Cannabis DRug Plague Sweeps UK: Scottish Police Say 90% of Perpetrators Are “South East Asian

Cannabis Plague Sweeps Britain: Scottish Police Say 90% of Perpetrators Are “South East Asian”

BNP Newsroom

Ninety percent of people arrested for the cannabis factory plague sweeping Scotland and elsewhere are of South East Asian origin, the Scottish Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill has announced.

Speaking ahead of a campaign by the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA) to enforce a crackdown on the criminal activity, Mr MacAskill said that the “fact that so many of the individuals involved in cannabis cultivation are of South East Asian origin should not be seen as us targeting a community.

“Nine out of 10 of those arrested for these particular crimes are of South East Asian descent and it would be negligent if we refused to acknowledge that reality. But I hope that we will also get the support of those communities with family ties to that region of the world.”

The SCDEA campaign calls on people to report what it calls “telltale signs of cannabis factories” such as blacked-out windows and premises that appear unoccupied apart from visits from “people of South East Asian appearance.”

Mr MacAskill, a member of the fake “Scottish nationalist” party, went on to add that the cannabis plague was “fuel[ling] street-level crime in our communities and increases the fear of crime through the violence and intimidation used.

“It brings human misery to thousands of families through the harmful drugs they peddle — with cannabis most often the drug that starts people on that dark journey,” he said.

According to reports, Scotland’s police forces have seized £40 million of cannabis plants in the last few years, equivalent to enough plants to cover football pitches at Hampden, Ibrox and Parkhead.

The main perpetrators of this crime across Britain have been identified as Vietnamese.

In London, for example, the Metropolitan police have reported that “swaths of London are being overwhelmed by Vietnamese gangs flooding the streets with high-strength, home-grown cannabis.”

The gangs, who have also been linked to murders, people-smuggling and kidnapping, are making millions of pounds by renting houses from unsuspecting landlords and converting them into sophisticated cannabis farms.

In one London court, five separate cases involving Vietnamese drugs gangs were heard recently on the same day. One judge even complained he was having trouble telling the cases apart as he had dealt with so many in such a short time.

There are now almost 20 commercial cannabis factories being found by police every day, taking the total for 2009/10 to 6,886 — more than double the 3,032 discovered two years ago. This is more than eight times the annual average between 2004 and 2007.

More than 1.3 million plants worth an estimated £150 million were recovered in the past two years. Last year alone, police seized almost 750,000 plants with an estimated yield of £85 million, compared with more than 500,000 plants worth £65 million the year before

A report by chief constables says the gangs are growing so much cannabis that — for the first time — there is enough to start selling the drug overseas.

* Mr MacAskill’s party has been at the forefront of promoting immigration into Scotland and is therefore directly to blame for this disaster in that region.

Arriving in UK for Homes and Benefits! family from the Czech Republic get it All

Arriving in UK for Homes and Benefits!

Allocated a Home by Peterborough council, only few days after the family arrived from the Czech Republic

Can We Have A Bigger House?

Helena Horvatova (above) is grateful for her council house. Her only complaint is that it has just three bedrooms for herself, her husband and their seven children.

The 27-year-old was allocated the property by Peterborough council in March, only days after the family arrived from the Czech Republic.

Her 29-year-old husband does not work. Their youngest child, born six months ago, is named Kevin.

'It is a very British name,’ Mrs Horvatova said. ‘We want him to grow up British. We came to Britain because we wanted a better life for all our children.’

She added: ‘My husband is claiming Jobseekers’ Allowance. Back in our country he was a school cleaner, but in Peterborough they say there are no vacancies.

‘Our oldest boy has to go to school five miles away. The schools nearby are full of children who came to Peterborough before us.’

At least 10,000 eastern European immigrants have arrived in the city since the EU expanded its borders six years ago.

• From next year migrants will be able to claim benefits etc after 3 months. I wonder if the coalition will do anything to stop that? I doubt it. I trust them as much as I trusted Bliar.

• Now call me an old cynic but once the Human Rights Lawyers get their claws into this it will never happen. How can you possibly discriminate against people just because they are not british and have never paid into the system, especially if they have loads of kids, it won't happen. Far easier to discriminate against the british national, no-one will fight their corner for them.

• I thought that if people from the new EU countries did not have a job to come to they would not be alllowed in.Why are they getting paid benefits as soon as they arrive? What good is a school cleaner from the Czech Republic,how is he contributing towards our society when he cannot get a job and bringing a large family over to claim all our benefits.This is sooooo wrong and surely is unsustainable. We are broke,how can we afford to keep all these.people?

• Most people realise that most immigrants who come to this country do not do so for the love of the British people, in fact quite a lot of them despise us..... They come for one reason and one reason only to benefit from the standard of living WE have earned for OUR citizens. If the benefit system dried up for them, which it should, they would be off to the next best soft touch country...if there is one.

• If any of us turned up in Prague, Warsaw, or Budapest and asked to be given accommodation we'd be refused. So why in Britain are immigrants from eastern Europe given council houses anyway - even after a wait? They haven't fled torturing regimes as all the asylum seekers claim to have done. The same with health. Try going without work to Germany or Slovenia and permanently joining their health services. You will be refused point blank. The EU may be bad but it is British politicians themselves who simply don't understand the word NO.

• We are constantly being told by pro-immigration advocates that it is necessary to fill jobs, yet examples like this are endless where the head of a large family is unemployed and they are costing a fortune to keep. Crazy!

• Well at least they have finally admitted to something that EVERYONE ELSE has known for years. Maybe one day they will come clean and agree that most of these people have no valid right to Asylum and are nothing more than economic scroungers. Then they may have a revelation as to why law-abiding, hard working people like myself are turning to the BNP and/or UKIP. We are seeing moves to end the right to council housing for life. How long will it be before home-owners are forced by Law to sell their homes under the guise of "its too big for you now" and forced to move into the social/private dog kennels currently being thrown up around the country that are called "houses"? Or worse, maybe we will be forced to rent out our spare rooms to these unwanted characters? Looks like the Revolution is still coming folks.

• I know of a family who have been in the UK 18 months and after 12 months they were sitting in a lovely 4 bedroomed council house in a nice area of Blackburn and they plan to buy the property in time, so don't tell me that immigrants and asylum seekers are not getting houses before the British people because the people who live in the areas know whats going on despite the Governments denials.

• But Zanu Lie-bore swore blind this didn't happen, do you reckon they were lying? Can't believe it! LOL.
• for more stories visit http://uktabloid.co.uk/MainNews.html

Obama changes US immigration policy makes it easier for potential Muslim terrorists to get into USA

September 2010 FROM THE BOLTON PATRIOT

OUTRAGEOUS! Obama quietly changes US immigration policy to make it easier for potential Muslim terrorists to get in

The Obama Regime quietly announced in December ’09 that it would overturn one of the harsh immigration enforcement measures enacted by the Bush administration following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. You know, those ‘harsh’ measures that kept us safe for eight years.

(New America Media) Dec. 29, 2009 – Beginning next month, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said, those who arrive in the United States seeking asylum will no longer automatically be welcomed with handcuffs and months in a jail cell. Instead, many of those seeking protection will again be permitted to live freely in the country while their applications for permanent asylum are considered by an immigration judge.

The measure is the latest in a string of little-noticed initiatives by the Obama DHS to reconsider some of the most controversial enforcement policies of the past decade. The administration in August launched an overhaul of the immigration detention system, which had grown out of control as the number of detainees doubled in just five years to more than 440,000annually. (Detainees doubled and no there were no terrorist incidents in America, unlike Obama’s America 2009)

The administration has also largely halted workplace raids that resulted in jailing, deportation and even criminal charges for many unauthorized workers. And DHS has curbed the authority of state and local police forces to demand immigration documents from anyone stopped for minor offenses like traffic violations, saying that such checks should be done only for those jailed on criminal charges, particularly for serious criminal offenses. To drive home the point, DHS in October stripped the notorious Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona of federal authority to make immigration-related arrests.

ConDem’s Business Secretary Demands More Immigration into UK

ConDem’s Business Secretary Demands More Immigration

The BNP Newsroom

The ConDem regime’s Business Secretary Vince Cable has inadvertently revealed the coalition government’s true feelings on immigration by calling for even more immigrants, not less, to enter Britain.

Vince Cable and David CameronMr Cable said the Government “should not saddle the UK with excessive border controls” on the highly questionable grounds that it would “hurt economic growth.”

Mr Cable, a Liberal Democrat, even criticised the Tory party’s pathetic “migrant cap” which, as he quite correctly pointed out, was nonsense because it was calculated after deducting immigrants from emigrants.

Mr Cable said the recently reported 196,000 increase in the UK population last year was calculated by working out how many more immigrants came into Britain than Britons who emigrated.

Mr Cable said the growth was caused not by an increase in work permits for non-EU citizens, which fell by 14 percent, but by a significant drop in the numbers leaving Britain, which would not be affected by a cap.

“I've full confidence that my colleagues understand the need for immigration control measures that support business recovery and economic growth,” Mr Cable said.

Earlier this year, during a trip to India, Mr Cable also said that it would not be a good idea to cap the number of work permits issued to Indians entering Britain on the grounds that it would “deter trade” with that country.

At the time, Mr Cable was even more open than usual on his government’s views: “It's no great secret that in my department and me personally, we want to see an open economy and as liberal an immigration policy as it's possible to have,” he said.

Liberal Democrat leader and deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has defended Mr Cable’s position in public.

At a question and answer session in Croydon, South London, Mr Clegg confessed that his views represented the government, both Tory and Lib Dems.

“What Vince said, which is widely shared across Government, is that all ministers want to get the balance right between having an immigration system that is properly managed, but one that also helps the economy grow and creates jobs,” Mr Clegg said.

TODAY ANTI FASCISM IS THE NEW FASCISM

ANTI FASCISM IS THE NEW FASCISM

by Dr Aidan RankinFROM THE WIGAN PATRIOT BLOGSPOT 

When I hear the word 'fascist', I do not think of the assorted pub bores or the few full-blooded bigots who are the stereotypical activists of the 'far right'. Nor do I think of half-drunk, testosterone-driven skinheads in tight-fitting jeans or combat trousers, bawling out anti-immigrant slogans richly spiced with obscenity. Least of all do I think of the thousands of disgruntled Labour supporters, ordinary men and women in working class enclaves, who have given the British National Party its newfound electoral clout. None of these people are fascists, in any meaningful sense of the word. They are victims rather than aggressors - victims of failed liberal social experiments, heartless economic programmes and, above all perhaps, of betrayal by a Labour movement that was set up specifically to defend them.

The left, and many bien pensant liberals and Tories with them, would like us to visualise fascists as aggrieved, poorly educated working class whites - white males in particular, since they are a double negative for the Politically Correct. Such progressives (as they invariably call themselves) use accusations of racism and fascism as excuses to bully and oppress impoverished white communities and isolate them in racially based ghettos. For white liberals, anti-racism becomes a form of auto-racism, directed at members of their own race who are deemed to be socially inferior. It is, in other words, a new type of snobbery and social exclusion. Likewise, the true heirs to fascism are not skinheads, bigots, or BNP-voting former socialists. They are the BNP's sworn enemies, the 'anti-fascist' shock troops of the left, whose slogans of contrived defiance, melodramatic gesture politics and emotional blackmail reach far beyond the Marxist coteries where they originate.

At Burnley, where the BNP made its strongest local government gains this year, the paradox of anti-fascism was apparent in a demonstration by the Anti-Nazi League, images of which were widely disseminated in the press. Piously anti-racist and inclusive, the protesters were overwhelmingly white and middle-class. Proclaiming the virtues of tolerance, their eyes shone with the purity of hatred that is the prerogative of extremists the world over. In that almost archetypal left-wing demo, the chants and clenched fists of the scruffy young men, the screams and hot tears of the even scruffier women, the banners calling for political parties to be suppressed (in the name of tolerance, presumably) expressed something larger than a Lancastrian quirk. For anti-fascists base their campaigns on a sense of outrage that anyone, anywhere should dare to disagree with them. In their appeal to feeling over reason, force over argument, such activists resemble most those phantom Nazis they are claiming to 'fight'. This is why, in a stroke of post-modern irony, anti-fascism is the new fascism.

There is, in British - and especially English - political culture, a rich vein of sentimental radicalism, to which anti-fascist slogans appeal. It is from this section of politics and society that anti-fascist campaigners derive emotional (and, crucially, financial) support. Unlike working class communities, they do not see the violent, arrogant face of anti-fascism, any more than most of Germany's Mittelstand witnessed directly the violence of the Brownshirts. This strand of radical thought, ironically, has its origins in the imperial epoch, amongst a burgeoning middle class influenced strongly by evangelical Christianity, which believed that it had a duty to 'save' benighted natives. The missionary impulse usually placed concern for the Empire's subject peoples, and their material or spiritual well-being, well above concern for the indigenous working class. Typical of such philanthropists is Mrs Jellyby in Dickens's Bleak House, whose eyes 'had a curious habit of looking seeming to look a long way off, as if they could see nothing nearer than Africa'. Like many a modern liberal, Mrs Jellyby neglected those around her, including notoriously her own children. Her thoughts were directed instead towards the (fictitious) African possession of Borrioboola Gha and her idealistic plans for its 'development'.

The world of Non-Governmental Organisations is replete with Mrs or 'Ms' Jellybys. But in a post-colonial age, the phenomenon of immigration has brought their concerns closer to home. Today's Ms Jellyby is just as likely to work for the race relations unit of a local authority as for a Third World NGO. For 'ethnic minority communities' have become the new Borrioboola Gha. They are to be patronisingly helped and pitied, even given special rights, but their members are not to be treated as individuals and the reality of their cultures is to be ignored or scorned. As the white liberal person's burden, the black or brown skinned citizen is supported as long as he reads from a Politically Correct script and shows gratitude and obeisance to those pressure groups that 'care' about him. It is into this Jellyby Syndrome, a legacy of the missionary age, that anti-fascist groupings successfully tap. Guilt-ridden liberals confuse the violent cant of anti-fascism with humanitarian concern, much as the violent cant of fascism was once confused with appeals to tradition and order.

But the missionary impulse does not end with ethnic minorities. In anti-fascist campaigns, there are vestiges of earlier evangelical missions, aimed at the indigenous population, with a view to controlling and pacifying it. Working class communities are treated by anti-fascists, and their liberal apologists, as benighted white tribes to be civilised and subdued. The evangelical fervour present in anti-fascism accounts for the lachrymose quality of its activists, whose tearful appeals are often a prelude to acts of violence or demands for censorship. This is a characteristic they share with fascists, who were the most emotional and least reasoning of political campaigners. Like evangelical temperance campaigners of a bygone age, anti-fascists appear to be trying to save working class people from themselves. Their particualrism, expressed through opposition to large-scale immigration, is labelled as 'racism' and treated as a new form of vice. Their patriotic gut instincts, and their wish to preserve the traditional character of their neighbourhoods, are dismissed as ignorant prejudices, from which white working class men and women must be emancipated just as their forebears were emancipated from drink.

Like evangelicals, anti-fascists seek to liberate by a combination of moral pressure and legal force. Anti-fascism is, however, a radical secular ideology that allows no possibility of repentance or absolution. The evangelical Protestants who joined temperance or anti-vice campaigns were often oppressive and insensitive, but their zeal was frequently held in check by a concern for individual souls. Anti-fascists, by contrast, have no such concerns. They seek to save communities, by changing their collective consciousness or forcing them to conform. Their ideology allows for no concern for individuals, except for attack or denunciation. This contempt for the individual, the white, male worker in particular, allows the anti-fascist to reconcile two contradictory demands - for civil disobedience (including violence) and for the massive extension of state power.

Anti-fascist propaganda makes frequent address to the history and mythology of the left, to which the movement volubly lays claim. Searchlight, anti-fascism's house journal, make frequent reference to the Spanish Civil War, carrying photographs of heroic resistance fighters and carrying interviews with stalwarts of the International Brigade, now elderly and impressive. Other photographs evoke the memory of 'The Battle of Cable Street' and similar events where in the 1930s when working class Jewish communities stood up to the Blackshirt followers of Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists. There is in these images an explicit and false assumption of continuity. It is false because in both the Spanish Civil War and Cable Street, a high level of working class self-organisation was involved, and with it a genuine aspiration towards a just society.

Searchlight, by contrast, bases most of its activities on accusation, smear and incitement to hatred - often class hatred directed at working class racists. This was not always so. Its founder, Maurice Ludmer, was a thoughtful ex-Communist Party member for whom the education of working class communities was important, and who believed in freedom and dignity for individuals of all backgrounds. Anti-fascist campaigners today, including Searchlight, refuse to concede to their opponents - especially working class opponents - any sense of human dignity. Working class racists are described routinely as scum or products of the sewer, in a curious echo of the Nazis' twisted denunciations of Jews and other 'enemies' of the Volk. Searchlight still, on occasion, carries intelligent, thoughtful commentaries, especially on events abroad, but in its refusal to compromise with or attempt to win over its opponents, it perpetuates conflicts of a social and racial character.

This latter attribute it shares with the Anti-Nazi League, which is far more explicit in its advocacy of violence and its hatred of the white working class. At one level, the ANL sets itself up as a secular missionary organisation for anti-fascism. At another, its overwhelmingly bourgeois or petty bourgeois activists set out to create an atmosphere of intimidation and violence when they descend on areas such as Burnley. Like a fascist movement, the ANL is explicitly committed to the abolition of free speech. Its activities make it the heir less of the Cable Street battlers and more of the BUF interlopers. Like the Blackshirts, ANL protesters assume the 'right' to descend on working class areas, threaten and harass their inhabitants, incite and engage in violence.

The Anti-Nazi League is linked intimately to the Socialist Workers Party, the best known and most aggressive far left faction in British politics since the demise of orthodox Communism. Unlike the Communist Party, the SWP is opposed to the parliamentary road to socialism and advocates violent revolution. The SWP worldview regards all existing political institutions as outgrowths of 'capitalism'. Neither capitalism itself, nor its institutions, can be 'patched up' or 'reformed'. The party's struggle, therefore, is as much against 'reformist ideas and leaders' as against the capitalist economy:

The state machine is a weapon of capitalist class rule and therefore must be smashed. The present parliament, army, police and judges cannot simply be taken over and used by the working class. There is, therefore, no parliamentary road to socialism.

This rhetoric of class warfare disguises a critique of parliamentary rule identical to that of the Italian Squadristi, Mussolini's foot soldiers who closed the Italian parliament and installed a fascist state. To Mussolini, parliamentary rule was so corrupt - and, indeed, 'bourgeois', that it could not be patched up. The fascist ideal of the Corporate State was based on representation by trade. This policy finds strong echoes in the SWP, which seeks to replace Parliament with a series of 'workers councils'. It also resembles the modern anti-fascist obsession with group rights, whereby racial minorities (and all 'oppressed communities') are represented collectively by activist pressure groups that claim to speak for them. Whilst resembling fascist politics, the SWP's position differs dramatically from that of Marx, who especially in his later years strongly favoured the parliamentary road. Even Lenin, who was always a pragmatist, believed in the use of any expedient institutions, including parliaments. In ultra-left groupuscles he saw only an 'infantile disorder'.

Another far left faction that has had a seminal influence on the anti-fascist movement is the International Marxist Group (IMG), whose luminaries included Tariq Ali. Long defunct now, the IMG played an important role in the student agitation and violent demonstrations of the late 1960s, many of which called to mind the behaviour of young Stormtroopers in the colleges of Weimar Germany. Crucially, the IMG rejected the white working class as hopelessly reactionary and saw the new revolutionary elite as students, ethnic minorities and feminist women. The ideology and tactics and ideology of anti-fascism today owe much to the IMG's profoundly anti-working class and anti-white prejudices.

These far left groups have based their politics on interpretations of Trotsky's 'permanent revolution', a purist doctrine of continual change akin to that of Mao's Cultural Revolution - and Hitler's Third Reich. To the Fuhrer, the Nazi 'revolutionary creative will' had 'no fixed aim, … no permanency, only eternal change'. On the left, anti-fascism has risen to prominence at precisely the time when socialism lacks permanency and continuity, whether as an ideal or a practical programme. In their strident emotionalism and ritualistic denunciation of opponents, anti-fascist campaigns act as a substitute for a coherent left-wing ideology. The same was true of fascist movements, which aimed to replace the left by appealing to more basic psychological impulses of fear, envy and hatred.

Anti-fascism shares with its alleged opposite a belief in the cleansing or redemptive power of violence. They share as well an obsessive preoccupation with race. Indeed it could be said that organisations like Searchlight and the ANL do more than even the BNP to keep racial awareness alive. Both fascism and anti-fascism are uncompromisingly modernist movements, concerned with narrow categorisation and so unsuited to a post-modern age of complexity and permutation. Searchlight, for example, was horrified when some Hindu and Sikh community workers refused to be classified alongside Muslims as 'Asians'. Here were ethnic minorities daring to defy the pressure group definitions. In reality, the violence and nihilism of anti-fascist activists are almost laughably remote from the conservatism of most ethnic minority populations.

It is easy, and tempting at times, to dismiss anti-fascism as a peripheral fringe interest, irrelevant to our lives and thoughts. However its crocodile-tear appeals are in some ways more effective than those of the more traditional far left. Anti-fascists claim to be opposing a political evil. In so doing, they evoke memories of that evil and the wrong done to millions of our fellow human beings. Many people of good will, therefore, fail to see that they are being manipulated. This is why ritual denunciations and balkanising 'group rights' are in danger of pervading public life. The subjectivist definition of a racist incident in the MacPherson Report - any incident that the victim or anyone else 'perceives' as racist - has all the totalitarian characteristics of anti-fascism, yet few dare to describe it as totalitarian for fear that they might be smeared as 'racist'. Likewise, the attempts of New Labour apparatchiks to unearth political 'information' about the Paddington rail crash survivors had all the furtive and perverse instincts of a Searchlight campaign. Such influences have touched conservative politics as well. In the interests of inclusiveness, the Tories tend increasingly towards reverse discrimination and group rights, forgetting that many black and Asian people want freedom from racial politics.

Anti-fascism, like its fascist precursor, is primarily anti-human and misanthropic. It despises its supposed constituents as much as its sworn enemies, and has a vested interest in promoting racial conflict. When we recognise that fascists and anti-fascists are as one, their rhetoric of hatred will lose its power.

UK Oldest Defence and Security Institute Confirms that BNP is Right

Britain’s Oldest Defence and Security Institute Confirms that BNP is Right

From the BNP Newsroom

Britain’s oldest defence and security research think tank, the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), has confirmed that the British National Party has been correct all along with its claim that Labour/Tory foreign policy is a major cause of terrorism in Britain today.

RUSI, founded in 1831 by the Duke of Wellington, said in an article in its latest journal that “home-grown terrorism in the UK is growing” partly due to a “foreign policy that serves to focus alienation and resentment.”

The BNP has long argued that there are two primary causes of terrorism in Britain today: mass immigration, which has created a large Third World population pool from which radical Islamists can recruit; and British foreign policy which provides an excuse for Islamists to whip up hatred against Britain.

In the article, titled “Terrorism: The New Wave,” RUSI authors Michael Clarke and Valentina Soria said that in the five years “since the 7/7 London bomb attacks and almost a decade after the 9/11 attacks in the United States, the jihadist terror threat from violent extremists has evolved in significant ways, particularly as it affects the United Kingdom.”

The authors go on to state that the radicalisation of Muslims in British prisons could produce hundreds of home-grown terrorists as the UK faces threats from lone bombers and assassins.

“Large-scale co-ordinated attacks are being replaced by highly-motivated but poorly trained individuals operating with the expectation that eventually one will succeed.”

According to the experts, Britain has more to fear than any other western country from home-grown terrorists and the conditions are all there for a series of attacks to begin at any time.

“Estimates showed one in 10 of the 8,000 Muslim prisoners in high-security institutions in England and Wales were ‘successfully targeted’ by radical jihadists.

“Perhaps some 800 potentially violent radicals, not previously guilty of terrorism charges, will be back in society over the coming five to 10 years," they wrote.

"The natural reaction to improved counter-terrorist operations is for jihadist attacks to evolve towards more individual efforts."

They added that "a powerful al-Qaida media campaign" would make them "appear as dramatic and threatening as earlier attacks".

"If lone bombers and assassins are being sent out to try their luck... the key variable will be the effect these lone or spontaneous attempts have on the motivation of others to join the jihad," they said.

"Lone killers will always exist and some of them will succeed. The key question is whether their acts remain that of individuals or become part of a structural phenomenon."

Under a new generation of leaders such as Anwar Al-Awlaki, considered one of the world's most wanted terrorists, "it appears that high motivation is followed by fairly rudimentary training", the authors wrote, pointing to the apparent lone bomber behind the Times Square car bomb in New York in May.

While the chances of success for a lone, poorly trained individual may be considerably lower, "eventually, it is reasoned, one of them will be lucky enough to succeed in a major way against high-profile targets in Western countries".

The Rusi report went on: "The possibility of attacks now hangs over all major sporting events from the Commonwealth Games in India and the 2012 Olympic Games in London, to all future signature events such as football World Cup tournaments."

For the British public, it warned, the "greatest danger is public complacency".

The BNP is the Party of the Ethnic British Forever Plus Nick Griffin Speech

The BNP is the Party of the Ethnic British and Will Never Change

From the British National Party Newsroom

The British National Party is the party of the ethnic British people and will never apologise for or change that position, Nick Griffin MEP said at the end of the first indigenous family weekend today.

Addressing the final event of the two-day long outdoor gathering attended by around 200 people, Mr Griffin also warned against attempts by civic nationalists to infiltrate and destablise the BNP.

He pointed out that it was a Marxist tenet to believe that all variations in society could be ascribed to economics along. This view had become the norm for all political parties in Britain, except the BNP.

“Don’t think David Cameron is any different,” Mr Griffin said, adding that all political parties from the far left right through to UKIP endorsed the civic nationalist view which allocated nationality and identity purely on the basis of economics.

“Civic nationalism is actually a Marxist mentality which starts at the very far left, comes through the BBC, the Labour Party, the Lib Dems and the Conservatives,” he said.

“There are even people in this party who are also civic nationalists. Now some of them are perfectly decent people but are beguiled by the ideology which is in is part somebody else’s, is Marxist and so is desperately wrong.

“That is why they all on the same side trying to destroy this party, because we are the ethnic British, the English, the Scots, the Irish and the Welsh, and we do not apologise for it and we will never change it,” Mr Griffin said to applause.

The weekend’s events were an unqualified success enjoyed mostly in fine weather, reports our correspondent.

Families pitched tents and caravans all over the site next to the gently flowing river and all of Saturday was taken up with a series of youth-orientated activities which included fishing, campfire making, games and similar activities.

In the evening, a well-attended folk sing along was held in the main marquee, after acoustic performances by professional singers and a superb hog roast put on by the caterers.

The recitation of folk music was captured on film and for Radio Red, White and Blue. Full reports  will shortly be online at that radio station which you can find here.

Sunday morning started off with a church service by the Rev. Robert West. His sermon dealt with the corruption of the clergy and the resultant destruction of Britain’s moral compass.

The ever-popular James Whittle was up next and provided a fascinating nationalist slant on two famous battles which helped shape Britain’s history, Shrewsbury and Malden

Official Report Says Immigration Has Made Britain the Most Overcrowded Country in Europe

It’s Official: Immigration Has Made Britain the Most Overcrowded Country in Europe

From The BNP Newsroom

The British National Party’s warnings that unchecked mass immigration would destroy the fabric of British society is coming true faster than even the most dedicated multi-culturalists would have hoped, as news emerges that we are no officially the most crowded country in Europe.

The BNP has warned for many years of the dangers to British identity caused by the mass importation of millions of people from the Third World and also of the environmental impact such a mass movement of people would have.

Now, new figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the House of Commons Library have shown that England is (after the island of Malta) the most densely populated country in the European Union.

Last year, net migration was 196,000, an increase of almost 20 percent over 2008, while in the 12 months to June, the numbers granted permanent settlement in the UK rose by over a third.

Even this figure is deceptive in the sense that the calculation of “net” migration is based on a straight trade-off between those coming into Britain and those leaving.

Up to half a million Britons flee the Tory and Labour-created multi-cultural state every year, and they are replaced by an almost equal number of Third World immigrants.

It is from that trade-off that the net migration figure is calculated, whereas in reality the demographic shift in favour of the Third World is greatly amplified by the emigration figures.

The total number of people who entered Britain in 2009 was some 567,000. In the same year, some 371,000 Britons left, a slight decline from the 427,000 who left the year before.

In addition, some 362,015 visas were issued to foreign students in the twelve months to June this year, while the number of working visas fell 14 per cent to 161,000.

The vast majority of “student visas” issued (long acknowledged as the “easy way” around any immigration controls) means that the actual number of immigrants has risen once again.

“Study visas” have been shown time and time again to have been used to enter Britain illegally under the guise of attending utterly bogus colleges.

One of the most dramatic examples of this took place last year when the “Cambridge College of Learning” in east London, which had no link with Cambridge University and had only 11 desks, was shut after more than 2,500 ‘graduates’ applied for post-study working visas in two months.

Mass immigration is not only destroying the nature of British tradition and identity, but has also created intolerable pressures on public services and infrastructure such as schools, which are already buckling under the strain.

Urgent action is needed if Britain is to avoid being plunged over the abyss into Third World status.

Only the BNP has been right all along, and only the BNP has the policies and willpower to bring the situation under control.

Use this link to Join the British National Party https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

AN URGENT APPEAL BY Andrew Brons MEP to all Patriots

AN URGENT APPEAL BY Andrew Brons MEP

Author: Green Arrow |  

Dear Fellow Patriot,

During the last year, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), acting on behalf of the British government (of both the Brown and Cameron-Clegg administrations) has been trying to divide, bankrupt and thereby destroy the British National Party.

The action has cost the Party a lot of money. Why? Would it not have been possible to accede to the demands of the EHRC from the outset and avoid the legal costs? It would have been legally possible but not politically possible. There would always have been an element of the membership that would have suspected that we were embracing the changes too willingly and threatened to break away from the Party.

Splinter groups have been trying unsuccessfully to win over those of our members who were unhappy about the changes in the membership criteria. However, the changes were passed at an Extraordinary General Meeting almost unanimously. There were only five votes against and five abstentions. The issue did not divide us.

Despite the Party having complied with the demands of the court, the EHRC is pursuing a further case against our Chairman, claiming that the changes that we had made did not go far enough and that our Chairman was therefore in contempt of court. This is a clear attempt either to bankrupt our party and sequester its assets or to imprison our Chairman or both. This is simply an attempt to ban the British National Party by the backdoor.

It is imperative that the Party should unite on this issue, if we are to protect our party from dissolution. Our lawyers must be paid so that they can protect us from this further attack by the EHRC.

The Electoral Commission, another quango, acting on behalf of the British government, has been concerned at the ability of our party to raise such large sums of money during the European elections and afterwards. Our opponents identified Jim Dowson as the person behind our fundraising success and determined to destroy him and his fundraising capabilities.

They could simply have appealed to our supporters to desist from making contributions to the party but that was hardly likely to work. Instead they used the oldest trick in the book: they made unsubstantiated allegations (and in one case a provably false allegation) of financial impropriety. This is an old trick but it does work with naïve and the stupid.

The combination of necessarily high expenditure and falling donations has caused a cash crisis that will last for a few months. I should like to ask you to join me in making a substantial donation each month for an initial period of six months to help the party get back on its feet. I would also like to ask those who are able to make a single substantial donation to the Party to do so.

Our party is the only chance that our nation has of being able saved for our children and grandchildren. If we fail, the British nation will be finished for all time. Please do what you can to prevent the Equality & Human Rights Commission, the Electoral Commission, Searchlight and the old gang parties from destroying our nation forever:

You can make a donation to saving our country by following this link to the BNP Donations Page

Yours sincerely,

Andrew Brons MEP
BNP Member of European Parliament

UK to face New Homegrown Islamic terror Threats Soon

UK faces new wave of homegrown attacks - report

Britain faces a new wave of attacks from poorly trained but highly motivated homegrown militants, as the al Qaeda threat shifts from big, sophisticated bomb plots to acts by individuals, a report said on Friday.

A shift in al Qaeda tactics, the growing radicalisation of Muslims in prisons and a foreign policy that "serves to focus alienation and resentment," was fuelling the threat, the study by the Royal United Services Institute think tank argued.

"The conditions are all there for a series of attacks that could begin at any time," said the report, co-authored by the Director of RUSI, Professor Michael Clarke, who has advised the government on security matters.

There have been 20 significant Islamist plots against Britain since 2000. Only one has been successful, the July 2005 London bombings by four young Britons which killed 52 people. More than 230 people have been jailed for planning attacks.

Britain is on its second highest threat level of "severe," meaning a terrorist attack is considered to be highly likely, and the RUSI report said Britain had more to fear than any other Western country from homegrown terrorism.

However, the report said both the origin and nature of the threat had changed. Previously, Osama bin Laden's "al Qaeda Core" on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border had been the instigator of nearly all the major plots in Britain.

Now, groups such as al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), which took responsibility for a failed plot to blow up a U.S. airliner on Christmas Day, have become heavily involved.

To the fore is AQAP's American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, linked to the U.S. army psychiatrist who shot dead 13 soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas in 2009, as well to UK militants.

This shift has brought a change in tactics and targets, away from the dramatic, large-scale attacks on air travel planned by well-trained leaders operating extensive cells.

The report said Awlaki and other new leaders were happy to send out individuals with rudimentary training, targeting major sporting events and hotels, while suicide terrorists were also likely to attempt more assassinations of specific individuals.

"Eventually, it is reasoned, one of them will be lucky enough to succeed in a major way against high-profile targets in Western countries," the report said.

The report said security services also faced a growing threat from a rising number of Muslims radicalised in British prisons, which it said could produce some 800 "potentially violent radicals" over the next decade.

Meanwhile some of those convicted of involvement in terrorism plots who had received short jail terms would also be released and were likely to remain committed to their cause.

"British security services are acutely aware of the possibilities for a wave of individual, random attacks against different targets," the report concluded.

"Attacks on 'crowded places' are near the top of the government's risk rankings over the next five years."

The 'Equalities Commission' are determined to jail political party officers

NOW CONFIRMED! The 'Equalities Commission' are determined to jail party officers including myself! Dear Fellow Patriot, You may recall that last year I predicted that the equalities commission was absolutely determined to have me thrown in jail. On Tuesday the 7th September the future of the British National Party could well be decided and I could be  sent to prison! We as you know have done all we were  asked for by the courts, we opened up the  membership and removed 'controversial'  articles etc, but still they attack us!  Just what have we to do to satisfy  these people? DIE OFF, THAT'S WHAT! Trevor Phillips and the rest of  his establishment attack dogs are  hell bent on killing the BNP off once and for all by bankrupting our top officials and  leaving them homeless, penniless  and perhaps behind bars. Just imagine  if it where your name on these writs? It is indeed scary stuff, that's why we  must stand together in this desperate and dangerous time. We will suffer the blows but we need your support to do so. Courage, truth and justice, that's how we will beat the Equalities Commission! They think by imprisoning me and some other officials  we will fold! Well let me tell them and assure you, I will  never bow down to their threats. Jail me, strip me of  everything but they can never take my dignity nor can  they ever dent my pride and honour in being the Chairman  of this maligned and battle hardened party. I am your chairman and I give you a solemn oath to  fight these bullies, if I need to go to prison to defend  this party and our people I will cherish my incarceration as an honour on your behalf. I have the full support of my wife and children and now I need the support of  every true nationalist in the country. I need you to stand tall with me as we face the wrath of the establishment bully boys. There is no knight in  shining armour to save us, just TRUTH, HONOUR  AND THE OLD FASHIONED BRITISH FIGHTING SPIRIT! Like our forebears, I will never bow the knee to tyranny. They can expect nothing less from us than total resistance. I will fight, but I truly need your help right now, and be  assured there will be NO SURRENDER! As I write you this  personal letter we are only a few short days away from the most momentous event in our party's history. The 'Equalities Commission' have spent vast sums in an attempt to destroy this party. I must be very frank  with you: we have the fight of our lives before us.  But just pause for a moment, consider the battles  our forefathers had in their generations at Waterloo,  Ypres, the Somme, Dunkirk, D-day and the Falklands. Where would we be now without their sacrifices? Men and women of our blood have triumphed against  staggering odds to defend our proud nation. Now in  our time, we must also take up the torch of freedom  and liberty. We don't have to sacrifice our life blood  but we will have to sacrifice our time and money to  fight and to survive this current onslaught. Our enemies are almost strong enough - watch the horrors unfold! But we will not give up. Immigration, multiculturalism and political correctness are destroying Britain. Without a strong nationalist  voice our children have no future in this country and face a bleak future where they will become a  dispossessed and despised minority in their own homeland. Only the British National Party can stop this, that's why they must destroy us.  DON'T LET THEM WIN FOR OUR CHILDREN'S SAKE. The 'Equalities Commission'(CEHR) are at this very moment poised to destroy this party! They and their political masters are already celebrating the demise of the BNP and 'GRIFFIN IN PRISON'. They think we're on the ropes, backed into a corner,  maybe we are? But now we're coming out FIGHTING! We need to fight and we need to win. Will you help me to defend our rights? Will you help light the torch  of bold defiance and liberty? The Equalities Commission  have tried to bankrupt us and know they want to jail us.. .what is next, an assassin's bullet? This fight is all or nothing-winner takes all: it's as simple as that. You can thwart their evil plan to destroy us in  court on the 7th of September by backing this party financially. REMEMBER: your cheques and postal orders or credit card donations are the weapons the traitors fear most. Your indomitable spirit and kindness in giving  generously to preserve all that we all hold dear can and will destroy their feckless and wicked plans to destroy first the BNP, and then every  last vestige of Britishness they can. What you do now will have implications for  generations to come, your actions now may  well mean the difference between victory and  defeat for this Party and our British Heritage on  September the 7th. We are not only fighting for ourselves,  we are fighting to ensure our children  and grandchildren still have a country  to call their own. The weight of history rests upon OUR shoulders today, what will future generations say of our actions?  Nobody wanted this expensive fight except our enemies,  now we have it, let's turn it to our advantage! I know you receive many requests for help, but you and I both know that we are fighting for the very survival of this party. Would it be possible for you to consider a gift of £1000? If not, would a gift of £500 be within your reach? I am earnestly hoping that you dig deep  and make the biggest sacrifice you can.  I am counting on a few large gifts but I am  also depending on a multitude of gifts of £25,  £35, £50, £100 and £200. Please send whatever you can,  straight away. I need an urgent response to this email!  Our future is literally at stake! Every day lost in launching our legal fight back will cost us dear.   I am prepared to go to prison to defend  our cause but I don't want to see good party officials lose everything  and possibly being thrown in jail with me. That's why I must urge you to respond today.  Please tell me that I can count on your support and action. Can I tell the other officials on the writ that you are solidly behind them? This will mean a lot to Simon Darby and  Tanya Lumby at this time: Yours sincerely, Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party PS: We need to raise this money in the NEXT FEW DAYS to make the necessary arrangements to defend our Party and our vulnerable officials. The so-called 'Equalities Commission' and the other traitors hope that you will set this email aside and forget about it - that's why I hope that you will send your most generous gift right away.

> Forward to a friend

Thinking on Donating to Pakistan Flood Relief Think Again!

Author: Green Arrow |  

 

Amazing isn't it that our country has become one of the highest donators  to the Pakistan Flood Appeal via our government, whilst the moslem world sits back and lets the west pay as usual.  But that does not surprise me when I read about just how corrupt Pakistan is

Pakistan's economy has long suffered problems because of its embarrassingly narrow tax base. Broad sections of the wealthy, including senior politicians, pay little or no tax."

And strange isnt it, that Pakistan is squealing like a drowned rat, that we in the West are not doing enough to save them and send them foreign currency, whilst they have a nuclear arsenal and one of the biggest military machines in the world.

Well there is little we can do at this moment in time about stopping our traitor government sending our money overseas to help a nation that hates us, that in fact hates any nation that is not Islamic but as private individuals there is something you can do by not doing anything.  Do not send them a penny.  It is not our problem - our people are our problem.  If you really want to save and help people then make a donation to the British National Party.

However if you must send money to Pakistan then think about this first.  There are almost 3 million Christians remaining in Pakistan,  their churches are slowly being destroyed and replaced by mosques and the christians themselves are beaten, raped and murdered on a daily basis.

Pakistani Christian stonemason named Nasir Ashraf was working near Lahore  when he drank water from a public facility using a glass chained to the facility. He was assaulted by Muslims for "Polluting the glass". A mob developed, who beat Ashraf, calling him a "Christian dog".Bystanders encouraged the beating, because it would be a "good" deed that would help them in heaven.

But even in this time of tragedy the moslems of that mad land are taking this opportunity to wipe out a few more Christians by depriving them of aid in their hour of need.

The Christian victims of devastating flood in Southern Punjab are still waiting from any aid and selling their valuables to buy expensive food while Muslim flood aid organization are preferring Muslims.

The Christian flood victims are denied registration by district administration due to which they can not receive tents, food and medical assistance.

The Southern Punjab is hot bed of banned terrorist Muslim organizations which declare Christians to be Infidels and administration with fear of these radical Muslim elements not permitting Christians to keep in tents areas allocated for Muslim flood victims.

What I do find ironic about the elimination of the Christians in Pakistan is that originally, during the creation of the crazy country, Christians had been very active in their support of the Muslim League, having believed the moslem lie that all citizens of Pakistan would be treated with complete equality of citizenship.   Boy did they have a shock coming to them.  Taqiyya triumphs again.

And what about the Taliban, what are they saying now?  Well they are saying what they always say.  I Kill You.  They are going to target foreign aid workers involved in flood relief in Pakistan and I for one will not shed a tear when they fly the bodies of the aids workers back. 

Then again, having seen the number of Pakistani Doctors and Nurses working in our NHS, then perhaps we should encourage some of those to go and assist their own countrymen in Pakistan, instead of our people who would be murdered.

The Right Standpoint

By Mister Fox

There is an ideological muddle which impedes the protection of our people and we must find the right standpoint. Some influenced by university conditioning think it is is a rationalist formula written down in a book like Das Kapital or Mein Kampf but our patriotic way of thinking grows out of emotion and the need for numinous things in life rather than universal abstractions. The way to develop a new world view is to gather examples from the world around us, of what is really happening as a result of, say, immigration, then collate it and our version of reality begins to form.

We must link to our patriotic traditions and develop from there, but with a more suitable economic system to give our people priority in their own country. Many patriotic Conservatives, social and cultural, fought against mass immigration throughout the 50s and 60s. M.P.s like Cyril Osborne who began his campaign against open - door immigration in 1954 and Norman Pannell in 1956. Even Churchill prepared a Bill to control immigration but it was dropped when he had to relinquish the premiership because of deteriorating health. He also wanted the Tories to fight the General Election with the slogan ”Keep England White.” We have the famous example of Enoch Powell.(1)

The Conservative party was a “National” Conservative party which put the national interest first, not the Global economy. We are their natural successors and must position ourselves as such. This would give supporters a secure base to argue from with abundant role models and quotes from our history and that would strengthen their conviction which would impress their hearers more. People follow the dominant elites. Even those who agree with us vote for one of the dominant parties and a renewed conviction on our part would counter that. It is a mistake to lament they have not woken up when we are not putting our case with enough confidence. This is a starting point and would be adapted to deal with contemporary circumstances.

I have written before that we need to make an accommodation with Jewish communities and other groups who are in danger like Hindus and Sikhs but we must make it clear that this is our country and our people take priority. We are being invaded by a common enemy and the elites have adopted anti-Semitism as part of their surrender. Jewish people tend to regard “White Christians as a danger to them but must transcend the Ghetto Mentality and understand that the Muslims hate them first and they are under attack in France and Malmo, Sweden and when emasculated pricks like Cameron and Milliband get Turkey in the EU Jews will be openly persecuted! Mass immigration has changed everything and old enmities are no longer feasible. About 1 in 8 of the population of Southern Ireland are asylum seekers so the internecine wars in the North are not appropriate during an invasion. (2)

Do not think everyone in the media or the Conservative Party is an implacable enemy. Many agree with us and even have useful information about what the elites in politics and the media have planned but they stay away because of the Holocaust denying leaders.

The elites use the media and Equalities Commission to makes us like them or destroy us and we have to allow ethnics in but not adopt civic nationalism. There is a tendency for those who lament our lack of progress to think the situation hopeless and think conforming to the ideology of the elites but you do not win by capitulation. This shows they misunderstand the aims of the elites which is to replace Whites with immigrants. (3)

Simple or self-loathing people say “So what?”. “It doesn't matter if different people take over!” This shows a failure to understand how people behave. They think it will be painless like handing the baton on in a relay race.

It was common to hear liberals say:” We did it to them, now they can do it to us” though they did not themselves live in it. That submissive attitude still dominates the elites.”(4)

We must convey the urgency of this situation not try to be nice. We must respond in kind to the anti British propagandists in the media and be more urgent in our defending our children.

The vile abuse and the police and media cover-up of the murder of Charlene Downes shows how the elites are surrendering our young people to Muslims. She was a 14 year-old Blackpool schoolgirl who went missing in 2003. It is thought that older Muslim men who were illegally having sex with her murdered her, chopped her up and sold her to Blackpool people in kebabs!A trial in 2007 collapsed. The Independent Police Complaint Commissions decided covert surveillance was "handled poorly and unprofessionally", and police were forced to apologise.(5)

In Rochdale Nine men were jailed after a 14-year-old White girl was preyed upon and forced into prostitution. The child was fed vodka after she was found wandering the streets and repeatedly raped by gangs of Muslim men.

The convictions for various offences, including sexual activity with a child, controlling a child prostitute, facilitating child prostitution and paying for sexual services with a child. She had to testify in separate trials involving the men and was eventually excused further evidence after a third hearing when psychologists ruled there were fears for her mental and physical well-being.

The submissive attitude of children to Muslim predators is inculcated by the state at school. Harrop Fold High School in Worsley, Greater Manchester, persecuted Jodie Stott, a 14-year old schoolgirl, who was arrested by police for “racism.” She had wisely refused to sit with a group of Asian students because three, who had recently immigrated here, could not speak English. She was kept in a police cell for three-and-a-half hours after being reported by her teachers: "They told me to take my laces out of my shoes and remove my jewellery, and I had my fingerprints and photograph taken," said Codie.

Totalitarian headteacher Dr Antony Edkins: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark by one student towards a group of Asian students new to the school and new to the country." We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards people and pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form." Edkins and the other teachers are persecuting this young girl in her own country for wanting to be able to understand her school companions.

The same Education Authority had a ten-year-old boy prosecuted for allegedly calling an 11-year-old mixed race pupil a 'Paki' and 'Bin Laden' in a playground argument at a primary school in Irlam.

District Judge Jonathan Finestein said the decision to prosecute showed "how stupid the whole system is getting" and was himself attacked by teaching union leaders for "feeding a pernicious agenda" that aided the BNP.

In 1965 Peter Griffiths Conservative MP for Smethwick showed great wisdom when he called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused by progressives of wanting to start apartheid in schools!

The Daily Mail reported that a Catholic schoolgirl was labelled ‘truant’ by her teachers for refusing to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque. Staff the 14-year-old pupils to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote ‘community cohesion.’ Amy Owen refused.

Totalitarian headmaster Peter Lee wrote the visit was “as compulsory as a geography field trip. There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.”

‘The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement”. Around ten others in year 9 classes refused to dress as Muslims and were marked down in the truanting register. It is clear from this how the word tolerance is used in an ideological rather than grammatical sense.: the state through its institutions is trying to enforce submission to Islam.

We must start highlighting the religious apartheids enshrined in Islamic Sharia law and what would happen to British women if decadent elites like Dame Butler-Sloss and Prince Charles succeed in introducing it and, especially, the legalised sexual abuse of children; the cruelty to animals.

The surrender to Islam and the new anti-Semitism is taught in schools. A Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are abandoning teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils whose do not believe the Holocaust happened and are frightened to teach the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques. They also teach a version of the development of slavery, which omits the much longer and harsher Muslim slave trade.

MPs also want children given relationship advice 'in context' to make informed decisions about when to have sex. Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. This ignores the essential human duty to re-produce. Propagandising homosexuality is a threat to our demographics.

The State collects DNA records of children as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Schools take their fingerprints which is replacing library cards. When working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer technie could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft.

In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.

A nation's manners, morals, religions, political institutions and social structure, are inherited from ancestors and develop from the character of the people at that time.

Government from Brussels, economic control by global corporations and Afro-Asian colonization is part of the progressives' new dream for an ideal future, but in practice it disinherits our children of community and association with their own kind which we are duty bound to preserve for them.

Throughout history wars have been fought for territory and by allowing newcomers to stake claims, our emasculated ‘elite’ are encouraging them to fight for yet more. In The Territorial Imperative Robert Ardry explains how much having a country of their own has boosted the confidence of Israelis, but our rulers are handing our ancestral homeland to invaders and protecting their welfare over and above that of our own people.

Our views derive from an emotional and instinctive relationship with our people and our territory. It is more profound than rationalising or adopting an artificial blueprint for a Utopian world because it grows from natural, human instinct and emotion.

To give favourable treatment to aliens over our own people, as the fifth Marquess of Salisbury described them “our kith and kin,” is morally evil.

Look at data from the Office of National Statistics (which doesn’t take into account the births to mothers born here) then look at your sons and daughters and ask, ”Am I betraying my own children? Where will they live and work?”

We have natural bonds with our families, a responsibility for them and a duty to them. We also have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture, and we must honour that.

Our loyalties begin with affection within families and this emanates outward to neighbourhood and nation. Men and women are distinctive sexual beings within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin, above strangers, and this affects the type of community we create.

Edmund Burke’s famous definition of society is that it is a continuous community of the living, the dead and those who are yet to be born. Each man and woman is part of a larger body. The individual dies, but descendants live on.

We have positive benefits to offer our people: preferential treatment in their own country, better education, priority in housing and employment for our children and protection from child-rape by older members of a rival community. You only need look at the names of graduates from medical and law schools to see how our young are being dispossessed. We would offer British children more opportunities and a better future without unfair competition from outsiders.
from http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/