Working Until You Die is "Good" for the Economy

Working Until You Die is "Good" for the Economy

Created: Monday, 10 May 2010 16:06 Author: rugfish |  

No wonder Greeks are angry with their government when among its package of austerity involving increased pension ages, job cuts, the removal of protected areas of the economy like taxi driving and the legal professions, it is raising taxes and VAT.
Many Greeks will doubtless be bewildered by a system which seems only to want to take and not to give in terms of protecting the needs of its own citizenry, but of course since Greece is a part of the European Union, and since the European Union is about harmonising the bloc of countries in trade, then one can hardly be too sympathetic with Greeks when you learn that many have had retirement ages as low as age 50 and that other more productive countries such as Britain for example have sought to increase or abandon the retirement age altogether.
The UK Govt sold the idea of course, that it would be 'fairer' to 'allow' its citizens to work until they die here whilst simultaneously ending our ability to get a job by increasing immigration whilst imposing a lot of laws to promote positive discrimination where only white males can be discriminated against, and thus sold people the idea that this was good for society because Brits being without work, (obviously), is 'good for the economy???
But back to that idea the EU had to create a stable trading zone where goods bought in France were no differently priced to those bought in Spain or the Netherlands or in Britain.
This partial chart, taken from Wiki, shows the muddle of VAT rates across the EU.

It misses out a few unfortunately as I couldn't squeeze them all in here, so it's as best you know that Britain's VAT rate is currently 17.5% with a lower rate of 5% on domestic energy. Whereas Sweden's is 25% and 12%, and the Canary Isles has a top rate of 5% with no lower rate.
I wonder where harmonised trading is supposed to be in this when clearly goods bought in one country will simply not be the same as in another when VAT rates themselves are not equal?
Surely this is competition not equality?
Yet if you believe politicians (and I don't), then you would think we are part of a trading bloc in order to balance out our economic fortunes as members, and that 'protectionism', or 'competition' is to be frowned upon?
How can this be equal when incomes and salaries and pensions and pensionable ages, VAT and income taxes are not 'equal'?
But there are other questions too, and at this point I'm minded to go get some more figures but I'll resist the temptation to do that right now and instead give readers the benefit of the doubt that they themselves are intelligent enough to see there are major problems if wanting to think 'equality', if you live in an 'unequal system'.
For instance Greece doesn't have a nuclear program but France and Britain do and surely it is British and French taxpayers who would meet the bill of providing defences to Greece and to other European countries if the shit hit the fan, and meanwhile it is us who are maintaining those systems.
Another example for instance would be if the Canary Islands were seized and occupied by another dictator as they were in WWII, whether it would be the taxpayers of the Canaries who would meet the bill of British task forces with the measly contribution of Canarians of 5% which had already been re-invested into its economy and had been spent?
But I still feel sympathy personally for Greeks in their economic plight right now which sees that the only way for them to manage is with a sizeable loan through an EU and IMF led rescue plan which I can't really see as being that much different to tipping money down a Greek drain.
Greece's economy must surely have been primarily based on tourism unless you can think of any major Greek exports apart from Feta cheese? - Incidentally, the higher rate of VAT in Greece could be one reason why British tourists previously tended to have to dig deep into their Visa's when holidaying there, and it could be why 'some' would say it was a 'rip-off' when they returned?
Also, over 50% of their employed are employed by the state, and it has to be considered as to exactly where the money comes from to pay those people given that tourism generally has dropped by at best 40% across Europe?
How does Greece pay back its loan?
Oh hang on, you think tourism will bounce back and everything will be okay right?
Or maybe Greece could sell more cheese?
I would ask on the other hand, who will buy that cheese and who will be touring around Greece in the coming months, and then I'd look around and see our own economic drain hole which is about to start swirling to suck the last remaining bit of wealth out of British taxpayers pockets, in a climate where jobs are scarce, industry is non-existent, debts are high, cuts have to be made before we go under, and where our own state services employ 40% or more of the workforce on higher salaries than the national average along with immigrants who will likely not be giving up their jobs any time soon as a result that politicians have already been 'warned' - stroke - threatened with mass strikes if they make cuts to jobs or incomes.
So basically, the government will instead of upsetting immigrants and unions, go fishing into private pensions again and will have no scruples at making cuts where they hurt you but not it.
Nice for some people to feel that they are protected in a European Union where everyone and everything is 'harmonised' then?
I could go on a lot more but if I get into the industrial outputs of France and Germany versus that of all the other EU economies then I'll be here another week.
Go take a look yourselves and when you do, come back and tell me how we are 'equal partners', trading in a 'balanced economy', where we are able to live in 'harmony' in a market which is the same. And then tell me why 'protectionism' only applies if you have muscle to bring down governments like the unions in Britain which are funded predominently with money from state employees whose wages are met by the taxpayers, who are thus responsible for their own demise when that taxman's chopper lands on the back of their neck (or pension), and why anyone else can go take a flying leap because 'protectionism' is wrong (sic), and being unemployed or working until you die, and giving your jobs to immigrants is 'good' for the economy!

Britain Has Entered a New Political Era — Post Election Analysis by Nick Griffin

 

Britain Has Entered a New Political Era — Post Election Analysis by Nick Griffin

Mon, 05/10/2010 - 02:33 |  BNP News

So the election dust has now settled, and from our point of view there are four key outcomes:

First, the resulting hung Parliament and political instability will rapidly add to Gordon Brown’s economic disaster. The Bank of England prediction that whoever won this election will end up being “out of power for a generation” is now going to apply to two of the three old parties. That’s bad news for Britain, but good news for us.

Second, although many people were initially disappointed that the enormously sympathetic response (yes, don’t worry; it wasn’t just you, it had me going too!) we received from the public during the campaign did not translate into huge votes, the fact remains that this was the best general election result in the history of British nationalism. The headline figures tell us what we need to know:

* Total votes cast 563,743. This compares with 192,746 votes secured by the BNP in 117 seats in 2005. The nearest comparison historically is with 1979, when the National Front fought the now easily broken record of 303 seats, from which it garnered a feeble 191,719 votes

* There were a record number of deposits saved. This would undoubtedly have been even higher were it not for us missing out on crossing this important threshold in a number of seats by the votes that were undoubtedly lost in each constituency thanks to the confusion and concern caused by the unforgiveable sabotage of our website.

* The 6,620 votes I secured in Barking is the highest number ever cast for a BNP (or in fact for any British nationalist party) candidate in a general election.

* BNP candidates beat UKIP in the majority of seats where we went head-to-head — despite their party having vastly more money and receiving relentless media puffs. And we positively slaughtered the Greens.

Third, our frankly shocking wipe-out from Barking & Dagenham council is, when we look at the facts, not some terrible indictment of our councillors or leadership, but simply the result of a paradigm shift in the quality of Labour’s election-winning machine.

Four years ago, the British National Party, Respect and the Christian People’s Alliance between us dealt a series of shattering blows to Labour, particularly in Barking & Dagenham, Stoke, Tower Hamlets and Newham.

Rather than losing heart and wasting time blaming each other, Labour took this as a wakeup call and set about improving their election machine.

Opposition plants, sacked and bitter incompetents and ambitious knaves may use such moments to try to advance their own personal agendas, but looking for better ways to do things next time is what mature parties with real ambitions do.

Last year I wrote that Labour’s use against us of state-of-the-art US techniques imported by Obama’s Blue State Digital team was only a trial run, and that the real target in the long term was the Tory party.

Some people may not have believed me then, but look at what Labour just achieved by rolling out BSD’s potent mix of targeted voter contact, sophisticated data basing and the ruthless use of deceit and lies to sway vulnerable voters.

It didn’t just knock us out in Barking & Dagenham and take 10 of Respect’s 11 seats in Tower Hamlets, but it also eliminated all opposition on Newham council, wiping out Respect and turning a confident Christian People’s Alliance challenge into the loss of all three of their existing seats.

Despite Blair, despite Brown, the strong local challenges of three radical alternative parties have been crushed, leaving the whole of East London, from the edge of the City right out to the horsey fields of Essex, a Labour one party state.

The same tactics were also rolled out against the Tories and Lib Dems in other key areas, with the result that Labour, despite losing heavily in the general election, walked back into control of no fewer than 14 major councils up and down the country.

I am not saying that our inability to stand up to the Labour steamroller is not in part our own fault — of course it is. Our elections department did rest on its four- or five- year-old laurels, despite our failure to win a by-election for more than two years.

Personally I should have acted quicker to reinvigorate that side of the party — putting Clive Jefferson in charge with the brief to bring his innovative approach to wooing and securing the postal vote (the advance he pioneered that undoubtedly won us our two northern Euro seats last year) was something I should have done earlier.

But there’s no use crying over spilt milk or beating ourselves up over our failure to stand up to Labour’s brilliantly effective new techniques.

Rather, we must learn from the scientifically applied beating we’ve just received, and equip ourselves to hand out the same to our opponents in future.

I’m looking forward to that, and I know that it can and will be done.

The fourth and final point is that we have just seen the last first-past-the-post major election contest in British history.

Apart from local council elections, which may continue to be held on the old basis for some time yet, first-past-the-post is finished; Britain has entered a new political era.

Next year we have the Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliamentary elections — proportional representation (PR) contests in which we can win (we only missed out winning last time around in Wales by a few thousand votes, and our Welsh results last week all showed further clear improvements).

In two years’ time we have another round of Greater London Assembly elections — a PR contest in which we have already shown we can win.

Just two years after that we’ll be back contesting the European elections, defending our two seats and aiming to win more.

And probably even before then, we’ll be facing another general election. That too will almost certainly be fought with a PR system.

If a pure one were to be adopted, last week’s showing would give us twelve MPs, which would compare well with UKIP’s twenty and the Greens’ six.

In fact, the Powers-That-Be will probably plump for a less fair system, but even the worst one possible is likely to lower the threshold for victory from the present mountain of about 36 percent down to a relative molehill of 15 percent. I know which target I’d rather have to reach.

Even more worrying for Labour and their hate-filled far-left mercenaries, the voter targeting they have now mastered in local elections is many times harder to roll out in the much larger constituencies that have to be used to make PR work.

We can, and will, learn ways to use techniques such as mass telephone contacts to boost and then mobilise our core vote in those future contests, but they are far harder to apply in the negative way we’ve just seen rough us up so effectively at local level.

With all major elections from now on therefore inevitably scheduled to involve PR, our opponents have just one year in which to break the British National Party.

Make no mistake, the forces of political hell are about to be unleashed on us. ‘Operation Total Destruction of the BNP’ is being rolled out right now.

You can see it in the fake emails supposedly from me and our London organiser, the brave Bob Bailey, in which we attack each other. Disastrous news — if it were only true, but fortunately it’s not. And it would take much more than bogus emails to break the trust that people like Bob and I have in each other.

You’ll hear it in the disgusting accusations of fraud, theft and all sorts of horror stories that are already being hawked around by various Searchlight and direct state assets who have burrowed into the party over the years.

Their previous subtle negativity, ‘misjudgements’ and minor acts of ‘accidental’ disruption are now being replaced by outright lies and sabotage in a last desperate throw of the dice to break our party before it’s too late.

Again, if their tales were true, it would be a disgrace, but fortunately they are not.

Old hands have seen it before, of course, back in 1979. And that’s the real good news, because enough of us know what we will now have to face together to be able to guide our party through this treacherous passage of stormy and rocky waters.

The would-be wreckers, waving their fake lighthouse lanterns from various deadly cliffs, will get short shrift from us.

Those who offer easy routes to victory, or who whisper poison against colleagues but who publicly profess loyalty or ‘concern for the party’, should be called to account at every turn.

If you hear anything that sounds too bad to be true about the people who have transformed this party thus far, and who united will do even more good, then understand that it probably isn’t true.

New readers might at this point be thinking, “what’s going on here, surely this isn’t what happens in normal political parties?”

Well, friends new and old alike, that’s quite right. Because the BNP is NOT a “normal political party.”

In fact, in reality, we are much more than a political party, and have no desire to be like the others.

For this is not a “party”, so much as a movement — nay, the movement — of national salvation.

Without a complete change of course our entire nation and civilisation are heading for the rocks and for irrevocable disaster.

The old parties, the internationalist masters of the media, and the super rich and the banksters they all ultimately serve, are all happy with that deadly course. After all, they charted it.

So why should anyone who understands that be surprised to learn that these people — with all their money, all their greed, all their ruthlessness and all their fear of justice and the anger of a people betrayed — will use a combination of apparently ‘internal’ squabbles, wicked and baseless accusations against the innocent, and no doubt a wave of legal attacks from without, to try to drive this party to destruction over the months ahead.

They can try; they are trying — but with your loyalty and true British team spirit and dogged determination, they will fail. Our day will come — because, together, we will make it come

New Buzzword Progressive spouted by Lib Lab Crooks

New Buzzword of the Moment Progressive!

Have you spectators of the political horse trading going on at the moment by the Old gang of closet Marxists in charge of the labour and Liberal parties noticed what the the new Buzzword of the moment is? well if you have noticed for reason related to stupidity , it is PROGRESSIVE! ever since the fixed election result of last Thursday. One after another of the Lib/Lab Marxists has spouted the word progressive in their comments, even Brown in his so called resignation speech spouted it. 

Well what will this new progressive political agenda involve? Firstly it will mean a amnesty for the estimated one and half million plus illegal immigrants due to the Labour party , and full British citizenship for them, should be enough to ensure a election victory for the Labour Liberal coalition, at the next election in around 18 months.

Secondly it means that stronger anti Christian legislation is produced , so as to silence the true Churches from objecting to the moral equivalence of the perverted sodomites and I suspect the eventual moral equivalency of Pedophilia, no joke either! to suit the cultish demands of the Islamic cult they wish to replace Christianity with.


Thirdly the implementation of anti White race laws especially directed at the Anglo Saxon Male , in which in the name of equality will silence the British People, from ever objecting against their unjust treatment and the rise of a political opposition , 1st us in the British national Party and then the Old Guard Conservatives! 

These will be easily approved especially by the middle class middle aged token women harridans elected to parliament, who for the sake of a name tag and a title such as junior minister for the menopause, will in their brain washed way will stick their hand up for anything called progressive. But these Progressive hags will be in for a nasty surprise, for when the Islamic horde turn on them as they undoubtedly will, they will have destroyed if successful in their goals the only thing that could protect them, and that is the Anglo Saxon Celtic male and the British Right in Politics,And when the Islamic Republic of Eurabia is founded you know what their fate will, NOT HARD TO GUESS! 

Do not say we tried to warn you!

The End of the World as we know it

The End of the World as we know it

Created: Sunday, 09 May 2010 18:16 Author: rugfish |  

" readonly="readonly" type="text"> 
Thank you to readers for bringing this video to Green Arrows. I've just watched what I believe to be the most intelligent argument I've yet heard, as to why our voices must be listened to on the question of a disappearing culture and people, which without affirmative action will become a minority and will soon become extinct.
As British National Party members, activists and supporters repeatedly point out, this is a battle for our very survival which we must not lose.
Sum it up any which way you please, whether you be a Nationalist, a patriot, a Christian, Liberal, Socialist or Conservative, or any other type of person. This will effect you and your family and if you fail or refuse to join a cause which fights against it, then YOU alone will be responsible for the defeat of your own children and their children in future years as they will become EXTINCT.
NEVER again will YOU be given a choice to team up with the British resistance and all people who fight against us must be seen as enemies of our people.
This is no longer a time for niceties and political correctness and it is no time for weak minded individuals fighting for any other cause.You do not have the time!
Furthermore, all politicians who defy the facts described in this discussion are clearly making themselves YOUR enemies, they are enemies of freedom, enemies of democracy, enemies of your descendants and are enemies of our ancestors.
I name David Cameron as posing the biggest threat to our culture, and I name Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, as the biggest liars and traitors in British history. As for Clegg, unless he makes a comment on this website or in another place to condemn them, then he in my mind has joined their ranks.
This invitation is for everyone, to come together in the county's time of need, to back and support the policies of the British National Party and stand with us.
You are either too scared and will lose your country and people, or you are with us and will resist it.
What are you..........Man or Mouse!
Once again, thank you to readers for dropping this video into Green Arrow and friends. Supporters of the British National Party, and saviour of the British people.

Fake Emails and Whispering Campaign: Dirty Tricks Launched against BNP

Fake Emails and Whispering Campaign: Dirty Tricks Launched against BNP

  Author: Green Arrow |  

The following has been copied from Britain's most patriotic website - The British National Party. Great to see it back and publishing articles.  I am sure they will have it running at full speed soon...here is the story.

British National Party London organiser Bob Bailey has warned party activists not to be taken in by a wave of fake emails, whispering campaigns and false propaganda disguised as internal dissent.

“A hate campaign has been launched against the BNP by our increasingly hysterical enemies as they start to realise that despite the far left’s best efforts, the BNP vote not only held up in the election but actually increased overall,” Mr Bailey said.

“Today an email purporting to be from myself attacking the party leader was widely circulated amongst the crank web blogs,” Mr Bailey said.

“The email is completely fabricated and untrue. Everyone knows that despite some setbacks, the BNP’s vote has increased across the board.

“Party members must be on their guard against our enemies who are trying to sow dissension with fake rumours and lies,” he said.

“There was another email doing the rounds today supposedly from Nick Griffin which was also fake,” Mr Bailey added.

* In an act of unspeakable treason against all the hard-working BNP activists, candidates and donors, the BNP website was destroyed two days before polling day by the previous technical web master, Simon Bennett.

Mr Bennett took down the site and replaced it with pages of personal hatred and bile against the BNP’s business manager.

There was no justification for this behaviour and it was grossly unfair on all BNP supporters for Mr Bennett to take out his personal problems on everyone else who had sacrificed so much in this election campaign.

The nature of his attack and the timing thereof -- just before the election and clearly designed to inflict maximum damage on the BNP -- indicates that there is substantially more to this matter than meets the eye.

Further details will be revealed during the upcoming series of legal actions which have already been launched against Mr Bennett for damages suffered as a result of his spiteful and vindictive actions.

Nick Griffins Election Night Count Speech

NICK GRIFFINS ELECTION NIGHT COUNT SPEECH 

BNP Is Now Britain’s Fourth Party

BNP Is Now Britain’s Fourth Party

BY  BNP News

The British National Party is now Britain’s established fourth party, says nationalist election statistician Martin Wingfield.

“As some of our more vocal opponents are dancing on the grave of the electoral revival of the BNP, there comes a word of caution from other, slightly more reserved, anti-BNP campaigners in tomorrow's Financial Times,” Mr Wingfield said.

Journalist Jim Pickard writes: “The old argument against proportional representation is that it gives more voice to the most minor parties. Would its proponents really be so happy to see the British National Party get seats in the Commons? That, presumably, would be the outcome given that the BNP picked up 562,000 votes last week — up from 192,000 in 2005.

“In a theoretical PR system that could be 13 seats. But the system would probably be skewed to stop the very smallest parties getting equal representation; for example the 5 percent threshold used by the London Assembly. That didn’t stop the BNP getting a seat there, however.

“Once the BNP did have 'representation' within the Commons their grouping would have disproportionate influence in any hung Parliament situation, which would happen more frequently.

“‘Imagine if they were the kingmakers’,” says one Labour insider opposed to electoral reform.

“The counter-argument is that no far right party in Britain has ever reached the level of popularity in Britain to even merit a place on the podium. That doesn’t mean it cannot ever happen. I’m not the only person with worries about this; several cerebral politicians have told me the same thing.”

Mr Wingfield said that the Financial Times is right. “Putting aside the disappointment that we didn't make the breakthrough in our high profile seats in Barking and Stoke Central, our votes across the country in many of the 334 seats we contested were a testament to a solid bedrock of support.

“In the North East, Yorkshire and the East Midlands our candidates made inroads into the core vote of the Old Gang parties which has been established for years.

“In Wales we not only managed to save our deposits in some seats but also mounted a challenge to Plaid Cymru for the nationalist core vote.

“Anti-BNP proponents of electoral reform say that the 5 percent threshold plus an additional 2.5 percent safeguard for good measure would keep the BNP out of Westminster. How wrong they would be.

“Take a look at these results from last Thursday.

Ashton-Under-Lyne: David Lomas 2,929 votes (7.6%)

Barking: Nick Griffin 6,620 (14.6%)

Barnsley Central: Ian Sutton 3,307 (8.9%) 

Barnsley East: Colin Porter 3,301 (8.6%)

Burnley: Sharon Wilkinson 3,747 (9.05%)

Dagenham & Rainham: Michael Barnbrook 4,952 (11.2%)

Leeds Central: Kevin Meeson 3,066 (8.2%)

Leeds East: Trevor Brown 2,947 (7.8%)

Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford: Graham Thewlis-Hardy 3,864 (8.4%)

Rother Valley: Will Blair 3,616 (7.7%)

Rotherham: Marlene Guest 3,906 (10.4%)

Sheffield Brightside; John Sheldon 3,026 (7.8%)

Stoke-on-Trent Central: Simon Darby 2,502 (7.7%)

Stoke-on-Trent North: Melanie Baddeley 3,196 (8.0%)

Stoke-on-Trent North: Michael Coleman 3,762 (9.4%)

Thurrock: Emma Colgate 3,618 (7.9%)

Walsall North: Christopher Woodall 2,930 (8.1%)

Wentworth & Dearne: George Baldwin 3,189 (7.6%)

West Bromwich West: Russ Green 3,394 (9.4%)

“That's 19 constituencies where the British National Party would be staking a claim to a seat in Westminster but it's not only these high profile seats from where the BNP will be making its challenge,” Mr Wingfield said. “There are other seats where the BNP vote is ready to soar.

“This election is very much like our European election of 2004. We failed to win a seat so we were written off by the political pundits. But on closer analysis, our results on Thursday deserve much more than to be dismissed out of hand.

“In nearly 200 seats our votes were around the 4 percent mark and we were firmly established as the fourth political party. This is something to build on and shows that we have a presence across the country.

“When people digest our results in full they will see that this was a very respectable performance and bodes well for the future."

There will be a full round up of both general election and local election results in next month's issue of Voice of Freedom.”

 The Rise of Enoch PowellA Nation Not Afraid: The Thinking of Enoch Powell

Europa, Europa über alles, über alles in der Welt

Europa, Europa über alles, über alles in der Welt

 Author: Sir Percival |  

When David Cameron says he will ensure "less Europe" he is deliberately lying. He can ensure nothing of the sort because the EU has a constitution agreed under the Lisbon treaty which has

1. a qualified majority voting system (which means even if the UK vetoes anything it can still be passed) and
2. is self amending (which means that it can be changed without further negotiations).

This is incidentally the same when he says he’ll control immigration. Another lie, because the EU controls our borders.
Under a deal brokered by the Germans and French the UK will be FORCED to contribute to a fund which will be used to shore up the Euro. This is called the “European stabilisation mechanism”.
It could cost Britain BILLIONS at a time when the government, whichever colour it might be, will be making savage cuts.
And this is just the start. I have often said that the realisation that the UK is no longer a sovereign nation after Lisbon will be slow to sink in, even though it’s blindingly bloody obvious. There will be more and more of this rule from Brussels by people who frankly don’t give a toss about Britain. We can do nothing about it. Will the sheep then understand the price of treason?  Even then I doubt it.
Opinion polls before the election constantly showed a huge majority of Britons being against EU interference and yet, in the general election, more than 94% of people voted for parties that support that very interference. How soding retarded can you be?(All the main parties signed up to Lisbon including the Tories when Cameron refused a referendum on Lisbon, despite all his promises – yet another lie).
They must not bleat, they must not moan, BECAUSE THEY CHOSE THIS PATH.  And yet the stupid thick hypocrites act as if this is a shock to them.
It’s what you voted for you morons, you had your chance and chucked it away.
Now you stupid thick sheep people, you slaves, you stupid bastard cowards, down on your knees (its where you belong) and face Brussels and sing after me:
Europa, Europa über alles, über alles in der Welt

British Taxpayers Now Liable for £2 Billion of Greek Debt

Monday, 10 May 2010

British Taxpayers Now Liable for £2 Billion of Greek Debt

The proposed British share of the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) bailout of Greece has risen to nearly £2 billion, despite Britain being buried in debt due to decades of Tory and Labour mismanagement.

The £2 billion annual fee could be Britain’s pro-rata share of the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) bailout of Greece, a nation which has a deficit almost identical to that of Britain.

Originally the IMF had planned on contributing €15 billion, which would have made the UK’s share £650 million. That number was then raised to €20 billion, pushing the UK’s share up to £1 billion, and now has been raised again to €40 billion, of which the UK will have to pay £2 billion.

The collapsing 11-year-old euro fell 4.3 percent last week. In addition, spreads on Greek, Spanish and Portuguese bonds widened, further indicating a lack of confidence in the EU. European banks have suffered big losses, especially those with exposure to Greece, Portugal and Spain.

The fundamental flaw in the EU superstate is the notion that all members are economically comparable in terms of productivity, development, employment, inflation and other factors which determine overall economic performance.

Simon Tilford, chief economist at the Center for European Reform in London, said that the southern countries, meaning Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy, are so uncompetitive compared with the others, especially Germany, that there are permanent trade imbalances that will destroy the euro.

“The myth of European integration and solidarity has been exposed as wishful thinking,” said Mr Tilford.

According to researchers at Morgan Stanley, “[A] stabilisation fund is just buying time for distressed borrowers. The fiscal policy action taken in these countries during this ‘extra time’ is essential. If yet another rescue mechanism isn't followed by aggressive austerity measures, the problem just continues to fester — and could eventually spread even wider."

Professor of Economics and International Affairs at Princeton University and New York Times columnist, Paul Krugman, explained it thus:

“During the years of easy money, wages and prices in the crisis countries rose much faster than in the rest of Europe. Now that the money is no longer rolling in, those countries need to get costs back in line.

“But that’s a much harder thing to do now than it was when each European nation had its own currency. Back then, costs could be brought in line by adjusting exchange rates — e.g., Greece could cut its wages relative to German wages simply by reducing the value of the drachma in terms of Deutsche marks. Now that Greece and Germany share the same currency, however, the only way to reduce Greek relative costs is through some combination of German inflation and Greek deflation. And since Germany won’t accept inflation, deflation it is.

“The problem is that deflation — falling wages and prices — is always and everywhere a deeply painful process. It invariably involves a prolonged slump with high unemployment. And it also aggravates debt problems, both public and private, because incomes fall while the debt burden doesn’t.

“Hence the crisis. Greece’s fiscal woes would be serious but probably manageable if the Greek economy’s prospects for the next few years looked even moderately favorable. But they don’t. Earlier this week, when it downgraded Greek debt, Standard & Poor’s suggested that the euro value of Greek G.D.P. may not return to its 2008 level until 2017, meaning that Greece has no hope of growing out of its troubles.”

Today is the 60th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration, the proposal by France’s foreign minister, Robert Schuman, to create a supranational organization of states in war-ravaged Europe, which is now celebrated as Europe Day.

While the early pact between France and Germany led to the free-trade zone known as the European Economic Community, the European Union still lacks serious economic cohesion, due to the disparity between the individual member countries.

The British National Party resolutely opposes the single European currency, supports the overwhelming majority of the British people in their desire to keep the pound and our traditional weights and measures, and would withdraw from the European Union.

British tax money should be used to rescue Britain first, and not to bail out other nations.

read more from kevin  http://kevinnmoore.blogspot.com/

Britains Wholly Corrupt Politics

Wholly Corrupt Politics

Created: Sunday, 09 May 2010 06:36 Author: rugfish |  

It's official

The UK has the most corrupt electoral system in the world

The other week I remember reading something or other about the corrupt excuse for an election we just went through being officially monitored by 'commonwealth inspectors'.
This election, which saw laughing witch Hodge elected in Barking based on the timely arrival of bins full of late delivered Labour votes via the postal system.
That is what these OFFICIAL MONITORS are talking about when they say the system in the UK is more corrupt than any other country in the world including Kenya.

They questioned the legitimacy of the result after thousands of voters were turned away from crowded polling stations. The observers were also shocked by allegations that the electoral roll was being filled out with “ghost” voters. Ababu Namwamba, an MP in Kenya, said: “The allegations of fraud and of voters being turned away threaten the integrity of the vote, especially in marginal constituencies where candidates have a majority of less than 1,000.

Many of our own candidates took notice of the bins full of Labour votes arriving at the last minute too. They knew this system was flawed and corrupt, and they knew many constituencies would be attacked by them.
Yes attacked!
For we are indeed under attack by a political elite who wishes to keep hold of the corrupt levers of power.
They will 'take all measures necessary to keep stability'.....i.e. The Status Quo where nothing changes.
These OFFICIAL INSPECTORS have openly stated the system is corrupt.
I will now state my own and others observations.
1 - Postal voting has been allowed from other countries under what the corrupt leaders say is a 'trial'.
The only 'trial' I want is a trial againt the corrupt leaders who a) didn't ask us, b) didn't think to tell us, c) didn't involve the entire political party choices but instead 'campaigned' in 'other countries', with banners of the LibLabCon. This is political fraud in itself and I'd like to know how funds were made available for that 'trial'.
2 - Postal voting throughout England and Wales at least, was subject to open fraudulent vote gathering.
Gangs of vote gatherers were making up names for voting slips which they simply sent in the post without any checks. Secondly, gangs going door to door getting signatures on blank paper from 'residents' who couldn't speak English and didn't know what they were signing. Thirdly, harassing and threatening people at polling booths by standing ominously near asking 'who will you vote for' before voters went in.
This is organised crime:
It is no good burying your head, thinking they will sort it out because it is they who are the criminals. (Remember they took part in the trial which excluded other parties.)
The police are investigating 50 cases of fraud, but their investigations cannot be completed until AFTER the election result.
Where were the powers of the police to halt an illegal practice prior to it being committed? i.e. Why did the police not stop the election going ahead!
Answer: Because the police are part of the crime.
If they were not part of the crime, then we would by now have seen some faces of the arrested gangs of criminals who were used to corrupt our election, and able to because the LibLabCon allowed it, and who were assisted in their efforts with taxpayers money and benefits coupled with non-existent immigrant controls, so that 'illegal immigrants' could carry out any crime they like and never be traced as they simply disappeared into crowds of ordinary innocent people, who thought they lived in a democracy.
As for my own assumption, I will refer you to something I said at least a month before the election.
I said: "It is my view that the election result has already been decided, and that this will occur by reason that they have already got bins full of Labour votes in the numbers they need, and they'll bring them out on the day".
Now all we need to do is to put a name to who gave the order to fiddle the votes in Barking, Stoke Central, Neath and other places where the simple job of having pre-arranged 100,000 fraudulent postal votes could swing an entire political process into action, to 'smash the BNP'.
As it happened, if you removed those 100,000 fraudulent votes from those areas, then just as we see across the country as a whole, we would be looking at seats where there was very little difference between the votes belonging to the top two places, so I find it quite strange why there'd be such a dramatic difference in the number for Labour in three seats which were political hot potatoes.
Not to leave the point of known corruption, the question now is what will be done about it and what will be done if they refuse to change a system which is completely corrupt.

Ignore Us At Your Peril

Ignore Us At Your Peril

Another excellent Analysis by rugfish

 

Created: Sunday, 09 May 2010 14:03 Author: rugfish |  

Lord Tebbit

Lord Tebbit is a giant in politics with an enviable reputation for straight talk. I recall listening to his speeches on YouTube at the Bruges Group, when he smattered his speech on the future of where Britain's place in Europe lies, with both humour and unarguable definition, that no one except the idiot left or the misplaced republican within the ranks of liberal democrats could find reason to argue.
Read that speech here: LINK which I saved as an historical account of a man who for me at least will always be known for having spoken the truth succinctly, and which I will continue to remind readers of at times when clarity is missing from others less brave.
I have always admired this man, as I do any man, or woman for that matter, who speaks their mind honestly and with a clarity of purpose which when summoned, shows that they are loyal to their country and loyal to its people and this is why I hold him and people like him in high esteem. People like Enoch Powell, people like Churchill, people like Thatcher, and people like Nick Griffin. Whose only interest has been to dedicate their political thoughts to the betterment of the British people.
This is why, regardless he may have been on the wrong end of the media at times with his 'advice' that out of work Brits should "get on their bikes", I can now better understand, given my knowledge of the media today, and I can carefully deselect that 'advice' as having been nothing more than an off the cuff remark made into glorious headlines at a time when the media were doing their best to 'smash Margaret Thatcher', just as they now want to 'smash the BNP'.
Doubtless others will have their own opinions but that is mine and it will not change.
So when I read today that he has made a "ferocious attack on David Cameron", I am minded to look beyond the headline and see why.
Lord Tebbit argues against Cameron doing a deal with Clegg.
He says a second election is inevitable and says to do a deal with Clegg will put fiscal controls, i.e. cuts at risk.
Which it will. He is right, because Clegg's party and top priority is 'fairness in the tax system'.
Remember that the LibDems and Labour are all about 'fairness', and the Tories are all about being 'unfair' if you believe the papers, and this is why the Tory leader David Cameron has been banging on so much about 'being more fair'.
Lord Tebbit isn't the only Tory grandee to be spitting blood over Cameron's ineptitude at the polls, but he's the only one currently speaking out about it.
But the fact he is speaking out should give warning to all the fake Tories out there who think they are in the Conservative party under Cameron, when nothing could be further from the truth.
The minute Cameron conceded to liberal thought was the minute I left the Tory Party.
For a Conservative can NEVER be a liberal and a Conservative can NEVER put 'fairness' to minorities above clear pragmatism, both when dealing with an entire populace with beliefs which are not the minority and with an economic and monetary problem which will effect the lives of all.
These problems, if dealt with on the basis of 'fairness' will sink the ship and will cause retaliatory strikes against the political direction he is proceeding by a majority which thinks otherwise to what he attempted to force down their throats, and was trounced at the polls because the people didn't want it.
He must come off this pedestal of 'fairness' and look toward a pragmatic approach which is Conservative thinking or I doubt he will remain Conservative leader much longer than another election.
Lord Tebbit also said; "Enoch Powell was right", and that should be taken as another warning.
At this point I have to wonder why I bother relating Lord Tebbit's warnings to someone who is clearly incapable of understanding them, but in the spirit of an Englishman I will give Cameron if not his aides, one last chance to take heed, before he completely smashes the Tory Party with his liberal thinking.
But I'm British National Party, so why do I care you might ask.
Well I care because I understand Lord Tebbit has more in common with the British National Party than many might think including him and the media. I see Lord Tebbit as the Nick Griffin who hasn't been 'got at', and the Margaret Thatcher they couldn't shut up.
Lord Tebbit with his clear sound advice that the British people will think like he does that if David Cameron abandons his manifesto for the sake of a third rate party leader who was beaten to a pulp by the electorate, then they like him will think he is "daft".
What Cameron needs and what the people needs is a way out of this mess, and that should start by listening to the people and to what they actually voted for.
One part of what the people told the political elite the other day on 6th May 2010, was that they wanted immigration to be dealt with properly and they wanted the question of the EU answered.
Remember, the only two parties who favour our membership of the EU got a drubbing at the polls.
David Cameron can step forward with a clear plan now:
1 - He should say 'no deals'.
2 - He should say this has gone on long enough and we must ask the people about Europe.
3 - He should open the books and tell the people what cuts to really expect.
4 - He should say that NOTHING will stand in the way of British democracy and I will honor the decision of the people in what they decide on a set number of choices for electoral reform which will include proportional representation.
5 - He should speak out now AGAINST the unelected subversives who he aligned himself to, promise to put them out of action if he is elected, retract the disgraceful way he conducted himself when referring to an elected MEP as 'ghastly filth', and openly recognise a need to discuss the politics of this country with a man who holds over 563,000 votes in his hand from only half the country, and who WILL gain a voice with or without him in any event as the polls open next time.
Cameron should also consider that his bully boy tactics did not work but instead worked against him.
If he doesn't learn from that then he will take an even bigger drubbing in the polls next time as the British National Party I am confident will redouble its efforts and will field a lot more candidates than they did last time.
The old cliche of racist, fascist and Nazi will undoubtedly be seen as complete lies when the British people have their eyes opened at how ordinary people, the men and women of Britain, who stood against the establishment and came out top, whose only aim was like Lord Tebbit's in that they wanted to save their country, were people just like them who you will ignore at your peril.
NORMAN TEBBIT, UPWARDLY MOBILE

STEPPING UP A GEAR, THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE NATION

STEPPING UP A GEAR THE BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF THE NATION!

A Nation and its people are built upon a common culture, which in itself shares a common philosophy, which in turn is based on a theology!

These are the core principles on which the Marxist Antonio Gramsci (1891 - 1937) realised that were the means of attack upon Western culture and values. As he had realised after a visit to Stalin's Russia in 1922 that the means of exporting the revolution by traditional methods would never work on the culture of the West.
  
He realised that Western Culture was based on the morality of the Judea Christian traditions of the individual’s knowledge of good and evil and personal & social responsibility concerning them in the matter of their outlook on all matters both public and private.

therefore the 1st stratagem of the Marxist cultural attack on the west and it’s values must be to attack and destroy the Christian faith 1st in it’s role in public life and then in it’s relevance to the individual, in effect, the Christian Tradition is the foundations of our society and if you destroy the foundations of any structure the edifice will collapse!
The pathway to socialist oppression is no longer bloody revolutions. The omnipresent dialectic process is far more subtle and effective. Enhanced by the steady drumbeat of the media's pervasive, suggestive and anti-Christian stimuli, minds are dulled and the masses indoctrinated everywhere. While people in the Soviet Union knew they were trapped in a cruel system, many could still think factually and logically. Today's managers of mind-control have nearly perfected the social "science" of collective brainwashing.

So using this principle later worked on by other Marxists mainly Herbert Marcuse the Frankfurt school, it was used in the so called sexual revolution of the 1960,s amongst the younger members of society especially the students and their campuses ,were the future leaders of the west are educated ! 
Were it was claimed that the free use of sexual gratification of any nature was a personal liberty and was being denied by the antiquated views of the Christian church and western culture on personal freedoms. And that to warn against the so called sexual freedoms was the sign of intolerance, and therefore the views of a bigoted and uneducated mind.



  Well it is quite obvious that hormone ridden young men and women of the 1960,s would have their attention grabbed by such notions especially as when the use of cheap and free contraception had been introduced.
And they would be easily led to believe that the Christian Church was a institution of oppression of their personal freedoms and choices and therefore become a irrelevance in their lives and personal choices, both in their private and public lives, which could lead to all kinds of personal gratification if not curbed by the morality and traditions of the Church and western culture which quite clearly stated what was good and what was evil in mankind!

So if you destroy the moral teachings and traditions of the Church what did they conclude would they replace it with, A RELIGION CALLED TOLERANCE! 

This is something that can easily be controlled by the communist state as in the eyes of the Marxists a moral choice is not fixed for all time! they argue that something that was morally acceptable in the 19th century may not be acceptable in the 21st century, so in effect morality can be changed to suit the needs of the moment in time, example their are to many old people euthanasia is a good moral choice for the good of the proletariat. Or their are too many children forced abortions are a good moral choice, in effect a moral equivalency for any action (see china’s Birth policy).

And as today it is acceptable that divorce can be had at the drop of a hat, that fathers have no responsibility for their children apart from a mediocre maintenance payment, and on and on, till you get a fragmented & disorganised host society, as in the UK today, where even the main stream Churches the victim of this first stratagem is now blindly arguing against itself blowing Satan's trumpet in the cause of tolerance.



But not being stupid even Stalin realised the use of a spiritual aspect to some of the proletariat lives was essential in keeping them in check in case they fought against the moral equivalency of the state, at 1st they tried to introduce the shamanistic religions of the East, But an even better Cult was found for their ends, Islam and a mass introduction the followers of this cult into the Western World would help also, what better a cult based on the basis of submission to higher authority, and who’s moral precepts were based on the acceptability of death as a tool of control, and the added benefit of a multi cultural society that is fractured on all aspects of social life, IE diversity means division! A divided society can not rise to supplant its political elite!



So what is the remedy to this situation 1st educate your self about the tactics of these monsters. And secondly it must be within yourselves you must 1st rediscover your moral and spiritual traditions and by publicly declaring and living at all times in your life, put pressure on your Church leaders to not hide them selves away hoping for divine intervention as a cure all they themselves must take the battle to Satan's door, and also put pressure on all members of public society make them know how strong in numbers we are, and how tired we are of all the perversion and moral decay that pollutes our lives , write to TV advertisers the papers where your voice can be heard, They will try to attack you with their tolerance lies but like the Emperors news clothes people will see that if you show a lead many other will follow, In the Words of our Lord Jesus Christ "Seek the truth! It will open your eyes and then you will see things as they really are!
Our Mission is just not political It is now a spiritual one also!
The Greening the Environmentalists Drive for Global Power, 

Islam 2 Christianity Nil , Laws biased against Christians in UK Today

Islam 2 Christianity Nil

Created: Sunday, 09 May 2010 08:38 Author: rugfish |  

Under a law designed to bar religious discrimination, it is now perfectly legal to discriminate against someone's beliefs so long as these are based on religion – eg Christianity (but not of course Islam)

"Under a law designed to bar religious discrimination, it is now perfectly legal to discriminate against someone's beliefs so long as these are based on religion - eg Christianity (but not of course Islam)" Telegraph columnist Christopher Booker
The case I am referring to is the dismissal of Gary McFarlane, an evangelical Christian who lost his job as a counsellor at Relate, because he refused to give "sex therapy lessons" to gay couples because it was against his Christian principles.
Now perhaps I can ask whether there are any Islamic Relate counsellors, and whether there is any evidence that an Islamic counsellor has refused to give sex therapy lessons to a gay couple, and whether if so this is or were the case, would he or she be sacked for refusing.
Secondly, the ruling last year that Climate change evangelist Tim Nicholson's "philosophical belief" in man-made global warming was on a par with religious belief and must therefore be given legal protection under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, issued under the 1972 European Communities Act to implement EC directive 2000/78......Is questionable as to whether he would be unfairly sacked if he refused to give therapy in a position of say a climate counsellor, to people who fundamentally disagreed with his views. Or perhaps refused to carry out a reasonable instruction of his employer who happened to think that man-made climate change was a complete load of nonsense, and the instruction ran against his 'beliefs'.
But sticking with Islam here, why is it acceptable for a nurse to not wash and bare her arms as a nurse, because she happens to find this to be unacceptable because of her Islamic beliefs. Yet a Christian who put the lives of patients in danger as a result of her refusal to adhere to the requirements of basic personal hygiene, would be dismissed.
If anyone needs evidence that the law is complete ass, and  that it is also intentionally being used to discriminate against Christians, then this is it.

Order of the White Feather

Order of the White Feather

Created: Saturday, 08 May 2010 09:07 Author: rugfish |  

A white feather has been a traditional symbol of cowardice, which has been used and recognised within the British Army since the 18th century. Never has it been more appropriate than today to award the Order of the White Feather to the Enemies of Democracy, and I'd like fellow comrades, patriots and brave activists to know when they collect their own awards for bravery, that this white feather is for all those who deliberately tried to sabotage your brave, valiant and wholly democratic efforts in this last election.
As said, your efforts tripled votes for the British National Party, and Chairman Mr Nick Griffin has revealed thousands of enquiries were made and followed up as a result of your work.
UAF leader and criminal Weyman on the other hand, should have a large white feather for his repulsive and abusive attempts to overthrow the democratic process using bricks, darts, metal railings and other lethal weapons, whilst trying to convince the populations in cities up and down England which have been colonised by foreigners, that he was on their side.
Needless to say, a Marxist can only ever use lies to further his aims, and there has not been one Marxist in history, just like Weyman, who has not resorted to violence when confronted with the fact that people just don't agree with their wierd beliefs or their criminal and obvious undemocratic actions.
This can be attested if you simply look at public reaction to Weyman and other criminals when they tried to block Mr Griffin's appearance on Question Time.
If we were really at war in the 18th or 19th centuries, then Weyman would undoubtedly have faced a firing squad for cowardice and subversion, but rather than bringing charges against him, the cowardly government has instead offered financial backing through their many grubby fingered unions and activists in an attempt to cling to power with their bitten nails.
Gordon Brown and Peter Hain must surely share a feather between them for what amounts to the highest degree of political cowardice which is quite visible by all but their other bullying friends. Their punishment will be that they are out on their arse as soon as Nick Clegg can convince Cameron that democracy is a good way to reach the top in politics as opposed to using hammers, bricks and darts and placed people who agree with you.
Another white feather for cowardice must surely go to David Cameron for his continuing support of the criminal subversive Weyman.
He also abuses political priviledge as he hides behind the apron strings of an established party leadership. With the weight of media in front of him along with armed guards, it is without doubt a measure of his cowardice that from his position, he deliberately hurls abuse toward the brave leader of the British National Party Mr Nick Griffin, who in contrast was prepared to put his own life on the line in Wootton Basset to halt an illegal demonstration, whilst Cowardly Cameron buried his head under the blankets back in his Tory bunker.
Cameron is a coward of a particular kind as he ducks the major issues of immigration and the EU, and he refuses to confront Nick Griffin in open debate.
Cameron should receive a white feather, a bar from politics and a community order to see if he can help run another television station but this time without making it bankrupt whilst seeking only personal gain.
After that, maybe if there's an old scrap car dealer handy in his area, then they could be persuaded to have him take a job such as washing cars for which cowardly Cameron would be more suited.
Next white feather goes to HopeNotHate, who were busily engaged in trying to destroy the democractic process with 1,000 activists, all bought and paid by the Daily Mirror, NUJ, Socialist Workers Party, and Morning Star. i.e. Marxists.
None of these cowards had the bottle to stand for election but instead chose to interfere with the democratic process and sought to peddle lies about people who were brave enough to walk the streets knocking on doors and seeking votes in a country where an entire establishment had gathered against them.
HopeNotHate are advised to check their budget to see if they have any money left and they are ordered to submit accounts to the nearest BNP office for inspection where interested parties will be delighted to take them to see exactly who donated to their Marxist cause which was designed to subvert democracy in our country.
Nothing British is another subversive which is hardly worth a mention saying as their pathetic propaganda could really only be believe by a halfwit like those who run it.
Shifty eyed coward Lord Bethel might want to come and collect his feather himself if he can muster up the courage to leave his little office at Westminster where he continues to hide himself from public gaze with his other compatriots and traitors whose only achievement has been to prove they are Nothing British.
Green Arrows will be pleased to snap a pic of cowards on the day, or on some other day in the not too distant future if they are too scared to collect it.
Meanwhile, BNP victory medals are to be awarded for all once we get a democracy in Britain.
THE GREAT IMMIGRATION SCANDAL.