Why is the Asia & The Rest of The Third World Not “Multicultural?”

Why is the Third World Not “Multicultural?”

  The British National Party Newsroom

Why does the liberal elite want to force multiculturalism upon Britain and the First World yet they vigorously defend the right of the Third World nations to maintain their distinct cultures, asks British National Party correspondent Maid of Kent.

By Maid of Kent — It must be time to divert the attention of the sheeple away from another 'bad news day' — what better way to hide bad news than to announce that our 'beloved and respected leaders' have finally seen the light about the mass immigration and attendant multiculturalism disaster that they imposed on us in the first place?

Watching David Cameron give his 'failed multiculturalism' speech (for all of 30 seconds — I can't take any more than that) I have to wonder at the desperation of the Conservative Party and voters that they would vote for this man.

He speaks with the conviction of a wooden puppet (Pinocchio comes to mind) and so obviously neither believes what he is saying nor intends to follow through with any promises that his speech/propaganda writers make.

He reminds me of Tony Blair, but is an even worse actor and liar, which is saying something.

I just find it frightening that there are masses of people in this country who believe this performance and really think that things are going to change!

What is more indicative of the predominant beliefs among the liberal elite who Cameron represents is the comment on his speech by Paul Vallely in the Independent newspaper.

This — and many of the comments posted — reveals the twisted views and beliefs of influential segments of our society, views and beliefs that we must rigorously contest.

These elements in Britain have the self-righteous view that multiculturalism is the natural and desired state of life in our country, although they rigorously and hypocritically avoid the suggestion that it should be imposed on any other country on earth.

From the brainwashed Marxist agitators to the Asians who say that they are British but still call themselves 'Asians' (you cannot be both), we can see the whole range of Liberal fascism and intolerance of the views of the ordinary British people.

Vallely himself suggests that British culture has no right to be the dominant culture in Britain — how twisted is that?

Perhaps he would be happier if Islamic culture was the only culture of Britain?

Would he also suggest that Indian/Chinese or African culture had no right to be the dominant cultures of those countries? Of course not — such is the hypocrisy and arrogance of these so-called liberals.

Unfortunately, such has been the brainwashing of our people by these liberal fascists, that many British people believe that the mass immigration-imposed multiculturalism is the normal and best state for Britain.

Nationalists, who have opposed the folly of mass immigration and have resented the invasion of our homeland by uninvited and unwanted hordes from all over the world, believe that the indigenous British people have the right to their own homeland and for their culture to be the only acceptable culture in that homeland.

We ask no more than African, Asian or Oriental people do in their own homelands — the acceptance of the indigenous peoples' culture as the sole and dominant culture of that country. 

Why is that not acceptable to these liberal fascists? I can only assume that it is because they wish to see the destruction of any European Christian based culture — for what reasons and ends I can only guess.

But when they make war with my culture, they make war with me, and any who share my belief in our culture.

Bear in mind that the hordes of immigrants who have invaded Britain came originally and solely for economic reasons — and should have been grateful for the opportunities afforded them — but have bitten the hand that fed them by then seeking to impose their cultures (prevalent in their failed Third World homelands) on the countries and native peoples that allowed them such opportunities.

How ungrateful and ungracious is that?

When I see all of the countries in the world happily and peacefully enjoying the multicultural experience, then I may be prepared to submit my country to the multicultural experience.

I fail to understand why Britain and Europe should be the ones to have this experiment forced on them, when many, many, countries in the world would be far more likely to benefit from this experiment than previously successful European nations.

But the liberal fascist elite hypocritically recoil from any suggestion that failed Third World nations might benefit from such an experiment — it is only acceptable for the white European nations.

The truth is — and they know it — that multiculturalism has failed in every country that has experienced it, throughout history.

We have been able to read in our history books and learn about these multicultural failures, but thanks to the Lib/Lab/Con politicians, we can now experience the horrors of such failures ourselves.

The former Yugoslavia, the anti-Semitism prevalent in Europe throughout history — the history of mankind is full of examples of the failed concept of multiculturalism — yet the idiots from the Lib/Lab/Con parties who have ruled Britain for decades ignored the lessons of history and imposed the same doctrine on us — and it has failed yet again. 

This is Britain — not Africa, not China, not India, not Pakistan — and British culture, the culture of the British people who are the rightful inhabitants of Britain, should and will prevail.

If any don't like it, they can go to a country with a culture that they do like.

I, and other Nationalists, won't stop them and if necessary, will help them on their way.

Like many British people, my forefathers spilt too much blood to allow me to give my homeland away to foreign invaders. Like the flesh that I spring from, I will fight for my God, kith, kin and country — and culture.

By the way, there is no such thing as 'multicultural'. The term suggests that the people of a nation enjoy living with numerous aspects of different cultures, all interweaving seamlessly and harmoniously.

While superficially that may be correct — the British people have always enjoyed their cup of tea and more recently, a curry — these examples are merely occasional adoptions of certain elements of other countries cultures in that they have then been absorbed into our culture over time, therefore over time, becoming part of British culture.

These foreign customs have been willingly adopted by the British people, through choice and preference. They have not been forced down our throats.

I had a quite heated discussion with a multi-culture supporter recently. She is quite offended by someone who belches out loud in public — to her (as a British person) it is bad mannered to do so.

But what happens when a refined British person who believes that belching in public is the height of bad manners comes up against someone of Arabic origin and culture, who believes that belching loudly after a meal is the height of good manners?

Does the Arab refrain from belching in order to not offend the Briton (therefore changing their culture and submitting to the norms of another culture) or do they belch loudly (following their own culture) and offend the Briton?

Or does the Briton (adhering to their cultural norms) show their disapproval of the belching (therefore offending the Arab) or, ignoring their own culture, accept the cultural manners of the Arab?

If both follow their own culture, then both will be highly offended by the actions of the other, proving that for multiculturalism to work, one or the other (or both) cultures has to submit to the other.

One, or both have to make concessions for people of different cultures to live harmoniously together, in which case, neither is following their own culture — they are both giving way on their traditional beliefs — therefore they have no culture. Or one does not give way and makes no concessions to other races and cultures, which leads either to the submission of one culture to the other, or to a cultural clash. 

We see this every day in Britain with the acceptance by the British people of 'gay' rights, feminist rights etc., when these same ideals and principles are fundamentally opposed by Muslims — whose culture prevails?

Multiculturalism does not work in theory and it does not work in practice.

People of all cultures and races have more respect for each other when they live in their separate nations where they can observe their own unique cultures, moulded and guided by their own peoples’ customs and traditions.

had enough then Join or donate to the British National Party Here

UK Police running scared of Muslim grooming

Police running scared of Muslim grooming

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick griffin MEP N.W England Euro News

FEBRUARY 2011: 
TELEVISION programmes often generate a lot of correspondence to the MEP's Constituency Office and this week's The Wright Stuff was one such programme.


 Programme presenter Matthew Wright (right) was confronting the issue of racially motivated sex crime, and trying to get studio and audience guests to comment.
Apparently the police refused to attend the show, and Matthew Wright openly called them "chicken" for running scared of this growing problem.
What prompted constituents to write to their MEP was the way the invited guests were too scared to honestly respond to questions and used typical political evasion to avoid answering.
One or two people were brave enough to tell the truth including an Asian woman called Yasmin who pointed out that racially motivated sex crimes had increased British National Party membership.
Even a Muslim caller even acknowledged that the perpetrators of these crimes were almost exclusively Muslim.
Special guest Robert Winston backed off when faced with the Muslim grooming issue and this otherwise incredibly intelligent man, displayed that he had virtually no knowledge whatsoever about Islam.
Responding to those who had written to their MEP, Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Given that the police fully collude with the “culture of silence” surrounding the issue of racially motivated sex crime, it is not surprising that they declined to talk publically about the issue. Off the record, of course, officers have revealed that the pathetic conviction rates for sex offenders represents only a small proportion of the “tidal wave” of offending that has been uncovered in areas such as Lancashire and Manchester.
Mr Griffin and the constituency team are working to expose the scandal of the lack of action by police and education authorities to address the problem.
The police are so politically correct that they twist the statistics to hide the extend of Muslim involvement in these vile crimes. We have however, through Freedom of Information requests, forced Lancashire police to admit that all the victims in their Operation Engage grooming investigation were recorded as 'white' and we will continue to shine the spotlight on the police until the true facts surrounding this crime are revealed.
When we have collected all the relevant evidence, Mr Griffin will raise this issue in the European Parliament, as well as running a high-profile campaign in the North West to ensure that this increasing problem is fully recognised and effectively confronted.
We owe it to the young victims - and thousands of potential future victims - to ensure that Political Correctness and the fear of being branded as 'racist', is not allowed to jeopardise the protection of our vulnerable youngsters or to prevent justice from being served."

Bogus Foreign Student Visa Racket Costs Taxpayer up to £500 Million per Year

Bogus Student Visa Racket Costs Taxpayer up to £500 Million per Year

The British National Party Newsroom

The bogus student visa points-based system racket, started by Labour and endorsed by the Tories in their election manifesto, costs British taxpayers anywhere between £300 and £500 million per year, a new study has shown.

Although liberals and some university staff have claimed that a crackdown on the student visa swindle — which saw 90,000 foreigners enter Britain last year — will cost money, the amount lost is far less than the cost to taxpayers which the system causes, said independent think tank Migrationwatch UK.

That body said in a report that a crackdown on bogus student visa applications “is likely to lead to a loss of some £95 million a year fee income to colleges offering below degree level courses, this has to considered alongside the £300—£500 million a year that it has estimated the taxpayer must fund to support British workers made unemployed by bogus students working illegally.”

“This is yet another legacy of the previous Government’s disastrous management of the immigration system which has once again left the taxpayer picking up the bill,” Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green said in a statement, ignoring the fact that the Conservative government had specifically endorsed that policy in their election manifesto.

“It is neither economically justifiable for the hard pressed taxpayer nor fair to British workers who have to compete for scarce jobs with people who have cheated the system to come here,” Sir Andrew continued.

Migrationwatch did, however, point out that that it was “important to be clear that the purpose of the government’s measures is not to reduce the number of students but to reduce the exploitation of the present system by bogus students” and went on to endorse the typically Tory nonsense of ‘net immigration'.

“In the normal course of events, students should leave after completing their courses to be replaced by others. Over time, therefore, the number of those who arrive will be counter balanced by those leaving with no effect on net migration,” Sir Andrew said.

Meanwhile, a separate report has revealed that last year alone, no less than 90,000 foreign ‘students’ entered Britain by applying to colleges which are not on any Home Office ‘trusted’ list.

A significant number of these entered the country since the election last year, meaning they entered under the Tory government.

Students are only supposed to be allowed to enter the country to attend colleges which have been checked and approved, but this rule has not been applied with any consistency.

According to the figures, there were 613 private colleges which are not ‘highly trusted’ in existence in January this year. Between them, these ‘colleges’ have the ability to sponsor a total of 280,000 international students.

Many of these colleges have been exposed as offering totally bogus courses in ‘hospitality', ‘business administration’ and other obvious hoaxes.

Janus the Chameleon Cameron’s Pronouncements on Islam

Chameleon Cameron’s Pronouncements on Islam

  The British National Party Newsroom

Treacherous Tory leader David Cameron has called upon Muslims to “embrace our British values” just 44 months after telling voters exactly the opposite, namely that British people “need to integrate more” with the Muslim way of life.

In addition, Mr Cameron claimed that there was a difference between Islam and Islamism, even though in an earlier policy statement, he warned directly against making that distinction because, he said, it “plays into the extremists’ hands.”

In an article which appeared in the Observer newspaper in May 2007 titled “What I learnt from my stay with a Muslim family,” Mr Cameron wrote: “Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around.

“If we want to remind ourselves of British values — hospitality, tolerance and generosity to name just three — there are plenty of British Muslims ready to show us what those things really mean,” the Tory leader wrote.

In his latest remarks, made over the past weekend, Mr Cameron has decided that it is Muslims who need to integrate into British society, not the other way round.

In his speech at the security conference in Munich, Mr Cameron said that British Muslims must subscribe to mainstream values of freedom and equality and that the policy of allowing each group to have its own culture had failed.

In the earlier Observer article, Mr Cameron also took great pains to stress that “many Muslims” are “deeply offended by the use of the word 'Islamic' or 'Islamist' to describe the terrorist threat we face today.

“Indeed, by using the word 'Islamist' to describe the threat, we actually help do the terrorist ideologues' work for them,” Mr Cameron wrote in his earlier article.

In his Munich speech, however, Mr Cameron once again completely reversed his view.

“We have got to get to the root of the problem, and we need to be absolutely clear on where the origins of where these terrorist attacks lie,” he said.

“That is the existence of an ideology, Islamist extremism. We should be equally clear what we mean by this term, and we must distinguish it from Islam.

“We need to be clear: Islamist extremism and Islam are not the same thing,” Mr Cameron said in his speech, which can be found on the Downing Street website.

The astonishing chameleon-like change is conclusive evidence that the Tory leadership is either utterly devious and opportunist, or just plain downright stupid.

Either way, Mr Cameron is clearly an embarrassment to Britain.

Had Enough Then Join The British National Party Here 

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful

---

OK – so now the cracks are really beginning to appear.

I am indebted to my good friend and fellow Freeman on the land, for allowing me to use his documentation for this:-
Let me fill you in on the background so you have the case history:-
“Jim” (As we will call him”) is a Freeman on the Land along with us (More on that here www.TPUC.org & www.thinkfree.ca) – and a few months back he decided (Like many of us) that he wasn’t going to pay the UNLAWFUL Council tax that they were trying to enforce upon him via thier unlawful statute legislation. So he stopped paying:-
In due course he started receiving the threatening letters until one day the “summons” appeared on his doormat. (Note: A summons is merely an invitation to attend their place of business to discuss a punishment – its an offer – Read more - just as the Council Tax Bill is an offer to contract with them – read more on this)

The “invitation” was to appear before Wirral Magistrates Court for a hearing concerning the issuing of a liability hearing. Now as we all now ALL magistrates courts are merely a trading styles of the “run for profit” company called “Ministry of Justice” – see below and you can get a copy of the document I have acquired clearly showing:-

1. The corporate status of the Ministry of Justice
2. The Directors (Lord Falconer of Thoroton & Others)
3. The fact that Ministry of Justice has County Court Jugements against it
4. The trading styles of MOJ (Top right – which includes “Magistrates Courts”

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE IS A BUSINESS
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/MOJ_1.jpg

Now call me blonde but I would say this is pretty damned conclusive that we are dealing with a corporate court convened by a corporation to simply lift money from you and I.

So … “Jim” jotted the council a little letter which is shown below:-
FIRST LETTER TO WIRRAL COUNCIL
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_1.jpg

Jim sent this letter about THREE WEEKS before the date that the hearing was due to be heard on.
So … the DAY BEFORE the hearing, Jim received a phone call from the Wirral Council LEGAL DEPARTMENT and what they said was staggering …

THEY WERE GOING TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION FOR A LIABILITY ORDER!

1. Now this is incredible that on the back of one letter they decide to withdraw and more importantly confirms the following:-
2. Council tax is UNLAWFUL, as you and I well know that if these leeches had once ounce of a lawful case for taking this money then they would fight it to the death

They KNOW Council Tax is unlawful and are simply robbing those who haven’t woken up to the facts yet to the tune of £140,000,000,000 per annum (thats 140 BILLION of our money!)
So, Jim being the experienced fellow he is – asked them to email him with confirmation that they were going to withdraw and printed below is their email.
WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMATION OF WITHDRAWAL BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO LAWFUL CASE
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_2.jpg

Jim then asked for further clarification in a formal letter and here is the letter that they sent!
LETTER FROM WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMING THEIR WITHDRAWAL FORM COUNCIL TAX LIABILITY HEARING
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_3.jpg

Then Jim asked them to confirm in writing that because there was now NO LIABILY that the council tax was no longer due
This is the letter they and this is probably (in my opinion) one of THE single most important documents in the fight against Council Tax as it PROVES beyond ANY DOUBT that we DO NOT HAVE TO PAY this UNLAWFUL COUNCIL TAX.
Look at the bit in red!

LETTER FROM WIRRAL COUNCIL CONFIRMING THAT COUNCIL TAX DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PAID
http://www.nocounciltax.com/content/images/RGWCC_4.jpg

So not believing a word of the Council or the courts Jim rocked up to the court on the morning of the Liability hearing and standing as a Freeman on the Land asked the Judge to confirm the withdrawal of the other side which the Judge duly confirmed. The judge then told Jim that he needn’t have turned up and then Jim hit with it.
“I know that sir, but there is the small matter of mys costs”
BAM! – They were not expecting that one!

So, Jim has now duly entered a claim for costs of £1,400 against Wirral Council which is still ongoing at this time as the courts are trying to play silly !!!!!!s with Jim – he has even had one judge step down and refuse to adjudicate in favour of his costs – as you can see – its a stitch up!

Anyway – Jim has some other things planned and I will keep you abreast of developments but there you have it.

A UK Council running away from a court hearing because they KNOW they dont have a LAWFUL leg to stand on and the whole Council Tax is a scam to relieve you and I of money and use it to

• A) Line the pension funds of civil servants
• B) Keep us opressed
• C) Pay of the interest on loans to the bank and the IMF

If you think that Council Tax pays for your bins or the Police – then you are very misguided I am afraid.

GAME ON!
origional posting on  

Proof wirral council admit council tax unlawful - MoneySavingExpert.com Forums: "

Prophets of Doom: David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will

Prophets of Doom: David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will

Written by Tim Heydon

origionaly published on the http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/

Part 1:  Radical Individualism and Opening the Road to State Terror Modern Freedom means the Limitless Freedom to Will. Unleashed from the Guiding Hand of Christianity and Tradition, the Freedom to Will can Mean  the Freedom to Will Terror Christianity Has Made Us – So How Can We Imagine a Non-Christian World? It is difficult for us, living as we are at the end of nearly two millennia of Christian Civilisation, fully to grasp quite how revolutionary Christianity was in the transformation of attitudes in the ancient world, or to imagine what it might mean if those attitudes were to disappear, as disappearing they are in the West. The World of Rome and the Christian Revolution In his book ‘Atheist Delusions; The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies’  the theologian  David Bentley Hart does a terrific job of bringing  out  the impact of Christianity on the ancients, transforming  a world in which  an individual’s worth was predicated on  his or her  power or lack of it  to one in which every individual has intrinsic worth.   Roman society was built on a rather Nietzschean hierarchy of power in which the most powerful of all, the Roman Emperor, could be worshipped as a god while the lower orders were of little account individually and slaves had no personhood whatsoever. The latter were powerless things, like Christ before the powerful Roman Procurator Pontius Pilate. Hart says , ‘the new world we see being brought into being in the Gospels is one in which the whole grand cosmic architecture of prerogative , power and eminence has been shaken and superseded by a new positively anarchic order; an order in which we see the glory of God revealed in a crucified slave’. Hart’s Answer to Christopher Hitchens and his Ilk:  Western Civilisation The title of Christopher Hitchens’ book ‘God is not Great’ is subtitled ‘How Religion Poisons Everything. ’ After a remarkably entertaining exposure, touched with more than a soupcon of asperity, of the paucity of Hitchen’s intellectual capabilities (and those of Dawkins), Hart asks, ‘Does he (Hitchens) really mean precisely everything?" Would that apply then – confining ourselves just to things Christian – to ancient and medieval hospitals, leper asylums, orphanages, almshouses and hostels?  To the golden rule, ‘Love thine enemies’? ‘Judge not lest ye be judged’? Prophetic admonitions  against oppressing the poor, and commands to feed and clothe and comfort those in need? To the music of Palestrina and Bach, Michelangleo’s Pieta, ‘ah bright wings’; San Marco’s mosaics, the Bible of Amiens and all the gorgeous blue stained glass at Chartres? To the abolitionist movement and contemporary  efforts to liberate Sudanese slaves? And so on and so on? Surely it cannot  be the case that if only purged of faith these things would be even better than they are; were it not for faith it seems fairly obvious, most of them would have no existence at all.’ Our Future:  the Idea of the Sunny Uplands of ‘Progress’ is Likely to Lead to a Totalitarian Hell. Hart holds out little hope for the West in the dawning age of secularism. He asks, ‘What evidence is there for the idea that secular reason, if finally allowed to move forward free of the constraining hand of archaic faith will naturally make society more free, more humane and more rational than it has been? It is rather difficult… to vest a great deal of hope in modernity, however radiantly enchanting its promises, when one considers how many innocent lives (‘an unprecedentedly vast collection of corpses’) have already been swallowed up in the flames of ‘Progress.’ The best ideals to which we moderns continue to cling long antedate modernity. For the most part all we can claim as truly, distinctively our own are our atrocities… The process of secularisation was marked from the first by the magnificent limitlessness of its violence.’ Radical Individualism and the Triumph of the Will The tale of the modern nation-state’s struggle for liberation from the ‘shackles’ of religion and tradition should be located within the larger narrative of the triumph of the will. Like most of the defining ideas in our culture, perverted though they may have been in the modern era, the emphasis on freedom of the will has its origins in Christian theology, but Descartes, the father of modern philosophy, spoke both as the heir of the late Scholastic tradition and for modernity when he said that the true image of god within human beings is the godlike liberty and incomprehensibility of the will. Modern Ideas of Freedom are Nihilistic Hart argues that the modern notion of freedom is essentially nihilistic, ie freedom is to be found in the individual subject’s power of choice, rather than in what is actually chosen. Neither God nor nature nor reason provides the measure of an act’s true liberty, for an act is free only when it is done in defiance of all three. The Degradation of the Idea of Liberty.  Freedom as Consumerism  Where is the ascendancy of the modern Idea of Freedom as Pure Spontaneity of the Will leading our Culture, Hart asks?  At an  ordinary, everyday level, it obviously leads to a degradation of the very idea of freedom, its reduction in the public imagination to a fairly banal kind of liberty, no more –though no less- significant than a consumer’s freedom to choose among different kinds of breads, shoes, televisions, drugs, drinks, sexual activities and relationships, political parties or religions. The Death of Shared Obligations and Common Cause -  the Decay of ‘Community ‘ (and therefore National Sentiment) At the level of conventional social behaviours it leads perhaps towards a decay of a shared sense of social obligation or common cause, or towards an increasingly insipid and self-absorbed private culture, or towards a tendency in society at large less to judge the laudability of particular choices by reference to the worthiness of their objects than to judge objects worthy solely because they have been chosen. (eg ’a woman’s right to choose’) From the Banal to the Terrible All this is both obvious and rather vague, but the modern concept of Freedom can lead to other more terrible things as well. For what the will may will, when it is subordinate only to its own native exuberance, is practically without limit. Although pure spontaneity of the will is an illusion (we must actually will something), something dangerously novel entered our culture when we began to believe that the proper end of the will might simply to be willing as such. Nor does the truly liberated have to confine itself to the adventure of discovering and inventing  itself.  Collective will is so much more exciting than an individual’s will, at least if it can be disciplined and marshalled for some collective purpose. With no Transcendent Source of the Good, the Capacity for Evil is Limitless Furthermore if there is no transcendent source of the good to which the will is drawn but only the power of the will to decide what ends it desires, then no human project can be said to be inherently irrational or abominable. If freedom of the will is our supreme value, after all, then it is to all intents and purposes our god. And certain kinds of gods (as our pagan ancestors understood) need to be fed. Part 2 of ‘Prophets of Doom:  David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will’  will show how radical individualism leads to state control. T his is No 2  In the ‘Prophets of Doom’ Series. No 1: ‘Pitirim Sorokin’ and ‘A Christmas Message of Hope’ Parts 1&2

The Coming English Revolution

Brief edited excerpt from The Mighty Oak Of The Coming English Revolution by Mike James.
We have been betrayed over successive generations by a financial caste, based in the City of London, that regards us as nothing more than cattle. We have been fooled into thinking that the British Crown, an international financial concern, is somehow connected to that wonderfully anachronistic and wholly false construct, the United Kingdom.....which is synonymous with another misnomer, “Great Britain”. They even confuse that with the geographically delineated landscape known as “The British Isles”, which includes Ireland. How deluded we have become, not by dint of their our backwardness, but by an evil, Satanic ruling oligarchy that holds us ever so tightly around the proverbials, placing manacles on our own capacity to think for ourselves.

The little-known Nielson Dissertation, which proves beyond any shadow of doubt that the international-financier controlled British Crown is illegal and had no authority to usurp the Third Republic, is almost entirely inaccessible in any English library. The British Crown system of government, comprising Westminster, Whitehall and the Mafiosa state-within-a-state, the City of London, is not only illegal and lacking in legitimacy, but comprises a unified terrorist organisation designed to kill the spirit of all Freeborn Englishmen and Englishwomen. [I assume here that the author naturally includes Freeborn Welsh/Scottish/Ulster men and women due to the current meaning/interpretation of 'British' - as a result of the failed multiculturalism experiment - becoming so worthless and diluted as to mean virtually anyone]

Every man and woman employed by the illegal British Crown and its administrative adjunct, the fantasy, fictional United Kingdom, is an enemy of the English people. Most would choke on their morning coffees to hear such words. We are just as ignorant of the evil Satanic system that made serfs, and then consumer-slaves, out of the one race of men and women who have, should they rediscover the natural-born courage of their innate, God-given convictions, the effortless ability to utterly destroy the viciously evil Soviet European Union that will have our grandchildren working for less than a euro a day and bow to the Mecca of Brussels at five in the morning.

Not one government minister, not one judge, not one policeman in the illegal United Kingdom has the power or authority to make us obey rules created to protect the Dutch-British-Jewish money matrix for which all English people must pay, namely, the parasites who control every aspect of our lives by playing with virtual money in the City of London, which is, constitutionally, a separate state:
What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown' http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/tax... Without the City of London, the monarchy and its hierarchical system of institutionalised repression and deceit would collapse. Without the “pretender” monarchy, not to be confused with its administrative arm, the duplicitous British Crown, then the men and women who are stealing food from out of the mouths of babes and are condemning the elderly and infirm to an early grave would scramble for the first flight out of Heathrow.

This is something that must NEVER be allowed to happen.....
By forcing early closure of all international financial transactions, not one penny of the money they have stolen from us will find itself in the flush of a panicked cash-flight. By confiscating their passports and forcing closure of all international airports, we have them exactly where they belong: in prison awaiting trial.

A STICK TO BEAT US WITH!

A STICK TO BEAT US WITH! 

by Horwich Nationalist

 On a political tactical point every time some mentions Jewish Zionists and not just Zionists, after all Zionism and not Judaism is a globalist political movement that has a great many Gentile acolytes.  

We hand our political and cultural enemies a big stick to beat us with. So ingrained is the folk memory of WW2, and what happened to the forced Jewish labourers of the Nazi’s. That our Political and Cultural opponents can bend and twist any comment or argument when the word Jew is used, to suit their own destructive; twisted and other bitter objectives,

 I know many will say it is true, , concerning many leading Marxist leaders and thinkers, but just look at the leadership of the Munich Red revolution of 1918-18 and other Communist revolutionary examples.

Which is true, but we would also have to ask why also, to me personally it is that due to not the race or ethnicity but Cultural difference towards education of the 19^th century of Eastern Europe between the Jewish and Gentile population, as the Jewish population being barred from many trade and mercantile opportunities placed a greater emphasis on education to better their prospects in life.

But we also must recognise the lack opportunity to put that education into effect within Eastern European society of the time in all aspects of cultural life as the majority of the educated Jewish population although denied wanted to, unlike the Islamic population in modern Europe want to be  absorbed and be involved In European culture,

 Which led to a great many Eastern Jewish graduates lacking experience of the realities of the  world  and some mediocre intellectuals struggling, to be recognised for their abilities perceived or not, becoming bitter towards a culture and society that had rejected them?

And therefore they began looking for a system to change or destroy the society or culture that had snubbed them, and therefore they came across a system that would achieve that goal, in effect Communism a deliberate twisted system that would appear to be an idealistic system that was devised for the betterment of mankind to the disenfranchised and that would allow for the recognition of their alleged talents.

 But in reality was created for it’s domination by an elite who are willing to use any one or any thing in their quest for power and wealth. And the more rejected or idealistic or bitter the recruit to this cause the better!

BUT! We have also to be politically ASTUTE! In avoiding terms and statements that can be read in two ways, after all a great many of the Jewish people oppose Zionism knowing what it really is, a elitist political movement for the creation of world domination and power, at no matter the cost in lives, started by the Rothschild’s  ,who did not give a damm about the Jewish members of European society, only their impassable lust for wealth and power.

 And that now has a majority of gentile members I must add, and including some also say the highest echelons of our own so called Royal Family.

So that I must remind you that we are a party that has Jewish members and elected Jewish officials, who like many of their faith of which ours is the child of are deeply concerned at the growing Islamist threat to Western Europe and it’s culture, a culture that is strongly based on the Judeo Christian tradition of personal responsibility and freedom.

 And also remember many British Jewish patriots laid down their lives of their own free will for this Nation in both World Wars, and it would be sad to tar them with the Communist Zionist brush as well as giving our opponents a stick to beat us with!

clicking on the google ads raises funds for the Bolton BNP branch £75 raised in 6 months.

Nick Griffin MEP BNP Chairmans Update: So much for "Respect"

So much for "Respect"Dear Fellow Patriot,

I’m sure that you like me were enraged when you saw the news today about the two Muslim Respect party councillors from Birmingham, who refused to join the standing ovation for one of our newest decorated war heroes.

Salma Yaqoob and Mohammed Ishtiaq were the only people to remain seated as Lance Corporal Matthew Croucher arrived at the event in Birmingham, our second city to celebrate being given the George Cross for gallantry in Afghanistan.  Unfortunately Birmingham is not only our second city, but is also a centre for dangerous Islamic extremism.

The Lance Corporal is a 27-year-old Royal Marine.  Every time he goes to work he puts his life on the line for his mates and his country.  He was awarded the medal after he flung himself onto a Taliban hand grenade in order to protect and save his comrades in 2008.  Miraculously, he survived the blast.

Isn’t it just typical of the UAF-supporting thugs of Respect that two of their Muslim “councillors” show such disgusting disrespect to one of the very bravest of our brave war heroes? 

Not British

More than 100 other people gave the young Lance Corporal a standing ovation when he arrived at this meeting held in his honour.  Many more ordinary people have rung our central office today expressing their disgust at this outrageous lack of respect.

I am telling you, these two councillors and others of their treacherous kind, who feel the same as them should be ashamed of themselves. They are not British.






That’s the kind of anti-British attitude we’re up against, and if it weren’t for the growing number of British National Party demonstrations and campaigns for our soldiers and against mosques, the confidence and aggression of these Islamic colonists would be even higher.  Truly, while our soldiers are in the front line in Afghanistan, back home here in Britain it’s we who are in the front line of the fight for freedom!

Help us fight back!

Please help us to do something about this monstrous lack of respect shown to our heroes, both alive and sadly departed.  Give us the tools that we need to keep our campaigns in the front line.  Every single penny you send will make a difference.  Your continued support will help us confront and face-down not only the blatant traitors like Respect and their radical Muslim allies, but also the treacherous thieves in the Westminster parties who opened the door to the Islamic fifth column now ripping the heart out of our Britain and bleeding us dry.

Right now, our design and publicity team are putting the finishing touches to a fantastic new full-colour recruitment leaflet, which will be the first really big public showing of our great new Heart for Britain logo. It’s positive, professional and powerful. You’ll love it when you see it, but we need £5,000 to print a first run of 250,000 in time for our Organisers’ Conference on Saturday week.





With stories like the behaviour of those disgusting Muslim Marxists hitting the news almost every day, the time is absolutely right for us to get our message of hope out to our people.  Let’s just do it!   We need the money by Monday. We already have nearly £4,000 put aside – can you help us to raise the rest, right now?



Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Stop Tilting at Windmills:An Open Address to Rank and file Members of the E.D.L

Stop Tilting at Windmills 
 by Horwich Nationalists 
An Open Address toMembers of the E.D.L

              

                                            

I must first state to the individual rank and file of the English Defence League this that this article is in no way a criticism of your motives in your wish to halt the spread of the threat of the Islamic threat to our nation, it is something that I utterly agree with you on.

But it with regret that I must state that one of the oldest political tricks in the book is that when a ruling political elite grows concerned that their true political opposition is about to make a serious breakthrough in support.

The best political method of defence is to attempt to split the opposition, by the conspiracy and the creation of an smokescreen opposition , that can managed by the old political elite and establishment, in order to  draw away support and resources in manpower and material from their political enemies. And at the same time slowly but surely try to mislead the recruits of the smokescreen opposition that they and their policies are not the real enemy but the original opposition is.  We see that in the leadership of the E.D.L some of whom are not even English defending multi culturalism a totally Marxist philosophy and also defending the moral corruption of the Homosexual lobby.

This I must say appears to be the case with the English Defence League,leadership an organisation that suddenly appeared from out of nowhere with apparent material resources to hand. That also has no real political manifesto or objectives apart from in my view diverting the potential support and resources both material and intellectual from the real political issues at hand into the exercise of pointless marches that have and will achieve NOTHING! Towards political change in this country.

It is thus  I can only state my belief that if members of the E.D.L want real change in this once proud Nation, that it can only come about by a political solution. And that the only way that objective can be achieved is by the massed ranks of our Proud English along with our Scots , Welsh And Ulster brothers uniting under the banner of the only Political organisation that can effect the change we all so desire, the British National Party other wise the Marxist inspired elite that run this country will continue with their programme of our National destruction , whilst you just end up TILTING AT Windmills

Nick Griffin MEP launches Spring Initiative with 'Campaign for Equal Respect'

MEP launches Spring Initiative with 'Campaign for Equal Respect'

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 FEBRUARY 2011: 
Nick Griffin MEP has launched his Spring Initiative for his North West of England Euro Constituency with a Press Release and letter to constituents outlining his priorities for the coming months.


 He has pinpointed three issues that he will be campaigning on during February, March and April, in order to raise their profile and make sure that the appropriate authorities respond to the concerns of the public.
Nick has told constituents and journalists:
"Over the next three months, I am concentrating on three key issues that are raised time and time again by people in the area:
1. The problems created by EU red tape for local businesses. Helped by informed advice from tradesmen, community volunteers, small businessmen and farmers, I'm speaking out for commonsense and to curb 'nanny state' meddling that hits jobs and profits.
2.  Animal welfare matters. We Brits really are a nation of animal lovers. So I'm privileged to be able to use my position as a European Member of Parliament to help campaigns such as stopping the barbaric practice of cutting the fins off living sharks and throwing them back in the sea to die in agony. I've just tabled a Written Declaration for MEPs of all parties to join with me to put pressure on foreign zoos to comply with the high standards of animal welfare rightly upheld in zoos in Britain.
I'm also determined to do all I can to ensure that British farmers and consumers are protected against the import of sub-standard food from Eastern European countries where pigs and chickens are kept in disgusting conditions which would rightly lead to prosecution for cruelty if anyone kept animals like that here in our country.
3. Exposing the scandal of the lack of action by the police and education authorities over the scandal of the 'grooming' of young girls from our English community by gangs of Muslim paedophiles. Girls as young as 11 are being tricked or drugged into going to squalid flats with older Muslim men who then gang-rape them and pass them around their relatives as sex toys.
My mailbag is full of letters from worried parents. Some are heartbroken by what has already happened (many of these girls end up as heroin addicts or try to commit suicide), others are desperately scared that their child may be next.
The police are so politically correctness that they twist the statistics of this crime to hide the extent of Muslim involvement in these vile racist crimes. I've just used the Freedom of Information laws to force Lancashire police to admit that all the victims in their Operation Engage grooming investigation were recorded as 'white'.
My constituency office staff and I are working throughout the North West region to uncover the true extent of this crime against our youngsters, and to press the Powers That Be to take action to stop it.
I'm calling this my Campaign for Equal Respect.
When I have collected all the evidence I shall be raising the issue again in the European Parliament. I will also be running a high-profile campaign in the North West to ensure that this increasing problem is fully recognised. Girls from all communities must be treated with equal respect. British girls do not deserve to be treated as valueless, disposable sexual playthings. We've got to work together to stop it." 

EU Diary Erases our European Christian Heritage

EU's Wise Choice . . . ? Erase our Christian heritage

  Martin Wingfield at  Nick Griffin MEP N.W England Euro News

 JANUARY 2011: 
NICK Griffin has slammed the European Commission for producing three million copies of an EU diary for schools (right), that contains no reference to Christmas or Easter but includes Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Jewish and Chinese festivities as well as Europe Day and other key European Union dates.

 "This appears to be the deliberate undermining of our traditional identity and religion by the forces of leftist aetheism," Nick told fellow MEP Roberta Angelilli who is collecting signatures for a written question to the Commission on the issue.
Pressure is now mounting for the Commission to recall the 2010-2011 diary, which has been sent out to schools across the 27 nation state bloc.
Commission spokesman in Brussels, Frederic Vincent, claimed that the omission was just a “blunder” would not be repeated in future editions.
"We’re sorry about it, and we’ll correct that in next edition. Religious holidays may not be mentioned at all to avoid any controversy," he said, the Johanna Touzel, of the Catholic Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Community, was sceptical"
"Christmas and Easter are important feasts for hundreds of millions of Christians and Europeans. It is a strange omission to make. I hope it was not intentional," she said.
There is a belief amongst some MEPs that the move was deliberate and done so not to offend Europe's growing Muslim population.
Last year's EU Christmas card had no mention of Christ’s birth but just the words "Season's Greetings."
The approach is seen as a deliberate policy to marginalisation of Christianity, which is the majority religion in Europe, because of the growing influence of Islam.
And it's not just the anti-Christian message that has angered Nick:
"Make no mistake this is EU propaganda, which is being part-paid for by the British taxpayer and sent into schools across Europe to brainwash impressionable young minds. It's a sinister ploy to promote the European Union and undermine the sovereignty of nation states and our Christian values and traditions," he said.

Racism in UK MUST cut both ways

Racism MUST cut both ways

Martin Wingfield at    Nick Griffin N.W England MEP Euro News

 FEBRUARY 2011: A bus driver from Greater Manchester was called a White 'slag' and a racist by a Muslim after she told him that he was driving up a one-way street.


 There then followed a confrontation in the street which was witnessed by the passengers on the bus.
The lady told Nick Griffin's Constituency Office what happened next
"The 'gentleman' claimed to be a teacher and told me:
"I teach your parasite White kids".
I replied that he couldn't be much of a teacher if he couldn't read a sign saying 'No Entry'.
He called me a racist again and then stormed off.
How can it be right that he can get away with abusing me in this manner. If it had been the other way around I would have been arrested for what he said to me.
My dad and grandad fought for this country in two world wars. They would both turn in their graves if they could see what has happened to our country.
I think it a sorry state of affairs when only going about my job, I was also in uniform, to receive this kind of abuse just earning a living."
Responding on behalf of the MEP, Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield, wrote:
"Thank you for your email, explaining your recent negative experience while on duty as a bus driver.
"Your frustration is understandable, and many people feel as you do.
"The British people were never consulted over the policy of consecutive Conservative and Labour Governments to promote and facilitate mass immigration, yet we must now face the many problems that the consequent over-burdening of our country has caused.
"On top of the very real social and economic difficulties we now endure, it seems we also have to tolerate the unjustified distain of our 'invited' guests. There is an attitude prevalent particularly within the Muslim community that we - as non-Islamic westerners - are decadent and of lesser value than their own community. In essence, it is a manifestation of what would be termed “racism” or xenophobia if the same attitude was displayed by British people towards Muslims. In today’s topsy-turvy PC world, however, racism clearly doesn’t cut both ways!
The British National Party is often labelled as ‘racist’ by the media and mainstream politicians because of its stance on controlling immigration. From our perspective, there is nothing racist about wanting to protect your family, community group and nation. If you imagine Britain as a lifeboat, we have welcomed many newcomers onboard to share in our steady success, but now the boat is sinking under the enormous pressure resulting from our charitable intentions and we have to say ‘enough is enough’ in order to ensure our own - and our invited guests’ - survival. This is not ‘racism’, it is simply common sense.
If you would like to speak to a representative of the British National Party, our Enquiries Office would be pleased to hear from you. Please contact them via email at enquiries@bnp.org.uk , or by telephone on 0844 809 4581. One lone voice often achieves little, but the voices of many raised together cannot be ignored."

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The Voice of Freedom (VoF) is the monthly newspaper of the British National Party. It is packed with hidden and censored news that the mainstream media refuses to print.

This re-branded newspaper is the only place where you will find the latest British National Party activities and news.

The Voice of Freedom also carries a regular monthly column containing the latest developments in the European Union from our MEPs, Andrew Brons and Chairman Nick Griffin.

The Voice of Freedom is not to be missed. A full year's subscription is only £13.15, postage and packaging included.

The Voice of Freedom is a must for every serious British patriot and is the ultimate way to keep abreast of British National Party activities.

Stay in the driving seat of British Nationalism with the Voice of Freedom. Subscribe today:

- Click Here to Subscribe to The Voice of Freedom

Yours sincerely,

Nick Griffin, MEP
Leader, British National Party

Sad UAF Marxists try to Disrupt the Democratic Process in Barnsley

By Horwich Nationalists
Is it not sad to see these poor deluded fools on the streets of Barnsley trying to disrupt the Democratic process. And in my view the most saddest point is how the older Trade Union State Stazi Professor types are deliberately deluding the younger student type members of this small bunch of UAF Marxists, into some how believing that they are fighting for some kind of freedom. When in fact they are shouting for their own enslavement and destruction. It is especially sad to see the attractive  girls amongst them, I wonder if they have really considered what would happen to her under a Islamic regime, or what it would be like to be pimped for sex by the immigrant led sex slave gangs now in operation in Britain. They should all hang their heads in shame at their betrayal of their Nation and it,s People who in generations past has sacrificed their tomorrows for their today's  !!!!!!!. 
SHAME ON YOU ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Battle for the Soul of the British Nation

The Battle for the Soul of the Nation

Written by HORWICH NATIONALIST

A Nation and its people are built upon a common culture, which in itself is based on a common philosophy, which in turn is based on a theology which in turn effects the conduct of an individual within that Nation! So using this principle later worked on by other Marxists mainly Herbert Marcuse, and the Frankfurt school. The attack on our culture began in the late 30's and came to real fruition during the so called sexual revolution of the 1960,s amongst the younger members of society especially the students and their campuses ,were the future leaders of the West were educated! These are the core principles on which the Marxist Antonio Gramsci (1891 - 1937 - see image) realised the means of attack upon Western culture and it's Christian values. As he had realised after a visit to Stalin's Russia in 1922 that the means of exporting the revolution by traditional bloody methods would never work on the culture of the West. He realised that Western Culture was based on the morality of the Judea Christian traditions of the individual’s knowledge of good and evil.  And that it affected the individuals personal and social responsibility concerning the matter of their outlook on all matters both public and private within their nation. Therefore the 1st stratagem of the Marxist cultural attack on the west and it’s values must be to attack and destroy the Christian faith 1st in it’s role in public life and then in it’s relevance to the individual, in effect, the Christian Tradition is the foundations of our society and if you destroy the foundations of any structure the edifice will collapse! For the pathway to Socialist/Marxist oppression is no longer bloody revolutions. It is the omnipresent dialectic, further enhanced by the Marxist infiltrated media in it's pervasive, suggestive, Anti Christian stimuli, in which minds are dulled and the masses indoctrinated by the stream of perversion and low culture set by this media. were as the people in the Old Soviet Union knew full well they were trapped in a God less and cruel vicious Marxist state, many of them could still think in a rational logical manner. But today's managers of mind control have perfected the the social science collective brain washing Were it was claimed that amongst many the free use of sexual gratification of any nature was a personal liberty that was being denied by the antiquated views of the Christian church and western culture on personal freedoms. And that to warn against the so called sexual freedoms was the sign of intolerance, and therefore the views of a bigoted and uneducated and frustrated mind. Well it is quite obvious that the spoilt hormone ridden young men and women of the 1960's would have their attention grabbed by such notions especially as when the use of cheap and free contraception had also been introduced. And they would be easily be deceived in to believing that the Christian Church and it's morality was a institution of oppression of their personal freedoms and choices And therefore needed to become a irrelevance in their lives of personal choices. both in their private and public lives, which free them to  follow selfish personal gratification by not being curbed by the social morality and traditions of the Church and western culture which quite clearly stated what was good and what was evil in mankind! So if you destroy the moral teachings and traditions of the Church what did they conclude would they replace it with, A RELIGION CALLED TOLERANCE! This is something that can easily be controlled by the communist state as in the eyes of the Marxists a moral choice is not fixed for all time! they argue that something that was morally acceptable in the 19th century may not be acceptable in the 21st century, so in effect morality can be changed to suit the needs of the moment in time, example their are too many old people euthanasia is a good moral choice for the good of the proletariat. Or their are too many children forced abortions are a good moral choice, in effect a moral equivalency for any action (see china’s Birth policy). And as today, it is acceptable that divorce can be had at the drop of a hat, that fathers have no responsibility for their children apart from a mediocre maintenance payment, and on and on, till you get a fragmented and disorganised  society, Due the effects of Political Correctness, as in the  where even the main stream Church, the victim of this first stratagem is now blindly arguing against itself blowing Satan's trumpet in the cause of tolerance. But not being stupid even Stalin realised the use of a spiritual aspect to some of the proletariat lives was essential in keeping them in check in case they fought against the moral equivalency of the state, at 1st they tried to introduce the shamanistic religions of the East, But an even better Cult was found for their ends, Islam and a mass introduction the followers of this cult into the Western World would help also, what better a cult based on the basis of submission to higher authority, and who’s moral precepts were based on the acceptability of death as a tool of control, and the added benefit of a multi cultural society that is fractured on all aspects of social life, IE diversity means division! A divided society can not rise to supplant its political elite! So what is the remedy to this situation? 1st educate your self about the tactics of these monsters. And secondly it must be within yourselves you must 1st rediscover your moral and spiritual traditions and by publicly declaring and living at all times in your life, put pressure on your Church leaders to not hide them selves away hoping for divine intervention as a cure all they themselves must take the battle to Satan's door, and also put pressure on all members of public society make them know how strong in numbers we are, and how tired we are of all the perversion and moral decay that pollutes our lives, Join the British National Party the only political party that will free us from the moral morass.  They our Marxist opponents will of course try to attack you with their sophistry of tolerance that is like the Emperors news clothes. But people will see that if you show a lead by seeking the truth and freeing your mind from this PC poison, many others will follow, So as i say to you now pick up your Bible to seek the truth as it warns in that greatest of Books  Acts chpt 20/ 30 "Also of your own selves shall men arise , speaking perverse things , to draw away Disciples after them".. for It will open your eyes and then you will see things as they really are! Our Mission is now just not political! It is now a spiritual WAR also!

The Islamic Middle East Protests : Is this the Start of the Return of the Caliphate?

Tunisia, Egypt: Is this the Start of the Return of the Caliphate?

  The British National Party Newsroom

The mass uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt, while being portrayed as pro-democracy protests by the controlled media, are more likely to end in Islamist takeovers and could well lay the foundation for the return of the Islamic Caliphate of old.

This is the opinion of British National Party foreign affairs spokesman Arthur Kemp, who has specialised in the history of Islam and its conflict with the West.

“The underlying force behind the uprising in Egypt is an organisation called the Muslim Brotherhood, which is one of the modern world’s oldest Islamist organisations,” Mr Kemp told a recent party meeting.

“The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in Egypt in 1928, and has since spread to Bahrain, Syria, the Palestinian territories, Jordan, Iran, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Algeria, Sudan, Somalia, Tunisia and Libya.

“In addition it has followed mass Muslim immigration into Europe and even the United States,” he said.

“According to that organisation’s website, all Islamic governments must be based on sharia law and unified in a Caliphate, or one great Muslim state as was the case during the period immediately following the founding of that religion,” Mr Kemp continued.

“Most of the modern Arab Muslim states are in fact artificial divisions created by European colonial powers, many after the destruction of the Ottoman Empire at the end of the First World War.

The Muslim Brotherhood is in fact banned in Egypt, but is still active by way of proxy or front organisations and was implicated in the assassination of former Egyptian President Anwar Sadat.

“He was killed for agreeing to sign a peace accord with Israel, which the Muslim Brotherhood views as an instrument of the West in the Middle East and a stumbling block to the creation of the Caliphate,” Mr Kemp continued.

The founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hassan al-Banna, declared his organisation’s aim to ‘reclaim Islam’s manifest destiny, an empire, stretching from Spain to Indonesia.’

Al-Banna went on to say that the Muslim Brotherhood’s credo was as follows: ‘Allah is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.’

“The current set of dictatorships in the Middle East, Egypt and Saudi Arabia included, are seen by the Islamists as Western puppets, and hence deserving of being overthrown,” Mr Kemp continued.

“It is thus unlikely, as the controlled media is obviously hoping will be the case, that the current unrest in Arab states is the precursor to a great wave of democracy.

“Rather it is more likely that it will be the precursor to a renewed wave of Islamism which will in turn renew the 1,300 year long open war of Islam against the West.

Mr Kemp referred to a recent (September 2010) sermon, published on the Muslim Brotherhood website, delivered by that organisation’s current ‘Supreme Guide’ Muhammad Badi’, titled ‘How Islam Confronts the Oppression and Tyranny [against the Muslims].’

“Badi’ pointedly accused the Arab regimes of employing tyranny against their peoples, of avoiding confrontation with the Muslims' real enemies — Israel and America — and of disregarding Allah's commandment to wage jihad against the infidels,” Mr Kemp said.

“He stated that the Arab governments are ‘disregarding Allah's Commandment to Wage Jihad’ and that ‘many Arab and Muslim regimes have not managed to build up their peoples, due to their weakness and their dependence [on the West], and in many cases they have begun to work against the interests of the [Muslim] nation,’” he added.

“Badi’ went on to say that the Arab governments have ‘disregarded Allah's commandment to wage jihad for His sake with [their] money and [their] lives, so that Allah's word will reign supreme and the infidels' word will be inferior.’

“Although the current Arab regimes are indeed dictatorships, what is likely to replace them is bound to be far worse,” Mr Kemp warned.

“It is like Iraq once again: the promise to bring ‘democracy’ ended up in the creation of yet another Islamist nightmare.

“If the Caliphate does re-emerge from the current wave of unrest sweeping the Arab world, then Europe must steel itself for a renewed conflict with that religious-political force of old.

“If this does happen, and God forbid that it does, then it will be vital for Europeans to get rid of their traitor politicians who have encouraged and supported mass Islamic immigration into Europe, because that is the fifth column which will ultimately destroy all of Europe.”

Recommended reading: Jihad: Islam’s 1,300 Year War on Western Civilisation

By Arthur Kemp. For centuries, violent Muslims have been trying to capture Europe for Islam. Sweeping out from its origin in Saudi Arabia, Islam has expanded through violent conquest into North Africa, the Middle and Near East, and very nearly into Europe itself, attacking through Spain, Italy, and the Balkans.

Each time, the Islamic hordes were turned back by a united European military effort. Today, the Islamic invasion is not being carried out with sieges, scimitars, or cannon, but rather by immigration, birth rates, and demographics. Given current trends, Europe is set to be overrun before the end of this century.

This book puts the current crisis into historical perspective, showing that instead of being a "religion of peace," violent Islam has, in fact, been waging war on all its self-appointed opponents since its inception.

Finally, this book dares to say what must be done if Europe is to avoid succumbing to the new invasion. The choice is hard, but is one which will determine whether Western Civilisation lives or dies. Softcover, 72 pp. £10.60 includes postage and packaging. Click here to purchase.

To Whom Does the British Government Owe All this Debt ?

To Whom Does the Government Owe All this Money?

The British National Party Newsroom

Much is made of the ‘government debt’ which is the prime cause of the budget cuts currently ripping their way through Britain’s infrastructure, but to who exactly is all this money owed? The British National Party’s Andrew Moffat supplies the answer.

Economics – The Dismal Science

By Andrew Moffat—An earlier article on the site referred to the ‘mysterious and unnamed’ borrowers who finance the UK’s debt. In November, the article continued, the UK’s borrowing requirement was put at £23.3 billion.

The position, in fact, is not quite so mysterious. The government, via the relevant debt management office, simply issues a range of gilt-edged securities, i.e. bonds, bearing a redemption date and a coupon.

Often, new bonds are issued merely to cover the redemption of bonds issued in earlier years, often under previous administrations.

The proceeds from the sale of these bonds finance the government’s liabilities.

The British government has never reneged on its debts or the coupons (interest) attached thereto. For this reason, UK government debt is referred to as ‘gilt-edged’.

Given its record, the government borrows at favourable rates. At the opposite end of the spectrum, by contrast, the Greek government borrows at far higher rates; its financial record is poor.

The buyers (on the international money markets) usually comprise a range of institutions,

largely domestic but also foreign. 

Many are pension companies, and government bonds are favoured by them as secure investments to safeguard the contributions of ordinary men and women, who usually save through a collective scheme, via one of the many large pension companies, such as Aviva or Prudential.

Other investors will include, for example, unit trusts and life insurance companies, on behalf of their retail clients.

A portion of government debt, sold at the regular auctions, will also find its way into the banking sector, where it will form part of the banks’ capital ratio requirements.

Because of the foregoing, it is not possible to name all the buyers as they would stretch to an enormous list of many hundreds each time, often buying in small lots of millions, depending upon the terms of the auction concerned.

Ordinary people may buy gilts, too, and many do so. Gilts are listed and priced on the London Stock Exchange. On Monday, for example, I might purchase, via my broker, Treasury Stock 4.75 percent 2020 at approximately 108.4p, the approximate price at last Friday’s close.  Here, the coupon (interest) is 4.75 percent per £1.00 nominal or 4.75p/year.

As a percentage, however, the yield is 4.38 percent, given the market price is £1.084.  The coupon rate from month to month and year to year usually reflects the market interest rate at the time — interest rates fluctuate.

Currently, with interest rates as 0.5 percent, the above return of 4.38 percent may seem attractive. Were interest rates to rise more than the markets expect, then the market price of these instruments would fall.

Bear in mind, also, that the gilt will be redeemed at £1.00 in 2020, or some eight pence beneath its current market price.

If we descend into 1930s deflation, then bonds will rise in price as the income stream from them becomes more valuable.

This is what has occurred in Japan over the past 20 years and it was a notable feature in the ‘30s in the UK and the USA, in a time of deflation — i.e. falling prices.

Where do we go from here and will bond prices rise or fall? No one knows for certain but conflicting views and opinions instruct market prices.

In the UK inflation is presently high at between 4 and 5 percent, depending upon the measure employed. Because wage rises are well below this (excepting for senior bankers, who are hoarding money), then it follows that there has been a fall in real terms of take-home pay.

Inflation is high for a variety of reasons, not least the fall in the value of Sterling.

This translates into higher energy costs and imports. Poor crop yields and additional factors, including the fall in Sterling, has caused a rise in food prices. VAT rises have also contributed to inflation.

These are considered by some to be ‘one-off’ factors and they believe inflation will fall considerably in a year or two.

Given the spending cuts to come, still to have an effect on the economy, there are considered to be disinflationary prospects over the next year or two.

There are many unknown economic factors, including the level of Sterling and the ongoing impact of Quantitative Easing (QE), the process of creating money to offset the deleveraging that has occurred since the financial crisis.

No one has yet answered the question of why it is that QE can be employed in a recession but not during a period of normalised growth.

QE is, in effect, nationalist economics and it is an economic lever nationalists have long advocated. It has taken a financial collapse to achieve it.

One final point: at a time of unprecedented spending cuts, no one will have failed to notice that the areas not being cut are those politically-correct projects whose end ambition assists the extirpation of the nation state: the EU, Overseas ‘Aid’, Climate Change levies and multiculturalism. In aggregate, these annual costs amount to some £60 billion per annum.

The British National Party would cut, absolutely, every one of these costs and place the money back into the pockets of those who earn it and into a programme of massive national rejuvenation