Liberals Shocked As Globalisation Chickens Come Home to Roost

Establishment Liberals Shocked As Globalisation Chickens Come Home to Roost

  BNP News at http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Establishment liberals have reacted with shock at the logical end result of their much-vaunted globalisation ideal as China launches a massive worldwide natural resource grab bid.

The liberal elite, typified in the readership of the Independent newspaper, have long since promoted globalisation as a way of de-industrialising the West as part of their pro-Third World mania, but probably never quite expected China to be so ruthless about its global ambitions.

Instead, it seems, they genuinely expected China to “play fair” and be equal with all other nations, as per the liberal luvvie fantasy dream world.

Hence the shock was palpable when last weekends’ Independent newspaper ran a front page headline announcing that there were “[F]ears of Chinese land grab as Beijing's billions buy up resources.”

According to that article, China is “pouring another £4.4 billion into into Brazil's oil industry, reigniting fears of a global ‘land grab’ of natural resources.

“[Chinese] State-owned Sinopec clinched the deal with Spain's Repsol yesterday to buy 40 per cent of its Brazilian business, giving China's largest oil company access to Repsol Brasil's estimated reserves of 1.2 billion barrels of oil and gas,” the breathless Independent article continued.

In addition, the shell-shocked report told its equally shell-shocked readers, Sinopec provided a $10 billion loan to Petrobras, Brazil’s state-owned oil company, “in return for guaranteed supplies of 10,000 barrels of oil every day for the next 10 years.”

As if that was not enough, the article revealed even more of the Chinese state’s natural resources power grab throughout the world: “China has continued a global spending spree of unprecedented proportions, snapping up everything from oil and gas reserves to mining concessions to agricultural land, with vast reserves of US dollars.

“This year alone, Chinese companies have laid out billions of dollars buying up stakes in Canada's oil sands, a Guinean iron ore mine, oil fields in Angola and Uganda, an Argentinean oil company and a major Australian coal-bed methane gas company.”

Of course, only a fool, or a liberal, would not have foreseen this development. It is impossible to transplant the entire manufacturing base of Britain, America and much of the West over to China in the name of globalisation and not to expect that nation to have increased demand for raw materials,

Indeed, as the Independent coyly pointed out, China already is the world’s largest consumer of oil and its annual electricity demand growth is equivalent to Britain's entire output.

The Chinese are only too aware of the upcoming peak oil shortage and are simply taking advantage of the globalisation nightmare visited upon the West to bolster its natural resources base.

This development is as logical as it is inevitable, and for the Independent to “reveal” this news as a shock-its-readers article reveals how little liberals understand of the real world, and of how the chickens they have hatched will soon come home to roost.

Horwich and Bolton BNP Bring our Boys Home Campaign in Westhoughton oct 2010

Horwich And Bolton British National party in Westhoughton 

This last weekend saw the Bolton and Horwich British National Parties Bring our Boys Home Campaign come to the town centreof Westhoughton Lancashire, 
The response from the public was overwhelming in there support of the campaign and the British National Party also.
there was much appreciation from the public for the campaign as it was overwhelming that 99% of those spoken to thought that the sooner we are out of that wind swept hell hole the better.

And as our boys are only out their on behalf of those multi nationals and bankers who own the other three main political parties who want to build the gas pipe line across Afghanistan. And we did our best to pass the message across to the public of what is really going on in Afghanistan, as we all know the state controlled media can no longer be relied on to be impartial and truthful.
just see for yourself as members of the Bolton and Horwich BNP engage with members of the public face to face,  and not by dropping leaflets in the early hours through your letter box. As you will find the British National Party campaigning on the streets all year round not just at election time.

European Police Office Report Blows Lid on Extent and Impact of Third World Immigration Invasion

Europol Report Blows Lid on Extent and Impact of Third World Immigration Invasion

  BNP Newsroom

A newly-released report from the European Police Office (Europol) has revealed that at least 900,000 illegal immigrants from the Third World enter the EU every year and that 350,000 legal visitors overstay their visas each year — and that the continent faces major criminal threats from this invasion force.

The Europol report, submitted to the EU’s Standing Committee on operational cooperation on internal security (COSI), which can be found here, was drawn up in May this year but was only released to the public last week.

According to that report, most “threats to the internal security of the EU either originate outside Europe or have a clear nexus to other parts of the world.”

By way of illustration, the EU report states, all “heroin and cocaine consumed in Europe, for example, is trafficked here from a different continent.

“So, too, in the case of the estimated 900,000 illegal migrants entering the EU each year, while Colombian, Nigerian, Russian, Albanian, Turkish, and other non-EU groups have important roles in organised crime activity in the region.”

In addition, the report goes on, at least 350,000 visa overstayers were detected in 2008 alone.

This massive influx has seen “European citizens and businesses increasingly exposed to systematic violence and corruption at the hands of organised crime groups, terrorist groups, and, increasingly, street gangs,” the Europol report states.

“West Africa’s strategic position between Latin America and the EU is increasingly exploited by cocaine and synthetic drug traffickers, assisted by an increasing flow of licit commodities between West Africa and the EU.

“Nigerian organised crime groups are active in the EU, particularly in terms of organised fraud and trafficking of human beings for sexual exploitation,” the Europol report continues.

“East Africa, specifically the Horn of Africa, is increasingly a transit region for Afghan heroin. North Africa (Morocco), meanwhile, continues to be the most prolific

supplier of cannabis resin to the EU and acts as a distribution centre for counterfeit Euros.”

The report makes specific mention of the problem posed by already resident Third World nationals in Europe.

“The risk of illegal migration by North, East and West African nationals to the EU remains high, due to geographical proximity, wide economic disparities compared to the EU and sizeable communities already established in several Member States,” it states.

“North and West Africa have emerged as significant feeder regions for the South West criminal hub around the Iberian Peninsula.

“This hub is a key distribution centre for cocaine, cannabis products, trafficking in human beings and illegal migration to markets including the North West criminal hub, located in The Netherlands and Belgium.”

The report continues: “Suspects of Turkish ethnicity based in this [North Western] hub and those in contact with Turkish trafficking groups dominate the wholesale of heroin through the Netherlands.

“Moroccan groups in Belgium and The Netherlands move cannabis products from Morocco through Spain to the North West criminal hub for distribution to EU markets.”

The report also makes mention of the growing problem of cannabis factories in Europe, caused directly by Third World immigration: “Meanwhile, indoor cultivation of cannabis by Vietnamese and other groups is increasing, with an impact on the availability of cannabis products in the EU, which has a market of 22.5 million users.

“This in turn encourages illegal migration and trafficking in human beings (THB): illegal Vietnamese and Chinese immigrants and Bulgarian trafficking victims required to pay for their transportation and upkeep are often put to work tending cannabis plantations.”

After discussing the extent of the problem caused by the use of forged documents and fraudulently obtained documents which it says are “indispensable facilitators for illegal migration, trafficking in human beings (THB), stolen vehicle trafficking, identity fraud and terrorism,” the report also points out that “fraudulent claims of those nationalities granted asylum by Member States are made in order to benefit from EU residency.

“Forged documents, particularly EU passports and ID cards, which are used to cross the external border illegally, are subsequently used in association with other criminal activities or types of fraud, such as the abuse of social benefits,” the Europol report states.

“With biometric security features becoming more common in travel documents, there is growing abuse of documentation by impostors.”

“The impact on society of organised crime activity channelled to the EU from these external sources” is described by Europol as “significant.”

According to the report, these Third World origin criminal activities have created “4 million cocaine users and up to 1.5 million problematic opioid users in the EU.

“Exposure to drugs-related problems in particular has been identified as a major source of fear of street crime, with just under 30% of EU citizens feeling unsafe on the street after dark,” the report states.

In its conclusion, the Europol report is blunt about the causes of this nightmare: “The internal security of the EU faces a substantial threat from organised crime, terrorism, and illegal migration,” Europol states.

The evidence is startlingly clear: Third World immigration and the open borders policy pursued by the Conservative Party, the Labour Party and their ideological allies across Europe have had a devastating impact on the security and well-being of the people of Europe.

Will Oldhams Labour’s Phil Woolas Lose His Seat?

Will Labour’s Phil Woolas Lose His Seat?

BNP News@ http://www.bnp.org.uk/

Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, Phil Woolas, could possibly lose his parliamentary seat if an ongoing court case goes against him — and would that not be a fine day, reports British National Party candidate and Euro assistant Chris Beverley.

A leaflet distributed by the Labour Party at the last General Election. Readers may recognise some of the imagery, which has also been used in BNP propaganda.Writing on his blog, Mr Beverley said he had “followed with interest the recent court case involving Labour MP Phil Woolas, who was accused by his Lib Dem opponent at the recent General Election — a man defeated by Woolas by just over a hundred votes – of distributing literature that included ‘false statements of fact in relation to the candidate's personal character or conduct.’

“It is alleged that this constituted a breach of the Representation of the Peoples Act 1983, and for the first time in 99 years, Woolas found himself embroiled in a specially-convened election court case that would rule on an MP’s right to be a sitting MP,” Mr Beverley wrote.

“This court has the power to bar Woolas from office and order a by-election to take place should it find him guilty.

“The furore surrounds claims made against the Lib Dem Elwyn Watkins, who was alleged to have received foreign donations, garnered support from Muslim extremists and been involved in vote-fixing.

“It is ironic to hear such claims coming from the Labour Party considering their own track-record in this area, but this vile party obviously deemed it necessary to make such claims in order to shore up the votes of a sufficient proportion of the English population within this constituency.

“Let us also not forget that the constituency where this all took place is Oldham and Saddleworth, where the BNP has a fairly entrenched voter base. In a close contest, it makes a degree of political sense for enemy parties to try and tease away a few BNP voters, something which would rarely be attempted in areas of low BNP support.

“The case is now over and a ruling is expected to be reached in October.

“I found this case interesting and amusing for a number of reasons. “Interesting because it is important to learn from such cases to better prepare oneself for what can go in a political leaflet and what cannot. I go to great lengths to avoid putting anything into print that could backfire on me or the party, as I do not believe that spending large amounts of time fighting avoidable court cases is the most productive way to spend one’s time.

“It is also interesting in that it demonstrates once again that desperate politicians are willing to play the race card where they feel this is necessary.

“We are used to the Tories doing this, but the fact that Labour are also happy to do so, in this case the former Labour Government’s Immigration minister no less, shows the incomprehensibly hypocritical depths at which the ruling political class are content to operate.

“Between them the Tories and Labour have done more harm to our country over the past 60 years than would have been imaginable to most people in this country in the early post-war period.

“They have created a society in which the indigenous population are second class citizens and are discriminated against in a whole host of ways, many of which are so deeply entrenched in people’s automatic everyday behaviour that this seems to many to be the natural state of affairs (this is worth an article in itself, which I may one day write!)

“There is nothing worse than the parties that have created this situation attempting to appeal to what were referred to in the above case as ‘Sun reader’ types, and making noises about immigration or Islamism.

“I said the case also amused me, and indeed it did, as I enjoy the spectacle of our enemies falling out with one another, especially when this is done in a courtroom.

“It would also amuse me greatly to see Woolas lose his seat over this affair, though I do not know how likely this is.

2As a general rule, Establishment politicians who cynically exploit people’s genuine concern over the excesses of mass immigration — whilst deep down knowing that they have no intention whatsoever of addressing the causes of these concerns — are the very lowest form of politician, far lower, in my opinion, than those who actually believe in the benefits of mass immigration (stay with me here) and are happy to say so openly.

“Here’s to hoping the election court makes history and casts Woolas out of Parliament,” Mr Beverley concluded.

Third World Benefit Fraud Rife In Britain as Colonisation of UK Speeds Up

from the BNP Newsroom

Third World Benefit Fraud Rife In Britain as Colonisation Speeds Up

News Team

By MaidofKent—The increasing numbers of Third World immigrants present in Britain has generated a massive wave of corruption and benefit fraud which the media is doing its best to cover up by claiming that the increasingly long list of swindlers are “British.”

Evidence of Third World fraud and corruption in the UK caused by the importation of  people from Africa was highlighted once again when a couple, identified as Abiodun Olaleye, 50, and his wife Olanrewaju, 49, were sentenced to imprisonment for benefits fraud at Southend Crown Court last week.

The two, which media reports said were “from Romford in Essex,” claimed almost £150,000 in benefits for 10 fictitious children and managed to buy 4 homes from the proceeds of their crime against the British taxpayer.

Their punishment, deemed suitable by our out-of-touch justice system, was 20 months in prison for Abiodun Olaleye and a 6 month suspended prison sentence plus Community Service for his wife.

Despite having names that no indigenous Briton could pronounce properly, the media seeks to hide the fact that these criminals are not natives of our country and are certainly not from Romford.

The couple will face a confiscation hearing later to decide how much of this stolen money they will have to pay back.

British people may wonder how our welfare system can be cheated of such vast amounts by foreigners and may why the criminals are handed such pathetic sentences, not to mention the fact that there was nary a mention of a deportation order for these criminals.

The fact that foreigners like the Olaleyes can come to this country, be handed British passports and then end up milking the benefits system of £150,000 betrays the lie of successive governments that immigrants are here to do the jobs that the British people cannot or will not do.

The Olaleye case is merely the latest in a long line of cases.

In August, for example, Newham Council fraud investigator Badrul Islam was convicted of running a benefits scam for the past 18 months, in which he diverted over £200,000 in “ghost rent” payments.

Islam, 46, had been working for Newham council since 1994 and was a trusted senior benefits officer. Investigators discovered that Islam had created a series of claims in the names of people who had previously been claimants but were no longer receiving money.

Islam also reactivated dormant claims but instead of sending the money to individual landlords, he diverted large amounts to the offices of property agent and landlord Dulal Haque, 40, and to his friend Moinuddin Ahmed, also a landlord. All three were born in Bangladesh.

In June this year, Iraqi “asylum seeker” Mahira Rustam Al-Azawi, 49, was convicted of fraud after using a series of false identities to milk the benefit system over an eight year period. Although she never worked, she was able to purchase three properties – two of which she rented out – worth in excess of £1million and her 18-year-old son was educated at Colfe’s School, in South-East London, where fees are currently £4,164 a term.

The fraud was uncovered only when Al-Azawi uccessfully applied for a student loan to study civil engineering at Greenwich University. When police raided her £800,000 detached home in Bromley, they found what was described as an ‘Aladdin’s cave’ of false documents, including a selection of passports, identity papers and driving licences.

During her trial at Croydon Crown Court, it emerged that she had claimed for income support, housing and council tax benefits in her own name, as well as those of her cousin and mother.

Earlier this year, a Chinese couple were imprisoned after being convicted of making £500,000 from a plan to help immigrants stay in the UK illegally using hundreds of fake university documents.

Haiyang Liu, 29, and his girlfriend Jiao Wang, 26, ran a lucrative internet scam selling bogus diploma certificates to people desperate to stay in the country through the firm E-Fly Education. The sophisticated forgeries earned the 'well organised criminals' between £500 and £3,000 and duped the Home Office into handing out student visas.

 During the two-year fraud immigrants were also provided with papers enabling them to claim council tax handouts from local councils.

A Sunday Times investigation last year found that immigrants were even smuggling babies into Britain to enable them to make up fake benefit claims. Forged immigration documents and employment records are used in the multi-million pound scam, and in many cases the children are taken from families with the knowledge of their parents, the paper said.

A special team set up to investigate the problem in London has identified 119 potential child trafficking victims in the capital with more than 1,500 convictions between them.

Vote Fraud: Muslim Tory Party Chairman Refuses to Say the M word

Vote Fraud: Muslim Tory Party Chairman Refuses to Say the M-Word

The BNP Newsroom

Muslim Conservative Party chairman “Baroness” Sayeeda Warsi has blamed what she called “Labour” electoral fraud for depriving her party of an outright majority in Parliament — but what she actually meant, and was to too scared to say, was Muslim electoral fraud.

Speaking in an interview with the New Statesman magazine, Ms Warsi said the Conservative Party had lost at least three seats to Labour because of fraud in what she called “Asian areas.”

Ms Warsi, who is also Britain’s first female Muslim cabinet minister, said there were “at least three seats where we lost, where we didn’t gain the seat, based on electoral fraud.”

She refused to say exactly which seats they were, but then conceded that they were “predominantly within the Asian community.”

According to reports, police have instigated launched 50 criminal inquiries into claims of voter fraud during the election.

Ms Warsi is however living in a dream world if she thinks Muslim voter fraud is exclusively a Labour problem.

Just yesterday, the last day of September, five Muslim Conservative Party members in Bradford, including two former councillors, were jailed for their part in a postal vote scam aimed at getting a Tory candidate elected.

Former Bradford city councillors Jamshed Khan and Reis Khan were jailed along with Mohammed Sultan, Mohammed Rafiq and Alyas Khan were all jailed for attempting to pull off a vote fraud which literally involved making up over 3,000 fraudulent votes.

In May this year, Conservative councillor for the Palfrey Ward in Walsall, Mohammed Munir appeared in court charged with voter fraud relating to his victory in the May 2008 elections. That case is ongoing.

There are also a large number of cases of electoral fraud involving Muslims from the Labour and Liberal Democratic parties.

This is not surprising, given the fact that Pakistan ranks as the 139th most corrupt country in the world (out of 157 on the corruption index list) and has almost no record of successful participatory democracy.

The ongoing problem of Muslim voter fraud is not therefore, as Ms Warsi says, a problem confined to the Labour Party. It has been caused by mass Third World immigration and the resultant steady Islamification of Britain by immigrants from parts of the world where the indigenous culture is alien to the concept of democracy.

As British National Party MEP Andrew Brons recently told the European Parliament, culture is not something like a coat which can be taken off at the arrival desk of an airport. Culture comes with a people, not the other way round.

After Billions Spent on War, plus £800 Million in Foreign Aid and 338 British Deaths, Afghanistan to Get Taliban Back in Power

After £12 Billion War, Nearly £800 Million in Foreign Aid and 338 British Deaths, Afghanistan Aims to Get Taliban Back

  BNP News@http://www.bnp.org.uk/

The announcement by Afghanistan president Hamid Karzai that he intends to bring the Taliban back into government as part of a peace deal has underlined the pointlessness of the war which has cost the British taxpayer billions of pounds and the lives of at least 338 soldiers.

Karzai announced his latest plan at a meeting in Kabul where he said that he had appointed a new 68-member council tasked with setting up peace talks with Taliban-led insurgents.

The proposed plan includes an improbable program to lure Taliban insurgents with cash bribes and “seeking reconciliation with senior militant leaders by offering them asylum in Muslim countries and striking their names off a UN blacklist,” according to reports.

The cash bribes will, of course, come out of the £700 billion in foreign aid that the British taxpayers are busy handing over to the Afghan government.

The 10-year old war has cost several billion each year, with latest estimates saying the annual cost has now risen to about £4 billion per year as the military struggle intensifies.

Some 338 British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan, and thousands more seriously injured. The total number of Afghans killed in the conflict is unknown, but certainly numbers in the tens of thousands.

And now, after all that sacrifice, blood and money, the Taliban, which was supposed to have been the reason for the invasion in the first place, is going to be allowed back into government — with money provided by the taxpayer.

To add insult to injury, President Karzai also warned that the war was causing the “next generation” of Afghanis to “flee the country.”

In other words, the invasion of Afghanistan has caused an upsurge in refugees and asylum seekers entering Europe, and Britain in particular, precisely as the British National Party predicted.

Furthermore, the latest offer to the Taliban to rejoin the government makes a mockery of the original reason given for the war, namely that the Taliban regime was a supporter of international terrorism and was providing refuge to Osama bin Laden.

In fact, the head of the American CIA is now on record as saying that there were no more than 50 Al Qaeda terrorists in all of Afghanistan.

Now it seems that the original objectives (to drive out the Taliban and to capture Osama Bin Laden) have also been abandoned.

What was it all then for?

Voting Rights for Britons living Abroad

Voting Rights for Brits Abroad

  Author Martin Wingfieldat Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

29TH SEPTEMBER 2010: BY far the most consistent query to the MEP's office in the North West Region comes from Britons now living overseas - "Please advise me, can I vote in UK elections?"
One such letter arrived at the office this morning from Ross in British Columbia who told Nick:
"We have many expats here in Canada who share the same political viewpoint and believe that the British National Party is best suited to safeguard these values. We want to vote for BNP candidates back home at election time but are not certain whether we are able to."
Responding on behalf of the MEP, Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Thank you for your email regarding ex-pats’ voting rights in the UK.
"The UK Government’s public service website, DirectGov, states the following with regard to voting rights:
'British citizens living abroad can register as overseas voters if they have been registered to vote in the UK at any time within the past 15 years. Brits living overseas can either vote by post or arrange for someone (a proxy) to vote for them in a UK election.
Voters can apply for a postal vote when they register.'
"If you would like further information about your voting rights, and to download a voter registration form, please go to: aboutmyvote.co.uk .
"Please also feel free to contact the British National Party’s Overseas Liaison Officer, Mr Andy McBride, who co-ordinates all our associated overseas groups and organisations. He may be able to put you in contact with some similarly-minded compatriots. His contact details are:
overseas@bnp.org.uk
Telephone: 05601 950167."

Britain must re-build its own UK transport infrastructure

Britain must re-build its own transport infrastructure

  Martin Wingfield@ Nick Griffin MEP

September 2010
  A number of constituents have written to Nick Griffin to express their deep concern at the amount of money being spent by the European Union on the Intelligent Transport System Initiative.

One gentleman from Blackburn wrote:
I doubt the motives for building this system, believing it to be a vehicle for a few large corporations to make a lot of money from road pricing.
I feel that some political institutions are out of public control, and even local councils act as if they are no longer the publics servants but bodies in their own right, and this is certainly true of the European Parliament.
How can you as MEPs restore a feeling of public control?
I fear we have created an automaton, over which I as a citizen, have no control!
Perhaps it time we should consider the Swiss system of democracy."
Responding on behalf of the MEP, Constituency Office manager Tina Wingfield wrote:
"Thank you for your email regarding the EU’s new legal framework for intelligent Transport systems.
"The consensus within the European Parliament is, unsurprisingly, that a common European approach is required to ensure that the transport systems used in each Member State of the European Union are mutually compatible.
"As you rightly point out, this consensus on uniformity on a grand scale reflects today’s dominant approach to politics and the organisation of public, social and economic life, which asserts that macro-organisation is always the best policy. Hence, we see control consistently taken away from small, localised bodies and transferred to ever-larger, cross-county and cross-border institutions.
"Such a policy framework takes no account of the wealth of experience which suggests that the further away you take the decision-making process from the people and communities it directly affects, the more likely it is that the outcomes decided upon will not reflect the will of local people nor their best interests. Again, it should perhaps come as no surprise that there is little notice taken in political life these days of common sense or collective wisdom.
"If common sense did prevail, responsibility for deciding the direction of Britain’s transport network would not rest with a mega-European bureaucracy comprised of 736 politicians representing the self-evidently disparate interests of 27 Member States and 500 million citizens. It simply isn’t feasible that such an institution could be capable of developing a transport strategy tailored to the particular long-term needs of the United Kingdom. The recurring financial contributions demanded from British taxpayers to simply maintain this obscenely bloated, resource sapping bureaucratic monstrosity could moreover, be so much more wisely spent if redirected towards investment in our own transport infrastructure.
"As a British National Party MEP, Mr Griffin believes that Britain should withdraw from the European Union and British independence and control over its national destiny restored. The British National Party will end the multibillion cash haemorrhage Britain loses to the EU in membership fees and invest the money instead in re-building British transport infrastructure.
"Unfettered by European regulation and policy directives, a British Nationalist Government will invest public money to fund transport upgrades and the contracts for such developments will be awarded to British companies, to the benefit of British workers. The disastrous privatisation process will be reversed; traffic congestion eased by controlling the immigration invasion which is swelling our population to unsustainable proportions; foreign freight vehicles charged to use Britain’s road network (which will discourage the importation of goods which could and should be produced in this country where possible); the price of fuel will be decreased by reducing the level of government taxation; and toll-free motorways will be maintained.
"If you would like to find out more about the British National Party’s views on transport policy and other issues - such as the call for constitutional change which will ensure that all powers properly capable of exercise at local level are devolved and county council government revived - please visit the Party’s website at www.bnp.org.uk ."

Nick Griffin MEP asks for clarification on benefits

MEP asks for clarification on benefits

  Author  Martin Wingfield  @  Nick Griffin MEP

22ND SEPTEMBER 2010: THERE's an email doing the rounds that has upset a number of Nick Griffin's constituents in the North West of England.

Many have contacted their MEP to ask him to find out whether there is any truth in the claim made with regard to a significant disparity in benefits between pensioners and newly arrived immigrants.
"People want an answer and quickly so that the email can be dismissed as just mishief-making, or something that needs to be highlighted," says Constituency Office Manager Tina Wingfield.
"So I have written to the Department of Work and Pensions Ministers to ask for clarification."
This is the letter:
"Nick Griffin, MEP has been contacted by a number of his constituents with regard to benefits information that is being widely circulated via the internet.
I reproduce the information they have received below.
BENEFITS - BRITISH OLD AGED PENSIONER
Weekly allowance - £100
Weekly Spouse allowance - £25
Additional weekly hardship allowance - £0.00
TOTAL YEARLY BENEFIT - £6,000
BENEFITS - IMMIGRANTS / REFUGEES LIVING IN BRITAIN
Weekly allowance - £250
Weekly Spouse allowance - £225
Additional weekly hardship allowance - £100
TOTAL YEARLY BENEFIT - £29,900
 Mr Griffin’s constituents - mainly pensioners - have voiced their shock and concern at the disproportionate benefit allowances that appear to be available to immigrants and refugees living in Britain, in comparison with British old age pensioners. They have asked him to ascertain whether the figures quoted are correct, and if so, what justification the Department for Works and Pensions provides for such disproportionality.
To enable him to respond to his constituents’ queries, Mr Griffin would be grateful if you could confirm if the chart below presents an accurate summary of current benefit allowances. If the figures are correct, can you please explain the rationality behind such a discrepancy in benefit allowances?
If the information is not correct, can you please provide accurate benefit allowance levels?
Mr Griffin looks forward to a prompt response and thanks you for your assistance with this matter."

Burnley and Bolton Amongst 120 Groups and Branches Taking Part in the BNP’s “Bring Them Home” Campaign

Burnley and Bolton Makes it 120 Groups and Branches Taking Part in the BNP’s “Bring Them Home” Campaign

  BNP Newsroom

The appearance of the British National Party’s units in Burnley and Bolton on the streets of their towns last weekend has pushed the total number of party groups and branches taking part in the “bring our boys home” to 120, reports national organiser Clive Jefferson.

“The campaign is gaining momentum right through the North West and indeed the full country, with over 120 groups and branches now equipped with the campaign banners and literature,” Mr Jefferson said, adding that many more were just going out with the petitions.

The BNP’s Bolton group set up is stall near a busy pedestrian point and people could not but help see them, Mr Jefferson continued.

“The sun was shining but it was very cold, but the stall was well worth it for the response received.

 “People where very happy to sign when they saw it was to bring our boys home, and one lady said her nephew had just gone in the army and she was worried sick,” he said.

 “In Burnley, a party stronghold for the last decade, our organiser reported gathering up 300 signatures in just under two hours, which is a remarkable indication of the campaign’s popularity.”

Blackburn's Sacred Heart School Colonisation Is A Symptom of the Ethnic Cleansing of Britain

Sacred Heart School Colonisation Is A Symptom of the Ethnic Cleansing of Britain

The BNP Newsroom

The complete colonisation of the formerly Catholic Sacred Heart School in Blackburn by Muslims is a symptom of the ethnic cleansing of Britain which, left unchecked, will see white British people reduced to minority status well within 40 years.

Newspaper reports last week revealed that the decades-old Sacred Heart School is about to be handed over to Blackburn’s Tauheedul mosque and re-opened with a new name after the number of Muslim pupils rocketed from just 7 percent in 2000 to 97 percent last year.

The 10-year period saw a tidal wave of immigrants and immigrant births fill up the school benches, ethnically cleansing the indigenous population from possession of the school grounds. Most of the new pupils do not even speak English as their first language.

The school board of governors has recently resigned en masse as they no longer had anything in common with the pupil makeup and staff retention has proven to be a major problem.

The Tauheedul mosque is already responsible for a voluntary aided Islamic girls’ secondary school in Blackburn and now looks set to take over the Sacred Heart School and run it along the same lines.

A voluntary aided school is a state-funded school in England and Wales in which a foundation or trust (most commonly a religious organisation) contributes to building costs and has a substantial influence in the running of the school.

In other words, the British taxpayer is paying for Muslims to educate their children in the Islamic faith in schools from which they have physically displaced British children.

It is not only in Blackburn that British children are being ethnically cleansed from the schooling system.

A report issued by the Birmingham City Council in February this year revealed that Asian children outnumbering white pupils in Birmingham primary schools for the first time. Only 39 percent of primary school children in Birmingham are white, according to the council.

A similar pattern has played itself out in London, where white children are also a minority in many of the capital’s classrooms, according to figures released by the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

In Tower Hamlets, 15 percent of primary school pupils are classed as white British, while the figure for Newham is 12 percent and 7 percent in Brent.

In Bradford, 47 percent of primary school children are non-white, and in

Manchester, less than 60 per cent of primary pupils are white. In Leicester, 41 percent of primary school children are white.

Birth rate figures issued earlier this year by the NHS revealed that white babies will be a minority of all live births in Britain by the year 2030.

Make no mistake: British people are rapidly being ethnically cleansed from Britain under a tidal wave of immigration and immigrant birth rates.

The British public still have a chance to avert this disaster which will irrevocably plunge Britain into Third World status.

That chance is the British National Party.

While Nu Labours Marxists Huddle, South Wales BNP Hits the Streets

While Marxists Huddle, South Wales BNP Hits the Streets

The BNP Newsroom

While the two sons of a Marxist immigrant were doing behind the scenes deals with the unions in Manchester this weekend, British National Party activists in towns all across South Wales were busy holding “support our troops” table top petition signing events, reports Clive Bennett, Swansea group organiser.

“The West Wales group held their table top in Haverfordwest town centre as activists from Swansea, Neath and Port Talbot turned out to assist the local group,” Mr Bennett said.

“We were able to have a table top at Castle Square, a second group complete with clipboards, situated at Old Bridge on the other side of the town centre, and an additional group of activists leafleting in various parts of the town.”

Mr Bennett said that the “table was busy all the time with people who wanted to sign the petition and have a chat.

“In many cases, people gave vent to their worries and concerns for members of their family who are service personnel and presently in Afghanistan, some for the third or fourth time,” he said.

“One man told us of his nephew who had been serving his country from the time of the Falklands War, with tours of duty in Northern Ireland and Iraq and who was now on his fourth term in Afghanistan.

“I told him that I hoped good fortune followed his nephew and that this petition does something to speed his and every other British son, daughter, niece and nephew's safe passage home,” Mr Bennett said.

“During the day, 122 signatures were collected and over two thousand leaflets distributed. Several Voice of Freedom newspapers were sold.

“A number of very welcome donations were also made, rounding off a very productive day which gave many local people an opportunity to meet and speak to our members face-to-face,” Mr Bennett said.

UK Democracy Has Been Denied in Britain, Says BNP Press Officer

Democracy Has Been Denied in Britain, Says BNP East Midlands Press Officer

The British people are being denied their democratic rights by a politically correct elite which thinks it knows best, according to East Midlands British National Party press officer Cllr John Ryde.

Addressing the latest meeting of the Salisbury branch, Cllr Ryde said on issue after issue, from immigration to the EU, the views of the majority of British people have been ignored and overridden.

“The British people have never been consulted on the really important issues which have determined the direction of this nation,” he said to applause.

Cllr Ryde also gave the lively audience an insight in to his work as a councillor for the BNP and his own achievements throughout his community in reducing crime.

He finished off with a Q&A which gave the audience a chance to ask him how he has seen change through mass immigration in Leicestershire.

Compared to where Cllr Ryde lives, Salisbury has “escaped the effects of mass immigration to a degree. But it is our duty to alert the residents  of Salisbury and surrounding areas to what can be expected if we do nothing,” said organiser Sean Witheridge after Cllr Ryde’s speech.

Mr Witheridge officially welcomed several new members to the meeting, including some university students.

A video of party chairman Nick Griffin’s recent speech in Bolton at the launch of the “Bring our boys home” campaign was shown and went down a storm.

“During the interval, several new members showed great interest in supporting the campaign and offered to assist the branch in any way they could,” said Mr Witheridge.

see Nicks speech speech here. Nick griffins Bolton Speech filmed in Horwich

BNP Bring Our Troops Home” Tabletop Campaign “More Effective than Leafleting”

“Bring Our Troops Home” Tabletop Campaign “More Effective than Leafleting”

The BNP Newsroom

The British National Party’s “Bring our troops home” tabletop campaign is as effective, if not more so, than putting leaflets through doors, reports Windsor and Maidenhead organiser Neil Kilbane.

“We shall carry on with type of campaigning long after this present campaign stops,” Mr Kilbane said. “It is much more productive than putting leaflets through doors.”

The tabletop campaign, which started again yesterday in the constituency, drew what Mr Kilbane described as “very good support in a very conservative area.

“The supporters of this petition filled out at least 12 of the petition sheets and we sold dozens of copies of Voice of Freedom,” he said.

One interesting point which came up during the tabletop outreach was the support expressed by ethnic minorities who were happy to sign the BNP’s petition.

“One particular gentleman, a doctor in nuclear science, told us that as a first generation immigrant, he was disgusted with today's politicians for allowing mass immigration and not then supporting the rights of the indigenous population," Mr Kilbane said.

“This gentleman said he had moved to Britain with qualifications and under terms of which he brought something useful and needed by the British Government.

“He then went on to ask why the Government insisted on allowing unqualified persons to enter the UK who bring nothing but their Third World customs and religions that do nothing but bring contempt for the British way of life.”

Mr Kilbane said that this gentleman had offered to attend a local branch meeting to speak to real Britons who share his concerns.

Western Liberals Are Tolerant – As Long As You Agree With Them

Liberals Are Tolerant – As Long As You Agree With Them

  BNP Newsroom

By Dr Phil Edwards—All over Europe, liberals are panicking as anti-immigration parties make steady progress. How predictable, that as soon as one such party in Sweden — the Swedish Democrats — enjoys success under a traditional democratic system, the liberal luvvies are, just as in the UK, out in force.

Henning Mankell, a Swedish crime writer, occasional children's author and dramatist, best known for a series of mystery novels starring Inspector Kurt Wallander proclaimed in the Guardian that the “rise of Sweden's far right has clearly shown that trying to silence them will backfire...we should have argued them into oblivion.”

That’s right — "argued them into oblivion."

But with about 100,000 immigrants entering a country of almost 9 million every year and Malmo, Sweden’s third most populous city, having about 38 percent of its 300,000 population of foreign background (from Asia, Africa, and Arab countries, with a particular problem with Somalis, Lebanese, and Palestinians) one wonders just how or what sort of argument would have prevailed.

The good news is the Sweden Democrats party (SD) has made it into parliament, with nearly 6 percent of the vote and 20 MPs.

According to Mankell this creates "an uncertain situation in parliament" — Sweden will get a "weak government" since all the parties have spent most of the post-election debate guaranteeing that they won't in any way co-operate with the SD.

So much for "strength through diversity."

Mankell asks "Who are the more than 300,000 Swedes (out of a population of 9 million) who voted for the SD? Why couldn't this be stopped?"

With echoes of the situation in the UK, the SD was pushed out of the election campaign, the other parties refused to engage in a dialogue with it. The SD was forbidden to come and spread its "message" in some schools.

"This was, of course, a completely mistaken and counterproductive strategy; it was, in fact, idiocy. The only way to deal with people with racist, xenophobic and generally populist views is through a determined dialogue" says Mankell belatedly, going on to compare the Sweden Democrats with the German National Socialism of the 1920s, asserting that "it was precisely the refusal of the other parties, from left and right, to debate with the SD that allowed them to grow from nothing to 6 percent of the vote.”

Shamefully, Mankell even admitted that "...in Sweden we have until now been able to keep these ultraconservative groupings out of play. They have had a few representatives in local government but not much more than that.

“The difference this time was that the SD was much better organised, that they made their views much clearer, and that they were pushed out. At one stage a television channel refused to show their party political broadcast. It was thought too xenophobic" — sounds familiar.

The problem for the likes of Mankell is that were parties like the SD and the BNP allowed a genuinely free and open discussion by the media, we would soon be in government — and that's the paradox for the perverted minds of the media and political elites.

Europe versus Intolerance: Proceedings of the Seminar [Held Strasbourg, Palais De l'Europe, 3-4 March 1994] 

Andrew Brons BNP MEP helps injured British Soldier

MEP helps injured soldier

  Author Martin Wingfield

SEPTEMBER 2010: WHEN Chris Beverley addressed BNP members at a meeting in Bridlington recently and asked them to let him know of any good local causes that they would like to see supported by Andrew Brons MEP, it did not take long for good suggestions to be submitted.

Indeed, it was at this very meeting that Sub-Regional organiser Gary Pudsey mentioned a fundraising event due to be held on the following Saturday. The event in question had been organised to raise money for a local soldier who lost his leg following an explosion in Afghanistan, and who had since been told that his £185 disability benefit has been stopped. Without this payment he cannot afford to run his specially adapted car.
26-year-old Aron Shelton from Bridlington (right) was told by the DWP that he was no longer entitled to disability allowance to fund his car, despite losing one leg and suffering crippling arthritis in the other.
Aron told his local newspaper:
"I was livid, I needed a punch bag to take my anger out on - though the British Prime Minister would have done! I lost my leg for a reason, I didn't lose it in an everyday accident or by messing around, I lost it fighting for my country in the British Army and I would expect that the British government would look after me because of it."
Upon learning of this case, Andrew Brons immediately send a cheque for £1000 from his community fund, which has been gratefully accepted.

Tories Lied About Human Rights Act Abolition

Lib Dem Justice Minister Confirms that Tories Lied About Human Rights Act Abolition

 BNP News

The Lib Dem minister of Justice Lord McNally has confirmed that the ConDem coalition government has “no intention” of abolishing the Human Rights Act (HRA), one of the key election pledges made by the Conservative Party during the last election.

Lord McNally told the Lib Dem party conference that there would be “no retreat” over the Act, that it would never be “diminished” and that the government wanted the law to be “better understood and appreciated.”

The HRA was introduced by the Labour regime to bring UK law into line with EU legislation, and has been used by countless scroungers, serial immigrant criminals and other deadbeats to swindle their way into staying in Britain.

This has been possible due to a clause in the Act which says that everyone has a “right to a family life.” This clause has been used by serious criminal illegal immigrants to fight deportation orders because they have managed to smuggle their spouses and of children into Britain as well, and their deportation would therefore violate their rights under the Act.

It is not only family rights which are used to avoid deportation under this bizarre Act. One of the more infamous rulings occurred in January this year when an Iraqi immigrant who stabbed two doctors to death won the right to stay in Britain after a judge ruled that he would pose a danger to the public in his homeland.

An immigration tribunal decided that Laith Alani, a paranoid schizophrenic, should not be deported to Iraq because it would breach his human rights and put people there at risk.

Alani has spent the past 19 years in a secure hospital after he killed two NHS consultants in a frenzied attack because he believed he had received a "command from Allah".

The Conservative Party pretended to be very angry about these blatant abuses, and wrote in their manifesto that the HRA was an example of the state’s encroachment on freedom and promised to abolish it.

David Cameron even once famously said that the law was “practically an invitation for terrorists and would-be terrorists to come to Britain.”

However, just like Mr Cameron’s “cast-iron” promise to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, the Tories knew all along that this was a lie.

Because the HRA is merely a reflection of EU law, and because Britain is a dues-paying member of the EU, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) can pass judgments based on its law which have to be enforced in Britain, irrespective of what UK law says.

In other words, an appeal from an illegal immigrant in Britain would be as successful in the ECJ as it would in a British court under the HRA, and the only way to avoid this situation would be for Britain to withdraw from the EU.

Hence the Tories were lying from the beginning on this issue, and are now only too glad to be able to use the coalition as an “excuse” to abandon their core election promises once again.