BNP’s Anti-EU Stance Supported By British people in Latest YouGov Survey

Dramatic Endorsement of BNP’s Anti-EU Stance in Latest YouGov Survey

The BNP Newsroom

The latest YouGov survey on Britain’s continued membership of the European Union has producing a ringing endorsement for the British National Party’s policy of complete withdrawal from that body.

According to the poll, almost half of the British public would vote for Britain to leave the EU if there were a referendum on British membership. Some 47 percent would want Britain to leave the EU compared to 33 percent who say they would vote for Britain to retain its membership.

EU scepticism is not restricted to the older generation. Some 43 percent of those over 60 want to leave the EU, while 69 percent of the 18–24 age group indicated they would be in favour of ending Britain’s membership.

The poll, conducted amongst 1,948 adults between 8 and 9 September, asked respondents: “If there was a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union, how would you vote?”

The answers were as follows: “I would vote for Britain to remain a member of the European Union: 33 percent.

“I would vote for Britain to leave the European Union: 47 percent.

“I would not vote: 5 percent.

“Don't know: 14 percent.”

* The ConDem regime’s pathetic attempts to persuade the EU to freeze its annual budget have ended in utterly predictable failure.

Chancellor George Osborne had called on the EU to adopt a cash freeze for 2011 but was heavily outvoted by other member states.

The annual rise has yet to be fixed but a 6 percent increase has been proposed by the European Commission, taking spending to £130 billion. In terms of the Lisbon Treaty, the UK has no veto on the EU's annual budget. Unlike on the multi-year budget, the UK has no veto on the EU's annual budget.

Part of this massively increased expenditure goes on EU institutions and agencies outside of Brussels whose numbers have increased from 12 to 38.

These outside agencies now employ 6,700 bureaucrats and cost a total of €1.66 billion per year. Examples include the Institute for Food Safety in Parma, the Agency for Chemicals in Helsinki and the Network and Information Security Agency on the Greek island of Crete.

In addition, the EU spends over €8 million every year “entertaining, training and informing journalists.”

At least €8.14 million was directly spent on entertaining, training and 'informing' journalists with €2.6 million spent on transport, accommodation and sustenance. An additional €351,800 was spent on Irish journalists and Lisbon-related seminars in the run-up to the 2009 referendum.

Join The British National Party https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

Europe Is “Committing Identity and Economic Suicide

Europe Is “Committing Identity and Economic Suicide” Says Andrew Brons MEP

BNP News

The individual nation states of Europe and the European Union, on behalf of the continent, are committing "identity and economic suicide," British National Party MEP Andrew Brons has told the European Parliament.

Speaking this week during a debate on a 'State of the Union' address from European Commission President and “former” Communist Jose Manuel Barroso, Mr Brons used his minute’s speaking allocation to spell out the effects of the EU’s embrace of globalism.

“"Mr. Barroso has spoken of sustainable growth; in fact we have negative growth. He spoke of increasing the proportion of people (or working age) in employment, whereas that proportion has fallen,” Mr Brons said.

“"He speaks of increasing the competitiveness of European goods and services. However, the EU, like each of its member states, is embracing globalism and voluntarily accepting a deluge of cheap imports from low wage countries that are emerging from the Third World. The only way in which we could compete with such countries, would be by driving down our wage rates to their levels.

"Just in case our employers and employees should not get the point, we are filling up our countries with Third World workers who are turning large areas of our countries into parts of the Third World, with below minimum wage rates and unsatisfactory working conditions. 

"We are making (our) workers in the commercial services sector redundant and outsourcing their jobs to people in the Third World. The individual nation states of Europe and the European Union, on behalf of the continent, are committing identity and economic suicide,” Mr Brons concluded.

You can follow more of Mr Brons’s activities by regularly visiting his official website here.

Another Tory David Cameron’s UAF Thugs Found Guilty of Public Violence

Another of David Cameron’s UAF Thugs Found Guilty of Public Violence

From the BNP Newsroom 
Yet another of the David Cameron-backed UAF and Socialist Workers’ Party thugs has been convicted of public violence following an attack on a policeman which took place during a protest outside last year’s Question Time.

Martin Smith, who is a leading UAF member and National Secretary of the Socialist Workers Party, was found guilty of assault on a police officer.

The criminal thug Smith was sentenced to a 12-month community order, with 80 hours’ unpaid work and has been fined £450.

This violent Communist’s conviction will be the forerunner of many such convictions over the next few weeks, if previous reports are anything to go by.

On 8 August 2009, some 35 UAF thugs were arrested by police in Birmingham for public violence.

This will followed on 19 August 2009, when a further 19 UAF thugs were arrested by police for violence committed outside the BNP's Red, White and Blue festival.

On 10 October 2009, some 48 UAF thugs were arrested in Manchester for public violence, and on 22 October 2009, a UAF demonstration against Nick Griffin's appearance on the BBC's Question Time programme was marked by a UAF attack on the police which resulted in serious injuries to no less than three police officers.

It was for this violent and unprovoked attack that the Communist criminal thug Smith was arrested and convicted.

On 31 October 2009, eight UAF thugs were arrested in Leeds for public order offences.

On 20 March 2010, some 55 UAF thugs were arrested in Bolton for public violence, including UAF secretary Weyman Bennett on suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.

Not surprisingly, the thug Bennett is also a central committee member of the Socialist Workers’ Party. His case is still currently under review by the Crown Prosecution Service.

In a statement issued after the arrests, police in Bolton specifically blamed the UAF for provoking violence and said that Bennett’s UAF thugs had "acted with, at times, extreme violence."

On 30th August 2010, another 14 UAF thugs were arrested in Brighton, East Sussex.  A police statement issued after that attack said that a “group from the counter-demonstration (UAF) resisted this [police wishes to keep both demonstrations apart] and threw missiles at the police."

The evidence is clear and obvious: the UAF organisation is nothing but an extremist, violent, far left Trotskyite front organisation, bent on causing anarchy and violent confrontation.

The long list of UAF violence and attacks on the police and members of the public shows a clear trend in behaviour for this ultra-violent organisation. This makes it even more outrageous that Mr Cameron is a signed-up founder UAF member.

The time has come for Mr Cameron — and all the other Westminster MPs who have signed up to support this criminal organisation, to either acknowledge that they support public violence, or to distance themselves from the UAF.

Blair Chickens out in the Face of BNP’s Righteous Anger

Blair Bottles It in Face of BNP’s Righteous Anger

  From the BNP News

The British National Party has claimed credit for Tony Blair’s cancellation of his book signing event in central London this week, party leader Nick Griffin has said.

Reacting to the announcement today that Mr Blair had decided to forego his personal appearance at Waterstone’s in Piccadilly after the BNP had announced its intention to demonstrate and send twelve people inside to confront Mr Blair with the enormity of his crimes, Mr Griffin said he was “very happy with the result.”

“It is a disgrace that Mr Blair would even consider making money off the graves of the dead British soldiers he sent to fight his useless, lie-based and illegal war in Iraq,” Mr Griffin said.

“This event has underlined the fact that the BNP was the first party to oppose Mr Blair’s warmongering, and the first party to point out that the allegations of weapons of mass destruction were nothing but lies.

“We must also not forget that Mr Blair was also responsible for the disastrous British involvement in Afghanistan and even more shockingly, recently called for British military action against Iran on the Andrew Marr Show,” Mr Griffin said.

“Mr Blair, his cabinet and all those Westminster politicians who supported the war, then and now, bear full responsibility for the deaths caused by these wars.

“Intelligence and army experts have also confirmed that these wars have increased terrorism in Britain and elsewhere. The sum total of all of this is that Tony Blair is the premier war criminal suspect of our time and the BNP is proud to have played a role in highlighting this fact.”

Islamic Terror Funding Mosque Bust latest in USA Latest

Islamic Terror Funding Mosque latest in USA Latest 

From our USA Reporter the Alabama Rose

Please if you watch nothing else I send out, watch this.

This has been going on right under our noses here in Orlando and this video is the result of a federal investigation.

This is absolutely horrendous – every time we complain we are told we are paranoid BUT WE ARE NOT.

The Moslem Brotherhood is taking over this country and we have a President and Attorney General that are doing nothing.

Whether you believe he is a Moslem or merely a supporter is no longer important – what is important is that he is helping this happen by his silence and refusal to act.

Canada has banned George Galloway – yet he comes and goes here as he pleases.  He was HERE IN ORLANDO soliciting funds for Hamas!

Please watch this and then send it to everyone on your e-mail list all over the country, and ask them to do the same.

We must stop this now.

Also, I suggest you ask your legislators to immediately write legislation that demands we ban terrorist sympathizers and fundraisers from the USA and that we immediately revoke the status of any organization that supports this crap.  These donations are tax deductible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please act on this immediately – send this video to each and every legislator in Florida and then start sending it around to the other state and federal legislators.  We need them to take this threat seriously or we will soon be living under Sharia law.  In case you have forgotten, that is the edict of Islam – to convert everyone, whether willingly or by force.  

Pakistani Election Fraud in UK Tories Found Guilty

Democracy, New Conservative Style

From the BNP Newsroom

Five Muslim Conservative Party members, including two councillors, in Bradford have been jailed for just over seven years after being found guilty of large-scale voter fraud.

The New Conservatives have joined the growing list of Muslim “politicians” in Britain from all the Westminster parties who have been found guilty of importing election “tactics” from their homelands to Britain.

According to a local report, Tory councillors Reis Khan and Jamshed Khan conspired in a plot with fellow Conservatives Mohammed Sultan, Mohammed Rafiq and Alyas Khan to use fraudulent postal votes to get their candidate Haroon Rashid, elected to the Bradford West seat.

Mr Khan is also treasurer for the local Conservative association.

The practice of Muslim (and in particular, Pakistani-origin Muslim) cheating in Britain’s elections is widespread.

Even the far-left Joseph Rowntree Foundation was forced to admit in a 2007 report that “several cases [of electoral fraud] have involved proven instances of large-scale vote-rigging within British Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities. There is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that practices associated with traditional forms of Pakistani ‘clan politics’ have been a common factor in a significant minority of recent prosecutions for electoral fraud.”

In Slough, Berkshire last year, Six British Pakistanis were jailed for postal vote abuse.

In an earlier case in Birmingham in 2005, local elections were voided and had to be re-run at a massive cost to the taxpayer, as several Pakistani candidates were found to be operating what was described as a ‘vote-rigging factory’.

The judge commented on government claims at the time that postal voting was working: “Anybody who has sat through the case I have just tried and listened to evidence of electoral fraud that would disgrace a banana republic would find this statement surprising.”

The latest court case in Bradford underlined the seriousness of the problem once again.

The Leeds Crown Court Judge Robert Bartfield warned that the fraud threatened to “contaminate” Britain’s democratic foundations and render those principles “worthless.”

The growth in Third World corruption is an inevitable consequence of the Third World colonisation of Britain. All the signs are there, and the only question still to be answered is if the British people will read the signs and respond accordingly.

EU’s Theft of National Sovereignty Continues: 1st EU Ambassador” to USA Appointed

EU’s Usurpation of National Sovereignty Continues: First “EU Ambassador” to USA Appointed

The BNP Newsroom

The European Union’s steady usurpation of our national sovereignty has taken another leap forward with the appointment of the first “EU ambassador” to the United States of America.

Joao Vale de Almeida, a Portuguese national and close friend of “former” Communist Party member and now EU Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso, announced in one of his first public pronouncements since taking office that American officials should regard him as their first point of contact for all transatlantic discussions.

In a series of interviews to US-based press this week, Mr Vale de Almeida said he was not only empowered to speak on behalf of EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy and Mr Barroso, but also on behalf of all EU member states.

“Where we have a common position, I am the one leading the show,” he told the Washington Post.

"I'm the first new type of ambassador for the European Union anywhere in the world. Our delegations now cover a wide spectrum of issues well beyond the economic dimension, trade dimension and regulatory dimension, to cover all policies in the union, including foreign policy and security policy,” he added.

Mr Vale de Almeida presented his credentials to President Barrack Obama this week and was formally installed as the first of what will be 138 EU ambassadors around the globe who will now speak on behalf of all EU members.

The project is a part of the Lisbon Treaty plans and is being rolled out under arch-leftist and Labourite EU foreign relations chief Catherine Ashton.

Mr Vale de Almeida's appointment was made under a cloud of allegations of cronyism against the EU commission. Mr Barroso, a fellow Portuguese countryman, reportedly pushed through the nomination over Ms Ashton's head.

Mr Vale de Almeida also has no diplomatic experience whatsoever, although critics pointed out that this was also true of Baroness Ashton, as witnessed by her pitiful performance in the job thus far.

Ultimately, the EU’s Lisbon Treaty aims to replace all the essential national sovereignty functions of member states (such as defence, foreign affairs, immigration and finance) with its own institutions.

The appointment of the first formal ambassador is but the first step in this process.

BNP Mobilises for National Day of Action to Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home”

BNP Mobilises for National Day of Action & Campaign Launch on 18 September: “Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home”

The BNP Newsroom

Saturday 18th September will witness the launch of the British National Party’s autumn recruitment campaign under the banner of “Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home” with a wave of leafleting drives, town centre stalls, petitions and banners nationwide.

The party’s Communications Department has designed a new recruitment leaflet focussing on the British involvement in the Afghanistan war and the constant stream of dead British soldiers returning from that pointless and unwinnable war which has nothing to do with our nation.

Public anger at the ongoing Afghan war is at bursting point, as recent BNP surveys have shown. 

Furthermore, the establishment’s allegation that the war is necessary to “prevent terrorism” has been thoroughly debunked by all security experts and military institutions.

Every single one of these experts and institutions have confirmed the accuracy of the BNP’s prediction that involvement in these wars would not prevent terrorism, but cause it.

In addition to the campaign material, a new petition has been created which will be distributed nationwide on 18 September. The petition and a range of downloadable material will be made available when the campaign is formally launched.

BNP branches and groups up and down the country are mobilising for the national day of action and it is estimated up to 100 units will be out in force in towns and cities across the country on 18 September.

This will make the campaign into the single biggest recruitment activity in British nationalist history. Activists, sympathisers and supporters are urged to contact their local BNP branch and get involved

September 7th - This Day we Fight Back For Our Freedom

"A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day."

Author The Green Arrow
What an amazing coincidence.  There is to be a tube strike in London on the same day that Nick Griffin MEP is in court fighting for freedom of speech and his own personal freedom. 

BNP members and supporters from Wales will be travelling to London to support the Chairman and Wales Camera Crew will be there to film the event and those who seek to disrupt their vigil.

Ok, it is going to be expensive to go by car.  But here is the link to pay the London Congestion (Tax) charge on-line.

Parking charges near the court are horrendous as you can see by these Daily Parking Charges: 0 to 1 hour - £ 4.00, 1 to 2 hours - £ 8.00, 2 to 3 hours - £ 13.00 3 to 4 hours - £ 17.00, 4 to 5 Hours - £ 25.00, 5 to 24 Hours - £ 29.00

Easy Car Park Services
0845 045 0625  6, Arundel Street, London, WC2R 3DB

Here is the link to Car Parks within walking distance of the Royal Court of Justice.

Q: What buses go to the RCJ?
A: Bus numbers 4, 11, 15, 23, 26, 76, 172, and 341 stop outside the RCJ. Bus numbers 1, 59, 68, 91, 168, 171, 188, 243, 521 and X68 stop on Kingsway and Aldwych. Go to www.tfl.gov.uk for more detailed travel information.

Show your support for the Chairman.  Please make every effort to be there.  The UAF will probably be busy supporting one of their thug marxist leaders, Martin Smith who is charged with assaulting a police officer and is also in court on the 7th.  However there is a whisper that some of Butlers Dupes may well turn up to do the work of Searchlight and the UAF for them.  


Below are some links kindly sent in by Chrissy.

IntenseDebate NotificationCan I remind people that Trevor Phillips described major broadcasters as 'hideously white' and referred to white men in the Civil Service as ‘Snowy Peaks’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1035878/B...
http://www.psi.org.uk/events/event.asp?event_id=5...

He didn’t like the arrival of EU immigrants either, too white for him, but if we make the same remarks about ethnic immigrants, we are branded as racists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-402904/Mi...

A couple more headlines from this anti white black racist.

Force supermarkets to show bias in favour of ethnic staff says Phillips
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-450435/Fo...

'Legalise positive discrimination for sake of national security'

The head of the state race watchdog has called for new laws to allow 'positive discrimination' in favour of blacks, Asians and ethnic minorities.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-391255/Le...

The Patriotic right as an anti-liberal pendulum in Britain

An interesting article from a Russian Magazine website

The Patriotic right as an anti-liberal pendulum in Britain

Boris Volkhonsky

30.08.2010,From the voice of Russia

On Saturday, August 28, a demonstration, organized by a far-right group named English Defense League (EDL) in a northern English town of Bradford resulted in intense clashes with the police and with a counter-demonstration led by anti-racist groups and the local Asian diaspora, mainly of Pakistani origin.

The two groups, divided by a strong police force, threw bottles and stones at each other and at the police. As a result, 13 members of the far-right EDL were detained by the police. The main accusation against them was that the EDL was granted a right to hold a ‘static’ protest, but not a public march.

It is doubtful whether a demonstration of some 700 supporters of a rather marginal political group could be worth of mentioning. Bur actually, the event in Bradford raises a lot of questions, which the dominant British (as well as European, as a whole) establishment would like to avoid.

First, the choice of Bradford, a townlet in Northern England with a population of little more than 200,000 people was not accidental. The fact is that this small town has a huge Asian, namely Pakistani, i.e. Muslim diaspora. And therefore it has for a long time been a target for far-right demonstrations under the slogans of ‘defending the British identity’. A similar demonstration occurred last year, and riots of 2001 virtually tore the town apart.

This time, fearing a repetition of 2001, about 10,000 local residents signed a petition demanding a ban on the planned far-right demonstration under anti-Muslim slogans. The local authorities banned the march, but the ban did not prevent the EDL supporters from coming in bus-loads to Bradford for participating in the action.

Second question arises if we connect the demonstration in Bradford with the last year’s elections to the European Parliament. It is worth mentioning that in June 2009, for the first time ever, two candidates from the far-right British National Party (BNP) become European MPs. And that was far from being a single accident in the all-European trend of nationalist and isolationist movements gaining momentum. In fact, the wave has swept over all of Europe, with a wide spectrum of anti-immigrant, nationalistic and xenophobic elements showing much better results in comparison with the previous years and arriving at mainstream politics from what previously seemed just a marginal political outskirt.

Now, the nationalist parties that have asserted themselves as a part of mainstream may say as much as they will that they do not have anything to do with the events in Bradford. Well, maybe legally they don’t – the EDL is quite new phenomenon in British politics, and at the moment there is no solid ground to state that it is organizationally linked with the BNP.

But if we look at the public statements made by BNP leaders in 2009, we could see a clear cross-reference between the slogans of the Bradford demonstration and the BNP program mottos.

As BNP leader Nick Griffin said a year ago, "this (Britain. – B.V.) is a Christian country and Islam is not welcome, because Islam and Christianity, Islam and democracy, Islam and women's rights do not mix.”

Is there ground to wonder why the demonstration in Bradford was held under anti-Islamic slogans?

So, the spiritual and ideological roots of the far-right demonstration in Bradford seem to be very clear. But there still remains a question whether the anti-immigrant trend is a one-way traffic. Remember that the strict measures against public demonstration of Muslim identity (like wearing head-scarves in public places) in France have led to a number of clashes initiated by French Muslims, but actually drove the French far-right to oblivion.

At the same time, the more liberal stance of other European, as well as North American government which allow immigrants not only to settle in the country, but also to continue abiding their national and religious laws, often in a violation of European (i.e. Christian) rules and values, has resulted in a steep rise of far-right sentiments and has brought to the frontline of mainstream politics a number of far-right parties which were virtually unknown some ten years ago (Austria, the Netherlands are just among most striking examples).

As for Britain, it has always been rather skeptical of the all-European integration. But, at the same time, has followed the general liberal guidelines in its immigration policies. Isn’t it the time to gather stones scattered away in the previous years?

Left Wing BBC Bias: 'The Continuing Story'

BBC Bias: 'The Continuing Story'

  Author: Tim Heydon | @ the Green Arrow and Freinds 

                                                                             Mark Thompson 
 First the good News...
First the good news. It’s been a long time coming (decades in fact), but at last the BBC’s director-general, Mark Thompson, has admitted left-wing bias at the BBC. There was ‘in the BBC I joined thirty years ago..in much of current affairs, in terms of people’s personal politics , which were quite vocal, a massive bias to the left,’ he said. The station was ‘massively’ biased against Margaret Thatcher.
So far, so good. Even if one is or was not a fan of Margaret Thatcher, no publicly funded organisation like the BBC has a right to be biased against any point of view which enjoys widespread support. Even minority views need to be treated with impartiality, unless they are those which advocate downright genocide, like some moslem organisations in the Middle East, or murder, like the IRA. (The BBC  has in fact long had a soft spot for Hamas and other muslim organisations which want to eliminate Israel.  It was Orla Guerin

                                                                                  Orla Guerin
who actually cried on the death of that evil man Yasser Arafat. Like its siamese twin in the public prints. the Guardian, it has always been soft on any leftist, anti-British or anti-white organisation ideology or state, ranging from the IRA and the Soviet Union to New Labour and the ANC).
 
Then the Bad News
But then the bad news. Mark Thompson thinks that the bad days of bias are all in the past. ‘It is (now) a broader church. The BBC is not a campaigning organisation and can’t be.’ He claimed. Oh, but it is a campaigning organisation, Mr Thompson. Not campaigning in a flag-waving, militant, at-the-barricades way of course, but in a subtle, understated way; the way in which the idea is projected that certain politically correct assumptions are not just to be preferred, but are the only ones around which a thinking, decent, civilised person might have, to the extent that no other attitudes are even considered or discussed.
Current Affairs Bias
This bias is not restricted to current affairs programmes, of which the Question Time programme which attempted to crucify Nick Griffin may be counted as one. For example, as your present writer can attest, there have been umpteen programmes on BBC TV and radio over the last thirty years or so about the alleged difficulties immigrants have faced in Britain. You could however count on the fingers of one hand the programmes in that period devoted to the far greater, and to the native population vastly more interesting question of how the latter feel about the immigrant invasion of their homeland.
And such programmes invariably feature a preponderance of carefully selected individuals who either are in favour of multiculturalism and multiracialism or are indifferent, whilst those against are stigmatised as ‘racists’ and ‘fascists’ whose  views are a function of their ignorant bigotry, rather than of a perfectly reasonable, human desire to live in their own country amongst their own people in their own way.
Bias exists in every Corner of the BBC's Vast Empire 
And the subtle PC bias continues and extends to every corner of the BBC’s vast empire. Here are just few of the recent examples: the Police Station in ‘Heartbeat,’ the series set in 1960’s ‘Adensfield,’ has acquired a woman Police Sergeant. This is supposed to be at a time when women in such positions were rarer than hens’ teeth. Similarly, the School Head in the new series of ‘Waterloo Road’ is a woman. Indeed, it is more or less de rigueur for the head of anything in BBC shows to be female, if possible ethnic, and to be seen to have authority over white men.
 Meanwhile, over at ‘Holby City’ a show which like so many others on TV and the BBC in particular creaks with Politically Correctness to the point of caricature, the saintly Ric Griffin, the consultant and hospital director is described by one of his typically ‘feisty’ female patients with the liberal views on sex, marriage etc we are encouraged to sympathise with, as ‘noble’ and ‘handsome’ while another patient says he is a ‘magician,’ so good is he. And, of course, in charge.
 
                                                                                    Saint Ric
Ric is of course obviously black. The depiction of this character, as of others in this and other BBC shows, is a deliberate attempt to fix a positive image of immigrants in the public mind. It is a PC lie which like all PC lies spits in the face of reality. As recently pointed out by Sarah Maid of Albion, a remarkable preponderance of doctors and others in the medical field who have undergone disciplinary proceedings for incompetence and other lapses by their respective professional organisations have been immigrants.
The mirror – image of this of course is that the way in which those opposed to immigration are depicted as pathetic, ignorant bigots rather than the ordinary people with real and justified concerns, which is what they are in reality.
If Mark Thompson doesn’t grasp this, it is either because he personally is so politically correct that he can’t see out of that particular box, or he is lying at a time when the BBC s facing cuts in its license fee. Either way, it does not bode well for the BNP and non-PC views in general ever getting a fair showing on the organisation we all pay for.

The Root of Our Problem — Drawing Back the Veil on Censorship

The Root of Our Problem — Drawing Back the Veil

BNP Newsroom

Ever wondered why the media never criticise or even mention the violent activities of groups who oppose the British National Party or groups which try to disrupt the lawful activities of BNP members? Dr Phil Edwards, former national press officer for the party, makes some observations.

When thousands of leftist demonstrators blockaded the BBC Television Centre last October 2009 in an attempt to prevent BNP Chairman Nick Griffin from appearing on BBC’s Question Time, a number of police officers were injured and arrests were made. But there was no criticism of the mob by the media.

That year’s Red White and Blue Festival had similar disruption; again without any media criticism of UAF and similar groups who used violence and intimidation to prevent the arrival of visitors.

Ever wondered why the media routinely brand the BNP as “violent” or “thuggish” when BNP members studiously avoid ANY confrontation that could lead to such violence, whilst at the same time the same media ignore the violent history of left wing and other Marxist inspired activists?

What precisely is “wrong” or “hateful” in using the political process to protect our homeland from the problems caused by enforced diversity and mass, uncontrolled immigration and why do the media never report even the slightest possibility that we may have some valid points?

After all, many of us can agree with parts of the establishment’s status quo. Where’s the reciprocity?

Then there’s the constant repetition in the press of certain untruths about the capabilities of our politicians (false evaluations of Nick Griffin’s appearance on Question Time being a prime example) or a total lack of objectivity with regard to reporting of BNP policies.

And why should “indigenous” be put in parenthesis (“  ”) when applied to indigenous Brits but not when applied to, say Australian aborigines, or Native Americans?

Why do ordinary people, our co-racial, indigenous people, react so strangely and irrationally when the BNP is mentioned and why are so many people totally unaware of our true aspirations?

Finally, in an age where politicians and media folk fall over themselves to parade their “equal opportunity” credentials, why is there zero media criticism of individuals or organisations which discriminate against BNP election candidates by barring them from election hustings or other debating opportunities?

Now, it shouldn’t need me to point out the obvious inconsistencies of the above — any fair minded person will see immediately how irrational and illogical the media are behaving.

The old adage “Never let the facts get in the way of a good story” is only part of the answer to the mystery. No, there’s a very sinister and worrying aspect to this whole situation, and without the unique catalytic property of nationalism in general and the British National Party in particular, it would pass unnoticed.

Our exposure of the root cause of our national malaise, as opposed to the symptoms — of which we are all painfully aware — could well turn out to be our greatest and lasting legacy to Nationalism, not just in Britain, but in the world in general.

During my time as the party’s National Press Officer, many people complained to me that they were confused about how some particular newspaper columnist would rant and rave about the state of the country, crime, welfare dependency and, yes, immigration — the topics on which we have considered opinions — and then finish off by routinely condemning the BNP as “evil”, “loathsome” etc. How could this be? Why should the Daily Express use big headlines bemoaning immigration yet at the same time knock the BNP?

Well, the answer’s easy — it sells copy, and anyway, each paper has its own particular “stance” on party political allegiance — invariably one of the establishment parties. They simply don’t care about what they publish or the problems of the people involved.

The press really are media whores (Stanley Baldwin said, in criticising the media barons who owned British newspapers, in a speech in London on March 17, 1931 they have “Power without responsibility — the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages.”)

I remember a few years ago, a very prominent yet friendly hack actually phoned me after his otherwise reasonable weekly Sunday Times piece described the BNP as “loathsome” or other such epithet, to explain that he had not put that term in his original article, but was inserted by someone higher up the food chain in order to “protect his career.”

Consider this — if the media choose not to report an occurrence, whether it be a politician’s speech, a race riot, an earthquake, anything, then to all intents and purposes it hasn’t happened — except, of course, for the people closely involved. But for the rest of us, it hasn’t happened. 

The media create “the news.” To use the trade jargon, it gives a story “legs,” or attention and longevity.

Or they can ignore it and let it fade away — and note just how the entire mass media appear to sing from the same song sheet. Globalisation is good for their business but not so good for the rest of us, victims of pro-multiracial and pro-multicultural government policies.

What sort of "democracy" is that?

Imagine just how much large corporations spend on “slow burn” advertising, a form of conditioning or brainwashing, to fix their brand of coffee or their little furry price comparison web site in the public conscience. 

Well, the mass media have done just that, free of charge, to put off people from supporting the BNP.

Just who do the newspaper owners and their editors think they are, with their greedy, global ambitions, peddling daily trivia, pompous opinionated nonsense from over paid hacks, selling our country down the river for their 30 pieces of silver?

Who do the people behind the Guardian rag think they are, “setting the political agenda” yet being totally unaccountable to the voters — nobody voted for the anonymous men who write the Guardian “Opinion” columns?

And just listen to BBC hacks on current affairs programmes openly reading from and quoting from “the newspapers” as if they are holy writ! Talk about incestuous!

Thankfully, with the arrival of the digital media age we need the mass media less and less.

Opinions can be aired on the World Wide Web, we are no longer prisoners of the internationalist editors and the press barons, newspapers are closing, hacks and pompous, overpaid columnists are regularly being put on the dole.

We can all do our bit to accelerate this process. Do you really need to buy that daily rag? Why not read their web version, it’s free?

Hate sheets like the Daily Mirror are in deep financial trouble. Why not help it along by stopping buying the childish, offensive rag and punish their hate filled hacks, promoters of multiculturalism all, and the ludicrous “Hope Not Hate” bus?

Our greatest and lasting legacy to Nationalism, not just in Britain, but in the world in general will only be effective if we keep up the pressure and spread the good news.

A View from USA: American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor Speaks

A View from America: American Renaissance’s Jared Taylor Speaks

BNP News@ http://www.bnp.org.uk/

White people have every right to resist demographic shifts that will change their countries in the same way that Jews have a right to a Jewish state and Japanese people have a right to a Japanese state, leading European American political activist Jared Taylor has said.

 Jared Taylor (right) and Jesse Jackson at the National Press Club, Washington DC, March 18, 2010.

Speaking in an interview with the mainstream Washington Examiner newspaper, Mr Taylor, who is editor of the publication American Renaissance and who has hosted conferences at which British national Party leader Nick Griffin has appeared, said that “whites, whether in North America or Europe, have the right to live in nations that reflect their culture and heritage.”

Asked why he describes himself as a "race realist," Mr Taylor said in the interview that “race realism is rejection of the agreeable fantasies about race that have become orthodoxy since the 1960s."

“First, it is obvious that most people prefer the company of others of their own race. Forced integration therefore causes tension and resentment,” Mr Taylor said.

“Second, race is an important element in individual and group identity, which means it is impossible to build a society in which race does not matter.

“Third, people of different races build different societies. Blacks — wherever they are found in large numbers — establish communities with certain characteristics, and whites and others do the same.

“Fourth, the combination of the first three factors means that racial diversity is a source of constant conflict. This is blindingly obvious, yet one of the requirements of respectability in this country is to pretend — and to repeat loudly at every opportunity — that diversity is a strength.

“Fifth, the evidence is overwhelming that there is a substantial genetic contribution to well-established racial differences in average IQ.

“North East Asians living in America have higher incomes, better test scores, and more education than whites because they are, on average, smarter.

“Whites are smarter than Hispanics, who are smarter than blacks. It is vital to recognise this because otherwise “society” (meaning whites) is blamed for the failures of blacks and Hispanics.

“Finally, race realism recognises that whites have legitimate group interests just like everyone else,” Mr Taylor said.

When asked what these ‘legitimate group interests’ are, Mr Taylor went on to explain that it was “vital to eliminate the stark racial double standard that denies whites even have legitimate interests as a group.

“White pride or racial consciousness is considered ‘bigotry’ or ‘hatred,’ while any other kind of racial consciousness is considered to be a healthy form of ethnic self-esteem.

“This means every group in the country — except whites — is constantly pushing its collective interests, while whites are not allowed even to have interests as a group, much less work for them.

“Some of the interests of whites are obvious. The first is not to be reduced to a minority. Most whites don’t want this but they dare not say so for fear of being accused of ‘hate.’

“Hispanics, on the other hand, are constantly rejoicing in their increased numbers and influence, and it is considered natural for them to look forward to eventually become a majority.

“Their gain is our loss, so why are they allowed to be happy about their gain but we are not allowed to resist our loss?

“Whites have every right to prefer the kind of society that they create and to resist demographic shifts that are already changing their country in profound ways.

“Jews have a right to a Jewish state, and they keep it Jewish through selective immigration.

“Japanese have a right to a Japanese state and they keep it that way through restrictive immigration.

“Whites also, whether in North America or Europe, have the right to live in nations that reflect their culture and heritage.

“Second, what is known as 'affirmative action' is really discrimination against whites.

“If the kinds of preferences shown to blacks or Hispanics were shown to whites it would be a national scandal, but because the victims are whites (and sometimes Asians) it is of no consequence. Whites must work to eliminate this while it is still possible to do so.

“When nonwhites become majorities, they are likely to push for even more extensive racial preferences than the ones they enjoy today.”

Mr Jared also dealt with a number of other issues including why he rejected “white nationalism” and “white supremacy,” his own background and the meaning of demographic change for America, the current state of race relations in that country and the state of the civil rights movement.

You can read the full interview in the Examiner newspaper here and you can find American Renaissance by clicking here.

Is There To Be Any Green Space Left In Horwich

Author Horwich Nationalists 

It is with sadness that we have to report that Horwich is losing even more of it's open spaces, What with the building on the last green space left in central Horwich on Wright St, and now the encroachment onto the playing fields on Singleton Ave, We must ask how long is there left before the entire Green Lane Playing Fields are put up for building land, to suffer the fate of the Hilton Playing fields years ago, as well as the land where the once vibrant Market was once, a market that was shut due to years of deliberate neglect by the local Labour Liberal Zanu PF parties.

Wating to colonise Horwich

We believe that the houses that are being built on our green spaces may look adequate but are in fact overcrowded and cheaply built and and most liable to become a slum in a short time, especially as we believe that these properties are being built to house a influx of the colonisers who are ready and waiting to be shipped into our once clean and green town. Leaving Local people without recourse to cheap affordable rented local authority accommodation.

You the people of Horwich and elsewhere do have a chance to halt this neglect of ours and other towns by joining the only party that cares about decent upright working British families, The British National Party, if you are a Horwich or Bolton Resident why not Join using this link https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html
or just donate using this link https://www.bnp.org.uk/donate.html
for the simple reason it is only the British National Party that will honour the pledge of British Homes for British Families on a national and local level! we hope for your support in next years elections also !





  

Shame on You Clarke and Tories

Shame on You

  Author: Green Arrow |  

OK click on the above image to enlarge it and then read it and then read it again.

The Chairman of the British National Party, Nick Griffin MEP, is facing jail because he has had the courage to stand up for the True British People and by British People, I mean the English, Scots, Welsh and Irish.  Let me make it clear.  There are no such animals as a Black Englishman, an Asian Welshman, an Oriental Irishman or a Martian Irishman.  You are either "British" or a "British Citizen".  The Nazi Establishment can scream that "two plus two equals five" as much as they like but it will never make it true no matter how many of us they lock up.

Nazi  theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as "the truth" exists. […] The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such an event, "It never happened"—well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five—well, two and two are five. This prospect frightens me much more than bombs […]George Orwell.

And whose name is on the bottom of the Death Warrant for Nick Griffin and the BNP? Why it is that of the bloated parasite and expense fiddler, Ken Clarke QC MP, one of the most infamous traitors to Britain ever.

However, he told Rushcliffe Borough Council in Nottinghamshire  that he spent so little time at his constituency address that his wife Gillian should qualify for a 25% council tax (single person’s) discount, saving the former chancellor around £650 per year. Land registry records showed that Clarke did not have a mortgage on his home in Nottinghamshire, where he has lived since 1987. He instead held a mortgage on his London house, which he had most recently charged to the taxpayer at £480 per month.

Now this creature Clarke was once described as One of the Big Beasts in the world of politics but I would remind him and the rest of the filth in The Establishment that the dinosaurs were also big beasts and like them Clarke and his kind will also become extinct.  The BNP will be the cloud that brings them to justice and if found guilty, hopefully hangs them.  I find it almost beyond comprehension that decent conservative supporters can support a government that believes a man should be imprisoned for leading a party that states.

"We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of a unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British".

And please just explain to me why a political party should not be allowed to make the following statement?

"We are pledged to stemming and reversing the immigration migration of peoples into our British Homeland that has, without the express consent of the Indigenous British, taken place since 1948, and to restoring and maintaining, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the indigenous British as the overwhelming majority in the make up of the population of and expression of culture in each part of our British Homeland."

Now then a slap on the wrist to some of those in the BNP who have been silly. Stop it.

• I am ashamed of you who were duped and fell for the lies and smears of the enemies of the British People.
• I am ashamed of those of you who sat on the fence during the Chairman's Hour of Need.
• I am ashamed of the Senior Officers of the Party who could not be bothered to attend the recent Indigenous Forum weekend. You have lost some of my respect.  Please win it back.
• I am ashamed of the Party Officials who did attend and who could not be bothered to walk around the site and just introduce themselves to the rank and file members and supporters of the BNP.
• I am ashamed of you who put personal feelings and grievances before the welfare of your country and Party.

You are supposed to be British Nationalists.  You are supposed to be gentlemen.  If you are not gentlemen by nature then at least try and act like one.  Learn some modesty.  Learn to listen to the members. Learn from the Chairman whilst we still have him.  He risks his life and freedom for us and you have let him down.  Shame on You.

Now the Party needs money to carry on fighting - Please go to the BNP site and Donate here.  Do it now please. 

Message to the BNP - Get a Paypal Donations button up also please.

VISIT THE GREEN ARROW FOR MORE NEWS http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/
 

Will You Be Ready to Reject the Mark of the Beast? and the World Government?

Will You Be Ready to Reject the
Mark of the Beast?                                    


by mark Shabi
Where there is prophecy, there is plenty of speculation. People wonder: When will the “end time”
be? Who will be the Beast prophesied in Revelation? What nations will comprise that final union
the Beast will head, and when will that government arise?

Perhaps no passage in the Bible
has drawn more speculation than
Revelation 13:16-17:
“He causes all, both small and great, rich
and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark
on their right hand or on their foreheads,
and that no one may buy or sell except one
who has the mark or the name of the Beast”
(emphasis added throughout).
The mark of the Beast has long fascinated
readers of Revelation. What will
the mark be? Will it be a literal mark like
the Jews had to wear during Hitler’s Third
Reich? Will it be a figurative mark, such as
worshipping a false god on a false Sabbath
day? Or as some modern theories suggest,
will it be a computer chip that is implanted
in each person, allowing him or her to
“buy and sell” once he or she has “pledged
allegiance” to the Beast power?Speculation makes for interesting contemplation
and conversation, but amongthe many questions we might ask about
the mark of the Beast, there is one veryimportant thing we should ask ourselves:
Will I be ready to reject the mark of theBeast when that time comes?
The purpose of the markThe society that inflicts the mark of
the Beast differs significantly from the world we know today. In that future
time, there will be no distinction between the “small and great, rich and poor, free
and slave.” No one will be able to “buy or sell” anything—that is, conduct any
commerce—unless he or she publicly accepts the precepts, supremacy and ultimate
authority of the government led by the Beast, thereby receiving its “mark” of
approval.What kind of government will hold
 such sway over the people of this world? Revelation 13 offers a striking description
of the world-ruling system of that time.“Then I saw a Beast coming up out of
the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, and there was a crown on each horn. A
name against God was written on each head… And the dragon gave the Beast
all of his power and his throne and great authority. One of the heads of the Beast
looked as if it had been killed by a wound, but this death wound was healed. Then
the whole world was amazed and followed the Beast. People worshiped the dragon
because he had given his power to the Beast. And they also worshiped the Beast,
asking, ‘Who is like the Beast? Who can make war against it?’” (Revelation 13:1-4,
New Century Version).Here’s a future governmental system
that arises out of the sea, is a union of 10 lesser authorities, derives its power and
authority from Satan (the identity of the“dragon” is revealed in Revelation 12:9),
captivates the imagination of the world and exerts such military might that it
appears invincible. But there’s more. “The Beast was allowed to say proud words and words
against God, and it was allowed to use its power for forty-two months. It used its
mouth to speak against God, against God’s name, against the place where God lives,
and against all those who live in heaven. It was given power to make war against
God’s holy people and to defeat them. It was given power over every tribe, people,
language, and nation. And all who live on earth will worship the Beast—all…whose
names are not written in the Lamb’s book of life” (Revelation 13:5-8, NCV).
This future government and worlddominating military power is the adversary
of the God of the Judeo/Christian Bible. It
Will You Be Ready to Reject the Mark of the Beast?
Where there is prophecy, there is plenty of speculation. People wonder: When will the “end time”
be? Who will be the Beast prophesied in Revelation? What nations will comprise that final union
the Beast will head, and when will that government arise?
by Rick Shabi

Christ admonished His disciples to settle it in their
hearts ahead of time that
they would rely on Him for the
words, strength and courage they
would need to endure the time of
the end—the time when mankind
will have to choose between
loyalty to God and accepting the
mark of the Beast.


©2009 United Church of God, an International Association—www.ucg.org

Anti-Democracy Laws Now Being Extended to Other Groups And Christians besides BNP in UK

Anti-Democracy Laws Now Being Extended to Other Groups besides BNP

BNP Newsroom

The warning by British National Party leader Nick Griffin that state-directed attempts to persecute the BNP were just the precursor to moves against any dissident group which did not agree with the far left, is about to become a reality for Christians opposed to homosexuality.

A Christian group, Christian Voice, which is a multiracial organisation, has now discovered that its protest against a gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender parade in Manchester has been targeted for “hate” and faces the possibility of being banned from all future protests.

According to a report in a local newspaper, around 20 placard-waving demonstrators gathered outside the John Rylands Library on Deansgate as the procession passed.

Despite the small group’s protest being completely drowned out by the singing and whistle-blowing crowd of thousands, the Labour Council has decided that the tiny group of Christian protestors were “disrupting” the procession and needed to be banned.

Apparently the council bosses now “plan to work with police to see whether anti-hate laws can be used to ban similar scenes at Pride next summer.”

Pat Karney, the council’s city centre spokesman, said “such protests had no place in Manchester.

“I will be meeting organisers and police to make sure that next year people are not subject to these vile, hate-filled rantings,” Mr Karney said.

“We have a proud history in Manchester of freedom of speech but there is no place for this,” he added, either not realising or deliberately ignoring the utter hypocrisy of that statement.

"There are things we can do using hate laws to make sure they do not come back,” he added.

Stephen Green, national director of Christian Voice, was quoted as saying that it “is a very sad day for this country when the authorities want to clamp down on the teachings of the Gospel. This is a major assault on freedom of speech,” he said.

The decision to persecute Christians in Britain for daring to peacefully protest is indeed a major assault on freedom of speech, but it is the logical consequence of the chain of events set into motion when the Tory/Labour/Lib Dem establishment created laws to persecute the BNP.

It is a pity that the Christian groups did not protest then and did not heed the BNP’s warnings that this was just the start of an all-out assault on traditional values, but at least now that the situation is more obvious, perhaps the scales will fall from a few more eyes.

* The BNP’s official position on the issue of homosexuality is that it is firmly a matter for the individual and nothing to do with anyone else. There should be no more reason for “gay pride” marches than there should be for “straight pride” marches.

New Example of Muslim Hypocrisy in Horwich As They Open the Courtyard Wine Bar

A fine example of Muslim, indeed the total HYPOCRISY of Islam as whole , as opened it's doors in Horwich NR Bolton,

The Bay Horse Pub Horwich as it was

The latest example is the Courtyard Wine bar on Lee Lane in Horwich formally the Bay Horse Public House.  the owners also now own the spice valley restaurant as well. ( stage 2 in colonisation.

Entirely owned no doubt, and staffed by Muslims and selling Alcohol to the Indigenous British People , and no doubt targeting the young especially. 
I see theirs No equal opportunities employment in a still 95% white town at this establishment .

What absolute hypocrisy by these people that they should peddle Liquor to the Young people of Horwich, whilst they themselves are strictly forbidden to touch it,or sell it to people from their own Religion. It is to us at The Horwich Nationalist like a pacifist becoming a arms dealer. 


I call on all the good patriotic people not to frequent this premises, and to boycott it completely. why fund these Hypocrites, by allowing them to get old of more money to aid in the colonization of our once proud town and Homeland. 

One dread of mine is that this den of hypocrites may become a base for the Asian gangs that are targeting young whites girls to become sex workers and even worse a place to spread the pollution of drugs.

Strong claims you may say, but all based on irrefutable facts a recent police report has said that 90% of all drugs are coming from Asians and even some Muslims have admitted to the fact of Asians pimping young white girls see this Article.

Please do not frequent this place boycott it and do not let the Hypocrites take another step into our still lovely town!