Sarah's Law - addressing concerns over Sex Offender Risk

  Martin Wingfield

 AUGUST 2010: DURING his first 12 months as a Member of the European Parliament, Nick Griffin has been contacted by a number of his constituents with regard to the potential risk to children from paedophiles who have moved into their area.

When dealing with these requests for assistance regarding a perceived sex offender risk, constituency office manager Tina Wingfield, follows the same protocol which includes signposting correspondents for further help if required.
"I write to the Public Protection Unit of the local Constabulary, raising the constituent's concern about the potential risk posed to local children and request that they look into the matter," she told the website.
"Often correspondents have already been in touch with the Police and are concerned that no action seems to have been taken. I do stress however, how important it is for a positive relationship with the local police force to be maintained, because it is only the police who have the power and authority to deal with this public risk.
"I direct them to the “Stop it Now” free-phone Helpline on 0808 1000 900, which offers confidential advice from experienced advisors about the possible steps you can take in respect of their concerns. The Helpline is available from 9.00am to 9.00pm Mondays to Thursdays and from 9.00am to 7.00pm Fridays."
Tina makes correspondents aware of the new disclosure scheme, arising from the successful “Sarah’s Law” campaign, and in areas with large Pakistani populations also draws attention to the British National Party's campaign to highlight the increase in sexual grooming carried out by Muslim gangs.
"The disclosure scheme - when it is rolled out to the North West - could help parents with such concerns. Unfortunately, at the moment, the North West is not yet covered, but Cheshire will be the first county in the region to introduce the scheme in October, with the rest of the North West invited to join by spring of next year," reports Tina.
More Information About the Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme:
 The Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme lets parents ask the police if someone who has contact with their child is a sex offender. After a successful pilot in four areas, eight more areas are joining the scheme in August. Twelve more areas will join by the autumn.
The Disclosure Scheme is being extended after successful pilots in four police force areas. Under the scheme a parent, carer, guardian or another interested party can ask the police to check whether someone who has access to their children has a record of child sexual offences.
If they have convictions for sexual offences against children, and pose a risk of causing serious harm to the child or children, then this information may be disclosed.
How to ask for a check
The child sex offender disclosure scheme means anyone can ask for a police check on someone they are worried about. Simply call or visit your local police station for more information. To actually make an application, you will need to visit your local police station in person. At the police station, you will need to:
• show some ID, for example your passport or driving licence
• tell the police what your relationship to the child is
• say why you want to have this particular person checked
Who the scheme is for
The scheme is for anyone who wants to find out if someone in contact with a child has a record of child sexual offences. You could be a family member, friend, neighbour or anyone that’s worried about the child.
Of course, if anyone is worried about the safety of a child then they can and should report that to the police right away. And if you think a child is in immediate danger, always call the police on 999.
Why this is needed
The majority of child sexual offenders are known to their victims. They are often a friend of the victim’s family, a friend of the victim, or a member of the victim’s family.
Results of the pilot scheme
The pilot scheme in the four areas saw:
• a total of 585 enquiries and 315 applications, mainly from parents, carers and guardians
• 21 disclosures made about registered child sex offenders
• 11 general disclosures made, for example in cases relating to protection issues linked to violent offending
• 43 additional cases leading to a range of other child safeguarding actions such as referrals to children’s social care
Some of the cases seen in the pilot force areas involved concerns raised by neighbours or extended family members. Their actions led to children being protected from potential harm.
Areas currently covered by the scheme
The existing areas covered by the Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme are Cambridgeshire, Cleveland, Hampshire and Warwickshire. Joining the scheme from August 2010 are:
• Bedfordshire
• Essex
• Norfolk
• North Yorkshire
• Suffolk
• Thames Valley
• West Mercia
• West Midlands
Twelve further areas will join the scheme by the autumn, and the rest of the country will be invited to join by spring 2011.
If you are concerned about the safety of your children, you can and should go to any police force at any time about your concerns. Every force already has a public protection team to deal with these issues.
read more at EU News at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

A personal Message From Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party Aug 2010

British National Party

Dear Fellow Patriot, I am writing personally to you today to draw your attention to a grave situation we find ourselves in at present. As you know, we have all worked extremely hard for many years to gain success. Some people think that now we've broken through into the political and media big time, our troubles are over. Not so! With success comes new challenges and obstacles, and the party is now suffering acute legal and financial pressure. Precisely because we've shown we can win, we are being forced to fight for our very existence! The anti-British Equalities Minister is running a ruthless campaign of legal persecution to destroy our party. The spiteful and venomous move by the ConDem Home office to bar me from the Queen's Garden Party once again shows all too clearly that the liberal-left Establishment will stop at nothing in their desperation to halt our progress. The impact of these attacks on our finances is severe. We have to buy in the services of expensive legal experts just to survive as a party. Our latest response to Trevor Phillips and the PC bullies is 27 pages of razor-sharp legal argument. If there is anything like justice, it will 'rip' apart their case in court. We cannot begin to produce such material by ourselves. An expert - especially one who will have courage to risk all by helping us against our enemies - does not come cheap. This has been so urgent that some of the money we had allocated to pay other pressing bills had to be diverted to this most urgent fight. In short, we are cash struck. We've made good progress with the money already raised and spent on infrastructure, equipment and campaigns over the last 3 years. But our successes have unleashed the furies of hell against us. Our existence is being challenged and it's costing us dear. Be clear on this, if you don't give, we can't fight... and if we don't fight we will be shut down and killed off... THE END! If they win, the British people - and most especially our children - would be left voiceless and at the mercy of the PC fanatics and the Islamist extremists who hate all we hold dear. It's that brutal. We are the last bastion of the rights of our indigenous white society. If they break us, our people will be left defenceless! In the wake of the Establishment's Palace own goal, public sympathy for our party is at an all time high. We are ready to roll out the advances we've made centrally over the last 2 years to our regions and local branches. The future really does belong to us, but only if we can keep our forces in the field. We can't take that for granted. Our current financial situation is certainly not good. On top of the legal attacks on us, we have fought massive European and General election campaigns back-to-back in under a year. And we've had the enormous cost of modernizing our central party machine. I know how generous everybody has been over the last year, that's why I did not want to send you a simple appeal letter. I am writing to you like this to ask you personally to help your party out of these current difficulties. Our enemies' attacks on our very existence are placing an intolerable strain on us and I need you to help me guide the party through this difficult period. We need to raise £150,000 to keep the wolves at bay and to ensure our survival. I know you love our country and your commitment to our cause is beyond reproach and that's why I am asking you in earnest to give as generously as you can right now to keep the party machine rolling on in defence of our constitution, our true nationalist principles and our right to exist. Over the last year we have built a political powerbase that has astounded the Establishment and as you know, it has worked and will keep working! Through top-flight campaigning and administration while delivering the electoral breakthroughs, what we have achieved has sent out the signal that the British National Party is a real 'threat' to the status quo. That's why we are now under such serious attack. Today we stand at the crossroads of history. Do we pull together and go on to launch a really effective challenge to win seats in next year's Welsh and Scottish parliamentary elections, or do we scale back our operation and go back to being a 'fringe party'? Only you and how you respond to this letter can decide the future direction and survival of our party. By digging deeper than ever before you will be making a statement that you are with me on our journey to even greater success to winning in the big PR elections next year and then onto Westminster. As I said on TV on the day I was barred from the Palace, we are David to the establishment's thuggish Goliath. But right now, were out of the slingshots we need to keep fighting - in blunt terms, hard cash! I will never let you down, you have my solemn word on this, and right now I really need your help to get us out of this dangerous situation. Remember, your donation is the weapon our enemies fear the most....Please use it: Yours sincerely, Nick Griffin, MEP Leader, British National Party

> Forward to a friend

EU Justice - no thoughts for the victim or the UK public interest

EU Justice - no thought for the victim or the public interest

By Martin Wingfield

AUGUST 2010: A communique this week from the EU Commission regarding some recent decisions has caught the attention of British National Party researchers.
In particular the Proposal from the Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Council on the right to information in criminal proceedings
Here the Commission has adopted a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council aiming to set common minimum standards as regards the right to information in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union.
This is in order  . . .
* to improve the rights of suspects and accused persons by ensuring that they receive information about their rights
* to inform them better about the nature and cause of the accusation against them
* to enable them to prepare their defence and to safeguards the fairness of proceedings.
This proposal is the second step in a series of measures  which instructs the Commission to put forward proposals on a "step by step" basis on the following measures:
(1) the right to interpretation and translation;
(2) the right to information about rights;
(3) legal advice, before trial and at trial;
(4) the right for a detained person to communicate with family members, employers and consular authorities;
(5) the protection for vulnerable suspects.
The legislation seems to be falling over backwards to look after the requirements of the suspected wrongdoer, with special help for illegal immigrants.
As one researcher pointed out:
"There's nothing about the rights of the victim or the public interest.
"It seems that in this case, the Commission is falling over itself to help those those facing criminal proceedings by squandering vast sums of taxpayers' money on expensive legal and interpretation fees."
read more at Nick Griffin MEP Blog at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

Join the British Resistance BNP Chairmans Update Aug 2010

Dear Fellow Patriot,

The Muslim chairman of David Cameron’s Conservative Party, Sayeeda Warsi, has backed the wearing of the burka, a move which is perfectly in line with that party’s apparent desire to see Britain Islamified.

Ms Warsi, who was appointed as a “baroness” by David Cameron so that she can also sit in the cabinet without having to fight an election, claimed that wearing a burka does not prevent Muslim women “engaging in everyday life” in Britain.

The comments came just prior to a new Daily Mail investigation into Islamic paedophile gangs in Britain in which it is claimed that police and victims are often too scared to pursue the perpetrators for fear of being called “racist.”

The Daily Mail investigation echoes many of the points raised by the BNP, in particular the aspects relating to the refusal by authorities to investigate the matter for fear of offending Muslims. According to the report, the Muslim gangs specialised in luring “naive local girls” into underage sex rings. The men target white girls and ply them with alcohol, cigarettes and drugs.

The girls are usually at first raped violently, and then threatened with extreme violence should they report the matter. “They threatened to firebomb my home with my parents inside if I told anyone what they’d done, shoot me with a pistol, rape my mother and kill my older brother if I told anyone,” one of the victims said in the report.

“Most of the men running the sex slave gangs in the north of England are Asians of Pakistani origin. But very few of the authorities will admit this,” the victim said. The refusal to address the root cause is “political correctness and a fear of being branded racist,” the report continues.

One mother from Yorkshire, whose 13-year-old girl was lured into sex slavery, told the Daily Mail reporter that “Almost every man found guilty of grooming under-age girls in this part of Britain is Asian, and everyone knows that.

“I think the police are over cautious about this issue because they fear being branded racist. That is wrong. These are criminals that should be treated as criminals whatever their race.” The report concludes by saying that “Scotland Yard estimates that 5,000 British-born children are today under the control of sex-slave gangs across the UK.”

This is the shocking face of modern Britain, where native British people are treated like second-class citizens. Only the British National Party is standing up for the victims of racist grooming.

The time for talking is over - now is the time for action!

Is this the future you want for your children? Will you regret it when it is too late and you wished you would have joined the British Resistance when you had the chance?

The British National Party is Britain's fastest growing political party, with dozens of councillors, a seat on the Greater London Assembly and two seats in the European Parliament.

The clock is ticking, our country is dying, and our beautiful innocent children are depending on us to save their future. Here are the different membership options:

METHOD #1: Join the British Resistance

The BNP is the only hope for our country, for our children and grand-children. There are thousands of people receiving this e-bulletin that are not members yet. Why not join the British Resistance to political correctness, multiculturalism and the enforced colonisation of our country. Membership costs only £30:

METHOD #2: Become a Life Member

Life members are that small elite of British patriots that sign-up to the Cause of British Nationalism for life, not just for one year. Life membership comes with various other attractive benefits:

METHOD #3: Become a Gold Member

Gold members stand out from the crowd due to the unique gold membership badge that all Gold members wear with pride. Gold membership costs just £60 and shows that little bit of extra commitment to the Cause of British survival:

METHOD #4: Upgrade your membership

For the thousands of existing BNP members out there why not upgrade your membership to Gold or even Life? Upgrading your membership shows your commitment to our Cause and provides real and substantial benefits to you and the Party:

Thank you in advance for your loyalty and support.

Yours sincerely,

The man Who Would Be King - Has Obama Belief in Divine Right to Govern the USA?

What the  French Philosophers of the 18th century would make of today’s USA Obama administration were he alive today is anyone’s guess. But I bet that the author of L’Ancien Régime and Democracy in America would be less than impressed with the lavish lifestyle and arrogance displayed by the White House elites that rule America as though they had been handed some divine right to govern with disregard for the wishes of the American People!

It is the kind of disregard that has been spotlighted to the world  this week by Michelle Obama’s Lavish trip to Spain, which has prompted an American columnist Andrea to dub the First Lady a contemporary Marie Antoinette. As The Telegraph reports, while the Obamas are covering their own holiday expenses such as Hotels, the trip could cost USA taxpayers as much as $375,000 in terms of  security and flight costs by the USA Air Force.

The timing of this Lavish European vacation could not have come at a worse moment, when unemployment in the USA stands at up to 10 percent, and large numbers of Americans are struggling to survive in the face of the global economic downturn.
It smacks of a total indifference, and contempt, for the millions of Americans who are struggling just about to feed their families on a daily basis , and to pay the mortgage and utilities , while the same time size of the national debt balloons to Greek-style proportions.

While the liberal-dominated US mainstream media have largely ignored the story, it is all over the Web and Blogs and talk radio, and will lead to Obamas free falling poll ratings.
As much as the USA Liberal media establishment keeps turn a blind eye to stories like this,
which are major news in the international media, the American public is increasingly turning to alternative news sources, including the British Blogs and websites and to a minor extent the Press, which has a far less different approach towards the White House.
The First Lady’s  trip to Europe and the contempt for public concerns over lavish government spending is symbolic of a much far wider problem with the Obama presidency ,the contempt for the principles of limited government, individual liberty and free enterprise that have built the United States over the last two and a half centuries into the most powerful Christian and free nation on earth.
It is shown by all the President’s determined drive towards large government against the will of the American people, and increases in government spending and borrowing, which threaten to leave the USA so in debt for generations to come that the USA government and it,s impressive military will be at the behest of the UN and the World Bank and subject to their interests and not it,s own.. It is also shown by Barack Obama’s drive towards a anti Christian  pro Islamic socialism system of Government, which, as has been noted before, which  is “a thinly disguised project for a president who is committed to transforming the United States from the world’s most successful large-scale free enterprise economy, to a highly interventionist Islamic society with a massive role for centralized Socialist government.”
There is however a  revolution fast approaching in the USA that is driven not by the mob but by the power of ideas and principles, based upon the ideals of the Founding Fathers and the US Constitution.And the Christian Faith!
It is a Christian conservative revolution that is sweeping America and is reflected in every poll ahead of this November’s elections. It is based on a belief in liberty, limited government, and above all, political accountability from the ruling elites. The Obama administration’s Philosophy seems to be “let them eat cake”, as it continues to gorge itself on taxpayers’ money, but it will be looking nervously over its shoulder as the concerns of the freedom loving Americans mounts.at the way that the Obamas wish to also change America demographically by allowing mass 3rd world immigration and the sense of National Identity and being an American also.

But on the other hand we must realise that the same type of thing is! And has been happening in the United Kingdom for the last 20 years also, but over in the UK their seems to be little more than a apathetic sense of surrender by the political and middle classes to the Liberal dictatorship that is now managing the UK on behalf of the Marxist Liberal Elites and their Multi National Corporation masters, who are funding their political experiment of mass national destruction, who both considering each other useful idiots seek to obtain their objectives of a unnatural hegemony or a completely free unrestrained market free from the national interest.
Is it not about time that the Politically aware in the UK awoke to the dangers that they are losing their freedom to a Islamic socialist style of a EU Government, and the Horror that would bring to the Themselves and the Nation as a whole!I for one have come to the conclusion that the only hope for the UK is the continued rise of the  Christian Nationalist movement based on the British National Party, who' policies are not based on race but on the National interests and the interests of the British people as a whole!

Mexico amongst Issues that are nothing to do with the European Union

Issues that are nothing to do with the European Union

Aug 2010 Author  Martin Wingfield

AUGUST 2010: NICK Griffin's researchers in Brussels and Strasbourg spend many hours each day trawling through the European Parliament's past, present and forthcoming legislation in search of intended laws that could have a direct effect on the lives and welfare of the British People.

But, of course, there is other legislation which although it does not have direct influence on the United Kingdom, still uses British taxpayers' money to sometimes push agendas which are misguided because MEPs haven't received the necessary briefing on the issue.
One such issue that has been flagged up by our researchers was on the Strasbourg agenda recently and concerned 'Violence in Mexico.'
The resolution stated:
"Alarmed at the escalating gang violence in Mexico, MEPs voice solidarity with the Mexican people and support for the government's efforts to combat the violence and drug trafficking. They also urge the government to provide more protection to human rights activists and step up its efforts to strengthen the rule of law.
European Union Governments are asked to provide more assistance to Mexico."
So here we have the European Parliament telling its member states to support the Government of a country that is not even in Europe, let alone a member of the European Union.
In the resolution, adopted by 57 votes to 2 with 3 abstentions, Parliament says it:
" . . . shares the Mexican authorities’ concern at the escalation of violence in the country, and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the Mexican people in the fight against drug trafficking".
" . . . supports the Mexican Government in its determination to combat organised drug trafficking" and "condemns all forms of violence, in particular the violence and persistent death threats to which activists engaged in promoting and defending human rights in Mexico are subjected".
EU Member States are then called upon "to step up the support they provide for human rights through cooperation programmes and financial and technical resources; calls on them also to increase the budgetary resources allocated to cooperation in strengthening and reforming the judiciary".
On the face of it, taking on drug traffickers and pledging support for democracy seem the right course of action, even if it is in a country that has nothing to do with the European Union.
But the actual situation in Mexico is very different to the way it was portrayed in the European Parliament.
One of Nick Griffin's researchers explains:
If the EU understood the situation in Mexico, they would see this resolution is ludicrous.
Yes. there is terrible violence in Mexico - more than 28,000 people have died in drug violence in Mexico since President Felipe Calderon took office in December 2006.
What makes the matter worse is that many of the police are in the pockets of the drug cartels - in fact many believe that Mexico is run and ruled by the drug cartels.
One cartel, Los Zetas was even trained at the school of Americas to combat drug trafficking, but then turned and are now better trained and better armed than the police and even the army.
Any money channelled into Mexico would end up in the pockets of the cartels because corruption is deeply ingrained in many internal systems.
While there are some people in the Government and police who are taking on the cartels, there are many more who are in the pay of the cartels which means that this is an internal war which the current government with its existing infrastructure does not have the resources to win.
While violence in Mexico is not an issue for the European Parliament to be involving itself in, it is something that is focussing the minds of politicians and the people of the American states bordering Mexico who are inextricably tied in with border control and immigration issues there.
Authorities in Arizona recently tried to introduce legislation to protect the state's borders, but were over-ruled by the Federal Government after extensive lobbying from human rights groups, similar to the ones which the European Parliament are requesting EU member states provide funding for.
By debating 'violence in Mexico', the European Parliament is interfering in an issue that it should have nothing to do with. 
read more at Nick Griffins MEP Euro News  at http://www.nickgriffinmep.eu/news

If only Telegraphs Mr. Gilligan would take the trouble to investigate

If only Mr. Gilligan would take the trouble to investigate

  Martin Wingfield

6TH AUGUST 2010: Andrew Brons has written to the editor of the Daily Telegraph over an article written by Andrew Gilligan (right) entitled 'Our dangerous dalliance with radical Islam'.
Dear Sir
I feel so sorry for poor Andrew Gilligan. He would so like to be treated as a serious journalist but he simply cannot be bothered to carry out the necessary research. He clearly thinks that making yet more unsubstantiated jibes at the British National Party will win him friends in high places. He might be right.
In his latest outburst (6th August) he compares Islamists – Muslims who either wish to replace democracy with an Islamic dictatorship or sympathise with terrorism – with the British National Party. The BNP does not wish to replace democracy but to promote it and extend it. The BNP does not advocate violence; it is the victim of violent attacks from the David Cameron-sponsored UAF. Furthermore, the BNP opposes aggressive wars against Muslim states that serve only to turn ordinary Muslims into violent Islamists.
At the recent General Election, all small parties were squeezed but the average vote per contested seat received by the BNP was slightly higher than that received by the media-promoted UKIP and much higher than that received by the Green Party.
If only Mr. Gilligan would take the trouble to investigate before reaching for his keyboard, he might achieve his ambition of becoming a third rate scribbler.
Yours faithfully
Andrew Brons
British National Party M.E.P. for
Yorkshire & North East Lincolnshire.

Pakistan floods, a Self Inflated Natural Disaster Do Not Give Aid Message

 

Pakistan floods, a self inflated natural disaster

Aug 2010

by Robert Martin.

Nature has many ways of thinning out the herd, especially in places like Pakistan where reckless overpopulation has created hordes of simplistic people with a mean average IQ of 81, that then, unable to create a higher civilization from what they have inherited, consume and savage the wildlife and landscape:

We have been seeing in the news recently about the Pakistan floods and how evil nature is harming the poor, innocent Pakistani people, here’s a few reasons why we shouldn’t concern ourselves with other societies problems:

Twelve million are affected in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces, while a further two million are affected in Sindh. In Indian-administered Kashmir, at least 113 people died in mudslides. Meanwhile, it has emerged that a charity connected to a group with alleged al-Qaeda links has been providing flood relief.
Flooding has submerged whole villages in the past week, killing at least 1,600 people, according to the UN. And the worst floods to hit the region in 80 years could get worse, as it is only midway through monsoon season.
According to the federal flood commission, 1.4m acres (557,000 hectares) of crop land has been flooded across the country and more than 10,000 cows have perished. A UN official, Manuel Bessler, told the BBC that with crops swept away by floodwaters, some Pakistanis could be forced to rely on food aid to get through the winter.
Pakistan floods ‘hit 14m people’

The current floods could also be blamed to some degree on deforestation and more people living in flood-prone areas as the population keeps growing.
Pakistan has lost vast areas of forest over the past few decades, while overgrazing often strips degraded land of whatever plant cover is left. The government has set a target to boost forest cover from 5.2 percent to 6 percent by 2014.

What may be the case here is that a more severe natural event has occurred where a more severe human event has occurred, that means having lots of offspring without weeding out the less desirable has negative effects on the surrounding ecosystems; which would be required to maintain a steady population that evolves in quality rather than growing in quantity.
The usual solutions are not of this quality, unfortunately, and are destined to fail by neglecting that simple fact, the writer then goes on to explain the usual, socially acceptable explanations of climate change:

Scientists say nations will need to start adapting to climate change impacts such as more intensive droughts and floods but poorer nations with limited cash face the toughest challenge.
Pakistan, like any flood-prone country, needed early warning systems, better storage of drinking water, even to move people from vulnerable areas, said Andrew Ash, who leads a climate adaption programme for Australia’s state-funded research body the CSIRO.
“There are definite limits to adaptation. We often talk about adaptation as if we can adapt our way out of trouble,” he told Reuters. “But these sorts of events highlight that we can’t adapt our way out of all the impacts of climate change.”
Pakistani food expert Abid Suleri, executive director of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, said the country would need to work on seed varieties to adapt to climate change.
Floods show threat from warmer world

If they were that concerned about surviving they would build away from the flood plains and remove the least productive individuals thereby solving overpopulation and impoverishment; they also need to allow the majority of their land to be forested naturally and allow their most intelligent higher rights to then build more streamlined infrastructure so that when heavy rains come, it doesn’t get dragged under a flood of aid and stupidity from self hating westerners throwing money at the problem.
Instead they could have their intelligent generate wealth for themselves, or if they’re too stupid, they can perish naturally allowing a more competent society to conquest it, but that’s not going to happen whilst modern society still slouches its clumsy altruistic-domesticating tentacles all over the planet, when clearly they do not want it.
But Pakistan, being a corrupt society itself, does however prefer convenient solutions rather than paying attention to the signs that reality shows us;

• Natural events only transform into disasters when humans remove the safety barriers of its ecosystems – if we actually think beyond isolated events and see the bigger picture, we realise that without the cover of wildlife there is little to nothing to act as natural drainage or to at least anchor the soil from excessive mudslides, and therefore realise that if we remove the forests from the valleys in the mountains to the north, then all the mud will come pouring down with a flood and kill all the sleepy southerners by burying them in muddy water.
• Natural disasters are both caused by natural and unnatural factors - the natural chain of events that precede it (seasons, regular patterns), and unnaturally as an effect from humans altering variables such as the forest cover and polluting planetary variables (oceans, atmosphere; temperature, composition) that alter the intensity and frequency of those natural events; the disaster element being deaths of poor, impoverished and the ill designed.
• And finally – if a nation cannot stand by itself, then that nation is not fit to survive. If a nation becomes reliant on externalized environments for it to survive, then it is not natural and should suffer the consequences of its negligence. Whether you’re a European who creates padded foam societies for your retarded to live in a fake reality that adapts to them, or perhaps you’re feeding people who wouldn’t be alive today because of the destructive decision making on behalf of corrupted values – you’re out of sync with natural reality and cannot exist as a part of it.

Don’t be a guilty white prole, don’t give aid to a failed state, be instead concerned for your own survival because any disaster that occurs back home will receive no aid back from them, and you will have injected all of your wealth into making the problem monstrously larger and only prolong the misery.

PC Liberals The Brainslug Owns Your Minds

 

Brainslug owns you

Aug 10th, 2010

by Robert Martin.

What unifies these revolting ideologies is that they do not benefit the individual although they claim to be doing so, they are a Brainslug that prefers its own survival over yours individually, because it manipulates you into believing passive lies.

When you wake up to this planet, you realise one thing sticking out the side of people’s heads; their thoughts are not their own but are subservient toward a domesticating agent, a memetic Brainslug.
We can coalesce many ill thought out ideologies with little substance and stereotype them as Crowdism. Crowdism contains memes such as but not limited to; liberalism, egalitarianism, democracy, socialism, communism and greenism.
Brainslug owns the population, the majority do not think for themselves and have this parasite wedged into their skull awaiting big daddy Technium to erupt from the Hivemind – or in terms the above average human should understand, ecocide and death, whatever prevails after that is not concerned with the ecology as we know it, if anything.
The rules of the game are simple;

• Do not think for yourself – be subservient toward the Brainslug, although it disables your self awareness and concern for sanity, it tells you that you’re innocent and nothing is your fault, therefore you can call people RACIST when they disagree with your altruistic, all loving Brainslug.
• If you attempt to think for yourself – that would mean removing of the Brainslug, therefore, if you dare touch it, it will call other infested individuals over to shout RACIST into intimidating you into keeping the Brainslug in control of your thoughts, perhaps not so altruistic?
• If you manage to think for yourself – this would be an indirect threat to other Brainslugs, therefore, the Hivemind of Brainslugs will synchronise with each other collectively, to crush you in Crowdism, making you unpopular through bias, they hate you with a vengeance.
• If you attempt to get others to think for themselves - that would mean removing of the Brainslugs from the source, the great media and entertainment Hivemind sending out memetic software to the antennaes of your Brainslug. Killing the parasite at the core would allow the Brainslugs to be picked off individually, so this is a direct threat to the Brainslugs collectively. Therefore, they will use whatever means, dirty tricks and immoral means into getting rid of you, despite their passive lies of altruistic moralism – as clearly the intellectuals form the greatest antibody resistance to this infection. The easiest, more short term route is to banish you from your native homeland, the toughest but more long term solution is to kill you, and kill you they will if it gets them what they want.
• If you manage to get others to think for themselves – you can slay the Brainslugs from specific territories whilst establishing antibody resistance to prevent future infections. However, in the mean time, thanks to hardwired genetics, many are prone to re-infection on first contact, as they’ve now become industrially farmed by their Brainslugs from over 300 years ago in the so called ‘Enlightenment era’, the stemming spores out of the hollow headed corpse of rotten cultures.

Now on a more serious note, for those who have removed their Brainslug, here is the introduction to a text which covers much ground on the psychology of Crowdism;

IN its ordinary sense the word “crowd” means a gathering of individuals of whatever nationality, profession, or sex, and whatever be the chances that have brought them together. From the psychological point of view the expression “crowd” assumes quite a different signification. Under certain given circumstances, and only under those circumstances, an agglomeration of men presents new characteristics very different from those of the individuals composing it. The sentiments and ideas of all the persons in the gathering take one and the same direction, and their conscious personality vanishes. A collective mind is formed, doubtless transitory, but presenting very clearly defined characteristics. The gathering has thus become what, in the absence of a better expression, I will call an organised crowd, or, if the term is considered preferable, a psychological crowd. It forms a single being, and is subjected to the law of the mental unity of crowds.
Le Bon, Gustave. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind

From www Amerika

AN ALERT TO ALL PATRIOTIC BRITISH MEN AND WOMEN WHO LOVE FREEDOM

Author Wigan Patriot

Statewatch, the civil liberties body that monitors the EU, has gained access to Council of Ministers Conclusions that reveal that Brussels now want law enforcement agencies in its member countries to build lists of political activists as part of a 'systematic data collection'.

Those responsible in the member countries for acquiring the information on 'agents of radicalisation' have been sent, by the EU, a 'data compilation instrument' that includes a list of 70 questions they are requested to answer.

This involves discovering who targeted activists socialise with, family members, psychological traits, religious affiliation, activities, economic status and, very revealingly, 'oral comments' - presumably ascertained through phone taps.

What actually constitutes being considered to be an 'agent of radicalisation' is not defined to any degree of detail and leaves open the door to wide categories of people finding themselves of potential interest to EU agencies.

The EU documents refer to 'extreme right/left, Islamist, nationalist, anti-globalisation' groups as some of those qualifying for surveillance. Europol, the EU's fledgling FBI equivalent, will pull together the information gathered at the member state level.

This move by the EU to document and keep under surveillance political activists follows on from the establishment of Project Indect which York University and the Police Service of Northern Ireland are spearheading in the UK with £10m of Brussels funding.

When will people waken up to the EU's destruction of our freedoms?

 

http://subrosa-blonde.blogspot.com/2010/08/eu-mass-surveillance-project-revealed.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FbUee+%28SUBROSA%29 

 

Spread the link far and wide. Like-minded people on the European mainland need to know about this too.

NHS Birth Figures Confirm That Immigrant Births Will Be Majority within Two Decades

The 2030 Deadline: New NHS Birth Figures Confirm That Immigrant Births Will Be Majority within Two Decades

BNP Newsroom

New National Health Service figures about the number of immigrant-origin live births — which are an underestimate of the actual numbers — indicate that Third World immigrant births will be an outright majority of all babies born in Britain by the year 2030.

The latest NHS figures claim that of the 652,638 deliveries in 150 NHS Trusts in England last year, an average of 62 percent were to mothers who were classed as “white British.”

This means that 38 percent of all live births in 2009 were supposedly of immigrant origin.

This figure contrasts strongly with a 2005 Office for National Statistics report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British” (“Birthweight and gestational age by ethnic group, England and Wales 2005: introducing new data on births” by Kath Moser, Office for National Statistics, Kristina M Stanfield and David A Leon, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).

Given immigration levels since 2004, and natural reproduction rates amongst immigration groups (for example, an August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women), it is highly unlikely that the number of immigrant births have only climbed two percent in the period 2005 to 2009.

Even if the new figures are accurate (which they appear not to be), they are still evidence enough that Britain faces imminent colonisation via the womb.

Even if a reproduction increase rate of “only” two percent every four years is maintained for the non-ethnically British segment of the population, they are set to become an outright majority in twenty years’ time.

The immigrant increase will of course be greater than two percent as their numbers are increasing exponentially.

Nonetheless, even taking the unaltered growth projection rate of two percent every four years, the growth pattern appears as follows:

2005 = 36%; 2009 = 38%; 2013 = 40%; 2017 = 42%; 2021 = 44%; 2025 = 46%;

2029 = 48%; 2033 = 51%.

According to the new figures, the number of white British births in Bradford is already down to 34 percent of the total, while in Sandwell and West Birmingham it is 16.5 percent.

In West Hertfordshire the white British birth numbers are only 57.2 percent of the total, while in North West London it is 9.4 percent and in North Middlesex it is 11.1 percent.

The figures are, as outlined above, an underestimation and the demographic swing will in all likelihood happen even faster.

Nonetheless, even using the latest figures, the urgency of drastic action to address the immigration invasion of Britain has been highlighted once again.

It is obvious now to even the most casual observer that unless the immigration invasion is not only halted but reversed, Britain will be turned into a Third World country well within the next 30 or 40 years.

The clock is ticking. Will the British people rise up to the challenge and back the British National Party in which their only salvation lies?

Endangered Species Alert T-Shirt

A great T-shirt to wear to awaken friends, colleagues and even total strangers to the fact that immigrant birth rates will soon outnumber indigenous birth rates.

This one will start the conversation . . .

Each T-shirt individually printed: please allow 14 to 20 days for delivery.

£12.50 Includes postage and packaging.

Size scales (in inches): S: 34-36 M: 38-40 L: 42-44 XL: 46-48 XXL: 50-52

Click here to order online.

What is British? Honour Killings and Pakistani Political Rallies Provide the Answer

Who is British? Honour Killings and Pakistani Political Party Rallies Provide the Answer

Mon, 09/08/2010 - 12:40 |  BNP News

Claims by the controlled media and the establishment that the Third World immigrant population are “British” have been exposed as lies by the events surrounding the latest ‘honour killing’ incident and Pakistani political party rallies in Birmingham over the past weekend.

The leading Tory-fake fishwrap, the Daily Mail newspaper, led the controlled media charge by claiming that a “British couple” had been gunned down in Pakistan over an ‘honour killing’ dispute.

The Mail article, which was headlined “British couple gunned down in Pakistan in suspected honour killing after calling off marriage” however revealed details of that “dispute” which showed exactly how non-British the murdered couple were.

The distinctly non-Anglo-Saxon named couple, Gul Wazir and his wife Bagum, were murdered in the village of Salehana in Nowshera Province, Pakistan, after travelling there to try and settle a “wedding dispute,” according to the Mail.

This “wedding dispute” was in fact nothing but an arranged marriage, as is the custom amongst Pakistani families in that country and in Britain.

“The husband and wife had already promised their daughter to a man. When that arrangement ended he was not happy,” a family friend was quoted as saying.

Apparently the tradition of “honour killings” in marriage disputes are frequent in that region, and less than 18 months ago, a man from Bordesley Green was murdered in the same village for very similar reasons, the Mail report continued.

Are these people British? Or are they Pakistani villagers living in Britain who have imported their culture and traditions with them en masse to colonise this country?

The other example of just how colonised Britain has become by Pakistan came with the weekend rally of that country’s president, Asif Ali Zardari — in Birmingham.

Organised by the “UK branch of the Pakistan People's Party,” the rally drew thousands of people, while outside hundreds more demonstrated against Mr Zardari in a blatant display of internal Pakistani politics in the heart of Britain.

The rally was interrupted by a shoe-throwing incident which provided a powerful insight into how “British” the Pakistani population views itself.

The shoe-thrower, identified as Sardar Mohammed Shamim Khan, said he was “proud” of what he did because “I thought we have a crisis back at home and all he can do is take a trip around Europe while his own people are suffering.”

Note the reference to “we have a crisis back at home” which is a reference to the floods in Pakistan. Would those be the words of a British person?

Mr Zardari addressed most of the rally in Urdu, as it was after all a Pakistani political party rally, even though it took place in the Birmingham Convention Centre.

There are in fact so many non-British Third World immigrants in Britain that some of the demonstrators outside Mr Zardari’s rally were Muslims living in this country who call themselves “Sharia For Pakistan.”

According to news reports, that organisation’s spokesman, Abu Jihad, said “Zardari was an apostate which is punishable by death according to Sharia law.

“Zardari is evil and his government is a puppet of the West. We are against any democratic laws because they are not the laws of God. People like Zardari would not be tolerated under an Islamic system and his apostasy would be met with death.”

The appropriately-named Mr Jihad’s comments were repeated by other Islamic protestors including those from the UK-based Hizb Ut Tahrir branch.

Others who protested outside the rally included a group of Pakistani Christians who objected to Pakistan's discriminatory blasphemy laws, a Kashmiri independence group and members of another Pakistani political party, the “Pakistan Movement for Justice.”

The reader should stop and pause to think about these events.

What would the Pakistani nation say if there were so many white British people living in Pakistan that they regularly went back to Britain to marry off relatives?

What would the Pakistani nation say if there were so many white British people living in Pakistan that British political parties could hold mass rallies in that country and attract other British people to counter protest those rallies?

The Pakistan government would be perfectly justified in claiming that their nation was being taken over, or being colonised by British people, because that would be the case exactly.

The weekend’s events prove conclusively that nationality, ethnic origin and culture are not swopped around at airport terminals, but remain part of any colonising population.

Britain is being colonised under the indigenous populations’ noses, and only the British National Party stands opposed to this process.

An insult too far for the USA No Mosque at Ground Zero

An insult too far  

by sarah Maid of Albion

As many of you may be aware the chances of a thirteen story Islamic Center and mosque being built next to the area in New York, known as Ground Zero, where the twin towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by muslim fanatics in September 2011 are growing by the day.

If this abomination does come to pass then, were Mayor Bloomberg or indeed Obama to walk up to the spot where the towers fell, unzip their flies and urinate into the earth where the victims dies, they would not commit a greater act of deliberate contempt for the memory of the dead and for their families. I do not know enough about Bloomberg to comment on his motives, but I suspect as far as Obama is concerned, the offense it will cause is the point, it is certainly what is motivating those behind this sickening plan.

I would like to recommend the comments of two separate gentleman on this subject first the excellent Pat Condell, I missed this brilliant commentary when it was first posted in June, and I am grateful to TVJ for drawing it to my attention, you can either watch the video at this blog, or even better
An insult too far for the USA

John Pilger Copies BNP Lead in Calling for War Crimes Charges against Tony Blair

The New Statesman’s John Pilger Copies BNP Lead in Calling for War Crimes against Tony Blair

From the BNP Newsroom http://bnp.org.uk/

Award-winning investigative reporter for New Statesman magazine John Pilger has copied the British National Party’s lead in calling for war crimes charges against Tony Blair and has even repeated many of the exact case points as first made by the party.

In an article in the latest issue of New Statesman, Mr Pilger used verbatim arguments first made by the BNP in public pronouncements and on this website.

“Consider the Proceeds of Crime Act. Blair conspired in and executed an unprovoked war of aggression against a defenceless country, of a kind the Nuremberg judges in 1946 described as the ‘paramount war crime',” Mr Pilger wrote, echoing last year’s BNP press release which was the first to point out the parallels between the charges at Nuremburg and the invasion of Iraq.

“On 29 January 2003, Blair told parliament: ‘We do know of links between al-Qaeda and Iraq . . .’,” Mr Pilger continued, once again copying the BNP lead which pointed out years ago that there was no link between Iraq, Osama bin Laden and the 2001 attack on New York’s World Trade Centre.

“Last month, the former head of MI5 Eliza Manningham-Buller told the Chilcot inquiry: ‘There is no credible intelligence to suggest that connection . . . [it was the invasion] that gave Osama Bin Laden his Iraqi jihad',” Mr Pilger continued, once again copying an angle first raised on this website.

“Asked to what extent the invasion exacerbated the threat to Britain from terrorism, she replied: ‘Substantially'. The bombings in London on 7 July 2005 were a direct consequence of Blair's actions,” he continued, echoing the BNP’s point that Britain’s foreign policy directly incited Muslims living in this country.

Mr Pilger then went on to make a number of important new points about the full extent of Mr Blair’s criminal activities.

The Iraq invasion, he wrote, “caused, according to scholarly studies, the deaths of more than a million people, a figure that exceeds the Fordham University estimate of deaths in the Rwandan genocide. 

“In addition, four million Iraqis have been forced to flee their homes and a majority of children have descended into malnutrition and trauma.  Cancer rates near the cities of Fallujah, Najaf and Basra (the latter "liberated" by the British) are now higher than those at Hiroshima,” he wrote.

“UK forces used about 1.9 metric tonnes of depleted uranium ammunition in the Iraq war in 2003, the Defence Secretary, Liam Fox, told parliament on 22 July.

“A range of toxic "anti-personnel" weapons, such as cluster bombs, was employed by British and US forces. Such carnage was justified with lies that have been exposed repeatedly.

 “Tony Blair must be prosecuted, not indulged like Peter Mandelson,” Mr Pilger said, going on to point out the complicity of other Labour Party apparatchiks.

“The cabinet in March 2003 knew a great deal about the conspiracy to attack Iraq.  Straw, later appointed "justice secretary", suppressed the relevant cabinet minutes in defiance of an order by the Information Commissioner to release them.

“Most of those now running for the Labour Party leadership supported Blair's epic crime, rising as one to salute his final appearance in the Commons.

“As foreign secretary, David Miliband sought to cover up Britain's complicity in torture. He promoted Iran as the next ‘threat'.

“Journalists who once fawned on Blair as 'mystical' and amplified his vainglorious bids now pretend they were his critics all along. As for the media's gulling of the public, only the Observer's David Rose has apologised,” Mr Pilger said.

Mr Pilger’s article can be found here.

The Blair War Crimes Foundation home page can be found here.

Asylum Seeker Figures Continue to Rise as France Cracks Down

EU News: Asylum Seeker Figures Continue to Rise as France Cracks Down

BNP News

The number of “asylum seekers” entering the European Union — and then having access to soft touch Britain — rose by eight percent in 2009, an EU data source said this week as the French government announced sweeping new measures to try and halt rampant immigrant crime.

Statistics from the Eurodac agency, which runs a fingerprint database for identifying asylum seekers and “irregular border-crossers,” showed 236,939 asylum seekers last year.

However just 31,071 were apprehended after making it inside the EU, down from 61,945 the previous year, the data said.

Greece is responsible for 60 percent of all those fingerprinted after irregular entry, the agency's 2009 annual report said.

EU officials said so-called multiple asylum applications had been "constantly rising since 2007," and questioned the impact of different practices by member states for logging fingerprints and filing them to the bloc's central agencies.

The vast majority of EU entrants, 85 percent, came in through airports on tourist visas, the European Commission pointed out.

Member states dismissed 73 percent of asylum requests in 2009, the EU's Eurostat data agency said.

Almost one in four rejected candidates tried again in another country, showing up as such on the fingerprint database.

Meanwhile, French immigration minister Eric Besson has announced that his government will amend the law to strip naturalised French citizens of their nationality if they commit crimes punishable by five or more years in jail.

Mr Besson said he would also propose that repeat offenders born in France to foreign parents could be denied French citizenship.

French Interior Minister Brice Hortefeux has also announced plans to strip French nationality from people with immigrant roots found guilty of killing a policeman and for importing Third World practices into France.

"I will present proposals before the end of the month for legal measures to implement the withdrawal of nationality from those who kill public officials, practice polygamy or excision (female circumcision)," Mr Hortefeux said.

read more at http://bnp.org.uk/

Illegal Immigrants Account for 25% of all UK Police Arrests

Home Office Report: Illegal Immigrants Account for 25% of all Police Arrests

 BNP News

Illegal immigrants account for 25 percent of all those arrested for “serious offences” in England and Wales, a new Home Office report has revealed.

The study, titled "Determining Identity and Nationality in Local Policing," also revealed that political correctness — which is the inevitable end product of decades of Labour-Tory-Lib Dem rule — has made police forces too scared to arrest illegal immigrants for fear of being called “racist.”

The report, issued last week, said that police officers are “reluctant to question a suspect's nationality” as they fear “racism” accusations.

A study of 14 custody suites in England and Wales revealed that in one unnamed city, only six of 20 suspected illegal immigrants were deported due to a lack of detention space and the rest were all “given temporary release with conditions.”

The report also revealed that illegal immigrant criminal offences amounted to around 25 percent of all arrests made by the police.

“The research demonstrated that more rigorous practices in custody suites could increase the number of foreign nationals and illegal migrants who are identified as being involved in criminal activity,” the report continued.

“In some sites there was a marked reluctance to challenge arrestees who claimed to be British, even though officers suspected that the claims might be false.

“This reluctance was commonly ascribed to the fear that any such challenge could result in an accusation of racism.”

Just under one in five of all suspected illegal migrants arrested were questioned over serious offences, compared with just over one in ten of UK citizens arrested.

According to a Migrationwatch study released in April this year, Britain plays host to “more than one million illegal immigrants.”

That study, conducted for Migrationwatch by David Coleman, professor of demography at Oxford University, said that there were at least 1.1 million “regularised” illegals already present in this country.

“The number is clearly substantial, and it’s clearly growing," Dr Coleman said
Read more at the http://bnp.org.uk/ 

Tory Party Chairman Supports the Burka as Investigation Reveals Extent of Islamic Paedophile Gangs in UK

Muslim Tory Party Chairman Backs the Burka as New Investigation Reveals Extent of Islamic Paedophile Gangs in Britain

BNP Newsroom

The Muslim chairman of David Cameron’s Conservative Party, Sayeeda Warsi, has backed the wearing of the burka, a move which is perfectly in line with that party’s apparent desire to see Britain Islamified.

Conservative Party chairman Sayeeda Warsi wearing her native dress.Ms Warsi, who was appointed as a “baroness” by David Cameron so that she can also sit in the cabinet without having to fight an election, claimed that wearing a burka does not prevent Muslim women “engaging in everyday life” in Britain.

Ms Warsi’s comments echo that of fellow Tory Environment Secretary

Caroline Spelman who said that the burka “confers dignity” on women and can be “empowering.”

The comments came just prior to a new Daily Mail investigation into Islamic paedophile gangs in Britain in which it is claimed that police and victims are often too scared to pursue the perpetrators for fear of being called “racist.”

Fortunately for the public, the British National Party has no such “fear” and has highlighted the growing problem of Muslim paedophile and grooming gangs in articles, videos and speeches.

The Daily Mail investigation echoes many of the points raised by the BNP, in particular the aspects relating to the refusal by authorities to investigate the matter for fear of offending Muslims.

According to the report, the Muslim gangs specialised in luring “naive local girls” into underage sex rings.

The men target white girls and ply them with alcohol, cigarettes and drugs.

“With rap music blaring, the men drove her around Leeds in a expensive cars, including a Bentley with personalised number plates. They bought her cheeseburgers at McDonald’s and gave her a new mobile phone,” the report states.

The girls are usually at first raped violently, and then threatened with extreme violence should they report the matter.

“They threatened to firebomb my home with my parents inside if I told anyone what they’d done, shoot me with a pistol, rape my mother and kill my older brother if I told anyone,” one of the victims said in the report.

“Most of the men running the sex slave gangs in the north of England are Asians of Pakistani origin. But very few of the authorities will admit this,” the victim said.

The refusal to address the root cause is “political correctness and a fear of being branded racist,” the report continues.

One mother from Yorkshire, whose 13-year-old girl was lured into sex slavery, told the Daily Mail reporter that “Almost every man found guilty of grooming under-age girls in this part of Britain is Asian, and everyone knows that.

“I think the police are over cautious about this issue because they fear being branded racist. That is wrong. These are criminals that should be treated as criminals whatever their race.”

The report concludes by saying that “Scotland Yard estimates that 5,000 British-born children are today under the control of sex-slave gangs across the UK.”

Read More of what the Government controlled media will not report at The BNP Newsroom

Radio Red White Blue Expands Programming Selection

Radio RWB Expands Programming Selection

  BNP News

Radio RWB has continued to expand its range of programming with the launch of a personality interview section and soon-to-be daily news bulletin, project coordinator John Walker has announced.

RadioRWBThe first part of the new programming schedule is already live and consists of a discussion with BNP foreign affairs spokesman and author Arthur Kemp on the topic of his Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Britain book.

“This marks the first of a series of interviews with personalities on topics which we know will be of great interest to our listeners,” Mr Walker said.

In addition, plans are well-advanced to create a daily news bulletin in conjunction with the BNP News web team, which will run Monday to Friday at 8pm, called The World at 8.

“On Sunday afternoon we will have a World at 1 report as well,” Mr Walker said.

“Internet radio offers us the opportunity to compete for the first time on an equal playing field with the controlled media and we fully intend to ensure that we take up our space on the virtual airwaves,” he said.

The first of the new interviews can be found by clicking here.

Radio RWB has also opened a virtual shop where listeners can download nationalist music in MP3 format directly to their computers. The shop can be found by clicking here.