smash-and-grab attack on the future of the eurozone that could transform the dynamic of the European Union" (Bill Jamieson, "Germany Pushes the Issue Too Far," The Wall Street Journal, May 21, 2010).
"'If we don't avert this danger, then the consequences for Europe are inevitable,' [German Chancellor Angela] Merkel said. 'Because if the euro is failing, then Europe is failing . . . This will all remain in place until other rules [other than those in Germany] are established on a European level'" (Andrew Thomas, "Germany's Merkel: Failure of Euro Means Failure of Europe," The Wall Street Journal, May 19, 2010). Clearly Berlin, as key paymaster for Greece and other weaker economies, expects the eurozone members to follow its leadership.
The Stratfor Global Intelligence report commented: "As we have seen during the current crisis, Germany is clearly the economic center of gravity in Europe, and this crisis has shown that the economic and political issues are very much one and the same. Unless Germany agrees, nothing can be done, and if Germany so wishes, something will be done" (May 25, 2010).
Partially through the efforts of dislodged Labour Party Prime Minister Gordon Brown (while he was still chancellor of the Exchequer), Britain has retained its pound sterling and so far avoided joining the eurozone. While on board a ferry crossing the Irish Sea from Britain to Ireland, I watched on TV the newly elected British Prime Minister David Cameron in a joint news conference with Angela Merkel, ostensibly in support of German efforts to stem the current crisis. Apparently they had a 90-minute meeting as well.
But the night before (May 20), as reported by The Guardian, Mr. Cameron had apparently confided to French President Nicolas Sarkozy, "I always had concerns about the euro on a fundamental level" (May 22, 2010). The same article states, "Cameron's footwork looked impeccable—until he used the V-word with Merkel."
During the news conference with Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Cameron "declared that the support of all 27 EU countries was needed to change the Lisbon Treaty to stiffen the rules for the single currency, something Merkel stressed might be necessary to revive the euro." Calling her attention to the "V-word," Cameron said: "The United Kingdom has a veto. Those are very important points to understand."

Tensions between Britain and Brussels

The new British government's plans for Europe have been summed up in a white paper published in The Daily Telegraph. It says: "Britain should play a leading role in an enlarged European Union, but no further powers should be transferred to Brussels without a referendum . . . Britain will not join the euro in this Parliament and the possibility of a United Kingdom sovereignty bill stressing the 'ultimate authority' of Parliament will be explored" (May 21, 2010).
Well-known British author Frederick Forsyth, also a columnist for the Daily Express, starkly stated: "Once again Brussels has come up with a new decree aimed at afflicting more damage on our country. Like it or not London's Square Mile absolutely dominates the world of the hedge fund [an investment fund to protect against losing money] . . . The funds generate a huge amount of wealth and they are overwhelmingly based here.
"So Brussels has come up, impelled by the Franco-German alliance, with a series of measures to cripple them . . . It is just a ploy to hound them [the hedge funds] out of London where they contribute billions to the British economy." This particular piece was titled, "Humiliating Britain Is Still Top Item of Brussels Agenda" (May 21, 2010).
John Griffing asked the question in his article in The American Thinker: "How did independent nations with separate identities and divergent cultures allow themselves to be bullied into submission by a gaggle of European bureaucrats in Brussels?"
All human aspirations and failures aside, the ultimate answer appears to lie in the fulfillment of Bible prophecy. With all of its ups and downs, and whatever the eventual fate of the euro, the European Union has set up a complex infrastructure of bureaucratic government that could well be used by a future charismatic dictator reminiscent of Adolf Hitler. According to the biblical book of Revelation, many people will actually come to worship this man and the empire over which he will rule. Scripture calls both the man and the empire "the Beast."
Jesus Christ urged His followers, "Watch therefore, and pray always that you may be counted worthy to escape all these things that will come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man" (Luke 21:36). You need to be sure you're regularly reading The Good News to properly comprehend what we are told to watch! GN

Related Resources

The Book of Revelation Unveiled
Is the book of Revelation relevant today? Is it possible to understand it?
Are We Living in the Time of the End?
Religious people aren't the only ones asking this crucial question. Many recognize that we live in an increasingly dangerous world.
Moses and the Prophets: The Old Testament in the Jewish church, the prophets and Phrophecy in Israel, and the Prophets of Israel

A Personal Message from Nick Griffin to All British Patriots

Nick GriffinDear Fellow Patriot,

A Message From BNP Chairman Nick Griffin MEP
I am personally writing to you today to draw your attention to a grave situation we find ourselves in at present. As you know, we have all worked extremely hard for many years to gain success. Some people think that now we've broken through into the political and media big time, our troubles are over. Not so! With success comes new challenges and obstacles, and the party is now suffering acute legal and financial pressure.
Precisely because we've shown we can win, we are being forced to fight for our very existence! The anti-British Equalities Minister is running a ruthless campaign of legal persecution to destroy our party. The spiteful and venomous move by the ConDem Home office to bar me from the Queen's Garden Party once again shows all too clearly that the liberal-left Establishment will stop at nothing in their desperation to halt our progress.
The impact of these attacks on our finances is severe. We have to buy in the services of expensive legal experts just to survive as a party. Our latest response to Trevor Phillips and the PC bullies is 27 pages of razor-sharp legal argument. If there is anything like justice, it will 'rip' apart their case in court. We cannot begin to produce such material by ourselves.
An expert - especially one who will have courage to risk all by helping us against our enemies - does not come cheap. This has been so urgent that some of the money we had allocated to pay other pressing bills had to be diverted to this most urgent fight.
In short, we are cash struck. We've made good progress with the money already raised and spent on infrastructure, equipment and campaigns over the last 3 years. But our successes have unleashed the furies of hell against us. Our existence is being challenged and it's costing us dear.
Be clear on this, if you don't give, we can't fight... and if we don't fight we will be shut down and killed off... THE END! If they win, the British people - and most especially our children - would be left voiceless and at the mercy of the PC fanatics and the Islamist extremists who hate all we hold dear. It's that brutal.
We are the last bastion of the rights of our indigenous white society. If they break us, our people will be left defenceless!
In the wake of the Establishment's Palace own goal, public sympathy for our party is at an all time high. We are ready to roll out the advances we've made centrally over the last 2 years to our regions and local branches. The future really does belong to us, but only if we can keep our forces in the field.
We can't take that for granted. Our current financial situation is certainly not good. On top of the legal attacks on us, we have fought massive European and General election campaigns back-to-back in under a year. And we've had the enormous cost of modernizing our central party machine.
I know how generous everybody has been over the last year, that's why I did not want to send you a simple appeal letter. I am writing to you like this to ask you personally to help your party out of these current difficulties. Our enemies' attacks on our very existence are placing an intolerable strain on us and I need you to help me guide the party through this difficult period. We need to raise £150,000 to keep the wolves at bay and to ensure our survival.
I know you love our country and your commitment to our cause is beyond reproach and that's why I am asking you in earnest to give as generously as you can right now to keep the party machine rolling on in defence of our constitution, our true nationalist principles and our right to exist.
Over the last year we have built a political powerbase that has astounded the Establishment and as you know, it has worked and will keep working! Through top-flight campaigning and administration while delivering the electoral breakthroughs, what we have achieved has sent out the signal that the British National Party is a real 'threat' to the status quo. That's why we are now under such serious attack.
Today we stand at the crossroads of history. Do we pull together and go on to launch a really effective challenge to win seats in next year's Welsh and Scottish parliamentary elections, or do we scale back our operation and go back to being a 'fringe party'? Only you and how you respond to this letter can decide the future direction and survival of our party.
By digging deeper than ever before you will be making a statement that you are with me on our journey to even greater success to winning in the big PR elections next year and then onto Westminster.
As I said on TV on the day I was barred from the Palace, we are David to the establishment's thuggish Goliath. But right now, were out of the slingshots we need to keep fighting - in blunt terms, hard cash! I will never let you down, you have my solemn word on this, and right now I really need your help to get us out of this dangerous situation. Remember, your donation is the weapon our enemies fear the most….Please use it.

Donate Button
Yours sincerely,
Nick Griffin
Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Opposing 'Eurabia' - The Time for ACTION is now! A Message From Nick Griffin MEP

BNP


Opposing 'Eurabia' - The Time for ACTION is now!
David Cameron and his slick PR machine convinced
large numbers
of desperate British folk during the recent election
that he would bring genuine 'change' to our country.
The Cameron honeymoon period has already ended
and his true, treacherous intentions are revealed for all to see.
Practically every single Conservative election pledge,
including their 'daft' immigration promises,
have been ditched with breathtaking speed and openness. 
The BNP's frank statement that Lib-Lab-Con election pledges 
are totally fraudulent has been proved fundamentally correct.
But nothing could demonstrate any better that the old Conservative Party
and its support for traditional British values is totally dead
than the sickening sight of David Cameron this week visiting Turkey 
and promising to promote and support the entry of Turkey into the European Union.
Firstly, Turkey is not a European country, 
but a nation of the Middle East, with traditions, culture
and a way of life 
that is completely alien to traditional Europe.
Secondly, Turkey is an Islamic country with a population of
around 80 million. 
Every country of the European Union is Christian
with a Christian heritage that is completely at odds with Islam.
If Turkey is granted entry into the European Union,
that would mean that 80 million Muslim low-wage
Turks would be able to move freely across Europe. 
Even the most sensible observers admit this would trigger a tidal wave 
of Muslim immigration into Europe totally changing
the face of our continent
Making this nightmare scenario even more terrifying is
the fact that Turkey 
has just relaxed immigration controls on its eastern borders
touching its
Middle Eastern neighbours.
This means that the untold countless Islamic millions
of the Middle East only have to cross the lax border
into Turkey and they
immediately are entitled to travel to Britain,
claim asylum and work within the EU.
The entry of Turkey into the EU would be nothing less than
a total catastrophe for Britain and for Christian Europe, 
and is the first stepping stone on the path to creating the
liberal-left dream of 'Eurabia',
the fusion of Europe and the Middle East.
This is why the British National Party is
leading the British resistance to the European Union, 
to the mass immigration displacing
our people from our own homeland, 
and to the evil plan to bring Turkey -
a gigantic Muslim country - into the EU, 
leading to a disastrous new wave of migration
into our Continent.
The time for talking is over -
now is the time for action!
Is that the future you want for your children? 
Will you regret it when it is too late and you wished
you would have joined the
British Resistance when you had the chance?
The British National Party is
Britain's fastest growing political party,
with dozens of councillors, 
a seat on the Greater London Assembly
and two seats in the European Parliament.
The clock is ticking, our country is dying,
and our beautiful innocent children are
depending on us to save their future.
Here are the different membership options:


METHOD #1: Join the British Resistance

The BNP is the only hope for our country,
for our children and grand-children. 
There are thousands of people receiving
this e-bulletin that are not members yet.
Why not join the British Resistance
to political correctness,
multiculturalism and the enforced
colonisation of our country. Membership costs only £30:

Join Button

METHOD #2: Become a Life Member

Life members are that small elite of
British patriots that sign-up 
to the Cause of British Nationalism
for life, not just for one year. Life membership 
comes with various other attractive benefits:

Life Button

METHOD #3: Become a Gold Member

Gold members stand out from the
crowd due to the unique gold membership badge
that all Gold members wear with pride. 
Gold membership costs just £60
and shows that little bit of extra commitment
to the Cause of British survival:

Gold Button

METHOD #4: Upgrade your membership

For the thousands of existing BNP members
out there why not upgrade your membership to Gold
or even Life? Upgrading your membership
shows your commitment 
to our Cause and provides real and substantial
benefits to you and the Party:

Upgrade Button

Thank you in advance for your loyalty and support.
Yours sincerely,
Nick Griffin
Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party
 

Thursday 5 August 2010

New Report Confirms that NHS Waiting Lists Have Risen After EU Rules Implement

BNP News

Predictions that patient waiting lists would rise dramatically if European Union rules on working hours were implemented have proven to be completely accurate in a new study issued by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS).
The EU rules, which were implemented last August, have seen thousands of patients waiting up to 18 weeks longer than usual for surgery, the report said.
“The increase is predictable,” John Black, RCS president was quoted as saying. “If you have the same number of patients, no more doctors and ask them to work less then it is inevitable that the time available for elective procedures will reduce and waiting lists grow.”
He pointed out that the rule was so ridiculous that “most European countries had bypassed the legislation by either not monitoring compliance or, as in Germany and Holland, finding ways around the directive.”
The report found that 80 percent of consultant surgeons and two thirds of surgical trainees said “patient care had deteriorated since the directive was implemented.”
A 2009 RCS report said that there were not enough surgeons to fill rotas if they worked only 48 hours a week and that 90 percent of trainee doctors were exceeding their timetabled hours on a weekly basis.
That survey also revealed that 55 percent of surgeons reported being pressured to falsely declare their actual hours worked and that 68 percent felt that their training and skills had deteriorated as a result of shift-working patterns introduced to meet the working time regulations.
At least 71 percent felt the reduction in overall hours had not led to any improvement in their work-life balance.
In March 2009, think-tank Open Europe issued a study on the EU’s working time directive called titled Time’s UP! The case against the EU’s 48 hour working week.
“In the middle of a full-blown recession, we estimate that the Working Time Directive as it currently applies in the UK is already costing the economy between £3.5 billion and £3.9 billion every year,” the report said.
Open Europe goes on to quote a NHS nurse in London as saying that the “important practice of ensuring patients see the same nurse could be threatened by a maximum 48 hour week. ‘It is common sense that there will be nurse shortages once all the nurses have worked their maximum permitted number of hours.’”
Their report continued: “In 2000, the UK Government gave way in a similar stage of the negotiations, that time on a proposal which limited working hours for junior doctors the effect of which was tantamount to losing between 4,300 and 9,900 junior doctors, according to the British Medical Association.
Click here To Join the British National Party 

Wednesday 4 August 2010

Con-Dems Council House Secure Tenancy Plan What Will it Mean In Reality

Author, Horwich Nationalists

It was with some alarm that I heard today that the Con-Dem Axis of Evil were today announcing that they intended to change the Secure Tenancy agreements of millions of British Low income families!
I could not help thinking when it was mentioned that they will look at British Tenants circumstances and how they change over time. Twinned with the rise in the Population of the UK, through Immigration and the growth of the Ethnic population of the UK.

That many indigenous British people especially the Elderly will now be forced from their homes , were they raised their children and put a lifetime of effort and money into the properties the rent on behalf of the councils, in order that Immigrant and asylum seeking clans can have their properties! who,s rent will be paid for the oppressed British Worker once again.
So in effect not only will we be made homeless but we will be expected to pay for it to!
Alarmist you may think but by the past standards of the Marxist elite that now dominate the halls of Westminster, anything is possible that is to detriment of the true British People!

If you are reading this and thinking my goodness what can I do about it, WELL their is something that you can do join the British National party now, to have a SECURE HOME, A SECURE NATION, AND MORE THAN ANYTHING A SECURE FUTURE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR CHILDREN  click this link to join NOW! https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html 

Immigration: How a Foreign Invasion Is Reshaping the West

An article on the Christian view of what is happening to the western world through the policy of mass 3rd world Immigration, once again convinces me , that we are not just up against the forces of Marx and Multi Nationals, But! are facing the REAL! Forces of Darkness.
before you scoff and say well whatever religious Nutter!
just read on! And you will see that our battle is not just for the NATION, BUT FOR IT,S SOULS ALSO! 


From the Good News magazine 
Suddenly, immigration is becoming a bigger issue throughout the Western world. Governments around the globe are very concerned about potential problems that massive immigration may bring.


Immigration: How a Foreign Invasion Is Reshaping the WestImmigration: How a Foreign Invasion Is Reshaping the West

In the last 50 years, millions of people from the Third World have moved into the Western democracies. Many have contributed to the welfare of these nations, but others lack work skills, proper education and democratic convictions. What will it mean if and when these ever-growing minorities begin to constitute the majority in several key countries?

by Melvin Rhodes

The American state of Arizona, which borders Mexico, recently passed a law authorizing police to inquire of people they've stopped for other legitimate reasons if they are in the United States legally, should there be sufficient reason to suspect otherwise, and to ask for proof of their legal status in such case. Illegal immigrants have contributed to mounting crime, increasing health and educational costs and other problems in the state.
Most of Arizona's citizens support the law, though some organizations outside the state have announced boycotts, which could cost it a great deal. Even the federal government is considering filing lawsuits to prevent the law from being implemented.

Immigration reshaping Western countries

A car bomb placed in New York City's Times Square on May 1, 2010, was the 11th attempted terrorist act in the city of New York since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The bomb—which, thankfully, failed to go off as planned—raised some deeply troubling questions about even legal immigration.
How could a young Pakistani immigrant who lived the American dream possibly want to kill hundreds of his fellow citizens? The United States and other Western democracies, still coming to terms with radical Islam, are finding it hard to fathom. It just doesn't fit into the multicultural ideal!
France, Belgium, Italy and other European countries are passing laws to block Islamic women from wearing full veils in public. Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel is insisting the country's large Turkish population should assimilate, while the Turkish prime minister insists they should have their own separate schools to protect their Islamic identity.
Meanwhile, a Danish cartoonist whose cartoon depicting the prophet Muhammad led to riots in a number of countries was threatened by an ax-wielding intruder, and a Swedish cartoonist was physically attacked by protesters shouting "Allah is great!" as he gave a lecture on free speech. Muslims insist that freedom of speech, long cherished in the West, has its limits.
In Britain, the issue of immigration may have cost Prime Minister Gordon Brown the recent election. When a 65-year-old supporter of his own party approached him during the campaign and expressed concern about all the immigrants from Eastern Europe flowing into her neighborhood, Mr. Brown was overheard in his car describing her as a "bigoted woman."  Leaders clearly don't like the sensitive issue of immigration being brought up.
But it's not going to go away.

Majorities becoming minorities in their own land

People are feeling increasingly threatened by the changing demographics in their own nations. The ethnic composition of Western countries is rapidly altering due to massive immigration in the last few decades. The United States alone took in 10 million more immigrants in the seven years following Sept. 11, 2001—many of them from countries rife with radical Islamists. To many citizens, this just doesn't make sense.
An increasing number of Americans are aware that these demographic changes will lead to a majority nonwhite population in their own lifetimes. How they handle this will determine the country's future. As Time magazine put it: "How the current majority reacts to its incipient minority status is the most crucial socio-demographic issue facing the country" (Gregory Rodriguez, "The White Anxiety Crisis," March 22, 2010, international edition).
In an amazing break from tradition, many Western nations changed their immigration policies after World War II and welcomed millions of people from the Third World. Even the United States, often deemed a cultural "melting pot," had an immigration policy prior to 1965 that favored maintaining the racial status quo.
The late Senator Edward Kennedy's 1965 immigration bill deliberately changed earlier policy, welcoming a big influx of immigrants from the world's poorer nations. At the time, Americans were assured it would not alter the ethnic mix and social fabric of their nation.
Now it's evident this assurance was false. One could easily make the argument that the election of America's first African-American president would not have happened without the reality of changing demographics.

Immigration leading to unrest

The issue of immigration was briefly discussed on NBC's Chris Matthews Show on May 9, 2010.
During the program, John Heilemann of New York magazine observed: "We're going through one of these once-in-a-century transformations that cuts across a lot of different things—cultural change, there's big demographic change, there's big economic change, and technological change, and it makes people really nervous. It's been going on for about 15 years in America—the sense of anxiety, the sense we've lost control of our lives."
Also on the show was Cynthia Tucker, a columnist with the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who offered this perspective: "I've always thought that this great melting pot or salad, however you want to describe this diverse nation, works as long as the economy is good, as long as the pie is growing and every American believes he or she has an opportunity to get a piece of that pie, we're all pretty happy." 
However, now that the economy is not doing so well, the United States could be in for a more stressful time when it comes to assimilating the various ethnic groups that now live in the country.
The same applies elsewhere, of course. Some of the eurozone countries are on the brink of financial collapse due to decades of overspending. Severe government spending cuts are inevitable. The nations have already seen unemployment rise. Without jobs, many are already blaming immigrants for their situation.
In the latest election in Britain, the anti-immigrant British National Party almost tripled the share of the vote it received in the 2005 election. In fact, anti-immigrant parties are seeing growing support in a number of European countries.
The perceived threat applies on several different levels.

Security a growing concern

Besides feeling that their way of life is threatened, both culturally and economically, people are also becoming more concerned about security as radical terror movements increasingly recruit homegrown terrorists. Commenting on the recent attempted bombing in Times Square, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies professor Fouad Ajami wrote the following in the May 10, 2010, Wall Street Journal:
"'A Muslim has no nationality except his belief,' the intellectual godfather of the Islamists, Egyptian Sayyid Qutb, wrote decades ago. Qutb's 'children' are everywhere now; they carry the nationalities of foreign lands and plot against them. The Pakistani-born Faisal Shahzad [who set up the car bomb] is a devotee of Sayyid Qutb's doctrine, and Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, was another.
"Qutb was executed by the secular dictatorship of [Egyptian President] Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1966. But his thoughts and legacy endure. Globalization, the shaking up of continents, the ease of travel, and the doors for immigration flung wide open by Western liberal societies have given Qutb's worldview greater power and relevance. What can we make of a young man like Shahzad working for [the cosmetics company] Elizabeth Arden, receiving that all-American degree, the MBA, jogging in the evening in Bridgeport, then plotting mass mayhem in Times Square?
"The Islamists are now within the gates. They fled the fires and the failures of the Islamic world but brought the ruin with them. They mock national borders and identities. A parliamentary report issued by Britain's House of Commons on the London Underground bombings of July 7, 2005, lays bare this menace and the challenge it poses to a system of open borders and modern citizenship.
"The four men who pulled off those brutal attacks, the report noted, 'were apparently well integrated into British society.' Three of them were second-generation Britons born in West Yorkshire. The oldest, a 30-year-old father of a 14-month-old infant, 'appeared to others as a role model to young people.' One of the four, 22 years of age, was a boy of some privilege; he owned a red Mercedes given to him by his father and was given to fashionable hairstyles and designer clothing...Two of the four, rather like Faisal Shahzad, had spent time in Pakistan before they pulled off their deed.
"A year after the London terror, hitherto tranquil Canada had its own encounter with the new Islamism. A ring of radical Islamists were charged with plotting to attack targets in southern Ontario with fertilizer bombs. A school-bus driver was one of the leaders of these would-be jihadists.
"A report by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service unintentionally echoed the British House of Commons findings. 'These individuals are part of Western society, and their "Canadianness" makes detection more difficult. Increasingly, we are learning of more and more extremists that are homegrown. The implications of this shift are profound'" ("Islam's Nowhere Men: Millions Like Faisal Shahzad Are Unsettled by a Modern World They Can Neither Master nor Reject," emphasis added).

Prophecy warned of consequences for national sins

The modern descendants of the ancient Israelites include many of the nations that make up today's Western world. In Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, God promised tremendous physical blessings if they would obey Him, but He also warned them of the dire consequences of disobedience. The promised blessings for obedience are awe-inspiring; the assurances of punishment for sins are deeply troubling.
These chapters make for sobering reading when we consider trends in recent years. In Deuteronomy 32, verse 25 warns of "terror within"—a prophecy clearly being fulfilled now, with an even greater increase in the problem likely still to come.
The apostle Paul spoke of how God created "from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings" (Acts 17:26).
Of course, this passage does not mean that correctly controlled immigration is inherently wrong, seeing that when the Israelites left Egypt the door was opened for a certain number of non-Israelites to dwell among them. However, they had to leave their culture behind and abide by the same laws God gave the Israelites. We are now learning the negative consequences of the multicultural society that has been propagated for the last 50 years.
Mixing cultures, and especially religions, can be volatile! We should have known that before the change in immigration laws just by looking at history and at other societies where mixing religions has led to serious tension and conflict.
The people of Europe feel particularly threatened. With higher population densities than the United States and closer proximity to the volatile Middle East, many West European nations have significantly high Muslim populations. Add to this Europe's low birthrate in contrast to the high Islamic birthrate, and the potential for violent conflict only increases.
And as we've seen, it's not just security that is threatened. Economics also play a major role. God Himself warned of serious consequences for the native peoples as a result of immigration: "The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail" (Deuteronomy 28:43-44).
In other words, the strangers—those of foreign cultures and religions—will end up on top, in control and in time possibly dictating a way of life foreign to the indigenous population.
This is, of course, exactly what happened when European settlers started arriving in North America, Australia and elsewhere—they ended up on top and in control, displacing the native populations. Now, two or three centuries later, they are the ones losing control to newer arrivals.
Immigration trends and birthrates show that sometime in this century the peoples who currently dominate most of the Western nations will be minorities in their own lands. Whatever you may think of the ethnic mix, the reality is that significant change is underway, and it's threatening no less than the future of Western civilization. GN
 read more at www.gnmagazine

Related Resource

The United States and Britain in Bible Prophecy
Where does the United States of America appear in Bible prophecy? Does Bible prophecy neglect to mention major nations such as the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom? In fact, many prophecies do mention these nations.
subscribe to the Good News Magazine! http://www.gnmagazine.org/subscribe/index.htm

Tuesday 3 August 2010

Rochdale Asian Gang force English Girl, 14, to be prostitute in Greater Manchester

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

From Bolton Patriot

Girl, 14, forced to be prostitute in Greater Manchester


A 14-year-old was forced into prostitution and sexually abused by a series of men after going missing from her home in Greater Manchester.

Nine men were convicted in connection with the abuse, which took place in February and March 2008.

The girl, described as vulnerable, was "used as a commodity" for sexual activity with the men, police said.

Supt Paul Savill, of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), said she had been through an "absolutely horrifying ordeal".

Police said the girl, who first went missing on 16 February 2008, had been abused by a number of different men "as she went from one vulnerable situation to another".

In each case the men identified her vulnerability to take advantage of her.

In a statement issued following the convictions, the girl said: "These people exploit young girls, introduce them to prostitution, feed them drugs and alcohol and tell them they love them.

'Changed my life'

"I know this because it has happened to me and it has changed my life enormously.

"I just hope that people will be more aware of this now and will be able to prevent this from happening to other vulnerable young girls."

Continue reading the main story

Start Quote
She has been treated like a commodity: beaten, threatened and sexually exploited”
End Quote
Supt Paul Savill

Greater Manchester Police
Over a series of separate hearings and trials, Manchester Crown Court heard how the girl was first picked up in Rochdale town centre by Asad Hassan.

He took her to a nightclub where she was plied with drink and taken to a flat along with two other men, Basharat Mohammed and Mohammed Atif, who all later sexually exploited her.

A few days later she travelled to Manchester where she met another man, Aftab Khan, who also plied her with alcohol and drugs before ordering her to work as a prostitute.

Over the next 10 days she was forced to have sex with a number of men for money, before flagging down a couple in the street and begging them for help.

Supt Savill said the level of abuse the girl had suffered was "almost beyond belief".

"She has been treated like a commodity: beaten, threatened and sexually exploited.

"These men took advantage of her vulnerability with no regard for her wellbeing.

"I commend this young girl for her bravery in supporting this case. Even after her ordeal she was able to revisit the sites where she was abused and testify against her abusers in court."

'Nightmare experience'

The girl's parents added: "We are very proud of our daughter for her courage in assisting Greater Manchester Police with the prosecution of these abusers who caused her such terrible harm.

"No family should have to endure a nightmare experience like the one we have been through.

"We support our daughter in hoping that these successful prosecutions will send a message that will help protect other children."

Nine men convicted at Manchester Crown Court in connection with the abuse were:

Aftab Khan, 31, of Tarporley Avenue, Fallowfield pleaded guilty to one count of controlling a child prostitute and one count of sexual activity with a child. He was sentenced to nine years in prison. This was later reduced to seven years on appeal
Abid Khaliq, 30, of Shrewsbury Street, Stretford was sentenced to eight months in prison after admitting perverting the course of justice
Noorzai Ahmed, 29, of Royce Court, Hulme was sentenced to four years in prison after he was found guilty of paying for the sexual services of a child
Mohammed Anwar Safi, 29, of no fixed address, was sentenced to 31 months in prison after admitting paying for the sexual services of a child
Mohammed Khan, 26, of Royce Court, Hulme was sentenced to four years in prison after he was found guilty of facilitating child prostitution
Najibullah Safi, 33, of Reabrook Avenue, West Gorton was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting to sexual activity with a child
Asad Yousaf Hassa, 28, of Rivington Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting two counts of sexual activity with a child
Mohammed Basharat, 28, of Prospect Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after he pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child under 16
Mohammed Atif, 29, of Rivington Street, Rochdale was sentenced to two years in prison after admitting to sexual activity with a child

President’s “English Are Anti-Semitic” Remarks in Context Concerning Future Demographics

Israeli President’s “English Are Anti-Semitic” Remarks in Context

Israeli president Shimon Peres’s remark that the “English are “anti-Semitic” is highly insulting but is valuable because it starkly reveals the irreconcilable dichotomy of Lib-Lab-Con foreign and domestic policies.
Mr Peres’s comment is not shocking in itself — as Israelis tend to automatically dismiss any criticism of Israel as “anti-Semitism,” which it is not — but his follow-up remark, that the increasing number of Muslim voters in Britain will inevitably have an effect on British politics, is extremely accurate.
Mr Peres, who was awarded an honorary knighthood by the Queen in 2008, said that England's attitude towards Jews was Israel's "next big problem.”
"There are several million Muslim voters, and for many members of parliament, that's the difference between getting elected and not getting elected," he said.
There can be no doubt that the steady swamping of Britain through Third World immigration and Islamification will indeed change the face of this country and its foreign policy forever.
An Islamified Britain and Europe will be disastrous for Israel as the Jewish state’s support base in Europe (and ultimately America) will vanish and be replaced by Third World-dominated regimes which will be highly hostile to Zionism.
Over the long term, this will lead to the cutting off of the massive foreign aid handouts to Israel from the United States of America, upon which the Zionist state depends for its survival.
In that sense, Mr Peres’s remarks are spot on. The Islamification of Britain and the West will be Israel’s “next problem.”
However, Mr Peres’s further comments that “England was deeply pro-Arab ... and anti-Israeli" and “always worked against us [Israel]” are staggeringly incorrect and deeply insulting.
On the contrary, the continuing Middle Eastern wars into which Britain is always dragged are driven primarily by a British subservience to American foreign policy.
American foreign policy was exposed as being completely dominated by the right-wing Zionist lobby in America (which is a coalition of Likud-supporting Zionists and fundamentalist Christian organisations) in the 2007 New York Times bestseller book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy by John Mearsheimer, Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and Stephen Walt, Professor of International Relations at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.
As a result, the dichotomy of Lib-Lab-Con policies has emerged: on the one hand, a pro-Israeli foreign policy (ungratefully dismissed by Mr Peres) combined with a domestic policy of encouraging Muslim immigration from nations with whom Israel is in conflict.
Thus Britain finds itself offering sanctuary to massive numbers of Pakistani nationals while that country does not even recognise Israel’s existence and is sworn to destroy it.
Mr Peres’s remarks therefore need to be seen in context: he is correct in pointing out that demographic change here will influence British foreign policy against Israel, but he is most certainly wrong in asserting that current UK foreign policy is “anti-Semitic.” If anything, it is the very opposite.
The British National Party advocates complete neutrality in matters of foreign policy and demands the right to protect our nation from internal Islamic colonisation.
Only in this way can Britain be preserved from the disaster to which our nation is inevitably headed should it continue down the road mapped out by the Lib-Lab-Con liars.
Recommended reading: The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy by John J Mearsheimer and Stephen M Walt. The book describes the lobby as a "loose coalition of individuals and organizations who actively work to steer U.S. foreign policy in a pro-Israel direction." The book "focuses primarily on the lobby's influence on U.S. foreign policy and its negative effect on American interests." The authors also argue that "the lobby's impact has been unintentionally harmful to Israel as well."
The authors argue that although "the boundaries of the Israel lobby cannot be identified precisely," it "has a core consisting of organizations whose declared purpose is to encourage the U.S. government and the American public to provide material aid to Israel and to support its government's policies, as well as influential individuals for whom these goals are also a top priority." 
They note that "not every American with a favourable attitude to Israel is part of the lobby," and that although "the bulk of the lobby is comprised of Jewish Americans," there are many American Jews who are not part of the lobby, and the lobby also includes Christian Zionists. They also claim a drift of important groups in "the lobby" to the right, and overlap with the neoconservatives.
This book is important in helping to understand why Britain is involved in conflicts in the Middle East. P/B 496 pages. Click here to order online.

Reflection on Reverend West's Pal Talk Service

RevWest

Time To Reflect after Reverend West's Pal Talk Service

The Reverend West
This Author was very happy to have found another avenue for the leaders, both politically, and spiritual, of this political party to give us a wider voice, by requesting their presence in the GA Pal Talk room. Had it not been for former Councillor Russell Green, it may have just been a fleeting glance, a swift look in now and again, and nothing more.  However, once on board, it seemed only natural that it be used to engage us all, any time GA and the other hosts allowed, and create a virtual meeting place.

With the latest guest, Reverend West, something stirred within all of us I think, and that is this simple, but forgotten fact: We have a solid Christian past that was steeped in genuine love of our nation, and that God had made such nations with intent and purpose. Reverend West's talk, and short sermon and prayer, allowed us an opportunity to reflect on his words. 

Also, realising what we have already lost, and will continue to lose if we do not pull ourselves together, both as a nation and party soon, it is prudent to offer another wise man's words, to hammer home this basic philosophy of protecting our traditions, architecture, and total way of life.

Ruskin said:

''The greatest glory of a building, is not in its stones, or in its Gold. It's glory is in its age, and in that deep sense of voicefulness of stern watching, of mysterious sympathy, nay, even approval or condemnation which we feel in walls that have long been washed by the passing waves of humanity.
It is in the lasting witness against men, the decline and birth of dynasties and the changing face of earth, and connects forgotten ages with each other. It is the golden stain of time that we are to look for the red light, and colour for the preciousness of its architecture. Not until the building has assumed this character, til it has been entrusted by the deeds and fame of men, till its walls have witnessed suffering, and its pillars rise out of the shadow of death that, its existence is more lasting than natural objects. It can be gifted to posses the very language of life.''
If the above quote has bored you, or you read it out of a kind of sympathy and duty to this Author, and found it unmoving, then the very reason for our potential demise is even more imminent. It is the very fabric of both our ancient Celtic (Keltoi) ancestry, and the architecture, languages and Socio-Cultural meaning of our Christian past that Ruskin was trying to convey. Our children know nothing of the Welsh, Irish, Scots, English (W.I.S.E) tradition of poem and verse. Our last generation of now grown up men and women, are now so limited in Intellectual opportunity that the above quote, would fill them with a face-wide yawn, and unable to read past The greatest glory of a building.


At the the end of the pointless and insane Second World War, and well into the Nineteen Sixties and beyond, a vicious and hateful era of government sponsored vandalism, ran riot up and down the country. Councils were given every encouragement to reform and modernise our towns, cities, and rural inheritance. Both architecture, and social engineering destroyed the fabric of our nation.

Let us please, seriously reflect on what we still have. And that people like our current Chairman, Reverend Robert West, and a whole host of activists and support networks, including without doubt, The Green Arrow and Friends, are well and truly protected, and continue to be loyally invested in.

The very word Reform, used by our enemies from Governments to Institutions, and from Law to recent anti Nick Griffin groups, should spell out an evil link to common sense folk. Reforming anything means changing, bending, and ultimately destroying, our very existence.

Thank God for Reverend West, for if he, a man of Christian philosophy can boldy and bravely support Nationalism, then we have a future for sure.

Join in at Pal Talk Below