Search This Blog

Wednesday, 15 September 2010

Government-Funded Report Reveals True Extent of Islamic Colonisation: A Caliphate in Britain

Muslim Organisations Squeal after Government-Funded Report Reveals True Extent of Islamic Colonisation: A Caliphate in Britain

Muslim organisations in Britain have squealed in collective horror at a secret government-funded report leaked onto the Internet which revealed that all Islamic groups want to see Britain turned into a Caliphate, and not just the “extremists.”
The report, issued by the Quilliam Foundation, which is supposed to be a “counter-extremism think tank” run by two “former” radical Muslims, says that many mainstream Islamic groups who denounce violence and terrorism still want to bring Britain under Islamic control.
The report was sent in June to Charles Farr, the director general of the Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism (OSCT), a directorate of the Home Office.
It was addressed personally to Mr Farr and a covering letter said it should be kept secret to avoid “the twin distractions of media attention and potential civil service defensiveness.”
The report warns that the ideology of non-violent ‘Islamist’ groups is “broadly the same as that of violent Islamists” adding “they disagree only on tactics.”
Entitled “Preventing terrorism; where next for Britain?" the report lists extremist sympathisers, including the Muslim Association of Britain, the Federation of Student Islamic Societies, the Cordoba Foundation, and Muslim Welfare House, the Finsbury Park mosque, Birmingham Central mosque, the East London mosque, the Muslim Safety Forum, the Islamic Human Rights Commission and the Islam Channel.
Most shockingly, the report says that a Scotland Yard counter-terrorism squad called the Muslim Contact Unit is dominated by extremist Islamist ideology.
“These are a selection of the various groups and institutions active in the UK which are broadly sympathetic to Islamism,” the report says.
“Whilst only a small proportion will agree with al-Qaeda’s tactics, many will agree with their overall goal of creating a single ‘Islamic state’ which would bring together all Muslims around the world under a single government and then impose on them a single interpretation of sharia as state law.”
The document warns that if the Government works with such groups “it risks empowering proponents of the ideology, if not the methodology, that is behind terrorism.”
The report has merely highlighted the reality which faces Britain in the face of the ever-increasing and unchecked colonisation of Britain by the Third World.
The conversion of Britain — and all of Europe — into an Islamic state is merely a matter of time unless the criminal mass immigration policies propagated by all the Westminster parties is not only halted, but reversed.
This then, is the task the British National Party has set itself.

Vive Le France! Vive Le Sarkozy! Vive Le Liberty!

Vive Le France! Vive Le Sarkozy! Vive Le Liberty!

By Horwich Nationalists


One can only admire the French people and the President of France Mr Nicolas Sarkozy's defence of their Homeland and culture, from the scourge of the Roma Gypsy inflicted crime wave on France and the French people. And also not to forget the previous Banning of the oppression of women who are forced to wear the Islamic garment the Burka. All this in the face of determined opposition from the Marxist EU and their left wing Liberal elite allies. 

Whose spokesman a little known puffed up eurocrat with the title of Justice Minister of the EU , (now theirs a contradiction in terms justice in the EU) Vivane Reding , who hails from the parasitical Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, yes! Luxembourg the postage sized state that surrenders at the first sign of trouble and after hostilities cease demand the victors pick up all the defence bills of their minuscule state whilst they offer tax exile to all those multi millionaires who should be contributing  for the defence of their own nations. has compared the French President and in effect the French People as Nazi's. And has also threatened the French Nation with Legal action. I bet the French  are Quaking in their boots at that threat. just imagine the  headline on that one, 
Menopausal Harridan invades France with Legal Document, Last seen exploding on the end of of an Exocet missile, Luxembourg surrenders!
All I can add it is about time that the British Public shouls also elect Politicians that are willing to stand up for the rights of British People and Nation, and not those who are only to glad to turn this once proud nation into the dumping ground of the worlds undesirables. 
And off course their is only one Party that to be blunt HAS THE BALLS TO DO SO! It is of course the British National Party , who's entire ethic is the British People and Nation must be the first consideration in all laws and policies!  And 1st task would be to leave that nest of vipers called the EU and once again take our own place on the world stage!
So I hope soon to not only to shout Vive La France but also Vive Grande Britan!

Tuesday, 14 September 2010

Nick Griffin BNP MEP Visits Horwich Bolton and Give A great Speech this Weekend

Author Horwich Nationalists,

This Sunday evening just gone , The members of the Bolton British National party and members of the public were treated to a superb and in depth topical speech by Nick Griffin MEP and Chairman of The British National Party at their monthly meeting. 

The meeting was opened by Dorothy Sayers who gave a impassioned speech on the need for the British people to unite behind the British National party , in order to ensure their survival as a indigenous majority in their homeland. Mrs Sayers also pointed out that in her opinion and I must say many many others, we have only 15 years left to stem this tide that threatens the survival of the British people and Nation. And when you bear in mind that is only three General Elections, the horror of the situation really hits the mark.Dorothys speech below.


Before and after  the meeting Nick who is a very busy man, had plenty of time to mix with members and the public, in order to discuss topics and pose for photo,s from the many admirers, as the one he graciously agreed to have taken  with last years Horwich North east British National Party candidate Ivan Cooper. Mr Cooper commented that, "It is the first time that I have met Mr Griffin and I found him to a pleasant and quiet spoken man who,s persona has been much maligned by the Left wing media lies. I also found him also to be sincere with a true love of the British people and Nation a truth that is obvious to any one who listens to the speech he gave, it is also a pity that we could not make Nicks appearance at our meeting fully public, but unfortunately we would have had the the Prime Ministers sponsored violent Marxist UAF thugs threatening public safety. It is a shame that the three main political parties now have to use third party organisations to threaten and use actual violence in order to attempt to silence the British Peoples opposition to their policies of the British peoples and Nation destruction by subverted means ".

Also after the meeting many members of the ordinary members of the public who attended the meeting declared themselves to  to be utterly now convinced that the Left wing media are complete liars! and also that their support for OUR party was assured. indeed several membership applications forms were taken by the public, and the news is that in the last 48 hours one is now indeed a new member of the Bolton British National Party.
So why Not decide for yourselves a choice we always give in our party, by sitting back and watching Nicks superb speech!




convinced then why not join us in our modern day Battle to Save Britain by joining the British National Party British National Party Membership application

Sunday, 12 September 2010

BNP Vote Tops 21% in Spennymoor By Election

BNP Vote Tops 21% in Spennymoor

The British National Party took nearly 22 percent of the vote in the Spennymoor town council by-election from a standing start in a seat never before contested by the party, reports candidate Adam Walker.
Adam Walker and supporters at the polling station. Adam Walker and supporters at the polling station.“I am really delighted with the result which shows that hard work on the streets does pay off,” Mr Walker said.
The BNP polled 264 votes to the winning Lib Dem candidate’s 494. The seat was previously held by Labour and a large defection of that party’s voters to the BNP played a critical role in securing the result.
“We had never contested a seat on Spennymoor town council before and had no real idea what to expect,” Mr Walker continued.
“We decided to fight the Spennymoor seat all-out and put up a paper candidate in the neighbouring ward of Middlestone Moor.
“We put out seven leaflets in Spennymoor and completed a full canvass, while in Middlestone Moor we did not even put out a leaflet,” Mr Walker said.
“The result in the two wards showed the difference that hard work can make. Even so, the paper candidate polled 47 votes, or a respectable 8 percent of the vote,” Mr Walker said.
There was a 28.9 percent turnout in Spennymoor and a 22.8 percent turnout in Middlestone Moor.
“I'd like to say thank you very much to everyone who came to help throughout this campaign. We've had lots of people from the Cumbria in particular come to help, and it has served to raise the party’s profile in the area once again,” he said.
* The BNP also stood a paper candidate as a test in Exeter Council this past week. The single BNP candidate (amongst the race which was fought by 13 Tories, 13 Lib Dems, 12 Labourites and 10 UKIP candidates) polled a respectable 673 in his ward.

Saturday, 11 September 2010

The Koranic Book Burning And a Missed Opportunity to Gain the Moral High Ground

Author Horwich Nationalists 


The latest false outrage from the world of spineless politics about a little known American Pastor claiming that he was about to burn hundreds of copies of the Holy Book of the followers of Mohamed, was yet another example of the so called Liberal political class, surrendering to the fear of the Islamic mob, and perhaps even worse the loss of a few strategic votes, that will keep them in power for another 4 years in order to put their own career before the welfare of their nations or peoples and more importantly the true faith of Christianity that is under attack constantly but refuses to act violently.

It is with sadness in my opinion that these so called defenders of democracy, who are willing to send the brave young people in the armed forces of the west to fight in illegal wars for the sake of oil, in which hundreds of thousands of Muslims out side their respective nations ( Unable to vote) have died only for the sake of their political parties financial backers gaining more billions. 
And yet at the same time pontificate about the lack of respect for the beliefs of the followers of Mohamed. In other words submitting to the Islamic Mob rule within their own borders, in the belief that such incidents are bad for their own electoral success. Which I suppose is just a another example of Multi Culturalism, ie: the Tail wagging the Dog! instead of informing the followers of Mohamed that if they wish to live in a democracy they should abide by the laws that govern those who do not follow the dictates of Mohamed and if they find that unpalatable then they should seek another land to live in.

But to me as a Christian the most saddest part of the entire incident is the fact that the Parson missed a golden opportunity to show the Islamic world the wisdom of Christianity and peace by putting a mirror in the face of the followers of Mohamed and the illegal wars of the Liberal Politicians , by showing the ingrained  violence of their faith . By seeking the assistance of  other preachers even those of Mohamed who would bear witness to his intent. By claiming at 1st that he was going to burn these books, whilst not having any intent to do so. Then as the violence and death threats begin , he could have asked the followers of Mohamed why do you always react with violence to any criticism, is your faith in this man and his teaching so fragile that you must seek to destroy all those who question or any of the critics who put your belief to the test. it seems to me that your faith is as a house made of mud and that when it rains you attack the drops. It is as deep within yourselves you know that the entire structure of your faith in this man cannot stand against it , and will be washed away by any of the drops of criticism. 
But if it is not so then rise to my challenge which would be to put away your violence of word and deed. And answer your critics and point out with debate and reason the injustices you feel that are done against you and your beliefs, and gain the ear of the world. 
Then the people of the world, would be more understanding towards you and would not allow these Liberals a free rein to make war on you for false reason of the war on terror, for that reason is a reason that YOU AS MUSLIMS HAVE GIVEN THEM, by your outrages such as 9/11, for the real reason you know and I know that it is all down to oil and money.

Geert Wilders to form a new Government for the Netherlands?

Geert Wilders to form a new Government for the Netherlands?

The latest polls show that Geert Wilders’ party, the PVV, has forged even further ahead of the other political parties in the Netherlands. The leftist dissenters within the CDA (Christian Democrats) have done nothing to improve their party’s standing; it remains at an all-time low.
If the election were held today, the PVV would hold almost a quarter of the seats in parliament. Matters seem abundantly clear, and yet the parties are unable to form a government, thanks to the cordon sanitaire around Geert Wilders.
watch this film



Islamic Holy Book Burning Controversy: Let’s Strike a Deal with the Muslim World Instead

Koran Burning Controversy: Let’s Strike a Deal with the Islamic World Instead

The worldwide hullabaloo over a threat by a tiny Christian church in Florida to hold an “international Koran burning day” has illustrated how divisive Islam has become in modern Western society and has highlighted once again the sense and logic behind the British National Party’s foreign policy towards Muslim nations, according to party Foreign Affairs spokesman Arthur Kemp.
“The fact that a denomination of less than 50 people at an obscure church could provoke a world crisis involving the heads of state of Britain, America, Afghanistan and others, should serve as a wake-up call to the importance of Islam’s influence in the world,” Mr Kemp said.
“Under normal circumstances, such an event would hardly even be noticed, much less seized upon by the President of the United States of America and the head of the American military mission in Afghanistan,” he continued.
“Even the president of Afghanistan has said that the Koran-burning would have international repercussions and would see Americans attacked anywhere in the world. From that point of view, it is good that the event has been cancelled.
“However, it has underlined the fact that Islam has now, courtesy of uncontrolled mass immigration, become a factor in Western societies on both sides of the Atlantic.
“The BNP has long pointed out that the Westminster parties are directly responsible for this disaster, and have encouraged terrorism in the West through their twisted foreign policy which incites the Muslim world against the West.
“If that were not bad enough, these same parties then follow a domestic policy of encouraging as much Third World immigration as possible, creating a huge pool of potential support inside Britain (and Europe and America, for that matter) from which radical Islamists can recruit,” Mr Kemp continued.
“We have to bear in mind that Islam’s primary objective is in any event to seize control of non-Muslim lands, either by force or colonisation. The Westminster parties are actively aiding this objective and through their foreign policies are fanning the flames of radical Islam and providing them with the excuse to encourage acts of terrorism against the publc.
“The BNP’s position is quite clear, simple and obviously truthful: Islamist terrorism in the West will never be contained until the twin issues of mass immigration and our biased foreign policy are corrected.
“Only once mass immigration has been halted and reversed, and our foreign policy brought into line to serve British interests alone, will the immediate threat dissipate.
“In this regard, the sense and logic behind the BNP’s foreign policy towards Muslim nations will play a major role in sorting out the problem. For there is no truth at all to the allegation that the BNP is anti-Muslim.
“All we say is that in the same way that Saudi Arabia has the right to be a Muslim country without outside interference, Britain has the right to be a British country without outside interference.
“This means that Britain has the right not to be colonised by millions of Muslims who will change the very nature of our society, and that Saudi Arabia has the right not to be colonised by millions of Christians who will change the very nature of that society.
“The BNP would offer a deal to the Muslim nations of the world: We would agree to a completely neutral foreign policy and undertake never to interfere in the internal affairs of Muslim nations. This would mean never again launching wars such as the illegal invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan, or undertaking any action in which British interests are not directly threatened.
“In return, all we would ask is that the Muslim nations accept our right not to be colonised and accept back their excess populations which they have already exported to Britain.  It is an offer founded on realism and a desire to create a lasting peace so that we may never again have to face the prospect of an international incident over a ‘Koran’ burning’ threat,” Mr Kemp concluded.

BNP’s Anti-EU Stance Supported By British people in Latest YouGov Survey

Dramatic Endorsement of BNP’s Anti-EU Stance in Latest YouGov Survey

The latest YouGov survey on Britain’s continued membership of the European Union has producing a ringing endorsement for the British National Party’s policy of complete withdrawal from that body.
According to the poll, almost half of the British public would vote for Britain to leave the EU if there were a referendum on British membership. Some 47 percent would want Britain to leave the EU compared to 33 percent who say they would vote for Britain to retain its membership.
EU scepticism is not restricted to the older generation. Some 43 percent of those over 60 want to leave the EU, while 69 percent of the 18–24 age group indicated they would be in favour of ending Britain’s membership.
The poll, conducted amongst 1,948 adults between 8 and 9 September, asked respondents: “If there was a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union, how would you vote?”
The answers were as follows: “I would vote for Britain to remain a member of the European Union: 33 percent.
“I would vote for Britain to leave the European Union: 47 percent.
“I would not vote: 5 percent.
“Don't know: 14 percent.”
* The ConDem regime’s pathetic attempts to persuade the EU to freeze its annual budget have ended in utterly predictable failure.
Chancellor George Osborne had called on the EU to adopt a cash freeze for 2011 but was heavily outvoted by other member states.
The annual rise has yet to be fixed but a 6 percent increase has been proposed by the European Commission, taking spending to £130 billion. In terms of the Lisbon Treaty, the UK has no veto on the EU's annual budget. Unlike on the multi-year budget, the UK has no veto on the EU's annual budget.
Part of this massively increased expenditure goes on EU institutions and agencies outside of Brussels whose numbers have increased from 12 to 38.
These outside agencies now employ 6,700 bureaucrats and cost a total of €1.66 billion per year. Examples include the Institute for Food Safety in Parma, the Agency for Chemicals in Helsinki and the Network and Information Security Agency on the Greek island of Crete.
In addition, the EU spends over €8 million every year “entertaining, training and informing journalists.”
At least €8.14 million was directly spent on entertaining, training and 'informing' journalists with €2.6 million spent on transport, accommodation and sustenance. An additional €351,800 was spent on Irish journalists and Lisbon-related seminars in the run-up to the 2009 referendum.

Join The British National Party https://www.bnp.org.uk/membership.html

Europe Is “Committing Identity and Economic Suicide

Europe Is “Committing Identity and Economic Suicide” Says Andrew Brons MEP

The individual nation states of Europe and the European Union, on behalf of the continent, are committing "identity and economic suicide," British National Party MEP Andrew Brons has told the European Parliament.
Speaking this week during a debate on a 'State of the Union' address from European Commission President and “former” Communist Jose Manuel Barroso, Mr Brons used his minute’s speaking allocation to spell out the effects of the EU’s embrace of globalism.
“"Mr. Barroso has spoken of sustainable growth; in fact we have negative growth. He spoke of increasing the proportion of people (or working age) in employment, whereas that proportion has fallen,” Mr Brons said.
“"He speaks of increasing the competitiveness of European goods and services. However, the EU, like each of its member states, is embracing globalism and voluntarily accepting a deluge of cheap imports from low wage countries that are emerging from the Third World. The only way in which we could compete with such countries, would be by driving down our wage rates to their levels.
"Just in case our employers and employees should not get the point, we are filling up our countries with Third World workers who are turning large areas of our countries into parts of the Third World, with below minimum wage rates and unsatisfactory working conditions. 
"We are making (our) workers in the commercial services sector redundant and outsourcing their jobs to people in the Third World. The individual nation states of Europe and the European Union, on behalf of the continent, are committing identity and economic suicide,” Mr Brons concluded.


Thursday, 9 September 2010

Another Tory David Cameron’s UAF Thugs Found Guilty of Public Violence

Another of David Cameron’s UAF Thugs Found Guilty of Public Violence

From the BNP Newsroom 
Yet another of the David Cameron-backed UAF and Socialist Workers’ Party thugs has been convicted of public violence following an attack on a policeman which took place during a protest outside last year’s Question Time.
Martin Smith, who is a leading UAF member and National Secretary of the Socialist Workers Party, was found guilty of assault on a police officer.
The criminal thug Smith was sentenced to a 12-month community order, with 80 hours’ unpaid work and has been fined £450.
This violent Communist’s conviction will be the forerunner of many such convictions over the next few weeks, if previous reports are anything to go by.
On 8 August 2009, some 35 UAF thugs were arrested by police in Birmingham for public violence.
This will followed on 19 August 2009, when a further 19 UAF thugs were arrested by police for violence committed outside the BNP's Red, White and Blue festival.
On 10 October 2009, some 48 UAF thugs were arrested in Manchester for public violence, and on 22 October 2009, a UAF demonstration against Nick Griffin's appearance on the BBC's Question Time programme was marked by a UAF attack on the police which resulted in serious injuries to no less than three police officers.
It was for this violent and unprovoked attack that the Communist criminal thug Smith was arrested and convicted.
On 31 October 2009, eight UAF thugs were arrested in Leeds for public order offences.
On 20 March 2010, some 55 UAF thugs were arrested in Bolton for public violence, including UAF secretary Weyman Bennett on suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.
Not surprisingly, the thug Bennett is also a central committee member of the Socialist Workers’ Party. His case is still currently under review by the Crown Prosecution Service.
In a statement issued after the arrests, police in Bolton specifically blamed the UAF for provoking violence and said that Bennett’s UAF thugs had "acted with, at times, extreme violence."
On 30th August 2010, another 14 UAF thugs were arrested in Brighton, East Sussex.  A police statement issued after that attack said that a “group from the counter-demonstration (UAF) resisted this [police wishes to keep both demonstrations apart] and threw missiles at the police."
The evidence is clear and obvious: the UAF organisation is nothing but an extremist, violent, far left Trotskyite front organisation, bent on causing anarchy and violent confrontation.
The long list of UAF violence and attacks on the police and members of the public shows a clear trend in behaviour for this ultra-violent organisation. This makes it even more outrageous that Mr Cameron is a signed-up founder UAF member.
The time has come for Mr Cameron — and all the other Westminster MPs who have signed up to support this criminal organisation, to either acknowledge that they support public violence, or to distance themselves from the UAF.

Blair Chickens out in the Face of BNP’s Righteous Anger

Blair Bottles It in Face of BNP’s Righteous Anger

The British National Party has claimed credit for Tony Blair’s cancellation of his book signing event in central London this week, party leader Nick Griffin has said.
Reacting to the announcement today that Mr Blair had decided to forego his personal appearance at Waterstone’s in Piccadilly after the BNP had announced its intention to demonstrate and send twelve people inside to confront Mr Blair with the enormity of his crimes, Mr Griffin said he was “very happy with the result.”
“It is a disgrace that Mr Blair would even consider making money off the graves of the dead British soldiers he sent to fight his useless, lie-based and illegal war in Iraq,” Mr Griffin said.
“This event has underlined the fact that the BNP was the first party to oppose Mr Blair’s warmongering, and the first party to point out that the allegations of weapons of mass destruction were nothing but lies.
“We must also not forget that Mr Blair was also responsible for the disastrous British involvement in Afghanistan and even more shockingly, recently called for British military action against Iran on the Andrew Marr Show,” Mr Griffin said.
“Mr Blair, his cabinet and all those Westminster politicians who supported the war, then and now, bear full responsibility for the deaths caused by these wars.
“Intelligence and army experts have also confirmed that these wars have increased terrorism in Britain and elsewhere. The sum total of all of this is that Tony Blair is the premier war criminal suspect of our time and the BNP is proud to have played a role in highlighting this fact.”

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Islamic Terror Funding Mosque Bust latest in USA Latest

Islamic Terror Funding Mosque latest in USA Latest 

From our USA Reporter the Alabama Rose

Please if you watch nothing else I send out, watch this.
This has been going on right under our noses here in Orlando and this video is the result of a federal investigation.
This is absolutely horrendous – every time we complain we are told we are paranoid BUT WE ARE NOT.
The Moslem Brotherhood is taking over this country and we have a President and Attorney General that are doing nothing.
Whether you believe he is a Moslem or merely a supporter is no longer important – what is important is that he is helping this happen by his silence and refusal to act.
Canada has banned George Galloway – yet he comes and goes here as he pleases.  He was HERE IN ORLANDO soliciting funds for Hamas!
Please watch this and then send it to everyone on your e-mail list all over the country, and ask them to do the same.
We must stop this now.
Also, I suggest you ask your legislators to immediately write legislation that demands we ban terrorist sympathizers and fundraisers from the USA and that we immediately revoke the status of any organization that supports this crap.  These donations are tax deductible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Please act on this immediately – send this video to each and every legislator in Florida and then start sending it around to the other state and federal legislators.  We need them to take this threat seriously or we will soon be living under Sharia law.  In case you have forgotten, that is the edict of Islam – to convert everyone, whether willingly or by force.  

Tuesday, 7 September 2010

Pakistani Election Fraud in UK Tories Found Guilty

Democracy, New Conservative Style

Five Muslim Conservative Party members, including two councillors, in Bradford have been jailed for just over seven years after being found guilty of large-scale voter fraud.
The New Conservatives have joined the growing list of Muslim “politicians” in Britain from all the Westminster parties who have been found guilty of importing election “tactics” from their homelands to Britain.
According to a local report, Tory councillors Reis Khan and Jamshed Khan conspired in a plot with fellow Conservatives Mohammed Sultan, Mohammed Rafiq and Alyas Khan to use fraudulent postal votes to get their candidate Haroon Rashid, elected to the Bradford West seat.
Mr Khan is also treasurer for the local Conservative association.
The practice of Muslim (and in particular, Pakistani-origin Muslim) cheating in Britain’s elections is widespread.
Even the far-left Joseph Rowntree Foundation was forced to admit in a 2007 report that “several cases [of electoral fraud] have involved proven instances of large-scale vote-rigging within British Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities. There is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that practices associated with traditional forms of Pakistani ‘clan politics’ have been a common factor in a significant minority of recent prosecutions for electoral fraud.”
In Slough, Berkshire last year, Six British Pakistanis were jailed for postal vote abuse.
In an earlier case in Birmingham in 2005, local elections were voided and had to be re-run at a massive cost to the taxpayer, as several Pakistani candidates were found to be operating what was described as a ‘vote-rigging factory’.
The judge commented on government claims at the time that postal voting was working: “Anybody who has sat through the case I have just tried and listened to evidence of electoral fraud that would disgrace a banana republic would find this statement surprising.”
The latest court case in Bradford underlined the seriousness of the problem once again.
The Leeds Crown Court Judge Robert Bartfield warned that the fraud threatened to “contaminate” Britain’s democratic foundations and render those principles “worthless.”
The growth in Third World corruption is an inevitable consequence of the Third World colonisation of Britain. All the signs are there, and the only question still to be answered is if the British people will read the signs and respond accordingly.

Monday, 6 September 2010

EU’s Theft of National Sovereignty Continues: 1st EU Ambassador” to USA Appointed

EU’s Usurpation of National Sovereignty Continues: First “EU Ambassador” to USA Appointed

The European Union’s steady usurpation of our national sovereignty has taken another leap forward with the appointment of the first “EU ambassador” to the United States of America.
Joao Vale de Almeida, a Portuguese national and close friend of “former” Communist Party member and now EU Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso, announced in one of his first public pronouncements since taking office that American officials should regard him as their first point of contact for all transatlantic discussions.
In a series of interviews to US-based press this week, Mr Vale de Almeida said he was not only empowered to speak on behalf of EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy and Mr Barroso, but also on behalf of all EU member states.
“Where we have a common position, I am the one leading the show,” he told the Washington Post.
"I'm the first new type of ambassador for the European Union anywhere in the world. Our delegations now cover a wide spectrum of issues well beyond the economic dimension, trade dimension and regulatory dimension, to cover all policies in the union, including foreign policy and security policy,” he added.
Mr Vale de Almeida presented his credentials to President Barrack Obama this week and was formally installed as the first of what will be 138 EU ambassadors around the globe who will now speak on behalf of all EU members.
The project is a part of the Lisbon Treaty plans and is being rolled out under arch-leftist and Labourite EU foreign relations chief Catherine Ashton.
Mr Vale de Almeida's appointment was made under a cloud of allegations of cronyism against the EU commission. Mr Barroso, a fellow Portuguese countryman, reportedly pushed through the nomination over Ms Ashton's head.
Mr Vale de Almeida also has no diplomatic experience whatsoever, although critics pointed out that this was also true of Baroness Ashton, as witnessed by her pitiful performance in the job thus far.
Ultimately, the EU’s Lisbon Treaty aims to replace all the essential national sovereignty functions of member states (such as defence, foreign affairs, immigration and finance) with its own institutions.
The appointment of the first formal ambassador is but the first step in this process.

Sunday, 5 September 2010

BNP Mobilises for National Day of Action to Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home”

BNP Mobilises for National Day of Action & Campaign Launch on 18 September: “Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home”

Saturday 18th September will witness the launch of the British National Party’s autumn recruitment campaign under the banner of “Support Our Troops — Bring Our Boys Home” with a wave of leafleting drives, town centre stalls, petitions and banners nationwide.

The party’s Communications Department has designed a new recruitment leaflet focussing on the British involvement in the Afghanistan war and the constant stream of dead British soldiers returning from that pointless and unwinnable war which has nothing to do with our nation.

Public anger at the ongoing Afghan war is at bursting point, as recent BNP surveys have shown. 

Furthermore, the establishment’s allegation that the war is necessary to “prevent terrorism” has been thoroughly debunked by all security experts and military institutions.

Every single one of these experts and institutions have confirmed the accuracy of the BNP’s prediction that involvement in these wars would not prevent terrorism, but cause it.

In addition to the campaign material, a new petition has been created which will be distributed nationwide on 18 September. The petition and a range of downloadable material will be made available when the campaign is formally launched.

BNP branches and groups up and down the country are mobilising for the national day of action and it is estimated up to 100 units will be out in force in towns and cities across the country on 18 September.

This will make the campaign into the single biggest recruitment activity in British nationalist history. Activists, sympathisers and supporters are urged to contact their local BNP branch and get involved

September 7th - This Day we Fight Back For Our Freedom



"A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship, but it is not this day."
Author The Green Arrow
What an amazing coincidence.  There is to be a tube strike in London on the same day that Nick Griffin MEP is in court fighting for freedom of speech and his own personal freedom. 

BNP members and supporters from Wales will be travelling to London to support the Chairman and Wales Camera Crew will be there to film the event and those who seek to disrupt their vigil.

Ok, it is going to be expensive to go by car.  But here is the link to pay the London Congestion (Tax) charge on-line.

Parking charges near the court are horrendous as you can see by these Daily Parking Charges: 0 to 1 hour - £ 4.00, 1 to 2 hours - £ 8.00, 2 to 3 hours - £ 13.00 3 to 4 hours - £ 17.00, 4 to 5 Hours - £ 25.00, 5 to 24 Hours - £ 29.00

Easy Car Park Services
0845 045 0625  6, Arundel Street, London, WC2R 3DB

Here is the link to Car Parks within walking distance of the Royal Court of Justice.

Q: What buses go to the RCJ?
A: Bus numbers 4, 11, 15, 23, 26, 76, 172, and 341 stop outside the RCJ. Bus numbers 1, 59, 68, 91, 168, 171, 188, 243, 521 and X68 stop on Kingsway and Aldwych. Go to www.tfl.gov.uk for more detailed travel information.

Show your support for the Chairman.  Please make every effort to be there.  The UAF will probably be busy supporting one of their thug marxist leaders, Martin Smith who is charged with assaulting a police officer and is also in court on the 7th.  However there is a whisper that some of Butlers Dupes may well turn up to do the work of Searchlight and the UAF for them.  


Below are some links kindly sent in by Chrissy.

IntenseDebate NotificationCan I remind people that Trevor Phillips described major broadcasters as 'hideously white' and referred to white men in the Civil Service as ‘Snowy Peaks’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1035878/B...
http://www.psi.org.uk/events/event.asp?event_id=5...

He didn’t like the arrival of EU immigrants either, too white for him, but if we make the same remarks about ethnic immigrants, we are branded as racists.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-402904/Mi...

A couple more headlines from this anti white black racist.

Force supermarkets to show bias in favour of ethnic staff says Phillips
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-450435/Fo...

'Legalise positive discrimination for sake of national security'

The head of the state race watchdog has called for new laws to allow 'positive discrimination' in favour of blacks, Asians and ethnic minorities.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-391255/Le...

The Patriotic right as an anti-liberal pendulum in Britain


An interesting article from a Russian Magazine website

The Patriotic right as an anti-liberal pendulum in Britain

Boris Volkhonsky
30.08.2010,From the voice of Russia

On Saturday, August 28, a demonstration, organized by a far-right group named English Defense League (EDL) in a northern English town of Bradford resulted in intense clashes with the police and with a counter-demonstration led by anti-racist groups and the local Asian diaspora, mainly of Pakistani origin.
The two groups, divided by a strong police force, threw bottles and stones at each other and at the police. As a result, 13 members of the far-right EDL were detained by the police. The main accusation against them was that the EDL was granted a right to hold a ‘static’ protest, but not a public march.
It is doubtful whether a demonstration of some 700 supporters of a rather marginal political group could be worth of mentioning. Bur actually, the event in Bradford raises a lot of questions, which the dominant British (as well as European, as a whole) establishment would like to avoid.
First, the choice of Bradford, a townlet in Northern England with a population of little more than 200,000 people was not accidental. The fact is that this small town has a huge Asian, namely Pakistani, i.e. Muslim diaspora. And therefore it has for a long time been a target for far-right demonstrations under the slogans of ‘defending the British identity’. A similar demonstration occurred last year, and riots of 2001 virtually tore the town apart.
This time, fearing a repetition of 2001, about 10,000 local residents signed a petition demanding a ban on the planned far-right demonstration under anti-Muslim slogans. The local authorities banned the march, but the ban did not prevent the EDL supporters from coming in bus-loads to Bradford for participating in the action.
Second question arises if we connect the demonstration in Bradford with the last year’s elections to the European Parliament. It is worth mentioning that in June 2009, for the first time ever, two candidates from the far-right British National Party (BNP) become European MPs. And that was far from being a single accident in the all-European trend of nationalist and isolationist movements gaining momentum. In fact, the wave has swept over all of Europe, with a wide spectrum of anti-immigrant, nationalistic and xenophobic elements showing much better results in comparison with the previous years and arriving at mainstream politics from what previously seemed just a marginal political outskirt.
Now, the nationalist parties that have asserted themselves as a part of mainstream may say as much as they will that they do not have anything to do with the events in Bradford. Well, maybe legally they don’t – the EDL is quite new phenomenon in British politics, and at the moment there is no solid ground to state that it is organizationally linked with the BNP.
But if we look at the public statements made by BNP leaders in 2009, we could see a clear cross-reference between the slogans of the Bradford demonstration and the BNP program mottos.
As BNP leader Nick Griffin said a year ago, "this (Britain. – B.V.) is a Christian country and Islam is not welcome, because Islam and Christianity, Islam and democracy, Islam and women's rights do not mix.”
Is there ground to wonder why the demonstration in Bradford was held under anti-Islamic slogans?
So, the spiritual and ideological roots of the far-right demonstration in Bradford seem to be very clear. But there still remains a question whether the anti-immigrant trend is a one-way traffic. Remember that the strict measures against public demonstration of Muslim identity (like wearing head-scarves in public places) in France have led to a number of clashes initiated by French Muslims, but actually drove the French far-right to oblivion.
At the same time, the more liberal stance of other European, as well as North American government which allow immigrants not only to settle in the country, but also to continue abiding their national and religious laws, often in a violation of European (i.e. Christian) rules and values, has resulted in a steep rise of far-right sentiments and has brought to the frontline of mainstream politics a number of far-right parties which were virtually unknown some ten years ago (Austria, the Netherlands are just among most striking examples).
As for Britain, it has always been rather skeptical of the all-European integration. But, at the same time, has followed the general liberal guidelines in its immigration policies. Isn’t it the time to gather stones scattered away in the previous years?

Saturday, 4 September 2010

Left Wing BBC Bias: 'The Continuing Story'

BBC Bias: 'The Continuing Story'

markthompson
                                                                             Mark Thompson 
 First the good News...
First the good news. It’s been a long time coming (decades in fact), but at last the BBC’s director-general, Mark Thompson, has admitted left-wing bias at the BBC. There was ‘in the BBC I joined thirty years ago..in much of current affairs, in terms of people’s personal politics , which were quite vocal, a massive bias to the left,’ he said. The station was ‘massively’ biased against Margaret Thatcher.
So far, so good. Even if one is or was not a fan of Margaret Thatcher, no publicly funded organisation like the BBC has a right to be biased against any point of view which enjoys widespread support. Even minority views need to be treated with impartiality, unless they are those which advocate downright genocide, like some moslem organisations in the Middle East, or murder, like the IRA. (The BBC  has in fact long had a soft spot for Hamas and other muslim organisations which want to eliminate Israel.  It was Orla Guerin
orlaguerin
                                                                                  Orla Guerin
who actually cried on the death of that evil man Yasser Arafat. Like its siamese twin in the public prints. the Guardian, it has always been soft on any leftist, anti-British or anti-white organisation ideology or state, ranging from the IRA and the Soviet Union to New Labour and the ANC).
 
Then the Bad News
But then the bad news. Mark Thompson thinks that the bad days of bias are all in the past. ‘It is (now) a broader church. The BBC is not a campaigning organisation and can’t be.’ He claimed. Oh, but it is a campaigning organisation, Mr Thompson. Not campaigning in a flag-waving, militant, at-the-barricades way of course, but in a subtle, understated way; the way in which the idea is projected that certain politically correct assumptions are not just to be preferred, but are the only ones around which a thinking, decent, civilised person might have, to the extent that no other attitudes are even considered or discussed.
Current Affairs Bias
This bias is not restricted to current affairs programmes, of which the Question Time programme which attempted to crucify Nick Griffin may be counted as one. For example, as your present writer can attest, there have been umpteen programmes on BBC TV and radio over the last thirty years or so about the alleged difficulties immigrants have faced in Britain. You could however count on the fingers of one hand the programmes in that period devoted to the far greater, and to the native population vastly more interesting question of how the latter feel about the immigrant invasion of their homeland.
And such programmes invariably feature a preponderance of carefully selected individuals who either are in favour of multiculturalism and multiracialism or are indifferent, whilst those against are stigmatised as ‘racists’ and ‘fascists’ whose  views are a function of their ignorant bigotry, rather than of a perfectly reasonable, human desire to live in their own country amongst their own people in their own way.
Bias exists in every Corner of the BBC's Vast Empire 
And the subtle PC bias continues and extends to every corner of the BBC’s vast empire. Here are just few of the recent examples: the Police Station in ‘Heartbeat,’ the series set in 1960’s ‘Adensfield,’ has acquired a woman Police Sergeant. This is supposed to be at a time when women in such positions were rarer than hens’ teeth. Similarly, the School Head in the new series of Waterloo Roadis a woman. Indeed, it is more or less de rigueur for the head of anything in BBC shows to be female, if possible ethnic, and to be seen to have authority over white men.
 Meanwhile, over at ‘Holby City’ a show which like so many others on TV and the BBC in particular creaks with Politically Correctness to the point of caricature, the saintly Ric Griffin, the consultant and hospital director is described by one of his typically ‘feisty’ female patients with the liberal views on sex, marriage etc we are encouraged to sympathise with, as ‘noble’ and ‘handsome’ while another patient says he is a ‘magician,’ so good is he. And, of course, in charge.
 HolbyCityBlack
                                                                                    Saint Ric
Ric is of course obviously black. The depiction of this character, as of others in this and other BBC shows, is a deliberate attempt to fix a positive image of immigrants in the public mind. It is a PC lie which like all PC lies spits in the face of reality. As recently pointed out by Sarah Maid of Albion, a remarkable preponderance of doctors and others in the medical field who have undergone disciplinary proceedings for incompetence and other lapses by their respective professional organisations have been immigrants.
The mirror – image of this of course is that the way in which those opposed to immigration are depicted as pathetic, ignorant bigots rather than the ordinary people with real and justified concerns, which is what they are in reality.
If Mark Thompson doesn’t grasp this, it is either because he personally is so politically correct that he can’t see out of that particular box, or he is lying at a time when the BBC s facing cuts in its license fee. Either way, it does not bode well for the BNP and non-PC views in general ever getting a fair showing on the organisation we all pay for.