The Uk Tory Party Break Up : You Read It Here

The Conservative Party Break Up : You Read It Here First

Written by

DATE_FORMAT_LC2 at The VBR Site

In his Mail On Sunday column of 4th December, Peter Hitchens wrote:- ‘The monstrous birth of a new Liberal Conservative Party is now certain’. Hitchens goes on, ‘A few weeks ago I drew attention to the amazing remarks of Francis Maude, a close ally of David Cameron, who said he would prefer a coalition to a Tory majority after the next Election. I am sure Mr Cameron agrees with this. Now, Sir John (Major) – another close Cameron ally – has called for a permanent alliance of two of our three parties against the people of Britain’. Major ‘explained the attraction of coalitions – to politicians: ‘Two parties are more likely to enjoy a tolerant electorate for policies that are painful.’ …Or, in other words, that a coalition can ram through unpopular policies (Mr Major is an expert on those) more easily than one-party governments.’ The realignment of British Politics suggested by Hitchens and quite probably the break-up of the Tory Party with its traditionalist wing hiving off, was foretold in the forerunner of this Website ‘The Home of the Green Arrow and Friends’ in an article posted on 5th July entitled ‘Sigmund Freud and the BNP.’   There, in a discussion of the way groups of varying sizes deal with internal dissensions, it was stated that:- ‘By way of contrast, the Tory Party is somewhere further down Freud’s spectrum of difference. It is obviously much larger than the BNP and for historical reasons has always been something of a coalition of interests. The differences between these interests have not been  perceived  so large, at least compared to the party’s main oppositions, as to occasion splits.  So the Party has survived.  All that might change.  One section of the Tory coalition may reposition itself elsewhere. The liberal David Cameron (‘Heir to Blair’) and his acolytes seem to have more in common with a good many Lib Dems than they do with the traditionalist Tories and the gulf between them may come to be seen as so wide as in Freud’s terms to be viewed with ‘Insuperable Repugnance.’ Many of these Tories  actually have in many respects a good deal more in common with the BNP than they do with Cameron’s politics, but would be loath to admit it for the present at least, for reasons mainly of social acceptability – of snobbery,’ The implications for the BNP are enormous should the ‘permanent coalition and /or  probable split in the Tory Party come about. There will immediately be available a large number of voters including many of the traditionalist working class with nowhere else to go but to this Party. The BNP should be prepared for this opportunity

EU Regulation Costs £110 Billion to European Business

http://www.bnp.org.uk/£110 Billion: What EU Regulation Costs European Business

The British National Party Newsroom

The European Commission (EC) has admitted that regulation and red tape created artificially by the European Union costs businesses in excess of £110 billion, or €130 billion, every year.

The shocking admission was made in an article in the EU-related news service, Euractive, dealing with the failure of the EC to live up to its own deadlines for cutting waste and red tape.

According to the article, the EC claimed that it was on track to cut red tape by a quarter by 2012. However, the Euractive article added, “businesses shouldn't get their hopes too high up [sic].”

According to Euractive, the EC has admitted that “unnecessary regulation” has created a burden, especially for small to medium enterprises (SME).

The EC realised as long ago as 2007 that it had created a bureaucratic monster, and that year appointed yet another taxpayer-funded body to make suggestions on how to cut down on the waste which they themselves had created.

The High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens (HLG) was duly created, and then actually proceeded to make suggestions as to where “unnecessary” regulations could be cut.

However, as Euractive pointed out, “only a few of the Commission’s major proposals have been fully approved.

“The other initiatives to simplify rules and reduce paperwork are still being debated by EU member states and the European Parliament.”

The article then quoted Andrea Renda, senior research fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies, who was a consultant to the Commission on the project, as saying that “while the Commission contends it could ultimately cut red tape by 31 percent, "I wouldn’t say we’ve gotten anywhere close so far.”

According to Euractive, other problems involved in cutting red tape include flaws in the method used to measure the paperwork burden and the fact that the target was based on the Commission’s proposals, not on the sometimes weaker versions that are passed by Parliament and EU member states.

Even worse, the goal of a 25 percent saving was based on a 2005/2006 level of bureaucracy, and many additional EU laws have been passed since then, which will have considerably added to the burden.

Increasingly, SMEs have complained that their time is being taken up just adhering to EU legislation.

The Euractive article then quoted Mary Boughton, co-director of a herbal veterinary medicines business in Dorset. That company now spends 20 percent of their time on administrative tasks.

“It’s certainly increased more since we joined the EU,” Ms Boughton was quoted as saying.

“It’s increased a lot in the last five years, especially the employment issue, which is a big issue and very time consuming.”

“We know all of our employees, and we have to jump through the same hoops as if we were British Airways.”

Although one of the original reasons for the creation of the EU and its predecessors was supposedly to simplify trade, Ms Boughton revealed that she now has “more problems exporting within Europe than outside because EU rules are interpreted differently by member states.”

 

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

Yes ! Enoch Powell Was Right After All

 Enoch Powell Was Right

The British National Party Newsroom

A review of political utterances made by establishment politicians since the early 1970s has shown that Enoch Powell was perfectly accurate in his prediction that unrestricted immigration would inevitably lead to the swamping of Britain, says Manchester superactivist Derek Adams.

Speaking to BNP News on the release of a new video, the latest in a series of highly popular multi-media releases dealing with political issues on YouTube, Mr Adams said that everything that Mr Powell had come true.

“We have nonwhite immigrants such as Trevor Phillips using the power of the state to persecute white people, exactly as Mr Powell warned,” Mr Adams said.

“We have an already present immigrant population fast out breeding the indigenous population, exactly as Mr Powell predicted.

“Finally, in this new video, we can see the pathetic excuses and lies being told by Tory and Labour politicians alike on immigration over the years.

“The time has come to acknowledge that both Enoch Powell and Nick Griffin have spoken the truth on immigration in Britain,” he said.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the British National Party Website

 

Reflections of a Statesman: The Writings and Speeches of Enoch Powell

  

Nick Griffin's MEP Constituency Office diligence gets results

Constituency Office diligence gets results

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

DECEMBER 2010: THERE has been a welcome Christmas present for one North West constituent after Nick Griffin's Constituency Office took on the Maltese Government and battled on his behalf.

 The constituent from Cumbria wrote to Nick Griffin concerning the Maltese Government's charge for vehicle importation and tax registration.
The gentleman spent some time in Malta with the intention of settling there permanently. He fell ill however within six months and returned to England following medical treatment. Whilst he was ill in hospital, he was pressurised into importing his British car and paying over 5000 Euros for tax registration.
He found out subsequently that he may have been wrongly advised and did not need to import the car, so he wrote to the Maltese Ministry of Finance, requesting a refund but had not received a reply.
"This was back in January and for the past 11 months Nick and I have been in correspondence with the Maltese Government trying to get the matter resolved," says Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield.
"Initially the Maltese Ministry of Finance stonewalled requests to open discussion on the matter, insisting that there was 'no exemption entitlement in the strict terms of the law'.
"Apparently it was a Transport Authority decision to reject the refund, so I requested an exception in writing, supplying all the documentary evidence in support of the case based on our constituent's particular and personal circumstances."
This was back in May, and over the the next three months there were more than 30 emails, letters and telephone calls from the Constituency Office to the Maltese Ministry of Finance trying to get the matter resolved
At the end of September there was some disappointing news which Tina reported to the constituent.
"I spoke to the Maltese Ministry of Finance this morning and was told that your case had been discussed at a meeting of the Transport Authority and it was decided that, as you had lived in Malta for more than seven months, you were liable to pay the vehicle tax. Your request for exemption from the payment was therefore refused on legal grounds. While it is stated that there is no legal basis for a refund, I have requested that an exception might be made in your case."
For the next six weeks the was no response from the office dealing with the matter and calls were not returned. In the end  Tina was left with no option but to contact the Ministry of Finance's Customer Care office.
She told them that her constituent had been denied the simple courtesy of a single response to his request for a refund, and that he was preparing a formal complaint.
Finally at the end of October there was a light at the end of this long tunnel.
The Customer Care office reported that the claim was being reconsidered by the Government of Malta but that proof of the vehicle's re-registration in the UK was required to be able to proceed.
This posed problems as Tina explained to the Customer Care Office:
"Unfortunately, the constituent sold the car that was registered in Malta, so no longer holds the logbook. As a pensioner, faced with ever-increasing petrol prices in the UK, he was forced to change his vehicle for a smaller, more economical car. He has however, provided you instead, with copies of the following documentation: the MOT Test Certificate which shows the registration transfer date; the Bill of Sale and the acknowledgement letter from the DVLA confirming the ‘change of owner’; and the logbook issued by Malta ADT (Certifikat ta’ Registrazzjoni) - which will enable you to cross-reference the vehicle details.
I hope this documentation suffices for the purposes of progressing the refund claim."
But there was further delay because more meetings in Malta failed to come up with a resolution.
Then finally on the 3rd of December, the Maltese Ministry of Finance agreed that there were "exceptional circumstances" in this case and that a refund on “humanitarian grounds” should be made.
This was a very satisfying outcome after nearly a year's polite persistence by Nick Griffin's Constituency office, and a very welcome Christmas bonus for the constituent concerned.

UK Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

The British National Party Newsroom

The Met Office has dramatically downgraded its apocalyptic sea level flood warnings of just a few years ago as the government-appointed Committee on Climate Change has estimated that fighting “global warming” will cost the UK taxpayer £150 billion.

The Met Office, which is an official government body, had earlier endorsed the prediction made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which, in a 2007 report, said that sea levels would rise six feet within the next century and flood out many cities.

However, a new report by the Met Office said this was no longer likely and instead halved its predicted "worst case scenario."

In addition, the IPCC’s prediction that the Arctic conveyor belt (which moves warm and cold water around the world’s oceans) is slowing has also been dismissed by the Met Office, with a spokesman being quoted as saying that this was “not likely to happen this century.”

Meanwhile, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), established under the Climate Change Act (2008), which advises the Government on “setting and meeting carbon budgets and on preparing for the impacts of climate change,” has presented a preliminary cost estimate of £150 billion which British taxpayers will have to pay to combat “climate change.”

To put this into perspective, the budget cuts announced by the ConDem regime this year amount to some £83 billion.

In addition to tax increases, the huge figure will send already expensive energy bills soaring even further.

The Climate Change Committee has said that the money will be needed to “deliver green transport, power and energy efficiency” over the next 20 years.

In addition, the CCC has said that Britain must cut its carbon emissions 60 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 as a stepping stone to an 80 percent cut by 2050.

In reality this means further de-industrialising Britain, and the removal of even more industry to China and the Far East.

The CCC’s budgetary plans also do not include British contributions towards “climate change funds” currently being set up to allegedly help the Third World.

The upcoming “climate change” talks in Cancun, Mexico, for example, aim to create a £60 billion fund to help “poor countries cope with climate change and deforestation.”

Of course, the major source of deforestation and aridification in the Third World is the fact that there is insufficient social responsibility in those societies to properly plan ahead and take care of their environments.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

PC Media Blame White Students Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

Whites Blamed Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

The British National party Newsroom

Another example of the anti-white mania which infests the establishment has come to light with the instant blame accorded to “white racism” because fewer black students are accepted into Oxbridge, even though the facts show that this has nothing at all to do with university policy.

The latest “blame whitey” media feeding frenzy came with the release of Freedom of Information Act (FOI) figures by Labour’s former universities minister, the black MP David Lammy.

Mr Lammy, who is well-known for the racial chip on his shoulder, said that his figures “proved” that there was “racial exclusion” at Oxford and Cambridge.

The controlled media lost no time in rebroadcasting the statistics, with lurid headlines such as “Whitewash at Oxford” and “Bleak Picture of Racial Exclusion,” all directly implying that the small number of black students at the two institutions was directly due to deliberate white racism hidden deep within the university administration.

In reality, both Oxford and Cambridge universities have formally established “Race Equality Schemes” which actively promote, encourage and give preferential treatment to nonwhites in order to meet government-sanctioned “race equality programmes.”

These programmes are designed to encourage applications from state school students and those from “black and working-class backgrounds.”

Despite all these programs, the number of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) students remains relatively low.

There are, however, simple and logical reasons for this state of affairs, and it is most certainly not due to “white racism.”

Firstly, the reality is that poor academic achievement by vast numbers of black students means that the number of applicants from that community is disproportionately smaller.

According to figures released by Diane Abbott MP, secretary of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs, 48 per cent of 16-year-old white boys get five GCSE grades A-E, while only 13 per cent of black boys achieve this level of education. In largely black boroughs like Hackney, this figure drops to as low as six percent.

Although liberals love to blame “white racist teachers” for this state of affairs, most sensible people know that this is not the root cause of black academic failure.

Secondly, admission statistics from the universities in question show that those black students who do apply to university, all attempt to get into already-oversubscribed faculties, which reduces their admission chances even further.

As an Oxford university spokesman said in response to Mr Lammy’s allegations: “Black students apply disproportionately for the most oversubscribed subjects, contributing to a lower than average success rate for the group as a whole: 44 percent of all black applicants apply for Oxford's three most oversubscribed subjects, compared with just 17 percent of all white applicants.

“That means nearly half of black applicants are applying for the same three subjects, the three toughest subjects to get places in. Those subjects are economics and management, medicine, and maths.

“This goes a very long way towards explaining the group's overall lower success rate,” the spokesman said.

* Mr Lammy’s statistics also show that of the more than 1,500 academic and lab staff at Cambridge, none are black, and only 34 are Asian.

This lack of academic prowess was, of course, also blamed on the ubiquitous “white racism.”

The British National Party utterly rejects the endless allegation that whites are to blame for every ill affecting any other community. Each year, tens of thousands of white British students are turned down for admission into the university of their choice, but do not endlessly blame this on mythical racial conspiracies.

The time has come to break the cycle of “whites are to blame” and firmly re-establish the rules of decency, fair play and common sense.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the BNP website

US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

Leaked US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

The British National Party World Newsroom

David Cameron knows about the huge terrorist threat posed to Britain by immigration from Pakistan, according to a leaked US diplomatic cable, but has refused to do anything about the problem.

According to a US cable released in the flurry of leaked documents by the Wikileaks website, Mr Cameron told a visiting delegation of US senators in 2008 that 60,000 individuals travel to Pakistan from the UK each year and that this has implications for the UK's own significant domestic "terror threat."

According to a Centre for Social Cohesion report, the “Security Service estimates that over 2,000 people in the UK pose a terrorist threat and in March 2005 it was estimated that there were up to 200 al-Qaeda trained operatives in the UK.”

According to the report, the “British-based threat does not only affect the UK: a number of British Muslims have been convicted in foreign courts or have fought for (or trained with) terrorist or extreme Islamist groups abroad.

“The most common country of heritage for Britain’s Muslim population, in recent years” was identified in the report as Pakistan.

Quoting Osama Nazir, a senior member of the Pakistani terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed and associate of 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer, the report said that between 2001 and 2005 over 300 Muslims from Britain “of Pakistani origin had visited Pakistan to attend training camps and enrol for suicide bomb missions.”

Furthermore, in November 2008 the Security Service revealed that over 4,000 “British Muslims” had attended terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

According to a Heritage Foundation report titled “The Pakistan–Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States”, published in November 2009, the “Pakistan–Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States.”

According to that report, Pakistan needs to be held “accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism.

“There is a terror connection between Pakistan and Great Britain. Many of the planned or successful Islamist attacks in Britain have been linked directly or indirectly to Pakistan ... This threat includes both terrorist attacks and the financial and ideological networks that support and inspire attacks,” the Heritage Foundation said.

Despite all of this and Mr Cameron’s own knowledge of the situation, the ConDem government has done nothing to halt the flood of Pakistanis entering Britain.

The Cameron government’s failure to address this issue is one which borders on the criminally negligent, and exposes ordinary Britons to the threat of terrorism in their own country.

The British National Party advocates a clampdown on immigration and a neutral foreign policy as the only way to bring the internal terrorist threat under control.

The ever present international Islamist threat needs to be contained in countries with large Muslim populations, and all steps necessary must be taken to avoid Britain becoming one of those nations.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

UK Govt ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

The British National Party Newsroom 

The ConDem regime has fully adopted the principle of anti-white male employment discrimination by endorsing the Equality Act promoted through Parliament by the last Labour government.

Making the announcement that the law will proceed as planned, ConDem “equalities minister” and Liberal Democrat MP Lynne Featherstone said that the law was about “making the workplace fairer.”

In reality, the law says that employers (which will include the state, where the guidelines will be rigorously enforced) will now be allowed to employ non-whites, homosexuals, lesbians, transgenders or another group over white males without being sued, even if those white males are equally qualified for the position.

In an attempt to make the vicious anti-white law more “acceptable,” the crazed social Marxists who dreamed up this latest scheme have included white women in the category of people to whom preference can be given, implying that businesses actively discriminate against them and all the aforementioned groups.

It is thus another form of the “blame whitey” syndrome, which is drawn from a worldview which intrinsically views whites (and white males in particular) as all-powerful, all-controlling wire-pullers who appear to do little else in society except continually try and put down everyone else.

The new law will come into effect from April next year and formal guidance will be published early in the new year.

Ms Featherstone was quoted as saying that the “positive action in recruitment and promotion processes” would be applied “when faced with candidates of equal merit, to address under-representation in the workforce.”

David Green, director of think-tank Civitas, said in his reaction that the law “imposed illiberal requirements on employers.

“For centuries liberals have fought for individuals to be judged on their own merits not according to their class or race,” Mr Green said.

“The Government is now to require employers to discriminate on grounds of “group identity”, not personal qualities.”

* It comes as no surprise that the Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties have endorsed the Labour Party bill. Observers have pointed out that both those parties unanimously voted in favour of the law when it was read just prior to the closing of the last parliamentary session before the election.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party Website website.

 

The Nuremberg Laws (Words That Changed History Series,) 

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Larger than in Pakistan

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Bigger than in Pakistan

  David Hannam The British National Party Newsroom

The colonisation of Britain by Islam is reflected in the dramatic growth in shariah law schools and courts, but nowhere better illustrated by the fact that the Islamic banking sector in this country is now bigger than in Pakistan.

The UK has five shariah-compliant banks which offer discriminatory no-interest transactions to Muslims — while British people face increasing interest burdens on banking transactions.

Recently, the International Financial Services London revealed that Britain’s Islamic banking sector is bigger than that of Pakistan.

There are also 55 colleges and professional institutions which offer education in Islamic finance, more than anywhere else in the world.

The growth of Islamic finance has been helped in recent years by the Government. The Government has extended discriminatory tax relief on shariah-compliant mortgages to companies.

These tax reliefs completely discriminate against the British non-Muslim population, who receive no such benefits.

As if these facts were not evidence enough of the spread of Islam in Britain, other statistics dealing with the growth of Islamic schools, Muslim birth rates and increasing numbers of shariah courts have accentuated the colonisation of our country.

For example, figures released by the Department of Education and Skills there around 126 Muslim schools in Britain. 

The think tank ‘Policy Exchange’ has recently warned that Muslim schools were allowing militant Jihadists to indoctrinate young Muslims, while the BBC programme Panorama came under fire recently for exposing anti-Semitic and shariah law teachings at Muslim Schools across Britain.

Many Islamic schools insist that girls wear the burka or a full headscarf and veil known as the niqab.

Earlier this year, statistics from the Office for National Statistics revealed that Mohammad was the most popular boy’s name in Britain, another sure sign of the huge racial demographic change occurring in Britain today.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the decades-old Sacred Heart School in Blackburn was to be handed over to Blackburn’s Tauheedul mosque and re-opened with a new name after the number of Muslim pupils rocketed from just 7 percent in 2000 to 97 percent last year.

Last year, think-tank Civitas revealed that there were at least 85 shariah courts operating in Britain, but added that the number could be significantly higher.

Shariah law allows the beating and enslavement of women, the punishment of rape victims and in some extreme cases, the killing of non-Muslims,

In contrast to all the other political parties, the British National Party is the only organisation dedicated to preventing the colonisation of Britain by Islam.

The BNP would address the core of the issue, which is massive Third World immigration, first. Once steps have been taken to ensure that the indigenous British population remains the majority population of this nation, then a BNP government would take steps to prevent all the outward manifestations of Islamic colonisation.

These steps will include a halt to the discriminatory Islamic banking industry, to which the Labour and Tory regimes have pandered by issuing tax reliefs on Islamic mortgages while the indigenous British people receive no help at all.

The BNP will also prevent the existence of Islamic schools within Britain. They are a breeding ground for militant Islam which educates young Muslims to recognise the second class ‘dhimmi’ status of non-Muslims.

The BNP will also prevent the establishment of shariah courts in Britain. British law should be the only law system recognised in our country.

In short, Britain has a choice: be overrun by Islam and the Third World, or vote in a British National Party government. The choice is as clear as it is simple.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running cost of the British National Party Website
Christianity in danger: As Islam threatens ; the five whys

Keep Greenwich Mean Time in The UK

Keep Greenwich Mean Time

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

DECEMBER 2010: 
THE Daily Mail's campaign to stop Greenwich Mean Time from being abolished and being replaced all year round by Central European Time, has led to a big mailbag for the MEP \nick Griffin.

 Many constituents in Nick's North West constituency are worried that if GMT is abolished it will mean darkness in the north of the United Kingdom until around 9.45am during winter time, and daylight during the summer until 11.pm.
This is of primary concern to parents of young children who will have to send them to school in darkness during the winter and will have to encourage them to go to bed while it's still light in the summer.
Relying on behalf of the MEP, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Putting the clock forward in March and back in October - spring forward and fall back - was basically designed so that we can better enjoy the longer daylight hours in the summer. Without daylight savings much of the morning sun would be wasted as most people are still asleep. As you rightly point out, a change to Central European Time would impact particularly negatively on people who live in the North, who would lose this extra daylight time.
Mr Griffin believes that Greenwich Mean Time should be retained and has registered his support for the campaign."

Political Correct insanity Say No To Hobbit Racism!

Say No To Hobbit Racism! 

By the Shropshire Patriot. 

And just when you thought the P.C brigade could not get any worse,
Peter Jackson's already troubled Hobbit film has become embroiled in accusations of racism after an extra claimed she was told she was too dark to play one of the diminutive Tolkien creatures.
Briton Naz Humphreys, who has Pakistani heritage, attended a casting session in Hamilton, New Zealand, last week and stood in line for three hours only to be told her skin tone was not suitable.
The Waikato Times said video footage from the audition showed the casting manager telling people they were looking for light-skinned people to play Hobbits.
He reportedly tells the would-be Hobbits: 'I'm not trying to be... whatever. It's just the brief. You've got to look like a Hobbit.'
Ms Humphreys, who is in New Zealand on a working holiday with her husband, told the newspaper: 'It's 2010 and I still can't believe I'm being discriminated against because I have brown skin.

'Wrong skintone': Naz Humphreys attended a casting session in New Zealand but after standing in line for three hours was told her colour wasn't suitable for a Hobbit

'The casting manager basically said they weren't having anybody who wasn't pale-skinned.'
The would-be extra, who is just under 5ft tall, had hoped for a bit part in The Hobbit - a two-part prequel to the Oscar-winning Lord Of The Rings films.
But she has now set up a Facebook group called Hire hobbits of all colours! Say no to hobbit racism!

KNOW YOUR HOBBITS

There were originally three different breeds of Hobbit. Over time, due to inter-species relations, the gene pool became more mixed...

• Fallohides: Fair skin and hair, taller and slimmer than others. Frodo and Bilbo Baggins were part Fallohide.
  
• Stoors: Broader and heavier built than other Hobbits - and their hands and feet were larger. Often lived near water or flat land.
• Harfoots: Smallest of the Hobbits, they had browner skin. They did not grow beards or wear boots.

They all look kind of homogenised beige and all derived from the Caucasian gene pool.
A spokesman for Peter Jackson said he was unaware of the casting restriction and described it as an 'incredibly unfortunate error'.

UK Liberals Delusions of ‘Endless Population Growth’ is Unsustainable

Liberal Delusion of ‘Endless Population Growth’ is Unsustainable

The British National Party Newsroom

The liberal delusion of ‘endless population growth’ is economically and environmentally unsustainable, as a population aiming towards 70 million, all scrabbling for decent jobs, homes, congested roads, overcrowded schools and overstretched hospitals proves, writes British National Party correspondent Maid of Kent.

Responding to the highly popular article “Not Fraud, but Demographic Reality: A BNP Supporter’s Review of the “Battle for Barking” Documentary” by fellow correspondent Edith, Maid of Kent went on to point out that the official population statistics were made up by the “liars and thieves” in Westminster and could not be trusted.

Her full article is as follows:

Well done "Edith" for pointing out some radical, but common sense, truths - isn't it strange that common sense and the truth seems radical these days?

Unfortunately people tend to take the latest official 'figures' on immigration and accept them, without giving any thought to the compound effect of those figures.

They hear that perhaps 1 million immigrants entered Britain between 2007 and 2010, but forget about the 1 million who entered between 2004 and 2006 and the other 1 million that entered between 2000 and 2003, and so on and so forth.

Adding all of those odd millions up, they would be astounded to find that Britain may have absorbed 15 million immigrants since 1945, with the majority from alien and incompatible countries and cultures.

People also don't realise that all of the immigrants, right from 1945 onwards, have stayed and produced families — non-British families.

So if we have had 15 million immigrants to Britain since 1945, the number of immigrant descended people in Britain today will be several multiples of this original 15 million.

No wonder that large areas of our country resemble foreign lands and even so called non-enriched areas are beginning to see a noticeable difference.

I realise that the figure of 15 million immigrants sounds exaggerated, but consider a couple of points.

First, the population of Britain 'officially' increased by more than 2 million people in the seven years between 2001 and 2008.

This is what is termed a 'net' increase, meaning that if 1 million native Britons left this country and 3 million Third World immigrants came here, the result is a 2 million net increase.

What matters to those of us left here is the end figure of 3 million immigrants from alien and incompatible cultures.

We don't see the replacement of 1 million of our native Britons with 1 million Third World immigrants as a neutral 'swap', as the traitorous politicians from the Lib/Lab/Con do.

These 'net' increase figures do not count illegal immigrants either, so this 'official 2 million “growth” could quite easily be increased by another 1 million.

Taking a longer view, Britain's population has 'officially' increased by 12 million since 1950 — again a 'net' increase which takes no account of Britons leaving their homeland.

Taking these lost Britons into account plus illegal immigrants, and the figure of 15 million immigrants is easily achieved.

Secondly, bear in mind that we are fed 'official' population statistics — fed to us by the thieves and liars who have been in Westminster for the last 6 decades — so I would recommend taking them with a pinch of salt.

When it is considered that the major supermarkets met with Tony Blair because they needed to build huge storage depots for the 80 million people living in the UK that they needed to feed, then there seems to be a large discrepancy between the 'official' population of 60 million then and the 80 million whom the supermarkets fed, a 20 million discrepancy, in fact.

Looking around me, I know whose figures I believe.

Your accurate assessment of what has happened in Barking and what will happen in the rest of Britain is spot on "Edith," and as you truthfully and painfully point out, this will happen even if immigration was totally halted today.

However, the really 'radical' idea in your post "Edith" is your accurate observation that smaller is better, smaller populations mean more for the people living in a country.

With a finite amount of resources available, fewer people in a country means that those resources are spread less thinly, which means more for everyone.

This idea is so 'radical' because it is the opposite of what people in the west have been told for many years by capitalists and their paid for political puppets in the Lib/Lab/Con parties, who have fed us their ideology of constant growth.

As we are now seeing in the west — indeed the whole world — constant growth in any area is not sustainable when we are confined to one planet.

We have seen the effects of this unsustainable constant growth in this country and have ended up with a population of 70+ million all scrabbling for decent jobs, homes and lives. Our roads are congested, our schools crowded, hospitals overstretched, all the results of 'constant growth'.

It has become more apparent that constant growth is economically unsustainable. There is a shortage of jobs for the numbers wanting them and low wages/high taxes for the employed.

It is also ecologically unsustainable. There is not enough food, water, energy, housing, public services etc., to go around.

Ordinary people are beginning to realise that they have been lied to for years and that they have not benefited, but those who fed them the lie have reaped the harvest for themselves.

Our 'prosperity' over the last few decades has all been built on the constant growth ideology, and nothing else.

This has been fed by a number of scams engineered by the Lib/Lab/Con politicians:

- The benefits scam has allowed people to live their whole lives at the expense of the taxpayer. Although never earning a penny, the politicians enabled the workshy to spend freely in the shops, keeping up the constant growth in the High Street.

- The mass importation of ‘cheap’ labour from the Third World to drive wages down, which creates more 'growth' in their massaged figures. These figures only included taxes paid by these immigrants, and never the total costs of mass immigration incurred by the taxpayer.

- The creation of a housing shortage which increased the 'value' of houses. With this increased 'value,' you've got it: more 'growth.'

The whole economy of the West has been built on a flawed and dishonestly manipulated ideology — and it is now falling apart.

The politicians from the Lib/Lab/Con, who have swamped our country with people from all over the world —against our wishes and to our detriment — and their big business 'friends' who pay them handsomely to betray the British people, are the only ones who benefit from this constant growth ideology.

Whether people believe me or not — I ask anyone to show me a politician from these parties who has financially suffered the way that the British people are now suffering.

I cannot think of one.

Well done again Edith.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the BNP website.

African Monetary Zone Integration: Final Step in the EU’s Plan for the Destruction of Europe Revealed

African Integration: Final Step in the EU’s Plan for the Destruction of Europe Revealed

The British Natrional Party world Newsroom

The European Union seeks to fully integrate all of Africa into the European monetary zone by 2050, its president Jose Manuel Barroso has announced. This move will inevitably lead to full political integration as well.

The plan, revealed at the EU-Africa Summit held this week in Tripoli, Libya, seeks to create an expanded Eurozone into Africa which will add another 2.5 billion people from 80 African countries into a “new alliance between Europe and Africa,” European Commission president Mr Barroso said.

“We have come to Tripoli with the fascinating long-term perspective of a Euro-African economic area in mind, an area which will provide opportunities for 2.5 billion citizens by 2050,” Mr Barroso, who is a “former” member of the Portuguese Communist Party, said.

“The economic and financial crisis is not over yet. But as we work to emerge from it, new avenues for Africa and Europe to restore and accelerate growth are opened,” he added.

The recent crisis in Greece and the ongoing crises in Ireland and Spain show the Eurozone does not even function effectively within Europe.

The primary reason for the Eurozone malfunction within Europe are the differences in economic output and makeup in these European nations, which leads to discordances in debt levels, trade figures and other critical economic indicators.

The vast disparities between African economies and European economies make a combined currency zone utter madness.

In fact, the economies of most African states make Greece look like some perfectly functioning Swiss Bank.

Africa is the world's poorest inhabited continent. Of the 175 countries reviewed in the United Nations' Human Development Report 2003, 25 African nations ranked lowest amongst the nations of the world.

The African Economic Outlook, an annual reference book-journal which focuses on the economics of most African countries, is published by the OECD Development Centre and the African Development Bank.

This journal pointed out that the economies of China and India have grown rapidly, and Latin America has experienced moderate growth, while Africa, in contrast, “has stagnated and even regressed in terms of foreign trade, investment, per capita income, and other economic growth measures.”

The African economic disaster runs contrary to modern economic theory, which claims that increased population growth and urbanisation leads to economic development.

In Africa, precisely the opposite has happened. By any measure, endemic warfare, unrest, corruption, despotic regimes and poverty have increased in Africa, and not decreased.

All of Africa (encompassing 52 countries including the relatively better-off North African Arab states and the minority white population of South Africa) has a gross domestic product (GDP, nominal) of only $1.2 billion (2008 figures supplied by the International Monetary Fund).

This equates to 2 percent of the world’s total GDP of around $60 billion.

Europe’s GDP (nominal), by contrast, stood in 2008 at $22.2 billion, nearly a quarter of the world’s total GDP.

To make matters worse, there is no correlation in Africa between natural resources and quality of life. Angola, for example, has large diamond and oil resources, but is a textbook case of poverty and destruction.

African nations dominate the lower reaches of the UN Human Development Index. Infant mortality is high, while life expectancy, literacy, and education are all low.

Although liberals have tried to invent many excuses for the ongoing disaster in Africa (mostly consisting of blaming whites for “colonisation”), the reality is that the primary cause of Africa’s backwardness is the astoundingly low IQ levels prevalent on that continent.

As discussed in the June 2005 issue of Psychology, Public Policy and Law, a journal of the American Psychological Association, the average IQ in sub-Saharan Africa is 70.

Bearing in mind that this is the average, this figure means that half of all Africans have an IQ below 70. Most of those scoring above 70 will be clustered in the 70-80 range, with the rest flattening out sharply as the IQ rises (as is the case with all IQ ‘bell curve’ graphs).

The shocking meaning of this statistic takes on an added dimension when posited against the definitions of IQ levels as detailed in a psychology-industry standard handbook, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), issued by the American Psychiatric Association in 1994.

According to that book, an IQ of between 71 and 84 is officially classified as “borderline intellectual functioning” while an IQ below 70 is officially classified as “mild mental retardation.”

In their book, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Dr Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, and Dr Tatu Vanhanen, Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, found that differences in national income (in the form of per capita gross domestic product) correlate with differences in the average national intelligence quotient (IQ).

The European Commission’s plan to integrate all of Africa into the Eurozone is the precursor to full political integration, as has already been mapped out in Europe.

This move, along with the equally insane mass immigration policies pursued by all the governing parties in Europe, will ensure that Europe will die — unless patriots from all European nations act together to avoid this catastrophe.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the British National Party website

NICK Griffin MEP Has Pledged his Support Letter of support for our Metric Martyrs

Letter of support for our Metric Martyrs

  Martin Wingfield at Nick griffin MEP Euro News

DECEMBER 2010: 
NICK Griffin has pledged his support to the Metric Martyrs Royal Pardon Campaign in a letter to Neil Herron.


 The MEP for the North West of England wrote:
"I am pleased to confirm that I have signed your Campaign Postcard and sent this to the Prime Minister, David Cameron.
"I support your organisation’s efforts to protect and preserve the British way of life, and to win justice for the brave individuals who have shown true courage in standing up for their beliefs.
"It is outrageous that ordinary British tradesmen should be criminalised simply for daring to assert their right to sell goods according to our traditional weights and measures. Resistance however, to the new 'harmonised' European order cannot be tolerated by any Government that is committed to remaining with the EU, which is why such draconian action has been taken against the Metric Martyrs.
"Unfortunately, successive British Governments have been content to bow to the increasing might of the European Union, an Orwellian super-state that is dedicated to usurping British sovereignty and to destroying our national identity. By degrees, it is depriving
our people of their inherited right to determine their affairs in their own traditional and democratically elected Parliament.
"Today, 75% of our laws are made in the EU and over 120,000 directives and regulations are in force in Britain.
"The governing party at Westminster is so restricted by EU rules and regulations that there is hardly an area of policy where the British parliament remains entirely sovereign. I’m afraid I do not hold out much hope therefore, that David Cameron will actually honour his pledge to "free our society of unnecessary laws and regulations", but I wish you well in your organisation’s endeavours to persuade him to do so.
"I believe the only effective way to ensure that justice, fairness and British commonsense prevails is for Britain to withdraw immediately from the European Union. Only then can our independence, national sovereignty and cultural identity be restored and preserved."

Wikileaks-leaked US Embassy Cable Quotes Warmonger William Hague: ‘Tories Share Labour’s Policy’

US Embassy Cable Quotes Warmonger William Hague: ‘Tories Share Labour’s Policy’

 The British National Party national newsroom

A Wikileaks-leaked US Embassy cable from 2008 quoted Tory Foreign Secretary William Hague assuring visiting American senators that his party “shared the Labour foreign policy agenda” in waging war on Afghanistan.

The revelation, which has confirmed that there is in fact no difference at all between Labour and Tories, also showed that the only reason why the Tory government had not committed more troops to Iraq was political, or, as Mr Hague explained, “the moment had passed.”

The meeting, held in David Cameron’s office while he was Leader of the Opposition on 20 March 2008, included US Senators John McCain, Joseph Lieberman and Lindsey Graham, accompanied by Senate staff Richard Fontaine and Dan Serchuk, Poloff Kirsten Schulz and the American ambassador in London.

The Tory attendees were listed as Mr Cameron, Mr Hague, George Osborne, Liam Fox, Michael Howard, Dame Pauline Neville-Jones and Chief of Staff Edward Llewellyn.

The cable said that “Hague noted the Conservatives largely share the Labour foreign policy agenda.”

It continued: “Cameron said Prime Minister Brown did not have the political support to increase the British troop presence in Iraq, saying ‘that moment has passed.’

“Hague seconded Cameron's assessment,” the cable said.

Significantly, Mr Cameron then asked Senator McCain if British plans for a withdrawal from Iraq should continue, “given that [Her Majesty’s Government] HMG could not both maintain a presence in Iraq and build up its role in Afghanistan.”

The cable went on to spell this out in detail: “Cameron told McCain that he and his party focused on Afghanistan as the key foreign police issue.

“This was due, not least, to the timeline for when the Conservatives might come into office (2010 or 2009 at the earliest) and the fact that British troops were meant to be out of Iraq by then.”

This comment reveals two things about the Tories: firstly, Mr Cameron in effect admitted that British foreign policy is dictated by American policy, and secondly that the “withdrawal from Iraq” was in fact merely an excuse to redeploy in greater strength in Afghanistan — and not a desire to end British involvement in foreign wars.

In response, Senator McCain said he understood that the then Prime Minister Gordon Brown “intended to withdraw British troops prior to the next election.”

The cable then quoted Mr Hague as saying that “Brown politically could not do otherwise,” confirming once again that the issue of party popularity was being put before the lives and interests of British soldiers.

* The cable also revealed that the Tories had been slavishly pursuing another American foreign policy aim since 2006, namely that of “pushing” for economic sanctions against Iran.

In response to a demand from Senator McCain that “Europe cut off all credit to Iran,” Mr Hague said “he and the Conservatives had been pushing for this for the last two years,” the cable said.

“Hague and Cameron alleged that the release of the National Intelligence Assessment had set back this effort,” it said.

The National Intelligence Assessment (NIA) to which Mr Hague referred was a report from the US’s Director of National Intelligence (DNI) which proved that Iran had no nuclear weapons, as continually alleged by the neo-con establishment of which the Conservative Party is firmly part.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the british National Party website

Not Fraud, but Demographic Reality: A BNP Supporter’s Review of the “Battle for Barking” Channel 4 Documentary

Not Fraud, but Demographic Reality: A BNP Supporter’s Review of the “Battle for Barking” Documentary

  |  BNP News

Demographic change which propelled the non-white portion of the Barking electorate to 50 percent was the reason why the Labour Party won that election, writes regular British National Party website commentator “Edith.”

I have just watched "The Battle For Barking" on Channel 4 oD — what a dramatic film, very well made, and if the director intended to present the BNP badly she failed. In fact, I think she intended to tell the truth, and the truth showed that we are decent and honest, with no slick PR systems and vast funds like Labour — and that we are addressing a very real problem not an imaginary one. 

The main thing though, after the sheer pleasure of watching all our leaders and supporters working so hard and being so calm, courageous and funny in spite of all the aggro, is a terrible mathematical reality which propelled me to look up some statistics.

In 2001 the official population of the UK was 59 million.

Of this 4.6 million was non-white — that is 8 per cent and did not seem too alarming at the time to most of us.

However, if we had looked closer, we would have been alarmed because in 1991 the non-white population was 3 million.

So 1.6 million had been added in ten years. In fact, it was probably double that unofficially but 1.6 million is already quite enough to be a prediction of doom given the ability of humans to multiply. 

There are no census figures for any year later than 2001.

But taking the borough of Barking and Dagenham, its Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic  (BAME) population leapt from 8 percent in 2001 to an estimated 40 percent in 2008, and probably 50 percent by 2010.

(Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic - BAME, this is Labour's pet and the Tories will compete for its affection too once it gets dominant in more constituencies). 

What happened? The electorate is now 73,000 instead of 58,000 in 2005 — but that is because 3 wards were added to the constituency of Barking adding 21,000 electors and taking off a few thousand from a 4th ward —  and none of the new wards was any less "white" than the rest of Barking.

So what happened? The same thing that is happening or about to happen all over the UK.

A lot of elderly white people died. Anyone white of any age who could get out, got out of Barking and went somewhere where non-whites are still 8 percent (but they went with a sinking feeling that this won't stay at 8 percent for long).

A lot of white people didn't have 5 or 6 children in 1991 or before, and lot of non-white residents and non-white newcomers had 5 or 6 children in 1991 or before, and those children were 18 or older by 2010. 

That is how the BAME population of Barking became at least 50 percent, so the BAME proportion of the electorate would also be at least 50 percent.

Thus Labour won with ease — and would have won even if every white person in Barking had voted Tory, or every white person had voted BNP. 

In the UK, the white population is falling (if you discount immigration), as white people have less children and older white people die (this is happening all over Western Europe actually, if you discount immigration).

This could create a blissful situation where our population is once again sustainable (around 30 or 40 million).

It is starting to happen in Japan now because Japan does not allow much immigration — and contrary to stupid press reports, it is going to make life in Japan much better for everybody (especially the young) by reducing overpopulation dramatically and giving Japanese children a decent life of full employment, low prices, plentiful housing, etc. at the small “cost” of having to look after their own family in old age for a very short while. 

But, at the moment all governments are smashing our happiness and well-being to pieces by encouraging millions of immigrants to not only keep the population at 60 million but vastly increase it to 70 million and beyond.

They are robbing all our children of a future, whether they go to university or not. Why? It is criminal — genocidal in effect, whether the genocide is intended or not. 

I think quite a lot of people still haven't quite understood that what has happened to Barking is going to happen to the whole UK even if immigration stops totally from today.

It seems too fantastic, when white Britons formed 92 per cent of the population in 2001.

But Barking was a majority white constituency in 2001.

Look at it now, ten years later. And no-one did anything — a bit of electoral register shenanigans maybe — but it wasn't mainly down to fraud.

It just seems like fraud because the reality is too hard to believe.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs

The Alabama Rose Letter from America, Mass Complacency

The Alabama Rose Letter from America,
Mass Complacency
I get so frustrated sometimes with the mass complacency! Argh!....

I know I Was not meant to be a mindless follower yet we are corralled and treated like mindless sheep! Oh I am so tired of the...e oppression..the most frightening part is that most commoners are more insightful than the average politician...the only thing that sets the two apart is fear! What they don' seem to understand is that their lack of action is swiftly designing a society that they will need to fear MUCH more than ANYTHING that exists now! I pray each night before I close my eyes not for the current powers that be , for I liken them to a monolith of stone...one mind, a heart as hard as stone and so dense that they may only be altered if completely demolished!
Who I pray for is you, me , the store clerk with 3 young children. I pray for them to come to terms with their own unhappiness and rather than spend time spinning the rodent exercise wheel of finger pointing, just have one true moment of clarity and claim responsibility. It is a cleansing thing as much as that of any confession. We must admit that although most of all the folks controlling our lives are blind deaf and dumb, at some point we must accept with great acceptance , that we have become deaf dumb and blind as well! We simply live on opposite sides of the coin! We are blind by their rhetoric and flashy propaganda. We have become deaf to their sly agendas that they slip into law under our very noses and dumb, yes the one we are most guilty of.... If your 3 of your children were killed on the street in front of your house, how long would it tale the average parent to march to their local offices and demand to have speed bumps put in place to force drivers to slow down to protect the safety of the innocents? It would be dumb not to, right? The point is this. We would never get used to the idea of our children being slaughtered in front of our own home right? You say RIGHT! However, how many of our children have been slaughtered in Iraq, Afghanistan etc. Yet still no mass storming of the politicians!
NO ONE WILL MAKE THE CHANGES BUT US!!!!!!! THE CHANGES WILL NOT BE MADE WITHOUT US!!!!! We are two of the most powerful nations in the world! Who makes us that way? It is we of course! The regular folks. It is irrational to think that a hand full of men in political offices are responsible for the power and strength of an entire Nation! No. ! We are the power of our Nations... Our blood sweat and tears, our sacrifices and our children who march! Be afraid to fight out against a hand full of tired old men and a few women who preach power? Or be afraid of the entire population of your country who REALLY HAS THE POWER AND CHOOSES TO DO NOTHING WITH IT? That is what is frightening and fearful... And the knowledge of our complacency is the FEAT ON WHICH THE EVIL FEW FUEL THEIR PERCEIVED POWER! We must feed ourselves this fuel and stand ready for battle! I shall be tired nor fear no more! Whose with me? Then be with yourself first...

Latest BNP News Stop the Bletchley Park Mosque Demonstration in Full Swing

Stop the Bletchley Park Mosque Demonstration in Full Swing

  BNP News at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The British National Party’s campaign to halt the building of a mosque in Bletchley Park to prevent the further Islamic colonisation of Buckinghamshire is in full swing with a growing public demonstration forming at the venue, reports Eastern Region press officer and Milton Keynes organiser Kieren Trent.

Speaking to BNP News from the scene this afternoon, Mr Trent said that support “is growing at the demonstration against the proposed mosque in Bletchley.

“Local residents are fully behind the local BNP campaign to encourage the local council to refuse planning permission for a pub to be turned into a mosque,” Mr Trent said.

Although Bletchley Park is best known for its World War II role in breaking the German Enigma codes, the estate was formerly part of the Manor of Eaton, which was noted in the Domesday Book of 1086. It is thus a double tragedy that this fine part of British history is threatened with colonisation, and the BNP is dedicated to preventing the same fate befalling Bletchley Park as has so many other parts of Britain

It is hoped to update this story at regular intervals.

See also: BNP to Launch Campaign against New Mosque in Bletchley, Milton Keynes

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the British National Party Website