Pakistan floods, a self inflated natural disaster
Nature has many ways of thinning out the herd, especially in places like Pakistan where reckless overpopulation has created hordes of simplistic people with a mean average IQ of 81, that then, unable to create a higher civilization from what they have inherited, consume and savage the wildlife and landscape:Twelve million are affected in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces, while a further two million are affected in Sindh. In Indian-administered Kashmir, at least 113 people died in mudslides. Meanwhile, it has emerged that a charity connected to a group with alleged al-Qaeda links has been providing flood relief.
Flooding has submerged whole villages in the past week, killing at least 1,600 people, according to the UN. And the worst floods to hit the region in 80 years could get worse, as it is only midway through monsoon season.
According to the federal flood commission, 1.4m acres (557,000 hectares) of crop land has been flooded across the country and more than 10,000 cows have perished. A UN official, Manuel Bessler, told the BBC that with crops swept away by floodwaters, some Pakistanis could be forced to rely on food aid to get through the winter.
Pakistan floods ‘hit 14m people’
The current floods could also be blamed to some degree on deforestation and more people living in flood-prone areas as the population keeps growing.What may be the case here is that a more severe natural event has occurred where a more severe human event has occurred, that means having lots of offspring without weeding out the less desirable has negative effects on the surrounding ecosystems; which would be required to maintain a steady population that evolves in quality rather than growing in quantity.
Pakistan has lost vast areas of forest over the past few decades, while overgrazing often strips degraded land of whatever plant cover is left. The government has set a target to boost forest cover from 5.2 percent to 6 percent by 2014.
The usual solutions are not of this quality, unfortunately, and are destined to fail by neglecting that simple fact, the writer then goes on to explain the usual, socially acceptable explanations of climate change:
Scientists say nations will need to start adapting to climate change impacts such as more intensive droughts and floods but poorer nations with limited cash face the toughest challenge.If they were that concerned about surviving they would build away from the flood plains and remove the least productive individuals thereby solving overpopulation and impoverishment; they also need to allow the majority of their land to be forested naturally and allow their most intelligent higher rights to then build more streamlined infrastructure so that when heavy rains come, it doesn’t get dragged under a flood of aid and stupidity from self hating westerners throwing money at the problem.
Pakistan, like any flood-prone country, needed early warning systems, better storage of drinking water, even to move people from vulnerable areas, said Andrew Ash, who leads a climate adaption programme for Australia’s state-funded research body the CSIRO.
“There are definite limits to adaptation. We often talk about adaptation as if we can adapt our way out of trouble,” he told Reuters. “But these sorts of events highlight that we can’t adapt our way out of all the impacts of climate change.”
Pakistani food expert Abid Suleri, executive director of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute, said the country would need to work on seed varieties to adapt to climate change.
Floods show threat from warmer world
Instead they could have their intelligent generate wealth for themselves, or if they’re too stupid, they can perish naturally allowing a more competent society to conquest it, but that’s not going to happen whilst modern society still slouches its clumsy altruistic-domesticating tentacles all over the planet, when clearly they do not want it.But Pakistan, being a corrupt society itself, does however prefer convenient solutions rather than paying attention to the signs that reality shows us;
- Natural events only transform into disasters when humans remove the safety barriers of its ecosystems – if we actually think beyond isolated events and see the bigger picture, we realise that without the cover of wildlife there is little to nothing to act as natural drainage or to at least anchor the soil from excessive mudslides, and therefore realise that if we remove the forests from the valleys in the mountains to the north, then all the mud will come pouring down with a flood and kill all the sleepy southerners by burying them in muddy water.
- Natural disasters are both caused by natural and unnatural factors - the natural chain of events that precede it (seasons, regular patterns), and unnaturally as an effect from humans altering variables such as the forest cover and polluting planetary variables (oceans, atmosphere; temperature, composition) that alter the intensity and frequency of those natural events; the disaster element being deaths of poor, impoverished and the ill designed.
- And finally – if a nation cannot stand by itself, then that nation is not fit to survive. If a nation becomes reliant on externalized environments for it to survive, then it is not natural and should suffer the consequences of its negligence. Whether you’re a European who creates padded foam societies for your retarded to live in a fake reality that adapts to them, or perhaps you’re feeding people who wouldn’t be alive today because of the destructive decision making on behalf of corrupted values – you’re out of sync with natural reality and cannot exist as a part of it.
