Culture Shock

Culture Shock

  Author: Sarah: Maid of Albion |  

One striking element of the recent conflict unfolding on the streets of Bangkok has been the reaction of the English middle classes to the death and bloodshed on the streets of the Thai capital. “How could this be happening in the land of smiles?” they cry “What has happened to the charming and delightful Thai people we met when were were there?”

They can't believe what they are seeing because these scenes bear no comparison to Thailand, the popular holiday destination, they thought they knew.

Of course they never knew the real Thailand, they may have visited it many times, thought they loved it, dreamed of living there and praised the 'wonderful culture' to their friends upon their return, but they never really saw Thailand.

These same smug and comfortable people who, safe in their leafy sanctuaries have applauded the arrival of the invading immigrant hoards, as the bringers of low cost domestic staff, easier access to authentic ethnic cuisine and “culture Darling, such wonderful enriching culture”, have not the faintest idea of the truth of the cultures over which they swoon.

Every year you see them returning from their three weeks of luxurious indulgence in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, the Gambia or Mombasa gushing about the wonderful culture and the delightful, friendly and happy people. We the miserable, bigoted English “could learn so much” from the “simple, contented and smiling world” they have just visited, or so they tell us. Each time you want to scream at them “Of course they smiled at you, you dumb bastard, you had just given them three months off season income in return for some beads and bits of coconut husk which their six year old was up half the night stringing together!".

The hatreds and tensions exploding now in Thailand have been simmering there for decades, but James and Chloe from Hoxton never saw them as they clapped their hands and tapped their feel to the local music in the way that embarrassing middle class English prats always do, grinning like morons as they imbibe the four or five star version of what they imagine is ethnic culture.

They see what the deeply dishonest glossy brochures tells them they will see, they see what they want to see, but what they don't see is the truth. They don't see the brutality, the violence and the hatreds which fill the lives of those living full time in the theme parks they jet in and out of every summer. Hidden from them is the corruption, the tiny battered corpses, the child abuse, the raped and battered women, the sweatshops and slavery (yes I mean slavery) not to mention the filth and decay which is the reality lurking behind the smiles.

Some even go back to the same place year after year, yet never really see it.

Some, of course, do see it, but they are the liars who, when they are raped, would rather deny they have been raped than admit the colour of their rapists. However, others, like the woman I know who recently returned from Cape Town and declared South African crime rates a myth because she has got through a two week visit without being car-jacked or murdered, believe the lies they are told, and only see a made up world.

Can we really blame the ageing Hippy mother of 15 year old Scarlet Keeling who's raped and battered body washed-up on an idyllic Goan beach in February 2008, for believing that it was perfectly safe to leave her teenage daughter in the care of a 25 year old ethnic boyfriend she had only just met?. This was Goa after all, the Utopia of the flower children, the paradise of the Lonely Planet guide generation, and only beautiful things happen in paradise.

Maybe to some degree this sort of blindness is nothing new, to our grandmothers' generation Rangoon and Mandalay were where the flying fishes played and people went to drink cocktails on sun soaked verandas, not brutalised outposts of one of the most vicious dictatorships on the planet. In the 1960's the Lebanon was a playground for the rich and beautiful, nothing like the war weary and battle scarred land it has become.

However, the difference was, previous generations, much as they may have loved different and far away cultures, real or imagined, still loved their own culture, back at home at least as much. It had not yet become a fashionable display of class and style to laud another culture, or even what one imagines another culture to be, over one's own. To earlier generations the thought of replacing their home culture with a foreign one would have been anathema.

Earlier generations also seemed to understand the principles of import and export better than the current one, and did not imagine it was necessary to import a population in order to share the tastes and pleasures of other lands. “We so love the diversity of food!!” cackle the chattering classes in defence of mass migration, speaking as if the tea, which Britons drank for centuries without considering it necessary to grant citizenship to half of India, grew in the fields of Shropshire, or that the bananas, which had been widely on sale in Britain sixty years before the docking of the Windrush, thrived around the oast houses of Kent.

When you import a people you do not gain the Holiday hotel fantasy of their culture or the vision of a land which you can buy for 2,000 Thai baht a night in Phuket, The foreigners arriving in their droves are not the beaming natives who draped garlands round your necks and danced for you with beads around their ankles in exchange for British pounds. When people are imported with their products there is a lot more to diversity than foodstuff and fabrics. What is arriving at our shores is the reality of alien culture, the one appearing on the blood spattered streets of Bangkok, Nairobi, Mogadishu and Islamabad not the picture postcard pretence sold to you by Kuoni Tours.

The other madness which merges incongruously with the asinine belief that importing cultures where child slavery, child rape, acid attacks, homophobic murder, honour killing, gang rape, political corruption, electoral fraud, xenophobia, savage animal cruelty, female, and sometimes male, genital mutilation, muti killings, kidnapping, decapitations, male rape and torture together with any number of other horrors are every day events, and which are so cruel and dangerous we can not with humanity return terrorist suspects to them, enriches Britain, is the fantasy that when people from such cultures arrive here, they will automatically become part of British society and adopt British values.

That they will, in effect become "British".

When Newsreaders aggressively and incessantly fire the word “British” at us, as if from rapid reloading machine guns, when reporting stories Asian children being kidnapped and held for ransom in Pakistan, or, as with today's tragic news item, Asian families being murdered on account of some marriage dispute whilst in Asia, we are supposed to obediently accept that these are British people who have struck unlucky whilst holidaying over seas.

When men walking down North London streets have acid poured down their throats because they romanced someone else's wife, and when girls are beaten to death by their fathers (or maybe buried alive by them) for loving the wrong man, we would be denounced as racists if we do not insist that white people do these things too.

When official figures slip out revealing that 92% of gang rape suspects in London are non-white we are obliged to blame white British society rather than point to the facts that:

* in the lands where the 92% originate gang rape is endemic

* the white 8% were part of mixed race gangs

Click here to read about what this group of lovelies contributed to our culture

As falsehood piles upon lie, we are are told, and required to believe that our immigrant communities suffer continuing racial violence, yet it is we, the host community, and not they who fear to walk our streets.

Our country, indeed our continent, is in the worst economic state it has ever been in in peace time, yet we are expected to enthusiastically agree when liars tell us that the mass immigration they have forced upon us has brought great economic benefits.

Yet, despair as you may, there are those who still believe it.

Much like our cousins in America, where the myths of popular belief are in some ways even further removed from reality, we in Europe live in the age where truth is rejected in favour of fantasies and downright lies. Most of our people believe not in the world as it is but as they want it to be, and amongst the worst lies are the ones they tell themselves.

I fear for them, for one day they must wake, and when they do the culture shock may well kill them.

When People Believe in War

When People Believe in War  Author: rugfish 



One issue of many which concerns the British people is that of war

The word 'war' can hardly be used in the same general context we may think of when reflecting on an enemy with equal or superior forces as was the case in two world wars, but nevertheless for the sake of dispute on this subject I will refer to a coalition of the United Nations beating up on cave dwelling goat herders as a war if it will avoid argument.

I mean saying as I might have a disagreement with the politicians who make war in our names, I guess I should maybe watch it too, since no doubt they have my exact coordinates by now and I don't think double glazed french doors will stand much chance of catching a missile or a troop of U.S. soldiers bent on knocking me off if I make them angry.

It would stand about the same chance as a cave and a piece of canvas over the doorway I guess.

But where is the media coverage?

If we are 'still' at (war), then surely this warrants front page news but all I see is a load of skirts on most of them.

In WWII for instance, war was extremely kept in the public eye, but, well.......We've been engaged in war as a nation now for I don't know how long, and it wasn't even debated during the last argument we had over who will take charge of the last remaining embers of a dying democracy.

I thought it would be a good chance of course to remember our own brave men and women who are in close combat with an enemy who actually does possess enough firepower to kill, but I also thought it would be a good time to give a reminder to Cameron, Clegg, and whoever might be leader of the Labour Party this week, along with the 646 politician scum some chose to elect, to ask them why TF, WAR is not in the media, and what TF they are doing about ending it.

Don't tell me we are under threat of our lives from goat herders in Afghanistan if you are not prepared to discuss HOW.

And in preemption of that debate (which I know won't happen), I will ask the leading question as to how Taliban forces on the border of Pakistan can get into Britain, unless of course our government is too thick to notice they have an agreement with Pakistan to let any Tom, Dick, and Ali, walk freely in here, again without debate on the subject just like those wars.

Also,

Since Conservative, Liberal Democrats, and Labour parties all believe in war. This video shows what their supporters believe in when they support them at the ballot box. People think it's okay to place the non-argument of 'racism' against imaginary victims, higher up the list of their considerations I guess, than the fact THEY and THEIR politicians are KILLING innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, where in my ordinary knuckle-dragging BNP way of thinking happens to make me think is a whole lot worse than 'racism', even IF that was actually occurring. (Still no evidence yet on this one I see incidentally)

Or has DEATH and DESTRUCTION become unspeakable now under the new regime of death and destruction, which some people elected to continue in government?

There are a lot of people who voted for these parties who have the blood of innocent people on their hands whilst calling the British National Party racists and Fascists.

Those people cannot erase the blood from their hands, nor can they erase their culpability and guilt for causing the deaths of millions of people.

However, none of this happened in my name, yet those who say they love the fine attributes of freedom and democracy make it only an evil upon my earth.

I know the difference between right and wrong, and I know my country is in the wrong.

What we need, is a media brave enough to say it, and a people brave enough to say they've had enough of their lies!

Truth will only ever be revealed with the BNP.

NAZIS AND ISLAMISTS

Nazis and Islamists

From the desk of Paul BelienDuring the Second World War, the Nazis worked on plans to build the “Amerikabomber,” an airplane specially devised to fly suicide missions into Manhattan’s skyscrapers.
Albert Speer, the Nazi Minister for Armaments, recalled in his diary: “It was almost as if [Hitler] was in a delirium when he described to us how New York would go up in flames. He imagined how the skyscrapers would turn into huge blazing torches. How they would crumble while the reflection of the flames would light the skyline against the dark sky.” Hitler hated Manhattan. It was, he said, “the center of world Jewry.”
Less than 60 years later, Hitler’s plans were executed by Muslim immigrants living in Germany. At the 2003 trial of the network around Mohammed Atta (the pilot who flew into the World Trade Center), Shahid Nickels, a German convert to Islam and a friend of Atta’s, said that the Islamists had targeted Manhattan because it is “the center of world Jewry, and the world of finance and commerce controlled by it.”
The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of “Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11,” was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.
There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man’s history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered – and sometimes even prosecuted – as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis.
The European Left, in league with the Islamists, is constantly reminding the Europeans of Hitler and the Nazis, accusing Europe’s identity, the very core of its being, of being intrinsically evil. Hence, attempts to rob Europe of its identity are seen as “good,” even when those eager to eradicate this identity leave no doubt that they will eradicate the Jews first.
Unfortunately, some American “conservatives” are also blind. Last year, Ralph Peters wrote in the New York Post that Europe’s identity is stained by “ineradicable viciousness.” He said that the Europeans are “world-champion haters,” who have “perfected genocide and ethnic cleansing.” Mr. Peters’ message is similar to that of Ayyub Axel Koehler. Last June, Mr. Koehler, a convert to Islam and the chairman of the German Council of Muslims, told German church leaders that Europe should be ashamed of the “trail of blood” that it had left throughout the world down the centuries.
To some, defending Europe’s identity is seen as a characteristic of neo-Nazism, while they fail to realize that Hitler’s real successors are the Jihadists. To many Europeans it now seems that the only way in which Europe can atone for the crimes of the holocaust is by looking on passively while others prepare a new holocaust.
And so, ironically, Hitler will get his way and win the war after all. Contrary to what is generally acknowledged, the Fuehrer did not care about Europe’s or even Germany’s identity. Those European nationalists who today take their inspiration from Charles Martel, the Germanic leader who beat the Arabs in 732 at the Battle of Tours, cannot be neo-Nazis for the simple reason that Hitler explicitly wished Martel had lost the battle.
“Had Charles Martel not been victorious,” Hitler told his inner crowd in August 1942, “then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.” Hitler told Albert Speer that Islam is “perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament.” If the Muslims had won in Tours, the whole of Europe would have become Muslim in the 8th century and “the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of [Europe]. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.”
Today, Germany, like the rest of Western Europe, is rapidly turning Islamic. In addition to the many Muslim immigrants, 4,000 Germans convert to Islam each year. As always the converts are among the most radical. Last September, Fritz Gelowicz and Daniel Schneider, two young German converts to Islam, were arrested as they were preparing to bomb Frankfurt International Airport. Hitler would have been proud of them. And he would have loathed the so-called “racists” who worry about their country losing its national identity.
This piece was originally published in The Washington Times on November 7, 2007 .

Only white people can hate but only if you believe the papers

Only white people can hate but only if you believe the papers

Created: Thursday, 20 May 2010 08:56 Author: rugfish |  

a) What is a hate crime?

b) Who is responsible?

Suddenly, I hear the sound of quiet on our streets except if you look up the exploits of a certain protest group called the English Defence League and see that their legitimate protests were stopped by armed police.
Armed police, who incidentally gave one of EDL's members a broken arm after he had already submitted to being falsely arrested on a charge of burglary after having climbed a rooftop simply to display an English flag and make his protest.
Were any protesters of the group Fathers against Injustice arrested for burglary by armed police when they climbed the roof of the House of Commons? - I think not.
I seen nothing in the news media about the EDL protest despite that marauding gangs of Machete wielding Muslims were rampaging around Dudley shouting 'Kill the infidel', and despite that outnumbered police chose to arrest and prevent legitimate protesters protesting rather than confront those who threatened the lives of 'infidels'. - Is it not 'hate' when you declare death upon a group of people simply because they don't agree with your desire to kill?
Instead, we were treated to constant coverage of candidates of three parties who the public finally chose not to elect into government. We were shown a constant round of speeches from two minority party leaders who together had decided between themselves to ignore the public's declaration - manifested by a hung parliament - that politics was broken and that their legitimate concerns remained unanswered. - Instead we watched two imbeciles appoint themselves into office for a period of 5 years without any mandate or with any further recourse to the general public, most of whom must themselves be imbeciles for actually voting for them at all.
I seen video footage of Cameron and Clegg at Operation Black Vote giving it large about how 'poor black people' are "still victims" in our country, which Cameron declares is 'rightly theirs'. I didn't hear him say where this 'racism' was, who was responsible, or where he obtained the figures, or on what information he relied, but I heard him spell out his belief by implication of the reverse of his argument, that anyone who is 'not black' must be suspect of a 'hate crime', and he deliberately mentioned what he described as 'the despicable BNP'. - Is it a hate crime to denigrate a group of people because of their political views if they happen by sheer chance of fate to be 'white', or can hate crime only be attributed to white people who protest against black groups and Islamists who either want to remove our sovereign rights to government and self determination, or want to kill us?

I seen plenty of coverage too during that election, of gangs of up to a thousand calling themselves HopeNotHate leaflet droppers, delivering hate, lies and propaganda through people's letterboxes, and I seen evidence of unquestionable ballot fraud, suspect threats at polling stations, illegal immigrants canvassing with UKIP, and plenty of evidence of immigrants sitting on television in comfy armchairs telling viewers what they think about British society, but I didn't see anyone asking British people what they think. - Is that bias, hate, exclusion by intent, or is it simply a figment of my vivid imagination?
Yet, despite all this, and despite there is an admittedly larger proportion of crime attributed to 'ethnics' - 80% - and despite the former Group ISLAM4UK has been proscribed, and despite the The Guardian itself gave coverage of what it described as a 'chilling account' of a former member of the Metropolitan Police having spent the last 10 years working: "undercover among anti-racist groups in Britain, during which he routinely engaged in violence against members of the public and uniformed police officers to maintain his cover"......

The Guardian chooses instead, to waste police time and taxpayer resources in a massive number of inquiries under the Freedom of Information Act, to raise question only, whether 'hate crime' rises when you have a BNP councillor. LINK
Such startling QUESTIONS (not news but questions), are brought to the public eye of course without any reference to the above, or to what constitutes a 'hate crime', or indeed what 'ethnicity' were the perpetrators of these so called 'crimes', or with in fact any shred of evidence. Rather, it poses a QUESTION which it delivers in the form of NEWS.
Let me make plain the fact at this point that I do not read The Guardian.
I have more important matters to attend to such as finding out the facts and the truth of a situation rather than wasting my time in seeking to 'expose' details which are half truths that amount to lies and propaganda like The Guardian.
Like the Guardian who would have you believe that to shout 'Out with Islamic extremists' for instance would constitute one of these so called 'hate crimes', but to shout 'Kill the infidels', "We will conquer Europe', "We will treat your women as war-booty', and 'We will behead all those who insult Islam', are NOT 'hate crimes. 
They would have us believe that an innocent law abiding person who doesn't want her home used by two gay men who would use it in a way which ran counter to her deeply held religious beliefs was herself guilty of a 'hate crime' because she chose to say she was heterosexual and that homosexuality was against her beliefs. Or that a couple who happened to think that the Islamic Hijab or Burkah, was a sign of women's oppression was in some way guilty of a 'hate crime' for having expressed what is widely known to be the truth otherwise the French Government would not be declaring it to be a crime to wear a Burkha in public. - Maybe the French Government should be arrested for a hate crime?
Is it a 'hate crime' to speak the truth but no longer a 'hate crime' to utter death threats against 'non-believers'?
The Guardian, as members of NUJ and IMRAX, and as supporter of the same UAF - Searchlight - HopeNotHate - etc, in which MI5, Special Branch, and the Metropolitan Police admit to: "working 'undercover' to routinely engage in violence against members of the public and police officers in order to maintain cover", seems to be getting confused when looking at the line between truth and materially unbiased journalism and are sharply distorting the difference between a 'Question', and what constitutes 'News'. - Is the Guardian guilty of a 'hate crime' in that this 'question it raises is likely to stir up 'racial hatred'?
It seems one can only speculate as to whether the Guardian is simply another 'undercover operation' for those whose aim, like the ex-cop who blew the gaffe on state sponsored subversion, and like UAF etc who actively engage in denying the British people democracy, or like the unelected politicians who deny any measure of truth or democratic value with their constant lies about 'hate', may themselves be guilty of hate crimes against the indigenous people of Britain, were those 'whitey' able to demand that they all be arrested and tried, had they not been so undermined in their own country by immigrants.
As I said before, only white people can hate, but only if you believe the papers.

Black Woman who hurled torrent of racial abuse at White Neighbour escaped jail

Racist walks from court after launched a 3-hour tirade

A black woman who hurled a torrent of racial abuse at a white neighbour has escaped a jail sentence.

Church-goer Carol Maxwell launched a three-hour racist and foul-mouthed tirade at Andrew Thorn. During the verbal attack she called him a "honky" and a white b******.

Judge Charles Macdonald QC branded the 44-year-old (pictured left, by Mike Gunnill) "an entrenched racist". She denied racially aggravated intentional harassment, alarm and distress but was convicted by a jury.

Maxwell was sentenced to 26 weeks imprisonment suspended for 18 months and 200 hours unpaid work. Maidstone Crown Court heard Mr Thorn was walking towards his flat Sutton-at-Hone, near Dartford, in August last year when Maxwell swore and called him a "white honky".

Prosecutor Neil Sandys said: "He understands that to be a term of abuse. It is just the same as black or 'Paki'. "He didn’t want to respond and went into his flat. "The tirade of abuse continued for some three hours."

The victim saw a bottle fly through the air and smash next to his car, followed by Maxwell shouting. "At this stage, he could take it no longer and wanted to get assistance," said Mr Sandys. "Mr Thorn made allegations. He felt it was racist and threatening."

Maxwell, now of Rochester Street, Chatham, told the judge when she appeared for sentence: "I feel there has been some misunderstanding about this. "I am not a woman feminist organisation leader trying to protest racially.

"I just happen to have strong Christian principles I would stand by. I think there is an injustice I am here because of hooligans." Judge Macdonald told Maxwell, who represented herself, having sacked her solicitor and barrister: "I observed you at trial. "I reach the decision that you are, indeed, an entrenched racist.

Nick Griffin tells the EU to stop Robbing Britain

Nick Griffin tells the EU to stop Robbing Britain
 

Arizona in the USA shows the way on Illegal Immigrants

An interesting article sent to Horwich Nationalists by our Alabama Rose in the USA !

This is very interesting and if Arizona can do it, why can't the rest of
America?

MEXICO IS ANGRY!
Three cheers for Arizona

The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora,
Mexico don't like it.

The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico. Nine
state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to
complain about Arizona's new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico.
It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and
the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off.    A
delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on
Tuesday to state that Arizona's  new Employer Sanctions Law will have a
devastating effect on the Mexican state.

At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, - Arizona's
southern neighbor, - made up of mostly small towns, - cannot handle the
demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican
workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.
 

The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers
who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in
the United States.    Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their
business license.
 

The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are
returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state
government. 'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep
Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales.
 

'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or
relative working in Arizona,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is
not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more
and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their
families return to their home-towns in Sonora without jobs,' she said.
'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people
of Sonora and Arizona.


Please Read

New Immigration Laws: Read to the bottom or you will miss the message...

1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
* * * * * * * *
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language..
* * * * * * * *
3.. All government business will be conducted in our language.
* * * * * * * *
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how
Long they are here.
* * * * * * * *
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office
* * * * * * * *
6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food

Stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any
Burden will be deported.
* * * * * * * *
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at
least
Equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
* * * * * * * *
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... Options will be restricted.
Certain
Parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens
naturally born
Into this country.
* * * * * * * *
9. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a
Foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or
his
Policies. These will lead to deportation.
* * * * * * * *
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively
hunted and
When caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All
assets
Will be taken from you.
* * * * * * * * *
Too strict ?

The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO!

Diane Abbott Joins The Jedward Clones

Diane Abbott Joins The Jedward Clones

  Author: john of gwent |  

Now I've heard everything.
Over here http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8693687.stm you can read how Labour has reached the bottom of the barrel.
Many times during my General Election campaign I heard people discuss in hushed tones in dark corners of pubs just who the hell they might find to replace Gormless Gordon and indeed they had a point because the party is having to plumb the depths of hitherto uncharted mediocrity to find a token capable of taking the helm.
And now full time supporter of Cameron's Claw Hammer Gang Diane Abbott has made it known she is up for the job.
I think she is a perfect choice. Just as Michael Foot was in the 1980's. a perfect choice for ensuring the party stay in the gutter where it belongs until it learns some humility.
Abbott of course is famous for her remarks to camera on Andrew Neill's "This Week" when the supposed "BNP Membership List" was made public. With venom and spite she tried to incite violence with claims that it was extremely important that "people (meaning her hammer wielding thugs) knew where these Nazis Lived", not realising perhaps that to say such words intending to cause distress and alarm is a breach of the law her lickspittle pals brought in as Sectoion 5 of the Public Order Act, the same legislation I just had the police use against a Tory Loudmouthed Oik I found ranting on my driveway.
Abbott is also famous for - along with Trevor Phillips - condemning as "racist" the council of Tower Hamlets who wanted to operate a "Sons And Daughters" policy for council house accomodation 20 years ago, a charge she seems less keen to hurl at the Bangladeshi Officials who operate the same policy in favour of Bangladeshi "tenants" today.
Cameron must be wetting himself with rejoicing this morning. If Abbott gets the leadership he'll be Prime Minister until his grandchildren have finished paying off Brown's Government Debt. Giving her a Donkey jacket will be the icing on the cake.

Labours Diane Abbott and the Guardian

Diane Abbott and the Guardian. Anyone For Mentalness?

Yesterday saw Diane Abbott announce that she is running for the Labour leadership. Good for her.

I have zero issue with anyone running to be leader of a party of which I could not care less. All I really care about is if that person is credible, if they will be good in opposition and if, hopefully, it will hasten the demise of that detested outfit of corruption. Not that it needs any help, the markets are about to fail in a major way and in years to come Brown and Labour will be very much the focus.

This is the polar opposite of the Left and more so the Guardian and its readers. They really do care, but not just because they no longer support Labour (they area all Lib Dems now remember). They care because they are obsessed not with who a person is, but what they are.

So, yesterday I waded into the Guardian article about the situation where I was at first amazed and then astounded at the reaction I and others received.

You see, I hate Diane Abbott because she is a smug, arrogant, hypocritical champagne socialist. That, I was informed very clearly, was....Racist.

Yup. Oh and sexist.

You see, as far as the Left are concerned, to dislike someone is fine unless that person is a woman or non-white. If they are, then the reason you don't like them simply has to be because of their colour or gender. This on the Internet, where my colour is neither here nor there.

It was stated by one moron 'Nxile' that, and I quote (you couldn't make this up) “I see the phrase "Smug and Arrogant" a lot which seems to be the British translation for "Uppity N***er".”

Just incredible. To call a black person smug is direct proof that you are a racist shit. In fact you think black people are niggers that should know their place.

Astounding.

And this article from the Guardian makes it painfully clear. They specifically highlight and then entirely focus on her colour and her gender. Neither of which concerns me in the slightest. In fact it is something that is of no concern, I would postulate, of the majority of the people in this country.

It goes on and on about how she loves Mandela and how she black and a woman and how she is of 'The Left'. Therefore, because she is black and a woman, she should be Labour leader. That's it. That's the logic.

In my comments, being me, I of course highlighted her staggering hypocrisy.

There is the famous story about sending her son to a private school outside of her constituency because black kids failed at state school. When Rod Liddle made some remarks about crime and race (which were partly right but badly put), Abbott went mental. However, when Abbott makes just as sweeping a statement about how 9% of black boys fail at school, that is fine. Intelligent kids must go to rubbish schools to raise the attainment of children from less well of backgrounds. That is the Left's logic, except when you are Abbott, or well off and left wing. Or both.

To lay the context, she had recently attacked both Tony Blair and Harriet Harman for sending their kids to private schools, and in fact had applied to three such institutions and no local state schools. I also hate Blair and Harman. Harman is a woman and white, so that just means I hate women, Blair is upper class, white and male, so a legitimate target.

Abbott now dismisses this event as a stick to beat her with. Yes Diane, you are right, because it is mind blowlingly hypocritical.

"Diane came into politics to tackle racial inequality". That was said by Simon Woolley of 'Operation Black Vote'. Shame then that she attacked Finnish nurses in her local hospital, saying that they shouldn't be there because they had never met black people before. In Left Guardian Abbott land, racial inequality only applies to black people you see. Shall we imagine the reaction of a John redwood saying that about black nurses and white people?

There is always the £17,000 in earnings she failed to declare of course.

But the biggest defence of this wonderful person was that she voted against the Iraq war. Such is a her moral code that she defied her party and voted strongly against the invasion, which of course could well mean that empty plinth in Trafalgar Square.

There is a problem there though isn't there. You see, she also voted against investigating that war.

So the Moral Compass of Abbott went from declaring it an illegal war that she would not support to the point of sainthood, all the way round to refusing to call for an investigation into that illegal war and holding Blair to account. What a moral champion, what a fucking martyr.

Why is she supported in this contest? Because all the other candidates are white men. In fact that is basically her campaign motto. She is remarkably smug and patronising, as is witnessed by everyone bar the editors and readership of the Guardian.

Because when they are wrong or you disagree, they have one answer and one answer only: you must be a bigot.

No way could you not agree with them and therefore it simply must be because you are a racist misogynist. Must be. That is all they have and therefore that is what you are.

And all the time there is Abbott, playing the gender/race card for all it's worth. 'Vote for me because I'm a black woman and they are all white men. I'll be great because I'm a black woman'. How sad is it when all you have to offer is the colour of your skin and what's between your legs?

I hope she wins though. The end of the Labour Party will be hastened for her efforts and we can all laugh whilst being pointed at and called evil, racist, women hating pigs.

Posted by Kevin Boatang @ Botang & Demetriou

Damning questions about Lord Mandelson's role in Russian oligarch's £500million deal

Damning questions about Lord Mandelson's role in a controversial Russian oligarch's £500million deal which undermined British manufacturing jobs are raised today.
The former Business Secretary was a 'valuable extra' as a dinner guest as billionaire Oleg Deripaska entertained American aluminium executives in Moscow.
The meeting, also attended by British-born financier Nat Rothschild, resulted in a deal to sell two of Deripaska's giant Russian-based RUSAL factories to a U.S. firm, Alcoa.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1280326/Mandelson-Russian-oligarch-friend-500m-deal-dinner.html#ixzz0obSmGThq

Affirmative Action Discrimination against White People!

Woman denied bus firm training post 'because she is white'

A woman who applied for a training position at a bus company was told she could not be accepted because she is white.

Marion Ryan, 40, has accused Hackney Community Transport (HCT) of racism after staff said the colour of her skin prevented her applying for the post.

The mother-of-four had approached the London transport firm after seeing an advert for a course to become a bus passenger assistant.

However, when she inquired at the firm’s head office in Hackney, east London, a female member of staff said they were only looking for candidates of mixed race, Afro-Caribbean or Asian backgrounds.

Mrs Ryan said: “It did not register in my head at first what she was telling me – that I could not do the programme because of the colour of my skin.

“I am so angry and upset. I have never heard or seen anything like this.

“I just thought: ‘I don’t think you should be allowed to do that. That is discrimination. It’s not right’.”

HCT admitted that the incident had happened but said Mrs Ryan had mistakenly been given false information that she was ineligible to enrol on its course.

Frank Villeneuve-Smith, an HCT spokesman, said: “She was given incorrect information by a member of staff.

“In fact, Marion is eligible. We have been trying to get hold of her to say that she is eligible and to apologise. We are very sorry.

“There is no policy that would prevent anyone from applying for one of our training courses.”

Mrs Ryan had wanted to take up the post as a step towards returning to work after spending the past 18 years bringing up her children.

She had hoped that the position, learning how to help disabled passengers on buses, would lead to work in social care.

Mrs Ryan, from Clapton, east London said it was too late for HCT to apologise now.

HCT was founded in 1982 by various community groups in Hackney, with the aim of providing affordable community transport for voluntary organisations, charities and community organisations.

British People Put Last as Significant Portion of “Budget Cut Savings” Will be Put into Foreign Aid

British People Put Last as Significant Portion of “Budget Cut Savings” Will be Put into Foreign Aid

  BNP News

The ConDem-controlled Treasury will announce their plan to cut £12 billion off the public services expenditure next Monday, with half of that being reinvested in health, defence — and foreign aid. 

Half of the £12 billion in “savings” will allegedly accrue from “austerity measures” in seven areas, including consultancy and travel costs, IT, and reductions from 70 of the government's major suppliers.

In other words, private contractors who supply government departments with goods and services are going to find themselves short changed.

This in turn will have a knock-on effect throughout the economy and is likely to increase business failures and personal bankruptcies.

The announcement that a portion of these savings is to be reinvested into foreign aid adds insult to the injury.

Just like its predecessor, the new regime places greater importance on helping foreigners with British tax money than it does the British people themselves.

An illustration of this inverted priority policy has come with a new press release from the Department for International Development (DFID) dated 17 May, in which the new

Tory DFID Secretary of State Andrew Mitchell announced cuts in certain “awareness” projects.

According to Mr Mitchell, “five existing projects will be stopped at once, saving over half a million pounds, while all other UK-based projects will be scrutinised in an urgent review.  A further stop has been put on projects totalling more than £6.5m, with immediate effect.”

Projects which Mr Mitchell has ordered cancelled with immediate effect are the ones which the British National Party first raised to the public’s consciousness, and include:

- £146,000 for a Brazilian-style dance troupe with percussion in Hackney;

- £55,000 to run stalls at summer music festivals;

- £120,000 to train nursery school teachers about ‘global issues’;

- £130,000 for a ‘Global Gardens Schools Network; and

- £140,000 to train outdoor education tutors in Britain on development.

Before readers applaud Mr Mitchell for cancelling these obvious swindles, they should read on in the official DFID statement: “Funding will be redirected to areas where it will have a greater impact on global poverty, Secretary of State, Andrew Mitchell, said.

“At this difficult economic time, it is crucial that our money is spent where it makes the most difference. “Today I send a clear signal:  value for money will be our top priority for aid.”

In other words, the money is not being “saved” but simply reallocated to another part of the foreign budget where its waste will not be so open to public ridicule.

* By way of comparison, the £9 billion foreign aid budget — which the ConDem regime will increase to £13 billion — completely overshadows the £87.5 million shortfall faced by the NHS’s Cardiff and Vale University Health Board.

In the South Wales Valleys, the Cwm Taf Health Board is predicting a £40.5 million spending gap, while the region’s other health boards also face significant shortfalls.

According to Dr Andrew Dearden, chairman of the British Medical Association’s Welsh Council, said that across Wales between £400 million and £600 million would have to be cut from NHS spending.
Foreign Corporations to Fraud and Deceit (1-138) (American Jurisprudence, Volume 23) 

BNP Website Re-Launched

BNP Website Re-Launched

Created: Friday, 21 May 2010 16:27 Author: Green Arrow |  

Paul Golding at 2009 RWB

At the height of the General Election campaign, at a time when millions of leaflets were hitting doorsteps around the country, the British National Party website was destroyed by a treacherous former employee.

This unforgiveable act of treason contributed to the loss of dozens of election deposits around the country.

For several weeks a group of loyal Party officials and volunteers have been working hard getting the entire BNP internet operation up and running once again.

"It has been a hard slog but now things are moving once again. Instead of depending on one person to run the entire BNP cyberspace presence we now have a team of people working together, technicians, designers, writers and moderators," said new BNP webmaster Paul Golding.

Please take the time to visit the new BNP website and register, this will allow you to place comments complete with avatar after each news article: www.bnp.org.uk

New Changes to Website: Avatars Added to Comments Section

New Changes to Website: Avatars Added to Comments Section  BNP Communications

The new BNP website is going from strength to strength as the highly popular Avatars have been re-added to the comments section.
Users only have to edit their profiles and upload an 85x85 pixel image to adorn their comments.
Very soon we will be launching new social networking features to the website which will allow BNP supporters and members to network, organise, plan and communicate once again.
If you haven't already registered an account with this website be sure to do so as this allows you to post comments under each individual news article.
It is vitally important for each and every BNP supporter to share the BNP website with friends and family, to help spread the message.
Be sure to visit the BNPtv website at http://bnptv.org.uk/

A Case Study in How the LabConDem “Immigration” System Allows the World’s Scoundrels to Parasite off the British Taxpayer

Bushra Ferozdin Butt: A Case Study in How the LabConDem “Immigration” System Allows the World’s Scoundrels to Parasite off the British Taxpayer

  BNP News

The shocking case of Pakistani national Bushra Ferozdin Butt, wanted in her home country on murder charges but living in Britain on £1,300 per month benefits, is the perfect example of everything that is wrong with the LabConDem immigration system.

Ms Butt is wanted in Pakistan for murder after allegedly killing her husband by burning him to death. She was arrested and spent ten months in jail awaiting trial. When she was released on bail, she fled to Britain, where she had previously resided for nine years.

That period of residence in Britain ensured that she has permanent leave to remain in our country, and consequently she draws benefits equivalent to a British person earning £22,000 per year.

According to news reports, Ms Butt draws £330.70 a week in council tax and housing benefit. She arrived in Britain in September 2009, which means that she has already earned £11,243.80 courtesy of the British taxpayer.

Interviewed by a daily newspaper in her flat in Luton, Ms Butt declared that she was not working because she has depression.

“I go to the bank every two weeks and get my benefits. It is all very good. I like this country very much. It is better here than Pakistan. I get [sic] benefit for housing and my illness.”

How is it possible that a person born in Pakistan, wanted for murder in that country, can live in Britain drawing benefits which total more than what many ordinary working British people earn in a year?

Ms Butt is in fact not doing anything illegal. She is merely following the guidelines laid down by successive governments with regard to immigration law in Britain.

Anyone, from anywhere, who has “indefinite leave to remain” in Britain, even if they are not citizens or have never paid into the social welfare system, qualify for benefits.

This state of affairs, more than anything else, shows precisely how badly the British people have been betrayed by Tory and Labour regimes.

There is not another nation on earth which would allow itself to be so brutally abused in this manner, and certainly not Pakistan.

Only the British National Party would address this ongoing problem, and it is to that end that the party is redoubling its outreach efforts to the public.

New Government Also Puts British Workers Last

New Government Also Puts British Workers Last by  BNP News

According to a succession of Labour and Tory ministers, Britain can afford to get rid of its “dirty” industrial base through the closure of mines, steel works and shipyards because opportunities in high-tech industries, such as information technology (IT) will be developed to replace them.

This, like so much mindless drivel spouted by the grossly over-remunerated Westminster politicians, is demonstrable nonsense.

Take Britain's failing IT industry as an example. Home-grown computer professionals find it hard to hang onto jobs in an industry racked by downsizing, cost-cutting and redundancy, while relatively cheap IT “experts” from abroad on short-term contracts have flooded in to replace them.

This is bad news for skilled Brits and those studying IT at university, hopeful of rewarding careers in the industry.

One might imagine that the Government, mindful of these matters, would be pressuring employers to adopt an “employ Britons first” policy or at the very least ensure that government IT contracts went to British companies employing British workers.

Nothing could be further from Government thinking. According to a recent article in Computing magazine, Gartner research director Massimiliano Claps said the government is “likely to want to shave at least £500m from its IT budget by using technologies such as shared services, increased automation and the G-Cloud. ‘The new government’s ICT strategy looks very much like that of the old one in these respects,’ he said.

“Claps said the new government is also likely to continue Labour’s strategy of saving money through offshoring. The last government signed several big offshoring contracts in the months before the election, including a £600m deal between the Department for Work and Pensions and India’s Tata Consultancy Services for management of its pension scheme,” continued Computing.

The magazine added that in the short term, services such as application development and testing are most likely to be offshored” even though “there is some resistance to offshoring business services and call centres” but that this is “likely to change over the next 12 to 18 months as people become more used to the idea.”

The awarding of the Government's pension contract to India's Tata Corporation came just months after Tata's steel division announced the mothballing of their huge former Corus/British Steel plant at Redcar, with the loss of 1,500 local jobs.

Perhaps the Government will also now reward Tata with the contract to maintain their Job Seekers Allowance administration systems. 

Footnote: It is reported that Tata are in negotiation to sell their largely redundant Redcar plant to SSI —  a Thai-owned industrial group.

The “sticking point” appears to be just how much cash the British government will stump up in the form of “grants” to entice the Thais to conclude the deal.

Tweedledee Tweedledum: Now Labour MP and Blair Cabinet Minister Is Offered Job by ConDem Tricksters

Tweedledee Tweedledum: Now Labour MP and Blair Cabinet Minister Is Offered Job by ConDem Tricksters

 |  BNP News

Tory activists, already astonished by the speed with which their party’s leader has abandoned core Conservative election promises, have had their worst fears confirmed with the news that David Cameron has offered Labour MP Frank Field a job in the new Government as well.

Mr Field, MP for Birkenhead and cabinet minister in the Blair regime, has been offered a job as special personal advisor to Mr Cameron, tasked with welfare.

Mr Field is also known for his support of the ‘balanced migration’ scam trick which argues that the number of immigrants being let into Britain should equal the number of people leaving the country.

This policy is, of course, nonsense, as immigrants have a much higher birth rate than indigenous British people and allowing masses of Third Worlders to enter the country in proportion to people who leave, adds massively to the population over the medium term.

In addition, the number of people who leave Britain every year is around half a million —   almost identical to the numbers of immigrants currently entering Britain legally.

Mr Fields’ ‘balanced migration’ policy is therefore a subterfuge which in reality is merely a continuation of the status quo which will see Britain overrun by the Third World within the next 30 years or so.

The fact that Mr Cameron would actively invite a former Labour cabinet minister to be his personal advisor is an indication of how far left the Tory party has been taken under its new leadership.

It is little wonder than those Tory negotiators who finalised the ConDem alliance were quoted as asking the Lib Dem team to object to “daft” Conservative policies so that they could be struck off.

The leftward lurch of the Tory leadership is bound to generate tensions within that party as increasing numbers of backbenchers and grassroots activists realise that the new Conservative Party is merely the new Labour Party under another guise.

* Mr Field was interviewed by BBC Radio 4 on the topic of immigration yesterday and revealed that it was his opinion that “mass immigration was fuelling poverty.”

Sounding as if he was reading from the BNP’s election manifesto, Mr Field said, “If this Government had, as the last Government had, an emphasis that work is the way out of poverty, you cannot go on having an immigration policy that was, to all intents and purposes, an open-door policy.”

It is a pity Mr Field is not more honest in admitting that mass immigration per se is a threat to the future existence of this nation. But it seems that telling the truth about anything borders on the impossible for the LabConDem alliance.

People versus Corporatism United Kingdom Demographics:

People versus Corporatism

 Author: rugfish |  

United Kingdom Demographics:
This article is about the demographic features of the population of the United Kingdom, including population density, ethnicity, education level, health of the populace, economic status, religious affiliations and other aspects of the population.
According to the 2001 census, the total population of the United Kingdom was 58,789,194—the third-largest in the European Union (behind Germany and metropolitan France) and the 21st-largest in the world. Its overall population density is one of the highest in the world, due to the particularly high population density in England. Almost one-third of the population lives in England's southeast and is predominantly urban and suburban, with about 8.2 million in the capital city of England, London. The United Kingdom's extremely high literacy rate (99%) is attributable to universal public education introduced for the primary level in 1870 and secondary level in 1900. Education is compulsory from the ages of 5 to 16, with an option to continue education free of charge in the form of A-Levels, vocational training or apprenticeship to age 18. About two-fifths of British students go on to post-secondary education (18+). The Church of England and the Church of Scotland function as the official national churches in their respective countries, but all the major religions found in the world are represented in the United Kingdom. The UK's population is predominantly White British.
Being located close to continental Europe, the countries that formed the United Kingdom were subject to many invasions and migrations, especially from Scandinavia and the continent, including Roman occupation for several centuries. Historically, British people were thought to be descended mainly from the different ethnic stocks that settled there before the 11th century; The Britons, Anglo-Saxons, Romans, Vikings and the Normans, who had lived in Northern France. However, recent genetic analysis appears to indicate that around 80% of British DNA comes from an indigenous population who settled Britain around 12,000 years ago, with subsequent invaders contributing very little to the gene-pool. LINK
The case for replacement through mass migration, which WILL effect the gene-pool?
NONE
Mass migration to the UK did not begin fully until 1948. The native population of the United Kingdom has never been asked whether they agree with it and no debate on the economic, social or cultural benefits and drawbacks, has ever been conducted.
David Cameron (in the video), relates to 'Operation Black Vote', and to a history of 'racism' against black people in Britain who he says should take their 'rightful' place, but the sovereign will of the British people has never been sought nor gained in relation to any government policy or treaty in respect of mass migration.
The video shows that mass migration is in fact a social construct to create a global workforce, global consumers, and global corporate profits with no regard at all to criminality or to the cultural erosion , family break up and displacement of civilizations which took a millennium to make, of all peoples which businesses and politicians simply use as their economic slaves in no different a way than once did ancient Rome.
Protest
To protest against this destruction of our gene-pool, people, race, society, culture and the discrimination against you which is undermining your individual opportunity to better the lives of you and your family, you should write to your MP and ask who gave him the authority to do this, and ask him to provide you with all relevant information regarding all government decision making in regard to immigration since 1948.
You should also ask, what measures has he taken to raise issues of criminality checks on all immigrants into this country since 1948, and ask that he provides you with evidence of the checks under the Freedom of Information Act.
You should compile a file as to the facts in regard to former criminal prosecutions of individuals prior to them being declared a British citizen.
That's if you're interested in whether any were sex-traffickers, pedophiles, muggers, robbers, gun dealers, drug pushers, drug abusers and child abusers etc.
And you should seek information why a person who has committed bigamy was permitted into this country to continue to live in bigamy since it is and was against the law.
Lastly,
You should ask your MP whether he signed the Early Day Motion signed by 122 MP's to recognise the indigenous rights of those people native to Britain of which you are one, and ask him why he signed or indeed did not sign.
Your MP MUST give a written reply to your questions.
Get these worms out of our woodwork and make them understand that THEY are our servants not us theirs.
rugfish