European Parliament must not interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state

Author Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin Euro News

 OCTOBER 2010: NICK Griffin has responded to a letter from the Ukrainian Ambassador to Britain and criticised the European Union's support for Ukraine's "plutocrat puppet Orange 'revolution' movement".

 Volodymyr Khandogiy wrote to the MEP:
"It has come to my attention that there has been some work undergoing in the European Parliament on drafting of the Resolution on situation in Ukraine.
With this regard let me share with you some thoughts on the matter. My understanding is that to adopt a resolution on internal situation in Ukraine on the eve of local elections in Ukraine seems to be counterproductive. This particular timing for the adoption of the document could be considered as a gesture to support certain political forces in Ukraine.
"Please, find enclosed a non-paper on the constitutional process in Ukraine, which, I think, could be useful in making assessments of the developments in my country.
"I would very much appreciate your comments and vision of the mentioned above and would be happy to discuss the matter with you over a telephone.
"I am open for further dialogue on this and other matters that are of interest to you. I am looking forward for an opportunity to meet you personally in the nearest future.  
Sincerely,
HE Volodymyr Khandogiy
Ambassador
Embassy of Ukraine to the UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
60, Holland Park,
London, W11 3SJ.

Nick replied: 
"Dear Mr Khandogiy
"Thank you for your letter concerning the EU Resolution on the situation in Ukraine.
"I do not believe that the EU has any right whatsover to interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state, or to give overt or tactic support to supporters of the plutocrat puppet Orange ´revolution´movement (above) in their bid to destroy the natural political balance of Eastern Europe.
"Accordingly, I agree entirely that the Parliament should refrain from commenting on the situation on the eve of important local elections in Ukraine.
"Indeed, I regard it as the height of hypocrisy for the ruling elites of Western Europe, who persecute, imprison and rig elections against nationalist opponents at every opportunity, to complain about alleged shortfalls in the democratic process elsewhere."

Sonia Alfano gets short shrift on 'Thought Crime' motion from Nick Griffin MEP

Sonia gets short shrift on 'Thought Crime' motion

Author  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

OCTOBER 2010: ON the face of it, Written Declaration No. 59 on a Clean Parliament seems quite reasonable. No self-respecting MEP would want to see terrorists, members of the Mafia, or those convicted of corruption, sitting in the European Parliament.

 But the motion is not exactly what it seems.
Written Declaration 59 demands "Candidates for European elections must not have been convicted of corruption, abuse of public office,  **** **** **** or crimes relating to involvement with mafia groups, organised crime or terrorism."
Now there's nothing wrong with that, but it's the three missing words that the motion is really all about . . . "incitement to racism".
This written declarations seeks not only to stifle discussion on immigration but effective to bar any candidates who campaign on an anti-immigration platform from being able to take their seat in the European Parliament.
So when Italian Liberal MEP Sonia Alfano (right) wrote to Nick Griffin asking him to sign the Written Declaration, it was not surprising that she received short shrift from the MEP for the North West of England.
Sonia wrote:
You have not yet signed Written Declaration No. 59 on a Clean Parliament.
"Candidates for European elections must not have been convicted of corruption, abuse of public office, incitement to racism or crimes relating to involvement with mafia groups, organised crime or terrorism."
I should be very grateful if you would sign the declaration in the register situated outside the Chamber during the part-session
Thank you in advance for your support."
Nick replied:
"I have no intention of signing a motion that would debar those convicted of 'thought crimes' from taking their seats. Substitute "class hatred" for "racism" if you need educating as to the full undemocratic monstrosity of the proposal.
Nick Griffin MEP (with a conviction under a law that states that "telling the truth is no defence").

Could the English Fair Fund help your Social Club or Group

English Fair Fund

  Martin Wingfield

2010:  
HELPING to maintain the traditions and heritage of the North West as well as improving the quality of life of the under privileged in the region is the key goal of Nick Griffin's English Fair Fund.

He donates 10% of his monthly MEP salary to the fund for this purpose and has provided help to dozens of good causes over the past 12 months.
The MEP for the North West Region of England was particularly pleased that a recent trip to Ullswater in the Lake District was hailed a huge success by those who attended.
"My political assistant, Adam Walker, arranged the day out for a group of youngsters to enable them to make full use of newly purchased kayaks paid for out of the English Fair Fund, Nick said.
"I bought five kayaks, wetsuits and buoyancy jackets to give some youngsters an alternative to maybe just hanging around the street corners.
"Kayaking is a great way of getting out and about, having new experiences and an enjoyable way of keeping fit. It is good for confidence and team building and can be enjoyed by all age groups.
"The day went well and Adam reported that the youngsters had a great day out and they were so pleased to be able to use this fantastic equipment in such a beautiful part of our country.
"It was the first time they have tried kayaking and was their first visit to the Lake District. They enjoyed the day enormously and were eager to know when they could try it again,” he concluded.
Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield said that dozens of good causes had been helped with small donations of between £100 and £250.
"Sports clubs struggling for funding and heritage projects needing resources have been helped. We have also made a loan to assist when there was a shortfall in funds," reports Tina.
"The largest donation the English Fair Fund has made was £1,000 to the Cumbria Flood Appeal, but we have also invested in equipment such as the boats and lifejackets."
If your sports clubs or heritage project would like to be considered for a small donation, then please contact the constituency office of Nick Griffin MEP at contact@nickgriffinmep.eu

Angela Merkel's Comment Multiculturalism Has Failed” Remarks Highlight Danger of Multiculturalism

German Chancellor’s “Multiculturalism Has Failed” Remarks Highlight Danger of “Adapt or Integrate” Mentality

The British National party Newsroom

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s comment that multiculturalism in Germany has “utterly failed” has once again highlighted the dangerous ignorance of the “adapt or integrate” mentality which pervades civic nationalist thinking.

Ms Merkel’s remarks, made to a meeting of her Christian Democrats Union (CDU) party, were widely misinterpreted by the controlled media as some type of “anti-immigration” outburst.

In reality, it is nothing of the sort. Ms Merkel’s comments are actually is a call for even greater integration of immigrants from the Third World, not less.

Ms Merkel has in essence endorsed the “become like us and do not form separate societies” philosophy, which is prevalent in Britain in UKIP and other civic nationalist circles.

This belief, that Third World immigrants can “become” German (or “British”) simply by learning the language and not forming separate cultural ghettoes inside European countries, is of course as much of a disaster as the “multi-cultural” approach, and just as deadly.

Both approaches fail to account for the reality that all ethnicities are linked to a specific people, and cannot be “transplanted” like clothes or language by checking through an airport terminal.

It is for example, the uniqueness of the British people, their originating population and their ancestry going back tens of thousands of years which make the people of these islands unique.

In the same way, it is the ancestry, heritage and history of the German people which make them unique. Any attempts to deny this uniqueness by pretending that Third World immigrants can “become” British or German just by learning a language and dressing in a bowler hat or lederhosen, is nonsense, born out of ignorance or maliciousness.

To explain this in a simple way:

- Would an African who learned Mandarin and dressed in Oriental clothes become Chinese?

- Would an Englishman who learned Ngaanyatjarra and who dressed in animal skins become an Australian Aborigine?

- Would a Chinese person who learned Yoruba and dressed in African garb become a Nigerian?

- Would an African who learned Iroquoian and dressed in deerskin and wore a feather hat become a North American Indian?

The answer to all these questions is a resounding no, and only an idiot would even contemplate otherwise.

Yet, the very same people who would deride any of the concepts outlined above, would have the rest of the world believe that Africans, Asians, Chinese and all manner of Third Worlders can suddenly “become” European simply by learning the language and dressing like Europeans.

It is this civic nationalist ideology, also known as “cultural nationalism,” which is far more insidious and dangerous to the existence of the native people of Europe than even the obviously failed “multiculturalism” to which Ms Merkel referred.

“Multiculturalism” implied the creation of a society in which each culture was allowed to flourish and exist, supposedly “side-by-side,” so that the benefits of diversity” would be enjoyed by all.

Multiculturalism, and its twin ideology of “cultural nationalism” ignores the demographic reality of a higher Third world immigrant birth rate. This will inevitably lead to the overwhelming and destruction of the native peoples of Europe, irrelevant of the language and dress of the conquerors.

The fake “multiculturalism” and “cultural nationalism” ideologies, both rooted in civic nationalism, are the collective death knell of our people.

Only the British National Party’s sound, logical and natural policy of ethno-nationalism is the only alternative which can guarantee the survival of the native, indigenous European people.

Recommended reading on the topic:

Folk and Nation: Underpinning the Ethno-State

By Arthur Kemp and Nick Griffin. This booklet explains in detail the concept of ethno-nationalism. It is divided into the following subheadings:

Ethnic Nationalism - A Definition;

Central Tenets of Ethno-Nationalism;

Underlying Concepts of Ethno-Nationalism;

The Implications of Ethno-Nationalism;

The Practical Application of Ethno-Nationalism;

Attacks on Ethno-Nationalism; and

How to Argue the Case for Ethno-Nationalism.

This booklet will provide all the answers underpinning the non-racist argument for Britain to remain a British country.

Invaluable for anyone wishing to understand a crucial part of BNP policy and modern democratic nationalist ideology. Click here to order online.

Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Britain (DNA, History and the Right to Existence of the Native Inhabitants of the British Isles.)

By Arthur Kemp. Contrary to what the liberal left Tory/Labour/Lib-Dem/UKIP-ECHR allege, the native people of the British Isles are a distinct, identifiable and homogenous indigenous people who have every right to exist and be free from invasion and domination -- like any other indigenous people on earth. This booklet proves that the vast majority of the British people have ancestors going back to the last mini ice age more than 12,000 years ago.

This booklet shows:

* Genetic evidence shows that the vast majority -- nearly 80% -- of all British people have ancestors going back to the end of the last mini ice age 12,000 years ago;

* Genetic evidence showing that the Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, Viking/Danish and Norman conquests had negligible impacts upon the British people (less than 5 percent each);

* The people of the British Isles have been indigenous peoples for far longer than many other nations who are already classified as "indigenous" by the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

This booklet also shows how the indigenous people of Britain are fully protected by the United Nations Charter on Indigenous Peoples from "dispossession of their territory" through "mass population transfers" and from "forced integration and assimilation" and "destruction of their identity and culture" (all according to the United Nations.)

Even more importantly, the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states that all indigenous peoples have the right to define who is part of their nation and who is not.

This is the killer booklet to destroy the final left-liberal argument against the right of Britain to be British. Click here to order online.

Immigration Has Impoverished Britain: 75% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Children “Live Impoverished Lives

How Immigration Has Impoverished Britain: 75% of Pakistani and Bangladeshi Children “Live in Poverty”

Claims that immigration is economically beneficial for Britain have been destroyed by news that three-quarters of Pakistani and Bangladeshi children in the UK are being brought up in families that are living on poverty-level income.

The report, issued by Millennium Cohort Study, which is tracking children born between 2000 and 2002, has found that 73 per cent of the Pakistani and Bangladeshi seven-year olds were in families estimated to be living on less than 60 per cent of the average national household income.

Just over half of the black children (51 percent) in the Millennium cohort were in such low-income families, compared with one in four white (26 percent) and Indian (25percent) children, said an official press release.

“Predictably, low income was strongly linked to joblessness among parents, say researchers at the Institute of Education, University of London, who collected information from almost 14,000 families in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2008/9.”

According to the report, among fathers, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis had the highest unemployment rate (15 percent) – well above the UK average of 6 per cent. Unemployment among black fathers was also high (11 percent) but Indians were less likely to be unemployed (4 percent) than whites (5.5 percent).

Almost two-thirds (64 percent) of white and Indian mothers had jobs, compared with half (52 percent) of black mothers and only 17 per cent of Pakistani and Bangladeshi mothers.

A much higher proportion of children in lone-parent families (63 percent) were living below the study’s poverty line than those with married (16percent) or cohabiting (30 percent) parents.

 “The incidence of income poverty for the Millennium cohort families has not changed appreciably over the first seven years of the children’s lives,” says Professor Heather Joshi, the study’s director.

“Despite government efforts to eradicate child poverty almost three in 10 children are still in poor families at age 7. It’s particularly disappointing that around one in five seven-year-olds is in severe poverty – on incomes below half the national average.”

The findings appear in a report published today by the Institute of Education’s Centre for Longitudinal Studies: Millennium Cohort Study, Fourth Survey: A User's Guide to Initial Findings. Copies of the report can be downloaded here.

In Times Like These, Could We Do Without Money?

In Times Like These, Can We Do Without Money?

Written by BC1959    At The British Resistance Newsroom

The answer is no, not completely, but there is more to it all than we realise. Pensions, education, benefits, and everything associated with the world, and this country in particular, as we know it, are essentially finished. And why? Internationalism and it's Permanent Revolution, which is what Trotsky proffered. With unrest, debt, and the dismantling of age-old natural ways of life, and Socio-Cultural self-sufficiency, comes a reliance upon central government. With central government, comes oppression, dictatorship, and the financial control so desired by greedy, race-hating alien ideologies, all utiliising bits of the various 20th century dictators' ideas and political agendas that never worked. Thomas Pynchon, in ''Gravity's Rainbow'' said: If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about the answers. So, instead of asking how we are going to survive the coming shortage of, well... everything really, let's take a look at the shortage of money. In reality, it is not the shortage of money that's problematic, it's the way it has been taken from us, and devalued. An average house, bought for £2,507 in 1960, would only be worth £43,713 in today’s money. What does that tell us? Yes, the answer is ONE QUARTER of a modern house in average terms. Now let's go down the  scale a little. In humorous terms, our parents and grandparents used to say things like: When we were young, we could go out with Ten bob, (Fifty Pence) go to the pub for a couple of pints, see the latest film, have fish and chips on the way home, and still have change left over. If you are 14, this may sound very funny indeed. However, it is actually true, and in the current situation, it is far from funny. Not that long back, going out was not such a big thing, but as we see on the high streets, in the towns and cities, and even in some rural areas, the situation is so bad, pubs are closing down at an alarming rate each week. People cannot afford to go out regularly, and when they do, spend far less. Everything that led to people connecting, communicating, and generally being sociable and spending within their own community, is being completely dissolved. The economy is engineered to produce large profits for the few, debt induced spending patterns by the public, and having to make do and mend for the worse off. Money is literally being stolen from us, and society will end up broken. Poverty will be the reward for our reliance on the traitors whom have spent their whole political lives, doing the bidding of the money lenders, who in turn, have become wealthier than any industrialist of the Victorian era, or indeed, any rich factory owner of the early 20th century. Money is now too expensive to own, and now, as this article asks, can we, in fact should we, literally do without it in it's basic form? Who again, could ever produce the things we could at the dawn of the Industrial Revolution?. Where can one ever again, regain the skills to bring back full employment? You know the answers don't you? But wait a minute folks. There is a way back to freedom, ingenuity, and self-sufficiency on a limited scale... forget money. We all know that no housewife, partner, or business can actually get fully away from the fact of life, that we need money on a daily basis or certain transactions. But we do have the ability to take the sting out of the current reliance of it that, will end up in millions of people in serious poverty, compound debt, and all that this brings. It has been discussed before, but what if we Nationalists extended the idea of a sort of Harvest Festival on a regular basis? Instead of the usual, and no offence meant of course, basic prizes at monthly meetings, we could bring real British, in season foods and other consumables such as free range eggs, and milk to meetings. I personally know people who are as we speak, in a position to do this, and the idea is being rolled out locally small scale initially. However, considering all of the above, and far worse to come many think, the idea should, and could be made into a real currency alternative to money concept. Not only food, but skills, education, and almost anything else could be used to JUMP OFF THE PAGES and be activated upon soon. I know many people who can access skills, but then, many people cannot access quality food, therefore, the two could be connected and create joined up thinking on a local scale, which when reported on, as you will see soon from my region, would enthuse others to do the same. Money need not be a ball and chain, with minimal effort and funds, rental of land or even purchase of it, could provide Nationalists of every age, skill, or those who have retired, with access to either free, or extremely low cost food and other provisions. One of our activists this end can even provide logs, and this will be part of the getting back to nature philosophy that many already do, as log and wood burning systems are now an alternative that will grow and grow (excuse the pun). A report will be available as soon as the next meeting has been conducted. The alternative to worry, is relief, and with relief comes freedom, and once freedom has been regained, at least 80% of the need for hard cash in bad times, will then be relinquished. If we cannot make this simple, and to be honest, natural act of human kindness and Nationalistic community spirit work, then we may as well lock ourselves away behind closed doors, and wait for the knock on the door. If WE can make it work, and it worked for our modern and ancient ancestors, then we could be half way to surviving what will surely be, the ultimate test of the modern era... are we worth the blood, sweat, and tears of our ancestors?

Supermarket Waitrose’s Response to BNP’s Halal Campaign: Claims of “Humane Slaughtering” Exposed

Waitrose’s Response to BNP’s Halal Campaign: Claims of “Humane Slaughtering” Exposed

The British National Party Newsroom

The John Lewis Partnership-owned supermarket Waitrose has been the first to respond to the BNP’s campaign against the secret imposition of halal-slaughtered meat in Britain — in which they admit the majority of their meat is halal but with an easily disprovable claim that it is “slaughtered humanely.”

The BNP campaign, which can be found by clicking here, urges readers to view the sensational Derek Adams-produced halal video and then complain to supermarkets directly over their decision to secretly impose halal-compliant meat in their stores.

An email received today by the BNP from Christine Watts, Communications Director at Waitrose, said that the claim that the company was “selling unstunned lamb is absolutely untrue.

“Our approach and priority for all of our meat is to ensure animal welfare of the highest standard, approved by the Humane Slaughter Association (HSA). Our practices are also in line with the recommendations of Compassion in World Farming and the RSPCA,” said the Waitrose statement.

“All our meat is electrically stunned before slaughter meaning that animals are unconscious and are not subjected to pain. UK law currently permits halal slaughter both with stunning and without.”

This might sound reasonable to an uninformed public, but the reality is very different.

Firstly, the official UK Halal Food Authority (HFA), headquartered in Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, states very explicitly that meat is not halal if the animal is not killed through a process of “[A]ll the flowing blood should be drained out from the carcass by natural convulsion” — in other words, that the animal must be alive in order for the blood to drain.

The HFA goes on to say that “stunning is not to be used to kill the animal.” This raises the interesting question: Does Islam allow stunning at all, as Waitrose claims, and if so, can this be done in such a way that the animal suffers no pain?

According to the HFA’s ‘Frequently Asked Questions” section on its website, the question of stunning is addressed as follows:

“Q 3. Does Halal Food Authority allow stunning of birds and animals?

A. Yes, however, one has to be reminded that HFA has always maintained ‘no stunning to kill.’

1. Captive Bolt Stunning – proscribed – prohibited

2. Percussion Stunning - proscribed – prohibited

3. Gas Stunning – proscribed – prohibited

4. Halal Food Authority allows controlled electric stun-with-minuscule amperage, with official Veterinary Surgeon validating that the animal or the birds do not die prior to slaughtering.

There are two types of electric stunning that Halal Food Authority approves:

1. Waterbath Stun – for Poultry

2. Electric Tong Stun – for Ovine meat.”

And therein lies the rub: for ovine halal meat, only an “electric tong stun” with “minuscule amperage” is allowed.

Furthermore, a veterinary surgeon must validate that the animal “does not die prior to slaughtering.”

According to Abraham Natural Produce, a major halal abbatoir based in Somerset, the stun which is used “knocks the animal out for around 15-20 seconds. After 20 seconds it is potentially back to normal and during that 20 seconds it is alive and breathing. This means that when the animal is cut it still bleeds the animal properly.”

Halal slaughter takes at least 4 minutes, and hence all that a “low voltage stun” does is to knock out the animal so that its throat can be cut with the least resistance.

After 20 seconds, the animal is fully conscious once again and suffers tremendous pain for the remaining three and a half minutes of its life as it is ritually slaughtered.

As if this was not enough, the “electric tong stun” method which is the only method approved by the HFA, is viciously cruel, as animal rights activist organisation Animal Aid proved with an undercover video taken of that method of stunning taken at Essex-based slaughterhouse A & G Barber in April this year. A & G Barber was forced to close down after the video was released, which showed exactly how the “electric tong stun” method is used.
Furthermore, even if there were a way to humanely slaughter using an electric stun prong, that is only part of the point. The real issue is that the introduction of halal meat in Britain is a potent symbol of the extent of the Islamic colonisation of our country which has occurred through mass immigration.
The issue of halal slaughter would not be an issue at all if the treasonous Westminster parties had not encouraged and promoted mass Third Word immigration in the first place. Only the BNP is dedicated to halting the immigration invasion, and, by implication, the Islamic colonisation of Britain.

The multicultural society has failed - BNP vindicated

Written by Green Arrow

The British Resistance Newsroom

It has taken them long enough but some of the ruling European "elite" have started to wake up to the fact that multicultural societies do not work. However I suspect that the admission from German Chancellor Angela Merkel has more to do with the rocketing growth of patriotic nationalist parties across Europe rather than genuine remorse for the misery the global marxists have caused and the chaos and the violence that their mad socialist experiment has also brought down on the civilized Western European world. Merkel has been the first of the European Leaders to have the truth ripped from her lips: "the beginning of the 60s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country... We kidded ourselves a while, we said: 'They won't stay, sometime they will be gone', but this isn't reality. "And of course, the approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side-by-side and to enjoy each other... has failed, utterly failed." Watch now, as other European Leaders, desperate to secure their own positions start to voice similar opinions.  It might slow things down but rest assured it will not stop what is coming and their words of contrition should mean nothing.  They must and will be brought to justice for their crimes against the indigenous populations of Western Europe. The British National Party has been fully vindicated.

Nick Griffin MEP Made Well aware of the slanted Bias of the likes of the BBC

Well aware of the slant of the likes of the BBC

  Author Martin Wingfield At http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

 OCTOBER 2010: 
THE subject of media bias provides by far the biggest mailbag that the MEP receives, with letter and emails coming from across the country.


 After Nick's appearance on the BBC's Question Time, his constituency office was swamped by correspondence with hundreds of people complaining about the unfair nature of the programme. But each week the MEP gets many similar letters and this was a typical one that arrived recently.
It came from a lady from Fordingbridge and she wrote:
"Sir, are not my MEP as I live in Hampshire, but I wish you were!
"Coming from a media background, I am well aware of the slant of the likes of the BBC, and your treatment at their hands came as no surprise, but now my eyes have been well and truly opened by the information I'm reading each day on your website.
Suddenly things that happen which you think at the time are a bit 'odd', are now beginning to make sense, fitting piece by piece into a very frightening vision of this fine country in the not so distant future.
I just wanted to say thank you for doing what you are doing and for taking the abuse and risks that you are. Please be assured that I, in my own way, am spreading the word at every opportunity.
I now have placed you in the same category as Eco warrior, Paul Watson of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society who also stands up to those who try to intimidate him."
Replying to the lady, Tina Wingfield, Nick Griffin's Constituency Office Manager wrote:
"Mr Griffin has noted your comments and thanks you for taking the time to share these with him.
"The media, in collusion with Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem politicians, has portrayed anyone associated with nationalist politics as ignorant, dangerous or mad - and often all three - for many years. Thankfully, the British public are beginning to see through this media smokescreen, designed simply to impede the inevitable progress of the only Party in British politics that truly reflects the fundamental concerns of the majority, indigenous population. 132,094 voters in the 2009 European Elections, for example, placed their faith in the North West Region British National Party candidate, Nick Griffin, in spite of the intense and vicious anti-BNP campaign waged against the Party by an alliance of the media, trade unions, and mainstream political parties.
"Advances in communications technology, such as the internet, have moreover, provided the British National Party with the opportunity to by-pass the Establishment media, which is committed to maintaining the status quo. Our independent websites, coupled with a national monthly newspaper and nationwide leaflet campaigns, have enabled us to take our message directly to the public, and to show them that British National Party supporters are ordinary citizens from a range of social backgrounds and occupational professions who recognise that contemporary politics appears to be devoid of any semblance of common sense.
"It is, for example, common sense that Britain should close its doors to any further immigration given that the UK is now so overwhelmed and overburdened with the excessive number of newcomers to our shores that our social services and infrastructure are collapsing under the consequent unsustainable pressure. It is also common sense to withdraw from membership of the European Union - an organisation that costs the British taxpayer billions of pounds per year yet delivers, in response, only regulation and bureaucracy that impedes British business.
"It makes sense that people who have paid into Britain's national insurance scheme should be given priority in terms of welfare benefits, pensions, housing, education and social services, over newcomers who haven't contributed a penny. It is perfectly reasonable to stop giving aid to foreign countries when our own National Health Service is underfunded and many of school buildings are in desperate need of repair.
"It is fair to call for a criminal justice system that protects the welfare of the victim over and above the human rights of the criminal; to abolish political correctness from the police service in favour of real crime fighting; and to ensure that the traditional British concepts of civility and courteousness are taught in our schools.
It is perfectly fitting to call for a halt to the immoral war in Afghanistan and to focus instead on the extremist Islamic 'enemy within' our own society, which seeks to destroy our culture and colonise our nation; and to seek to realign British foreign policy so that our nation’s interests are put before all others.
"While the British National Party clearly proposes common sense policies there are, in contrast, countless examples of ignorant, bad and frankly, insane policies which have been implemented by our mainstream politicians. It appears however, that those who grace the green benches in Westminster are totally oblivious of the phrase, “people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones"!
Racial Paranoia: The Unintended Consequences of Political Correctness

Alliance of European Nationalist Movements... What will It Mean?

Alliance of European Nationalist Movements... What Does It Mean?

Written by Green Arrow   at The British Resistance Newsroom

As the realisation of the world-wide depression, and political chess game that spawned it, finally lands on the doormats of each nation's people, the Alliance of Nationalists will further antagonise the elites. With our own Chairman at the forefront, and knowing his achievements on the British political scene, things could soon bring the term NATIONALISM to millions, in a way that previously never got into the minds of those who thought they could go it alone, and carry on regardless. The Alliance, once it has found it's feet, will produce a coalition of genuine intellectuals, radicals, and far-sighted leaders, specialising in two particular things. 1 - The might of the power of technology and media to induce enthusiasm amongst a tired, and brow-beaten western world. 2 - A political force to oppose the European Union's increasing dictatorial power, and insane agenda to include countries like Turkey in it's ugly plan to mongrelise indigenous western European people. A bloc system, is far better than each nation having to battle for exactly the same goals alone. The Nationalist leaders, each representing their indigenous people's wishes, will also act as a brick wall, especially in further involvement in foreign wars, economic destruction by engineered means, and the ''one size fits all'' stupidity of monetary union and Socio-Cultural integration. Ultimately, no amount of starving Nationalist leaders of the ''oxygen of publicity'' within the EU, or within their respective nations, can continue, as with each attempt, comes further technological support, out-reach, and public recognition in terms of sensible, and well thought out policies, and political arguments that go with all this. The public are at this moment in time, on a spinning wheel, and no one dares get off because they are scared of what they will find when they do. They are about to find out anyway. Sadly, without the Alliance and it's opportunity to halt or at least, oppose all of the above, they would see a different solution to debt, job losses, and police-state interference, which would include desperate measures by each nation's elite, to crush their spirits, and their former, long-held ancient rights. With the Alliance, both they, and us, are at least armed with weapons that we can collectively use in this battle. In fact, battles are numerous, and without the Alliance, and other rights organisations soon to be introduced officially such as the United Nationalist Nations (UNN), their ancient war on the white west would be achievable in one foul blast of hatred. The Alliance of European Nationalist Movements is a lifeboat, a rope across the waters, and every man, woman and child, should now do all they can to support it.

One million signatures should trigger a referendum In citizens' initiatives

One million signatures should trigger a referendum

|  Andrew Brons http://www.andrewbronsmep.eu/?q=newsAt

11TH OCTOBER 2010: THIS was my contribution to a debate in the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) committee on proposed amendments to the proposal to introduce citizens' initiatives this afternoon.
 "I am in favour of the amendment that would reduce from 300,000 to 5,000 the number of signatures that would have to be secured by the qualifying stage (the stage at which it is decided whether the initiative is admissible ). I am in favour of the amendment that would reduce the number of countries from three to one from which the signatures at the qualification stage would have to come. I am also in favour of the reduction of the number of states from which the one million signatures must come from a third of states to a quarter. I favour the amendment that would extend the period over which the million signatures could be obtained from twelve months to forty-eight months. All of these would allow genuine citizens' initiatives and not just ones organised, perhaps  covertly, by large organisation
"I am against the extension of the European values criterion to ones that are said to be covertly against European values. This would be a subjective judgement, as has been said. In fact I am against the European  Values criterion altogether. The European Union is too often frightened of hearing what the public really wants to say. This (European values) criterion (for admissibility) would stifle debate and place a constraint on what can be said.
"However, let us set that aside for a moment. Whereas a substantive proposal must not be contrary to European values, would it be permissible to call for additions to, deletions from, or amendments of, European values in a citizens' initiative. Perhaps the answer to that might depend on where the particular value is to be found.
"The competence criterion is apparently still the competence of the Commission. However, last week in AFCO it was suggested that initiatives might be allowed that call for amendments to the treaties. This would suggest that the competence criterion might be treated flexibly to extend to the competence of the European Union as a whole and beyond the competence of the Commission.
"We heard a lot this afternoon about direct democracy (referendums) but citizens' initiatives are not referendums. They are simply petitions by another name. However, they are substandard petitions because they can be smothered at birth or at maturity by the Commission.
"I believe that the one million signatures should not be a petition that can be ignored but a trigger that calls a referendum."

Judges Warned in Official Guideline: Don’t Use “British” to Mean White Use Newspeak

Judges Warned in Official Guideline: Don’t Use “British” to Mean White

The British National Party Newsroom

A new official training manual published by the Judicial Studies Board which tells judges that the word “British” as a “synonym for White, English or Christian is incorrect and unacceptable” is one example of how George Orwell’s 1984-styel Newspeak is taking over Britain, says Doug Ward, Yorkshire BNP Press Officer in a new article.

The rise of Newspeak is more than the death of the English language—By Doug Ward.

The theory and practice of oligarchical collectivism steers our nation ever closer to the web of complete destruction, like moth transfixed on the brightness of the light that dooms it to the dangers of the spider’s guarantee.

But what is Newspeak? You would think its chief architect’s dream is the creation of new words, not a bit of it. It is the destruction of words, hundreds of verbs and adjectives as well as nouns can be got rid of, not only synonyms but antonyms as well.

After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word, when a word contains its opposite within itself?

Take ‘good’ for instance, what need is there for a word like ‘bad’, when ‘ungood’ will do just as well.

Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good’, why use excellent or splendid when ‘plusgood’ covers the meaning, or ‘double plusgood’ if you want something stronger still.

I sense in your heart you would prefer to stick to Oldspeak with its vagueness, you just don’t grasp the beauty of the destruction of words.

Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end ‘thought crime’ will literally be impossible, because there will be no word in which to express it.

By 2050 at the latest, not a single human being will be alive to understand such a conversation as you have daily, not even the proletariat will know Oldspeak.

Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron, they’ll all exist only in Newspeak. The whole climate of thought will be different, in fact there will be no thought as we understand it today.

The Equal Treatment Bench Book, published by the Judicial Studies Board, guides the judges and magistrates to their conformance of the Equalities Act which came into force on Friday 1st October 2010.

The manual warns about the use of the word ‘British.’ It states: ‘Use of the word ‘British’ as a synonym for White, English or Christian is incorrect and unacceptable’. 

The erosion of Oldspeak continues with the erosion of the meaning of ‘British’, or its connotation of who is actually British.

Once the meaning of the word is acceptable in its change we can then remove that word from the dictionary so its need has no worth and therefore will not then exist.

Do you not see the beauty of destruction?

Has Migrationwatch’s Sir Andrew Green Realised That the Tories Really Are Con as Their Name Suggests

Has Migrationwatch’s Sir Andrew Green Realised That the Tories Are a Hoax?

The British National party Newsroom

Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green’s latest press release, which contains a strongly worded attack on UK “governments” having “ducked” the immigration issue and “making the country suffer” could be the first sign that he has at last realised that the Tory Party leadership lie as much to their supporters as does the Labour Party.

In the statement, which revealed that the recent flood of immigrations has meant that one million new school places have to be created over the next decade, and half a million within the next five years, Sir Andrew warned that “no-one” wants to talk about it.

 “Almost every family in England is being affected by the growing crisis over school places but no-one will talk about its causes,” he said in a the press release, obviously including the Tories in that statement.

Previously, Sir Andrew has come out in tentative support of Tory promises to “cap” immigration, obviously refusing to believe that David Cameron would actually lie over such an important topic.

Now, however, the penny may have dropped.

“Our paper graphically demonstrates how families throughout the country suffer when governments duck the issue and fail to plan for the consequences,” Sir Andrew said, deliberately using the plural form of government in his statement.

According to the latest Migrationwatch paper, children of recent immigrants to the UK who arrived after 1998 are the primary cause of the schooling crisis which will cost an additional £40 billion over the period.

“By 2020 the need for extra places increases to one million at a total cost over the ten year period of almost £100 billion if immigration continues at current rates,” Sir Andrew continued.

“So far, educating the children of immigrants who have arrived over the past twelve years has cost the taxpayer more than £15 billion. In 2009 alone it was almost £4.5 billion or more than £12 million a day.

“The public are waking up to the speed and scale at which fundamental changes are being forced upon them, thanks to the policies of the previous administration, and our schools are but just one example.

“It will be replicated in many areas of our national life such as health, housing, natural resources and infrastructure and the costs will continue to increase for many years to come — all against a background of severe financial stringency,” he continued.

“What is also becoming clearer all the time is that there has been little if any planning or preparation for this surge in the need for education and other public services,” he said.

“Some schools might have spare capacity from earlier periods of higher birth rates but they will not necessarily be in the same places as the new demand,” he added.

The Migrationwatch statement also pointed out that the employment rate among some immigrant communities was considerably lower than the UK average, adding that “only about 40 percent of immigrants come for the purpose of work.”

Furthermore, the  Migrationwatch paper said, “between 2008 and 2033, official population projections suggest that an additional 2.3 million births will result from migration.

“Assuming that all of the additional children are educated in state schools, the total costs of their schooling would be around £ 190 billion over a 25 year period. This calculation is made using very conservative assumptions about school leaving age etc. It does not make any allowance for additional education requirements of migrants (eg: help with languages etc.) so the eventual cost could be much higher than this.

“If the official population projections are broadly right, an additional 1.3 million school places would be needed by 2033. This would be equivalent to almost 4,000 new schools staffed by around 55,000 additional teachers,” the statement said.

Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Wilders 'very happy' with court decision as Europeans Continue to Claim back their Homelands and Freedoms

Geert Wilders proclaimed himself 'very happy' with the public prosecution department's announcement on Friday afternoon that he should be found not guilty on all charges of inciting hatred and discrimination.
The anti-Islam MP told reporters: 'I don't insult, I don't incite to hate and I don't discriminate. The only thing I do and will continue doing is speak the truth.'
Marxist Campaigners who took the case to the high court to force the public prosecutors to bring the case against Wilders said they were 'disappointed'.
'We hope the court will come to a judgement on a number of the charges,' a Marxist spokesman told reporters.


But the public prosecution department on Friday afternoon stated that Geert Wilders is not guilty of discriminating against Muslims. Earlier on Friday it announced he should also be found not guilty of inciting hatred.
Prosecutors Birgit van Roessel and Paul Velleman reached their conclusions after a careful reading of interviews with and articles by the anti-Islam politician and a viewing of his anti-Koran film Fitna.
They said comments about banning the Koran can be discriminatory, but because Wilders wants to pursue a ban on democratic lines, there is no question of incitement to discrimination 'as laid down in law'.
On the comparison of the Koran with Mein Kampf, the prosecutors said the comparison was 'crude but that did not make it punishable'.
Dealing earlier on Friday with incitement to hatred, Van Roessel and Velleman said some comments could incite hatred against Muslims if taken out of context, but if the complete text is considered, it can be seen that Wilders is against the growing influence of Islam and not against Muslims per sé.
On Tuesday, the prosecutors said the MP should not be found guilty of group insult.
The public prosecution department was forced to take the case by the high court after Marxist anti-racism campaigners protested at its refusal to prosecute Wilders.

As UK Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show White British Losing out to Immigrants

As Britain Tops Jobless League, New Figures Show Whites Losing out to Immigrants, Chinese and Indians

The British National Party Newsroom

The growing anti-white nature of the British state has been revealed with a series of statistics which show that despite increasing unemployment in Britain, immigrants, Chinese and Indians are still being given preference in employment opportunities.

According to a report issued by the Centre for Policy Studies (CPS), nearly one in eight British households has no-one in work.

This rate is the highest of the six largest EU economies, the CPS said.

According to its figures, the UK has a total of 11.5 percent of households where no adults are working, compared to 10.5 percent in France, 9.2 percent in Germany and 6 percent in the Netherlands.

A 10 percent drop in the number of workless households would add around 1 percent to Gross Domestic Product, the CPS said.

Remarkably, the CPS report also called for the “reduction of low skilled immigration” to prevent an increase in unemployment.

The news coincided with a report in the Financial Times which said that at least 139,000 immigrants had beaten the “jobs crunch” while the number of “Britons in work had dropped by 654,000.”

According to the FT report, “migrant workers have continued to flow into the country during the recession while Britons lose their jobs.”

The FT continued: “The findings echo official figures two months ago that the number of foreign-born workers had risen by 114,000 in a year, bringing the full number in the economy to 3.85 million.

“Some 100,000 of the migrants who have arrived in the past two years come from outside the EU.

It is not only in the unskilled job market where white people are being replaced.

According to the recently released “How fair is Britain?” report from the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to find professional, middle-class jobs.

The EHRC report says that “People from some ethnic groups are more likely to be in higher skilled, professional occupations than others.

“For example, Chinese and Indian men are nearly twice as likely as white British men to be in professional jobs.”

According to the report, just 14 percent of white men are in professional jobs, compared with 27 percent of Chinese and 25 percent of Indian men.

All in all, the picture which emerges is clear: white native British people are falling behind under the Labour-Tory-Lib Dem plan to ensure that our nation is colonised and taken over by the Third World.

Only the British National Party stands between you and this tragic disaster. Isn’t it about time you did something about it and helped the BNP?

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in UK Every Month

8,000 Failed Asylum Seekers Get Permission to Stay in Britain Every Month

The British National Party Newsroom

Conservative Party claims to be “tough on immigration” have been exposed as a hoax once again with the news that in excess of 8,000 failed 'asylum seekers' are being granted permission to stay in Britain every month.

The shocking statistic was contained in a Home Office release of 'asylum' figures issued last week which has been largely ignored by the controlled media.

In the report, the Home Office said that special rules had so far allowed more than 135,000 failed 'asylum seekers' to legally take up residence in Britain.

When their dependents are added in, the total figure of 'asylum seekers' whose claims have been rejected, but who now can live in Britain and parasite off the taxpayer, will be as high as 240,000.

The special rules which have allowed the invasion to take place are part of the measures put in place in an attempt to deal with the massive backlog in applications which have built up over the years.

The backlog has, of course, been caused by the lax 'asylum' policies endorsed by the Labour, Tory and Lib Dem parties which have encouraged the parasites of the earth to descend on soft-touch Britain’s benefits bonanza.

Now, so many legal precedents have been set that even if the current influx was halted, the Government would face an avalanche of lawsuits based on the currently existing “Human Rights Act” and other legal devices.

The special measures included rushing through thousands of cases without proper checks on applicants’ stories, with a decision being made purely on the basis of written statements without any corroborating facts.

According to a media report, guidelines for officials state that they should “expedite” cases if, for example, the UK Border Agency had been at fault for delays. Claimants are also rushed through if they threaten suicide.

In July 2009, it was announced that 144,000 'asylum seekers' had been allowed to stay in Britain after the claims backlog was first announced.

The impossible demands on the asylum process are obvious from a bit of simple maths: there are in excess of 450,000 outstanding 'asylum seeker' claims, according to official figures.

If they are “resolved” at the rate of ten every day, it will take 4,500 days, or 12 years, just to bring the backlog to a conclusion — never mind the thousands who are pouring in all the time.

It is obvious that the 'asylum' issue is just an invasion scam designed to allow as many Third World immigrants as possible into Britain.

Only the British National Party will bring an end to this invasion. The BNP argues that asylum seekers have the right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they flee, and do not have the right to cross 20 safe countries to reach Britain.

How the UK Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Enquiry in Britain

How the Westminster Parties Have Destroyed Scientific Endeavour in Britain

The British National Party Newsroom

Great Britain, which was the home of the Industrial Revolution and whose collective genius shaped the modern world, is on the brink of total scientific academic collapse thanks to the treasonous ineptitude of the three-party-one-policy Tory-Labour-Lib Dem gang.

The crisis has been sparked by the massive deficit crisis which the ConDem coalition are just as complicit in causing as the previous Labour regime, although they pretend otherwise.

The deficit has five primary causes:

- The bank bailout (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (supported by the Tories and now endorsed by the Lib Dems);

- Mass immigration which costs upwards of £13 billion per year (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems);

- Continued EU membership (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems); and

- The £9 billion a year foreign aid budget (supported by both Tory and Lib Dems who want to see it raised to £13 billion per year).

As a result of this reckless spending, Britain now faces one of its greatest deficits ever and all Government departments have been told to prepare for an average of 25 percent cuts in their budget (except, of course, the foreign aid budget).

Currently, Britain’s research budget is around £6 billion and a new report drawn up by Research Councils UK, which is responsible for distributing government funding for research, has warned that a £1 billion cut in this funding will mean “game over” for British science.

The report says that impending cuts “to scientific research funding could cost the UK economy up to £10 billion” as well.

“Public investment in scientific research is essential to ensure that long-term productivity and breakthroughs continue,” the report said.

“Without publicly funded research, private research and development could also dry up as companies will simply move to countries where they can still work with academics.

"Science is important for innovation and productivity not just for pushing forward the technological frontier.

"Universities at the research frontier have a second core 'product', namely highly trained people, an essential resource for UK companies and foreign companies investing in the UK,” the report continued.

“Continued public investment in scientific endeavour is essential for the success of UK business and industry and, more broadly, for a productive economy, a healthy society and a sustainable world."

It would seem that the amateurish clowns in Westminster have not only destroyed Britain’s recent past, but seem fully intent on destroying its future as well.

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Protest Rally after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

BNP Councillor Threatens Citizens Advice Bureau with Demonstration after Politically-Motivated Victimisation

The BNP Newsroom

A British National Party Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Councillor, Martyn Findley, is considering holding a demonstration outside the local Citizens Advice Bureau after that taxpayer-funded body engaged in blatant politically-motivated discrimination against him.

Cllr Martyn Findley said he would hold the demonstration if the district manager of the Bedworth, Rugby and Nuneaton Citizens Advice Bureau (branCAB) refused to let him offer his services as a volunteer at the bureau.

“The reason the director, David Gooding, gave was simply that I was a BNP councillor,” Cllr Findley said.

“This was outrageous as I have a long history of community involvement. I enjoyed my time as a school governor, for example, as much as I did my voluntary activities on occasion with the church.

“As an activist with the local residents association, I assisted in organising a family festival and was prepared to spend evenings burning the midnight oil filling in applications for funding,” he said.

The drama started when earlier this year, Cllr Findley responded to an advertisement in the local newspaper placed by branCAB which asked for volunteers.

“Encouraged by the knowledge that the CAB has previously never discriminated against anyone, I called and spoke to a lady about volunteering,” he continued.

“After I shared with her my volunteering experience she assured me that with my availability and experience, I sounded ideal and would be contacted as soon as possible. This happened and I passed the telephone stage successfully. 

“I waited and when my written invitation to the induction day came through the post I was delighted,” Cllr Findley said.

Instead of welcoming his services, the letter from Mr Gooding informed Cllr Findley that the branCAB would not accept his offer because of his membership of the BNP.

Bizarrely, the letter went on to confirm that branCAB staff, trustees and volunteers may be active members of political parties, providing that they keep their political work completely separate from their CAB work. 

“I cannot for the life of me see any conflict between being an elected member, under any party banner, and volunteering with the CAB, and there is certainly no prospect for political work,” Cllr Findley said.

However, the next paragraph contained the clause to which he took exception: ‘Active membership includes promoting being publicly associated with, or expressing the views of organisations such as the BNP,’ the letter said.

“Is there a list of organisations which the CAB discriminates against? Who wrote it and which organisations are on it?  Exactly which law do they think gives branCAB the authority to discriminate against a member of a lawfully constituted political party?” Cllr Findley said.

“It is even more shocking when compared back to an earlier section of the same letter where the branCAB specifically forbids discriminatory policies or practices.

“As I am prepared to state publicly that my heart is open to all and that as an extension to my duties as a democratically elected councillor I am prepared to work for nothing for the benefit of the whole community, I believe that I am suitable to volunteer with the CAB.

“If there are any volunteers, staff members or funders out there who wish to discriminate against me on the grounds of political belief I think it is they, not I, who should have their motives questioned,” Cllr Findley said.

“I feel that I must fight this discrimination and I am calling upon members and supporters of the British National Party for their assistance. I would be grateful if you could take a few minutes and politely outline your objection to this discrimination to Mr Gooding as I feel that public pressure is the best way of getting this disgraceful decision overturned.”

Mr Gooding’s email address is david.gooding @ brancab.org.uk. Why don’t readers send him a polite email asking why he does not want Cllr Findley’s kind offer of help.

“The branCAB is funded by the Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council and Rugby Borough Council,” Cllr Findley continued.

“At the next full council meetings of the two councils I shall ask publicly, locally as an elected member and in Rugby as a member of the public, for the leaders of the councils to assist me with my struggle against discrimination in an organisation over which they share a great deal of influence.

“This will place on public record their position for/against institutional discrimination. As far as I am aware at the moment this is the limit of my redress to this voluntary organisation.

“If our appeals fall on deaf ears I consider that I shall have no alternative other than to organise a demonstration against discrimination on the footpath outside of the main CAB offices in Bedworth. I should imagine that having the British National Party holding a demonstration against discrimination outside the offices of the CAB would be the last thing that they would want, but the choice is theirs,” Cllr Findley concluded.