Kai Murros "pan-European nationalist" Bio

Kai Murros

Written by Finlandia    At the VBR Patriotic Site

Unlike most famous Finns, the philosopher and writer Kai Murros is better known abroad than he is in Finland – which probably explains why I discovered him only after returning to Britain from a five-year stay in that country. Murros is a self-proclaimed "pan-European nationalist" whose writings burn in passionate defence of the rights and destiny of native Europeans. He is in equal measure inspiring, infuriating, exhilarating and alarming – but never dull. Surprisingly, considering that he is still young, Murros lives a rather quiet life in the suburbs of Helsinki, preferring reading and gardening to direct political action (although he has travelled extensively in Europe to speak at nationalist gatherings). Therefore, instead of writing a potted biography, which had been my original intention, I have selected some of his best quotations, and provided weblinks for those wanting more. Kai Murros is an odd mixture – but he is a true original, as you will see. Murros on liberals: "As long as the liberal elite is running the show things will only go from bad to worse. The liberals are totally unable to change their basic paradigm and therefore they will keep wrecking our civilization and coincidentally also undermining their own position. Year after year there will be more and more desperate, poor masses trying to get into Europe to get their share of the pie and liberals will still be dreaming that integration is possible if only we are willing to be submissive and apologetic – if only we are willing to die out".  "Curiously enough both the liberals and the ultra radical left deviation of the socialist movement are actually very similar. Both want to suppress the traditional, ethnic identity of the people. The liberals want to turn people into mechanical machines of consumption. Products must be sold across the planet at a maximum speed and efficiency. This requires that people will be alike, planet wide. McDonalds people will share the same McDonalds culture and whether they be Eskimos or aborigines they will buy McDonalds products...". "When the sun is shining and everything is nice and dandy the liberals are strong, but when the struggle begins over the basic necessities of life the liberals shrink. When everything collapses – as it is going to happen very soon – it becomes so painfully clear what a daydream liberalism really is…". On immigration: "A wreckage of humanity set adrift by the tidal waves of international capitalism has washed up on our shores… the new Europeans? And we are supposed to die out to make room for these… new Europeans…". "The audacity... they openly declare that they want to bring over a hundred million immigrants to Europe in one generation... to change the whole population of Europe... in one generation... and they think they can get away with it too... what madness". "The greatest propaganda work for us is done by the youth gangs from the third world running amock in our streets. They will drive people to us and all we have to do is to open our arms... I almost hope there were more of them". "...The elite has openly declared death sentence to the European Nation and it also has sworn to completely and irreversibly change the make up of the population in Europe. We will in return declare death sentence to the elite and its lackeys". "Gangs of uprooted criminals invading our streets, looting our stores, robbing our people abusing our welfare system and liberals wailing and blaming racism for everything – things just couldn't be better". "We are the children of the Great Northern Light, a race that has existed for over 40,000 years. How can anyone think that we would vanish from the face of the earth overnight? How dare anyone ask us to relinquish this sacred soil to strangers and accept being cast into oblivion ? How dare anyone expect us to embrace our own downfall so that our achievements and those of our forefathers would be spoils of war for usurpers and thieves". On globalisation: "Much of the current industrial activity in the developing economies is largely the result of outsourcing of western industrial base to countries with substandard wages and working conditions and no environmental laws. For decades the economists have been explaining to us that this erosion of Europe's industrial base only benefits us and the entire world in the long run – by now it should be clear to everybody that this is not the case. "The outsourcing of Europe's industrial base brings us two serious problems: 1. Mass unemployment in Europe 2. Loss of tax revenues. "The massive loss of industrial jobs during the last few decades hasn't been balanced by an equal number of reasonably paid service jobs – as was the original liberal economic theory. The opposite has happened instead – the ample supply of new low-skilled workers from the Third World has often reduced service jobs to modern slavery with less than minimum wages and substandard working conditions. As a result large numbers of Europeans suffer now from perpetual poverty. "Outsourcing of industry has turned large sections of Europe into a decaying wasteland and people living there into a rotting underclass predetermined to a life of poverty and misery. This plague of post-industrialism is only spreading as the global liberal economy deems most ethnic Europeans redundant and useless". On big corporations: "We have allowed transnational corporations to grow more powerful than nation states, we have allowed them to extort us, to bleed us and to abuse us. We have allowed the transnational conglomerate complex to become more powerful than European civilization itself. We have been led to believe that the prosperity of transnational corporations is our prosperity as well – once we realize that this is not the case, we will deem transnational corporations redundant". On myths: "Our task is to turn myths into concrete reality. Myths will guide us, myths are the very stuff the national philosophy is made of. We need a myth, a powerful story, the greatest story ever told through which we will shape the mind of the masses. "The people have an intuitive understanding for the importance of myths. The people sense their powerful immaterial forces and how they bind individuals together as a nation. No wonder intellectuals who despise the people also look down upon myths. "The ordinary man of the street is guided through his life above all else by the myths embedded in the collective consciousness. Take away the myths and he has nothing, he is lost without a direction. A sterile, theoretical and speculative philosophy cooked up by shady intellectuals has nothing to offer to the people". On European survival: "The ultra radical left deviationists have openly declared that they will always and unconditionally take side with foreign hordes that are spreading into our streets and towns. This means that the ultra radical left deviation has in effect declared war on the European Nation and aims at hurting our people whenever it is possible." "This war will be the decisive push of the Europeans to reclaim their place in the world. We are fed up with being the scapegoats of the world, we are tired of being blamed for our achievements and we are sick and tired of yielding to every possible demand by non-Europeans simply because we are supposed to carry the collective white man's guilt AD INFINITUM. "For over a thousand generations our people have lived of this land, over a thousand generations of people have grown out of this land, physically come into being by the riches of this hallowed ground. For over a thousand generations this sacred soil has nurtured and provided our people. We are one with this soil, for every ounce of our flesh and blood comes from this soil, there is nothing in us that is alien or hostile to it… "Our enemies do not know what kind of powers they are dealing with and that is why they are about to unleash beasts whose existence the world so dearly would like to forget. "You have to see our revolution in a biological context. We are basically a pack of wolves defending its territory and cubs… a pack of wolves fighting for its survival, defending its right to exist". "Young men, defenders of the race! When the darkness sets in, run into the forests, run with the wolves, learn to know that same beast in you, let it break free, cut all ties, forsake civilization, be free in order to rule… Denounce the false conventions that have castrated your spirit…". On hate: "Accept the fury, let the hatred guide you, find the beast in you. Break your shackles and burn the bridges behind you. Nothing good will ever come out of you before you know who you truly are".

On art:

"Art is the stuff the future is made of, art moves people in mysterious ways, art is the soul of our race. Art gives the first wakeup call that things are about to change. This is why if we wish to seize the future we must seize art and the aesthetics. More than anything else I would like to be involved in making political art/propaganda. Just like the masses respond to visions rather than to theories".

On selling nationalism to "the masses":

"Our cause is noble but our means must be practical and effective. We have to transform progressive pan-European nationalism into a brand and sell it to the masses, we must customize it to suit the needs of different segments of potential supporters. Propagating nationalism is basically no different than selling Coca Cola – propaganda is about selling ideas. When good marketing and the needs of the masses coincide, the result may well be a massive breakthrough.

"The New European Nationalism will be sexy, sassy, outrageous and glamorous. It will be the most alluring form of rebellion and our young people will love it. The New European Nationalism will be violent, brutal, fanatic and macabre and our young people will love it even more! When fat, impotent liberalism has reached its final stage of paralysis and soiled its own bed the only way to challenge this moral corruption is through discipline and organization. In this world of filth it will be an intoxicating power trip for young people to experience the Esprit de Corps of the nationalist storm troops.

"The worst mistake we could make is to endlessly re-live the past, use outdated aesthetics and images and try to revive nostalgia as an answer to modern problems. The European civilization and the entire planet is about to face unprecedented challenges and dangers in the coming decades and if the nationalist movement in this situation gives the impression of being an anachronism we will lose all our chances for success".

On Europeans and the environment:

"The European race, which by its nature is a Faustian race, is the prodigal son of Gaia – and now it is time for the prodigal son to return home. The European race will become the guardian race of Mother Earth. Our supremacy over other civilizations will be based on this manifest destiny. European civilization which is the most advanced civilization on earth will also spearhead the ecological revolution just as it initiated both the scientific and industrial revolution".

On 1960s leftism:

"Philosophically the left states that man is simply a product of the society and therefore we should always blame the society for everything and not to expect the individual to control his behaviour in any way. – In the eyes of the modern left self-discipline equals fascism.

"This attitude makes sense when we remember that already the 'heroic' revolutionary struggle of the young radical leftists in the 60's was only a childish tantrum of the most pampered and spoiled generation this planet had so far seen. "It was easy to play revolution here in the affluent west, to challenge and defy the 'system' which was a democratic, well meaning, welfare society, to demand freedom when you already were free. – And still for decades we have been forced to listen to the self-praise of the 1968 generation for their heroic achievements – especially how they liberated us from the stuffy reactionary values of the past.
"The message of the infantile revolution of the 60's nevertheless is that bad behaviour is revolutionary activism. It has become painfully obvious that modern leftism is simply a form of regression to a childlike state of irresponsibility and low impulse control.

"Since we live in societies where leftist values are predominant the ultimate form of rebellion is SELF DISCIPLINE".

Kai Murros' website http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/intindex.htm

Kai Murros – The Revolution on Skadi Forum Germanic Online Community http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=18531&highlight=murros

The Sunic Journal: Interview with Kai Murros, Voice of Reason, August 24, 2010 http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=8853

UK Conservatives Drop All Pretence of Protecting British Workers

Tories Drop All Pretence of Protecting British Workers

The British National Party Newsroom

The Government’s Chief Information Officer, John Suffolk, has urged Indian IT companies to “bid, bid, bid” for UK-based work in yet another stab in the back for British workers.

The move comes in the wake of David Cameron’s climb down on intra-company transfers which will now be excluded from the pathetic “immigration cap.”

Even opponents of that policy, such as Martyn Hart, chairman of the National Outsourcing Association, have pointed out the obvious, namely that Mr Cameron’s announcement was inevitable.

“Is it a coincidence that this news comes amidst new warnings that a forthcoming European trade treaty with India will circumnavigate the proposed cap in any case, by allowing multinational firms to transfer unlimited numbers of Indian employers to the UK?” Mr Hart wrote in a recent article.

Mr Suffolk, quoted in an interview with the online magazine ComputerWeekly.com, encouraged Indian suppliers to compete for IT work in the public sector, despite massive spending cuts announced in the Comprehensive Spending Review.

Mr Suffolk, who represents government thinking on the issue, said he had "no reservations whatsoever" on Asian firms “claiming a slice of the outsourcing pie services giants such as Fujitsu, Capgemini and IBM already enjoy.

"As far as we are concerned, the more suppliers bidding for government work, creates a positive, vibrant, innovative IT community and that is what we ought to promote," Mr Suffolk said.

“I spend a lot of time with our Indian colleagues, they are hugely talented and I encourage them to bid: it's their commercial decision whether do so and they will be treated like anybody else," he said, adding, significantly, that “In fact, we have to do that legally under the European Procurement rules. So yes please: bid, bid, bid."

A 2008 study by the Association of Technology Staffing Companies (ATSCO) revealed that the pay and prospects of junior IT support staff in the UK have “stagnated as services have been relocated to India.”

According to the ATSCO report, annual salaries at the lowest end of the industry have not risen in five years, which is directly attributable to the “offshoring" of low-skilled jobs to cheaper locations in Asia.

Furthermore, the report said, the depressed wages have deterred British people from even entering the industry, leaving a shortage of candidates for UK managerial positions.

"It is like removing the bottom rung of the ladder," Ann Swain, ATSCO's chief executive said in her reaction.

“The shortage now is of candidates with a few years experience looking for second and third jobs. But how do you get that experience if entry-level jobs are being sent offshore?"

Once again, the interests of British workers are put last by the Westminster parties.

The BNP Vrs EHCR Court Case - Day Two Updates to People Of Horwich and Bolton

The BNP Vrs EHCR - Day Two Updates

Written by Green Arrow

Good day patriots of the British National Party.  Welcome to Day Two of the persecution of the British People by The Establishment who seek to silence the Voice of Freedom that is represented by The British National Party. This article will be used to bring you news from inside and outside the Royal Courts of Justice as soon as we receive it. Outside, Mr Mark Walker is rallying our troops and making sure that the passing British Public are aware of just what is happening in Our Country today. UPDATES 11:52 BNP barrister is tearing the opposition case to shreds point by point and going for a "No case to answer".  Judge has raised possibility of further hearing. 12:10 Nick Griffin MEP Pack of press hyenas looking glum. Bnp beating the bullies. Not the story they wanted. 13:30--The proceedings have concluded in the Equalities and Human Rights Commission court case against the British National Party. Judgement has been reserved and will be issued next week. 13:46 Simon Darby - Out of court now judgement will be announced in a week or so. Feeling very confident, our legal team were superb today.

Failed Iraqi Asylum Seekers Get Right to Stay — The Legacy of the Illegal Iraq War

Failed Iraqi Asylum Seekers Get Right to Stay — The Legacy of the Illegal Invasion of Iraq

The BNP National Newsroom

Britain has been forbidden from deporting failed “asylum seekers” from Iraq back to their homeland by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) — because the invasion of that country by the British and American governments has caused that nation to become “unsafe.”

The new ECHR ruling, which has effectively halted the UK Border Agency’s attempts to send back the increasing flood of Iraqis pouring into Britain, said that “forcible returns” to Baghdad must be immediately suspended because of a new upsurge in bombings, violence and attacks on the Christian minority in Iraq.

The coverage given to the ECHR ruling by the controlled media has ignored completely the reason why Iraq is now become “unstable” and why it was not so “violent” before the 2001 invasion by the Blair and Bush regimes.

The ECHR overrules all EU member states’ national laws, and its latest decision has already led to Holland halting all repatriation flights to Iraq, a move which is also now imminent in the UK.

Furthermore, deportation flights of failed Kurdish asylum seekers back to the Kurdish-controlled northern region of Iraq were halted in September this year because that regional government simply refused to allow any planes with forcibly deported Kurds on board to land.

The court ruling comes simultaneously with a call by a senior Iraqi Christian on all of that religion’s adherents to leave that country and seek asylum in Britain.

Archbishop Athanasios Dawood made this announcement at a service at the Syrian Orthodox Church in London after Muslims attacked the Catholic Our Lady of Salvation church in Baghdad in a suicide mission which left 46 people dead.

Christians were protected under Saddam Hussein’s regime, but since he was displaced from power by the 2001 invasion, they have “become isolated and the Baghdad government has proved unwilling or unable to protect them,” a BBC report said.

The evidence from all quarters is very clear: the invasion of Iraq in 2001 has sparked off a humanitarian crisis which has not only destabilised Iraq, but caused thousands of its citizens to flee to Europe and the UK.

Furthermore, the expulsion of the Hussein regime, as undemocratic as it was, has led to an upsurge in al-Qaeda activity (an organisation which Hussein opposed and suppressed), a rise in militant Kurdish nationalism (which has terrorist tentacles all over Europe), and violent attacks on Christian Iraqis.

All of this has provided the perfect excuse for a tidal wave of Iraqis to claim “asylum” in Europe and the UK, using the chaos created by the Bush and Blair invasion to justify their “refugee” status.

This then, is the other hidden legacy of the illegal invasion of Iraq: the flooding of Europe with untold thousands of Iraqi refugees.

It is yet another charge which needs to be added to the indictment against Tony Blair, the Labour Party and the Conservative Party leadership who supported and encouraged that invasion.

Could The Latest Attacks On The BNP Be Too Late For The Liberal Establishment?

Could The Latest Attacks On The BNP Be Too Late For The Establishment?

Written by BC1959

November 2010

The latest attacks on the British National Party seem to be openly aggressive. Comments made by the traitors in power, such as: ''Schools have the right to sack BNP teachers'' and: ''housing problems could be good for the Far Right'', seem to come from a concerted effort to shut Nationalists out from a far wider, Socio-Cultural normality. Accepted rights will now be aggressively used against us, and now that Turkey has also identified a ''Concern of European Nationalist support'', the plan to introduce this Islamic nation into the ever dictatorial EU fold, is under threat. However, with everything they have thrown at the party in the last ten years, from attempting to Jail Mr Griffin and others, to trying to freeze the party's funds and assets, and outright voting fraud etc, the question we should be asking ourselves should be: Could The Latest Attacks On The BNP Be Too Late For The Establishment? Rising membership and support of not only this party, but Nationalist parties Europe wide, and a renaissance of genuine patriotism in America, could now mean that one last desperate attack is on the horizon. This not only means that the BNP is having a big impact, but that other countries are facing the same challenges from so-called ''smaller parties'', and that could mean serious challenges we all face. The New World Order is apparently, facing deep divisions within, and commentators are suggesting that for example, the Bilderbergers shadowy 50 year hidden agenda, is splitting apart at the seams. David Cameron came into the spotlight, by saying he would battle the EU, de-regulate business, and tackle mass immigration. Every policy and suggested potential has been ignored, and he now continues to allow the EU to reign supreme over this land of ours. Prisoners being given the right to vote, is an absolute disgrace, and ANY supposedly right minded, and pro-British Conservative would be up in arms about this, and the ''fake win'' over money given to the EU. Where are the opposition? In the BNP, that's where, and they know it. Former Councillor and Activist Russ Green, suggests that the Bilderbergers and the rest of the NWO freaks, will try to foment serious racial and ethnic tensions in Britain and Europe, and makes the analogy that, mass immigration and it's obvious agenda, could be part of the plan to accomplish this. Many would agree, and by the look of the economy, it could also be presumed that a good dose of ''Let Them Eat Cake'' will make these parasitical politicians, Journalists, and writers ''Eat Their Own Words''. Only time will tell, but it certainly looks as though the establishment seems to be getting rather arrogant and aggressive, in it's attacks on this party, and the people themselves. Here's what one international news source said: The historic entry of a Swedish far-right party in parliament has tarnished the reputation of Sweden as a bastion of tolerance and raised questions over Prime Minister Fredik Reinfeld’s future political alliances. So what do they expect him to do? How will the world establishment react? Let's try this one for example: An alarming trend is sweeping Europe. Far-right-wing parties, using anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant rhetoric, have made electoral gains in several European countries. In the June European parliament elections, these parties were able to garner votes in a way they haven't before. The British National Party (BNP), which has its roots in fascist parties of the past, got almost a million votes and its first two seats in the European parliament. Geert Wilders' Party for Freedom (PVV) in Holland made significant gains as well. It's now useless, and pointless, if Nationalists don't get to grips with the prospect that at some point in the near future, a combined effort to demolish democracy by the current world order, is ignored. For instance, this is what Time magazine produced: Around Europe, a ragbag of extremist parties, as varied as the countries that produced them yet united by a vehement nationalism that singles out minority groups as a growing threat, scored in Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Romania and Slovakia. Confronted with sliding economies and disappearing jobs, voters kicked the mainstream parties they held most responsible. If the power brokers at the top of the financial tree, decide to act sooner, rather than later, serious complications could arise. This is why our own Chairman is a leading light in the unity of Nationalist parties, and is Deputy head in Europe, and also why all nationalists, regardless of percieved differences in opinions, should now take the threat seriously, and attack and defend our positions at all costs. Political battles can only ever be won, if every nation and it's peoples, come together... we must be ruthless, and maintain the ancient addage of: Never again, no more brother wars, no more disunity, and NO SURRENDER to anyone, anywhere, anytime.

A Bit of A Culture Shock

Culture Shock 

Sarah Maid of Albion

One striking element of the recent conflict unfolding on the streets of Bangkok has been the reaction of the English middle classes to the death and bloodshed on the streets of the Thai capital. “How could this be happening in the land of smiles?” they cry “What has happened to the charming and delightful Thai people we met when were were there?”

They can't believe what they are seeing because these scenes bear no comparison to Thailand, the popular holiday destination, they thought they knew.

Of course they never knew the real Thailand, they may have visited it many times, thought they loved it, dreamed of living there and praised the 'wonderful culture' to their friends upon their return, but they never really saw Thailand.

These same smug and comfortable people who, safe in their leafy sanctuaries have applauded the arrival of the invading immigrant hoards, as the bringers of low cost domestic staff, easier access to authentic ethnic cuisine and “culture Darling, such wonderful enriching culture”, have not the faintest idea of the truth of the cultures over which they swoon.

Every year you see them returning from their three weeks of luxurious indulgence in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, the Gambia or Mombasa gushing about the wonderful culture and the delightful, friendly and happy people. We the miserable, bigoted English “could learn so much” from the “simple, contented and smiling world” they have just visited, or so they tell us. Each time you want to scream at them “Of course they smiled at you, you dumb bastard, you had just given them three months off season income in return for some beads and bits of coconut husk which their six year old was up half the night stringing together!".

The hatreds and tensions exploding now in Thailand have been simmering there for decades, but James and Chloe from Hoxton never saw them as they clapped their hands and tapped their feet to the local music in the way that embarrassing middle class English prats always do, grinning like morons as they imbibe the four or five star version of what they imagine is ethnic culture.

They see what the deeply dishonest glossy brochures tells them they will see, they see what they want to see, but what they don't see is the truth. They don't see the brutality, the violence and the hatreds which fill the lives of those living full time in the theme parks they jet in and out of every summer. Hidden from them is the corruption, the tiny battered corpses, the child abuse, the raped and battered women, the sweatshops and slavery (yes I mean slavery) not to mention the filth and decay which is the reality lurking behind the smiles.

Some even go back to the same place year after year, yet never really see it.

Some, of course, do see it, but they are the liars who, when they are raped, would rather deny they have been raped than admit the colour of their rapists. However, others, like the woman I know who recently returned from Cape Town and declared South African crime rates a myth because she has got through a two week visit without being car-jacked or murdered, believe the lies they are told, and only see a made up world.

Can we really blame the ageing Hippy mother of 15 year old Scarlet Keeling who's raped and battered body washed-up on an idyllic Goan beach in February 2008, for believing that it was perfectly safe to leave her teenage daughter in the care of a 25 year old ethnic boyfriend she had only just met?. This was Goa after all, the Utopia of the flower children, the paradise of the Lonely Planet guide generation, and only beautiful things happen in paradise.

Maybe to some degree this sort of blindness is nothing new, to our grandmothers' generation Rangoon and Mandalay were where the flying fishes played and people went to drink cocktails on sun soaked verandas, not brutalised outposts of one of the most vicious dictatorships on the planet. In the 1960's the Lebanon was a playground for the rich and beautiful, nothing like the war weary and battle scarred land it has become.

However, the difference was, previous generations, much as they may have loved different and far away cultures, real or imagined, still loved their own culture, back at home at least as much. It had not yet become a fashionable display of class and style to laud another culture, or even what one imagines another culture to be, over one's own. To earlier generations the thought of replacing their home culture with a foreign one would have been anathema.

Earlier generations also seemed to understand the principles of import and export better than the current one, and did not imagine it was necessary to import a population in order to share the tastes and pleasures of other lands. “We so love the diversity of food!!” cackle the chattering classes in defence of mass migration, speaking as if the tea, which Britons drank for centuries without considering it necessary to grant citizenship to half of India, grew in the fields of Shropshire, or that the bananas, which had been widely on sale in Britain sixty years before the docking of the Windrush, thrived around the oast houses of Kent.

When you import a people you do not gain the Holiday hotel fantasy of their culture or the vision of a land which you can buy for 2,000 Thai baht a night in Phuket, The foreigners arriving in their droves are not the beaming natives who draped garlands round your necks and danced for you with beads around their ankles in exchange for British pounds. When people are imported with their products there is a lot more to diversity than foodstuff and fabrics. What is arriving at our shores is the reality of alien culture, the one appearing on the blood spattered streets of Bangkok, Nairobi, Mogadishu and Islamabad not the picture postcard pretence sold to you by Kuoni Tours.

The other madness which merges incongruously with the asinine belief that importing cultures where child slavery, child rape, acid attacks, homophobic murder, honour killing, gang rape, political corruption, electoral fraud, xenophobia, savage animal cruelty, female, and sometimes male, genital mutilation, muti killings, kidnapping, decapitations, male rape and torture together with any number of other horrors are every day events, and which are so cruel and dangerous we can not with humanity return terrorist suspects to them, enriches Britain, is the fantasy that when people from such cultures arrive here, they will automatically become part of British society and adopt British values.

That they will, in effect become "British".

When Newsreaders aggressively and incessantly fire the word “British” at us, as if from rapid reloading machine guns, when reporting stories Asian children being kidnapped and held for ransom in Pakistan, or, as with today's tragic news item, Asian families being murdered on account of some marriage dispute whilst in Asia, we are supposed to obediently accept that these are British people who have struck unlucky whilst holidaying over seas.

When men walking down North London streets have acid poured down their throats because they romanced someone else's wife, and when girls are beaten to death by their fathers (or maybe buried alive by them) for loving the wrong man, we would be denounced as racists if we do not insist that white people do these things too.

When official figures slip out revealing that 92% of gang rape suspects in London are non-white we are obliged to blame white British society rather than point to the facts that:

* in the lands where the 92% originate gang rape is endemic

* the white 8% were part of mixed race gangs, not gangs of white rapists

Click here to read about what this group of lovelies contributed to our culture

As falsehood piles upon lie, we are are told, and required to believe that our immigrant communities suffer continuing racial violence, yet it is we, the host community, and not they who fear to walk our streets.

Our country, indeed our continent, is in the worst economic state it has ever been in in peace time, yet we are expected to enthusiastically agree when liars tell us that the mass immigration they have forced upon us has brought great economic benefits.

Yet, despair as you may, there are those who still believe it.

Much like our cousins in America, where the myths of popular belief are in some ways even further removed from reality, we in Europe live in the age where truth is rejected in favour of fantasies and downright lies. Most of our people believe not in the world as it is but as they want it to be, and amongst the worst lies are the ones they tell themselves.

I fear for them, for one day they must wake, and when they do the culture shock may well kill them.

Unfair Trade Restrictions on the sale of electronic books

Restrictions on the sale of electronic books

  by Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 NOVEMBER 2010: A British citizen resident in France has written to Nick Griffin over trade restrictions on E-books.


 The gentleman concerned, who is an OBE and formerly from Mollington near Chester, wrote to his MEP:
"As my native language is English I prefer to read books in English. I purchase books electronically from English retailers. These books are downloaded to be read on an electronic reader.
Recently, two retailers (Waterstones and W H Smith) have announced that because of "...geographical restrictions imposed by publishers we can no longer sell electronic/digital books outside the UK....".
This appears to have come into effect in October 2010. Not all UK retailers I trade with have imposed this restriction.
This restriction impinges on my rights as a citizen of the European Community and is, I believe, in breach of the free passage of goods within the Community.
 Could you please tell me if you will act to have this restriction removed?"
Responding on behalf of Nick Griffin, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield, wrote:
"If you believe that the restrictions placed on the sales of electronic books by British retailers, Waterstones and W H Smith, breach your rights as a citizen of the European Community, you can raise the matter with the European Consumer Centre (ECC).
New EU legislation gives you more rights when you purchase services abroad, including the right to buy from a service provider in another EU country without having the seller refuse to sell to you simply because you live in a different EU country. If an online shop refuses to sell you an item simply because you live in a different EU country then your rights may well be being breached.
You can get assistance in confirming your consumer rights, and if appropriate, to defend your rights in such a situation, from the European Consumer Centre. This is an EU funded information and support service for consumers shopping across the European Union.
The ECC advises that in the event of a complaint, the first contact with the trader should be made by the consumer - preferably in the form a letter (with proof of delivery). If the consumer is dissatisfied with the outcome or response from the trader, the Consumer Centre may be able to help. They can offer detailed advice on points of law and consumer entitlements, as well as guidance on the next step to take in the complaints process.
Letters and emails should be addressed to the UK European Consumer Centre. Email : ecc@tsi.org.uk. Postal address: The UK European Consumer Centre. Hosted by the Trading Standards Institute, 1 Sylvan Court, Sylvan Way, Southfields Business Park, Basildon, Essex. SS15 6TH. Telephone: Phone : 08456 04 05 03.
The European Consumer Centre also provides its own cross-border complaint form, which is available in all European languages. [In order to fill in and submit this complaint form, you must have at least the Adobe reader version 8.1.2 or higher - otherwise you will not be able to use the form.] I attach this Complaint Form, for your convenience.
When you consider the £billions of British taxpayers’ money that is wasted on funding our membership of the European Union and facilitating the establishment of the supposed seamless European Single Market, it seems reasonable for consumers such as yourself to expect to be able to purchase an electronic book without hindrance.
Please do not hesitate to contact Mr Griffin again if you require any further assistance."

The Iniquity and Foreign Rights Commission Better Known as the EHRC

The Iniquity and Foreign Rights Commission

The BNP National Newsroom

The attempt by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission to crush the British National Party is an assault on freedom of association which will negatively impact on all Christians, regardless of their political beliefs, the Reverend Robert West has said.

Speaking in his regular Sunday sermon broadcast on Radio Red, White and Blue, Reverend West said the real objective of the EHRC’s attack on the BNP was “a political one of oppression of a political party and the dispossession of a people.

“What is crucial for Christians to understand is that this is also done in the context of a media, legal and government campaign against Christians and their views and values,” he said.

“There is a unifying thread in all this: the moral law which is under attack by equality/iniquity legislation, in the case of Christians and homosexuality, is also to be the victim of state bodies which now seek to promote the anti-Biblical religion of Islam and to attack the Biblical and Judeao-Christian teaching of nations and nationalism; the preparation for this being the equating, with little justification, of nationalism — especially British nationalism — with racism.

“This word, racism, is being used as a bullying and brainwashing term to stop British people defending their right to a national home in their own country in the face of what is an ongoing scandal: the invasion and colonisation of their country by mass and unwanted levels of foreign immigration,” Revd West continued.

“In like manner the word, Islamohphobia, has been invented to beat down rational thought and cogent analysis of the violent and anti-democratic nature of core Islamic texts and their mainstream sharia.  

“It is in trying to becloud the issues which are at stake that the Iniquity and Inhuman Rights Commission is seeking to do its evil work on Britain and our British democracy and way of life. We all stand to lose if it gains its wicked way.”

He went on to point out that the EHRC’s attempt to prescribe to the BNP who its members could be and what it believes in, “would mean the end of the ability of that viewpoint to express itself, and to organise itself, against the prevailing or dominant viewpoint.”

This logic, applied to Christian churches, would “destroy the Christian view before it could get off of the ground. 

“That would be the end of diversity and democracy; and it is that which is at stake in the current attacks by the coalition Government, and its New Labour forebears, on the rights of the BNP to have a view and to organise peacefully in accordance with that view. 

“We have here from the Iniquity and Foreign Rights Commission an attack on the freedoms and liberties essential for the civic space of all non-state bodies, including churches, within our society, and of the independence of civic society itself from state diktat,” Revd West concluded.

The entire sermon can be heard on Radio RWB by clicking here.

UK Mass Immigration and International Terrorism Hotbed

Britain: Mass Immigration and International Terrorism

The British National Party Newsroom

Mass immigration policies pursued by decades of Tory and Labour regimes have turned Britain into a nerve centre for international Islamist terrorism, as proven once again by new revelations that the Muslim terror group behind the ink jet bomb plot is operating inside the UK.

The shocking news that the ink cartridge bombers are actually working from Britain was made by Tory Home Secretary Theresa May in a rare bout of honesty on Thursday.

Addressing the Royal United Services Institute in London, Ms May confirmed that Yemen-based Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), was “now working in the UK and planning new atrocities.”

She also announced that one member of AQAP had already been arrested in Britain for planning a suicide bomb attack on a jetliner.

Even more amazingly, Ms May finally admitted that there was a second threat to Britain from young Muslims living in this country (whom she incorrectly called “Britons”) who were “being trained in Somalia to carry out atrocities when they return to Britain.”

She identified the “radicalised young Britons” as being of “East African origin.”

Ms May is of course being an arch-hypocrite. Firstly, these waves of “east Africans” and Muslims are not British by any stretch of the imagination, and secondly the only reason why they are here in the first place is because of the insane pro-immigration policies her party and its Labour clone have pursued over the years.

The British National Party alone has warned that tolerating mass immigration could only lead to terrorism in Britain. The radical Islamists now how a pool millions strong from which to recruit, using as their primary persuasive tool the foreign policy followed by successive Tory and Labour governments.

That Britain has become the nerve centre for Islamist terrorism worldwide gave rise to the French police referring to London as “Londonistan.”

Central to this was the activities of jailed Muslim cleric Abu Hamza, who, coincidentally, has just won an appeal against a bid to strip him of his British passport after a tribunal ruled the move would make him stateless.

Egyptian-born Hamza was jailed in 2007 for inciting his followers to murder non-Muslims, and he currently facing an extradition order to America. Three of his associates, all “British” nationals named Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat and Seyla Talha Ahsan are awaiting extradition along with Hamza for numerous terrorism charges.

They are accused of setting up an Al-Qaeda-style training camp in Oregon, of sending money and “British” recruits to fight for the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, and for helping kidnappers in Yemen who seized a 16-strong party of Western tourists in 1998.

Hamza, the former imam at Finsbury Mosque in London, provided accommodation for shoe bomber Richard Reid, Zacarias Moussaoui, the only team member of the September 11, 2001 attacks to have been arrested and imprisoned, Ahmed Ressam, arrested for trying to blow up Los Angeles Airport, and Nizar Trabelsi, arrested for planning to attack the American Embassy in Paris.

One of the 7/7 Tube bombers had regularly attended Hamza’s preaching, as had two of those attempting to replicate the mission two weeks later.

In 1998, six “British” citizens, described as of “Pakistani and North African descent” along with two other “British residents” were arrested by the government of Yemen and convicted of planning to kidnap a group of tourists and attack British targets in the port of Aden.

In October 2001, the London-based Islamist group al-Muhajiroun claimed that “thousands” of Muslims living in Britain have gone to Afghanistan to fight for the Taliban.

At the time, Asian radio station Sunrise canvassed the opinions of 500 Muslims in Greater London, mainly of Pakistani origin and aged between 20 and 45, and found that 48 percent said they would fight for bin Laden or for Islam.

In February 2009, army commanders claimed in an article in the Independent that British soldiers are engaged in "a surreal mini civil war" with “growing numbers of home-grown jihadists who have travelled to Afghanistan to support the Taliban.”

According to that paper, “interceptions of Taliban communications have shown that British jihadists — some ‘speaking with West Midlands accents’ – are active in Helmand and other parts of southern Afghanistan, according to briefing papers prepared by an official security agency.

“The document states that the numbers of young British Muslims, ‘seemingly committed jihadists,’ travelling abroad to commit extremist violence has been rising, with Pakistan and Somalia the most frequent destinations.”

That newspaper went on to add that “MI5 has estimated that up to 4,000 British Muslims had travelled to Pakistan and, before the fall of the Taliban, to Afghanistan for military training.

“The main concern until now has been about the parts some of them had played in terrorist plots in the UK. Now there are signs that they are mounting missions against British and Western targets abroad,” the paper’s source said.

That same month, British army reports revealed that the majority of the detonating devices used in Taliban roadside bombs — which are responsible for most army deaths in that country — are made using British-made electronic components.

Reports revealed that the devices had either been sent from Britain, or brought over to Pakistan by Muslims living in Britain. The components are then easily smuggled into Afghanistan.

In October this year, a Taliban commander in Afghanistan told Sky News the bulk of its funding comes from Britain, where, the commander said, “dedicated fighters are ready to launch terrorist attacks” upon his order.

How much more evidence does Ms May need before she admits that it is her own party’s policies which have created this terrorist nightmare?

Recommended reading: Londonistan: How Britain Is Creating a Terror State Within

By Melanie Phillips. The Times bestseller, now with a new chapter. For years, Britain pretended to be tough on terrorism, while invading two countries. But when it was hit by the 7/7 suicide bombers, the secret was out. Having looked the other way since 1989, Britain has become the hub for Islamist terror throughout Europe and beyond, In Londonistan, Melanie Phlilips reveals herself as that typical breed of journalist who can identify the problem in great detail, but is obvious in her inability to address the cause of the problem, namely Third World immigration. This flaw aside, Londonistan gives a revealing insight into the Islamist threat facing Britain -- and the establishment’s refusal to deal with it. Paperback, 336 pages. Click here to order online.

EU acknowledges African immigration has left a shortage of workers in Africa

EU acknowledges immigration has left a shortage of workers in Africa

  Martin Wingfield at Andrew Brons MEP Euro News

 NOVEMBER 2010: 
Andrew Brons has now received an answer to his Written Question regarding the effects of immigration concerning the President of the Republic of Mali.

Andrew asked:
On 7 September, Mr Amadou Toumani Toure, President of the Republic of Mali, addressed the European Parliament.
In his speech he referred to the pernicious effect of EU immigration policies on the economy of Mali. In particular, he stated that his country was being denuded of its university graduates, with as many as 35% of graduates emigrating.
The President also referred to the debilitating effect of emigration on his country's health service, given the shortage of nurses and doctors because of emigration.
In my speeches to Parliament – to which the Commission may or may not listen – I have frequently warned of the damage wrought to the developing countries by the EU Commission's policy of enforcing a multicultural society on the EU Member States, without any democratic mandate.
1. Does the Commission agree with Mr Toure in respect of his concerns, which are also my concerns?
2. Does the Commission consider that its immigration and population policies are depriving developing countries of some of their most valuable citizens, which they can ill afford?
There has now been a response from EU Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström on behalf of the Commission
"In the Stockholm Programme the European Council encourages the creation of flexible admission systems that are responsive to the priorities, needs, numbers and volumes determined by each Member State and enable migrants to take full advantage of their skills and competence. The European Council also underlines the need to take further steps to maximise the positive and minimise the negative effects of migration on development in line with the Global Approach on Migration.
"Following this approach, the existing EU legislation and the legislation in preparation contain a number of safeguards aiming at preventing "brain drain". For example, Directive 2009/50 on the EU "Blue Card" provides that Member States can refuse applications for Blue Cards in order to ensure ethical recruitment. In addition the Directive does not affect agreements with third countries which list professions suffering from lack of personnel and which are therefore subject to ethical recruitment. Third country nationals who have long term resident status in the European Union can leave the EU territory for up to a year without losing that status, and this period is extended to two years for highly qualified migrants with a Blue Card. These provisions encourage "circular" migration between the EU Member States and the migrant's home country, with the accompanying transfer of skills and money.
"Looking at the specific situation in the health sector, the Commission is particularly concerned about the critical shortage of qualified workers in many African countries. It is estimated that a minimum of 2.3 health workers per 1000 population are needed in order to provide basic health care. Africa, on average, has 0.8 health workers per 1000 population and Mali even less, compared to 10.3 per 1000 population in Europe. Aware of this challenge and of the responsibility of the EU's benefit as destination region of migrant health workers, the EU has adopted a Strategy for Action on the Crisis in Human Resources for Health in Developing Countries, followed by a European Programme for Action. The EU supports health programmes with a human resources for health (HRH) component in 51 countries (including Mali). At the global level the EU is beginning to explore opportunities for stimulating circular migration and for introduction of other mechanisms that would make migration of health workers beneficial for development.
"In addition, the Commission, through geographic and thematic financial instruments, finances a number of initiatives aiming at maximising positive effects of migration on development of countries of origin and transit. They aim, among others, at strengthening capacities of developing countries to integrate migration into their national development strategies, to maximise the development impact of remittances, develop a policy to attract diaspora members, favour circular migration and retain skilled migrants.

Woolas Saddleworth Judgement Opens Legal Door to Crush Lies About BNP (And BNP Will Contest By-Election if Called)

Woolas Judgement Opens Legal Door to Squash Lies About BNP (And BNP Will Contest By-Election if Called)

The High Court ruling today that Labour MP Phil Woolas “deliberately” spread lies about his opponents during the May 2010 election has opened the legal door to finally prevent the Labour Party, the Tories, the Lib Dems and their far-left Communist Party allies from deliberately spreading lies about the British National Party.

August 2008: The Communist crank Gable from Searchlight/Hope not Hate is a guest speaker at a Communist Party function. All the lies issued by these extremists have now been declared illegal by the High Court.In addition, the BNP has announced that it will definitely contest a by-election in Saddleworth if one is called. Mr Woolas has seven days in which to lodge an appeal, failing which a by-election will be held.

The significance of the court ruling is that for the first time ever, judicial notice has been taken of the fact that it is a breach of the Representation of the People Act, section 106, to deliberately misrepresent and lie about a political opponent in an election.

The court ruled that Mr Woolas had “published leaflets and newsletters making false statements about [his opponent] Mr Watkins while knowing them to be untrue.”

Mr Woolas had, the judges ruled, used “illegal practices” during the election.

Furthermore, they concluded that statements made by Mr Woolas which were lies, were known by him to be misrepresentations.

“Having considered the evidence which was adduced in Court we are sure these statements are untrue. We are sure that the Respondent did not believe them to be true,” the judges ruled.

The BNP has been the subject of years of the most outrageous lies and smears from the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties, all drawing up on the Searchlight/Hope not Hate lie factory under the directorship of its longtime hardcore Communist Party activist Gerry Gable.

Some of the more recent deliberate lies spewed out by the Communist crank Gable include allegations that the BNP opposes the Gurkhas, that the BNP would throw David Beckham or nonwhites off the England football team, amongst many, many others.

These lies are then printed and distributed by the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems, and repeated in the controlled media.

All these lies are about to come to a screeching halt. Today’s court ruling has in effect made these lies a criminal offence, and the BNP will now certainly use this precedent to close down all the lies and distortions about the party once and for all.

The Communist freaks and their Labour/Tory/Lib Dem allies take notice: the BNP will act legally against your lies.

* BNP National Organiser Clive Jefferson confirmed to BNP News today that if a by-election is called in Saddleworth, the party will most definitely contest it with a high profile candidate and campaign.

Bolton Marxist Left wing Protester Conviction for Assault on Police Officer

AN anti-facist Left wing protester who attacked a police officer at a rally in Bolton has been sentenced to carry out unpaid work by magistrates.

Roger Cox denied assaulting PC Darren Calladine at the English Defence League and Unite Against Facism counter-demonstration on March 20.

But he was found guilty after a trial last month.

Howard Sloane, prosecuting, told magistrates how, on the day of the rally in Bolton town centre, PC Calladine was trying to arrest a man who was kicking out.

Cox and several other demonstrators pulled the man back into the crowd, with Cox hitting PC Calladine in the chest and swearing at him.

Cox, aged 29, of Croydon Road, Newcastle, was then forced to the ground by PC Calladine and a colleague, and was handcuffed.

Mr Sloane added that when arrested, Cox was found to be wearing football shin guards and when questioned at a police station declined to answer.

Andrew Fitzpatrick, defending, told magistrates that Cox has been approachable and cooperative with probation officers preparing a presentence report.

The court heard that Cox had three previous convictions in 2008 for possessing a knife, obstructing a police officer and a public order offence.

Yesterday, for the assault on PC Calladine, magistrates ordered him to do 250 hours’ unpaid work and pay £650 costs

Christians in the West must be ready for suffering

Barnabas Fund says Christians in the West must be ready for suffering.

Barnabas Fund is inviting churches in the UK to dedicate one Sunday in November to the issue of persecution around the world – as well as at home.
The theme of this year’s Suffering Church Sunday, ‘Be on Your Guard’, reflects Barnabas Fund’s growing concerns over the freedom of Christians in the West.
It described as “worrying” the case this week of Eunice and Owen Johns to decide whether their Christian beliefs make them unfit to foster children.
“The outright violence and injustice endured by our brothers and sisters throughout the non-Western world, like the atrocious hostage siege in Iraq on Sunday, is what we tend to consider persecution. But more insidious threats are creeping into Western society – and we need to be prepared," the group said.
It warned that full religious liberty, including the freedom to choose one’s faith, was “under attack”. It said religious liberty was being “publicly undermined” by world leaders on the international stage, including US President Barack Obama, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and British Home Secretary Theresa May, who have adopted the term “freedom of worship” instead of “freedom of religion”.
Its concerns are shared by Ashley Samelson, International Programmes Director for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, expressed concern over the case of the Johns.
“Any person of faith knows that religious exercise is about a lot more than freedom of worship. It’s about the right to dress according to one’s religious dictates, to preach openly, to evangelise, to engage in the public square," she said.
Barnabas Fund is asking churches in the UK to remember Christians in other parts of the world who are suffering for their faith but also equip themselves to be ready for persecution too.
Dr Patrick Sookhdeo, International Director of Barnabas Fund, said: “It is understandable in the West – a bastion of freedom and tolerance – Christians tend to think that persecution is something that happens only to believers in far-flung places.
“But it is becoming increasingly apparent that we too need to steel ourselves for suffering if we are going to make a stand for Christ.”
Barnabas Fund is offering churches free resources for its Suffering Church Sunday, including a DVD, sermon outline, Bible study and prayer/response cards.
Visit:www.barnabasfund.org

UK Conservative “Immigration Cap” Lie Finally Collapses

Tory “Immigration Cap” Lie Finally Collapses

The BNP National Newsroom

The Conservative Party’s much-vaunted “immigration cap” policy has finally collapsed and that party has given up all pretence of controlling immigration with David Cameron’s announcement that intra-company transfers are to be “exempt” from all immigration rules.

Mr Cameron made the announcement before a surprised group of Tory MPs yesterday, who had all fought election campaigns on a promise to bring down immigration.

“Intra-company transfers shouldn’t be included in what we are looking at,” Mr Cameron said in a discussion on the immigration cap.

The exemption of intra-company transfers from any immigration cap makes a complete mockery of the Tory election promise to slow down the immigration invasion of Britain.

Nearly 100,000 work related visas were issued last year, a significant number compared to net immigration of 196,000. Furthermore, over the past three years, intra-company transfers have allowed almost 350,000 non-EU workers to enter the UK.

The intra-company transfer system allows businesses (even foreign owned ones) to bring in as many workers as they like from outside, without having to fulfil all the normal immigration criteria.

Such criteria include checking to see if there are any British people qualified to do the job, what the salary levels are and what the standard of living levels are for these immigrants. The jobs do not even have to be advertised.

In 2009, over half of all intra-company transfer visas issued went to Indian IT workers, with 10,000 going to just three companies, Migrationwatch chairman Andrew Green said in a statement.

“They are clearly undercutting tens of thousands of unemployed UK IT workers while computer science graduates suffer the highest unemployment of any discipline, currently 16 per cent,” he added.

His opinion was reinforced by Marilyn Davidson, of the Association of Professional Staffing Companies (Apsco), which represents recruitment firms.

“The immigration cap will largely be an empty political gesture that will do little to restrict the influx of non-EU IT workers to the UK,” Ms Davidson said.

According to data obtained by Apsco from the Home Office under the Freedom of Information Act, 35,430 non-EU IT workers came to work in the UK in 2008 alone.

“Most of these were low to mid-level workers, which goes against the grain of why this system was set up and these suppliers are taking the mickey,” said Ann Swain, chief executive of Apsco.

The collapse of the Tory “immigration cap” lie comes hot on the heels of a Westminster home affairs committee report which proved that even if fully implemented, the “immigration cap” would only cut overall immigration by as little as 1 percent.

Only 20 per cent of the 500,000 migrants who arrive annually will be covered by the cap, let alone barred from entering the UK, the report said.

Are there any Tory MPs left with even a smattering of a conscience? If so, now is the time to speak up

Hate by any other name ot the Crime the Will not Name

Hate by any other name 

Sarah Maid of Albion 

I wonder how many white Americans know that if they were attacked by a gang of Blacks, Hispanics or Asians, who beat them to the ground and then set about them with machetes, Clubs and bats, while shouting “We hate you you white [expletive] Cracker, we are doing this to you because we hate you and your whole [expletive] white race!” their attackers could not be charged with a hate crime. Even if the gang then pulled out guns and fired a dozen bullets into their heads while screaming “We hate you, hate you, we hate you!” Their murder would still not be a hate crime.

They could be murdered, raped, tortured, even dismembered alive, but, no matter how much actual hate was involved in their dispatch from this earth, it would still not count as a hate crime.

Meanwhile, however, the act of tugging a headscarf, could well be a hate crime even if no physical injury occurred. That is provided, of course, that it was not a heterosexual, white Christian wearing the headscarf at the time it was tugged, in that case, it would not be a hate crime, even if the headscarf tugging were accompanied by an assault with a 50 pound mallet.

The reason for this is that as white people, unless they are gay (since October 2009), disabled or, in some limited circumstances, female, are not a “protected class” under US anti-discrimination legislation, they are therefore, not protected by the current hate crimes legislation, and, as such, can not be the victim of a hate crime.

Technically white people over 40 are protected from discrimination, but only when the discrimination relates specifically to age, which isn't much help when they are being battered around the head by a 200 pound Negro.

Believe it or not, the same distinction does not apply in Britain, however, the effect is the same, as we all know, the police and crown prosecution service would rather crawl over red hot coals than charge a non-white person with a racially motivated crime against a white person. The terrible killing of Kriss Donald was an exception only because the authorities could not deny the racial motive of his killers, who went out looking for a white boy, snatched an innocent child from the street and tortured him to death for no reason other than the colour of his skin.

Even the CPS could not find a way to ignore that, although they certainly tried, and the media have been busily burying all memory of the case ever since.

In America that would have made no difference. In the USA, Kriss's skin colour, the very thing his murderers killed him for, would by law have prevented his murder being treated as a race hate crime. The law deliberately denies white males protection from hate crimes.

The hate crimes legislation was recently extended to include hate crimes against gays and lesbians. This move was strongly opposed by the so called Religious Right, and by many Nationalists. By doing so, they again demonstrated their seemingly suicidal instinct for picking the wrong target.

It matters not a jot that an additional minority group has been included amongst the preferred groups who have been selected for protection, what matters is that the legislation deliberately denies protection to another politically chosen section of the population.

By opposing the extension of the legislation, the Right left themselves open to, in some instances legitimate, accusations of homophobia, whilst by their very actions appearing to imply that the hate crimes legislation, as it stood, was acceptable, when it was most certainly not.

The Right allowed themselves to appear beset by irrational prejudice, whereas, in fact, the law itself was drafted on that very basis. The iniquity of the US hate crimes laws are that they exclude selected groups, based on race, gender and (now) sexual orientation, the Right should be challenging the left to defend their anti white racism and bigotry, rather that providing them with diversion to hide behind, not to mention an open goal through which they could and did call us bigots.

A law should protect everyone, or it is a bad law. The current hate crimes legislation in both its prior and post October 2009 forms is a bad law because it enshrines racial and sexual discrimination into US law, and it is that iniquity which the right should have been fighting.

Those who opposed the Matthew Shepard Act in the manner they did were defeated, because it is indefensible to argue that a law should not protect a particular group, however, that is what the law already does and why the law itself is indefensible. The exclusion of whites from the protection of hate crimes legislation is indefensible, and results entirely from bigotry and racial prejudice on the part of the left wing zealots who drafted the law.

The exclusion is based on the politically and racially motivated fantasy that most hate crimes are committed by young heterosexual white males, which is patently untrue. In fact young white males are most likely the main victims of hate crimes, statistically they are the main victims of interracial violence, and it denies all credibility to suggest that the majority of that violence does not have racial animus at its root.

There are vast areas of many US cities where an unarmed white man dare not go in peril of his life, there are far fewer, if any, areas where a black man would be at similar risk, yet it is the black man, not the white who the law protects.

Everyone knows that to send a young white man to an unsegregated American prison is cruel and unnatural punishment, the lowlife scum in Hollywood, who out sick society treat as heroes, laugh and joke about the multiple gang rape and violent abuse of white men in prison, crimes which are far less likely to be inflicted on a black man. Yet, at the same time political correctness bars the authorities from even acknowledging this let alone protecting the victims, for no reason other than that the victims are white and their abusers black.

America is littered with hidden hate crimes which are not acknowledged as such because the law is not intended to protect white people.

In 2002, the Carr brothers, Reginald and Jonathan, raped, sodomised and tortured five young whites in Wichita, inflicting acts of extreme violence and humiliation on them including forcing the three young male victims to perform involuntary sexual acts both on each other and on the female victims, before taking them naked into the frozen winter countryside and shooting each, execution style (amazingly one of the two female victims survived). Shortly after killing four of their victims the Carrs attempted to hijack another woman, again a white one, almost certainly with the same motive.

Despite the fact that the brothers were black and all their victims white and in the face of the obvious hatred involved in their crime, the authorities laughably (should that be contemptibly?) declared that “race played no part” in the crime and the brothers did not face hate crimes charges. This was of course a charade, they could not have been charged with a hate crime because of the skin colour of their victims.

Likewise, none of those charged and currently standing trial for the brutal 2007 rape and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom in Knoxville can face hate crimes charges, despite the level of brutality involved. Brutality minimised and suppressed by the national media, who even denied that genital mutilation had been inflicted, until one lawyer fainted in court at the sight of the photographs.

I defy anyone to suggest that the killers in both the Wichita and Knoxville cases would not have been automatically charged with hate crimes had the races been reversed.

The abject hypocrisy was exposed n the Knoxville case when the prosecution argued that racism could not be involved because one of the defendants had previously dated a drug addled white girl. This ignored the fact that he had actually beaten the woman, and also than out in Virginia, Bobby Ray Brewster faced hate crimes charges for allegedly beating and raping his own black girlfriend, a crime the alleged "victim" now claims never occurred.

in ways such as this the authorities will perform somersaults to avoid charging a non white person with a hate crime against a white person, because they don't want to admit that the law does not permit them to do so.

Some actually argue that whites are not entitled to such protection because “whites have power”. This echoes that deeply evil and unpleasant old bigot Jo Brand's claim that you can't be racist against whites for the same reason. These claims completely ignore the fact that in numerical terms both in America and in Britain there are more deprived white people living beneath the poverty line than all other racial groups .

The lying media will throw statistics at us to suggest otherwise, but in terms of the numbers of people officially living in poverty, there are more whites than any other group, in America it is more than twice as many.

They have no power, why are they not entitled to protection?

The left will no doubt claim that even deprived whites have power because other whites do. However, this is like claiming that the average citizen in a third world dictatorship has power because those at the top of their society have billions of dollars in Swiss bank accounts and enjoy more power over others in their country than a white man has dreamed of since the Romanovs were shot in Ekaterinburg.

The assertion is not merely hypocritical it is deceitful, and deliberately so.

The reason that “Hate crimes” do not protect white people because they are designed to fit a fake world view within an entirely fake world, which exists only in the agenda deluded minds of the true believers and and possibly the script writers of CSI Vegas and Law and Order Special Victims Unit. A politically correct fantasy world where all hate victims are black or brown and all hate criminals are white, male and preferably “preppy”.

As the left in Britain cling to their tiny number of totem white perpetrator hate crimes, such as the tragic murders of Stephen Lawrence and Anthony Walker, whilst ignoring the far higher number of crimes which do not fit their chosen narrative, the American left have their celebrated handful of anti-black hate crimes, which they constantly roll out whenever they need to distract the public from what is really happening. The most famous of this relatively small number of white perpetrator hate crimes is the truly terrible murder of James Byrd Jnr.

However, even that awful crime is not exactly what it seems. The main perpetrator in the killing of James Byrd Jnr, a man called John King, had himself been the victim of multiple hate crimes, having been subjected to repeated gang rapes by black men in prison not long before the killing.

King had shown no previous evidence of being a "racist" before he went to prison, but he had become one by the time he came out. This does not, in any way excuse what was done to James Byrd Jnr, but who can doubt that had a black man been repeatedly raped and brutalised by white men, this would most certainly have been held up as mitigation no matter how awful a crime he then went on to commit.

It is not my purpose to defend John King, merely to point out our society does not permit him the claim to mitigation which they would willingly grant a black man, merely because King is white.

The fact hate crimes legislation enshrines anti-white racism into US law is hardly surprising in a country where a Hispanic anti-white racist and feminist bigot has just been appointed to the Supreme court, and where the legal system conspires to deny “standing” to anyone attempting to question the highly dubious eligibility of their affirmatively appointed president. However, the prejudice behind this law goes further, as anti white racism has become an increasingly prominent feature in popular culture.

In music hip-hop and rap are not only valued above blue grass, but they is now valued above the classical greats, and certainly never mocked and disparaged in the same way. When the public watch the popular soaps they see dim and dawkish whites confronting bright and confident blacks and their cop shows are all about white crime, black heroes and politically correct victims.

All the while Americas superpower strength is falling away, its streets are less safe and its infrastructure is crumbling. As its once great cities like Baltimore, Cleveland and St Louis follow New Orleans and Detroit into crime ridden decay and social collapse one is left to wonder if this was somehow the aim.

We in Europe should tremble as we watch, because what happens in America today will most likely happen here tomorrow and the same dark forces that steer our course steer theirs. There is an agenda to what is going on and it is not an agenda designed to serve us of European origin well.

As with so much else, the true hate behind the hate crimes laws lurks in the hearts of those who drafted them, and they have only just begun.