The British National Party Unveils it's New Party Logo Emblem

British National Party Unveils New Party Logo

The BNP Newsroom

British National Party leader Nick Griffin has unveiled the party’s new official logo, a Union flag emblazoned heart with the party’s name, on the first official day of the party’s annual conference in the East Midlands.

“This logo will illustrate exactly what this party is about,” Mr Griffin told the 200-strong conference.

The logo was created after a long period of consultation with professional designers and input from the Advisory Council. It forms part of a rebrand of the party in the run-up to the next local and national elections.

The new logo will shortly officially replace the “BNP” logo and the party will also stop using the acronym “BNP” in all official logos and literature.

Delegates interviewed about the new logo were all unanimous in their support for it.

Simone Clarke said that she “loved it,” while Lisa Hicks said that “it was absolutely perfect. 

Alwyn Deacon said “I did not like the new logo to start with, but it is growing on me and the more I think about it, the more I like it.”

Derek Adams said the new logo was “good as softens the image a bit which is what we need.”

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

British National Party will Promise “Increased Militancy in Future” in it's Actions

British National Party Promises “Increased Militancy in Future”

The British National party Newsroom

The British National Party will become more militant in physically defending British troops against Islamic militant abuse and against mosque-building programs, party leader Nick Griffin has announced.

Speaking to a 120-strong audience attending a black tie dinner to launch the party’s 2010 conference in the East Midlands, Mr Griffin said that in future, the party would start acting as well as talking about protecting Britain.

“We are going to start attending homecoming parades of British troops, and when the Islamic militants abuse our troops and threaten them, we are going to physically stand in their way,” Mr Griffin said to thunderous applause from the crowd.

He also said that the party would increasingly start demonstrations against mosque-building programmes in Britain, using the recent demonstration organised by the party’s branch in Milton Keynes as an example.

“The British people have already shown that they are willing to start supporting the British National Party in increasing numbers,” Mr Griffin said.

“When we hand in the ‘bring our boys home’ petition next year, with ex-servicemen and widows in attendance, there will be around 100,000 signatures on those forms,” he said.

“It will be one of the largest anti-war petitions ever handed in, and the fact that so many people are prepared to put their names to a petition organised by the most demonised political party in British history, shows the latent support we have.

“For those who think the British National Party is going away, we have a surprise. We are here and we are here to stay,” he said to a standing ovation.

* Mr Griffin also gave the attendees a glimpse of the new party logo which will be officially unveiled during the conference itself.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

BOLTON PATRIOT: British National Party Promises “Increased Militan...

BOLTON PATRIOT: British National Party Promises “Increased Militan...: "The British National Party will become more militant in physically defending British troops against Islamic militant abuse and against mos..."

Far Leftist Marxist Hijacking of Student Protests Spotlights Vicious Media and Establishment Bias

Far Leftist Hijacking of Student Protests Highlights Vicious Media and Establishment Bias

The British National Party Newsroom

The communist and anarchist hijacking of the student protests in London — which have included a physical attack on Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall — have highlighted once again the vicious bias of the media and establishment in favour of all causes and ideology of the far left.

Time and time again the British National Party has been the subject of media infiltrations, secret filming, disruptions and subversion.

Yet never once has the BNP been responsible for mass public violence and disorder, physical attacks on the police, or, as happened yesterday again, the defilement of war memorials, statues and even a physical attack on the Royal family.

In fact, the “worst” that the BNP has ever been accused of in all of these subversive media attacks is one or two individuals making comments which are politically incorrect.

As there are members of all political parties who make politically incorrect comments from time to time (remember Tory MP Ann Winterton’s comments about Chinese people, or veteran Labour Party MP Tam Dalyell who declared in May 2003 that the British and American governments were controlled by Jews), not even that is exactly a hanging offence.

The odd non-pc comment here and there in fact pales into insignificance when compared to the street violence and criminality displayed by the far left and the “UAF” organisation.

Since August 2009, nearly 200 members of the UAF have, for example, been arrested by police for public violence, mostly for attacks on the police and members of the public.

Undeterred, the far left Socialist Workers Party (SWP) types who are behind the UAF and the Hope not Hate/Searchlight cabal have hijacked the otherwise legitimate student protests against tuition fee hikes.

Attaching themselves to the crowds of students, these far leftists have seized the opportunity to create chaos and proceed with the plans for “class war” (hence their attack on the Prince of Wales) and general anarchy.

And herein lies the rub: not once have any of these far leftist and clearly criminal organisations ever been the subject of a media investigation.

Not once has the BBC sent undercover filming crews to record internal UAF or SWP meetings to record their members making plans (which obviously include public violence).

Not once has the media trawled anarchist or far leftist websites looking for anonymous “quotes” with which to smear the UAF or the SWP.

Not once has any TV channel decided to make a “fly-on-the-wall” documentary about the far leftist anarchists who hurl petrol bombs at the police, deface statues with spray paint and desecrate the Cenotaph.

The media’s cover-up of the far left is in fact an extension of the establishment’s own approach to these criminals, as reflected in the actions of the police in the ongoing ‘student’ protest violence.

Policing authorities regularly try to disrupt BNP activities from taking place, either by placing planning objections before councils or physical intimidation of party activists on the street.

Yet, it would seem, the police freely let the far left organise in large numbers to create mayhem and public violence without even so much as a single complaint or objection, despite similar events showing a clear pattern of violence.

Why is it that the authorities “allow” the far left a free hand to literally smash up city centres, yet threaten and intimidate BNP supporters when they hold private, peaceful family gatherings on a tent in a remote field?

Without wishing to sound conspiratorial, the answer might just be that the establishment actually wants the public to be distracted by the sight of mad anarchists in London city centre.

It is just possibly the panem et circenses (‘bread and circuses”) which the establishment needs to keep the public’s eye off the real ball, namely the destruction of Britain by the EU, mass immigration and globalisation.

* It is not only in their pro-leftist coverage of current events that the media displays its true face.

When covering other news items which have an obvious ethnic angle to them, the media regularly attempt to cover up the truth with staged photographs designed to hide the truth.

So, for example, whenever the issue of knife crime is discussed, the media almost always use a staged photograph of a white youth holding a knife (see for example the Daily Mail of 28 October 2007) even though all the official statistics show that this is overwhelmingly a problem amongst the urban black population.

Similarly, whenever the problem of immigration is discussed in the media, photographs of supposed white or European immigrants are used as illustrations (see for example the Guardian of 7 December 2010, discussing non-EU student visas but showing a group of blonde-haired girls as ‘students’).

Another good example came with the Daily Mail’s coverage of 8 December 2010 of the gunshot sensor system installed in Lozells in Birmingham.

That newspaper saw fit to illustrate their article with a picture of a white man holding a gun, even though the system had been installed in an area which was 90 percent nonwhite.

These, and many other examples, show up the agenda of the mass media more than anything else. Their role in the destruction of Britain is one which has been noted and one day they must be called to account for their crimes against this nation.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

Tuition Fees Debacle: £4 Billion Slashed off University Budgets, but £20 Billion Spent on Illegal Wars

Tuition Fees Debacle: £4 Billion Cut off University Budget, but £20 Billion Spent on Illegal Wars

The British National Party Newsroom

The controlled media has refused to compare the £4 billion university budget cut — which is at the heart of the decision to raise tuition fees and the student riots in London — to the cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which have now exceeded £20 billion.

Television viewers the world over have been shown the riots on Parliament Square, but not one of the mass media outlets has dared mention the fact that the Labour, Liberal Democratic and Conservative parties have all supported far bigger expenditures on fighting illegal and unjustified wars in the Middle East than on educating British kids.

There is, of course, no excuse for scenes witnessed on television and in the media of “students” urinating on statues and attacking police.

However, the British National Party can fully understand student anger over the cuts which have led to the tuition fee increases.

According to official figures released in June this year, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost the British taxpayer more than £20 billion.

This includes £18 billion for military operations as well as “overseas development and aid” which has, as recent Wikileaks cable releases have shown, has largely been siphoned off by corrupt Afghan warlords.

The total figure of £20.34 billion does not include the salaries of soldiers or paying for their long-term injuries and mental health care.

The current unrest amongst students has its root cause in the fact that universities in England have had their subsidies cut by more than £4 billion.

The cuts have forced universities to resort to increased fees in order to make up the shortfall in public funding.

The spending review cuts announced by Chancellor George Osborne included a cut in the higher education budget from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion.

As a result of the latest vote in Parliament, universities have been granted the right to increase tuition fees from the current maximum of £3,290 a year to £9,000 per year.

In effect, this means that three quarters of students will be faced with a tripling of their education bill, with the middle classes being hardest hit, as always. In terms of subsidies and other calculations, middle class students will see their university fees rise by as much as six times the current levels.

The British National Party remains committed to the principle of the abolition of university fees.

It is nothing short of treason for the ConDem regime and its Labour Party Tweedle Dee clone to support illegal and immoral foreign wars at the expense of educating British youth.

The BNP does not endorse the violence shown at the demonstrations, but shares in the anger of students at the vicious betrayal of this nation’s interests by the criminal gangsters currently occupying the Houses of Parliament.

The time has come to make the demand “Fund Education, not War” heard loud and clear across this land.

* The education budget cuts are also a fraction of the £12 billion “foreign aid” budget, which ironically includes subsidies to educational systems in China and India.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

The problem of tolerance A letter from Amerika

The Problem of Tolerance

Dec , 2010

by Brett Stevens. at  http://www.amerika.org/

When we have individual fears, we wish the world went easier on us.
When confronted with authority, we want to find some kind of rule that means it cannot get to us, or at least that we make it really hard.
Around 1789, we started banding together and overthrowing authority. Their rule: form a hierarchy to achieve an abstract goal. Our rule: all people are equal, and people are the goal, so destroy authority.
We trashed culture, religion, aristocracy, then even the idea of government itself. Surely now we are free.
But there’s a problem. The more we smash authority and enforce tolerance, the more disorder spreads.
It turns out that not everyone is nice. Our thought progression:

1. The rich are bad. The rich are the bad.
2. The bad are the rich. The rich are the only bad.
3. We remove the rich; therefore, we’ve removed the bad.
4. Oh wait, the bad exists among We The People, too.

We have rich people and governments as a way of distinguishing leaders. If enough people bought your product, it must be good and you must be smart. If enough people voted for you, you must be doing something that’s right.
Alternatively, we could just pick our best people to rule, and we’d have to con them into it because they and only they will view it as the most serious and hardest job on earth, but that’s another topic for another day.
But instead, we’re focused on defending ourselves against The System. As individuals, we want rules that ensure we are beyond its reach. We want to weaken it however we can. It is beyond us that others will abuse these same freedoms and in the ensuing chaos, produce a worse form of social system.
There are many ways this phenomenon manifests:

• Crime. We pad our courts with rules, laws, appeals, technicalities and other means to protect us if we’re unjustly accused, which happens very rarely. What happens all the time however is career criminals, pedophiles and scammers exploiting these rules.
• Screening. First airplanes, now maybe trains and buses: we will experience the radar scan and pat-down. This means that every single person undergoes a humiliating procedure and thousands of hours are wasted, instead of doing what smarter groups do: find those likely to commit the crime and pull them out. But we can’t do that; it’s not humanistic, or fair, or equal. Human rights must trump logic, because we as individuals fear being on the wrong side of authority.
• Schools. Your child gets a terrible education in public school because (a) the course work is dumbed down so no one feels left out and (b) the school refuses to kick out troublemakers, violent kids, and special education cases who cannot “mainstream” with an ordinary class and always require more attention, yet will never use that education. We all suffer so the few unproductive ones have rights.
• Customer service. At your favorite stores, people do dumb things all the time, and some are understandable. Sometimes, the bottle of apple juice just slips out of the fingers and breaks. Other times, it’s people moving slowly, scamming the customer service returns, vandalizing packages (including the odious habit of leaving frozen goods in random aisles when they decide they no longer want to buy them) and obstructing aisles. The few again ruin the experience for the many.

Our modern world is addicted to this human rights view of reality because all of our political systems are based on it. After all, if you were oppressed and the kings were bad news, you need to have reached a Utopian state after you killed those kings. But we haven’t. So the denial spreads, and we insist further on the human rights of all people, especially to sabotage the rest of us with their selfish and delusional behavior.

MigrationWatch UK Exposes Yet another UK Government ConDem Immigration Betrayal

MigrationWatch UK Exposes Yet another ConDem Immigration Betrayal

The British National Party Newsroom

The ConDem regime’s much-vaunted “student immigration control” plans specifically exclude “short term student visas” which think tank MigrationWatch UK has correctly identified as an equally-abused illegal immigration channel.

Responding to a government announcement of a supposed “crackdown” on bogus student visas, Migrationwatch Chairman Sir Andrew Green said that short-term student visas had been made exempt from the new restrictions.

Official figures show that last year alone exactly 37,715 “non-EU” students entered Britain on these short-term visas.

“The absence of measures on student visitors is a disappointment. This route is just as likely to be abused as the longer term route,” Sir Andrew said in a statement.

“The cost of a short course in the UK is only a fraction of what a people-smuggler would charge.”

According to a briefing paper issued by Migrationwatch, there are currently over 2,250 educational institutions registered with the UK Border Agency (UKBA) who are able to sponsor students to study in the United Kingdom.

To sponsor students an institution must be an educational provider, inspected, audited or reviewed by the relevant authorities or be an accredited educational provider if it is a private organisation.

Once approved by the UKBA, a sponsor may issue a ‘Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies’ (CAS), which allows the student to then apply for leave to study in the UK.

Of the 280,000 student visas issued in 2009, 130,000 were issued to students taking qualifications below degree level, the Migrationwatch briefing continued.

Of the students studying below degree level 90,000 were at private colleges. The two largest categories, which make up 70 percent of the total number of student visas are the ‘Middle East and the Remainder of Asia’ with 112,000 (41 percent) and the ‘Indian sub-continent’ with 78,000 (29 percent) students.

“Institutions that the UKBA believes must improve their practices i.e. they are not meeting the criteria of a trusted sponsor and are a potential risk to immigration control, are still able to issue a CAS so long as they agree to make improvements by signing up to an action plan,” the Migrationwatch briefing paper said.

“An educational institution can be granted a licence without ever coming under the scrutiny of a visiting UKBA official and it is not clear what percentage of institutions actually receives a visit from the UKBA before approval.

““Even after an application has been refused, a subsequent application does not automatically require a visit from the UKBA. Applications will be considered from individuals who have been issued with civil penalties under Section 15 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006, allowing an individual previously fined for employing illegal workers to set up an educational institution with the right to grant a CAS.”

In other words, the “crackdown” is yet another half-hearted measure which will only impact slightly upon the massive influx of Third Worlders into Britain — exactly as the Westminster criminals planned it all along.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

Nick Griffin MEP To Be The British National Party's Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election Candidate

The British National Party have announced that their leader, Nick Griffin MEP will be standing in the Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election that will take place in January or February.  The by-election was brought about after Labour MP Phil Woolas was removed from his commons seat for lying during the general election campaign.  Check out these excellent videos of Mr Griffin speaking in Oldham yesterday. 

Egyptian Coptic Christians Appeal to BNP MEP for Help After Fresh Attacks by Islamists

Egyptian Copts Appeal to BNP MEP for Help After Renewed Attacks by Islamists

The British National Party Newsroom

A representative of the Coptic Egyptian community in Britain has appealed to British National Party MEP Nick Griffin to highlight the violent anti-Christian attacks in Egypt by Islamist-supporting police in Egypt, instances of which are routinely covered up by the politically-correct controlled mass media.

In a statement released by Mr Griffin’s office, he announced that he would most certainly raise the latest attack at the earliest opportunity in Parliament, coming as it does hard on the heels of similar attacks by Muslims on Christian churches on the island of Cyprus.

The appeal for Mr Griffin’s assistance in publicising the latest attack in Egypt was sent by a well-known representative of the Coptic Christian community, who said that he was “writing on behalf of some of the Egyptian Copts who live in Great Britain. We are very concerned for the life and safety of our Christian brothers who live in fear under constant persecution from the State of Egypt.

“In the small hours of Wednesday morning 24th November 2010, the Egyptian Police opened fire on Christian worshippers who were staying overnight in a new building that they had built to use for services and prayers,” the letter continued.

“One person was killed instantly and two others died two days later in hospital. Over 64 people were injured, some seriously, and 165 people were detained by Police.

“The incident happened in Al-Omraneya near Cairo where there is a high concentration of Christian population. For the last 10 years the Christian residents there have been trying to obtain a license to build a church, but without success.

“To get around the obstacle of building a church, they obtained permission to build a four-storey building with the intention of using part of it to gather for prayers.

“The council’s Health and Safety department advised them to add to the original plan an escape stairwell, which they did.

“The building was almost complete when an inspection by another department from the council found the new stairwell added to the original plan which they said was in breach of the original license.

“A meeting was conducted with the Governor who, in an act of deception, advised the Christians that he was happy with the current building and would approve it,” the appeal said.

“It was the night of that same day in which the Christians found that the building was surrounded by thousands of policemen and saw demolition equipment on standby near the building.

“Seeing that months of their hard work was about to be demolished, they gathered inside the building to stop the demolition. The Police fired at them tear gas, plastic bullets and live ammunition.

“The Christians trapped inside the building and surrounded by thousands of policemen responded to the bullets by throwing bricks and stones at the Police. The Police closed in on the building shouting Allah Akbar! (Allah is Great), kill the infidels.

“They attacked the people with such savage brutality that many of them will live with disabilities for the rest of their lives. They ransacked the building, looting the donation box and altar vessels, threw the Holy Bible on the ground and stamped on it, and burned the icons.

“The police acted in exactly the same way that Muslim terrorists act,” the letter continued.

“The following morning the state-run media gave a completely different version of events. They accused the Christians of rioting and attacking the police. This wrong version of events spread to the international media.

“The Attorney General of Egypt announced that the Christians who defended themselves will face the full force of the Law. Nothing, however, was done to the police who were seen on video firing live ammunition, killing and injuring many people.

“A few days prior to these events, Muslim mobs had torched and burned to the ground over twenty Christian houses, also killing their farm animals, in the village of Nawahed at Qena province, in southern Egypt.

“The Christians gave the police the names of the perpetrators. However, the police decided that no one was responsible and that the fires, which affected only Christian houses, were merely an accident.

“These recent incidents and countless others, for which no one has been held responsible, prove the long held suspicion that many of the attacks on Christians are masterminded by the security forces in an attempt to drive the Christians to leave their homeland and live in foreign countries.

“In a way it is a slow, covert process of ethnic cleansing.

“Once again the incident of Al Omranya highlights the plight of the Coptic Christians in their own country. Despite the fact that the Copts are the indigenous people of Egypt, they are discriminated against, persecuted and killed by the Muslim majority, in collaboration with the police and with the blessing of the Egyptian government.

“Despite the fact that sectarian violence in Egypt is increasing with alarming severity, the British Government remains silent on the issue.

“We, the Christians of Egypt, are in need of help from every person and every country who cares for the values of freedom and human rights.

“The President and the government of Egypt will not act to protect Christians unless they realise that their acts to hide the truth from the eyes of the world are no longer working and that their devious acts are exposed.

“I hope you will be able to raise these issues in the European Parliament. I hope the European Parliament will be able to exert maximum pressure on the Egyptian Government to face up to its obligations to comply with the international conventions and laws on religious freedoms and human rights.

“Thank you for taking the time to listen to our concerns,” the letter concluded.

Mr Griffin said that this sort of treatment was fairly typical in majority Muslim countries.

“These events should serve as a wake-up call for Christians in Britain who think that they will be treated any differently if the establishment succeeds with its plan to colonise those country with Islamics,” Mr Griffin said.

* The Copts are native Egyptian Christians whose ancestors come from the original ancient Egyptians, who embraced Christianity in the first centuries after Christ.

The Copts became a minority in Egypt after Muslim armies from Saudi Arabia conquered that land by violence in the 7th century and today make up just over 5 percent of the population of Egypt.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of te British National Party  website.

The Uk Tory Party Break Up : You Read It Here

The Conservative Party Break Up : You Read It Here First

Written by

DATE_FORMAT_LC2 at The VBR Site

In his Mail On Sunday column of 4th December, Peter Hitchens wrote:- ‘The monstrous birth of a new Liberal Conservative Party is now certain’. Hitchens goes on, ‘A few weeks ago I drew attention to the amazing remarks of Francis Maude, a close ally of David Cameron, who said he would prefer a coalition to a Tory majority after the next Election. I am sure Mr Cameron agrees with this. Now, Sir John (Major) – another close Cameron ally – has called for a permanent alliance of two of our three parties against the people of Britain’. Major ‘explained the attraction of coalitions – to politicians: ‘Two parties are more likely to enjoy a tolerant electorate for policies that are painful.’ …Or, in other words, that a coalition can ram through unpopular policies (Mr Major is an expert on those) more easily than one-party governments.’ The realignment of British Politics suggested by Hitchens and quite probably the break-up of the Tory Party with its traditionalist wing hiving off, was foretold in the forerunner of this Website ‘The Home of the Green Arrow and Friends’ in an article posted on 5th July entitled ‘Sigmund Freud and the BNP.’   There, in a discussion of the way groups of varying sizes deal with internal dissensions, it was stated that:- ‘By way of contrast, the Tory Party is somewhere further down Freud’s spectrum of difference. It is obviously much larger than the BNP and for historical reasons has always been something of a coalition of interests. The differences between these interests have not been  perceived  so large, at least compared to the party’s main oppositions, as to occasion splits.  So the Party has survived.  All that might change.  One section of the Tory coalition may reposition itself elsewhere. The liberal David Cameron (‘Heir to Blair’) and his acolytes seem to have more in common with a good many Lib Dems than they do with the traditionalist Tories and the gulf between them may come to be seen as so wide as in Freud’s terms to be viewed with ‘Insuperable Repugnance.’ Many of these Tories  actually have in many respects a good deal more in common with the BNP than they do with Cameron’s politics, but would be loath to admit it for the present at least, for reasons mainly of social acceptability – of snobbery,’ The implications for the BNP are enormous should the ‘permanent coalition and /or  probable split in the Tory Party come about. There will immediately be available a large number of voters including many of the traditionalist working class with nowhere else to go but to this Party. The BNP should be prepared for this opportunity

EU Regulation Costs £110 Billion to European Business

http://www.bnp.org.uk/£110 Billion: What EU Regulation Costs European Business

The British National Party Newsroom

The European Commission (EC) has admitted that regulation and red tape created artificially by the European Union costs businesses in excess of £110 billion, or €130 billion, every year.

The shocking admission was made in an article in the EU-related news service, Euractive, dealing with the failure of the EC to live up to its own deadlines for cutting waste and red tape.

According to the article, the EC claimed that it was on track to cut red tape by a quarter by 2012. However, the Euractive article added, “businesses shouldn't get their hopes too high up [sic].”

According to Euractive, the EC has admitted that “unnecessary regulation” has created a burden, especially for small to medium enterprises (SME).

The EC realised as long ago as 2007 that it had created a bureaucratic monster, and that year appointed yet another taxpayer-funded body to make suggestions on how to cut down on the waste which they themselves had created.

The High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens (HLG) was duly created, and then actually proceeded to make suggestions as to where “unnecessary” regulations could be cut.

However, as Euractive pointed out, “only a few of the Commission’s major proposals have been fully approved.

“The other initiatives to simplify rules and reduce paperwork are still being debated by EU member states and the European Parliament.”

The article then quoted Andrea Renda, senior research fellow at the Centre for European Policy Studies, who was a consultant to the Commission on the project, as saying that “while the Commission contends it could ultimately cut red tape by 31 percent, "I wouldn’t say we’ve gotten anywhere close so far.”

According to Euractive, other problems involved in cutting red tape include flaws in the method used to measure the paperwork burden and the fact that the target was based on the Commission’s proposals, not on the sometimes weaker versions that are passed by Parliament and EU member states.

Even worse, the goal of a 25 percent saving was based on a 2005/2006 level of bureaucracy, and many additional EU laws have been passed since then, which will have considerably added to the burden.

Increasingly, SMEs have complained that their time is being taken up just adhering to EU legislation.

The Euractive article then quoted Mary Boughton, co-director of a herbal veterinary medicines business in Dorset. That company now spends 20 percent of their time on administrative tasks.

“It’s certainly increased more since we joined the EU,” Ms Boughton was quoted as saying.

“It’s increased a lot in the last five years, especially the employment issue, which is a big issue and very time consuming.”

“We know all of our employees, and we have to jump through the same hoops as if we were British Airways.”

Although one of the original reasons for the creation of the EU and its predecessors was supposedly to simplify trade, Ms Boughton revealed that she now has “more problems exporting within Europe than outside because EU rules are interpreted differently by member states.”

 

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

Yes ! Enoch Powell Was Right After All

 Enoch Powell Was Right

The British National Party Newsroom

A review of political utterances made by establishment politicians since the early 1970s has shown that Enoch Powell was perfectly accurate in his prediction that unrestricted immigration would inevitably lead to the swamping of Britain, says Manchester superactivist Derek Adams.

Speaking to BNP News on the release of a new video, the latest in a series of highly popular multi-media releases dealing with political issues on YouTube, Mr Adams said that everything that Mr Powell had come true.

“We have nonwhite immigrants such as Trevor Phillips using the power of the state to persecute white people, exactly as Mr Powell warned,” Mr Adams said.

“We have an already present immigrant population fast out breeding the indigenous population, exactly as Mr Powell predicted.

“Finally, in this new video, we can see the pathetic excuses and lies being told by Tory and Labour politicians alike on immigration over the years.

“The time has come to acknowledge that both Enoch Powell and Nick Griffin have spoken the truth on immigration in Britain,” he said.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the British National Party Website

 

Reflections of a Statesman: The Writings and Speeches of Enoch Powell

  

Nick Griffin's MEP Constituency Office diligence gets results

Constituency Office diligence gets results

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

DECEMBER 2010: THERE has been a welcome Christmas present for one North West constituent after Nick Griffin's Constituency Office took on the Maltese Government and battled on his behalf.

 The constituent from Cumbria wrote to Nick Griffin concerning the Maltese Government's charge for vehicle importation and tax registration.
The gentleman spent some time in Malta with the intention of settling there permanently. He fell ill however within six months and returned to England following medical treatment. Whilst he was ill in hospital, he was pressurised into importing his British car and paying over 5000 Euros for tax registration.
He found out subsequently that he may have been wrongly advised and did not need to import the car, so he wrote to the Maltese Ministry of Finance, requesting a refund but had not received a reply.
"This was back in January and for the past 11 months Nick and I have been in correspondence with the Maltese Government trying to get the matter resolved," says Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield.
"Initially the Maltese Ministry of Finance stonewalled requests to open discussion on the matter, insisting that there was 'no exemption entitlement in the strict terms of the law'.
"Apparently it was a Transport Authority decision to reject the refund, so I requested an exception in writing, supplying all the documentary evidence in support of the case based on our constituent's particular and personal circumstances."
This was back in May, and over the the next three months there were more than 30 emails, letters and telephone calls from the Constituency Office to the Maltese Ministry of Finance trying to get the matter resolved
At the end of September there was some disappointing news which Tina reported to the constituent.
"I spoke to the Maltese Ministry of Finance this morning and was told that your case had been discussed at a meeting of the Transport Authority and it was decided that, as you had lived in Malta for more than seven months, you were liable to pay the vehicle tax. Your request for exemption from the payment was therefore refused on legal grounds. While it is stated that there is no legal basis for a refund, I have requested that an exception might be made in your case."
For the next six weeks the was no response from the office dealing with the matter and calls were not returned. In the end  Tina was left with no option but to contact the Ministry of Finance's Customer Care office.
She told them that her constituent had been denied the simple courtesy of a single response to his request for a refund, and that he was preparing a formal complaint.
Finally at the end of October there was a light at the end of this long tunnel.
The Customer Care office reported that the claim was being reconsidered by the Government of Malta but that proof of the vehicle's re-registration in the UK was required to be able to proceed.
This posed problems as Tina explained to the Customer Care Office:
"Unfortunately, the constituent sold the car that was registered in Malta, so no longer holds the logbook. As a pensioner, faced with ever-increasing petrol prices in the UK, he was forced to change his vehicle for a smaller, more economical car. He has however, provided you instead, with copies of the following documentation: the MOT Test Certificate which shows the registration transfer date; the Bill of Sale and the acknowledgement letter from the DVLA confirming the ‘change of owner’; and the logbook issued by Malta ADT (Certifikat ta’ Registrazzjoni) - which will enable you to cross-reference the vehicle details.
I hope this documentation suffices for the purposes of progressing the refund claim."
But there was further delay because more meetings in Malta failed to come up with a resolution.
Then finally on the 3rd of December, the Maltese Ministry of Finance agreed that there were "exceptional circumstances" in this case and that a refund on “humanitarian grounds” should be made.
This was a very satisfying outcome after nearly a year's polite persistence by Nick Griffin's Constituency office, and a very welcome Christmas bonus for the constituent concerned.

UK Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

Met Office Downgrades Apocalyptic Flood Warnings as British Taxpayers Presented with £150 Billion “Climate Change” Bill

The British National Party Newsroom

The Met Office has dramatically downgraded its apocalyptic sea level flood warnings of just a few years ago as the government-appointed Committee on Climate Change has estimated that fighting “global warming” will cost the UK taxpayer £150 billion.

The Met Office, which is an official government body, had earlier endorsed the prediction made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which, in a 2007 report, said that sea levels would rise six feet within the next century and flood out many cities.

However, a new report by the Met Office said this was no longer likely and instead halved its predicted "worst case scenario."

In addition, the IPCC’s prediction that the Arctic conveyor belt (which moves warm and cold water around the world’s oceans) is slowing has also been dismissed by the Met Office, with a spokesman being quoted as saying that this was “not likely to happen this century.”

Meanwhile, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC), established under the Climate Change Act (2008), which advises the Government on “setting and meeting carbon budgets and on preparing for the impacts of climate change,” has presented a preliminary cost estimate of £150 billion which British taxpayers will have to pay to combat “climate change.”

To put this into perspective, the budget cuts announced by the ConDem regime this year amount to some £83 billion.

In addition to tax increases, the huge figure will send already expensive energy bills soaring even further.

The Climate Change Committee has said that the money will be needed to “deliver green transport, power and energy efficiency” over the next 20 years.

In addition, the CCC has said that Britain must cut its carbon emissions 60 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 as a stepping stone to an 80 percent cut by 2050.

In reality this means further de-industrialising Britain, and the removal of even more industry to China and the Far East.

The CCC’s budgetary plans also do not include British contributions towards “climate change funds” currently being set up to allegedly help the Third World.

The upcoming “climate change” talks in Cancun, Mexico, for example, aim to create a £60 billion fund to help “poor countries cope with climate change and deforestation.”

Of course, the major source of deforestation and aridification in the Third World is the fact that there is insufficient social responsibility in those societies to properly plan ahead and take care of their environments.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.

PC Media Blame White Students Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

Whites Blamed Because Black Students Fail to Get into Oxbridge

The British National party Newsroom

Another example of the anti-white mania which infests the establishment has come to light with the instant blame accorded to “white racism” because fewer black students are accepted into Oxbridge, even though the facts show that this has nothing at all to do with university policy.

The latest “blame whitey” media feeding frenzy came with the release of Freedom of Information Act (FOI) figures by Labour’s former universities minister, the black MP David Lammy.

Mr Lammy, who is well-known for the racial chip on his shoulder, said that his figures “proved” that there was “racial exclusion” at Oxford and Cambridge.

The controlled media lost no time in rebroadcasting the statistics, with lurid headlines such as “Whitewash at Oxford” and “Bleak Picture of Racial Exclusion,” all directly implying that the small number of black students at the two institutions was directly due to deliberate white racism hidden deep within the university administration.

In reality, both Oxford and Cambridge universities have formally established “Race Equality Schemes” which actively promote, encourage and give preferential treatment to nonwhites in order to meet government-sanctioned “race equality programmes.”

These programmes are designed to encourage applications from state school students and those from “black and working-class backgrounds.”

Despite all these programs, the number of Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) students remains relatively low.

There are, however, simple and logical reasons for this state of affairs, and it is most certainly not due to “white racism.”

Firstly, the reality is that poor academic achievement by vast numbers of black students means that the number of applicants from that community is disproportionately smaller.

According to figures released by Diane Abbott MP, secretary of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs, 48 per cent of 16-year-old white boys get five GCSE grades A-E, while only 13 per cent of black boys achieve this level of education. In largely black boroughs like Hackney, this figure drops to as low as six percent.

Although liberals love to blame “white racist teachers” for this state of affairs, most sensible people know that this is not the root cause of black academic failure.

Secondly, admission statistics from the universities in question show that those black students who do apply to university, all attempt to get into already-oversubscribed faculties, which reduces their admission chances even further.

As an Oxford university spokesman said in response to Mr Lammy’s allegations: “Black students apply disproportionately for the most oversubscribed subjects, contributing to a lower than average success rate for the group as a whole: 44 percent of all black applicants apply for Oxford's three most oversubscribed subjects, compared with just 17 percent of all white applicants.

“That means nearly half of black applicants are applying for the same three subjects, the three toughest subjects to get places in. Those subjects are economics and management, medicine, and maths.

“This goes a very long way towards explaining the group's overall lower success rate,” the spokesman said.

* Mr Lammy’s statistics also show that of the more than 1,500 academic and lab staff at Cambridge, none are black, and only 34 are Asian.

This lack of academic prowess was, of course, also blamed on the ubiquitous “white racism.”

The British National Party utterly rejects the endless allegation that whites are to blame for every ill affecting any other community. Each year, tens of thousands of white British students are turned down for admission into the university of their choice, but do not endlessly blame this on mythical racial conspiracies.

The time has come to break the cycle of “whites are to blame” and firmly re-establish the rules of decency, fair play and common sense.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costsof the BNP website

US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

Leaked US Cable Scandal: David Cameron Knows about Pakistan Terror Threat

The British National Party World Newsroom

David Cameron knows about the huge terrorist threat posed to Britain by immigration from Pakistan, according to a leaked US diplomatic cable, but has refused to do anything about the problem.

According to a US cable released in the flurry of leaked documents by the Wikileaks website, Mr Cameron told a visiting delegation of US senators in 2008 that 60,000 individuals travel to Pakistan from the UK each year and that this has implications for the UK's own significant domestic "terror threat."

According to a Centre for Social Cohesion report, the “Security Service estimates that over 2,000 people in the UK pose a terrorist threat and in March 2005 it was estimated that there were up to 200 al-Qaeda trained operatives in the UK.”

According to the report, the “British-based threat does not only affect the UK: a number of British Muslims have been convicted in foreign courts or have fought for (or trained with) terrorist or extreme Islamist groups abroad.

“The most common country of heritage for Britain’s Muslim population, in recent years” was identified in the report as Pakistan.

Quoting Osama Nazir, a senior member of the Pakistani terrorist group Jaish-e-Mohammed and associate of 7/7 bomber Shehzad Tanweer, the report said that between 2001 and 2005 over 300 Muslims from Britain “of Pakistani origin had visited Pakistan to attend training camps and enrol for suicide bomb missions.”

Furthermore, in November 2008 the Security Service revealed that over 4,000 “British Muslims” had attended terrorist training camps in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

According to a Heritage Foundation report titled “The Pakistan–Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States”, published in November 2009, the “Pakistan–Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States.”

According to that report, Pakistan needs to be held “accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism.

“There is a terror connection between Pakistan and Great Britain. Many of the planned or successful Islamist attacks in Britain have been linked directly or indirectly to Pakistan ... This threat includes both terrorist attacks and the financial and ideological networks that support and inspire attacks,” the Heritage Foundation said.

Despite all of this and Mr Cameron’s own knowledge of the situation, the ConDem government has done nothing to halt the flood of Pakistanis entering Britain.

The Cameron government’s failure to address this issue is one which borders on the criminally negligent, and exposes ordinary Britons to the threat of terrorism in their own country.

The British National Party advocates a clampdown on immigration and a neutral foreign policy as the only way to bring the internal terrorist threat under control.

The ever present international Islamist threat needs to be contained in countries with large Muslim populations, and all steps necessary must be taken to avoid Britain becoming one of those nations.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

UK Govt ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

ConDem Regime Adopts Labour’s Anti-White Employment Laws

The British National Party Newsroom 

The ConDem regime has fully adopted the principle of anti-white male employment discrimination by endorsing the Equality Act promoted through Parliament by the last Labour government.

Making the announcement that the law will proceed as planned, ConDem “equalities minister” and Liberal Democrat MP Lynne Featherstone said that the law was about “making the workplace fairer.”

In reality, the law says that employers (which will include the state, where the guidelines will be rigorously enforced) will now be allowed to employ non-whites, homosexuals, lesbians, transgenders or another group over white males without being sued, even if those white males are equally qualified for the position.

In an attempt to make the vicious anti-white law more “acceptable,” the crazed social Marxists who dreamed up this latest scheme have included white women in the category of people to whom preference can be given, implying that businesses actively discriminate against them and all the aforementioned groups.

It is thus another form of the “blame whitey” syndrome, which is drawn from a worldview which intrinsically views whites (and white males in particular) as all-powerful, all-controlling wire-pullers who appear to do little else in society except continually try and put down everyone else.

The new law will come into effect from April next year and formal guidance will be published early in the new year.

Ms Featherstone was quoted as saying that the “positive action in recruitment and promotion processes” would be applied “when faced with candidates of equal merit, to address under-representation in the workforce.”

David Green, director of think-tank Civitas, said in his reaction that the law “imposed illiberal requirements on employers.

“For centuries liberals have fought for individuals to be judged on their own merits not according to their class or race,” Mr Green said.

“The Government is now to require employers to discriminate on grounds of “group identity”, not personal qualities.”

* It comes as no surprise that the Conservative and Liberal Democratic parties have endorsed the Labour Party bill. Observers have pointed out that both those parties unanimously voted in favour of the law when it was read just prior to the closing of the last parliamentary session before the election.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party Website website.

 

The Nuremberg Laws (Words That Changed History Series,) 

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Larger than in Pakistan

Islamic Banking Sector in Britain Now Bigger than in Pakistan

  David Hannam The British National Party Newsroom

The colonisation of Britain by Islam is reflected in the dramatic growth in shariah law schools and courts, but nowhere better illustrated by the fact that the Islamic banking sector in this country is now bigger than in Pakistan.

The UK has five shariah-compliant banks which offer discriminatory no-interest transactions to Muslims — while British people face increasing interest burdens on banking transactions.

Recently, the International Financial Services London revealed that Britain’s Islamic banking sector is bigger than that of Pakistan.

There are also 55 colleges and professional institutions which offer education in Islamic finance, more than anywhere else in the world.

The growth of Islamic finance has been helped in recent years by the Government. The Government has extended discriminatory tax relief on shariah-compliant mortgages to companies.

These tax reliefs completely discriminate against the British non-Muslim population, who receive no such benefits.

As if these facts were not evidence enough of the spread of Islam in Britain, other statistics dealing with the growth of Islamic schools, Muslim birth rates and increasing numbers of shariah courts have accentuated the colonisation of our country.

For example, figures released by the Department of Education and Skills there around 126 Muslim schools in Britain. 

The think tank ‘Policy Exchange’ has recently warned that Muslim schools were allowing militant Jihadists to indoctrinate young Muslims, while the BBC programme Panorama came under fire recently for exposing anti-Semitic and shariah law teachings at Muslim Schools across Britain.

Many Islamic schools insist that girls wear the burka or a full headscarf and veil known as the niqab.

Earlier this year, statistics from the Office for National Statistics revealed that Mohammad was the most popular boy’s name in Britain, another sure sign of the huge racial demographic change occurring in Britain today.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the decades-old Sacred Heart School in Blackburn was to be handed over to Blackburn’s Tauheedul mosque and re-opened with a new name after the number of Muslim pupils rocketed from just 7 percent in 2000 to 97 percent last year.

Last year, think-tank Civitas revealed that there were at least 85 shariah courts operating in Britain, but added that the number could be significantly higher.

Shariah law allows the beating and enslavement of women, the punishment of rape victims and in some extreme cases, the killing of non-Muslims,

In contrast to all the other political parties, the British National Party is the only organisation dedicated to preventing the colonisation of Britain by Islam.

The BNP would address the core of the issue, which is massive Third World immigration, first. Once steps have been taken to ensure that the indigenous British population remains the majority population of this nation, then a BNP government would take steps to prevent all the outward manifestations of Islamic colonisation.

These steps will include a halt to the discriminatory Islamic banking industry, to which the Labour and Tory regimes have pandered by issuing tax reliefs on Islamic mortgages while the indigenous British people receive no help at all.

The BNP will also prevent the existence of Islamic schools within Britain. They are a breeding ground for militant Islam which educates young Muslims to recognise the second class ‘dhimmi’ status of non-Muslims.

The BNP will also prevent the establishment of shariah courts in Britain. British law should be the only law system recognised in our country.

In short, Britain has a choice: be overrun by Islam and the Third World, or vote in a British National Party government. The choice is as clear as it is simple.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running cost of the British National Party Website
Christianity in danger: As Islam threatens ; the five whys