France – Token Ethnic minority women sacked from cabinet as Sarkozy moves to right

France – Ethnic minority women sacked from cabinet as Sarkozy moves to right

 November 2010 by Giuseppe De Santis.  

It seems to me that the useless marxists who write for The Guardian have spent so much time with Trevor Phillips and the EHRC that they have lost the plot.
They are quite happy to see the British National Party sued by the EHRC on the grounds that our constitution discriminates against non-whites, even though they know that there is not a long queue of ethnics wanting to join.
However their racist nonsense is now directed against France, they are complaining that the French government has become more white and more rightwing in a reshuffle that included the sacking of two ministers handpicked by Nicolas Sarkozy to bring ethnic diversity to the cabinet.

Senegalese-born Rama Yade, the sports minister, and Fadéla Amara, the minister for urban policies, lost their jobs in the shake-up which also signalled an end to the French president’s policy of “openness” to his political opponents and to racial minorities.
Less than two years ago, Sarkozy declared: “The diversity at the bottom of the country must be illustrated by diversity at the head of the country. This is not a choice, this is an obligation.”
That obligation went by the board in Sunday’s long expected reshuffle – it was announced almost five months ago. The prime minister, François Fillon, was reappointed, and the French administration moved further to the right.
Yade, 33, was one of the so-called Sarkozettes, seven women given ministerial posts after Sarkozy’s presidential victory in 2007. Their appointment was to fulfil his election vow to introduce “positive discrimination French-style” and to reflect the diversity of modern France.
Yade, while hugely popular with the public, fell out of favour with the president for not toeing the official line on several occasions, including the time she criticised Sarkozy’s decision to invite the Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi, to Paris on a state visit. She also refused his offer of a European parliament job.
Amara, 46, a once outspoken French feminist and former president of the organisation Ni Putes Ni Soumis (Neither Whores Nor Doormats), is a Muslim born to Algerian parents. She was appointed junior minister for urban policies in 2007. Her main job was to devise a “Marshall plan” for France’s troubled city suburbs, but she found herself rapidly sidelined.
The third symbolic appointment, Rachida Dati, who was made justice minister, the first Frenchwoman of Algerian and Moroccan roots to hold a top post in government, also fell out of favour with Sarkozy and was packed off to the European parliament in June last year.
In Sunday’s reshuffle French diversity was represented far down the political pecking order by Jeannette Bougrab, of Algerian parentage and a former president of the country’s anti-discrimination and equality authority, who is the newly appointed junior minister for youth, and by Nora Berra, 47, who has north African roots, and was appointed junior minister for sport.
Patrick Lozés, president of the Representative Council for Black Associations, wrote in his blog on the Nouvel Observateur site: “This is a sad day for diversity. I particularly regret the departure of Rama Yade from the government. Her leaving is a heavy symbol for all French from visible minorities.”
He said the appointment of Bougrab was a blow to his organisation. “It’s not a matter for celebration,” he wrote.
Female politicians fared slightly better: six of the 15 cabinet posts are now held by women, one fewer than in Sarkozy’s first government in 2007. The recruits include Nathalie Kosciusko-Morizet, 37, who is made minister for ecology, development, transport and housing.

So now the French government is institutionally racist?
Never mind that those ethnic minority women were not up to their job and attracted much criticism, clearly if they have been removed it’s because Mr Sarkozy is racist.
The Guardian’ problem is that they cannot accuse him of being nazi scum as he is Jewish, of Hungarian descent and they are worried that if Mr Sarkozy rejects diversity then the MSM would be caught between a rock and a hard place, it would be far more difficult to criticise us for trying to do the same thing.
Any day that is bad for those unwashed marxists is a very good day for nationalists and those who care about the future of this country.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Midwives: Yet Another Tory Election Pledge Ditched as Maternity Wards Overwhelmed by Immigrant Birth Rate

Midwives: Yet Another Tory Election Pledge Ditched as Immigration Invasion Overwhelms Maternity Wards

The BNP Newsroom

Yet another broken promise has been added to the growing list of abandoned Tory election pledges in the form of increased subsidies to the midwife profession, which has come under intense pressure due to the sustained immigrant invasion-driven rise in births.

In a speech to the annual conference of the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) in Manchester, that organisation’s general secretary Cathy Warwick said that both the Conservative Party and the Lib Dems had “gone back on pre-election pledges to increase the number of midwives.”

According to Ms Warwick, Prime Minister David Cameron and his deputy Nick Clegg had both promised to create more midwifery posts.

However, it has transpired, Ms Warwick said, that discussions with Health Secretary Andrew Lansley have shown that the Government is "clearly not prepared" to fulfil that commitment, despite the service being close to "cracking point.

“I fear for the future of maternity services, that the quality of care will fall and that safety could be compromised. I fear that midwives who are toiling away doing their best will become even more disillusioned,” Ms Warwick said.

“Most of all I fear that women and their babies will be ill-served by maternity services. The government's lack of response about this seems at best bewildering, and at worst a clear refusal to do something about it.”

She said David Cameron and health secretary Andrew Lansley had gone back on a pledge made before the election to increase midwife numbers by 3,000.

Ms Warwick pointed out that in January this year, Mr Cameron said in public that ‘We are going to make our midwives' lives a lot easier. They are crucial to making a mum's experience of birth as good as it can possibly be, but today they are overworked and demoralised. So we will increase the number of midwives by 3,000.’

Since the coalition government came to power it has consistently refused to honour that pledge, Ms Warwick continued. “When the NHS business plan was published last week, it contained no mention of midwife numbers.

“I am very concerned that the needs of pregnant women are greater than ever before, the birthrate remains high yet we are still acutely short of midwives. The RCM is well aware of the pressures on public spending, but midwives are already doing more for less. It now looks like they will be asked to do even more with fewer resources and fewer staff.”

The intense pressure on the maternity wards is a direct result of the immigration invasion of Britain by the Third World, a policy which has, ironically, been actively encouraged and supported by all the Westminster parties.

An analysis of official figures conducted by BNP news revealed that at least 60 percent of all new babies in Britain in 2009 were born to non-indigenous recent arrival immigrant mothers or to second or third generation immigrant parents.

The shocking figures are based on a comparison between new Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures and existing data.

According to the latest ONS figures, released in July this year, 24.7 percent of children born in Britain last year have mothers who were born abroad. These figures have doubled since the late 1990s.

According to the ONS figures, around 10 percent of babies are “born to mothers from New Commonwealth countries,” in other words, the Third World, with Pakistan topping the list.

An August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

In London around half of babies have foreign-born mothers while in Newham and Brent, around three quarters of children have mothers who were born abroad.

As shocking as these figures are, they do not tell the whole story.

According to the ONS Population Review of 2004 and 2005: England and Wales, legal Third World immigrants made up 14.7 percent (7.5 million) of the population of England in 2004.

A 2005 ONS report said that in the previous year, 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British.”

This 2005 birth rate figure does not include births to second and third generation immigrant mothers. Once it is added in, the non-indigenous birth rate climbs to just over 50 percent of all births in Britain — and this in 2005, data which is already five years old.

This figure, combined with July’s ONS figures, means that at least 60 percent and possibly more of all live births in Britain last year were of immigrant origin

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs of the BNP Main Website

Children in Need funded 7/7 terrorist propaganda, says the BBC NewsnightTV Programme

BBC's Children in Need funded 7/7 terrorist propaganda, says the BBC NewsnightTV Programme 

BY Horwich Nationalists

Thousands of pounds raised by Britons for the BBC’s Children in Need charity may have been used to recruit and train the homegrown Islamic terrorists involved in the 7/7  Islamic terror attacks on London.

Pudsey and other Islamic Friends

Some of the cash may also have been used to fund the propaganda activities of the Islamic suicide bombers who killed 52 people in July 2005, according to an investigation by BBC ,s Newsnight programme.

The programme has reported that £20,000 from Children in Need was handed over to the Leeds Community School, in Beeston, Yorkshire between 1999 and 2002.

The Islamic school, which also received large sums from other Tax funded public bodies, was run from premises behind the Iqra Islamic bookshop which the 7/7 Terrorist Bombing gang used as a meeting place and an opportunity to increase the radicalization of other Muslims in the UK.

Children in Need's chief Executive David Ramsden told the BBC Newsnight programme : I'm incredibly concerned that we did make an award to Leeds Community School over nine years ago .

well tough we at The Horwich Nationalists have always suspected the motives behind this annual Bourgeoisie fund raising event. And often how in our view the millions raised never seemed to be spent on the British People themselves but always seemed to be spent on ethnic projects in both the UK and in the never ending money pit of Africa.If you have made a pledge to this now apparent Islamic fund raising event we suggest you break it and donate any money raised to reputable charities such as the Poppy appeal and the Salvation Army or the RNLA.

Political Police in Wales Pay Compensation after Gestapo-like Harassment of BNP Leaflet Team

Political Police in South Wales Pay Up after Gestapo-like Harassment of BNP Leaflet Team

The British National Party Newsroom

South Wales Police have settled out of court in four figure sums with five British National Party activists who were detained in 2006 after legally leafleting the Bonymaen area of Swansea, reports South Wales correspondent Clive Bennett.

“After four and a half years of wrangling and just a few weeks from going to court, South Wales police have decided to settle out of court,” Mr Bennett said.

“All of the ‘Swansea Five,’ as the BNP team became known, have received an out of court settlement, without prejudice of course, which includes a four figure lump sum and all costs.”

The drama started in May 2006, when, in the run-up to the last Wales Assembly elections, a team of activists were delivering BNP leaflets.

“Shortly after they had started leafleting, the Plaid candidate phoned the police and complained about the leaflets,” Mr Bennett explained.

“Subsequently the group became aware that they were being kept under surveillance and they were followed for more than half an hour by a police constable in a panda car.

“At 12 o’clock, just before the group had finished leafleting the area, several police vehicles arrived and arrested the whole team, confiscated their phones and leaflets and proceeded to load the whole group into a police van.

“They were taken to the police station where they individually locked up in police cells and interviewed one by one. They were asked about where their meetings are held and who is in the group,” he said.

“Then their photographs, fingerprints and DNA were taken. Once all that was done, they were sent back to the cells and only released at 1 am the next morning, some thirteen hours after the arrest.

“In addition, during the afternoon, the police took it upon themselves to go around the area which had been leafleted to ask residents to hand over the leaflets.

“Now if that was not a political move designed to put those residents off supporting the BNP, I cannot think what is,” Mr Bennett said.

Of course, no charges were ever made against any of the activists. Rightfully angry at this blatant Gestapo-like interference in the political process, the activists laid a formal complaint of false arrest and imprisonment.

To no-one’s surprise, the internal police investigation found “no fault” with their actions.

Not satisfied with this obvious cover-up, the activists then took out a private case against South Wales Police and sued them for damages. It is this action which has now been settled by the police with the out-of-court payments.

“But most important of all, I think it is safe to say that because of this action, the South Wales police will be less inclined to act quite so politically in the future,” Mr Bennett said.

“It may be a small win, but nevertheless an important one. Well done to the Swansea Five for their tenacity.”

Multicultural Political Police Pass the Buck onto the EDL for Muslim Militancy

By Horwich Nationalists

A spokesman for the Politicised Police of the West Midlands of England, has stated that Muslim Militancy is caused by the EDL marching for the rights of the Indigenous British Peoples, in the face of the Islamic and Politically Correct repression the said British people now face.

Whilst completely ignoring the failure of the Multi cultural socialist experiments of the Main Lib/Lab/Con Political parties. Detective Superintendent of the West Midlands Police John larkin simply in our view has attempted to pass the buck ( reuters) onto the ordinary people of this nation who wish for nothing more than to preserve the hard won freedoms and traditions of our people in the face of an Islamic onslaught.

Has Detective Larkin forgot that the 7/7 bombings happened long before the EDL ever existed, or the fact that in order to show their willingness to get along with the British way of life it was Muslims who burnt a poppy at the Cenotaph insulting all members of the British Nation, And along with the suspected Islamic bomb test on the shores of a Scottish Loch this week.  As well as the majority of the heroin trade being owned and controlled by the so called Muslim Community , and the grooming of under age English Girls by Islamic sex gangs!
So come on Larkin stop Larking about and smell the roses it is not the EDL that is the Problem it is the failure of the Multi cultural experiment, and that is what you must be addressing as well as hunting down these Islamic criminals, and protecting our freedoms for a CHANGE! 

So I call on all EDL members to register to vote and to cast their votes for or join the only Political Party with a track record of standing up for the British and English way of life and who is sworn to put an end to the politically correct madness of the last 40 years, And I do not think it will be one of the main parties to!

Equalities Commission vS bnp Court Case Update

Equalities Commission Court Case Update

The British National Party National Newsroom

The British National Party’s legal team has advised the party leadership that there will still be another two day’s legal arguments early in December before the case brought by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission comes to an end.

“The news means that judgement in the case will not be given within the next week or two, as was previously thought,” Nick Griffin MEP said.

“Because Equalities Commission was forced to admit in court that their original order was unclear and ambiguous, the consensus of legal opinion is that there is no prospect of their contempt action succeeding,” Mr Griffin continued.

“During the upcoming two days, our excellent legal team will be arguing strongly that that the entire ECHR case was flawed from the very beginning, and that in addition to it being totally struck off, the Equalities Commission should bear all the costs,” he said.

“The ultimate decision, of course, lies with the court. However, the bottom line is that party supporters can only expect a decision in the case in December.

“Once we have an exact date, we will advertise that widely so that people can once again show their support at the Royal Court of Justice, and, hopefully, at the end of it, celebrate a famous victory,” Mr Griffin said.

“But no matter what the outcome, we need to show these fascist terrorists that the British people are not going to bow to their blackmail, and will carry on the fight to save our great nation no matter what.”

Legal Aid to British People Cut, Asylum Seekers” Continue with Subsidies

Legal Aid Cuts: “Asylum Seekers” Continue with Subsidies as Aid to British People Cut

The British National Party Newsroom

“Asylum seekers” in Britain will continue to have all their endless legal appeals financed by the taxpayer while legal aid to impoverished British people will be cut by more than £350 million, according to the ConDem regime’s new plans.

According to Tory “justice” secretary Ken Clarke, the taxpayer-funded legal aid bill will be cut by £350 million as part of “cost-saving” measures.

This means that all legal aid normally given to impoverished British citizens to aid them in civil cases such as divorce, medical negligence, private family cases, education, employment, welfare benefits and school admissions will end. Legal aid for criminal cases will not be affected.

The justification for the cuts — that the taxpayer is footing the bill for unnecessary court cases that could probably be settled out of court if the parties themselves were paying — is almost certainly valid. The publicly-funded legal bill in England alone was almost £2 billion last year, which is one of the highest in Europe.

At present, anyone with assets worth less than £8,000 qualifies for legal aid, with those worth £3,000 or less paying nothing and others expected to contribute.

Under the new proposals, all those with assets of £1,000 or more will have to pay a minimum of £100 towards their legal costs should their cases be successful.

This sounds all good and well — until the fine print of the new deal is read. It turns out that “asylum seekers” are one of the handful of groups (along with mental health, debt and housing matters) to be specifically excluded from the cuts.

Legal aid for asylum seekers cost taxpayers more than £90 million in 2009, according to figures released by the Ministry of Justice.

The bill, more than £550,000 a week, paid for "initial advice" in 46,000 cases. Each case costs the taxpayer an average of £610. Cases that go on to a full tribunal cost an average of £1,670, while those that go to judicial review cost £2,500 each.

The decision to exclude “asylum seekers” from the cuts goes directly against Mr Clarke’s own promises on the subject which he made as recently as August this year.

At the time, Mr Clarke said he would “target payments made to lawyers who make repeated challenges to decisions to turn down claims for asylum” and would “crack down on payouts to solicitors who make last-minute objections to deportation orders.”

While there is obviously a need for a crackdown on the exploitation of the legal system which results from free legal aid, the first point of savings should have been the utterly bogus asylum racket.

There are, in fact, no legal “asylum seekers” in Britain at all. All such persons have crossed dozens of safe countries to reach Britain, and are as such illegal immigrants, not genuine asylum seekers who only have right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they fled.

However, just like its Labour Party predecessor, the current government is always happy to put the interests of British people last.

If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.

The Misnamed Equalities and Human Rights Commission Their Evil Aim: Destroy the BNP

Their Evil Aim: Destroy the BNP

The British National Party Newsroom

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission is no neutral regulator, but an organisation out to destroy our human rights and democracy, British National Party leader Nick Griffin has said.

Writing in the latest fundraising appeal, Mr Griffin said that the “Commission's aim is to destroy OUR human rights and the democracy and freedom for which generations of our war heroes have died.

“The misnamed Equalities and Human Rights Commission brought a contempt case against me, Simon Darby and Tanya Lumby. Their aim was to use public funds to bully and oppress us and the entire party.

“Make no mistake, this is no neutral regulator out to secure the 'human rights' of others - the Commission's aim is to destroy OUR human rights and the democracy and freedom for which generations of our war heroes have died.

“Their aim was to bankrupt and humiliate us and to jail me. The Guardian newspaper made this clear: ‘Griffin faces a large financial penalty or even jail if the court rules in favour of the equality watchdog, which is bringing the case.’

“Both ECHR head Trevor Phillips and his racist ‘Operation Black Vote’ sidekick Simon Woolley have claimed that the BNP is deliberately flouting the original court order. The truth is quite different.

“The BNP has complied with the order and it is the ECHR that is misusing the courts and public money for political ends.

“Woolley has made his hatred of the BNP and his desire to close us down very plain. He does not even want to address your legitimate concerns: ‘Pandering to views peddled by the BNP and bought by BNP voters is grotesque,’ he has said in public.

“For his part, Phillips is on record saying that he views BNP members as ‘less than human.’

“These are the people who run the tax-guzzling ECHR. They want to destroy the BNP, dismiss your concerns and exclude you from any democratic debate No wonder Phillips used to have a bust of Lenin on his desk!

“Phillips and Woolley don't understand the British spirit - when our backs are against the wall we come out fighting! Supporters of the BNP embody that spirit. “Our boys and girls were on the streets outside the Royal Courts of Justice standing up for freedom, despite the pouring rain and freezing cold. Our supporters paid for a high-powered, confident and well-briefed legal team to present the best possible case to the court to throw out this crackpot charge.

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

or ring 0207 078 3269

“They were there because of you and your generosity. And they gave the Commission's lawyers bloody noses all round. The equality bullies got their come-uppance this week!

“I believe that the judges understand that we have sought to abide by the law and that the ECHR kept moving the goalposts to try to find new ways to attack us. We are nearing the end of this now and only have to get through a further two-day hearing on technical legal points before judgment will be delivered.

“So we will still have to send a legal team back into court. “It is vital to see that the party is represented by a professional team so that our best interests can be served.

“Give me the weapons I need in this fight. Please send a donation today to ensure that we once again - and for the last time - field the best legal minds to defend our rights.

“Let's wipe the smiles off the faces of Phillips and Woolley and show them that we will defend our rights and will not be bullied, sidelined or oppressed!

>> Click Here to Make a Donation >>

or ring 0207 078 3269

Yours sincerely

Nick Griffin MEP

Chairman, BNP

P.S. I know that the same spirit that got our Country through two World Wars is still alive in us today. With that spirit we can never be beaten. Whether you fight by attending protests or giving money you are expressing that 'never say die' attitude. It's what once made our country great and, God willing, will again.

Five UAF arrested for throwing fireworks at BNP stall Merseyside Police Reply

Five UAF arrested for throwing fireworks at BNP stall

  Martin Wingfield Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

 NOVEMBER 2010: Nick Griffin has now received a reply to his letter to Merseyside Police concerning intimidation of British National Party campaigners in Liverpool.


 Chief Constable Jon Murphy wrote:
Dear Mr. Griffin,
Further to your letter dated the 11th October 2010 and our acknowledgement dated the 21st October 2010, I would like to provide you with the following response in relation to the questions you raised.
Firstly, I am able to confirm that on Saturday 2nd October 2010, representatives of both the British National Party and United Against Fascism were campaigning in Liverpool City Centre.
A period of approximately six hours passed without incident and the police facilitated the lawful political campaigning by both groups. Unfortunately at about 6pm the same day, a flash point occurred when missiles and fireworks were thrown at representatives of the British National Party. As a result the police were requested to escort British National Party campaigners from the location for their own safety.
I am able to confirm that five arrests were made for a variety of public order related offences.
This was a disappointing outcome to the day and we immediately reviewed our response to the situation. For trie weeks that foiiowed, we increased our resources in relevant locations to prevent any further incidents of this nature. We have also engaged in active dialogue with both parties to ensure that we can, when possible, facilitate both lawful protest and political campaigning.
In addition we have worked closely with all local authorities and partner agencies to ensure the British National Party, as a legal political party can continue to campaign without fear of transgressing any local by laws or environmental legislation.
However it must said that our efforts to police incidents such as this are hindered by receiving very short notice of British National Party intentions to campaign in this area, if in fact we receive any notice at all.
I would very much appreciate it if you would encourage your members to provide us with at least 24 hours notice of any specific locations where they intend to campaign, which will allow us the opportunity to plan accordingly.
This reply was in response to Nick's letter below:
Dear Chief Constable Murphy
Re: Intimidation of British National Party Campaigners: Liverpool
I have been contacted by a number of my constituents, some of whom are campaigners for the British National Party, with regard to the unacceptable intimidation they have been subjected to during the course of their campaigning activities in Liverpool city centre.
On Saturday 2nd October, a small team of British National Party campaigners, who were gathering signatures for a petition calling for the withdrawal of British troops from the war in Afghanistan, were surrounded by an organised and co-ordinated group of political opponents (who term themselves as “antifascists”) and subjected to a relentless, vicious verbal and physical attack. In addition to the campaign team suffering sustained verbal abuse from this group, they were also physically assaulted with objects thrown as missiles, which included eggs, water, bottles, cans and small incendiaries.
The British National Party campaign members report that they, and members of the public who tried to approach them with the intention of signing the petition, felt afraid for their physical safety and were not reassured by the actions of the Merseyside police officers who were present on the day. There was a general consensus, on the part of both the campaign team and the public, that the officers in attendance were unsympathetic toward their safety concerns and generally reluctant to take control of the situation: i.e. by dispersing the aggressive and unruly opponent group and taking direct action against the individuals responsible for the missile throwing and targeted verbal abuse.  
I understand that Mr Mike Whitby, the Liverpool British National Party organiser, has already written to Superintendent Bill McWilliam, raising his concerns about the apparent unwillingness of local police officers to intervene effectively to allow the British National Party campaign team to conduct their legitimate political campaigning without harassment, and also to protect the public from intimidation.
Given the seriousness of this attack and the climate of fear and victimisation that such incidents engender amongst individuals exercising their democratic right to freedom of political expression, I would appreciate it if you could provide me with a full report on Merseyside Police’s response to the events of Saturday 2nd October, including whether any arrests were made on the day, and your assessment as to whether sufficient action was taken by officers to deal with the attack.
In order for me to reassure my constituents that Merseyside Police is committed to ensuring the physical safety of all individuals involved in legitimate democratic political activity, and to protecting their democratic right to function free from harassment, I would be grateful if you could also identify what risk management plans will be set in place to avoid a repeat of the events of Saturday 2nd October.
I would be grateful if you could direct your reply to my Wigton Constituency office address.
Yours sincerely
Nick Griffin, MEP
North West Parliamentary Constituency

The Continuing Persecution of Christians in Egypt

Persecution of Christians in Egypt

  Martin Wingfield at Nick Griffin MEP Euro News

NOVEMBER 2010: AS an MEP, Nick Griffin gets sent numerous texts of speeches that are being made in Britain. The speeches cover a multitude of topics and while some are of interest to nationalists, such as protecting the environment and defending a country's culture and traditions, the majority promote an internationalist agenda, seeking to expand the influence of the European Union and the global economy.

 Yesterday, Nick received notification of a lecture being given by Dr Ahsraf Ramelah at the Community College in Northampton on the Persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt.
In his introduction Dr Ramelah provides a brief history of the Coptic Christians in Egypt and the persecution they have faced from Muslims. There then follows an interesting analysis of the Western Mindset with regard to Islamic aggression, Sharia Law and Jihad.
This is what he had to say:
"Many Westerners, including Americans, for some reason hesitate to hear the truths related to Islam and its history or see the sad reality of current events around the world, especially  the oppression and discrimination within Egyptian society today.
While in the Western civil societies there is a clear separation of religion and state, in Arab-Muslim countries the two are inseparable. Islam is a juridic religion which governs every single part of an individual's life and by definition must extend to state government. Therefore, the policy in Egypt which forces the dhimmi (submissive second citizens) status upon those of minority religions is linked to the religion of Islam. In fact, the Sharia, laws based upon Muslim religious texts, is written into Egypt's state constitution as an amendment and is the official guide to all rulings.
The United States constitution is the basis for our laws and regulations but does not interfere with individual citizens and their beliefs, while in Arab Muslim countries the Sharia is the source and basis of law and dictates an individual citizen's behavior and attitude.  
What is Sharia? And what does it mean to us as Westerners?
Sharia is an Arabic word which indicates the source of law in general. According to Islamic doctrine this law was delivered directly by Allah as a Divine revelation set fourth in the Qur'an and the Sunnah text which contains examples of behavior set forth by the Islamic prophet during his lifetime.
In analyzing the above, one can easily see how non-Muslims in Islamic majority countries are subject to the Sharia.
Muslims claim that Sharia is applied only to the Muslim people as part of their religion, however history and current practice indicates the opposite. The Sharia was introduced in Egypt by President Anwar Sadat in 1981, indicating Egypt to be a Muslim country with Sharia as its law. Sadat did not abrogate or nullify the Egyptian constitution, but instead he wrote a simple amendment and placed it as the second article within the Egyptian constitution.
Here are a few examples of Sharia compliance happening in Egypt today:
* Today as the past, the legal courts of Egypt do not ever rule against a Muslim when he has committed a crime against a non-Muslim and this practice follows Islamic Sharia doctrine.
* Today as in the past, Egypt Copts are struggling to build new churches and repair existing ones based upon two decrees, Omrani and Hamayoni, which regulate the relationship between believers (Muslims) and unbelievers (Jews, Christians, etc.). The submission of non-Muslim to Muslim is based on Sharia. This is likewise happening in other Islamic countries; for example, in Afghanistan a few years ago the Taliban destroyed a huge, ancient statue of Buddha!
* Today as in the past, Christian women and girls are kidnapped, raped and converted to Islam. Rape is part of Sharia. This is also in accordance to Mohammad's message to the countries his armies were to invade that all should embrace Islam to keep from being killed (Islam, Teslam).
* Today as in the past, in the public schools, Islam is taught to all students as part of Sharia.
Jihad is part of sharia and means holy war. Muslims teach that jihad is a fight in self-defense to protect their faith. The reality is the opposite; in fact, jihad is one of the pillars of Islam and is offensive and aggressive. Let me borrow a few verses of the Qur'an to prove this important matter.
The following are two verses. The first is from Surah Al Anfal (8) verse 60 below: Arabic Qu'ran, English Qu'ran.
60. And prepare for them, you Muslims, all the strength that you can recruit? armed forces and mounted troops? to strike terror into the hearts of Allâh's enemy, who is your enemy, and into the hearts of others whom you do not know but who Allâh knows. And remember that whatever you spend in the way of Allâh, you will be reimbursed for it and you will never be unjustly wronged.
Islam promoted Jihad in the past, promotes it now, and will promote it forever for the sole reason that Islam intends to conquer the whole world.
Here are the verses that state it, Al Bakara (Cow) 2:154 below: Arabic Qu'ran, English Qu'ran.
154. Do not consider the martyrs in Allâh's cause to be dead. They have acquired the glorious privilege of martyrdom. Do not say they are dead, for they are alive in the Lord's providence, but you do not perceive this fact.
Al Twaba 9:20:
20. Indeed, those who believed in Allâh's oneness and migrated to where they could best serve Him and strove for His cause with their wealth and their lives, are privileged by Allâh with distinction in the scale and rank, and these are the triumphant who are bound to His care.
Al Twaba 9:41:
41. O you who believe, march out, each in his capacity, lightly armed and heavily armed. Every hand must be open to contribute something to the common purpose, and strive in the cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives. Such a campaign is charitable for you if only you knew (it helps you prevail and confirm Allâh's faith and worship)."

UK PM Cameron let's cat out of The Bag On Economics

Those red Communist flags, side by side with our Union Flag simply couldn't have been more appropriate.  Cameron, the so-called ''Conservative'' half of the Coalition government, told news crews that: Globalisation will go into reverse unless China corrects it's trade imbalance.

Written by BC1959

Here in Britain, we were under the illusion that the Coalition government was paid for by our taxes, to actually look after our interests and future prospects. Meanwhile, to gauge what other countries think about all this, here's   UKRAINIAN GLOBALIST, a rather garbled and unprofessional news source. David Cameron became the new leader of a great country:  David Cameron, as a successor to departed Brown,  will not be repeating his mistakes, and take a course on strengthening the economy of Britain, and the development of social programs. Social Programmes?  It just oozes internationalist connections, and brings to mind what can only be described as ''a global conspiracy'' to outlaw national interests and indigenous people. Considering the massive damage done through international treaties and other ''cash generating'' con tricks by all post war governments, one would have thought Cameron, could have at least honoured enough election pledges to seemingly give a damn about British interests, and it's long suffering, tax robbed people. Over in Turkey, the ''Sofia Echo'' (http://sofiaecho.com/) had this to brag about: British Prime Minister David Cameron has promised to fight for Turkey's stalled bid to join the European Union. Mr. Cameron made the remarks during his first visit to Turkey as Britain's prime minister. Cameron says he is angry that Turkey has not been allowed to join the European Union. Our nation starves, it's people are murdered, raped and mugged, robbed of their inheritance as a free country, and he's angry? This writer, and millions of worried Britons are more inclined to think: Turkey is for Christmas, not for life.  Now that Cameron and come to think of it, Clegg, have reneged on a plethora of promises and pledges before entering the money laundering club known as Parliament, we should look at what is happening to our country... that's right, OUR COUNTRY. In January this year, two elderly people in their late seventies were left to die, unwanted, and ignored... and they were only two out of the 30,000 plus each year, in Cameron's new global society, his BIG SOCIETY. Social services had ignored requests to help the frail pensioners, Jean and Derek Randall, and just a month later, both of them were found dead. Millions of people face hunger and loss of home and business, as cuts and compound debt take hold.  No, we are not discussing Zimbabwe or some despotic Asian Communist country, this is Britain. Amongst the millions of crimes committed each year, many of them by immigrants, one that sticks out as the rule, rather than the exception, was an illegal immigrant who was classed as a one-man crime wave. Back in April, he was threatened with deportation for a fourth time after returning to Britain again, and attacking a police officer. Bag-snatcher Hakim Benmakhlouf aged 28, was back in a British jail once more, after being given a six-month sentence for kicking the PC who tried to arrest him at Heathrow. Thanks Blair/Brown/Cameron/Clegg, so this is the ''skilled labour'' Britain needs is it, because white folk are too lazy? With the police now acting as two bookends, one as a military outfit to attack and hammer protesters senseless and the other to act as uniformed Social Workers, the media and Coalition government must ''talk up'' the economy, and tell us also that serious crime is down. Many people forget that any globalist agenda, whereby we rightly worry about these issues, also means that our once stable, well priced, and much loved national assets are under threat. This includes our rural economy, and those who are reliant upon work related to it. Andrew Brons MEP, and one of the most respected and erudite Nationalists, brings up the subject on his blog at just the right moment for an article such as this. Whilst my Party has a United Kingdom rather than an EU perspective on farming, there are many problems that farmers and consumers face throughout the Union, said Mr. Brons. His particular point of view recently, is exactly the same for many of us who value our natural resources, as Mr Brons outlined his and by association, our view that, GM infected foods should not reach the food chain for mass consumption here. Also, we I am sure would all agree that, third world countries and food exports from those nations, are not inclusive of the high standards we enjoy, and expect. Our rural landscape is being damaged by imports, immigrant labour, and the ugly trend, brought into play by a globalist agenda, to ''host international companies on former Green Belt land, because of potential investment and jobs''. Readers are reminded that over the last two or three years, the term Green Belt has been replaced in some quarters, by the crafty use of the term.. ''Green Land''. We know what's coming to a village near us, don't we? I am sure there are hundreds of business men and women in this country, whom, if endowed with the same ''grants and investment'' opportunities, would employ the same, if not more unemployed people here, and also, would benefit greatly from the export income we are seriously lacking through over exposure to inward products and services. Lastly, over at ''One World'', a source for political globalism, there is much to be gleaned, as we now face cuts and debt induced slavery here in Britain. British foreign aid is to be increased, even though Students here, are to be further clubbed by the hammer of debt.  Also, no commitment has been made to ensure indigenous British Students gain access to the home market. The budget for aid now stands at £9 Billion, with an estimated increase to £13 Billion soon.  With Britain the fifth largest donor on the world's ''top ten'' list, Claire Melamed, head of the ''growth and equity programme'' at the Overseas Development Institute, tells us that we should ignore concerns about aid being ''lavished on fat cats and corrupt governments''... let's inform those white farmers in Zimbabwe then shall we? Yes, David Cameron and Nick Clegg, both sons of bankers, are certainly making their mark on the world stage. Sadly, the only mark they are making on the British stage, is a stain of some considerable amount and stench. One we cannot possibly mention in polite company of course, but presumably you get the picture?

Tory Boy Comes Reality: Iain Duncan Smith Blames British People for Not Being Employed

Tory Boy Comes to Life: Iain Duncan Smith Blames British People for Not Being Employed

The British National Party Newsroom

Harry Enfield’s “Tory Boy” comedy character, who used to tell unemployed people that their predicament was “their fault,” has come to life in the shape of ConDem Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith.

Mr Duncan Smith said this week that lazy or incapable Britons are to blame for nearly three million jobs being taken by immigrants since 1997.

Making the announcement while stealing a part of British National Party policy (the workfare-not-welfare section), Mr Duncan Smith said it was a “sin” that 70 per cent of the four million jobs created since 1997 had gone to immigrants because British people were not “capable or able” to do them.

The BNP was the first to come up with the idea of making long term unemployment benefits claimants provide some sort of work.

In its 2010 election manifesto, the BNP said that “ultimately there must be only one category of welfare recipient: those who genuinely deserve or have earned it. The scrounger entitlement mentality must be discarded. Those who can work but refuse to do so, must face the consequences of their actions on their own.”

However, what Mr Duncan Smith has so typically and arrogantly ignored is the reality that the vast majority of British people currently unemployed are not “lazy” or “incapable,” but simply unable to compete with the masses of foreign workers which decades of Tory and Labour rule have allowed into this country.

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect a British bricklayer, who has a mortgage, kids to feed, utility bills to pay etc., to compete with ten Polish lads all working as bricklayers and who share a house?

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect a British IT graduate, who is saddled with tens of thousands of pounds of debt before he or she even begins, to compete with an Indian IT worker whose comparative salary is a third of UK standards?

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect a British steel worker to find work at the age of 45 after almost all UK-based steel mills have been sold and exported to China or India?

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect a trained British call centre operator to find work when almost all large companies have outsourced their call centres to the Far East?

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect British fisherman to find work when the EU has slapped unfair quotas on the UK’s fishing allowances and allowed foreign vessels free access to our fishing waters?

How does Mr Duncan Smith expect British construction workers to find work when building projects — such as the Olympic village — are flooded out with “cheaper” foreign labour?

The list is literally endless.

Mr Duncan Smith’s “blame the Brits” attitude is callous, spiteful and downright wicked.

It is his party’s ideology and support of globalisation which is the primary cause of the mass unemployment now facing Britain.

Only once the internal economics of Britain have been straightened up, can anyone dare talk of identifying those who refuse to work.

UK Workers Put Last Again in EU/India Free Trade Agreement

British Workers Put Last Again in EU/India Free Trade Agreement

The british National party Newsroom

A leaked European Commission document has revealed that in terms of the secret EU/India Free Trade Agreement, Britain is to take 20,000 Indian IT workers every year, even though there is a 17 percent unemployment rate amongst British IT graduates.

The shocking betrayal of British workers only came to light after think tank Migrationwatch released the secret papers on their website.

Up to now, the ConDem regime has deliberately suppressed all news of this treachery, even though British National Party MEP Nick Griffin raised the matter in the European Parliament in July this year.

The leaked documents show that the UK’s immigration quota for Indian workers is 40 percent of the entire EU commitment, nearly three times that of Germany and seven times that of France.

According to Migrationwatch, the EU/India Free Trade Agreement negotiations, which have been conducted in secret, will see 20,000 Indian workers exported to Britain every year, over and above any nonsense “migration cap.”

Migrationwatch chairman, Sir Andrew Green, showing his increasing disenchantment with the Conservative Party once again, called on the government to “end its secrecy and come clean.”

In an official statement, Sir Andrew said that this “looks suspiciously like a side door to Britain for 15,000 to 20,000 Indian IT workers every year.

“It is even more astonishing coming at a time when British IT workers are finding it increasingly difficult to find employment and there is a 17 per cent unemployment rate amongst computer science graduates who left university last year.

“It is time to end the secrecy and for the government to come clean with what is going on and what, if any, safeguards are being put in place,” Sir Andrew said.

The breakdown between member states has been based on the share of the working population of each member state in the relevant sectors and on the share of member states in the total number work permits granted to Indian migrants in the past by EU members, taken together.

The effect of this is that Britain's quota is 40 percent of the total while the UK population is only 12 percent of the EU. Britain would be committed to up to 20,000, Germany 7,000, France 3,000 and Italy 2,600.

* A footnote to the document reveals that some countries have insisted on a cap to Indian workers — ironically, most of them are new East European members.

Cllr Cliff Roper: Labour Hoist By Their Own Petard

Cllr Cliff Roper: Labour Hoist By Their Own Petard: "I was struck today by the sheer audacity of the local Labour Party. Last year, one of their fiction writers, in a web posting exposed leftie..."

“Bitter Far Leftists” Attempt to Start Trouble over BNP MEP’s Address to Doncaster Sea Cadets

“Bitter Far Leftists” Attempt to Stir up Trouble over BNP MEP’s Address to Doncaster Sea Cadets

The BNP National Newsroom

“Bitter” politicians who were too lazy to take up an offer to attend the recent Doncaster Sea Cadets awards evening, are behind a “storm in a leftist” teacup after British National Party MEP Andrew Brons attended the non-political event in their stead, reports local activist Ian Kitchen junior.

Reacting to the news that the Marine Society & Sea Cadets (MSSC) head office’s announcement that it had launched an official inquiry into how it was possible that Mr Brons got invited to the function in the first place, Mr Kitchen said in a letter to a local newspaper that he wanted it placed on record that he “was responsible for coming up with the suggestion to invite Andrew Brons MEP to do the awards presentation at the recent Doncaster Sea Cadets evening.”

Mr Kitchen added that he had already received a letter from the MSSC head office in London, informing him that his volunteer status with the Sea Cadets had been suspended while they conducted their investigation.

“I am a Sea Cadets volunteer of considerable standing, as are both my parents. None of our political affiliations are any secret, and this has never been a problem before,” Mr Kitchen wrote.

“Our professionalism and dedication to the Sea Cadets has never been questioned and the new attack on myself and Mr Brons is an artificially created storm in a far leftist teacup, generated by a bunch of bitter politicians who were too lazy to do the job themselves.

“Mr Brons was asked to attend after several invitations to MPs, the Mayor, and other figures went ignored and unanswered. Mr Brons was the only high profile community figure to respond to a request to attend, and his political affiliation had nothing else to do with it,” he continued.

“It is, however, simply untrue to allege that no-one knew of his political allegiance. Mr Brons is probably one of the most high profile politicians in the entire Yorkshire and Humberside region after winning just on 10 percent of the vote in the European Parliament elections last year.

“As a result, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that the local Labour MP, who, it is worth repeating, refused to attend after initially being invited, is now bitter because Mr Brons took up the invitation.

“There is no justification for an inquiry into this matter, as the MSSC head office has announced. Mr Brons was not there as a representative of his party, nor did he make any political references at all.

“Furthermore, it is highly subjective of the MSSC to pass political judgement on the BNP’s policy. That is a subject way beyond the remit of a national charity which relies on public support and they have severely overstepped their bounds.

“We look forward to exposing the lies and hypocrisy which are currently being spread about this issue, when the time comes,” Mr Kitchen said.

Mr Brons was quoted in a local newspaper as saying that he did not attend the awards as a representative of the British National Party and no mention of the BNP was made to staff, cadets or parents.

"I gave a short talk at the end of the awards ceremony in which I referred to the great service that Sea Cadets can provide and the valuable experience that they can gain from their membership.

"Needless to say there were no political messages, party political or otherwise, included in the speech. I understand that the local MP and the Mayor of Doncaster were both asked to make the awards and both declined the invitation.

"I find the quotation attributed to the organisation's headquarters 'we do not support the views of the BNP' to be rather superfluous. As a charitable organisation they are not there to support or decry the views of any political party.

"I shall be happy to attend any other non-political events anywhere in my constituency in the future and I will behave as professionally and non-politically as I did on this occasion. I only hope that other elected office holders who are invited to such events can follow my example,” Mr Brons was quoted as saying.

Why haven't the politicians condemned the islamic poppy Burners

Why haven't the politicians condemned the moslems?

from the Bolton patriot
So have any of those MPs, councilors , dignitaries, Police and Union reps and so on, condemned the recent burning of a large representation of a poppy in public by Muslim extremists, whilst screaming 'British soldiers burn in hell’ during the 2 minutes silence on Thursday 11th of November?

Knowing that the principal reason for attending the Remembrance Day ceremony is to honour the war dead who went to war to prevent an invasion by a foreign force and to so maintain freedom, dignity and a better future for the British people in their own land.

If no one in government stood up and publicly denounced this disgusting violent hate filled attack on one of the important symbols, this incitement to hate, one has to ask why?

So, the very government that attends these ceremonies to honour the war dead are the very ones that have not only allowed, but encouraged these people to invade and colonise Britain, and moreover to be given every kind of freedom to defame, abuse and spew hate on our streets whilst all the time seeking to dominate the country. Now, why then, are they honouring our war dead who died to protect this land and its people from invasion, and tyranny? When this is exactly what consequent governments have increasingly subjected Britain and the British people to, and where they object are demonised and called ‘racists’?

What would the millions of the war dead say about the country they laid their life down for? Where the country as been given over to a foreign power, the EU without consent of the British people and indeed illegally. Where the very same people are now second class citizens , where the ‘minorities’ rule, and the majority are soon to be minority people in their own land? Where foreign criminals roam the land raping, murdering, robbing, as well as grooming young white girls, and moreover a land where criminals get the vote and where a MP say things like ‘The English are a race not worth saving’

If they the glorious dead would appear to day and objected to the state of this land would the same government who stand their today at memorials across the country , would they the same establishment scream ‘racist’ at them? Nazis? Fascists? Would they call them ‘less than human’?

The elite who stand there today with several illegal, unnecessary wars already undergone and more deaths of British people, they say for ‘freedom and democracy’ for a foreign land that doesn’t want it, whilst they destroy democracy in Britain and sovereignty of the British people right for self determination.

Westminster, the establishment betraying and dishonouring the War Dead and the people of Britain, whose future they condemn.

The Islamic Fifth Column in Britain or Secret Army ?

The Islamic Fifth Column in Britain

British National Party Newsroom

Numerous incidents of anti-British outbursts across the country — including the refusal of a Muslim taxi driver to carry a RAF man in uniform — have given lie to the claim that the poppy-burning incident in London yesterday was the work of an “unrepresentative group of Muslims.”

The poppy-burning outrage — which is an obvious breach of section 154 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 — was committed by a group of Muslim colonisers known as “Muslims Against Crusades” which is, of course, headquartered in London.

However, the justifiable outrage over the incident, which was clearly designed to insult all British people honouring the dead in all wars, has hidden a host of other incidents which clearly show that anti-British sentiment runs very high across the entire Islamic community in Britain.

For example, one of the more recent incidents involved a young Royal Air Force man in Sheffield who attempted to take a taxi home after attending a family wedding in the town.

According to a report in a local newspaper, the “Asian” taxi driver refused to carry the RAF serviceman after objecting to his uniform.

“The 24-year-old serviceman who had been at a family wedding ceremony in his RAF ‘blues’ was turned away from the black cab by the driver who apparently became aggressive,” the local newspaper report continued.

The paper went on to quote a Vince McDonagh of the local joint ex-servicemen's association as saying that “Everybody is astounded that a British taxi can turn away someone in uniform at this time of year.” (Mr McDonagh’s mistake is of course to think that this is a “British” taxi).

The incident occurred last Saturday after the RAF man’s sister was married at the Sheffield Register Office. The RAF man’s father recounted the incident in the local  newspaper as follows: “My wife and my son went to get a taxi near the town hall after the ceremony to go on to the reception. When the cab pulled up they were about to get in when the driver said he wasn't letting my son in because he was in uniform.

"My wife asked him for a reason and the driver became quite aggressive in turning them down. He made it quite clear it was because my son was in the forces.”

The incident only made the local news, of course. Observers pointed out that a British cabbie who refused to carry Muslims in garb would have made national headline news as an example of “evil white racism.”

The cabbie incident is but one of many such outrages which have occurred up and down Britain.

In 2008, it was reported that British soldiers returning from overseas to Birmingham airport were ordered to change out of their uniforms into civilian clothes on the runway before being allowed to enter the airport building.

The outrageous order was made to avoid offending Muslims either working or visiting the airport.

Also in 2008, RAF command ordered its personnel not to wear their uniforms off base for “fear of being abused by hate mobs.” It was later admitted that these “hate mobs” were all local Muslims.

There have also been numerous incidents of wounded British soldiers being accosted and threatened by Muslims at Birmingham’s Sell Oak Hospital.

The cause of the problem is clear: mass immigration which has allowed a fifth column of Muslim colonisers to build up inside Britain.

Those who would claim that these incidents are the work of a “minority” would do well to look at the facts again.

In reality, they are representative of mainstream Islamic thought, and serve as yet another reason why Britain has to halt and reverse the Islamic colonisation of our land.

Boltons? Multicultural Comfort Zone

Multicultural Comfort Zone. 

Bolton Patriot 

Figures, produced by the Department Of Communities And Local Government’s 2008-09 English Housing Survey (EHS), show that foreign nationals now occupy 8.4 percent of the social housing stock and that amongst occupants aged 16-40, that figure rises to 12.6 percent.

This is a particularly relevant survey for those British people on the housing lists in Bolton: despite Anthony Backhouse pursuit of the issue Bolton Council has said that it will not withdraw from its contract with the UK Boarders Agency, a contract which through the ‘Gateway Scheme’ attempts to relocate and house refugees.



In 2005 the council had a portfolio of 160 properties which were used only for asylum seeker and refugees. A number of large local authorities around the country have cancelled their contracts with the Boarders Agency but for Bolton’s political elite such a decision would appear a step to far outside their multicultural comfort zone.