The Genocide of a Nation: British People Being Ethnically Cleansed by Islamic Colonisation
The British people are being subjected to a calculated genocide through ethnic cleansing caused by Islamic and other Third World colonisation, as evidenced by the news that Mohammed (or variants thereof) was the most common name for newborn boys in England and Wales last year.
The figures, released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), did not provide any clues about the total number of Muslim female babies born in Britain last year.When it is calculated that their numbers will be approximately the same as the male birth rate, the extent of the Islamic colonisation of Britain becomes evident.
According to the ONS figures, there were 7,515 babies born last year with the name Mohammed, Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamed or Mohammod.
This compares with the second ranking name of Oliver, given to some 7,364 babies.
Even without the different spellings, Mohammed was the most common boy's name in the West Midlands and the fourth most popular in London during 2009.
During 2009 there were 3,300 boys named Mohammed, 2,162 Muhammads, 1,073
Mohammads, and 980 called either Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamed or
Mohammod.
While the Islamic colonisation of Britain is the most overt sign of the murder of our nation as a result of the Tory, Labour and Lib Dem-supported policy of mass Third World immigration, it is not the only threat to the continued existence of the British people.
The baby names list do not, for example, reveal how many other Third World births are recorded under that listing. To gain some idea of the overall racial imbalance, other sources have to be consulted.
National Health Service figures released in August this year showed that the number of immigrant-origin live births — which are an underestimate of the actual numbers — indicate that Third World population-origin births will be form an outright majority of all babies born in Britain by the year 2030.
These NHS figures claim that of the 652,638 deliveries in 150 NHS Trusts in England last year, an average of 62 percent were to mothers who were classed as “white British.”
This means that 38 percent of all live births in 2009 were supposedly of immigrant origin.
This figure contrasts strongly with a 2005 Office for National Statistics report which said that 36 percent of all births in England and Wales were not “white British” (“Birthweight and gestational age by ethnic group, England and Wales 2005: introducing new data on births” by Kath Moser, Office for National Statistics).
Given immigration levels since 2004, and natural reproduction rates amongst immigration groups (for example, an August 2008 ONS population report stated that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women), it is highly unlikely that the number of immigrant births have only climbed two percent in the period 2005 to 2009.
Even if the figures released in August are accurate (which they appear not to be), they are still evidence enough that Britain faces imminent colonisation via the womb.
Even if a reproduction increase rate of “only” two percent every four years is maintained for the non-ethnically British segment of the population, they are set to become an outright majority in twenty years’ time.
The immigrant increase will of course be greater than two percent as their numbers are increasing exponentially.
Nonetheless, even taking the unaltered growth projection rate of two percent every four years, the growth pattern appears as follows:
2005 = 36%; 2009 = 38%; 2013 = 40%; 2017 = 42%; 2021 = 44%; 2025 = 46%; 2029 = 48%; 2033 = 51%.
Britain stands before the precipice. Will the British people choose to live, or will they choose extermination through colonisation?
The choice is clear, but time is short.
