Search This Blog

Friday, 20 May 2011

Liverpool British National Party Activist Arrested for Distributing Labour 25 Labour party paedophiles Leaflet

British National Party Activist Arrested for Distributing Labour 25 Leaflet

British National Party superactivist Peter Tierney has been arrested for handing out Labour 25 leaflets, which detail the names of 25 convicted Labour party paedophiles.
Adam Walker and Nick Griffin with Peter Tierney todayAdam Walker and Nick Griffin with Peter Tierney today
Mr Tierney was arrested in Liverpool and taken to Belle Vale police station after distributing the leaflets, which name and shame 25 Labour party councillors, mayors and activists who were convicted for crimes such as possession of child pornography and child rape.
The event mirrors that of Merseyside police’s arrest of thirteen British National Party activists in 2008 for distributing the Racism Cuts Both Ways leaflet, which highlights the government-and-media ignored issue of anti-white racism.
Adam Walker, who met with Mr Tierney ahead of a party meeting in Liverpool tonight, said that the police’s heavy-handed reaction clearly showed that the leaflets had struck a cord.
More information about this latest state attack on freedom of speech will follow on this site tomorrow.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Food for thought Written by American Nationalist

Here is an interesting article from an American patriot , although I do not share his view on giving any credit to Marx in recognising his identification of the problem of the elite Bankers and their drive for global domination, as I believe Marxism was created by the Monies elites, for creating their own opposition using the system of Dialectics, I believe that it is an excellent article that go's a long way to showing who the enemies of all of mankind are!
Written by American Nationalist   
Question_120_x_120Since it is my main position that besides the Devil himself, who is their mentor, the Banksters are the main political enemy of all true populist/Nationalist political movements,. it seems appropriate to expand upon  my logic here.
First let me say that to win any fight one must concentrate upon ones enemy's  central brain.. Flailing away at the limbs and pawns and  other useful idiots is a fruitless activity
The brains of the Globalist and misnamed "multiculturalist" movements in this world are the Banksters.
The source of capital that funds all their activities is the Banksters.
The main push for all the mass immigration  with it's devastating effect on social unity and individual cultures  comes from the Banksters.
Unless we focus our attack on the Banksters all our efforts will be fruitless.
When I wrote"it's the economy stupid,"  it was  to make a point.  Ethnic nationalists had become so concerned with the effects of multicult immigration that they had ignored the necessity to gain support from others outside the ethnic nationalist sphere.  They have become so focused upon what they wanted that they had forgotten to listen to where other peoples main concerns are.
Even worse, they have  ignored the fact that the banksters current move is to engineer a economic crash so large that any consideration other than  where can I get food, clothing and shelter for my family, will be a distant second.
The Banksters Devil inspired main goal is to eliminate world overcrowding not by scientific breakthroughs that will enable mankind to fill God's universe but  by destructive wars and famines that will decimate mankind.
This statement seems unbelievable until you  understand what the Club of Rome is and until you have read some of the uttering's of the main Banksters in their few unguarded moments.
That is because the Banksters plans,  when all the dust settles, are  to "own" virtually everything.
They hold all the ends of the chains of mortgages in which the hapless front street banks and building societies are mere pawns, collection agents that enforce payment from the people, on pain of losing the very roof over their heads. They hold the same financial chains on all the industries and the mineral reserves.
They are just as evil, just as ruthless,  as Karl Marx claimed them to be.  He was not wrong in his assessment of these creatures.  True, he underestimated their intelligence and cunning, and his vision of a social utopia  showed he - in common with most atheists -had no real understanding of Human  nature, But let us give the man his due, he recognized that there would have to be a political struggle against these human parasites.
Others, before his time,  had recognized these evil creatures for what they are.  The most prominent amongst them was the author of the American Declaration of Independence , and the main mentor of the author of the Constitution and Americas third President.  Thomas Jefferson.
He wrote many denunciations of the banksters and their plans. In America his achievements are monumental .Yet it has been  mostly obscured from the general  public  that  the main concerns of this man were directed towards this hidden enemy.
And that is the main Problem with the Banksters.  They operate in the shadows and as far as possible  avoid publicity
An enemy who challenges people openly, a Hitler, Mussolini or a Suleiman, is terrifying yet relatively easy to oppose.  People have no trouble recognizing who is the  enemy and the fear they engender creates  resolve in the hearts of men who go forth to destroy these monsters and protect their families and nations.
But an Enemy whose main weapons are what was once called "the silver cavalry of St. George" infiltrates like a flood,  creating secret agents everywhere, corrupting and molding governments to its will.  That is an enemy that is difficult to see and to fight.   But that enemy,  the Banksters, are our true enemy. and more deadly than all of Hitler's armies put together.
Note the intelligent way they seek to destroy our communities and nations.  The do not oppose directly.
They use their media to smear and disparage.  They use the brain dead druggies who  fill the ranks of communist organizations like the SWP.
Most importantly they use fools and moles inside the nationalist organizations that oppose them.
A mole is a deliberate destructive agent.  a fool is one who takes everything at face value. who is easily led and confused by a mole.
Because of the restrictions of the owner of this site I name no names.  My purpose is to get people to think before they act,  to look for inconsistencies in the activities and statements of so called "concerned nationalists".
There are four basic types of people who cause problems in Nationalist populist political movements the first and the least troublesome  are those who  I will call the "angries."  They are people who are so incensed at the end results of the banksterparenting" by more stable people, who can commiserate with their anguish, but as far as possible keep them operating in a civil mode.
The next  type are not  redeemable.  They are the Haters.  They really despise, the (fill in the blank)   Jews Pakis Blacks , whatever.   They are happy to go along with any movement they think will rid the nation of people they hate. They make remarks in private like "you know Hitler really had the right idea" .  They do not have a clue as to why. normal people, ones not so afflicted by their malady, look at them with disgust.. "Wot?!" they will say " come on  you now I am only saying what we all think!!". and they believe it too.
They. must be permanently blacklisted from any nationalist organization that wishes to be successful. no matter what work they have done in the past  retaining these people for their alleged "nationalist" sympathies is a recipe for disaster.
The third type are usually only. identified after they have caused much damage. they are the Moles.
Since their  goal is destruction or corruption of the true nationalist movement  they are deliberately deceptive.   Like a chameleon they often change positions and allies quickly.   The more intelligent of them cause  enormous destruction, because they  instill feelings of bitterness and hatred against other good people in the movement.
They  are difficult to detect because often times it is a question of  " is this bloke just an extreme egotist or is he being deliberately destructive."
And that brings us to category four.  the Egotist.
The Egotist is one whose own self importance is far bigger than his talent.  He is not in the movement for  the sake of the movement  he is in it  to be the big fish in the small pond.  Fortunately this type is easy to spot.  they work hard, but they always want the  top spot. Not for them the long climb up the ladder.  It is their position they worry about. They want to be the star right now and irrespective of any talent they do  not possess
It is when they are thwarted that  their true character comes into play.  They will often resort to blackmail to hold their position.  In the end when  they have to put the good of the organization ahead of themselves they cannot do it.
IMHO the BNP needs to develop a cadre of leaders of the caliber of Griffin and Brons in order to be around to provide leadership in the very dark year of 2013 which is looming all too close.  People who have a serious heart for all those who will be suffering.  People who will recognize the main enemy and offer support to their comrades in the struggle.

BBC Celebrates and Promotes the Ethnic Cleansing of White British in South London

BBC Celebrates and Promotes the Ethnic Cleansing of White Britons in South London
 News Team at  http://bnp.org.uk/

By Chris Barnett –

Proof that this war isn't about diversity and cultures getting along, but the ethnic cleansing of the White British from our own towns and cities.

From the BBC website: "Each Saturday, a group [sic] ethnically diverse boys meet in a south London park for football practice. Despite their cultural differences, the universal appeal of football helps unite the boys - as they learn about sportsmanship, fair play and discipline."

There's no doubt that the British-invented sport of Football has united cultures all around the world.

Grown White British adults who played on that Park in their childhood, would be shocked to see this BBC webpage: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-13353578. I know because I'm one of them.

Clearly not one White British schoolchild is in the slide show, and this is something that is so much worth celebrating, in comes the BBC to promote it on their website. You may also notice, that so fast is the ethnic cleansing of White British people in London, you'll hear not one cockney accent on the audio slide show.

Well, I suppose we can't knock our friends in the BBC too much. They are, after all, helping us highlight the scandal of the ethnic cleansing of the White British from our cities.

Furthermore, no one in our party would begrudge kids from having fun with football because they aren't White British, and we wish the best of luck to them and their coach.

Years beforehand, I can remember back to 1976, that record-breaking hot summer, in that same Park, there used to be a lido where people of all cultures would use the thing. Mr Men lollipops all around and everyone was getting on. No po-faced government officials telling us how to be "ethnically aware".

We all knew that "diversity" for the sake of "diversity" was going to spell trouble.

It is shocking and quite telling, the hypocrisy of those that say a "diverse" environment is superior to a White British one, exasperated by the deafening silence from them when that "diversity" they speak of no longer includes White British people.

They say that we are racist because we want a White British Britain, yet here it is, the future they want for Britain, with no British Whites, promoted and celebrated with your licence fees.

ONLY the British National Party opposes the White British ethnic cleansing of our society supported by the LibLabCon alliance.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again. 

Wednesday, 18 May 2011

In the Borough at the Heart of London, We Find the Tower Hamlets Taliban!

In the Borough at the Heart of Our Capital City, We Find the Tower Hamlets Taliban!

By Cllr Clive Jefferson –  
The lead rouge in this one is Richard Dart, who converted to Islam in 2009 and renamed himself Salahuddin (the son of teachers). He is one of several extremist Muslim Hate preachers operating in the Tower Hamlets area of East London, now being nicknamed the Islamic republic of Tower Hamlets.
Readers will remember this person as the mouthpiece who made threats to disrupt the Royal Wedding. The area has seen a huge rise in Islamic Extremism, with Asian women receiving death threats for refusing to wear the veil and longer robes. Religious police operating in the Capital City of Britain sounds just too incredible to believe, but this is the reality of life in Tower Hamlets today.
An Asian in his 40s marched into a chemist shop and told the shop owner his employee must cover her head and wear longer robes. ‘If she keeps working here and continues to dress like that, we will boycott you because this is a Muslim area,’ the shop’s owner was told.
Subsequently another, younger, Asian man came into the pharmacy and started shouting at the employee. ‘He said: “If you keep doing these things, we will kill you,”’ recalls a Bangladeshi-born man who witnessed the scene.
It is not the first time such death threats have been issued, and nor are they confined to issues of dress and deportment. In behaviour that some have compared to that of the Taliban in Afghanistan, abuse and physical attacks against gay men and women are also reported to be on the increase.
Those familiar with life in Tower Hamlets are not surprised. They say that such attitudes are commonplace. Residents have grown used to the fact that the council-run libraries are stocked with books and DVDs containing the extremist rantings of banned Islamist preachers.
There is a Muslim faith school where girls as young as 11 have to wear face-covering veils. There are plans to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds of municipal money to build a set of Islamic arches – the so-called ‘hijab gates’, which would look like a veil – at either end of Brick Lane, which is packed with Indian restaurants and clothes shops.
And as these outrages carry on seemingly without anyone taking any action whatsoever to stop this resurgence of religious fanaticism last seen in the dark ages on another continent, there have been allegations of corruption during council elections, with the names of hundreds of Bangladeshi ‘ghost voters’ suddenly appearing on the electoral register.

Under the cloud of these ghost voters, a Mayor – Lutfur Rahman has been ‘elected’. He is pictured (right) with another well-known perverter of the electoral process, Red Ken.
In October, Bangladeshi-born Lutfur Rahman became the first directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets. He originally stood as the Labour candidate but was deselected by the party amid allegations about his links with an organisation known as the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE).
The fundamentalist group believes in jihad and Islamic sharia law and wants to turn Britain and other European countries into Islamic republics. Last year, a Labour minister said the organisation had infiltrated the Labour Party and accused it of ‘corrupting our politics’.
Leaders of the group want to impose hardline views on local communities. With bitter irony, it is said to have pocketed £10 million from the taxpayer by attracting state grants designed to ‘prevent violent extremism’.
Dumped by Labour, Mr Rahman ran as an independent (allegedly with the help of the IFE) and romped to victory in what the London Evening Standard described as ‘one of the nastiest campaigns in recent London political history’. Now in power, he has control over a £1.3 billion municipal budget.
‘You basically have a large umbrella Islamist group that appears to have almost a stranglehold over a major council in the East End of London,’ said one local resident. ‘The concern is that this Islamist group has an “us versus them” mentality. Their ideology is basically that Muslims are in the trenches, being assailed by the rest of the world. But they are convinced the Muslims will ultimately triumph. It may sound dramatic, but they are trying to impose Islam on Britain.’
As a result, the borough has a 49.4 per cent Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) population — with 33 per cent Bangladeshi. Soon, the borough will become one of a handful of council areas where the BAME grouping will outnumber the white population.
On their own, the figures are not exceptional. But what sets Tower Hamlets apart is the huge amount of political power wielded by the minority. For several decades, Bangladeshis have been heavily involved in local politics, particularly in the ruling Labour Party.
In a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary last year, an IFE activist and Tower Hamlets councillor told an undercover reporter: ‘We’ve got a lot of influence and power in the council – councillors, politicians.’
In view of some of IFE’s more extreme policies, that ‘influence’ is worrying.
For example, IFE leaders were recorded expressing opposition to democracy, support for sharia law and mocking black people. According to one of its leaflets, the IFE wants to change the ‘very infrastructure of society, its institutions, its culture, its political order and its creed . . . from ignorance to Islam’.
One of its members was recorded by an undercover reporter, saying: ‘Democracy, if it means not implementing the sharia, no one’s going to agree with that.’
In the past it has organised meetings with extremists including allies of the Taliban and a man under investigation by the FBI for his links to the September 11 attacks.  Further, moderate Muslims told how the IFE and its allies were enforcing their hardline views on the rest of the community, cracking down on behaviour they deemed ‘un-Islamic’.
Dispatches also claimed that the IFE had helped Lutfur Rahman become leader of the council. He was voted in on a paltry 26 per cent turnout and has an all-powerful role as a directly elected mayor, similar to that of a traditional council leader, with almost total control over a council’s finances. Most worryingly, he cannot be called to account or sacked by councillors.
Councillor Peter Golds, leader of the Tory opposition in Tower Hamlets, says that since Mr Rahman’s election there have been worrying changes in the way the council is run.
Everywhere you look, you can see advertising hoardings ‘censored’ with thick black paint – particularly those that show women in swim wear or people kissing.
There is a battle raging on the streets of Britain. Whether the majority of the population want to believe it or just stick their heads in the sand, please read the above and know: ‘This is coming to a town near you... soon, and the British National Party is quite simply the only political party that stands in the path of the Islamic domination of our country within our lifetime!’
Step forward, please. Join us, donate to our cause or become active in our constant campaigns throughout the UK. Your country really does need you.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again. 

Tuesday, 17 May 2011

Circulation of anti-BNP National Newspapers Down Again in March

Circulation of anti-BNP newspapers fell again in March


 originally published at http://www.londonpatriot.org/
‘Down down deeper on down’ Status Quo.
The MSM take great pride in their campaign against the British National Party, if the figures below mean anything, then the ‘dead tree press’ is going to be one less medium we have fighting against us. Nationalists will be delighted to know that every national newspaper lost print circulation year on year in March, according to the figures released by ABC.
Press Gazette
Growth of The Independent’s new cut-price stablemate ‘i’ seems to have levelled off. It saw a slight month-on-month drop from 175,714 to 171,415 sales a day.
The worst performer in a particularly tough month for print sales was the Glasgow-based Sunday Herald which fell 27.5 per cent year on year to 31,123 sales a week. Amid staff cutbacks it relaunched as a news magazine in January.
National newspaper print circulations for March 2011
(Figures are average circ, percentage change year on year)
National dailies
Daily Mirror 1,155,895 , -7.31
Daily Record 312,655 , -6.21
Daily Star : 699,216 , -15.45
The Sun : 2,817,857 , -6.24
Daily Express : 620,616 , -7.13
Daily Mail : 2,039,731 , -2.05
The Daily Telegraph : 626,416 , -8.78
Financial Times : 381,658 , -4.89
The Herald : 50,621 , -8.92
The Guardian : 261,116 , -7.75
i : 171,415 , n/a
The Independent : 181,934 , -1.20
The Scotsman : 41,806 , -8.16
The Times : 446,109 , -11.21
Racing Post : 61,588 , -9.87
National Sundays
Daily Star Sunday : 293,489 , -14.14
News of the World : 2,664,363 , -8.27
Sunday Mail : 365,923 , -8.29
Sunday Mirror : 1,063,096 , -7.34
The People : 477,815 , -10.21
Sunday Express : 533,192 , -6.46
Sunday Post : 312,188 , -7.38
The Mail on Sunday : 1,888,040 , -3.31
Independent on Sunday : 153,183 , -0.71
The Observer : 296,023 , -10.70
Scotland on Sunday : 56,466 , -3.57
Sunday Herald : 31,123 , -27.51
The Sunday Telegraph : 481,941 , -5.46
The Sunday Times : 1,031,727 , -7.19
Nationalists who visit this blog regularly know only too well the reason for the decline in circulation.
How many times have we reported stories that newspapers deliberately ignored?
Way too many to count.
So what is the point of buying a newspaper, when you can get better, and unbiased stories for free on the Internet?
I only hope that sooner rather than later, at least one of these organs of propaganda closes down, it will be poetic justice.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Andrew Brons on The British Resistance Live in Paltalk Chatroom 18 May 2011

Andrew Brons on The British Resistance 18 May PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow   
andrewpaltalk
Well it has been quite a while since Andrew Brons MEP BNP? has visited our British Resistance Paltalk room, so we are pleased to announce that Andrew will be speaking in there on Wednesday, the 18th of May at 7.30 p.m.
Last time Andrew - who is one of Nationalism's most popular speakers - visited, he was very warmly greeted.  Will he be as welcome this time round? Only one way to find out and that is to tune in and listen.
Bertie Bert will be hosting the event, Corsham Crusader moderating and questions will be asked by The False Idol.  So if you want to know why Eddy Butler is still on the payroll or have any other questions for Andrew, then turn up and ask him.  See you there.
More details at http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/nationalistnews/ppnews

Monday, 16 May 2011

PM Cameron Offers Another Juicy ‘Anti-Immigration’ Carrot – and Proves the British National Party Was Right

Cameron Dangles Another Juicy ‘Anti-Immigration’ Carrot – and Reveals the British National Party Was Right

By Maid of Kent – With plans announced on Monday of a proposed ‘clampdown’ on distant relatives of immigrants being allowed to enter the UK temporarily for family reasons, David Cameron has unwittingly revealed the truth behind the ‘official’ immigration figures – and revealed that the British National Party has been right all along about the real numbers arriving in our country.
However, as usual, this loudly proclaimed clampdown is another Lib/Lab/Con sham to conceal another development in their loss of control of our borders.
While loudly trumpeting their proposed crackdown on immigration abuses in the puppet mainstream media, the Lib/Con government omitted to mention that on the same day it is being obliged by the Courts to abandon its requirement that a marriage or civil partnership involving someone subject to immigration control must have prior permission from the Home Office.
This Court-imposed ruling means that the government will have no control over immigrants using scam marriages as a means of entering the UK and automatically becoming eligible to claim the full range of state benefits.
So this loudly proposed crackdown is nothing more than an attempt to bury bad news and to keep the real truth from the British people.
Announcing a ‘drastic reduction’ in the issue of temporary visas so that only children or parents of immigrants will be allowed to travel to the UK, Home Office figures reveal that around 49,000 distant relatives of immigrants used this scam route to enter the UK last year, and had no intention of leaving.
In a recent speech, Home Secretary Theresa May announced that in 2004 more than two-thirds of the 63,000 people who had entered Britain on temporary visas to visit immigrant families were still here five years later.
That works out at 42,000 extra and officially uncounted immigrants in one year alone.
As readers of the British National Party website have known for years, the officially announced numbers of immigrants coming to the UK from non-EU countries have only included the ‘primary’ immigrant known as the head of household and have not included any of that primary immigrant’s immediate or extended family, who either arrive with him or follow at some time after.
As each primary immigrant can be responsible for an average of 22 other people entering the UK, a figure that does not include their British-born children and grandchildren – and the British-born children and grandchildren of the other 22 – it is not difficult to understand why large parts of our country are populated by non-EU immigrants and their descendents and why the native British people will be a minority in their own homeland within a few short decades.
Naive Britons who do not read the truth on this website have been convinced by decades of ‘official’ and dishonest Lib/Lab/Con government figures, which only count ‘primary’ immigrants and not their extended families, that the numbers arriving here are far less than they actually are.
In addition to the true figures entering the UK are the high birth rates of many non-EU immigrants, whose UK-born children are then counted as ‘British’.
In another ‘proposed’ crackdown announced today, Immigration Minister Damian Green plans to scrap the right of appeal for applicants who have been refused visas to attend weddings in the UK. This follows a previously announced ‘crackdown’ on the abuse of student visas – these two scam immigration routes accounted for 343,000 extra immigrants last year alone.

The British National Party Chairman's May 2011 Post-Election Message

The Chairman's Post-Election Message

Now the dust has settled, I'm writing this personal message to all our loyal members and supporters. First of all, I want to thank all the activists and donors who kept us in the field and in the public eye.
You know, if the sinister enemies of nationalism had had their way, we wouldn't even still exist, let alone be able to mount, as we did, the most professional campaigns ever in – for the first time – every part of the United Kingdom.
But fight we did – and hard, although only where we could afford it, in keeping with our determination to avoid fighting elections on debt! This time, we've paid our bills as we've gone along and not lived beyond our means.
I know everyone was disappointed with the results of the elections. Let's not beat about the bush: like nearly all the smaller parties, we had a tough time at most of the counts.
In Scotland we ended up just 0.1% behind UKIP. That's despite all their money and media backing. In Wales we dropped by more than a third, as people voted Labour to kick the Tories and LibDems. The same thing hit UKIP, who yet again spent a fortune but failed to win a seat in any of the three devolved governments.
I was as disappointed as anyone. Not so much by the actual results, but by the huge gulf between them and the fantastic reception that I and so many other party activists enjoyed from the public over the last few weeks. I was out day after day, particularly in the South Wales valleys, and I can tell you that I've never seen so much enthusiasm for us and our message.

Handshakes and photos
Everywhere I went, people of all ages and walks of life wanted to shake my hand and have their photo taken with me. Everywhere our speaker cars and the Truth Truck went, people – especially the young – repeatedly mobbed them for leaflets and copies of Freedom. That's what all your past work, donations and sacrifice have helped to achieve.
But it seems really weird, doesn't it? More people than ever agree with us, but frankly, in most areas, our vote was way below expectations.
This gulf between our growing popularity on the streets and the actual vote is disappointing and puzzling, but something strange is happening out there. I think people are starting to view us as a sort of insurance policy, welcome as being there to call on if the need arises. I agree that it's not as good as getting elected now, but it must give us hope for the future.
The extent of the growing 'soft' support was particularly highlighted in Northern Ireland, where we were standing for the very first time.
I spent a whole day out on the streets of Larne, Ballyclare and East Belfast with our enthusiastic local activist team, and I was amazed by how many people, of all ages and from all walks of life, were on our side.
Even better is the fact that, although we didn't received enough first-preference votes to have our second-preference votes counted, from the ballot papers seen, we appear to have got more than 10% of the second preferences of voters for other parties. This too bodes well for the future as we expand our organisation and external circumstances are more favourable.
More than anywhere else in our United Kingdom, the people of Northern Ireland – just like us – have had to suffer and fight for the right to be British. So we can be really proud that we were there for them, truly the British National Party at last!

English council elections – Rough, but we're not going away!
As for the results in the English council elections, first of all, let's get things into perspective. We had it rough, but others had it worse, and (unfortunately) they're not going away either. While we lost 11 district seats, the LibDems lost around 700 of them and control of nine entire councils.
Labour candidates with UAF banners in StokeLabour candidates with UAF banners in StokeWe lost seats, but despite the wholehearted backing of the Daily Express, and repeated plugs for Nigel Farage from almost all the other papers and the BBC, so did the phoney Establishment safety valve UKIP. The candidates for the pro-IRA, Muslim-loving English Democrats were humiliated in most areas. They won in only one small ward in the country, and even then only because the Tories didn't stand.
We, by contrast, faced ruthless Establishment opposition. Five of our 11 losses were in Stoke, where the ruling Labour regime were so desperate to get rid of our highly effective opposition group on the council that they did away with 16 seats and redrew all the ward boundaries in order to split and swamp our strongholds.
This is gerrymandering on a scale unseen in the United Kingdom since Northern Ireland 50 years ago. The fact that Labour's corruption worked reflects badly not on us, but on the political Establishment and on the media prostitutes who have kept quiet about the scandal. We weren't just fighting with one hand tied behind our back, but with chains on our legs as well!
You may have seen the disgusting footage on the Internet of the mob of far-left thugs, middle-class students and swaggering Muslims in Stoke. Labour organised them with taxpayers' money to threaten and abuse our brave candidates, barring their way into the count.
As usual, the chocolate fireguard police stood by and did nothing. You can see for yourself by clicking HERE. Watch out for the Labour councillors wearing rosettes and stickers – then come back and find out how we're going to wipe the smirks off their hate-filled faces.

Blooded, but not beaten. And fighting back already!
But despite the spittle and the hatred, our people came through with their heads held high and are already working on their campaign to expose the orgy of anti-English spending bias that Labour will run now they've fiddled and bullied their way to power in Stoke. That's British National Party true grit!
That's the kind of thing the British National Party's front-line fighters go through for you and yours and to secure a future for our race and nation. And it's the sort of spirit that drives our opponents to despair, as we shrug off whatever they throw at us, dust ourselves down, learn from the setbacks, and keep moving forward.
Right across the country, every single one of our councillors was targeted for Labour's ruthless far-left smear campaign, invariably paid for with taxpayers' money by anti-British Equality Councils or Marxist trade union bosses.
But we stood and fought our ground. After all, that's what we British have always done throughout history. From Harold's shield wall on Senlac Field, through to Agincourt, Waterloo and Dunkirk – however tough things get, we never give up. Which is why, even though we sometimes lose battles, we bounce back and usually win the wars!
And even last Thursday, we won some of our battles. While we lost seats to Labour - who had the advantage of now being in opposition – in the two district seats where we were up against the Tories, we held them both.
Two of our best lady councillors worked really hard and held their District council seats despite ferocious efforts by the opposition to defeat them. Cathy Duffy won in Charnwood, Leicestershire, beating the Tories by a nail-biting five votes.
In Queensbury, Bradford, Lynda Cromie polled 1,461, increasing her majority over the Tories by 170 and repeating the success of her husband Paul, who won a second term last year.
Cathy, Lynda and Paul are fantastic, caring councillors, and all have put a lot of effort into making sure the public hear about their many successes for local people.

The Labour traitors were on a roll – We were fighting to survive. And we did!
Other councillors of ours have done just as good a job, but, being in Labour areas, they never stood a chance this time around. It's unfair, but that's politics. And at least they'll never lose the experience of their first term in office – and now have more time to campaign to build the party and to win again in future.
We'd have stood a better chance this time if, like Labour, we'd been able to invest enough time and money into building our election machine and training people to use it effectively.
While Labour were free to do that, we were fighting for our very survival against their taxpayer-funded Equality Commission attack dogs, and being stabbed in the back by the black-op lies of Searchlight's 'Enemy Within' and their Useful Idiots.
The fact that all the seats we took or held were in Tory wards highlights the fact that we've lost to Labour because, on top of their election machine, their councillors are no longer being punished by voters for their failings in government. Now it's the Tories' turn, so from now on, we'll be targeting them.
By doing so, and applying the many lessons we've learnt from fighting Labour's unrivalled election-winning machine, we can and will win more Tory seats next year and beyond.

Now for some real good news!
I've saved some of the best news for you until now. You wouldn't know it from the snide put-downs on the Searchlight-run black propaganda blogs, but the British National Party came out of these elections with a dozen more councillors than we had last month.
This success is thanks to National Elections Officer Clive Jefferson, who provided the leadership to push for a record number of our activists to stand for election to Parish, Town and Community councils.
Because there are no salaries on these first rungs of the political ladder, the other parties often neglect them. As a result, we had two dozen local councillors elected unopposed. Showing the way ahead was West Cumbria, with ten new British National Party councillors, followed by the East Midlands with six, plus others in Burnley, Yorkshire, Essex, Sussex and Somerset.
We also won three contested Town Council seats in Pendle, Lancashire. In a hard-fought contest in a ward where we already hold the two District Council seats, our three candidates each beat their Tory rivals.
Meanwhile, on the edge of nearby Burnley, our John Cave showed that serving the community in these unpaid positions can produce big political rewards, when the announcement of his appointment as Mayor of Padiham hit the national headlines.
So now we know that this tactic of flying under the enemy radar can work so well, we'll be doing a lot more of it. And we'll be working on a number of other techniques to help us sink the deep local community roots that will nourish our growth for the long haul ahead.

'Way Ahead' meetings – listening to our grassroots
This coming week, I'll be at the first three of a series of 'Way Ahead' regional meetings of our officials and activists. Called by our deservedly popular National Organiser Adam Walker, these will involve our setting out the lessons we have learned from these elections and our plans to put the failures behind us and build on our successes.
Each 'Way Ahead' meeting will also provide a forum for our grassroots activists to put forward constructive criticism of the things we've done and not done. I'm going to listen, and then we'll move forward together. The first three are being held for South Wales/South West, London/South East/Eastern and the East & West Midlands.
Others will follow shortly for our Northern regions. By the time we've held the final one (for Scotland/Northern Ireland) in July, I have no doubt that the brainstorming sessions especially will have given us all sorts of extra strings to our bows.

Ready to roll!
I'm really looking forward to sharing with so many good and positive people the winning tactics and campaigns we're already planning to roll out this summer.
We'll be building on our real success in forcing the Marxist and Common Purpose bigots at Wakefield Housing to drop their persecution of the Christian van driver. From now on, those who bully decent people or wage war on our traditions are going to learn there's a price to pay.
I'm sure that you, like me, have been mad as hell when you've seen the Equality Commission dragging elderly couples through the courts for daring to put their Christian ideals into practice. Weren't you fuming when that idiot judge let that poppy-burning traitor off with a fifty-quid slap on the wrist?
Well, we're going to be equipping and funding teams of volunteer super activists in each of our regions, with loudspeakers, banners, placards, leaflet templates and fuel.
Then we're going to be directing them in a carefully controlled, peacefully militant campaign to show the bullies and overpaid elite leftists what decent people like us think of them, and to tell their neighbours who they are and what they've done.
We'll be running a summer campaign to alert communities and vulnerable children to the dangerous scandal of the Muslim drug-rape gangs – and to how the ConDems have already broken their promise to take action to protect the young victims.
And we'll be pressing ahead with our positive, Heart for Britain rebranding, as everyone on our mailing list will see when they get the next issue of Hope & Glory.
All together, we're going to have a summer of action, of positive steps forward and of strictly legal militancy. Millions of people out there have had enough, and many of them already admire us for standing up for the truth and our identity. Now we're going out to turn that admiration into love.
But please don't leave it to me and my great central team and to our fantastic local activists. We can't do it all by ourselves. There's no knight in shining armour on a white horse out there to ride to the rescue. There's only us. With our flaws and failings and weaknesses, there's only us. And if we are to do what we must do, that 'us' must include YOU.
So please – whether it's by giving if you've not given before, by being active if you've not been active before, or by doing more if you're already one of our Band of Brothers – do your bit.
Join with me right now. Pledge to yourself and to your ancestors and to the future of our sacred land that you will take action to make a difference and help us make history.
Personally, I'm loving editing the new-look Freedom and doing more in the UK again after more than a year learning the ropes at the European Parliament. It's great to be back on the front line with you and for you.
More than anything, I'm completely invigorated by the surge in public empathy that I and so many activists like me experienced during the campaign. It's shown me more than ever the huge potential we have.
And it's made me more determined than ever to lead this party to unleash that potential and to prove to our opponents that – far from being 'finished', we've only just begun! We've got a world to save – let's get back to work.

Yours faithfully,
Nick Griffin MEP
Leader, British National Party

P.S. Perhaps the best thing of all is what I saw time and time again in our week of Truth Trucking in South Wales – enthusiastic members of the public waving and smiling and then very deliberately touching their hearts!
The first time I saw it I thought I'd imagined it, but no, it's real! After just seeing it on a leaflet and on the side of our campaign vehicles, people out there are already taking our heart to their hearts. And, in an inexplicable way that shows just how brilliant our new logo is, they are spontaneously finding a way to show it. Magic!
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Sunday, 15 May 2011

Burning Poppies, £50; Defending England, £315; British Justice, Sold Out To Islam

Burning Poppies, £50; Defending England, £315; British Justice, Sold Out To Islam

  by The Freedom News Network  

At a West London Magistrates court, Tommy Robinson was convicted of a Section 5 Public Order Offense. This was the second attempt to prosecute him as the first charges were thrown out of court in January.
Tommy was ordered to pay a fine and costs of £315. If you recall, the only man accused and convicted of burning a poppy on that day was fined £50 and immediately vowed not to pay the fine.
Tommy is, of course, appealing. There could hardly be a better example of a two tier legal system operating in England today. We have explained here before exactly what the black flag of Jihad means and we all know what burning a poppy was supposed to mean. Yet it is Tommy, trying to stop this incitement and hate who is punished. The Police and the State do nothing to enforce anti-incitement laws as long as it is Muslims who are doing the inciting and the hating.

But it is the events outside the court that the press will now focus on because they know that presenting the simple fact of Tommy with a £315 fine and a £50 fine for hate filed, £800 per month benefit scrounger, Emdadur Choudhury on their front pages would stiffen the resolve of the whole of descent England: the whole country know something is rotten and the EDL are the ONLY major movement not afraid to name the problem.
Outside Tommy was supported by at least 150 loyal EDL who stood for hours. But what the press are writing about happened when a few Muslim lads decided to raise the adrenalin level.
There are reports of stone throwing at first by Muslims and then after walking, unharmed, into the middle of the group of EDL one young muslim man started to mouth off. He started to leave but lashed out and hit EDL Angel in the mouth. She went down with a damaged jaw and needed stitches: the perpetrator ran for the cover of his friends. A few scuffles and arrests later and it was over. One EDL woman off to hospital and up to 8 people arrested, the vast majority of them not from the EDL.
But if you read the Daily Express or the BBC you’d be hard pushed to know that it wasn’t the EDL kicking off and it wasn’t the EDL being led to the cells. The Fulham & Hammersmith Chronicle has a reasonable report (apart from using the term Far-right which is something they’ll regret eventually).
The BBC, in particular, has written a completely ridiculous piece about the violence (ignoring the case inside) with the headline: “Arrests at EDL founder Stephen Lennon’s court case”. The arrests, of course, were all young muslim males but there is no mention of this and the emphasis and juxtaposition of the words implies the EDL were arrested.
So all in all what did we learn yesterday? The EDL can hold a peaceful protest outside a court for many hours but once a group of Muslim lads steam in and start hitting women, the press will call the EDL violent and ignore the travesty of two tier justice happening inside the court. Welcome to England, 2012.

Majority of UK Voters Want Less Immigration (but Voted for More, Again

Majority of LibLabCon Voters Want Less Immigration (but Voted for More, Again)

The vast majority of LibLabCon voters want a sharp reduction in immigration despite having last week voted for parties that encourage more of it, a survey has revealed.
A new YouGov poll found the majority of voters for all three establishment parties want a huge immigration cut.
Seventy-two per cent of Liberal Democrat voters want net immigration of 100,000 or less per year. A majority (55 per cent) of Lib Dem supporters want to see a much lower figure of 50,000 or less. Only eight per cent want the present level of 200,000 a year or more.
Results for Labour voters were almost identical. Seventy-four per cent of potential Labour voters favour net immigration of 100,000 or less a year and a majority (64 per cent) want 50,000 or less. Only seven per cent want 200,000 or more.
Conservative voters were 92 per cent in favour of 100,000 or less while only two per cent want 200,000 or more.
Overall, 79 per cent favour a yearly net immigration total of 100,000 or less while just five per cent wanted 200,000 or more. Only two per cent of all LibLabCon voters wanted an increase in immigration.
The largest percentage of respondents, 36 per cent, chose the option closest to the British National Party’s policy of a complete halt to immigration, the “No net migration” option. As is usual in YouGov polls, no “Zero immigration” option was listed.
Stricter controls on non-EU economic migrants were also favoured by voters of all three parties, with 82 per cent wanting a reduction (96 per cent Conservative, 76 per cent Labour and 76 per cent Lib Dem). Only eleven per cent of LibLabCon voters were against such proposals.
Revealingly, seven per cent of Conservative voters, eighteen per cent of Labour voters and twenty per cent of Lib Dem voters said they “didn’t know” what immigration numbers would be best for Britain.
Replicate questions were posed in a YouGov survey last November and showed almost identical findings.
The results are still somewhat surprising given the commitment to mass immigration of all three branches of the LibLabCon political establishment. Voters of those parties need to realise, as soon as possible, that, by electing LibLabCon, they are voting for the very opposite of what they themselves demand.
Their wishes can only be achieved via the British National Party’s policies of halting all immigration, withdrawing from the EU and deporting illegal asylum seekers and foreign criminals living on British soil.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Saturday, 14 May 2011

Islamic Fanatics Paint Over Bikini Fashion Advertisments In Britain






 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Muslim Fanatics Paint Over
Bikini Fashion Ads In Britain

Nick Griffin
by Nick Griffin
Member of the European Parliament































Fellow Patriot,
Elections come and elections go,
but the need for the British National Party remains constant.
Every day news items are brought to my attention which show 
that the British people need us to speak out for them and fight their corner.

I follow some themes which emerge from the news

very closely. For some time I have been watching the
growing attempts by Militant muslims to impose their culture and values on us.

It is a real danger and concern that our Political Class is failing

to address or actively colluding with. The latest development is
that Street adverts featuring women in bikinis have been 
defaced in apparently targeted attacks. Most show women
in swimwear by chain store H&M. The damage is
similar to attacks in Pakistan on billboard ads branded
“ un-Islamic” and “obscene” by hardliners.
I have seen reports of bus shelters around Tower Hamlets, 
including many in Limehouse, being hit. People have also
told me of similar vandalism in Waltham Forest.
Similar Ads Before (Left) and After (Right)above


The latest attacks have taken place in Birmingham. 

These actions represent an attempt to bully our populatio
and dictate what is acceptable within our country and culture.

They are effectively saying "These are our streets and we 

will decide what can be displayed on them". In the twisted
world of these fanatics pretty girls advertising swimwear
are something to be attacked.

Ask yourself: Do you want to live in a country where

these religious bigot are the masters?

If the British National Party did not exist to counter these

evil fanatics they would run rampant. We have the guts and
determination to fight them.


http://communications.bnp.org.uk/donatenow_button.jpg

It is vital that the British National Party grows in strength
to defend our people and way of life. It is vital that we are 
able to get our message out that fundamentalist fanatics 
are a real and present danger. Will you help me and the
frontline activists in this fight.

If you can send any contribution it will help us get our 

message to more people that radical Islam is a threat to
our survival as a people with a tolerant Christian heritage.




Please accept my sincere thanks,


http://communications.bnp.org.uk/donatenow_button.jpg







Please forward this message to a friend

ANOTHER SENIOR UK MUSLIM POLICEMAN ARRESTED IN BOLTON

ANOTHER SENIOR UK MUSLIM POLICEMAN ARRESTED IN BOLTON!

Once again another Senior Islamic policeman in Bolton has been arrested on charges of conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice. This time it was the arrest of 51 year old Inspector Mohammed Razaq. The arrest has been covered in the Marxist Loving Bolton Evening Newski, who have of course tried to gloss the issue by claiming that the man was well respected and liked, and quoting unnamed sources as well, a very dubious practice in our opinion! 
Mohammed Razaq
It is our opinion that this police officer only gained his high rank due to the political correct practices of the Greater Manchester Police.
And once again despite the warnings as in other cases of  Islamic Police in the UK , questions must be asked free from the political restraints of the Marxist Labour party in Bolton and elsewhere in the UK. 
 What links have there been , if any between these senior Islamic Police and the drugs trade that is almost fully supplied from Pakistan and the Islamic foreigners now residing in Britain . And also what are the links if any to the Islamic sexual grooming gangs that prey on young white girls in Bolton and the North west. and also how much of this corrupt money is going to fund Islamic terrorist groups in the UK. we strongly recommend that you write to your local representatives and demand an end to the political correct practises and immigration that are allowing the true British People to become victims of the now wide spread Islamic culture of corruption in the UK !

Force Pro multicultural MEPs Live in the “Enriched” Part of Brussels, Says Nick Griffin

Make MEPs Live in the “Enriched” Part of Brussels, Says Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin MEP has called on his pro-multicultural peers in the European Parliament to practise what they preach and move their operations to one of Brussels’ move “diverse” areas.
Mr Griffin’s suggestion was in response to a study group looking into closing down the Strasbourg Parliament and moving the Plenary Sessions to Brussels.
A report titled “A Tale of Two Cities” for the Brussels-Strasbourg Seat Study Group identified that a large majority of MEPs – about 90 per cent – would prefer to meet only in Brussels. But last week, the French Senate adopted a resolution stating that all the European Parliament's activities should be moved to Strasbourg and that the Strasbourg city council has also adopted a similar resolution.
Asked for his opinion on the issue, Nick told the Study Group:
"I agree entirely that, in order to reduce the waste of taxpayers' money, there should only be one seat for the European Parliament.
“However, since liberal capitalist immigration policies have turned Brussels into a crime-ridden, multi-cultural slum, I suggest that Strasbourg would be preferable.
“But if we are forced to stay in Brussels, I propose that Parliament should buy a block of flats in the most 'enriched' part of the city and make MEPs live there, in order to allow them to enjoy the same benefits of immigration as so many of their poorer constituents."
More than 30 per cent of Brussels’ population is foreign-born, mostly concentrated in the north and west sides of the city, in the Molenbeek, Saint-Josse and Schaerbeek communes, which are home to a large Moroccan community. More than a quarter of the city's inhabitants are Muslim.
Brussels was hit by Muslim riots in 2009, when police were attacked with Molotov cocktails and gas cylinders, and an immigrant crime wave in 2010.
The city has the highest unemployment rate in Belgium, over 17 per cent, and in some areas, youth unemployment is as high as 50 per cent. Many neighbourhoods are considered no-go areas for indigenous people and policemen.
Ironically, European Parliament employees have been on the receiving end of muggings as they have travelled to and from work in the city.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Friday, 13 May 2011

Tonight Friday at 8 p.m. Lawful Rebellion Night

Tonight at 8 p.m. Lawful Rebellion Night: "We will be kicking of at 8 p.m. with a pre-recorded speech by Roger Hayes of Lawful Rebellion followed up by a general discussion interspersed with video and audio clips of Lawful Rebellion in action.

Call It ConspiracyThe GreeningShakeout: How to Profit From the Greening of the Gold Mines

Thursday, 12 May 2011

The War and Invasion Iraq, Libya and the Dollar

Iraq, Libya and the Dollar


 


“Some believe it [the NATO/US-led Libyan invasion] is about protecting civilians, others say it is about oil, but some are convinced intervention in Libya is all about Gaddafi’s plan to introduce the gold dinar, a single African currency made from gold, a true sharing of the wealth.
Gaddafi did not give up. In the months leading up to the military intervention, he called on African and Muslim nations to join together to create this new currency that would rival the dollar and euro. They would sell oil and other resources around the world only for gold dinars.
It is an idea that would shift the economic balance of the world.
“If Gaddafi had an intent to try to re-price his oil or whatever else the country was selling on the global market and accept something else as a currency or maybe launch a gold dinar currency, any move such as that would certainly not be welcomed by the power elite today, who are responsible for controlling the world’s central banks,” says Anthony Wile, founder and Chief Editor of the Daily Bell.  (1) (2)
The attempt by Libya to create a new gold currency was backed with the vast amount of gold that Libya has collected over the years. At current conservative estimates Libya has 6.5 billion dollars woth of gold bullion stored. (3)
This proves that the Libyan plan to create a new gold currency to replace the dollar, and for Arab oil producing states to demand gold in payment for oil sales instead of the US dollar, was not some pit in the sky scheme – it was a well planned and well funded threat to the US control of the worlds oil sales via the dollar being the primary currency in such sales.
The invasion of Iraq was also based on two primary factors – Iraqi oil and the fact that Saddam Hussein planned to stop selling Iraqi oil in dollars and switch to the Euro. (4)
This is also the reason many suspect behind the threat to attack Iran, as Iran has also claimed it wishes to replace the dollar as the primary trading currency in its oil sales. (4)
The fact is that the Dollar as a currency is worthless. Its value is based solely on the fact that the United States controls the sale of oil through the dollar being the primary currency in which oil is traded around the world.
” The economic essence of this [post Bretton Woods] arrangement was that the dollar was now backed by oil. As long as that was the case, the world had to accumulate increasing amounts of dollars, because they needed those dollars to buy oil. As long as the dollar was the only acceptable payment for oil, its
dominance in the world was assured, and the American Empire could continue to tax the rest of the world. If, for any reason, the dollar lost its oil backing, the American Empire would cease to exist. Thus, Imperial survival dictated that oil be sold only for dollars. ” (4)
If the Dollar were to be replaced by a new currency in relation to oil sales then this would result in the total collapse of the dollar as a global currency and destroy the American economy.
Therefore any nation state that threatens to undermine the dominance of the dollar and its control over global oil sales, will suffer what Iraq and Libya have suffered.
Iran is also in danger as well if its oil bourse progresses from the small trading mechanism at the moment to an large scale trading mechanism that is supported by other oil producing states. (5)
The fact is that the corporate media in Britain, Europe and America is not a free press, it is the Corporate Press and they are two entirely different things. The corporate media are as much dependent on the supremacy of the dollar as the American government, for a collapsed dollar would wipe out the value of
the global media corporations. Fox News, CNN, Sky News and all those other media groups are all as dependent on the dollar as the rest of the US economy.
A free press prints the truth whilst the corporate media print only lies and corporate propaganda.
This is why the propaganda we see about the Iraq War was based on lies, e.g. that the war was about searching for WMD and stopping Saddam’s missiles that could hit London in 45 minutes, all of which was revealed to be lies.
This also why we see the Libyan attack is peddled to the masses as a ’humanitarian mission’ when in reality it is Oil Imperialism and a war for the protection of the Dollar.
(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_oil_bourse
(2) http://strategyunit.blogsome.com/2006/01/21/iran-crisis-another-war-for-oil-bourse-and-the-us-dollar/
(3) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12833866
(4) http://www.thedailybell.com/2226/Real-Cause-for-Gaddafis-Expulsion-Wanted-Gold-Currency.html
(5) http://investmentwatchblog.com/has-the-un%E2%80%99s-intervention-in-libya-been-about-the-libyan-gold-dinar-mexico-central-bank-buys-gold/
One of the main debates about the real basis of the US and NATO attack on Libya has focused on the most obvious reasons, that being Libyan oil, but specualtion is now focusing on the even more interesting issue of Colonel Gadaffi’s attempt to create a new gold currency for Arab and African states to trade with instead
of the dollar.
origonaly published at http://freedomnewsnetwork.co.uk/

Wednesday, 11 May 2011

Force Pro multicultural MEPs Live in the “Enriched” Part of Brussels, Says Nick Griffin

Make MEPs Live in the “Enriched” Part of Brussels, Says Nick Griffin

Nick Griffin MEP has called on his pro-multicultural peers in the European Parliament to practise what they preach and move their operations to one of Brussels’ move “diverse” areas.
Mr Griffin’s suggestion was in response to a study group looking into closing down the Strasbourg Parliament and moving the Plenary Sessions to Brussels.
A report titled “A Tale of Two Cities” for the Brussels-Strasbourg Seat Study Group identified that a large majority of MEPs – about 90 per cent – would prefer to meet only in Brussels. But last week, the French Senate adopted a resolution stating that all the European Parliament's activities should be moved to Strasbourg and that the Strasbourg city council has also adopted a similar resolution.
Asked for his opinion on the issue, Nick told the Study Group:
"I agree entirely that, in order to reduce the waste of taxpayers' money, there should only be one seat for the European Parliament.
“However, since liberal capitalist immigration policies have turned Brussels into a crime-ridden, multi-cultural slum, I suggest that Strasbourg would be preferable.
“But if we are forced to stay in Brussels, I propose that Parliament should buy a block of flats in the most 'enriched' part of the city and make MEPs live there, in order to allow them to enjoy the same benefits of immigration as so many of their poorer constituents."
More than 30 per cent of Brussels’ population is foreign-born, mostly concentrated in the north and west sides of the city, in the Molenbeek, Saint-Josse and Schaerbeek communes, which are home to a large Moroccan community. More than a quarter of the city's inhabitants are Muslim.
Brussels was hit by Muslim riots in 2009, when police were attacked with Molotov cocktails and gas cylinders, and an immigrant crime wave in 2010.
The city has the highest unemployment rate in Belgium, over 17 per cent, and in some areas, youth unemployment is as high as 50 per cent. Many neighbourhoods are considered no-go areas for indigenous people and policemen.
Ironically, European Parliament employees have been on the receiving end of muggings as they have travelled to and from work in the city.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

PM Cameron Offers Another Juicy ‘Anti-Immigration’ Carrot – and Proves the British National Party Was Right

Cameron Dangles Another Juicy ‘Anti-Immigration’ Carrot – and Reveals the British National Party Was Right

By Maid of Kent – With plans announced on Monday of a proposed ‘clampdown’ on distant relatives of immigrants being allowed to enter the UK temporarily for family reasons, David Cameron has unwittingly revealed the truth behind the ‘official’ immigration figures – and revealed that the British National Party has been right all along about the real numbers arriving in our country.
However, as usual, this loudly proclaimed clampdown is another Lib/Lab/Con sham to conceal another development in their loss of control of our borders.
While loudly trumpeting their proposed crackdown on immigration abuses in the puppet mainstream media, the Lib/Con government omitted to mention that on the same day it is being obliged by the Courts to abandon its requirement that a marriage or civil partnership involving someone subject to immigration control must have prior permission from the Home Office.
This Court-imposed ruling means that the government will have no control over immigrants using scam marriages as a means of entering the UK and automatically becoming eligible to claim the full range of state benefits.
So this loudly proposed crackdown is nothing more than an attempt to bury bad news and to keep the real truth from the British people.
Announcing a ‘drastic reduction’ in the issue of temporary visas so that only children or parents of immigrants will be allowed to travel to the UK, Home Office figures reveal that around 49,000 distant relatives of immigrants used this scam route to enter the UK last year, and had no intention of leaving.
In a recent speech, Home Secretary Theresa May announced that in 2004 more than two-thirds of the 63,000 people who had entered Britain on temporary visas to visit immigrant families were still here five years later.
That works out at 42,000 extra and officially uncounted immigrants in one year alone.
As readers of the British National Party website have known for years, the officially announced numbers of immigrants coming to the UK from non-EU countries have only included the ‘primary’ immigrant known as the head of household and have not included any of that primary immigrant’s immediate or extended family, who either arrive with him or follow at some time after.
As each primary immigrant can be responsible for an average of 22 other people entering the UK, a figure that does not include their British-born children and grandchildren – and the British-born children and grandchildren of the other 22 – it is not difficult to understand why large parts of our country are populated by non-EU immigrants and their descendents and why the native British people will be a minority in their own homeland within a few short decades.
Naive Britons who do not read the truth on this website have been convinced by decades of ‘official’ and dishonest Lib/Lab/Con government figures, which only count ‘primary’ immigrants and not their extended families, that the numbers arriving here are far less than they actually are.
In addition to the true figures entering the UK are the high birth rates of many non-EU immigrants, whose UK-born children are then counted as ‘British’.
In another ‘proposed’ crackdown announced today, Immigration Minister Damian Green plans to scrap the right of appeal for applicants who have been refused visas to attend weddings in the UK. This follows a previously announced ‘crackdown’ on the abuse of student visas – these two scam immigration routes accounted for 343,000 extra immigrants last year alone.