Nick Griffin MEP joins the battle to save Liverpool Coastguard Station

MEP joins the battle to save coastguard station

FEBRUARY 2011: Nick Griffin MEP Euro News
RESPONDING to requests for help from coastguards across his North West constituency, Nick Griffin has written to the Ministry of Transport and the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) raising his concerns over the possible closure of Liverpool's Maritime Rescue Co-ordination Centre. 

 A recent MCA consultation document has revealed the intention to close 10 of the current 18 coastguard stations throughout the UK including .
The station at Crosby in Liverpool covers a vast area which includes the whole northwest of England, the Isle of Man, parts of Scotland and Wales.
This is not the first time Liverpool coastguard has been earmarked for closure.
In 1999, the station was under threat, but a campaign by staff at the MRCC halted the planned closure although the MCA did close three other coastguard stations in other parts of Britain.
A Transport Select Committeee report on "The Work of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency" published  on 18th July 2004, clearly states in para 64 that "it is unacceptable to contemplate further closures when there has been no full assessement of the closures already made."
Nick Griffin has written to Mr Mike Penning MP (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport) and Vice-Admiral Sir Alan Massey (Chief Executive, Maritime and Coastguard Agency), outlining his concerns with regard to the changes proposed and pointing out that cost-cutting alone should not be the pre-eminent driver of change and that over-zealous efficiency measures must never over-ride emergency response effectiveness.
In his letter he said:
"I have read your Consultation Document on Modernising the Coastguard, which of course potentially affects many of my constituents in North West England. In general I welcome the broad outlines of these changes proposed to equip H.M. Coastguard to meet the challenges of the 21st Century.
There are, however, a number of issues which in my view raise concern, and merit, therefore, further consideration.
Firstly, cost savings to the long-suffering British taxpayer achieved through increases in efficiency are always most welcome. However in a vital service such as this it is essential that cost savings are not seen as a pre-eminent driver of change.
As you rightly observe, the number of incidents with which this Service is expected to have to deal is likely to increase, as is the potential seriousness of these incidents as vessels get bigger and our waters grow more congested with shipping and offshore installations such as wind farms in, potentially, worsening weather conditions.
I need not, I am sure, point out that if excessively zealous cost-cutting leads to just one additional major pollution incident in our coastal waters, the consequent clean-up costs will exceed many times over any savings achieved, to say nothing of less easily quantifiable environmental damage.
To this end, I believe that all possible steps should be taken to avoid losing the services of any more experienced Coastguard Officers than is absolutely necessary, and would ask you to endeavour seriously to confine redundancies to administrative staff only.
Secondly, in any centralisation of emergency coverage to fewer and further away Operations Centres, as proposed, it is essential that local knowledge is not lost. I am familiar with the consequences of this adversely affecting my constituents in another Emergency Service.
When the Ambulance Service was reorganised on broadly similar lines to those you propose, 999 calls for Cumbria were transferred to a call centre outside of the county. The result was a marked and potentially life-threatening decline in service. This was in many cases due to the new call centre staff being unfamiliar with the geography and in some cases the dialect of Cumbria. An ambulance called to attend in Wigton, Cumbria, for example, was sent in error to Wigtown, Dumfries and Galloway, many miles away.
H.M Coastguard needs to study and learn from this and similar reorganisations in other emergency services - including the Fire Service "FiReControl" project the new Government has decided to scrap, citing similar concerns to those which have been widely expressed about this reorganisation.
If it is decided to proceed as planned, I would suggest that the new structure makes full use of the local expertise of the increased number of Coastal Safety Officers, who I understand are intended to provide 24/7 cover. Perhaps the local Coastal Safety team member on watch could be included in the handling of 999 and other urgent calls? The Maritime Operations Centre staff receiving such a call could if required telephone the appropriate local Coastal
Safety Officer on call and include him/her and the caller in a phone conference loop so the caller would be able to talk to someone with detailed local knowledge. This would undoubtedly in some cases make a potentially vital difference to the swift and effective resolution of the incident.
I would add that I particularly welcome the additional support you propose to be provided by local professional Coastguard officers to the local volunteer Coastguard Rescue teams.
Thirdly, I feel that if a choice must be made between Liverpool and Belfast as the site of a Maritime Operations Sub-Centre, Liverpool is significantly preferable. Liverpool is a larger port than Belfast, and is once again expanding after a long period of decline, notably as a result of proposals to use it as a significant port of call for cruise liners as well as cargo shipping.
Unlike Belfast, which is geographically isolated from other significant ports, Liverpool is near for example Birkenhead, Fleetwood and Heysham and well placed to offer additional support if needed to Holyhead. Also Northern Ireland has - for good reason I agree - received a disproportionate amount of public expenditure and public sector employment in recent years, and it is surely time to redress the balance in favour of another economically challenged area, Merseyside. I must therefore firmly oppose any proposal to close the existing MRCC at Crosby rather than incorporating it into the new structure."

British National Party Chairmans Update - Barnsley the Next Battle

Barnsley the Next Battle

Written by Nick Griffin MEP

February 2011

Dear Fellow Patriot, Another Labour party thief is caught red handed with his hands in the taxpayers’ till. Quite rightly he is losing his seat in Parliament, and our next by-election will soon be upon us. Working closely with our hard-working Barnsley branch, we have selected a superb candidate – Enis Dalton, a professional trainer and well-known local community campaigner – to be our candidate in this high-profile election. As a local girl, she is perfect for a constituency like Barnsley with its close-knit community. Predictably, Labour have parachuted in a candidate, from Hampshire. Last year, at the General Election, the British National Party candidate polled 3,307 (8.9%) votes in Barnsley Central. With the party united behind Enis, and a strong local branch under dynamic organiser Ian Sutton leading the campaign, all we need to secure an excellent vote is the money to stand against Labour and run a really professional campaign. We’ve already hit the ground running, with a fantastic total of 150 activists joining me and Enis Dalton on our first Day of Action. The whole constituency was blanket leafleted in just a few hours, with more specialised teams also out canvassing and using specially designed questionnaires to collect the information about what Barnsley voters really worry about. This information will allow us to tailor our message for maximum possible impact. We’re aiming to make this our most professional campaign ever. “We need to remind voters that Labour are no friends of the people of Barnsley. They have betrayed us. The British National Party is now the true voice of the British people” – British National Party candidate, Enis Dalton. Your help is always appreciated. All nationalists are required to assist in this battle. Please help us in any way you can. Come and join us on the streets, or send your most generous gift today. It is almost impossible to put a monetary target on this appeal for Barnsley, but every single penny you send will make a difference. You will help us confront the Labour thieves, raise public awareness and ensure that the British National Party become the true voice of Barnsley... because we’re in it for the long haul. By working together, we will win the battle for local hearts and minds in Barnsley. Thank you for your continued and generous support. I know that Enis will appreciate your help as much as I do. Yours faithfully, Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party You can donate to the British National Party on their site here. The British National Party’s national organiser, Adam Walker, has called for urgent ‘instant’ demonstrations against convicted thief Labour MP Eric Illsley for tomorrow afternoon

EU Commission Rules Questions on president, José Manuel Durão Barroso Communist Background “Inadmissible”

European Commission Rules Questions on Barroso’s Communist Background “Inadmissible”
The British National Party Newsroom

The European Commission has unilaterally ruled that any questions about the extremist Communist background of its president, José Manuel Durão Barroso, are “inadmissible” and will not be discussed.

The shocking refusal to answer a simple set of questions over Mr Barroso’s background was made in a letter to the British National Party Member of the European Parliament for North West England, Nick Griffin.

The questions which Mr Griffin asked related to Mr Barroso's college days when he was one of the leaders of the underground Maoist MRPP (Reorganising Movement of the Proletariat Party, later PCTP/MRPP, Communist Party of the Portuguese Workers/Revolutionary Movement of the Portuguese Proletariat) in his home country.

There is a video clip of Mr Barosso, recorded in 1976, where he criticises the “bourgeois education system” which "throws students against workers and workers against students" and which displayed his ultra-leftist and Maoist sympathises.

With the title “Marxist connections of Commissioners,” Mr Griffin’s written questions ran as follows:

“Given that the Commission does not consider the extremist, totalitarian political affiliations of unelected Commissioners and officials — who initiate legislation — to be of significance to the people they govern, kindly advise in specific regard to Commissioner Barroso:

1. For what duration was he a member of a Maoist party?

2. Whether, given the elimination of between 60-1 00 million persons in Maoist China, Mr Barroso will condemn Maoism?

3. Whether Mr Barroso has ever expressed regret for his past affiliations, which many persons will consider to have been distasteful in the extreme?

4. Whether Mr Barroso will apologise to the people of both Europe and China for his previous membership of such an organisation and, if not, why not?

5. Whether Mr Barroso considers his previous affiliations an error of judgement?

6. Whether Mr Barroso will condemn, outright, both the organisation to which he was affiliated and its policies?”

After a lengthy wait, Mr Griffin finally received a response from the European Commission in which he was told that the “President” (that is, Mr Barosso) “has deemed it [the questions] inadmissible.”

Mr Griffin said later that patriotic politicians are forced all the time to apologise for youthful indiscretions and for silly things they have said or done in the past.

“Everyone can change, but it is always reassuring to hear from the horses’ mouth that such youthful dalliances are no longer applicable,” Mr Griffin said.

“It is therefore worrying that Mr Barosso, whose salary package is now larger than the president of America, will not even discuss his extremist Communist past, never mind apologise or repudiate it.”

The Church of England Now there's a Misnomer

Screw the Church of England

Written by Green Arrow    At the British Resistance Site

February 2011

Church of England.  Now there's a misnomer if ever there was one.  The Church of England has not been for England or any other part of the United Kingdom for a long, long time.  In fact it has very little to do with religion even these days and is more about pushing the communist party manifesto or the homosexual Pink News rather than the word of God. Instead of being concerned about the number of Churches being converted into mosques for the followers of the Cult of the Dead paedophile, whose followers are killing Christians world wide, they are more concerned about their pink frocked priests joining the British National Party. Today, their ruling body, the General Synod has backed draft legislation paving the way for a ban on clergy membership of the patriotic BNP.  One wonders how long before they start to ban their congregations from joining or even supporting the party.  But why stop there?  Why not burn the nasty BNP alive at the stake or perhaps throw them to some lions. One would also have thought that the issue of how they can condone having practising homosexuals as priests and ordain at so called homosexual weddings is driving real Christians away from the Churches, would have been more important.  But in the new Church of England, politics is far more fun than saving souls. Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. One of the main drivers for pushing this ban through on British People, is Indian born Vasantha Gnanadoss, a Metropolitan police civilian worker and General Synod member who first won backing for the ban two years ago and who I wrote about here. My advice to true Christians (and I consider myself to be one) is to say "Screw you Vicar and screw the Church of England.  God does not care where we worship or where we pray to him but he does care about the way we follow his teachings".

Beirut in Folkestone Kent ” — David Cameron’s Muscular Liberalism in Action

Beirut in Folkestone” — David Cameron’s Muscular Liberalism in Action

The British National Party Newsroom

An outbreak of Afghan tribal warfare which has left at least one dead and several injured in Folkestone, Kent, has served once again to highlight the continuing insanity of mass Third World immigration and David Cameron’s “muscular liberalism.”

According to local inhabitants quoted in regional media sources, Folkestone has “become like Beirut” and there are entire areas of the town which are no-go zones for white British people.

Most recently a tribal warfare broke out between gangs of Afghan “immigrants” at Marine Parade in the town.

One Afghan “immigrant” was stabbed to death in an area which was described as a “no-go area after dark” in the local media.

Another five Afghan “immigrants” were hospitalised as the fight, which turned the street into something resembling a combat zone, raged up and down the street.

According to local residents, the area around the former harbour has “become a hotbed of problems between rival gangs and is notorious for drug taking.”

The buildings behind the hotel, which overlooks the harbour, has been used to house “asylum seekers” and “foreign nationals,” the local media reported.

“Other locals say it is not safe to walk the streets after 9pm and in recent months problems in the area have got worse,” the reports continued.

One local resident was quoted as saying: “This used to be a holiday town but in the last few years it’s turned into Beirut. This could be such a nice place, all these old buildings and it’s been left to go to ruin."

Another resident, Michael Straw, 50, said he had stayed with friends since the mass brawl. “It is absolute chaos and like being in a war zone. I felt scared being there and cannot face going back.”

Another local resident interviewed by the media, former policeman Malcolm Montgomery, said the area had a long history of trouble.

“There’s a lot of problems around here; I wouldn’t feel happy walking around here at night. This area has got an awful reputation."

Chief Superintendent Chris Hogben announced that police were “investigating this serious incident which appears to be the result of a dispute between two groups of Middle Eastern people.”

Ironically, Chief Superintendent Hogben added that the police “also have specialist officers working within the community to reduce these tensions" as if a ‘community cohesion officer’ would be capable of sorting out a tribal war imported into Britain as a result of the Labour/Tory immigration policy.

One report claimed that some families have fled their homes to “escape the violence that has come with the influx of immigrants.”

If this is the sort of ‘muscular liberalism’ and its ‘integration’ which Mr Cameron now prefers instead of his equally awful ‘multiculturalism', then it is about time that Afghan ‘asylum seekers’ should be placed next to his millionaire’s house in Witney.

Why is the Asia & The Rest of The Third World Not “Multicultural?”

Why is the Third World Not “Multicultural?”

  The British National Party Newsroom

Why does the liberal elite want to force multiculturalism upon Britain and the First World yet they vigorously defend the right of the Third World nations to maintain their distinct cultures, asks British National Party correspondent Maid of Kent.

By Maid of Kent — It must be time to divert the attention of the sheeple away from another 'bad news day' — what better way to hide bad news than to announce that our 'beloved and respected leaders' have finally seen the light about the mass immigration and attendant multiculturalism disaster that they imposed on us in the first place?

Watching David Cameron give his 'failed multiculturalism' speech (for all of 30 seconds — I can't take any more than that) I have to wonder at the desperation of the Conservative Party and voters that they would vote for this man.

He speaks with the conviction of a wooden puppet (Pinocchio comes to mind) and so obviously neither believes what he is saying nor intends to follow through with any promises that his speech/propaganda writers make.

He reminds me of Tony Blair, but is an even worse actor and liar, which is saying something.

I just find it frightening that there are masses of people in this country who believe this performance and really think that things are going to change!

What is more indicative of the predominant beliefs among the liberal elite who Cameron represents is the comment on his speech by Paul Vallely in the Independent newspaper.

This — and many of the comments posted — reveals the twisted views and beliefs of influential segments of our society, views and beliefs that we must rigorously contest.

These elements in Britain have the self-righteous view that multiculturalism is the natural and desired state of life in our country, although they rigorously and hypocritically avoid the suggestion that it should be imposed on any other country on earth.

From the brainwashed Marxist agitators to the Asians who say that they are British but still call themselves 'Asians' (you cannot be both), we can see the whole range of Liberal fascism and intolerance of the views of the ordinary British people.

Vallely himself suggests that British culture has no right to be the dominant culture in Britain — how twisted is that?

Perhaps he would be happier if Islamic culture was the only culture of Britain?

Would he also suggest that Indian/Chinese or African culture had no right to be the dominant cultures of those countries? Of course not — such is the hypocrisy and arrogance of these so-called liberals.

Unfortunately, such has been the brainwashing of our people by these liberal fascists, that many British people believe that the mass immigration-imposed multiculturalism is the normal and best state for Britain.

Nationalists, who have opposed the folly of mass immigration and have resented the invasion of our homeland by uninvited and unwanted hordes from all over the world, believe that the indigenous British people have the right to their own homeland and for their culture to be the only acceptable culture in that homeland.

We ask no more than African, Asian or Oriental people do in their own homelands — the acceptance of the indigenous peoples' culture as the sole and dominant culture of that country. 

Why is that not acceptable to these liberal fascists? I can only assume that it is because they wish to see the destruction of any European Christian based culture — for what reasons and ends I can only guess.

But when they make war with my culture, they make war with me, and any who share my belief in our culture.

Bear in mind that the hordes of immigrants who have invaded Britain came originally and solely for economic reasons — and should have been grateful for the opportunities afforded them — but have bitten the hand that fed them by then seeking to impose their cultures (prevalent in their failed Third World homelands) on the countries and native peoples that allowed them such opportunities.

How ungrateful and ungracious is that?

When I see all of the countries in the world happily and peacefully enjoying the multicultural experience, then I may be prepared to submit my country to the multicultural experience.

I fail to understand why Britain and Europe should be the ones to have this experiment forced on them, when many, many, countries in the world would be far more likely to benefit from this experiment than previously successful European nations.

But the liberal fascist elite hypocritically recoil from any suggestion that failed Third World nations might benefit from such an experiment — it is only acceptable for the white European nations.

The truth is — and they know it — that multiculturalism has failed in every country that has experienced it, throughout history.

We have been able to read in our history books and learn about these multicultural failures, but thanks to the Lib/Lab/Con politicians, we can now experience the horrors of such failures ourselves.

The former Yugoslavia, the anti-Semitism prevalent in Europe throughout history — the history of mankind is full of examples of the failed concept of multiculturalism — yet the idiots from the Lib/Lab/Con parties who have ruled Britain for decades ignored the lessons of history and imposed the same doctrine on us — and it has failed yet again. 

This is Britain — not Africa, not China, not India, not Pakistan — and British culture, the culture of the British people who are the rightful inhabitants of Britain, should and will prevail.

If any don't like it, they can go to a country with a culture that they do like.

I, and other Nationalists, won't stop them and if necessary, will help them on their way.

Like many British people, my forefathers spilt too much blood to allow me to give my homeland away to foreign invaders. Like the flesh that I spring from, I will fight for my God, kith, kin and country — and culture.

By the way, there is no such thing as 'multicultural'. The term suggests that the people of a nation enjoy living with numerous aspects of different cultures, all interweaving seamlessly and harmoniously.

While superficially that may be correct — the British people have always enjoyed their cup of tea and more recently, a curry — these examples are merely occasional adoptions of certain elements of other countries cultures in that they have then been absorbed into our culture over time, therefore over time, becoming part of British culture.

These foreign customs have been willingly adopted by the British people, through choice and preference. They have not been forced down our throats.

I had a quite heated discussion with a multi-culture supporter recently. She is quite offended by someone who belches out loud in public — to her (as a British person) it is bad mannered to do so.

But what happens when a refined British person who believes that belching in public is the height of bad manners comes up against someone of Arabic origin and culture, who believes that belching loudly after a meal is the height of good manners?

Does the Arab refrain from belching in order to not offend the Briton (therefore changing their culture and submitting to the norms of another culture) or do they belch loudly (following their own culture) and offend the Briton?

Or does the Briton (adhering to their cultural norms) show their disapproval of the belching (therefore offending the Arab) or, ignoring their own culture, accept the cultural manners of the Arab?

If both follow their own culture, then both will be highly offended by the actions of the other, proving that for multiculturalism to work, one or the other (or both) cultures has to submit to the other.

One, or both have to make concessions for people of different cultures to live harmoniously together, in which case, neither is following their own culture — they are both giving way on their traditional beliefs — therefore they have no culture. Or one does not give way and makes no concessions to other races and cultures, which leads either to the submission of one culture to the other, or to a cultural clash. 

We see this every day in Britain with the acceptance by the British people of 'gay' rights, feminist rights etc., when these same ideals and principles are fundamentally opposed by Muslims — whose culture prevails?

Multiculturalism does not work in theory and it does not work in practice.

People of all cultures and races have more respect for each other when they live in their separate nations where they can observe their own unique cultures, moulded and guided by their own peoples’ customs and traditions.

had enough then Join or donate to the British National Party Here

UK Police running scared of Muslim grooming

Police running scared of Muslim grooming

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick griffin MEP N.W England Euro News

FEBRUARY 2011: 
TELEVISION programmes often generate a lot of correspondence to the MEP's Constituency Office and this week's The Wright Stuff was one such programme.


 Programme presenter Matthew Wright (right) was confronting the issue of racially motivated sex crime, and trying to get studio and audience guests to comment.
Apparently the police refused to attend the show, and Matthew Wright openly called them "chicken" for running scared of this growing problem.
What prompted constituents to write to their MEP was the way the invited guests were too scared to honestly respond to questions and used typical political evasion to avoid answering.
One or two people were brave enough to tell the truth including an Asian woman called Yasmin who pointed out that racially motivated sex crimes had increased British National Party membership.
Even a Muslim caller even acknowledged that the perpetrators of these crimes were almost exclusively Muslim.
Special guest Robert Winston backed off when faced with the Muslim grooming issue and this otherwise incredibly intelligent man, displayed that he had virtually no knowledge whatsoever about Islam.
Responding to those who had written to their MEP, Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Given that the police fully collude with the “culture of silence” surrounding the issue of racially motivated sex crime, it is not surprising that they declined to talk publically about the issue. Off the record, of course, officers have revealed that the pathetic conviction rates for sex offenders represents only a small proportion of the “tidal wave” of offending that has been uncovered in areas such as Lancashire and Manchester.
Mr Griffin and the constituency team are working to expose the scandal of the lack of action by police and education authorities to address the problem.
The police are so politically correct that they twist the statistics to hide the extend of Muslim involvement in these vile crimes. We have however, through Freedom of Information requests, forced Lancashire police to admit that all the victims in their Operation Engage grooming investigation were recorded as 'white' and we will continue to shine the spotlight on the police until the true facts surrounding this crime are revealed.
When we have collected all the relevant evidence, Mr Griffin will raise this issue in the European Parliament, as well as running a high-profile campaign in the North West to ensure that this increasing problem is fully recognised and effectively confronted.
We owe it to the young victims - and thousands of potential future victims - to ensure that Political Correctness and the fear of being branded as 'racist', is not allowed to jeopardise the protection of our vulnerable youngsters or to prevent justice from being served."

Bogus Foreign Student Visa Racket Costs Taxpayer up to £500 Million per Year

Bogus Student Visa Racket Costs Taxpayer up to £500 Million per Year

The British National Party Newsroom

The bogus student visa points-based system racket, started by Labour and endorsed by the Tories in their election manifesto, costs British taxpayers anywhere between £300 and £500 million per year, a new study has shown.

Although liberals and some university staff have claimed that a crackdown on the student visa swindle — which saw 90,000 foreigners enter Britain last year — will cost money, the amount lost is far less than the cost to taxpayers which the system causes, said independent think tank Migrationwatch UK.

That body said in a report that a crackdown on bogus student visa applications “is likely to lead to a loss of some £95 million a year fee income to colleges offering below degree level courses, this has to considered alongside the £300—£500 million a year that it has estimated the taxpayer must fund to support British workers made unemployed by bogus students working illegally.”

“This is yet another legacy of the previous Government’s disastrous management of the immigration system which has once again left the taxpayer picking up the bill,” Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green said in a statement, ignoring the fact that the Conservative government had specifically endorsed that policy in their election manifesto.

“It is neither economically justifiable for the hard pressed taxpayer nor fair to British workers who have to compete for scarce jobs with people who have cheated the system to come here,” Sir Andrew continued.

Migrationwatch did, however, point out that that it was “important to be clear that the purpose of the government’s measures is not to reduce the number of students but to reduce the exploitation of the present system by bogus students” and went on to endorse the typically Tory nonsense of ‘net immigration'.

“In the normal course of events, students should leave after completing their courses to be replaced by others. Over time, therefore, the number of those who arrive will be counter balanced by those leaving with no effect on net migration,” Sir Andrew said.

Meanwhile, a separate report has revealed that last year alone, no less than 90,000 foreign ‘students’ entered Britain by applying to colleges which are not on any Home Office ‘trusted’ list.

A significant number of these entered the country since the election last year, meaning they entered under the Tory government.

Students are only supposed to be allowed to enter the country to attend colleges which have been checked and approved, but this rule has not been applied with any consistency.

According to the figures, there were 613 private colleges which are not ‘highly trusted’ in existence in January this year. Between them, these ‘colleges’ have the ability to sponsor a total of 280,000 international students.

Many of these colleges have been exposed as offering totally bogus courses in ‘hospitality', ‘business administration’ and other obvious hoaxes.

Janus the Chameleon Cameron’s Pronouncements on Islam

Chameleon Cameron’s Pronouncements on Islam

  The British National Party Newsroom

Treacherous Tory leader David Cameron has called upon Muslims to “embrace our British values” just 44 months after telling voters exactly the opposite, namely that British people “need to integrate more” with the Muslim way of life.

In addition, Mr Cameron claimed that there was a difference between Islam and Islamism, even though in an earlier policy statement, he warned directly against making that distinction because, he said, it “plays into the extremists’ hands.”

In an article which appeared in the Observer newspaper in May 2007 titled “What I learnt from my stay with a Muslim family,” Mr Cameron wrote: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.

“If we want to remind ourselves of British values — hospitality, tolerance and generosity to name just three — there are plenty of British Muslims ready to show us what those things really mean,” the Tory leader wrote.

In his latest remarks, made over the past weekend, Mr Cameron has decided that it is Muslims who need to integrate into British society, not the other way round.

In his speech at the security conference in Munich, Mr Cameron said that British Muslims must subscribe to mainstream values of freedom and equality and that the policy of allowing each group to have its own culture had failed.

In the earlier Observer article, Mr Cameron also took great pains to stress that “many Muslims” are “deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today.

“Indeed, by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them,” Mr Cameron wrote in his earlier article.

In his Munich speech, however, Mr Cameron once again completely reversed his view.

“We have got to get to the root of the problem, and we need to be absolutely clear on where the origins of where these terrorist attacks lie,” he said.

“That is the existence of an ideology, Islamist extremism. We should be equally clear what we mean by this term, and we must distinguish it from Islam.

“We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing,” Mr Cameron said in his speech, which can be found on the Downing Street website.

The astonishing chameleon-like change is conclusive evidence that the Tory leadership is either utterly devious and opportunist, or just plain downright stupid.

Either way, Mr Cameron is clearly an embarrassment to Britain.

Had Enough Then Join The British National Party Here 

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful

---

OK – so now the cracks are really beginning to appear.

I am indebted to my good friend and fellow Freeman on the land, for allowing me to use his documentation for this:-
Let me fill you in on the background so you have the case history:-
“Jim” (As we will call him”) is a Freeman on the Land along with us (More on that here www.TPUC.org & www.thinkfree.ca) – and a few months back he decided (Like many of us) that he wasn’t going to pay the UNLAWFUL Council tax that they were trying to enforce upon him via thier unlawful statute legislation. So he stopped paying:-
In due course he started receiving the threatening letters until one day the “summons” appeared on his doormat. (Note: A summons is merely an invitation to attend their place of business to discuss a punishment – its an offer – Read more - just as the Council Tax Bill is an offer to contract with them – read more on this)

The “invitation” was to appear before Wirral Magistrates Court for a hearing concerning the issuing of a liability hearing. Now as we all now ALL magistrates courts are merely a trading styles of the “run for profit” company called “Ministry of Justice” – see below and you can get a copy of the document I have acquired clearly showing:-

1. The corporate status of the Ministry of Justice
2. The Directors (Lord Falconer of Thoroton & Others)
3. The fact that Ministry of Justice has County Court Jugements against it
4. The trading styles of MOJ (Top right – which includes “Magistrates Courts”

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE IS A BUSINESS
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/MOJ_1.jpg

Now call me blonde but I would say this is pretty damned conclusive that we are dealing with a corporate court convened by a corporation to simply lift money from you and I.

So … “Jim” jotted the council a little letter which is shown below:-
FIRST LETTER TO WIRRAL COUNCIL
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_1.jpg

Jim sent this letter about THREE WEEKS before the date that the hearing was due to be heard on.
So … the DAY BEFORE the hearing, Jim received a phone call from the Wirral Council LEGAL DEPARTMENT and what they said was staggering …

THEY WERE GOING TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION FOR A LIABILITY ORDER!

1. Now this is incredible that on the back of one letter they decide to withdraw and more importantly confirms the following:-
2. Council tax is UNLAWFUL, as you and I well know that if these leeches had once ounce of a lawful case for taking this money then they would fight it to the death

They KNOW Council Tax is unlawful and are simply robbing those who haven’t woken up to the facts yet to the tune of £140,000,000,000 per annum (thats 140 BILLION of our money!)
So, Jim being the experienced fellow he is – asked them to email him with confirmation that they were going to withdraw and printed below is their email.
WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMATION OF WITHDRAWAL BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO LAWFUL CASE
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_2.jpg

Jim then asked for further clarification in a formal letter and here is the letter that they sent!
LETTER FROM WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMING THEIR WITHDRAWAL FORM COUNCIL TAX LIABILITY HEARING
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_3.jpg

Then Jim asked them to confirm in writing that because there was now NO LIABILY that the council tax was no longer due
This is the letter they and this is probably (in my opinion) one of THE single most important documents in the fight against Council Tax as it PROVES beyond ANY DOUBT that we DO NOT HAVE TO PAY this UNLAWFUL COUNCIL TAX.
Look at the bit in red!

LETTER FROM WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMING THAT COUNCIL TAX DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PAID
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_4.jpg

So not believing a word of the Council or the courts Jim rocked up to the court on the morning of the Liability hearing and standing as a Freeman on the Land asked the Judge to confirm the withdrawal of the other side which the Judge duly confirmed. The judge then told Jim that he needn’t have turned up and then Jim hit with it.
“I know that sir, but there is the small matter of mys costs”
BAM! – They were not expecting that one!

So, Jim has now duly entered a claim for costs of £1,400 against Wirral Council which is still ongoing at this time as the courts are trying to play silly !!!!!!s with Jim – he has even had one judge step down and refuse to adjudicate in favour of his costs – as you can see – its a stitch up!

Anyway – Jim has some other things planned and I will keep you abreast of developments but there you have it.

A UK Council running away from a court hearing because they KNOW they dont have a LAWFUL leg to stand on and the whole Council Tax is a scam to relieve you and I of money and use it to

• A) Line the pension funds of civil servants
• B) Keep us opressed
• C) Pay of the interest on loans to the bank and the IMF

If you think that Council Tax pays for your bins or the Police – then you are very misguided I am afraid.

GAME ON!
origional posting on  

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful - MoneySavingExpert.com Forums: "

Prophets of Doom: David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will

Prophets of Doom: David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will

Written by Tim Heydon

origionaly published on the http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/

Part 1:  Radical Individualism and Opening the Road to State Terror Modern Freedom means the Limitless Freedom to Will. Unleashed from the Guiding Hand of Christianity and Tradition, the Freedom to Will can Mean  the Freedom to Will Terror Christianity Has Made Us – So How Can We Imagine a Non-Christian World? It is difficult for us, living as we are at the end of nearly two millennia of Christian Civilisation, fully to grasp quite how revolutionary Christianity was in the transformation of attitudes in the ancient world, or to imagine what it might mean if those attitudes were to disappear, as disappearing they are in the West. The World of Rome and the Christian Revolution In his book ‘Atheist Delusions; The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies’  the theologian  David Bentley Hart does a terrific job of bringing  out  the impact of Christianity on the ancients, transforming  a world in which  an individual’s worth was predicated on  his or her  power or lack of it  to one in which every individual has intrinsic worth.   Roman society was built on a rather Nietzschean hierarchy of power in which the most powerful of all, the Roman Emperor, could be worshipped as a god while the lower orders were of little account individually and slaves had no personhood whatsoever. The latter were powerless things, like Christ before the powerful Roman Procurator Pontius Pilate. Hart says , ‘the new world we see being brought into being in the Gospels is one in which the whole grand cosmic architecture of prerogative , power and eminence has been shaken and superseded by a new positively anarchic order; an order in which we see the glory of God revealed in a crucified slave’. Hart’s Answer to Christopher Hitchens and his Ilk:  Western Civilisation The title of Christopher Hitchens’ book ‘God is not Great’ is subtitled ‘How Religion Poisons Everything. ’ After a remarkably entertaining exposure, touched with more than a soupcon of asperity, of the paucity of Hitchen’s intellectual capabilities (and those of Dawkins), Hart asks, ‘Does he (Hitchens) really mean precisely everything?" Would that apply then – confining ourselves just to things Christian – to ancient and medieval hospitals, leper asylums, orphanages, almshouses and hostels?  To the golden rule, ‘Love thine enemies’? ‘Judge not lest ye be judged’? Prophetic admonitions  against oppressing the poor, and commands to feed and clothe and comfort those in need? To the music of Palestrina and Bach, Michelangleo’s Pieta, ‘ah bright wings’; San Marco’s mosaics, the Bible of Amiens and all the gorgeous blue stained glass at Chartres? To the abolitionist movement and contemporary  efforts to liberate Sudanese slaves? And so on and so on? Surely it cannot  be the case that if only purged of faith these things would be even better than they are; were it not for faith it seems fairly obvious, most of them would have no existence at all.’ Our Future:  the Idea of the Sunny Uplands of ‘Progress’ is Likely to Lead to a Totalitarian Hell. Hart holds out little hope for the West in the dawning age of secularism. He asks, ‘What evidence is there for the idea that secular reason, if finally allowed to move forward free of the constraining hand of archaic faith will naturally make society more free, more humane and more rational than it has been? It is rather difficult… to vest a great deal of hope in modernity, however radiantly enchanting its promises, when one considers how many innocent lives (‘an unprecedentedly vast collection of corpses’) have already been swallowed up in the flames of ‘Progress.’ The best ideals to which we moderns continue to cling long antedate modernity. For the most part all we can claim as truly, distinctively our own are our atrocities… The process of secularisation was marked from the first by the magnificent limitlessness of its violence.’ Radical Individualism and the Triumph of the Will The tale of the modern nation-state’s struggle for liberation from the ‘shackles’ of religion and tradition should be located within the larger narrative of the triumph of the will. Like most of the defining ideas in our culture, perverted though they may have been in the modern era, the emphasis on freedom of the will has its origins in Christian theology, but Descartes, the father of modern philosophy, spoke both as the heir of the late Scholastic tradition and for modernity when he said that the true image of god within human beings is the godlike liberty and incomprehensibility of the will. Modern Ideas of Freedom are Nihilistic Hart argues that the modern notion of freedom is essentially nihilistic, ie freedom is to be found in the individual subject’s power of choice, rather than in what is actually chosen. Neither God nor nature nor reason provides the measure of an act’s true liberty, for an act is free only when it is done in defiance of all three. The Degradation of the Idea of Liberty.  Freedom as Consumerism  Where is the ascendancy of the modern Idea of Freedom as Pure Spontaneity of the Will leading our Culture, Hart asks?  At an  ordinary, everyday level, it obviously leads to a degradation of the very idea of freedom, its reduction in the public imagination to a fairly banal kind of liberty, no more –though no less- significant than a consumer’s freedom to choose among different kinds of breads, shoes, televisions, drugs, drinks, sexual activities and relationships, political parties or religions. The Death of Shared Obligations and Common Cause -  the Decay of ‘Community ‘ (and therefore National Sentiment) At the level of conventional social behaviours it leads perhaps towards a decay of a shared sense of social obligation or common cause, or towards an increasingly insipid and self-absorbed private culture, or towards a tendency in society at large less to judge the laudability of particular choices by reference to the worthiness of their objects than to judge objects worthy solely because they have been chosen. (eg ’a woman’s right to choose’) From the Banal to the Terrible All this is both obvious and rather vague, but the modern concept of Freedom can lead to other more terrible things as well. For what the will may will, when it is subordinate only to its own native exuberance, is practically without limit. Although pure spontaneity of the will is an illusion (we must actually will something), something dangerously novel entered our culture when we began to believe that the proper end of the will might simply to be willing as such. Nor does the truly liberated have to confine itself to the adventure of discovering and inventing  itself.  Collective will is so much more exciting than an individual’s will, at least if it can be disciplined and marshalled for some collective purpose. With no Transcendent Source of the Good, the Capacity for Evil is Limitless Furthermore if there is no transcendent source of the good to which the will is drawn but only the power of the will to decide what ends it desires, then no human project can be said to be inherently irrational or abominable. If freedom of the will is our supreme value, after all, then it is to all intents and purposes our god. And certain kinds of gods (as our pagan ancestors understood) need to be fed. Part 2 of ‘Prophets of Doom:  David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will’  will show how radical individualism leads to state control. T his is No 2  In the ‘Prophets of Doom’ Series. No 1: ‘Pitirim Sorokin’ and ‘A Christmas Message of Hope’ Parts 1&2

The Coming English Revolution

Brief edited excerpt from The Mighty Oak Of The Coming English Revolution by Mike James.
We have been betrayed over successive generations by a financial caste, based in the City of London, that regards us as nothing more than cattle. We have been fooled into thinking that the British Crown, an international financial concern, is somehow connected to that wonderfully anachronistic and wholly false construct, the United Kingdom.....which is synonymous with another misnomer, “Great Britain”. They even confuse that with the geographically delineated landscape known as “The British Isles”, which includes Ireland. How deluded we have become, not by dint of their our backwardness, but by an evil, Satanic ruling oligarchy that holds us ever so tightly around the proverbials, placing manacles on our own capacity to think for ourselves.

The little-known Nielson Dissertation, which proves beyond any shadow of doubt that the international-financier controlled British Crown is illegal and had no authority to usurp the Third Republic, is almost entirely inaccessible in any English library. The British Crown system of government, comprising Westminster, Whitehall and the Mafiosa state-within-a-state, the City of London, is not only illegal and lacking in legitimacy, but comprises a unified terrorist organisation designed to kill the spirit of all Freeborn Englishmen and Englishwomen. [I assume here that the author naturally includes Freeborn Welsh/Scottish/Ulster men and women due to the current meaning/interpretation of 'British' - as a result of the failed multiculturalism experiment - becoming so worthless and diluted as to mean virtually anyone]

Every man and woman employed by the illegal British Crown and its administrative adjunct, the fantasy, fictional United Kingdom, is an enemy of the English people. Most would choke on their morning coffees to hear such words. We are just as ignorant of the evil Satanic system that made serfs, and then consumer-slaves, out of the one race of men and women who have, should they rediscover the natural-born courage of their innate, God-given convictions, the effortless ability to utterly destroy the viciously evil Soviet European Union that will have our grandchildren working for less than a euro a day and bow to the Mecca of Brussels at five in the morning.

Not one government minister, not one judge, not one policeman in the illegal United Kingdom has the power or authority to make us obey rules created to protect the Dutch-British-Jewish money matrix for which all English people must pay, namely, the parasites who control every aspect of our lives by playing with virtual money in the City of London, which is, constitutionally, a separate state:
What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown' http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/tax... Without the City of London, the monarchy and its hierarchical system of institutionalised repression and deceit would collapse. Without the “pretender” monarchy, not to be confused with its administrative arm, the duplicitous British Crown, then the men and women who are stealing food from out of the mouths of babes and are condemning the elderly and infirm to an early grave would scramble for the first flight out of Heathrow.

This is something that must NEVER be allowed to happen.....
By forcing early closure of all international financial transactions, not one penny of the money they have stolen from us will find itself in the flush of a panicked cash-flight. By confiscating their passports and forcing closure of all international airports, we have them exactly where they belong: in prison awaiting trial.

A STICK TO BEAT US WITH!

A STICK TO BEAT US WITH! 

by Horwich Nationalist

 On a political tactical point every time some mentions Jewish Zionists and not just Zionists, after all Zionism and not Judaism is a globalist political movement that has a great many Gentile acolytes.  

We hand our political and cultural enemies a big stick to beat us with. So ingrained is the folk memory of WW2, and what happened to the forced Jewish labourers of the Nazi’s. That our Political and Cultural opponents can bend and twist any comment or argument when the word Jew is used, to suit their own destructive; twisted and other bitter objectives,

 I know many will say it is true, , concerning many leading Marxist leaders and thinkers, but just look at the leadership of the Munich Red revolution of 1918-18 and other Communist revolutionary examples.

Which is true, but we would also have to ask why also, to me personally it is that due to not the race or ethnicity but Cultural difference towards education of the 19^th century of Eastern Europe between the Jewish and Gentile population, as the Jewish population being barred from many trade and mercantile opportunities placed a greater emphasis on education to better their prospects in life.

But we also must recognise the lack opportunity to put that education into effect within Eastern European society of the time in all aspects of cultural life as the majority of the educated Jewish population although denied wanted to, unlike the Islamic population in modern Europe want to be  absorbed and be involved In European culture,

 Which led to a great many Eastern Jewish graduates lacking experience of the realities of the  world  and some mediocre intellectuals struggling, to be recognised for their abilities perceived or not, becoming bitter towards a culture and society that had rejected them?

And therefore they began looking for a system to change or destroy the society or culture that had snubbed them, and therefore they came across a system that would achieve that goal, in effect Communism a deliberate twisted system that would appear to be an idealistic system that was devised for the betterment of mankind to the disenfranchised and that would allow for the recognition of their alleged talents.

 But in reality was created for it’s domination by an elite who are willing to use any one or any thing in their quest for power and wealth. And the more rejected or idealistic or bitter the recruit to this cause the better!

BUT! We have also to be politically ASTUTE! In avoiding terms and statements that can be read in two ways, after all a great many of the Jewish people oppose Zionism knowing what it really is, a elitist political movement for the creation of world domination and power, at no matter the cost in lives, started by the Rothschild’s  ,who did not give a damm about the Jewish members of European society, only their impassable lust for wealth and power.

 And that now has a majority of gentile members I must add, and including some also say the highest echelons of our own so called Royal Family.

So that I must remind you that we are a party that has Jewish members and elected Jewish officials, who like many of their faith of which ours is the child of are deeply concerned at the growing Islamist threat to Western Europe and it’s culture, a culture that is strongly based on the Judeo Christian tradition of personal responsibility and freedom.

 And also remember many British Jewish patriots laid down their lives of their own free will for this Nation in both World Wars, and it would be sad to tar them with the Communist Zionist brush as well as giving our opponents a stick to beat us with!

clicking on the google ads raises funds for the Bolton BNP branch £75 raised in 6 months.

Nick Griffin MEP BNP Chairmans Update: So much for "Respect"

So much for "Respect"Dear Fellow Patriot,

I’m sure that you like me were enraged when you saw the news today about the two Muslim Respect party councillors from Birmingham, who refused to join the standing ovation for one of our newest decorated war heroes.

Salma Yaqoob and Mohammed Ishtiaq were the only people to remain seated as Lance Corporal Matthew Croucher arrived at the event in Birmingham, our second city to celebrate being given the George Cross for gallantry in Afghanistan.  Unfortunately Birmingham is not only our second city, but is also a centre for dangerous Islamic extremism.

The Lance Corporal is a 27-year-old Royal Marine.  Every time he goes to work he puts his life on the line for his mates and his country.  He was awarded the medal after he flung himself onto a Taliban hand grenade in order to protect and save his comrades in 2008.  Miraculously, he survived the blast.

Isn’t it just typical of the UAF-supporting thugs of Respect that two of their Muslim “councillors” show such disgusting disrespect to one of the very bravest of our brave war heroes? 

Not British

More than 100 other people gave the young Lance Corporal a standing ovation when he arrived at this meeting held in his honour.  Many more ordinary people have rung our central office today expressing their disgust at this outrageous lack of respect.

I am telling you, these two councillors and others of their treacherous kind, who feel the same as them should be ashamed of themselves. They are not British.






That’s the kind of anti-British attitude we’re up against, and if it weren’t for the growing number of British National Party demonstrations and campaigns for our soldiers and against mosques, the confidence and aggression of these Islamic colonists would be even higher.  Truly, while our soldiers are in the front line in Afghanistan, back home here in Britain it’s we who are in the front line of the fight for freedom!

Help us fight back!

Please help us to do something about this monstrous lack of respect shown to our heroes, both alive and sadly departed.  Give us the tools that we need to keep our campaigns in the front line.  Every single penny you send will make a difference.  Your continued support will help us confront and face-down not only the blatant traitors like Respect and their radical Muslim allies, but also the treacherous thieves in the Westminster parties who opened the door to the Islamic fifth column now ripping the heart out of our Britain and bleeding us dry.

Right now, our design and publicity team are putting the finishing touches to a fantastic new full-colour recruitment leaflet, which will be the first really big public showing of our great new Heart for Britain logo. It’s positive, professional and powerful. You’ll love it when you see it, but we need £5,000 to print a first run of 250,000 in time for our Organisers’ Conference on Saturday week.





With stories like the behaviour of those disgusting Muslim Marxists hitting the news almost every day, the time is absolutely right for us to get our message of hope out to our people.  Let’s just do it!   We need the money by Monday. We already have nearly £4,000 put aside – can you help us to raise the rest, right now?



Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Stop Tilting at Windmills:An Open Address to Rank and file Members of the E.D.L

Stop Tilting at Windmills 
 by Horwich Nationalists 
An Open Address toMembers of the E.D.L

              

                                            

I must first state to the individual rank and file of the English Defence League this that this article is in no way a criticism of your motives in your wish to halt the spread of the threat of the Islamic threat to our nation, it is something that I utterly agree with you on.

But it with regret that I must state that one of the oldest political tricks in the book is that when a ruling political elite grows concerned that their true political opposition is about to make a serious breakthrough in support.

The best political method of defence is to attempt to split the opposition, by the conspiracy and the creation of an smokescreen opposition , that can managed by the old political elite and establishment, in order to  draw away support and resources in manpower and material from their political enemies. And at the same time slowly but surely try to mislead the recruits of the smokescreen opposition that they and their policies are not the real enemy but the original opposition is.  We see that in the leadership of the E.D.L some of whom are not even English defending multi culturalism a totally Marxist philosophy and also defending the moral corruption of the Homosexual lobby.

This I must say appears to be the case with the English Defence League,leadership an organisation that suddenly appeared from out of nowhere with apparent material resources to hand. That also has no real political manifesto or objectives apart from in my view diverting the potential support and resources both material and intellectual from the real political issues at hand into the exercise of pointless marches that have and will achieve NOTHING! Towards political change in this country.

It is thus  I can only state my belief that if members of the E.D.L want real change in this once proud Nation, that it can only come about by a political solution. And that the only way that objective can be achieved is by the massed ranks of our Proud English along with our Scots , Welsh And Ulster brothers uniting under the banner of the only Political organisation that can effect the change we all so desire, the British National Party other wise the Marxist inspired elite that run this country will continue with their programme of our National destruction , whilst you just end up TILTING AT Windmills

Nick Griffin MEP launches Spring Initiative with 'Campaign for Equal Respect'

MEP launches Spring Initiative with 'Campaign for Equal Respect'

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 FEBRUARY 2011: 
Nick Griffin MEP has launched his Spring Initiative for his North West of England Euro Constituency with a Press Release and letter to constituents outlining his priorities for the coming months.


 He has pinpointed three issues that he will be campaigning on during February, March and April, in order to raise their profile and make sure that the appropriate authorities respond to the concerns of the public.
Nick has told constituents and journalists:
"Over the next three months, I am concentrating on three key issues that are raised time and time again by people in the area:
1. The problems created by EU red tape for local businesses. Helped by informed advice from tradesmen, community volunteers, small businessmen and farmers, I'm speaking out for commonsense and to curb 'nanny state' meddling that hits jobs and profits.
2.  Animal welfare matters. We Brits really are a nation of animal lovers. So I'm privileged to be able to use my position as a European Member of Parliament to help campaigns such as stopping the barbaric practice of cutting the fins off living sharks and throwing them back in the sea to die in agony. I've just tabled a Written Declaration for MEPs of all parties to join with me to put pressure on foreign zoos to comply with the high standards of animal welfare rightly upheld in zoos in Britain.
I'm also determined to do all I can to ensure that British farmers and consumers are protected against the import of sub-standard food from Eastern European countries where pigs and chickens are kept in disgusting conditions which would rightly lead to prosecution for cruelty if anyone kept animals like that here in our country.
3. Exposing the scandal of the lack of action by the police and education authorities over the scandal of the 'grooming' of young girls from our English community by gangs of Muslim paedophiles. Girls as young as 11 are being tricked or drugged into going to squalid flats with older Muslim men who then gang-rape them and pass them around their relatives as sex toys.
My mailbag is full of letters from worried parents. Some are heartbroken by what has already happened (many of these girls end up as heroin addicts or try to commit suicide), others are desperately scared that their child may be next.
The police are so politically correctness that they twist the statistics of this crime to hide the extent of Muslim involvement in these vile racist crimes. I've just used the Freedom of Information laws to force Lancashire police to admit that all the victims in their Operation Engage grooming investigation were recorded as 'white'.
My constituency office staff and I are working throughout the North West region to uncover the true extent of this crime against our youngsters, and to press the Powers That Be to take action to stop it.
I'm calling this my Campaign for Equal Respect.
When I have collected all the evidence I shall be raising the issue again in the European Parliament. I will also be running a high-profile campaign in the North West to ensure that this increasing problem is fully recognised. Girls from all communities must be treated with equal respect. British girls do not deserve to be treated as valueless, disposable sexual playthings. We've got to work together to stop it." 

EU Diary Erases our European Christian Heritage

EU's Wise Choice . . . ? Erase our Christian heritage

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP N.W England Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 
NICK Griffin has slammed the European Commission for producing three million copies of an EU diary for schools (right), that contains no reference to Christmas or Easter but includes Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Jewish and Chinese festivities as well as Europe Day and other key European Union dates.

 "This appears to be the deliberate undermining of our traditional identity and religion by the forces of leftist aetheism," Nick told fellow MEP Roberta Angelilli who is collecting signatures for a written question to the Commission on the issue.
Pressure is now mounting for the Commission to recall the 2010-2011 diary, which has been sent out to schools across the 27 nation state bloc.
Commission spokesman in Brussels, Frederic Vincent, claimed that the omission was just a “blunder” would not be repeated in future editions.
"We’re sorry about it, and we’ll correct that in next edition. Religious holidays may not be mentioned at all to avoid any controversy," he said, the Johanna Touzel, of the Catholic Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community, was sceptical"
"Christmas and Easter are important feasts for hundreds of millions of Christians and Europeans. It is a strange omission to make. I hope it was not intentional," she said.
There is a belief amongst some MEPs that the move was deliberate and done so not to offend Europe's growing Muslim population.
Last year's EU Christmas card had no mention of Christ’s birth but just the words "Season's Greetings."
The approach is seen as a deliberate policy to marginalisation of Christianity, which is the majority religion in Europe, because of the growing influence of Islam.
And it's not just the anti-Christian message that has angered Nick:
"Make no mistake this is EU propaganda, which is being part-paid for by the British taxpayer and sent into schools across Europe to brainwash impressionable young minds. It's a sinister ploy to promote the European Union and undermine the sovereignty of nation states and our Christian values and traditions," he said.