Jobbik and Hungary's Agony

Jobbik and Hungary's Agony

Author: Albion  

The Hungarian People - "We only want a voice"

While the Pan European Federation is eager to condemn countries like Iran, Iraq, and Burma and so on for human rights violation, it remains silent about police brutality in Hungary--a member of the European Union and NATO. In the opening session of the EU parliament, the assembly didn't waste time to condemn the nations mentioned above, in the mean time, it played dumb when members of the assembly were reminded by Krisztina Morvai about the atrocities the criminal Hungarian regime has been committing against its own people on the ongoing basis.

What the European Marxist Federation dread after many years of preparation, planning, treaties and constitutions disguised as treaties is for a possible fracture or break up of the federation by a withdrawal of even one poor member of the federation. The obvious problem being it could have a domino effect throughout the region that might awaken the populace to the fact they have lost among many other things freedoms, self rule and control of their interest rates of their collective currency. It’s much like the old USSR that loses a satellite country that gains independence through internal struggle, no different.

In 2006, the Hungarian regime ordered police to shoot at protesters during a passive sit down protest. This was a crime against humanity and the EU should investigate the incident before worrying about human rights violation in Iran or anywhere else.

Roma immigration overload is a prime example of the plague affecting all countries of the Federation. Hungary’s unofficial estimates place the Roma at between 6-11 percent of the population of 10.8 million plus people. In many UK towns the percentage of immigrants would be similar, though in towns like Southall the percentage of immigrants is nearer 90% of the population. As yet the disparity throughout the whole of the UK has yet to reach Hungary’s frightening proportions, but time is a great leveller.

The history of Hungary, once a great power has been one of turmoil for centuries with invasions by Moguls and Ottoman Turks, it is beyond me to contemplate to write even a shot précis on Hungary’s rich history. Hungary is haemorrhaging again, this time it is the swamping of its country by Roma Gypsies.

The vicious Socialist government of Fidesz did not heed the concerns of the people which at the last election saw the Nationalist party Jobbik won 26 seats in parliament. The state controlled newspapers screamed ‘rightward swing has Fascist overtone’ Sound familiar? The result should give heart to the British National Party.

On Apr. 11, 2010 the centre-right Fidesz party won a landslide victory, winning 206 seats in the 386-member parliament and reducing the opposition MSZP to dust with only 28 seats. But despite slander, baseless accusations, downright lies and electoral fraud the ‘extreme’ right-wing ‘Movement for a Better Hungary’ (Jobbik), born after the 2006 protests, entered the parliament with 26 SEATS.

Jobbik has often been accused of indulging in hate speeches and racism, directed against the Roma people and their "predominant and overwhelming association’’ to ‘’certain criminological phenomena". Allegations abound that members of its civil neo-fascist ‘Hungarian Guard’ are linked to increasing attacks on the Roma in the countryside. Roma Gypsies who are now infesting Western Europe appear to be a race of thieves and beggars, Italy particularly is infested by Roma.

Jobbik has also been associated with anti-Semitic sentiments and openly propagates the irredentist cause of a ‘Greater Hungary’ to restore Hungary to its pre-World War I borders, an idea popularised earlier by Fidesz

GREEN ARROW N.B. Balasz Barcoszi, a researcher of information networks and cyber communities, says that Jobbik has utilised the Internet better than any other party to transmit its ideology. ‘’The party encourages and supports a wide network of sites and blogs which are not directly political but are all connected and constantly reproduce messages and information in favour of the party’s cause. He continues, THIS IS THE CLASSICAL WAY IN WHICH FAR-RIGHT PARTIES IN EUROPE DOMINATE CYBER SPACE……………. is that opposed to far left parties?

In a move more worthy of Zimbabwe, the Hungarian Supreme Court has ruled today to terminate an investigation by the National Electoral Commission (OVB), into Fidesz’s ruling party’s systematic criminal electoral fraud. Again, sound familiar? Jobbik has long questioned the party-political impartiality of the Hungarian judicial system, and its uncanny ability to follow whichever way the prevailing political wind, and potential for financial recompense, is blowing.

I suggest the reader might visit Jobbik’s home page below, its similarity to the UK’s corrupt political scene, fraudulent elections and use of the police as a political tool is uncanny. But the British police have yet to reach the animal savagery of the Hungarian police. Once the Marxist Dictatorship of the Pan European Federation is fully implemented Hungary’s present political scene could be YOUR future, if you show any dissent in opposing to the Orwellian ideology of the European Marxist Kommissars.

Jobbik Home Page
Fidesz "dictatorship" begins
Disturbing pictures of savage Hungarian police brutality

Dramatic Breakthrough for Common Sense in the Netherlands

Dramatic Breakthrough for Common Sense in the Netherlands

BNP Report

The politics of common sense, decency and rationality have been the biggest winners in the Netherlands’s Dutch general election as Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party polled 1.5 million votes and took 24 seats in the Dutch parliament.

The Freedom Party is now only five seats behind the largest party, the conservative VVD, which took 31 seats. The far left Labour Party took 30 seats.

"The impossible has come true," Mr Wilders announced at his party headquarters after the final results were declared.

“More security, less crime, less immigration, less Islam — that is what the Netherlands has chosen.

"I say to all the newly elected Freedom Party MPs of our beautiful party, bring battering rams with you because, starting tomorrow, we're going to give them hell."

* The VVD will in all likelihood offer Mr Wilders a cabinet seat if they try to form a collation. It is unsure if the Freedom Party will accept such an offer.

The Freedom Party’s TV broadcast is below with English subtitles. Nationalists all over the world will be able to draw encouragement from their success, as it shows the spirit of European resistance is not dead.

Latest Edition of Voice of Freedom to Appear this Weekend

Latest Edition of Voice of Freedom to Appear this Weekend

BNP News

The latest edition of the Voice of Freedom newspaper is to appear this coming weekend, new editor Martin Wingfield has announced.

“The 20-page 'Election Results Special' issue will contain an in-depth look at the British National Party's performance in the general election and local council elections. It will also contain a discussion on the way forward for the party over the coming 12 months,” Mr Wingfield said.

“The newspaper will be a morale-boost for those people who felt disappointed with the BNP's results.

“Although we didn't win a seat at Westminster, there were still some excellent performances, especially in Yorkshire.

“When our results are viewed as a whole, readers will see just how significant they were and how the general election has established us as Britain's fourth political party," he said.

Mr Wingfield is a veteran nationalist writer who has now returned to run the newspaper. He will be assisted by new deputy editor Steve Johnson, who wants the newspaper to return to reporting more on the work and campaigns of BNP units.

"The news we report needs to be our news and not just stories that could appear in any daily newspaper,” Mr Johnston said.

“What the British National Party is doing to win back our country is our special news, and reporting it immediately gives the newspaper a unique pitch.

"Seeing photos of our members out campaigning and at meetings and reading about the nuts and bolts of BNP’s branches and groups is the best way to recruit new members."

Mr Johnson has asked that all BNP units make sure they send their reports and photos to freedom@bnp.org.uk so that the widest possible audience reads about the hard work being done by members in their particular area.

Cambridgeshire County Council Launches “Non-Whites Only” IT Training Scheme

Conservative Party-Controlled Cambridgeshire County Council Launches “Non-Whites Only” IT Training Scheme

from the BNP Newsroom

The Conservative Party-controlled Cambridgeshire County Council (CCC) has launched an IT skills training programme open only to non-white people, while at the same time announcing cutbacks of millions to its frontline services.

The latest shocking display of Tory hatred for white British people has come with an announcement by Antonio Callisto, a CCC employee in charge of running “diversity” projects, that free basic IT training is now available to people who “are 16yrs+ from African, Bangladeshi, Caribbean, or Pakistani communities.”

According to Mr Callisto, if members of these communities are “currently unemployed or work less than 16 hrs” then they qualify for free placement on the course.

Helpfully, Mr Callisto’s announcement added, if any members of these communities do not own personal computers, then the council will gladly provide one as well.

Earlier, CCC announced that it was facing £6 million of cuts to its services which would impact almost all of its services.

BNP News called Mr Callisto to inquire about the exact nature of the course. His accent made it clear that he was not of indigenous British origin and indeed his command of English appeared to be just above basic.

When asked why CCC was providing services to non-white communities only, Mr Callisto replied that it was part “of a Government programme.”

“The Government has,” Mr Callisto said, “determined that there is a shortage of [IT-skilled] people in those communities who are not accessing the necessary resources to move off dependency on state welfare.”

The overt racial basis and anti-white nature of the programme was underlined when Mr Callisto was asked what the situation would be if an African “who happened to be white” applied for placement on the course.

Mr Callisto laughed and said that a white South African would have to come into his offices for an “assessment to see if he qualified” and that there were “probably other services we could offer him.”

The programme is merely the latest in a long line of anti-white and anti-British measures which are endorsed, supported, financed and promoted by all the Westminster parties.

* Readers are encouraged to contact Mr Callisto and politely inquire why he runs programmes which actively discriminate against white people. His contact details can be found on the CCC website here.

Richard Barnbrook on a Ken Livingstone comeback

From the Green Arrow & Freinds

By The Green Arrow

Richard the Lionheart

Foreword by The Green Arrow

It is no secret that I am an ardent admirer of the British National Party London Assembly Member Mr Richard Barnbrook.  In my opinion he has the charm of  David Niven, the heart and courage of a lion and his nickname Richard the Lionheart is well deserved.

Whilst speaking to him at the 2009 Red, White and Blue, I asked him how he could daily go into that pit of filth known as City Hall in London and take the endless abuse after delivering yet another hard hitting and truthful speech.  He replied that he had developed the skin of a rhinoceros.  Well apart from all these atributes I am also pleased to note that he also retains a stiletto style sense of humour as you will discover when you read the articles beneath, that I have shamelessly taken from his site here.  Whilst there, why not leave the Lionheart a comment of support, because even lions like to be patted now and again.  The rest is all Richard.

Ken Livingstone(top) and friend

A Ken Livingstone comeback? He can’t be serious!

Strange how politicians seem to assume that the majority of voters suffer with amnesia. Or maybe they put it down to the pendulum effect which can be described as follows:

A government, from one (or even maybe two) of the half-baked main parties gets elected.

• Everyone feels a warm glow of optimism.
• That cheery feeling soon fades.
• The government shows itself completely inept.
• The voters groan.
• Time for an election- let’s give the other guys a chance!
• This time, the former party in opposition is elected.
• The people feel optimistic again.
• The optimism soon fades as the pre-election promises are disregarded.
• The country sinks further into bankruptcy and chaos…..

And so it continues, back and forth.

Presumably Ken Livingstone thinks we’ve forgotten all the disasters of his mayoralty in the general reaction against the inadequacy of bungling Boris!

However, a quick canter back down memory lane should serve to remind us just what a disaster the reign of Mayor Livingstone was!

• Remember who introduced the congestion charge?
• The £200 000 pay-offs received by 8 of his City Hall advisers?
• The scandal that surrounded his race advisor Lee Jasper with grants from the Mayor’s office?
• The money wasted on zany multi-culti projects like the Rise music festival?
• The celebrations for the Muslim festival of Eid held in Trafalgar Square for the first time?
• And his ridiculous, tearful and nonsensical apology for the slave trade of 200 years ago.
• And don’t forget the 27 teenage murders that took place on the streets of London.
• All the money wasted on his ludicrous promotion stunt in Venezuela.

And going back yet further, his historic support for of the IRA when he was on the GLC is yet another example of his daft adherence to political correctness and positive discrimination.

And after all this, instead of hanging his head in shame, Ken’s now eyeing up the mayoral contest in 2012. Maybe he thinks that Londoners will be so deliriously punch drunk with having to stump up for the Olympics that they won’t mind forking out for him to deliver yet more of his mad ideas!

It’s about time that Red Ken, Up-in-the-clouds-Blue-Boris, and anyone else from the main parties that has their sights on the Mayoral throne got the message:

Londoners need less government, not more!
We want less interference from the pen-pushers at the GLA.
We want to keep more of our own money, instead of being fleeced with higher congestion charges and exorbitant council tax.
We want less regulation, surveillance and interference in our daily lives, not more of it.
We want the burden lifted from small business, currently over-regulated and priced out of existence.

And we want a London that we can be proud of, that reflects the character and input of the past generations of British people that built it, not one that bends over backwards to reflect the diversity of newcomers at the expense of the people who already live here.

That’s the sort of London I believe that Londoners want. Both Ken and Boris have shown by their past records that they are clearly not up to the job!

By the way, as a keen supporter of animals and wild life I fully applaud Ken as a newt fancier, and. I also appreciate Ken’s support for rare endangered Australian Rhino Iguanas, so I do hope that he has a licence for them now!

The Mayor’s ‘State of London Debate’ is just another talking-shop!

This event, due to take place this month, has apparently been upgraded this year,”to enable the highest number of people to take part and put their questions to Mayor Boris Johnson and senior members of his administration.” For the first time, Londoners will be able to question the Mayor by using Twitter, and the GLA website.

I wish all Londoners who take the trouble to participate, the best of luck!

From my experiences in confronting Boris in the Assembly Chamber face to face, all I get in response to my carefully aimed questions are bluster, avoidance and dismissal. Nothing constructive in the practical sense that would address the concerns of ordinary people of London about immigration, overcrowding, rising crime rates and lack of jobs. And, come to think of it, nothing seems to have been done by the Tories about the programme of affordable (council) housing which was apparently going to be implemented in the Boroughs. But I expect when he’s in front of the cameras in this well publicised and stage managed event, Boris will probably make more of an effort to pander to the points made by members of the public than he does to me! After all, he’s got his beady eye fixed on the 2012 mayoral election already, as indeed has Ken Livingstone.

The purpose behind what are effectively carefully orchestrated public events like this, is simply to placate the voters by giving them the illusion that they can be personally involved in formulating policy, when nothing can be further from the truth. I can tell you from my first hand experiences in the Chamber that Boris and this cronies simply don’t want to know! They know what they think and they certainly don’t want to want to know what you or I think, save to pay lip-service to a choice few voters’ aspirations in order to get themselves voted in again.

Unfortunately, words come cheap, and under the current political system where so much of our daily activity is regulated by Europe, and politicians are never held personally accountable, talking-shops are seen as a useful tool for diffusing voters’ frustrations and getting the politicians themselves trowel-loads of publicity at the same time. Meanwhile, the wheels of a bloated, ineffective and wasteful bureaucracy grind inexorably on, ever more restricting our lives, and strangling personal initiative and freedom. The end result of all this is that nothing changes- to the delight of the top echelons of civil servants who continue to clandestinely run the show and get paid handsomely for doing so.

Enjoy the debate by all means, and do try to bait Boris and get him in a twist if you can! But don’t be surprised when all is said, there’ll be next to nothing done, if anything!

We need to roll back regulation and reduce unnecessary government. The BNP sees the importance of limiting legislation, cutting bureaucracy and restoring power to where it truly belongs- the people!

Labour Councillors Refuse Pay Cut — But Lay off Their Own Staff

From the BNP Newsroom

By Mercia — The Labour Party-controlled Lambeth council has announced its intention to cut 400 jobs from its staff — while its councillors have refused to take a five percent cut in pay.

To add insult to injury, the announcements were made while the national Labour Party demanded a “full disclosure” of the scale of proposed job losses in the National Health Service.

Lambeth Borough Council launched a 90-day consultation period with Labour supporting trade unions last week over the proposed job cuts, which are intended to reduce expenditure by £20 million during this financial year.

At the same time, senior councillors were reported in the south London media as refusing to accept a five percent reduction in their Special Responsibilities Allowances (SRA).

Many claim this decision to be perverse considering the sums Lambeth councillors have received from the taxpayer.

The leader of the council, Cllr Reed, is recorded as having received £40,215 in SRA and “Civic Allowances” (CA) for the financial year 2009/10.

Council deputy leader Cllr Meldrum, and eight cabinet members having responsibility for Children and Young People, Community Safety, Culture and Communities, Employment & Enterprise, Environment, Finance and Resources, Health and Wellbeing, and Housing and Regeneration, received SRA and CA payments of £28,236 per councillor.

Even the opposition parties are in at the trough, with the leader of the opposition majority group entitled to £10,797 and the leader of the opposition minority group to £5,556.

Amazingly, none of these already very generous payments include the basic payment, currently just over £10,000 per year.

In other words, at least ten Lambeth councillors received around £40,000 or more of taxpayers' money during the year in question.

The average rate for a state carers' allowance to members of the public stands at around £1 per hour. Lambeth Council provides a discretionary allowance of up to £7 per hour, plus taxi fares of up to £10, for those councillors requiring help with either childcare or dependent care whilst on council business.

According to Cllr Meldrum, the council's "absolute priority" is to improve and maintain front-line services whilst making cuts.

Yet, instead of cutting councillors allowances and expenses, as common decency requires, the council proposes to axe 215 positions in children and young people's services; 58 posts in housing, regeneration and the environment; 36 posts in finance and resources; 25 general administration jobs and an unspecified number of jobs in adult and community services. 

Amongst the first to go will be temporary and agency staff, with permanent staff approaching retirement age also high on the list of vulnerable workers.

Despite the behaviour of their councillors in Lambeth, the Labour Party, whilst ignoring its role in burdening the NHS with £1 billion of PFI re-payment, has demanded to know the full scale of job losses in the NHS.

Many suggest that local authority cuts should start in the council chamber, the most non-productive area of all local authorities.

You know what really depressed me last week?

You know what really depressed me last week?

  Author: Green Arrow

Now some of you may or may not have noticed that I have been away for a week.  Or rather away from writing, I continued to do background admin tasks and moderate comments, etc but effectively I took a week away from reading the news or visiting sites that had anything to do with politics.  It was either that or top myself.

The reason was a series of events that just made me completely despair and for the first time to consider the horrifying thought that this time, the True British People would not prevail - despite the heroic efforts of the British National Party.

The first instance to start the clouds forming, was to be be parked outside a chemists in a small valley town late afternoon and watch walking towards me, two young white girls of about 13/14.  Both of these young ladies were dressed in grubby pyjamas, pink dressing gowns and wearing fluffy mules on their feet.  Their hair was dishevelled and in their arms they each carried baby dolls.

Now I had read about the new trend for people to go out shopping and clubbing in their pyjamas and thought stupid teenagers, until they got closer and I saw that both of the dolls were black and I thought: "Is this what our young women aspire to be?  Unmarried mothers with black children?".
And I wondered first about what sort of parents would let their teenage daughters out through the door looking worse than Cherie Blair when she opened the door to Number 10 dressed in a similar fashion and then about the marxist teachers who had polluted the minds of these children.

Later in the day I spoke to some old friends and the conversation turned to the state of the country and the influx of immigrants (ok so I steered it in that direction) and the fact that soon the True British People would be a minority in their own country.  The response was an "Oh well there is nothing we can do about it" and "Doesnt bother me, I will be dead by then".

Never have I despised my Welsh kinsmen more.  Or thought my contempt for some of them could sink lower.  But of course I was wrong.  My complete and utter contempt for some of my fellow Welsh reached new lows, when on returning home, I read that Cardiff Citty fans had been in a large scale punch up in London with Chelsea City fans back in February.

And this is what depressed me.  There are still those in Our Country who put loyalty to a Football Club before the family, friends and Country.  Individual Football Clubs have hundreds of thousands of supporters who spend a fortune on Team Products, tickets and travelling but few of these supporters who will wave their nations flags in the coming world cup even care about their nation or their children's non future.  Depressing.

UAF in Cardiff is now run by moslems

Because whilst the football supporters rush off to games around the Country to beat the crap out of each other, the EDL/WDL in Cardiff were outnumbered by 3 to 1 by the moslems, who now control the former Welsh Capital and who now that they also control the taxis in that city, ensured no support reached the EDL/WDL protest there last week.

What as gone wrong with the Welsh?  They continue to vote for the pervert Chris Bryant in Merthyr and the crook and former terrorist supporter Peter Hain in Neath.

And whilst our soldiers are still dying for the New World Order and whilst every day, moslem numbers increase, what do we Nationalists do?  Why we bicker and squabble amongst ourselves and the stupid among us, allow red and state agents to engineer splits and divisions within our ranks that makes some of us give up and walk away from the war.

Well I can tell you, I almost walked away.   It would have been so easy.  So I needed that week off but I am back now and the war continues and instead of being dejected and demoralised I intend to increase my personal efforts to wake up those stupid sheep people or die in the attempt and dying is the last thing I intend to do.

We have a lot going on in the background at the moment of which I will tell you more later.  Meanwhile, keep your faith in the British National Party and their chairman Nick Griffin MEP.  If I did not believe in them I would give up now.
Finally, who said:-"If God did not want them sheared, He would not have made them  sheep."?
read more at http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/

Take Stock of how far down the road to MADNESS we have traveled

From the photographer, Dean Shaddock:

This was captured as I collected my things from airport security (Detroit Metro Concourse A). I think of it as something like a Rorschach test. Is an elderly Catholic nun being frisked by a Muslim security agent the celebration of blind justice? Or is it simply an admission of absurdity?

Sometimes we need to stop and take stock of how far down the road to madness we have traveled.
A Muslim Security guard at a Airport in the USA it is like giving a loaded gun to a child!

Gaza Flotilla - what really happened

                      Gaza Flotilla - what really happened

 

By the Green Arrow 

I am getting increasingly fed up with reading about the hard done by people living in the Gaza Strip.  If the moslems living there wanted real change all they have to do is get rid of their terrorist leaders and stop spending the money they receive from Saudi Arabia on improving their land and lives and not buying weapons.  Perhaps then Israel - who in my opinion has the right to take action, including pre-emptive - might sit down and listen to them.

There was never a country called Palestine and those of you who support Hamas against the state of Israel should find a new site to post your comments.  No more will be going through.

I have no great love for Israel or any other country outside the United Kingdom if it comes to that but all sane people should recognise the right of the Israeli  nation to exist, regardless of how it came into being.

Shackling through “Racism”: The Route to Globalisation

Shackling through “Racism”: The Route to Globalisation

  Author: Dave Yorkshire freind of the Green Arrow

There is a high-profile news story in France at the moment that confirms both Enoch Powell’s prediction that “the black man will have the whip-hand over the white” and that we are well on the way to a global totalitarian state. The Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux has been convicted and fined 750 Euros and ordered to pay a further 2000 Euros in damages for a supposedly racist comment he made last year.

He was joking with an Arab Muslim UMP (the same party as Hortefeux) activist and a crowd of people that “He’s one of us”, “He doesn’t fit the prototype” and that “It’s when there are more of them there’s a problem.” Another of the crowd joked “He eats pork and drinks: he’s okay!”.

The Arab was laughing and joking with him at the time, yet the left-wing extremist newspaper Le Monde and various anti-white racist pressure groups, such as “SOS Racisme”, who aid illegal third-world immigrants in the country, turned it into a national race scandal. Even though the Arab in question had defended Hortefeux, and the jokes were made in regard to his religion and not race, the minister was forced to give a half-hearted apology at the time and attended a festival to mark the end of Ramadan. But this was not enough.

The lobby groups of the extreme left, of which there are many, had been after Hortefeux for some time, as he has been one of the few politicians to speak out against third world immigration and took his job of expelling illegal “sans-papiers” seriously. In the newspaper Aujourd’hui en France in 2007, he gave these words, reminiscent of Powell’s: “France has the right to choose whom she welcomes…Above all, have the courage to look reality in the face! …Is it normal that 60% of immigrants are concentrated in three of the 22 regions of France, that these people have an unemployment level of 22%, and that their children are often absent from school? No, it is not acceptable.” He plans to appeal against the conviction.

But what this all means is that, on the global stage, nobody who is white can disagree with or even joke about someone who is non-white. Essentially, this legitimatises anything a person of colour does and puts them beyond reproach. This is, indeed, the mechanism by which globalisation works.

Those at its head, the moguls of big business and neo-Marxists, who all wish to create a one-world dictatorship-cum-mass-consumer market, free of the encumbrance of national borders, are slowly but surely putting non-whites in positions of power over whites and shackling any white who disagrees through increasingly draconian and expansive laws regarding the freedom of speech and expression. Last year’s court action against the BNP’s right to govern its own membership and policies is another fine case in point and I suspect it will not be long before Trevor Phillips attempts to impose quotas and fast-track promotion programmes for ethnic minorities.

There is an added significance in the story. What we are witnessing here is the increased perversion of language to suit the ideals of those who would enslave us. The political philosopher Roger Scruton identified this some years ago in his lecture “Newspeak and Eurospeak” that formed part of his collection A Political Philosophy: Arguments for Conservatism, which, of course, owes a huge debt to the insight of George Orwell. One notes that Muslims are now being defined under the umbrella of “race” and are therefore now protected under laws imposed against whites by the EU.

The extreme left are still trying to prosecute the Danish minister and leader of the Danish People’s Party Pia Kjærsgaard, who, while speaking out against the Islamification of Denmark, referred to Muslims as people who “lie, cheat and deceive”. This, of course, is the first step in forbidding any ideological criticism by a European against a Muslim. It is the next step in the Islamification of Europe. And we remember that Islam is characterised by totalitarian rule and that it was founded by a merchant on the principles on capitalism. Certainly, there is no disparity between rich and poor, the powerful and the powerless greater than in Muslim countries. This is just how the heads of big business like it.

The ConDem Cabinet — A Millionaires' Club Which Makes You Pay for Their Private Living Expenses

The ConDem Cabinet — A Millionaires' Club Which Makes You Pay for Their Private Living Expenses

From the BNP Newsroom

By Mercia — Despite 23 of the Government's 29 cabinet ministers being millionaires, almost all of them demand that the taxpayers pay for their houses and private living expenses (even down to dog food,) a BNP survey has shown.

The Westminster politicians assured the public that the reason they entered politics had nothing to do with money but everything to do with “making a difference” and a noble desire to better the lot of their fellow man.

However, a review of their expenses claims shows that the “difference” these millionaire politicians are making, appears to be more to themselves than the public.

Observers point out that these individuals are wealthy enough to afford their own costs, even if only to pay for their own bed and board.

Furthermore, in a time of increasing austerity, why should the public subsidise the lifestyles of those who are already extremely wealthy and in receipt of a generous Ministerial salary and perks?

This is particularly so when their choice of career was entirely their own. No one, after all, forced them to become politicians.

All of the following cabinet ministers have all been identified as millionaires. The figure in parentheses following their name is the total they claimed in allowances and expenses for 2008/9:

Philip HammondPhilip Hammond, Secretary of State, Transport (£132,424).

Only last year Mr Hammond was reported as having claimed £122,586, including £23,075 on his second home allowance, just £8 short of the maximum, despite living within easy commuting distance of Westminster. Quite why Mr Hammond needs a second home has not been explained.

George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer (£167,054).

It was revealed earlier this year that Mr Osborne broke expenses rules by claiming for a £450,000 mortgage on his Cheshire farmhouse, when it was worth much less.

This follows on from the revelation that the taxpayer picked up a £440.62 bill from Mr Osborne for the 200-mile journey from Cheshire to London by taxi in November 2005.

Jeremy Hunt, Secretary of State, Culture, Olympics, Media & Sport (£125,739).

In December 2009 it was reported that Mr Hunt had been ordered to repay £9,500 in second home expenses after he was found to be in breach of House of Commons rules.

In May 2009, Mr Hunt came under fire for claiming £37,000 over a three year period for his second home in Farnham rather than commuting to Westminster, as many of his constituents do on a daily basis.

David Cameron, Prime Minister (£152,179).

In May 2009 Mr Cameron took out a £350,000 taxpayer-funded mortgage to purchase a “grand” constituency home in Oxfordshire.

By claiming the property to be his second home, Mr Cameron was able to claim around £20,000 a year for the mortgage interest payments, almost the maximum allowed under Parliament's now discredited second home allowance.

Yet, only four months after securing the mortgage he paid off a £75,000 loan on his London property.

Although this was not illegal and no rules were broken, the fact remains that if he had kept the loan on his London home and borrowed £75,000 less on his Oxfordshire residence, he could have saved taxpayers over £22,000, according to mortgage experts.

Chris Huhne, Secretary of State, Energy and Climate (£149,139).

Mr Huhne is one of Parliament’s wealthiest MPs and owns no fewer than seven houses, including his official second home in Eastleigh. He does, however, make sure that the taxpayer pays for its frequent renovation.

In August 2006, Mr Huhne was reimbursed more than £5,000 for building work that included having two coats of “red rustic timber care” applied to garden items and two coats of green preservative for fences.

On another occasion, Mr Huhne submitted a bill for £77.31, covering odd jobs such as “replacing rope on swinging chair.”

Perhaps, most staggering of all, was a claim submitted by Mr Huhne for fluffy dusters, bus tickets, milk and chocolate HobNob biscuits.

Dominic Grieve, Attorney General (£137,154).

In May 2009, Mr Grieve was reported to be considering giving up his second home in Marlow — which he rents, but for which he is reported as having claimed nearly £19,000 during the 2008/9 financial year.

Beaconsfield, just outside London, is considered an easy commute from West Kensington, where Mr Grieve's main home is located.

Francis Maude, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General (£155,797).

Mr Maud claimed tens of thousands of pounds in parliamentary allowances on a £345,000 London flat situated a mere 70 yards from a house he also owned.

Mr Maude has a home in Horsham which he has declared to be main residence, while his house in Lambeth has been rented out.

William Hague, Secretary of State, Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs (£150,926).

In March 2009 Mr Hague claimed £61,995 in taxpayers’ cash to help pay for a £1 million second home in London. The penthouse in question was purchased in 2003 for £685,000.

Mr Hague also owns a £1 million apartment in Yorkshire and uses his MP’s living allowance to pay his mortgage interest and £4,000-a-year service charge.

Andrew MitchellAndrew Mitchell, Secretary of State, International Development (£163,526).

Mr Mitchell, whilst in charge of the Tory party's policy on alleviating world poverty, claimed £19,000 from the taxpayers for the cleaning, redecorating and furnishing of his West Midlands home and garden.

Mr Mitchell also claimed nearly £12,000 in other expenses between 2004 and 2007, including £2,500 on decorating and £2,650 on a new boiler.

Mr Mithcell also famously claimed for a £395 "Lingfield" table, "Santorini" linen sheets, a duvet and pillow cases, all courtesy of the taxpayer.

In addition, Mr Mithcell claimed more than £9,000 for cleaning and maintaining the garden at the property, including a £220 bill for "gardening and shrubbery removal.”

Nick Clegg, Deputy Prime Minister, Lord President of the Council (£148,064).

Mr Clegg billed the taxpayer for £84,000 over a four year period for a new kitchen at his constituency home as well as for redecoration, gardening and soft furnishings.

In total, Mr Clegg claimed £83,824 between 2005 and 2009, including £1,018 in monthly mortgage interest payments, £9,244 in legal costs and stamp duty, £2,600 on a new kitchen and £5,857 on decorating.

He also bought Ikea cushions, napkins and a cake pan, and spent £850 on curtains and blinds.

David Willetts, Minister of State: (Universities and Science), Business Innovation and Skills (£164,610).

Mr Willetts billed the taxpayer £115 plus VAT for workmen to replace 25 light bulbs in his west London second home.

He also charged another £80 to “change lights in bathroom”, part of a £2,191.38 invoice for odd jobs that included cleaning a shower head.

Oliver Letwin, Minister of State, Cabinet Office (£139,783).

Since 2004, Mr Letwin has claimed more than £80,000 for a cottage in Somerset.

His most controversial claim was made in September 2006 when he submitted an invoice for £2,145 which was a bill to “lay a new 25mm pipeline to replace the existing leaking pipeline under the tennis court.”

Caroline SpelmanCaroline Spelman, Secretary of State, Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (£101,786).

Ms Spelman claimed £40,000 for bills and cleaning for her second home, despite her husband claiming it was his main home when he unsuccessfully stood as a candidate in the Euro elections.

Her second home claim of more than £10,000 a year was for electricity, gas, water and phone bills, plus £200 a month for cleaning, and council tax of more than £2,000 a year.

Ms Spelman was also the subject of controversy when she had to repay £9,600 of parliamentary allowances for breaching rules by overpaying her assistant to be both an administrator and nanny.

Cheryl Gillan, Secretary of State, Wales (£159,533).

Ms Gillan submitted a Sainsbury’s receipt for £27.25 for groceries that included £4.47 of pet food. She charged taxpayers for one £3.69 bag of Iams Senior Chicken dry meal meant for older dogs, and two 39p cans of Cesar chicken and turkey meat, along with food and drink for herself.

The previous year, Ms Gillan claimed back a £72.27 gas bill even though the statement showed her account was £26.72 in credit. Shortly afterwards, she claimed £66.15 when her account was £64.35 in credit.

Despite Chesham and Amersham being in easy commuter distance of Westminster, Ms Gillan has a taxpayer subsidised second home in Battersea.

Kenneth Clarke, Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State, Justice (£128,125).

Mr Clarke has homes in Nottinghamshire and London and the Parliamentary record reveals that in the four year period from 2004 to 2008, he claimed over £50,000 in respect of his second home in Lambeth.

George Young, Lord Privy Seal, Leader of the House of Commons (£128,665).

Between 2001 and 2009, Mr Young claimed £127,159 for his flat in Victoria, which is within walking distance of the House of Commons.

Liam Fox, Secretary of State, Defence (£155,838).

Earlier this year, Mr Fox’s appeal against a finding that he was overpaid £22,476.00 in parliamentary expenses for mortgage interest on his second home was dismissed by a court.

Mr Fox challenged the claim after increasing the mortgage on his London flat from £120,000 to £300,000, using most of the capital to pay for a family home in his Woodspring constituency and to refurbish his second home.

Michael Gove, Secretary of State, Education (£161,804).

Mr Gove spent thousands on furnishing his London home before “flipping” his Commons allowance to a property in his Surrey constituency and claiming a staggering £13,000 in moving costs.

Mr Gove also claimed £34.99 for a foam cot mattress, eight coffee spoons and cake forks, worth £5.95 each; four breakfast knives, a woven door mat worth £30 and new patio furniture worth £219.

Furthermore, between December 2005 and April 2006, Mr Gove spent more than £7,000 on his semi-detached north Kensington home of which around a third was spent at Oka, an upmarket interior design company established by Lady Annabel Astor, David Cameron’s mother-in-law.

And these are only the ones we know about.

Little wonder they are all millionaires — the taxpayers seem to have paid for their lifestyles in full.

MUSLIM prisoners are cashing in on their religion

MUSLIM prisoners are cashing in on their religion to claim hundreds of thousands of pounds in additional benefits, a report revealed yesterday.

A study of Muslim inmates found that 30 per cent only converted during their sentence, while many others were non-practising before, only becoming “active” inside.

Others admitted that one reason they had taken up the religion was “the perceived material benefits offered to Muslims,” according to the report by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons.

It found that many Muslim prisoners realised they were entitled to more time outside their cells and better food, specially prepared at Ramadan.

With 10,300 Muslim prisoners in the system, the extra cost to the taxpayer is believed to stretch to hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Prisoners who convert to Islam are entitled to attend Friday prayers and Islamic classes outside their cells and are offered a Halal meat choice for every hot meal.

They are also granted time with Muslim chaplains, as well as access to the Koran and Islamic Literature. 

In effect it appears that Crime pays for Muslims both inside as well as outside Prison as most of the class A heroin comes via pakistan by these so called British muslims also.

EU Spent £2 Million on “Bands and Orchestras” to Promote Political Objectives

EU Spent £2 Million on “Bands and Orchestras” to Promote Political Objectives

from the BNP Newsroom

The European Union spent £2 million of taxpayers’ money funding “orchestras and bands” to promote its political objectives, the Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA) has revealed.

In a briefing note titled “The Band Played On: EU Taxpayers and the Orchestration of European Integration”, the TPA said that the EU budget is being used to “fund a wide range of orchestras, concerts and music festivals. There is a clear policy of using these orchestras to promote the political objectives of the EU, in particular ever closer political union.”

According to the TPA, the EU employs what it calls “European Cultural Ambassadors” which are organisations it has deemed suitable for large and regular recipients of funding.

Organisations qualify as ambassadors if they meet the criteria of being “orchestras, choirs, theatre groups and dance companies whose activities have a real European dimension.”

This apparently separates them from the publicly-funded “Advocacy Networks, Festivals (which have to be both ‘renowned’ and have ‘a broad European visibility’) and Policy Support Structures for the Culture Agenda,” says the TPA.

The “Ambassadors” currently receiving EU funding are listed by the TPA s follows:

European Union Youth Orchestra €600,000

International Yehudi Menuhin Foundation €280,056

European Union Chamber Orchestra Trust €143,785

International Foundation Manifesta €212,081

The Chamber Orchestra of Europe €304,652

European Union Baroque Orchestra €332,246

The European Opera Centre Trust €250,000

De Krijtkring €80,000

Slovensko Mlandinsko Gledalisce €142,820

European Youth Jazz Orchestra €221,049

Total €2,566,689.

The TPA says that this shows that music dominates the programme, with bands and orchestras receiving over €2.2 million in funding out of the €2.6 million available — out of the €6.8 million awarded to all groups).

The EU has a budget of €400 million for its 2007—2013 culture programme. According to its own statement of purpose, the objective of the EU’s culture department is to “encourage the emergence of European citizenship.”

The TPA briefing paper goes on to give a number of case studies, including the European Union Baroque Orchestra which has been described by European Culture Commissioner Jan Figel as “a perfect symbol of our united Europe.”

Another case study quoted by the TPA is the Chamber Orchestra of Europe, which is described in EU literature as “a role-model for European integration.”

European taxpayers are therefore involuntarily funding the propagation of the EU through additional taxes over and above what they have to pay to their national governments.

According to the Bruges Group, the EU costs Britain a total of £60.1 billion per year.

A report by the Bruges Group revealed that:

- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.

- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.

- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or£66.3 billion net. By 2013, this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.

- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.

- This year membership of the European Union will cost Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.

- That is the equivalent for every man, women and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.

Migrationwatch Forced to Admit That Tory-Backed “Points Immigration Systems” is Useless

Migrationwatch Forced to Admit That Tory-Backed “Points Immigration Systems” is Useless

The BNP Newsroom

Despite giving cautious backing to the Conservative Party during the recent election, immigration think tank Migrationwatch has now been forced to admit that the Labour Party-invented and Tory-backed points-based immigration system has failed utterly.

Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green attacked the points-based system in public after a House of Commons library research paper revealed that the system had given more than 1.1 million jobs to immigrants who could have been refused work permits.

“So much for the ‘tough’ points-based system,” Sir Andrew was quoted as saying.

“This research shows beyond doubt that British workers have been displaced by foreign-born workers. This cannot be in our wider interests.

“British workers are having their wages held down or even losing their jobs as a result of competition from migrant workers who can afford to work for less,” Sir Andrew said.

The Conservative Party officially endorsed the points-based system, saying they only wanted to add a cap to the total number of immigrants.

Tory leader David Cameron said this would reduce the number of migrants from the “hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands” — pretending that this was the answer to the problem.

According to the latest figures, the number of non-EU origin workers in Britain increased even during the worst of the recession period when British unemployment rose by more than 400,000.

Between 1997 and 2009, the number of jobs held by foreign-born workers in Britain went up from 7.5 percent to 12.9 percent and now stands at around 3,720,000 of the total. Only 576,000 of this latter number came from within the EU.

This means that 3.2 million came from outside the EU and, to make matters worse, it transpires that 1,130,000 were granted work permits under the points-based system.

Perhaps now the time has come for Sir Andrew and Migrationwatch to admit that what is needed in Britain is not a “points-based system” or a “cap” but simply a halt to all further immigration.

This policy must be combined with an intensive education and training programme — which can be funded by, amongst other measures, cutting foreign aid, EU membership fees, ending Britain’s involvement in the Afghanistan war —  which will train up and provide the skills to Britain’s unemployed to become economically active once again.

Perhaps the time has come for Migrationwatch to admit that the BNP is right.

ConDem Regime Tells Britons to Brace For “Painful” Spending Cuts As They Give £100 Million to Gaza

ConDem Regime Tells Britons to Brace For “Painful” Spending Cuts — As They Give £100 Million to Gaza

BNP Newsroom

ConDem Prime Minister David Cameron has warned Britons to prepare themselves for “painful” domestic spending cuts — while his Government has just approved a £100 million foreign aid package to Gaza.

Writing in a Sunday newspaper, Mr Cameron warned of "pain" as his administration tackled Britain’s debt.

Earlier, ConDem Chancellor George Osborne said that “wasteful spending” was to be the target of the first wave of budget cuts.

University places are to be reduced by at least 10,000, and Child Trust Funds are to be axed, but the biggest cuts will be in the Transport budget (£683 million), Communities and Local Government (£780 million), Business (£836 million), Education (£670 million) and Justice (£325 million).

There will also be a freeze on recruitment to the civil service and an active “job loss” programme in that sector as well.

The effects on the private sector will also still ripple out, as many companies depend on Government contracts for their livelihood.

All of these cuts will not affect the £9.1 billion foreign aid budget, which the ConDem regime has ringfenced and promised to increase to £13 billion in due course.

To add insult to injury, the ConDem’s International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell has announced that British taxpayers are to give a further £19 million in foreign aid to Gaza.

In a DFID press release, Mr Mitchell said that the money will go to the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).

This money forms part of a 5-year, £100 million DFID funding agreement with UNRWA.

British taxpayers will be ecstatic to hear that the agreement includes “annual core contributions” and “performance-related payments,” based on a Performance Assessment Framework agreed between the DFID and UNRWA.

The £19 million payment is the “core contribution for 2010” and has just been approved by Mr Mitchell.

A Proposition or Blood and Soil Nation?

David Hamilton Conservative Democratic Alliance A Proposition or Blood and Soil Nation?

Conservative Democratic Alliance BCM 9045, London WC1N 3X X cda@xxxx25.freeserve.co.uk http://cdall.net

A Proposition or Blood and Soil Nation?

We have been transformed into a people of an idea from a nation founded on kinship and land by stealth. There are two different views of a nation. The progressive or ideological view is that a nation is not held together by the bonds of history and memory, tradition and custom, language and literature, birth and faith, kin and territory, but by abstract ideas. An abstract or ideological nation is supposed to be united by a set of ideals or are just an economy! They think that a fondness for Democracy, the Rule of Law and Free Speech binds immigrants into a nation. But without the ethnic-cultural core a nation dissolves.

Neither Democracy and Equality nor free markets are enough to hold a people together. The progressives think we can transcend our history and origins as a common people. This is the view I remarked in “Filling the Reality Gap” where people think they are creating a new nation. This follows the rationalist idea that if you get the premise right the right conclusion will follow but in practice human nature, accidents and circumstances prevent the perfect conclusion. (1)
The natural equality ideal was well shot by Jewish Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852): “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man... but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Queen Elizabeth in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported..
In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities. The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them. They would not be human if they did not bear us a grudge.
Sir Winston Churchill tried in 1955 to have a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (2)
The fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth, fought in Cabinet to stop immigration. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954: “We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
Britain allowed anyone to immigrate but other Commonwealth countries were trict on admissions and refused “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission.
(Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954.)
The battle between proponents of the two views have been nasty with representatives of the dominant view treating their traditionalist opponents with contempt. I invite anyone to read in Hansard the despicable way the great Cyril Osborne was treated in his many attempts in the House of Commons to introduce Bills to control immigration. He first tried in 1954 under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present, 14 spoke but only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the race battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham, Osborne wrote to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who left it to his secretary to reply: “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Three months after he instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958. Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).”
At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he said: “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell a Conservative MP in Liverpool had served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. let anyone in.
He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking. Pannell stated that though Home Secretary RAB Butler in 1958 disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but done nothing.
In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Birmingham Conservative Harold Gurden wrote, “on the health question we find the middle ring of the city, where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.” In 2007 it was admitted that we had a record number of cases of TB which the elites have imported.
When we were homogeneous, we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are under constant surveillance and have totalitarian race laws the rulers use to oppress us.
http://steadfastonline.org.uk/journal/?cat=5
At Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 April 1968, two days before Enoch’s Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced ... many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow...“To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.”
In 1981 K.Harvey Proctor announced the Monday Club plan to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984, guest of honour Enoch Powell told that the Conservative party had threatened tosend Proctor to Coventry which would have been the first time in their history they had refused to speak to one of their MP’s !
In “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote:” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In a biography Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants and it was clear they were being brought as cheap labour.
The issue is not our “racism” but treason of the ruling caste that is held together by ideology. They have used propaganda and social engineering constantly to wipe us out and give our country to immigrants and their descendants. Protest and you are called a Nazi or smeared by the media with no regard to the Democratic principles they pretend to uphold. (3)
They have presented Patriotism as something evil or primitive because it is the soul of a nation and a barrier to reconstructing the nation along ideological lines. Patriotism is presented as nation-worship or the nationalism that denigrates or wants to dominate other nations, but it is an emotional bond with one's own country - its land, its people, its past, its heroes, literature, language, traditions, culture, and customs.
A nation is more than a "division of labour" or a "market,." and communities of interests makes commercial treaties. An economic union like the European Union is not a nation and can only be stopped from fragmenting by identity checks for every transaction, political police and surveillance.
An economy is not a country it operates within one and an economic system should strengthen the bonds of national union, but the nation is of a higher order than the construct of any economist. A nation is organic; lives and grows and can be destroyed.
A constitution does not create a nation it gives it order but that is after it lives in the hearts and minds of its people..
This belief that"that people of any culture or continent can be assimilated grows from John Locke’s funny idea that humans are Tabla Rasa - blank slates for experience to scribble on
and make them what they are. It’s nurture versus nature. This is why the believers or what Peter Brimelow termed “Immigration Enthusiasts” see no harm in immigration. (3)
Nation, is from a Latin root nascere, to be born, which intrinsically suggests a blood link, and a common community - an extended family. An “Ethnocultural community is”, wrote Peter Brimelow, “an interlacing of ethnicity and culture, that speaks one language”. It is handed down to the current generation by their ancestors and they have a duty to preserve it and pass it down to their children ad infinitum.
The immigrants are human like us and have attachments to their own tribe, race, nation, culture, community whence they came. Any man or woman, of any color or creed, can be a good person and law abiding citizen but will their grand children merge? The Muslims fighting us on our streets are from the smiley, servile immigrants of the fifties. They are now showing their teeth.
French counter revolutionary Joseph de Maistre wrote: "During my life, I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians... but I must say, as for man, I have never come across him anywhere; if he exists, he is completely unknown to me." It is what is left out of the abstraction "tribal behavior" is what makes us human. Take it away you do not get "pure man" or "liberated man" but dehumanised man.
To traditional conservatives, this "abstract nation" is an intellectual construct, which inspires love nor loyalty. They have the superficial idea that people speaking in local accents are as British as us! But what are they speaking about? (4)
Every true nation is the creation of a unique people. Indeed, an ideological nation based on abstract ideas only appeals to the reason not the heart and it is emotion that unites people not high minded attitudes and citizenship classes. We no longer speak the same language nor do we share the same faith. We are splitting into warring factions.
We have been trained to despise our heroes yet immigrant communities are encouraged to identify with theirs. But our glorious past is treated as shameful history.
Edmund Burke definied a kin and territory nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
Around ten years ago President Bill Clinton proudly told some Arab leaders that he was looking forward to whites becoming a minority in the states! Our children are having their future taken away.
I hear that artists and with his new film sacha Baron Cohen is pushing the boundaries back. Well that sounds such fun that I thought I would push some back: We are not going to be wiped out and we are going to give our children a future and we do it by re-asserting our being as Patrick J. Buchanan’s “Blood and Soil people.” As three times British Prime Minister, Stanley Baldwin put it On May 24 1929 :“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”. (5)
(1) http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2009/07/filling-reality-gap.html
(2) http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2008/11/keep-england-white-winston-churchill.html
(3) http://www.vdare.com/alien_nation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnAvwB9zn5Q&feature=related
(4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttz8-ucWhYc
(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEO1yqJVXEU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYtti8MzvBk&NR=1

Another Woman in Bolton Sexual Assualted by A Immigrant

Another  woman was sexually assaulted by a immigrant in Bolton it has been revealed the second reported as in as may days..
It happened at a store in Market Hall on Knowsley Street, Bolton, at about 4.35pm on May 7, 2010.
The man went into the shop and while pretending to ask about an item of clothing, sexually assaulted a 19-year-old woman.
The man is described as being Asian, in his early 40s and about 5ft 10 to 5ft 11in tall. He had a muscular build and dark brown hair, slightly longer on the top and combed forward with what appeared to be gel.
He was wearing very strong aftershave and appeared to change his accent from Asian to English several times. He was wearing a three quarter-length black jacket, dark blue jeans and black shoes with a silver buckle.
On his middle finger he wore a gold and silver ring with inset diamonds and some sort of animal shape in the middle.
Police are now appealing to anyone who recognises this man or who has information about what happened to come forward.
Police Constable Carol Winrow, of the Public Service Team at Bolton, said: "The woman is clearly very upset she has been put through such an ordeal, and the best peace of mind we can give her is to find this man and take him off the streets.
Anyone is information is asked to call Greater Manchester Police on 0161 856 5660 or the independent charity Crimestoppers, anonymously, on 0800 555 111.